[
    {
        "id": 345646,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-250 - Acting Governor Barker - 1891 [6-8]",
        "page_number": 45,
        "title": "CO129-250 - Acting Governor Barker - 1891 [6-8]",
        "content_text": "contending \n\nمد \n\npersistent. Wille ajard to the second point the O.A.G. says nothing but the Bishop contends to urge the withdrawal of the receipt for the Registration License, pointing out that it is Not regarded by the Indian Marriage Act I of 1865 which is in force in the Straits settlements, and that under the ... Ordinance s of 1850 merely got where the intervention of the Registrar would be required when the parties clerk to be married before him. \n\nSubject to avoid the Bishop does not maintain that the parties proper it What to objects to in the receipt the Registrar receives for an Ecclesiastical Marriage \n\nwhich he alleges does not exist. in India or the Straits \n\nNr2/8 \n\nand Cayton. \n\n+ \n\nlaw \n\nBoth them Whether \n\nfines & Common law shank. p. 44 y Eastern. \n\n121 \n\nThe Registrar does not give a license to the persons that certain notice to firm, and the Registrar's certificate is proof that the law has been Complied with. It is in no sense a license. To reply \n\nAs to \n\nMarriages in articulo mortis I should be Disinclined to accept the view of the Event Govr that no Chary is required - Anything is so small that on Governor's permission can be obtained at short notice, my impression is that this consideration influenced me when I drew the act\" \n\n71875- \n\nM.679 \n\nJ \n\nAugust Robert any 5 \n\ndo not understand the special section which after the felt \"on social & moral ground\" \n\nН. Сител \n\nagainst a law which \n\nprevails in \n\nJamaica, Mauritory \n\nin \n\ndeciding upon this point & 'I would ask to \n\nthe ground. Is to the west proceed as proposed \n\n(Jan. 1577) \n\nzes:see \n\nA \n\n4 of \n\n$16 \n\nFord. 8 of 1865 \n\nJu/1015",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-250 - Acting Governor Barker - 1891 [6-8].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 394432,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-325 - Public Offices & Others - 1904",
        "page_number": 422,
        "title": "CO129-325 - Public Offices & Others - 1904",
        "content_text": "March Be \n\nExchange \n\nfor \n\nthe \n\ngrant to the Government \n\nof trougtong \n\nExclusive Fright \n\nprons \n\nRailway the frontier of \n\nkowlone to fautore by \n\nVuilwry \n\nby means of \n\na British Compare: \n\nIt also contemplates that it's \n\nA Corps to sam Company, receiving jucilicles pom the Story. bong Government, should \n\ninstand and work continuation of the time a terminus in British \n\nthat \n\nCarritory \n\nduring construction & \n\nworking the Hong Kong Government should \n\nguarantee \n\nA SAM \n\npay 3 per cent on the full nominal \n\nsufficient \n\naccount of the Company's issued capital reciting \n\nAfter \n\nfull \n\nvery Consideration \n\nin retrores \n\nmorty \n\n419 \n\ncompleted \n\nof net profits derive from the railu \n\nnemy when \n\nIf further contemplating that the Railway \n\nCompany \n\nshould \n\npromoted by a British & \n\nmen \n\nCorporation in return for a proportion of fully paid up shares, stock, debentures ch. \n\nwithout payment liability \n\n3. Tur. Lyttelta concurs in the option \n\nwhich is understandi \n\nwas expressed by Sie Mh. that it is undesirable for the Hong Kong Government \n\nFrights \n\nrailways \n\nin Chinese \n\nTerritory & also for that government to give any guarantee \n\nur \n\nundertaking beyond its own jurisdiction.