Our views on problems of publicity and detainees
a70 Be ut in other telegrams.
As regards
Estleh, there seems to be a measure of agreement that there is little to be achieved by his
premature release on its own. Ja observed in
Peking tol. No. 905, his value as a potential
concession has decreased with time and must now be
slight. To go outside the normal processes of
law with only a negligible chance of its paying
dividends seems pointless.
3. It is still our view that ideally the move
most likely to prompt the early release of Grey
is the premature release of both Hsueh and Lo.
But we realise fully the difficulties of justifying
such a move in Hong Kong, particularly in the
absence of any assurance or even hint regarding
the release or Grey; and indeed in face of the
advice received from contact that there is
"no price", If it failed we should be in the
embarrassing position anticipated in para. 2
of tel. No. 1414 of 30 August.
In this difficult situation, we accept that the
least unsatisfactory course of action is to proceed as you propose, 1.e. await the release
of Hsueh, with remission, on 17 November and
see what then happens.
15.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.