TNAG-0200-FCO40-236-Divorce-rules-1970 — Page 91

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

Registry No.

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

Top Secret.

Secret.

Confidential.

Restricted. Unclassified.

PRIVACY MARKING

..In Confidence

DRAFT letter

To:-

D

T. E. Roberts, Esq., 0.B.E.

Attorney General, Hong Kong.

Q.C.

Type 1 +

From

Sir James McPetrie, KCMG

"

OBE.

Telephone No. & Ext.

Department

Hak. 18/11.

wtTelene i hoes on leave)

I am replying to your letter of 1 May in which

you raise the question of the delays encountered in

obtaining the comments of the F.C.0. on Bills and

other legal matters sent to us from Hong Kong.

I appreciate that you have written to me on this

subject because all the matters that you mention

involve legislation in one form or another.

course, always ready to accept the responsibility for

ept

I am, of

any delays which may be directly attributable to short-

comings on the part of my own staff. But the items

that you list in your letter range far beyond the

purely legal field and are the responsibility of a

number of different Departments in the Office. I

therefore thought it best to bring your letter to

the notice of those Departments and this I have done.

In your letter you mention the dates on which

the different communications relating to the various

matters raised were sent to us; and the implication

seems to be that Hong Kong are still awaiting replies

to those communications.

However, I understand that

in certain cases replies have already been sent although

finality may not necessarily have been reached. For

example, in the case of the Hong Kong (Non-Domiciled

Parties) Divorce (Amendment) Rules, a reply was sent

to Hong Kong in our Saving Despatch No. 122 of 24

March, 1969; I am told that in this particular case

1

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.