TNAG-0046-FCO40-82-Britain-s-entry-into-EEC-effect-on-trade-with-Hong-Kong-1967 — Page 114

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

97499 St.S.

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

Registry No.

6/18

DRAFT LETTER

Type 1+5

To:-

-Top-Secret

Secret Confidential. Restricted

Unclassified.

A.G. Trickett,

Hong Kong Government

office,

54, Pall Mall, London, S.W.1.

From

52

JDP 22/4

J.M. Healey

Telephone No. & Ext

WHI 2323 X. 470

Department

Common Market

Mr Healey Mr Heitt (D-T.D.) has agreed that

direct

we sho

reply

to Trickett.

Secretanat Doc 48 & our reply sad be copied onte our file. KR

22/9

I am sorry for the delay in replying to

your letter to Gaminara of 18 August, asking

us to check the accuracy of a table you had

received from Jeaffreson, which sets out

various rates of decalage likely to have

resulted from the last EEC negotiations.

Gaminara is at present on leave and your

letter has been passed to Common Market

Dept. for reply.

2. We have checked the table, assuming

that the probable date of Britain's accession

would have been 1.1.64, and have the following

comments to make:

3. Column 1: Commonwealth General

Assuming that this refers to the rates agreed

for manufactured goods from Canada, Australia

and New Zealand, the 60% should be opposite

"By the end of the third year", since the

second alignment was to have taken place on

1.1.67.

4.

Column 2: India Pakistan Hong Kong, General

This rate was specially designed to apply to

India and Pakistan and had not been agreed in

respect of Hong Kong when negotiations broke

off.

As will be seen in the light of

para. 3 above, it was a more favourable rate

than that agreed for Canada, Australia and

/New Zealand

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.