[
    {
        "id": 288834,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-159 - Sir Kennedy - 1872 [9-12]",
        "page_number": 207,
        "title": "CO129-159 - Sir Kennedy - 1872 [9-12]",
        "content_text": "810\n\nTHE LONDON AND CHINA TELEGRAPH.\n\nSUANGHAI SILK SHIPPERS, From 1st June to 28th Sept., 1879,\n\nAdantson, Bell, and Co. Balfour, Butler and Co. Barnet and Co. Birt and Co. \nBirley, Worthington, & Co. Bain and Co. \nBower, Hanbury and Co.... Bourjau, Hubener, and Co. \nBovet, Brothers and Co. ... Bull, Purdon and Co. Butterfeld and Swire \nChapman, King and Co. \nCoutts and Co. \nDent and Co. \nDickinson and Co. \nEssex and Co. \nFindlay, Wade and Co. \nFogg and Co. \nGamwell, F. R. \nGibb, Livingston, and Co..... Gilman and Co.\n\nBales.\n\n352 Jardine, Matheson, and Co. 276 Jarvie, John, and Co. \n57 Skeggs, C. J. and Co.\n\nTEA CARGOES AFLOAT.\n\nBales.\n\n[Nov, 18, 1872]\n\nShipping Intelligence.\n\nARRIVALS.\n\nAt YOKOHAMA.—From London, Sept. 23, Florence Nightingale.\n\nAt SHANGHAI.—From London, Sept. 25, Foutenaye; from Swansea, 23, Daylight; from Liverpool, Nov. 10, Agamemnon (str.); from Cardiff, Whinfel; from Southampton. Deccan (str.).\n\nAt HONG KONG and CANTON.—From London, Oct. 1, Golconda (str.), James Vinicombe; from Callao, Emigrante; from Boston, 4, Europa.\n\nAt SINGAPORE.—From Liverpool, Oct. 11, Agamemnon (str.); from Glasgow, 7. Saltes (str.); from Sunderland, 8, Stanley; from Hamburg, 11, Harmonia.\n\nDEPARTURES.\n\nFrom YOKOHAMA.—For London, Sept. 7, Audax; for New York, 16, Emulation; 18, Etta Loring; 23, Leander; 30, Ceylon.\n\nFrom HONG KONG.—For London, Sept. 15, Penrith; for New York, 18, Jessie Isabel.\n\nFrom SHANGHAI.—For London, Sept. 21, Priam (str.), Woodlark; From Foochow.—For London, Sept. 29, Zibu; Oct. 1, Eme.\n\nFrom HONG KONG and CANTON.—For Falmouth, Oct. 2, Hermine.\n\nFrom SINGAPORE.—For London, Oct 4, Eleanor; Nov. 12, Hector (str.).\n\nSHIPPING POSTSCRIPT.\n\nDEPARTURES.—Nov. 14, from London, for Yokohama and Hiego, Glamorganshire; 13, from Cardiff, for Singapore, Proserpine; 14, Massimo d'Azeglis, Elizabeth Child.\n\nLAID ON.—At London, for Shanghai, Carmarthenshire.\n\nSPOKEN.—Esperance, Newport to Hong Kong, Aug. 12, 33 S., 25 W. Franklin, Batavia to London, Sept. 28, 20 S., 60 E. N. C. D. H. (Amicizia, Italian three-mast schooner), Cardiff to Ceylon, Sept. 29, 16 S., 29 W.\n\nLEGAL.\n\nJUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL.\n\nHART V. VON GUMPACHI.\n\nThis appeal from Her Majesty's Court for China and Japan came on for hearing, and presented some remarkable features. The appellant is a British subject, and occupies an important position in the service of the Emperor of China as inspector-general of customs.\n\nThe respondent is a naturalised British subject, and is an astronomer and mathematician. Both met in London in August, 1866, and it was alleged that Hart represented to Von Gumpach that he was entrusted with the formation of a college and observatory at Peking, which college was to be an institution for the teaching to the Chinese of Western sciences and learning, \"with a view to the regeneration of China,\" and that he was to procure a library and appoint professors.\n\nIn consequence of these alleged representations, Von Gumpach went to China, and his salary was to be £600 a year. He alleged that there was no such institution, and that he was willing to discharge the duties of his appointment.\n\nHe alleged that Hart represented to the Tsang-li Yamen, or Foreign Board, that he had absented himself, and he received an intimation from the Chinese Government that his services were no longer required; and since the 30th September, 1868, he had been unable to obtain any salary.\n\nHe brought his action against Hart in Her Majesty's Court, and claimed £3,000 as compensation besides his salary.\n\nThe cause was tried before a jury, and they gave £1,800 as damages and 176 taels for money payable to Von Gumpach.\n\nThere had been a demurrer and further litigation, and one point urged for the present appellant was that these were privileged communications from him as to the office he held under the Chinese Government.\n\nThe Court, after further litigation, decided in favour of the plaintiff (the present respondent), and the defendant (the present appellant) has obtained special leave to appeal to Her Majesty in Council.\n\nHe denied the alleged misrepresentations, and stated that the Court at Peking had found in his favour as to the representations, and gave damages to Von Gumpach for the loss of his situation, and for money due on account stated.\n\nHe appealed on several grounds—that the verdict was against evidence, on misdirection, and on the privileged communications.\n\nSir John Karslake, Q.C, with whom was Mr. F. Herschell (instructed by Messrs. Murray and Hutchins), appeared for the appellant; Mr. Benjamin, Q.C., and Mr. Myburgh (instructed by Messrs. Brooks and Co., of Doctors' Commons) were for the respondent, the plaintiff in the original action.\n\nMr. Benjamin discussed the several points. He urged that the appellant was liable to the respondent for the wrongs he had committed against him.\n\nThe Chinese Government had not adopted the acts of the appellant as their servant, and therefore it was not an Act of State.\n\nIt was idle for the appellant to say that what he did was by order of the Chinese Government, and that, therefore, he was not amenable to the laws in Her Majesty's Court for China and Japan.\n\nHe cited various authorities in support of his contentions that unless a Government adopted the acts of their servant, the servant was liable, and could not shield himself under the authority of an Act of State and justify the wrong he had committed.\n\nFurther, the learned counsel submitted that Her Majesty's Treaty with the Emperor of China gave all British subjects a right to resort to the Supreme Court for redress; and it was no answer for the appellant (the original defendant) to say what he had done was as servant of the Emperor when malice was alleged against him.\n\nThe question of privilege would not go to such an extent as to shield a man from false representations, and none of the cases cited would support the points raised by the other side.\n\nMr. Myburgh followed on the same side.\n\nSir John, in reply, cited several cases in support of the view he had submitted—namely, that the original action could not be maintained, and that the demurrer ought to have been allowed.\n\nIt was not an action between two British subjects, as was contemplated by the Treaty, but an action against a Minister of China for an act done as such Minister.\n\nBoth parties had been in the service of the Emperor, and the reports made by Mr. Hart were privileged communications, and it was not by merely alleging malice that the protection extended to such documents was to be removed.\n\nThe matter was of importance, and he asked their Lordships to allow the appeal.\n\nSir Montagu Smith, on the conclusion of the arguments, announced that their Lordships would take time to consider their judgment.\n\nCOURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.\n\nIONIDES V. PENDER.\n\nThis was a case (tried last term) of some mercantile importance as to marine insurance, especially with reference to over-insurance.\n\nIt was an action on several policies of insurance, on goods, on profits, on charterparty, and of commission, amounting altogether to some thousands of pounds.\n\nThe defence set up was that there had been enormous over-insurance, and that the ship was not lost by perils of the seas, but had in reality been scuttled.\n\nThe policies were affected by a firm at Hamburg, who had chartered and loaded the ship for a commercial adventure to a port La Sineria.\n\nOn the voyage the vessel sprang a leak, and is making four inches water per hour in still water.\n\nCASUALTIES.—The Carolina (Spanish barque), from Manila to Cadiz, with tobacco, went a bore on Sandalwood Island. Sept. 15, but got off without damage, after remaining on the reef seven days.\n\nThe Hebe (ship, of Rotterdam. Meermans, from Batavia, to Rotterdam, put into Mauritius, Oct. 5, leaky, having encountered a very heavy N.E. to N.W., and S. W. gale Sept. 21st, in lat. 12 S., lon. 93 E., during which\n\nTHE LONDON AND CHINA TELEGRAPH.\n\n811\n\nNov. 18, 1872.\n\nMISCELLANEOUS.\n\nEXTRACTS FROM MEDHURST'S \"FOREIGNER IN FAR CATHAY.\"\n\nAfter what I wrote in my last letter of the negotiations between the commissioners of the two legislative bodies of this city having been broken off because they could not come to an agreement on the vexed question of the Bank Valuta, your readers will no doubt be greatly surprised to hear that, after all, the affair has been finally set at rest and disposed of by a compromise, both sides having given way to a certain extent.\n\nThe draft of the Bill sent by the Senate to the Burgerschaft, but rejected by them, served as a sufficient basis for a rapprochement, and as both parties were agreed in principle, and only differed on certain, though important, points, the door was again opened for discussion.\n\nAn abstract of the amended Bill as agreed to is as follows :--\n\nLaw for the Alteration of the Hamburg Bank Valuta.\n\nArt. 1. Closing of the Accounts based on Silver Bars.—The date is fixed for the 15th Feb., 1879, the Burgerschaft originally wishing it to take place within eight days, and the Senate inclined to keep them open for six months longer.\n\nAfter the above date the balances of accounts can only be repaid in silver bars.\n\nArt. 3. Denomination of Payments in the New Currency made through the Bank.—In all agreements and contracts where payment is stipulated to be made through the Bank, it is required to write after the amount the letters B.Z., which stands for Bank Zahlung, or Bank payment.\n\nI have dwelt thus much upon the characteristics of the servants employed by foreigners, not only to show how they fare in this particular, but because these servants are the only natives with whom the foreign merchant comes more immediately into contact.\n\nThe opinion prevalent at home that foreigners mingle in Chinese society generally is altogether a mistaken one.\n\nThe conventional rules of the Chinese are so constituted, and their habits of thought and customs so peculiar, that there is little or no encouragement to court acquaintance on either part, even were the entire ignorance of each other's language not to present a serious bar in the way of an interchange of ideas.\n\nThere is a class of Chinese brokers and middle men who haunt the offices of the merchants, but they are mostly shrewd, clever upstarts, whom the difficulties of interlingual communication have introduced into the trade, and, with rare exceptions, they lay no claim to respectability even with the Chinese themselves.\n\nThe language employed between these brokers and the merchants is a jargon made up of English, Portuguese, Chinese, and Malay words, tortured into unrecognizable shapes and constructions, and it is little fitted to sustain any conversation beyond what appertains to the mere technicalities of trade.\n\nI have frequently expressed to our merchants the opinion that it is a pity they do not take the trouble to learn the Chinese language.\n\nIt is an acquirement in the spoken form to an extent sufficient for all practical purposes; offers no difficulties that an average intellect and a moderate share of determination cannot surmount, and familiarity with it would have the effect of freeing the foreigner from the domination of roguish brokers and compradores, at whose mercy he now lies, whilst it would open the way to a more extended acquaintance and friendly intercourse to the mutual advantage of both parties.\n\nThere is perhaps no country in the world frequented by the English-speaking race in which merchants are so lamentably ignorant of the customs and resources of the locality in which they live as they are at this moment in China, and this is entirely to be attributed to a want of familiarity with the language.\n\nTHE SUEZ CANAL.\n\nThe Suez Canal Company will continue to insist upon its recent advance of tolls, and declares that it will appeal to the decision of the Government.\n\nThe Ottoman Porte has protested, by order of the Sultan, against the competency of the Tribunal de Commerce de la Seine to interpret the Act of Concession of the Canal—a power which belongs to itself alone.\n\nThe Turkish Government also maintains that, the company being an Egyptian association, subject to the Ottoman jurisdiction, and having its headquarters at Alexandria, cannot admit a foreign jurisdiction in respect to its differences with third parties.\n\nThere is some idea of inviting the Marine Powers to hold a conference at Constantinople, in order to agree upon a uniform system for the measurement of tonnage.\n\nForeign Intelligence.\n\nGERMANY.\n\n(FROM OUR OWN CORRESPONDENT.)\n\nHAMBURG, Nov. 12.\n\nArt. 4. Belehnungen (or advances on deposits).—After the close of the silver accounts the Bank is authorised to receive as deposits the foreign coin hitherto accepted, as well as gold and silver bars, and credit the depositors for the amount in the new currency, according to the regulations drawn up by the administrators of the Bank and having been approved of by the Senate.\n\nArt. 5. Deferred fulfilment of obligations to pay in Banco.—After the closing of the silver accounts, all still outstanding engagements in Hamburg banco or in species banco, whatever may be the period of their origin and the nature of the claim, must be settled by Bank payment in Imperial gold coin, or in double or single silver thalers of German mintage, at the fixed rate of 150 marks new currency for 100 marks banco, with an agio of 18 per mille for species banco.\n\nBills of exchange falling due on the 15th of February, but not presented for payment till after that date, are to be calculated at the officially quoted price of silver on the day of their maturity.\n\nArt. 6. Transitory Regulations.—During the period of transition, viz., from the date of the opening of the accounts in the new Imperial currency till the 15th of May, 1873, creditors of the Bank may have the amount of their balance in Banco transferred, partly or entirely, to their account in the new currency at the fixed rate of 145 marks Imperial currency for 100 marks Banco, as such transfers are to be considered as Belehnungen, or advances on deposits.\n\nThe sum thus transferred may, at any time during the period of transition, be re-transferred to the silver account of the owner; but all such re-transfers must be made before the expiration of the period of transition, in default of which the Bank is authorised to realise the silver for account of the proprietor.