21
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1988
EXISTING
OF
MR OWEN SAID ANOTHER SERIOUS FLAW IN THE
OF BOOKS AND RECORDS LAY IN THE AREA OF INSPECTION PERSONS.
LEGISLATION REGISTERED
OF REGISTERED
TI
"OBVIOUSLY IT IS FUNDAMENTAL THAT ANY REGULATOR PERSONS MUST HAVE ADEQUATE POWERS TO INSPECT THEIR BOOKS AND RECORDS, HE SAID.
ORDINANCE GAVE NO SECURITIES
HOWEVER, HE ADDED, THE COMMODITIES TRADING POWER TO THE COMMISSIONER IN THIS IMPORTANT AREA WHILE THE ORDINANCE GAVE CERTAIN LIMITED POWERS UNDER SECTIONS 122 AND 123, THESE PROVISIONS WERE SERIOUSLY INADEQUATE.
WHICH
BUT
ONE FURTHER EXAMPLE WAS SECTION 122 OF THE SECURITIES ORDINANCE GAVE THE COMMISSIONER
TO INSPECT DOCUMENTS OF A POWERS
AND TAKE EXTRACTS FROM THOSE REGISTERED PERSON AND TO MAKE COPIES
THE POWER DOCUMENTS, BUT
WAS
AUTHORISING THERE
NO SPECIFIC COMMISSIONER TO ENTER BUSINESS PREMISES FOR THAT PURPOSE, HE SAID.
CLOSE
THESE SERIOUS
GAPS IN THE THE NEW PROVISIONS AIM TO EXISTING STATUTORY POWERS WHICH HAD FRUSTRATED STAFF OF THE OFFICE
THEIR ATTEMPTS FOR SECURITIES COMMISSIONER
IN
ΤΟ
OF
UNDERTAKE
INVESTIGATIONS.
PREMISES WITHOUT
ON THE RIGHT
AND SEARCH ΤΟ ENTER MAGISTRATE'S WARRANT WHICH HAD ATTRACTED CONSIDERABLE RECENTLY, MR OWEN SAID IT HAD BEEN MADE QUITE BEING PROPOSED WAS THAT ENTRY TO THE PREMISES OF THOSE REGISTERED WITH THE SECURITIES
(SFC) WOULD REQUIRE A WARRANT.
A
MEDIA COMMENTS CLEAR THAT WHAT WAS PERSONS OTHER THAN COMMISSION
AND FUTURES
REGULATOR SHOULD
ALSO, THERE IS SIMPLY NO SUGGESTION THAT THE HAVE ACCESS TO RESIDENTIAL PREMISES WITHOUT A WARRANT, HE SAID.
ACCESS
QUARREL WITH THE "I DO NOT THINK ANY REASONABLE PERSON COULD REGULATOR'S HAVING AN EXPLICIT, AUTOMATIC RIGHT OF UNIMPEDED TO THE BUSINESS PREMISES OF REGISTERED PERSONS TO DEMAND OF AND INSPECT BOOKS AND RECORDS AND TO ASK QUESTIONS OF SUCH ABOUT MATTERS RELATED TO THEIR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY PROVISIONS RELEVANT ORDINANCES.
NORMAL
PRIVILEGE
OF
REGULATORS "THIS IS A WHOLLY JURISDICTIONS. INDEED, IT IS DIFFICULT TO SEE HOW THEY CAN JOB WITHOUT IT, HE STRESSED.
||
PRODUCTION PERSONS OF THE
IN
OTHER DO THEIR
MR OWEN SAID
THE
ΤΟ
DEBATE WAS ISSUE
IN WERE OBSTRUCTED
WHAT
WHEN HAPPENED THE COURSE OF AN OFFICERS OF THE COMMISSION
OFFENCE INVESTIGATION OR DISCOVERED PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF A SERIOUS AND WISHED TO PRESERVE DOCUMENTS FROM DESTRUCTION OR REMOVE THEM THE PREMISES.
FROM
IT TAKES ΤΟ OBTAIN A
(USUALLY TWO
HE SAID.
TO
FOUR
**EXPERIENCE HAS SHOWN THAT IN THE TIME DOCUMENTS MAGISTRATE'S WARRANT TO SEIZE SUCH HOURS) THE EVIDENCE HAS A TENDENCY TO DISAPPEAR,'
"IN TH
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.