TNAG-0208-FCO40-244-Discussions-about-extension-to-Kai-Tak-airport-1969 — Page 33

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

Registry

No. HKK 21/11

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

Top Secret.

Secret.

Confidential,

Restricted.

Unclassified.

PRIVACY MARKING

„In Confidence

DRAFT letter

To:-

C. C. Lucas, Esq.,

Treasury Chambers,

Great George Street,

London, S.W.1.

27 Type 1+6

기그

From

44

W. S. Carter

Telephone No. & Ext.

Department

Copies to:

D. C. Smith, Esq., Board of Trade.

C. C. Ricketts,

ODM

J. Gill, Esq., E.C.G.D.

RHJ Steel, Esq.,

Treasury.

Draft h/w

лиши

7/7

Thank you for my copy of your letter of

3 July to Gill about Hong Kong Airport.

The

I hasten to remind you that Hong Kong's

case hinges on the extent of, UK civil aviation

interest in Kai Tak. If you will look back at

the memorandum I submitted to the Treasury in

February you will see the first attempt at

quantifying this made by the Board of Trade in

paragraphs 14-20. It is admittedly not easy to

measure our advantage from Kai Tak with such

precision that the figure is unassailable but

I had thought that by now it was not in dispute

that we derived considerable benefits. What we

are looking for surely are ways and means of

recognising the fact. It was for this reason

that I did not dwell on the self interest element

in the proposed package deal although I did refer

briefly to this in my second paragraph.

In other words it is we who should be look-

ing for an appropriate quid pro quo and I cannot

conceive that the cost to H.M.G. of supplying the

three ingredients of the package listed in my

paragraph 8 will be out of balance (to our dis- advantage that is) with the value of Hong Kong

Airport to us.

W(B)L 51-7433

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.