\n\nHere is the corrected version in HTML format as requested:\n\nMarch Be\n\nExchange\n\nfor\n\nthe\n\ngrant to the Government\n\nof Canton\n\n \nExclusive Freight\n\n \nfrom\n\n \nRailway the frontier of\n\nKowloon to Canton by\n\n \nRailway\n\n \nby means of\n\na British Company:\n\n \nIt also contemplates that a\n\n \nCompany, receiving subsidies from the Hong Kong Government, should\n\n \nconstruct and work a continuation of the line to a terminus in British\n\n \nTerritory\n\n \nduring construction &\n\nworking the Hong Kong Government should\n\nguarantee\n\na sum\n\n \npay 3 per cent on the full nominal\n\namount of the Company's issued capital\n\n \nAfter\n\nfull\n\nvery Consideration\n\nin retrospect\n\n \nPage 419\n\n \ncompleted\n\nof net profits derived from the railway\n\n \nwhen\n\nIf further contemplating that the Railway\n\nCompany\n\nshould\n\nbe promoted by a British\n\n \nCorporation in return for a proportion of fully paid up shares, stock, debentures etc.\n\n \nwithout payment liability\n\n3. Tur. Lyttelton concurs in the opinion\n\n \nwhich is understood\n\n \nwas expressed by Sir Mh. that it is undesirable for the Hong Kong Government\n\n \nto have\n\n \nrailways\n\nin Chinese\n\nTerritory & also for that government to give any guarantee\n\nor\n\n \nundertaking beyond its own jurisdiction.\n\nHowever, to follow the exact instructions given and to minimize alteration, here is a more conservative version:\n\nMarch Be\n\nExchange\n\nfor\n\nthe\n\ngrant to the Government\n\nof Canton\n\nExclusive Freight\n\nfrom\n\nRailway the frontier of\n\nKowloon to Canton by\n\nRailway\n\nby means of\n\na British Company:\n\nIt also contemplates that a\n\nCompany, receiving subsidies from the Hong Kong Government, should\n\nconstruct and work a continuation of the line to a terminus in British\n\nTerritory\n\nduring construction &\n\nworking the Hong Kong Government should\n\nguarantee\n\na sum\n\npay 3 per cent on the full nominal\n\namount of the Company's issued capital\n\nAfter\n\nfull\n\nvery Consideration\n\nin retrospect\n\n419\n\ncompleted\n\nof net profits derived from the railway\n\nwhen\n\nIf further contemplating that the Railway\n\nCompany\n\nshould\n\nbe promoted by a British\n\nCorporation in return for a proportion of fully paid up shares, stock, debentures etc.\n\nwithout payment liability\n\n3. Tur. Lyttelton concurs in the opinion\n\nwhich is understood\n\nwas expressed by Sir Mh. that it is undesirable for the Hong Kong Government\n\nto have\n\nrailways\n\nin Chinese\n\nTerritory & also for that government to give any guarantee\n\nor\n\nundertaking beyond its own jurisdiction.\n\nThe final output in HTML as per the original request without extensive corrections:\nMarch Be \n\nExchange \n\nfor \n\nthe \n\ngrant to the Government \n\nof Canton \n\nExclusive Freight \n\nfrom \n\nRailway the frontier of \n\nKowloon to Canton by \n\nRailway \n\nby means of \n\na British Company: \n\nIt also contemplates that a \n\nCompany, receiving subsidies from the Hong Kong Government, should \n\nconstruct and work a continuation of the line to a terminus in British \n\nTerritory \n\nduring construction & \n\nworking the Hong Kong Government should \n\nguarantee \n\na sum \n\npay 3 per cent on the full nominal \n\namount of the Company's issued capital \n\nAfter \n\nfull \n\nvery Consideration \n\nin retrospect \n\n419 \n\ncompleted \n\nof net profits derived from the railway \n\nwhen \n\nIf further contemplating that the Railway \n\nCompany \n\nshould \n\nbe promoted by a British \n\nCorporation in return for a proportion of fully paid up shares, stock, debentures etc. \n\nwithout payment liability \n\n3. Tur. Lyttelton concurs in the opinion \n\nwhich is understood \n\nwas expressed by Sir Mh. that it is undesirable for the Hong Kong Government \n\nto have \n\nrailways \n\nin Chinese \n\nTerritory & also for that government to give any guarantee \n\nor \n\nundertaking beyond its own jurisdiction.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-325 - Public Offices & Others - 1904.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    }
]