[ { "id": 218394, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-005 - Sir Henry Pottinger - 1844", "page_number": 267, "title": "CO129-005 - Sir Henry Pottinger - 1844", "content_text": ": \n\nto \n\nSuch instrument \n\nwithin a certain time after execution. \n\n4-And be it further enacted that all judgments deeds wills conveyances or be registered instruments in writing hereafter obtained made or executed, which shall be duly registered within the respective times next mentioned: \"that is to say \" all deeds conveyances and other instruments in writing (except wills) which (if executed in Hongkong or its dependencies) shall be registered within one month, or which if executed in any other place shall be registered within twelve months after the time of execution thereof respectively, and all wills which (if the devisor die in Hongkong or its dependencies) shall be registered within one month, or which (if the devisor die in any other place) shall be registered within twelve months, after the decease of every devisor respectively, and all future judgments whe's shall be registered within one month after the entry or recording thereof, shall severally be in like manner entitled to priority, and shall take effect respectively by relation to the date thereof, only in the same manner as if this Ordinance had never been made. Mode of Registra- \n\n5. And be it further enacted that the registration inten 'ed by th tion by a Memorial Ordinance shall be made in manner following, that is to say \"a Memorial containing certain containing the particulars herein after specified shall be delivered into the said particulars to be de- Land Office, signed (in case of deeds conveyances or other instruments in writing except wills) by some or one of the parties to the original deed or instrument, or if such parties be dead or absent from the Colony, then by one or more of the witnessess to such deed or instrument, and (in case of wills and devises) signed by some or one of the devisees or his or her guardian or trustees, and (in case of judgments) signed by the plaintiff or plaintiffs: and every such Memorial shall be verified by the oath of some competent person, that the same contains a just and true account of the several particulars therein set forth, which oath shall be taken before the Chief Magistrate of Police, or before any Justice of the Peace of the said Colony. \n\nlivered to the land officer. \n\nParticulars which \n\nZain. \n\n6.--And be it further enacted that every memorial of any judgment shall it is necessary for contain the following particulars,\" that is to say \" the names and additions of the the memorial to con- planitiffs and defendants respectively, the sum thereby recovered or secured, the time of entry or recording the same, and the sum of money bona fide due thereon; and every memorial of any deed or conveyance will or other instrument shall contain and set forth the date of such deed conveyance will or other instrument, and the particular nature and object thereof the names and additions of all the parties to such deed conveyance or instrument, and of the devisor devisee or devisees of such will, and the names and additions of all the witnesses thereto, anf shall especially particularize and express the parcels of ground tenements aud promises affected or intended to be affected by such deed conveyance will of instrument, and the proper and ordinary or accustomed names of the places where the same shall be situated, and (except in cases of wills) the pecuniary or other consideration for the same, in the form or to the effect of the form numbered i in the Schedule hereunto annexed. Provided always, that when there shall be more writings than one for perf cting the same conveyance devise or security affecting the same parcels of ground tenements and premises, all such writings shall be stated in one and the same memorial, in which it shall be sufficient to particularize such parcels tenements and premises only once. \n\nSuch memorial to \n\n-And be it further enacted, that on delivery of any such memorial as be numbered by the aforesaid, the said Land Officer shall number the same according to the order of Land Officer and a receipt to be given \n\ntime in which it shall bave been so delivered, and shall give a receipt for the same, for the same and in which receipt shall be specified the certain day and time of day when such Land Officer shall memorial shall have been so delivered, and the proper number thereof in the endorse thereon a Register of the said Land Office, and he shall also in like manner immediately certificate of the day indorse on the back of such memorial a certificate, containing the day and time of & hour when such memorial was deli- day when the same was so delivered, and the name and place of abode of the vered into his Office person verifying the same, and shall sign the said certificate when so indo sed and such certificate to be such certificate shall be taken and allowed as evidence of the registration, and evidence of the time time of registration of every such judgment deed will devise conveyance or other of Registration of \n\ninstrument whereof such memorial shall be so made. the Memorial. \n\nThe Memorial to 8. And be it further enacted that every such memorial shall, as soon after be registered as soon the receipt thereof as practicable, be carefully registered by the Land Officer, in as possible in a pro- regular succession as received, according to its proper number, in a particular book per book and be de- to be kept by him for that purpose, and shall afterwards be deposited by him in posited in a secure place in the Office. some secure place in his Office, and there kept for future reference when required, \n\nLand Officer to \n\nand he shall also keep an index of the parcels of ground tenements and \n\nprim'ses keep an index of mentioned in every such memorial, and also a like index or indexes of the names of places and names the several parties to conveyances and other deeds and instruments, and of devisors vennected with the and devisees in wills, and of the plaintiffs and defendants in case of judgments with \n\ninstruments so re- accurate references in all such indexes respectively to the number and page of gistered with correct \n\nregistry of the memorial to which any entry in sucli index or indexes shall relate. references to the pro \n\nper page of the Re- gistry book. \n\nenter satisfiction for \n\nForm of the certi- ficate of satisfaction \n\nmortgage. \n\nIn case of mortga 9. And be it further enacted that in case of mortgages and judgments ges and judgments registered in pursuance of this Ordinance, if at any time afterwards such verified Land Officer shall certificate as is hereinafter next mentioned shall be brought to the said Land the same on receiv Officer, signed by the respective mortgagoers and mortagagees or plaintiffs and ing a verified certi- defendants or their agents respectively, and attested by two credible witnesses, ficate as after des whereby it shall appear that the whole of the monies due on any such mortgage cribed. \n\nor judgment have been fully paid, or that such mortgage or judgment is otherwise satisfied, then the said Land Officer shall make a short entry or memorandum thereof on the memorial and on the margin of the registry of such mortgage or judgment, and shall afterwards carefully register the sanie certificate in one of the registry books of his office, and the Land Officer, shall make an entry thereof in his index or indexes, referring accurately to the page of registry of such certificate. 10. And be it further enacted that every such certificate shall contain the on a judgment or following particulars; \"that is to say\", (in case of judgments the names and additions of the plaintiffs and defendants, the time of entering upor recording the same, the sum or sums thereby recovered, the date or dates of payment or other satisfaction of the amount bona fide due thereon, and in case of mortgages the names and additions of the original parties, the date of the instrument, the sum thereby secured, and the time or times of payment or other satisfaction thereof, and every such certificate shall be verified by the oath of some competent persou, that the same contains a just and true account of the several particulars therein set forth, which oath shall be made and taken before the said Chief Magistrate, or before any Justice of the Peace of the said Colóny, and on the back of such verified certificate the Land Officer shall immediately indorse the date when the same was received by him, and the name and place of abode of the person verifying the same, and the said certificate shall after being so indorsed and entered as aforesaid be safely kept in his Office for future reference when required. Any person may \n\n11-And be it further enacted that it shall be lawful for any person or deposit in the said persons whatsoever to deposit in the said land office for safe custody any convey- Office any deed will or other instrument ance deed power of attorney or instrument in writing whatsoever or his or her last will and testament of which deeds wills conveyances or other instrument the said land officer shall (first giving a receipt for the same) immediately make an entry or entries in a book to be kept for that purpose to which book he shall keep an accurate alphabetical index having reference therein as well to the name Wills when so de- of the testator or parties to each such deed or instrument as to the person or posited for safe cus- persons depositing the same and the said Land Officer shall carefully and securely lody to be wrapped keep all such deeds wills or other instruments in his said Office until required by up in an envelope the party or parties depositing the same to deliver them back again. Provided testator or testatrix, that every such will or testament shall be cnclosed within a cover or envelope; On the death of sealed with the seal of the testator or testatrix, whose name shall be endorsed by testator or testatrix the Land Officer on such envelope or cover, and every such will shall retain in Land Officer shall the said Offre until the dicense of the testator or to statrix unless he or she shall deliver the will to previously require the same to be delivered back, and upon the death of the the first named ex- testator or testatrix the said Land Officer shall (after examining such will) deliver \n\nfor safe custody. \n\nunder the seal of. \n\necutor \n\nOr \n\nto any \n\nperson ordered to the same to the executor first named therein, or to such other person as shall be receive the same. duly authorized to receive the samë. \n\nOfficer or subordi- \n\nduty. \n\nPenalty on Land 12.