TNAG-0033-FCO40-69-Relations-with-China-1968 — Page 45

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

1

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

It is also true that we have had some

success in educating the press and public onion in this country to realise that

crude retaliation against Chinese nationals

is not likely to be helpful.

On the other

hand there is still a limited but steady

4

tickle of letters and Barliamentary Questions

demanding retaliation.

They tend to

increase when ver public attention is

focussed on British subjects in China,

as

for example when Sir D. Hopson arrived in

this country. Mr. Cradock is wrong in Supposing

proposing that we deliberately muted publicity

about Mr. Johnston of the Chartered Bank

(wao

a team

was arrested in Shanghai because a

from another British firm, Simon Carves,

negotiating in China.

was

I £genty etatement

Viso made about Mr Solarston but on-the-

May the staremust

It was in fact ar me Linsistence of the Chartered Bank was

kept in restrained terms.

At that stage,

the Bank were not sure whether the case

was connected with an affair between the

at

Bank of China/and Singapore and the Chartered Bank and thought that if it were,it might

be possible to settle the matter by

so long as negotiation if/the Chinese were no driven to take up any public position. The position

is still obscure and for the moment the Bank

prefer that pressure should be maintained on the Chinese through the diplomatic channel. Similar considerations have applied in the

ommi casi, eeee of some of the Heretant Hevy Officer's

Mat A

arrested in particular/Mr. Crouch, 2nd Sewni

Officer of the Blue Funnel Line ship

"Demodocus"✔

where there is some convent

140

albert tumma

between the chimm

Page 45Page 46

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.