\n\nDuring the period of transition only those who have paid in gold coin or silver thalers are at liberty to withdraw their balances in the same money.\n\nDuring the period of transition no charge will be made by the Bank on Imperial gold coin or silver thalers paid in or taken out.\n\nThe publication of this new law will take place in the course of this week, and the date to be fixed for the opening of the accounts in the new Imperial German currency is expected to be the 15th inst.\n\nBut this arrangement has no effect on cash payments made in Hamburg and Lubeck currency, which retain their value as hitherto, till a sufficiency of the new money is coined, which, as the minting operations proceed but slowly, may be deferred for two or three years longer.\n\nIt will be seen by the above that the Bergerschaft have abandoned one of the principal points on which they were at issue with the Senate, and that is that the loss sustained by the conversion of Banco into new currency, the agio on silver being at present rather more than one per cent. above par, should be borne by the State.\n\nAs it now stands everyone who has Banco will only get 150 marks new currency for every 100 marks Banco, and must bear the loss himself.\n\nThe sharp and somewhat bitter remarks made by certain organs of the press in England respecting the award of the Emperor of Germany in his capacity of Arbitrator in the Anglo-American dispute about the San Juan question have found a responsive echo at Berlin; and if these counter remarks have not been translated and reprinted in the English papers, it is perhaps owing to the editors remaining reticent, not to aggravate and increase the ill-feeling between the two countries.\n\nOne of your contemporaries says that the award is remarkable for being written in the German language, instead of the customary diplomatic French\" to which the Germans reply that this is an exploded idea, quite out of date; that the despatches of the German Government—railway companies have received instructions to discontinue, from December 1, the eddies hitherto praised to emigrants, of a reduction in the fares—amounting in some instances to 50 per cent.—and double allowance of luggage (100 lb. per head).\n\nThe number of emigrants that passed through this city to the end of October, 1871, is officially stated to be 37,324 persons, whilst at the same period this year it has risen to 65,151, and before the end of the year will no doubt have reached 80,000.\n\nDr. Hilgendorf, a native of this city, and formerly director of the Hamburg Zoological Gardens, and now professor at the Royal Polytechnic at Dresden, has received a call to go to Japan to prepare young natives for their subsequent studies of medicine at German universities.\n\nA considerable number of Japanese are now studying at Berlin, Leipzig, and Heidelberg.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-159 - Sir Kennedy - 1872 [9-12].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 336684,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-237 - Governor Des Voeus Acting Governor Stewart - 1888 [1-6]",
        "page_number": 400,
        "title": "CO129-237 - Governor Des Voeus Acting Governor Stewart - 1888 [1-6]",
        "content_text": "ment might cut the other way if a man were to say \"Without the pier the godown is of no use to me, therefore I give it up and the Government will lose £130 they got out of me.\" Seeing that your Excellency's remarks have not been in favour of my motion, perhaps it would not be of any use to put it, as it would only take up the time of the Council.\n\nHis EXCELLENCY-I think hon. members ought to give us some credit for having reduced existing taxes one half.\n\nHon. P. RYBIE-Piers have not always been taxed.\n\nThe COLONIAL TREASURER-I think I was quite clear on that point.\n\nThe matter then dropped.\n\nThe COLONIAL TREASURER-Before we go further, I have a very important change to suggest in the shape of a new Section between 29 and 30 to this effect:-\"The rates provided for in Sections 28 and 29 may from time to time be altered by resolution of the Legislative Council, but no motion to alter the amount of such rates shall be made without the previous sanction of the Governor. If such motion shall be carried the Governor shall fix a day for its coming into effect.\" I may say the rating here was for many years in the hands of the Executive Council, and the rates were altered from year to year. I am sorry to say they were generally raised. They were once lowered, I think, but immediately raised again. Your Excellency's predecessor attached great importance to putting the matter in the hands of the Legislative Council. It was put in the hands of the Legislative Council, but the result was unfortunate, because when it was in the hands of the Executive it did receive attention once a year, whereas now it receives no attention at all. Also a new Ordinance was necessary to give effect to any alteration. The section I now propose is to provide for alterations being made without the cumbersome machinery of a new Ordinance every time.\n\nHis EXCELLENCY said that the section had been introduced at his suggestion.\n\nThe section was then passed with the omission of the words \"but no motion to alter the amount of such rates shall be made without the previous sanction of the Governor.\" His Excellency, after conferring with the Acting Chief Justice, said he thought this part of the section unnecessary.\n\nHon. A. P. MACEWEN-Referring to Section 29, said-I would like to ask on what basis you would value a pier? For instance, if you take the piers at Kowloon of the Wharf and Godown Company, would you charge the seven per cent. on what they get for berthing steamers alongside, or on the actual cost of the pier?\n\nThe COLONIAL TREASURER-The annual value of a pier depends on a hypothetical tenement. If there is not a tenement you must suppose one, and ask yourself this question: Supposing circumstances were such that it was necessary to let this out and someone was willing to pay rent for it, what amount would he pay? The question is sometimes a very difficult one; where there is a rent passing that generally decides it, but not always, and in relation to railways, collieries, and so on the question is a very difficult one and one that has given rise to more litigation than anything else in connection with rating. The first cost is very little criterion because it may have been thrown away in an injudicious undertaking. The question is what letting it from year to year would give, and that is expressed in the second definition: \"Annual Value-The rent at which any tenement might reasonably be expected to let, at the time of the valuation, from year to year, if the tenant undertook to pay all usual tenant's rates and taxes; and if the landlord undertook to pay the Crown Rent and the costs of repairs and insurance, with any other expenses necessary to maintain the tenement in a state to command that rent.\" That is the only possible answer to the question.\n\nHis EXCELLENCY-Is the hon. member satisfied?\n\nHon. A. P. MACEWEN-Well, it does not appear to me very clear. I am referring to piers in this colony.\n\nHis EXCELLENCY-It is a subject which does not admit of being very clear. There have been disputes about it everywhere where rating exists. Though the principle is clear enough, the application is difficult.\n\nThe COLONIAL TREASURER—The hon. gentleman might as well ask me to tell him in three words what general average is.\n\nThe ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE-I should like to ask, while on the subject, on what basis machinery is to be rated, whether on the cost of it or otherwise, because it is not difficult to get a valuation of machinery, the machinery of a sugar refinery, for instance.\n\nThe COLONIAL TREASURER-That again is a most difficult question. You must first decide what machinery is to be rated, discriminating between fixtures and workmen's tools, which are never rated, and then ask what would a tenant give for the whole going concern, supposing he finds the movable tools, but was provided with the fixed machinery, boilers, &c. The capital value of the machinery has, of course, something to do with it, but it does not necessarily always decide it. That is the only practicable test; you must somehow arrive at the sum which a tenant would find himself justified in giving for the concern. You may take the gross earnings, making a reduction for the tenant's profit, wear and tear, insurance, and other considerations, and this would leave the net rateable value. I don't know that I can make it any clearer than that.\n\nHis EXCELLENCY-This has been talked about ever since rates have existed, but the principle has come to be pretty well recognised now.\n\nThe ATTORNEY-GENERAL-Every item of property taxable has been discussed and decided upon in appeals in the courts at home.\n\nSection 30, providing that the Governor in Council might from time to time direct that lower rates should be charged in districts newly opened for building, was struck out, being considered unnecessary after the new section inserted after 29.\n\nIn Section 38, Hon. J. BELL-IRVING proposed to add to the list of exemptions places of recreation. He said-Hitherto the premises of the Race Club and the Recreation Club have not been taxed, but in view of the attempt made to tax these places last year, I think they ought to be specially exempted, as they are not made use of for purposes of gain.\n\nHon. P. CHATER-I have much pleasure in seconding the amendment.\n\nThe COLONIAL TREASURER-After careful consideration, I am obliged to oppose this amendment. In the first place, I may say places of recreation in this Colony are not by any means free institutions, open to all. They are all protected by subscriptions, ballots, and machinery of that kind, and it hardly requires a moment's consideration to see that they are all supported by the wealthier part of the community. I hold in my hand a printed return of the exemptions from rates in England and Wales. Universities are not exempt, almshouses are not exempt, nor buildings or lands occupied by municipal or other bodies, when profit is made from such lands or buildings other than of a national character. The latest case bears very strongly on the point here. A race course in Australia had been assessed at £2,500. The trustees appealed. The land was used as a race course under demise from the Crown for 999 years at a peppercorn rent. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, reversing the decision of the Court below, held that the land was not exempt. But to come nearer home, I should imagine there is perhaps not a place in the world where the interests of recreation are looked after more thoroughly than they are at Shanghai. I find at Shanghai all those places of recreation are rated when they are within the limits of the settlement. The hon. member read an extract from a letter from the Shanghai Municipal Council in 1886, saying that with the exception of the Chinese Polytechnic Institution and churches, chapels, and hospitals, all buildings in the settlement were rateable; and refusing to exempt a school on the ground that if one school were exempted all the others would claim the same privilege. The Municipal Council of Shanghai had arrived at an exactly correct definition. There is something more than that; there is an institution known as the Country Club, essentially for recreation, and I find that this institution pays voluntarily, being outside the limits of the settlement, a contribution of $60 annually towards the policing of the road on which it is situated. In other words, I suppose this Club, finding it more convenient to have the road policed, and seeing that it would not otherwise be policed, being outside the limits of the settlement, voluntarily chooses to pay this sum for the policing of that road. Surely, it would not be said our institutions in Hongkong can get their police for nothing, but elsewhere the institutions must pay for it because they cannot get it for nothing. I don't think it can be said that these resorts of the \n\n## Page 394A",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-237 - Governor Des Voeus Acting Governor Stewart - 1888 [1-6].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 369060,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-287 - Public Offices & Others - 1898",
        "page_number": 236,
        "title": "CO129-287 - Public Offices & Others - 1898",
        "content_text": "## Queen's exequation bill\nR. Wildman, American Consul at Hong Kong, conforming his tract in the capacity of Consul-General. I am at etc.\n\n## Foreign\n1898 June\n\nat previous Paper. No.\n\n## DOMESTIC\nC.O. 14447 **RECR** (Rec 29 JUN 98)\n\nDirector of the Botanical Museum, the Federal Polytechnic school, Switzerland. Sivies Amban applies for letters of introduction and facilities.\n\nSir W. Hamilton saying (Minutes.)\n\n? Draft to Governor of Hongkong & Straits Settlements\n\nthat Professor Schröter, Director of the Botanical Museum of the Federal Polytechnical School, Switzerland, accompanied by M. Pernod, a student of that School, is working for scientific purposes between 20 August next & 1st May 1899. I ask that they be granted every facility for the furtherance of the object of their tour.\n\nTem 29/6\n\n11 Ls (33)--370- - 14905-13-67 \n5490-200-5-09\n\ntsubsequent Paper.\n\n36707",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-287 - Public Offices & Others - 1898.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 387631,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-315 - Public Offices & Others - 1902",
        "page_number": 384,
        "title": "CO129-315 - Public Offices & Others - 1902",
        "content_text": "## BOARD OF EDUCATION LIBRARY, \n382 \nST. STEPHEN'S HOUSE, \nCANNON ROW, \nLONDON, S.W.\n\nWitek met eldur Ly aula ari the Intermediate School for Boys at Cardiff. You will find in this school many new ideas as to organisation and as to the development of corporate life among the boys in actual working practice, and I think the modern language instruction is well deserving of your special attention. For the sake of comparison it might be advisable to visit the Higher Grade School at Cardiff as well.\n\nBefore going to Cardiff you might find it profitable to read a small book, which has just been written by Dr. Findlay and published by Messrs. Macmillans, on the Principles of Class Teaching.\n\nAs Bristol will lie on your route, it might be worth your while to stop there and look at the Institution supported by the Merchant Venturers' Company, and supplying a large amount of technical instruction of excellent quality. I therefore enclose with this letter a note of introduction to Principal Wertheimer.\n\nWhen you return to London you will probably desire to see one or two of the schools under the management of the Girls Public Day School Company; and I think you should also visit one at least of our London Polytechnics. If you would call at this",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-315 - Public Offices & Others - 1902.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 424075,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-364 - Public Offices & Others - 1909",
