TNAG-0043-FCO40-79-Future-Sovereignty-of-Hong-Kong-Defence-Review-Working-Party-1968 — Page 61

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

TOP SECRET

(t) In certain circumstances we might consider making an

informal and disavowable approach to the Chinese

aimed at reaching a tacit understanding with them

about an eventual withdrawal at a suitable agreed

date.

(u) The Chinese response to a formal or informal approach

would depend very much on whether it suited their

policy and interests at the time to take the Colony

over and, of course, on the strength of our position.

The chances of a favourable response would be best if

the Chinese were genuinely anxious, for economic

reasons, to take Hong Kong over with minimum damage

to the economy; our negotiating position would be

strongest if we sought to withdraw when the Hong Kong

economy was its normal buoyant self and there was no

Chinese pressure.

(v) Our position is, however, weak in that we have many

hostages in the Colony in terms of people and assets

and no means of bringing significant pressure to bear

on China. Its strength will rest on Hong Kong's

economic value to China and on our ability to hand

it over with that value unimpaired and its trading

links with Western countries kept open. To use this

card changed attitudes towards China on the part of

some Western countries will be a prerequisite.

(w) The initiative does not effectively lie in our hands:

the Chinese could always frustrate our attempts to

negotiate or reach an understanding with them. But

TOP SECRET

/on

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.