1
853
CONFIDENTIAL
-2-
They have
6. I should add I do not find reasons so far elicited
The argument for holding on to detainees very convincing. that release will encourage militants and discourage the loyal (Hong Kong telegram No. 2038), even if true, is hardly sufficient grounds. It would be advanced against release of a Communist at any time. A better question would be, will releases cause disorder? but evidence is all against. So far releases of detainees have caused no fuss. obviously given little encouragement to militants since releases since July have coincided with a better atmosphere in Hong Kong, including lowered Communist morale, as well as in wider fields. The National Day celebrations in Hong Kong showed Communist leaders determination and ability to avoid violence (Hong Kong telegram No. 2062, paragraph 6). 7. I am encouraged that you will be able to hold full consultations with the Governor on these questions beginning 21 October. The background for such talks is not too hopeful, however. Since your encouraging telegram No. 769 of 26 July, progress has been disappointing in obtaining moves in Hong Kong that should lead to a real easing of our relations with China. On Communist education a big step back has been only narrowly averted. On Gray there is no real progress. On detainees the Governor has made clear his unwillingness to allow releases to respond to or encourage better treatment of non-diplomatic British subjects and now asserts that Chinese are not influenced by treatment of prisoners in Hong Kong (Hong Kong telegram No. 2038), As seen from here a very determined effort will be needed in discussions if any advance is to be made. If, therefore, there are any points made by this post that you think doubtful or in need of fuller argument I hope you will let me know.
1
F.0.
Mr. Cradock
FILES
F.E.D.
Sir D. Allen
P.U.S.' Office
C.O.
H.K.D.
CONFIDENTIAL
bbbbb
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.