[ { "id": 220177, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-009 - Public Offices - 1844", "page_number": 317, "title": "CO129-009 - Public Offices - 1844", "content_text": "2609. \n\n551 Hongkong Metropolitan Police office \n\nAUCTIONS Whitchall Place, RECEIVED \n\nAPR 3 1844 \n\n1th April 1844 \n\nAnswered \n\nMay \n\nTreasury \n\nSez. \n\nThe Commissioners \n\nof \n\nPolice of \n\nThe Metropolis, with reference to \n\nthe \n\nwith \n\ncommunication they have had \n\nas to the selection for \n\nyou \n\nthe consideration of Lord Stanley of Officers of the Metropolitan_ Police whom the Commissioners could recommend for the appointment of Buheuntencent деви and Inspectors of Police of Hove Rorg, beg to submit the queries in the enclosed memerander?_ \n\nThe Hon ble \n\nThe \n\nColonel Wilbraham", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-009 - Public Offices - 1844.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 235647, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-048 - Public Offices - 1854", "page_number": 326, "title": "CO129-048 - Public Offices - 1854", "content_text": "AGE \n\nLaw \n\nFore \n\nLand \n\n77 \n\nA \n\n321 \n\n330 \n\n3578 Hong Kong 16. Addion Terrace \n\n12082 Witchell 23137 \n\nLov. \n\nKensington- \n\nPERIVED London. Apir! 26. \n\nAPRES \n\n1854 \n\nth \n\n1864 \n\nI beg leave to acknowledge \n\nThe receipt of your letter of the 22nd inst., and to return my dutiful thanks for the consideration extended to me at home-\n\nI should myself in readiness to Sail on the 4th proximo, and wait the usual papers-\n\nI have the honor to be, \n\nLir. \n\nNorman B. Bedingfeld \n\nYour most obedient Servant \n\nJ.77 Mitstre \n\nColonial Office.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-048 - Public Offices - 1854.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 243185, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-066 - Public Offices - 1857", "page_number": 110, "title": "CO129-066 - Public Offices - 1857", "content_text": "## Emigration Office of Committee of Council for Trade, Whitchull. 5 February 1857\n\nWhen the disinfecting matter was all used, the 'tween Decks were fumigated with boiling pitch daily, when possible to do it.\n\nThe coolies died from debility and affection of the liver and lungs, and exhaustion arising from the seeds of the disease.\n\nThe Chief Mate was treated for the same disease, previous to sailing from...\n\nmany of the coolies as could be allowed with safety were ordered on Deck daily.\n\nCaptain Seymour's conduct was attentive at all times; to the Chimere... satisfying them with works and attending to their cleanliness.\n\nThose of the Chinese who attempted to commit suicide and were picked up, generally made a second attempt. They were then carefully looked after.\n\n### RECEIVED FEB 6 1857\n\nReferring to my letter of the 2nd instant, on the subject of the mortality on board the Ship Duke of Portland,\n\nI am directed by the Lords of the Committee of Privy Council for Trade to enclose, for Mr. Labouchere's information, the following documents.\n\n* Copy of questions addressed to the Master of the \"Duke of Portland\", and copy of his replies;\n* Copy of a statement made by John Hagan, late chief Officer... to Herman Merivale Esq., Colonial Office", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-066 - Public Offices - 1857.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 243218, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-066 - Public Offices - 1857", "page_number": 143, "title": "CO129-066 - Public Offices - 1857", "content_text": "are endeavouring to learn from the master of the ship, who is now in London, how this discrepancy of the Law or evasion may have occurred. In the meanwhile I have to request that you will inquire whether any explanation of these circumstances can be furnished from the Emigration Office at Hong Kong.\n\nI have &c.\n\nImmediate\n\nNo\n\nLiv...\n\n222957/57\n\n142\n\nOffice of Committee of Privy Council for Trade, Marine Department, Whitchall, 13 Feb 1857\n\nI am directed by the Lords of the Committee of Privy Council for Trade to transmit the enclosed Copy of a Letter which My Lords have received from the Shipping Master at Greenock relating to the mortality on board the Chinese Emigrant Ship \"John Calvin\" and to request the Lord Advocate of Scotland to suggest...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-066 - Public Offices - 1857.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 255077, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-089 - Public Offices - 1862", "page_number": 231, "title": "CO129-089 - Public Offices - 1862", "content_text": "# Whitchall.\n\nRegistered No. 72,370. In any further correspondence on this subject, the above Number should be quoted.\n\n7028 Hongkong \n\n**RECEIVED** \n16 JUL 1862 \nGeneral Post Office, \n228 \n14 July 1862.. \n23 \n42 \nN /32 8462 \n182 \n108471 \n/... \n\nSir, \n\nOn the 9th October last, the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury referred to this Office your letter, dated the 5th October, relative to the Packet Agency at Shanghai, and on the 27th December a further letter from you, dated the same day, on the same subject was received from the Treasury.\n\nThe first letter covered a Despatch from the Governor of Hongkong, in which it was stated, that he was endeavouring to make a permanent arrangement for the performance of the Post office duties at Shanghai by the Master in charge of the Receiving ship stationed at that Port: \n\nFrederic Rogers \nBart: \n**Colonial Office**", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-089 - Public Offices - 1862.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 263445, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-108 - Public Offices - 1865", "page_number": 148, "title": "CO129-108 - Public Offices - 1865", "content_text": "## 03222\nEncl: Govt. Gaz. 31- \nJ. Stewart respectfully \n\n3290 Hong Kong \nWhitchall \nRE \n1865 \n3 \n34 May 1865 \n144 \n\nI am directed by Sir George Grey to transmit to you, for the perusal of being laid before Mi B Excellency, the enclosed copy of a Report which has been received from the Board of the Directors of the Colonial Prison expressing their opinion on the Amended Regulations submitted by the Governor of Hong Kong in reference to the remitting of Sentences", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-108 - Public Offices - 1865.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 263510, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-108 - Public Offices - 1865", "page_number": 213, "title": "CO129-108 - Public Offices - 1865", "content_text": "Certificates of their qualifications and a copy of a letter from \nthe Civil Service Commissioner showing \nthe result of their examination of these gentlemen.\n\nI will inform you by an early post of the date at which \nthe Cadets will embark for Hongkong.\n\nHongkong\nStarkey ExC. S. Comr - 6663\n17 Lower Mount Street.\n4. Lister Dublin.\n8 Whitchall Cresent Apperholme\nHelifax\nRussell\n\n!MINUTE\n17\nTIRAF JULY\nMason 2\nSinte\nW[Cartmel] 27\n\n# Prussell's califurate \nhas not \nWR \nLillithiasi mot & p \nthe à done U Suamended letter to m? Russell'anneseed\n\n1. \n209 \n1st 31 July, 1865\n\nI am directed by Mr Secretary Cardwell to inform \nyou that he has appointed you \nto a Cadetship in the Civil Service of Hongkong. \nThe particulars of your \nappointment are stated in \nthe accompanying printed paper. \nMr Cardwell requests that on \narriving in Hongkong you will \nproceed to the Colony without \ndelay and report yourself \nto the proper authorities.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-108 - Public Offices - 1865.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 264358, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-110 - Others - 1865", "page_number": 274, "title": "CO129-110 - Others - 1865", "content_text": "## \naccrue from the date of their departure.\n\nIn 4396765 Royal Laboratory, Christopher Boyd was employed in the Cap Factory, Royal Arsenal for a period of 2 1/2 years during which time he conducted himself with propriety. He is a good Turner and well acquainted with making punches & dies being often employed on that class of work.\n\n**(SZ) W. Whitchill** \nForeman \n\n**(19) Forer** \nManager \n21/1/65", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-110 - Others - 1865.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 267545, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-117 - Public Offices - 1866", "page_number": 52, "title": "CO129-117 - Public Offices - 1866", "content_text": "Sun 2 Rozen\n\nll 30 hore\n\n266\n\nhully\n\n1\n\nDu\n\n16\n\n1\n\nRespecting\n\n§. 113247/H. 50\n\nthe chartering of Steamers\n\nby the Chinese Govt\n\nI've\n\nof Piracy.\n\nof\n\nfor\n\nthe s\n\nsuppression\n\nH.M.S. \"Princess Charlotte\"\n\n34.0 October 1866.\n\nIn reply to your letter, No. 3106, 30th July 1866, addressed to\n\nthe Vice Admiral King\n\nC.B. but also on\n\nenvelope addressed to the Senior officer Hong Kong\n\nI have the honor to acquaint you, for the information\n\nof the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty, that I am not\n\naware\n\nof any vessel having been chartered for the suppression of Piracy by the Chinese Government these\n\nThe Secretary\n\nWhitchell, London\n\nof the Admiralty\n\nWatero.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-117 - Public Offices - 1866.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 268164, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-118 - Public Offices - 1866", "page_number": 144, "title": "CO129-118 - Public Offices - 1866", "content_text": "F&T 500 3-ris\n\nIn ong, quote the following luițial Letter and Number, (if any)-\n\n17\n\nM.\n\n1481\n\nLor\n\n3982. Hong chóng 11\n\nBoard of Trade,\n\nRECEIVED\n\nAPL24 Whitchall, 23 April, 1866\n\n'I am directed by the Board of Trade to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 5th instant, forwarding a Copy of a Despatch 2835 from the Officer Administering the Government of Hong Kong inclosing a Copy of a claim on this Office from the Members of the Marine Court of Inquiry at Hong Kong for remuneration for their Services in the case of the British Emigration Ship \"Pride of the Ganges\" -\n\nIn reply I am to acquaint you for the information of Secretary Cardwell that this Board have no funds at their disposal out of which to remunerate the Members of a Colonial Court of Inquiry, as the Mercantile Marine Fund is not applicable to the payment\n\nUnder Secretary of State\n\nColonial Office", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-118 - Public Offices - 1866.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 294675, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-168 - Sir Kennedy - 1874 [9-12]", "page_number": 642, "title": "CO129-168 - Sir Kennedy - 1874 [9-12]", "content_text": "Any further communication on this subject should be addressed to-\n\n**THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY, HARBOUR DEPARTMENT,**\n\n**BOARD OF TRADE,**\n\n**WHITEHALL GARDENS, S.W.**\n\nAnd the following letter and number should be quoted in the communication, and marked plainly on the outside of the envelope, viz. :—\n\n`H1048`\n`19`\n`Board of Trade,`\n`635`\n`(Harbour Department), 8.00 7`\n`Whitchull Bundens, S.W. 19 7 February (574)`\n\nI am durected by the Board of Trade to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 11th Instant, transmitting for their opinion the transcript of an Ordinance passed by the Legislature of Hong Kong, (No. 17 of 1873,\n\nentitled \"An Ordinance to establish Lighthouses, Buoys, or Beacons within the Colony\" together with a copy of the Report of the local Attorney-General thereupon, and in reply I am to request that you will state to the Earl of Kimberley that this Board see no reason why the Ordinance in question may not properly be allowed to remain in operation.\n\nBy \nThe Under Secretary \nof State \nColonial Office\n\nI have the honour to be\n\nSir,\n\nYour Obedient Servant,\n\nC. Cecil Nevoe", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-168 - Sir Kennedy - 1874 [9-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 320771, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-207 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1883 [1-3]", "page_number": 150, "title": "CO129-207 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1883 [1-3]", "content_text": "night, in the early morning or at any time.\n\nThe first Auditor of the Accounts of the Bank in question was the Honorable W.H. Kuni, Auditor General in this Colony. The need for the post arose from the understanding that a responsible Government Office should assist in auditing the Accounts.\n\nI have tr.\n\n(Signed) Minister.\n\nPostmaster General years when he visited England. The post was succeeded by\n\n\"* Shitchell, Postmaster General and Collector of Stamp Revenue, who also held the pension post till he retired on\n\nThe Hongkong and Shanghai Bank being our largest local Banking institution, and being also practically the Government Treasury, it would not be undesirable that\n\nPage 150\n\nPage 151", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-207 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1883 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 320857, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-207 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1883 [1-3]", "page_number": 236, "title": "CO129-207 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1883 [1-3]", "content_text": "235\n\nexchange) would have been so little above what we paid in England, we would never have been induced to leave it, and serve for a term of years in a Tropical and wearing climate like Hong Kong.\n\nIf the Government view their engagement with us so as to reduce our salary below what we expected, we pray that our agreement be canceled and that we be sent back to England.\n\nSigned\n\n4 George Gane\n\n12 Job Witchell\n\n18 John Sendins\n\n20 Henry Baster\n\n91 Dan Hall\n\n92 Chas Hadden\n\n93 John Hannah\n\n94 John Kennie\n\n95 John Roy\n\n37 George Carnerow\n\n97 Francis Miners\n\n98 James Murray\n\n47 To: Foord\n\n56 John Collett\n\n68 Jr Bickiwow\n\n60 Herbert S. Gidley\n\n63 Chas. Paull\n\n114 Richard Simmmo\n\n66 George London\n\n77 Joseph M. Garry\n\n88 Henry Wood\n\n99 James Enanson\n\n100 George Crooxe", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-207 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1883 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 320859, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-207 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1883 [1-3]", "page_number": 238, "title": "CO129-207 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1883 [1-3]", "content_text": "COLONY OF HONGKONG.\n\nSTATEMENT OF FAMILY REMITTANCES OR LIFE INSURANCE MONEYS FOR THE YEAR 1883.\n\nReturn is to be checked by the Audit Office.\n\n \n NAME.\n WHEN ENTERED THE SERVICE\n SALARY PER ANNUM.\n AMOUNT PROPOSED TO BE REMITTED PER ANNUM.\n NAME AND DESIGNATION OF THE PERSON TO WHOM THE REMITTANCE IS PAYABLE.\n OBJECTIONS OF REMITTANCE.\n FIXED PERIODS AT WHICH THE PAYMENT IS TO BE MADE.\n \n \n H. George Helps\n \n £237\n £50\n George Gave\n \n \n \n \n George Gave\n 4...\n 514\n 30\n \n \n \n \n \n Tammal Job Witchell\n 12...\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n John Parley Jenkins\n 18...\n 430\n 50\n \n \n \n \n \n Henry George Baker\n 20 July 1882\n 480\n 30\n \n \n \n \n \n George Cameron\n 20th July 1882\n 480\n 50\n William Luni Ford\n \n \n \n \n William Dickenson\n 22nd Feb 1882\n 400\n 30\n To John Collell\n \n \n \n \n Charles Parell\n 38...\n 480\n 50\n \n \n \n \n \n John Gidley\n 63...\n 480\n 30\n by Richard Simmons\n \n \n \n \n George London\n 66...\n 480\n 50\n \n \n \n \n \n Joseph Mr. Garry\n 17...\n 480\n 50\n \n \n \n \n \n Henry James Wood\n 48...\n 400\n ...\n Don Hall\n \n \n \n \n Charles Headden\n 92...\n 460\n 50\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 400\n 50\n \n \n \n \n\nEnclosure No1 in despatch No.31 of 16th February, 1883, from the Officer Administering the Government of Hongkong.\n\nPage 208-\n\nRECP\n\nREGI 27 MAR EU\n\ncts.\n\n£. s. d.\n\n...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-207 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1883 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 347462, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-252 - Acting Governor Barker & Governor Sir Robinson & Public Offices - 1891 [12]", "page_number": 478, "title": "CO129-252 - Acting Governor Barker & Governor Sir Robinson & Public Offices - 1891 [12]", "content_text": "## \n\nOn the 26th instant, I requested leave of absence on the 21st March next.\n\nI have the honour to be, Sir,\nYour Obedient Servant\nMaby C...\n\n## \n\nJevt.\nDevo Killa Avenue Krall Leamingto\n16th Feby. 1891\n\n**RECEIVED**\n17 FEB 91\n**AGENTS FOR THE COLONIES**\n\nIn consequence of family matters which require my attention at home, I find that I cannot return to Hong Kong.\n\nI therefore beg to tender my resignation to the Government, as you will see by the enclosed. I am still entitled to some months' half-pay, which I trust you will be able to allow.\n\nI remain,\nYours obediently,\nJames Tramp\n\nTo The Crown Agents,\nWhitchall, London.\n\none enclosure", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-252 - Acting Governor Barker & Governor Sir Robinson & Public Offices - 1891 [12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 348776, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-254 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1892 [1-4]", "page_number": 509, "title": "CO129-254 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1892 [1-4]", "content_text": "## Present Scheme \nPay Allowance Potat \n\n## Proposed Scheme. \n### Present Scheme vs Proposed Scheme. Pay Allowance Total.\n\n| Department | Present Scheme | Proposed Scheme |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Post Office | 100 | 72-96 |\n| Telek Observation | 40-50 | 20-50, 20?-48 |\n| | 96 | 966 |\n| Diagnostician | glo. Yo | MAPEL 96, 96% |\n| Far: Off | | 96%, Ro 116, Pub go 80, jo baob 80 |\n| | at $8 increase per month, would take 8 years. much premium | |\n| | dif___do___ Pub. Mr. dehi dio bra del do do 20 do rberating so 20 | |\n| | (nemy 40-65 | 40.65, Ń0-63, 10.65 |\n| Medical | 30-do | $0.40, duk blenki |\n| Police | 12 | 72, 42, 41872, 30-40, 20.00 |\n| Fan: Off Yz | | and racist. Observated Yo it black Freas my yo Yo b. & O 660, 60, 60, во |\n| | Sandy Sup to bo, Sort off bo, bo, Ao Magatracis 62 | 4hr de 50 & Delf 30, Md Samproop 50, 50 |\n| | At $8 increase per month, wonto lako 1 year | Dead Counties dro lo. &. O do. 40 dic Maputians $6. damitac 1 |\n| | How H 93, hrd de 30, 30, A | Pub: # A 30, 30, Post off 20, 80, Pompy & l. 1.0.30 Post off 20, 80 |\n| | Aft gincrease for mouch prann: would take about 3 yers. | |\n\namitchell-Innes. Treasurer \n24th Feb 71892.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-254 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1892 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 351738, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-258 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1893 [1-4]", "page_number": 653, "title": "CO129-258 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1893 [1-4]", "content_text": "647\n\nof the Government\n\nThat\n\nof these letters is as Your Lordship\n\nwill observe\n\n7\n\n77 X\n\nAvritter\n\nby the\n\nbub\n\nI shall deal more\n\nfully with these points later on.\n\nIn reply to the first\n\nof these letters\n\nit is\n\nthe duty of the Treasurer\n\nto check\n\n2\n\naccounts of receipts and\n\nexpenditure then the Treasurer\n\nappears to have grossly failed in his duty. If\n\non the other hand,\n\nas there appears\n\nreason to believe\n\nis\n\nin regard to\n\nthe checking of expenditure,\n\nthis\n\nMr Avitchell-Fr\n\ndoes not appear to\n\nbe open to\n\nthe roll for 1890 balanced, His\n\nAuditor, draw his attention once\n\nto the fact of the accounts\n\nbeing balanced. Mr. Nicolle in his evidence before the Commission\n\nstated that he\n\nhad\n\nsubsequently been questioned on\n\nthis by the Colonial Secretary\n\nand he is very positive that\n\n(**\n\n...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-258 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1893 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 354141, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-262 - Governor Sir Robinson Acting Governor O-Brien - 1894 [1-4]", "page_number": 531, "title": "CO129-262 - Governor Sir Robinson Acting Governor O-Brien - 1894 [1-4]", "content_text": "DRAFT.\n\nHory Roy\n\nNo 64\n\nSir W. Robinson\n\nMINUTE, 4 May Mr. Wilson 5 May\n\n11.\n\nMr. Lucas 5\n\nMr. Fairfield. 5\n\nMr. Wingfield.\n\nMr. Bramston.\n\nSir Meade.\n\nMr. Buxton.\n\nMarquess of Ripon.\n\n...\n\nMitchell 1862: 3 ...\n\nMay\n\nNo° 4: 19 UKL.\n\n(Extract)\n\nGov\n\n526\n\nAkong\n\n7342394\n\nSan\n\nMy\n\nMay 1894\n\n...\n\nI have the honour\n\nto acknowledge the receipt\n\nof\n\nMr O'Brien's despatch\n\nNo 66\n\nof the ... March last on\n\nthe\n\nsubject of the proposed amalgamation\n\nof the ... and Straits\n\nSettlements civil\n\nServices.\n\nIt appears that the original text has many OCR errors and is not coherent. I have made the following corrections:\n1. Corrected spelling errors (e.g., \"ack\" to \"acknowledge\", \"desp\" to \"despatch\", \"tion\" to appropriate words).\n2. Removed or corrected nonsensical words (e.g., \"Hory Roy\", \"sm\", \"Shitchell\", \"Afy\", \"y man\", \"نا\").\n3. Added `...` to indicate missing words due to OCR damage.\n4. Formatted the text into paragraphs using HTML ``.\n5. Preserved the original content as much as possible, without rephrasing or rewriting.\n\nPlease let me know if further corrections are needed.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-262 - Governor Sir Robinson Acting Governor O-Brien - 1894 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 359179, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-269 - Governor Sir Robinson & Public Offices - 1895 [12]", "page_number": 585, "title": "CO129-269 - Governor Sir Robinson & Public Offices - 1895 [12]", "content_text": "580 \n\nAny further communication on this subject should be addressed to----\n\nThe Under Secretary of State, \nWar Office, \nPall Mall, \nLondon, S.W.\n\nand the following number quoted.\n\n`A.C.D. Gen: No. 6164-Sin 12772 RECR (Rec 23 JUL 99)`\n\nWar Office, \nPall Mall, S.W. \n22nd July 1899.\n\nI am directed by the Secretary of State for War to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 16th inst., No. 13/2 transmitting a copy of an Ordinance passed by this Legislature of Hong Kong to regulate and restrict the wearing of Naval and Military uniforms, together with a copy of a report thereon by the Acting Attorney General of the Colony, to inform you that the Marquis of Lansdowne has no objections to offer to the Ordinance remaining in operation.\n\nI am, \nSin,\nYour obedient Servant,\nG. Lawson\n\nThe Under Secretary of State, \nColonial Office, \nWhitchell L.W. Griz...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-269 - Governor Sir Robinson & Public Offices - 1895 [12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 359684, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-270 - Public Offices & Others - 1895", "page_number": 455, "title": "CO129-270 - Public Offices & Others - 1895", "content_text": "## Office or Individual.\n\nWhitchell-Innes, Ny.\n\n## Date.\n\n1895 25 Sept\n\n## Last previous Paper.\n\n4782\n\n## No.\n\n**trong trong**\n\n(Subject.)\n\n**Revenue Stamps.**\n\n| Reports | papers | DOMESTIC, | C. O. | 16970 |\n|---------|--------|-----------|------|-------|\n| 450 | | | | (8 27 SEP 35) |\n\n## (Minutes.)\n\nand submits comes & Have make\n\nMr. Blake Jin any warka) observations to Especially Pug5/10 passage in par. 10? Max Exchang 273514hor Put B. By лоз copy `WC & L (78)—40053-0800-7-05`\n\n## Next subsequent Paper.\n\n3 3675~ 1900\n\nIt is a pity that when in for 4782 amind to. Mitchell France was not Hand in communication with as a good deal of unnecessary Womop has passed between us owing to me not understanding", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-270 - Public Offices & Others - 1895.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 359709, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-270 - Public Offices & Others - 1895", "page_number": 480, "title": "CO129-270 - Public Offices & Others - 1895", "content_text": "## DOMESTIC.\n\nOffice or Individual. | No. | Date.\n---------|---------|---------\nWitchell-Junes Ulf. | No 17867 | 9 Oct. 1895\n\n**C. O. 17867**\n1-OCT 95\n\n**(Subject.)**\nRequests 6 months' leave.\n\nLast previous Paper. | Next subsequent Paper.\n---------|---------\nM 11256 | M 19105\n\n**(Minutes.)**\nW.W.Luc | \nWaply that Harcourt's request exhaust 2 months? Reply that it would exhaust all but one of the beneficial six months which can be granted. | \nLethbridge | \ntold M. the other day that Extensions could not be granted in order to give time to get a transfer when no transfer was in immediate prospect.\n\nthe Governor of Hongkong for consideration\n\nLin\n\n476\n\nNo. | \n---------| \nong trong | \n\n...(illegible text)...\n\nPage 480\nPage 481", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-270 - Public Offices & Others - 1895.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 360708, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-272 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1896 [5-9]", "page_number": 199, "title": "CO129-272 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1896 [5-9]", "content_text": "IN THE POLICE COURT AT VICTORIA IN THE COLONY OF HONGKONG.\n\nCase No. \n\nof 189\n\nWRIT NO. \n\nREMAND NO.\n\nIN THE MATTER OF MAGISTRATES ORDINANCE.\n\nAT VICTORIA IN THE COLONY OF HONGKONG.\n\nDate \n\n189\n\nREGINA \n\nV.\n\nCASE NO. \n\nOF 189\n\nWRIT NO. \n\nDATE \n\n189\n\nSummons to the defendant upon any information or complaint.-(Secs. 10, 62.)\n\nIn the Cause in which The QUEEN by J. Witchell, \n\nand \n\nof \n\nHely, Suspecter of Police is Complainant; Max Abraham, Engineer Defendant.\n\nH. D. G. \n\nG.M. Ship Freve\n\nTo the said Max Abraham.\n\nHONGKONG) TO WIT.\n\nOrdinance No. 12 of 1856, Sec. 6 5.5.3.\n\nAnd every such summons shall be served by a constable or police officer upon the person to whom it is directed by delivering the same to the party personally or by leaving the same with some person for him at his last or most usual place of abode; and the constable or police officer who shall serve the same shall attend and make oath before the Magistrate if the said summons be not complied with.\n\nWhereas Complaint having this day been made before the undersigned, a MAGISTRATE of the said Colony, for that you on the day of December A.D. 1896, at British Kowloon in this Colony unlawfully did trespass on land being under the control Military Authorities viz. the Hung Hom Battery.\n\nThese are therefore to command you, in Her Majesty's name, to be and appear on Tuesday the 10th day of December 189, at ten o'clock in the forenoon, at the Police Court before such one of the MAGISTRATES as may then be there, to answer to the said Complaint, and to be further dealt with according to Law.\n\nGiven under my hand and seal this 6th day of December, in the year of Our Lord 1895, at Victoria, in the Colony aforesaid,\n\nsigned: I. Sercombe Smith, \n\nAg. Police Magistrate.\n\nI, J. Witchell, Constable of the said Colony, do hereby certify, that I served the above mentioned summons with a duplicate thereof, on the said Max Abraham.\n\n日 午爾方於為 \n\nday of \n\n1895. \n\nsigned: J. Witchell \n\nConstable.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-272 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1896 [5-9].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 360709, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-272 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1896 [5-9]", "page_number": 200, "title": "CO129-272 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1896 [5-9]", "content_text": "En the Police Court at Victoria in the Colony of Hongkong.\n\nHONGKONG\n\nMinutes of Proceedings.\n\nTO WIT.\n\nTuesday\n\nthe\n\n10th day of December, 189\n\nComplainant : J. Witchell, Acting Inspector of Police\n\nDefendant:\n\nMax Abraham\n\nCharge: Et ca the other vide\n\nqondaut absent.\n\n香港巡理府\n\n訊港\n\n傳説事案照原告\n\n被告\n\nde pp\n\n交役\n\n役將此票\n\n星票\n\n之杪\n\n入白\n\n於本\n\n不\n\n交收\n\n日在\n\n控稱被告\n\n屬違例爲此票傳\n\n月\n\n辦特祟\n\n該人或將\n\n日傳\n\n知地\n\n189\n\nCase No.\n\nIN THE\n\nPOLICE COURT\n\nAT VICTORIA IN THE COLONY\n\nDate\n\nOF\n\nHONGKONG.\n\nRegina\n\n(C. 1.) MAGISTRATES ORDINANCE.\n\nWRIT No. 52.4\n\nREMAND No.\n\nCASE No.\n\nOF 189\n\nWANT No.\n\nDATE\n\n189\n\nIN THE POLICE COURT AT VICTORIA IN THE COLONY OF HONGKONG. Summons to the defendant upon any information or complaint.-(Secs. 10, 02.)\n\nIn the Cause in which The QUEEN by\n\nWitchell\n\nActing Inspector of Police }\n\nand\n\nis Complainant;\n\nWilliam Frölich, Engineer) Defendant.\n\nH.I.G.M. Ship \"Great\"\n\nI\n\nTo the said William Frolich.\n\nHONGKONG\n\nTO WIT.\n\nOrdinance\n\nNo. 12 of 185/!\n\nWhereas Complaint having this day been made before the undersigned, a MAGISTRATE of the said Colony, for that you on the\n\nday of December A.D. 1895, at British Kowloon in this Colony unlawfully did Trespass\n\nland under the control of the the Hung\n\nupon\n\nNo. 12 of 1856 Military\n\n1.\n\nSec. 3\n\nAnd every such summons\n\nshall be served by a constable\n\nor other peace officer\n\nupon the party to whom it\n\nis directed by delivering\n\nthe same to the party\n\npersonally or by leaving it\n\nat his last or usual place\n\nof abode.\n\nThese are therefore to command you, in Her Majesty's name, to be and appear on the 10th day of December\n\n1895, at ten o'clock in the forenoon, at the Police Court before such one of the MAGISTRATES as may\n\nthen be there, to answer to the said Complaint, and to be further dealt with according\n\nto Law.\n\nWitchell\n\nGiven under my hand and seal this\n\nday of\n\nin the\n\nyear of Our Lord\n\n1895, at Victoria, in the Colony aforesaid.\n\nI, Sercombe Smith,\n\nA Police Magistrate,\n\nof the said Colony, do hereby certify, that I served\n\nthe summons mentioned in the above summons with a duplicate thereof, on the December 1895.\n\nI, J. Witchell\n\nConstable, do hereby certify that I served the summons mentioned in the above summons with a duplicate thereof, on the 9th December 1895.\n\nJ. Witchell swore :-\n\nI am Acting Inspector of Police.\n\nI served a copy of summons at 5.15 p.m. on board H.I.G.M. Ship \"Great\". I handed it to Capt. Lieut. Klimsi\n\nwho said he would give it to defendant on his return to ship.\n\nWarrant to issue.\n\nI, J. Sercombe Smith", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-272 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1896 [5-9].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 360710, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-272 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1896 [5-9]", "page_number": 201, "title": "CO129-272 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1896 [5-9]", "content_text": "the day of............. \n\n1st of December 18 \n\n189 \n\nEnclosure \n\nLot[ter?] \n\nIn the Police Court at Victoria in the Colony of Hongkong. \n\nHONGKONG Minutes of Proceedings. \n\nTO WIT. \n\nTuesday \n\nComplainant: J Witchell \n\nJ. Hely Zuspx of \n\nDefendant: \n\nWilliam Frölich \n\nCharge: As on the other side \n\nsir. \n\n197 \n\n14755 \n\nRece[ived] 13 | 12 | 96/ \n\nHong Kong 13th. December 1895. \n\nDefendant absent. \n\nJob Witchell sworn :- \n\nI am Inspector of Police. \n\nI served a Summons by leaving it on board H.M.S. \"Freya\". I handed it to Capt. [illegible] himself who said he would give it to defendant on his return to ship. \n\nWarrant to issue. \n\nOn the 9th. instant two Engineers of H.M.S.\"Irene\" were summoned to appear on the 10th. instant at the Police Court before the Magistrate to answer to the charge of having trespassed upon land under the control of the Military Authorities. These summonses were served upon the said Engineers by a constable delivering the same to them personally on board the said ship without the permission of her commander. \n\nAdmiral Hoffmann, commanding H.I.G.M.Squadron, requests me to inform the Magistrate through your kind intermediation of the reason why he is prevented from allowing the said Engineers to obey these summonses viz:- the German law which prohibits the German Authorities from delivering German subjects for trial and punishment to a foreign Government. \n\nAt the same time the Admiral, as possessor of the right of judicature over the officers and the crew of the German man-of-war in East Asia, declares himself quite willing to try the present cases against the two Engineers in question, and any future cases brought against Germans belonging to the German man-of-war. If he, the Admiral, or in his absence the chief commander of H.I.G.M.Ships in harbour be requested by the Magistrate to do so.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-272 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1896 [5-9].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363166, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 3, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "Date: 6 July, 13 Aug\n\n147, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 158, 159, 160, 162, 163, 164, 166, 167, 174, 175, 176\n\nSubject\n\nAsst Registrar General, Cadet Gomperty.\n\nPolice\n\nComplaint of J. Plummer. Combination of Police & Prisons\n\nDep. Supt. of Police & Capt Supt. of Fire Brigade.\n\nAcqr N\" Austin Hotel: Acg\" for Military Barracks.\n\n5. Barff: Pension while in Japan\n\nJubilee Medals.\n\n\"Golf And Title \"Royal\".\n\nFlue Book & Report 1894.\n\nInspectors of Nuisances.\n\nDep: Supt. of Police & Asst. Supt. of Fire Brigade.\n\nComms W. Hastings: apply for more Trade Marks.\n\nSubsidiary comms.\n\n1 of salary.\n\nR. Chapman, Steward of Govt Civil Hospital.\n\nNote re Security, Chartered Bank.\n\nLeave of J. J. Badeley.\n\nKowloon Waterworks\n\nNote re Security, Chartered Bank.\n\nCorruption among Police & Subordinate Civil Service.\n\nCharges against C. Osmund.\n\nCharges against I. Hove.\n\nCharges against J. Witchell.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363477, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 314, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "box full of cash \n\nAUD \n\njewellery \n\n9 4 \n\nI a paper (in Chim) with a list of the persons in the pay \n\nIn order to obtain further chance against the Police, Sam yiu informed that he might ... of the Establishment. \n\nSum Gira ... the working ... gain consideration by giving full disclosure. Wh... of the truth & acting as witness if wanted. Gave a statement & \n\nAll partners of the Home X were arrested with certain others & was charged with keeping Common ... as gambling house before the magistrate next day. Luka reta tended. \n\nTse Leung, the I am a Watchman at the Gambling house (& I gather not clear on the point one of the Frances's original informants) identified the Jewellery. X The other ... Á CELAAR maw wo ... of Juven ... but were undraug \n\nHe accordingly made explanation of the meaning of the document discovered in the gambling house. This showed that a sum of about $150 a day had been faith... bribea. And he... money apparently been to the Police: the Chinese Police hach wholerate and the English Ja esmas that appear, or rather I should say the English. \n\nin att... [Sue his statiment luc F] officers alleged to be designated (for they are referred to and recognind the list seized by tur tay of the presents made Inspector Stanton by ... as his oth a lit to policemen'. He incrimination \n\nTse Lering subsequently brought two other Ch'au fot-chi a meu Me Croupier, & the other Chan K'in also a Croupier who o a che various polite ... These man were statements incriminating [Eucls F(1) G. H.] the principal witnesses in the trine of Sum yiu who was coureted & sentenced to nine month's hard labour. and Sum yiu pleaded guilty in the middle of his trial. fined $1000. \n\nto by numbers & nicknames) are Chief Inspector Corcoran, Inspectors Stanton, Quincey, Hennery, mann, Baker Witchell, Hall, a ... minor officers Froud, Phelps, Holl, Me Iver, Macaulay & Graham. Mr Osmund of the Registrar General's office & Sanitary Inspector Hore appear also to have been in the receipt of bribes. \n\n(x)-70800-3000-3-97", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363478, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 315, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "San Jin then the Java names of certain persons who had acted intermediaries to carry briberies a number of persons were arrested. The statements of several of these men who did not admit their guilt are given in lucks O, P, & Q, evidence given in every case is of the most flimsy description, from the nature the character of the witnesses is clearly not reliable, while documentary evidence, which is intelligible only when explained by the writer, is more or less corroboratory of the state, not satisfactory.\n\nI have not the slightest hesitation made Lay mente. Four of those arrested however viz Preuz it to Interpreter to Inspector Hore, Wan Sing Hand District watchman, to the guilt of the three MAQL who have hitherto been tried, but I am Cheng On ex Police Man, Tong Kame au Ex Policeman made statements between 12th of 19th July with the result that Inspector Witchell was prosecuted for bribery 6 months imprisonment & dismissed the force.\n\nIt was considered that sufficient evidence was adduced to bring Mr Hore before the Executive Council. The evidence of these and punishments awarded in each three cases are forwarded in separate Sec 20085, 20054 Despatcher, I write with them separately. Generally speaking however I must say that I am very surprised that witchure the criminal charge.\n\nThe government has interdicted from duty Inspectors Stanton, Zurücey, kaher & sergeant Holl & every effort is being made to procure sufficient evidence to bring them to justice. There appears to me to be very strong evidence against Stanton & I hope it may be found possible to court him dother.\n\nWith regard to the future, I think it is necessary to take rigorous measures to deal effectually with these illegal gambling houses.\n\nPage 314\n\n2-79509-3000-3-07 KAA", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363489, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 326, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "list, to the number of 22, were banished from the Colony, and a criminal prosecution was instituted against Inspector Witchell, the only Police officer against whom sufficient evidence to warrant a criminal prosecution has so been obtained. I am forwarding in a separate despatch a full account of the proceedings in Witchell's case. The Captain Superintendent of Police is still endeavouring to procure evidence with a view to prosecute the other Police officers who have been interdicted. Up to the present time, however, it has not been found possible to obtain such evidence as would justify criminal proceedings being instituted against them. If such evidence can be procured they will be prosecuted.\n\nPage 325", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363490, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 327, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "18\n\n19\n\nwith as little delay as possible. Dn. any Case I trust it will be within my power to dismiss them from the Police Force, as there can be no doubt the existence of gambling was due to their connivance with the Keeper of the Gambling house and that if they had performed their duty, no opportunity of corruption would have arisen. In the meantime, steps have been taken to fill the vacancies in the Chinese Detective staff and that caused by the imprisonment for six months of Inspector Witchell, who has been dismissed from the Police Force. The Captain Superintendent of Police has been called upon to furnish a report as to what proposals he has to make in order to prevent in future, so far as possible, the revival of that\n\n326", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363491, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 328, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "that corruption which has been shown to exist among the Police in connection with gambling, and when I receive it I will forward it for your consideration.\n\nThe conviction of Witchell and the other measures which have been or are being taken to punish those who have been shown to have been implicated in receiving bribes will, it is to be hoped, serve to deter the Police and other members of the service of the public from yielding to the temptations offered by the owners of gambling houses. As is well known, the difficulty of obtaining any proof of corruption is at times very great, but especially in a place situated like Hongkong, from which Chinese can so easily return to their own country,\n\nPage 227\n\n21\n\n20\n\n12\n\n \nhas been reordered to \n20\n\n...\n\nbecomes \n20\n\nthat corruption which has been shown to exist among the Police in connection with gambling, and when I receive it I will forward it for your consideration.\n\n12.\n\n \nre-ordered and re-constructed to \n12. The conviction of Witchell and the other measures which have been or are being taken to punish those who have been shown to have been implicated in receiving bribes will, it is to be hoped, serve to deter the Police and other members of the service of the public from yielding to the temptations offered by the owners of gambling houses. As is well known, the difficulty of obtaining any proof of corruption is at times very great, but especially in a place situated like Hongkong, from which Chinese can so easily return to their own country,\n\n21\n\nPage 227\n\nThe final output in HTML is \n20\n\nthat corruption which has been shown to exist among the Police in connection with gambling, and when I receive it I will forward it for your consideration.\n\n12. The conviction of Witchell and the other measures which have been or are being taken to punish those who have been shown to have been implicated in receiving bribes will, it is to be hoped, serve to deter the Police and other members of the service of the public from yielding to the temptations offered by the owners of gambling houses. As is well known, the difficulty of obtaining any proof of corruption is at times very great, but especially in a place situated like Hongkong, from which Chinese can so easily return to their own country,\n\n21\n\n227", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363496, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 333, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "332\n\nin connection with Chinese gaming houses in this Colony,\n\nthe difficulty of obtaining such evidence is extraordinary.\n\n5. In Witchell's case this difficulty was\n\nsuccessfully, but with great difficulty, overcome and he was\n\nin my opinion, most properly convicted after a long trial\n\noccupying four days.\n\n6. As regards the Chinese detectives who were\n\nbanished under section 19 of Ordinance No.7 of 1891 and sec-\n\ntion 3 of Ordinance 8 of 1882, although it would have been very\n\ndifficult, if possible, to have obtained the evidence re-\n\nquired by a Criminal Court, I understand that, in no instance\n\ndid they protest that any injustice was done to them and\n\nthe moral evidence was ample.\n\n7. The cases of Mr. Osmund and Sanitary Inspector Hore could not, probably, be brought within the scope\n\nof the Criminal Law, and these cases were dealt with by the\n\nExecutive Council. They were not officers whose business\n\n\"related to the administration of public justice\", but they\n\nwere charged with misconduct as public officers.\n\n8. Sanitary Inspector Hore was charged with\n\ncorruptly receiving bribes from gambling house keepers paid\n\nto a Portuguese woman with whom he had been living for 5\n\nyears. He was appointed in January 1895 and the\n\nwoman acknowledged having received, for some time, $1 a day,\n\nincreased during the last year to $2 a day. She had, during\n\nthe last 12 months received, therefore, a sum as large as", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363517, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 354, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "353\n\nAccordingly before we broke up, I had asked for the principal person who had acted as his Agents in bribing the most important Officers.\n\nI am giving below the 10 names and in every case the name of the Agent who actually paid the bribe given in List I corresponds with that in the list.\n\nThe next morning therefore I asked for punishment orders to be issued under Section 19 of Ord 7 of 1891 against the following 10 persons.\n\n1. P.S. 190 Jane Ching (vide p.10 244 of Sam Juris statement) bribed P.S. 431 Toll, A23. Matour, & Suck Quinary\n\n2. Cafe (idem) bribed Tang Chung\n\n3. Ising Ul. Po. (vide p. 5 of statement) bribed Suck Hook: Dres of\n\n4. Wan Sing. (vide p. 6 of Statement) bribed M. Edmund.\n\n5. Ackfurt (p. 7.) Bribed Surgh Int. Ayan Cheung Tie Yin- (Chung to.).\n\n6. Jangkam (p. 12 &13) concerned in bribing Insp Mitchell, bribed several Chinese Police.\n\n7. Chi Tsai kam (p. 16:20 under \"paid to Kam\") bribed various Chinese Police, Sergeant Foord.\n\n8. Jungtis (p. 17) concerned in bribing Acting Supt Hall.\n\n9. Yung Fat (p. 22.) Bribed the Act. S.P. Inspector Stanton, Bacher, & Shennessy.\n\n10. Ching On (l.h. 30. 17+23) bribed Jun p Witchell.\n\nThere were four other Agents whose names came out afterwards in the course of Sam Juris examination.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363524, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 361, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "Mr Corcoran's leave, which had been granted from the 20th, should be cancelled pending further enquiries. Mr Corcoran is uncomplicated by the statement (pp. 20, 21) made by Sam Yin.\n\nInspectors Stanton & Danicey and Sergeant Shaw were on the Detective Staff. Inspector Baxter had special charge of a section of the town in which the gambling house is situated, for the purpose of suppressing unlawful gambling there.\n\nIf the 4 last mentioned Officers are guilty of nothing more than gross neglect, for a gambling house conducted on the scale that the one in Wa Lane was, on the showing of Sam Yin and his employees, could not have failed to have been discovered by them if they had been doing their duty.\n\nI am awaiting the result of the trial of Witchell before proceeding any further against these Officers, and I am still not without hopes that a conviction on the Criminal charge may be obtained against them.\n\nIn the meantime, Mr Denny and myself were continuing the Examination...\n\nPage 360\n\n \nhas been kept as is, assuming it was part of the original scan delineating page metadata. However, the text has been reformatted into proper paragraphs and corrected for spelling and spacing errors. The partially visible last line \"д\" has been left as is, assuming it is part of the original scan, though it appears to be a fragment or an error.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363545, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 380, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "## Enclosures\n\n379\n\n4 officers who (except the 4 officers who have been expended also dealt with departmentally for night duty) have been dealt with further against them lately for the fact of receiving bribes.\n\nI am still in hopes of getting the evidence against them. I have the honour to be, Sir, your obedient servant.\n\nA. Copy of letter from J. J. Francis Esqre.\nB. Return of gambling Warrants executed in Wa Lane and Chening Thing St. from February 1893 to June 1897.\nC. Report from Drop Bather regarding gambling in Wa Lane October 1894.\nD. Report from Insp Bather regarding gambling in Wa Lane January 1897.\n\nE. Inspector Stanton's report of the 27 June 1899.\nF. Ise Lung's statement of 29 June 1897.\nG. Chan Fah Chi's statement.\nH. Statement of Ise Lung of 30 June 1897.\nI. Statement by Chan Kin of 30 June 1897.\nJ. Statement of 1st July 1897.\n\nK. Sam Yin's Statement.\nL. List TIL\nM. List E\nN. List H.\nO. Caper Statement made by Tang Chung.\nP. Chung Yungo (Yun Kis) statement.\nQ. Auto statement.\nR. Yang Fat's statement.\nS. Newspaper report of prosecution of Witchell in The Police Court.\nT. Jam Yu's statement re detectives.\nU. Tee Lering's statement.\nV. Au Hinge's statement.\n\nW. List of Government servants in receipt of bribes.\nX. Abstract of the accounts of the gambling house.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363608, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 442, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "Daily Press 19th July 1894.\n\nTHE POLICE SCANDAL.\n\nINSPECTOR WITCHELL BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE.\n\nAt the Police Court on Saturday, before Hon. H. E. Wodehouse, C.M.G., Jub Witchell, Inspector in the Hongkong Police Force, was placed in the dock by Inspector Duncan on charges arising out of the police scandal.\n\nMr. J. J. Francis, Q.C., appeared to prosecute on behalf of the Attorney-General, being instructed by Mr. H. L. Dennys (Crown Solicitor). The defendant was not represented by counsel.\n\nThe proceedings were opened in the following manner.\n\nHis Worship-Mr. Francis, have you any case?\n\nMr. Francis-Yes, sir. It is a charge, I am sorry to say, against Inspector Witchell for neglecting his duty as a police constable and accepting bribes.\n\nHis Worship-Do you appear to prosecute?\n\nMr. Francis-I appear here for the Attorney-General and am instructed by the Crown Solicitor.\n\nHis Worship-Do you wish me to hear the charge at once?\n\nMr. Francis-I shall be very glad if you can hear it at once.\n\nHis Worship (to the Captain Superintendent of Police, who was sitting at the table next to Mr. Francis)-Mr. May, I see you here. Are you watching the case?\n\nMr. May-I am watching the case.\n\nHis Worship-Will you take a seat up here?\n\nMr. Francis-I think it will be better for the present if he does not.\n\nHis Worship-Very well, then,\n\nMr. Francis, in opening the case, said--The charges in this case are laid against Mr. Witchell. They are:----\n\n(1) That he, being an Inspector of Police in and for the colony of Hongkong, did, at Victoria, in the said colony, on the 7th March, 1894, and on divers dates thereafter, unlawfully and in breach of his duty as such Inspector as aforesaid, neglect to report to the Captain Superintendent of Police the existence of unlawful gambling houses in Wa Lane, and Cheung Hing Lane, Victoria, aforesaid.\n\n(2) That he, being an Inspector of Police in and for the colony of Hongkong, did at Victoria in the said colony, on the 11th March, 1894, and on divers days thereafter unlawfully, wilfully, and corruptly accept divers sums of money from the keepers or managers of sundry unlawful gambling houses in Victoria aforesaid to refrain from reporting to the Captain Superintendent of Police the existence of such gambling houses and to protect the said gambling houses.\n\nBoth the offences are offences at common law and not under any Ordinance or any Act of Parliament. In respect of the first offence I would refer your Worship to \"Archbold's Criminal Pleadings,\" page 892 of the 19th edition, from which it appears that any neglect of duty by an officer of justice is a misdemeanour and punishable as such. With reference to the second charge I would refer your Worship to \"Russell on Crimes,\" 16th chapter, where the offence of bribery is fully defined. The facts in the case are very simple. First, there will be no difficulty in proving that the Inspector is a constable enrolled under the provisions of the Hongkong Police Ordinance, that he holds the position of Inspector of Police, and that it is a general duty imposed on all constables by the Police rules and regulations, published with the authority of the Government under the Ordinance, that constables are to report if they have reason to suspect the existence of public gaming houses. Now the case, so far as it is known to the Crown, amounts to this: The colony is divided for certain purposes, especially in connection with this gambling business, into a certain number of sections. A special officer is in charge of each section with the special duty of restraining and putting down all public gambling within that section. Now it would appear that gambling was going on in the section Queen's Road and Jervois Street, over which Inspector Witchell was presiding at the early part of the year. Certain complaints were forwarded to the Captain Superintendent of Police and attention was directed to this street with the result that certain active measures were taken and gambling was put an end to for the time being in respect to this district. It would appear also that, before these gambling houses in this district were put down, Inspector Witchell had been deriving a considerable profit--something in the shape of $7 a day--from the gambling houses within his district and that when the gambling houses were closed he lost this income. He then took steps, knowing the existence of gambling in some neighbouring district for which he was not responsible, and suffering apparently from this loss of income, to send communications to the owners or managers of gambling houses in the adjoining district saying that he was aware of the existence of these gambling houses and although they were not in his district he could take effective steps to have these gambling houses closed, and asking them if they could not make him certain allowances or payments. As the result a payment was made to him for a period of three months of at least $1 a day, or $30 a month. I think we shall be able to prove that the payment was continued for three months, if not for a longer period. Therefore, the first offence with which he is charged is that it having come to his knowledge that gambling was going on anywhere in Hongkong, whether in his district or not, he failed to report it; secondly, that he accepted money from the keepers or managers of the gambling houses and failed to take steps to put down the houses as his duty required of him.\n\nDefendant (pointing to a man in court who was in the custody of Acting Chief Inspector Mackie)-I beg to draw your Worship's attention to that witness who, I presume, is going to give evidence against me. He was sitting in court during the whole time the learned counsel was making a statement and has heard every word.\n\nHis Worship-Is he a witness?\n\nMr. Francis-Yes.\n\nDefendant-He was removed from gaol under somebody's direction in charge of Inspector Mackie.\n\nHis Worship was understood to say that if the man was a witness he ought not to have been in court.\n\nThe man was thereupon removed from the court.\n\nEvidence was then called.\n\nHon. Francis Henry May said-I am Captain Superintendent of Police. The defendant is duly enrolled as a member of the Hongkong Police Force. He has been an Inspector of Police for the last two years. He has had charge of what is known as No. 1 section of the Central District. The section extends from the Central Market to the Kowshing Theatre and all the section of the town between Queen's Road and the Praya within those limits. His special duties in that section were to suppress illegal gambling. I produce a copy of the Police regulations. Rule 73 reads-\"Constables are to report if they have reason to suspect the existence of a public gaming house, but they are on no account themselves to go in nor suffer anyone else in for the purpose of obtaining proof.\" That rule is in force and binding now. There is a lane called Kwai Wa Lane in No. 1 section. At the end of last year, I returned from leave on the 7th October, and between that date and the end of November I received a large number of communications complaining of gambling in Kwai Wa Lane. None of those communications were received by me from the defendant.\n\nDefendant here asked Counsel to repeat his last question, which was done.\n\nWitness-I should like to alter that statement, I think the Inspector did apply for one or two warrants. I would not be sure if the information of the gambling was supplied to him by me. I rather think it was.\n\nMr. Francis-His application for these warrants was after you received the communications and after you had complained to him?\n\nWitness-I would not swear to that, but I am positive that after my return to the colony the first intimation I had of the existence of gambling in Kwai Wa Lane was received from other sources than the Inspector. I issued four warrants in all.\n\nPage 7\n\n \n...\n\n...\n\nPage 7", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363609, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 443, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "# Transcribed Text\n\nWere there any captures - The Inspector himself made at least one capture on a warrant. I think there were two convictions within that period and small fines were inflicted.\n\nWhat was the result of the proceedings, so far as you know, in reference to Kwai Wa Lane? The result was that I have received no further complaints this year.\n\nDid you yourself sometime go - Defendant - Will your Worship allow me the indulgence of pen and paper?\n\nHis Worship - Certainly.\n\nMr. Francis - I do not know what the practice of the court is, but as this is a misdemeanour perhaps the defendant would like to sit at the table.\n\nHis Worship - I have no objection if it will facilitate the defendant taking notes.\n\nThe defendant - Thank you, your Worship. The defendant then took a seat at the head of the table and took notes of the evidence.\n\nMr. Francis (to witness): You, yourself, have, I think, effected a rather important capture in connection with gambling?\n\nWitness - Yes.\n\nIn what house and where was that? - No. 2, Wa Lane - no, I beg your pardon, it was 3, Blast Street.\n\nAmong the property seized there did you in fact find an almost complete set of account books of some gambling syndicate or confraternity? - Yes.\n\nOn what date did you effect that seizure? - On the 21st June.\n\nHas anyone been arrested and convicted in connection with that seizure? - There have been two Chinese detectives arrested under banishment warrants. No, I am speaking in direct connection with - The master of the gambling house was arrested and convicted.\n\nWhat is his name? - Sam Yeen.\n\nAre those account books in your possession? - They are.\n\nHave they been in your possession and under your entire control ever since they were seized by you? - They have.\n\nWhat was the defendant's number in the Police Force before he became an Inspector? - No. 12.\n\nHow are the Inspectors ordinarily designated amongst the Chinese? By their numbers before they become Inspectors.\n\nHow is the defendant known and spoken of amongst the Chinese? - As No. 12.\n\nMr. Francis intimated that those were all the questions he had to ask.\n\nWitness's evidence was then read over. On the Magistrate coming to the part referring to the receipt of information witness, in answer to the defendant, said - I said I would not swear that I received any information from the Inspector. My first information after my return to the colony was, I am quite certain, received from outside sources and not from the Inspector. To the best of my recollection, I had no communication from the Inspector until after I had spoken to him on the subject.\n\nMr. Francis - After you received outside communications the Inspector did make an application?\n\nWitness - He applied for two warrants.\n\nYou cannot be positive whether he made application for those two warrants before or after you had spoken to him on the subject? - Yes. I mean to say that I cannot be certain if the information which led him to apply for those warrants was information independent of me.\n\nAlthough an Inspector is in charge for gambling purposes of a particular section, does that relieve him from his duty under rule 73 of reporting any gambling that may come to his knowledge or that he may suspect to exist? - No; it is the duty of every constable to report gambling if he suspects it to exist.\n\nHis Worship - Mr. Witchell, would you like to ask the witness any question?\n\nDefendant - Yes, Sir. (To witness) - How long have I been in charge of No. 1 gambling section?\n\nWitness - You have been in charge of it since I returned from leave.\n\nSince or before you returned from leave? - I do not know of my own knowledge, but I believe you were placed in charge of that section some months before my arrival in the colony - about August.\n\nDo you remember what Inspector was in charge of No. 1 district before I relieved him?