—And be it farther enacted that if the said Land Officer or any other nate Officers wilful person employed in the said Land Office shall wilfully neglect or omit manner hereinbefore directed any memorial ly neglecting their to number register or enter m \n\nor certificate delivered into the said Office, he shall for every such offence forfeit and be liable to pay to Her Majesty Her, Heirs and Successors for the public purposes of the said Colony, the penalty or sum of five hundred dollars, and be Wilful destruction further liable in damages to the party injured to the extent of the loss or injury Forgery or altera sustained. And if the said Land Officer or any clerk or person whatsoever shall tion of any register wilfully destroy embezzle or secrete forge counterfeit raz? deface or alter any intent to defraud or memorial or any part thereof or any indorsement made thereon or any entry or injure punishable registry thereof in any book in the said office, with intent to defraud or injure any with 7 or 14 years person or persons, such Land Officer clerk or person so offending shall be guilty of trans ortation. \n\nfelony, and being thereof duly convicted shall be liable to be transported beyond Correction to be seas for any term not less than 7 years and not exceeding 14 years. verified by signature of Land Officer. \n\ned instrument with \n\n13. And be it enacted that all corrections by erasure interlineation or otherwise in any memorial of the registry of any document required to be register- ed by this Ordinance shall be noted and set forth at length in red ink in the margin \n\n", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-005 - Sir Henry Pottinger - 1844.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 225286, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-020 - Sir John Davis - 1847 [5-8]", "page_number": 164, "title": "CO129-020 - Sir John Davis - 1847 [5-8]", "content_text": "27 Sch W. Hawes\n\nChefoo\n\nI suppose that this should be communicated to this\n\n9 But it probably connects itself with the\n\nWith the highest respect, Your Lordship's,\n\nMost Obedient,\n\nHumble Servant,\n\nD. Dani\n\nInterest\n\nCE. Pacely an to ope\n\nForgery is MB\n\n... \n\nPage 14\n\n7787\n\n1\n\n114\n\n78-19 July 197\n\nSor\n\n159\n\n19. Ochrony.\n\nwith reference to your\n\nLetter of the 10 May ultimo\n\non the subject of the report made by the Governor of Hong Kong on the 13 Septr last on the Colonial Expenditure for the years 1845-6 I am directed by\n\nEarl Grey\n\nto transmit to\n\nyou, for the consideration of the Lords Commissioners of\n\nthe\n\nithie Treasury, the accompanying copy of a despatch from Sir John Davis, dated the 19 July", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-020 - Sir John Davis - 1847 [5-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 225447, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-020 - Sir John Davis - 1847 [5-8]", "page_number": 325, "title": "CO129-020 - Sir John Davis - 1847 [5-8]", "content_text": "the early part of \n\nin the \n\nthe present year \n\nthe Honble the Colonial Secretary sent to \n\nme \n\na Memorial \n\nfor registry \n\nof a Deed \n\nthe \n\ntogether with the original Deed, which purported to be an assignment of a Crown hold known as the Central \n\n\"Market in this place; on inspection of this Document I discovered grant informalities; A mortgage of \n\nthe \n\nproperty had been previously registered: \n\nbut no mention was made in the Deed of the Property being in anywise encumbered. \n\nthe consideration specified was \n\nridiculously small in proportion \n\nto \n\nthe value of the property, in fact less in amount than the registered mortgage incumbrance, and I had grounds for belief that the Assignor's death, must have occurred about the date of the deed; \n\nOrdinance for Deed Registry did not however authorize the Registrar to reject a Memorial provided it contains the particulars set forth \n\nin a schedule attached to the Ordinance, and when attested by the \n\noath of a competent person; \n\ninstructions conveyed in an extra \n\nLetter from the Colonial Secretary \n\n10 \n\nall Deeds and Conveyances \n\n319 \n\nby Chinese \n\nwere ordered to pass through the office of the Chinese Secretary for investigation, and the Chinese Secretary having concurred in the opinion that the Document exhibited general irregularity the parties concerned in the \n\nproperty \n\nwere sent for \n\nand examined, when the brother of the deceased Assignor alleged the Deed to be a Forgery, with consent of the \n\nMortgagee, \n\nand according to the \n\nThe \n\nOrdinance, the Memorial was however \n\neventually registered; at this stage of the proceedings \n\n(The \n\nIt \n\nIt was at this \n\nthat Mr. Afoon \n\nthe brother of the deceased Assignor) stated to me that his Brother had been in the habit of paying to the Honble Major Caine's Comprador James One Hundred and Fifty \n\nDollars a Month, which he alleged were extorted by the Honble the Major Caine's order, and had been promised for that consideration and interest in obtaining for his deceased Mr. Afoor the holding \n\n\"did not deem it \n\nthe Market prudent or right, for reasons which will hereafter be stated to \n\nall \n\nYour \n\nDE \n\nCore Ship", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-020 - Sir John Davis - 1847 [5-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 227097, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-025 - Bonham - 1848 [7-8]", "page_number": 121, "title": "CO129-025 - Bonham - 1848 [7-8]", "content_text": "a cloth after Mei Acqui's death, brought forward and a deed purporting that in Consideration of $2000 due and owing, Mei Soqui had wholly assigned him the Marker Lease hold. The suspicious circumstances attendant on registry of a Memorial of this kind have already been detailed in my Dispatch, it being your Lordship that Wei F'von openly stated to me that Major Caine's Comprador had been in the habit of taking monies from the Market in his Master's name.\n\nFrom enquiries made, there does not appear to be the shadow of a doubt but that this Deed of Assignment was an absolute forgery. It was drawn, but in blank, in the Office of AV Parker, solicitor of this place, and taken to Canton by some of Fong Ushe's Agents, where before Mr PRP Tuyler, Meaton's Interpreter to the British Consulate, the signatures of a Man personating Mei Asqui was feloniously attached, and the Document was brought back to Hongkong, without even the dates of execution being inserted, or notarial attestation of the subscribing witness appended.\n\nThe date was not inserted at his office after being brought back. Mr Parker admits this date, to wit, on the 2nd day of December 1849, Wei Acqui died at Konam on the opposite side of the river from the Canton Consulate, and for six weeks previous, he had resided without stirring out of doors, in such a state of weakness and debility, as by the testimony of several respectable Chinese who were constantly about his person, it was impossible he could have comprehended the nature of such a document, if anyone had endeavoured to explain it to him.\n\nI am the more particular in drawing your Lordship's attention to the forgery thus effected, because you will be better able to judge of the motives influencing the delinquent (Tong sche) when inciting Wei Afong to sign with him and Chowk Nan.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-025 - Bonham - 1848 [7-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 227133, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-025 - Bonham - 1848 [7-8]", "page_number": 157, "title": "CO129-025 - Bonham - 1848 [7-8]", "content_text": "2\n\n15\n\nMame.\n\n14\n\nblein Arshing, Sarceny\n\nYuen Artseun alias Joy Artseun.\n\nCrime.\n\nLite a\n\nver 25\n\nVerdict\n\ndustling houce July 17 Not quilty\n\nBurglary Larceny\n\nJay\n\nSentence\n\nRemarks\n\n155\n\nPrisoner acquitted\n\nin consequence of absence of principal witnesses.\n\nand.\n\n17. Not guilty.\n\n16 Yeony Aryee.\n\nSteaking, cattle\n\n17 Guilty\n\nJen. years transportation.\n\n77\n\nChun Arlum.\n\nForgery\n\n15 Guilty.\n\nSeven years transportation\n\n18 Koe Archun\n\n19 Henry Gubbe Assault\n\nAltering a forged chequer 15 Guilty.\n\nBeury Musich as the excention of his duty.\n\nAssault on a Constable in\n\nGabby not guilty\n\n17 Musicha quilty\n\n26.\n\nHenry Gubbs.\n\nAssault\n\n032\n\nMook a Constable\n\nHenry Musicka in the cxcution of his duty.\n\n17\n\nYeep Aroong. Ishing uring\n\n\"ker\n\nFung\n\nWong Arquen\n\nWong hoony\n\nAglei\n\nlum lour\n\nWong Ay you Wong Aroong. Wolig Arping in\n\nfeo-\n\nJeeing fogok Youre Archum. Kung part.\n\nFor t\n\nCh\n\nFring Chring.\n\nWeen Sarm.\n\nAger Farm.\n\nFarm Bung Ching\n\nFarm\n\nGuilty.\n\nhard labour\n\nJung\n\nАганк\n\nPrincipal witnesks did not appear\n\nGaing Arpo\n\n22.\n\nHow Arfork.\n\nLaing Arearm.\n\nAggravated Assault. 17. Not guilty\n\n23.\n\nChun Archee.\n\nRobbery.\n\n7 Guilty\n\nGuilty. Fen\n\nIon years Transportation.\n\nPrevious Conviction.\n\nAgfi Alook,\n\nSeven years transfentation.\n\nMusicka\n\nOne month's imprisonment.\n\nProsecution withdrawn.\n\nSeveral parties ( deep troong, Jung Ayee, Chung lun 2000. Wong Arping, Kong joong po. Kung part,\n\nYoud Afok\" Tiep mouths' imprisonment with Chung Feut, and Age Farm)\n\nAssault and Battery 17 Leon Fisherm\n\nout on their own,\n\ncharger\n\n~ recognizanced\n\nand failed to appear\n\nHere is the corrected version in HTML format:\n\n15\n\n14\n\nMame.\n\nBlein Arshing, Sarceny\n\nYuen Artseun alias Joy Artseun.\n\nCrime.