TNAG-0097-FCO40-133-Construction-of-a-Cross-Harbour-Tunnel-1968 — Page 5

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

Registry No.

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

Top Secret.

Secret.

Confidential.

Restricted. Unclassified.

PRIVACY MARKING

In Confidence

DRAFT LETTER

To:-

J. Cowperthwaite, CMG.,

OBE.,

Colonial Secretary,

HONG KONG

Type 1 +

102

From

Telephone No. & Ext.

Department

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

signi

W(B)L 51-74 33

Nise West

Plse law for despatch by Friday's bag.

2613

Judging by reports reaching us, it seems

there may be some slight revival of interest

and of opinion in Hong Kong in favour of the

Tunnel project.

Montagu, after visiting Hong Kong last

month, told me of his intention to see what

could be done to re-establish the project on a

fresh financial footing; he talked in terms of

an injection of new finance from outside Hong

Kong. He mentioned the high cost of the mass

transit proposals as a factor leading people to

look more favourably on the tunnel and, when

I asked him how widespread this attitude was,

said it was to be found in unofficial members

of both Councils. We have since seen a report

of P.C. Woo's contribution on this subject to

N.P.# ん

the Budget debate. However there are no

developments known to us which would indicate

that the project could proceed on the basis at

present conceived. And the deadline you set

the Tunnel Company in your letter of 18 December

is near at hand. You may therefore shortly be

considering with the Company the terms of an

announcement about abandoning or shelving the

project.

It would ease a few consciences here,

I think, if your decision were to be the latter

I imagine too that the Company might be reluc-

tant at this stage to write off its existing

investment in the project.

Whatever...

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.