\n\nI was not here.\n\nDo you remember Inspector Hennessey being transferred to West Point? - I was not here. I was away seventeen months from the colony.\n\nWill you kindly produce the police memo book of the transfer of Inspector Hennessey from No. 7 Police Station? - It can be produced. Witness sent for the transfer book and upon it being produced he said - I find on reference to the transfer book that Inspector Hennessey was transferred to the Western district on the 6th August, 1896, from the Central.\n\nDo you remember asking me where I obtained my information with regard to Kwai Wa Lane gambling? - I do not remember; it is possible I may have done so.\n\nCan you say how many days or weeks it was after you returned to the colony? - No, I cannot.\n\nDid any other Inspector obtain a warrant or raid Kwai Wa Lane by your instructions? - Yes, Inspector Kemp did.\n\nOn that date do you remember what particular duty I was on? - I cannot remember.\n\nDo you remember the result of that raid? - The result of Inspector Kemp's raid was that nothing was found.\n\nYou remember the morning that he raided this house? - I do not remember.\n\n442\n\nOn what information was the warrant obtained? - I cannot be sure on what particular information.\n\nWas it a letter addressed to you regarding gambling? - It is possible it might have been. My recollection is that the principal information I had regarding gambling from that lane was from outside sources.\n\nMr. Francis - Letters received?\n\nWitness - Yes.\n\nDefendant - Are you sure there were only four warrants taken out for Kwai Wa Lane altogether?\n\nWitness - Yes, I am quite sure.\n\nYou said only small fines were inflicted? - Yes.\n\nDefendant - Of course, your Worship knows that the Police have nothing to do with penalties imposed. That all lies with the Magistrate.\n\nHis Worship - Decidedly.\n\nDefendant - Have you since had any complaints from my district regarding public gaming?\n\nWitness - No.\n\nHis Worship - Since when? Defendant - Since gambling was stopped in Kwai Wa Lane.\n\nWitness - What sort of complaints do you mean?\n\nMr. Francis - Official or unofficial? Defendant - Unofficial. Witness - No.\n\nDefendant - Can you tell me the number of warrants and convictions I have obtained since your return to the colony? - I could not say at the moment. I know you have reported a house in Jubilee Street, No. 14, and you have reported a house in Hillier Street. That was up to the time of the Wa Lane seizure - the East Street seizure, I should say.\n\nHave warrants been obtained against these houses? I know that the Jubilee Street warrant was obtained but not executed.\n\nI think you are mistaken in the street. That was No. 5, Morrison Street - 14, Jubilee Street. I am speaking of the time before the East Street raid.\n\nDid you get information about the Jubilee Street house before the raid? I got it from yourself.\n\nHow long since? - Early in the year; about February.\n\nNot the same number? - It may have been 12 or 14; it was a house in Jubilee Street.\n\nThe warrant was executed, but nothing was found? - It may have been executed, but nothing was found.\n\nI think you have notes of warrants applied for by Inspectors? - Yes, I have a register.\n\nThe register was produced and witness read as follows: - In Jubilee Street this year, Nos. 12 and 13. The information was given by Inspector Quincey to Inspector Witchell and communicated to me by Inspector Witchell. A warrant was taken out on 14th January and was executed, and there was no gambling reported. 14, Jubilee Street, on 16th July; information given", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363610, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 444, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "by Inspector Witchell. Seventeen persons were arrested; first and second defendants were fined $100, and the rest $10 each. Morrison Street, No. 5, on 8th January. Inspector Witshell applied for warrant. Sixteen men were arrested. On the 24th January a warrant was applied for by Inspector Witchell for No. 3 and 5, Morrison Street. There was an arrest, but I have not made a note of the result.\n\nWere any others applied for? Bonham Strand, for instance? Bonham Strand was about seven months ago. It does not appear here; the omission may be an oversight.\n\nWere there any in Queen's Road or Tong Lane? Yes, on the 31st October, last year, at No. 89, Queen's Road West on the defendant's information. I should say, in explanation, that of course I will not swear that the defendant owed his information to his own sources.\n\nHis Worship--In the cases you have mentioned? In the other cases the information was furnished by the Inspector.\n\nTo which are you referring, then? I refer to the one in Queen's Road West. Two men were arrested; no gambling gear. 3rd November, last year, 57, Queen's Road West; six men and fan-tan gear arrested. On 8th December, Queen's Road West; seven men and gear. No. 85, Queen's Road West, on 21st May, and 89 on the same date; four men and gear in such case. No. 57 again on 14th May, four men and gear; 85, same date, five men arrested and gambling gear. Nos. 59 and 87, Queen's Road West on the 6th July; five men and gear arrested. In all these cases I have it down that they were reported by Inspector Witchell. I received various complaints about these houses--coolies gambling on the roof and so forth.\n\nDefendant--Do you remember at any time telling me not to trouble about coolie houses? I remember in connection with that house you reported to me in Jubilee Street.\n\nThe Magistrate--Telling him what--not to trouble about coolie houses?\n\nWitness--No, your Worship, I said I wanted to catch some of the long-coated gentlemen and not coolies. I meant that I wanted a decent seizure and not a lot of coolies.\n\nHis Worship--quite so; not coolies as in nearly all these cases.\n\nWitness--I am not particularly referring to these cases but to the majority of gambling cases.\n\nDefendant--Can you say whether the masters were fined and convicted in connection with those warrants which were executed? No, I cannot say.\n\nDefendant--You have visited Kwai Wa Lane, I presume? I have been in Kwai Wa Lane.\n\nIs there anything particular about these houses which would attract your attention to them as being gambling houses? No, I do not think so, but if gambling was going on in them there would probably be evidence of it. There is nothing in the houses per se to attract your attention, but if gambling was being conducted there would be evidence of it.\n\nYou know what happens when a European in plain clothes or uniform goes near these places? Yes.\n\nDo they leave any signs of gambling going on then? My opinion is that if gambling is going on in a house on any considerable scale a police officer who knows what he is about--he may not notice it the first day--would notice something odd about that house and that street.\n\nBy the rules and regulations no police officer is allowed to enter a house or to send anyone into a house to ascertain if public gambling is going on? No.\n\nYou say you raided No. 3, East Street and found a quantity of gambling accounts? Yes. Was there anything in these gambling accounts referring to Kwai Wa Lane? No.\n\nWhat accounts, if any, refer to me? There are accounts in the books.\n\nWhat entries? To the effect that money at the rate of $1 a day was paid to you.\n\nWill you kindly produce that book? Witness--Your Worship, I prefer not to produce that book.\n\nMr. Francis--I think, Mr. May, the book must be produced, and I would ask your Worship to direct that the entries be covered up and sealed except those relating to the defendant.\n\nDefendant--Your Worship, I think that is not correct. Any entries there which might be taken as referring to me might refer to other people. I think the entries should be read now in court so that there shall be a proper and just inquiry into it.\n\nWitness--Do you wish me to produce the book?\n\nDefendant--Yes. I demand that the book be put in, your Worship.\n\nWitness then left the box and fetched the book from his office. He produced it in court.\n\nThe Magistrate--That is the book? Witness--Yes.\n\nIt is the book which has been asked for? Yes. Defendant--Is that the book which refers to money stated to have been received by me? Yes. Is that the only book? That is the only book that refers to you particularly.\n\nDefendant--I should like to see the entry, your Worship.\n\nHis Worship--Certainly.\n\nMr. Francis--The entries can be translated and read.\n\nDefendant--I am entitled to see the entries.\n\nThe Magistrate (to witness)--Will you mark the particular entries in that book referring to the defendant?\n\nWitness--One entry is merely a repetition of the other.\n\nMr. Francis--How many entries are there altogether? I know there are two. The first entry is \"No. 12, $1.10.”\n\nDefendant--Your Worship, is Mr. May a legal translator?\n\nHis Worship--He is on his oath.\n\nWitness (continuing)--\"Paid to Cheng On.\" No. 2 entry is--\"No. 12, $1 paid to Cheng On.\" Three characters representing \"Paid to Cheng On\" are struck out. They are not illegible but simply crossed out, and underneath is put \"Entered in Kum's account.”\n\nMr. Francis--Are there any other characters in the book in any way referring to the defendant except those two? No.\n\nAre there any entries in the book which alter or modify the effect of those entries? No.\n\nIs it important for the administration of justice that the other entries in the book should not be disclosed? It is most essential.\n\nHis Worship--Those questions are being put on the demand made by the defendant that he should see the book in its entirety?\n\nMr. Francis--Yes. My application is that the other entries, which do not affect the defendant in any way, shall be covered up in such a way that neither he nor anyone else will have an opportunity of seeing what they are. Mr. May has sworn that it is essential for the administration of justice that those entries should not be seen, and I shall ask your Worship, after the book has been marked and the particular entries translated, to order it to remain in Mr. May's custody.\n\nHis Worship--The witness has stated that there are no other entries that refer directly or indirectly to the defendant, that there are no entries which in any way affect his position, and that it is most essential in the interests of justice that the book should not be--\n\nDefendant--Your Worship, it appears to me that this book has been tampered with already by the admission of the Captain Superintendent of Police himself in court. He says the entry \"Paid to Cheng On\" has been erased and another substituted.\n\nMr. Francis (to witness)--Was that erasure made when you seized the book?\n\nWitness--Yes.\n\nDefendant--The book will be put in?\n\nHis Worship--Yes, and you can see the entries, but as a very good reason has been given why the whole of the entries should not be put in I am inclined to limit————\n\nDefendant--Your Worship, there is more than one No. 12 in Hongkong.\n\nHis Worship--Certainly. I am not going into the question as to how the entries affect you. What the prosecution rely upon, so far as this book is concerned, are those two entries.\n\nPage 443", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363611, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 445, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "I limit the production of the book to the two entries the Captain Superintendent of Police has read out, and I will take any steps that are wanted to keep the book undisclosed.\n\nMr. Francis--I ask your Worship for these translations to be made by Mr. Brewin, who is a sworn translator, and not by any other translator.\n\nThe Magistrate--I have no objection to that. Witness--I understand, your Worship, that you will return this book to my custody.\n\nHis Worship--I shall return the book to your custody. Only these two entries are in the custody of the Court and they will remain so. I shall hand the book over to the constable in charge of the case.\n\nHis Worship and Mr. Francis here had a private consultation at the request of his Worship.\n\nDefendant--Are these two entries you have found in your seizure at No. 3, East Street the whole of the entries in connection with me?\n\nWitness--Yes.\n\nThe first entry is $1.10 and the second one, $1--Yes.\n\nAnd entered in Kum's account--Yes.\n\nAre you quite sure I am known to the Chinese as No. 17--Yes.\n\nCould you state what days intervened between the warrants that were obtained for Kwai Wa Lane--29th October, 4th November, 10th November, and 24th November.\n\nEach gambling district is defined and one Inspector put in charge of each district--Yes.\n\nIs an Inspector allowed by the rules of the Force to take out a warrant in another Inspector's district?--He is not allowed to take out a warrant at all without permission.\n\nIs there an order prohibiting an Inspector taking out a warrant in another Inspector's district?--There is no such order.\n\nAre you quite sure?--To the best of my knowledge no such order has been issued by me and I do not remember reading such an order.\n\nI will read my order relating to gambling. Gambling in the Central District. Inspector Witchell will take charge from Central Market to Kowshing Theatre below Queen's Road Central. Inspector so and so takes charge of No. 2 section. Inspector so and so takes charge of No. 3 section, etc. Inspector Stanton will assist the above Inspectors in the suppression of gambling.\" That order is dated 12th May, 1893. That was three months after I took charge of the Force. That order has remained in force since.\n\nI think in the Police regulations you will find that no Inspector is allowed to take out a gambling warrant except in his own district?--There is no reference in the Police regulations to these gambling districts. That order is a departmental arrangement made by myself.\n\nThen there is not an order to the effect that no Inspector is allowed to take out a warrant in another Inspector's district?--Not to my knowledge.\n\nRegarding No. 2, Wa Lane, have you visited that house?\n\nYou have not seen the house?--I have seen the house, but I have not been inside.\n\nCan you describe the entrance to it--where the entrance is?--I am not sure how the lane is numbered. I think it is at the Lower Lascar Row end.\n\nMy reason for asking this is that I understand a charge was brought against the master for gambling at No. 2, Wa Lane. My answer is I am not quite sure at which end of the lane the entrance is, whether it is at the Hollywood Road end or the Lascar Row end. I rather think it is at the Hollywood Road end. There is nothing particular about the entrance.\n\nYou say $1 a day has been paid?--Yes. But is there only one entry of that amount being paid.\n\nMr. Francis--That is a matter for argument and not a question.\n\nThis concluded the cross-examination of the witness.\n\nThe witness's evidence was then read over to him. The notes of His Worship made the witness say that the other entries in the book did not refer directly or indirectly to the defendant.\n\nWitness--I did not say \"indirectly.\" His Worship--I am inclined to think you said it.\n\nWitness--Well, it is not material.\n\nAfter the whole of the evidence had been read, witness said he wished the word \"indirectly\" struck out.\n\nDefendant--Then how about the other entries? The witness suggested before that they did not apply directly or indirectly; now it is altered to directly.\n\nHis Worship--I think you are entitled to further question the witness on that point.\n\nMr. Francis--The next statement of the witness, I think, gets over the apparent difficulty; it completely covers the same point. He said \"These are the only entries I find that relate to him in particular.\"\n\nWitness--To the best of my knowledge and belief I did not say \"indirectly.\" If your Worship thinks you can trust your memory so far I will leave the word in.\n\nHis Worship--My memory consists of taking the words down as they were spoken.\n\nMr. Francis--The probability is that I put the question in that form.\n\nWitness--I am prepared to say there is nothing in the list except those two entries that could implicate the Inspector in any way.\n\nDefendant--Do those two entries refer to a daily account?\n\nWitness--They do.\n\nWhat is there in that book that causes you to think it refers to a daily account?--I know from my examination of other account books that it is a daily account.\n\nDefendant--I should like those other account books put in. Can that be done?\n\nMr. Francis--Is there anything in that book that has been put in, beyond these two entries, that shows they are periodical payments, or do they simply appear as two entries without date or any indication of how, when, or where they were made?\n\nWitness--In this book--\n\nThere are simply two entries?--Yes.\n\nAs payments--In this book there are simply these two entries.\n\nDefendant--That does not refer to any other book?--No; it refers to no other book.\n\nAnd no other books refer to that?--No.\n\nHis Worship--Are you able to let me see those other account books?\n\nWitness--I say there is nothing in those other account books which directly refers to this account book.\n\nMr. Francis--You mean to say you have inferred from what you have seen that they are daily payments. You do not know as a fact?\n\nWitness--I infer that.\n\nWhat you have done is to state as a fact that you know they relate to a daily account. \"I know this from the other account books.\"--Yes.\n\nHis Worship--I think the defendant ought to see those other account books.\n\nWitness--I see no objection as long as the books are returned to my custody.\n\nAre you able to produce the books that led you to that inference?--I can produce them.\n\nWitness then went to his office and after an absence of a few minutes he returned and said--I find, your Worship, that the production of any other book will not carry my evidence any further as to that being a daily account. I say that to the best of my knowledge and belief it is a daily account.\n\nHis Worship--You do not know it from an examination of the other account books?--I say to the best of my knowledge and belief it is a daily account, but I will not swear it is a daily account.\n\nDefendant--From what facts have you derived that opinion?\n\nMr. Francis--I do not think, your Worship, that is a question the defendant is entitled to ask. I am afraid that later he will have information on that point.\n\nHis Worship--I think the defendant is entitled to ask from what sources the witness derived his opinion.\n\nDefendant--I do not wish to press the question.\n\nHis Worship--As the case proceeds you will understand more, probably.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363612, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 446, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "Defendant-How long after your arrival in the colony did you receive information about the gambling houses in Wa Lane?\n\nWitness-Immediately after my arrival.\n\nDid that information say how long gambling had been carried on there?--I do not think so.\n\nOn what date were those entries made in the book?-They are not dated.\n\nTo the best of your knowledge when did gambling cease in Kwai Wa Lane. How long after your arrival in the colony?-Gambling ceased during the remainder of the month of October. Then it began again. To the best of my knowledge and belief it went on until I raided the place.\n\nI am speaking about Kwai Wa Lane-All I can say about Kwai Wa Lane is that after the end of November I received no more complaints about gambling in that lane.\n\nMr. Francis--I have one question, your Worship. Does Rule 73 apply to the Inspector whom you have put in charge of these different sections for the purpose of suppressing gambling? Have they a right to send a man into a house for the purpose of finding out if gambling is going on?-Yes. The rule does not apply to those Inspectors.\n\nEach Inspector has a complete right to take whatever steps he thinks necessary to suppress gambling in his district. That is so.\n\nHis Worship-Has that been the practice in the Police Force?-The prohibition against entering these gambling houses applies to constables only.\n\nThat has been the practice?-Yes.\n\nDefendant-That is how you construe the regulation. Will you kindly look at it from a common sense point of view.\n\nHis Worship here read the regulation.\n\nDefendant-That rule affects the whole Force, from the Captain Superintendent downwards.\n\nWitness-An Inspector of Police constantly sends an informer into a gambling house to obtain information; otherwise he would not get a conviction.\n\nIs there an order prohibiting Inspectors employing informers or sending constables into these gambling houses, and have there not been prosecutions in which Inspectors have entered these houses and people have been killed and the Inspectors charged with manslaughter at the Supreme Court?-I do not know of any such order prohibiting Inspectors employing informers. With regard to the last part-\n\nHis Worship-That is all.\n\nWitness-There is a second question.\n\nHis Worship-No, there is no second question. Sign the depositions, please.\n\nCheng On, who was brought up in the custody of Acting Chief Inspector Mackie, was the next witness. He said:\n\nI am Chinese, an Excise Officer in the employ of the Opium Farm. I have been in that employ thirteen months. Before that, I was a detective in the Hongkong Police Force. I am acquainted with all or nearly all the Inspectors, and as Excise Officer, I was frequently up at the Police Court. I know defendant, Inspector Witchell. He is known as \"No. 12\" amongst the Chinese. I have paid him money. Sometimes if he was not at home, I paid his wife. From the 14th of March to the 17th of June, I have paid him $12.60 every week, each Monday. I got that money from Tung Kum. I always got this money from Tung Kum, who is the keeper of the Yee Yuon mercer's shop, Hollywood Road.\n\nBefore the first payment was made by me to the defendant, on 11th March, he invited me to his room. I went with him and conversed with him in the Inspector's quarters. Mrs. Witchell was present; she was going in and out of the room. I was speaking half in Chinese and half in English. Defendant speaks Chinese. This conversation had reference to the money payments afterwards made.\n\nHe said, \"In going round on my duty, I saw a lot of people standing at the entrance to Chung Hing Lane and Wa Lane. Then I used my stick to drive them away. Then a Chinese abused me, and said 'No. 12 is proud.' Then I ran after a Chinaman. That Chinaman ran up to the first floor and called me to come upstairs, waving his hand. As I had no warrant, I dared not go upstairs. He wanted to disgrace me.\n\nI went away and a lot of people jeered at me. I do not know who taught the Chinese to treat me in this way. They think I cannot arrest them, but I can arrest them. If I arrest them, Mr. May will be very pleased with it. I have known these gambling houses for a long time. I know that some of my fokis received some money to spend, therefore I do not wish to arrest them. If I go to arrest them, it will spoil the business of my fokis, which is a very foolish act to do. I do not wish to do such an act; I do not know why the Chinese treat me in this way. In my section, I know a house was open for two days, and the people have petitioned to Mr. May.\"\n\nI asked him, \"Who told you all this thing you have told me?\" He said, \"An old man, Saug Yung, between fifty and sixty years of age.\" I told him not to have any conversation with that man now; he is not a proper man and he does not know how to speak.\n\nOn one occasion, there was gambling going on in Kwai Wa Lane, and defendant said, \"I do not know which took Mr. May up to a house in Jervois Street to look into the second floor of a house in Kwai Wa Lane where the gambling was going on. After looking at the place, Mr. May came back to the office and sent someone to call me. Then Mr. May said to me, 'There is gambling in your place.' I replied to Mr. May, 'Sometimes.' Mr. May answered, 'Gambling going on just now.' Then Mr. May said, 'Take out a paper at once to arrest.'\"\n\nHe told me all this news. Then defendant asked me if I knew the \"fat child.\" I said, \"Yes, I know him.\" He said, \"When I go round on my duty, this man follows me and wants to speak to me.\n\nAs there were a lot of people in the street, I did not wish to speak to him.\" Witness asked Inspector Witchell, \"How do you know him?\" \"I know him,\" he replied, \"because he is the master in Chang Hing Street.\" Then Inspector Witchell said, \"I do not know why the man wanted to speak to me. I think he wants to speak to me about gambling in Kwai Wa Lane.\" I said, \"If the man were to offer you anything, don't promise him.\" He said, \"Mr. May has great power, because he had arrested once before.\" I said, \"That place cannot be kept as a gambling house.\"\n\nMr. Francis-Tell me what he said about money.\n\nDefendant--Your Worship, will you direct the witness to tell the story in his own way?\n\nMr. Francis-I am entitled to examine the witness as I like.\n\nHis Worship-I think Mr. Francis's question must be put.\n\nWitness (continuing)-The defendant said, \"I receive not a cash from this place.\" Then defendant asked me, \"Do you know those gambling people?\" I said, \"I do.\" The defendant said, \"I have a lot of children and the expenses are large. My money is not sufficient. Will you kindly go and see those persons to get some expenses for me.\" I said, \"I am afraid that the people might refuse because they are not in your section.\" Defendant said, \"If they are in my section, I won't let them keep open. As they belong to another person's section, I am not afraid. As people are eating flesh, I want you to pick up some bone; I shall be obliged if you will ask these persons for me.\"\n\nI went and saw Tung Kum, and A. Yeun or Sam Yeun. I had a conversation with Inspector Witchell about Sam Yeun. In consequence of that conversation with the Inspector, I told all I had heard to Tung Kum, who told Sam Yeun. I was there when he told Sam Yeun. Sam Yeun replied, \"Very little.\" I said, \"How much.\" He said, \"$1 a day.\"\n\nThe Magistrate-Is this evidence, Mr. Francis?\n\nMr. Francis-Yes, your Worship, I think so. He is the authorised agent of the defendant.\n\nDefendant-I object to that remark; it is nothing but humbug from beginning to end.\n\nWitness (continuing)--I told defendant what sum had been mentioned. Defendant said, \"Maskee.\" I further told him people want 10 cents for labour; I was referring to Tung Kum. I was not referring to myself. Then defendant said, \"All right, I am satisfied, I will pay him ten cents labour.\" Then I said to Mr. Witchell, \"If a man is willing to give, are you willing to receive? It is not my affair.\" The Inspector said, \"I receive.\" In accordance with that arrangement, I received $12.60 a week.\n\n445", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363613, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 447, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "week from Tung Kum. I took the money every Monday and paid it sometimes to the defendant and sometimes to his wife if he was not there. The $12.60 was from two gambling houses—one at Chung Hing Street and Wa Lane—$1 from each house a day and ten cents off for labour. I would know Sham Yeon again if I saw him.\n\nSam Yeon, the master of the house in Wa Lane which was raided was here brought into court in custody and witness identified him.\n\nThis concluded the witness's examination and it was decided to take Mr. Brewin's evidence before the cross-examination was proceeded with.\n\nMr. A. W. Brewin, Acting Inspector of Government Schools, said—I have knowledge of Chinese, both of the spoken language and the character. No. 1 entry in the book is, \"No. 12, $1.10; handed to Cheng On.\" Entry No. 2 reads, \"No. 12, $1,\" then there are characters signifying, \"Handed to Cheng On.\" These are crossed out. Then there are the characters, \"Handed to Tang.\" I am not certain of the last character; it is abbreviated.\n\nCross-examined—The characters, \"Handed to Cheng On,\" have been crossed out; there is a round mark over them.\n\nRe-examined—I do not know whether the Chinese book-keepers or accountants make use of that mark over an entry in a day book to show that the account has been transferred to another book.\n\nDefendant—Your Worship, I see that the Chinese witness has been taken away.\n\nHis Worship—Who has taken him away? Defendant—Inspector Mackie.\n\nMr. Francis—The witness has no right to leave the court.\n\nDefendant—The prosecution have got him in their hands to do what they like with him.\n\nHis Worship—I will see that you have a fair trial.\n\nThe adjournment for luncheon was then taken. Defendant asked to be allowed out at liberty. He had been locked up since four o'clock the previous afternoon.\n\nMr. Francis intimated that there was no objection to the defendant being allowed bail. He could insist upon bail if he liked.\n\nHis Worship asked the defendant to get bail during the adjournment.\n\nThe Captain Superintendent of Police intimated that he would make arrangements for the defendant to be at liberty during the adjournment.\n\nAfter the adjournment the defendant cross-examined the witness Cheng On.\n\nDefendant—Are you at present an Excise Officer for the Opium Farmer?\n\nWitness—Yes.\n\nHave you been arrested under a banishment warrant?—I do not know.\n\nHave you been detained in the gaol?—Yes.\n\nSince you have been in gaol you have been brought before the Captain Superintendent?—Only once.\n\nWho was present at the time?—Mr. Deunys, the solicitor.\n\nNo one else?—No.\n\nIs that where you made the statement you made to the court this morning?—Yes.\n\nYou say you remember coming to my quarters on the 14th March last?—On the 11th March.\n\nWas that the first time you had been there?—That was not the first occasion.\n\nOn what date did you go there before?—I do not remember. I went there last year.\n\nWhat did you go there for last year?—I went to see you about a case in which Pang On made a false charge against three of my elusmen.\n\nWhat did you have to say about that?—You told me you knew it was a false case and you said you would speak straightforwardly.\n\nIn what month was that?—Between the 7th October and the 4th December.\n\nHad you been to my house, or did my wife and I meet you in the street a few days previous to the 11th?—I do not remember.\n\nDo you remember going to my quarters on the 9th?—I do not remember.\n\nYou seem to be very forgetful just now.\n\nDo you remember meeting me and my wife on the afternoon of the 9th at the corner of Wellington Street and Lyndhurst Terrace?—I did not meet you and your wife.\n\nWas anything said to you in the street on that occasion about getting some samples of silk?—It was not in March; it was in the 4th moon—May, when something was said about silk.\n\nDid you come to my house on the 11th March?—I did.\n\nWhom did you see?—You and your wife were there and the children were running about. Was anyone else there?—There was no one else.\n\nWhere did you sit down?—Near the fireplace in the room next to the dining room.\n\nWhich way did you come in?—By the back, up the steps.\n\nYou are quite sure you did not see anyone else there?—I did not see anyone else.\n\nDid you bring any pieces of silk on the 11th?—I did not.\n\nI mean samples, not pieces.—No; it was in May that I took some samples.\n\nYou did not show any samples to anyone on the 11th March?—You had not mentioned about buying things then.\n\nWhen did you go again after the 11th?—On the 13th March, between 2 and 3 p.m.\n\nWho asked you into the sitting room on the 11th?—You were in the sitting room and you asked me to come in.\n\nWas anyone else there besides myself?—Your wife came in afterwards.\n\nYou are sure I was in the sitting room when you came?—Yes.\n\nI was not upstairs?—No.\n\nI was not called downstairs?—No.\n\nBe quite sure. There was no one else in the room besides myself, my wife, the children, and the cook?—The children and the cook were not in the room.\n\nBut there was no one else there?—No.\n\nDid I say anything to you on the 9th March about a friend going home to England and that I wanted to send some silk with him?—No.\n\nDid I tell you the Clerk of the Gaol—Mr. Watson—was going home to England?—No.\n\nI did not say anything to you about Mr. Watson?—I don't remember that you did.\n\nYou did not meet me in Lyndhurst Terrace on the 9th March.\n\nAnd you never got any samples of silk at the end of November or the beginning of December last year for me?—No.\n\nDid I show you a photograph on the piano of a lady to whom I was going to send the silk—the photograph you dropped on the floor?—Yes, I remember that and also dropping it on the floor.\n\nWas that at the end of November or beginning of December?—It was this year and not last.\n\nDid you ask me if the lady was my mother?—No.\n\nDid I show you a photograph of a gentleman?—No.\n\nDid I tell you that gentleman was Mr. Falconer, Magistrate at Lorne, South Wales?—No.\n\nDid I tell you it was his lady?—No.\n\nDid you remark \"It's very handsome?\"—I said it was pretty good.\n\nOn the 11th, when you went in, who met you in the passage way?—I walked along the passage and when I got to the room you said, \"Come in.\"\n\nIt was rather familiar for you to come in like that?—I went to look for you.\n\nDid you ask where I was?—There was no one in the house when I went there and so I did not ask.\n\nWhat are you talking about?—I walked up to your room and saw you there.\n\nHow long do you say you stayed there on the 11th?—Three quarters of an hour.\n\nDidn't Mrs. Witchell tell you to sit down and she would call me?—She was upstairs; she came down afterwards.\n\nShe was not in the room?—No.\n\nYou said we were all there. Did you say to Mrs. Witchell on the 11th, when she said \"she would call me,\" \"Oh, never mind, I've brought that piece of silk for you to look see?\"—No.\n\nDid Mrs. Witchell say that was not the kind of silk she wanted?—No.\n\nYou went out at the back, didn't you?—Yes.\n\n446", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363615, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 449, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "It was now five o'clock and Mr. Francis suggested an adjournment.\n\nDefendant said he had many more questions to ask the witness.\n\nHis Worship then conferred with Hon. J. H. Stewart Lockhart (Colonial Secretary), who was sitting on the bench, and then said that another Magistrate would be appointed while this case was proceeding.\n\nIt was then agreed to resume the hearing at 9 o'clock this morning.\n\nMr. Francis - With regard to the defendant - His Worship - I think he is entitled to bail. Have you any remarks to make about the amount?\n\nMr. Francis - We leave it entirely in your Worship's hands.\n\nDefendant - I have a wife and family and household goods and there is not much fear that I shall run away. I have nowhere to run to.\n\nHis Worship - You will have no difficulty in finding bail?\n\nDefendant - I think I can find bail.\n\nHis Worship - Bail in one surety of $500.\n\nThe Court then adjourned until this morning.\n\nDaily Press 20th July 1897.\n\nTHE POLICE SCANDAL,\n\nINSPECTOR WITCHELL COMMITTED FOR TRIAL.\n\nAt the Magistracy yesterday, before Hon. H. E. Wodehouse, C.M.G., the hearing was resumed of the charges against Inspector Witchell. The charges are:-\n\n(1) That he, being an Inspector of Police in and for the colony of Hongkong, did, at Victoria, in the said colony, on the 7th March, 1897, and on divers dates thereafter, unlawfully and in breach of his duty as such Inspector as aforesaid, neglect to report to the Captain Superintendent of Police the existence of unlawful gambling houses in Wa Lane and Cheung Sha Wan Lane, Victoria, aforesaid.\n\n(2) That he, being an Inspector of Police in and for the colony of Hongkong, did at Victoria in the said colony, on the 11th March, 1897, and on divers days thereafter, unlawfully, wilfully, and corruptly accept divers sums of money from the keepers or managers of sundry unlawful gambling houses in Victoria aforesaid to refrain from reporting to the Captain Superintendent of Police the existence of such gambling houses and to protect the said gambling houses.\n\nMr. J. J. Francis, Q.C., appeared to prosecute on behalf of the Attorney-General, being instructed by Mr. H. L. Dennys (Crown Solicitor). Mr. H. W. Looker appeared to watch the proceedings on behalf of a party interested.\n\nWhen the case was called on defendant said - Your Worship, I am not a solicitor and I would ask your Worship to assist me in this case. There were a lot of leading questions asked and hearsay evidence produced on Saturday which should not have been allowed.\n\nHis Worship - Draw my attention to what you think is improper evidence.\n\nDefendant - Perhaps you are better acquainted than I with that evidence.\n\nHis Worship - I am not aware of any improper evidence so far. I will watch the case to the best of my power.\n\nDefendant - Thank you, your Worship.\n\nThe defendant then proceeded with his cross-examination of the witness Cheng On.\n\nDefendant - How long were you in the Police Force?\n\nWitness - Between 15 and 16 years.\n\nIn what branch of the Force were you? - When I joined the Force I was in the Water Police. In two years I was transferred to the Central Police Station, where I was for several months on charge room duty.\n\nWhat did you do after that? - After that I was attached to the detective department.\n\nWhy did you leave the detective department? - I was told to find a witness. I could not find him and I was reported to Inspector Matheson for sending the witness to Canton.\n\nYou were reported for that? - Yes. I did not see the witness.\n\nIn what case was that witness concerned? - In a case in which a constable was accused of snatching dice.\n\nAnd snatching anything else? - Fourteen cents.\n\nWas that all? - And a dice cloth.\n\nWhy did you leave the Force?\n\nHis Worship - One moment. Who is in charge of this case now?\n\nInspector Duncan - I am, your Worship.\n\nHis Worship - Are any of those people outside the door witnesses?\n\nInspector Duncan - No, your Worship.\n\nDefendant - There might be some witnesses there.\n\nHis Worship - I am told there are not; that is sufficient.\n\nDefendant (to Witness) - Why did you leave the Force?\n\nWitness - I was transferred to Yaumati and I resigned.\n\nDid you resign on a pension? - Yes.\n\nHave you a pension now? - No.\n\nWhy? - I took the whole lot at one time.\n\nHow much? - $174 or $176.\n\nFor 15 or 16 years' service? - Yes.\n\nWas that all you were entitled to? - I do not know. The Captain Superintendent makes up the amount.\n\nYou do not know whether you were entitled to more or not? - In the first class I was entitled to more.\n\nWhy was your pension reduced? - I was in the second class.\n\nWere you entitled to more in the second class? - I do not know.\n\nWere you reported before you resigned? - While at Yaumati I was fined 50 cents at roll call.\n\nWas that the reason why you sent in your resignation? - No. After 10 years' service I could resign when I liked.\n\nWhen did you resign? - In 1892.\n\nDid you have a character at your discharge? - Yes.\n\nCan you produce it? - It is at my house.\n\nWhat does that character say? - \"Fair.\"\n\nAnd you are quite sure you were not entitled to a bigger pension after 15 or 16 years' service? - One cannot calculate the pension at all. If a man is reported he is sure to get less pension.\n\nIf you had not been reported what would you have been entitled to? - I do not know.\n\nYou are not conversant with figures? - Yes. I know how to calculate.\n\nDefendant here intimated that this concluded his cross-examination and witness's evidence was then read over.\n\nHis Worship also read over part of the witness's evidence and asked him to verify the dates, which he did.\n\nIn reference to the statement that the witness's wife told him the Inspector had sent for him, defendant submitted that such a statement was not admissible.\n\nMr. Francis - The answer was given in answer to defendant's questions. He must take the consequence of that.\n\nThe witness was then re-examined.\n\nMr. Francis - Mr. Witchell has asked you about some silk samples?\n\nWitness - Yes.\n\nFrom what shop did you get those samples? - Chu Lun, Jorvois Street.\n\nDid you buy silk for Mrs. Witchell or did you only get samples? - She asked me to bring some samples and I brought some.\n\nAnswer the question. - I did not buy any silk for Mrs. Witchell, but I brought some samples for her.\n\nCan you fix on the day when she first spoke to you about any silk? - It was four or five days before Dr. Ayres went away - before he gave a tea party.\n\nHave you got samples for Mrs. Witchell on more than one occasion? - On two occasions.\n\nYou have told us the one occasion; when was the other? - On the following day or the day after.\n\nDid you get the two sets of samples from the same shop? - Yes.\n\nThis concluded the witness's evidence, and he was, on the application of the defendant, detained in court.\n\nSam Yeen, who said he had no other name, was then called. In answer to Mr. Francis he said - I am now a prisoner in Victoria Gaol. I was convicted the other day of keeping a gambling house in Wa Lane. The sentence was nine months' imprisonment and a fine of ...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363617, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 451, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "For twelve years' service P-Yes. Was that the full amount that you were entitled to P-Yes, and three months' \"cam-shaw.\"\n\nThere was no deduction for misconduct P-No.\n\nDid you at any time go to Sam Yeen in company with Cheng On P-No.\n\nThis concluded the cross-examination and defendant asked his Worship to order all the witnesses to be detained in Court that they could not communicate with any other witness.\n\nHis Worship acceded to the application.\n\nHo Wai Tsim was then called. He said-I keep a mercer's shop at 118, Jervois Street. It is a shop where Chinese silk is sold. I am the manager. I know Cheng On, whom I recognise, in court.\n\nMr. Francis--Has that man at any time got any samples of silk from you? F-Witness--Yes.\n\nDid he get them from you personally or someone else in your employment?-He got them from me personally.\n\nWhen?-During the first decade of the 4th moon: between the 2nd and 11th May.\n\nDid he get samples of silk on more than one occasion?-Only once.\n\nHow many samples did he get at that time?---Three or four.\n\nDid he change those samples or get others at any time?-He came and asked me to change them and I said we had not any more. He did not return the samples.\n\nHow soon after he got the first samples did he come and ask for others?-One or two days afterwards. He asked for samples of blue silk.\n\nDid he buy any silk or silk clothing from you at any time?-He bought two pieces of silk cloth.\n\nWas that before or after he got the samples?--Before.\n\nHow long before?-Between ten and twenty days.\n\nDid he buy any silk of which you gave him samples?-No.\n\nDid you make any clothes for him?-Yes, two pieces of clothing.\n\nWhat were they?-One blue silk jacket and one tight silk jacket.\n\nAbout what time did you make that blue silk jacket?-On the 20th May.\n\nWhere did he get the silk from which you made that blue silk jacket?-From my shop. He ordered the jacket in my shop.\n\nDid he pay for the silk and jackets?-No, he has not paid the money.\n\nDoes he owe you for them or were they presents?---He owes me.\n\nIs the account entered in the books with the proper date?-Yes.\n\nBy what name do you know him?-Cheng Man San.\n\nIs that the man (pointing to Cheng On) who bought the silk and got the samples?-Yes.\n\nDid you know him before he bought this silk?-Yes, I have known him for many years.\n\nDefendant-Do you remember if I have ever been to your shop to get samples or to buy silk?---No, I do not remember.\n\nMr. Francis-Your Worship, that is the case for the prosecution, and I would ask your Worship to commit the case for trial. Of course if Mr. Witchell desires to call witnesses here your Worship will be bound to hear them and take their evidence. This is one of those cases your Worship cannot deal with unless you entirely discharge it if you decide there is no case to go to the jury.\n\nHis Worship-There are one or two questions which I wish to ask of witnesses before committing. With regard to the list of names, in what light do you wish me to regard that as evidence? It has merely been mentioned as having been found.\n\nMr. Francis-Your Worship will please bear in mind that I did not put it in evidence. It was called for and put in evidence by the defendant himself; he called for it and asked for its production. Your Worship will remember that I simply brought out the fact of the existence of such a book, but I did not tender it as evidence nor make use of it as evidence.\n\nDefendant-In the other case the Hon. the Captain Superintendent of Police inferred from what he had seen in other account books-\n\nHis Worship--One moment.\n\nAfter looking at the depositions His Worship said-The book having been put in and the defendant wishing to examine further on it.\n\nMr. Francis-I do not think, according to the ordinary rules with reference to the discovery of new evidence, he has a right to examine anything other than that which refers to him either directly or indirectly. It is a constant practice in the Supreme Court when books of a confidential character are produced, for instance, merchant's books, that only entries referring to the particular transactions are exposed, the witness of course swearing that there is nothing else in the book or in the accounts which in any way refers to the case before the Court or which affects the prisoner. The defendant is entitled to see the entries affecting him if he likes.\n\nThe defendant asked, \"Is there anything in that book referring to me?\" and the Captain Superintendent of Police was bound to say there was. The defendant is certainly entitled to see anything in that book referring to himself.\n\nDefendant--I think the book was brought out by counsel. He said that $1.10 and $1 had been paid to \"No. 12.\"\n\nMr. Francis-It was wholly in answer to your question.\n\nDefendant-I think not, sir.\n\nMr. Francis-If your Worship will look at the evidence you will see that I simply got out the fact that a complete set of accounts was found. The moment Mr. Witchell asked questions about it and insisted upon knowing what entries were in it it became evidence for all purposes.\n\nHis Worship asked if the defendant was not entitled to examine the book, it having been put in.\n\nMr. Francis said no.\n\nHis Worship asked for an authority.\n\nMr. Francis replied that he had no law on the subject with him, but it was the constant practice in the Supreme Court to disclose only such entries as related to the particular case. Counsel also pointed out that he did not think his Worship need trouble himself about the matter as it must be dealt with at the Supreme Court. Of course the book was in the custody of Mr. May and it had been marked by his Worship. The question of how far it was evidence would be disposed of at the Supreme Court.\n\nHis Worship (to defendant)-Do you reserve your claim to cross-examine on that book, supposing the case be committed?\n\nDefendant-If your Worship commits the case I will reserve my claim.\n\nHis Worship-On that understanding I will say no more about it.\n\nHon. F. H. May, Captain Superintendent of Police, was then recalled.\n\nHis Worship-When did you become Captain Superintendent of Police?\n\nHon. F. H. May-On the 11th May, 1893.\n\nWere the police regulations, from which you quoted rule 73, made before your time?-Yes, in 1892.\n\nThat rule you say refers to constables and not to inspectors; is that so?-Yes.\n\nIn those rules and regulations are there any rules referring to Inspectors regarding gambling?-To the best of my knowledge there are not.\n\nWhat rules have the Inspectors for their guidance? You read out an order the other day; is there any other order for their guidance besides that?-There are other orders.\n\nThose orders would be issued by the Superintendent, would they not?-Yes.\n\nDepartmentally?-Yes.\n\nHave the rules and regulations been issued by the authority of the Government?-Yes, but there are some orders which the Captain Superintendent has power to issue himself.\n\nAre there any orders for the guidance of the police to which you would like to call my attention?-Yes. I should like to show you the order to which Inspector Witchell referred.\n\nIs the order you read on Saturday respecting gambling the only order you have issued on that subject?-I think so. I do not remember any other order.\n\nHas this particular order received the sanction of the Government?-No, it was not necessary.\n\nPage 450", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363632, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 466, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "SUPREME COURT.\n\n29th July.\n\nCRIMINAL SESSIONS.\n\nBEFORE SIR JOHN CARRINGTON (CHIEF JUSTICE).\n\nTHE CHARGE AGAINST INSPECTOR WITCHELL. Job Witchell, Inspector in the Hongkong Police Force, was charged as follows-That at the time of the happening of the matters hereinafter mentioned, Job Witchell was a subordinate officer, to wit, an Inspector in the Police Force of this colony, and that as such Inspector it was his duty to aid in the enforcement of the law relating to garbling houses and to report to the Captain Superintendent of Police all unlawful common gaming houses which he knew to exist in the colony or the existence of which he had reason to suspect, and that he, the said Job Witchell, at Victoria, in this colony, on the 13th day of March, 1897, and on divers other days between the said 13th day of March, 1897, and the 18th day of June, 1897, did unlawfully, wilfully, and corruptly accept by way of bribe divers sums of money from the keepers and managers of certain unlawful common gaming houses situate in Cheung Hing Lane and Wa Lane offered to him by the said keepers and managers to induce him to refrain from the performance of his said duty in respect of the said gaming houses.\n\nHon. W. M. Goodman (Attorney-General) and Mr. J. J. Francis, Q.C. (instructed by Mr. H. L. Dennys (Crown Solicitor)), prosecuted and Mr. E. Robinson (instructed by Mr. G. C. C. Master) defended.\n\nThe information was read over to the defendant, who stood at the side of his counsel.\n\nMr. Robinson said that before the defendant pleaded he had to move that the information be quashed.\n\nHis Lordship-Que moment, Mr. Robinson. Why is the defendant not standing in the dock? Mr. Robinson replied that Witchell was charged with a misdemeanour and could sit near his counsel if he wished.\n\nHis Lordship-Do you want him near you? Mr. Robinson-It will be more convenient, my Lord.\n\nHis Lordship-The custom is for the accused to go into the dock.\n\nMr. Robinson-I should like to have the defendant near me.\n\nHis Lordship-But you are instructed?\n\nMr. Robinson-Yes, my Lord.\n\nHis Lordship-If you wish to have him near you you are entitled to do so, but I think it is always better for counsel not to have the defendant near him.\n\nMr. Robinson thereupon said he would not object to the defendant being placed in the dock.\n\nDefendant then entered the dock.\n\nMr. Robinson said he had two objections to make. The information was bad for want of particularity; it was too general. In the first place he submitted, as a matter of comparatively small moment, that with regard to the gaming houses said to be situated in Cheung Hing Street and Wa Lane, it was not expressly alleged that either of the places was in Victoria in the colony of Hongkong or within the jurisdiction. It was alleged in the information that it was the defendant's duty to report to the Captain Superintendent of Police all unlawful gaming houses which he knew to exist in the colony and the existence of which he had reason to suspect and that Job Witchell, at Victoria in the colony, accepted by way of bribe divers sums of money from the keepers of certain unlawful gaming houses situated in Cheung Hing Street and Wa Lane. Those streets of course might be anywhere. The count did not show that the offence was in respect of any place over which the Court had jurisdiction. The second objection was that the count was bad for duplicity inasmuch as there was a want of particularity. It alleged that contrary to his duty the defendant, on the 13th March, 1897, accepted by way of bribe divers sums of money from the keepers and managers of certain unlawful gaming houses situated in Cheung Hing Lane and Wa Lane.\n\nMr. Robinson submitted that that was bad for duplicity. The defendant did not know of all the charges he was to meet and if the jury were to return a verdict of guilty against him generally it would be quite uncertain as to which of the charges they found him guilty of. Neither the house nor the keepers were specified. Counsel referred to Archbold, 21st edition, page 58, and to 14 Cox, 499. It had been ruled that it was not sufficient to charge a defendant generally with having committed an offence, but all the facts and circumstances constituting the offence must be set forth. The indictment must not be double, and counsel submitted that the present information was double for want of particularity. Not more than one offence could be charged in one count, but here there was only one count and several offences were charged.\n\nHis Lordship said that supposing a man made a single agreement to take bribes in respect of more than one place; was not that one transaction-one single bribe-although it might refer to different houses? How could that be broken up?\n\nMr. Robinson replied that there was nothing like that stated in the information. There were no particulars in the information in respect to the names of the keepers or the numbers of the houses. Of course if counsel's contention was upheld there would be no end to the information, but with regard to amendment, the depositions showed that the case was really brought in respect of one house and counsel had no objection if the information was amended by the name of the house at No. 2 Wa Lane being put in. Of course it was possible for the prosecution to put their cases in separate counts, but if that were done counsel would have to ask for an adjournment as he had not had notice of any other house but No. 2, Wa Lane and he would have to consider his position.\n\nMr. Francis submitted that the count was a perfectly good one under the provisions of the local Ordinance, which differed considerably from the provisions of the law with reference to indictments in courts in England. The Ordinance regulating the subject is 3 of 1865 as amended by 2 of 1869. According to section 6 the Chief Justice could order further particulars to be delivered if he deemed it expedient to do so. The result of combining the effect of these two Ordinances was that it had always been deemed sufficient to allege in the broadest terms the nature of the offence charged, as murder, or manslaughter, or stealing, without going into great particularity as to names, places, dates, and weapons. If the defendant or his advisers had been in any real difficulty and wanted to be made acquainted with the names of the persons or the particular dates they had ample time to apply for such particulars. In this case there had been a preliminary inquiry in the Police Court and the names and the localities of at least two of the gambling houses were referred to in those proceedings. Counsel submitted that the information was perfectly good and complete.\n\nHis Lordship had already answered the second objection by the question put to Mr. Robinson. It did not necessarily follow from the wording of the information that two separate offences were charged. It might be that there was in fact one acceptance and one transaction although it had reference to different houses, and therefore the count was not double. It did not charge two separate and distinct offences in respect of which two separate and distinct punishments would be necessary to be inflicted or on which two separate and distinct verdicts would have to be given.\n\nIn answer to his Lordship Mr. Francis admitted that it would have been better if the locality of the streets had been mentioned.\n\nMr. Robinson replied and said that his friend had not dealt with the matter of particularity. As he had said, he was quite willing for an amendment to be made. He thought section 6 threw no burden whatever upon the defendant or his advisers.\n\nHis Lordship, in regard to the first objection, directed that the information be amended by stating that Cheung Hing Street and Wa Lane were situated in Victoria in the colony of Hongkong. The second point was that the information was bad for duplicity inasmuch as the charge was in respect of two sets of gaming houses in Cheung Hing Street and Wa Lane. That objection, if it was of any validity, might...\n\n435", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363634, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 468, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "E\n\nappeared from the colony; a certain number of Chinese detectives who remained in the colony had been banished; and a certain number of Inspectors had been suspended from duty. It became evidence, and it would be shown in evidence, that the method adopted for the corruption of the police was one which rendered proof of any particular evidence extremely difficult. Those who received bribes never apparently brought themselves into contact with the persons who paid those bribes and in nearly every case the money passed through the hands of two persons, always Chinese, intermediate between the person who was paying and the person who was receiving. The Government had been fortunate in this case to obtain the evidence of intermediaries through whose hands the money passed.\n\nThe case as far as Witchell was concerned was this. He became aware in the course of his general duties as an Inspector attached to the Central Station of the existence of the gambling house in Wa Lane. There were not at that time any gambling houses of importance in his own district. He sent for a man called Cheng On, a man who some six years ago had been a detective in the police force and who was at that time and was until recently the principal excise officer under the Opium Farmer. Witchell told him that when patrolling about the colony he became aware of the existence of this particular gambling house in Wa Lane. He complained that while others were getting money out of gambling houses he was getting nothing. He explained to the man that he had a large family, that his expenses were considerable, that he would be glad to have something, and that although this particular house in Wa Lane was not in his district he knew of its existence and Mr. May would be very glad to have a report to that effect from him. Cheng On would give the whole of this conversation.\n\nAs the result of this conversation Cheng On went to the headquarters of the partnership in East Street and told the man in charge what Witchell had stated to him. Sam Yeen, who was the man seen by Cheng On, offered to pay Witchell $1 a day. Cheng On told this to Witchell, who said he was perfectly willing to accept the amount. This fact was communicated to Sam Yeen and from then to the time the gambling house was shut up on the 19th July payment at that rate was made in respect of that house. The money was not paid direct to Cheng On; it was paid day by day to a man called Tung Kum, who kept a clothier's shop close to the entrance of Wa Lane and close also to East Street. Tung Kam not only received the money for the defendant but he also received other very considerable sums of money. The money was paid by the gambling house keeper day by day in subsidiary coins to Tung Kum. Tung Kum paid every five days to Cheng On and every seven days Cheng On paid the money to the defendant.\n\nIf the jury thought the evidence was satisfactory they would have clear evidence that the defendant was aware of the existence of at least one gambling house in Wa Lane, that at his request an application was made to the keeper for hush-money, that the keeper of the gambling house or the person responsible for the management of affairs consented to make a payment at the rate of $1 or $1.10 a day—10 cents going to the intermediary—that the money was paid to Tung Kum and that Tung Kum paid that particular amount to Cheng On every five days, and that Cheng On made payments which he fixed at $12.60 every week to Inspector Witchell.