        "page_number": 208,
        "title": "CO129-364 - Public Offices & Others - 1909",
        "content_text": "# TH CHINA MORNING POST, THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 1909.\n\n## GARDNER MARINE MOTORS\n\nFor commercial purposes. Use ordinary Kerosene as fuel. Most economical and reliable engine on the market. This Engine is not adapted from a Gasoline Engine. All types of motor craft built and engined,\n\n**J. W. KEW & CO.**\nSole Agents,\nConsulting Engineers & Marine Surveyors,\n1st Floor, 14, Des Vieux Road.\n\n## CAN'T MISS\n\nA good smoke... Felucca Cigarettes... a taste to the Man of Taste.\n\n## How the Government Rewards an Ideal Servant!\n\nThe dismissal of Mr. Carter, a subordinate officer, has been confirmed. He had made all arrangements to return after being on leave, but news of his dismissal was wired in July last. This is considered a discreditable proceeding on the part of those responsible. Mr. Carter's services to the Commission, his energy, and the undoubted ability he brought to bear in the performance of his duties, put him at loggerheads with others in the department. However, this is no reason why the Colony should be deprived of the services of a highly qualified man.\n\nThe President of the Board admitted that the best man had been retired and observed that he did not think it too late yet to make amends. We trust that, for the sake of the efficiency of the reduced public health staff, it is not too late for the Government to make amends.\n\n### Qualifications of Mr. Carter\n\nThe following examinations have been passed, and awards gained, in open competition:\n\n| Year | Award | Institution |\n|------|--------|-------------|\n| 1899 | Gold medal and certificate | Carpenters Company, for Sanitary building construction |\n| 1898, 1897, 1896 | Silver medal and certificate | Carpenters Company, for sanitary building construction |\n| 1898 | Bronze medal, first-class honours certificate, and prize of £2 | City and Guilds of London Institute |\n| 1897 | Bronze medal, first-class certificate, and prize of £5 | City and Guilds of London Institute |\n| 1897 | The Sir George Faudel Philips Medal | King's College, London, for sanitary science |\n| 1895 | Certificate | Sanitary Institute, for practical sanitary science |\n| 1892 | Certificate | Sanitary Institute, in conjunction with the Carpenters Company, for practical sanitation, and in building so far as it relates to sanitary construction |\n| 1891 | Certificate | Sanitary Institute, qualifying for Inspector of Nuisances |\n| - | Certificates | Science and Art Department, London, for building construction, also for hygiene |\n| - | Certificates | City and Guilds of London Institute, for carpentry and joinery, plasterers' work, and masonry |\n| - | Certificate | Polytechnic Institute, London, for plasterers' work |\n\nMr. Carter is also a Member of the Sanitary Inspectors' Association, and a Member of Council and late vice-chairman of the Polytechnic Engineering Society.\n\n## TE CIGARS\n\n...duced in Manila...\nBoxes of 50... $11.00 per 100\nAL, El Tamarindo... $8.00 per 100\nTSON & CO., \nBA BUILDING,\n\nThe Morning Post.\nTel. Address: \"Poweripi,\" Hongkong, A.B.C. Code, 5th Ed.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-364 - Public Offices & Others - 1909.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 428877,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-372 - Public Offices - 1910",
        "page_number": 218,
        "title": "CO129-372 - Public Offices - 1910",
        "content_text": "attended out of 3,000. The taotai again repeated that I might calm my fears as no trouble would ensue.\n\nOn the 13th April I sent for and warned Mr. Gregory, of the Polytechnic, who assured me that the students, if silent, appeared peaceful.\n\nThe same evening at 7:15 P.M. a telephone message came from the governor to the consulate asking me to request Commandant Yang, of the river guard-boats, to send reinforcements to the South Gate as there was a serious disturbance just outside the city.\n\nAt 7:30 this warning was repeated and, as I was dining on board the steam-ship Siangtan, I requested Commandant Yang to keep a man at our telephone. I went right through the city within fifty yards of the governor's yamên and right past the door of the taotai's yamên where there was a big crowd assembled. No notice was taken of me except one man, on seeing my chair pass, called out \"The British consul,\" and laughed heartily.\n\nAt 8-15 I received a letter from Dr. Hume, telling me of the riot, and asking if I was aware of it. I replied that I was fully informed, but that he need have no cause for apprehension, as I had the governor's assurance that full protection would be afforded.\n\nDr. Hume followed this up with another note, stating that the governor's yamên was being attacked. I thereupon went to the customs office and telephoned to the governor's yamên for information. I was told that about 2,000 men were in the yamên making a disturbance and demanding that the price of rice should be officially lowered. I stated that I was returning through the city and should pass near the yamên, and asked if it were safe; to which the reply came that it was perfectly safe, as the crowd would soon disperse. I then sent for Mr. Kwok, who, knowing of the trouble, repeated the assurance that I could easily pass through the city, though he qualified this remark when I asked him if it would not be wiser to return by water.\n\nI then returned to the steamer, and on arrival was met by one of the men of the consulate guard-boat, who begged me to return by water and to avoid the city, as the riot was very serious.\n\nI thereupon returned to the consulate and telephoned to the governor for more information. On being told that the rioters were still in the yamên, I telephoned to the taotai and asked him to send troops to all the missions to protect them. He replied that this had been done. I also asked whether, as a sign of friendship, and to help the officials in a difficult position, I should not telegraph to you to send one of His Majesty's ships. He replied that it was unnecessary to send a ship on account of the rice riot, but that if one was leaving I might as well ask it come at once. I thereupon sent my first telegram to Mr. Fraser, informing him of what had happened.\n\nI again asked the taotai whether troops had actually gone to the missions, and again received an affirmative reply.\n\nAt 2 A.M. the next morning, the 14th April, Mr. Warren, of the Wesleyan Mission, came to me and informed me that his mission had been burnt to the ground, and that all the members had only just managed to escape through the back door. They had fled to the West Gate, and were there kept in the guard-house until the gate could be opened, when they passed out unhurt. I at once sent my wife and child and Mrs. Cooke, who lived near to us, across to the island, and sent a message to Captain Agassiz to retain his ship. I again telephoned to the taotai, who replied that the destruction of the Wesleyan Mission must have been an accident, and that all other missions were being protected by troops.\n\nAt 3.30 A.M. a message came from Dr. Keller, of the China Inland Mission, that his mission and the Norwegian Mission had gone; that he was safe in a yamên, but that the Norwegians were fleeing for their lives. I then sent a messenger to every mission in the city to tell the members to leave as quickly as possible, and to get on board the steamers. I also telephoned to Mr. Gregory in the Polytechnic to leave by the East Gate, and to find his way to the consulate or to General Yang's camp. I further sent river guard-boatmen into the city, and gave them money to get covered chairs and bring the people to the consulate or to the steamer. I cannot speak too highly of the work done by these men. They went with the consulate writer repeatedly into the city, and did all in their power to get the people out quietly, and I think that the fact that no lives were lost is not only due to an apparent and inexplicable care on the part of the rioters that no lives should be sacrificed, but also to the prompt and skilful assistance they rendered.\n\nAt 9 A.M. I telephoned for, and got, the governor's launch, and she has rendered great assistance ever since. The launch was handed over quite unreservedly, and her \"lac yeh\" told to put himself entirely under my orders.\n\nAt 6 A.M. a detachment of the regular troops came to the consulate, and I was told that a large force had been sent into the city, and that order would be restored. At 10 A.M. General Yang sent an aide-de-camp well known to me, who assured me that the general could protect me if I went to his camp; but I felt that I ought to stay where I was most use to the whole community.\n\nAt noon the second-in-command of the guard-boats came to me to say that the governor's yamên was on fire, and that protection could no longer be afforded. He said that the message came from the governor direct, and he urged me to leave at once. He further stated that property would be preserved if we would leave the mainland. As I was strongly of opinion that the loss of one life would seriously prejudice the whole situation, I followed the advice, and after seeing everyone else embarked, I abandoned the consulate and went to the steam-ship \"Siangtan.\"\n\nI then requested the captain of the steam-ship \"Changwo\" to move down the river to opposite the consulate, in case any foreigners had been forgotten, and in case two, who had refused to leave until I wrote a personal note, should make for the consulate.\n\nAt that time the steam-ship \"Siangtan\" was lying alongside her bulk, but the Chinese began pouring on board in such numbers that I thought it advisable to move into the stream. At this time several places, including the governor's yamên, were blazing. We had only just moved from the hulk when we heard firing from the yamên, and hoped that orders had finally been given to put down the disturbance by force. I heard subsequently what happened. On the approach of the mob, with enormous torches, the general gave the order to fire, and one or two volleys were fired, by which about nine were killed. The treasurer thereupon threw himself at the feet of the general and implored him to cease fire, and at the same time the gentry coerced the governor. The result was that the governor put out a proclamation that the soldiers would not fire. This was promptly torn down. The treasurer then put out the order, and this was respected. After the issue of the treasurer's proclamation an officer of the governor's body-guard dared to give an order to fire, which one soldier obeyed; both were promptly executed. All this time the regular troops stood up against volleys of large bricks and tiles, and sustained about 120 casualties, all, I am told, more or less severe. One of the regular troops then said if they might not use rifles they could use swords, and killed a looter; but this was also forbidden, and from this moment a slow, deliberate, methodical destruction of property commenced.\n\nAt 4 P.M., as too many Chinese were still flocking to the \"Siangtan,\" I asked the captain to drop down to the consulate, and there we transferred passengers for Hankow on to the \"Changwo.\"\n\nAt 6:30 P.M., while we were about 50 yards from the Bund, the mob, just having completed the destruction of the London Mission, came to the consulate. They were headed, as I was told by one or two eye-witnesses, by a gang of men dressed all in black—black short coats opening in the front, black short trousers with broad white bands round their ankles. They were provided with implements to destroy houses, and the consulate writer, who watched the destruction of the London Mission, told me they went about their work with quietness and method. He said they were certainly not Changsha men, were from 20 to 30 years of age, very emaciated and with black faces. The officer in charge of the river guard-boats, of which there were eight, in addition to about sixty of the regular troops, came and asked me for permission to fire, but as I had all archives, English and Chinese, and the cyphers safe, I requested him to tell the heads of the looters they were free to enter the consulate and burn or loot it, provided they took special precautions that no lives were lost. I also asked him to move the guard-boats from the Bund to give proof of my intentions. He returned and executed all I had said. He added, however, that all the men of the river guard-boats were personally fond of me, and it seems that the villagers echoed this statement and made an earnest appeal to leave the property alone. The mob then asked the consulate gate-keeper, who kept the flag flying the whole time till the return of His Majesty's ship \"Thistle\" on the 17th, to open the main gate. This being done, they then asked him to hang out lamps, and the gate-keeper hung out the large consulate lamps. The mob never even entered the gate, and throughout the whole time not a single article of any kind whatsoever was touched in the building. The mob, it is interesting to note, then went and raided\n\n[2751 -4]\n\n216",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-372 - Public Offices - 1910.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 428878,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-372 - Public Offices - 1910",
        "page_number": 219,
        "title": "CO129-372 - Public Offices - 1910",