\n\nLite a ver 25\n\nVerdict\n\nDustling houce July 17 Not guilty\n\nBurglary Larceny\n\nJay\n\nSentence\n\nRemarks\n\n155\n\nPrisoner acquitted\n\nin consequence of absence of principal witnesses.\n\n17. Not guilty.\n\n16 Yeony Aryee.\n\nStealing, cattle\n\n17 Guilty\n\nTen years transportation.\n\n77\n\nChun Arlum.\n\nForgery\n\n15 Guilty.\n\nSeven years transportation\n\n18 Koe Archun\n\n19 Henry Gubbe Assault\n\nAltering a forged cheque 15 Guilty.\n\nAssault on a Constable in the execution of his duty.\n\nGabby not guilty\n\n17 Musicha guilty\n\n26.\n\nHenry Gubbs.\n\nAssault\n\non a Constable\n\nHenry Musicka in the execution of his duty.\n\n17\n\nYeep Aroong.\n\nStealing during\n\nFung\n\nWong Arquen\n\nWong hoony\n\nAglei lum lour\n\nWong Ay you Wong Aroong.\n\nGuilty.\n\nhard labour\n\nPrincipal witnesses did not appear\n\nGaing Arpo\n\n22.\n\nHow Arfork.\n\nLaing Arearm.\n\nAggravated Assault. 17. Not guilty\n\n23.\n\nChun Archee.\n\nRobbery.\n\n7 Guilty\n\nTen years Transportation.\n\nPrevious Conviction.\n\nAgfi Alook,\n\nSeven years transportation.\n\nMusicka\n\nOne month's imprisonment.\n\nProsecution withdrawn.\n\nSeveral parties ( deep troong, Jung Ayee, Chung lun etc. Wong Arping, Kong joong po. Kung part,\n\nYoud Afok, Tiep) months' imprisonment with Chung Feut, and Age Farm)\n\nAssault and Battery 17 Leon Fisherm\n\nout on their own recognizance\n\nand failed to appear", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-025 - Bonham - 1848 [7-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 228177, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-027 - Public Offices - 1848", "page_number": 481, "title": "CO129-027 - Public Offices - 1848", "content_text": "Appendix.\n\nReport on the Tea Trade,\n\n[66]\n\nled to the craving desire for opium as a counter stimulant, is deserving of consideration; certain it is that strong coffee (coffeine) among the Turks, Persians, and strong tea (theine), (coffeine and theine are similar in their elementary qualities) among the Chinese are followed or preceded by the use of opium or similar deleterious stimulating narcotics. It is stated that in the manufacturing districts of Great Britain, where tea is very largely consumed at all meals, opium is now being introduced.\n\nThe statesman is bound to watch apparently minute and remote causes in their operating influence on the character of a nation, and to look more to the preservation of the physical strength and moral power of a people, than to any imaginary increase of revenue or trade from one branch of commerce. Since the commencement of the present century tea has increased in consumption per head in Great Britain more than sugar, wine, tobacco, &c., and it now amounts to more than 20 oz. per annum for each man, woman, and child. 28,000,000 people in the United Kingdom consume double the quantity of tea that is used by the whole population of Europe (including Russia), North and South America, Africa, and Asia (exclusive of China and Japan), although the duties in these countries are low, or, as in the United States, nil.\n\nIt is asserted that if the Government reduced the duty on tea, a diminution of price would follow and cause a still larger consumption of tea in England. But low prices (if such be desired) would probably not be obtained by any reduction of the Government revenue. Other causes will operate in the reduction of price. Competition among the European merchants at Canton, and the necessity for selling cotton goods and other manufactures for which tea is received in barter, has tended to maintain for that commodity high prices, but it is expected that the opening of ports contiguous to the tea districts will materially reduce the prime cost. Mr. Consul Alcock informed me at Foochow foo, that he ascertained tea could be shipped from that port at 20 per cent. less than the Canton prices. The commercial prospects of this capital of the Fokien province will be found under its distinctive head. Some tea has been shipped from Ningpo, and several cargoes from Shanghai direct for England (see Shanghai Consulate). The shipments from the latter-named port will probably increase in return for the large quantities of British manufactures sent thither. Competition will thus take place with the Cantonese, and the sale price be lowered materially. Considerable efforts have been made by the Chinese and former Hong merchants at Canton to confine the foreign tea trade to that city; and in this they have been aided not only by the possession of large capital, enabling them to make contracts with and advances to the tea cultivators and manufacturers, but also by an extensive credit which assists them to take off and dispose of a considerable quantity of our manufactures, and by the routine of old established channels which are not easily changed, and also by the promulgation of official documents and edicts arising partly from the Imperial policy of keeping foreigners at the extremity of the empire, and partly from a fear of losing the transit and other duties which tea pays during its conveyance from Fokien and Chekeang to Canton. Tea will ultimately be shipped from the most convenient port near to the place of growth, when our merchants are permitted to carry on a free and unrestricted intercourse with China, which would be far more beneficial for the Chinese than for ourselves. Chusan produces considerable quantities of superior tea, which is sent manufactured to Ningpo and other places for the use of the mandarins. Were Chusan or some contiguous island a British possession, tea would be brought from different ports of the adjacent sea coast, and thus shipped for England at a reduced cost. It is not our policy or interest to maintain the tea trade at Canton; on the contrary, we ought to promote this valuable commerce in the northern ports.\n\nThere has latterly been considerable fluctuations in the price of tea, in consequence of extravagant speculations. About the mouth of June 1839, when the intelligence of Commissioner Lin having issued prohibitory edicts against opium smuggling reached England, speculation began in tea, and was principally sustained by the operations of a wealthy retired opium dealer. Congou rose from 1s. to 1s. 5d. per lb., and this description of tea became the regulating price for all other teas.\n\nOn 1st August, news of trade being stopped at Canton reached London, and Congou advanced to 1s. 8d.; in October to 2s. in consequence of Captain Elliott's order that no British ship should go up the river to Canton. On 2d December Congou rose to 2s. 7d., it being known that hostile measures were to be forthwith adopted towards China. The stock of tea on hand in England, 31st December 1839, was 52,500,000 lbs., and the quantity delivered for 1839 was 32,366,412 lbs. On 16th January 1840, the speech from the throne announced that Her Majesty's Government considered the dispute with China national, and the price of Congou rose to 3s. 2d. per lb. The rumour of a treaty being arranged by Captain Elliott brought down prices to 2s. 9d., but on the refusal of Lin to ratify it, they rose to 3s. 2d. On the arrival of tea taken out of American ships at Hong Kong, and permission to land it, prices fell to 2s. 8d., but rose on 11th March 1840 to 3s. 2d., on rumour that a declaration of war against China had been issued by the Governor-General of India, in the name of the British Government. When it was known that no declaration of war had been issued, prices fell to 2s. Thus the fluctuation proceeded, affected by every true intelligence or false report artfully promulgated.\n\nAt the close of 1840 the stock on hand was 46,500,000 lbs., and the quantity delivered for home consumption during the year, 35,136,232 lbs., the highest prices during the year, 3s. 3d., lowest 1s. 11d. per lb. Throughout the year 1841, the speculations were continued, almost every day producing a new rumour and a rise or fall. On 17th August a dated letter was inserted in second edition of the Herald and Chronicle, which was said to have been received from Man, 27th April, and put on board the Bombay steamer after the mail and other despatches had been embarked. In this letter it was asserted that the Emperor had ordered the destruction of all teas, and that the order was rigidly obeyed, that hostilities had recommenced, and that\n\n[67]\n\nAppendix.\n\nReport on the Tea Trade.\n\nnot 1,000 chests of tea had found their way to the outer coasters by smuggling. This fraud rose prices immediately, but they fell again on the discovery of the forgery. On 31st August the stock in the United Kingdom was reduced to 29,000,000 lbs., the lowest which had taken place, and this aided the rage for speculation. The siege of Canton, its evacuation, the local truce, indemnity of $6,000,000 caused large operations in what were termed \"time bargains.\" A gambling called \"puts and calls\" arose, one person purchasing from another the right of buying or selling to him at a certain price, a defined quantity of tea on a given day. The announcement that although we were pushing the war on the east and north coasts of China, the truce was to exist with Canton, and trade to proceed as usual, almost entirely checked the speculation in November and December 1841. On 31st December 1841 the stock on hand was 36,000,000 lbs., and the quantity delivered for home consumption 32,262,905 lbs.\n\nPrices ranged for Congou from 1s. 4½d. to 2s. 9d. During 1842 speculation was slow and cautious, but the market nearly resumed its usual steady operations, and prices fell to 1s. 5d. on the arrival, 22d November, of the treaty of Nankin. The quantity consumed for the year was about 36,000,000 lbs., and the stock in hand 34,000,000 lbs.; range of prices, 1s. 5d. to 2s. per lb. for Congous.