TNAG-0009-FCO40-45-Kowloon-disturbances-1967 — Page 81

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

Registry No.

F

DEPARTMENT

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

Top Secret

Seeret

Confidential

Restricted Unclassified

PRIORITY MARKINGS

(Date)....

Flash Immediate

*

Routine

Despatched /7/ /67/

* Date and time (G.M.T.) telegram should

reach addressee(s)

(68)

HK. Peking Ligans was on

16-052

1.7.15167. 16.202

[Se

Security classification'

if any

tion]

CONFIDENTIAL

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

PRIVACY MARKING

In Confidence

EXXCNIKI

Cypher

Draft Telegram to:- HONG KONG

NKO 350.

No.

(Date)

939.

[ Privacy marking ]

any

[Codeword-if any]

Addressed to

telegram No. 939.

HONG KONG

(date)

And to

repeated for information to

PEKING, POLAD SINGAPORE AND

WASHINGTON.

And to:-

Saving to

Repeat to:-

PEKING

POLAD SINGAPORE WASHINGTON

Saving to:--

Aye's. And 480

#Kwis 17/

طيف

Distribution:-

FO/CO/WH Fo. FE. Dell.

Copies to:-

Your Telegram 612, paragraph 3.

In the interview with the Chinese Chargé

d'Affaires ad interim reported in Foreign Office

telegram no.322 to Peking, de la Mare deliberately

did not refer to events in Hong Kong but limited

himself to the events of 16 May in Peking and

Shanghai.

This was partly because the seriousness

of the Shanghai case made it necessary to call

Shen Ping in immediately and the statement

under preparation about Hong Kong (paragraph 4

of your telegram under reference) was not yet

approved.

2. But even if this had not been the case the

Foreign Office would have had the gravest doubts

about the usefulness of attempting to discuss the

Hong Kong situation with the Chinese here.

The

/interview

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.