TNAG-0120-FCO40-156-Lord-Shepherd-s-visit-1969 — Page 94

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

In its original form it contained the power to detain ships or aircraft, but not the power to dotain persons therein.

There have been several instances of foreign military aircraft landing in Hong Kong without permission. In one case in 1956 a Chinese Nationalist Sabre jet fighter landed at Kai Tak;

there

was a strong C.P.G. reaction. On that occasion doubt was expressed in the Colonial Office whether the Governor had power under emergency regulations as they then stood to detain the aircraft indefinitely and it was thought that special legislation in Hong Kong might be necessary to put the legal position beyond question;

in any event the Governor had no power at that time to detain the pilot. We told the Governor in March 1956 that he would be addressed separately on the question of taking powers to facilitate in futuro the detention of crews of aircraft and ships as well as the vessels themselves. In July 1956 the Governor was asked to consider making a comprehensive regulation covering the detention of aircraft, vessels, crews and passengers whenever it appeared to him "to be necessary or expedient in the public interest" to do so. was asked at the same time to consult the Secretary of State boforo making use of these powers. Regulation 51 was accordingly made. In 1958 a Chinese Nationalist bomber landed at Kai Tak without warning claiming engine trouble. As a result of this case the Governor stated that he was experiencing considerable difficulty in using his powers of detention because of the need for prior consultation with the Secretary of State. He accordingly proposed that he should be permitted to exercise those powers first and inform the Secretary of State immediately that he had done so. This was agreed.

lio

In view of this history it would be difficult for us to argue that the Governor does not need to retain executive powers of detention in this field. Clearly there are circumstances in which the substitution of a power of arrest might import an unacceptable element of delay regarding the action that needed to be taken, I consider that these powers would be defensible if challenged and that we should accept their transference to permanent legislation.

/ 6.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.