XN000022-1996-05-29 — Page 58

- 41-

Reply:

Mr President,

We have considered the question of whether to appoint an independent nuclear safety consultant or advisory body on several occasions, but concluded that for the following reasons there is no strong grounds to do so-

(a)

(b)

(c)

We have sufficient expertise within the Government on nuclear safety technology to ensure that we are able to protect the health and safety of the people of Hong Kong. Staff in the Electrical and Mechanical Services Department, Royal Observatory and Department of Health have specialised training and experience in the operation of nuclear power stations, radiological monitoring and assessment, and health physics. We have been building up this capability for more than 10 years and will continue to improve it.

We have maintained close contact with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United Kingdom's Atomic Energy Authority and other regulatory agencies, and other internationally-renowned radiological experts. These agencies are involved in advising us in drawing up contingency plans. They also act as observers in our exercises to test our contingency plans, and give regular advice to us on how our system, plans and procedures should be improved.

The Hong Kong Nuclear Investment Company (HKNIC) employs highly qualified and experienced nuclear safety advisers from both France and China who are able to advise on both the normal operation of the Guangdong Nuclear Power Station at Daya Bay and on the related technical aspects of nuclear safety.

End