TNAG-0043-FCO40-79-Future-Sovereignty-of-Hong-Kong-Defence-Review-Working-Party-1968 — Page 162

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

TOP SECRET

(111) Nigel Tranch han suggested :-

(a) Putting the Military paragraphs in Section B

rather later on in the Section. I agree.

(b)

In fact, I think the various parts of this

Section might be rearranged in reverse

order (1.0. Political, Economic, Communica-

tions, Intelligence, Military).

1

Rearranging the material in Section B so

that advantages and disadvantages are

separately listed. I am not so sure about

this, but we might consider it. As a

compromise I have gone some way towards this

arrangement in framing conclusions (a) (c)

in Section 0; this might be sufficient.

(c) Mentioning in paragraph 9 of Section E that,

}

in the light of past experience, we do not

see any future in trying to involve the

Americans in the defence of Hong Kong.

We

might insert the following passage between

the second and third sentences of paragraph 9:

"They did not show any disposition ten

years ago to pursue discussions with us

about meeting the Chinese threat to

Hong Kong and we for our part were wary,

foreseeing that any proposal of a formal

American involvement might invite

difficult and dangerous American

demands for military facilities in

Hong Kong which we would find it hard

to resist if they were put forward as

facilities necessary for the proper

discharge of responsibilities they had

assumed towards the Colony. These

objections are valid today."

/Sections..

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.