\n\nProbably at no period since the celebrated Mississippi scheme was there ever greater and more prolonged speculation in one article. Expresses were established between Marseilles and London; large sums paid for early official information; newspapers were fed for promulgating false intelligence. At Garraway's the speculators continued this gambling in tea throughout the evening, and for a part of the night. Monied interest was transferred from the Stock Exchange to the Jerusalem Coffee-house and to Garraway's Mart. The mania spread into the country among wholesale and retail dealers in tea, and fortunes were lost and made with marvellous rapidity. The usual results ensued; the steady pursuit of trade was abandoned for the wildest gambling. Men who rose wealthy in the morning were beggars at night, and suicide, bankruptcy, and ruin to many a hearth and home closed the scene.\n\nIt behoves the Government to avoid interfering with the routine into which the trade has now subsided. Some persons still hold inferior teas, almost rubbish, that were purchased at enormously high prices during the speculation. Their only prospect of sale is a reduction of the duty, and an alteration in the mode of levying the duty, by admitting inferior teas at a lower customs rate. These persons and their agents are therefore very clamorous for an alteration in the duty to suit their purposes; but Government can look only to the public interests, and these were considered as best served by an uniform rate of duty on all teas entered after 1st July 1836.\n\nIt was attempted in 1834, when the trade with China was thrown open by the abolition of the monopoly of the East India Company, to levy ad valorem duty of 1s. 6d. per pound on Bohea, 2s. 2d. per pound on Congou, 3s. per pound on Souchong, &c. This was deemed preferable to the mode adopted previous to 1834, viz. 96 per cent. on all teas sold at or under 2s. per pound, and 100 per cent. on all teas sold above 2s. per pound; but the levy of a discriminating duty on Bohea, Congou, &c. was, after two years' trial, found impracticable, and in 1836 the uniform rate of 2s. 1d. per pound on all descriptions of tea was levied, which, with the additional five per cent. imposed in 1840, makes the total duty now levied per pound 2s. 2¼d.\n\nThe present system of an uniform duty on all teas was adopted at the urgent request of the tea brokers and tea dealers in England; and it is impossible to examine impartially the evidence taken before the Select Committee of Parliament, appointed 6th May 1834, to inquire into the expediency of establishing one fixed rate of duty, without seeing the justice of such a proceeding, no less for the interest of the public than for the advantage of the revenue.\n\nSir George Staunton, who was on that Committee, and possessing the largest information, truly observed that he believed the present system of a rated duty had not the support of a single individual who ever was in China. Moreover, any rated duty as to quality or price would exceedingly disturb the simplicity with which the tea trade is now conducted at Canton, where the merchant is unfettered in his purchases by any other consideration than the intrinsic goodness of the leaf he is buying. If two or more rates of duty were levied in England, inferior qualities of tea would be produced, whereas when the duty is alike on all teas, good or bad, the merchant finds it his interest to export only the good.\n\nThe consumption of tea in the United Kingdom being estimated at 45,000,000 lbs. yearly, and sold at an average price to the consumer of 4s. 6d. per pound, the money expended for tea is £10,125,000.\n\nThe expenditure of this sum is distributed as follows:\n\n \n Net cost of 36,000,000 lbs. at 1s. 5d. per pound, or about 25 taels per picul, 717 taels to 1,000 dollars, or about 70d. per tael exchange dollar of 4s. 2d. to 4s. 3d. picul 133 lbs.\n £2,250,000\n \n \n Export duty in China, $3.37 per picul, or 1¼d. per pound, about\n £280,000\n \n \n Shipping charges, &c. in China'\n £25,000\n \n \n Freight, &c. China to England, 2d. per pound\n £375,000\n \n \n Insurance, a halfpenny per pound\n £93,000\n \n\n(continued)\n\nnot", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-027 - Public Offices - 1848.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 228576, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-028 - Bonham - 1849 [1-3]", "page_number": 304, "title": "CO129-028 - Bonham - 1849 [1-3]", "content_text": "REPORTS EXHIBITING THE PAST AND PRESENT \n\nEnclosure 6 in No.\n\nRETURN of CRIMINAL CASES that have been Tried in the Supreme Court of Hong Kong, from 15th February to 15th December, 1848, inclusive.\n\n \n No.\n Crime.\n No. of Cases.\n No. of Persons.\n Conviction.\n Acquittal.\n Death Sentence.\n Transportation.\n Hard labour over 1 Year.\n Hard labour under 1 Year.\n Charge Postponed.\n Charge abandoned.\n Remarks.\n \n \n \n Perjury\n 1\n 1\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery\n 20\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Assault and battery.\n 1\n 1\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Assaulting a police officer\n 1\n 3\n 1\n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n tried twice.\n \n \n \n Assault on a constable in the execution of his duty.\n 1\n 2\n 1\n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n tried twice.\n \n \n \n Administering poison with intent to kill\n 1\n 2\n 1\n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Affray.\n 11\n 17\n 11\n \n \n \n 2\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Arson.\n 2\n 4\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Aggravated assault\n 4\n 4\n 4\n \n \n \n 1\n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Assault\n 17\n 26\n 16\n 1\n \n \n 4\n 9\n \n \n 1 tried twice.\n \n \n \n Assault with intent to commit sodomy.\n 1\n 1\n 1\n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Assault with intent to rob\n 1\n 2\n 1\n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Breaking into a building and stealing therefrom\n 1\n 2\n 1\n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Burglary and larceny\n 1\n 2\n 1\n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Cutting and wounding with intent to do some grievous bodily harm\n 1\n 2\n 1\n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Demanding money with menaces\n 1\n 2\n 1\n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Demanding money with menaces and force, with intent to steal same\n 2\n 4\n 2\n \n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Forgery\n 2\n 2\n 2\n \n \n \n 1\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Larceny\n 13\n 13\n 13\n \n \n \n 4\n 7\n \n \n 2*\n \n \n \n Larceny in a dwelling-house, over £5.\n 7\n 7\n 7\n \n \n \n 3\n 4\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Manslaughter..\n 1\n 1\n 1\n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Murder by stabbing..\n 1\n 2\n 1\n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Obtaining goods by false pretences.\n 1\n 1\n 1\n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Receiving stolen goods\n 2\n 2\n 2\n \n \n \n 1\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery by a person armed.\n 1\n 2\n 1\n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery by persons armed.\n 7\n 13\n 7\n \n \n \n 5\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery with arms\n 2\n 2\n 2\n \n \n \n 1\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery with arms, and receiving stolen goods\n 1\n 2\n 1\n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery with violence\n 13\n 26\n 13\n \n \n \n 9\n 4\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Stealing cattle\n 1\n 1\n 1\n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Stealing from the person\n 2\n 4\n 2\n \n \n \n 1\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Stealing in a boat in port\n 1\n 1\n 1\n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Stealing in a boat within 100 miles of the coast of China\n 2\n 2\n 2\n \n \n \n 1\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sodomy\n 1\n 1\n 1\n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n tried twice.\n \n \n \n Uttering a forged cheque\n 1\n 1\n 1\n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Total\n \n 94\n 157\n 91\n 1\n 2\n 1\n 46\n 41\n \n \n \n \n\n* Out on their own recognizances and failed to appear.\n\nW. CAINE, Colonial Secretary.\n\n#lac 130k of 18th se STATE OF HER MAJESTY'S COLONIAL POSSESSIONS.s\n\nNo.\n\nREPORT of the COLONIAL SURGEON for 1848.\n\nIN compiling a sanatory report upon this colony for the past year, attention is called to three important objects\n\n1. To deduce from such materials as are attainable, the most concise and the best evidence of the actual state of the health of the community.\n\n2. To trace out the various causes of endemic diseases, or those which are peculiar to the locality.\n\n3. To point out the general or political and social measures which may or ought to be taken for the removal of such causes.\n\nThe defect in statistical records of population, disease, and death, a defect ascribable to the peculiar character of the people, and the limited and insular nature of the colony,-is a serious obstacle to the faithful prosecution of the first inquiry. Until the establishment of the civil hospital, which will assist in affording scrupulous exactness to the future records of sickness in the various Government departments, the system pursued in the treatment of the sick amongst the police force, was not only inefficient and unsatisfactory, but it was one by which was impossible to impart faithfulness to the records of disease.\n\nAll averages in the police force will be referred to fixed numbers; dis- missals and changes in the force, however, during the year, will bring into the computation of the averages nearly twice the number of individuals that compose the fixed standard to which the averages are referred.\n\nPopular ideas are very apt to attribute to some apparent physical cause the epidemics which prevail; but those who are so ready with ex tempore explanations of the most recondite of all morbific phenomena, are little aware of the diversity, the complexity, and subtlety of the subject which they handle with so much facility. An insight into the varying influences of the atmo- sphere, the relation of such influences to vital tissues, and into the thousand changes which one familiar atmospherical phenomenon may, at a moment, work on the composition and constituents of the surrounding air, would demonstrate the presumption in endeavouring to trace causes with so little knowledge. The practical mischief of such rashness is every day apparent.