GOVERNMENT HOUSE
HONG KONG
●Kai - Tak:
Note No 16 refers.
The question of Kai-Tak
to generate considerable
and of
Original at:H/LK 22/1
This Copy for I In 200 Parafa
kelen on
cund raughts airation rights There contumes
southers in Hong Kong, despite the Governor's
statement in Legislative Cormeil on for October.
палів
2. Sis & Consultimate raid that lingking white expected
j
Freis origin request of 1967
(Mar.2).
an unsure to
Vans presently avants à 7 mustand demon
and
Sut his folan in to prove go for contractio fruance he said that "at that stage pricomacity aC.G.) might be involved it
ť
& Portin prims
Sw
secured any part of the content.
3. So hirugh Norman- Withers afterwards asked whether consideration comid
hot be gwen
purtures to the remission
of
might allay The widespread & crimin
Condol
ha
the 1959 wan. This, he Thought,
Hong Kong and special Treatment
Grimis that Kuistin in miting a
contradiction Braum's resources
be joi
jumped +
dicat
for Tone reasons
para. G. Tui
in the Treasury's
Chrys
as refriroduced
para Zisi
argument of Note No 16. Treasury,
Around
1
1 Groved
whers it is covered in othed converfonden who he
I showed have thought that Love Shepherd might in
adured to lich it up at menisième level whhh ho
Thev'in
Bił
Tramway. I dont
Bit grade for Wammunications Cquefunct would have the same
ступоритим
REULMED IN REGISTRY No.51
126y 1709
HILIK 21/11:
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.