Directory_and_Chronicle_1893 — Page 336

Further Defence.

By leave of the Court.

Amendment of Petition after

Answer.

Notice thereof.

At or before Hearing.

Amendment of Pleadings in

294

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE-HONGKONG

3. The defendant so answering may also set up by such answer any defence to the suit, and may explain away the effect of any admission therein made by any other allegation of faets.

Replication.

XXXIX. No replication or other pleading after answer shall be allowed except by special leave of the Court.

2. Where the plaintiff considers the contents of the answer to be such as to render an amendment of the petition necessary or desirable, he may obtain ex parte an order to amend the petition, on satisfying the Court that the amendment is not intended for the purpose of delay or vexation, but because it is considered to be material for the plaintiff's case, 3.-Notice of the amendment shall be given to the defendant within such time and in such manner as the Court in each case directs.

Settlement of Issues.

XL.-At any time b fore or at the hearing, the Court may, if it thinks fit, on the application of any party, or of its own motion, proceed to ascertain and determine what are the material questions in controversy between the parties, although th same are not distinctly or properly raised by the pleadings, and may reduce such questions into writing and settle them in the form of issues, which issues, when settled, may state questions of law on admitted facts, or questions of disputed fact, or ques- tions partly of the one kind and partly of the other.

2.—In settling issues, the Court may order or allow the striking out framing Issues. or amendment of any pleading, or part of the pleadings, so that the pleadings may finally correspond with th issues settled, and may order or allow the striking out or amendm nt of any pleading, or part of a pleading, that appears to be so framed as to prejudice, embarrass, or delay the trial of

How Application to be made.

Amended or additional Issues.

Power to deliver written Inter- rogatories to

the cause.

3. Where the application to the Court to settle issues is made at any stage of the proceedings at which all parties are actually present before the Court, either in person or by counsel or attorney, or at the hearing, the application may be made viva voce, and may be disposed of at once, other- wise the application must be made and disposed of on summons. It shall be in the discretion of he Court to direct which issues shall be first dis- posed of.

4.-At any time before the decision of the case, the Court may amend the issues or frame additional issues on such terms as to it shall seem fit, and all such amendments as may be necessary for the purpose of determin- ing the real question or controversy between the parties shall be so made. Interrogatories-Discovery-Unwilling Witness.

XLI.—In all suits, the plaintiff and the defendant, or either of them, may, by order of the Court, deliver to the opposite party or his attorney opposite Party. (provided such party, if not a body corporate, would be liable to be called and examined as a witness upon such matter), interrogatorics in writing upon any matter as to which discovery may be sought, and require such party, or in the case of a body corporate, any of the officers of such body corporate, within ten days to answer the questions in writing by affidavit, to be sworn and filed in the ordinary way; and any party or officer omitting, without just cause, sufficiently to answer all questions as to which a dis- covery may be sought within the above time, or such extended time as the Court shall allow, shall bleemned to have committed a contempt of the Court, and shall be liable to be proceeded against accordingly.

Afidavit by

to interrogate

2. The application for such order shall be made upon an affidavit of Party proposing the party proposing to interrogate, and his attorney or agent, or, in the and his Attorney. Case of a body corporate, of their attorney or agent, stating that the deponent believes that the party proposing to interrogate, whether plaintiss or defendant, will derive material benefit in the cause from the discovery