        "content_text": "6\n\nMr. Cooke's house, just behind the consulate, and from there proceeded to the Roman Catholic Mission, an enormous property, which they burnt out completely.\n\nBeing informed by Messrs. Butterfield and Swire's agent that it had been determined to fire on the two steamers from the city wall, from which they were well within range, I considered it advisable to drop about 1 mile downstream. We did this, and during the night the steam-ship \"Kian\" arrived and anchored beside us.\n\nBetween 6:30 P.M. of the 14th and 4 A.M. of the 15th all the property on the river front was destroyed, including the godowns and hulks of Messrs. Butterfield and Swire and of Messrs. Jardine, Matheson, and Co., and also the customs-house. The work, I am told by eye-witnesses, was performed by at most twenty men, all the others being onlookers, and no attempt was made to stop it. The Japanese property, which is largely financed by Hunanese, was left untouched. During the night the Japanese consul and his staff, together with other Japanese, escaped via their hulk, where troops were stationed, to Chinese boats, but waited till next day to join their steamer which was anchored near me.\n\nOn the 15th April at 3:30 A.M. a fire-boat passed the steam-ship \"Siangtan.\" The boat had obviously been filled with oil and was burning brightly; but it passed nowhere near the ship, and no other came.\n\nAt about 10 A.M. the Commissioner of Customs and his staff went up in the launch to see the damage done to the customs buildings and to guard their property on the island. Their arrival was the signal for the burning of the hotel, kept by a Chinaman, in which some of the members of the outdoor staff lived. It was not very long before I got a letter and a personal message from the treasurer that their presence was exciting the people, and that he would protect all property if I would persuade them to leave. I consequently urged Mr. Wakefield to retire, and as he had received a letter from the treasurer to say his property would be kept intact, he finally consented to abandon his position.\n\nAs the Chinese passengers on the \"Siangtan\" declared they would create a disturbance if we did not leave, and about the same time I received positive information from the river guard-boats and Captain Agassiz from the compradore of the firm that an organised attack on the steamers had been prepared, oil-boats and hand-grenades having been seen, and that all property having been destroyed they were the next objective, I felt, in view of all that had happened, that this warning could not be disregarded, and decided to move about 12 miles down out of sight of, though within touch of, the city. The Japanese consul not only endorsed this view, but stated, through his vice-consul, that it was not a riot but a revolution, and that he intended to go straight to Hankow whatever my course might be.\n\nOn the 16th April at 5 A.M. he left, and at 8 A.M. I sent the steam-ship \"Siangtan\" to Hankow, retaining in the steam-ship \"Kian\" a few who wished to return to Changsha.\n\nOn the 15th I had sent the launch to Siangtan, from which place I had received bad news, to give the residents the chance of reaching Changsha. They arrived on the night of the 16th, and I sent them to Yochou on the morning of the 17th under escort of Mr. Wrench and Mr. Morgan, as we were told there were riots at Siangyin and Chinkong, two places en route.\n\nMessrs. Wrench and Morgan met His Majesty's ship \"Thistle\" and returned with her. She arrived at the steam-ship \"Kian\" at 2:30 P.M., and I at once proceeded to Changsha.\n\nI refused to see the Customs taotai, who immediately came to call, giving as my reason that I would only see the highest authority in the province. Besides, as I was anxious to secure his removal as the first step to a settlement, I did not wish him to think that I in any way thought he was friendly. The same evening His Majesty's ship \"Nightingale\" arrived in port.\n\n**\n\nOn the 19th April the treasurer came to call with Mr. Kwok, the Customs taotai, Taotai Lu (Governor Ta'en's French secretary), and a certain Hu taotai. The treasurer assured me most emphatically that he could afford protection, and asked me to give him the names of those who wished to enter the city, in order that the Customs taotai might see to residences for them.\n\nDuring the interview the treasurer asked me if I had heard that \"Ch'uan-fei\" (the regular term for Boxers) were concerned in the trouble. I replied that I had not.\n\nAt about 2 P.M. I informed all that they could return into the city, and His Majesty's ship \"Thistle\" left for Chinkong. She had not been gone for half an hour when I was informed by the river guard-boats that the city was placarded with notices: \"Slay Ts'en and oust the foreigner.\" A copy of this placard was also given me by Mr. Wakefield. I thereupon sent for Mr. Kwok, and finally urged him to tell the truth for once. He stated that the interview in the morning was meaningless, as the treasurer had to speak as he did before the Customs taotai, and that protection could not be afforded. I was also visited by the commandant of the guard-boats and his second in command, who told me just the same. I therefore told Mr. Kwok to return to the treasurer and to obtain from him a definite assurance as to affording protection, telling him that, if this could not be given, he should get the few foreigners in the city out as quietly as possible, and giving him a circular to show them as proof. The treasurer then told Mr. Kwok to get foreigners out, and wrote to me that he could not provide against any untoward event, and that the idea that foreigners should not be in the city should be followed out.\n\nThereupon I wrote a note to the captain of His Majesty's ship \"Thistle\" and sent it by my launch. The launch returned with an armed party at 3:30 A.M. on the morning of the 20th and was soon followed by His Majesty's ship \"Thistle.\" A most earnest appeal was then made to me by the guard-boatmen to send away all foreigners. I sent those who had really nothing to do in the steam-ship \"Kian\" and kept an efficient number of good reliable working members of the community. That evening, the American consul at Hankow having telegraphed to me to order all his citizens out of Hunan, I sent launches to Siangtan and to Changtê to give foreigners the chance of coming to Changsha if they wished.\n\nThroughout the 21st April I was constantly interviewed by Chinese officers, including the president of the polytechnic (referred to in my intelligence report for the December quarter 1909, p. 12).\n\nThe\n\nI sent an armed launch, in charge of a warrant officer of His Majesty's ship \"Thistle,\" to get the people out of Iyang from which we had bad rumours. The journey was a complete success, all the women and children leaving and three men remaining. This evening reports came to me that two parties of rowdies armed with knives had crossed to the island, one to each end. The guard-boatmen and the troops were fully posted as to their movements and begged me to give them the chance of proving that they would fire, and asked some of the foreigners to join them in the defence. I was not, however, at this stage prepared to risk any lives and everyone was brought to His Majesty's ship \"Thistle.\" The preparations made were so effective that nothing occurred, and after about three hours all returned to their boats and the houses on the island. The rumour was verified next day.\n\nOn the 24th April the new governor arrived escorted by three gun-boats, making a most imposing entry. The events subsequent to his arrival and my suggestions regarding the due apportionment of blame for the outbreak will form the subject of separate despatches.\n\n\"\n\nI have, &c.\n\nEnclosure 2 in No. 1.\n\nW. MEYRICK HEWLETT.\n\nExtract from the \"North China Daily News\" of April 25, 1910.\n\nTHE CHANGSHA RIOTS.\n\nTHROUGH Reuter's Agency we have received the following intelligence :-\n\n\"London, via Bombay, April 23, 1910. \"Despatches from Washington state that the United States Minister at Peking, Mr. W. J. Calhoun, has telegraphed that he fears that the trouble in Hunan is spreading. The United States Asiatic fleet has been ordered to leave Amoy, to assist if necessary.\"\n\n\"London, via Bombay, April 24, 1910. \"The British chargé d'affaires in Peking has telegraphed to the Foreign Office to the effect that organised hands have resumed rioting at Changsha, and all foreigners have taken refuge in two British vessels.\"\n\nFrom subsequent news received from Changsha it would appear that the rioting referred to in the above telegram either did not take place or was not of a serious\n\n7",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-372 - Public Offices - 1910.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 429737,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-373 - Public Offices - 1910",
        "page_number": 474,
        "title": "CO129-373 - Public Offices - 1910",
        "content_text": "4\n\nChambers of Commerce on the Pacific Seaboard\" are headed by Mr. Willis H. Booth, an engineering contractor and banker of Los Angeles, president; and Mr. W. H. Gerstle, described as a \"transportation magnate,\" of San Francisco, vice-president. Mr. C. K. Field, of the \"Sunset Magazine,\" is official historian to the commission, and Mr. Charles N. Bennet, secretary. Mr. Hamilton Butler, United States vice-consul at Tion-tsin, is attached to the party as official interpreter, and Mr. A. P. Wilder, the American consul-general at Shangbai, accompanied them as far as Peking, apparently in his official capacity.\n\nThe delegates were not, as stated in Mr. Moore's despatch, invited by the Chinese Government, but by the Associated Chinese Chambers of Commerce. The idea of the visit originated, I believe, with the Shanghai branches of the American Young Men's Christian Association and the International Institute, whose membership is largely composed of American missionaries and returned students educated in America. It is doubtful whether the promoters of the tour and the American business men who accepted the invitation foresaw that the delegation would be treated by the Chinese authorities to all intents and purposes as an official mission from the United States to China. Yet this is what has happened: not only have the delegates been entertained by chambers of commerce, press associations, and kindred societies, but they have been officially received by the highest Chinese authorities, acting evidently under instructions from the Central Government, in every city they have visited; their progress, to which the epithet \"triumphal\" may well be applied, culminating in the unprecedented honour of an Imperial audience in Peking.\n\nThe following is a brief summary of the commission's tour up to date -\n\nShanghai (four days). Visits to local manufactories, flour mills, cotton, woollen, and paper mills, &c.; Chinese waterworks and Government dockyard. Receptions and banquets by Young Men's Christian Association, American community, Shanghai Taotai, chamber of commerce, and International Institute.\n\nHangchow (one day).--Visits to Bore and Lake. Banquet by chamber of commerce, presided over by Governor of Chekiang. Journey from Hangchow to Shanghai by rail made occasion for popular demonstration of welcome all along the line arranged by Chekiang Railway Company.\n\nNanking (two days).-Visit to exhibition, official reception and banquet. Tea party to ladies of mission by wife of Viceroy; dinner at Viceroy's yamen, Receptions and luncheons by provincial assembly, educational and military authorities. Visit to Naval School, Polytechnic, King Tombs, &c.\n\nHankow (three days).-Visits to Hanyan iron works, waterworks, &c. Banquet by chamber of commerce: luncheon with Viceroy.\n\nPeking (four days).-Visits to Great Wall and Summer Palace: reception at Audience with Prince Regent and visit to Winter Palace. Banquet by Board of Agriculture and Communications at Botanical Gardens. Luncheon at Wai-wu Pu. American Legation. Banquet by Chinese Press Association.\n\nThe above programme hardly bears out Mr. Gerstle's statement, quoted in the newspaper cutting enclosed in Mr. Moore's despatch, that \"There will be nothing of junketing about this trip: it will be the commercial, not the social side of China we shall be interested in.\" For this change in the character of their tour the delegates themselves can hardly be held to blame, but they will doubtless be prepared to admit that the uninterrupted series of receptions and entertainments has seriously interfered with the \"series study of the commercial situation in China,\" which forms the ostensible object of their journey. As a matter of fact, it does not seem probable that any tangible results in the direction of increased trade between China and the United States will accrue from this visit: speaking generally, no direct relation exists or are likely to exist for some time to come between the American manufacturer and the Chinese consumer, and vice versa. The trade is in the hands of the merchants or middlemen of San Francisco and the Pacific Coast ports and their correspondents in Shanghai and the large treaty ports of China, and it is the lack of American business houses of good financial standing and repute in Shanghai, Hongkong, and indeed throughout China, which accounts, I believe, for the comparatively slow development of American trade with China. Large American firms in Shanghai and Hongkong can be counted on the fingers of one hand, and I think I am not mistaken in saying that British firms are the largest importers of American goods in China. This remark also applies to exports, trade in which is liable to be handicapped by sudden changes in the American tariff.;\n\n5\n\nI append a table showing the comparative value of British and United States trade with China during the past ten years.\n\nThe tour has been made the occasion for an outburst of speech-making, which has astonished even those accustomed to the flights of American oratory. Ministers of State, Viceroys, Taotais, gentry, and merchants have vied with the members of the commission in giving expression to their mutual sentiments of esteem, admiration, and friendship. If any one speaker may be said to have deserved the palm in this friendly contest it is the American consul-general at Shanghai, Dr. Wilder, whose statement that \"this embassy is a unique and monumental landmark in the history of China\" may be accepted as typical of the strain in which both hosts and guests have discussed the mission and its labours.\n\nYet, making all allowances for that exuberance of diction which Chinese orators of the present day, more especially those who have been educated in the United States, share with their American prototypes, and for the festive nature of the occasion on which these speeches were delivered, one cannot help being struck by the under-current of sincerity which runs through so many of the speeches, and reading between the lines, one perceives on the part of the Chinese a recognition of the possibilities which the disinterested friendship of one of the great nations affords, joined to a feeling of naïve gratification at the public praise bestowed on China's moral and material progress; and on the part of the Americans a sense of real pleasure, not unmixed with surprise, at the cordiality of their reception by a people reputedly anti-foreign.