PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL
10.
5.
In short, there is I think, little doubt that Blair-Kerr is the better judge and the more able and hard working officer, with a wider knowledge of the law and a more acute intellect. The question is whether his margin over Rigby is sufficiently great, and sufficiently well-established, to justify overlooking Rigby's seniority and the tension, ill-feeling and criticism that would follow his appointment: criticism which will gain impetus in certain quarters from his reputation for favouring the administration. If the appointment now contemplated were likely to last for more than a few years. I might well take a different view, but my present opinion on balance is that the margin in favour of Blair-Kerr is not sufficient to justify his passing over Rigby or to outweigh the dis- advantages just mentioned. In such cases, it seems to me that the claims of a junior officer should be beyond dispute before he can be preferred. Consequently, unless circumstances or my assessment of the situation change by the end of the year, I would propose to recommend Rigby for the vacancy, although I would, in that event, recommend Blair-Kerr for the new appointment of Judge of Appeal, the legislation for which we intend to introduce in the near future.
Yuus
eve
bench.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.