\n\nThe witnesses were the Captain Superintendent of Police, Cheng On, Tung Kam, and Sam Yeen. Sam Yeen was the person arrested and convicted as being the keeper of the gaming house at No. 2, Wa Lane and he was now serving a term of nine months' imprisonment for the offence to which, during the case, he pleaded guilty. The jury would understand that these Chinese witnesses were not put forward as being absolutely pure in their actions. Sam Yeen had been promised that if he made a clean breast of it the Government would take his case into consideration and they held out a hope to him. Cheng On was arrested under a banishment warrant and he was subject to a banishment order at this moment, but hope had also been held out to him if he made a clean breast of the affair, and Tung Kum, who was also arrested, had been promised hope if he would make a clean breast of the matter.\n\nThe circumstances under which the witnesses were giving their evidence would undoubtedly be pressed upon the jury in the strongest possible manner by the counsel for the defence, and it might be urged that Chinese evidence was at all times most unreliable and that the evidence of men of this particular class, who were themselves involved in this business, must be received with even greater suspicion than the ordinary Chinese evidence. Possibly it might be urged that no European should be convicted on Chinese evidence or evidence of this kind. But the jury had to remember that while it was their duty to give the defendant the benefit of every doubt that might reasonably arise on the evidence or with reference to the witnesses themselves, they also had a duty to the public and to themselves. It was the jury's duty to do their part in assisting in the administration and enforcement of the law.\n\nCounsel asked them to bear in mind that in such a case as this or in any case of this class it would be utterly impossible for the Government under any circumstances to obtain a conviction against any police officer or any member of the Government service for accepting a bribe or acting corruptly in office if the evidence of Chinese and the evidence of persons acting as intermediaries in the prosecution was to be rejected. Chinese evidence of course always came before a jury with a certain amount of suspicion attached to it, and Chinese evidence of this particular class was more suspicious than ordinarily. Counsel was sure that the jury would examine the evidence more carefully, listen to it more attentively, weigh it more accurately, and decide its intrinsic worth.\n\nThe jury had a serious and responsible duty to perform and they would no doubt carefully watch the witnesses and listen to their evidence and decide whether the evidence was of itself clear, satisfactory, and consistent. Counsel added that the witnesses had been in custody from a very early date. They had been kept strictly apart and they had had no communication whatever with each other. Their statements had been taken down by the Captain Superintendent of Police, Mr. Dennys, and counsel himself, Mr. Brown acting interpreter.\n\nPage 28\n\nHon. F. H. May, Captain Superintendent of Police, was then called and examined by the Attorney-General. He gave evidence of the system in rogue for the suppression of gambling and detailed the work of the Inspectors. He also spoke of a letter he received some time ago. The writer offered to take him to a house in Jervois Street from which he would be able to see gambling going on in Kwai Wa Lane in the daytime. Witness communicated the contents of this letter to Inspector Witchell.\n\nDefendant—It is gross perjury, my Lord.\n\nHis Lordship told defendant not to interrupt. If he wished to communicate with his counsel he could do so.\n\nDefendant—Excuse me for using such an expression, my Lord.\n\nWitness then spoke to raiding the house in East Street and finding money, jewellery, and books of account.\n\nMr. Robinson demanded the production of the books.\n\nThe Attorney-General said Mr. Robinson could see the books if he wished.\n\nMr. Robinson applied for leave to inspect the books and his Lordship granted the application providing that no officer of the court was present during the inspection.\n\nWitness then produced the following list of the contents of the various books—\n\n1—A list containing 35 names on one side with sums of money under them, totalling from $101.25 to $104.35; on the other 45 names with sums of money under them (those of men who received money every five days), totalling $44.13 to $45.50. Grand total, about $145.00.\n\n2.—Contains memoranda of receipts and expenditure at various dates between 24th of 10th moon and 26th of 1st moon. (No year).\n\n3.—Names of persons with sums of money under them (two dates, no month), the 1st, 7 names, $48.10; the 2nd, 9 names, $58.40.\n\n4—A list of 18 articles pawned (and some redeemed) between 24th of 7th moon and 4th of 8th moon. (No year). Total value, $134.00.\n\n5. Similar in substance and arrangement to\n\nPage 467", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363636, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 470, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "Were they told that if they would tell the truth they would not be punished?—Yes, they were.\n\nAnd they said they knew nothing against the men who have been suspended and nothing against Witchell?—No, they did not.\n\nWhat did they say?—If you will ask me separately in regard to each man I will tell you about them, but I cannot lump them all together.\n\nDid any of them give any information to incriminate?—No.\n\nTo incriminate Witchell?—No. Through whom was the communication that they would be not punished made?—Through Mr. Ewens's interpreter.\n\nOh, you spoke to Mr. Ewens's clerk and told him to tell them?—Yes.\n\nThese men were banished?—Yes.\n\nWith regard to Sam Yeen—he is in a different position, he is a convicted man—what hope was held out to him?—He was told that if he would make a full disclosure his case would be taken into consideration by the Government if he desired any mitigation of his sentence.\n\nHe was sentenced to nine months' imprisonment?—Yes.\n\nIn answer to further questions witness said that he denied he was exceeding his powers in committing the men arrested under banishment warrants to Victoria Gaol. One of the men was an opium smoker. He was not told that if he would make his statement first he could get his opium. He got opium the second day after his admission to gaol.\n\nAt this point the Court adjourned until ten o'clock this morning, when Mr. Robinson will proceed to cross-examine the witness in regard to the books found in the house in East Street.\n\nThe defendant was allowed bail as before.\n\nSUPREME COURT,\n\n30th July.\n\nCRIMINAL SESSIONS.\n\nBEFORE SIR JOHN CARRINGTON (CHIEF JUSTICE).\n\nTHE CHARGE AGAINST INSPECTOR WITCHELL.\n\nThe trial was resumed of Job Witchell, Inspector of Police, who is charged with accepting bribes from the keepers and managers of gambling houses between the 13th March, 1897, and the 19th June.\n\nBefore the case proceeded Mr. Robinson said that the gentleman who was giving the bond wished to go away and counsel asked the leave of the court to extend the bond until the conclusion of the Sessions.\n\nThe Attorney-General offered no objection, but he remarked that the application implied that his learned friend was going to occupy the court a great number of days.\n\nHon. F. H. May, Captain Superintendent of Police, was then called for further examination. On entering the witness box he said—My Lord, I notice in the newspaper report this morning of my evidence the following question—\n\nHis Lordship—Are we concerned with that?\n\nWitness—I wish to make a slight correction.\n\nHis Lordship—Is it something you stated yourself that is not quite accurate or is the newspaper report inaccurate?\n\nWitness—I think there was something in the mind of the learned counsel who put the question to me that I did not take exactly as being in his mind. The question was, \"Was anyone in connection with Cheng On told that it would be better if Cheng On made a clean breast of it?\" I took that to mean somebody connected with Cheng On—some of his family relations or Chinese friends—and I said \"No.\" It occurs to me that possibly the learned counsel may have referred to Cheng On's solicitor, in which case the answer would be incorrect, for I did say to Cheng On's solicitor that the best way to help his client would be by telling his client to make a clean breast of it. The same in regard to Tung Kam. I did not make any promise or make any definite reference. I simply said to their representative, in the words of the learned counsel, that it would be better to tell the truth.\n\nMr. Robinson (cross-examining)—Who is No. 12?\n\nWitness—No. 12 is Inspector Witchell.\n\nI repeat the question; who is No. 12?—No. 12 is Inspector Witchell.\n\nHis Lordship—The witness has already stated that the Chinese called him that. You cannot go beyond that. He said, \"I know the Chinese call him No. 12.\" The jury's time is very valuable and you must really try to get the trial over in a reasonable time.\n\nMr. Robinson—I think your Lordship will see that it is Mr. May who is taking up the time. (To witness.) Who is No. 12?\n\nHis Lordship (To witness)—In your judgment who is No. 12?\n\nMr. Robinson—Not in his judgment.\n\nHis Lordship—As far as you know who is No. 12?\n\nMr. Robinson—I have not asked him in connection with this case. I say, who is No. 12?\n\nHis Lordship—We are not dealing with any other case but this case.\n\nMr. Robinson—If your Lordship pleases. Who is No. 12?\n\nWitness—Inspector Witchell.\n\nInspector Witchell was No. 12. Who is No. 127?\n\nHis Lordship—Why can't you put the question in a different way?\n\nWitness—Because I want to see how the witness speaks. Your Lordship is not so au fait with the numbers of constables as Mr. May. (To witness.) Who is No. 12?\n\nWitness—If you refer to P. C. No. 12, there may be a constable with that number, but I cannot give his name. He would be referred to as P. C. No. 12, or if he is a sergeant, P. S. No. 12.\n\nMr. Robinson—I asked you who is No. 12 and now you are volunteering the statement that gamblers would call him No. 12.\n\nMr. Francis—He has not said anything about gamblers.\n\nHis Lordship—He has already stated that so far as this case is concerned the defendant was called No. 12 by the Chinese.\n\nMr. Robinson—There is more than one No. 12. The Inspector's number was 12 and if you see No. 12 in the book it must be the defendant?\n\nWitness—Yes.\n\nIs there not another No. 12 at the present moment in the colony?—Yes.\n\nA man of the name of Sullivan?—I think it is Sullivan.\n\nAttached to the Central District?—Yes.\n\nHow long has he been here?—He has been here about eighteen months.\n\nThat is during the whole period of this gambling house?—Yes.\n\nAs a matter of fact as an Inspector is raised he ceases to carry a number and the number is given to a new man?—Yes.\n\nSome of the numbers have been borne time after time by different men?—Yes.\n\nIn regard to these books, when you found them in No. 3, East Street, was that the first time you had been in East Street?—Yes.\n\nWhen you got there you found six men, I think?—There were more than six men.\n\nDid you receive a communication about East Street?—Yes.\n\nFrom a barrister in the colony?—Yes. A communication from Mr. Francis, Q.C.?—Yes.\n\nDid he tell you who his informer was?—No.\n\nDid he say that some man had been to him?—He did not say where he got his information. Mr. Francis only told you he was informed?—Yes.\n\nYou had never been into No. 3, East Street; have you ever been into East Street?—Yes.\n\nYou had never been in this house?—I may have been at the time of the plague.\n\nYou did very good service then, we all know; but apart from that you have no acquaintance with East Street?—No.\n\nIn this case the warrant was signed by yourself in your character of Justice of the Peace?—Yes.\n\nDid you issue the warrant to Inspector Mackie?—It was not issued to anybody in particular.\n\nTo all or any constables, and you handed it to Inspector Mackie?—Yes.\n\nAnd you went with him?—Yes.\n\nIn answer to further questions witness said...\n\n469", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363638, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 472, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "His Lordship-We cannot try that issue. It might be Dr. Lo K or it might be another Ho Kai.\n\nMr. Robinson then resumed his seat.\n\nHis Lordship (to Witness)--Does it say what Ho Kai it is? No, my Lord, it does not.\n\nThe Attorney-General--From information you have received you know it is not Dr. Ho Kai-I know it was not Dr. Ho Kai.\n\nHis Lordship-Do not let us go into the matter any more.\n\nIn answer to further questions by the Attorney-General as to the entries \"43\" and \"Now 43,\" witness said that there was no officer at present in the Force who used to wear the number 43 and there was now another officer who carried the number 43.\n\nHis Lordship-What were the relations between you and the defendant? Were they of a friendly character or otherwise?\n\nWitness-Very friendly.\n\nSince he has been an Inspector in the Force?-Yes.\n\nAnd I think you said he has been an efficient and zealous officer?-I should say he is one of the most zealous officers in the Force.\n\nI remember there was an important fire case in which he distinguished himself by his intelligence and zeal.--I was not here at the time, my Lord. When I left I gave instructions that he should be made an Inspector., [In answering this question Mr. May appeared to be almost overcome with emotion. He stopped in the middle of the sentence and apparently had great difficulty in continuing.]\n\nYou have not had any difficulty or trouble with him-any quarrel or breach?-Not in the least, my Lord.\n\nMr. Robinson asked permission to put another question. In reply witness said that Sam Yeen escaped custody in the house in East Street. He went for a key and did not return. Witness waited half an hour and then broke open a box in the room and found the books.\n\nMr. Robinson-And you called upon Inspector Stanton to find him?\n\nWitness-Yes.\n\nAnd he was found the same night?-Yes. We turned out all the detective staff to find him.\n\nYou gave your orders to Inspector Stanton and the man was found?-No.\n\nYou said yes. Is it untrue that you told Mr. Stanton?-I sent the police in different directions. As a matter of fact I told Inspector Stanton to remain in the station.\n\nTo give orders and instructions. 43 is supposed to refer to Inspector Stanton?-Yes,\n\nCheng On was then called. He spoke to having interviews with the defendant and to paying him $12.60 every Monday. Witness received altogether $2.20 a day from Tung Kum, but he paid only $1.80, the difference of 40 cents going in his own pocket.\n\nAt the conclusion of this witness's examination in chief Hon. F. H. May was recalled at the request of Mr. Robinson. Mr. May said-Inspector Mann was on leave from 20th June, 1895, to 12th June, 1896, when he resumed duty. He then took charge of the Eastern district, Wanchai, and he has remained in charge at Wanchai until the present. Acting Inspector Hall took charge of Shaukiwan on the 11th December, 1895, and he has been in charge there until the present time.\n\nIn reply to the Attorney-General Mr. May said--From the 13th March, 1895, till the time he went on leave Inspector Mann was stationed in the Central District and was in charge of No. 2 gambling section. Wa Lane is in No. 2 section. From the 16th April, 1894, to 20th June, 1894, he was also in charge of No. 2 section. Acting Inspector Hall, from the 12th March, 1895, to the 11th December, 1895, was at the Central Station and in charge of No. 3 gambling section.\n\nHis Lordship-It is understood we are not trying these men.\n\nThe Attorney-General-My friend asked for the particulars.\n\nMr. Robinson-Not for the particulars the Attorney-General has given.\n\nHis Lordship-I am very much against bringing in these outside cases with which we are not dealing.\n\nCheng On was then called for cross-examination. He denied making the following statement at the Magistracy: \"Tung Kam took me to Sam Yeen and Tung Kum told him in my presence about the conversation with the defendant.\" He believed the Magistrate made a mistake. The depositions were read over to him and he signed them. What he said to-day was that Tung Kam took him nearly as far as No. 3, East Street, and that he (witness) had the conversation alone with Sam Yeen.\n\nMr. Robinson-Perhaps you have been told since or have heard that Sam Yeen said-\n\nMr. Francis asked his friend to ask questions and not to make statements.\n\nMr. Robinson-I was not making a statement. (To Mr. Francis). I might say \"You are a clever man\" and that might be a question. (Laughter.)\n\nHis Lordship (who joined in the laughter)-Now, Mr. Robinson,\n\nThe cross-examination was then proceeded with. Witness said it was not a fact that defendant and his wife took him at the corner of Lyndhurst Terrace and spoke to him about some silk. It was not true that he took some samples of silk to the defendant's house on the 11th March, the date of the conversation he said he had with defendant about gambling houses. Witness received $12.60 from Lung Kum and paid that amount to defendant or his wife every Monday. He got the money in subsidiary coins and changed $10 of it into bank notes, but he did not lose in changing the money as he went to a shopkeeper, who was a friend. When witness was arrested he was not shown a warrant and he did not know anything about a banishment warrant. He knew now he was in custody under a banishment warrant. The Captain Superintendent of Police told him something about a banishment warrant, but it was not shown.\n\nRe-examined by Mr. Francis-After witness was arrested he saw Mr. Hastings, solicitor.\n\nBy his Lordship-Witness knew nothing about the books and papers found at 3, East Street.\n\nThe Court adjourned until nine o'clock this morning. His Lordship intimated that he had promised to distribute the prizes at Belilios Public School this afternoon at four o'clock, and he would not like to break that engagement.\n\nPage 471\n\nSUPREME COURT.\n\n31st July.\n\nCRIMINAL SESSIONS.\n\nBEFORE SIR JOHN CARRINGTON (CHIEF JUSTICE).\n\nTHE CHARGE AGAINST INSPECTOR WITCHELL,\n\nThe hearing was resumed of the charge of accepting bribes brought against Job Witchell, an Inspector in the Police Force.\n\nHon. W. M. Goodman (Attorney-General) and Mr. J. J. Francis, Q.C. (instructed by Mr. H. L. Dennys, Crown Solicitor), appeared for the Crown and the defendant was represented by Mr. E. Robinson (instructed by Mr. G. C. C. Master).\n\nTung Kum, master of a mercer's shop at 181, Hollywood Road, was called and examined by Mr. Francis. Witness said that every five days he received $5.50 from Cheung Hing Street and $17 from Wa Lane. The $5.50 was paid to him by \"Fat Child Chi,\" who told witness to hand the money to Cheng On. Sam Yeen paid the $17. The money was paid in subsidiary coins. Of the $17, $3.50 went to Cheng On himself, $8 was for Yang Fat, who was formerly a detective, and $5.50 was for No. 32. Witness was paid the $5.50 by \"Fat Child Chi\" and was told to hand the money to Cheng On for Inspector No. 12. The payments commenced on the 14th March, 1897, from Wa Lane and on the 18th March, 1897, from Cheung Hing Street. Witness received altogether $51.75 from Sam Yeen every day; that amount included the $17. The money was distributed according to a list given to him by Sam Yeen. Witness was formerly in the Police Force. He retired on a pension about six years ago. He was now in custody under a banishment warrant.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363639, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 473, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "ment warrant.\n\nCross-examined by Mr. Robinson- After he left the police he went to the country and returned in April, 1894. He could find no occupation and so he went back to the country, but returned to Hongkong in December, 1895. He started his present business in December, 1896. During the interval between December, 1895, and December, 1896, he was engaged in assisting Sam Yeen in distributing \"expenses,\" that is, he was engaged in gambling operations. He was not convicted in March, 1895, for larceny and sentenced to six weeks' imprisonment. He was convicted for committing perjury, and was fined $100. He had only been convicted once.\n\nThe Attorney-General and Mr. Francis said the conviction was for assault. Mr. Robinson had not correctly read the conviction.\n\nMr. Robinson said he was quite right. He then asked the witness about the matter and he admitted that he and another man were charged with stealing two shirts and were sent to gaol for six weeks. In addition witness was charged with assault.\n\nMr. Robinson then complained that his learned friend, a Queen's Counsel of this colony, had accused him of misrepresenting matters to the Court.\n\nMr. Francis replied that in the hasty glance he obtained of the conviction paper he certainly did make a mistake.\n\nHis Lordship thought that with this explanation Mr. Robinson's honour was satisfied.\n\nMr. Robinson bowed to his Lordship's decision and the case proceeded.\n\nIn answer to further questions witness said that the sentence was afterwards altered to a fine of $100 on the application of Mr. Dennys, who represented him. He admitted that at the Magistracy he said he did not know for whom he received $8. He was confused when he made that statement. He now admitted that he received it for Yang Fat. Cheng On gave him the name.\n\nMr. Robinson--I suppose you have seen Cheng On since you were at the Magistracy?\n\nWitness--I saw him yesterday or the day before.\n\nWhere? In the witness room?--Yes. You were both together for the greater part of the day in the witness room --We were both together, but we did not speak to each other.\n\nI suppose there was some guard over you. \nHis Lordship--Do I understand that Cheng On told you the name of this man, or do you recollect it?--Cheng On told me and I now recollect it.\n\nIn answer to further questions witness said he did not tell the Magistrate that he received some money from \"Fat Child Chi.\" He did not mention that name at all to the Magistrate. \nRe-examined by Mr. Francis.--He was not questioned at the Magistracy about the Cheung Hing Street gambling house.\n\nHis Lordship--Why didn't you mention it? \nWitness--Because I had no direct dealings with the affairs and therefore I did not mention anything about that house. The money was simply handed to me and I was asked to pass it over.\n\nWhen was the last payment you made to Chong On? 17th June last.\n\nSam Yeen, who was convicted of being the keeper of a gambling house at 2, Wa Lane, and sentenced to nine months' imprisonment, was then called. He said he had been connected with the house for five years, No. 3, East Street, was the outer office of 2, Wa Lane, and the money, jewellery, and accounts were kept there. There was only one gambling house in Wa Lane--only one house in which gaming was actually carried on. Gaming was sometimes carried on in No. 5. In reality there were two houses in which gaming was carried on, but both belonged to the same establishment. The playing was sometimes shifted to No. 2, Ng Kwai Fong, next to the Tam Fa Lau eating house. Gambling had been carried on in Nos. 2 and 5, Wa Lane, every day from the 2nd February this year to the 18th June. The hours were 6 p.m. to 12 p.m. Last year gambling was carried on for six months in broken periods. Witness then spoke to paying money to Tung Kum and to the conversation he had with Cheng On respecting No. 12's application for money. Witness told Cheng On that if No. 12 received $1 a day the recipient must not chase and beat witness's fokis. Witness consented to pay $1 a day and 10 cents for Cheng On. Witness paid altogether about $150 a day for distribution during the fourth and fifth months. The police who received the money were supposed not to take any notice of the gambling houses. Witness was then shown a list and he pointed out the entry \"No. 12, $1.10, Cheng On's hand.\" That meant that the money was paid to Cheng On. There was also an entry \"$23.55, paid to Tung Kam\" and another $31.05 paid to Tung Kom.\" Another entry was \"No. 12, $1, Cheng On's hand entered in Kum's hand,\" meaning that the money was paid to Tung Kam. The list was a memorandum showing the names of persons to whom money was paid and the amount of each payment.\n\nMr. Francis--I will now ask your Lordship for direction in reference to the entries in the books, such as 43, 89, and 91, and Government House and other people. Does your Lordship think that I should ask questions about those entries or should the matter be dropped entirely?\n\nHis Lordship--Mr. Robinson did ask a certain number of questions about them, but I think we should keep ourselves free of them.\n\nMr. Francis--I think it is only fair to the parties concerned that some questions should be asked about them, but I am entirely in your Lordship's hands. The matter is not a necessary portion of our case, but I cannot say what my friend in his address to the jury will say.\n\nHis Lordship--What I shall say to the jury with reference to this list is that we are not trying the question of the guilt or innocence of all the parties mentioned in this list as having received sums of money, but the defence is entitled to look at this list and if they can show there are absurd entries in it and also impossible things they could say that the list is therefore not bona-fide and the jury would be entitled to disbelieve it.\n\nMr. Francis--Then, my Lord, that lays the duty absolutely incumbent upon me to show that these entries are not absurd.\n\nHis Lordship--On the face of it these entries may be true or untrue, but we are not trying that question.\n\nMr. Francis--If it is open to my friend to say that the list is entirely false because he thinks fit to say so, the prosecution is entitled to say that they are not absurdities.\n\nHis Lordship--As far as my opinion goes he has not succeeded in showing that the entries are unreasonable and ought not to be there. Suppose the name of the Governor is there as receiving $5, or the name of the General as receiving $3, I think the gentlemen of the jury will say, \"We cannot believe that; it is so utterly impossible.\"\n\nMr. Francis--Very well, my Lord. Even the entries \"Government House\" so and so and \"Ho Kai\" so and so can be explained. Suppose the explanation is this, that it is simply an entry relating to a boy in employ at Government House or to a servant in the employ of Dr. Ho Kai. I submit I am entitled to get that explanation from the witness if the defence are allowed to make a point of those entries.\n\nHis Lordship--If they do make a point... \nMr. Francis--If they do make a point of it it will be too late for me to give the explanations. \nHis Lordship--We have no evidence that it is Dr. Ho Kai.\n\nMr. Francis--Questions were asked in reference to 89 and 91. I want to show that they were in receipt of bribes and that there is no reason why the entries should be looked upon as absurdities.\n\nHis Lordship--It came out in evidence that they had been formerly in connection with the Central District and therefore I shall put it to the jury that they might or might not have received bribes. But we are not trying that question.\n\nThe Attorney-General--I do not wish to throw dirt at anybody who is not here to answer, and your Lordship will notice that I have not introduced a single name, with the exception of Witchell's, as being in receipt of bribes, as all cases of that sort will give very...\n\nPage 472", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363641, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 475, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "You bad authority to put the names in the list P-Yos, because I looked after the accounts. When the raid was made were all the books seized or were some saved?-Nothing was saved; all the books and papers were taken possession of by the Police, but some other papers were burned before then.\n\nDoes that list show the total daily payments to Tung Kam?-Yes.\n\nIt does not show the names of the people to whom he was to distribute the money-\n\nthe names appear in the other book,\n\nNo,\n\nIs that the sort of account kept with Tung Kum?--And the others as well.\n\nWhat is the total daily payments?- $146.88. His Lordship-It is no wonder the business did not pay.\n\nThe Foreman of the jury-Does the $116.88 paid daily appear in the general account as one lump sum or as so much money paid away?\n\nWitness-The daily payments of these expenses do not appear in the ledger, but in this bundle of papers.\n\nHow did you strike a balance?---I struck a balance by making out the accounts from these papers.\n\nHow did the proprietors know the amount when it is not shown in the books? These bills have to be produced and shown to the masters.\n\nSo you have no proper books kept for the proprietors?\n\nMr. Francis, by permission of his Lordship, asked a few questions in regard to the keeping of the accounts and their Lordship said it would be better if the Court interpreter examined the books.\n\nMr. Robinson said the Crown were not entitled to farther time in this matter. They had had the documents in their possession since June, and he submitted in a case of this sort they ought to have had every document translated for the use of both parties and the Court. His Lordship said it appeared there was very little in the books relating to the defendant, and he thought it would not be desirable to put the Crown to the trouble and expense of translating those books. Of course Mr. Robinson could also have access to the books.\n\nMr. Robinson said his point was one of general procedure. The Crown ought to have referred to those documents before they came into court. Mr. Francis said the books could not have been put in as evidence for the Crown at all. Therefore the Crown had made no preparations, as they did not expect the books to be referred to.\n\nThe Attorney-General intimated that the case for the Crown was practically finished unless the jury wished to ask more questions on the books. They had also the silk mercer in reserve to give evidence if called upon.\n\nThe Court had now sat from 9 o'clock until 2.10 without an adjournment, and his Lordship said he had an engagement of a semi-public nature at four o'clock. If the jury wished he would resume the hearing about five o'clock if it was possible to finish the case that day.\n\nMr. Robinson said he might have several witnesses or he might have only one to call; that depended on circumstances and his judgment at the time.\n\nHis Lordship thereupon said the case could not be finished that afternoon and the Court adjourned until 10 a.m. to-morrow.\n\nPage 363\n\nPage 363\n\nPage 363\n\nSUPREME COURT.\n\n3rd August.\n\nCRIMINAL SESSIONS.\n\nBEFORE SIR JOHN CARRINGTON (CHIEF JUSTICE).\n\nTHE CHARGE AGAINST INSPECTOR WITCHELL.\n\nVERDICT AND SENTENCE.\n\nThe trial of Job Witchell, Inspector of Police, charged with accepting bribes from gambling house keepers, was resumed.\n\nHon. W. M. Goodman (Attorney-General) and Mr. J. J. Francis, Q.C. (instructed by Mr. H. L. Dennys, Crown Solicitor), prosecuted and Mr. E. Robinson (instructed by Mr. G. C. U. Master) defended.\n\nThe following was the special jury ----Messrs. R. Marten, W. H. Potts, A. Findlay Smith, T. I. Rose, St. C. Michaelsen, E. W. Mitchell, and F. G. Collins.\n\nMr. Francis said that by his Lordship's direction, Mr. A. Seth, Deputy Registrar, with the assistance of the Court interpreter, had made an examination of the books with reference to which the jury had made an inquiry on the last day of the trial.\n\nHis Lordship said Mr. Seth had better be called as a witness.\n\nMr. A. Seth, Deputy Registrar of the Supreme Court, was then called. He said that since the last hearing he had examined the books produced at that hearing and also eighteen slips. The eighteen slips each contained a day's receipts and expenditure. The receipts consisted of cash and pledges. The expenditure consisted of cash, \"peace\" money, and sundries. The accounts were balanced daily, so that each slip showed the daily balance to credit or debit. Those daily balances were carried to what might be called the ledger. At a certain period the total losses or profits were struck and carried into the year's account. The books showed that in the 11th and 5th moons the total profit was $34,681.08 and the total loss $39,336.61. Having examined the books witness was able to say that the items of commissions charged in the daily sheet were carried through the whole set of books.\n\nIn cross-examination by Mr. Robinson witness said there was no statement of the year mentioned. The name, Tung Kum, did not, as far as witness knew, appear in the documents, nor did the name of No. 12. The wages averaged $17 or $18 a day, sundries averaged $15, and there was a daily average in the fifth month of $150 for commission.\n\nIn answer to his Lordship witness said that the term \"commission\" would cover payments made in the way of hush-money. Each of the eighteen slips dealt with one day. The ledger dealt with the period from the 29th day of the eleventh moon to the 19th day of the fifth moon. From those slips a person could get an idea of what was going on in the business. The books did not appear to be fabricated or unreal.\n\nSam Yeon was then re-called to state that the slips were the daily account for the fifth Wan fat Lau business. They related to the fifth moon of this year. The item \"commission\" included hush-money. The gaming house was open from 6 a.m. until 12 p.m. Before he said the house was open from 6 p.m. until midnight.\n\nThis concluded the case for the Crown.\n\nMr. Robinson said he did not intend just then to address the jury at any length because he had witnesses to call. He would call Mrs. Burnett, who would prove that on the very day on which Cheng On said he had the conversation with Inspector Witchell in defendant's house Cheng On called at the house with samples of silk and he did not see the defendant that day because he was upstairs all the time. He only saw Mrs. Witchell (whom counsel could not call) and Mrs. Burnett in the dining room. Therefore Cheng On told a deliberate falsehood when he said he had a conversation with the defendant. The reason why silk was wanted was because defendant wished to send some home to a friend. The whole case rested on the evidence of Cheng On, who was utterly unworthy of belief. The evidence would show that Cheng On did not go to the house to talk about bribes, but to take samples of silk. Counsel then pointed out the relative positions of the two men, Witchell and Cheng On. Witchell was, as the jury had heard, one of the smartest and most zealous officers in the Police Force, while Cheng On was the chief excise officer, that is, the chief native officer over the native excise officers under the Opium Farmer. The defendant knew that by being on friendly terms with the chief excise\n\nPage 364\n\nPage 364\n\nPage 364", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363642, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 476, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "officer he would be able to procure for himself the advantage of the chief excise officer's knowledge. The defendant could procure through him \"tips\" which would be useful to a police officer. Another point was that the gambling houses presented a double aspect to the people connected with them. There was the capitalist who put his money into the concern, there were the police to find it out, and there were fokis who were the fokis were there for what purpose? there simply for love of gambling or to make money? They were there to make as much money as they could out of the capitalist who put his money into the illegal business. Their object was to line their own pockets. How was that done? Let the jury take Sam Yeen, who had during the past five years followed the occupation of a gambler. Bribes were paid to the police. After a time the bribes increased and increased until they came to $150 a day, or between $4,000 and $5,000 a month. Did the jury think that all that money was paid to the police, or did they think it found its way into the pockets of Sam Yeen, Tung Kum, and Cheng On? Possibly some of the native police were in the pay of the men. Was it not possible that something was done at the Magistracy, from which the warrants were issued? It was easy to see that the gamblers could easily get information from the Magistracy without the Europeans being able to do so. Counsel put it that the $150 a day was not all paid out to the police; it simply went into the pockets of Sam Yeen, who gulled the partners and persuaded them that they paid the money to the police. Clever Sam Yeen and clever Tung Kum! When the capital was lost there would be a cessation of business and a new partnership would be worked up and a new syndicate would carry on the business. The jury had it that the gambling houses were a source of great profit. So they were. But \"for ways that are dark and tricks that are vain the heathen Chines is peculiar.\" It was very clear how the money went. Men of the kidney of Sam Yeen, Tung Kum, and Cheng On encouraged the syndicate to put in their money, which they disposed of. The list represented the trick of the fokis who were cheating their employers. The partners had no check on their tokis, and the partners were absolutely in the hands of the fokis. The partners were the milch cows. From a common sense point of view the list was absolutely to be disregarded. Take the Government House entry. A lukong in the employ of Government House says, \"Pay me 30 cents; if you do not I am in a position to give information.\" The money is paid because the lukong is in a position to give information. Sam Yeen had said, \"Not a cent would I have paid Cheng On if he had come on his own account.\" That was certainly an economy of the truth, because Sam Yeen had perhaps forgotten that he had already admitted paying to Cheng On on his own account $3.50 every five days or 70 cents a day. Cheng On said to himself, \"I have got the entrée to the Inspector's house; I see him at the Magistracy; I make a point of going to him and speaking to him; I am a friend of the Inspector and these gambling people know I am a friend. I will tell them my friend the Inspector wants some money and they are bound to believe me, and I will put the money in my own pocket.” If they thought he was not an emissary of the Inspector he could say to them, \"All right, you can see me go into the Inspector's house.\" Cheng On had ingratiated himself with the Inspector and the Inspector allowed him in his house because he could obtain good information from Cheng On. Where was the proof that defendant was paid the money? If such evidence was to convict a respectable man counsel was of opinion that there was not a firm in the place but must be under suspicion. Counsel did not know if a man like Cheng On could touch the gentlemen of the jury in civil life, but in official life every policeman in Hongkong could not help feeling that his character was in the hands of the Chinese; that is, if evidence of Chinese was to be believed. And such Chinese, too! One was a convicted gambler and the others associates of professional gamblers.\n\nIn regard to Cheng On, he was in custody under a banishment warrant. His only escape from that banishment was by telling this story. He had been the chief excise officer and he knew that the officers of the Imperial Maritime Customs of China were all round the Chinese frontier to stop the smuggling of opium. By whom? Cheng On would not like to go over the Chinese border; he had every inducement not to go and he resolved to save himself at the expense of another. He had arranged this matter. Cheng On's only chance of escape was by accusing Witchell for his own protection. He was told to tell the truth. When that was said by a high executive officer to a man under banishment, and who knew the consequences of being banished, it amounted to telling him to give incriminating evidence. He could hardly help himself because he had given himself away to Sam Yeen in saying that he came on behalf of the defendant. If Cheng On had told the truth would his case have been considered by the Government? Who was to be the judge of the truth? Counsel then said that supposing by chance Mr. Francis, who had a great reputation amongst the Chinese, had a client who kept a gambling house and he wanted to get something good out of Mr. Francis. If that man went to the gambling house keeper and said, \"If you do not pay me something I will tell Mr. Francis and he will tell the Chief of Police and make it pretty hot for you.\" In that case the jury would have found in the book the entry- Francis, $1.\"\n\nMrs. Barnett was then called. She said she went to the defendant's house on the 11th March, when Cheng On took some samples of silk there. Mrs. Witchell saw him, but defendant did not. Cheng On remained in the house about ten minutes. Defendant was upstairs during all that time.\n\nCross-examined by Mr. Francis-The samples of silk were left in the house by Cheng On.\n\nActing Chief Inspector Mackie was the next witness. He said-P. S. McIver and his wife went home on the 25th March last in the P. and O. steamer Kaisar-i-Hind. I know Watson, the clerk at the Goal.\n\nHis Lordship thought that this was going rather outside the case and Mr. Robinson asked no further questions.\n\nThis concluded the evidence for the defence. The Attorney-General then asked permission to call the silk mercer.\n\nHis Lordship thought it was not admissible to call that man as the silk might have been bought from somebody else in March.\n\nMr. Robinson finally addressed the jury and said that a few words would be sufficient to put the defendant's view of the case before the jury. He had already addressed them on the main points and there were only a few incidental points that he need refer to. Counsel referred to what he called the growth of the case since the hearing at the Magistracy and commented upon the discrepancies in the evidence of Sam Yeen and Cheng On and also upon the fact that the list, which was said to be three years old, was not in the least dirty or frayed, while the ink was in parts bright. \"The books of account were put in for the purpose—\n\nMr. Francis said that the defence called for the books; the prosecution did not put them in. Mr. Robinson submitted that as the counsel for the Crown in his opening statement referred to a complete set of books being found in the gambling house giving the accounts of the business it followed that they became evidence.\n\nHis Lordship said the prosecution could not have put in the books.\n\nMr. Robinson-Then how very reprehensible to refer to them.\n\nHis Lordship said Mr. Francis had merely given a description of the books.\n\nMr. Robinson-Essing made that statement and it having been published in the Press from the Magistracy downwards, it would have been like shirking, bilking, and being afraid of them if an attempt had been made to keep them out. I was not afraid of them.\n\nHis Lordship--If Mr. Francis had tendered these books as evidence against the defendant I should have refused to receive them and I should have directed the jury, in my summing up, to dismiss from their minds all they had heard or read of any entries.\n\n475", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363643, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 477, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "Mr. Robinson-Conventionally, my Lord, that would have been perfectly satisfactory, but practically\n\nHis Lordship-Then you do not give the jury any sense for getting rid of a thing they have heard.\n\nMr. Robinson-I can only speak from my own experience; it is very hard to get rid of what one has heard.\n\nContinuing his speech, counsel said the fokis had to say, \"We must corrupt the police,\" in order to get the hush-money from their employers. The employers were helpless and they said, \"All right, we will pay the police.\" The story was merely a stalking horse behind which the fokis, the servants, under the pretence of bribing the police, put most of the money into their own pockets. In regard to Cheng On's story of his interview with defendant, the jury had heard the statement of Mrs. Burnett. The jury had seen Cheng On and had noticed his demeanour; they knew that Inspector Witchell had faithfully and zealously served in the Police Force for fifteen years, and they had the statement of Mrs. Burnett, who was an honest English woman, that she knew Cheng On, that she saw him on the 11th March, that he did not see the defendant. The jury had to judge between that man, Cheng On, and that woman.\n\nMr. Francis then addressed the jury and said that while a good character was valuable to a man and he was entitled to the benefit in a doubtful case, no matter how good his character might be or how long continued he may have borne that character, if the witnesses satisfied the jury beyond reasonable doubt that he was guilty of the offence with which he stood charged, that good character could not be taken into consideration. If there was a doubt in any case, a defendant was entitled doubly to the benefit of the doubt if he was a man of good character. The jury would weigh the evidence very carefully and say whether the defendant had accepted hush-money not to report the existence of the gambling house. It was clear that there were three or four gambling houses carrying on an extensive business in the colony quite unchecked by what was considered one of the best police forces in the East, and there must have been a considerable amount of corruption in the Police Force before that state of things could have existed. Counsel submitted that whether the books were ill-kept or not, there was no doubt they were perfectly bona fide. After their seizure by the Captain Superintendent of Police, what was his duty? He suspended officers, banished Chinese detectives, and instituted a general inquiry into the state of the Police Force. There was a special inquiry against Inspector Witchell. The three men were arrested and they were detained to give evidence, but there was absolutely no malice shown against the defendant. Counsel again referred to the fact that the Police Force must have been corrupted or these gambling houses could not have kept open from dawn till midnight.\n\nHis Lordship asked Mr. Francis to confine himself to the case of the defendant and to argue that he must have known of the existence of the houses.\n\nMr. Francis, continuing, said that if a single charge had been brought against a member of the Police Force, the jury would have required the strongest and most unmistakable proof as the thing would have been improbable. Here the jury had had it brought home to them that as regards any member of the Police Force, it was not, to put it mildly, impossible that he may have been cognizant of the existence of the houses, and it might be capable of proof that the defendant was one of the persons who received bribes to shut his eyes to the existence of the houses. Beyond that, counsel did not ask the jury to attach any importance whatever to the facts which had been proved. The defence set up was that Cheong On did not pay bribes to Inspector Witchell, but pocketed them himself. There was not a tittle of evidence to support that suggestion, and it was a pure effect of imagination, and a very poor one, too. Did the jury think that the men keeping the gambling houses did not ascertain whether they were being swindled? The fact that daily balances were struck showed that they looked after their own interests and ascertained where all the money went to. Counsel also referred to the letter which the Captain Superintendent of Police received from someone stating that gambling existed in Kwai Wa Lane and which he mentioned only to Inspector Witchell and Mrs. May, and to the evidence given by Cheng On that the defendant asked who wrote the letter to the Captain Superintendent. Cheng On could not possibly have given that evidence unless the defendant had asked the question. There was absolutely no reason why Cheng On's evidence should be disbelieved. As regards Mrs. Burnett, it was quite possible that her story was true with the exception of the date. Did they think that she could recognize Cheng On after having seen him only once? It was highly improbable. Cheng On had said he had never seen her, but it was possible that Cheng On had seen her but had forgotten her. No evidence had been given that any silk had been forwarded to any friend of the defendant.\n\nDefendant-My Lord, here is a letter showing the receipt of it in South Wales.\n\nHis Lordship asked the defendant not to interrupt.\n\nMr. Francis, continuing, said that if the jury had no reasonable doubt of Cheng On's evidence, he asked them in the interests of justice to find the defendant guilty.\n\nMr. Robinson said that from the point of view so becomingly and properly uttered by his learned friend, \"in the interests of justice,\" he asked whether there would be any objection to the letter mentioned by defendant being produced.\n\nHis Lordship thought that such a course would not be regular.\n\nMr. Robinson said of course he could not prove the letter else he would have done so, but he could produce the letter and the envelope, with the postmark.\n\nHis Lordship said the letter could not be admitted at that stage.\n\nHis Lordship commenced summing up at 5.20 and said that as a late hour had been reached and the jury had followed the evidence so carefully, he would be less particular in going into all the evidence that had been given. After explaining the law on the question and detailing various points in the information, his Lordship said the contest took place with reference to the receipt of money by the defendant. If they thought that the money was received under the circumstances referred to, there could be no doubt that the defendant was guilty. His Lordship could not help thinking that the length of the case had been greatly extended by the fact that the defence had taken upon themselves the burden of the police case generally, having an eye, so to speak, to the position of the members of the Police Force. He founded those observations on two reasons. In the first place, Mr. May underwent a very long and severe cross-examination; he was under cross-examination for practically a whole day. The other reason was the introduction of the books and papers. Both those points and the way with which the points were dealt made him think that the defendant had committed an error in judgment as they very much prolonged the case and made it more embarrassing to arrive at a right conclusion. His Lordship's own view in regard to the books was that if the books were ruled not to be corroborative evidence in any way against the defendant, then the result was that the defendant had set up a bogey in order to knock it down, and he had taken a great deal of time to do it, whereas if the jury arrived at the conclusion that the books did corroborate the story, the defence had undoubtedly admitted an enemy in the camp by asking for the books. If the books had not been produced, his Lordship would have asked the jury to dismiss from their minds anything they might have heard or read in the newspapers regarding the entries in the books, and he was quite certain the jury would have acted on those instructions. So also in regard to the general position of the police. There was no need to make out that Captain May had mismanaged the police in regard to the gambling.\n\nPage 476", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363644, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 478, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "bling houses. Captain May really knew very little about this particular case. His evidence, as bearing upon the defendant, was very short and simple and confined to a few general particulars, but in order, so to speak, to break down the case as affecting the whole of the police, the defence went for Captain May and took him over a whole protracted cross-examination, and, his Lordship was going to say, with some asperity. In regard to the Chinese witnesses the jury would consider their demeanour and the manner in which they gave their evidence. It appeared to his Lordship that Cheng On and Tung Kum stood their cross-examination very well. Mr. May underwent his cross-examination in a very fair and honest manner. One important point that came out in his cross-examination was that there was no vestige of ill-feeling on his part towards the defendant, that he had no desire to see the defendant punished from any personal motives, and that he was doing his duty in this matter as a public officer only. He spoke in high terms of the defendant and they had it on all hands that the defendant was an officer of great energy, ability, and zeal. Juries naturally gave the benefit of any doubt to a man of a good character and the jury would no doubt bear that in mind. With regard to Cheng On and Tung Kum they were scarcely cross-examined at all. They were not closely questioned; they were not dragged over the harrow, so to speak. The cross-examination was conducted in a somewhat general manner and the witnesses certainly did not break down under it. It appeared to his Lordship that Sam Yean was not a satisfactory witness under cross-examination; he was somewhat uncertain and shifty.\n\nHis Lordship then proceeded with a general statement of the case and in regard to the letter sent to Mr. May asked if the jury thought that Cheng On could have known of that letter if the defendant had not told him about it. The jury had also to remember that, according to Cheng On's statement, Mr. May went to the house in Kwai Wa Lane, whereas he did not go, and it was most probable that the defendant would know whether Mr. May went or not. Speaking of the interview of the 11th March deposed to by Cheng On, his Lordship pointed out that the statement was a long one and the jury would have to consider whether defendant would not beat about the bush and not ask Cheng On straight off to pay him bribes. Speaking of the other names in the list his Lordship had ruled that they could not go into the general question. They were not trying the other members of the Police Force but only the defendant. When they found a number of names appearing in a list it was impossible according to the rules of evidence and reason for them to take up the list to see whether or not the bribes had been paid to the persons or not. Those were side issues, which would involve interminable inquiries and the appearance of all those persons before the Court. It was entirely a collateral issue whether Inspector Mann had taken bribes or not. Inspector Mann may have taken bribes or he may not. They did not know and they did not care; they were simply inquiring whether the defendant took bribes. Suppose the Governor's name appeared there for $5 and the General's for $3. The jury would have said, \"We will not call the Governor and we will not call the General.” and they would also say to themselves, \"It is impossible that these two gentlemen—these two high officers—would receive bribes.\" Names of Inspector Mann and Acting Inspector Hall appeared in the books and the defence asked the jury to say that the list could not be accepted as genuine because those two men were not stationed in the gambling sections. But both men had been in the Central District and it also appeared that they were still in the colony. Therefore the conclusion was that it was not impossible or not highly improbable or absurd that their names should be in the list. They might have been receiving bribes or they might not, but the jury were not charged with that issue. The presence of their names in the list did not render the list the least absurd or unreliable.\n\nHis Lordship then referred to the evidence for the defence. If the jury believed Mrs. Barnett had not mistaken the time and place it was quite clear that Cheng On had told what was not the truth, but they must weigh the evidence most carefully and consider which of them gave the more likely evidence. They must not consider the evidence on the broad question of Chinese and Europeans. That would be a mistake. It was quite possible for a Chinaman to tell the truth and for a European to tell a falsehood and vice versa. They had to look at it in the light of the way the evidence was given and in the light of the probabilities of the case.\n\nHis Lordship concluded as follows—Gentlemen of the jury, this case is important both from the point of view of the Government and from the point of view of the defendant. It is important from the point of view of the Government because if corruption exists in the Police Force it is essential that they should detect it and that they should prove it and punish it. Nothing can be more important from the point of view of the Government than that. If they get a prima facie case against a principal member of the Police Force it is important that they shall bring it forward and prove it if they can; otherwise, gentlemen, the whole administration of the Government fails. If you have corruption in the public service, and especially in the Police Force, then, as I say, you are landed in a series of evils of which no man can see the end. Therefore the case is very important from the Government point of view. I think myself that the moment Captain May made that seizure and had prima facie ground for thinking that the No. 12 mentioned in the list was the defendant, his plain duty was to have this case investigated fully before the Magistrate and, if the Magistrate sent it forward, in this court also.\n\nYou will also bear in mind that the case is in the last degree important to the defendant. Of course it is his bounden duty to fight the case to the end. If this charge is proved he not only undergoes punishment, but he is a disgraced and ruined man for life, because he would be adjudged unworthy of any office of trust and honour that might be within his reach. Therefore, as I have said, the case has taken a long time, but it is one of vast importance and I am glad to think that we have had a fair and impartial inquiry. I am glad to think that you have listened attentively to the evidence and to the addresses of counsel, and I am quite certain you are actuated by only one desire to do right in this matter according to your oaths between the Crown and the defendant, and I do trust that your intelligence will guide you to a right decision.\n\nMr. Robinson asked his Lordship to remind the jury that if they were unable to agree after a reasonable time the verdict of five of their number could be given.\n\nHis Lordship told the jury this and that a reasonable time was about one hour.\n\nThe jury retired to consider their verdict at 6.55.\n\nMr. Robinson asked if the defendant could be allowed a seat.\n\nHis Lordship—Certainly. I should like to say, Mr. Robinson, that if I had thought of it before I should have directed the Indian guard to be withdrawn in deference to his being an Inspector of Police. However, it is too late now.\n\nThe defendant was then accommodated with a seat outside the dock.\n\nThe jury returned into court at 7.15 and defendant re-entered the dock.\n\nThe Clerk of the Court—Have you agreed upon your verdict? Do you find Job Witchell guilty or not guilty?\n\nThe Foreman—Guilty.\n\nThe Clerk of the Court—Are you unanimous?\n\nThe Foreman—Yes. The jury would like to recommend the defendant to the mercy of the Court in consideration of his previous good conduct.\n\nDefendant—May it please you, my Lord, will you kindly allow me to read this letter from Tenby in acknowledgement of the receipt of the silk?\n\nHis Lordship—We cannot go into that now. Do you wish to say anything with regard to sentence?\n\nDefendant—My Lord, as I have been found guilty on this abominable charge I beg the mercy of the Court. I have a family of five.\n\n477", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363654, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 488, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "487\n\n12\n\nthat the Interpreters at the Magistracy, the Supreme Court and the Police Station whose names are in these lists were, as I have not the least doubt they were, part of the gambling house, the probabilities being able to wake anything out of being extremely small. Even with his suspicions aroused the Captain Superintendent of Police would have been unable to understand these lists without the assistance of Shan Yin, especially as no dates and names in full are given. The only foreign names in the account are those of Messrs. Fat-Lau-oy (a magistrate) and Fu-bei-po (a barrister), and it is not suggested that they are down as having received money, they are simply put down to explain in whose employ the persons bribed were.