- 3
trousers this year was making a nonsense of the restraint
and that it should therefore not be renewed. Jones
replied that Hong Kong, on the contrary, felt strongly
that it would be better to let the restraint run on.
4. On SHIRTS Stewart tried first of all to bring in
the factor that Canadian production of knitted shirts
was increasing. Jones pointed out that knitted shirt
production in Canada was very small less than a tenth
W
of woven shirt production and that the fall in woven
shirt production between 1967 and 1968 was as large as
the whole production of knitted. Furthermore knitted
shirt imports were about six times greater than
production and to bring them in would indicate greater rather
than less market disruption.
5.
Stewart then argued that Hong Kong's share of the
shirt market had fallen significantly and that Japan's
share was increasing; and also that the fall in
production was not substantial i.e. about 6% between
1967 and 1968. Jones replied that the share of the market
held by imports had now risen to about 48% compared with
only about 25% in 1966. Shirts were the major problem
for Canada and she would insist on it being settled. As
regards Hong Kong the 1966 and 1967 figures were pre-
restraint and there had been some cut back then.
Nevertheless the 60,000 dozen exports of polyester/
polynosic shirts this year would improve the position.
Stewart said that, nevertheless, imports from a number of
sources were being cut back this year. Jones pointed out
that the Hong Kong Government were aware of this and
would argue strongly that the colony's polyester/polynosic
shirts should be well accommodated in any new combined
level with polyester/cotton that might be agreed.
./4
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.