TNAG-0033-FCO40-69-Relations-with-China-1968 — Page 49

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

Registry No. F

DEPARTMENT

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

Top Secret

Secret

Confidential

Restricted

Unclassified

PRIORITY MARKINGS

Flash Immediate Priority

Routine

}

(Date)..

* Date and time (G.M.T.) telegram should

reach addressee(s).

Despatched

PRIVACY MARKING

In Confidence

En Clair. Code Cypher

Draft Telegram to:-

Peking

No.

(Date)

And to:

Repeat to:-

Hong Kong

Saving to:-

Distribution:- Departmental

Copies to:-

[Sec

"Security classification" -if any

CONFIDENTIAL

[

Privacy marking -if any

]

[Codeword-if any]

Addressed to

telegram No..

And to

PEKING

...(date)

HONG KONG

repeated for information to.

?

Saving to......

Your telegram No. 886. We agree that

reticence over the treatment of British subjects under

detention does not seem to have done any particular

good. On the contrary there is firm evidence that

moxe the Chinese at any rate new critical comment about

their treatment of foreigners and it is therefore

reasonable to assume that some sections of the

aware that this behaviour is damagmy leadership are working to improve Chinese beiravioul internationally.

It is for this reason that we have recently been

content to see greater publicity given to the plight

of British subjects. It is not unfortunately true

however that public pressures for undesirable

retaliatory action have ceased. There is a steady Incale flow of letters and some Barliamentary Questions

demanding tough action which increase on each

occasion when interest is focussed on British subjects

The demand by the "Economist" that NCNA in London

should be expelled if Grey is not released soon

/arton

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.