3/4
Loral
Affent. D
e
Sir L. Monson
Mooson
Mr. Dyff
Mr Wethan
Wed 7 3/4
Parliamentary Question by Lord Beaumont of Whitley
I submit the attached draft reply. It is rather long but since
the Question is for written answer perhaps this does not matter.
2 Notes for supplementaries are not required.
Poli Flags
Aand B
HKIL1/19 (1560/9
2. Three previous Parliamentary Questions have been asked on this
subject. Lord Shepherd was also questioned on the matter by FiLord Brockway in the House of Lords in June 1969. However, the
present Question is clearly a follow-up to an earlier Question by Lord Beaumont about Ombudsmen in dependent territories generally;
Flag
6
that Question was answered by Lord Shepherd on 24 March.
3. I assume that the present Question will be answered by Lord Chalfont since Lord Shepherd will be away until 15 April.
Background
4. The Hong Kong Government have for several years been considering the possibility of establishing an Ombudsman or something similar;
and it is evident that among the unofficial members of both the
Executive and Legislative Councils there is a substantial body of
opinion which doubts the necessity for such an appointment.
Existing facilities
5. There have been arrangements in Hong Kong for some time enabling
members of the public to make known and seek redress for their grievances. These arrangements include :
(a) The office of the Unofficial Members of the Executive and
Legislative Councils (UMELCO)
This is an office through which members of the public can
bring their views and complaints to the notice of unofficial
members of the two Councils. The Governor is at present
taking steps to provide the office with an administrative
secretary of high calibre. This officer will act as a
receiving point for representations from the public and
will make any necessary enquiries from the relevant
departments of Government.
/ (6)
...
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.