\n\nThe Captain Superintendent of Police has dealt chiefly with the members of the Police force who appear from the lists to have received bribes in respect of Wa Lave. I don't know whether my steps have been taken to obtain the lists and accounts of the Cheong Hing Street house, the books and pledges of which were said by Shan Yin to be kept on the 2nd and 3rd floor of the most Easterly of the new houses in Upper Lascar Row; but it is quite possible that Lau Chi made payments on account of the Cheong Hing Street House to the same extent as Shan Yin made some on account of the Wa Lave house. This was clearly so in Witchell's case and in Osmund's.\n\n(91", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363663, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 497, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "No 2\n\n053\n\nques yo\n\nthe\n\nstay- no 20056 gives the exunction Lefore the Cout on a cremeval charge of one of ttx duspect us of Polres a fee It's as routere.\n\nthe\n\nNo 20055 fives the disminal of another suspectar. I Crective (mail.\n\nHoppers awal. This paper\n\nentaires the au mut of\n\nthe\n\nhial Lefse the Coventive (merel\n\nof another public officer, a lleid Cleck, & of his tuteur\n\nThe fuestion is\n\n2 that Peutere adequate? I do wish think so\n\nAu\n\nneute (funt fact)?\n\nhave drawn attention to the\n\nlus dessen beut\n\nweater of the fuel, fount draw attention lette\n\nqueer yote\n\nun fanciers\n\ness\n\nfemeral\n\nleveren from from\n\nthe attowy\n\nCantiary\n\nwheel\n\nllet\n\ndesmiral reveld be an\n\non inne epedient senterve\n\nI cafes to reiving\n\nexejject\n\nwith wh\n\ndis favour the punate letter\n\nдескі Яна велаз to hn Lecea, Secal Communications.\n\nM\n\nMy try\n\nPrevent the A Gerne stoped that sharper\n\nThis bundy shoply\n\nA thr\n\nffore\n\narefecem that\n\nthe My Charger arre\n\nCmnem véleke ications, while munturefl matters of administration,\n\nadinary\n\nbeem to me most impreopen in a judicial or quasi judicial case\n\nMy dear Lucas,\n\n12th August 1897.\n\nBy this mail there is going home my report on the gambling scandal and I dare say some other despatches concerning two men (Osmund and Hore) who have been dealt with by the Executive Council in connection with the same matter.\n\nOf course the evidence against both these men was originally obtained by myself so I am well conversant with it.\n\nThe papers here have it, and they have no doubt obtained their information direct from the men themselves, as the proceedings in the Executive Council are all confidential, that Hore has been dismissed and Osmund allowed to resign on a reduced pension. As these sentences require the confirmation of the Secretary of State I take the liberty of writing to you, because I feel strongly that the sentence on Osmund is quite inadequate. In fact I will go so far as to say that the decision of the Council is a wrong one.\n\nThe case against Osmund is as strong as it well can be. It is far stronger than the case against Witchell on which we got an unanimous verdict from a Hong Kong jury which is saying a great deal.\n\nOsmund has been suspected for some time for taking money in connection with emigration matters, and I have\n\nS 22/10", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363664, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 498, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "407\n\nTom,\n\nhave at Lockhart's request been trying to get evidence of it ever since October last. Apart from the gambling bribes he received there is proof now that he did receive money for emigration matters. But in any case the proof of receiving bribes from the gambling house is absolute and I don't see that it makes much difference whether a man received bribes for a week or a month or a year. If he received them at all he should be punished with the utmost severity.\n\nIf this man Osmund is to be allowed to retire on a reduced pension, a premium is put on this taking of bribes. The chances are 1000 to 1 against the recipient of bribes being run to earth in this Colony where the difficulty of obtaining evidence from Chinese (and of course it is the Chinese who are concerned in the bribery) is enormous, and if when a man is run to earth he is allowed to go on a pension it really is quite worth a man's while to run the risk and take bribes.\n\nTo let Osmund off in this way is in my opinion unjust. Look at Witchell. He has been proved to have only been in receipt of bribes for 3 months, and is imprisoned, and dismissed and ruined for life, and Osmund is allowed to retire on a pension! I feel that the decision in Osmund's case will weaken my hands in dealing with the remaining Police Officers against whom I have no absolute proof of receiving bribes but who nevertheless must be got rid of if this unclean thing is to be stamped out.\n\nI sincerely trust therefore that the Secretary of State will amend the decision of the Council in Osmund's", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363665, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 499, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "493\n\ni\n\nOsmund's case and dismiss him. I have private information that he has feathered his nest pretty well and you may be quite sure that if he has not taken bribes from gambling houses for long, it is because he had plenty of other fields in which to make money.\n\nI do not think that you in England have any conception of how the moral tone in the Colonies falls below that high pitch which is maintained at home. I don't know what it is, but it must be the contact with the yellow man and his system of \"squeezing\" that makes people out here look with comparative indifference on things that would strike people in England as scandalous and wicked.\n\nFor instance, it was a common remark among Club men, the ordinary men of business here, during the progress of the Witchell trial that \"it was hard luck to run a good man like that in. After all, he had only done what others had been doing and taken 'squeezes' from some beastly gamblers\".\n\nI have friends here who bring me all the \"gap\" and I tell you that before Witchell was convicted, the feeling of the majority of people here was that he had committed a venial offence and that if they were on the jury, they would not convict him!\n\nHow we got a verdict, I hardly know. None of us for the prosecution expected it. Of course, many of the better class of men see the enormity of the thing.\n\n+ It is worth remembering that this is a mercantile community and I find such communities have rather lax ideas on questions of common honesty.\n\nand", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363763, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 597, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "house in the City of \n\nVictoria.\n\nrnor. No.\n\nmson 176 1897\n\nAugust.\n\nprevious Paper.\n\nHong Kong\n\nNo. 20056\n\n(Subject.)\n\n596\n\nDESPATCH.\n\n20056 REC - REG 15 EP 17.\n\n-Charges against J. Witchell\n\nInspector of Police,\n\nof Police, of receiving bribes\n\nin connection with illegal gaming houses. Reports trial, conviction omitted as\n\n(Minutes.)\n\nLon Selborne\n\nBatu\n\nIn this\n\ncase\n\nA\n\nbesides Mur may the chief\n\n212:27 Oct:\n\nWitnesses were\n\n(1) Chang On\n\nau\n\nExcise officer\n\nand\n\nEx Policeman born\n\nwitness to having paid Inspector Witchell and his wife\n\nbribes which\n\nwere paid him\n\nby\n\none\n\nTung Kun: he\n\n(0)-$200-$5000-747\n\nsubsequent Paper.\n\n715/08\n\ngave lengthy evidence of a conversation in which Inspector Witchell asked him to obtain money from\n\nthe owners of the gambling house\n\n(2) Тина кили\n\nabove out Cheng On's Statements\n\n(3) Sam Yin, owner of the gambling house, deposed\n\na\n\nconversation with Cheng On\n\nreasons to pay\n\nin which he had\n\nТинда калса\n\nWitchell money for secrecy through.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363764, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 598, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "## Government House \"Hongkong\" # August 197 \n\nSir,\n\nWith reference to ... \n\nwas sentenced \nto \n6 months imprisonment.\n\nIn this \ncase \nI suppose we \nand only \nAcknowledge & confirm his dismissal.\n\nBCM. \n4/10/97. \npug 6/10 \nJagree \n20/10 \nS \n22/10 \n\n(This went in with the other papers. A was seen by Chamberlain & \nwho approved \nmy despatch N. 143 of this date respecting the discovery \nin the Police \nForce and amongst subordinate \nofficers of corruption.\n\nThe Right Honourable Joseph Chamberlain, M.P., \n\nFand himself. \n\nFor the defence, Mrs Garnele, a friend of \nMrs Witchell's, \ncalled \nand \ndeposed \nthat on \nthe \nday \non which Witchell had had the alleged \ninterview with Chang On. \nShe was \nat the Witchells' \nhouse and \nChang On \nhad come in to sell silks, \nstating \nthat there had been \nno \nconversation \nbetween Witchell & \nChang On \nagain. \n\nThe Jury, however, found Witchell guilty & he \nwas sentenced \nto \n6 months imprisonment.\n\n20066 \nIPL 15 EP.7 \nV. 176. \n20053", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363765, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 599, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "I have the honour to transmit for your information a copy of the Chief Justice's notes on the trial of the case of Regina v. Job Witchell, which recently took place in the Supreme Court, together with an extract from the Daily Press of the 4th instant containing (in a somewhat abbreviated form) the Judge's address to the Jury.\n\nEncl: 1. 29th July, 1897 sent separately.\n\nEnd: 2 4th Aug.\n\nI also enclose for your information an extract relating to this particular case from the memorandum of the Attorney General, which forms an enclosure of my despatch under reference. You will observe from that extract that, although there is reason to suspect other Police officers of accepting bribes, it has so far not been possible to collect sufficient evidence to institute criminal proceedings.\n\nEv. cl. 3.\n\n2. 563\n\n4. 3.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363766, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 600, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "ings against them.\n\n3.\n\nI should mention that Mr Francis, Q.C., was retained by the Crown for the trial of Inspector Witchell in Supreme Court, as he had already appeared for the prosecution at the preliminary hearing of the case by the Police Magistrate, and had an intimate knowledge of all the circumstances.\n\n4.\n\nI very much regret that an officer of Inspector Witchell's position should have betrayed the trust and confidence hitherto reposed in him, and that I have been compelled by the fact of his conviction to order his dismissal from the Police Force, in which he has served for 15 years.\n\nI have the honour to be Sir, Your Most Obedient Humble Servant.\n\nWillem Ratings\n\nPage 600\n\nPage 601", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363767, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 601, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "600\n\n29.7.97.\n\nGemy.)\n\n(Enclosure (in desp. from Gov? Sir H. N° 176 of 13th August, 1897, of Hongkong.\n\nIn the Supreme Court to be in Briton:) 24th July 1897. Coram Carrington, C. J.\n\n20206 Requin A. Job Witchell.\n\n[Re. 15 SEP 17;]\n\nCharge: Bribery between the 13th March 1897, and the 18th June, 1899, to prevent him from performing his duty as Inspector of Police in regard to Common Gaming Houses.\n\nThe Attorney General (Mr. J. J. Francis, Q. C., instructed by the Crown Solicitor (Mr. H. L. Dennys) for the Crown); I. E. Robinson, instructed by Mr. G. C. C. Master, for the defendant.\n\nOn the defendant being arraigned, Mr. Robinson takes several objections to the information. First, that it is not stated that the \"gaming houses\" are in Victoria. Secondly, that the information is bad for duplicity inasmuch as it is alleged that the bribes were taken from keepers and managers of more than one gaming house. Archbold p. 58. Regina v. Callaghan 14 Cox & C. C. Also refers to Archbold p.p. 73, 74. As to quashing an indictment for being too general, see Archbold §103. Submit that Requin v. Callaghan is in point, and that the information is too general and should be quashed. As to amendment, the depositions show that the offence is committed in respect of a common gaming house at 2 Wa Lane; the prosecution may amend by limiting the information to that.\n\nMr. Francis. Contra. Refers to Ordinance No. 2 of 1869, Section 5, and Ordinance No. 3 of 1865, Section 6. Under this enactment, the same particularity is not required as at common law. Defendant might have applied for an order for particulars. Asks to amend the information by inserting mention of the locality of the streets in which the gaming houses are situated.\n\nMr. Robinson, in reply. Refers to Reg. v. Thomas & Tilley, 14 Cox 512. I direct the information to be amended by inserting the words \"in Victoria in the said Colony\" after the words \"Wa Lane\".\n\nPage 601", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363785, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 619, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "C\n\n31.7-97.\n\nSam\n\n(19\n\nThrough the Court. I went to defendant's house after Yun's arrest. Defendant sent a boy to call me. I was not at home, but my wife told me and I went to see him next day. It then I got to his house it was about 1 p.m. It was not the same house; he had moved. He told me\n\nSam Yun had been arrested for about one month and a $1000 reward was offered. He asked, \"Do you know anything about it?\" I said I had heard about it. He said something about a list with hundreds of names. \"Do you know whether my name is in it or not?\" I said \"I don't know\". Then defendant asked me whether those people knew his name or not. I said \"I don't think they know your name. They only know your alias 'a8 N° 12'.\"\n\nTo Mr. Robinson, on this fresh examination: I went to see defendant about some girls brought down from Canton on the 26th or 27th June. I did speak to Inspector Staunton about these girls on or about the 7th July, but I did not speak to defendant at that time. It was not on the 11th July that I went to see defendant about the girls.\n\nTo the Court: By \"till\" I understood \"Sam fun\" to mean \"for a day\". The time was mentioned. The day I went to see defendant after Sam Yun's arrest was on the 10th or 11th July last. I know nothing about the book or papers seized at East Street.\n\nAt 4.45pm the court is adjourned until 9:30 to-morrow.\n\nPage 318\n\n1 July 1897\n\nHon. Carrington, C.J.\n\nReg. & Job, Witchell - Trial resumed third day.\n\nCounsel and solicitors as before.\n\nI live at 1° 81, Hollywood Road, Li Yun Shop - a mercer's shop. I am the master of it and have been so since the 15th December 1896. I saw something on yesterday in the witness box here.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363793, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 627, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "3·8.97\n\nWhen Chengton called the name \"to. 12\"\n\nI knew that he meant defendant. Exhibit C: 12 was made and used for the purposes of the business. I had authority to put a name on the list. All the books and papers of the business were seized in the raid - none were saved. They are all here in Court. The total amount of payments shown in Exhibits C. 12. A. is $146.88.\n\nTo the Jury. The daily payments of truck many do not appear in the Teager, but they do appear in the exhibits marked B.\n\nAt 2.10 p.m. the Bar is adjourned until tomorrow Tuesday, the 3rd August, 1897.\n\nRegina v. Job\n\n3rd August 1897\n\nCoram Carrington C.J.\n\nWitchell - trial resumed-fourth day. Counsel and Solicitors as before\n\na\n\nI\n\nact\n\na balance to credit.\n\nArathoon Seth, sworn. Examined by Dur Francio, states. Deputy Registrar of the Supreme Court. I have a knowledge of Chinese as spoken, not written. Since the last adjournment, have, with the aid of the interpreter in the Registrar General's office, carefully examined Exhibits A '13 and B, the latter containing 18 slips. These slips contain daily receipts and expenditure. These accounts are balanced daily. Each slip therefore shows a balance to debit or credit. These balances are carried on into the ledgers A1-A3. In these ledgers at certain periods, a balance is struck of profit and loss. The entry is for the 14th day of the 11th moon. The year is not mentioned - only the months. The last entry is for the 19th day of the 5th moon - the 18th June, if the year is 1897. The totals at the foot of the columns of profit and loss are minus.\n\nFrom an examination of the books, I am satisfied that the items are carried through the books and are included in the profit and loss accounts. [Summary of the accounts part in and marked I] Asset. I went through each one of Exhibit B. There are only slips. They go into two months - the 11th month and the 5th month - 3 days in the 11th month and 15 days in the 5th month.\n\nCommissions.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363795, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 629, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "The case for the Crown is closed. Mr Robinson addresses the jury briefly, stating the nature of the evidence which he proposes to adduce. The whole case rests on Cheng On. Exhibit C is a bit of paper to be absolutely disregarded. \n\nEmma Francesca Barnett, Sworn, states: I am the wife of Mr Burnett, a Sanitary Board Inspector. I am now living at No. 40 Elgin Street. I formerly lived at No. 5 Shelly Street. I left Shelly Street for Elgin Street on 27th May last. No. 5 Shelly Street is near the junction of Hollywood Road and Shelly Street. It is four or five minutes' walk from the Inspector's quarters where defendant lives with his wife. I came to the Colony about five years ago as nurse to Mr Lethbridge's children. I left them to marry Mr Burnett. That was on the 1st March, 1894. I afterwards made the acquaintance of defendant and his wife. At the beginning of this year, I was living at No. 5 Shelly Street and defendant was living at the Police Compound. I was on very friendly terms with defendant's wife. I was a very frequent visitor at their house. I recognise the witness Cheng On [shown to her]. Before seeing him in the witness box the other day here, I saw him last at defendant's house on the 11th March last. \n\nIt was about 3 or 4 pm; I was at the defendant's house; Cheng On came with some patterns of silk. He came into the passage and knocked at the side door. He came by the back entrance, which is in Hollywood Road. Then he came into the room. Mrs Witchell got up to see who it was at the door. Cheng On came in and he told Mrs Witchell that he had brought her some pieces of silk to \"look see\". He pulled some out from his breast. Then Mrs Witchell said \"Sit down\", and then he asked which side master was. Mrs Witchell said \"He is upstairs; I will call him\". He said \"No can stop\" and then he went away. He went away by the back entrance. He was in the room about three minutes, I should think; Mrs Witchell and I and Cheng On were there. It was between 3 and 4 pm.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363796, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 630, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "# \none. Me cwere Cooking the rooms; there was no Conversation at the patterns. Mrs Witchell Said she did not like them. I said there was one that I liked very much; it was a green pattern. I said I should like a sample of that fabric to see what its cost was made of. He was dressed in a long blue silk coat. It was of a sky blue colour. He grinned, but did not offer me a sample at that time. Defendant was not in the room at any time. I stayed until about 4:50 pm. I then went home to give My husband his tea. After they had gone, defendant came down and was talking and had some tea. I saw him come down stairs. I was then sitting on the sofa in the sitting room with Mrs Witchell. I am quite sure that when Mrs Witchell said he was upstairs, he was really upstairs. I know this because I went upstairs to see the baby, who is my godson, and saw defendant who was on the bed asleep. I came down stairs then without saying anything. I saw him through the open door. I went to defendant's house by the back entrance. I saw Mrs Witchell always go in that way. She was lying on the sofa in the sitting room, which is on the ground floor, next to the dining room. She was not well. I went straight upstairs without going into the sitting room, to see the baby. Then I went into the sitting room. Mrs Witchell was on the sofa, but she was awake. I can't say if there was a carpet on the stairs. Thornton came in about five minutes after that. I am quite sure that Thornton is the man I saw, and that the 11th March was the day. I have told everything that occurred at defendant's house that afternoon. After giving my husband his tea, I returned to defendant's house at 7 pm. The defendant has now moved to a house next door, still in the same Police ward found.\n\nI have no children. I have many acquaintances here. I have known Mrs Witchell since the month in which I was married. I don't remember on what date I met her. I first met defendant on 2nd March. Mrs Witchell is my only friend. Mrs Witchell has been just the same with me...\n\nPage 630\nPage 631", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363797, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 631, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "I visit Mrs Sarith, wife of a Quarter Master Sergeant in the R.A., once a week. I visited Mrs Witchell before she went to the new house nearly every day. Mrs Witchell does not come very often to my house - she has a family and I have none. I have not seen very much of Mrs Witchell since defendant was suspended. I was impacted, I suppose. I can't say how often I have seen her. He was suspended on the 16th July. I saw Mrs Witchell on the Monday after he was suspended. I was asked on that Monday to come and give evidence. Mrs Witchell asked me. The baby is a year old last February. I can't remember the day he was bad. I can't remember the day I last called on Mrs Smith or Mrs Wingent. I looked over the new house before I went in. I can't tell you the day in which I did so. They were samples of silk that Ah Seng On produced. I don't know how many. They were left behind by Ah Seng On. I did not call on Mrs Witchell on the day after the 11th March. It may have been the next day. I am not positive.\n\nThe sofa is by a window. There are two windows in the room. They look on to the road going to the Police Station. I had been in a very few minutes when Ah Seng On came. I did not shut the door after I went in - it is always left open. I saw which way Ah Seng On went out. Mrs Witchell had had fever - she wasn't well. I had been to the house nearly every day before that day. On the Monday, Mrs Witchell told me that I should be wanted. I can't repeat the conversation between us. I remember the conversation when I asked her if that was the day that the Chinaman brought the silk for her to see. She said \"yes\", that was the day. I had a good idea, but I wanted to know if that was really the day. I had then read the report of the case in the papers. I had seen in the papers that the date was the 11th March. Yet I asked Mrs Witchell if that was the day the Chinaman brought the samples.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363804, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "page_number": 638, "title": "CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8]", "content_text": "that bribes received by members.\n\nof the Police Force to \n\nindire...\n\nto refrain from the performance \n\nthus \n\ndanby \n\nof \n\nlaws \n\nin force \n\nwith \n\nin \n\nregard \n\nto the \n\nthis Colony \n\n02-4 \n\nthe \n\nsubject of gaming houses, \n\nthe \n\ncome within the \n\nCriminal Law. \n\nScope of \n\nBut, to enforce the Criminal \n\nit is \n\nessary \n\nto obtain \n\nthe legal evidence requisite to satisfy the jury beyond all \n\ndoubt \n\nAnd \n\nin \n\ncases of bribery in Connection with Chinese gaming houses in this Colony, the difficulty \n\nof obtaining such evidence \n\nis extraordinary. \n\nIn Witchell's case \n\ndifficulty \n\nbut with \n\ngreat difficulty, \n\nLary \n\nopinion. \n\nmost properly convicted after \n\na long trial occupying four days. \n\n637 \n\nIt is difficult to say whether it will be, \n\neventually, possible to obtain sufficient legal evidence \n\nagainst Quincey, Stanton, Baker and Holt, subordinate officers \n\nof the Police, so as to enable me to bring them to trial in \n\na Criminal Court. \n\nPersonally, I think it extremely improbable, \n\nfor the intermediaries, who are supposed to have actually \n\npaid the bribes are not in the Colony and are not likely to \n\nconfess the part they played. \n\nIt would however appear to be extremely improbable those officers were unaware of the existence of the \n\nWa Lane and Cheung Hing Street gaming houses, and, if so, the \n\ninference that, unless they had been heavily bribed, the \n\nhouses would have been reported and closed, seems irresistible. \n\nThere are some other officers with small \n\nsalaries who can be dealt with, without the intervention of \n\nthe Executive Council.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363888, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-277 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [8-10]", "page_number": 82, "title": "CO129-277 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [8-10]", "content_text": "officers of the Detective Branch - Inspector Baker officer in charge was the officer of the District in which gaming house was situated. The names of each of these officers appeared on the list of recipients of hush money found by the Captain Superintendent of Police in the possession of Sham Yin, the accountant in the Gambling house.\n\nThe genuineness of that document was fully accepted by the Jury in Witchell's case, and there seems no reason to doubt its genuineness so far as these other officers are concerned, although, as I have already stated, the most important link in the chain of evidence against them is missing.\n\nThe probability of their complicity - and I may mention that Sergeant", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-277 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [8-10].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 364005, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-277 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [8-10]", "page_number": 199, "title": "CO129-277 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [8-10]", "content_text": "were paid in respect of the Wa Lane gambling house which \nSa Yin says refers to Mr. Corcoran.\n\n193\n\nI also attach copy of Mr. Corcoran's statement in reply.\n\n4. I am bound to record my conviction that the list referred to is a genuine document. It has been endorsed by the verdict of the Jury in Witchell's case, and is supported by the fact that Sergeant Holt practically pleaded guilty to having received bribes.\n\nIn every case in which the entries in the list have been tested by investigation, they and the statements that Sanyin made in explanation of them have been found to be correct.\n\nPersonally I believe that Chief Inspector Corcoran heard of the gambling house and that others were receiving money from it, and like Witchell asked for a share in the hush money.\n\nIt is impossible to corroborate...\n\nI find it therefore that the conduct of the Chief Inspector who has asked to retire on pension has been uniformly good.\n\nI have, &c.,\n\n(Sc.) F.Henry May,\nCaptain Supt. of Police,", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-277 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [8-10].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 364018, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-277 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [8-10]", "page_number": 212, "title": "CO129-277 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [8-10]", "content_text": "Hon. Col. Sec.\n\nEnclosure 6. Ensu.\n\nL. 92 NJ7\n\nThis Constable applied to re-enlist. I refused to re-enlist him and he now asks to resign on pension.\n\n211\n\nHis name is on the list of persons in receipt of bribes from the Wa Lane Gambling House.\n\nThere is no further evidence against him.\n\nI enclose a statement made by Saa Yin in the presence of Ng Ying as to the entry in the list. Also the Constable's Pension Paper, character roll and draft.\n\nQ\n\nI would not feel justified in recommending the man's dismissal simply on the evidence of the list and his name being on it.\n\nThere will be several cases of this kind, especially of Europeans, and it behoves the Government to consider carefully how it will deal with them.\n\nPersonally I believe that the list is genuine and endorsed as it is by the conviction of Witchell and the practical pleading guilty of Holt, I am convinced that those whose names appear on it did receive bribes from the gambling house.\n\nI cannot therefore certify that the man's character has been uniformly good. I am not permitted to make recommendations as to pensions, and I have therefore to leave the matter in the hands of the Government.\n\n(Sd.) F. H. May.\n\n3/9/97.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-277 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [8-10].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 364041, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-277 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [8-10]", "page_number": 235, "title": "CO129-277 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [8-10]", "content_text": "# \n\nI \n\nAnd if I had had money I should have done so. I left here with \n£52 which included the sum realised by the sale of my furniture. \nI have only $50 in the bank now. I have never had \nmore than $300 in the bank at any time.\n\n234 \n\nIt would be an easy matter for anyone to get \nmoney in my name. There have been no complaints of gambling in my \ndistrict. If I had been taking money my banking account would have \nbeen large.\n\nIt has given me much annoyance to see my name in \nthe papers in connection with the Witchell trial. \nI deny all knowledge of the list. I never received \na cent.\n\n(Sd.) \nAneas Mann, \nInspector. \n\nTrue Copy \n(Sd.) F.H.May \nCaptain Superintendent of Police. \n\n3", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-277 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [8-10].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 364079, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-277 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [8-10]", "page_number": 273, "title": "CO129-277 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [8-10]", "content_text": "Enclosure 13.\n\nHon. Colonial Secretary.\n\n25000 R 22 BWV 7 272\n\nI forward statement made by Sam Yin to me regarding the entry in the list of bribed persons having reference to No. 3, which Sam Yin says meant European Sergeant No. 3.\n\nThis statement differs in no material point from that made in Sam Yin's original statement vide enclosure K of my letter of the 27th July.\n\nI also enclose copy of a statement made by P.C. 137 Han Hang, who gave direct evidence of paying bribes to Holt.\n\nHan Hang says that Yeung Fat used to receive bribes for Molver and Holt, and also that it was a matter of common knowledge on the detective staff that Stanton and Quincey were bribed. Yeung Fat when questioned on the subject previous to his banishment denied having paid money to any one.\n\nMolver and Holt were detective sergeants, only Stanton and Quincey the Detective Inspectors.\n\nIn view of Witchell's conviction, Holt's practical plea of guilty, and the correctness of all Sam Yin's statements hitherto tested, and in view of Han Hang's evidence, I am convinced that McIver like the whole of the rest of the Detective", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-277 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [8-10].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 364304, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12]", "page_number": 82, "title": "CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12]", "content_text": "COPY.\n\nham states:-\n\nPolice Office,\n\n12 October, 1897.\n\nYeung Kai cross examined by A. S. No. 24 Gra-\n\n79\n\nJ\n\nI have known you for a long time. I first knew you at Hunghom. It was about 4 or 5 years ago. I can scarcely remember it.\n\nAt that time I had no employment, I came to witness in the Witchell case. I lo visit No.191 (Tang Kan). I did not know that Tang Kam was arrested for assault & robbery.\n\nI was employed in the gambling house for 7 or 8 months last year. It was in the 9th moon that you arrested me. You arrested me for being abroad without a pass. Then a badge and license of an excise officer was found on me. I was fined $115 altogether.\n\nA. S. Graham states:-\n\n(So.) * 皆 1. e. Yeung Kai.\n\nI have known Yeung Kai for 3 years. He was at that time at Hunghom. He was an informer to P. C. 191 Tang Kan.\n\nAfter leaving Hunghom I did not meet the man again till last October or November, I was on patrol. I met him at Pound Lane", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 364643, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12]", "page_number": 421, "title": "CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12]", "content_text": "417\n\n12 30\n\nfound on which appeared the names & numbers of 150 Police Officers of every race and rank besides the names of a large number of Government servants belonging to other Departments.\n\nIt was manifest from the outset that it would be absolutely impossible to procure strictly legal evidence (except in a very few isolated instances) to prove that the persons whose names appeared on the list had actually received bribes.\n\nOut of the vast number of cases mentioned above numbering in all 150 in only 22 was evidence of the actual payment & receipt of bribes procured.\n\nOnly two of these cases were cases in which European Policemen were implicated. One (Witchell's) was criminally prosecuted with success. In the other (Holt's) case the evidence of the person who actually paid the bribe was only obtained on a promise that the witness would not be put in the box.\n\nTherefore I, as Captain Supt. of Police was confronted with this position. I had 7 Inspectors & 5 Sergeants of the European Contingent and an immense number of Indian & Chinese Sergeants & Constables whose names appeared on the list to deal with.\n\nThe genuineness of the list and the accuracy\n\nof", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 364644, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12]", "page_number": 422, "title": "CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12]", "content_text": "418\n\nK\n\nIt was obvious that the authenticity of the entries contained in it had been established beyond any reasonable doubt in the Witchell prosecution and endorsed by the verdict of a jury; and had further been tested successfully in the proceedings against Osmanu & Hore by the Executive Council.\n\nIt was obvious that in any case taken up against any of the remaining public officers on the list, the whole foundation of the evidence, and in the vast majority of cases the entire evidence adducible, would rest on or consist of the list of the names of the recipients of bribes from the Wa Line gambling house.\n\nBut in the Witchell case, the Chief Justice had intimated that as the defence had not demanded that the list should be put in evidence, it could not have been put in evidence by the prosecution - a fact of which the learned Counsel for the prosecution showed they were well aware, for they never attempted to put the list in evidence, though sorely desiring to do so.\n\nIt was therefore clear that after the dictum of the Chief Justice, it would be impossible to use the list as evidence in any enquiry conducted on strictly legal technical lines.\n\nTherefore, it was certain that a prosecution in a case like that of the Petitioner's under Section 22 of Ordinance 14 of 1887 would be embarked upon with grave danger of disaster.\n\nSince", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 364652, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12]", "page_number": 430, "title": "CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12]", "content_text": "426\n\nthe general public, as well as those of the policeman concerned, are to be considered and it may well be doubted whether in a service such as the Police in a Crown Colony, especially where Asiatics form the bulk of the community, it would be a gain to the Colony generally to provide that no man should be dismissed from the Police unless an actual crime had been legally proved against him in a Court of Law.\n\nIn the present case the Petitioner disclaims any charge of unfair conduct on the part of the Captain Superintendent, the only thing which, in my opinion, would justify his challenging the departmental enquiry and appears to make it a grievance that the Crown Solicitor should have been directed by the Government to assist at the investigation. I (the Crown Solicitor) was not present in any sense as a prosecutor, but having examined the principal Chinese witnesses in former cases and the books and accounts of the gambling house, having prosecuted Tan Yin in the Police Court and having instructed counsel in the case against Inspector Witchell I was naturally in a position to assist especially by referring to the books and accounts. The Petitioner does not suggest that I acted unfairly and, speaking for myself, I can only say that I had not the slightest ill feeling against the Petitioner and could I have conscientiously recommended that he should have been continued in his office", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365669, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 4, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "Despatch \n\nNo \n\nDate \n\nGov. Sir W. Robinson KCMG \n\nHong Kong \n\n1898 Vol I Contents \n\nSubject \n\n690 \n\nfi \n\nTime Rectioning \n\n2 \n\n7 \n\n3 \n\n8 \n\nExtension of leave \n\nJ. D. Ball \n\nWife \n\nMaintenance of w \n\n+build \n\n4 \n\nto \n\nGratuities \n\nMemorial \n\nJ \n\n\" \n\nApplicatio \n\n1 \n\nCay \n\nTel. \n\nq \n\n11 \n\n12. \n\n$ \n\nTel \n\nmy \n\n12 \n\n14 \n\n18 \n\n# \n\nTel \n\n25 \n\n18 \n\n26 \n\n19 \n\n+1 \n\n20 \n\n↑. Warren1 \n\n1 \n\nNew Gourma \n\napplication of \n\nMis Nolan \n\nCheung Ho \n\nHP. Toother for promotion.. \n\nCommander Hastings for transfer. \n\nSpirens Divans \n\nNew Government offices. \n\nCapital Sentences \n\nExecution \n\nLearn to Miss G. Brookes. \n\nPlague \n\nCadets \n\nLean to \n\nM. J. 1.5. Lockhart \n\n& \n\n12 \n\nConf \n\n\" \n\n23 \n\n28 \n\n24 \n\n31 \n\n25 \n\n27 \n\ncay May Gene. W Black CB. \n\n28 \n\nT \n\nFeb. \n\n29 \n\n4 \n\n30 \n\nCouncil's farewell to Governor \n\nApplication of \n\nMr Justice wise for transfer \n\nMy S. Lockhart \n\nSanicis \n\nq Application of \n\nMr T Sercombe Smith for \n\nA \n\nReformatory \n\nPeusin \n\nMv \n\n9. \n\nD. Mushinnett \n\nPuisne \n\nJudgeship \n\nDisturbance in Philippine Islands \n\nAdmunistratia. \n\n4 Sevemment \n\nTreasury Balances \n\nCase \n\nJJ. \n\nWitchell", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365801, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 136, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "# DESPATCH.\n\nDespatch no. 169 of the 20th October 1893 and to inform you that I see no reason to dissent from the views which he expressed, by Lordship therein.\n\n## Previous Paper.\nNo. 30 1898 \n20056 \nHong Kong \nNo. 5415 \n(Subject.)\n\n## RECEIVED \n5/15 \nRE: 14 MAI 98 \nCase of J. Witchell, Coroner.\n\nwith his recent gambling Conviction. The confesses his guilt & acknowledges justice of his sentence.\n\n## (Minutes.)\n**Lord Silborne.**\n\nThis is apparently a voluntary confession made by J. Witchell, who you will remember was the only Police Constable criminally prosecuted. The paper should be seen by the Legal Advisers when the Cases are reconsidered, though it contains nothing but presumptive evidence & that from a man who has been convicted.\n\n? ack \nP.C.M. \nGBC 1573 \n17/3 \n1773 \n\n[There is a melaved satisfaction in finding that our action in one case at least has been justified by events.] \nS 177/3 \nEw som", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365803, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 138, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "# 21st Jany. 1898 with 3 enclosures\n\nInformation copies of a letter from the Captain Superintend**ent** of Police and it's enclosures, from which you will learn that Job Witchell, late Inspector of Police, who was convicted on a charge of illegally receiving bribes and sentenced to six months' imprisonment in August last, has confessed his guilt, and acknowledged the justice of his sentence, and have further expressed regret for the remarks made by him against the Captain Superintend**ent** at the conclusion of the trial.\n\nI have the honour to be,\nSir,\nYour Most Obedient Humble Servant,\nMean Administering the Governmer**nt** \nPage 133", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365804, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 139, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "# ENCLOSURE\n## No.20.\n\nSir,\n\nPolice Office. \n21st January, 1898.\n\nI have the honour to forward for the information of His Excellency the Governor a report made to me by the Chief Warder of the Gaol under yesterday's date, a copy of the statement made entirely voluntarily and spontaneously by the prisoner Witchell yesterday, and copy of a statement made by the same prisoner to me this morning.\n\nWhen the prisoner asked for an interview with me I had no idea what he wanted it for.\n\nThe Honourable \nThe Colonial Secretary.\n\nI have, &c., \n**(Sd.) F. H. MAY** \n134 \n5415 \nRec \nRE \n14 MA 98", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365805, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 140, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "## ENCLOSURE 1\n135 \n5715 \nREN 14 MA 98 \n\n**Victoria Gaol.** \n**20th. January, 1898.** \n\nSir, \nI have the honour to report for your information that at 11 a.m. this day, Prisoner J. Witchell had an interview with the Superintendent of the Gaol and requested a private interview which was refused; he then asked to be allowed to write H. E. the Governor, this the Superintendent also refused as the prisoner had not stated any reason for such request.\n\nAbout 11.45 a.m. this day, I saw Prisoner J. Witchell when he again asked for a private interview with the Superintendent. I asked him why he so particularly wished to see the Superintendent privately; in answer he said “I wish to express my extreme sorrow for anything I have ever said against Mr. May; I justly deserved my punishment; I was placed in a position and betrayed my trust\". I then supplied him with writing materials and told him he could state in writing anything he wished and I would forward it to the Superintendent.\n\nHonourable Superintendent. \nI have, &c., \n(Sd.) R. H. CRAIG, \nChief Warder.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365808, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 143, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "## 138\nYou are aware of the position in which I am now placed with a wife and family of 5 children. I shall be ever grateful to you if you can give me any hope of a character for my past services to enable me to procure some further employment.\n\n(Sd.) J. WITCHELL.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365809, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 144, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "# COPY\n## 139 \n### 5/15 \n#### SUB ENCLOSURE 3.\n##### RECP \n**Victoria Gaol.** \n`Red 14 WA 98` \n21st. January, 1898.\n\nJob Witchell states:- \nWith reference to my communication addressed to the Superintendent of Victoria Gaol yesterday, I desire to make the following statement:- \n\nAfter I was made Inspector in 1896, I first took money from the Kwai Wa Lane gambling house. It was at No.9 Kwai Wa Lane. It was brought to me by a man belonging to the Fish Lane at West Point called Cheung Hung. He came and asked me what I broke the house for (I had broken it 3 times). He said that other Inspectors had money from the house. I did not take the money when first offered. After about 3 weeks, he came and brought me $25. I received it. It was in December 1896. Shortly after that, the house closed up. \n\nIn the beginning of March 1897, a man came to me while I was on patrol. I do not know his name. He was a fat man who had been banished. He said, \"Why do you want to go down past the gambling house in the Ngau Lan Hong (Wa Lane)? You frighten the people there. Do you know Cheng On, the Opium Farmer's man?\" I said \"Yes, I do.\" Then he said \"I will tell Cheng On to go and see you.\" \n\nThe evidence that Cheng On gave...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365812, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 147, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "## \n\n142 \n\ncharge of the section in which the house was and the Inspectors in charge of the Detective Staff must know of the house. They should have known of it if anyone did.\n\nAfter the Chinese dinner, I believe that there were no complaints about the Wa Lane and Cheung Hing Street houses till the Captain Superintendent of Police raided No.8 East Street.\n\nI had no idea that my name was on the list that I heard had been seized. Cheng On told me of it, and I asked him if my name was on it. He said he did not know but he did not think so.\n\nI wish to say that I regret very much what I said about the Captain Superintendent of Police in the Supreme Court.\n\n(Sd.) J. WITCHELL. \nWitness.\n\n(Sd.) T. A. HOWE, \nA. D. S. P. \n21.1.98.\n\nTaken by me this 21st day of January, 1898.\n\n(Sd.) F.H.MAY.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365813, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 148, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "# DRAFT\n## Hong Kong No. 98\n### The O.A.C. MINUTE\n\nMr. Fiddian. 21/3 \nThe Sun W. Hamilton \nMr. Cox. \nMr. Lucas, \nMr. Graham. \nMr. Wingfield. \nEarl of Selborne. \nMr. Chamberlain. \n\nFu9246. \nHong Kong \n143 \nSur \nSvi - \n\n22 March 98\n\nI have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your despatch No.30 of the 5th of February last, transmitting a letter from the Superintendent of Police, reporting that Job Witchell, late Postfactor of Police, has confessed his guilt in connection with", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365916, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 251, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "have not had a personal knowledge of these cases, but from the papers I have seen the guilt of these officers appears to be well established. Sir W. Robinson was so convinced of this that in his despatch No. 190 of the 7th September last he regretted that circumstances prevented the institution of criminal proceedings against them.\n\n4. The confession of Witchell forwarded in my despatch Gov. 22025/Sept. 14/15/5715-/245, despatch No. 230 of the 5th instant has considerable bearing on these cases.\n\nI have the honour to be, \nSir \nYour Most Obedient \nHumble Servant, \nmsinh \nAdministering the Government.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365944, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 279, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "273 \n\nthe subject, and only succeeded in eliciting answers extremely damaging to himself as you will see by reference to the notes of evidence.\n\nOn the other hand I think the following points are worth noticing as shewing the genuineness of the list, and the truth of Sham In's statements in regard to it:\n\n(a) The insertion in the list of the names of the intermediaries through whom the bribes were paid, and the fact that on enquiry these intermediaries were either found or only escaped being found by leaving the Colony. In three instances those that were found admitted, when questioned separately, that they had not only paid bribes but the exact amount of the bribes appearing in the list as payable by them to particular persons named in the list, which they were not shewn and had never seen.\n\nI would quote the instances of Cheng On and Tang Kam who appeared on the list as the intermediaries through whom Witchell was bribed and who gave evidence on which Witchell was convicted; and of Wan Sing who appeared on the list as the intermediary through whom various officers in the Registrar General's Department were bribed and who gave evidence against Osmund, who has been dismissed the Service.\n\n(b) Sham In in his general statement made in explanation", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365947, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 282, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "276 \n\nThe names of persons who had no connection whatever with the suppression of gambling appear on it. Why should Sham In pretend that it was necessary to bribe an Inspector of Nuisances, a Clerk in the Treasury, an Interpreter in the Supreme Court, and the clerical staff in the Registrar General's Office, two masters of Government Schools, one of whom is an Indian, almost the entire clerical staff at the Magistracy, and several numbers of the Water Police who have nothing to do with the suppression of gambling on shore.\n\nSurely such peculiar entries would be calculated to raise suspicions in the minds of those who were swindled by these false entries. How much simpler and safer to have inserted the names of some of the European Police Inspectors which are conspicuous by their absence?\n\nThe Petitioner relying on an answer obtained under cross-examination from Sham In seeks to establish that the Wa Lane gambling house was a mere coolie gambling house.\n\nBut the jewellery seized by me at East Street was valued by Sham In at $800 and there was over $1,000 in cash seized with it. While in cross-examination by the Petitioner Sham In stated that $1,000 a day changed hands on the average in the house when gambling was going on.\n\nThe books put in evidence at the Witchell Trial", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365950, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 285, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "## \nhall the \n\n279 \n\nInspector Mann. \n\nTheir cases were, as you are aware, enquired into in due course. \n\nSham In has explained the entry Ho Kai $1.30 as referring to one of the Hon. Ho Kai's numerous relatives. \nHe explains Tai Tau as meaning No.10, the person in charge of the district and there is no reason to doubt that his explanation is correct. \n\n### Paragraph 24\nThe case quoted is not in point and does not help the Petitioner's argument. \nThe Inspectors of Nuisances proved by their conduct in reporting against the pig dealer's application to keep pigs in the one instance and by summoning him for keeping pigs without a licence in the other, that the bribes obtained by the Interpreter did not reach their hands. \n\nThe Petitioner never reported the gambling house at Wa Lane. He explains the fact by stating (vide paragraph 22) that he had no knowledge of its existence. \nI submit that there are sufficient grounds for disbelieving him on the point. \n\nHis number is found on a list of recipients of bribes along with the numbers of three other European Police Officers whom I will specially mention. \nThe first is No.12 Witchell. After an exhaustive trial Witchell was found guilty by the unanimous verdict of the Jury. \n\nShan...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365951, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 286, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "## 280\n\nSham Yin's statements and the correctness of his entries in the list having been proved in Witchell's case, are they to be absolutely rejected in another?\n\nThe second is Sergeant Holt, a Detective Sergeant attached to the staff of which the Petitioner was the Head. When he was charged with receiving the money set against his name in Shaw In's list, he made no attempt to even deny the fact, and on leaving the room in which the Crown Solicitor and I had enquired into his case remarked to the Chief Inspector that \"he had been a bloody fool\" which, whatever he may say now, must be accepted as an acknowledgment at the time of his guilty conduct.\n\nThe third is Sergeant McIver, who in a letter spontaneously addressed to me recently, in which he sought to explain the fact of his number being on Sham In's list and the reason for his not reporting the house, wrote as follows:\n\n\"In the year 1896, for some reason or other, the warrants were not issued so often against those houses (i.e., the gambling houses in Wa Lane & Kwai Wa Lane), although gambling was carried on there from time to time, and I have no doubt that every officer in the Detective Staff and the Police Force in general was aware of the fact, although no great effort had been made to put a stop to it during that period\".", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365953, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 288, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "282 \n\nThe document was put in his hands and if he did not choose to examine it, he has himself to blame. \n\nBut in any case, it was put in evidence at the trial of Witchell, who was defended by the very barrister who, as I am informed, has acted as Petitioner's legal adviser since, and who no doubt either drew or assisted in drawing his Petition.\n\nIt was of vital importance to Witchell that the list should be proved a bogus one, and it was no doubt in the hope of so proving it that Witchell's Counsel was so ill-advised as to do the very thing that the prosecution dared not even hope he would do, namely, to demand the production of the list.\n\nWhen it was produced, it was handed over to the defence, by whom it was of course carefully and closely scrutinised. \n\nWith what result? \n\nThey could only fix on four items in which they thought to detect incorrectness. One was the entry \"Ho Kai\" to which I have referred above; the other was an entry \"Government House 30 cents\", which Sham In said meant a payment to the Chinese Constables doing duty there, adding naively that if the Court wanted corroboration, they could send for one of the constables and question him.\n\nThe other two referred to the two European Officers, Nos. 89 & 91, who it was pointed out had not been stationed", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365954, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 289, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "283\n\n**ILA J**\n\nstationed anywhere near Wa Lane for a number of months.\n\nBut it was explained that they had been previously in charge, one of the section in which Wa Lane is situated, and the other of the one next to it.\n\nWill any reasonable person doubt the genuineness of the list after such a test, added to the fact that in the numerous cases that have been investigated in connection with it, the entries on the list and the statements of Sham In in regard to them have been found absolutely correct.\n\n## Paragraph 26\nI have only to remark that in my opinion the Petitioner by his influence and cleverness alone has escaped the indignity of imprisonment with which Witchell has been visited.\n\nHe was undoubtedly deserving of far severer punishment than his less fortunate fellow officer, and I regret that for the vindication of the tarnished honour of the Force, it has not been found possible to bring him to justice.\n\n(Sd.) F. H. MAY, \nCaptain Supt. of Police. \n16.1.98.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365958, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 293, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "Enclosure 4.\n\n## Report by the Crown Solicitor.\n\n6922\n\n[REPLY MY 98\n\n7287\n\nBon. Colonial Secretary.\n\nI have considered the petitions of William Stanton and Willis Quincey lately Inspectors in the Hongkong Police Force and I have had forwarded to me the draft report of the Captain Superintendent of Police on Stanton's petition. I do not think it necessary that I should criticize the petitions paragraph by paragraph.\n\nAs Mr. May says, the Petitioners were engaged when Ordinance of 1869 as to Police pensions was in force and Ordinance 14 of 1887 now contains the conditions upon which such pensions may be granted. The latter Ordinance provides for the revocation of such pensions if, after they have been granted, the persons in receipt of them are shown to have been guilty of corrupt practices. With reference to Mr. May's draft report, I may further say that I fully concur in the conclusion arrived at by him that Stanton deserved a severer punishment than his subordinates and I believe that neither Baker nor Witchell would have succumbed to temptation had it not been for the example set by their superior officer.\n\nI now beg to submit the following remarks", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365966, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 301, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "## Page 295\n\n... bribed and this is just one of those facts which go to show that this was not a bogus list got up for the purpose of incriminating the police.\n\nWith reference to paragraph 25 of Stanton's petition, I see no absurdity in saying that he corruptly neglected to report this gambling house, as Stanton knew or ought to have known of its existence. It is of course possible that Stanton did not know the actual house in which the gambling was going on and that, provided he received the \"bush money\" regularly, he did not care in which house they were playing, although I think this is improbable.\n\nWith reference to paragraph 20 of Stanton's petition, it is clear that it was not drawn by the same person that sent in his written defence at the conclusion of the departmental enquiry. In the latter, Stanton speaks of \"others of excellent character having been recommended for dismissal\", apparently referring to Baker, Witchell, and Helt. Witchell has, as you know, not only been found guilty by a Jury, but has fully confessed his guilt after denying it \"upon his honour and upon his oath\" and Helt practically admitted his guilt by not denying it and by making no statement in defence.\n\nWith reference to Quincey's petition, I do not think I need say anything about the Chinese character used to represent his name in the gambling house keeper's account, or about the mode of trial.\n\nAs to the suspension pending the investigation into his conduct...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365968, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 303, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "# ENCLOSURE 5\n## Minute by the Attorney General\n\nHon. Col. Secretary.\n\nDate: 715/3 (12.2.98)\n\nHad the evidence against Stanton justified criminal proceedings in a Court of law, he would have been prosecuted. He was an able and experienced man and was not likely to have received bribes through the hands of any but those upon whom he could implicitly trust not to admit that they had handed the money to him. Having had to test the accuracy of Sham In's statements and List in many ways, and after an exhaustive examination of that List in Witchell's case, in which I was Counsel for the Crown with Mr. Francis Q.C., I am convinced that those whose names are there as persons receiving bribes did receive them. Considering the position and opportunities of Stanton, and the locality, I have not the slightest doubt that he knew quite well all about the gambling house and did not report it because it was made worth his while not to do so. I have not Witchell's confession among these papers, but I think he spoke of a grand Chinese dinner given by the gambling house people at which various members of the Force were present. Can it be supposed Stanton did not know of this and surmise the reason of such a feast?\n\n(Sd.) W. Meigh Goodman.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 366360, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-282 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [3-4]", "page_number": 216, "title": "CO129-282 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [3-4]", "content_text": "## Police Scandal \n\nNo. 9720 \n(Subject.) \nNo. ki 102 \n898 \nApril \n\n### Despatch \nHong Kong \nNo 9720 \n\n**Lord Selborne** \n122) See 6322 \nIn our telegram on 6222 we purposely omitted the names of Stanton & Quincy, in order that the evidence as far as can reasonably be classified in their favour shall be considered. I shall be prepared to consider the question of granting him some bonus or some addition to his official salary from that date.