cheapest market. Even on purely public finance
grounds, there seem to be an unneccessarily rigid
attitude. Considering that France for example
applies sovers restrictions on imperta from Hong Kong,
it is difficult to see the justification of awarding
contracts to French firms (as has been done in
important cases) even if thair prices are marginly
lower than those of other contractors,
The margin
after all, is not likely to be all that great.
This is another point on which we think we could well
press the Hong Kong delegation harder.
As regards (d) we shall be taking up with the
Foreign Office in seperate correspondence the
question whether political considerations really
debar us from devolving full autonomy to Hong Kong
in the conduct of her external commercial relations
and thus enabling her to become a Contracting Party
to the 9.A.T.T. in her own right. If they did not,
this would of course be well worth doing since it
would solve the Hong Kong worries discussed at (d)
above, probably without Hong Kong having to resort
to the measures indiented at (c) above,
I an sending copies of this letter to
Denis Gildea in your Department, John Cambridge in
European Economic Integration Department at the
Foreign Office and Gerald Clark in Economic
Relations Department at the Foreign Office; I
should be grateful if the last named would consult
the Foreign Office Legal Advisers on the lines
suggested in paragraph 3 above. I should also be
grateful for any comments which you and the other
recipients of this letter may have to reach me by
15 August. We will then be able to take them fully
into account in preparing a general brief for the
second round of consultations with Hong Kong.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.