\n\nIn pointing out the remedies for gencral evils, it is often discouraging to feel that we are frequently called upon to suggest measures which cannot be taken.\n\n \n \n Europeans\n Indians and Chinese\n \n \n \n Number of Sick\n Days Sick\n Deaths\n Average duration of Disease\n Number of Sick\n Days Sick\n Deaths\n Average duration of Disease\n \n \n January\n 21\n 108\n 1\n 5.14\n 11\n 110\n 2\n 10\n \n \n February\n 40\n 152\n \n 3.8\n 47\n 180\n \n 3.83\n \n \n March\n 46\n 193\n 9\n 4.2\n 55\n 239\n \n 4.35\n \n \n April\n 34\n 160\n \n 4.71\n 42\n 254\n \n 6.05\n \n \n May\n 39\n 188\n 17\n 4.82\n 56\n 301\n \n 5.38\n \n \n June\n 48\n 260\n 15\n 5.42\n 63\n 389\n \n 6.17\n \n \n July\n 57\n 389\n 21\n 6.82\n 78\n 506\n 5\n 6.49\n \n \n August\n 51\n 430\n 26\n 8.43\n 77\n 718\n 19\n 9.32\n \n \n September\n 62\n 525\n 9\n 8.47\n 71\n 628\n 3\n 8.85\n \n \n October\n 47\n 326\n 10\n 6.94\n 57\n 395\n 11\n 6.93\n \n \n November\n 27\n 249\n 8\n 9.22\n 36\n 352\n 5\n 9.78\n \n \n December\n 28\n 175\n 8\n 6.25\n 34\n 209\n \n 6.15\n \n \n Total\n \n \n 124\n \n \n \n 45\n \n \n\nTotal Number of Deaths amongst Europeans 124\n\nTotal Number of Deaths amongst Indians, &c. 45\n\nTotal Number of Deaths 169\n\nIn explanation of the foregoing table, it is necessary to distinguish the actual amount of mortality from endemic causes from that resulting from other causes.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-028 - Bonham - 1849 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 228633, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-028 - Bonham - 1849 [1-3]", "page_number": 361, "title": "CO129-028 - Bonham - 1849 [1-3]", "content_text": "Descriptive List of One Half-year\n\nSame\n\nCountry\n\nAgent\n\nProfession\n\nTrades.\n\nCrime.\n\n355\n\nunder sentence of Transportation.\n\nChinese Prisoners under sentence\n\nand for\n\nTerm of\n\nSentence\n\nHeight\n\nGeneral Description.\n\nRemarks.\n\n \n 1\n Abran\n 26\n 44\n Private Soldier\n \n \n 2\n Men ape\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Chung colum\n \n \n \n \n \n \n I hão Archun\n \n \n \n \n \n 5\n I'vong Aryce\n \n \n \n \n \n &\n Chun terchec\n \n \n \n \n \n \n cluna\n 29\n \n \n \n \n 6\n Bishamm\n \n \n \n \n \n \n radero\n 25\n \n \n \n \n \n Compro\n \n \n \n \n \n 3\n 18\n Coolie\n \n \n \n \n 10\n Barber\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Bricklayer\n \n \n Cutting and wounding with intent to do some grievous bodily harm.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery with arms.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Forgery\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Uttering a forged cheque\n \n \n \n Enticing stealing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery with\n \n \n \n \n \n 7\n So tersa\n 25\n \n Coolie\n \n \n 8\n Chaong toler\n 20\n \n \n \n \n \n booté\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Gitang\n 29\n \n Coolie\n \n \n 10\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Cordic\n 23\n 4\n Boatman\n \n \n \n \n \n \n with intent to rob.\n \n \n \n Ditto\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Gitte\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Assault being armed\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Arwac\n \n \n \n \n\nCheong Foytai Hong Apun\n\nSheriff's Office, Victoria, Hong Kong, 24th February, 1849\n\n(Forwarded to) Colonial Secretary\n\nJuly\n\n1849\n\n \n 564\n Dark Complexion, Mark on nose.\n \n \n \n \n 14-11-\n \n \n \n \n \n 15\n spears\n totally\n 1000\n \n \n \n Her Life\n 5th –\n \n \n \n By\n \n \n \n \n \n \"\n 5\n fair complexion.\n \n \n \n Jegears\n \n \n \n \n \n SA\n \n \n \n \n \n 5\n 8½\n Park complexion\n 572\n \n \n Do\n \n \n \n \n \n Yo\n tivo scarsen\n \n \n \n \n Yo\n \n \n \n \n \n \n forehead.\n \n \n \n \n Marks\n \n \n \n \n \n Preciously convicted\".\n \n \n \n \n \n So\n \n \n \n \n \n 15-0\n \n \n \n \n \n 13th yet.\n \n \n \n \n \n 50\n Fair complexion.\n \n \n \n \n Go\n \n \n \n \n \n \"\n 5\n by Gart Complexion, Scar on left temple\n \n \n \n 15th Feb\n 5\n fair complexion, Marks sieve\n \n \n \n 5102\n \n \n \n \n \n Go\n \n \n \n \n \n Go\n \n \n \n \n\nSigned, Charles M. Holdforth.\n\nSheriff.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-028 - Bonham - 1849 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 231395, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-036 - Sir Bonham - 1851 [1-5]", "page_number": 180, "title": "CO129-036 - Sir Bonham - 1851 [1-5]", "content_text": "12\n\nHONG KONG.\n\nEncl. 10 in No.\n\nEncl. 11 in No.\n\nREPORTS EXHIBITING THE PAST AND PRESENT\n\nEnclosure 10 in No.\n\nVictoria, Hong Kong, January 27, 1851.\n\nMEMORANDUM on the Junk Trade in the harbour of Victoria, from 1st March to 31st December 1850.\n\nA MEMORANDUM furnished in February 1850 explained the difficulty of supplying extensive or accurate data regarding the trade of this colony, and the defectiveness of the means of obtaining information upon that head.\n\nFrom the return daily made up by a native in the employ of the Chinese Secretary's Office, it appears that there anchored in Victoria harbour during the above period 467 junks loading with stone from the colonial quarries, a slight advance upon the stone junks of 1849, which amounted to but 456.\n\nIn the salt trade there is a considerable increase, 456 junks having imported 345,050 piculs of salt in 10 months, while the whole import of 1849 was 335,350 piculs imported in 334 junks.\n\nThe monthly average of general traders has continued nearly the same as during the latter eight months of 1849; of the first four months, there was no record, but, in the remainder, 596 junks, laden with general cargoes, anchored here, while during the latter 10 months of 1850 there have been 706 at Victoria with general cargoes, moving to or from the east and west coasts of the Canton province, Fuhkien, the islands of Hainan and Formosa, and Singapore and Siam.\n\nFrom this last port a single junk brought areca-nut, Brazil-wood, rattans, pepper, birds'-nests, leather, and nutmegs.\n\nFrom Singapore three large vessels, the same cargo as above, birds'-nests excepted, and with it drugs, dried fish, glasses, and bicho-de-mar.\n\nThree from Formosa, coal, sulphur, rice, potato-flour, planks, and skin. The rest from various ports of the coast, reaching from Tien-tsin to Hainan Island; pigs, sheep, and poultry, drugs, bark, dried fruits, pulse, grain, sweet potatoes, sugar, sugar-candy, cocoa-nuts, areca-nuts, betel-leaf, dried fish, blubber-fish, rock-suckers, bicho-de-mar, hams, bacon, pickled vegetables, eggs, native wine and manufactured tobacco, salt, alum, coal, charcoal, fuel, sulphur, rattans, coarse paper, crockery, cloth, grass-cloth, leather, furs, raw silk, planks, raw iron, and iron ware.\n\nCompared with 1849 there has been a slight falling off in the marine junk trade of some four or five vessels a-month, and there have been none, as in 1849, from Tonquin; but it is impossible to account for this by any of the causes which might ordinarily be supposed to affect a coast trade.\n\nDuring the last two months when, although the monsoon is fair, the weather is such as to render navigation not a little perilous to the frail native craft, and while there has been more just alarm felt on the score of piracy than since the destruction of the pirates' fleet in September 1849, the number of monthly arrivals has been greater than at any period since May 1849.\n\nIn both November and December no fewer than 124 junks have touched here; the greatest number on record before this being in May 1849, when 122 are shown to have anchored here.\n\nT. WADE, Assistant Chinese Secretary.\n\n(Signed)\n\n(True Copy.)\n\nW. CAINE, Colonial Secretary.\n\nSTATE OF HER MAJESTY'S COLONIAL POSSESSIONS.\n\n174\n\n13\n\nEnclosure 12 in No.\n\nRETURN of Criminal Cases that have been tried in the Supreme Court of Hong Kong during the Year 1850.\n\n \n CRIME\n Number of Cases\n Number of Persons\n SENTENCE\n Acquitted\n Death\n Death recorded\n Transportation\n Hard Labour over One Year\n Hard Labour under One Year\n Postponed\n Charge abandoned\n REMARKS\n \n \n Arson\n 1\n 1\n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Abduction of Girl under 16 Years\n 1\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Assault\n 9\n \n \n 6\n \n \n \n \n 10\n \n \n \n \n \n Assault and false Imprisonment\n 3\n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Assault, with intent to rob\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n Aggravated Assault\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n Assault and Robbery\n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 7\n \n \n \n \n \n Breach of Prison\n 2\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Burglary, with intent to rob\n 6\n 8\n \n \n \n \n \n 6\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Burglary and Larceny\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n Burglary and Stabbing\n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n Conspiracy to sell Girl for purpose of Prostitution\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n Demanding money with menaces\n 1\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n False Imprisonment\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 4\n \n \n \n \n \n False Imprisonment and Extortion\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n Forgery\n 2\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Larceny\n 12\n 25\n \n \n \n \n \n 7\n 11\n \n \n \n \n \n Larceny by a Servant\n 2\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n Larceny in a Dwelling-house\n 2\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Manslaughter\n 1\n 9\n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Murder\n 3\n 3\n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Perjury\n 1\n 1\n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Piracy\n 41\n \n \n \n 29\n \n 12\n 4\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Piracy, with Stabbing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Receiving Stolen Goods\n 1\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n Revolt\n 7\n 12\n \n \n \n \n \n 7\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery with arms\n 4\n 4\n \n \n \n \n \n 4\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery, with stabbing\n 5\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 14\n \n \n \n \n \n Stabbing, with intent to do grievous bodily harm\n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n Total\n 81\n 163\n \n 18\n 31\n 1\n 29\n 40\n 51\n \n \n \n \n\n(Signed)\n\nDeputy Registrar.