CONFIDENTIAL
denying to British policy the very flexibility that is
most needed at the present tine?
16. What general advantages could we expect to draw
from declaring some kind of amnesty for confrontation
prisoners in Hong Kong?
Suppose that it was decided to
release in the colony, say at the end of this year, on
condition of good behaviour, a substantial number of those
convicted for offences connected with confrontation which
were not serious acts of violence.
By that time almost two-
thirds (422 out of 655) of the confrontation prisoners at
present in jail will have served their full terms. At a ting
when the Government of Hong Kong has proved beyond doubt its
ability to maintain law and order and is under no direct
threat from the Chinese, we should be demonstrating in a
concrete way our readiness to reach an accommodation with
the Chinese over Hong Kong. We should be allowing the Chinese Government to claim that there had been a response to their "demands", thereby enabling then to close the book on
last year's events and to disarm any of their number still
advocating more extreno counsels in respect of Chinese policy toward the colony. It seems unlikely that those released
would resort to violence, any more than their communist
colleagues now at liberty, or the communist prisoners
already released after completing their sentences, are doing.
Such an act on our part would probably be followed by a
significant casing in our relations with China. I would
expect the release of certain British subjects under detention,
/in particular
CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.