\n\nAs was to be expected, no opportunity has been lost of reciting America's claims to the gratitude and friendship of China. The return of the Boxer indemnity, the abstention from territorial encroachments, the educational facilities so generously offered to the youth of China, and the assistance rendered to the people of China in their crusade against the opium evil have been referred to again and again by speakers on both sides, and through the foreign and native press re-echoed all over China.\n\nIn the ears of those who remember the American boycott of 1905, and the agitation against the \"unforgettable wrongs heaped upon the people of China,\" a movement inaugurated and maintained by that same Shanghai Chamber of Commerce which has taken the lead in the present demonstration, the frequent references to America's \"traditional and uninterrupted friendship with China and her people\" must sound a discordant note; and the president of the Nanking Exhibition's reference to the Canton-Hankow Railway fiasco, in which the American Development Company played so discreditable a part, as \"America's opening of China's trunk lines\" must have struck many of his hearers as singularly unhappy.\n\n53\n\nIn one respect the delegates have undoubtedly done harm: I refer to their exaggerated and indiscriminating praise of Chinese railway construction and management. This was particularly noticeable on the occasion of their visit to Hangchow, when one of the delegates referred to the Shanghai-Hangchow Railway, a line whose construction is notoriously faulty, as being \"equal to the very first class of such work on American lines,\" and another speaker assured an audience of local officials and gentry that he had \"examined the railways of Germany, England, and America, and found that none of them surpassed the Chekiang Railway system.\" These statements have found their way into the native press, and will, it is to be feared, not only encourage the people of Chekiang in their opposition to the Government in the matter of the control of the railways now being constructed in that province, but will be cited by other provincial railway companies in support of their claim to build and manage their own lines.\n\nHARRY IL FOX, Acting Commercial Attaché.\n\n473",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-373 - Public Offices - 1910.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 429740,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-373 - Public Offices - 1910",
        "page_number": 477,
        "title": "CO129-373 - Public Offices - 1910",
        "content_text": "Chambers of Commerce on the Pacific Seaboard are headed by Mr. Willis H. Booth, an engineering contractor and banker of Los Angeles, president; and Mr. W. H. Gerstle, described as a \"transportation magnate,\" of San Francisco, vice-president. Mr. C. K. Field, of the \"Sunset Magazine,\" is official historian to the commission, and Mr. Charles N. Bennet, secretary. Mr. Hamilton Butler, United States vice-consul at Tien-tsin, is attached to the party as official interpreter, and Mr. A. P. Wilder, the American consul-general at Shanghai, accompanied them as far as Peking, apparently in his official capacity.\n\nThe delegates were not, as stated in Mr. Moore's despatch, invited by the Chinese Government, but by the Associated Chinese Chambers of Commerce. The idea of the visit originated, I believe, with the Shanghai branches of the American Young Men's Christian Association and the International Institute, whose membership is largely composed of American missionaries and returned students educated in America. It is doubtful whether the promoters of the tour and the American business men who accepted the invitation foresaw that the delegation would be treated by the Chinese authorities to all intents and purposes as an official mission from the United States to China. Yet this is what has happened — not only have the delegates been entertained by chambers of commerce, press associations, and kindred societies, but they have been officially received by the highest Chinese authorities, acting evidently under instructions from the Central Government, in every city they have visited; their progress, to which the epithet \"triumphal\" may well be applied, culminating in the unprecedented honour of an Imperial audience in Peking.\n\nThe following is a brief summary of the commission's tour up to date:\n\nShanghai (four days).—Visits to local manufactories, flour mills, cotton, woollen, and paper mills, &c.; Chinese waterworks and Government dockyard. Receptions and banquets by Young Men's Christian Association, American community, Shanghai Taotai, chamber of commerce, and International Institute.\n\nHangchow (one day).—Visits to Bore and Lake. Banquet by chamber of commerce, presided over by Governor of Chekiang. Journey from Hangchow to Shanghai by rail made occasion for popular demonstration of \"welcome all along the line\" arranged by Chekiang Railway Company.\n\nNanking (two days).—Visit to exhibition, official reception and banquet. Tea party to ladies of mission by wife of Viceroy; dinner at Viceroy's yamen. Receptions and luncheons by provincial assembly, educational and military authorities. Visit to Naval School, Polytechnic, King Tombs, &c.\n\nHankow (three days).—Visits to Hanyan iron works, waterworks, &c. Banquet by chamber of commerce; luncheon with Viceroy.\n\nPeking (four days).—Visits to Great Wall and Summer Palace; reception at American Legation. Banquet by Chinese Press Association. Audience with Prince Regent and visit to Winter Palace. Luncheon at Wai-wu Pu. Banquet by Board of Agriculture and Communications at Botanical Gardens.\n\nThe above programme hardly bears out Mr. Gerstle's statement, quoted in the newspaper cutting enclosed in Mr. Moore's despatch, that \"There will be nothing of junketing about this trip: it will be the commercial, not the social side of China we shall be interested in.\" For this change in the character of their tour the delegates themselves can hardly be held to blame, but they will doubtless be prepared to admit that the uninterrupted series of receptions and entertainments has seriously interfered with the serious study of the commercial situation in China, which forms the ostensible object of their journey. As a matter of fact, it does not seem probable that any tangible results in the direction of increased trade between China and the United States will accrue from this visit: speaking generally, no direct relation exists or is likely to exist for some time to come between the American manufacturer and the Chinese consumer, and vice versa. The trade is in the hands of the merchants or middlemen of San Francisco and the Pacific Coast ports and their correspondents in Shanghai and the large treaty ports of China, and it is the lack of American business houses of good financial standing and repute in Shanghai, Hongkong, and indeed throughout China, which accounts, I believe, for the comparatively slow development of American trade with China. Large American firms in Shanghai and Hongkong can be counted on the fingers of one hand, and I think I am not mistaken in saying that British firms are the largest importers of American goods in China. This remark also applies to exports, trade in which is liable to be handicapped by sudden changes in the American tariff.\n\nI append a table showing the comparative value of British and United States trade with China during the past ten years.\n\nThe tour has been made the occasion for an outburst of speech-making, which has astonished even those accustomed to the flights of American oratory. Ministers of State, Viceroys, Taotais, gentry, and merchants have vied with the members of the commission in giving expression to their mutual sentiments of esteem, admiration, and friendship. If any one speaker may be said to have deserved the palm in this friendly contest it is the American consul-general at Shanghai, Dr. Wilder, whose statement that \"this embassy is a unique and monumental landmark in the history of China\" may be accepted as typical of the strain in which both hosts and guests have discussed the mission and its labours.\n\nYet, making all allowances for that exuberance of diction which Chinese orators of the present day, more especially those who have been educated in the United States, share with their American prototypes, and for the festive nature of the occasion on which these speeches were delivered, one cannot help being struck by the undercurrent of sincerity which runs through so many of the speeches, and reading between the lines, one perceives on the part of the Chinese a recognition of the possibilities which the disinterested friendship of one of the great nations affords, joined to a feeling of naïve gratification at the public praise bestowed on China's moral and material progress; and on the part of the Americans a sense of real pleasure, not unmixed with surprise, at the cordiality of their reception by a people reputedly anti-foreign.\n\nAs was to be expected, no opportunity has been lost of reciting America's claims to the gratitude and friendship of China. The return of the Boxer indemnity, the abstention from territorial encroachments, the educational facilities so generously offered to the youth of China, and the assistance rendered to the people of China in their crusade against the opium evil have been referred to again and again by speakers on both sides, and through the foreign and native press re-echoed all over China.\n\nIn the ears of those who remember the American boycott of 1905, and the agitation against the unforgettable wrongs heaped upon the people of China, a movement inaugurated and maintained by that same Shanghai Chamber of Commerce which has taken the lead in the present demonstration, the frequent references to America's traditional and uninterrupted friendship with China and her people must sound a discordant note; and the president of the Nanking Exhibition's reference to the Canton-Hankow Railway fiasco, in which the American Development Company played so discreditable a part, as \"America's opening of China's trunk lines\" must have struck many of his hearers as singularly unhappy.\n\nIn one respect the delegates have undoubtedly done harm: I refer to their exaggerated and indiscriminating praise of Chinese railway construction and management. This was particularly noticeable on the occasion of their visit to Hangchow, when one of the delegates referred to the Shanghai-Hangchow Railway, a line whose construction is notoriously faulty, as being \"equal to the very first class of such work on American lines,\" and another speaker assured an audience of local officials and gentry that he had \"examined the railways of Germany, England, and America, and found that none of them surpassed the Chekiang Railway system.\" These statements have found their way into the native press, and will, it is to be feared, not only encourage the people of Chekiang in their opposition to the Government in the matter of the control of the railways now being constructed in that province, but will be cited by other provincial railway companies in support of their claim to build and manage their own lines.\n\nHARRY H. FOX, Acting Commercial Attaché.\n\n476",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-373 - Public Offices - 1910.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 429743,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-373 - Public Offices - 1910",
        "page_number": 480,
        "title": "CO129-373 - Public Offices - 1910",
        "content_text": "4\n\nChambers of Commerce on the Pacific Seaboard\" are headed by Mr. Willis H. Booth, an engineering contractor and banker of Los Angeles, president; and Mr. W. H. Gerstle, described as a \"transportation magnate,\" of San Francisco, vice-president. Mr. C. K. Field, of the \"Sunset Magazine,\" is official historian to the commission, and Mr. Charles N. Bennet, secretary. Mr. Hamilton Butler, United States vice-consul at Tien-tsin, is attached to the party as official interpreter, and Mr. A. P. Wilder, the American consul-general at Shanghai, accompanied them as far as Peking, apparently in his official capacity.\n\nThe delegates were not, as stated in Mr. Moore's despatch, invited by the Chinese Government, but by the Associated Chinese Chambers of Commerce. The idea of the visit originated, I believe, with the Shanghai branches of the American Young Men's Christian Association and the International Institute, whose membership is largely composed of American missionaries and returned students educated in America. It is doubtful whether the promoters of the tour and the American business men who accepted the invitation foresaw that the delegation would be treated by the Chinese authorities to all intents and purposes as an official mission from the United States to China. Yet this is what has happened: not only have the delegates been entertained by chambers of commerce, press associations, and kindred societies, but they have been officially received by the highest Chinese authorities, acting evidently under instructions from the Central Government, in every city they have visited; their progress, to which the epithet \"triumphal\" may well be applied, culminating in the unprecedented honour of an Imperial audience in Peking.\n\nThe following is a brief summary of the commission's tour up to date:\n\nShanghai (four days).--Visits to local manufactories, flour mills, cotton, woollen, and paper mills, &c.; Chinese waterworks and Government dockyard. Receptions and banquets by Young Men's Christian Association, American community, Shanghai Taotai, chamber of commerce, and International Institute.\n\nHangchow (one day).--Visits to Bore and Lake. Banquet by chamber of commerce, presided over by Governor of Chekiang. Journey from Hangchow to Shanghai by rail made occasion for popular demonstration of welcome all along the line arranged by Chekiang Railway Company.\n\nNanking (two days).--Visit to exhibition, official reception and banquet. Tea party to ladies of mission by wife of Viceroy; dinner at Viceroy's yamen. Receptions and luncheons by provincial assembly, educational and military authorities. Visit to Naval School, Polytechnic, King Tombs, &c.\n\nHankow (three days).--Visits to Hanyan iron works, waterworks, &c. Banquet by chamber of commerce: luncheon with Viceroy.\n\nPeking (four days).--Visits to Great Wall and Summer Palace: reception at American Legation. Banquet by Chinese Press Association. Regent and visit to Winter Palace. Luncheon at Wai-wu Pu. Agriculture and Communications at Botanical Gardens. Audience with Prince.