March_1967 — Page 29

Far East Builder 遠東建築雜誌 All

However, in humid climates re- radiation at night of energy received from the incoming solar radiation during the day, is difficult. Outgoing radiation to the sky at night proceeds most rapidly on clear nights, but with clouds overhead, and water vapour and pollution in the atmosphere, there is only an exchange between buildings and the surrounding atmo- sphere. Radiation towards the in- terior of buildings will be lower if the interior temperature is higher than the external temperature, but this is hardly desirable in a climate of small diurnal change. Geiger(17)

the

states that outgoing radiation will be strongest towards the zenith of the vault of the sky, because the thickness of the atmosphere, rela- tive to a radiating surface, will be

least in that direction. Directly to- wards the horizon the outgoing radia- tion will be weakest. Thus, if we wish to increase the heat loss by ra- diation at night, then we should de- sign our buildings with maximum area in plan. But this has the great disad- vantage of presenting a large roof sur- face to incoming solar radiation dur- ing the day.

in-

However, within a given plan area, increase in the perimeter wall length. although increasing costs, will crease the radiating surface area at night, and the area of contact with outside air for conductive heat loss. This is quite the opposite of the de- sign approach in colder climates. where the most compact plan shape and minimum wall area is desirable to reduce heat losses at night.

TABLE II

Natural air flow patterns around buildings $ Downwind Eddy Dimensions

Building Type

Roof Pitch

Width of Building

2A

4A

(End Elev.)

or Cross-Section

DDDD

པ་མམ་

Length of Building

*

8A 12A 16A 20A 24A

(downwind eddy dimensions †)

26

87

A

33

51

71

8

81

2A

2

23

33

53

6

3A

21

31

41

51

53

64

51

A

81

113

153 161

174

18

A

63

11

161

183 183

203

203

220

ما

143

12/12

A

34

9

111

131

131

8/12

A

31

43

73

83

101

10

111

6/12

A

23

43

61

73

83

101

11

4/12

A

23

37

64

71

81

81

81

12/12

2A

23

54

91

113

131 141

15

8//12

2A

21

41

83

104

121

13

6/12

2A

3

4

63

81

10

124

142

13

4/12

2A

21

41

64

73 10

11

121

12/12

3A

3

6

103

101

15

167 179

8/12

3A

43

8

101

121

143

6/12

3A

42

6

83 114

121

13

4/12

ЗА

21

37

64

81

91

113

3/12

2A

3

54

81

101

11

13

141

2/12

2A

81

103

111

12}

1/12

2A

21

31 6 73

101

11

12

3/12

2A

21

41

61

81

11

112

133

2/12

2A

4

6

8

93

101

11

1/12

2A

23

4

3

53

81

81

9

22

22

222

* As a multiple of 'A', the building width.

2

151

121

† Measured at right angles to leeside, with each of the figures in the tables

expressed as a multiple of 'A', the building width.

$ From "Natural Air Flow around Buildings" by Ben H. Evans, Research Report

No. 59, March 1967, Texas Engineering Experiment Station.

Far East Architect & Builder March, 1967

Perhaps, in relation to the climate of Malaysia, some studies could be undertaken on similar lines to those presented by Olgyay(18) for Miami, in a Wet and Dry Tropical (Aw) Climate. Here it was found that the "optimal shape (of building plan) was 1:1.7, but up to 1:3.0 on the east- west axis is also acceptable”.

It is likely, however, that if studies were undertaken on the night re- radiation properties of building ma- terials in the humid tropics, then in designing for greater wall surface area and the new night-time criteria for thermal comfort, a different optimal building shape would result. But there are other factors to take into account, perhaps the most important for night comfort being cross-ventila- tion and sufficient air changes. Open space around buildings to encourage natural air flow will also allow the ra- diating surfaces to "see" the night sky.

Air Temperature Reduction

Mention of open space between buildings in the humid tropics draws attention to the need for a town plan in which the climatic aspects of town planning have been fully consider- ed(19) There have been many de- monstrations of the effects upon tem- perature, wind and humidity caused by incorrect planning(17, 18, 20-23), It should be possible to plan a city with- out worsening the climatic conditions.

In colder climates, town planning to prevent night-time lowering of the temperature of an area and to reduce wind effects is possible, while close and compact building is advocated in hot and arid climates to reduce the effects of incoming solar radiation during the daytime and to induce local microclimatic breezes. In warm and humid tropical climates, open planning is one way of making tem- perature reduction and increased air movement possible.

Temperature traverses, across cities, with instruments instailed on the side of a car, screened from the engine, have shown quite marked temperature differences between city and sur- rounding countryside in colder climates. of the order of 10°F or more under particular climatic condi- tions. Now even a corresponding 3 to 4°F temperature difference, in warm and humid tropical cities, would be quite significant and worthy of further study from the town plan- ning point of view, since such a tem- perature drop would assist in reduc- ing thermal discomfort, and it would also lower air conditioning costs.

a

As an example of applied climatic planning we may refer to Chandigarh, where Landsberg deduced that breeze extending from the ground to a height of 3 to 4 ft. would pass for two miles down the side of Capital hill. To take advantage of this natural phenomenon, medium class housing was situated at the foot of the slope.

Other useful conclusions were reached at Chandigarh. For example it was concluded that street layouts may be 20° out of the wind in either direction, and may deviate up to 30°

53

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.