CONFIDENTIAL
additions to their list once it is presented to the Diet.
It seems therefore that the Japanese decision on
2.
Hong Kong cannot be much longer delayed and unless
Hong Kong see serious objections you should make an early approach to the Japanese with the proposal that they
should include Hong Kong in their preference scheme to
}
the extent that she is included in the schemes of the
BEC and the USA.
3.
You might say that we have good grounds for
hoping for a favourable EEC decision in the fairly hear
future and that this is bound to influence the United
States. As regards the qualifications which the EEC
are likely to attach to their acceptance of Hong kong
you might suggest that since the United States offer
excludes textiles and footwear, the EEC may well elect
to do likewise. If the Japanese object that they cannot
wait for the decisions of the EEC and USA and cannot be
expected to take on trust that they will eventually Opcid
in Hong Kong's favour, you might suggest that the
Jagunese could adequately protect themselves by
qualifying their offer generally by a reserve to the
effect that it would be modified as necessary in she
light of the beneficiary lists of other donor countries" (or if this seemed not specific enough) as a rider so the
crfect that Hong Kong's inclusion in their list was
Eubject to Hong Kong not being excluded from the lists
of other major donors when published.
We gather incidentally from approaches to DTI and
curselves by the Japanese here for a muss of factual
material about the trade and payments of the dependent
(other than Hong Kong) which
territories we have notified as prima facie beneficiaries
うん
that the Japanese may now be considering including
(11316) Dd.392077 300m 10/68 €,W,1,Lad, Gip,861
2.
!
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.