\n\nBanquet by Board of\n\nThe above programme hardly bears out Mr. Gerstle's statement, quoted in the newspaper cutting enclosed in Mr. Moore's despatch, that \"There will be nothing of junketing about this trip: it will be the commercial, not the social side of China we shall be interested in.\" For this change in the character of their tour the delegates themselves can hardly be held to blame, but they will doubtless be prepared to admit that the uninterrupted series of receptions and entertainments has seriously interfered with the serious study of the commercial situation in China, which forms the ostensible object of their journey. As a matter of fact, it does not seem probable that any tangible results in the direction of increased trade between China and the United States will accrue from this visit: speaking generally, no direct relation exists or are likely to exist for some time to come between the American manufacturer and the Chinese consumer, and vice versa. The trade is in the hands of the merchants or middlemen of San Francisco and the Pacific Coast ports and their correspondents in Shanghai and the large treaty ports of China, and it is the lack of American business houses of good financial standing and repute in Shanghai, Hongkong, and indeed throughout China, which accounts, I believe, for the comparatively slow development of American trade with China. Large American firms in Shanghai and Hongkong can be counted on the fingers of one hand, and I think I am not mistaken in saying that British firms are the largest importers of American goods in China. This remark also applies to exports, trade in which is liable to be handicapped by sudden changes in the American tariff.\n\n5\n\nI append a table showing the comparative value of British and United States trade with China during the past ten years.\n\nThe tour has been made the occasion for an outburst of speech-making, which has astonished even those accustomed to the flights of American oratory. Chinese Ministers of State, Viceroys, Taotais, gentry, and merchants have vied with the members of the commission in giving expression to their mutual sentiments of esteem, admiration, and friendship. If any one speaker may be said to have deserved the palm in this friendly contest it is the American consul-general at Shanghai, Dr. Wilder, whose statement that \"this embassy is a unique and monumental landmark in the history of China\" may be accepted as typical of the strain in which both hosts and guests have discussed the mission and its labours.\n\nYet, making all allowances for that exuberance of diction which Chinese orators of the present day, more especially those who have been educated in the United States, share with their American prototypes, and for the festive nature of the occasion on which these speeches were delivered, one cannot help being struck by the undercurrent of sincerity which runs through so many of the speeches, and reading between the lines, one perceives on the part of the Chinese a recognition of the possibilities which the disinterested friendship of one of the great nations affords, joined to a feeling of naïve gratification at the public praise bestowed on China's moral and material progress; and on the part of the Americans a sense of real pleasure, not unmixed with surprise, at the cordiality of their reception by a people reputedly anti-foreign.\n\nAs was to be expected, no opportunity has been lost of reciting America's claims to the gratitude and friendship of China. The return of the Boxer indemnity, the abstention from territorial encroachments, the educational facilities so generously offered to the youth of China, and the assistance rendered to the people of China in their crusade against the opium evil have been referred to again and again by speakers on both sides, and through the foreign and native press re-echoed all over China.\n\nIn the ears of those who remember the American boycott of 1905, and the agitation against the \"unforgettable wrongs heaped upon the people of China,” a movement inaugurated and maintained by that same Shanghai Chamber of Commerce which has taken the lead in the present demonstration, the frequent references to America's \"traditional and uninterrupted friendship with China and her people\" must sound a discordant note; and the president of the Nanking Exhibition's reference to the Canton-Hankow Railway fiasco, in which the American Development Company played so discreditable a part, as \"America's opening of China's trunk lines\" must have struck many of his hearers as singularly unhappy.\n\nIn one respect the delegates have undoubtedly done harm: I refer to their exaggerated and indiscriminating praise of Chinese railway construction and management. This was particularly noticeable on the occasion of their visit to Hangchow, when one of the delegates referred to the Shanghai-Hangchow Railway, a line whose construction is notoriously faulty, as being \"equal to the very first class of such work on American lines,\" and another speaker assured an audience of local officials and gentry that he had \"examined the railways of Germany, England, and America, and found that none of them surpassed the Chekiang Railway system.\" These statements have found their way into the native press, and will, it is to be feared, not only encourage the people of Chekiang in their opposition to the Government in the matter of the control of the railways now being constructed in that province, but will be cited by other provincial railway companies in support of their claim to build and manage their own lines.\n\nHARRY H. FOX, Acting Commercial Attaché.\n\n479\n\nPage 480\n\nPage 481",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-373 - Public Offices - 1910.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 429755,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-373 - Public Offices - 1910",
        "page_number": 492,
        "title": "CO129-373 - Public Offices - 1910",
        "content_text": "Chambers of Commerce on the Pacific Seaboard\" are headed by Mr. Willis H. Booth, an engineering contractor and banker of Los Angeles, president; and Mr. W. H. Gerstle, described as a \"transportation magnate,\" of San Francisco, vice-president. Mr. C. K. Field, of the \"Sunset Magazine,\" is official historian to the commission, and Mr. Charles N. Bennet, secretary. Mr. Hamilton Butler, United States vice-consul at Tien-tsin, is attached to the party as official interpreter, and Mr. A. P. Wilder, the American consul-general at Shanghai, accompanied them as far as Peking, apparently in his official capacity.\n\nThe delegates were not, as stated in Mr. Moore's despatch, invited by the Chinese Government, but by the Associated Chinese Chambers of Commerce. The idea of the visit originated, I believe, with the Shanghai branches of the American Young Men's Christian Association and the International Institute, whose membership is largely composed of American missionaries and returned students educated in America. It is doubtful whether the promoters of the tour and the American business men who accepted the invitation foresaw that the delegation would be treated by the Chinese authorities to all intents and purposes as an official mission from the United States to China. Yet this is what has happened: not only have the delegates been entertained by chambers of commerce, press associations, and kindred societies, but they have been officially received by the highest Chinese authorities, acting evidently under instructions from the Central Government, in every city they have visited; their progress, to which the epithet \"triumphal\" may well be applied, culminating in the unprecedented honour of an Imperial audience in Peking.\n\nThe following is a brief summary of the commission's tour up to date:\n\nShanghai (four days).—Visits to local manufactories, flour mills, cotton, woollen, and paper mills, &c.; Chinese waterworks and Government dockyard. Receptions and banquets by Young Men's Christian Association, American community, Shanghai Taotai, chamber of commerce, and International Institute.\n\nHangchow (one day).—Visits to Bore and Lake. Banquet by chamber of commerce, presided over by Governor of Chekiang. Journey from Hangchow to Shanghai by rail made occasion for popular demonstration of welcome all along the line arranged by Chekiang Railway Company.\n\nNanking (two days).—Visit to exhibition, official reception and banquet. Tea party to ladies of mission by wife of Viceroy; dinner at Viceroy's yamen. Receptions and luncheons by provincial assembly, educational and military authorities. Visit to Naval School, Polytechnic, King Tombs, &c.\n\nHankow (three days).—Visits to Hanyan iron works, waterworks, &c. Banquet by chamber of commerce: luncheon with Viceroy.\n\nPeking (four days).—Visits to Great Wall and Summer Palace: reception at Audience with Prince Regent and visit to Winter Palace. Banquet by Chinese Press Association. Luncheon at Wai-wu Pu. Banquet by Board of Agriculture and Communications at Botanical Gardens.\n\nThe above programme hardly bears out Mr. Gerstle's statement, quoted in the newspaper cutting enclosed in Mr. Moore's despatch, that \"There will be nothing of junketing about this trip: it will be the commercial, not the social side of China we shall be interested in.\" For this change in the character of their tour the delegates themselves can hardly be held to blame, but they will doubtless be prepared to admit that the uninterrupted series of receptions and entertainments has seriously interfered with the \"serious study of the commercial situation in China,\" which forms the ostensible object of their journey. As a matter of fact, it does not seem probable that any tangible results in the direction of increased trade between China and the United States will accrue from this visit: speaking generally, no direct relation exists or are likely to exist for some time to come between the American manufacturer and the Chinese consumer, and vice versa. The trade is in the hands of the merchants or middlemen of San Francisco and the Pacific Coast ports and their correspondents in Shanghai and the large treaty ports of China, and it is the lack of American business houses of good financial standing and repute in Shanghai, Hongkong, and indeed throughout China, which accounts, I believe, for the comparatively slow development of American trade with China. Large American firms in Shanghai and Hongkong can be counted on the fingers of one hand, and I think I am not mistaken in saying that British firms are the largest importers of American goods in China. This remark also applies to exports, trade in which is liable to be handicapped by sudden changes in the American tariff.\n\nPage 5\n\nI append a table showing the comparative value of British and United States trade with China during the past ten years.\n\nThe tour has been made the occasion for an outburst of speech-making, which has astonished even those accustomed to the flights of American oratory. Ministers of State, Viceroys, Taotais, gentry, and merchants have vied with the members of the commission in giving expression to their mutual sentiments of esteem, admiration, and friendship. If any one speaker may be said to have deserved the palm in this friendly contest it is the American consul-general at Shanghai, Dr. Wilder, whose statement that \"this embassy is a unique and monumental landmark in the history of China\" may be accepted as typical of the strain in which both hosts and guests have discussed the mission and its labours.\n\nYet, making all allowances for that exuberance of diction which Chinese orators of the present day, more especially those who have been educated in the United States, share with their American prototypes, and for the festive nature of the occasion on which these speeches were delivered, one cannot help being struck by the under-current of sincerity which runs through so many of the speeches, and reading between the lines, one perceives on the part of the Chinese a recognition of the possibilities which the disinterested friendship of one of the great nations affords, joined to a feeling of naïve gratification at the public praise bestowed on China's moral and material progress; and on the part of the Americans a sense of real pleasure, not unmixed with surprise, at the cordiality of their reception by a people reputedly anti-foreign.\n\nAs was to be expected, no opportunity has been lost of reciting America's claims to the gratitude and friendship of China. The return of the Boxer indemnity, the abstention from territorial encroachments, the educational facilities so generously offered to the youth of China, and the assistance rendered to the people of China in their crusade against the opium evil have been referred to again and again by speakers on both sides, and through the foreign and native press re-echoed all over China.\n\nIn the ears of those who remember the American boycott of 1905, and the agitation against the \"unforgettable wrongs heaped upon the people of China,\" a movement inaugurated and maintained by that same Shanghai Chamber of Commerce which has taken the lead in the present demonstration, the frequent references to America's \"traditional and uninterrupted friendship with China and her people\" must sound a discordant note; and the president of the Nanking Exhibition's reference to the Canton-Hankow Railway fiasco, in which the American Development Company played so discreditable a part, as \"America's opening of China's trunk lines\" must have struck many of his hearers as singularly unhappy.\n\nIn one respect the delegates have undoubtedly done harm: I refer to their exaggerated and indiscriminating praise of Chinese railway construction and management. This was particularly noticeable on the occasion of their visit to Hangchow, when one of the delegates referred to the Shanghai-Hangchow Railway, a line whose construction is notoriously faulty, as being \"equal to the very first class of such work on American lines,\" and another speaker assured an audience of local officials and gentry that he had \"examined the railways of Germany, England, and America, and found that none of them surpassed the Chekiang Railway system.\" These statements have found their way into the native press, and will, it is to be feared, not only encourage the people of Chekiang in their opposition to the Government in the matter of the control of the railways now being constructed in that province, but will be cited by other provincial railway companies in support of their claim to build and manage their own lines.\n\nHARRY H. FOX, Acting Commercial Attaché.\n\nPage 491",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-373 - Public Offices - 1910.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 479851,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-454 - Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1919 [4-6]",
