20
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 15, 1994
TO CONDUCT A CHAPERON
"IT MAKES GOOD COMMON SENSE FOR MALE DOCTORS MEDICAL EXAMINATION ON A FEMALE PATIENT IN THE PRESENCE OF A
ANY INVOLVES EXAMINATION IF THE
H
CONTACT, SHE SAID.
то
BE CARRIED
OUT
DIRECT BODY
EMPHASISED
WONG MRS REQUIRED BY THEIR CODES OF PRACTICE TO REGARD THE INTERESTS OF PATIENTS AS THEIR FIRST PRIORITY.
THAT BOTH DOCTORS
AND
DENTISTS
WERE
THEIR
EVER
ARE
ALLEGED OF
THEIR
"IF
HAVING DISREGARDED THEY
THE PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES TO PATIENTS, THEY MAY BE SUBJECT TO
MEDICAL AND DENTAL OF THE SANCTIONS
COUNCILS DISCIPLINARY
"
RESPECTIVELY, SHE SAID.
FEMALE PATIENTS CASES STATED THE DETAILS
REFERRING ΤΟ THE INDECENT ASSAULT OF MENTIONED BY MISS LAU IN HER QUESTION, MRS WONG OF SOME CASES.
THE FIRST
INVOLVED CASE
A DOCTOR WHO
WAS
CHARGED
IN THE
DISTRICT COURT WITH SIX COUNTS OF INDECENT ASSAULT.
THE CASE WAS DISMISSED ON MARCH 18, 1994 AFTER THE COURT HIM NOT GUILTY OF ALL CHARGES.
FOUND
THE SECOND CASE WAS CONSIDERED BY THE MEDICAL COUNCIL OF
ORDINANCE, THE
REGISTRATION TO
MEDICAL DISCIPLINARY HEARING HELD ON NOVEMBER 4, 1993.
KONG,
PURSUANT
IN
HONG
AT
A
THE
THE ACCUSED WAS "GUILTY OF HIS COURSE OF
AFTER HEARING EVIDENCE FROM THE COMPLAINANT AND DOCTOR, THE
WAS SATISFIED THAT THE DOCTOR COUNCIL IMPROPER,
INDECENT IMMORAL
BEHAVIOUR OR PROFESSIONAL DUTIES TO HIS PATIENT (THAT THAT IN RELATION TO THE FACTS ALLEGED HE HAS BEEN GUILTY OF MISCONDUCT IN A PROFESSIONAL RESPECT".
IS, THE COMPLAINANT), AND
THE COUNCIL FURTHER
ORDERED
THE DOCTOR'S NAME BE
REMOVED OF WHICH FROM THE MEDICAL REGISTER FOR SIX MONTHS, THE APPLICATION WOULD BE SUSPENDED FOR TWO YEARS SUBJECT TO THE DOCTOR NOT BEING FOUND GUILTY OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT DURING THE SAID PERIOD.
TO WITHDRAW HIS'
DECISION AND
COUNCIL'S
SUBSEQUENT ΤΟ THE DOCTOR'S RECENT DECISION APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, THE MEDICAL DISCIPLINARY ORDER WERE GAZETTED ON JUNE 3, 1994.
THE THIRD CASE WAS HEARD BY THE DENTAL COUNCIL OF HONG KONG,
AT ACCORDANCE WITH THE DENTISTS REGISTRATION ORDINANCE, DISCIPLINARY ENQUIRY HELD ON FEBRUARY 22 AND APRIL 21, 1994.
J
IN
ITS
WAS SATISFIED AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE ENQUIRY, THE COUNCIL
COURT OF THAT THE DENTIST IN QUESTION WAS "CONVICTED BY THE SUPREME
1986 OF 17 CHARGES OF INDECENT BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA ON DECEMBER 4
OF BRITISH ASSAULT AND SEXUAL ASSAULT; AND THAT THE COURT OF APPEAL
ALLOWED THE ON SEPTEMBER 23. 1987 CANADA HAD COLUMBIA,
DENTIST'S APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE AND IMPOSED A SENTENCE OF IMPRISONMENT OF TWO YEARS LESS ONE DAY WITH PROBATION FOR TWO YEARS".
/THE COUNCIL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.