CONFIDENTIAL
5.
Depending on what action the Chinese do take after the
expiry of the ultimatum I think that the time has come when
firm action must be taken against N.C.N.A. Quite apart from the holding of Mr. Grey under house arrest and anything further
which may be done to him, he has been unable to function as
Reuters correspondent for the last month. We would therefore be justified in taking reciprocal action against N.C.N.A. in
London. It could be argued action in Hong Kong would be more
appropriate as the N.C.N.A. are more heavily represented there. Five staff members have in fact been arrested for illegal
assembly and incitement one is in prison for two years and another appears in court today although the full trial is not
likely to take place until September. In view of the
possibility of violent Chinese reaction against further measures in Hong Kong, the Commonwealth Office strongly favour
action here and we agree.
In
6. The difficulty about stopping N.C.N.A. functioning is that we cannot prevent the circulation of their bulletin unless proceedings are instituted for, for example, criminal libel.
It is doubtful whether the Home Office would institute such
proceedings or whether a prosecution would be successful.
any case the process would be lengthy. We could, however, inform the Office of the Chinese Chargé d'Affaires by Note that
N.C.N.A. must cease to function. At the same time the Home
Office could instruct the police to make N.C.N.A. report to
them, for example, daily. If either instruction were ignored
we could, with Home Office agreement, expel all expatriate
/members
OCHFIDENTIAT
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.