        "page_number": 267,
        "title": "CO129-454 - Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1919 [4-6]",
        "content_text": "## SHANGHAI MUNICIPAL BUDGET, 1918,—Continued.\n\n### Educational Department,-Continued.\n\n#### PUBLIC SCHOOL FOR CHINESE\n\n| Category | Tls. |\n| --- | --- |\n| **Pay - Foreigners** |  |\n| Headmaster | 7,200 |\n| 3 Assistant Masters | 8,740 |\n| Assistant Mistresses | 6,360 |\n| Nominal School | 1,340 |\n|  | 23,640 |\n| Less-On War Service | 3,300 |\n| Temporary Bonus | 20,340 |\n| **Pay - Chinese** | 1,830 |\n| Teachers and Clerk | 29,300 |\n| Coolies and Watchmen | 1,190 |\n| Superannuation | 5,800 |\n\n#### ELLIS KADOORIE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOR CHINESE\n\n| Category | Tls. |\n| --- | --- |\n| **Pay - Foreigners** |  |\n| Headmaster | 6,490 |\n| 2 Assistant Masters | 700 |\n| 3 Assistant Mistresses | 7,190 |\n| Less-On War Service |  |\n| Temporary Bonus |  |\n| **Pay - Chinese** |  |\n\n## SHANGHAI MUNICIPAL BUDGET, 1918,-Continued.\n\n### Educational Department,-Continued.\n\n#### POLYTECHNIC PUBLIC SCHOOL FOR CHINESE\n\n| Category | Tls. |\n| --- | --- |\n| **Pay - Foreigners** |  |\n| Acting Headmaster | 6,250 |\n| Temporary Bonus | 4,800 |\n| **Pay - Chinese** | 16,850 |\n| Teachers | 13,550 |\n| Coolies | 1,210 |\n| Superannuation |  |\n\n### Finance Department.\n\n#### TREASURER'S OFFICE\n\n| Category | Tls. |\n| --- | --- |\n| **Pay - Foreigners** |  |\n| Treasurer | 4,140 |\n| Deputy Treasurer | 360 |\n| Assistant Treasurer | 2,615 |\n| 11 Assistants | 435 |\n| Stenographer | 3,050 |\n| Less-On War Service | 7,550 |\n| Temporary Bonus | 415 |\n| **Pay - Chinese** | 12,000 |\n| Chief Assistant | 6,600 |\n| 24 Assistants | 6,000 |\n| Office Boys and Coolies | 39,000 |\n| Superannuation | 1,350 |\n| Passagen | 65,550 |\n\n### Secretariat.\n\n#### SECRETARY'S OFFICE\n\n| Category | Tls. |\n| --- | --- |\n| **Pay - Foreigners** |  |\n| Secretary | 13,800 |\n| 2 Assistant Secretaries | 15,900 |\n| Acting Pay | 4,600 |\n| Chief Clerk | 5,110 |\n| 5 Assistants | 14,880 |\n| 2 Junior Clerks | 2,030 |\n| 2 Stenographers | 4,800 |\n| Less-On War Service | 3,300 |\n| Temporary Bonus | 1,980 |\n| **Pay - Chinese** | 900 |\n| Translator | 10,980 |\n| 4 Assistants | 1,100 |\n| Writer | 2,440 |\n| Messengers, Coolies, etc. | 8,150 |\n| Superannuation | 30,400 |\n\n#### NEW CAM KEE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOR CHINESE\n\n| Category | Tls. |\n| --- | --- |\n| **Pay - Foreigners** |  |\n| Headmaster | 2,920 |\n| Assistant Master |  |\n| Assistant Mistress |  |\n| Manual Training Instructor | 3,480 |\n| Temporary Bonus | 15,620 |\n| **Pay - Chinese** | 1,100 |\n| Teachers | 5,490 |\n| Coolies and Watchmen | 580 |\n| Superannuation | 6,070 | \n## \n9",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-454 - Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1919 [4-6].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 482543,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-458 - Public Offices & Others - 1919",
        "page_number": 592,
        "title": "CO129-458 - Public Offices & Others - 1919",
        "content_text": "578\n\nApplication for Employment as Matron or Nurse in the Colonies.\n\nForm to be filled up by the Applicant herself, and sent to the Private Secretary to the Secretary of State, Colonial Office, London, by the Colonial Nursing Association,\n\nName in full: Florence Stuart Dupiny.\n\nDate of Application: 22.11.19\n\nProfession or Occupation: Trained Nurse.\n\nAddress: 49, Sutherland St., Pimlico, S.W.1\n\nFather's Name: Charles Dupuy.\n\nProfession or Occupation: Stationer\n\nAddress: 49, Sutherland St., London, S.W.1.\n\nAge last birthday: 34.\n\nIf dead, his Name and Profession should nevertheless be given.\n\nDay and year of birth: 15 January 1885\n\nPlace of birth: Powerscourt, Clapton Park.\n\nWhether single, married, or a widow: Single\n\nNumber of Children: Sons -; Daughters -\n\nAged respectively: -\n\nEducation:\n\nMention the Schools or Colleges at which you received your education, professional as well as general; and give in each case the date of entry and leaving.\n\n  \n    The Misses Butt, Elderfield Rd., Clapton Park\n    1891-1896\n  \n  \n    St. Michael's, Westminster\n    \n  \n  \n    Westminster Polytechnic\n    \n  \n  \n    Chelsea Hospital for Women\n    \n  \n  \n    University College Hospital\n    \n  \n  \n    Certificate for Midwifery\n    March 1906\n  \n  \n    Certificate for General Nursing\n    Sept 1909\n  \n  \n    Certificate for Midwifery Clapham\n    Nov 1904\n  \n\nProfessional qualifications, and the place and date at which each was obtained.\n\nEmployment from completion of education to present time:\n\n  \n    Sister, St. Mary's Hospital, Plaistow\n    April 1911 - Aug 1914\n  \n  \n    Left on receiving Mobilization Orders\n    \n  \n  \n    Territorial Force Nursing Service, Sister\n    Aug 1914 - May 1917\n  \n  \n    In London General Hospital, Chelsea\n    1914 - Oct 1915\n  \n  \n    General Hospital, Lemnos\n    Dec 1915 - Feb 1916\n  \n  \n    Demobilisation\n    \n  \n  \n    Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital\n    Oct 1917\n  \n\nAppointment desired:\n\nIf you do not apply for a particular appointment you should state to what Colonies you would go, and what is the lowest salary that you would accept.\n\n[TURN OVER]\n\nPage 579 appears to be missing, but the instruction to turn over suggests there is more content on the reverse.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-458 - Public Offices & Others - 1919.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 489006,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-470 - Public Offices - 1921",
        "page_number": 154,
        "title": "CO129-470 - Public Offices - 1921",
        "content_text": "36\n\nMedhurst College (L.M.S.), Rev. E. J. Malpas, B.A. Medhurst Girls' School.\n\nNOTE.-In Shanghai there are the following schools provided for by the Shanghai Municipal Council from the rates, but under the control of British teachers entirely:\n\n| School | Head |\n| --- | --- |\n| Public School for Boys (foreigners) | G. M. Billings |\n| Public School for Girls (foreigners) | Miss Patterson |\n| Thomas Hanbury School for Boys (Eurasians) | A. J. Stewart |\n| Thomas Hanbury School for Girls (Eurasians) | Miss Mayhew |\n| Public School for Chinese | G. S. F. Kemp |\n| Ellis Kadoorie Public School for Chinese | R. G. Dowie |\n| Nieh Chin Kuel Public School for Chinese | L. H. Turner |\n| Polytechnic Public School for Chinese | G. S. F. Kemp |\n| Shanghai High School (for foreign girls) | Miss J. M. Fraser, B.A. |\n| Shanghai Jewish School | Miss Perry, B.A. |\n\nKwangtung-\nCanton:\n\n| School | Head |\n| --- | --- |\n| Holy Trinity School (C.M.S.) | Rev. W. W. Rogers |\n| Wesleyan Girls' Boarding School | Miss F. A. Britton |\n\nHong Kong (See Government Education Report.)\n\nManchuria-\nFakuting: (viâ Newchang), Christian Middle School (Irish Pres. Miss.).\nHaicheng: San Yu Middle School (U.F. Church of Scotland).\nHulan: (Heilungkiang), Christian School for Boys (U.F.C.S.), Rev. D. C. Davidson, M.A.\nKuangchengtzu: Middle School (Irish Miss.), Rev. W. H. Gillespie, M.A.\nKwangning: High School for Boys (Irish Miss.), Rev. W. Hunter, B.A. \nDitto for Girls.\nLiaoyang: Wen de High School (U.F.C.S.), Rev. G. Dougles, M.A.\nMoukden: \n- Manchuria Christian College (U.F.C.S.) (Irish Miss.), D. T. Robertson, M.A.\n- Medical College (U.F.C.S.), Dugald Christie, C.M.G., F.R.C.S., &c.\nYushuting (Kirin): Wen Shu Middle School (Irish Miss.), Rev. A. Weir, B.A.\n\nShansi-\nTaiyuanfu: Baptist Miss. Soc. Middle School, Rev. H. R. Williamson.\n\nShantung-\nChefoo: China Inland Mission Schools for Foreign Boys and Girls.\nChowtsun: Kwang Pei Middle School (Eng. Bap. Miss.), Rev. A. G. Castleton.\nPeichen: English Baptist Middle School, Rev. A. E. Greening.\nTaianfu: C. of Eng. Mission School, Rev. J. W. Hunter, Rev. C. R. Burnett, M.A.\nWei-hai Wei:\n- The Government School (for Chinese boys).\n- Wei-hai Wei School for Foreign Boys, L. H. Beer, L.C.B.\n- Wei-hai Wei School for Foreign Girls, Mrs. Bruce Shepherd.\n\nShensi\nSianfu English Baptist Girls' School, Mrs. Shorrock, B.A.\n\nSzechwan-\nChungking Friends' Mission High School, R. L. Simpkin, M.A.\nFowchow Boys Christian School (Can. Meth. Miss.), Rev. R. S. Longley.\nMienchow: \n- Anglo-Chinese School (C.M.S.), Rev. F. J. Watt, B.Sc.\n- Girls' Boarding School (C.M.S.), Miss V. C. Mannett.\nPenghsien: Canadian Mission School, Rev. F. Dickinson, B.A.\nTehyang C.MS. Boys' School, Rev. A. E. Seward.\n\nNOTE. There are several schools throughout the country conducted under the auspices of the China Inland Mission, but the members of this mission are not in all cases British.\n\n37\n\nOmitted from Chekiang\nWenchow: United Methodist College, T. W. Chapman, M.Sc.\n\n## German Schools in China\n\n152\n| Location | School | Details |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Peking, Chihli | Deutsch-Chinesische Mittel Schule (Old Peiyang University) | ... |\n| Tien-tsin, Chihli | Kaiser Wilhelm Schule | Boys and Girls of European parentage, 180 |\n| Hankow, Hupeh | Deutsch-Chinesische Schule | Boys 30 |\n| Hankow, Hupeh | Kaiser Wilhelmi Schule for European children | 22 |\n| Shanghai | German Engineering and Medical School | Teachers, &c., 50; Boys, 570 |\n| Shanghai | German School for Chinese, Kiangse Road | ... |\n| Shanghai | Kaiser Wilhelm Realschule and Kindergarten for European children | 226 |\n| Tungsun viâ Canton | Rhenish Mission Middle School | ... |\n| Hokshiha viâ Canton | Basel Mission School | ... |\n| Kaying: Kwantung | Basel Mission Middle School | Men, 20 |\n| Kowloon (Hong Kong) | Blindenheim (Mission School for Blind) | Girls, 62 |\n| Kuchuk via Canton | Middle and Normal School (Basel Mission) | Boys, 77 |\n| Linpingchow: viâ Canton | Basel Mission School | ... |\n| Lukhang: viâ Canton | Berlin Mission School | ... |\n| Shuichowfu | Berlin Mission School | Girls, 46 |\n\nNOTE. During 1915-6-7 many of the above schools were closed. During 1914 many were closed, of which details cannot now be obtained. Prior to 1914 the various German Missionary Societies were very active in Kwangtung and Shantung.\n\n## American Universities in China\n\n| University | President | Students |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Peking University | Rev. H. H. Lowry, D.D. | Men, 800 |\n| University of Nanking | Rev. A. J. Bowen, LL.D. | Men, 460 |\n| St. John's University, Shanghai | Rev. F. L. H. Pott, D.D. | Men, 483 |\n| West China Union University, Chengtu, Szechwan | Rev. J. Beach, D.D. | Men, 355 |\n| Boone University, Wuchang, Hupeh | Rev. A. A. Gilman, B.A. | Boys, 316 |\n| Shantung Christian University, Weishien | Rev. J. P. Bruce, M.A. | Men (including Medical School), 216 |\n| Soochow University, Soochow, Kiangsu | Rev. J. W. Cline, D.D. | Men, 420 |\n\nNOTE. Peking and Nanking Universities are Unions institutions, and controlled by American missions. The West China Union University and Shantung Christian University have British missionaries acting with Americans on the faculties, St. John's University and Boone University are under the American Church Mission. Soochow University is under the Methodist Episcopal Mission of America.\n\nApproximate number of American men and women engaged in teaching in mission and other schools and colleges of all grades: ...\n\n## American Colleges in China\n\n| College | Location | Students |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Hangchow Christian College | Chekiang Province | Men, 200 |\n| North China Union Women's College | Peking, Chihli | Women, 37 |\n| Union Medical College for Women | Peking, Chihli | 53 |\n| Tungchow North China Union College of Arts | Peking, Chihli | Men, 87 |\n| Palmage College (Kulansu) | Amoy, Fukien | Boys, 87 |",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-470 - Public Offices - 1921.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 490243,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-471 - Public Offices - 1921",
        "page_number": 734,
        "title": "CO129-471 - Public Offices - 1921",
        "content_text": "# Kiangsu\n## Shanghai:\n36\n\nAnglo-Chinese School (C.M.S.), W. A. H. Mouie. Cathedral School. S. P. G. Barrow. Medhurst College (L.M.S.). Rev. E. J. Malpas, B.A. Medhurst Girls' School.\n\nNOTE.-In Shanghai there are the following schools provided for by the Shanghai Municipal Council from the rates, but under the control of British teachers entirely:\n\n| School Name | Head/Teacher |\n| --- | --- |\n| Public School for Boys (foreigners) | G. M. Billings |\n| Public School for Girls (foreigners) | Miss Patterson |\n| Thomas Hanbury School for Boys (Eurasians) | A. J. Stewart |\n| Thomas Hanbury School for Girls (Eurasians) | Miss Mayhew |\n| Public School for Chinese | G. S. F. Kemp |\n| Ellis Kadoorie Public School for Chinese | R. G. Dowie |\n| Nieh Chin Kuel Public School for Chinese | I. H. Turner |\n| Polytechnic Public School for Chinese | G. S. F. Kemp |\n| Shanghai High School (for foreign girls) | Miss J. M. Fraser B.A. |\n| Shanghai Jewish School | Miss Perry, B.A. |\n\n## Kwangtung-\n### Canton:\nHoly Trinity School (C.M.S.), Rev. W. W. Rogers. Wesleyan Girls' Boarding School, Miss F. A. Britton.\n\n## Manchuria\nFakuting: (via Newchang). Christian Middle School (Irish Pres. Miss.). Haicheng San Yu Middle School (U.F. Church of Scotland).\n\nHulan (Heilungkiang), Christian School for Boys (U.F.C.S.). Rev. D. C. Davidson, M.A.\n\nKuangchengtzu: Middle School (Irish Miss.). Rev. W. H. Gillespie, M.A. Kwangning: High School for Boys (Irish Miss.), Rev. W. Hunter, B.A. Ditto for Girls.\n\nLiaoyang Wen de High School (U.F.C.S.), Rev. G. Dougles, M.A. Moukden: Manchuria Christian College (U.F.C.S.) (Irish Miss.), D. T. Robertson, M.A.\n\nMedical College (U.F.C.S.), Dugald Christie, C.M.G., F.R.C.S., &c: Yushuting (Kirin): Wen Shu Middle School (Trish Miss.), Rev. A. Weir, B.A.\n\n## Shansi-\n### Taiyuanfu \nBaptist Miss. Soc. Middle School, Rev. H. R. Williamson.\n\n## Shantung-\n### Chefoo: \nChina Inland Mission Schools for Foreign Boys and Girls. Chowtsun: Kwang Pei Middle School (Eng. Bap. Miss.), Rev. A. G. Castleton. Peichen: English Baptist Middle School, Rev. A. E. Greening. Taianfu C. of Eng. Mission School, Rev. J. W. Hunter, Rev. C. R. Burnett, M.A.\n\n## Wei-hai-Wei:\nThe Government School (for Chinese boys). Wei-hai-Wei School for Foreign Boys, L. H. Beer, L.C.B. Wei-bai-Wei School for foreign girls, Mrs. Bruce Shepherd.\n\n## Shensi\n### Sianfu \nEnglish Baptist Girls' School. Mrs. Shorrock. B.A.