\n\n* James Gilroy, one of the prisoners, was ordered to be discharged on payment of 1s. to Her Majesty.\n\nIn this case, the prisoners were further sentenced to pay a fine of 50 Dollars each, and to be further imprisoned till such fine was paid. This prisoner was indicted for murder, but the Crown waiving that charge, he pleaded guilty of manslaughter. One of these prisoners died before the day of trial in prison. This will explain the difference of one in the totals.\n\nW. H. ALEXANDER,\n\n(Signed)\n\nROBERT DUNDAS CAY,\n\nRegistrar.\n\n(True Copy,)\n\nW. CAINE, Colonial Secretary.\n\n4\n\nEnclosure 11 in No.\n\nRETURN of the Total Number of Felony Cases coming under the Cognizance of the Hong Kong Police, including those in which no Persons were apprehended.\n\n \n Year\n Total Number of Cases\n \n \n 1847\n 585\n \n \n 1848\n 713\n \n \n 1849\n 856\n \n \n 1850\n 674\n \n\n(Signed)\n\nCHARLES MAY, Superintendent of Police.\n\nVictoria, Hong Kong, February, 1851.\n\n(True Copy,)\n\nW. CAINE, Colonial Secretary.\n\nPage 180\n\nPage 181", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-036 - Sir Bonham - 1851 [1-5].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 231427, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-036 - Sir Bonham - 1851 [1-5]", "page_number": 212, "title": "CO129-036 - Sir Bonham - 1851 [1-5]", "content_text": "IMB241/51 236\n\nReturn of Criminal Cases that have been tried in the Supreme Court of Hongkong during the Year, 1850.\n\n \n No of Cases\n No of Persons\n Crime\n Convicted\n Sentence\n Acquitted\n Charge abandoned or Postponed\n Remarks\n \n \n 1\n 1\n Abduction of Girl\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n 2\n Arson\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n 2\n Assault under 16 years\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n 3\n Assault and false imprisonment\n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n 1\n Assault with intent to rob\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n 1\n Aggravated assault\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n 3\n Assault and robbery\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 3\n 3\n Breaches of Prison\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n 1\n Burglary with intent to rob\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 68\n 122\n Burglary and Larceny\n 112\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n 2\n Burglary and Stabbing\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 3\n 3\n Conspiracy to sell a girl for purpose of prostitution\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n 1\n Demanding money with menaces\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n 7\n False imprisonment\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 7\n 7\n False imprisonment and extortion\n 7\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n 1\n Forgery\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 610\n 725\n Larceny\n 440\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n 2\n Larceny by a Servant\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n 2\n Larceny in a Dwelling house\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n 2\n Manslaughter\n 2\n \n \n \n *\n \n \n 19\n 44\n Murder\n 18\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n 1\n Perjury\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 225\n 441\n Piracy\n 163\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n 1\n Piracy with stabbing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 160\n 260\n Receiving stolen goods\n 81\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 12\n 51\n Robbery\n 14\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 4\n 7\n Robbery with stabbing\n 4\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 5\n 5\n Stabbing with intent to do grievous bodily harm\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Total\n 78\n 2012\n 440\n 7\n 14\n \n\nof the Prisoners was ordered to be discharged on payment of $4. to Her Majesty. § In this case the Prisoners were further sentenced to pay a fine of $50 each.\n\nimprisoned till such fine was paid.\n\nand to be further\n\n* This Prisoner was indicted for Murder but the Crown waiving that charge, he pleaded Guilty of Manslaughter.\n\n© One of these prisoners died before the day of trial in prison. This will explain the difference of one in the Totals.\n\n(Signed) W. H. Alexander.\n\nDeputy Registrar.\n\n(Signed) Robt Dundas Cay.\n\nRegistrar.\n\nTrue Copy.\n\nColonial Secretary.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-036 - Sir Bonham - 1851 [1-5].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 232273, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-039 - Sir Bonham - 1852 [1-12]", "page_number": 134, "title": "CO129-039 - Sir Bonham - 1852 [1-12]", "content_text": "HONG KONG\n\nNumber of Cases.\n\nNumber of Persons.\n\nREPORTS EXHIBITING THE PAST AND PRESENT\n\nEnclosure No. 14.\n\nHong Kong Police, including those in which no Persons were apprehended. RETURN of the Total Number of FELONY CASES coming under the cognizance of the\n\n \n Total\n Year.\n Number of Cases.\n Remarks.\n \n \n \n 1851\n 488\n Decrease in 1851, 186 cases.\n \n \n \n 1850\n 674\n \n \n\nPolice Department,\n\n(Signed)\n\nC. MAY,\n\n12th February 1852.\n\nSuperintendent of Police.\n\nEnclosure No 15.\n\nRETURN of CRIMINAL CASES that have been tried in the Supreme Court of Hong Kong during the Year 1851.\n\n \n CRIME.\n \n Number of Cases.\n Number of Persons.\n Convicted.\n Acquitted.\n Death.\n Death recorded.\n Transportation.\n Hard Labour, over One Year.\n Hard Labour, One year and under.\n Number of Cases, abandoned\n Sentence postponed\n Remarks.\n \n \n Assault\n \n 7\n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n Burglary\n -\n 1\n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Child stealing\n \n 1\n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Burglary and Larceny\n \n 3\n \n 3\n \n \n \n \n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Assault, with intent to rob\n \n 1\n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Attempting to set fire to a ship\n \n 1\n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Assault and false imprisonment\n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Demanding money with menaces\n \n 1\n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Conspiracy to commit Piracy\n \n 3\n \n 3\n \n \n \n \n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Cutting, with intent to do grievous bodily harm\n (6)\n 1\n 7\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Endeavouring to make a revolt\n \n 1\n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Escape\n \n 1\n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Extortion by a constable\n (e)\n 6\n 4\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Keeping a bawdy house\n \n \n 6\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n False imprisonment\n \n 12\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Forgery\n \n 1\n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Larceny\n \n 5\n \n 3\n (f)6\n \n \n \n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Manslaughter\n \n 3\n \n 3\n \n \n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n Five of the prisoners were arraigned for murder, but found guilty of manslaughter.\n \n \n Murder\n \n 4\n \n \n 4\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Obtaining money under false pretences\n \n 1\n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Perjury\n (4)5\n 1\n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Piracy\n \n 8\n \n 8\n \n \n 8\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Receiving stolen goods\n \n 2\n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Piracy, with wounding\n \n 4\n \n 4\n \n \n 4\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Piracy, with violence\n \n 1\n \n 1\n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery\n \n 6\n \n 6\n \n \n \n \n 6\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery, with arms\n \n 12\n \n 12\n \n \n \n \n 12\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery in the harbour\n \n I\n \n I\n \n \n \n \n I\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Shooting at, with intent to maim\n -\n 2\n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Selling and purchasing a woman for purpose of prostitution\n \n 4\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sodomy\n \n 1\n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Stabbing with intent to do grievous bodily harm\n \n 10\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Total\n \n 66\n 116\n 51\n 27\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n(Signed)\n\nROB. DUNDAS CAY, Registrar.\n\nW. H. ALEXANDER, Deputy Registrar.\n\nSTATE OF HER MAJESTY'S COLONIAL POSSESSIONS.\n\nEnclosure 16.\n\nRETURN of the Number of CASES TRIED by the Honourable JOHN WALTER HULME, and ACTIONS COMMENCED in the Supreme and Vice-Admiralty Courts of HONG KONG, during the Year ending 31st December 1851.\n\nCASES TRIED before the Honourable J. W. HULME in 1851.\n\n \n \n Number of Cases.\n Hearings\n Debt and Damages.\n \n \n SUPREME COURT:\n \n \n \n \n \n Common Law\n 3\n \n $44,391.32\n \n \n Chancery\n \n 2\n \n \n \n Summary\n 71\n \n \n \n \n Insolvency\n 3\n \n \n \n \n Debts in schedule\n \n \n $11,798.08\n \n \n Assets per Appraisement\n \n \n $12,924.70\n \n \n \n \n \n $14,524.0\n \n \n Insolvent discharged\n 46\n \n \n \n \n Appeals\n \n \n \n \n \n VICE-ADMIRALTY COURT\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 5\n \n $7,476.80\n \n\nACTIONS COMMENCED in 1851.