TNAG-0033-FCO40-69-Relations-with-China-1968 — Page 70

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

Registry No.

DESTMENT

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

Top Secret

Secret

Confidential

Restricted

Unclassified

JM

26/9

PRIVACY MARKING

In Confidence

PRIORITY MARKINGS

Flash Immediate Priority Routine

:}"

(Date)

* Date and time (G.M.T.) telegram should

reach addressee(s)...................................................

Despatched

[Security_classification]

|

En Clair.

[

Privacy marking -if any

1

Code Gypher

Draft Telegram to:-

No.

(Date)

And to:-

[Codeword-if any]

Addressed to

telegram N..............

And to

repeated for information to

Repeat to:-

Saving to:-

Distribution:-

Copies to:--

Saving................

CONFIDENTIAL

HONG KONG

..(date)

PEKING

Your telegram No. 2015 of 23 September: Detainees

We continue to attach importance to

demonstrating to the Chinese that reasonable

behaviour on their part could yield them

advantages which harsh tactics have not.

However, in view of the arguments you have

advanced particularly in relation to security,

we agree that in the matter of detainees you

should proceed on the lines of paragraph 5 of

your telegram.

SO

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.