C
2.
did not intend to reduce textile imports from Japan, but merely to
maintain an orderly textile market. The Japanese mevertheless rejected
the suggestions and gave the following main arguments:
1) that self-imposed restrictions are contrary to the spirit of GATT
2) that in view of the present flourishing state of the U.S. textile
industry such restrictions were not necessary. (The Japanese could see
no economic justification for restraints in the statistics put forward
by the Amercians).
3) that it would seriously harm the Japanese textile industry to introduce
such restrictions at a time when Japan was pushing through a policy · ·
of rationalisation in the textile industry
4) one-quarter of all Japan's exports (presumably to U.S.) were already.
subject to voluntary restraint
...
5) a recent resolution in the Japanese Diet opposing voluntary restraint.
The Americans made it clear that this strong opposition would force in Jame them to abandon their oiginal intention to press for a CATT meeting, but
refused to accept as final the Japanese rejection of export control, end
pressed for continuance of meetings at official level at which the full
U.S. case could be presented. It was agreed that such "fact-finding"
meetings should take place but the Japanese continued to stress the
fundamental unacceptability of the U.S. proposals. The only concession
they have made to the U.3. argument is that if there were any specific areas
of hardship, these should be dealt with by Article 19 action.
Recent reports ft maxBabassy througı diplomatic channels indicate
that there may now be some reduction in the pressure for action on textiles
but that the Americans might try to seeks agreement to restraint under
the L.T.A. to cover some products mxxhich outside the cotton field in
which they were experiencing particular difficulty and that they might
try to justify this action on a substitution argument. HxSx On the other
hand, U.S. and Japanese textile experts are scheduled to begin discussions
in Washington about 15th September. The U.S. appears to be presenting
these discussions as negotiations for a bilateral agreement on some
textile restraints but the Japanese Embassy in London has stated that
....
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.