Mi Carni
Reference...
with
32
You have endorsed (32
The direct reference is to the baller at 26.
In general terins it is all part of his Stewart's
།
i
02
war of neares
is it more than that? in which he campaigns to prove that Either The UK is injured hen HK bixtika simportă, Noway, florden ate are not. Its is in a mys strong position if I am convinced that H.K
of
Should much mar destorunciation
disengage. S.S
clinate of opinia
to him.
is creating
a queral
favorable
·with some skill &
+ Expectavim
Maw
29/x.
Dilli
Во
Un I wok
MAW 31/10
S
am not aware of the purpose that
E/26 was supposed to serve. But-A..S.
Stewart has certainly
2.
made a meal of it en his own interest (as you say).
S agree
адже
(as does N.. Whitehead) that
H.K. Shared disengage. You might-
probe Mr. Sellers
of disengagement-
as to the possibilities
Mr. Jones
Jones e No. Jexchan
may be reluctant to let-(28) pass altogether;
indeed there may
be a case for trymą to
but the record straight
of figures. But s
on the subject
But I would hope this
could be done without, re-engaging in
argument over
The whole field. W
29/10
Page 75Page 76
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.