CONFIDENTIAL
4
-
you without referring the issue to the President
of the Board of Trade personally, who, I need
hardly say, was away on holiday and could not be
contacted. In these circumstances, and given the
time factor involved, I saw no alternative but to
accept the impossibility of getting what we would
have liked and to accept instructions to you in
the form of F.C.O. telegrams Nos. 536 and 537 to
you. I hoped that these would at least give you
enough to enable your representatives to run over
the ground with the Canadians, find out what their
position was to be and achieve a postponement of
decisions to a date still in advance of the
terminal date (30 September) for the restraint
agreements when further talks could be held. I
recognised that this would not be satisfactory to
you, as I said in my personal message, but it was
quite clear that we should not be able to move the
Board of Trade from their position until we saw
what line the Canadians actually took at the
talks in Hong Kong.
4. On receipt of your further telegrams Nos. 647
and 648 we met again at once at the Board of Trade,
late on the Friday evening.
Several points in your
telegram No. 647 the Board of Trade would dispute
but especially paragraph 7
Moreover they were
quite unwilling to concede the authority
that
requested in paragraph 12 of your telegram, No. 647,
but I insisted that they must make some effort in
that case to spell out for you the issues of
principle on which decisions have still to be taken.
CONFIDENTIAL
/Your
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.