CONFIDENTIAL
!
produced four exit visas for this Mission). The release
of prisoners, more than a year after the crisis and seven
months after violence ended, at a time when the Hong Kong
Government is under no great pressure, might be seen by the
people of Hong Kong and by British opinion as an act of
statesmanship coming from strength. Communist propaganda
would, no doubt, claim a victory (this would be an essential
part of the exercise) but it would be wrong to conclude that
we would thereby have suffered a real defeat. If tension were
reduced in Hong Kong and there were consequential improvements
in Sino-British relations wo should in fact have made
important gains.
14. The policy implied in the argument in paragraph 12
seems to me to be one of great pessimism, for which a heavy
price, human, political and perhaps economic, would have
to be paid probably over several years. It rejects at
the outset the possibility for flexibility and initiative on
our side. It accepts the possibility of continued detention
for British subjects in China and abandons hope of restoring
Sino-British relations even to anything like their old level.
Nor, I believe would such a policy necessarily protect Hong
Kong against further communist disturbances. The failure
to make the gestures needed to end confrontation might sooner
or later provoke further unrest, which as the Governor has
recently stated is ever a latent threat.
Further unrest could
mean further arrests. It would not then be just a question of
sitting tight until 1970, or 1971 or 1974.
the makings of a self-perpetuating crisis.
CONFIDENTIAL
We would have
Meanwhile, for the
/reasons
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.