7
WEDNESDAY, JULY 8, 1987
"WE ARE TODAY
CONCERNED WITH A
FUNDAMENTAL
FREEDOM,
THE
OF
THE
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, WHICH HAS BEEN ENSHRINED IN ARTICLE 19 INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS.
"AS WE
KNOW, ALL
THIS INTERNATIONAL
COVENANT ENSHRINED IN THE SINO-BRITISH JOINT DECLARATION AND NO DOUBT ALSO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE BASIC LAW,'
MR LEE
SAID FREEDOM
"
HAS
BEEN
IT WILL
NOT ONLY ΤΟ FAVOURABLY RECEIVED OR REGARDED AS THOSE ALSO TO
OF
OF
EXPRESSION APPLIED
INDIFFERENCE,
BUT
INFORMATION OR IDEAS THAT WERE
AS A MATTER INOFFENSIVE OR THAT OFFEND, SHOCK OR DISTURB.
"SUCH ARE THE DEMANDS OF
THAT PLURALISM, TOLERANCE
AND
BROADMINDEDNESS WITHOUT WHICH THERE IS NO TRUE FREE SOCIETY.
SERIOUSLY CONSIDER
WHETHER
MR LEE ASKED THE COUNCIL TO POLITICAL CENSORSHIP OF FILMS WAS REALLY NEEDED TODAY AND, IF ALLOWED, WOULD NOT IN THE FUTURE BE WHAT SAFEGUARD COULD THERE BE THAT IT
THEATRE AS WELL AS THE PRINTED EXTENDED TO COVER TELEVISION, THE MEDIA?
"IF ONE FREEDOM IS LOST TODAY, NO OTHER FREEDOM IS SAFE IN FUTURE," HE SAID.
THE
EDITOR OF THE SOUTH
A JAYAWICKRAMA,
LAW NOTED THAT SRI THE STAGE OF POLITICAL CENSORSHIP OF
MR LEE ALSO REFERRED TO A LETTER TO THE
BY DR. PUBLISHED TODAY CHINA MORNING POST LECTURER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG, IN WHICH HE LANKA HAD PROGRESSED BEYOND FILMS.
OUT THAT
DR. JAYAWICKRAMA
WAS
THE ACTING
TO
MR LEE POINTED ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SRI LANKA IN 1970; AND THE PERMANENT SECRETARY THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE IN SRI LANKA FROM 1970-1977.
"PLEASE LET US TAKE HEED AND LEARN LANKA," MR LEE SAID.
FROM THE EXAMPLE OF
SRI
OF INCOMPATIBILITY
THE
ON THE
GOOD RELATIONS CLAUSE WITH
THE ARTICLE 19 OF
POLITICAL INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND
SHOW THAT THE RIGHTS, MR LEE SAID: "IT IS FOR THE ADMINISTRATION TO
ΤΟ EXIST GOOD RELATIONS CLAUSE IS NECESSARY BEFORE IT CAN BE ALLOWED
THE SAID ARTICLE AS AN EXCEPTION TO THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION UNDER 19".
DOES NOT MEAN *USEFUL' Į IN THIS RESPECT ALL
"IN THIS CONTEXT, THE WORD 'NECESSARY' 'REASONABLE' OR 'DESIRABLE'. THE LEADING CASES
A PARTICULAR SHOW THAT NO MATTER HOW USEFUL, REASONABLE OR DESIRABLE
CONCERNED, IT WILL BE RESTRICTION IS IN THE VIEW OF THE GOVERNMENT
HAS CONSIDERED TO BE AN INFRINGEMENT OF THE SAID ARTICLE 19 UNLESS IT BEEN ESTABLISHED THAT THERE IS A PRESSING SOCIAL NEED' FOR IT.
+
"FURTHER, THE ................
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.