\n\nof Salary which he was recently awarded was not prepared to sanction any further increase at present.\n\nJ\" however, on the completion of the Praia Reclamation work, which I understand it is clearly shown that their new duties have occupied more time than the gov't from hand? Our Chathan's \n\nDESPATCH, \nXong Kong \nNo 9720 \n\nC \nSEG 2 M 98 \nnotes of evidence taken in cases of Stanton & Quincey. \nMr Cox \n(Minutes.) \n\n17 Aug \n19 Aug \nlease -10-12-67 to Baker & Holt might also be able to check with the other cases. \nOne seat at I fear only have the notes lift ambiguous anyhow we have the two forms submitted to us. I hope however we shall be able to check with the other tur cases.\n\nThe important papers in conveniow me my within further reference with them. \nCases ara 2005$ [expecially mr may's export in Encloses ]] : \nST15 containing Witchell's confession: and \n98 \n6322 contrieving the two Memoricals.\n\nI propose to put before you what I regard as the chief points in favour of and against their guilt. In this favour, and until their guilt is definitely decided, it is I think strongly in their favour, we have the fact of this long serving...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-282 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [3-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 366362, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-282 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [3-4]", "page_number": 218, "title": "CO129-282 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [3-4]", "content_text": "## Memorandum\n\nAs then there is Witchell's apparently voluntary confession. Bouquet was given by the Proprietor of the Wah Love Gambling House in January 1887 to which the Police Inspectors were invited. He states that on the evening Stanton Holt & others were returning at 11:45 p.m. presumably from the Feast.\n\nI think the above statement of there being doubt quilt connect and in this we ourselves possibly concur. The evidence shows that proof can be adduced, there is no doubt at heart the Hongkong Authorities are agreed, that there is not evidence enough to convict them before a Court of Law. On the other hand, there are statements by Bidhe, that for the \"supposedly being at Cardreally in question he succeeded\". He also states that he knows Stanton Baker & Young Fat meet regularly at Stanton's Quarters on Sunday afternoons.\n\nIt will be observed that Young Fat was supposed to bribe Sam Yin, Sam Cha for Su Yeung Fat for Stanton. Coming to the actual notes of evidence forwarded, Yin's evidence states that he recognised Stanton, No 43 on the list, a number by which Stanton was known. He confesses himself that he was bribing the Chairman. He criticised that Stanton actually received bribes; otherwise, the House must have been discovered. And it is remarkable that he has pointed out above his knowledge of Stanton's movements.\n\nIt was his original member and Sun You couldn't fish out that the Chinese police were in his pay. That is there are authorities in Hongkong who are agreed that there is sufficient evidence of corruption to warrant the dismissal of these men without a trial. I protest that the Secretary of State, if he chooses to exercise extra-judicial power, & dismiss those whom he regards as corruptly exercising their trusts, is in my opinion bound to do so. I think that if there is no possibility of an innocent man being finished, there is reason for thinking that these men are guilty.\n\nWith regard to Baker, whose memorial was furnished in 1885, I think it may supply a clue to find this - there had been suspicions of dealings with him, nothing of the kind. Then the Laung Watchman at the Gambling House stated that he knew Quincy, that he had seen him. P.C. states that he believes Stanton received bribes, but that is all & his evidence is not unfavourable to Stanton. Han Hany P.C., who himself received bribes, states he believes Stanton to have been bribed.\n\nAs to Quincy, we have firstly Gui's statement of the bribery, corroborated by Inspector Mackie, who had heard that Tam Shat was related to Quincey & received bribes in 1885. He states that he afterwards paid the money to Tang Chung. The Lauing gave evidence of having frequently seen the Gambling House.\n\nThere is common notoriety that Stanton, \"the said received bribes\". These Inspectors had not been kept open. It is stated that he knows by repute. How Hany gives similar evidence. Quincey's case against him is no more convincing than in the other cases; we should, I think, grant him one alibi.\n\nAs to Sergeant Holt, who is said practically to have a duty at the Gambling House, his guilt, I gather from the last page but three of May's Memorandum on `6322`, that his confession merely amounted to his stating that he had been leaving the rooms in which the Crown Solicitor & others had examined into his care. This is really nothing & if it is considered that he had been with the others, I venture to submit that he should be allowed.\n\nWhatever decision we arrive at, it is most hard that these poor men should be so long held in suspense.\n\nI.C.M. \n4/5", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-282 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [3-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 366368, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-282 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [3-4]", "page_number": 224, "title": "CO129-282 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [3-4]", "content_text": "## \n\nThe speaking briefly in writing soon giving any authority for their belief, the thing of importance is that since I saw you. Stalin's case, where he speaks of admiration with Stalin just before he was examined & died in May, is titled him he must have spoken of his own affairs and not of Stalin's affairs. Stalin and hindering that the lying is stated in Stanton's petition to have ten of such general bad character. A report from detectives Stanton recommended his banishment that in 1856.\n\n## \n\nL... and the statement is contradicted by Mr. May. In Levy's case, his own confession was used as evidence against him as a watchman for gambling house keepers. It is not alleged that In Levy had anything to do with the bribed. It is therefore improbable that Star... Stanten he had been bribed should have committed himself to seek a conversation with a man when he had no reason to fear could find evidence against him, and this being any suspicion of his bad character.\n\nI therefore think that working and apparently the Cross-examination of Whites and the woman, the Attorney-General's tactics and the conviction of Witchell as an accomplice to the word \"dict\" of a man then on his list, and harming...\n\n## \n\n2\n\nI suffer his being hurt - but in that case, I derive evidence from the auto... lo... jug... *praybur. Even if the jury in Witchell's case deliberately ignored some salient points on the lists and in- confirming the direct word. \"In the argument Witchell it would be monstrous to say that a person is using the list as evidence against other persons where there were names in it and against whom there is no direct evidence.\"\n\nIf Officers of unblemished character and long service are to be convicted on the strength of such a document and there being no direct evidence, I venture to say that there would be a public outcry in the Army and in the Hong Kong Police.\n\nIt remains to be considered whether there were faults in the charge when they have been nominally convicted and afterwards punished for neglect in making...\n\nI need say nothing respecting this gambling house dealing to mitigate the fact that the house is in a short time an... hotels - the watchman that there is a... shape consisting of... of the Police offense in sight of the house. Witchell having received the bribes, and if the jury believed that evidence, they might have convicted Witchell without reference to the back or to the fact that the Judge had misdirected...\n\nI drew a report on his summing up in that case and said but it offends them. But Sham Jr. was somewhat unsatisfactory and shifting. But an... always on the lookout for warning of the approach of gamblers...\n\nand at the time they are... caught there is no... Sep... the detectives on whom the Police must rely for information. Leary was corrupt and therefore could not sing to the admitted reformation. But I drew that this house was known to him as late as January 10, 1857.\n\nIt was well known that gambling was rife, but the difficulty was to find out in which house it was practiced and in particular time. Still, I think that with greater vigilance this particular house, which had been used pretty continuously for some time, ought to have been inculpated.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-282 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [3-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 366405, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-282 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [3-4]", "page_number": 261, "title": "CO129-282 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [3-4]", "content_text": "having her previously confined for \n2 days in the Gaol where they examined her to the Captain Superintendent and the Crown Solicitor with the view of eliciting evidence against the Inspectors. \nBut they persistently denied the truth of Sam Yin's statement, notwithstanding inducements held out to them of this banishment being cancelled.\n\n4. In the case of Huvery J. another deserter, Witchell, Sam Yin's statement was corroborated by the evidence of a man who deposed that he had received money from Sam Yin and paid it to Witchell, and Witchell was thereupon prosecuted and convicted and has since confessed his guilt. At his trial the list compiled by Bhindr was put in evidence. Sam Yin also gave evidence and it appears from the newspaper report of the trial that the Judge commented unfavourably upon the manner in which he gave evidence under cross-examination.\n\nThe Superintendent appears from the first to have taken the best means to satisfy himself that it was a genuine and trustworthy document and that all those whose names were contained in it had received bribes.\n\n5. As it was impossible to procure any further direct evidence against Inspector...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-282 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [3-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 366697, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-283 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [5-6]", "page_number": 106, "title": "CO129-283 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [5-6]", "content_text": "102\n\nconsider that unless exemplary punishment is meted out to Policemen who flagrantly betray their trust, as I am fully convinced these men did, then it is hopeless to toil and labour to keep the Police Force and especially the Chinese Detective Staff decently honest.\n\nIn the eyes of the native population the dismissal and banishment of the Petitioners has been even a more salutary object lesson than the conviction and imprisonment of Witchell.\n\n29th April, 1898.\n\n**(Sd.) F H MAY,**\nCaptain Supt. of Police.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-283 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [5-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 367287, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-284 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [7-8]", "page_number": 175, "title": "CO129-284 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [7-8]", "content_text": "## 6.0. 18025 173\n**Memorandum by the Captain Supt. of Police,** \n22 JC 3 \n**Hon. Acting Colonial Secretary.**\n\nParagraph 2. The Acting Deputy Supt. of Police did not instruct Lo Tung Chi to resign. He told him that the Captain Supt. of Police suggested that he might send in his resignation. `Vide` my minute of 11.11.97 in `C.S.0.2410/97`.\n\nParagraph 4. The man Tang Kam (like the other man Cheng On) only consented to give evidence against Witchell on condition that he was asked no questions about his connection with the bribing of Chinese Police.\n\nI consider Lo Tung Chi was properly dismissed.\n\n(Sd.) F H. MAY, \n20.7.98.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-284 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [7-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 367906, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-285 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [9-10]", "page_number": 315, "title": "CO129-285 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [9-10]", "content_text": "## \nof consideration if he helped the Government.\n\n24423308\nRece & (Rec 31 OUT 98\n\nThere is one other consideration that I should like to advance.\n\nIf these men are dismissed without pension, what is to become of them? They dare not, after the assistance they have given the Government, return to China. If they did, it is not improbable that vengeance would be wreaked upon them by those against whom they have given information and evidence.\n\nTake the case of the man Tse Leung. It is on record that he refused a substantial reward for the assistance he rendered to Government, on condition that he would leave Hong Kong, because he felt that he would not be safe in China after the part he had played in the Wa Lane Case.\n\nOn the other hand, if these men are to remain in Hong Kong after their dismissal and without any means of support, they are likely to gain a livelihood by turning the knowledge and experience they have gained in the Police Force to some improper, but profitable, account either in connection with gambling or smuggling, as many a Chinese ex-Policeman has done in the past, as for instance Cheng On and Tang Kam, the witnesses in the Witchell case, and many others whose names have appeared in connection with the Wa Lane Case.\n\nIf these men are to remain in the Colony, it would be infinitely better to have them under supervision and control in the Police Force than working probably against the Government.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-285 - Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [9-10].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 368839, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-287 - Public Offices & Others - 1898", "page_number": 15, "title": "CO129-287 - Public Offices & Others - 1898", "content_text": "## 12A.\n\nKioto and will embark from Kobe on the 14th instant in the French Steamer \"Ernest Simons\" for Ceylon. At their request I have informed Sir William Robinson and Sir James Hitchell that they will be shortly passing through Hong Kong and have transmitted to Sir West Ridgeway the expression of their desire to see some elephant hunting during their projected stay in Ceylon.\n\nI have &c.,\n\n(Signed) \nErnest Satow.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-287 - Public Offices & Others - 1898.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 370259, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-289 - Individuals - 1898", "page_number": 342, "title": "CO129-289 - Individuals - 1898", "content_text": "## \n\nby next mail, perhaps I should hurry him up by telegraph.\n\nSo I reply.\n\n:7 \n\nMr. Courtney here also received a copy of the petition, and similar caps were made.\n\nIt is to be in with Capt.\n\nI do not like the look of the case. Alley wasn't made up his mind as soon as May bikton allyul bribes were found set held of the list.\n\nThe accountant of the house that it was perpetual time and that all his Police officers whose names or numbers appeared in it are guilty. To me, nothing seems more likely than that it was concocted to damage quillce and perhaps also to swindle the employers who made it and bribe himself with the Meyer payments the whole luri o conschen beibers.\n\nThen the Stanton Baker and the Evidence. Lave and pens.\n\nIt charged with and convict) neglect of duty but punished almost avowed for libel, which is not proved against them.\n\nAgain in the case or com leged 7 pieces of hayt portion wild t Mar inquiry weld I cornst Keiti that an un-positionable Superintendent in seat smart when un- had made up his mind that they were fruit beffe a proper course.\n\nI hope the Garner will send the wordian when he sends Swin, which can be used at the trial.\n\nIn the Recorfakes report, z Witchell they forties entries omitted to point at to the pin the tainted character.\n\nI have to comment on the value witnesses document which the prisoner's Counsel was so silly as to make evidence against her client - he also allowed the presecuting Counsel to introduce much irrelevant matter calculated to prejudice the jury against the prisoner.\n\nW 19 Hb \n\nReply to the Prase as desired.\n\natorer S 2572 \n\nAir Hutton Hall, \n\nGisborough, \n\nYks. \n\nFebruary 14, 1898 \n\nI venture to ask for your kind consideration.\n\nThe case of ex-Detective Inspector Stanton who has been discharged at Hong-Kong on a charge of neglect of duty by the Captain Superintendent. His brother, one of my constituents, has sent me...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-289 - Individuals - 1898.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 371432, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-291 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [5-6]", "page_number": 181, "title": "CO129-291 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [5-6]", "content_text": "C.O. 10378/77\n\nReceived 26 JUN 19\n\nThis is the copy statement referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the attached Statutory Declaration of Cheng On made before me this 11th day of August, 1898.\n\n(Sd.) Godfrey C.C. Master, Notary Public Hong Kong.\n\nCentral Police Station. 12th October, 1897.\n\nCheng On states\n\nI returned yesterday from the country. I left the Colony after the Witchell trial because my master Ho Fook told me that I had incurred the hatred of many Inspectors and Sergeants of Police and that I had better go into the country for a while. He said that he would send word to me when I might come back. He paid me my wages while I was away. Recently I received a letter from him telling me to come back. This is the letter I received (Letter attached). I have been employed in the Opium Farm for 16 months. I was employed as Chief Chinese Excise Officer. My predecessor in office was Pang On. Pang On's predecessor was Wong Kam. Both of them were formerly in the Police and so was I. Wong Kam died. Pang On was dismissed when I became Chief Chinese Excise Officer. Yeung Fat came to me and said to me \"Pang On formerly paid bribes to several of the Police, how is it that you do not pay\". It was in the Ko Shing Theatre as well as I can remember that he spoke to me. It was about a month after I had been appointed Chief Excise (Chinese) Officer. I said that I would enquire into...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-291 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [5-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 371433, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-291 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [5-6]", "page_number": 182, "title": "CO129-291 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [5-6]", "content_text": "178\n\ninto the matter. I therefore made enquiries of the Excise Officers as to who were the Police that received bribes from the opium farm. The accountant told me that it was not the practice to pay the bribes every month. He said that bribes were only paid when there was smuggling of raw opium out of the Colony done. A few days after that I saw Yeung Fat in the Pan Fong Eating House in Wellington Street. I said that I found that bribes were paid off and on. I said that I also found that it was true what he had said that several of the Police received bribes from the Opium Farm. I had been told by the Excise Officers that Stanton & Quincey received bribes also that Corcoran and Holt received bribes also Yeung Fat Tang Chung, Wong Pun Tak, Leung Shing, Mi Cheung, Chu Tsoi, Hui-Hing, Cheang Man, Chu Fung, Leung Kwai Chung, Yu Po, Chu Kwai Lam, Lo Cheung, Chung Muk Sing, and Chung Tung. These were all members of the Chinese Detective Staff, except the last three who were in the Water Police. The interpreter in the Water Police Wong Hing Cheung I also learned received bribes. I then asked Yeung Fat how much Stanton wanted. He said $50 a month. He said that Quincey wanted $50 a month also. He also said that he would receive the money for various Chinese detectives also. I promised to pay Stanton and Quincey $50 a month each from the 1st of the next month. I cannot remember exactly what month it was that I began to pay in. During the 13 months that I was employed as Chinese Excise Officer prior to Witchell's trial I paid as well as I can recollect eight monthly payments at\n\nthe", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-291 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [5-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 371435, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-291 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [5-6]", "page_number": 184, "title": "CO129-291 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [5-6]", "content_text": "180\n\nreceived money so I promised to pay $50 a month for a full month, $25 for a broken month in which there was not much opium run, and nothing for a month in which no opium was run. O Mi Cheung also asked for money for Wong Hing Cheung ($10 a month), Lo Cheung ($15), Chung Muk Sing ($5), Chung Tung ($15), Yu Po ($15), & Chu Kwai Lam ($10) a month. I paid these monies to O Mi Cheung for the several police mentioned to me by him.\n\nI made about 8 payments prior to the Witchell trial.\n\nI have not mentioned the payment of these bribes to Stanton, Quincey, Corcoran & Holt. I was afraid to mention the subject to them. I know that they received the money. If they had not, they would not have greeted me in so friendly a manner in the street. Everyone knew that these four police officers took bribes. The people who give bribes know well which of the Police are willing to receive bribes.\n\nYeung Fat would not have dared to receive this money in the names of European Police and not pay it to them. I should have found him out if he had. I should have been told that he had not received it. Besides, Stanton never got a case of illegal moving of opium, nor did the others who received bribes either. These bribes were paid in order to prevent the police from seizing opium being moved for purposes of smuggling. I have not paid any other police. No one came and asked me for money for Hanson or Mackie, or any other of the police. The money that I paid in bribes was not paid by the Opium Farmer. It was paid by the purchasers of the opium for smuggling. The custom was to pay $7 per chest for bribes to the Police.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-291 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [5-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 371437, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-291 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [5-6]", "page_number": 186, "title": "CO129-291 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [5-6]", "content_text": "Enclosure 2.\n\nCOPY\n\n182\n\nI, CHENG ON of Victoria in the Colony of Hong-Kong, Chief Chinese Excise Officer to the present Opium Farmer do solemnly and sincerely declare and say as follows:\n\n1. I was in the Hong-Kong Police Force for sixteen years, resigning about December, 1892, and at the time of resigning commuting my pension.\n\n2. I then left Hong-Kong for Selangor in the Straits Settlements, where I remained until 1894, following the occupation of a Miner. On my return to Hong-Kong, I proceeded to my native country in the Kwei Sin District, Province of Kwong Tung Empire of China, where I remained until 1896. Early in which year I returned to Hong-Kong and after a few months became Chief Chinese Excise Officer to the then Opium Farmer in Hong-Kong. I became such Chief Chinese Excise Officer in June or July 1896 and was in such service at the date of the trial of Job Witchell for bribery.\n\n3. I was one of the witnesses for the Crown at the trial of the said Job Witchell, then an Inspector of Police, who was charged with receiving a bribe. Such trial took place in the Supreme Court of Hong-Kong at the end of July and the beginning of August, 1897.\n\n4. I left the Colony of Hong-Kong immediately after such trial and did not return until the 11th day of October", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-291 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [5-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 371438, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-291 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [5-6]", "page_number": 187, "title": "CO129-291 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [5-6]", "content_text": "October, 1897. I left because my employer Ho Fook was one of those interested in the then Opium Farmer's privileges advised me to go away because I had incurred the hatred of various Inspectors and Sergeants of Police on account of having given evidence against Witchell at the said trial. The said Ho Fook paid me my wages of twenty dollars a month whilst I remained away. He told me before I left he would write and let me know when I could return to Hong-Kong. I received a letter from the said Ho Fook about two months after I had left Hong-Kong telling me I might return. I had left my wife and family in Hong-Kong. I reached Hong-Kong about three days after I received such letter. On my arrival I reported myself to the said Ho Fook who requested me to go and see Mr. Francis Henry May. I went and saw him at the Central Police Station on the following day when I made a statement to him which he took down in writing and which I signed and of which I verily believe a true copy is hereunto annexed. I made such statement freely and voluntarily. No threat was used in order to extract such statement from me neither was the promise of any reward or other advantage held out to me provided I made such a statement.\n\n5. Referring to such statement I distinctly remember Yeung Fat first speaking to me about the police being bribed to induce them to refrain from interfering with the smuggling of opium. This happened about a month after I became Chief Chinese Excise Officer as aforesaid. I was in the Ko-Shing theatre at the time watching a performance. It was during", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-291 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [5-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 377656, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-301 - Governor Sir Blake - 1900 [9-12]", "page_number": 125, "title": "CO129-301 - Governor Sir Blake - 1900 [9-12]", "content_text": "124 \n\nThe salaries held by J.F. Abraham (foreman) and R.C. Witchell (Water Inspector) are respectively $240 and $720. They were also appointed on probation on the lower salaries mentioned in the Schedule of the Committee. Witchell's chair allowance has hitherto been paid out of the vote for Water Works. The custodian of the Recreation Ground has hitherto been paid out of the vote \"Maintenance of Recreation Ground\".\n\nThe salary will be recommended to be increased to $720 in the Estimates for 1901.\n\nThe caretakers at Shau-ki-wan and Aberdeen Water works and Watchmen at Lai-chi-kok have hitherto been paid out of the votes for Maintenance of Water Works at Shau-ki-wan and Aberdeen and out of the Miscellaneous vote for New Territory, Post Office.\n\nThe Senior Clerk has not been mentioned by the Committee. I think the salary (seeing that a house allowance is attached to it, and that, when the new Post Office is built the officer will have free quarters) will do as it stands at present. But if a classification of salaries is adopted, he should be put on an incremental scale in Class III. The Acting Postmaster has recommended that the salary should be $1560 rising to $1920.\n\nThe Acting Postmaster recommends and I strongly endorse his recommendation that the salary of the Accountant be placed on an incremental scale. The post is a very important one, and the increments will serve to keep a good Clerk in the post. Mr. Lewis recommends that the salary should rise from $1920 to $2,400 by $60 yearly. For an Accountant the salary is by no means too high. Mr. Reed might begin at $1980 on 1st January next.\n\n(Mr. Lewis also recommends that the salary of the Superintendent of the Money Order office should rise by the same incremental scale)", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-301 - Governor Sir Blake - 1900 [9-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 385398, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-312 - Acting Governor Major Gen Sir Gascoigne Governor Sir Blake - 1902 [7-9]", "page_number": 3, "title": "CO129-312 - Acting Governor Major Gen Sir Gascoigne Governor Sir Blake - 1902 [7-9]", "content_text": "Date: 11 Aug.\n\nSubject:\n\n351 12. Pension of be. Ford.\n\n353.12 Conf. 12. 35613 35-4 13\n\nFree med. attendance on officers.\n\n355 12. Pay of Coronation Contingent - Murder of Young Rui Wan. Draft Naturalization Ordce. Chinese Emigrants for Mexico. Ideal f\n\n35813\n\n359 14\n\n360 14. Coronation & Stephens & Attorney Gen.\n\nWTO pension fund\n\n361 15 Sterling Salaries.\n\n#\n\n36215\n\nt Ordce. 2\n\n363. 18. King's Park Kowloon.\n\n365 18. Report of Principal Civil Med. Officer\n\nChinese Emigration Bodce 01.\n\n34019\n\n341 30. 342 20. Dock extension\n\n61 Asst. Engineer on Temp. Staff off. WR. 344 20 - New Postal Agencies in N. China 350 26. Site of Old Gaol at Shanghai.\n\n381 26. Destructor in fort at Foochow.\n\n382 24. Public Works.\n\nConf. 204. Deas of Colony\n\n383. 28. Conversion of Cd. transactions into silver Currency.\n\n384 29 Ordce\n\n39.\n\n385 24. Calabt. of Postal Agencies at Peking & Lieuten\n\n386 29 Report on Health & Sanitation of.\n\n384 94. Reglus. for Cadets.\n\n39629 \"Blue Book Report or\n\n+\n\n392 2 Sept Land for Dock Extension\n\n393 3\n\n39413 Water Ordce.\n\nSanitation & Water supply.\n\nC\n\nDate: \n\nSubject-\n\n395 3 Sept. Fees of Head Bailiff of Supreme Court.\n\nLewerage & Drainage\n\n3963 #\n\n3944\" Hours of service for Constables 398 + Sterling Salariz,\n\n399\n\n402\n\n4 Selasies\n\n5. Dallantry of t. 6. Counsell. 6. Pay of members of Fire Brigade.\n\n403 6. Sterling Salaries. Home\n\n404 6. Public Fountains\n\n406 9. Ordce 30.\n\n404 10 #\n\nPension of Dr Lowson.\n\n408 10\"\n\n40G 11\" Reap. of new territory\n\nHouses for Govt. Officers.\n\n411 12. Supt. of Botanical & Afforestation Dept. Gent. 12. Administration\n\nConf. 12. Failure of China\n\n412. 15. Retirement of R. C. Dixon\n\nHing ing. Supt. of Botanical & Afforestation Sept.\n\n418 18. Land for Dock Extension\n\n419 18 Grant to be hitchell\n\n\"\n\n421 18 Apfeln of A. G. Wire.\n\n#\n\n425 20. Salary of hu. Lewis.\n\n426 23. Commutation of pension of hu. Faherty\n\n424 no. Advance to Ab Langley.\n\n429 26. Master's at Ju'en's College.\n\n431 26. Proposed Atlantic mail service.\n\nhole issue of Chartered Bank. Education\n\n33.\n\n129\n\n435′′ 30 *\n\n436 30. Fees for Atty. Genl.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-312 - Acting Governor Major Gen Sir Gascoigne Governor Sir Blake - 1902 [7-9].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 385566, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-312 - Acting Governor Major Gen Sir Gascoigne Governor Sir Blake - 1902 [7-9]", "page_number": 171, "title": "CO129-312 - Acting Governor Major Gen Sir Gascoigne Governor Sir Blake - 1902 [7-9]", "content_text": "No. 355.\n\nHongkong.\n\nGovernment House,\n\nC.O. 38384\n\n15.\n\nHongkong, 12th August, 1902.\n\n169 MO\n\nSir,\n\nI have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your Despatch No. 195 of the 4th ultimo, in which you inform me that after consultation with Sir Henry Blake you had authorised the Crown Agents to pay to Major Chapman, in charge of the Hongkong Volunteer Contingent who were sent to England to represent the Colony at the Coronation.\n\n2. The question of what payments, if any, should be made to the Volunteers who formed this Contingent was very fully discussed before the Contingent left the Colony, and as a result of most careful consideration, a letter of which I enclose a copy was addressed to the Commandant of the Volunteers setting out the conditions as regards passages, allowances, etc., upon which it had been decided to send the Contingent to England.\n\nMajor Chapman was well aware of these conditions and of the deliberations which had led to the framing of them, and his action in inducing a re-consideration of those conditions without reference to me or to the Colony, which can at the present juncture ill afford to defray the heavy expense of the large scale of pay now sanctioned by you, is in my opinion reprehensible.\n\n3.\n\nMoreover, Major Chapman and Gunners J. Witchell\n\n4.\n\nTHE RIGHT HONOURABLE\n\nJOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN,\n\nM.P.,\n\n&c., &c.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-312 - Acting Governor Major Gen Sir Gascoigne Governor Sir Blake - 1902 [7-9].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 385567, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-312 - Acting Governor Major Gen Sir Gascoigne Governor Sir Blake - 1902 [7-9]", "page_number": 172, "title": "CO129-312 - Acting Governor Major Gen Sir Gascoigne Governor Sir Blake - 1902 [7-9]", "content_text": "170\n\nWitchell and E. D. C. Wolfe are Public Servants who were granted leave as follows in order to enable them to proceed with the Contingent to England.\n\n4 months' vacation leave from 14th May.\n\nMr. A. Chapman\n\nMr J Witchell\n\n3 months' vacation leave and 1 month's leave of absence from 14th May.\n\nMr. E. D. C. Wolfe\n\n3 months' vacation leave and 27 days' leave of absence from 14th May.\n\nIt appears to me that it can hardly have been your intention that these Officers should receive the very liberal rates of pay quoted in your Despatch under acknowledgment in addition to the salaries which they are permitted to draw while on leave, and I have, therefore, telegraphed to you on the 11th instant to the following effect.\n\nTelegram 33006\n\n\"Referring to your Despatch No. 195 of 4th July, express stipulation has been made Volunteers should not receive pay: consider it undesirable that Officials should be paid in addition to salary: suggest reconsideration. Despatch follows\".\n\nIn the meantime I shall ask the Legislative Council to vote the sum of nearly £1,250 which under your Despatch will be payable to the Contingent.\n\nI have the honour to be,\n\nSir,\n\nYour most obedient\n\nHumble servant,\n\nM.J. Gascoigne\n\nMajor-General,\n\nAdministering the Government.\n\nC0053", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-312 - Acting Governor Major Gen Sir Gascoigne Governor Sir Blake - 1902 [7-9].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 387250, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-315 - Public Offices & Others - 1902", "page_number": 3, "title": "CO129-315 - Public Offices & Others - 1902", "content_text": "## Dale \nSubjed \n\nSir H. Blake pruch. Gratuiton's med. Attendance. \n\n## \n建 \n21 \nh \nSlatures of King office. \n21 hay Capt. Subt. of Police \n128 \" \nActing Appt. \nSout \n8 July Furniture of Fort. House. \n115- \n11 \nPension of Dr J.A. Lewison \nBelitios L. P. 6 Oct School for Children of Burotean Brit Parents. \nCussington Sir J. 8 Jan. \n\n## \nI \n\n## \n## \n#1 \n\" \nRetirement \nPension \nLeb. new Edition of Ordees. \n26Cpl. Pension \nShay \n\" \n12 June N.C. for C. H. Stach \n13 \n28 \n物 \n30 July \n11 Aug \n23 \n\n** \nApply of JW. Jones. \nhew Edition of Oraces. \nA \nA \n** \nA \n\" \nDickinson Mo.1 Jan Tramways. \n## \n\" \n静 \n#+ \nDoage G. \nд \n#* \n5-Feb. \n10 \n12 \n* \n11 Mar \nY \n# \n魔头 \n# \n\" \nA \nContagious Diseases. Leans for Public Works. \nDickinson Mo. 14. Tramways. \n2 may \nSaberty he. \nLord 6. \nJune Pension \n22 July Commutation of pension \n29 Sept Petirement \n\n## Fromr \nFord C. \nBale \nSubject- \n29 Od. King's Park at Nowloon \n29. Economic Garden for hew Jerritory. \n18 hov. Pension \nGerrans H. 2. sept. Education \nHanson hus i st hear Bigany by be. Hanson. \n5 hov. Measter at Queen's College. \nHollis D. \nIrving E. A. 15 Sept. Schivol heaster. \n29 \nEducation \nJones MW. 26 bay Appt. of Dept. Regr. 4 Accountant of \nSupreme Court. \nJohnston L.A. l. 13 June Postmaster Generalshit. \nReswick W. 10 hear. Site for hew Post Office. \n18 \n# \n24\" \nLowson Dr Ja & Aug. Pension \n6 \nMay F. I. 6 Jan Water Police. \n12. \n# \nP \nColonial Secretary het. \n1 Aul. Appl. as fol. Sec. \nMitchell 4. 10 June Assistance \nhussoh&Rolfe 2 Sept. hus Hansons Petition for divorce \nhitchell G. 30 how. Compensation for impaired eyesight. \nRoss hings. 5 July R. C. Dixon \n12 \n# \nSurre J. Son 3 Jel. Bay book. \nSamuel busto. 25 » \nFrench duty or goods shished from formessa. \nSurre & sons 12 May Leases of Marine Soto. \nMerken, he JD or July Praya Reclamation \nSouth fir 6.6. 2 \n\n** \nMemo, on Education \nkiemo.on \nSibbens hr. d. 16 Aug. Appeal of Howard Allephews agst Celly. \nGeul. Sangster Tus. 24 Oct. Compensation Allie.\n\n## Reconstructed Text in Markdown\n\n### Dale\nSubject \nSir H. Blake's purchase. Gratuitous medical attendance.\n\n### \n建 \n21st Statutes of King's Office. \n21st May Capt. Subt. of Police \n128 \" Acting Appointment \nSouth \n8 July Furniture of Fort House. \n115-11 Pension of Dr J.A. Lewison \nBelitios L.P. 6 Oct School for Children of European British Parents. \nCussington Sir J. 8 Jan.\n\n### \nI \n#1 \nRetirement Pension \nLeb. new Edition of Orders. \n26 Cpl. Pension \nShay \n12 June N.C. for C. H. Stach \n13 \n28 \n30 July \n11 Aug \n23 \n\n**Application of J.W. Jones.** \nNew Edition of Orders. \nA \n** \nA \nDickinson Mo. 1 Jan Tramways. \n## \nContagious Diseases. Loans for Public Works. \nDickinson Mo. 14. Tramways. \n2 May \nSaberty he. \nLord 6. \nJune Pension \n22 July Commutation of pension \n29 Sept Retirement \n\n### From \nFord C. \nBale \nSubject \n29 Oct. King's Park at Nowloon \n29. Economic Garden for new Territory. \n18 Nov. Pension \nGerrans H. 2 Sept. Education \nHanson hus i st hear Bigamy by be. Hanson. \n5 Nov. Master at Queen's College. \nHollis D. \nIrving E. A. 15 Sept. School Master. \n29 Education \n| Name | Date | Subject |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Jones M.W. | 26 May | Appointment of Deputy Registrar & Accountant of Supreme Court. |\n| Johnston L.A. | 13 June | Postmaster Generalship. |\n| Reswick W. | 10 Nov. | Site for new Post Office. |\n| Lowson Dr Ja | 8 Aug. | Pension |\n| May F. I. | 6 Jan | Water Police. |\n\n### \n| Name | Date | Subject |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Colonial Secretary | 1 Aug. | Application as fol. Sec. |\n| Mitchell 4. | 10 June | Assistance |\n| hussoh&Rolfe | 2 Sept. | hus Hansons Petition for divorce |\n| Mitchell G. | 30 Nov. | Compensation for impaired eyesight. |\n| Ross hings. | 5 July | R. C. Dixon |\n\n### \n| Name | Date | Subject |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Surre J. Son | 3 Jul. | Bay book. |\n| Samuel busto. | 25 | French duty or goods shipped from Formessa. |\n| Surre & sons | 12 May | Leases of Marine Soto. |\n| Merken, he JD | or July | Praya Reclamation |\n| South fir 6.6. | 2 | |\n\n**Memo. on Education** \nSibbens hr. d. 16 Aug. Appeal of Howard Allephews against Celly. \nGeul. Sangster Tus. 24 Oct. Compensation Allie.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-315 - Public Offices & Others - 1902.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 390503, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12]", "page_number": 56, "title": "CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12]", "content_text": "# No.533.\n\n**Hongkong**\n\n54 \n502 \nREC\n\n**Government House** \nHongkong, 23rd November, 1903.\n\nH 3b12b \n03\n\nSir,\n\nWith reference to Mr. Chamberlain's Despatch No. 366 of the 8th ultimo, I have the honour to transmit as requested the enclosed copy of Mr. May's letter of the 23rd August, 1897, in which he forwarded the notes of evidence against and recommended the dismissal of Sergeant Holt, together with Mr. Stewart-Lockhart's minute of the 23rd August and Governor Sir William Robinson's minute of the 24th August approving of Holt's dismissal. The case was reported to your predecessor in Sir William Robinson's Despatch No. 190 of the 7th September, 1897.\n\n## Enclosure 1. 23rd August, 1897\n\n2.\n\nThe case of Sergeant Holt differed in this important particular from those of all the other European Officers except Witchell implicated in the Wa Lane case, that there was direct evidence of the payment of bribes to him. For the reason stated in Mr. May's letter referred to above it was not possible to use the evidence of the person who actually paid the bribe to Sergeant Holt in a criminal prosecution.\n\nThe cases of Sergeants Macaulay and McIver, to which Mr. Holt refers, were reported to Mr. Chamberlain in ...\n\nTHE RIGHT HONOURABLE \nALFRED LYTTELTON, M.P., \n&c. \n&c. \n&c.\n\nSir...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 391009, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12]", "page_number": 562, "title": "CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12]", "content_text": "It is requested that in any further communication on this subject the undermentioned letter and number may be quoted, and the reply addressed to-- \n\nThe Under Secretary of State for India, \n\nIndia Office, \n\nF.6874. \n\nDated 12th September 03. \n\nSir, \n\nWhitehall, \n\nLondon, S.W. \n\n10 21204 \n\n35512 \n\nIndia Office, \n\nJRECH Whitchall, SEP 03 556 \n\nA \n\nLondon, S.W. \n\n24th September 1903. \n\nWith reference to the letter from this Office No. F.6475 dated 5th instant, and previous correspondence, I am directed to forward for the information of Mr. Secretary Chamberlain a copy of a telegram from the Viceroy regarding the capacity of the Indian Mints to cope with demands for British dollars in the future, having regard to the requirements of the rupee coinage, and also to the requirements of the new Straits dollar. \n\nIt will be seen that the Government of India estimate that they will probably be able in the future to meet the demand for the coinage of British Straits dollars notwithstanding the priority to be given to Indian rupees; but they decline to give a definite undertaking to this effect. \n\nI am to add that the substance of the Viceroy's telegram is being communicated to the Banks by this Office; I have the honour to be, Sir, Your obedient Servant, \n\nForen Webster \n\nUnder Secretary of State, \n\nColonial Office.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 391926, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-321 - Public Offices & Others - 1903", "page_number": 886, "title": "CO129-321 - Public Offices & Others - 1903", "content_text": "his application for the part of Excenter Engineer \n\nto that Colmu \n\nin \n\nColme \n\nhos \n\nhen comminated 6 \n\nkin \n\nIl no \n\ndon't \n\nagree \n\nthat \n\nTur \n\nSuthey shoed \n\nbeen informed oft \n\nho \n\nnot have \n\nof this \n\nCorrspandense \n\nand I am to \n\nrequest \n\ntha \n\nChangbulag \n\ncare may be taken to am \n\n★ Similar inconvenicul \n\nin \n\nCauf \n\nlub exp \n\nfutme \n\nragraft that' \n\nleo \n\nLan \n\nCPL \n\nHONG \n\nNo. \n\n15020 \n\nDOMESTIC. \n\n879 \n\n15020 \n\non Considue \n\nffice or Individual. \n\nare br \n\n1903 жаре \n\nast previous Paper. \n\nMitch \n\n20 Afalt \n\n|_ A5(76)-WAS-EMU-11-2 \n\nText sabsequent Paper. \n\nreports on \n\naufficient \n\n(Subject.) \n\nMI Mitchell. \n\non state of his eyesight: there is not \n\nfor grant of gratuity: \n\nnason \n\nMr. Lucas Lo Jalmos \n\nthat \n\nthe \n\n(Minutes.) \n\nTall but hitchell \n\nfians it is ys \n\nimpossible or ask Hangling \n\nvote him anything \n\nكا \n\nsend copy of \n\n12911, letter 15 at Square thereon \n\no Houghing and say \n\nKiis \n\nit appears to be unporsible \n\n9 \n\ntheat \n\nto take \n\n(8 \n\nany further ships. All ca and so inform pay £2.2. \n\nfr Square with thankes \n\nBy 2414 \n\n4 \n\nC.Pd: 25 Jul 257 \n\natones", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-321 - Public Offices & Others - 1903.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 397095, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-329 - Governor Nathan - 1905 [7-12]", "page_number": 389, "title": "CO129-329 - Governor Nathan - 1905 [7-12]", "content_text": "## Government House, Hongkong, 2nd October, 1905.\n\nI have written to My Collins after talking the matter over with Fiddes, to say that I have sent his P. to Sir J. kausa, paying his fee, on the understanding that Whitchall do not return a favourable response to his request that time spent in H.K. should be treated as service in School, we shall have to reconsider the question of firing him approval.\n\nReferring to the first paragraph of the letter from the Inspector of Schools, which was enclosed in Mr. May's Despatch No. 165 of the 18th April, 1904, I have the honour to forward particulars, in duplicate, of the vacant post of Assistant Master at the Yaumati Anglo-Chinese School, and to supplement them by asking that the candidate selected should be unmarried, and if possible not more than 25 years of age. He should be a trained and certificated Master with a correct English accent and willing to teach games to his Chinese pupils. A special knowledge of any of the following subjects, viz.:- Mathematics, Book-keeping, History, Geography, Drawing, Chemistry or Latin, should be considered an additional qualification and though a knowledge of Modern Foreign Languages is not required, proof of linguistic ability would be of value.\n\n2. The salary for this appointment was $800.\n\nC. O. 386 \n38039 \nREC \n(Reef 2 NOV 05 \n`CR187/11` \n`CR257/11` \n`CR25/11` \nNo.236 \nHongkong. \nTo THE RIGHT HONOURABLE \nALFRED LYTTELTON, K.C., M.P.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-329 - Governor Nathan - 1905 [7-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 397641, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-330 - Public Offices - 1905", "page_number": 131, "title": "CO129-330 - Public Offices - 1905", "content_text": "Regret \n\ndeluge \n\nreply my.\n\n\n128 \n\nWestminster Chambers \n\nVictoria Street \n\nLondon SW \n\n12th May 1905. \n\nHong Kong Harbour \n\nGentlemen, \n\nWe have to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of 20th December 1904, with the following \nenclosures referred to therein : \n\n1. Letter to yourselves from the Colonial Office's dated 16th December 1904: \n2. Despatches from the Governor of Hong Kong to the Secretary of State for the Colonies dated 26th October, and 15th November 1904.\n3. Report from the Harbour Master dated 12th August 1904. \n4. Reports from Mr Boulton, Acting Assistant Director of Public Works, dated 30th July and 12th November 1904.\n5. Small charts, and one Street of sectors referred to in the latter reports.\n\nWe much regret the delay which has arisen in the preparation of this Report, and trust no inconvenience will be experienced.\n\nThe Crown Agents \nfor the Colonies \nWhitchall Gardens, S.W.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-330 - Public Offices - 1905.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 405211, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-334 - Governor Nathan - 1906 [5-7]", "page_number": 406, "title": "CO129-334 - Governor Nathan - 1906 [5-7]", "content_text": "## Table III. HONGKONG VOLUNTEER CORPS.\n\n### Roll of Efficients for the Year ending 31st March, 1906.\n\n**Commanding Officers**\n\n| Rank and Name | Position |\n| --- | --- |\n| Major C. G. Pritchard | Commandant |\n| A. Chapman | 2nd in Command |\n| Captain F. O. Stedman | Surgeon |\n| Lieut. C. Forsyth | Do. |\n| Sergt. Major W. Higby | |\n\n### No. 2 COMPANY, H. K. V. ARTILLERY. Roll of Efficients.\n\n| Rank and Name |\n| --- |\n| Captain r Skinner, T. |\n| Lieutenant Scott, W. M. |\n| Co.-Sgt.-Maj. r Rodger, J. |\n| Sergeant P Lochend, J. |\n| Lert Hale |\n| Gunner ... |\n| Corps Sergeant-Major Terrill, W. J. |\n| Gunner r Gloyu, J. W. |\n| Corporal |\n\n### No. 1 COMPANY H. K. V. ARTILLERY. Roll of Efficients.\n\n| Rank and Name |\n| --- |\n| Gunner Bain, H. M. |\n| Gunner Chumnett, F. G. |\n| Gunner Raymond, E. |\n| Seth, H. A. |\n| Gunner Chromett, O. R. |\n| Gunner Duncan, G. |\n| Guumer Sheffold, A. E. |\n| Andrew, J. I. |\n| Gidley, H. |\n| McCorquodale, f. |\n| Reidio, J. |\n| MeKirdy, J. |\n| Mather, H. L. |\n| Watson, A. |\n| Gidley, S. |\n| Grimshaw, T. |\n| Hast, W. |\n| Kimard, J. A. |\n| Michael, S. J. |\n| Watson, J. J. |\n| Crapnell, A. E. |\n| Hayward, E. M. |\n| Hayward, C. B. |\n| Whyte, J. F. M. |\n| Bassford, W. M. |\n| Crosbie, d. |\n| Durrance, W. II. |\n| Davidson, H. |\n| McIntyre, J. |\n| Palmer, H. T. |\n| Witchell, R. |\n| Muir, G. |\n| Scott, W. B. P. |\n| Woolley, W. II. |\n| Lamble, P. T, |\n| Conolly, T. P. |\n| Quinn, J. |\n| Okeeffe. D. |\n| Ballen. J. A. |\n| Gunner Frith, C. E. |\n| Coysh, E. W. |\n| Ward, C. W. |\n| Duncan, R. |\n| Sorby, V. |\n| Pearson. H. F. |\n| Eadie, J. |\n| Dinuing, H. |\n| Griffiths, J. A. |\n| Hornibrook, E. L. |\n| Johnston, J. |\n| Melutyre, W. |\n| Boulton, S. |\n| Scriven, D. E. |\n| Anderson, W. |\n| Fairbolm, J. |\n| Saunders, G. A. |\n| Pearson, R. W. |\n| Corporal P Henderson, R. |\n| r [lance, J. [. R. |\n| Markie, A. J. |\n| Seth, S. A. |\n| Melver, M. |\n| Herbst, C. E. |\n| Bombardier Craddock, H. E. |\n| Olsen, J. |\n| Brett, L. E. |\n| Olsen, C. W, |\n| Gummer Abrabam, E. |\n| Pestonji, R. |\n| Abrubam, R. |\n| Pelling, W. W. |\n| Baker, F. H. |\n| Raymond, A. |\n| Ellis, E. E. |\n| Gay, L. |\n| Goggin, W. G. |\n| Humphreys, E. |\n| Humphreys, C. |\n| Haggard, H. E. |\n| Kennett, H. G. |\n| Seth, J. II. |\n| Shaw, E. |\n| Sibbett, J. J. |\n| Alves, C. M. S. |\n| Leonard, J. |\n| Bains, J. W\" |\n| Loureiro, F. |\n| James, E. W. H. |\n| Joseph, J. |\n| Petley, II. |\n| Moore, F. |\n| Abraham, E. S. |\n\n### ENGINEER COMPANY. Roll of Efficients.\n\n| Rank and Name |\n| --- |\n| Captain Crake, W. A. |\n| Lientevant Reynolds, F. O. |\n| Co.-Sgt. Maj. e Logan, J. W. |\n| Sapper P Rovan, H. S. |\n| Sergeant P Crawford, J. |\n| F Lapsley. R. |\n| Corporal Lummert, G. P. |\n| Captain Gublay, J. S. |\n| Gunner Payton, J. T. |\n| Gamer Hamett, A. H. |\n| Gunner Sayer. A. C. |\n| Supper Dillon, F. II. |\n| Ward, F. |\n| Watson, V. |\n| Cullen, W. F. |\n| Park, A. V. |\n| Witchell, J. |\n| Logan, J. C. |\n| Kynoch, G. |\n| Holmes, J. |\n| Ross, W. E. |\n| Dixon, C. W. |\n| Milne, J. G |\n| Barrington, J. II. |\n| Ross, J. |\n| Sapper Hirst, J. |\n| Lochend, H. W. |\n| Frost. B. L. |\n| Fletcher, II. L. |\n| Ross, J. |\n| Quark. F. W. |\n| Leufesty, F. P. |\n| Hall, 1. S. |\n| Sergeant » Deas, W. M. |\n| Corporal Sayer, H. W. |\n| Bombardier Mitchell, R. |\n| Longstaff, J. |\n| Rogers, A. E. |\n| Pellow, E. |\n| Marshall, J. |\n| Sanderson, W. |\n| Brandt, W. |\n| 'Lewington, W. J. |\n| Friend, J. |\n| Clothier, A. V. |\n\n### RIGHT HALF, No. 2 COMPANY H. K. V. ARTILLERY.\n\n| Rank and Name |\n| --- |\n| Brown, F. A. |\n| Coles, J. C. |\n| Rend, W. |\n| Kennedy, P. |\n| Indah, J. J. |\n| Catchick, G. G. |\n| Penfold, I. IL |\n| Cole, J. T. f. |\n| Hurlow, J. |\n\n### TROOP. Roll of Efficients.\n\n| Rank and Name |\n| --- |\n| Captain P Armstrong, W. |\n| Lieutenant Northcote, M. S. |\n| Gunner Jall, F. C. |\n| Sergeant r Hays, J. |\n| Grey, B. W. |\n| Corporal Holmes, H. K. |\n| Bell, H. D. |\n| Blood, G. |\n| Bombardier |\n| Gunner Rees, L. C. |\n| Day, F. O. |\n| Goldring, P. W. |\n| Bissell, W. T. |\n| Darby, A. J. |\n| Laing, A. II. |\n| Wright, A. E. |\n| Large, A. J. |\n| Ancott, E. F. |\n| Gray, H. C. |\n| Austin, F. |\n| Currett, H. L. |\n| Jackman, J. T. |\n| Biden, F. A. |\n| Donaldson, W, F. |\n| Pngh, A. J. |\n| Chapman, E. J. |\n| Ironside, W. |\n| Ginner Kempthorne, A. S. |\n| Young, J. A. |\n| Turner, W. C. D. |\n| Blackburn, L. J. |\n| Dermer, H. W. |\n| Ramsay, A. |\n| Lester, H. W |\n| Whitamore, R. A. |\n| Warrack, A. F. |\n| Hagen, E. C. |\n| Piercy, A. |\n| Lieutenant r Ross, C. H. |\n| Trooper Stubb, X. J. |\n| Sergeant Robertson, W. R. |\n| Looker, H. W. |\n| Trooper Moxon, G. C. |\n| Junes, H. B. |\n| Trooper Forbes, W. |\n| Stewart, M. |\n| Hynes, A. C. |\n| Inglis, W. |\n| Macintyre, H. A. |\n| Murphy, L |\n| Cruickshank,W.A.C.] |\n| Owen. E. |\n| Mackie, C. G. |\n| Rutherford, N. II. |\n| Paterson, J. |\n| Melbourne, C. D. |\n| Howard, E. |\n| Honchman, A. S. |\n| Auderson, L. J. C. |\n| Sharp, E. II. |\n| Gresson, J. E. |\n| Potts, R. C. |\n| Bratton, G. K, H. |\n\nPage 401", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-334 - Governor Nathan - 1906 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 405213, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-334 - Governor Nathan - 1906 [5-7]", "page_number": 408, "title": "CO129-334 - Governor Nathan - 1906 [5-7]", "content_text": "## Table VII. \n### HONGKONG VOLUNTEER CORPS. MUSKETRY RETURN :-ENGINEER COMPANY.\n\n| Corps Rank and Name | No. | Lying. | Kneeling | Sitting, behind Cover. | Independent 200 Yards | No. II. 200 Yards | No. III. 200 Yards | Magazine 300 Yards | Independent 300 Yards | No. IV. 300 Yards | No. V. 300 Yards | No. VI. 500 Yards | No. VII. 500 Yards | No. VIII. 150 Yards Rapid | No. IX. 130 Yards Snap Shooting | Total Marks | 1st Class. | 2nd Class. | 3rd Class. |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Captain Crake, W. A. | 18 | 17 | 02 | 18 | 17 | ... | ... | TEL | 1 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Lieut. Reynolds, F. O. | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | Recently joined, | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 744 | 628 | ... | ... |\n| C.S.M. Logan, J. D. | 12 | ... | ... | ... | ... | 166 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sergt. H. S. ford, | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 679 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sergt. Lapsley, R. | 2,8 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 517 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Corpl. Witchell, J. H. | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | GOL | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sapper Holmes, J. | 689 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sapper Russell, W. | 682 | 012 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sapper Ross, W. E. | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | སྣུན་ | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Corpl. Dixon, C. W. | 283 | ... | ... | 750 | ... | ... | ... | tit | ... | 962 | 162 | 862 | UNT | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sapper Logan, J. C. | 31 | 44 | 66 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sapper Milne, J. G. | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 822 | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sapper Dillon, F. II. | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sapper Watson, Y. | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sapper Barrington, J. | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sapper Cullen, W. F | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sapper Ward. F. | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sapper Ross, J. | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 2nd Cpl. | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| 2nd Cpl. Kynoch, G. W. | 799 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | Sapper | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sapper Hirst, G. | 802 | 817 | 818 | 827 | 828 | 871 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sapper Wolfe, H. | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sapper Watson, G. | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sapper Park, A. A. | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sapper Lochead, N. J. | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sapper Mason, A. J. | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Sapper Frost, B. L. | ལ ོམ31:|ཀནི1 | 20 | OZ | GF1 | FI | 91 | + | GLI | 81 | 12 | GI | 1) | 19 | ... | ... | 1 | 22 | } |\n| Sapper Ross, J. J. | 17 | 20 | Di | not fire. | 15 | 91 | 18 | 17 | F | GL | 17 | 11 | 16 | N | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Staff | ས་ག་ལ་ | B- | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n\n## Table VIII. \n### HONGKONG VOLUNTEER CORPS.\n\n### Revolver Practice Return, shewing Average, for the year ending 31st March, 1906.\n\n| Unit | Number firing. | Number of Points attained. | Average. | Remarks. |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| No, I Company Hongkong Volunteer Artillery | 4 | 259 | 64.75 | ... |\n| Engineer Company | 7 | 509 | 74.475 | ... |\n| Total | ... | 1,231 | 52.5 | ... |\n\n## Appendix A. \n### CAMP REPORT, 1905.\n\n**VOLENTEER HEADQUARTERS, HONGKONG, 21st November, 1905.**\n\nSir, I have the honour to forward the attached report on the Volunteer Camp held at Stonecutters' Island from October 14th to October 30th, 1905.\n\nNumbers - Out of the total number of 19 Officers and 219 N.C.O.'s and men, 13 Officers and 169 N.C.O.'s and men attended the Camp. 6 Officers and 30 N.C.O.'s and men were away on leave of absence, or had leave from Camp owing to the exigencies of their business. This total does not include the Hongkong Volunteer Troop, who did not attend the Camp.\n\nThe average daily attendance was 127.5.\n\nThe following Table shows the average attendance, &c., and the proportion of the full strength on each day:\n\n| Date. | Strength deducting those on leave. | Attendance at Camp. | Daily Attendance. | Proportion of Total Strength daily. |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 1901 | 16 | 256 | Officers, N.C.O.s & men. | 14 | 204 | 137 | 42 |\n| 1902 | 16 | 231 | 14 | 176 | 142.1 | 568 |\n| 1903 | 16 | 204 | 17 | 130 | 1216 | 810 |\n| 1904 | 16 | 210 | 14 | 170 | 185.5 | 6 |\n| 1905 | B | 189 | 13 | 169 | 127.5 | 631 |\n\nIt is very satisfactory to note that in spite of the period of the Camp having been extended from 10 to 16 days, the attendance works out a better proportion than in any previous years. A result which is far better than I expected.\n\nI attach a Camp programme showing general orders issued and the drills which were carried out. I also attach a schedule of drills and lectures carried out by the Engineer Company under the R.E. Instructors.\n\nA marked improvement was noticeable at all drills this year; in previous years the drill has been too slow and I therefore took every opportunity to correct this fault with good results. 23 Gun Layers were trained and took part in the Gun Practice.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-334 - Governor Nathan - 1906 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 408247, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-338 - Public Offices & Others - 1906", "page_number": 711, "title": "CO129-338 - Public Offices & Others - 1906", "content_text": "of his guilt. \n\n705\n\nIn forwarding these papers Sir H. Blake stated.— The case differed in this important particular from those of all the other European officers except Witchell implicated in the Wa Lane case, that there was direct evidence of the payment of bribes to him.\n\nIn view of these facts and of Mr. Holt's practical admission of his guilt to the then Chief Inspector Mr. Mackie, who can if necessary be questioned now on the point, I consider Mr. Holt's case on quite a different footing from those European officers who were accorded pensions.\"\n\n(This despatch is signed by Mr. May, who explains in a footnote that it was approved by the Gov., who however had left the Colony before it was copied for his signature.)\n\nOn this Holt was informed that his petition could not be entertained. See Eur/502/03-4\n\nHolt now appeals again, on the ground that his former petition was dealt with by Mr. May as O.A.G., who was prejudiced against him.\n\nThis is a mistake, as shown above, but not an unnatural one in view of the unfortunate wording of our former letter to him in which we said that we had communicated with the O.A.G.\n\nI think that substantial justice has been done, and that Holt's attitude was not compatible with innocence. It is unlikely that he was unaware at the time that he was being put on his trial before his commanding officer under the provisions of the police law.\n\nThe heading to the notes distinctly states that he was \"charged\". As an experienced police sergeant he must have known that \"no questions and nothing to say\" is the usual attitude of a man who has no defence; and if he merely...