TNAG-0192-FCO40-228-Criminal-procedure-ordinance-discussions-1969 — Page 36

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

Governor), its provisions in certain respects represented a

departure from the fundamental principles inherent in the

British system of justice and that further amending legislation

#4 # new pan would accordingly be required to remedy the situation. This

Frage

#new

pera

Despatch occasioned a reply from the Governor in the form of

a letter to Sir Arthur Galsworthy (copy attached) in which he

queried the conclusions in the Despatch both on legal and prac-

tical grounds. In Sir Arthur Galsworthy's absence, Mr. Moreton

replied to the Governor in a letter dated 8 May (copy attached)

in which he mentioned that our Legal Advisers were taking advan-

tage of the presence in London of Sir Michael Hogan

Justice, Hong Kong, to discuss the matter with him. In the

duly

the latter $5.

A

Chief

course of these discussions, which subsequently took place, our

Legal Advisers explained the difficulties with which we were

confronted in the matter and the course of action which had been

suggested to the Governor in order to remedy the situation.

These are set out in detail in the Despatch. The Chief Justice

mentioned that he had been consulted over the preparation of the

draft Bill: he appeared to favour our suggestion that as part of

the action which we were now proposing (paragraphs 6 and 7 of

the Despatch), consideration could be given to giving District

Judges and Magistrates wider powers for dealing with contempt

(although not so wide as those of the Supreme Court). But he

thought that our proposal that the provisions of the Ordinance

should come into force only when so ordered by the Governor,

after receiving a request to that effect from the Chief Justice,

might meet with difficulties. This was because such a procedure would encourage the press to expect that trouble was imminent

whenever such an order was made and from this point of view it

would be better if the powers conferred by the Ordinance were

permanently available.

Bir Michael Hogan returned to Hong Kong -

Take in slyp ]

shortly after these discussions took place.

Hong Kong, you

1969

CONFIDENTIAL

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.