\n\n \n Court.\n Number of Cases.\n Amount of Debt and Damages claimed.\n Settled without Trial.\n Judgment.\n Plaintiff.\n Defendant.\n Nonsuit.\n Remaining in Dependence.\n \n \n SUPREME COURT:\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Common Law\n (b) 18\n $75,479.70\n 4\n 1\n 1\n \n \n 14\n \n \n Chancery\n None.\n None.\n \n \n \n \n \n None.\n \n \n Summary\n 101\n $17,531.24\n 29\n 46\n \n \n \n 20\n \n \n Insolvency\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Debts in Schedule\n \n $16,995.22\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Assets per Appraisement\n \n $11,798.08\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Ecclesiastical\n (c) 20\n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n 5\n \n \n Appeals\n None.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n None.\n \n \n VICE-ADMIRALTY COURT\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 7\n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n TOTAL.\n 146\n $129,281.04\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\nN.B. Of the five Common Law Cases in dependence on the 1st January 1851, one was tried and four settled. The Summary Jurisdiction case was settled. Of the three Vice Admiralty Cases, two were tried and one is still in dependence, and the Chancery Cases are also still undecided.\n\n(a) In one of these cases the plaintiff has given notice of appeal.\n\n710 Dollars.\n\n(b) In three of these cases the defendant was arrested on a capias issuing from the Common Law side, and they were subsequently brought into the Summary Jurisdiction. The debt and damages in the said cases amount to\n\n(c) In five of these estates there was a will, consequently the property was not appraised.\n\n(Signed)\n\nROB. DUNDAS CAY, Registrar.\n\nW. H. ALEXANDER, Deputy Registrar.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-039 - Sir Bonham - 1852 [1-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 232300, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-039 - Sir Bonham - 1852 [1-12]", "page_number": 161, "title": "CO129-039 - Sir Bonham - 1852 [1-12]", "content_text": "Return of Criminal Cases that have been tried in the Supreme Court of Hongkong, during the year 1851-\n\nCrime.\n\n \n Crime\n \n Total\n Convicted\n Acquitted\n Death Sentence\n Death Recorded\n Transportation\n Hard Labour\n Over One year\n Remarks\n \n \n Assault\n \n 2\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Assault and false imprisonment\n \n 3\n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Assault with intent to rob\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Attempting to set fire to a ship\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Burglary\n \n 2\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Burglary and Larceny\n \n 3\n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Child Stealing\n \n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Conspiracy to commit felony\n \n 3\n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Cutting with intent to do grievous bodily harm\n \n 3\n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Demanding money with menaces\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Endeavouring to make a revolt\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Escape\n \n 3\n 3\n \n \n \n \n 4\n \n \n \n \n Extortion by a Constable\n \n 4\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n False Imprisonment\n \n 16\n 12\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Forgery\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Larceny\n \n 45\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Manslaughter\n \n 1\n 6\n \n \n \n \n \n \n a One Prisoner sentenced to pay a fine of $40 in lieu of imprisonment. Sentence postponed from 1850, imprisonment to commence at expiration of former sentence.\n \n \n Keeping a bawdy house\n \n 1\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Murder\n \n 24\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n b Three of the Prisoners sentenced to pay a fine of $50 each and to be further imprisoned till that fine was paid.\n \n \n Obtaining money under false pretences\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n c Two of these cases were postponed from 1850.\n \n \n Perjury\n \n 11\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n d Five of the prisoners were arraigned for Murder but found guilty of manslaughter.\n \n \n Piracy\n \n 8\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n e One of these cases postponed from 1850.\n \n \n Piracy with violence\n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Piracy with wounding\n \n 4\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Receiving stolen goods\n \n 2\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery\n \n 6\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery in the harbour\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery with arms\n \n 8\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Selling or purchasing a woman for prostitution\n \n 4\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Shooting at with intent to maim\n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sodomy\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Stabbing with intent to do grievous bodily harm\n \n 3\n 10\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Total\n \n 458\n \n 32\n \n \n \n \n 156\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 57\n \n 27\n \n 2\n 113\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 24\n \n 15\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 5\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 17\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 9\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n |21|\n \n \n \n\n(Signed.) W. H. Alexander.\n\nDeputy Registrar.\n\n(True Copy.)\n\n(Signed) Rob. Dundas Cay.\n\nRegistrar.\n\nColonial Secretary.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-039 - Sir Bonham - 1852 [1-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 232629, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-040 - General Jervois - 1852 [3-12]", "page_number": 221, "title": "CO129-040 - General Jervois - 1852 [3-12]", "content_text": "Descriptive List of the Chinese and others Natives\n\nJames\n\nCountry\n\nAge. Profession\n\nFads\n\nShep ahyan China 24 Beatman\n\nJane ühehu\n\nSo whfat\n\nSam Aissam\n\nBeng ahlang To chuing Eu thyeng\n\nChune traktsine\n\nBo 17.\n\nAnving\n\nAntonio Ozerio Gabriel de los Santos\n\nSoiterie de los Santos\n\n!\n\nAlexandre Masinen Seen a look\n\nMing aper Low Usam\n\nLoong Aggong to thefeeng\n\n\"\n\n20\n\nCrime\n\nManita, Tuseners under Sentence of Transportation 518\n\nFate\n\nTransportation Santé ecce.\n\nSize 7th January for Life\n\nfor Life\n\nHeight\n\nbergs General Description\n\n17. 1\n\n18525\n\n5 Marks of flogging on the back,\n\nscar under light\n\ncar.\n\nscar on back of tight leg, a les one\n\nback\n\nof left shoulder.\n\n56e Marked with small pox\n\n52 ship tattoed on light arm\n\nthe Marked with small pox\n\n1. Felmary = 548 Sarge scaron\n\n14.\n\n\"\n\nfor 7 years 15th April\n\n#\n\nleft shine and deficient of upper teeth:\n\n54 Delicate\n\nappearance\n\n5571⁄2 Tivo moles on tight muscle.\n\nThree sears on\n\n40\n\nJuil..\n\nPiracy with wounding\n\nLabourer\n\n146\n\nBoatman\n\nDo\n\n维\n\nfor Life yes Life\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n#\n\n28\n\n\"} Shop Cerlie Burglary\n\nBoatman Cutting with intent\n\nBurglary and Larceny\n\nfor 18 years for 15 years\n\n\"\n\n#\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n\"7\n\n32\n\nHawker-\n\nHeating from person\n\nfor 10 years 17th January\n\n23\n\nCoolie\n\nBurglary with wounding\n\n61\n\n\"\n\nShopkeeper Forgery\n\n17\n\nCoolie\n\nRevolt and Piracy\n\nfor 15 years 1973\n\nthe\n\n\"\n\n\"1\n\n\"\n\nManila 26\n\nSeaman Murder on the high sea\n\nfor Life\n\nGro\n\nfor Life\n\n\"\n\n38\n\nDo\n\nis po\n\nfor Life\n\n\"\n\n\"} 27\n\nClie\n\nfor Life\n\nChina 20\n\nBeatman Piracy with violence\n\nfor Life\n\nth July\n\n\"\n\n3/4 Scar in\n\n22\n\nFisherman\n\nfor Life\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n35\n\nBoatman\n\n\"\n\n28\n\nflo\n\nApo\n\nfor Life for Life\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n\"J\n\n98\n\nFarmer Highway Robbery with violence\n\nfor Life\n\n}} \n\nVictoria, Hongkong, 28th July, 1852.\n\nSentence of death was passed against these Prisoners, which was commuted to\n\nTransportation for Life, by St. C. the Governor, on the 20th July, 1852.\n\nSentence of death was recorded against these Prisoners, which was commuted to\n\nTransportation for Life, by His Excellency The Acting Governor, on the 20th July, 1852.\n\n(Signed, W. H. Mitchell, Sheriff.\n\nColonial Secretary.\n\n(True Copy)", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-040 - General Jervois - 1852 [3-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 233456, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-042 - Sir Bonham - 1853 [1-6]", "page_number": 363, "title": "CO129-042 - Sir Bonham - 1853 [1-6]", "content_text": "In 8440/53\n\n330\n\n}\n\nReturn of Criminal Cases that have been tried in the Supreme Court of Hongkong:\n\nNumber of Cases.\n\nNumber of Persons\n\nduring the year 1852.\n\n \n Charge\n Number of Cases\n Number of Persons\n Convicted\n Acquitted\n Charge abandoned\n Postponed\n Sentence\n Death Recorded\n Transportation\n Hard Labour. over one Year\n Hard Labour 1 Year and under\n Imprisonment without labour.\n Remarks\n \n \n 1. / Assaulting Peace Officer in execution of his duty.\n 3\n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Assault.\n 5\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Assisting in desertion.\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Attempting to persuade Soldier to desert\n 2\n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Attempting to set fire to a Ship\n //\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Breaking and entering a Building within Curtilage and stealing therein.