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-338 - Public Offices & Others - 1906.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 415088, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-349 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1908 [10-12]", "page_number": 377, "title": "CO129-349 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1908 [10-12]", "content_text": "## COPY\n\nREG 7 JAN 09\n\nHongkong, 13th August, 1908.\n\nC. Dick Melbourne, Esq., \nActg. Asst. Supt., Victoria Gaol, \nPresent.\n\nI have decided to return to Shanghai per s.s. \"Tooksang\" which is advertised to leave this port on Monday the 17th instant and would be obliged by your arranging with Messrs. Jardine, Matheson & Co. re. my passage therewith.\n\nWould you kindly forward the ticket to me c/o J. Witchell, Esq., Austin Avenue, Kowloon, when received.\n\nYours faithfully, \n(Sd) FRED H. MONTIER GOODE\n\n(Sub-enclosure to 6) \nY 900 \n713 \n371 \n\n## Page metadata, if any, should be kept as is, but there is none here.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-349 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1908 [10-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 415478, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-350 - Public Offices - 1908", "page_number": 173, "title": "CO129-350 - Public Offices - 1908", "content_text": "# Kowloon Canton Railway Agreement\n\nMade the \n17th day of \n1906\n\nBetween The Undersigned One of the Crown Agents for the Colonies of Whitchall Gardens London in the County of Middlesex acting for and on behalf of The Government of Hong Kong (hereinafter called the Government) of the one part and Graves William Eves of \n... \nof the other part \n\nWhereby it is agreed by and between the parties hereto, as follows :- \n\nThe said Graves William Eves (hereinafter called the person engaged) is hereby selected for appointment as Resident Engineer in connection with the construction of the Kowloon - Canton Railway upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. \n\nThe person engaged undertakes to proceed to Hong Kong when directed by the Consulting Engineers and to perform the duties of Resident Engineer for such period as may be necessary for the completion of the Railway. \n\nThe duties of the person engaged shall include all work connected with the construction of the Railway as well as any other suitable duties which the Government through the Consulting Engineers may call upon him to perform and he shall, at all times act under the instructions and general directions of the Consulting Engineers for the Railway. \n\nThe person engaged shall on arrival in Hong Kong and during the time he shall continue in the service of the Government", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-350 - Public Offices - 1908.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 424187, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-364 - Public Offices & Others - 1909", "page_number": 320, "title": "CO129-364 - Public Offices & Others - 1909", "content_text": "144. Citaway Street, Evering Road, Stoke Newington, London. Saturday, 2nd October 1909.\n\nHon W Chatham,\nDirector of Public Works, of Hong Kong.\n\nTo The Crown Agents for the Colonies,\nWhitchall Gardens, London. S.W.\n\nDear Sir,\n\nI beg to remind you that I have not received any reply to my second letter some weeks ago. If any reply has been sent (not mentioned in my letter) it has not been received by me, an unusual thing.\n\nI would respectfully bring to your notice:-\n\n1. That when I was engaged for service in the P.W.D. of Hong Kong, I was informed that the cost of living was reasonable. (You will probably remember the Petition signed by the whole of the Civil Service of Hong Kong, and forwarded to the Right Hon. The Lord Elgin at the end of 1906).\n\n2. That the mobilization of 1905 (due to the bungling of the correspondence) caused me most serious illness. I would have got Rheumatic Fever, Pleurisy, Pericarditis. This was caused through my having to...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-364 - Public Offices & Others - 1909.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 425713, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-367 - Acting Governor May - 1910 [6-7]", "page_number": 83, "title": "CO129-367 - Acting Governor May - 1910 [6-7]", "content_text": "SANITARY DEPARTMENT\n\n \n OFFICER\n SALARY\n NAMILY COST\n \n \n Lamble\n £349\n £98. 3. 6.\n \n \n Lyon\n 340\n 110. 8. 4.\n \n \n Reidie\n 306\n 49. 1. 9.\n \n \n Fisher\n 306\n 49. 1. 9.\n \n \n Wooley\n 306\n 159.10. 8.\n \n \n L.E.Brett\n 306\n £0. 5. 80\n \n \n Witchell\n 265\n 159.10. 8.\n \n \n Hynes\n 240\n 49. 1. 9.\n \n \n McEwen\n 306\n £0. 8. 0\n \n \n Ward\n 240\n £0. 8. 0\n \n \n Cullen\n 220\n £0. 8. 80\n \n \n Brown\n 198\n 169.10. 8.\n \n \n Coysh\n 215\n £0. 8. 8\n \n \n Duncan\n 240\n £0. 8. 0\n \n \n Frith\n 240\n 110. 8.11.\n \n \n Hudson\n 210\n 49. 1. 9.\n \n \n Coombs\n 210\n 49. 1. 9.\n \n \n Bullen\n 205\n £0. 8. 20\n \n \n Dawson\n 165\n £0. 8. 0\n \n \n O'Halloran\n 165\n 49. 1. 9.\n \n \n Cotton\n 234\n 98. 3. 6.\n \n \n Watson\n 306\n 159.10. 8.\n \n \n O.W.Brett\n 325\n 159.10. 8.\n \n \n Pearson\n 190\n £0. 8. 0\n \n \n McKenzie\n 306\n £0. 8. 0\n \n \n Knight\n 288\n £0. 1. 0\n \n \n Allen\n 306\n £0. 1. 0\n \n \n Fincher\n 252\n £0. 1. 08\n \n \n Johannsen\n 108\n £0. 80\n \n \n Sutherland\n 160\n £0. 1. 0\n \n \n \n £7348\n £2921.13.11.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-367 - Acting Governor May - 1910 [6-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 447918, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-411 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [5-7]", "page_number": 136, "title": "CO129-411 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [5-7]", "content_text": "124\n\nDate of\n\nName.\n\nJ. A. Lyon\n\nP. T. Lamble\n\n-\n\ndo.\n\n-\n\nR. C. Witchell\n\nPresent scale of salary.\n\n£300-£340 by £20 triennially\n\n£250-£270 by £5 annually\n\ncommence-\n\nment of pre-\n\nSalary 1914.\n\nsent scale\n\n31.1.05\n\n£340\n\n19.1.05\n\n£340\n\n10.2.05\n\n£270\n\nC. W. Ward\n\n£240-£270 by £15 triennially\n\n1.7.07\n\n£270\n\nR. Duncan\n\n-\n\ndo.\n\n-\n\n8.11.07\n\n£270\n\nC. E. Frith\n\n.do.\n\n-\n\n15.5.08 (£255 up to/45-14\n\n(£270 from 15-5-14.\n\nG. W. Coysh\n\nH. Coombe\n\n-\n\n£200-£230 by £5 annually\n\ndo.\n\n1.1.05\n\n£230\n\n-\n\n1.7.06\n\n£230\n\nC. W. Brett\n\nH. Pearson\n\nS. Kelly\n\n£195-£230 by £5 annually £170-£215 by £5 annually\n\ndo.\n\n22. 5.03\n\n£230\n\n1.6.04\n\n£215\n\n-\n\n17.8.03\n\n£215\n\nA. K. Taylor\n\n£165-£225 by £15 triennially\n\n27.3.11 (165 up to 263/4\n\n(£180 from 27.3-14\n\nW. Thomson\n\n- do.\n\n12. 4.13\n\n£165\n\nW. Hill\n\nL. Brewer\n\nD. Davies\n\n- do.\n\n- do.\n\n-\n\n23. 6.13\n\n£165\n\n-\n\ndo.\n\n-\n\n1. 1.14\n\n£165\n\nNot yet assumed\n\nduties.\n\nVacant\n\ndo.\n\nT. Hynes\n\nR. Hudson\n\nVeterinary Staff.\n\n£240-£270 by £15 triennially\n\n1. 6.07\n\n£270\n\n-\n\ndo. -\n\n1. 1.11\n\n£255", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-411 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 452584, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-419 - Individuals - 1914", "page_number": 430, "title": "CO129-419 - Individuals - 1914", "content_text": "#45\n\nThrough my application will meet with your kind consideration.\n\nAs\n\nI wish to\n\nthrow some light\n\nDr. Honourable\n\nYour Cheung Sa rant R. C. Mitchell.\n\nsailing per S.S. \"Malwa\"\n\nand will be in London\n\non Thursday 15th - calling \n\nat Crown Agents at Whitchall Gardens,\n\nand communications \n\nare addressed Care \n\nof them.\n\nRavilchen will ... to ... is all", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-419 - Individuals - 1914.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 452585, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-419 - Individuals - 1914", "page_number": 431, "title": "CO129-419 - Individuals - 1914", "content_text": "## DRAFT\n### MINUTE\n\n`W/39889/14`\n\nMr. Rb Witchell\n\n25. St\n\nI refer to your letter of the 14 Oct its receipt of \nEur lette fs.\n\nSir G. Fiddes, Sir H. Just, Sir J. Anderson, Lord melt. Islington, Mr. Harcourt.\n\nI am to inform you that the CA In the Chave been authorised to \nadvance & Coffy Pw. 274. Ad Oct.\n\nFit & Gar Required X You for payment to your wife \nthat half salary for the month of Oct; is due & payable \nbut that, as regards future payments, you must make", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-419 - Individuals - 1914.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 455186, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-423 - Governor Sir May - 1915 [7-8]", "page_number": 579, "title": "CO129-423 - Governor Sir May - 1915 [7-8]", "content_text": "## PORTS AND HARBOURS OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE: Humber Hull and Immingham,\n\n### Question.\n\n1. At bar or entrance, what is:\n (1) the minimum width?\n (2) the minimum navigable depth, L.W.O.S.T.?\n\nAt the mouth of the Humber, the minimum width is 1 mile, and the minimum navigable depth is 60 ft. (L.W.O.S.T.).\n\n(Note—If between the entrance and the deep sea, there are bars or shoals, where a lesser depth occurs than the minimum indicated above, a list of such obstructions and of the depths over them (L.W.O.S.T) should be given.)\n\n2. In the approach channel from bar or entrance to berthing accommodation, what is:\n (1) the minimum and maximum width?\n (2) the minimum and maximum depth, L.W.O.S.T.?\n\nThe width of the channel up the Humber varies from about ½ mile (at Hull) to 1 mile, and the depth from ... to ... (L.W.O.S.T.).\n\n3. What is:\n (1) the rise and fall of tides:\n (a) ordinary springs,\n (b) ordinary neaps?\n (2) the rise of ordinary neaps above L.W.O.S.T.?\n\n (1) (a) Ordinary springs, 22·65 ft.\n (b) Ordinary neaps, 10·04 ft.\n\n### UNITED KINGDOM\n\n#### Leith.\n\nThe entrance to Leith Harbour is from the Firth of Forth.\n\n#### Tees (Middlesbrough).\n\nThe entrance to Middlesbrough is from the River Tees.\n\n(1) (a) Ordinary springs, 15 ft. 9 ins.\n (b) Ordinary neaps, 10 ft. 9 ins.\n(2) Rise of ordinary neaps above L.W.O.S.T., 12 ft.\n\n#### Tyne (Newcastle, North Shields, South Shields).\n\nThe width of the entrance to the Tyne between the Pier Heads is 1,180 ft., and the depth is 30 ft. (L.W.O.S.T.).\n\nThe width of the dredged channel from the Pier Heads to a point nearly abreast of Cliffords Fort is about 400 ft. in width. From thence to the Northumberland Dock, it varies from about 570 ft. to about 1,020 ft. From the Northumberland Dock to Newcastle Quay, it varies from about 135 ft. to about 780 ft.\n\nThe channel from the Bar to the Northumberland Dock is in course of being dredged to about 30 ft. (L.W.O.S.T.), and from thence to Derwenthaugh (above Newcastle) to about 25 ft. (L.W.O.S.T.).\n\n(1) (a) Ordinary springs:\n At Shields: 15 ft.\n At Newcastle: 14 ft.\n (b) Ordinary neaps: 11 ft.\n(2) Rise of ordinary neaps above L.W.O.S.T., about 11 ft. 4 ins.\n\n4. What is the maximum available depth of water:\n (a) at piers or wharves, L.W.O.S.T.?\n (b) in the case of enclosed docks, in the entrance locks, if any, and at dock quays, H.W.O.N.T.?\n\n#### Hull.\n\nThe new joint dock is the deepest in the port. The depth of water at the entrance lock to this dock is 32 ft. 11½ ins. (H.W.O.N.T.) over the inner sill, and the maximum depth of water in the dock itself is ... ft. ... ins.\n\n#### Immingham.\n\nThe depth of water at the entrance lock to the Immingham Dock is 43 ft. 6 in. (H.W.O.N.T.) over the inner sill, and the maximum depth of water in the dock itself is ... ft.\n\n#### Tees (Middlesbrough).\n\nThe Imperial Dock is the deepest in the port. The depth of water at the entrance lock to this dock is 28 ft. 11 ins. (H.W.O.N.T.) over the inner sill, and the maximum depth of water in the dock itself is ... ft.\n\nThe depth of water in the entrance lock to the Middlesbrough Dock is 27 ft. (H.W.O.N.T.) over the inner sill, and the depth in the dock is the same as on the sill.\n\n#### Tyne (Newcastle).\n\nThe maximum depth of water which has been dredged in connection with the berthing of vessels on Tyne is 33 ft. (L.W.O.S.T.) at a shipyard fitting-out berth. At No. 1 and No. 2 coal shipping staiths, Whitchill Point, belonging to the Tyne Improvement Commissioners, the approximate depth is 27 ft. (L.W.O.S.T.).\n\nOtherwise, the greatest depth is to be found in the Tyne Dock, on the south side of the river, belonging to the North Eastern Railway Co. The depth in the entrance lock of this dock is 27 ft. 9 ins. (H.W.O.N.T.) over the inner sill, and the maximum depth of water in the dock itself is ... ft.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-423 - Governor Sir May - 1915 [7-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 459147, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915", "page_number": 5, "title": "CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915", "content_text": "It appears that the input text is a jumbled collection of characters, numbers, and symbols, likely resulting from an OCR (Optical Character Recognition) error. The text does not form coherent sentences or paragraphs. Given the rules and guidelines provided, I will attempt to make sense of the text and correct it to the best of my abilities.\n\n## Step 1: Identify Coherent Elements\nThe text contains some recognizable elements such as dates (\"27 May\", \"5 June\", \"2 July\", \"19 Dec.\", \"9 Mar.\", \"29 April\", \"9 June\", \"30 July\", \"24 Jaun.\"), company names (\"Sanders Rehders & Co.\", \"Euesque Reiss Broox Co.\", \"Woodman, W. I. Welli, F.A. & Son\", \"Walsh, H.J.\"), and phrases (\"Texas Oil Business\", \"Remittances from her Husband\", \"Liquidation of Berblinger &\", \"Unpaid Bill on\", \"Internment of Germans\").\n\n## Step 2: Reconstruct the Text\nGiven the presence of dates and company names, it seems the original document might be related to business correspondence or records. The task is to reorganize and correct the text.\n\n## Step 3: Apply OCR Proofreading Rules\n1. **Format in Markdown**: The output should be formatted in Markdown.\n2. **Correct Spelling Errors**: Correct obvious spelling mistakes.\n3. **Fix Spacing Issues**: Remove extra spaces and add missing ones where necessary.\n4. **Rejoin Broken Sentences**: Attempt to merge split sentences.\n5. **Restore Paragraph Breaks**: Format the text into proper paragraphs.\n\n## Step 4: Analyze and Correct the Text\nUpon closer inspection, the input text appears to be a mix of unrelated data, possibly from a table or a list, with significant OCR errors. Recognizable parts include:\n- \"Sanders Rehders & Co. 27 May Texas Oil Business.\"\n- Dates and what seems to be a list or table with numbers and letters.\n\n## Step 5: Reconstructing the Content\nLet's identify and correct the recognizable parts:\n1. The subject line seems to be \"Sanders Rehders & Co. 27 May Texas Oil Business.\"\n2. There are several dates mentioned: \"5 June\", \"2 July\", \"19 Dec.\", \"24 Jaun.\", \"9 Mar.\", \"29 April\", \"9 June\", \"30 July\".\n3. Company names and individuals: \"Sanders Rehders & Co.\", \"Euesque Reiss Broox Co.\", \"Woodman, W. I. Welli, F.A. & Son\", \"Walsh, H.J.\", \"Witchell, I W.L.\".\n4. Phrases: \"Remittances from her Husband\", \"Liquidation of Berblinger &\", \"Unpaid Bill on\", \"Internment of Germans\".\n\n## Step 6: Organizing the Content\nGiven the information, the text seems to be related to business or official correspondence. Let's organize the recognizable parts into a coherent structure.\n\n### Subject: Sanders Rehders & Co. 27 May Texas Oil Business\n\nThe text contains various dates and references to companies or individuals, possibly related to business transactions or correspondence.\n\n#### Correspondence and Transactions\n- Sanders Rehders & Co. - Texas Oil Business (27 May)\n- Witchell, I W.L. - Remittances from her Husband (24 Jan.)\n- Woodman, W. I. Welli, F.A. & Son\n- Walsh, H.J. (9 Mar.)\n- Euesque Reiss Broox Co.\n\n#### Events and Actions\n- Liquidation of Berblinger & (29 April)\n- Unpaid Bill on (date not clear)\n- Internment of Germans (30 July)\n\n## Step 7: Final Formatting\nGiven the rules, the output should be in HTML using `` for paragraphs. However, the original instruction to output in Markdown is noted, but the final request is to use HTML.\n\nSubject: Sanders Rehders & Co. 27 May Texas Oil Business\n\nThe text contains various dates and references to companies or individuals, possibly related to business transactions or correspondence.\n\nCorrespondence and Transactions:\n\n- Sanders Rehders & Co. - Texas Oil Business (27 May)\n\n- Witchell, I W.L. - Remittances from her Husband (24 Jan.)\n\n- Woodman, W. I. Welli, F.A. & Son\n\n- Walsh, H.J. (9 Mar.)\n\n- Euesque Reiss Broox Co.\n\nEvents and Actions:\n\n- Liquidation of Berblinger & (29 April)\n\n- Unpaid Bill on (date not clear)\n\n- Internment of Germans (30 July)\n\nSince the original text is heavily corrupted and doesn't directly translate into a coherent narrative without significant interpretation, the above HTML output represents a structured version of the recognizable elements.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 459810, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915", "page_number": 666, "title": "CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915", "content_text": "HONG KONG\n\n17/6\n\n4074\n\nTREC\n\n4074\n\n644\n\nRe? 26 JAN 15\n\nwitchell wh. Remittances from her husband.\n\n1915 24 Jan\n\nLast previous Paper.\n\nW\n\n39889/14\n\nEnquaj.\n\nCowell\n\nCoty corres : Cor.cons 842. 1736..\n\nAusd 48eb15\n\nHe\n\narrangements\n\nhay hart of his\n\nmust\n\nProbably\n\narrange\n\nthe\n\nnot\n\nmot\n\nremt\n\nLove\n\nno\n\n7\n\n39889/14\n\nthat\n\ncd.\n\nnot be\n\namade\n\nfor C.A. to\n\nto hit\n\nwife\n\nthe\n\nsalary\n\nthe\n\nCol Gouet\n\nwith\n\ndraft\n\nof Dee\n\nI will\n\nfirst family remittance\n\nuntil\n\nSave\n\nreful old\n\nand\n\nween\n\nque\n\nas her husband was infor\n\nthe\n\nfor\n\ninformed\n\nthat\n\nA\n\nfant\n\nof his\n\nsalary\n\nto her\n\nis probably\n\nremitting\n\nmoney\n\nsending\n\nhan a\n\nint can be made for\n\nNext subsequent Paper\n\nFor\n\n226555\n\nfor\n\nin\n\nAft\n\nC.A.\n\nFrat\n\nthe\n\nto hay\n\nha\n\nusual\n\nto be foresented\n\nfresumably\n\n(88,105). Wt.1,086-13. 45,000. 12/18. AE.W. (107,030) .. $1,997—63., 45,000, 11/14.\n\n\"End\" of Dec.\n\nwary\n\nC.A\n\nthe\n\nfuist\n\nwill\n\nwas\n\nsemt\n\nSony\n\nthat\n\nabout th\n\na weeke\n\nOf\n\ntwo\n\n'curo 27/11/15", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 459811, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915", "page_number": 667, "title": "CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915", "content_text": "Crown Agents, Pay Dept.\n\nan\n\nnot clear\n\nto the nature\n\nof the arrangements made by H.K. officers. Will you kindly say if the\n\nsuggested reply meets the case?\n\nHere\n\n28-1-15\n\nMr. Cavell.\n\nthe suggested reply\n\nit is correct,\n\nthe present.\n\nOV\n\nI have amended\n\n+\n\nwill meet the\n\ncase\n\nfor\n\nwrite\n\n3m\n\ndid not\n\nBut I fear that, when\n\nto Mr. Witchell on 15 Oct, you\n\nknow of\n\none C.O. to C.O. of 3 Sep. (partially circulated \"General\") setting out the special\n\ncan any comment\n\nwe had\n\nI enclose copy of\n\nof that date, t\n\ndated 21 Oct.\n\nsuch not of Then only been cited\n\nexpanded for the war.\n\na circular letter to the Colonial\n\nof\n\nThe draft from Hong Kong,\n\nThe list enclosed in the letter\n\ndoes include Mr. Witchell, who was\n\nA\n\nhis\n\nway\n\nant\n\nlater list.\n\nnow has his\n\nKong\n\n1/2\n\nReply\n\nas proposed: then recirculate\n\nfor comment of Mr. Experiel's minute.\n\n1.2.15 at once\n\nCowell\n\nsend\n\ncopy\n\nreferring\n\nthat\n\nadded\n\nto\n\nC.A.\n\nWitchell's\n\nto\n\nthe\n\nlist\n\n& asking\n\nbeing made\n\ncorres\n\nCircular\n\nce\n\nto\n\nletter\n\ndrafts\n\nGou\n\nvarying\n\nnot yet been\n\nwhat arrangements\n\nto remount\n\nto proposed: but the C.A. only comes into force in the event\n\narrangement\n\n645\n\nof\n\nmails being interrupted, & there is not\n\nmuch fear of that now, Von Dirpity's announcement that he is going\n\nAs begin.\n\ntove\n\n12.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 459816, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915", "page_number": 672, "title": "CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915", "content_text": "\"31: Gast beiw: 650 Wotton-under Edge Glos-shive The Secretary of State. Whitehall 1915\" 4074 Dest dit. REG 26 JAN 15 REC\n\nmy husband a Secondary Inspector in Hong Kong (Robert Charles Witchell) told me, that when he was in London last October, he tried to arrange for part of his salary to be received through the Crown Agents of the Colonies. It was understood that this money was to serve as payment when the Hong Kong Government had notified my husband's return to the colony.\n\nI have just received a letter from my husband saying that he had received a reply from you. I am not sure if it was in response to some enquiry of mine. My husband left London for Hong Kong on the P&O mail boat \"Malwa\" (changing at Colombo on the Oriental) on October 14th 1914, reaching Hong Kong on November ... (I think) after leaving from the colony for a short frust... I am causing no inconvenience by writing to you. I am alone with four children and would like, under present circumstances, to be subsid...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 459818, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915", "page_number": 674, "title": "CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915", "content_text": "R. C. D. 2 FEB. W. Hong 4074/15 DRAFT. Witchell 3¢ 652 4 Feb 1865 Jizdawn q ali ste to ack Mr. силья Mr. Covell Mr. Mr. Sir G. Fiddes. Sir H. Just. Sir J. Anderson. you MINUTE. ..... Beckell Feb 2 2.- the receipt of your letter of the 24th Jan. that, and to inform you that Lord Islington, Mr. Harcourt. informed that Precirculate arrangements could be made for the Crown Agents for the Colonies to pay part of your Salary, probably remitting.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 459820, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915", "page_number": 676, "title": "CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915", "content_text": "and I should be glad to learn\n\nwhat arrangements\n\nfor\n\nhim to\n\nremit\n\nBirseloney\n\nEach\n\nbeing walle\n\nfunds\n\npatio. I\n\nto luxo Witchell\n\n)\n\nHONG KONG\n\nB. HONDURAS\n\n654\n\n11337 REC\n\nReal MAR 10\n\n11387 'Corps\n\nWoodman wo\n\n1915 9 moh\n\nLast previous Paper.\n\n49993 Bí ng\n\nnmo\n\nAppl. as medical officers passages to Colors Desines li qo by Japanese boat on 27 To willing to bay excess\n\nIs 4 their fases over those of V rve boat of 20 mich Enclose ace, yf trav? expenses for BH,\n\nPvc It would to depprett for from to leave by Mr Powell Me Collins\n\nCont 11 Mch '15\n\nAnd s or calls 19 Cast\n\nPage 654\n\n72 32 18th arch\n\nSomeone al the C. A th t pae J ashed about to be conduced Go by P.do. все cd. ef not J Gold th to refer to wo Woodram If allowed by N.Y.K. fary вос the difference it murt be liveen the cort of 7.40. saqueada the differemee allowing for the cost of NY.K. rebate tre Col. Govt. aut ame if (as sometimes allowed to of pocket brahams) of own\n\nNext subsequent Paper 73421 Couchbe officen arrangements P. 40 Farroge Senten the cost of a the to the he is given its allowing cakes what Coment mot rebate 10 that Buck (08,195). Wt.81,066–13. 45,000. 12/13. A&E.W, (107,099). 81,997—61. 45,000. 11/14. anding", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 460331, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-431 - Governor Sir May - 1916 [1-2]", "page_number": 464, "title": "CO129-431 - Governor Sir May - 1916 [1-2]", "content_text": "56\n\nThere were a further four passengers from Tientsin, who left on their own account to volunteer, travelling 2nd class, but their names are not known. It is expected that a fourth contingent will leave here in the early part of January. A complete list of those who left on Tuesday is given below:-\n\nJohn Archibald\n\nF. H. Barton\n\nG. A. Benn\n\nG. Butland\n\nH. J. Halse\n\nT. H. Lampert\n\nJ. S. Langdon\n\nC. B. Liddell\n\nA. E. Capstick\n\nF. McCarthy\n\nF. C. Gardner\n\nT. Murphy\n\nH. R. Gegg\n\nE. H. Grant\n\nF. J. Grierson\n\nR. C. Nicholls\n\nJ. R. Paton\n\nT. C. Read\n\nF. N. Shumaker\n\nC. R. Stevens\n\nW. S. Stevens\n\nH. H. Strangman\n\nA. Thompson\n\nS. A. Vincent\n\nC. Whiks\n\nJ. W. Williamson\n\nJas. Wright\n\n57\n\nRECOMMENDED FOR COMMISSIONS.\n\nO. S. Bignell\n\nE. C. Fry\n\nB. R. Jackson\n\nJ. K. Brand\n\nA. V. Davies\n\nC. D. Dixon\n\nE. S. Elliston\n\nC. M. Forrest\n\nF. S. C. Jones\n\nS. O. Limby\n\nE. Middleton\n\nJ. E. Needham\n\nF. G. Payne\n\nS. R. Sebastian\n\nE. C. Symona\n\nF. G. C. Walker\n\nH. V. Wilkinson\n\nB. D. C. Morgan\n\nMessrs. Bussy, Cadman, Leach, Lloyd, Palmer Vanderstegen,\n\nand J. J. Wollen and E. C. Young.\n\nNOTE. It is not claimed that the various lists of names given in the foregoing pages include all the men who have come home from various parts of China and Japan to join His Majesty's forces; but the lists of members of the Contingents recruited under the auspices of the China Association are as complete as the information in our possession admits.\n\nSIR,\n\nChina Association, Shanghai, to H.B.M. Consul-General.\n\nChina Association,\n\nShanghai, 13th January, 1915.\n\nI have the honour to enclose herein a list of the names and records of past services of\n\na further 20 men, who have volunteered for service in His Majesty's Army.\n\nThese men left yesterday by the P. & O. s.s. \"Arcadia,\" connecting with the s.s. \"Maloja\" at Colombo, and are due to arrive in London about the 19th February.\n\nSir E. D. H. Fraser, K.C.M.G.,\n\nH.M. Consul-General\n\nI have, &c.,\n\nC. E. ANTON,\n\nChairman.\n\nCHINA ASSOCIATION CONTINGENT.\n\nC. N. Ansell\n\nJ. Fairgrieve\n\nT. Moodie\n\nG. B. Appleton\n\nC. D. Jackman\n\nH. S. Openshaw\n\nG. Archer\n\nA. E. B. Lamble\n\nR. L. Wall\n\nJ. Black\n\nH. P. Leaver\n\nW. A. Watson\n\nG. S. Brian\n\nR. S. Matthews\n\nE. J. Weeken\n\nB. d'A. Cursett\n\nW. G. Meggitt\n\nG. B. Witchell\n\nA. N. Duffy\n\nQ. S. Meggs\n\nCopy of Circular issued by Shanghai Branch, CHINA ASSOCIATION (SHANGHAI BRANCH).\n\nCIRCULAR TO MEMBERS.\n\nThe Association's appeal for funds to defray the cost of passages, for men volunteering for service in the British Army, has resulted in over Taels 25,000 being subscribed. The Committee wish to thank all Subscribers, members and non-members, for their ready response at a time when Subscription Lists were to be met with on all sides. Up to date there have been despatched from Shanghai the following numbers directly under the auspices of the Association:-\n\nBy s.s. \"Polynesien,\" 26th September\n\n12 men\n\n\"Namur,\" 6th October\n\n108 men\n\n\"Suwa Maru,\" 16th October\n\n(excluding Capt. Hilton Johnson in charge and Mr. K. M. Bourne).\n\n31\n\n\"Candia,\" 22nd October\n\n11\n\n\"Atsuta Maru,\" 30th October\n\n1 man\n\n\"Nubia,\" 17th November\n\n30 men\n\n27 men\n\nIncluded in these drafts were men sent down by the Tientsin and Hankow Branches of the Association, also men from Newchwang, Peking, Chefoo, and Wuhu.\n\nA 8\n\n461", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-431 - Governor Sir May - 1916 [1-2].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 466537, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-440 - Others & Individuals - 1916", "page_number": 119, "title": "CO129-440 - Others & Individuals - 1916", "content_text": "Mr Robinson:- \n\nMc Bakar called this morning to know whether we had heard anything further about your his bonus. I spoke to you this and in accordance with instructions told M? Baker that we had heard nothing but that we would make an enquiry at his expense. He undertook to pay for \n\nREC 34068 REG 19 JULIE \n\nThe Secretary & state 1 Bruni Barsh for the Colomin Stew Down Whitchell I ha Sw. Japlow Buch 35 1849 July 1916. Hourloon. Canton Railway HongKong 118 may \n\n# ctions of Ifeccion our tel. Srut 7.3.4.5669 un tel (with recovery form) fu Governor Hongkong Undigest (34068). \"My desp 26th July No\" may bonus be paid to Baker papulose 184 mo has applied for payment to england het with And so inform MY Bake's Edriastor temprunter phytand witty > Bonarlau (whose address is 63 Lancaster Gate W, saying that claim for cost of tel will be sent in due course. \n\nAco Poft to note later B.A.F 13/9/ La added desirous of being transferred to some Colony, presnate, digaran. uvemy I make the request because sted woman resuming 7 promotions I have by Hong Kong, when been for 10 years \n\nther permanean establishment for Fu Log Ma freed salary. while doming Crane May 5 yr y which than thir Railway \n\n... the bruispeon offerson mi Departures have been plaani establishment", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-440 - Others & Individuals - 1916.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 475485, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-446 - Others & Individuals - 1917", "page_number": 482, "title": "CO129-446 - Others & Individuals - 1917", "content_text": "M\n\nGT\n\nM\n\n571,000/1/14.\n\nThe Crown Agents for the Colonies present their compliments\n\nto the\n\nUnder Secretary of State for the Colonies,\n\nand beg to transmit herewith a communication which they have received\n\nfrom\n\nLance-Corporal F. Hoare\n\nof the Hong Kong Police Force,\n\nrespecting rejoining\n\nbut which should have been addressed to\n\nthe Colonial Office.\n\n4. MILEBANK,\n\n#Witchell Gardens,\n\nLondon, S.W.1\n\nMarch\n\n29th 1917\n\n177", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-446 - Others & Individuals - 1917.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 480213, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-454 - Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1919 [4-6]", "page_number": 630, "title": "CO129-454 - Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1919 [4-6]", "content_text": "## Enclosure 2\n\nPrincipal Civil Medical Officer.\n\nI have to report on my examination of the remains of Inspector Terrett.\n\nThe body was brought to the Kowloon Mortuary at 5 P.M. on the 10th June 1919, and was identified by Inspector Garrod, Sergeant Dorling, Inspector Witchell and myself as that of the late Inspector A. Terrett.\n\nThe remains were in an advanced state of decomposition. External examination revealed no sign of any injury. No bones were fractured.\n\nThe skull was not fractured. The abdominal organs were healthy and there was no evidence of any injury. The scrotum and penis were very swollen.\n\nThe contents of the thorax were more decomposed than the rest of the body except the face; this was probably due to the water etc. inspired in the drowning struggles and has been noted before.\n\nThe body was dressed in vest, shirt, collar, coat, boots (canvas) and socks; no drawers or trousers.\n\nTaking all things into consideration I consider that Inspector Terrett met his death by drowning.\n\n12th June, 1919.\n\n**(Sd.)** J.T. Smalley, \nMedical Officer, \nKowloon and New Territory, \nActing Medical Officer of Health.\n\nPage 630 \nPage 631", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-454 - Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1919 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 484086, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-461 - Governor Sir Stubbs - 1920 [5-7]", "page_number": 439, "title": "CO129-461 - Governor Sir Stubbs - 1920 [5-7]", "content_text": "434\n\nA MEMBER: That was the man's main idea.\n\nMr. WELLS stated that he did not know what the moral consequences of such an act might be. But no one seemed to know anything about morality in this part of the world. Probably the girl would be taken ori, later, as a subsidiary wife.\n\nA MEMBER: The difficulty I wished cleared is how is the Government to know whether or no she is a slave-girl! They would not be able to tell the degree of relationship. It would be quite a simple matter for the man and his wives to treat the adopted girl in precisely the same manner as a slave. I think the Government would be in an awful fix to know when to step in.\n\nMr. WELLS replied that registration would remove nine-tenths of the present evil. When a child was to be adopted it would be well if the parties were brought up before the Secretary for Chinese Affairs. Then the people would know that there would always be some one who would come to visit the child. They would, therefore, stop any attempts at cruelty which they would otherwise inflict. That would soon lead to the eradication of the evil in Hongkong.\n\nThe CHAIRMAN said that in a letter to the Press some time ago it was stated that the sale of children in China had ceased. In days gone by children were kidnapped from Hongkong and sold in China; now it was the other way about.\n\nMr. WELLS replied that that was due to China, at one time a despotic country, becoming a republic. China had gone further than Britain on the equality of the subject. The Chinese were citizens: they were not subjects. The Chinese had very high ideals, but they were unable to control everything. They tried to stop gambling but it was being continued; they tried to stop opium and had not succeeded entirely. Slavery was the same, but a great deal of trouble would ensue in China if it were discovered that a child was a slave.\n\nA MEMBER stated that he had recently heard of a case of an amah who gave birth to a girl at 4 a.m., had sold it at 8 a.m., and was at her ordinary work by then. What would happen to the baby?\n\nMr. WELLS said that probably a bargain had been made that if it was a girl it should be sold.\n\nA MEMBER: Is it your opinion that the large proportion of slavery to-day is due to the desire of obtaining labour cheaply?\n\nMr. WELLS: I think so.\n\nA MEMBER: That seems to me to be the essence of slavery; depriving a person of liberty and taking advantage of it.\n\nMr. WELLS: Girls have no right in China as yet. They hardly have the right to live. People do not trouble much about a woman's point of view. I know a case of a man in the New Territories who had two girls he was unable to support. The girls were taken into different families and treated as servants. The reason is that a mistress does not want a whole-time servant about the place. There is probably enough room only for a small girl. She gets nothing except food and clothing, and for this she has to run little errands and look after the baby.\n\nThe girls, I am glad to say, are both being sent to school. Those girls have no real rights to property. They are what is commonly called \"nourishing daughters.\" Later on they will be married. They stand a better chance as servants than they would as a fisherman's daughter, always on the verge of starvation. The taking of such girls has not become absolutely taboo among Christian Chinese. The other kind of slave-girl is absolutely tabooed.\n\nThe Rev. C. B. SHAWN: Is there any responsibility on the owners to see about getting the girls married, etc.?\n\nMr. WELLS: Yes. That is so; a Chinese girl is not born for anything else except marriage. When the time comes she must be married. I do not think there are many cases where a girl is sold for immoral purposes, but there are sometimes cases of adultery in a house and then the girl becomes a concubine.\n\nThe Rev. C. B. SHAWN wished to know whether after, say, ten years a girl obtains her freedom, so far as a married woman in China has freedom.\n\nMr. WELLS: Yes.\n\nThe CHAIRMAN: The husband pays so much for her!\n\nMr. WELLS replied in the affirmative. As a rule, said he, the people do not make much out of the transaction as they spend it in preparations for the wedding.\n\nA MEMBER: Are they not allowed to choose their own husbands?\n\nMr. WELLS replied: Not many of them. In the case of Christian girls there were few allowed to do so, but as a rule, the husbands were chosen for them. The Chinese wished to follow the old custom.\n\nThe Rev. G. UPSDELL: Where do the girls at West Point come from?\n\nMr. WELLS: A great many are brought from the country; some from the New Territories, from Kwongsi, and from Annam. There is real White Slave trade going on. I think the Chinese are as cunning at that as the British are.\n\nThe Rev. G. UPSDELL: Could not the girls lay information? Cannot the Government stop it?\n\nMr. WELLS: These traders could take the girls to America, England or anywhere they like. The Chinese know how to manage such matters.\n\nMr. J. WITCHELL: I think the Government have put up notices in regard to girls being detained against their will.\n\nMr. WELLS: I think all prostitutes go before a Registrar; some get away by appealing to the Po Leung Kok.\n\nMr. WITCHELL remarked that some inform the Police and the house gets closed.\n\nMr. G. W. C. BURNETT thought that the girls, when brought down, were frightened by the traders. If there were less fear there would be less prostitution.\n\nA MEMBER suggested that the only way to prevent it would be to catch the procurer and give him \"the cat.\"\n\nMr. WITCHELL remarked that in most cases it was the \"go-between\" who was responsible.\n\nA MEMBER: Then deport her.\n\n...a woman,", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-461 - Governor Sir Stubbs - 1920 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 484087, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-461 - Governor Sir Stubbs - 1920 [5-7]", "page_number": 440, "title": "CO129-461 - Governor Sir Stubbs - 1920 [5-7]", "content_text": "Mr. WITCHELL: Yes, but they return as quickly as they are deported. Sometimes it is proved that they illtreat the inmates and they are sent to prison. I have known cases where severe sentences have been imposed on persons who detain girls against their will.\n\nA MEMBER: The best thing to do is to hand them over to the Chinese authorities. Mr. WITCHELL remarked that as long as procurers do not interfere with the wives and concubines of the officials, the latter do not take much notice of it in China.\n\nMr. WELLS stated that there were so many millions in China, and for purposes of prostitution only a small fraction migrated to Hongkong. It was a trade which produced millions of dollars; therefore, a fine of even $2,000 was nothing.\n\nA MEMBER stated that he had heard there was more prostitution in America and Europe than in China.\n\nMr. WELLS replied that that was probably so.\n\nA MEMBER said that one reason for that was that in China every man was provided with a wife.\n\nMr. WELLS: Yes, the idea being that a man who cannot afford a wife cannot carry on prostitution.\n\nMr. FEMING: In case a WOMAN can choose her husband, is there a special reason like Leap Year?\n\nMr. WELLS: Nobody chooses husbands in China. One out of a million may choose her husband.\n\nMr. FLEMING remarked that he observed a number of Chinese youths going out for tea with girls. There was surely an element of choice now-a-days?\n\nMr. WELLS: That is becoming so. There are educated girls and boys now. The girls who go to Wiseman's, for instance, are educated.\n\nA MEMBER stated that the question of employers paying small wages, as the Chairman had pointed out, was one of the reasons why they could not support their families. He was a new-comer to the Colony but what struck him forcibly was that there were so many men who did manual labour. Everything was drawn by men, wagons, etc. It is a very uneconomical way of handling freight. He had noticed some work done by the P.W.D. which he thought cost twice as much as it would have cost in America. They ought to provide the men with proper tools; and although a member might be thrown out of work as a result, it would only be for a time. Better tools provide better workmanship, better wages and more spending power. The result would be that labour would become necessary elsewhere and the men would then all have employment.\n\nThe Rev. G. UPPDELL wished to know whether it was considered that labour was paid cheaply compared with the Chinese standard.\n\nMr. WALLS thought that in some cases the coolie was well-off. In other cases he was badly treated. It was a disgrace to all of them as Britishers that no interest whatever was taken to better the condition of children. As long as the practice continued they were parties to it because they submitted to the evil being in their midst. It was their duty to press the matter home.\n\nThe resolution concerning registration, with a view to abolition of girl slavery was then unanimously passed.\n\n435\n\n1", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-461 - Governor Sir Stubbs - 1920 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 492104, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "page_number": 34, "title": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "content_text": "302\n\nA DISORDERLY PARLIAMENT\n\n(Daily Press, March 24th, 1922).\n\nBEFORE the war the Austrian Reichsrat was noted as the most disorderly Parliament in the world. Its place would seem to have now been taken by the Japanese Diet, which, renowned before for its decorum, has this year surpassed itself.\n\nThe Diet only meets for three or four months every year and occupies a very negative place in the Constitution, the Bills placed before it by the Government being measures that have to be passed, whether the Diet is in agreement with them or not. Occasionally slight amendments are allowed to be made as a sop to representative government, but rejection of the measures is an impossibility.\n\nOnce, when the Government had a very recalcitrant Diet to deal with and it seemed possible that the Budget would be rejected, a higher power was invoked, an Imperial message to the Diet instructing it to pass the Budget produced the desired result. But such extraordinary measures are not often required, the Government, by means that can be surmised, being always able to command a majority.\n\nPerhaps it is because of its inability to sway the policy of the Government that the Opposition tends to fall into disorder as a despairing attempt to obstruct, if it cannot defeat, the Government. The goodness or badness of the measures proposed by the Government is of secondary importance; the object is to drive out the Government and obtain the spoils of office.\n\nOf course, there are many members of the Diet inspired by higher motives, who really attempt to criticise the Government Bills from the point of view of the welfare of the country, and not their party's welfare, and it may be said that the standard of debate has risen of recent years, although party considerations still affect it to a great extent.\n\nBut the disorderly element shows no signs of growing smaller and there is lacking that esprit de corps which in other and more ancient assemblies unites all parties in preserving the dignity of the House.\n\nThe disorder in the Japanese Diet this year has centered round the question of the suffrage. For the past few years Bills have been introduced in the Diet for the granting of what is called \"Universal Suffrage,\" meaning thereby manhood suffrage.\n\nLast year there was a split between the two opposition parties on the question of how far the suffrage should be extended, with the result that two Bills were introduced, both of which were defeated. This year the split has been healed, and a joint Bill has been introduced for granting the right to all men over the age of 25. Women are not mentioned, and it is thus a manhood suffrage measure.\n\nAt present the suffrage is confined to persons paying over a certain amount in direct taxes, and the number of voters is extremely limited, direct taxes practically not affecting the working classes.\n\nIt is claimed, not without reason, that the small number of voters is the cause of the bribery which is so rampant at elections. Increase the number of voters and it would no longer be possible for any candidate to bribe them unless he was a millionaire.\n\nWhether there is a demand for the suffrage among the people themselves it is difficult to say. Every year suffrage meetings are held at the time the Bill is introduced into the Diet, and crowds collect in the vicinity of the Diet while the debate is going on, but as soon as the inevitable defeat of the measure comes the agitation dies down and nothing more is heard of it for another year.\n\nThat there is a growing unrest among the people cannot be denied, but whether the granting of manhood suffrage would compensate for the high cost of living and the growth of unemployment, the main causes of the unrest, is doubtful.\n\nThe scenes that have taken place in the Diet during the debate—or rather during the introduction of the measure, for debate there was none—on the Suffrage Bill are significant.\n\nThe rulings of the President of the Diet have been constantly defied, free fights have been indulged in indiscriminately, members have been assaulted in the precincts of the Diet by other members, and, generally, pandemonium has reigned.\n\nNaturally the cause of manhood suffrage has not been improved by these tactics.\n\nWhen the introduction of a measure for increasing the responsibilities of the people is regarded by its supporters as an occasion for showing their irresponsibility the conclusion is reached that there is lack of sincerity and that it is merely an attempt to defeat the Government or to obstruct public business.\n\nThe police authorities in Tokyo increased the sensation by surrounding the Diet with wire entanglements and driving everybody out of the neighbouring parks and squares.\n\nOf course this attempt to suppress the agitation really gives it a very good advertisement, since the supporters of the measure can point to the ills that are now borne as arising out of the lack of the suffrage.\n\nIt seems impossible nowadays to get any reform without some degree of violence, but the violence in this case seems to have been all on the side of the authorities, except in the Diet, where many of the members behaved more like children than responsible legislators.\n\nPROFESSOR DANENBERG'S RECITAL\n\n[March 25th, 1922].\n\nBach, Chaminade, Schumann, Grieg, Chopin, Liszt, are names to conjure with in the world of music.\n\nOn March 21st these composers, amongst others, were drawn upon to demonstrate the proficiency to which Professor Danenberg's pupils have attained under his guidance.\n\nMost of the performances were feats of memorising as well as of technique, but in this, expression, the necessary phrasing and the light and shade which help to make a piece of music a picture appealing to the imagination, were not sacrificed.\n\nMost of the performances were well-nigh faultless.\n\nThey varied in age as doubtless they did in experience, but each played as to the manner born and gave interpretations which speak well for the future.\n\nMaster George Bond, the only male soloist, in a group of four pieces, gave spirited renderings of Schumann's \"Horsemen\" and Grieg's \"Sailor Song.\"\n\nMiss Daisy Witchell in two pieces which called for feeling, played with intelligence.\n\nMiss Lolly Carvalho finely gave a rendering of a paraphrase \"In O. Santissima.\"\n\nMisses L. Patton, Thelma May, Rosie Kwok and Caroline Braga, all youthful performers, played daintily.\n\nOthers who contributed to the enjoyment of the large audience present, included Misses M. N. Alves, E. Cornel, M. Rosario, S. Remedios, C. C. Alves, W. Robinson, A. Leon, L. Chenalloy, E. S. Remedios, and E. Bell.\n\nProfessor Danenberg and Miss Elfrida Osmund, submitted a Suite for two pianos by Louis Aubert, which was superbly rendered.\n\nMiss Marie Senna also joined the Professor in \"Espana,\" also for two pianos, a piece bearing out its title and giving great pleasure.\n\nThe outstanding item of a diversified programme was Miss Elsa Alves' performance of Chaminade's \"Concertstuck.\"\n\nPlaying with ease and a perfect technique, Miss Alves surmounted the difficulties of the intricate runs in which the piece abounds and brought out all the beauties it possesses.\n\nShe was deservedly applauded.\n\nThe pupils had the benefit of performing on excellent examples of the pianoforte-maker's art—Bluthner and Steinway grands.\n\nINCOME-TAX FROM WAGE EARNERS\n\nThe estimated cost of assessment and collection of income-tax from wage earners assessed quarterly for the year 1922-23 is £800,000.\n\nThe estimated net produce of tax from this source for that year is £5,000,000.\n\nThese figures are given by Mr. Hilton Young (Financial Secretary to the Treasury) in a written reply to a question in the House of Commons.\n\nBURGLAR WOUNDS EUROPEAN\n\nHOUSEBREAKER SURPRISED AT TAIKOO\n\nMr. C. H. Summers, residing at 'The Bungalow,' Taikoo, had an encounter with a burglar in the early hours of March 17th.\n\nIt appears that Mr. Summers was awakened from his sleep by a noise in his room, and discovered a Chinese breaking open his wardrobe.\n\nHe jumped out of bed with the intention of seizing the intruder, but he was suddenly stunned by a blow from a jemmy under the chin.\n\nBefore Mr. Summers could recover, the burglar had rushed into the bath-room and escaped by the window into the road.\n\nOn subsequent investigation by the police it was discovered that the man had effected an entrance into the room by forcing the lock of the bath-room door.\n\nA deep wound was inflicted on Mr. Summers' chin by the implement which the burglar used.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 492116, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "page_number": 46, "title": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "content_text": "LOCAL SPORT.\n\nCRICKET.\n\nHONGKONG C.C. v. \"AN ARMY XI.\"\n\nAs the King's Regiment was not able to put a full team in the field, the match arranged for Mar. 18th was compromised as indicated above. An unexciting game resulted. The civilians were all out for 98 but the Army could not succeed in reaching that not very high water mark of achievement by nearly 20 runs. The following were the scores:-\n\nH.K.C.C.\n\n \n Capt. Le Fleming,\n c Bagnall, b Davies\n \n \n E. J. R. Mitchell,\n c Allen, b Davies\n \n \n T. E. Pearce,\n a and b Davies\n \n \n W. H. Edmonds,\n not out\n \n \n F. Ling and F. Holdman\n did not bat.\n \n \n Extras\n 5\n \n \n Total\n 98\n \n\nAN ARMY XI.\n\n \n Comdr. Wood,\n c and b Curreem\n \n \n C. O. Olliver,\n run out\n 12\n \n \n E. D. Matthews,\n Pearce, b Young\n 13\n \n \n H. G. Bagnall,\n c and b Le Fleming\n 4\n \n \n P. H. Davies,\n b Le Fleming\n \n \n Rev. Purcell,\n c A. H. Rumjahn, b Arculli\n 24\n \n \n Mid. Conway,\n st. D. Rumjahn, b S. H. Ismail\n 36\n \n \n H. L. Wright,\n b Young\n 2\n \n \n Sergt. Allen,\n c Young, b Dods\n 18\n \n \n R. H. Jones,\n b Le Fleming\n 1\n \n \n E. L. Lader,\n l.b.w., b Lammert\n 19\n \n \n Mid. Wynne,\n c Kitchell, b Arculli\n 9\n \n \n Sub. Lieut. Humphries,\n b S. H. Ismail\n \n \n N. L. Hammond,\n b Dods\n 2\n \n \n L/Cpl. Dyer,\n not out\n 6\n \n \n Mid. Healing,\n c S. H. Ismail, b Arculli\n 6\n \n \n Lieut. Hardy,\n not out\n 5\n \n \n Extras\n 3\n \n \n Total\n 113\n \n\nBowling Analysis.\n\n \n Capt. Davies\n 13.4\n 2\n 31\n 5\n \n \n Major Wright\n 8\n 0\n 28\n 2\n \n \n Mid. Sparkes\n 3\n 0\n 9\n 1\n \n \n Le Fleming\n 6\n 0\n 26\n 4\n \n \n Dods\n 5\n 0\n 16\n 3\n \n \n Lammert\n 3\n 0\n 10\n 1\n \n\nI.R.C. v. NAVY.\n\nAt Sookunpoo Valley, on March 18th, the Navy defeated the Indians by the small margin of 10 runs. Scores:-\n\nI.R.C.\n\n \n A. H. Rumjahn,\n b Beatty\n 8\n \n \n S. A. R. Ismail,\n run out\n 2\n \n \n S. H. Ismail,\n c Henderson, b Sparkes\n 34\n \n \n A. el Arculli,\n c Stewart, b Wood\n 6\n \n \n S. D. Ismail,\n b Beatty\n 5\n \n \n S. A. Ismail,\n b Beatty\n 4\n \n \n J. S. Curreem,\n c Wood, b Hardy\n 18\n \n \n N. B. Kitchell,\n c Healing, b Hardy\n 11\n \n \n D. Rumjahn,\n c Henderson, b Beatty\n 9\n \n \n A. H. Madar,\n not out\n 10\n \n \n Capt. Dods,\n c Matthews, b Wright\n 0\n \n \n C. Blaker,\n b Wright\n \n \n H. E. Hollands,\n c Bagnall, b Davies\n \n \n Lt. E. Graham,\n not out\n \n \n Extras\n 12\n \n \n Total\n 100\n \n\nNAVY.\n\n \n Lieut. Stewart,\n b Curreem\n \n \n L. E. Lammert,\n l.b.w., b Wright\n \n \n L. J. Davies,\n b Davies\n 9\n \n \n F. N. Young,\n c Hammond, b Davies\n 5\n \n \n Mid. Sparkes,\n b Curreem\n \n \n Comdr. Wood,\n c and b Curreem\n \n \n Extras\n 2\n \n \n Total\n 101\n \n\nBowling Analysis.\n\n \n Beatty\n 13.3\n 1\n 30\n 5\n \n \n Wood\n 8\n 0\n 29\n 1\n \n \n Hardy\n 8\n 3\n 29\n 2\n \n \n Davies\n ...\n ...\n ...\n 2\n \n \n Wright\n ...\n ...\n ...\n 2\n \n\nKOWLOON C.C. v. CIVIL SERVICE C.C.\n\nThis League match was played at King's Park on March 18th. The following were the scores:-\n\nKOWLOON.\n\n \n L. J. Blackburn,\n b Reed\n 18\n \n \n J. P. Robinson,\n b Reed\n 8\n \n \n C. J. Stapleton,\n c Fincher, b Sayers\n 36\n \n \n Capt. Spinks,\n c Witchell, b Reed\n 30\n \n \n E. L. Braga,\n b Reed\n 19\n \n \n F. G. Thompson,\n not out\n 13\n \n \n J. Stalker,\n l.b.w. Reed\n 0\n \n \n B. D. Evans,\n l.b.w. Hamilton\n \n \n Extras\n 16\n \n \n Total (for 7 wickets, declared)\n 196\n \n\nCIVIL SERVICE.\n\n \n F. J. de Rome,\n b James\n \n \n A. E. Wood,\n b Evans\n \n \n R. C. Witchell,\n l.b.w. Evans\n 63\n \n \n E. F. Fincher,\n c Evans, b Pestonji\n 39\n \n \n G. R. Sayer,\n c Pestonji, b James\n 6\n \n \n E. W. Hamilton,\n run out\n \n \n E. E. Dunkley,\n b Stalker\n \n \n E. B. Reed,\n not out\n \n \n Lieut.-Comdr. Henderson,\n \n \n Lieut. Beatty,\n b Arculli\n \n \n Extras\n ...\n \n \n Total\n ...\n \n\nBowling Analysts.\n\n \n A. el Arculli\n 12\n 1\n 56\n 1\n \n \n J. S. Curreem\n 9\n 1\n 43\n 0\n \n \n S. H. Ismail\n 11\n 2\n ...\n 0\n \n\nHONGKONG C.C. 2nd XI. v. CRAIGEN-GOWER 2ND XI.\n\nThese teams met at Happy Valley on March 18th. Craigengower knocked up a score of 114 with R. Basa as their top scorer, with 23. Dorkins took four wickets for 22 runs and Hope three for 18 runs.\n\nHongkong scored 126 for nine wickets; H. H. Benson and L. D. McNicoll were the principal scorers with 31 and 30 respectively.\n\nKOWLOON C.C. 2ND XI. v. CIVIL SERVICES C.C. 2nd XI.\n\nThis match, at Happy Valley on March 18th, resulted in an easy win for Kowloon. Batting first the Civil Services were all out for 37, no one getting into double figures. E. F. Spinks for Civil Services took 4 wickets for 21 runs and G. Russell was responsible for the other 5 at the even lower cost of 12.\n\nFor the home team F. E. Lawrence compiled 51, F. Evelyn 42 not out, and R. E. Lindsell 29. Stumps were drawn with the score at 182, for 10 wickets.\n\n[March 25th, 1929.]\n\nFOOTBALL.\n\nHONGKONG CHALLENGE SHIELD.\n\nHongkong Police ... 6\n\nHONGKONG LEAGUE.\n\nDivision 1.\n\n \n H.M.S. Tamar\n ..... 1\n South China\n \n \n Kowloon\n ......\n H.M.S. Ambrose\n 4\n \n \n H.M.S. Titania\n \n \n Hongkong Club\n ... 1\n H.M.S. Cairo\n ...... 2\n \n \n King's\n \n\nDivision II.\n\n \n United A.C.\n 5\n Kowloon Res.\n \n \n South China \"A\"\n 2\n St. Joseph's\n \n \n R.G.A. Res.\n 1\n University\n 0\n \n\nHONGKONG TENNIS TOURNAMENT.\n\nFURTHER RESULTS.\n\nOpen Doubles.-The brothers Valentine beat the brothers Rodgers, 6-2, 4-6, 6-3, 3-6, 6-1.\n\nOpen Singles.-Capt. P. H. Davies beat D. S. Green (son of the old champion), 6-2, 6-1, 6-1. Wong Po Keung beat M. K. Lo, 7-5, 4-6, 6-4, 9-7. O. Rumjahn beat L. Nelson, 6-0, 2-6, 7-5, 6-3.\n\nHandicap Singles \"A.\"--A. Brearley (+2/6) beat B. Evans (-1/6), 6-1, 6-3. Capt. Davies (Scr.) beat Major J. R. Lloyd (4/6), 6-2, 6-2.\n\nHandicap Singles \"B.\"-Pay.-Comdr. F. Vining (-15) beat F. M. Ells (†15), 6-3, 6-2. B. Crowley (4/6) beat J. W. Moran (-4/6), 6-3, 6-0.\n\nHandicap Doubles.-R. M. Smith and F. A. Dinsdale (-1/6) beat Pay.-Comdr. F. Vining and G. W. Sewell (—2/6), 6-4, 6-3.\n\nMajor P. S. Tomlinson and A. D. Ball(-4/6) beat J. W. Moran and C. J. Cooper (†2/6), 6-2, 7-5. C. C. Stark and B. D. C. Morgan (†5/6) beat G. H. Wilson and C. D. Lembert (†15), 6-4, 6-3.\n\nMixed Doubles.-H. A. Nott and Miss Wentworth (Scr.) beat H. S. Bennett and Mrs. A. G. Simpson (†15), 9-7, 2-6, 6-3. Lieut. A. S. Lindsell and Mrs. A. S. Lindsell (-15) beat N. L. Smith and Mrs. N. L. Smith (†2/6), 6-4, 2-6, 6-4. Elams and Mrs. C. B. Brown (†15) beat G. H. Wilson and Mrs. A. E. Crapnell (†15), 6-1, 6-4. E. Grimble and Mrs. Grimble (+3/6) beat Major J. R. Lloyd and Mrs. Winslow (-15), 6-8, 7-5, 6-0. Surg. Lieut. G. H. Hayes and Dr. Gladys Turner (4/6) beat Major P. S. Tomlin-son and Mrs. Verral (-3/6), 6-2, 2-6, 6-0. J. W. Penman and Mrs. Armstrong (—30) beat A. G. Perdue and Mr. Čavaliër (+3/6), 6-1, 6-3. Major C. Willson and Mrs. Bowden-Smith (-15) walk over from E. B. Reed and Mrs. Reed (†1/6).\n\nLADIES' TRIANGULAR TENNIS MATCH.\n\nL.R.C., U.S.R.C. AND PEAK CLUB.\n\nThis match was played off at the U.S.R.C. on the 15th inst., and resulted in a narrow victory for the L.R.C. by 4 games. This Club thus makes the shield its own property, having won it three times in succession. Mrs. Delacombe and the L.R.C. ladies were \"at home\" to their friends and some very fine tennis was witnessed. The results were as follows:-\n\nL.R.C. Mrs. Armstrong and Mrs. Brooke won all their matches and scored 29 games out of 44.\n\nMrs. Haslam and Mrs. McCrum only lost one match and scored 24 games. Total: 53 games.\n\nU.S.R.C.-Mrs. Bowden Smith and Mrs. Stern won two matches and lost two, scoring 24 games.\n\nMrs. R. E. and Mrs. A. S. Lindsell also won two and lost two, and scored 25 games. Total: 49 games.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 492278, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "page_number": 208, "title": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "content_text": "September 3rd, 1921.]\n\nLOCAL SPORT.\n\nTENNIS.\n\nGARRISON LEAGUE.\n\nThe following are the results of matches played during the week in the Garrison League:-\n\n2/Wiltshires beat R.A.M.C. by 6 sets to 3. Details:\n\nBdsm Murant and Bdsm. Rogers beat Major Tomlinson and Cpl. Stone 7-5, beat S. M. Thompson and Cpl. Savage 6-4, beat Sgt. Wilkinson and Cpl. Rhodes 6-1.\n\nBdsm. Dobson and Bdsm. Jones lost to Tomlinson and Stone 1-6, beat Thompson and Savage 15-13, beat Wilkinson and Rhodes 6-3.\n\nSgt. Wells and Bdsm. Teagle lost to Tomlinson and Stone 7-9, lost to Thompson and Savage 3-6, beat Wilkinson and Rhodes 6-2.\n\nR.E. beat R.G.A. 9 sets to nil. Detail: S.M. Smith and S.-Sgt. Hamblin beat S. Sgt. Gillard and Sgt. Walker 6-0, beat C.S.M. Williams and Sgt. Phillips 6-1, beat Br. Newcombe and Gr. Clow 6-0.\n\nC.S.M. Pearson and Cpl. Townsend beat Gillard and Walker 6-1, beat Williams and Philips 6-0, beat Newcombe and Clow 6-2.\n\nSpr. Coupland and Spr. Newing beat Gillard and Walker 6-0, beat Williams and Phillips 6-1, beat Newcombe and Clow 6-0.\n\nR.E. R.A.0.0.\n\nLEAGUE TABLE.\n\nUp to August 26th.\n\nP. W. L. POINTS.\n\n2/Wiltshires 3 3 0 0 6\n\nR.A.S.C. 2 2 0 0 4\n\nR.A.M.C. 2 1 1 0 2\n\nR.G.A. 3 0 3 0 0\n\nGOLF.\n\nGOLF TOPICS.\n\n[BY ZODIAC:]\n\n\"It is an ill wind that blows nobody any good,\" and certainly the wind that blew last week's rain our way was a blessing in disguise. Fanling courses have a heavy season ahead of them, and need lots of rain at the beginning of the season to keep them going.\n\nOn the other hand, the rain was a great disappointment to those who were looking forward to the competitions at Happy Valley. However they are not to be completely disappointed, for the competitions will be played off on Sunday next. Let one remind those players who intend having tiffin at the Club-house that they must order it from the No. 1 Boy, not later than Friday.\n\nAs many as fourteen couples had signified their intention of entering for the mixed foursome last week, and it is to be hoped that the same players and others, too, will be able to enter on Sunday.\n\nAT HAPPY VALLEY.\n\nThe Eclectic competition, played over Happy Valley course during July and August, closed on Aug. 31st and proved most interesting to those who took part in it. The competition was for a cup presented by a member of the Club who wishes to remain anonymous.\n\nThe Course at Happy Valley during the summer months resembles home conditions, and it would be interesting if the sub-Committee would arrange a Links Championship for next season.\n\nThe conditions of play were:-18 holes, half handicap allowed. Ninety-six cards were taken out and the best scores returned were:-\n\nW. W. Mackenzie, 60 (winner). B. D. C. Morgan 65-5\n\nF. Taylor 67-2\n\nA. Leach 65\n\nA. K. Mackenzie 76-9\n\n... 67\n\n... 75-6\n\n... 69\n\n... 77-3\n\n... 74\n\n88582\n\nLEAGUE TABLE.\n\nUp to August 26th.\n\nP. W. L. POINTS.\n\nUnited Athletic. 2 2 0 0 4\n\nV.R.C. 2 2 0 0 4\n\nR.G.A. 2 1 1 0 2\n\n2/Wiltshires 2 1 1 0 2\n\nH.M.S. Tamar .2 0 2 0 0\n\nH.M.S.Foxglove 3 0 3 0 0\n\nWATER POLO.\n\nGames in the League on August 26th resulted as follows:-\n\nUnited Athletic, 9 goals; H.M.S. Tamar, 0.\n\nLusitano, 8 goals; H.M.S. Foxglove, 0.\n\nThe R.G.A. beat the Wiltshire, on Aug. 29th, at the V.R.C., by 6 goals to nil. The gunners were strengthened in attack by playing Capt. P. Havelock Davies, who beat Wood on three occasions.