guidance of employers and employees alike.
This in itself is not a document prescribed by
It does no more than suggest a form
statute.
of contract which would meet with the approval
of the Commissioner of Labour for purposes of
attestation. To this end it includes a
suggested form of words for clauses dealing with
matters whose inclusion the Commissioner of
Labour is bound by statute to insist upon;
details
other elauses are optional.
Even much of what
is inserted in the mandatory clauses (e.g. wage
rates, overtime pay, hours of work, holidays,
advances, etc.) is negotiable;
but the scope
for variation of the mandatory clauses is limited
since they must conform with the requirements
of Section 5(2) of the Hong Kong Ordinance
concerned (Contracts for Overseas Employment
Ordinance). All this has been explained to
Mr. Burn by his legal adviser.
I now turn to the employer's liability to
pay the alien worker's passage to this country. VE
The model contract contains a clause which makes
provision for the termination of the contract
by a worker, without commitment to repay any
part of the expenses incurred by the employer
in regard to his passage to the United Kingdom.
In requiring the inclusion in the contract of
provision along these lines, Hong Kong Gove.nment legislation follows the 1.1.0.
Convention covering this very matter (see
Article 20 of 1,
Convention No. 50 -
rkers"). It is
"Recruiting of Indigenous Workers"
not, I think you will agree, unreasonable to
The Ordinance (Socin 5(x)))) requires this and
fifurly fixes the obligation to pay ролгека вие решая to and from thûs country on thie employer of alien workers.
NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN
delete Whole senliance.
/ expect
...
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.