A. Stewart
-3-
in a non-discriminatory way which means that the United States cannot invoke it to impose restrictions on Hong Kong alone. Mr. Stewart is well aware of this so I assume he means that the emphasis should be put on "serious injury" because these are the words in Article XIX. I see no objection to this but I think that to refer to Article XIX when he means to refer to "serious injury" is confusing to the reader.
4. Nor am I convinced that the bench marks established in the Swedish case are all that damaging. The most up-to-date figures at the time of the first restraint arrangement on will no doubt synthetic men's anoraks were - domestic production 86,000 arque back that pieces; imports from Hong Kong 111,000 pieces. Whole picture!
12 in vind to hand
(R. Goldsmith) 30th April, 1969.
Mr. Dunnett (CRE.1)
c.c.
(7.1)
Mr. Hughes (SEC) Mr. Carey (1.1) Mr. Magor (CRE.4) Mr. Jupp (1.1) Mr. Toma CRE.2) Mr. Kemmis (CRE.1) Miss Elliott (CRE.1) Miss Dumble (CRE.1)
Mr. Whitehead (F.C.0.)
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.