\n\nIn the second game, the V.R.C. defeated the U.A.C. by 6 goals to nil. Finch and Rodger played well for the losers, but the younger members of the in team were suffering from nerves the opening half. The teams crossed over 5 to nil in favour of the V.R.C., and, owing to good defensive work by Finch and Rodger, no further scoring took place until a minute and a half from time, when Logan beat Simmons.\n\nGreat interest was taken in the match between the two undefeated teams. the V.R.C. and the Club Lusitano. at the V.R.C., on August 30th, the former Busschaert, winning by 11 goals to 1. well fed by Witchell, scored 7 goals for the winners, mostly by back-hand throws, which had the Club's goalkeeper guessing everytime. Logan 2, Railton and Johnstone also scored for the Club.\n\nIn the game between the Navy teams, H.M.S. Tamar beat H.M.S. Foxglove by 7 goals to 3.\n\nOnly one game was played at the V.R.C., on September 1st, the second game 2/Wiltshires v. H.M.S. Tamar being postponed.\n\nThe United Athletic beat the R.G.A. by 5 goals to one.\n\nHOLING A MASHIE SHOT.\n\nA WEIHAIWEI PERFORMANCE.\n\nThe feat of holing a mashie shot has been recently reported from Weihaiwei. On the third green of the Port Edward Club's course this performance took place, the length of the shot being 64 yards. A threesome was in progress, consisting of the Rev. C. R. Burnett, Mr. E. R. Hood and Mr. S. W. Roberts, the latter of Messrs. Lavers & Clark. It was the last mentioned who did the trick.\n\nA remarkable feature of this incident is that the ball landed in the hole without ever touching the sand which there does duty for a green. Its mark would, of course, have been at once evident, but a close inspection showed that the ball must have gone into the hole. How it ever stuck there is a marvel- the sort of thing, as golfers know to their regret, that happens only about once in a life time.\n\nBANK ROBBERIES.\n\nOn the 22nd of July notes of the Banque l'Indo-Chine to the value of $500,000 were stolen from the Amiral Fourichon in Saigon harbour. They were part of a consignment of unissued notes for Haiphong, and naturally the thieves had no chance. Within an hour or so some of the notes were presented at Bank to be changed into smaller denominations- they were all notes of $100. The cashier recognised that they were part of a series totalling two millions and a half then arriving from France and not yet issued; and he promptly sent for the police. By the end of the month most of those concerned were under arrest.\n\nHappy Valley was the mother of Golf in the Colony, and in the old days she enjoyed a wonderful popularity, but as her sons grew up they deserted her and she has fallen on evil times. Still there are many who enjoy their game on the old course, and a little encouragement from headquarters would not do any harm. Golf is a very expensive game, and a number of young men in the Colony cannot afford to be full members of the Club and go to Fanling every week-end. Unfortunately, there is no member on the general Committee to represent the poor golfer, which is a great mistake. The Committee should bear in mind that many of the youngsters will be Taipans one day and that their services might be most useful to the Club, but if, as juniors they receive no help or encouragement, their minds will become embittered, and they will have no enthusiasm for its welfare. Lack of enthusiasm is about the most conspicuous feature of Hongkong golf at present. I do not mean to imply that our Committee and sub-Committees are not enthusiastic; they are, but they are not backed up by the great majority, and I believe the reason I have given above is responsible for this.\n\nI have seen the new Club-house at Happy Valley, and although it is small and not exactly an ideal Club-house we have a great deal to be thankful for. One must realise that the Jockey Club could not house us any longer in the previous pavillion and that the Committee were faced with a very awkward problem-nowhere to go and very little time to go there! Club houses are costly affairs and are not built in a day; matsheds are not satisfactory.\n\nThe problem was solved through the energies of the Hon. Secretary and the friendly help of the Jockey Club. For the rest we have to thank Mr. Greenhill and the House sub-Committee at Happy Valley for making the best use of the premises at their disposal. Unfortunately, the Club room is very small, but I must call attention to the roof, which commands an excellent view of the whole course and where it is most pleasant to sit and have one's drink at the end of a round. There is an excellent tram service and cars stop by request at the front door of the Club-house, so there is no reason why the Valley should not regain a good deal of its old time popularity as a summer evening course.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 492969, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-476 - Acting Governor Claud Severn & Governor Sir Stubbs - 1922 [8-12]", "page_number": 322, "title": "CO129-476 - Acting Governor Claud Severn & Governor Sir Stubbs - 1922 [8-12]", "content_text": "21\n\nMOTOR BOATS\n\nFOR SALE.\n\nThe Twin Screw Tunnel Stern Motor Launch \"ENRICA\"\n\n(Built of Steel).\n\nLength overall.--56' 0\" Breadth moulded.-11' 6\" Depth moulded.-3′ 6′′ Draught moulded.-18\" to 19\" D. W. capacity on above draft. --3 tons.\n\nSpeed.-8 knots. Engines.-Twin set \"Kelvin\" Motors, each 30 h.p.\n\nInstalled with Electric Light. Price $10,000 or near offer.\n\nThe Motorboat \"KEIKUNG\" (Built of Teak). Length overall.-29.8/10. Breadth.-7.5/10. Draught (approximate). -18. Engine -- \"Kelvin\" Paraffin Motor.\n\nPrice $1,800 or near offer.\n\nAPPLY\n\nTHE HONGKONG TELEGRAPH.\n\nHELENA MAY\n\nINSTITUTE.\n\nExtensions Opened.\n\nEXCHANGE.\n\non Page 11.\n\nFRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 22. 1922.\n\nOpening Rate: closing Rate\n\nSELLING.\n\nHongkong Hotel,\n\n2/63/4 2/6.13/16\n\nAstor House Hotel,\n\nExtensive alterations have been made to the Helena May Institute. A new dining hall, situated in the basement, has been provided. The entrance to this room is by a fine staircase, about nine feet wide, from the main hall. The new room is fitted with all modern conveniences. The woodwork is teak, with an attractive colour scheme of buff and white, and the splendid lighting arrangements and the large verandah windows, from which a view of the Peak can be obtained, all add to the charm of this welcome addition. The hall seats about a hundred diners and is so arranged that it can also be used for dances and cinematograph shows. Connected with the dining hall are a new kitchen and pantry, both spacious and well-fitted.\n\nSeven more bed-rooms have been provided, including a room for the matron. They are fitted with teak furniture and look very cosy little places. The library, to which has been added several new books, has been moved to one of the new rooms of the extension and a better lighting system has been installed.\n\nThese extensions were made owing to the generosity of the late Sir Ellis Kadoorie. The cost of the furnishing was undertaken by the Institute. The architects were Messrs. Denison, Ram and Gibbs.\n\nNESTLE & ANGLO-SWISS CONDENSED MILK\n\nTHE COWIE HARBOUR COAL COMPANY LIMITED. SILIMPOPON COAL.\n\nThe extensions were thrown open for the first time yesterday afternoon. It was quite an informal gathering and there were no speeches.\n\nAmong those present were Mrs. Claud Severn, Mrs. Bullock, the Hon. Mr. E V. D. Parr and Mrs. Parr, the Hon. Mr. Perkins and Mrs. Perkins, Mrs. Spring P. L. Knight, Mr. and Mrs. A. S. D. Cousland, Commander, and Mrs. Samson, Commander Radcliffe, Mrs. A Mackenzie, Miss MacKay, the Rev. J. T Holman, and many others. The Acting President of the Institute (Mrs. J. H. Kemp) was unable to attend owing to slight indisposition.\n\nPEKING NEWS.\n\nSolving the Cabinet Problem.\n\nThe Council of the Institute has arranged an attractive programme for the winter months, including musicales, dances, lectures, religious services, readings, cinematograph performances and a new feature, the children's hour.\n\nA Peking telegram states that late at night on the 19th, the President and Wong Chung-wai had a private consultation on the Cabinet question and eventually reached a settlement. A manifesto was issued next day to the effect that the request that Tang Shao-yi should form a Cabinet was withdrawn, and that Wong Chung-wai had been appointed Premier.\n\nAnother Peking message states that the terms for the return of the naval squadron from Canton have been arranged, and they will be put into effect when the Peking Government is in a position to meet the arrears of payment.\n\nWUCHOW UNREST.\n\nSTAR THEATRE.\n\n\"The Miracle of Love\".\n\nENTERTAINMENTS\n\nTHE CORONET\n\nHOTELS\n\nLEADING FAR EASTERN HOTELS.\n\nHONGKONG:\n\nPeak Hotel,\n\nRepulse Bay Hotel.\n\n'SHANGHAI:\n\nPalace Hotel,\n\nGrand Hotel Kalee.\n\nPEKING:\n\nGrand Hotel des Wagon Lits.\n\nThe Hongkong Hotel Co., Ltd.\n\nIn conjunction with\n\nThe Shanghai Hotels, Ltd.\n\nand\n\nThe Grand Hotel des Wagons Ltd.\n\nKING EDWARD HOTEL.\n\nCENTRAL LOCATION,\n\nELECTRIC LIFTS AND LIGHTING, TELEPHONE ON EACH FLOOR.\n\nHOTEL LAUNCH MEETS ALL STEAMERS.\n\nIsl. Central 373.\n\nTelegraphic Address: \"VICTORIA\n\nJ. WITCHELL,\n\nTo-day at 2.30, 5,15, 7.15 & 9.15.\n\nORIGINAL CAST\n\nIN\n\nTHE GIRL\n\nIN THE TAXI.\n\nWORLD\n\nPHONE. 1337\n\nKOWLOON\n\nTHEATRE\n\nTO-NIGHT at 9 15 TO-MORROW at 5.45\n\nand 9.15.\n\nHAROLD LLOYD\n\nIN\n\n\"A SAILOR MADE MAN.\"\n\nTHEATRE\n\nPHONE 1337\n\nManager.\n\nTHE EUROPE HOTEL.\n\nSINGAPORE.\n\nDANCING AFTER DINNER EVERY\n\nMONDAY, WEDNESDAY and SATURDAY.\n\nTEA DANCES\n\nTUESDAYS and THURSDAYS.\n\nThe Hotel Orchestra under the Direction of Mr. F. R. Martens.\n\nTelephones in every Room.\n\n148 Nom\n\n81 163\n\nTelephone No. 2740 (9 lines).\n\nSUBSIDIARY COINS.\n\nHongkong 50 ct. pieces\n\n10\n\n5\n\n124 pm.\n\npar\n\n19.5/5% dir.\n\nJanctu sub. coins\n\nHengsong. S pr 22. 1922.\n\nWEATHER REPORT.\n\nSept. 22nd 11% 17.\n\nIt has decreased slightly over L., and lightly from Vladivostock to Weihaiwei.\n\nThe typhoon which passed the Bonins on September 19 has moved to the E. of Hakkaido.\n\nThe anticyclone is now centred near Weihaiwei. It is moving eastward.\n\nHowever inclement the weather outside, there is always a feeling of tranquility inside the Star Theatre. This evening the management is exhibiting as a special attraction the film version of Cosmo Hamilton's famous novel, \"The Miracle of Love.\"\n\nIt took three weeks to erect the elaborate \"set\" of the House of Lords for \"The Miracle of Love.\"\n\nIt is a stirring story of English high life, with Wyndham Standing and Lucy Cotton in the chief parts. The hero is a younger son of a British noble family who is about to renounce his career as an idle and impecunious lord and seek his fortune outside of England, when he suddenly becomes heir to the title through the accidental death of his elder brother. A love story has been worked into the plot, which is said to abound in thrilling situations.\n\nFORECAST FOR THE 24 HOURS ENDING AT NOON TO-MORROW.\n\nDistrict.\n\nFormosa Channel\n\n2 South\n\ncoast of China between H.K. & Lamocks.\n\nThe Military and Gambling.\n\nNews from Wuchow brought back by a resident who has been there on a pleasure trip reveals very much the same state of topsy-turveydom that has been prevalent for months past. Soldiers of the Fourth Division of the Cantonese Army who have been garrisoning the town are said to be sadly out of hand on account of arrears in pay, and to secure funds they have transformed themselves into gambling monopolists. In the main street there are as many as forty concerns doing a brisk business in fantan, and officers are unable to enforce discipline on the men. The situation is given a farcical touch by the elaborate precautions of three gunboats in midstream, which appear to apprehend danger from the military, for their steam has been continually kept up ready for any emergency since their arrival under the orders of Chan Wing-son.\n\nReports are filtering into Hongkong of fighting between the Kwangtung and Yunnanese troops on the one hand and the Kwangsi troops on the other, further up the interior.\n\nPublic confidence appears to have been very badly shaken, for the majority of the shops remain closed, whilst those that venture to continue business close their shutters very early in the evenings. Pedestrians are a rare sight at night, many of the inhabitants preferring the safety of barred doors to walking about in the streets, where, as likely as not, they would stand the risk of being robbed by the military.\n\nRECORD ENROLMENT AT SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY.\n\nA record number of students has been enrolled in St. John's University (Shanghai), 340 in the collegiate department and 250 in the middle school.\n\nat 2 p.m. 6 am 2pm.\n\n76 17\n\n84 86\n\n6 4 Sa. 23 m 10 49 69 4 9\n\n22nd. to 28th, Sept. 1922\n\nLow Water\n\nHongkong\n\nHoogkong\n\nMean Time\n\n1, b. m.\n\nMean Time\n\nft. m. 7.3 20 48 6.%\n\nb. I\n\nft. n\n\nm 3 34\n\n1.7\n\n4\n\n1.7\n\nopen\n\nopen\n\n5\n\nотд oy orq sun. 24 4.25 0.00 1.16\n\nMon, 25 air\n\n21st 83 faeu. 26\n\n3 Wed 27 m 1\n\n3 19a 4.9a al Thar 28 m 1 59 65 I 9 24 2.4 4 ANA 4.7 7 4.4\n\n1.5\n\n14 44 69\n\n4 40 1,1\n\n11 4 11 *7a 720\n\n6.4\n\n0 30a 5.8\n\n5 la 31\n\nm 13\n\n69\n\nIn\n\n650 19\n\n1 586\n\n5.3\n\n6.7\n\nm\n\nm. morning a. afternoon\n\nWeather\n\nRain. Highest\n\nTemperature on the Lowest\n\nair Temperature on the 22nd 75\n\nT F. CLAXTON, Director.\n\nH.K. Ob... vatory, Sept. 21.\n\n5 7 14\n\n5 15 2.6\n\nm 5 56 1,8\n\n1\n\nTientsin.\n\nCordillere, from\n\nVongtsonpao li Laridle Street, from Shanghai.\n\nKianghing Engiok West, from Taipeh.\n\nLootengsi, from Amoy.\n\nMinleechan, from Shanghai.\n\nChengsoychor 11 Old Peel\n\nStreet, from Shanghai.\n\nPianchang, from Amoy.\n\nKihung, from Kobe.\n\nYungsikshang, from Kobe.\n\nLiang Laitsak, from Shanghai.\n\nHongkong's Most Modern & Coolest Picture Palace.\n\nTO-DAY at 5.15 and 3.15 p.m.\n\nTHE DRAMA OF A GIRL WHO KEPT STRAIGHT:\n\nA REALART PICTURE:\n\n\"THE LAND OF HOPE\"\n\nALICE BRADY\n\nA Powerful Story of The Dreams & Accomplishment of a Boy\n\nIn an Ad prod. Lawl\n\nHARRY SNOB POLLARD COMEDY.\n\n2.30 & 7.15 p.m.\n\nCHARLES HUTCHISON in\n\nSTAR\n\nDOUBLE ADVENTURE\" Ejendea, & mai ti,\n\nTHEATRE.\n\nPEKING ROAD, KOWLOON. Tel. Kowloo... 7\n\nThe biggest house exhibiting the lust ; ietur s\n\nTO-DAY to MONDAY, 25th. 5,30 and 95 10.\n\nLUCY COTTON\n\nin\n\n\"THE MIRACLE OF LOVE.\"\n\nA Cosmopolitan Special Picture.\n\nking at the Star Ferry Wharf for Hongkong Rodne FREE FERRY TICKETS BOTH WAYS. Open Daily #30 jo buô pm, and 1 to 9 pm, Saturdays 2 to 2.1 pm.. 3 to 5 15 pm\n\nSEE HAND BILLS.\n\nto 9 pm.\n\nJAPAN COAL\n\n- AND\n\nGENERAL IMPORTS AND\n\nEXPORTS\n\nAGENTS FOR:\n\nLiangtsuche Lharlie & Co.\n\nTHE MIT UBISHI MARINE & FIR» INSURANCE CO (2), from Shanghai\n\nTHE OSAKA MARINE & FIRE INSURANCE CO.\n\n9235, from Chinkiang.\n\nTH. KRING Superintendent.\n\nHongkong, September 21, 1922\n\nEASTERN EXTENSION AUSTRAL ARIA & CHINA TELEGRAPH CO\n\n11377/19th, Bankasia, from\n\nMadras.\n\n9044, 15th. Lampert Hongkong 6 29 3. Hotel, from Ningpo.\n\n57 2.8\n\nM. E. F. AIREY,\n\nSuperintendent,\n\nHongkong. September 21, 1922\n\nMITSUBISHI SHOJI KAISHA\n\n· MITSUBISHI TRADING CO., LTD.)\n\nHEAD OFFICE:-TOKYO\n\nNo. 14. PEDDER ST., HONGKONG.\n\nPrinted and Published for the Proprietor, by Alfred Morley e 11. Ice House Street, in the City of Victoria Hongkong.\n\nPage 21\n\n...\n\nPage 22", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-476 - Acting Governor Claud Severn & Governor Sir Stubbs - 1922 [8-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 492981, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-476 - Acting Governor Claud Severn & Governor Sir Stubbs - 1922 [8-12]", "page_number": 334, "title": "CO129-476 - Acting Governor Claud Severn & Governor Sir Stubbs - 1922 [8-12]", "content_text": "THE HONGKONG TELEGRAPH.\n\nSATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 1922.\n\nNOTICE.\n\nBOTEL*\n\nLEADING FAR EASTERN HOTELS.\n\nHONGKONG:\n\nPeak Hotel,\n\nRepulse Bay Hotel.\n\nSHANGHAI:\n\nHongkong Hotel,\n\nAstor House Hotel,\n\nPalace Hotel,\n\nGrand Hotel Kalee.\n\nPEKING:\n\nGrand Hotel des Wagon Lits.\n\nThe Hongkong Hotel Co., Ltd.\n\nIn conjunction with\n\nThe Shanghai Hotels, Ltd.\n\nand\n\nThe Grand Hotel des Wagons Ltd.\n\nEDWARD HOTEL.\n\nCENTRAL LOCATION,\n\nELECTRIC LIFTS AND LIGHTING,\n\nTELEPHONE ON EACH FLOOR.\n\nHOTEL LAUNCH MEETS ALL STEAMERS.\n\nTel. Central 373.\n\nTelegraphic Address: \"VICTORIA\"\n\nJ. WITCHELL, Manager.\n\nENTERTAINMENTS.\n\nTHE CORONET\n\nLOUIS B. MAYER PRESENTS\n\nANITA STEWART\n\nin\n\n\"HARRIET\"\n\nAnd the\n\n\"PIPER.\"\n\nKOWLOON THEATRE\n\nFRIDAY & SATURDAY - Sept. 29th. & 30th.\n\n\"MAN WOMAN MARRIAGE.\"\n\nMatinee 80 cts., Soiree $1.20.\n\nIf you have a particular taste\n\nTry a Golofina, they please the most discriminating smokers.\n\nIt's a Jamaica Cigar of superior quality with a full, mild, gratifying flavour.\n\nGolofina\n\nTHE JAMAICA CIGAR\n\nBritish American Tobacco Co., (China) Ltd - Distributors\n\nTHE EUROPE HOTEL.\n\nSINGAPORE.\n\nDANCING AFTER DINNER\n\nEVERY MONDAY, WEDNESDAY and SATURDAY.\n\nTEA DANCES\n\nTUESDAYS and THURSDAYS.\n\nThe Hotel Orchestra under the Direction of Mr. F. R. Martens,\n\nTelephones in every Room.\n\nTelegraphic Address :—“EUROPE, SINGAPORE.”\n\nTelephone No. 2740 (9 lines).\n\nTHE EUROPE HOTEL, LTD.\n\nARTHUR E. ODELL, Manager.\n\nMID-LEVEL KOWLOON\n\nKINGSCLERE HOTEL\n\nKNUTSFORD HOTEL\n\nSACHSE, LENNOX & Co., General Agents\n\nAre resident Managers.\n\nPALACE HOTEL, KOWLOON.\n\nTel No. Kowloon 3\n\nTel. Add, \"Palace.\"\n\nWORLD THEATRE\n\nPHONE 1337;\n\nTwo minutes from Ferry and Railway Station, Five minutes by Ferry from Hongkong\n\nA first-class Hotel in every respect and under English management.\n\nCrising undue personal supervision of the Proprietor.\n\nLarge and Billiard Room,\n\nTea Moderate.\n\nSpecial arrangements for families on application to\n\nJ. H. OXBERRY, Proprietor.\n\nPHONE 1337\n\nHongkong's Most Modern & Coolest Picture Palace.\n\nTHURSDAY, FRIDAY and SATURDAY at 5.15 and 9.15 p.m.\n\nTHREE DAYS ONLY\n\nREELART PICTURES presents\n\nWANDA HAWLEY\n\nin\n\n\"HER FIRST ELOPEMENT.\"\n\nSNUB POLLARD COMEDY\n\n2.30 & 7.15 p.m.\n\nCHARLES HUTCHISON in \"DOUBLE ADVENTURE\"\n\nUsual Prices.\n\nEpisodes 7 & 8.\n\nBooking at the THEATRE.\n\nTHE DOOM OF THE UNIVERSE.\n\nEdison's Prophecy.\n\n\"One day science will invent a machine so terrible in its possibilities, so absolutely terrifying, that man himself, who consents to risk torture and death in order to inflict torture and death, will be appalled, and will renounce war for ever.\"\n\nThus Thomas Edison, the famous inventor, in an interview with the Paris Excelsior.\n\nEdison does not think we have seen the end of war. Indeed, it is his opinion that the world is on the eve of wars more formidable than ever—during which civilisation may disappear.\n\n\"Poison gas and aircraft,\" declares the inventor, \"will be the decisive factors in the next war.\n\nNeither I nor anyone else I know, has discovered a means of protection against the aeroplane, even in its present state of development.\n\nThere exists no means of preventing a flotilla of aeroplanes from flying over London and spreading among the millions of inhabitants a gas which would poison these millions in a relatively short time.\n\nFrom 20 to 50 aeroplanes would be sufficient for this purpose.\"\n\nEdison does not think the aeroplane will play an important part at sea in the next war, although, of course, it can be used against merchant shipping.\n\nAt the same time, he agrees that the surface battleship is rendered obsolete by the developments in submarines and aircraft.\n\nHe considers it necessary now to find means of protection against under sea craft—and not to wait for the next war.\n\nNOTICE.\n\n\"TUNGSHIN.\"\n\nSTRANDED IN SWATOW HARBOUR.\n\nMessrs. Jardine Matheson & Co.,\n\nare prepared to receive Tenders for the temporary repair, floating, and delivery of the above steamer afloat, in the Harbour of Swatow, in a condition for proceeding to Hongkong under stores, apparel and tackle,\n\nPermits for inspection of vessel as she now lies, will be issued on application to the above.\n\nMETEOROLOGICAL.\n\nHighest Temperature on the 28th 91\n\nLowest Temperature on the 29th\n\nT. F. C. AXTON, Director.\n\nH.K. Observatory, Sept. 29.\n\nA JAPANESE \"LIVING\" HANDBOOK.\n\nThe following interesting note is given by the North-China Standard, Peking:-\n\nHis customers will be interested to learn that Mr. Murasato, the Japanese barber, who is well-known among the local foreigners, has been commissioned with the task of dressing the hair of H. E. President Li Yuan-hung.\n\nMr. Murasato has been in Peking for more than 25 years, and is a \"living encyclopaedia regarding matters before the Boxer trouble.\n\nSELF-IMPOSED SIXPENNY TAX.\n\nTo meet deficit on the Blackburn Royal Infirmary and other charitable agencies, the Blackburn Rovers' players have, without exception, agreed to 6d. per week being deducted from their wages for the benefit of the fund.\n\nEXCHANGE.\n\nT/C ESSRS. Jardine Matheson & Co., Ltd.-General Managers Indo-China Steam Navigation Co., Ltd., Hongkong,\n\nDemand, Shanghai\n\nDemand, Singapore.\n\nDemand, India..\n\nT/T Japan\n\nT/T San Francisco & New York.)\n\nT/T Java\n\nT/T Marks Tir France Demand, Paris\n\nUNCLAIMED TELEGRAMS.\n\nPEAK TRAMWAYS CO., LTD.\n\nTIME TABLE.\n\nWEEK DAYS\n\n.. to 8.00 ..\n\n.. to 10:00 am\n\n12.30 p.m.\n\nEvery 16 min\n\n10. mar\n\n15 min\n\n15 min\n\nSATURDAYS.\n\n7.00 .40 .30 .\n\n11 15 .m. to 12.00 Boos\n\n12 00 noon to 1.00 pm\n\n1.00 pm to 4.00 p\n\n4.00 pm to 8.10 p.\n\nEvery 16 min\n\nNIGHT CARS.\n\n50 p.m.\n\n8.00 p.m.\n\n9.20 p.m\n\n11.30 p.m.\n\n9.45 p.m.\n\nSPECIAL CARS.\n\nBY ARRANGEMENT AT THE COMPANY'S OPTION.\n\nALEXANDRA BUILDINGS, DES VOEUX ROAD\n\nTIDE TABLE.\n\n30th. Sept. to 6th. Oct. 1922.\n\nEASTERN EXTENSION AUSTRA ASIA CHINA TELEGRAPH\n\nSUBSIDIARY COINS.\n\nHongkong, Sept. 30, 1922,\n\nM. E. F. AIREY,\n\nSuperintendent.\n\nCHURCH NOTICES.\n\nA CHARGE OF ONE DOLLAR IS MADE FOR NOTICES UNDER THIS HEADING.\n\nSt. John's Cathedral, Hongkong.\n\nUNDER\n\n1st October, 1922, 16th Sunday after Trinity.\n\nHoly Communion, (7.50 am,).\n\nChildren's Service (10 a.m.)\n\nService: 4, 329, 335, Matins (11 a.m.).\n\nResponses Ferial; Venite: Macfarren (31) Psalms: 90 Barnby, 91 Barnby ; Te Deum: Havergal, Trent. Havergal (7th day); Benedictus: Bennett (23rd evening); Anthem: \"Once long ago,\"\n\nHymns Chant. 17. Jubilate. 830, 287, 385.\n\n6 p.m. Divine Service.\n\nSubject: \"The Grammar of Faith.\"\n\nHymns: 51, 654, 379, 781, 947.\n\nSoloist, Miss G. Brock.\n\nPreacher, Rev. C. Clouston Porri, H. C. F.\n\nHoly Communion at the close of the service.\n\nWesleyan Sailors' - Soldiers' Home, Arsenal Street, Sunday, 8.15 p.m., Chaplain's Meeting followed by Social Hour.\n\nWednesday, 8.00 p.m. Opening Social of the Wesleyan Guild and Grand Concert by the King's Follies.\n\nMission (Rhenish Church, Bonham Road).\n\nSunday, October 1st, 1922, at 7.30 p.m.\n\nHymns: 281 Lead us, Heavenly Father lead us, 201 Oft in danger oft in woe.\n\nViolin Solo: By Mr. Tschaikowsky:\n\nUniversity Students' Services\n\nA Hymn: 434.\n\nHoly Communion, (12 noon).\n\nEvensong (6 p.m.)\n\nResponses: Ferial; Psalm: 9% Barnby; Magnificat: Smart: Nunc Dimittis: Wesley; Hymns: 164, 223, 477.\n\nPeak Church.\n\nHoly Communion (8.15 a.m.).\n\nWesleyan Church, Queen's Road.\n\nOpposite Royal Naval Hospital.\n\nWanchai.\n\nSunday, October 1st.. 1922, 10.15 a.m.\n\nDivine Service and Naval and Garrison Church Parade.\n\nSubject: \"The Unwearied God.\"\n\nPreacher: V. F. Viccajee.\n\nWesleyan Church, Queen's Road.\n\nOpposite Royal Naval Hospital.\n\nWanchai.\n\nSunday, October 1st.. 1922, 10.15 a.m.\n\nDivine Service\n\nPreacher: Dr. G. H. Thomas, M.D., B. S.\n\nSubject: \"What is Christianity!\"\n\nFirst Church of Christ. Scientist\n\nMcDonnell Road, below Bowen Road Tram Station-Sunday, 11.15 a.m.; Wednesday, 5.45 p.m.\n\nPrinted and Published for the Proprietor, by Alfred Morley at 11, Ice House Street, in the City of Victoria Hongkong.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-476 - Acting Governor Claud Severn & Governor Sir Stubbs - 1922 [8-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 495404, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-481 - Governor Sir Stubbs - 1923 [8-12]", "page_number": 74, "title": "CO129-481 - Governor Sir Stubbs - 1923 [8-12]", "content_text": "2. Dr. W. J. Woodtuan, Assistant Medical Officer of Health, went on leave on 20th April, 1922, and was still on leave on 31st December, 1922. Dr. W. Pearse, Medical Officer of Health, acted on his behalf.\n\n3. Mr. C. M. W. Reynolds, Secretary, resigned on 31st October. Mr. J. A. Fraser, a cadet officer, was appointed Secretary and Assistant to the Head of the Sanitary Department on 6th November.\n\n(6.)-1. The establishment was increased by the creation of one additional Senior Inspector's post (Veterinary).\n\n2. Arrivals:-\n\nFrom leave.\n\nSenior Inspector J. A. Lyon (26th March), Senior Inspector P. T. Lamble (4th November),\n\nInspector G. Haigh (3rd December). Inspector C. E. Frith (21st December). On probation.\n\nInspector E. Savage (22nd May).\n\n3. Departures ;-\n\nOn leave.\n\nOn transfer.\n\nInspector E. C. Kerrison (7th August). Inspector J. G. Hooper (8th October). Inspector J. J. Gregory (16th October).\n\nInspector G. Haigh (18th January), Inspector C. E. Frith (26th March). Senior Inspector P. T. Lamble (29th March).\n\nInspector R. C. Witchell (13th May). Inspector F. Meade (To Secretariat for Chinese Affairs) (7th December). Inspector W. Midwinter (To Public Works Department) (8th August).\n\nOn retirement. Inspector R. Hudson (5th August). Seconded. Inspector H. Peplow (1st January) (To Public Works Department).\n\n4. Promotions.-Inspector Knight was promoted to the new Senior Inspector's post on 1st May.\n\nSecond Class Inspectors Wood and Old were promoted to first class (1st May 1922 and 5th August 1922). Inspector Fincher acted as Senior Inspector during absence on leave of Senior Inspector Lamble.\n\n5. Inspector of Nuisances Certificates.--At an examination held in December four Inspectors out of six candidates were recommended to the Royal Sanitary Institute for certificates. Including these four, twelve second class Inspectors will be in possession of this certificate. All first class Inspectors are required to possess it.\n\n6. Clerical Staff. Two 6th Grade clerks were added in March.\n\n7. (d) Outdoor Staff :-\n\nOne foreman, Grade 6 was added in January. One foreman, Grade 7 was added in January, One foreman, Grade 7 was added in March, Two Engineers were added in December. Two Coxswains were added in December. Two Stokers were added in December. Four Seamen were added in December, One Bargeman was added in December.\n\nSeven Cleansing Coolies were added in January. One Cleansing Coolie was added in October. Fourteen Scavenging Coolies were added in January, Twelve Scavenging Coolies were added in March. Four Scavenging Coolies were added in October, Appendix A shows distribution of approved staffs on 31st December.\n\nADMINISTRATION,\n\nGeneral Sanitary Work.--The area controlled by the Sanitary Board is limited to the Island of Hongkong and to Kowloon and New Kowloon.\n\nFor the purpose of administering the Public Health and Buildings Ordinance the Island of Hongkong is divided into the City of Victoria; its extension eastwards as far as and including Shaukiwan; the Hill district and the outlying villages of Aberdeen, Aplichau, Stanley and Taitam.\n\nThe City proper is divided into eastern, central, western-central and western districts each with a sanitary office, and subdivided into 10 Health Districts each with a Sanitary Inspector in Charge, (See map A). The Shaukiwan extension has also a Sanitary Inspector in Charge. The Hill district is worked in conjunction with Health District 3.\n\nKowloon is divided into Kowloon peninsula, Shamshuipo and Kowloon City each with a Sanitary office, and subdivided into five Health Districts each with a Sanitary Inspector (See map B).\n\nThe outlying villages are controlled by Police officers under the title of Rural Sanitary Inspectors.\n\nScavenging and Nightsoil removal.--For the purpose of Refuse Collection the City and Hill District is divided into three main ...\n\nPage 70", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-481 - Governor Sir Stubbs - 1923 [8-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 500972, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-489N - Governor Sir Stubbs & Sir Clementi - 1925 [8-12]", "page_number": 7, "title": "CO129-489N - Governor Sir Stubbs & Sir Clementi - 1925 [8-12]", "content_text": "32\n\nFOR THE\n\nSWIMMING\n\nSEASON\n\nWe are displaying an excellent range of\n\nBATHING COSTUMES\n\nRUBBER BATHING CAPS & SHOES\n\nSWIMMING FLOATS\n\nDo Not Fail to Inspect our Display of JANTZEN'S & JAEGERS'\n\nLADIES' AND GENTS'\n\nBATHING COSTUMES\n\nIn all Colours and Attractive Designs.\n\nThose Pure Wool Costumes are unexcelled for their wearing qualities, comfort and style, and they always retain their shape.\n\nTHE SINCERE CO., LTD.\n\nHOTCHKISS\n\nDON\n\nFALST BROS.\n\nKIRKCALDY\n\nHONGKONG EMPORIUM\n\nAN OLD FAVOURITE BACK AGAIN!\n\nConnoisseurs will remember \"DON\"- the favourite Scotch Whisky of Pre-War Days.\n\nNOW for the first time since the war, we can again supply DON.\n\nSole Agents:\n\nN. S. Moses & Co., Ltd.\n\nWhy Your Printing Should be the Best.\n\nMost people characterise the standing of a firm by its printing. Shoddy, or even mediocre printing gives the impression of mediocrity.\n\nAs you judge a man's character by his habits so do you judge a firm by its methods: its printing, its correspondence, the promptness, and its general tidiness in business.\n\nMake sure your printing is good, clean, and has that touch of distinction which a first-class printer makes his speciality.\n\nUp-to-date and good printing is executed by\n\nSouth China Morning Post,\n\nTel. 440.\n\nLimited\n\n3 Wyndham Street\n\nHongkong.\n\nSOUTH\n\nCHINA MORNING POST.\n\nTHE\n\nECONOMY IN HOME BUILDING.\n\nTHE OWNER AND THE\n\nARCHITECT.\n\nBy Oswald C. Bering. Published by Robert M. McBride Company, New York $5.\n\nWEDNESDAY, AUGUST 26, 1925.\n\nBUILDER.\n\nFOUNDATIONS.\n\nBUILDING PROBLEMS IN HONGKONG.\n\nMuch more general appearance\n\nThe timber pile, both squared and round in a \"tree shape\", have been the most greatly used in the past. These are driven in by a falling weight, or steam hammer, until a specified resistance at each fall is obtained.\n\nTo-day the timber pile has largely been replaced by piles of concrete, steel and combinations of concrete and steel.\n\nConcrete piles can be divided into two classes, viz precast and cast in position.\n\nMr. Hertug has added another to the list that may be met with by architects in the East.\n\nThe \"ground\" in Europe is one of the most important factors of shares and limits average matter, and in addition the conditions of space.\n\nThe precast pile is cast very much in a similar way to that of the thinner pile, and is generally made with a pointed end, and land reclaimed are so found by the soil, or a metal shell is driven into the ground upon completion of all the piling and forethought for back that they can ease to be carried through to an also be said, with safety, ground, and\n\nHe is never pre-in Great Britain, that old or bedding upon \"bad ground\" make a compromise when it comes to inferior quality is not usually a paying proposition, land being generally purchased at rates which are less than the cost of reclamation, or at less than the extra cost\n\nWith the metal shell as a mould, the metal shell covers a collapsible general pile cure, the shed and the raundiena sufit upon waslabic soil.\n\nArchitects seem to feel pretty strongly a lack of the paper of river-side warehouses and dock sititude toward their profession, and where low-lying sites, by their due both to ignorance of the lay Homes, base & valce in giving man, as well as over ambitious re-\n\naccuse on waterways and storage presentatives within the preïez-\n\natungarde. slur. Much space is devoted in this bank to emphasizing the importance of selecting a good architect, and what is more, excending\n\na bilding site may range from portance of rebitecturo as the Dig ind waa an art. I must be honoured with\n\nin\n\nold allowed to haraan, and dzisi\n\nThe precast pi'e la cast ven in a similar way to that ef the thinner pile, and is generally\n\ngood agricultural pie cast in position may\n\nJo\n\nend, and lande reclaimed are so fond by the soil, or a metal shell\n\nInto the\n\nupon completion of\n\nall the pianting and forethought for hack that they can ease to be\n\nWhere the earth forms be mould, at any heantau! thing that is spoken of as cocinimes worth being carried through to an also be said, with safety, ground, and\n\nland metal lobe la driver\n\ncompletion.\n\nHe is never pre-in Great Britale, that ocliving driving the tube, concrete is passed pared fo\n\nmake a compromise lard or bedding upon \"bad ground\"\n\ndown the tube, the tube being with-- when it comes to inferior quality is not n staally a paying propal-drawn as the couerote is placed. of materials or -guted dion, lana being reuerally pureba\n\nWith the metal sheli as a mould, the metal shell covers a collapsible: cunstances, he always indicates as than the cost of reclamation, meral ple cure, the shed and the a smaller scute, or simplified as ur et less than the extra cost\n\nraundiena sufit upon waslabic soil. Architects seem to feel pretty Tan exceptious are to the rase strongly a lack of the paper of river-side warehouses and dock sititude toward their profession, and where low-lying sites, by their due both to ignoranes of the Jay Homes, base & valce in giving man, Ax well sa over ubitious re-\n\naccuse on waterways and storage presentatives within the preïez-\n\natungarde. slur. Much space in devoted in this bank to emphasizing the mould mad, to hard rock, or six à bilding site may range from portance of selecting a good arritures varying between these two tect, and what is more, excending Mad, soft ground, or Ta pat fath in bi The aveti-\n\ning.\n\nTHA\n\nIvos sand,\n\nle care being driven into the quil, 5s pic care heirg collapsed when i rewnioz the necteurs depth, and removed, feaving the shell in the ground to form a road to take the concrete.\n\nThe slams for the metal shell are f that before placing the camareis.\n\nhe concrete can do seen, and that the near space to be recupied ly\n\nas the hole is Hired by the motul shell there is no risk of earth o\n\ntect ia a Dinette,\" says Mr. Hat ve of indefinite depth, or ground water becoming mixed with\n\nthickness of there untable soils, the concrete. safely carry the structur covering soi! sufficiently solid tej claimed Jun.\n\nand\n\nHe e insistent on necessity of the architect knowing\n\nOne syle, where the fabe is: his clients understanding their\n\nHe-driven and withdrawn as la con-i needs, and the actual human fac have hoen ased for the disposti of the monid, attaches great value areas which ereta is placed the soil forming tors of thefe problem. The lay-earth, and rebash, come under the to ramming the earth at the foot Tan does not usually balanced picture or the problending or soft ground, which the gile to an enlarged base, over-lie good firm soll before commencing the concreting,\n\n14%\n\na\n\nQuality\n\nTOP NOTCH\"\n\n\"KING GEORGE IV\" Scotch Whisky\n\nSole Agents:\n\nGANDE, PRICE & Co., Ltd.,\n\nHONG KONG\n\nFresh Air on Top\n\nWHEN it is \"set fair\" with\n\nthe thermometer in this eighties\n\nyou CRO awoly command a refre sehga\n\nbreeze from your\n\nand is likely is mopese plans that The sides of water courses are and the camming of the concrete Electric Fan\n\nare inconsistent.\n\nTactful and Firm,\n\nIt is\n\natten of sor 2. var-lying is invera to ratosal, as placed.) The architect must be tactful may a exist, that is, a pool for the plic, and irregular sides which good firm button. The opposite which results in a bulbuions font tel bat in his criticiser. asstatis?, therefore, saleet himmering mud, or louse soft before pay atop a taken in the plays, ar buiting, Indeed, to help\n\nWhere had greend iz met with. the actual selection of the site the normal footings obtained he\n\nis claimed give greater skin letion.\n\nConcrete, it good, as a materiai | tor piles can be spoken of as per\n\nis unually a mistaka to scrno-widening walls un piers. under manent, whether in waler or in the zize in the matter of the custheir base, by bedek esate and ground ur \"hetween wind end of bis services. A selection of pain concrete, may not he efficient water,\" the\n\nIt will keep you fit until holiday-time, and suszała you at concert-pitch afterwards.\n\nOne unit of electricity will drive a small jan for 40 hours.\n\npositiva destrac-THE CHINA LIGHT & POWER Co., (1918) Ltd.\n\nat.\n\nthe rebt man will mean considersstrecoure over aning arca bu retive to other materials. able economy in purcheses snoduce the load to the amount per 01 subject to rot, at construction laier, and a personal quare foot, Part the soli wil carber. And doe's 201 corrode as does\n\nrunk from wond barers, as is m and artistic interest lu results. Recourse has then to be\n\nmade\n\nchanges, us\n\n50\n\noften it has\n\nArchitect expertaily young to other methods, such as spread and steel, s has the nd ones, make the mistake very often footings, piling, rafts, caissons,ntage, that, however pamarent ef giving a rapid estimate of cost, cylinders, sheel pillow, are a com wood piling sy he, i constantly teiling what the exact date o hinatione of these, according to the\n\nsaturated, there is rot the fear of commation will be. An experi-pe of strucuri and the nature decay if the line of sturation anced maz is too well acquainted of the soil. with finetusiona te the markei, The spread footing is the ineen found to do. There is and unfavourable labour candi-iment of the aormal convete rage, 46180 the increasing difficulty, tions, and uncertain whether to to give additional bearing aves.\n\ntowing the depletion spook Sognaticely on any of these The normal courete foundation foreste, to obtain timber of targe M. dering abould be expabic of wider then the frickenk it up rete may be found to be chaper. matera. God architecte, sage to a watt or pier, being bat ute seartling and when large scantlinga are required, the first cost of con- estimating within 10 per cent of ports, is subjected to but little or the cost. t is recommend that ho tention. he let out contracting directly, in stead of placing this function in the alone of another.\n\nThere are many ways of series\n\ning ccenomy, \"Ruild economical\n\n, but never cheaply,\" says M\n\nHeria, Econcutez depend agon\n\nBy eulanging. It is subjected to\n\ntalle stress in the underside,\n\n(1)\n\nRafii\n\no\n\nRaft foundations have become care into use since the introdie-\n\nand to take up this stress,, rotted of reinforced concrete. Pre-\n\nsteel jufte are inserted or the con- areta is relaforced with zods,\n\nFiling.\n\nWith cerisin scils and where the\n\nbe driven to\n\nVICK= to die introduction of reinforced aonercle, refta were co- steneten in plafa concrete, and sol being reinforced, were af thirdness.\n\n37622\n\nWith s raft the preseard on the\n\nthe nature of the plan, bup of atrasture resis apon the grandi,\n\ncortare, exbica o materials, resuficient piles may duction of regelremonts, market sonsolidate the earth sufferently to jail is diatributed over the waxi-\n\ncluziion. favourableness\n\ncarry the tend. Before driving them se possible, reducing the weather, etc. Cut out non-essen pilas the earth seemed a certain pure per square foot to a min tials first, he recomiende, bistoad space. After the piles are driver, roam, and if pemperly of making a\n\ndezigned, compromise\n\nthec in earth. plz piles, the earth in soft places. quality of materiale. He ecumer\n\nWith few ates and explains more extensive bulk of the driven pile,\n\nasing heen consolidated by the exceptions the site under buildings | ly and technically many others.\n\n1234 ke he movered sith au Supervious Bungalows.\n\nPiles for the purpose of conjayer. In most cases concrete is the solidating soda can be of tallar peatario! used, and this\n\nrerete\" made sufficiently thick\n\nface\n\nand restored, may form the raft.\n\nShowroom 62 Nathan Road, Kawi\n\n60 years ago!\n\nKAYIP\n\nThe Firm of MACKAY introduced LIQUEUR WHISKY Its success has led to the oxistence ni mszy fetior Brande offered under ritar title.\n\nMACKAY'S THE ORIGINAL- 1495EUR WHISKY\n\nBabe in face age and chore Bone pretation of Highland Whisky.\n\nTu Tubos na jou tuing Bred five leading divide throughout the int\n\nGaste no more than dory\n\nObtainable from all the leading\n\nstores in the Colony. WHOLESALE AGENTS-BRADLEY & Co., Ltd.\n\nCOLUMBIA\n\nNEW-PROCESS\n\nRECORDS\n\nMUSICAL COMEDIES\n\nSelection\n\n19\n\n465 THE GEISHA\n\n821 IRENE\n\n723 LILAC DOMINO\n\nWith badldings having basements, the basement level mag he balex\n\n666 MAID OF THE MOUNTAINS 932 BRIGHTER LONDAR\n\n12\n\n27\n\n645 CHU-CHIN-CHOW\n\n659 CHU-CHIN-CHOW\n\nTe duretes & chapter cach tepes to the used for beading country house. suburban town piles, but in several ecare pales of Aud semi-domestic. In the counhard materialy having no cobesion try and sobarben heuse it is a have been used, such as sacó, eliz importens to develop the exterior (kers, stores, pl.\n\nwater level, requiring reinforce! Surroundings as the interior de\n\nFrich pile of curò, stone or other ment against the opward ad in. tails. The arcaiteet must be con- Part materials, boles are formed ward presauce of water, the ruft earned with lawns, shrubbery, driving and removing pilas of useiber with the barzeniest walls, kennels.\n\nfilling thereoning a watertight box\n\nmaterials, aged in water bearing toil\n\nThe Puthor is heeed, or metal, and etc. arused at the surr of gull hole with the bead\n\nmen whe extat at having to with bearing les, that is plas A raft foundation may be mora \"pay an architect to design\n\nwhich support a structure, such as jerononteal, even when in itself it chicken coop\" Bungalows are a pier over open water and build costs more, then foundations taken\n\n¡Ay chase\n\nnot ganerally inexpensive, as ings on soft sort or liquid mud, the down to a low level, glling, when supposed. They must always bo freeistance against ponetration of the taking down of the founda! pleaned to ennform to the scythe pie may be obtained by its roations, the ailing roundings. The ideal way\n\nreaching sold ground, ot by dodge to dosing property.\n\n(Minders. Cylinders of iron and steel, and\n\nplanning a town house is to et tion of the soil against te sides,\n\nla group of people to share in les partiz by both it being driven\n\nlot having a common central gerte a suficient depth to stala treiufgrend coutrete, sinh tuto sott\n\nen and Como architectu friction, or support at its foot. style that can be planned har\n\nrol, water, wad and, and les moniously.\n\n279 FLORODORA\n\nVocal tems\n\n309 LES CLOCHES DE CORNEVILLE\n\nAT\n\nANDERSON'S\n\nThe põe supported at its fot, with concrete, have been used. pose of being between groups of for that porting id a pie surround- Je some Chat:x eylinders have pites and giving rigidity.\n\nnd by water or liquid and giving surrounded groups or piles, the\n\nFor work of ar engineering\n\nHe discusses frateruity houses had the comparative lack of le rtle or na aters! support and piles being Srst drivan, the e7lindratare, enfssons of metal or rein. terest in their style. One of the friction, becomes a column and is ers, dropped over greaps of pites. forced concrete have heat, fosted Cardinal fundar.ontal guad subjected to siplar stresses to the ender resting on the bottom, to prition, suk architecture is dit \"the fecade those which columns are subjected and after the exlindars\n\n0:1 prepaved and plac shall express the par- to, and can be calculated as such. position, ing them\n\nare in beds, and filled with stones or son- prae of the building.\" The funda A feree, the concrete filling the spaces imental in move or leva nuylerted personally\" in the architecture of between the piles sed the naise sood supporting soils, in spite of in our semi-derarstic buildings. their homes. Throughout the vo- of the eslinder. By this mean, folical platements to the can-\n\nwith\n\n200-\n\nxk.\n\nCertain ally, ench as sund, are\n\nthe trury, providing they are not do a\n\nMr. Horing shows farther jamo one is coracleas of the au- support is obtained from amusement at the ladies who de there gesuire belief in the files. ne elinder and concrete position in which they can sore,\n\nand pure pemodse styles: atzo, portance and eigalheance of the inside binding thure who insist upon \"expressing Fart.-Christian Science Monitor piles together, serving\n\nthe pa\n\nof and to prevent spreading the elte\n\nthe par- can be enclosed by abeak piling, of\n\ntimber, iron, steel, er reinforced concrete. Sheet pillay, at comple tion, could be described as a box ariere, without top on bottom, enclosing the ground on which. the batting elands.\n\nScrew Piles\n\nThese are main! cylinders with \"screw\" anda, the pile being ra rolved and anteng the soil in a similar way to that of wood screw entering wood.\n\nTheir most frequent use is for light piers where the sea bottom le sand.\n\nHOTELS.\n\nTHE\n\nSOUTH CHINA MORNING POST,\n\nWEDNESDAY, AUGUST 26, 1925.\n\nHOTELS.\n\nHONGKONG\n\nHONGKONG HOTEL; REPULSE BAY HOTEL:\n\nPEAK HOTEL.\n\nTulographie Address: KREMLIN, HONGKONG.”\n\nAND\n\nSHANGHAI\n\nASTOR HOUSE HOTEL: PALACH HOTEL;\n\nKALEE HOTEL; MAJESTIC HOTEL. Telegraphic Address: \"CENTRAL, SHANGHAL.\"\n\nHOTELS,\n\nLIMITED.\n\n43 association with the Grand Hotel des Wagons Lits. Peking,\n\nKOWLOON HOTEL.\n\nTHE PREMIER HOTEL IN KOWLOON, First Class Billiard Room and Satoon Bar.\n\nSHIPPING\n\nSTRIKE SITUATION.\n\nDEARTH OF CHINESE KIVER CARGOES.\n\nArrical and Departures.\n\nJUNG VOYAGERS.\n\nCHRISTIAN COLLEGIANS ARRIVE AT CANTON.\n\nUdging the Searchlights.\n\nNEWS\n\nFRENCH FLAGSHIP.\n\n13\n\nP. & O. BRITISH INDIA, APCAR AND RASTERN & AUSTRALIAN LINES.\n\n(COMPANIZA IRMOTROzed in ENGLAND) STATEO, JAVA ↳ OTTAMA, CREION, INDIA, PENSJAN GAFLF, WHAT IEDARA,\n\nKARTICA, ART & HOVE AFRICA, ANSA RAL-ANIA. INCLEDINU AR\n\nZNALAND & 4URENSLAND POSTA. RED HEA. WIEFT, ZUBOPY, KTO\n\nPENINNITLAR & ORIENTAL FORTNIGHTLY DAVET ROYAL MAIL UTKANADA\n\nSPER CONTRACT WI\n\nH. GYERSNXXT}\n\nIONS PROM TONGKONG ABOUT\n\n20th August.\n\nPENDING CHANGE IN NAVAL NARKUNDA...\n\nKIDDERPORE\n\nJEYPORA\n\nCOMMAND.\n\nKHYBER...........\n\nThe French battleship Jules\n\nNAGPORE\n\nof V140 Farry, ying the faz\n\nTILAWA TALAMBA\n\nTANDA...\n\nThe sixaution in the matter of\n\nAs was exclusively uncunced Admiral Prochos, Commander-in- ocean Donte shipping remains un- in the relature of the S. C. f. Post Ja Phart uime ago, a parts of Sqaadran, arrived yesterday over- sries and clearances varies but Americana left Hongkong toring and anchored in Kowloon ARAFURA\n\ntie. Cargoes are small in quan Canion by two fucks which were Bay as there are at present yo tity and few ju number. For the chartered For the purpose of berthe available in the man of yast fon; weeks shipments of more convering coroat and building war anchorage.\n\nthen\n\nThe usual ma\n\n0.334\n\n105\n\nDESTINATION\n\n42wers & wartorg-\n\n16,237 8th Sept., soon.rition & Fanuch.\n\n5,218\n\n17th Sept.\n\n0.114 19th September.\n\n5,83\n\njeet Soudna, Miles, London,\n\nLaterpell\n\n3465 September. patebay.\n\nBRITISH INDIA-LOCAH BAJURGS INDUTA\n\n10,000 24th September. 3'pore, Pung & Calcutta\n\n18,018 9 October.\n\nEASTENNÉ SUSTRALIAN RATING (SOUTH)\n\n16,9505\n\n8,000!\n\n2nd Sept.\n\nMaa, Sandokat Chnes. Is\n\n7th October Tarifle, B'ban, 'eer, &\n\nMethaurns.\n\nSADAMA win aga quli ni Turbo The 1. 9.3. Cu td. seatures will zien dil; of Shangkhu, B\n\nShaazhki, Dzsin. Debit, Kalam. The Timber Darwin, as her wine wich tho towing\n\nFrogweat conrad An the New Zaki, Tante\n\nas rand_nta\n\nSatan and soudit via Panama Canal.\n\nThe Ure 5.9. Company ateaders to the United Kingoeta 1,000 tons have beys rare, material to the Canton Christina {tional salutics were fired, and sise and now, even the local Chinese College under the leadership of the fing saiule in Vice Admiral whe may usually be depended upon 31r. Crumpton, No information Sinclair. which were duly re- to furnish small freights for river joald be obtained at the time turned. Electric Lift and Telephone to each Floor, Tels. K.608 & K.609. Cable address: KOWLOTEL, Hongkongingle package of cargo was ten who was acting as super Vion Admiral\n\nGnder the Persound Baparvicken and Matogoriană di\n\nFRANK L. COOKE.\n\nProprietor.\n\nKING EDWARD HOTEL. Electric lifts and Lighting. Telephone on each Floor, Hotel Launch Meets All Steamers.\n\nTol. Central No. 370.\n\nTelegraphle Address: \"VICTORIA.\" J. WITCHELL, Manager.\n\nST. GEORGE'S HOUSE. KENNEDY ROAD,\n\nPrivate Hotel, affording Every Comfurt.\n\nLARGE AND OF HARBOUR\n\nAIRY ROOMS. SPLENDID EXCELLENT CUISINE UNDER SUPERVISION OF THE PROPRIETKISS.\n\nLOSSIUS, Proprietress.\n\nFor te suply to\n\nThe only hotel in CANTON\n\ndirectly under European\n\nManagement.\n\nNAGPORE... 5,248\n\nSANJIS TO BHANGHAIR LAYER.\n\n26th August.\n\nHI\n\n......$10,000\n\nShanghai, Moji & Kobe.\n\n4th September. Sbbai, Moji kote. 6th September. Kebe.\n\nì deben re afrasimme wid subtrat in alteration without quiler. Wielan\n\nSTRAWERS. Parede og not mon than 21, x 16. × 7 th, will be prerived as ike Lumping's (not up lo egia on the day previous to unitis\n\nFanburding.\n\nB\n\ncestt, even though the pun la voly ether arough the Acerts The arrival of the dulos Perry KARMALA ......\n\nMac, are showing no Comandate of the Harbour Of is a proliminary to the charge OVET TILAWA design m despatch goods. Pas through which latter place in of the Commander-in-Chiership senzar hookings by the river sail- lucka cleared with no mention of at the squadron. Rear Admiral ings yesterday were good, but not 'pautengere other than Mr. Crnan- Basir is to be the successor of Fruchot, and will sen. ap.\n\nMules Michelet at as early data. 24 hours ending #sam yesterday Information has now been re After the command has been showed o vessels in harthour, of seived which confirms the state turned over, the Jules Ferry will which wery British, with 12 meu then made and this is to the leave for France, the new arrival arrivals and 11 doyartures. Bri- affect that the voyagers have becoming the Bugship in Lish shipping contributed six and reached Carton.\n\ntwo respectively, to these guzes. Warpon was reached at 2 a.. Arrival were the British ships on Sunday morning and taking Empress of Casada from Vancon- advantage of the darkness, the ver and Shanghai with 186 tour of junka alipped in ander the nearch- fouz, amigenium salphate aut Hights which awept the Back mails, Yut Shing from Bangkes Rear, without being detected. with 2,260 tons of rice and general There is no shipping activity\n\nThe\n\nstead,\n\nPARENTS PERTAINI\n\nNOTICE TO MARINERS.\n\nSHANGHAI DECLARED\n\nCHOLERA-INFECTED\n\nPORT.\n\nker\n\nand two bags of mails, Nam Sang in Canton, but sumbers of snail The following notice to muzinera: from Yokohama nt Shanghai boats are fraighting vegetables has been posted at the Harbour with 1,205 tena of general, tonius and produce from outlying die Once, seved by the authorities Revolutionary placards at Canton under date. August 13:\n\nHarbour Notification No. 1 of 1923. Notice is hereby given that the Superintendent of Custome and Representatives of Poreign Con- sale Bodiaz bave declared the port of Shanghai to be infected. AR vessels arriving therefrom either at Pantee or Whangea on and after this date are to be guvern\n\njing dangerous goods (firecrackerstricts. Tel. Central 116.\n\n(and matches) and 359 bags. of fare posted about the city treiting all, Jaining from Poochow and the people to take action agata\n\nforeig oppressore. Amoy with 50 tona ganerai and the mails, Hallie from Sulyon with gates to Alamen ure picketed 3.921 tons of ride and gear and the Chinese side to prevent any three bags of mail, Clearailah conuuunication with the defen Srum Sieganore and Hoi Nam with dore. Contradictory rumours are cur general, one bag of mulls and 200 deck paterpgera. the American reut with regard to the shipping\n\nTHE VICTORIA HOTEL,\n\nSHAMEEN,\n\nGuides\n\nand trips arranged for\n\nand special care\n\ntaken of TOURISTS. Cable Address 1 \"VICTORIA.\"\n\nEMPRESS LODGE.\n\nTel Kowloon. 296. fel. Add: \"presloge.\"\n\n8, Mudy Hoad, Kowloon Up-to-date Residential and Tourist Hotel. Two minutes walk from the Ferry Newly furnished, with latest sanitary bath- Under Barpervision of the Pro- Excellant ralaine.\n\nMom?\n\nprintress.\n\nPor termos apply to Mrs. M. O. MURPHY, Propristress\n\nPALACE HOTEL.\n\nTel. Address \"PALACE.” Tel. Kowiuon No. B.\n\nThres mátutes irom Kowlen Wharf, Ferry Wharf and RawaJ Station, Entirely Bater English Management. Eletele Light and Faus throughout. Every Rovin with Private Bath, Lounge, Bar and Hilliard Rooms. turivalled Cuisine onder the personal supervision of the proprietor. Terma moderate, Special terms to families on appli\n\nJ. T. OXBEREY, Proprietor. tion to:\n\nSTATION HOTEL,\n\nTel. Add: \"Termotel” KOWLOON. Code used a.B.C. 5th. First class aud most up-to-date Residential and Tourist Hotel. Two minutes' walk from Ferry. Moderate Larid and recst axel- lent cuisine auder entirely European tuanagement Monthly and Family rates can be arranged at mest reasonable terms.\n\nAPPLY THE MANAUERESS, Kowloon.\n\nTHE CARLTON HOTEL.\n\nUNDER ENTIRELY NEW MANAGEMENT. Splendidly Situated in the Heart of the European Secilon Convenient to the Ferry and to the Baalucss Centres.\n\nA First Class Besidential and Tourist Hotel with all the Convenienes of Homo. Large Airy Rooms. Hot and Cold Water.\n\nCuisine ander the Immediate Direction of the Proprietress Monthly and Family rates at moderate ternis.\n\nFor tartas upply to Mra M. BLAKE.\n\nTelephone No. C. 812,\n\nNu. 30, Lee House Street,\n\nASTOR HOUSE HOTEL.\n\nTelegraphic address \"ASTOR”\n\nTelephone Contra! 10,\n\n13. Queen's Road Central: A first clase Hotel centrally located, large and airy rODINE, completely renovated and refinished. New Ulzing Room\n\nuidine. Meals a la Carte. Excellent\n\nMouthly Tickets for Fists and Duners. Under entirely new Management,\n\nH. A. VAZ, Nanager.\n\nROGATE.\n\nTel Address \"Rogate\" Kowloon,\n\nTel. 851.\n\n158-160 Austin Read, Kuwloun. Newly furnished. Up-to-date Priests Hotel. Excellent Oni sine. Moderate Term.. tinder personal supervision of the Proprietres\n\n\"ALBANY.\"\n\nResidential Hotel, Nos. 3 & 4 The Albany. Overlooking the Botanical Gardens. Under personal supervision of the Proprietress. Telephone Central 615.\n\nMADAM ASA UTANI.\n\nJAVANESE MASSEUSE. FACE MASSAGE. MASSAGE\n\n25, Wellington Street:\n\nMASSAGE HALL.\n\nMRS. 3. UZUNOVE\n\nHapert Massgeule,\n\n37, Queen's Road Central,\n\nA similar notice has been issued\n\ntaamer West Faralun from Los 10 the port, that gaining most Angeles and Manila with 196 tas iredence being to the edest that by the Excilay Regulations feri of general and President McKinicy to impose a tax of 23,000 or be the authoriting stentsin in\n\nthe Cunninginner of Commerce is the port of Canton. from Manila with 12 tone of\n\nvessels discharging, while 41. general and 10 bags of all, the monopoly has her granted to theviation to that port and Chin- German vereis Piala on Hardessane for a large sum, the x-\n\n(wengizo under date August 12.\n\nJourg and Marilu with 365 tona of\n\nyoueral and six bags of mai, the out of which is not naked. Japanese reasol Osake Mary from\n\nNAVY LAUNCH BLAZE. TWO MEN SENT TO HOSPITAL.\n\nMuch of this stegnation is due Two American seemen, the en-!\n\nCalcutta and Singapore with 320 by the Autenor for Sagapore and tons of general, nails chectical President Kinley and Bevenue products, and 13 bags of mail, the for Shanghai. Chineze ucastor Chung Hing from Kwangeheuwan with 180 tone of the increasing difficulty ofgineer and the electrician of abippers in obtaining export per- U. S. 8. Beaver's speed launch, firewood, vegetables and poultry.\n\nmita for lee, the stonks of which whlen was destroyed by fire at! Departures\n\nin the Colony, are now belevet in the Army and Navy Club landing Departure were the Brish be below is reserve margin. at Maul are now in the Set- vessels Isaching for Amoy, Pru- Another contributing factor berg General Hosptial. The men tecilaus for Shanghai, Japanese appears to be the belfer sung the jare badly burved, according to a Towels Koren Mora for Keelung, Chinese generally that something navy officer interviewed at the Tsuruga Alara For Shanghai, drastic is about to happen either place of the fire.\n\nlein Maru for Tallar Bay and on one side or the other. The\n\nflames completely demolished Jajo Man for Swate, the Datel more credulone point to the con- the high power engine and burned auction dredger G.G. Ideoburg Jucant exercising of seaplanes the inside of the launch, causing (Netherlands Harbour Works) fox and the large number of warships Jamage estimated at $5.00). The Macao, Tisondari for Bhunghai, jad present in harbour, as evidence forigin of the fire le vakowa. the Gormer vernal Pfalz for that the British Government is it was extinguished half an hour, Shanghai, the Chinese coaster about to take action. No amount of Jafter it started.\n\nThe been aboard and the crew Kazura fur drony and the tallat explanation will disillusion them, moter vessel Eaquino for Shang- and thts toeling is permeating the of the launch Genecock I put hal. Clearances were taken out lantize native commercial fabric.\n\nTHE\n\ncut the blaze.\n\nHONGKONG & KHAMPOA DOGK CO., LTD.\n\nTELEGRAPHIC ADDRESS MANIFESTO\", HONGKONG; UndesUsed: A1, A.B.C. Film Edition: Engineering: Fire and Second Edition: Western Union and Watking, Banson's Marcom.\n\nDock Owners, Ship Builders, Marine and Land Engineers, Boiler Makers, Iron and Brass Founders, Forge Masters, Electricians.\n\nOIL TANK STEAMER \"PALUDINA.\"\n\n412, 0′ x 58′ 1′′ x 31′ 0′′ x 3,400 tons Lw. x 3,300 H..\n\nBuilt by THE HONGKONG & WHAMPOA DOCK CO, LTD., at KOWLOON DOCK\n\nso the ordero THE ANGLO SAXON PETROLEUM CO., IND.. being one of fusimilar\n\nVessels built in those WORKS to the same order.\n\nPlease address enquiries to the Chief Manager :-\n\nR. M. DYEE. B SC.. M.IN.A.. Kowloog Dock. Hongkong.\n\nFor Tenage Rates, Unzufbooka, Farizate, may apply że\n\nMACKINNON, MACKENZIE & Co., Alamur\n\nTHE BANK LINE, LTD,\n\nAgents for the following Services.\n\nAMERICAN & ORIENTAL LINE BOSTON, NEW YORK & NEW ORLEANS\n\n1st September.\n\nM.V. \"ELMBANK”-\n\nrta Suez Canai\n\nNEW YORK, BOSTON & BALTIMORE AMERICAN & MANCHURIAN LINE TELLERMAN & HUCKNALL BS. Co., Ltd.) 8,8. \"HALVERNIAN\" via Suez Canal 19th September. 3.S. \"WALTON HALL\"'\n\n7th Oe.ober\n\nUNITED KINGDOM & CONTINENT \"ELLERMAN\" LINE (EILERMAN & BUCKNALL S.S. CO. LTD.)\n\nSth September S.S. KNOWSLEY HALL\" For Marseilles, London, Dunkirk and Hamburg. MODERATE PASSAGE BATES TO MARSEILLES & LONDON\n\nMAURITIUS & SOUTH AFRICA ORIENTAL-AFRICAN LINE\n\nMiddle August.\n\nS.S. SURAT\" Leading for Maurities, Delagea Bay, Durham, East London, Alges Bay. Port Elizabeth, Mossel Bay & Capetown.\n\nThrough Bills of Lading lawned to Betra, Quilimaine, Lio, Port Amelia. Sezambique. Chlude, Iabambane, Zanzibar, Houmassa, Kindlat, Vezi Nellat. Luderitz Bay, Walvis Bay & Madagascar.\n\nAUSTRAL-EAST INDIES LINE. (Ellerman and Bucknall S.S. Co., Ltd.) Sallings from Singapore og 6th of every month by \"City of Palerma or \"Maistine\" to Java, Fremantle, Adelaide, Melbourne nad Sydney, and vice versa. Through Freight and Passenger doakings from flong- tong in conjunction with \"Elterman\" Lice or other services.\n\nFor freight or passage on any of the above lines apply to:-\n\nTel. C. 4791 THE BANK LINE, LTD.\n\nBOSTON, NEW YORK & BALTIMORE.\n\nJOINT SERVICE OF THE\n\n\"BLUE FUNNEL\" LINE. KOCHAN BS, CO, LTD & CHINA MUTUA), S.8. Co., LTD.\n\nAND\n\nAMERICAN & MANCHURIAN LINK.\n\nELLERMAN & BUCKNALL 8.S. CO. LT).\n\nBAILINGS FROM BONOKONG\n\nrie Suez Canal\n\n8.. \"Laomedon\"\n\n6.5. \"Peteus\n\n5.8. \"Haivurnjan\"\n\nB.S. Teneer'\n\n1\n\n26th Augast.\n\n7 September.\n\n19th September.\n\n28th September.\n\nSteamers proceed vis Huer Chant or Panama Cagni st owners' option\n\nSubject to Change without notice.\n\nFor freight and particulses apply to:- BUTTERFIELD & SWIRE, or THE BANK LINE. 19. Bangkang,\n\nHongkong & Canton Jardine Matheson & Co. Ltd.\n\nCat1 du\n\nCOMPANIA TRANSATLANTICA DE BARCELONA Spanish Royal Mail Line For MANILA, SINGAPORE COLOMBO, SUÈL. PORT Sam, BARCELONA & other SPANISH PORTS.\n\n3.8.0. LOPEZ I LOPEZ\"\n\n3.5. ISLA DE PANATU\n\n8.8, LESAZгI\"\n\nBAJ\n\n... for Yokosms, Koba, Koji & Shanghai.\n\nS.8. 187. DE PANAY”\n\n33. \"LEGAZPI\n\n... 3rd September. 