CONFIDENTIAL
(b)
living standards of its inhabitants, unless
mention were also made of the need to protect
industry in the Community from damage resulting
from imports of all kinds from Hùng Kong.
There is thus a likelihood that, by raising the
question of a declaration at all, we should
prompt the very damand for protection of
Community producers which it is the whole aim
of the "no special arrangements" gambit to
avoid. The more explicit a declaration was in
addressing itself to the problems of Hong Kong,
the greater this likelihood would be; on the
other hand, the more generalised it was, the
less likely the Six would be to agree to its
being made.
If we were to propose a declaration, should we
aim for a unilateral one by the United Kingdom or a joint one by all Members of an enlarged Community?
Hong Kong officials did not at any stage suggest
the possibility of a joint declaration by all
Members of the enlarged Community.
Nevertheless,
if there is to be a declaration of any kind, this
is something which should be considered.
Obviously, if we could obtain some kind of
acceptance by the Member countries of the enlarged
Community of a degree of responsibility for
helping to solve the problems of our Dependent
Territories, and particularly Hong Kong, this
would be more advantageous than the mere tacit
acceptance by them of a unilateral declaration on
our part about our own continuing responsibilities.
On the other hand, the more responsibility we try
to thrust on the Six, the more likely they are to
bject to the whole concept of a declaration.
CONFIDENTIAL
/One
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.