TNAG-0112-FCO40-148-Detainees-and-prisoners-following-19671968-disturbances-1969 — Page 34

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

WIBIL 51-74 33

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

Registry No.

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

Top Secret.

Secret.

Confidential.

Restricted.

Unclassified.

PRIVACY MARKING

In Confidence

DRAFT LETTER

To:-

Mr. Frank Allaun, MP

House of Commons,

LONDON, S.W.1.

(202)

Type 1 +

From

Mr. Goronwy Roberts

Telephone No. & Ext.

Department

I replied on the 17th February to a

Question which you asked about the practice

of "locking-in" in Hong Kong prisons. In the

course of a Supplementary Question you

enquired whether it was the case that some

prisoners had been confined in this manner

for as long as eight months. I undertook to

look into this point.

I should make it clear that there is

no practice of "locking-in" in the Hong Kong

prisons; nor does the Colony's prisons

ony'

legislation provide for it. Moreover, I have

BY

in that legislation

MISTER OF STATES able to discover any basis for your

Ijr demer

wi Lo Shepherds

reference to a maximum period of three months Confinements

in this or any related context.

As I said in my reply to your Question,

I think you must be referring to occasions

when certain prisoners have refused to work

and have of necessity been confined to their

cells, except during exercise periods. Such

occasions occurred during the eight month

period November 1967-June, 1968, and in such

circumstances there was no alternative but to

confine the prisoners in question to their

cells. It was open to the prisoners themselves

at any time during that period, to bring their

confinement to an end by agreeing to work and

this they eventually decided/ to do.

decided

2612.

26/2

пив

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.