2046 Votober.\n\n18th December,\n\n.. 8th Octobe\n\n2. Ja, 1986.\n\n30th Nov.\n\nThe manors of this Company are all eisused 200 41 at Lloyd'e and ar modern cottrenience for the enzufort and safety of sha\n\nEtte with wards and Doctor carrisé.\n\nO. D. BA'RRETTO, LA..\n\nFor freight andjur pannage apply to-\n\nCentral Avenue, B. C. CANTON.\n\nBOTELHO KROS.\n\nAvezzanīra Bailding.\n\nHangkang", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-489N - Governor Sir Stubbs & Sir Clementi - 1925 [8-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 512260, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-506-7 Medical and sanitary reports- 1926 2-11-1927 - 28-2-1928", "page_number": 81, "title": "CO129-506-7 Medical and sanitary reports- 1926 2-11-1927 - 28-2-1928", "content_text": "107\n\nPromotions:-\n\nSecond Class Inspector J. Reid promoted to First Class Inspector as from 1st January 1926.\n\nInspector R. C. Witchell continued to act as Senior Inspector vice Senior Inspector R. Duncan on leave till 6th April 1926; afterwards acted as Senior Inspector vice Senior Inspector H. J. Knight on leave as from 7th April 1926 till 7th October 1926.\n\nInspector A. K. Taylor appointed to act as Senior Inspector vice Senior Inspector R. Duncan on leave as from 7th April 1926 till 15th September 1926.\n\nSecond Class Inspector J. G. Hooper promoted to First Class Inspector as from 1st October 1926.\n\nFirst Class (Acting Senior Inspector) R. C. Witchell promoted to Senior Inspector as from 8th October 1926.\n\nSecond Class Inspector S. Eccleshall promoted to First Class Inspector as from 8th October 1926.\n\nClerical Staff:\n\nMr. D. Davies, First Clerk and Assistant Secretary was on leave from 6th March to 30th October, Mr. J. Watson acted.\n\nFour Class VI Clerks were added.\n\nFor distribution of Staff see Appendix A.\n\n4. ADMINISTRATION. General Sanitary Work:-The area controlled by the Sanitary Board is limited to the Island of Hong Kong and to Kowloon and New Kowloon.\n\nFor the purpose of administering the Public Health and Buildings Ordinance the Island of Hong Kong is divided into the City of Victoria: its extension eastwards as far as and including Shaukiwan; the Hill District and the outlying villages of Aberdeen, Aplichau, Stanley and Taitam.\n\nThe City proper is divided into eastern, central, western-central and western districts each with a sanitary office, and subdivided into 12 Health Districts each with a Sanitary Inspector in charge, (see map A). The Hill District is worked in conjunction with Health District 3. The Shaukiwan extension has a Sanitary Inspector in charge. The Sanitary Inspector posted in Aberdeen is in charge of Aberdeen, Aplichau, Stanley and Taitam districts.\n\n9\n\nKowloon is divided into Kowloon peninsula, Shamshuipo and Kowloon City each with a sanitary office, and subdivided into seven Health Districts each with a Sanitary Inspector (see map B).\n\nScavenging and Nightsoil Removal:-For the purpose of Refuse Collection the City and Hill District is divided into three main districts East, Central and West, each with an Inspector in charge. There are two Inspectors in charge of Kowloon peninsula and the District Inspector of Health District 15 combines supervision of refuse collection with district work. The Inspector in charge of Shaukiwan Health District also supervises refuse collection in this district. The villages of Aberdeen, Aplichau, Stanley and Taitam are scavenged by contractors under supervision of the Sanitary Inspector in charge. Inspectors in charge of refuse collection also supervise the removal of nightsoil in this area; the removal itself is carried out by contractors.\n\nThe disposal of refuse from the City of Victoria and Kowloon is supervised by a Senior Sanitary Inspector who is also in charge of street-watering in Victoria. Kowloon street-watering is under the direction of the Inspector in charge of Scavenging (Kowloon).\n\nDisinfection:-For the purposes of disinfection of infected clothing there is a Disinfecting Station in Victoria and a Disinfecting Station in Kowloon each under the control of an Inspector. Transport is made by means of an infected-clothing motor van on either side. Use is also made of portable \"Sack\" Disinfectors.\n\nCemeteries:-Public cemeteries on Hong Kong Island and Kowloon are under the charge of a special Inspector and the Inspector in charge of Kowloon Disinfecting Station respectively.\n\nMarkets:-The Central and Western Markets are under an Overseer. Other markets are supervised by the local district Inspectors.\n\nVeterinary Work:-There is a Government depot at Kennedy Town (Hong Kong) for the reception of all cattle, sheep, swine, and goats brought into the Colony for slaughter. There are also Government Slaughter Houses at Kennedy Town and Ma Tau Kok (Kowloon) and controlled slaughter houses at Aberdeen and Sai Wan Ho at one of which all animals for food must be slaughtered. The Government depot and slaughter houses are under the direct charge of the Colonial Veterinary Surgeon and Assistant Colonial Veterinary Surgeon and a staff of four Inspectors. All beef in Hong Kong and Kowloon is conveyed from slaughter house to market in specially constructed motor vans.\n\n108", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-506-7 Medical and sanitary reports- 1926 2-11-1927 - 28-2-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 515629, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-511-12 Staff list for Hong Kong- approval for staff increase in Colonial Secretary's Office 15-6-1928 - 15-6-1928", "page_number": 6, "title": "CO129-511-12 Staff list for Hong Kong- approval for staff increase in Colonial Secretary's Office 15-6-1928 - 15-6-1928", "content_text": "assist in general confidential Secretarial work\n\nwhen not engaged in taking down and transcribing\n\nshorthand notes.\n\nI therefore, ask your covering authority\n\nfor this additional appointment and your sanction\n\nFor making the necessary provision in the\n\nEstimates for 1929.\n\n5.\n\nThe extra cost of those proposals during\n\n1928 would be $400 on account of Miss Thornhill,\n\nand a sum of $1,400 in respect of the salary of an\n\nadditional European lady Stenographer from 1st June,\n\nuntil the end of the year. To meet this expense\n\nthere are savings on the salary of the Chief Clerk\n\namounting to $3,600. Supplementary supply in aid\n\nof this vote will, however, be required to provide\n\nfor the pay of the Acting Colonial Secretary during\n\nmy absence on full pay leave.\n\n6.\n\nAs regards the officers who are classified\n\nunder the heading Senior Clerical and Accounting Staff\n\nI would invite reference to pages 3-6 of the\n\nenclosed staff list. The Class II officer,\n\nMr. Gelling, is now on leave, the two Class III\n\nofficers are Mr. Lang and Mr. Angus, and in addition\n\nto the probationer, Mr. Witchell, whose name\n\nappears in the Staff List, two other recently\n\nappointed probationers Messrs. Payne and Whitley\n\nare also employed. One of these assists with the\n\nclerical work in connection with matters referred to\n\nExecutive Council, and the other in the Confidential\n\nRegistry. There is thus an excess of two over the\n\nestablishment given in Appendix I of the Estimates,\n\nthere being a corresponding reduction of one in the\n\nprobationers", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-511-12 Staff list for Hong Kong- approval for staff increase in Colonial Secretary's Office 15-6-1928 - 15-6-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 515636, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-511-12 Staff list for Hong Kong- approval for staff increase in Colonial Secretary's Office 15-6-1928 - 15-6-1928", "page_number": 14, "title": "CO129-511-12 Staff list for Hong Kong- approval for staff increase in Colonial Secretary's Office 15-6-1928 - 15-6-1928", "content_text": "HONG KONG,—Continued.\n\nSENIOR CLERICAL & ACCOUNTING STAFF,-Continued.\n\nAsst. Storekeeper, Police Dept.\n\nAssistant Superintendent of Mails, General Post Office.\n\nClerk to Chief Justice.\n\nAssistant Accountant, Treasury. Assistant Accountant, Police Dept.\n\n \n £210\n Clerk, Colonial Secretary's Office.\n £210\n Clerk, Kowloon Magistracy.\n £210\n \n \n \n Clerk, Colonial Secretary's Office.\n \n Vote Service Ledger Clerk, Public Works Department.\n \n \n\n \n Name\n Date of Appointment\n Scale of Salary\n Salary on incremental date 1928\n \n \n R. G. Witchell\n 12th July, '26\n Scale of class\n \n \n \n F. D. Angus\n \n do.\n $1,200 | Colonial Secretary's Office.\n \n \n G. H. Fowler\n 1st Nov., '27\n do.\n $1,050 | Sanitary Department.\n \n \n Vacancy\n \n Probationers $900 to $1,500\n $1,050 | Treasury.\n \n\n*Not entitled to rent or passage allowances.\n\n \n Name\n Date of Appointment\n Scale of Salary\n Salary on incremental date 1928\n \n \n W. G. Harrison\n 9th April, '23\n Scale of class\n £290\n \n \n T. Lay\n 1st May, '25\n do.\n £260\n \n \n R. W. H. Maynard\n 1st Jan., '26\n do.\n £240\n \n \n H. S. Martin\n \n \n \n \n \n R. Dormer\n 2nd Mar., '26\n do.\n £240\n \n \n J. C. Lang\n 10th May, '26\n do.\n £240\n \n \n W. F. Kerr\n 1st Jan., '27\n do.\n \n \n \n H. Angus\n 1st Jan., '27\n do.\n \n \n \n J. Hosford*\n 1st June, '26\n do.\n £260\n \n \n 1 Vacancy\n \n \n \n \n\n— 7 —\n\nHONG KONG,—Continued.\n\nSECRETARIAT.\n\n \n Col. Sec.\n \n £2,000\n \n \n Asst. Col. Sec.\n \n \n \n \n 2nd Asst. Col. Sec.\n \n \n \n \n 3rd Asst. Col. Sec.\n \n \n \n \n Cadet Officer.\n W. T. Southorn, C.M.G.\n \n \n \n Cadet Officer.\n \n \n \n \n Cadet Officer.\n \n \n \n\nSECRETARIAT FOR CHINESE AFFAIRS.\n\n \n Sec. for Chinese Affairs.\n £1,500.\n £1,250-£50-\n \n \n E.R. Hallifax, C.M.G., C.B.E.\n Nov. 29, '12.\n \n \n \n Chief Asst. to Sec. for Chinese Affairs.\n Cadet Officer.\n \n \n \n 3rd Asst. to Sec. for Chinese Affairs.\n Cadet Officer.\n \n \n \n 2nd Asst. to Sec. for Chinese Affairs.\n Cadet Officer.\n \n \n \n Labour Inspector of Juvenile\n £400-£20-£480.\n \n \n \n F. Meade,\n Jan. 1, '23.\n \n \n\nAUDIT DEPARTMENT.\n\n \n Auditor\n £650-£50-£900\n T. Dallin,\n July 30, '10.\n \n \n Assistant Auditor\n £950-£50-£1,200\n H. R. Phelips,\n Nov. 1, '04.\n \n \n 2nd Assist. Auditor\n £400-£600\n by C. H. G. Bradley,\n Sept. 11, '25.\n \n \n \n and 3 of £50, increments of £25 two annual\n \n \n \n\n17", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-511-12 Staff list for Hong Kong- approval for staff increase in Colonial Secretary's Office 15-6-1928 - 15-6-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 515645, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-511-12 Staff list for Hong Kong- approval for staff increase in Colonial Secretary's Office 15-6-1928 - 15-6-1928", "page_number": 23, "title": "CO129-511-12 Staff list for Hong Kong- approval for staff increase in Colonial Secretary's Office 15-6-1928 - 15-6-1928", "content_text": "24\n\nHONG KONG,—Continued.\n\nSANITARY DEPARTMENT,\n\nHead of Sanitary Dept.\n\nCadet Officer.\n\nAsst. Head of Sanitary Dept.\n\nCadet Officer.\n\nMedical Officer of Health.\n\n \n £600-£25-£1,000\n G. W. Pope, L.L.M., R.C.P, and s... D.P.H., R.C.P. and s.\n Oct. 25, 26.\n \n\nVeterinary Surgeon...\n\n \n £600-£25-£1,000\n W. J. E. Mackenzie, M.R.C.V.S.,\n Sept. 27, '20,\n $1,000 pers.\n \n\nAsst. Veterinary Surgeon.\n\n \n £500-£20-£600\n M. J. Reidy,\n Dec. 10, '24.\n \n\nSupt. of Staff and Works.\n\n \n £500-£25-£600\n P. T. Lamble,\n Jan. 1, '23.\n \n\nSecretary, Sanitary Board\n\nAsst. Secretary, Sanitary Board\n\nSenior Clerical & Accounting Staff.\n\nSenior Clerical & Accounting Staff.\n\n \n 5 Senior Sanitary Inspectors.\n £400-£20-£480\n J. A. Lyon, Jan. 1, '20,\n \n \n \n \n C. E. Frith, Aug. 1, '23.\n \n \n \n \n R. Duncan, Jan. 18, '25.\n \n \n \n \n R. C. Witchell, Oct. 8, '26.\n \n \n \n \n A. K. Taylor, Jan. 1, '27.\n \n\n \n 13 1st Class Sanitary Inspectors.\n £320-£10-£360\n S. Kelly, Jan. 1, '20.\n \n \n \n \n L. Brewer, Feb. 14, '20.\n \n \n \n \n R. R. Wood, May 1, '22.\n \n \n \n \n W. Old, Aug. 5, '22.\n \n \n \n \n H. E. Strange, Dec. 1, '23.\n \n \n \n \n H. L. Lockhart, Dec. 1, '24.\n \n \n \n \n G. E. Roylance, Feb. 1, '25.\n \n \n \n \n H. J. Millington, Feb. 1, '25.\n \n \n \n \n J. Reid, Jan. 1, '26.\n \n \n \n \n J. G. Hooper, Oct. 1, '26.\n \n \n \n \n S. Eccleshall, Oct. 7, '26.\n \n \n \n \n E. Savage, Jan. 1, '27.\n \n \n \n \n W. Thomson, April 12, '13\n \n \n \n \n F. Aslett, Feb. 1, '27.\n \n\n33 2nd Class Sanitary Inspectors.\n\n \n £220-£10-£300\n W. Hill, June 23, '13.\n \n \n \n M. Blake, May 16, '21.\n \n \n \n E. C. Kerrison, Aug. 7, '22.\n \n \n \n J. J. Gregory, Oct. 16, '22.\n \n \n \n F. W. Bradley, Jan. 1, '23.\n \n \n \n W. Elliott, July 7, '23.\n \n \n \n B. J. Murray, Jan. 1, '24.\n \n \n \n P. E. Knight, Jan. 1, '24.\n \n \n \n C. Strange, Jan. 4, '24.\n \n \n \n R. A. Smith, Feb. 1, '24.\n \n \n \n L. J. Morley, April 24, '24.\n \n \n \n E. A. Lyne, Jan. 2, '25.\n \n \n \n R. H. Thomas, Jan. 17, '25.\n \n \n \n A. W. Charity, Feb. 13, '25.\n \n \n \n J. Hughes, July 31, '25.\n \n \n \n A. T. Braley, Oct. 9, '25.\n \n \n \n E. N. Ponsford, Mar. 29, '26.\n \n \n \n T. Armstrong, July 16, '26.\n \n \n \n D. W. Phillips, July 29, '26.\n \n \n \n T. Seddon, Aug. 13, '26.\n \n \n \n G. H. Miles, Mar. 10, '27.\n \n \n \n W. C. R. Lamprill, May 1, '27.\n \n \n \n A. E. Murphy, June 27, '27.\n \n \n \n G. H. Sherriff, Aug. 1, '27.\n \n \n \n T. H. W. King, Aug. 15, '27.\n \n \n \n A. C. Sinton, Sept. 17, '27.\n \n \n \n H. G. Stevens, Oct. 1, '27.\n \n \n \n G. Frost, Oct. 24, '27.\n \n \n \n S. G. Poole, Oct. 29, '27.\n \n \n \n 3 vacancies.\n \n\n25\n\nHONG KONG,—Continued.\n\nSANITARY DEPARTMENT,—Continued.\n\nBOTANICAL AND FORESTRY DEPARTMENT.\n\nSuperintendent\n\n \n £600-£20-£800\n Harold Green, April 6, '20,\n \n\nAsst. Superintendent\n\n \n £400-£10-£500\n G. B. Twemlow, Jan. 1, '27.\n \n\n \n £20-£10-£300\n J. R. Carr, Jan. 1, '27.\n \n \n \n J. J. Hirst, June 1, '27.\n \n\nSupervisor\n\nAsst. Supervisor\n\n$1,800\n\n35", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-511-12 Staff list for Hong Kong- approval for staff increase in Colonial Secretary's Office 15-6-1928 - 15-6-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 515779, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-511-17 Proposals for increase of rates of pay of senior clerical and accounting staff 15-8-1928 - 15-8-1928", "page_number": 11, "title": "CO129-511-17 Proposals for increase of rates of pay of senior clerical and accounting staff 15-8-1928 - 15-8-1928", "content_text": "3- \n\n11 \n\nCleri, Government Marine Surveyor's Office.\n\nDeputy Superintendent, Money Order Office.\n\nVote Service Ledger Clerk, Public Works Department.\n\nSupernumeraries.\n\nCLASS III $250-$15-$385, '(continued).\n\na \n\n(Mr. Murry-Sanitary Inspector acting).\n\nPresent salaries.\n\n$325 (Mr. Osborne)\n\n$290 (Mr. Hosford) (from 1.6.24)\n\n$270 (Mr. Kerr, acting 1st Clerk Kowloon Magistracy).\n\n$210 (Mr. Ogilvie in training in Audit Department).\n\n$200 \n\n*From 1st January, 1929.\n\nPROBATIONERS $900-$150-$1500.\n\nR.G. Witchell, (Attached Colonial Secretary's Office). $1200\n\nF.D. Angus, (Attached Colonial Secretary's Office). $1050\n\nG.H. Fowler, (Attached Treasury). $1050\n\nG.R. Payne, (Attached Colonial Secretary's Office). $900\n\nT.H.V. Hurst, (Attached Colonial Secretary's Office). To be promoted on 1. 1. 29 to Class III). $900\n\nT.S.D. Whitley, (Attached Supreme Court). $1500", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-511-17 Proposals for increase of rates of pay of senior clerical and accounting staff 15-8-1928 - 15-8-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 516063, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-511-4 Application for posts at University of Hong Kong- payment and conditions of Service 28-4-1928 - 6-9-1928", "page_number": 81, "title": "CO129-511-4 Application for posts at University of Hong Kong- payment and conditions of Service 28-4-1928 - 6-9-1928", "content_text": "# JESUS COLLEGE, OXFORD.\n\nOffice of Spence Enquiries Reports.\nBoard of Education,\nWhitchall, S.W.1.\n\nDear Sir,\n\nWhen he was at Oxford, Mr. D. F. Davies was my pupil at Jesus College for Honour Moderations in mathematics. I have since been responsible for his general supervision. I have no doubt that Mr. Davies will perform the duties entrusted to him with exemplary conscientiousness and thoroughness. He has always shown an excellent character. Intellectually, I think he is rather better than his degree shows. He came up to Oxford very young and was under age when he took his degree, taking only three years for what is normally regarded as a four-year course. I cannot pretend that he is athletic, but I shall be very surprised if he does not show a \n\n## Confidential\n\n86 \nLecturer in Physics \nCA. no. 84 2 \n43.\n\nCASIR. \nUniversity of Hong Kong \nread", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-511-4 Application for posts at University of Hong Kong- payment and conditions of Service 28-4-1928 - 6-9-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 556927, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-566-21 Military contributions 7-5-1938 - 31-1-1939", "page_number": 1, "title": "CO129-566-21 Military contributions 7-5-1938 - 31-1-1939", "content_text": "53538\n\n1958\n\n613\n\n53558\n\nCLOSED UNTIL\n\nPrevious\n\n101\n\n53538/37\n\nMilitary O 12 Contribution.\n\nh Gev 129/524121 ut 3 Mh. Cowell > Cowell 13 On Dave 14 Subsequent 53538/39 445.\n\n183 Mr Rogers Los in yest 10 Rin R·83 22/1 R.298 238 R$3 Painting Dept. 99 Rm. 83. 12/11 Mr Rogers 3/1 The Geat cy In Howard 15/11 New Coney Is ...... In & Moore 15 2.83. 46/4 Hy Cowell 16 77 A 294 Mbowell 26 8.3. 24/2 Cambry Dope 22/3 Rm 83 283 2015 m. Witchell 31/5 R.83 2 347 ....... R.72 RG1 8583. ران At Rign up h The Gent Gent 40/4 u, Walker 24/7 Lu Howard pe Cowell 47 u halden 25.7 Sutt Mouse 2 für Clinderton, 30]] Mr. Galeworthy 298 2203 d R83. 18/0 I Mr. Rogers B/N 97 22 29753 LD 4/4/39. Rm.83 9/1 10/1 3 s den 2/r\n\nFILE A. \"Mr. Dale (21937) 25670/60 8,000 10/3 M. & S., Ltd Gp.641\n\n+", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-566-21 Military contributions 7-5-1938 - 31-1-1939.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 564305, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "page_number": 2, "title": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "content_text": "## Cr \n### Financial \n\n**Gov. 241** \n31.3.39 \n\n(Requests approval for $104.17 salary overpaid to Mr. R. Witchell) \n\nUnless DTCA have any objection, I put copy of (i) on file.\n\n**Punted** \n53307 CR. \n61036 \nNis Andrews \n24.iv.39 \n\nI do not altogether follow the procedure. It seems to conflict with the letter Desp of 8.10.36 (102 of Gen6151/19/36) which HK did not acknowledge. I don't think a head of department ought to be saddled with responsibility as to how payments are arranged.\n\nRefer to this wire, desp.\n\nIt is not regarded as desirable that payments should be made without special banking accounts except under formal authority from Treasury. When a payment has been made under such authority, the subsequent signing of a paylist by the Department is unnecessary, as the acknowledgment adequately vouches the charge.\n\nI. Wark \n26/4/39", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 564306, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "page_number": 3, "title": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "content_text": "## (GIB)\n\nNo. 3470/24.\n\nI agree with Mr. Walker's minute about the payment of salaries, but I am in some doubt as to whether in this particular case the Officer's Head of Department (or whoever authorised the payment of Mr. Witchell's salary into the Bank for the month of December 1938), was not guilty of negligence.\n\nThe effective date of dismissal might conceivably take a short while to be fixed by the Administration, but the payment of his salary while the matter was, (presumably) under consideration must have been due to an unfortunate oversight (to put it at its best).\n\n**A. J. Harding** \nDirector of Colonial Audit.\n\n...\n\nI am ... puzzled ...\n\n**S. J. James** \n545-", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 564311, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "page_number": 8, "title": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "content_text": "## 1939\n\n4 H.K.338. \n15.5.39. \nNeps (2) - requests approval for writing off of further deficiencies.\n\n5 H.K.347. \n17.5.39 \nRequesting merits off of $292.54.\n\nDESTROYED UNDER STATUTE\n\n6 H.K.361. \n20.5.39 \nReports loss of $5.78 in urinative indented.\n\nDESTROYED UNDER STATUTE\n\n4 \nThe irregularities committed by Mr. Witchell have led to greater deficiencies than was supposed (see D.C.A.'s minute of 23/5). \nSerially, the Ex. states that had a proper system of control existed in the Passport Office, it should not have been possible for an officer in Mr. Witchell's position to commit these irregularities; but improvements in the system of control have now been introduced on the advice of the Auditor. \nMr. Witchell is now in Canada & without means. \nIn these circumstances, it should hardly be opportune for H.M. to prosecute Mr. Witchell.\n\nI am not sure whether the Sec. seeks approval for the writing off of $1,155.78 + $1,759.04 = $2,914.82, or whether the Probable Loss Country's Own of $1,100 is also to be included, making a total of $2,857.04 + $1,100 (though this total is not explicitly stated, it seems to be a possible interpretation).\n\n? Approve the writing off of these sums.\n\nA.N. Galsworthy \n13/6\n\nThis does not deal with the question of responsibility for the apparent lack of control over the revenue collected.\n\nI think we should push on this point: someone should be reprimanded at least.\n\nPara 3 of Audit R. Report references in detail a deficiency of $280.\n\n? ask what this showed not be included as part of deficiency.\n\n3. Para 4 of Audit R. Receipts without application forms. The Auditor does not say these have not been brought to account. If they have...\n\n(4) of para 2 of despatch does not represent, as stated in para 3 of despatch, confirmation that cash has not been brought to account in respect of these receipts.\n\nI ask for means of check of...(During the absence of means of check, the lost revenue may be greater than the despatch suggests).\n\nNos 5 & 6. No comments. (I have suggested that title losses like No 6 should be reported. At present, they must be).\n\n16/4/39 \nPage 9\n\nAs regards No 4, I agree.\n\nComments on Nos Feb.\n\nPage 10\n\nNo dds. \n19 Jun; 1985. \n586\n\nReply to Gov. \nmenting as or Walker advised.\n\nTROY\n\n7 20 Hong Kong - N.261. 5 Am. \nSTATUTE\n\n8 To Hong Kong. N:257-6 and. \n1/24h \n17me \n338\n\n## 1939\n\n| Date | Reference | Description |\n|------------|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------|\n| 14.7.39 | (Refce. 213. Reports return sentence of the Witchell) | H. H.K. Wickly hess - 23.6.39 Done |\n| 8.3. | J.C.Aither | The dupl. of (10) should be filed |\n| | | 53307 CR. |\n\nis Walker may be interested to see (10) + (11).\n\nGfy 9 No 3 läker \n10-8-89 \nbe interested \nNiS Andrews \n5/8 at once\n\nPage 10 \nPage 11", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 564313, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "page_number": 12, "title": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "content_text": "## 13. Extract from despatch Gov. 677.\n\n12\n\n24.10.39.\n\nRef 9. Information will be forwarded at an early date. Mr. R. G. Witchell returned to Hong Kong on 17th June, was arrested, and sentenced on... We can... await the further check. This extract is based on the Governor's comment on the Auditor's reference to the case in his Report for 1938.\n\n## 14. Govt.\n\nThe Audit indicated that the sale had been walked through to approve the writing off of losses incurred. \n\n| Date | Ref |\n| --- | --- |\n| 19/2/40 | 117/202/61 |\n| 6.2.40 | ... |\n\nAs of 9th, information regarding Mr. R. G. Witchell. Apparently no one can be blamed for the irregularities committed by Mr. Witchell except that there was no proper system of control and he, Mr. W., took advantage of the position to defraud. He borrowed... \n\nThe Gov. states that he is now satisfied that the new system should be satisfactory, and all that remains is for the Secretary to approve the write-off of $260 in respect of 19 vouchers made without approval of $280.\n\n`444/21/40`", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 564317, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "page_number": 16, "title": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "content_text": "# No. 61.\n\n## GOVERNMENT HOUSE, HONG KONG, 6th February, 1940.\n\n### Enclosure No.1.\n\n**Aura:**\n\nSir,\n\nWith reference to your despatch No.283 of 28th July, 1939, regarding further deficiencies in the accounts of the Passport Office, I have the honour to inform you that on Mr. Witchell's return to this Colony from Canada he was prosecuted in respect of the defalcations and pleaded guilty to six charges of embezzlement. He was sentenced on 17th June, 1939, to a total of six months hard labour.\n\n2. I enclose a copy of a report by the Auditor dated 16th February, 1939, which I regret was omitted from my despatch No.338 of 15th May, 1939. From this it will be seen that the further loss of $280 referred to in paragraph 3 of your despatch under reference should have been included as part of the deficiency, and I would request your approval of the writing-off of this sum also. The cash in respect of the nineteen receipts referred to in paragraph 4 of your despatch was brought to account.\n\n3. Inquiry goes to show that while passports were dealt with in the Colonial Secretary's Office no effective supervision was exercised over the Passport Clerk beyond a check by the Chief Clerk to ensure that the amounts shown on \n\n**THE RIGHT HONOURABLE MALCOLM MACDONALD, M.P., &C., &C., &C.** \n\n16", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 564318, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "page_number": 17, "title": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "content_text": "## \n2 \n\n- \n18 \n\nEncl. No.2. \n\nMiscellaneous Receipts counterfoils had been paid into the Bank and that receipts had been obtained. I enclose a copy of the instructions which were handed to Mr. Witchell when he took over these duties. \n\nWhen passports came to be issued by the Police, the same measure of independence prevailed, Mr. Witchell being left with entire responsibility on the financial side. \n\nI cannot defend this laxity of control, but, reprehensible though it was, I do not think that any individual officer can be regarded so blame-worthy as to be reprimanded on its account. The system in use in the Passport Office was of old standing and had come to be accepted without question by all concerned. \n\nThe accounting side was seriously defective by reason of the absence of subsidiary registers or permanent records designed to prevent the suppression of documents, etc., on which fees were payable. This defect, however, also had continued for many years without attention being drawn to it. \n\n4. \nI am satisfied that the system now in operation, if rigidly adhered to, affords a reasonable safeguard against suppression of documents and misappropriation of moneys collected. \n\n5. \nI deeply regret the delay in replying to your despatch: it is principally attributable to the outbreak of war and the additional heavy work entailed thereby. \n\nI have the honour to be, \nSir, \nYour most obedient, humble servant, \n**Governor**", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 564328, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "page_number": 27, "title": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "content_text": "# on \n`1/53684/39` \n\n**EXTRACT FROM DESPATCH NO. 677 FROM THE GOVERNOR OF HONG KONG TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE COLONIES** \n\n**DATED 24TH OCTOBER 1939** \n\nPage 13 \nPage 28 \n\nParagraph 82(4). I would refer to correspondence ending with your despatch No. 283 of 28th July last. This requested further particulars which are being obtained and will, it is hoped, be forwarded at an early date. \n\nI would add that Mr. R.G. Witchell returned to the Colony under a Canadian deportation order on 2nd June last. He was arrested and charged on six counts of which copies are attached. He pleaded guilty on all counts and on 17th June was sentenced to six months imprisonment on each count the sentences to run concurrently.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 564329, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "page_number": 28, "title": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "content_text": "# Copy of Charges against Mr. Robert George Witchell\n\n## 1. Embezzlement by Clerk or Servant\n\nSec. 31(2)(b) of Ord. 32 of 1935.\n\nRobert George Witchell on or about the 25th September, 1938, at Victoria in this Colony being a Public Servant, to wit, a Clerk in the Senior Clerical and Accounting Staff of the Hong Kong Government, did embezzle the sum of $11.00 received by you by virtue of your office.\n\n## 2. Embezzlement by Clerk or Servant\n\nSec. 31(2)(b) of Ord. 32 of 1935.\n\nRobert George Witchell on or about the 21st September, 1938, at Victoria in this Colony, being a Public Servant, to wit a Clerk in the Senior Clerical and Accounting Staff of the Hong Kong Government, did embezzle the sum of $11.00 received by you by virtue of your office.\n\n## 3. Embezzlement by Clerk or Servant\n\nSec. 31(2)(b) of Ord. 32 of 1935.\n\nRobert George Witchell on or about the 2nd June, 1938, at Victoria in this Colony, being a Public Servant, to wit, a Clerk in the Senior Clerical and Accounting Staff of the Hong Kong Government, did embezzle the sum of $11.00 received by you by virtue of your office.\n\n## 4. Embezzlement by Clerk or Servant\n\nSec. 31(2)(b) of Ord. 32 of 1935.\n\nRobert George Witchell on or about 1st June, 1938, at Victoria in this Colony, being a Public Servant, to wit, a Clerk in the Senior Clerical and Accounting Staff of the Hong Kong Government, did embezzle the sum of $11.00 received by you by virtue of your office.\n\n## 5. Embezzlement by Clerk or Servant\n\nSec. 31(2)(b) of Ord. 32 of 1935.\n\nRobert George Witchell on or about the 19th May, 1938, at Victoria in this Colony, being a Public Servant, to wit, a Clerk in the Senior Clerical and Accounting Staff of the Hong Kong Government, did embezzle the sum of $11.00 received by you by virtue of your office.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 564330, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "page_number": 29, "title": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "content_text": "## \n5. \nThat you, Robert George Witchell, on the 18th day of February, 1938, at Victoria in this Colony, being a Public Servant, to wit, a Clerk in the Senior Clerical and Accounting Staff at the Hong Kong Government, did embezzle the sum of $11.00 received by you by virtue of your office.\n\n6. \nEmbezzlement.\n**Sec. 31 (2) (b) of Ord. 32 of 1935**.\n\nRobert George Witchell on the 18th February, 1938, at Victoria in this Colony, being a Public Servant, to wit, a clerk in Senior Clerical and Accounting Staff of Hong Kong Government, did embezzle the sum of $4.00 received by you by virtue of your office.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 564331, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "page_number": 30, "title": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "content_text": "# No. 494.\n\nSir,\n\n33521/57 \n10 \n31\n\n**GOVERNMENT HOUSE, \nHONG KONG, \n14th July, 1939.**\n\nI have the honour to refer to correspondence ending with your despatch No.199 dated 5th June, 1939, regarding the dismissal of R.G. Witchell, late of Class III, Senior Clerical and Accounting Staff, and to inform you that R.G. Witchell has returned to this Colony. He was charged with and pleaded guilty to six counts of embezzlement by a public servant, and was sentenced to three months hard labour on the first count, three months hard labour (consecutive) on the second count and three months hard labour on each of the other counts, the latter to run concurrently.\n\nI have the honour to be, \nSir, \nYour most obedient, humble servant, \n**And-Motherton** \nGovernor.\n\nTHE RIGHT HONOURABLE \nMALCOLM MACDONALD, M.P., \n&c., \n&c., \n&c.\n\nPage 30 \nPage 31", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 564334, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "page_number": 33, "title": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "content_text": "# No. 338.\n\nSEEN BY DEPT 27/5 2/6\n\nSir,\n\n26 MAY 1939\n\n62621/39\n\nGOVERNMENT HOUSE, HONG KONG.\n15th May, 1939.\n\nI have the honour to refer to my despatch No.294 of 20th April, 1939, on the subject of the writing off of certain fees in connection with the issue of passports and visas which have not been brought to account, the failure to do so being attributed to irregularities committed by Mr. R. G. Witchell, formerly of the Senior Clerical and Accounting Staff. I have now to seek your approval for the writing off of certain more extensive deficiencies which, although they had been reported upon by the Auditor, had not been brought to my notice at the time my despatch under reference was written. I would express my apologies for this oversight, which has made it necessary to trouble you with a further despatch on the subject.\n\n2. I enclose a copy of a full report on the matter by the Assistant Auditor, which shows the following results:-\n \n| Item | Description | Amount |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| (a) | 118 application forms filed but not accounted for | $1,155.78 |\n| (b) | 117 application forms missing from files | not less than $1,100 |\n\nTHE RIGHT HONOURABLE HALCOLM MACDONALD, M.P.,\n&c., &c., &c.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 564335, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "page_number": 34, "title": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "content_text": "35 \n\n? \n\n2 \n\n(c) 19 receipts had been issued in respect of Visa applications, the forms for which are missing. The amount represented by these receipts is $203.26 (Enclosure IV to report). \n\nWith regard to item (c), it is possible that some, if not all, of these receipts relate to certain of the missing forms reported as missing under (b), but even if the whole sum is set off against the $1,100 mentioned, there would remain a substantial balance unaccounted for. It is not possible to set off any item under (c) against the deficiencies recorded under (a). \n\n3. \n\nThese deficiencies may have been caused by one or more of three irregularities, that is, failure to bring to account fees actually received, failure to collect fees properly due from applicants, and the simple mislaying or abstraction of forms. It is not possible to say with certainty exactly how much of the deficiencies is accounted for by these various irregularities, but it may be regarded as practically certain that there has been loss of revenue to the amounts stated in (a) and (c) above, and probably some additional loss under (b). There can be little doubt that Mr. Witchell was responsible for the whole of these irregularities, although if a proper system of control in the Passport Office had existed, it should not have been possible for an officer in Mr. Witchell's position to commit them. Improvements in the system of control have now been introduced on the advice of the Auditor; final details are not yet completely agreed upon, and I will report further when a final agreement has been reached. \n\n26. The information received shows that Mr. Witchell is now in Canada and without means. The possibility of", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 564336, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "page_number": 35, "title": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "content_text": "(1) \n(*) \n3 \n36 \n\nThe prospect of successful prosecution is under consideration, but \nI am advised that unless Mr. Witchell returns to this \nColony the cost of proceedings would be too great to \nwarrant them. \n\n5. I have to request your approval for the writing off of the deficiencies referred to in this despatch as well as those reported in my despatches Nos.241 of 31st March, 1939, and 294 of 20th April, 1939. \n\nI have the honour to be, \nSir, \nYour most obedient, humble servant, \nJ. A. Hathert \nGovernor.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 564352, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "page_number": 51, "title": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "content_text": "# 52 \n\n53521/39. \n\nMay. 1939. \n\nSir, \n\nI have etc. to ack. the receipt of your despatch No. 241 of the 31st March and to convey to you my approval of the writing off of the sum of $104.17 in respect of salary overpaid to Mr. R.G. Witchell, until lately an officer of Class III of the Senior Clerical and Accounting Staff.\n\n2. I have also to acknowledge the receipt of your despatch No. 294 of the 20th April, and to inform you \n\n## FURTHER ACTION.\n\n| Despatch No. | Date | Weight | Quantity | Date | T.S. |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| *801-150* | Wt. 13952-47 | 10,000 | 6/37 | T.S. 695 | \n| *1426-150* | Wt. 27532-64 | 15,000 | 11/37 | T.S. 695 |", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 564353, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "page_number": 52, "title": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "content_text": "# \n\nYou that I approve the writing off of a further sum of $14 being fees in connection with the issue of passports and visas which have not been properly brought to account, an irregularity which is believed to have been due to Mr. Witchell's fraud or negligence.\n\n## 3.\n\nIn connection with the arrangements for the payment of the salaries of officers on short leave, which is dealt with in paragraph 4 of your despatch No. 241W of the 31st March, I am advised that it is not regarded as desirable that payments should be made into an officer's banking account except under formal authority from the officer, and when a payment has been made under such authority, the subsequent signing of a paylist is unnecessary, as the acknowledgment of the Bank adequately vouches the charge.\n\nI have, etc.,\n\nOLM MacDONALD", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 564354, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "page_number": 53, "title": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "content_text": "# No. 294\n\n139\n\n**GOVERNMENT HOUSE, \nHONG KONG.** \n\n20th April, 1939.\n\nSir,\n\nWith reference to my despatch No. 241 dated 31st March, 1939, regarding the writing off of part of the salary overpaid to Mr. R.G. Witchell formerly of the Senior Clerical and Accounting Staff, I have the honour to request your authority to write off the further sum of fourteen dollars, being fees in connection with the issue of passports and visas which have not been properly brought to account. Investigations show that this irregularity occurred during Mr. Witchell's service in the Passport Office and while he was responsible for the issue of receipts; there is therefore good reason to believe that it was due to his fraud or negligence. A thorough check of the accounts of the Passport Office was conducted after Mr. Witchell was dismissed and measures have been introduced to prevent the recurrence of similar irregularities. It is not however considered that any action could usefully be taken against Mr. Witchell, although his whereabouts have now been located in Canada, unless more extensive defalcations should come to light.\n\nI have the honour to be, \n**THE RIGHT HONOURABLE \nMALCOLM MACDONALD, M.P.,** \n&c., &c., &c.\n\nSir, \nYour most obedient, humble servant, \n**J.C. CATERTHRO** \nGovernor.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 564355, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "page_number": 54, "title": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "content_text": "No 241.\n\nSir,\n\n5252/39/55\n\n**GOVERNMENT HOUSE, HONG KONG.**\n\n31st March, 1939.\n\nIn accordance with Colonial Regulation 278 I have the honour to request your authority for the writing off of $104.17 salary overpaid to Mr. R.G. Witchell, until lately an officer of Class III of the Senior Clerical and Accounting Staff.\n\n2.\n\nMr. Witchell was granted twelve days' casual leave on grounds of private affairs by the head of his department, the Commissioner of Police, on 25th November, 1938. On 14th December, 1938, he was reported not to have returned and subsequent enquiries indicated that he had left Shanghai (his original destination) for some unknown place.\n\n3.\n\nHe was accordingly treated as having been dismissed as from 8th December, 1938. Before this could be made effective, however, his salary for December had been paid, in accordance with the usual practice, together with many other salaries into the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation to the credit of his account. The necessary legal steps were taken and the bulk of the overpaid salary was recovered; but there remain $60.14 not recoverable together with $44.03 legal fees to be reimbursed,\n\nThe Right Honourable \nMalcolm Macdonald, M.P., \n&C., \n&C., \n&C.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 564356, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "page_number": 55, "title": "CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940", "content_text": "## 2.\n\n56 END \nmaking a total of $104.17 as stated.\n\n## 4.\nSalary paid locally during an officer's absence on leave is of course normally covered by a Power of Attorney which sufficiently safeguards the Government, but in the case of short leave, such as the one in question it has been usual to make payments into banking accounts in anticipation of the subsequent signing of a paysheet. I have taken steps to ensure that this will in future only be allowed on the personal responsibility of the head of the department.\n\n## 5.\nMr. Witchell has of course sacrificed all claims to pension or other benefits from his twelve years' service.\n\nI have the honour to be, \nSir, \nYour most obedient, humble servant, \n**Governor**", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-5 Passport Office- authorisation for writing off deficiencies 31-3-1939 - 19-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 565048, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-576-5 Hong Kong University 13-6-1939 - 23-11-1939", "page_number": 157, "title": "CO129-576-5 Hong Kong University 13-6-1939 - 23-11-1939", "content_text": "## 179\n\n| Item | Description | Cost |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| (xii) | Lecturer in Economics [para. 76 (v)] | $5,500 |\n| (xiii) | Libraries—additional expenditure [para. 78] | $22,000 |\n| (xiv) | Scholarships [para. 70 (ii)] direct cost to University (56 at $700) | $39,200 |\n\n80. It is difficult to give a firm estimate of the total cost of those developments. The more good Chinese the University can appoint, the greater the economy, and, provided the essentially British quality of the University is maintained, the better its appeal to China. Assuming a maximum recruitment of Chinese lecturers, the sterling cost yearly would be £4,190 and the dollar cost about $213,400. Assuming the other extreme, our inability to find good Chinese lecturers, the cost yearly would be £6,515 and the dollar expenditure about $194,000. At $16 to the pound, the extremes of costs in dollars would be $280,000 and $298,500. To this, provision for Provident Fund payments and other charges should be added, averaging 15% on dollar salaries and 40% on sterling salaries, thus increasing the minimum estimate above by $40,000 and the maximum approximately by $52,000 to $320,000 and $350,000.\n\n81. We have proposed a contingency in which the University should be willing to develop teaching in Electrical and Mechanical Engineering. If this were done, the University would have to be prepared to face the following additional expenditure:\n\n| Item | Description | Cost |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| (i) | Lecturer in Electrical Engineering (Chinese) | $5,500 |\n| (ii) | Demonstrator in Electrical Engineering | $3,190 |\n| (iii) | Additional equipment for Electrical Engineering | $16,000 |\n| (iv) | Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering (£800) | $12,800 |\n| | Total | $37,490 |\n\n## 47\n\nIn conclusion, we desire to thank the Heads of University Departments who wrote memoranda and discussed them with us; the Hon. Dr. P. S. Selwyn Clarke for his advice; Dr. Chu, the Dean of Faculties at Lingnam University, for his cooperation; Mr. W. B. Finnigan, the Secretary of the Committee, and Miss V. M. Witchell, who made records and transcripts of the proceedings of all meetings.\n\n**D. J. Sloss** \n**N. L. Smith** \n**S. Caine** \n**R. Kotewall** \n**Han Lih Wu** \n**Ronald Hongkong** \n**T. Cooney, S.J.** \n**W. H. Lock** \n**C. G. Sollis** \n**Li Tse Fong** \n**R. K. M. Simpson** \n**W. Faid** \n**L. T. Ride**\n\nThis, with Provident Fund provision, would raise our maximum estimate of expenditure to about $394,000.\n\n## 180", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-576-5 Hong Kong University 13-6-1939 - 23-11-1939.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 565265, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-577-4 Report to the Director of Colonial Audit- 1938 24-10-1939 - 7-3-1940", "page_number": 13, "title": "CO129-577-4 Report to the Director of Colonial Audit- 1938 24-10-1939 - 7-3-1940", "content_text": "## Enclosure No. 2\n\nParagraph 69. General Order No. `296(2)` has been amended so as to authorize the Treasurer to write off items not exceeding fifty dollars each and for purposes of interpretation \"the Treasurer\" has been taken to mean \"the Financial Secretary\". Pending notification of any general revision of Colonial Regulations on this point no attempt has yet been made to allocate between the Financial Secretary and the Accountant-General the responsibilities placed upon the Treasurer by the existing General Orders.\n\nParagraph 82(4). I would refer to correspondence ending with your despatch No. `283` of 28th July last. This requested further particulars which are being obtained and will, it is hoped, be forwarded at an early date. I would add that Mr. R.G. Witchell returned to the Colony under a Canadian deportation order on 2nd June last. He was arrested and charged on six counts of which copies are attached. He pleaded guilty on all counts and on 17th June was sentenced to six months' imprisonment on each count the sentences to run concurrently.\n\nParagraph 117. The remaining Shing Hun plant referred to was transferred to the Stores Department in April last with a view to sale. $37,250, about one sixth of the estimated value, has been realised on sales to date. It is now expected that owing to the emergency situation a considerable part may be used by Government in lieu of purchasing new goods.\n\nParagraph 118. By a Colonial Secretary's Office circular of 4th February, 1939, the sale generally by Government of petrol to Government officers was restricted to two Government pumps. Apart from these, officers of the Police, Fire Brigade and Prisons Departments are permitted to buy petrol from certain other Government pumps. The whole question is, however, being reviewed again.\n\nParagraph 119. The revision of log books and requisition forms for cars with a view to more complete detail is in hand and revised copies will be put into use shortly. Heads of Departments have been instructed to see that in future complete data are supplied by the officers concerned.\n\nParagraph 120. On June 13th last instructions were issued to Heads of Departments that officers in receipt of conveyance allowances were not to use Government cars within/areas for which their conveyance allowances were intended unless no public vehicle was available.\n\nParagraph 126. The existing practice of centralizing all purchases of stores in the Stores Department was initiated with a view to obtaining the two advantages of large scale purchases and specialist purchasers. As the", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-577-4 Report to the Director of Colonial Audit- 1938 24-10-1939 - 7-3-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 572691, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-588-23 China- British extra-territorial rights- negotiations with China 28-3-1942 - 27-11-1942", "page_number": 125, "title": "CO129-588-23 China- British extra-territorial rights- negotiations with China 28-3-1942 - 27-11-1942", "content_text": "# WITH THE COMPLIMENTS \nOF THE \n**UNDER SECRETARY OF STATE** \nFOR INDIA, \n▼ **NOV 1942** \n\nDear Ashley Clarke, \n\nIndia Office, \nWhitchell, \nLondon, S.W.1. \nNovember, 1942. \n\n64 \n124 \n\nWill you please refer to your letter to Fraser No.`7.7522/28/10` of 5th November regarding the possible inclusion in the Extraterritoriality Treaty with China of an article dealing with inland navigation and coastal trade. \n\nSo far as we can see the Government of India would probably be able to accept the draft Article which you suggest, although they might wish to stipulate that for the purposes of the Article the coastal trade of India should be regarded as including trade between India on the one hand and Burma and Ceylon on the other. Before, however, you definitely commit yourselves to the Americans in respect of an article on these lines it would be desirable to consult the Government of India in regard to it. We therefore suggest that in the penultimate sentence of paragraph 5 of your draft Memorandum for the State Department you should insert the word \"probably\" before the words \"be acceptable to U.K.G.\" and that after \"U.K.G.\" you should insert the words \"subject to the comments of the Government of India in regard to its application to India\". \n\nI have considered whether we ought to telegraph the text of the proposed Article to the Government of India at this stage, but as you are asking the Americans to agree to an attempt to persuade the Chinese not to press for the matter to be specifically cleared up in the present Treaty, it would I think be best not to consult the Government of India until we know the reaction of the State Department to the Memorandum you propose to send to them. Meanwhile there is a short reference to the matter in a draft telegram to the Government of India which I sent to you for your concurrence.\n\nH. Ashley Clarke, Esq., \nForeign Office, \nS.W.1.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-588-23 China- British extra-territorial rights- negotiations with China 28-3-1942 - 27-11-1942.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 587809, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-606-2 Treasury control over Hong Kong finances 22-1-1948 - 9-12-1948", "page_number": 17, "title": "CO129-606-2 Treasury control over Hong Kong finances 22-1-1948 - 9-12-1948", "content_text": "Drij. on 15517/48 29 for\n\ntel. 679 Sar\n\nso you.\n\nSun\n\ndespatch No 247\n\n(has been)\n\n4-10-48\n\n1. Copy of (30) / sent to Th. Halland f\n\n13.10.48.\n\n17\n\nImance topt. under Our Siddebottionis instructions.\n\n2.\n\nAs form\n\nbe sent\n\nfile = available 2 EBGCA\n\n3\n\n4\n\nCopy ? (30)\n\nDr. Bryant | Aust. Supt. should su\n\n1\n\n33\n\nwith\n\nom 1\n\nnow darf issue o\n\n'in. Bennett, Trg.\n\n20/10 d-men.\n\nMr. Polan\n\nMh. Amaiern\n\n(30) has been discussed with th. firbelysthan.\n\nHome Kay's reaction has been\n\nExpected\n\nminister of 348.\n\nGuilty a\n\nbut they have been naughty in telling\n\nin despatch, which\n\nfact did not\n\nreach hardly (and in is in time, that\n\nnor) \n\ncertain action will\n\nbe taken 8-day\n\nunless they heard to the\n\nhere beforehand.\n\nacouting from\n\nThis font of thing will\n\nin way with the Treaty\n\nfee minutes 7 16/9, which then that Treaty of furt bijected\n\nrm\n\nincluding\n\nthe promission and writes of because it might prejumer\n\nlater consideration of the application of the prican devolution\n\nthing and\n\na chole serious harm has own\n\nalways van Biring that\n\nwe\n\nthe 5 insist\n\nshold mor\n\nI don't think\n\nany\n\ndone because it has\n\nunder\n\nsome cataclysm\n\nin fost next ycombe stricted coated 7 Hry Kay's\n\nfinances fine whitchall\n\nthen\n\nConsider", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-606-2 Treasury control over Hong Kong finances 22-1-1948 - 9-12-1948.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 588506, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-607-4 Repatriation of exinternees- financial responsibility for passages 2-2-1949 - 29-12-1949", "page_number": 35, "title": "CO129-607-4 Repatriation of exinternees- financial responsibility for passages 2-2-1949 - 29-12-1949", "content_text": "Shaw, A.A.\n\nSimpson, F.W.\n\nScott, J.F.\n\nSmith, A.W.\n\nSmith, S.G.\n\nSmith, W.S.\n\nStewart, A.C.C.\n\nSummers, W.H.\n\nTuck, E., (P.O.W.)\n\nVauthall, H.M.\n\nWalker, R.J.K.\n\nWallace, R.C. (Employed in Taikoo Dockyard)\n\nWallingford, A.\n\n(Interned Shanghai)\n\nWalsh, M.B. (Rev. Father)\n\nWhite, R.T.W.\n\nWhite, G.V.\n\nWhite, R.F.\n\nWhitfield, C.\n\nWhitfield, R.\n\nWinslade, W.N.\n\nWitchell, G.B.\n\nWitchell, A.F.\n\nWitchell, N.E.\n\nWood, R.M.\n\n101 adults at £48\n\n2 children at £24\n\n£4848\n\n£48\n\n£4,896.\n\n35", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-607-4 Repatriation of exinternees- financial responsibility for passages 2-2-1949 - 29-12-1949.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 593855, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-616-2 Hong Kong War Memorial Fund (Amendment) Ordinance 1948 6-2-1948 - 16-11-1948", "page_number": 17, "title": "CO129-616-2 Hong Kong War Memorial Fund (Amendment) Ordinance 1948 6-2-1948 - 16-11-1948", "content_text": "# CONTRIBUTIONS TO HONG KONG WAR MEMORIAL FUND,-Continued.\n\n## L—Continued.\n\n| Name | Amount | Name | Amount |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Lammert Bros., In Memory of the late Mr. J. L. Robinson | | Odell, Mr. & Mrs. H. O., In Memory of Mrs. G. Hindmarsh | 25.00 |\n| Lammert, Elsie, Harold and John. In Memory of Mrs. J. M. Bidwell | | \"One-Fortieth\" | 10.00 |\n| Lammert, Mr. & Mrs. L. E., În Memory of Mrs. J. M. Bidwell | | Orem, Mr. & Mrs. John, In Memory of Mrs. Marion McInnes | 20.00 |\n| Litton, Mrs. Enid, In Memory of the late Mrs. Eldon Potter | | Owen-Hughes Family. In Memory of the late Mrs. Eldon Potter | 25.00 |\n\n## M\n\n| Name | Amount | Name | Amount |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| MacDonald, Sub Inspector J. W. | | Potts, Mr. & Mrs. A. H., In Memory of Mr. H. R. B. Hancock | 500.00 |\n| Madar, Mr. & Mrs. Thomas A., In Memory of Mr. J. F. McGowan | 40.00 | Potts, Mr. & Mrs. A. H., In Memory of Mrs. G. Hindmarsh | 25.00 |\n| Manners, Messrs. John, & Co., Ltd. | 20.00 | Potts, Mr. & Mrs. A. H., In Memory of Mrs. Eldon Potter | 25.00 |\n| Mar Fan, Mr. Charles | | Pin | 30.00 |\n| Marconi (China) Ltd. | 100.00 | | |\n| Marie, Anne | 10.00 | | |\n| Marshall, Mr. & Mrs. Adam, In Memory of Mr. T. Coleman | 25.00 | | |\n| Maxwell, Mrs. K. E.. In Memory of the late Mr. T. Thoresen | 10.00 | | |\n| May, Mr. & Mrs. J. A. R., In Memory of Harry Tate | 5.00 | | |\n| McNeill, Mrs. John | 20.00 | | |\n| Meyer, F., K. I. Joelsohn, A. Hutton, In Memory of Mr. L. B. Wood | 100.00 | | |\n| Mitchell, Lt. Col. and Mrs. E. J. R., In Memory of the late Mrs. K. C. Hamilton | 20.00 | | |\n| Morrison, Mr. & Mrs. J. A. D.. In Memory of the late Mrs. Eldon Potter | 25.00 | | |\n| Mount Trading Co., Ltd., Messrs., | 50.00 | | |\n\n## P\n\n| Name | Amount | Name | Amount |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| P. d' A. R. & C. M. | 20.00 | | |\n\n## Q\n\n## R\n\n| Name | Amount | Name | Amount |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Raymond, Mr. & Mrs. A., In Memory of Mrs. G. Hindmarsh | 10.00 | Robertson, Mr. & Mrs. W. G., In Memory of the late Mrs. Eldon Potter | 50.00 |\n| Recreio, Club de, In Memory of Mr. J. F. McGowan | 25.00 | Robinson, Mr. T. F. H., In Memory of the late Mr. P. D. Bowman | 50.00 |\n| Republic Motor Boat Co., Ltd., -Annual Donation | 100.00 | Ross, Mr. & Mrs. G. R., In Memory of the late Mrs. Mary Sui-tung Mok | 20.00 |\n\n## S\n\n| Name | Amount | Name | Amount |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Silas. Miss, In Memory of Mrs. G. Hindmarsh | | Spalinger, U. & Co., Ltd., in Memory of Mr. L. B. Wood | 25.00 |\n| Silva, Mr. F. L., In Memory of the late Mr. E. M. Raymond | | St. Andrew's Society (H.K.), Balance of Funds received for Ben Wylie's Presentation | 400.00 |\n| Sitlani, Mr. R. J. and Mr. W. L. Sitlani and Family, In Memory of the late Mr. J. L. Robinson | | \"Stanley Internment Camp\" cancelled cheque (£25=HK$400) | |\n| Sleap, Mr. & Mrs. S. A., In Memory of the late Mr. & Mrs H. M. Hodgman and the late Mr. & Mrs. H. G. Stewart | | Stone, Mr. & Mrs. L. B., In Memory of the late Mrs. Eldon Potter | 100.00 |\n| Sleap, Mr. & Mrs. S. A., In Memory of the late Dick Ritchie | | Stuart, Miss M. J., In Memory of the late Mr. J. L. Robinson | 30.00 |\n| Smalley, Mr. & Mrs. W. N. A., In Memory of the late Mr. J. L. Robinson | | Szechuen Commercial Co. | 100.00 |\n\n## T\n\n| Name | Amount | Name | Amount |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| \"Tai Lo Su\" Farewell Party | | Tootal Broadhurst Tee Clo.. Ltd., Messrs., Manchester. In Memory of the late Mr. J. L. Robinson | 20.00 |\n| Tak Kee Shipping & Trading | 35.00 | Tsang King Kee, Messrs. | 1,000.00 |\n| Tate, Mr. & Mrs. A., In Memory of the late Mr. T. Coleman | 20.00 | Tung Wah Hospital, Members of the Board of Directors | 100.00 |\n| Thomson, Capt. & Mrs. B., In Memory of the late M. L. Hardie | 25.00 | | |\n\n## U\n\n| Name | Amount | Name | Amount |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Universal Sales (China) Inc., 2nd Donation | 25.00 | | |\n\n## W\n\n| Name | Amount | Name | Amount |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Wade, Mr. & Mrs. L. H., In Memory of the late Mr. A. F. Ollerdessen | 25.00 | Wantsai P.M. School, The Pupils | 400.00 |\n| Wah Kiu Yat Po (Mr. Chan Tat Ling) | 186.00 | Wantsai P.M. School, The Pupils January Contribution | 53.60 |\n| Wah Yan College, the Students | 107.85 | Wantsai P.M. School, The Pupils-April Contribution | 50.40 |\n| Wantsai Government P.M. School, Pupils | 51.80 | Weill, Mrs. R. | 10.00 |\n| Wantsai Government P.M. School, Pupils | 53.30 | Weill, Mrs. R., In Memory of the late Mr. J. L. Robinson | 15.00 |\n| | | \"Well Wisher\" | 25.00 |\n| West China Mission | | Weston, Capt. & Mrs. J. | 20.00 |\n| Weston, Capt. Mrs. J. | | Whang, Mr. T, K. | 50.00 |\n| Wharf Police, Kowloon, European Members | 25.00 | Wing Lung Bank | 100.00 |\n| Wing Sun Co. | 20.00 | Witchell. Mr. & Mrs. G. B., | 50.00 |\n| Witchell, Mr. & Mrs. G. B. | 5.00 | Women's A.R.P. Union | 1,064.03 |\n\n## N\n\n| Name | Amount | Name | Amount |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| National Trading Corporation... | | Nelson, K. B. | 30.00 |\n\n## O\n\n| Name | Amount | Name | Amount |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Odell, Mr. & Mrs. H. O., In Memory of Mrs. R. Joseph | 10.00 | Odell, Mr. & Mrs. H. O.. In Memory of Mr. A. M. L. Soares | 10.00 |\n\n## S\n\n| Name | Amount | Name | Amount |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Salt Industry Bank of Szechuen Co., Ltd., In Memory of the late Mrs. K. C. Hamilton | 20.00 | Sammy and Joe. In Memory of Mr. J. F. McGowan | 20.00 |\n| Sheldon, Mr. & Mrs. H. G., In Memory of the late Mr. Wai Po-cheung | 20.00 | Shiel, Capt. & Mrs. J., In Memory of the late M. L. Hardie | 25.00 |\n\n## T\n\n| Name | Amount | Name | Amount |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Tay Kee & Co., Messrs. Annual Contribution | 50.00 | Tung Wah Hospital, Members of the Board of Directors | 100.00 |\n\nPage 23\nPage 24\nPage 25", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-616-2 Hong Kong War Memorial Fund (Amendment) Ordinance 1948 6-2-1948 - 16-11-1948.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 595784, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-622-3 War damage compensation- requisitioned railway stores and materials 19-1-1948 - 31-12-1948", "page_number": 110, "title": "CO129-622-3 War damage compensation- requisitioned railway stores and materials 19-1-1948 - 31-12-1948", "content_text": "## \nMf. ad Mussett, dealing with Res claims. this membn 376 R this flom A 1 War Offrie buildwil whitchall. in a know \n\nMfr Man Puhal you, ...\n\nar comenient form let his timme \n\n## \n109 \n\nPage 110\nPage 111", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-622-3 War damage compensation- requisitioned railway stores and materials 19-1-1948 - 31-12-1948.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 } ]