0003230 G.F. 323
CONFIDENTIAL
· 28 -
policies of the U.S. and U.K. Governments differed. The
U.S. Government went out of its way to help the small
businessman, and he did not accept that the small company
was by definition or implication inefficient.
66.
Mr. Jordan noted that the Production Index
having 1957 1959 as a 100 base, stood at 151.3 for
textiles and at 149.9 for apparel in 1968. The latest
figures showed continuing increase for textiles and
were steady for apparel. He also referred to F.T.C. and
S.E.C. figures for sales, profits before tax and profits
after tax comparing the first half of 69 with the first
half of 68.
All the 1969 figures were higher than the
68 figures. In the light of these, the only published
figures, and the fact that production was up 50% over
10 years, there seemed to be general well being in the
textile industry and surely any company that could not
achieve success in these conditions would not achieve it
whatever was or was not done about imports. Mr. Nehmer
said that convincing proof of inefficiency could only
come when textile imports were under restraint and this
excuse for inefficiency was removed.
67.
Mr. Stewart thought that the figures showed the
best sales/profit experience since the 1950's. Mr. Nehmer
asked why if the experience of the U.S. textile industry
had been so good there was such agitation for restraints
on imports?
/68.
CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.