TNAG-0196-FCO40-232-Judiciary-appointments-1970 — Page 127

Reference..

with @

Mr. Fletcher ( Niews Deput:)

Ple

see mmutes

draft

attached.

Is it in fact correct to

say that the A.P.

reza

resentative

Hong

may have

Kang

broken the embargo?

Is he not

able to

hand

evey

The information esti

to a newspaper until

the embargo time

has paned

or

cam

he

hand it over

in advance provided he makes it clear

It is still under embargo

Can do

newspaper

fault.

Mr Carter.

? of he

The latter, firesumably the

Lang

Chely to have been at

6.5. Carter

1973/09

The normal patter of wents would

mean that the embargord copy would be passed

by the

agency

(A.P.

in this instare) to the

newspaper (s) which would be expected to

observe the embargo. It is, I think, almost certa that the newspaper is the culprit here,

b. Hetch

2573/69

Praneed Lise

wast

Day to Fair for

I Ilmie the draft will do,

with

to tow for the small amendinant I have made to the prot

sión ple

2613

Para.

Matur 2613.