\n\n## Szechwan-\n### Chungking \nFriends Mission High School, R. L. Simpkin, M.A. Fowchow: Boys' Christian School (Can. Meth. Miss.), Rev. R. S. Longley. Mienchow: Anglo-Chinese School (C.M.S.), Rev. F. J. Watt, B.Sc. Girls Boarding School (C.M.S.), Miss V. C. Mannett. Penghsier Canadian Mission School. Rev. F. Dickinson, B.A. Tehyang: C.M.S. Boys' School, Rev. A. E. Seward.\n\nNOTE. There are several schools throughout the country conducted under the auspices of the China Inland Mission, but the members of this mission are not in all cases British.\n\n37\n\n## German Schools in China.\n\nDeutsch-Chinesische Mittel Schule (Old Peiyang University), Peking, Chibli. Tientsin, Chihli, Kaiser Wilhelm Schule, Boys and Girls of European parentage, 180.\n\nHankow, Hupeh. Deutsch-Chinesische Schule, Boys, 50. Kaiser Wilhelm Schule for European children, 22.\n\nShanghai: German Engineering and Medical School, formerly in the French Concession. now at Woosung Forts; Teachers, &c., 50; Boys, 570. German School for Chinese, Kiangse Road. Kaiser Wilhelm Realschule and Kindergarten for European children, 226. Tungsun viâ Canton. Rhenish Mission Middle School. Hokshiha: viâ Canton, Basel Mission School.\n\nKaying Kwantung. Basel Mission Middle School; Men, 20. Kowloon (Hong Kong). Blindenheim (Mission School for Blind); Girls, 62. Kuchuk: via Canton. Middle and Normal School (Basel Mission); Boys, 77. Linpingchow via Canton. Basel Mission School. Lukhang via Canton, Berlin Mission School. Shuichowfu. Berlin Mission School; Girls, 46.\n\nNOTE. During 1915-6-7 many of the above schools were closed. During 1914 many were closed, of which details cannot now be obtained. Prior to 1914 the various German Missionary Societies were very active in Kwangtung and Shantung.\n\n## American Universities in China.\n\n| University Name | President | Number of Men |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Peking University | Rev. H. H. Lowry, D.D. | 800 |\n| University of Nanking | Rev. A. J. Bowen, LL.D. | 460 |\n| St. John's University, Shanghai | Rev. F. L. H. Pott. D.D. | 483 |\n| West China Union University, Chengtu, Szechwan | Rev. J. Beach, D.D. | 355 |\n| Boone University. Wuchang, Hupeh | Rev. A. A. Gilman, B.A. | 316 |\n| Shantung Christian University, Weihsien | Rev. J. P. Bruce, M.A. | 216 |\n| Soochow University, Soochow, Kiangsu | Rev. J. W. Cline, D.D. | 420 |\n\nNOTE. Peking and Nanking Universities are \"Union\" institutions, and controlled by American missions. The West China Union University and Shantung Christian University have British missionaries acting with Americans on the faculties. St. John's University and Boone University are under the American Church Mission. Soochow University is under the Methodist Episcopal Mission of America.\n\nApproximate number of American men and women engaged in teaching in mission and other schools and colleges of all grades:-\n\n## American Colleges in China.\n\nHangelow Christian College; Men. 200 (Chekiang Province).\n\nPeking. Chihli: North China Union Women's College; Women, 37. Union Medical College for Women, 53.\n\nTungchow: North China Union College of Arts; Men, 87. Amoy, Fukien: Talmage College (Kulansu); Boys, 87.\n\n732",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-471 - Public Offices - 1921.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 490899,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-472 - Others - 1921",
        "page_number": 592,
        "title": "CO129-472 - Others - 1921",
        "content_text": "דיז \n\n585 \n\nThe candidate whose name is given below has been interviewed by the Selection Committee. Further details concerning him will be found in the accompanying application form.\n\nNAME: Ewart Guy Milburn Neville.\n\nADDRESS: Elm Croft, Whitstable, Kent,\n\nAGE: 31.\n\nEDUCATION: \n\nBritish Schools, Ealing, W. 1893-1904.\n\nEvelina Scholarship 1901.\n\nActon & Chiswick Polytechnic 1905-1907.\n\nModel Drawing 2nd Class 1905.\n\nFreehand Drawing in 2nd Class 1905.\n\nLondon Matriculation 2nd Class 1907.\n\nCounty School, Southall, Middlesex 1907-1908.\n\nIntermediate B.Sc. (London) Physics, Chemistry, Pure Maths, Applied Maths, Pass 1908.\n\nBorough Road College (as an external student of the University of London) 1908-1910.\n\nB.Sc. (London) Pass degree, 2nd Class, Physics, Pure Maths, Applied Maths 1911.\n\nEmmanuel College, Cambridge Oct. 1913-Dec. 1914, Jan. 1921-June 1921.\n\nB.A. (Special Examination in Physics) Cambridge, passed first class in both parts of examination and first in the order of merit 1921.\n\nStudent at Borough Road Training College for Teachers 1908-1910.\n\nTrained Certificated Teachers\n\nParchment Certificate No. 11/1692-1911.\n\nFirst Class in College Leaving List 1910.\n\nScarborough Summer School for Handwork August 1912.\n\nTeachers Certificate Board of Examinations for Educational Handwork 1912.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-472 - Others - 1921.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 494120,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-478 - Public Offices & Others - 1922",
        "page_number": 512,
        "title": "CO129-478 - Public Offices & Others - 1922",
        "content_text": "The candidate whose name is given below has been interviewed by the Selection Committee. Further details concerning him will be found in the accompanying papers.\n\nNAME\n\nMr. Edward Thomas Vincent\n\nADDRESS\n\n6, Arundel Mansions, Fulham Road, London, S.W.6.\n\nAGE\n\n29 years.\n\nEDUCATION\n\nDate of birth: 16th June 1893, Chatham.\n\nH.M. Dockyard School, 1909-1913.\n\nGillingham, Technical Institute, 1910-1914, Royal Scholarship and Whitworth Exhibition.\n\nImperial College of Science and Technology, South Kensington, London, 1914-1916.\n\nWhitworth Scholarship 1916.\n\nB.Sc. (2nd Class Honours, 1921).\n\nTyndall Prize in Physics, Royal College of Science, 1914.\n\nAttended L.C.C. Summer Course for Teachers, 1918.\n\nTEACHING EXPERIENCE\n\nGillingham, Technical Institute, 1916-1917.\n\nEvening Class Lecturer (Heat Engines, etc.), London, Acland Road, L.C.C. Institute, 1918-1919.\n\nEvening Class Lecturer (Practical Mathematics, etc.), Croydon, Central Polytechnic, 1921 onward.\n\nEvening Class Lecturer in Practical Mathematics and Drawing.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-478 - Public Offices & Others - 1922.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 494122,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-478 - Public Offices & Others - 1922",
        "page_number": 514,
        "title": "CO129-478 - Public Offices & Others - 1922",
        "content_text": "Educational Appointments in India and the Colonies.\n\nFORM OF APPLICATION to be filled up by persons desiring Educational Employment\n\n54/X//20 DUGATI FR940 507 1922\n\nName in full :— Edward, Thomas, Vincent\n\nAddress :— 5 Arundel Mansions, Fulham Rd., S.W.6.\n\nAge last birthday, with date and place of birth :— 29 yrs.; 16th June 1893\n\nMarried or Single (Number and ages of children, if any):— Married, no children\n\nHealth (past and present) :— Very Good (no serious illness of any sort)\n\nFather's name, nationality, and occupation (State whether living or dead) :— Edward, Vincent; British Tradesman; Dead\n\nPermanent domicile of candidate's family:— 5 Arundel Mansions, Fulham Rd, S.W.6.\n\nPost and approximate salary desired :— Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering, University of Hong Kong: Salary $4,800\n\nDuration of visits or residence abroad :— \n\nNames of districts abroad of which the applicant has special knowledge :— Hong Kong\n\nParticulars and dates of any important appointments, e.g., Headmasterships or Principalships, Administrative posts, Senior Laboratory Assistant, University Professorships, Lectureships, for which the applicant has worked or is standing as advertised :—\n\nLectureships Central Polytechnic Croydon (Gillingham Technical Institute 1916-1917 Acland Rd. L.C.C. Institute 1918-1919 Laboratory Engineering Laboratory, West Drayton from March 1919\n\nAthletics—(a) experience in organising games; (b) proficiency in athletics :— (a) sleight; (b) Good average player (Tennis, Cricket and Football)\n\nDate of application :— 1st November 1922\n\nA 36. W.I. 34250–1896 A. 1,000. 21. J.T.&B., Ltd. 152.\n\n[OVER.\n\nPage 1\n\non the back\n\n NOV 1922A.M \n\non the back\n\nPage 1",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-478 - Public Offices & Others - 1922.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 494123,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-478 - Public Offices & Others - 1922",
        "page_number": 515,
        "title": "CO129-478 - Public Offices & Others - 1922",
        "content_text": "14. School education - \n\n15. University education, if any :- \n\n16. Professional training as a teacher, if any :- \n\n(If a holder of the Board of Education's parchment certificate, the registered number of certificate and any distinctions in each part of the examination must be shown).\n\n17. Teaching employment:- \n\n18. Other employment: \n\n(All employment to be entered in order of time).\n\n  \n    Name of School or College.\n    Name of Principal.\n    Dates of joining and leaving.\n  \n  \n    H.M. Dockyard, school fr. Darlington\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    Chatham\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    Gillingham Technical Institute\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    Imperial College of Science and Technology, South Kensington\n    \n    Attended LCC. Summer Course for Teachers\n  \n\n  \n    Name of School (or place) where employed.\n    Dates of joining and leaving.\n  \n  \n    Gillingham Technical Institute\n    1904-1913\n  \n  \n    Acland Rd. L. C. C. Institute\n    \n  \n  \n    Central Polytechnic\n    \n  \n  \n    Croydon\n    H.M. Dockyard, Chatham.\n  \n\nScholarships, Certificates, Degrees and other Honours.\n\nIt should be stated whether the degree is Honours or Pass: also in what class and Division the candidate was placed in the examination qualifying for degree.\n\n  \n    Name of Principal or on Dates of joining and leaving.\n    \n  \n  \n    R. L. Weil\n    16 - 1917\n  \n  \n    Thomp\n    15-19\n  \n  \n    \n    um 1914\n  \n\nWhitworth Scholarship (1st Place) 1916\n\nwhile doing research work at the Admiralty Engineering Laboratory 1919-1922\n\nBachelor of Science with 4th Class Honours of University of London 1921\n\nLyndall Prize in Physics of R.C.S. 1914\n\nPrizes in 1921/12 for Papers on Internal Combustion Engines before graduates section of Institution of Mechanical Engineers\n\n  \n    Position and character of work done, also salary received.\n  \n  \n    Lecturer in Advanced Courses of Heat Engines, Machine Design & Practical Laboratory Course, for students taking the examinations for Whitworth Scholarships etc. Salary 12/6 per evening:\n  \n  \n    Lecturer in Practical Mathematics and Internal Combustion Engines; Salary 10/- for eng.\n  \n  \n    Lecturer in Practical Mathematics and Drawing; Salary 18/- per evening\n  \n  \n    Engineer\n    9-1915\n  \n  \n    \n    16-1917\n  \n  \n    Admiralty Engineering Superintendent\n    1-1919\n  \n  \n    Laboratory\n    do\n  \n  \n    \n    be March\n  \n  \n    \n    do\n  \n  \n    \n    1919\n  \n  \n    Apprentice in Engineering dept. instruction in Fitting.\n  \n  \n    Erection, pattern making, Foundry, ship's drawing office etc.\n  \n  \n    Draughtsman in Dockyard £150 p. a.\n  \n  \n    Salary from 4/- to 16/- per week\n  \n  \n    Senior Laboratory Assistant, in charge of various types of experimental Internal Combustion Engines etc. £250 p. a.\n  \n  \n    Technical Assistant to the Superintendent\n  \n  \n    Responsible for all technical investigation, preparation of reports, design of apparatus, payment of wages, accounts etc. Salary base rate List ha\n  \n\nUnited Kingdom in 1912 &\n\nAm 1913-1914 Royal Scholarship and Whitworth Exhibition\n\nDalby 1976\n\n1979\n\n1918\n\nalso several Board of Education certificates in Class\n\nholding\n\nRoyal Scholarship and Whitworth Exhibition",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-478 - Public Offices & Others - 1922.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 494132,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-478 - Public Offices & Others - 1922",
        "page_number": 524,
        "title": "CO129-478 - Public Offices & Others - 1922",
        "content_text": "2-25pm.\n\n28/12/22\n\nDRAFT telegram\n\nAthong 517 UNFROZEN (20270) Jour tel. 16 May\n\nE DOSSERA Decond Lecturer Mechanical Engineering Sducation Univeraly BEQUEATHED recommend WEDGEWERE Vincent age 29 Mr.\n\nMINUTE. Samens 20/12/22 atr. By vehetted Mr. Davia. Sir G. Grindle. Sir H. Read. Sir J. Masterton Smith Mr. Ormaly Gore. Duke of Devonshire.\n\nwait for refly before baying anything to D/E Ausd R2bps marred children educated Chatham Dockyard School... Fillingham Technical Insitute Imperial College Puance Technology\n\nLoud R. REMENTS B.Sc./23 class honours 1921 teaching exference 1916 to date at Gillingham Institute Techmeal London Acland Road LCC potitute Croydon Central Polyscinie other aference affrentice & ugineering\n\nHowever, to follow the instructions more closely and improve readability, here is a more processed version in HTML, correcting some of the obvious OCR errors and formatting issues:\n\n2-25pm.\n\n28/12/22\n\nDRAFT telegram\n\nAthong 517 UNFROZEN (20270) Jour tel. 16 May\n\nE DOSSERA Second Lecturer Mechanical Engineering Education University BEQUEATHED recommend WEDGEWERE Vincent age 29 Mr.\n\nMINUTE. Samens 20/12/22 attn. By vetted Mr. Davis. Sir G. Grindle. Sir H. Read. Sir J. Masterton Smith Mr. Ormsby Gore. Duke of Devonshire.\n\nwait for reply before saying anything to D/E Ausd R2bps married children educated Chatham Dockyard School... Fillingham Technical Institute Imperial College Finance Technology\n\nLoud R. REMARKS B.Sc./23 class honours 1921 teaching experience 1916 to date at Gillingham Technical Institute London Acland Road LCC Institute Croydon Central Polytechnic other reference apprentice & engineering\n\nThis version corrects spelling errors (e.g., \"Decond\" to \"Second\", \"Univeraly\" to \"University\", \"vehetted\" to \"vetted\", \"Ormally\" to \"Ormsby\", \"marred\" to \"married\", \"exference\" to \"experience\", \"Techmeal\" to \"Technical\", \"potitute\" to \"Institute\", \"Polyscinie\" to \"Polytechnic\", \"aference\" to \"reference\", \"affrentice\" to \"apprentice\", \"ugineering\" to \"engineering\"), and makes minor adjustments for clarity.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-478 - Public Offices & Others - 1922.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    }
]