2.
and depending on the soundings which we had taken
as to the attitude of other countries, we might
suggest the setting up of a Working Party under ·
GATT to review the situation in regard to textiles
generally and to recommend the best ways of dealing
with it. I realise that this suggestion is
tentative at the present stage and that our tactics
will have to be decided in the light of developments
during the discussions. The attitudes of other
countries (particularly the EEC having regard to the
possibility of developments in regard to our
application to join the Community) will be important.
There are, however, obvious dangers in such an
initiative and while cur objective would be to
achieve a set of strictly observed criteria which
would keep quantitative restrictions to a minimum,
we might end up with something which made it easier
for quantitative restrictions to be imposed. This
would be unpalatable to us and could have very
serious consequencos for Hong Kong. For this
reason, I think that before we commit ourselves we
should perhaps have another look at the idea
}
of a Working Party when we have worked out much
more clearly what the terms of reference might be,
and what the outcome is likely to be.
4. As you know, the Hong Kong Government have
serious reservations about the implications for thea
of a policy of the sort proposed in the paper.
I do not suggest that we must change this policy
because of Hong Kong's objections. But I feel
that from our own point of view as well as that of
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.