XN000022-1973-08-01 — Page 9

Daily Information Bulletin 新聞公報 All

8

Wednesday, August 1, 1973

The majority of the nine-man Committee are not convinced that

the advantages of compulsory disclosure are sufficiently great to justify

elaborate legislation imposing obligations which would be profoundly

distasteful to most law-abiding people and could easily be evaded.

They were influenced in their conclusion by the deep-seated aversion

of Chinese people to letting others know what property they own and by the

ease of evasion through nominee companies and the use of aliases.

As for disclosure of dealings, the majority view is that routine

general disclosure is not required in addition to the strong action

recommended against "insider dealings" coupled with the proposed special

power of the courts to order disclosure, where needed.

On the other hand, the minority are of the opinion that if Hong

Kong is to take its place with other major cities as a financial centre,

rules must be instituted along British lines in respect to the disclosure of

holdings of directors and major shareholders.

The minority believe that disclosure of relevant shareholdings

and share dealings would be one way of giving small investors the greater

protection they need.

!

They contend that in take-over situations, the law of the jungle"

should not prevail, and that disclosure is a necessity so that company

directors, shareholders and employees could be made aware of a situation

where it was reasonable to suppose that a person or company might be in

the process of buying control.

In addition,

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.