TNAG-0027-FCO40-63-Relations-with-China-1968 — Page 99

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

Cypher/Cat A

CONFIDENTIAL

PRIORITY HONG KONG TO COMMONWEALTH OFFICE

Telno

1775

CONFIDENTIAL

28 November 1967

TOP COPY

179

(D.T.D.)

Hew

Colin on HWB 14/32

Addressed to Commonwealth Office telegram No. 1775

of 28 November

Repeated for information to Peking and Rawalpindi

My telegram 1755: Reuters.

On afternoon of 25 November Reuters were told by Bank of China that interview would not now take place. No reason was given; but in reply to enquiries, Reuters were told to

ask the Hong Kong British Authorities' what the reason was.

H14/12 2. My immediately following telegram (not to all) reports

a Communist Press statement of 26 November protesting against a Supreme Court judgment of 25 November against the Wer Wei Pao and Ta Kung Pao for libelling a Government servant (A.W. Olivier). This is one of the civil cases instituted Min July (my telegram 1058) to which further reference was made

Court has given an interim judgment Hin my telegram 1202.

against the papers but no application has yet been made to fix a date for assessment of damages. Present indications are that the paper will ignore whatever decision is reached. they do further action by way of distraint will inevitably follow.

If

3. There seems little reason to doubt that the cancellation of Reuters interview is related to the judgment against the Wen Wei Pao and the Ta Kung Pao. The Communists have of course been aware for a long time of the progress of these civil actions but have made relatively little fuss about them. Interim judgments against the Ta Kung Pao for libelling an officer of Commerce and Industry Department was in fact given on 28 October and against the Ching Po in respect of two police officers on 4 November. (Again damages have not been assessed, but in the former case it is expected that they will be assessed before the end of the year). It is perhaps odd that in these circumstances Bank of China should have made the original arrangement to talk to Reuters. 4. Meanwhile, all this may have been overtaken by the information in paragraph 2 of Peking telegram 273.

Foreign Office please pass Priority to Peking 634 and Routine to Rawalpindi M 655.

Sir D. Trench

[Repetition to Peking referred for

departmental decision, repeated as requested to other post.]

DEPARTMENTAL DISTRIBUTION

C.O. Hong Kong Dept.

Int. & Genl. Dept.

Far East & Pacific Dept.

South Asia Dept.

News Dept.

J.I.R.D.

F.0. Far Eastern Dept.

Consular Dept.

RLC AR

APNOV 1967

170

J.R.D. News Dept.

Ελί

R'.F.

176

CONFIDENTIAL

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.