Reference...
/1938
4. Clauses XIV and XV of the Instinctives of 1967, and
the
Claus XIV in the form in which it affeared in Additional Instructiones of (1928), who contained a pervision to the affect that every peen prontionally, affinated
as a becule
the legislative Comcil under there Classe show Inthewith cease to be a bunden
*
of his afforstual was disallowed by les".
the Corsial
5. It will be seen that the words " In Que confirmation or disallowance" while recurred in be pusecesions of last xor
the
parshash of the present Clause XIX of the Instinction ham leen omitted from the latter. I understand that the print racines is thether the effect of this omission has in Hodalbanke theat sequification of the majesty's "confirmuatin' of thom prositioned efferintment, is is toege required. 6. In the light of the history of that prontion, what I have attempted to describe above, I think that, in sticther,
He besporty's "confirmation" signification of
ጉ
Luch
afpartmant
disallware
as incorrect. But they are still subject to by the heajesty and that is jammably the reason like the fovensor, when reporting them, states that they have been made & subject to the beajesty's plassen". I thish that signification of non-disallowance of the affinatraced (not of confirmation Heerest) is desirable, suven if the contention whe correct that the effect of " In Aver colmaatio a Ohallowened' in that such inquifitation is not legally necessary. It is obvinely convenient In the fressen to be informed that the foren of
Не любый го пр
the winds
Sisallowan
what exists in relation to then affinctment will with
Wyhest iniusanft,
jelow.
In venated.
havin Westworden; роший
25°-4.1568.
Mr. N.Q. Smith
Please see
Sir Francis Herehenryder's minute
of 25? Abril ( a transcript is below this minute
la
(sheet), with hantroular reference to the low
have graph thereof
wish to consider using
your
Dept. will, no doubt,
the form he has suggested
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.