\n 2\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Burglary.\n J\n /\\/\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Burglary and Larceny.\n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Bourglary with wounding.\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Cattle Stealing.\n 12\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Combining with Pirates.\n 22\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Cutting with intent to do grievous bodily harm.\n 2\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Forgery\n 12\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Keeping a bawdy house\n !!\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Larceny\n 69\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Murder on the high seas, aiding and abetting\n //\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Murder on the high seas\n 11\n 20\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Passing Counterfeit Coin-\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Piracy.\n 925\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Piracy with wounding\n 8\n 17\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Rape\n 7\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Receiving goods piratically Stolen.\n 2/\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery\n 3\n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery with Arms\n 3\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery with violence\n !!\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery with wounding.\n 2\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Stealing in a dwelling house-\n 22\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Stealing from the person_\n 29\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Stabbing with intent to do grievous bodily harm -\n //\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Uttering forged Receipt.\n 75\n 126\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Total\n \n \n 61\n 42\n 12\n 15\n \n 8\n 18\n 8\n 15\n 36\n \n \n \n No of Persons.\n \n \n 14\n 6\n 12\n 2\n \n 2\n \n 4\n 18\n 10\n \n \n \n N of Cases.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\nof this case was, case was postponed from the December Sessions of 1851. / Several abandoned. af Previous Conviction.\n\n(True Copy) Maine\n\nColonial Secretary.\n\nsorts had\n\n(Signed) Ribt Dundas Cay,\n\nRegistrar.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-042 - Sir Bonham - 1853 [1-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 239008, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-056 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [6]", "page_number": 417, "title": "CO129-056 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [6]", "content_text": "106\n\n127\n\n415\n\naidastinal\n\ninual proportional\n\n\"gladly pay our granted\n\ncould\n\n-\n\n\"rental, of the ground thine ottoned cold be secured to them by grout of leave. \"Such a preeceding would add to the \" revenue of the Colony, and by the forme \" means sinforcementos enla pertemper cavity The effected inthout cost to Government,\n\n• size, the extension of the Strand Prod \" from the Enver Kaur, which, if the \"Land in front of the Porod Ground were \" sold by Public Auction, would with \"great facility be extended to the Military Cantomento.\n\nIt appears to me that a charge for \" additional Loud obtained by the Lessees \"Marine Loto would be but just and reasonable, mise it in the most production; vend no holder of an Inland Lot end o \"and \" would be permitted to obtain additional per.\n\n• Land without paying for it ; and what \" is right \"in the \"in the other. The cave is but but just Land has since been sold at Eart Paint, and in front of the Parade Ground, and \" The Reveine the ture by forgely benefited, sint only from the conviderable premium ofterned, but males by the andetitional ammal Resome in the cheaper of Loud tent\n\nOne of the conditions on which the Loud in front of the Perende Ground wea sold, was to the effect that purelovers must fill up the ground, and bricht on kea wall and Hand Road of 25 ket width in front of their lives, with the now of extending the Strand Frond after- _wards woorder to the Westward, and the Government Notification N. 53 in the Yorgetter of the 11t Movember fart, distinelly stated that the Sale of Loto in front of the Parade Ground,\n\n隊", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-056 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 239954, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-059 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [11-12]", "page_number": 171, "title": "CO129-059 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [11-12]", "content_text": "with any move ^ ques obseration ( I wait the further developement of this hire, before troubling it, beyond taking leave with your \n\n7. 2-2 upon respect to direct \n\nI give the utmost Moral attention to the following points in the history of this measure recently clicited, by the Public discussion which it has provoked in the Colony.\n\nIt now appears that this Ordinance, emanating from a closed Council Chamber, was a forgery - and its penalties operative for three days before it was even promulgated. It passed the Legislative Council on the 16th of April, but was not gazetted as law until the 19th. It first appeared in draft in the Government Gazette of 29th March - disappeared from the time intervening Gazettes of 5th and 12th April, and for anything the Community could positively know to the contrary was withdrawn altogether, when it suddenly made its appearance as law on the 19th of April - and as a retrospective law.\n\nHis Excellency is surprised that it elicited no animadversion, to call its \"discussion\" into question, during what he is pleased to term its \"experimental\" period.\n\n168 By Metropolitan Building Act 1855 upon which this experimental Ordinance purports to have been modelled, and an Act of the Indian Legislature, No 14 of 1856 - framed only five months later and expressly adjusted to the circumstances of an infant population, are dated respectively four months and seventeen days after their promulgation - and after that interval both these Acts will be found expressly to exclude all Buildings that had advanced above the level of their foundation from within even the compass of their operation, much less being held \"liable to their penalties.\"\n\nIs it greater wisdom to follow precedents with the arm of our law, or to contract these wise local Executive measures under one head for expat facts penaly, under another; and making", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-059 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [11-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 240286, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-060 - Public Offices - 1856", "page_number": 94, "title": "CO129-060 - Public Offices - 1856", "content_text": "hem forged or pandur.\n\nforgetown, ik wonte orfrandur - bentley be his duty to seize the ship and send her to the nearest Court having five Admiralty Jurisdiction for condemnation. So donig he would of course take care to send with the ship the most ample proofs in his power of aither the absence the forgery - or the fraudulent alloration of the Enign papers as the case be, and alth esthough he might would not be authorized to pick the master orkiew under arrest orto compel of them (wn the casesfa (withe ship sized in Port) to proceed in her, itwouts be his duty to allow the master to do co\n\nisher descried it, and air desirable to procure the attendaver opsome of portion of the few. there, however, the papers are in proper farne and sa sufficiant, it will their remains to ascertain how far the Regulations for the protection of the Eui- pants have heme carried out. It appear to for La bouchere that sudve this head it. would not be neuf- or desirable, =sary wilep he should have good grounds for suspecting fand officer that the should engaire\n\nPage 92", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-060 - Public Offices - 1856.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 240316, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-060 - Public Offices - 1856", "page_number": 124, "title": "CO129-060 - Public Offices - 1856", "content_text": "the case be necessary uz Forcion Shipwritte: of a 10 = in British periodiction that the officer chould be quite sure that she had sailed from Hong Long with Passengers - before he proceeded to put . the Law in force agamither \n\nIn either case when the Ecommmander of one Her Majesty's Hips proces to put the Law in operation it would just be necessary that he should inspect the Stups Emigration papers, and if she should not be fur.-moked with such papers or if the papers produced should bear evidence of having been \n\n122 meca frauamenty altered, it would be his duty to sccze and send her to the nearest Court having Admiralty jurisdiction for condemnation. In so doing he would emire tavic Eure sand with the ship the most aurée proofs in his power of either the absence_ the forgery The fraudulent alteration of the Emigration 29 paper.\n\n{ \n\nA", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-060 - Public Offices - 1856.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 244365, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-068 - Sir Bowring - 1858 [5-12]", "page_number": 106, "title": "CO129-068 - Sir Bowring - 1858 [5-12]", "content_text": "# The Hongkong Government Gazette.\n\n## JUNE 19, 1858.\n\nThe Hongkong Government Gazette.\n\n### GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION.\n\n**No. 56.**\n\nHis Excellency The Governor has been pleased to appoint Second-Class Staff-Surgeon **EDWARD MENZIES**, to be Surgeon of the Lock Hospital, under Ordinance No. 12 of 1857, from this date.\n\n### LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS\n\nThe Governor put the question,-That the Clause stand part of the Ordinance. Council divided.\n\n| Ayes (5) | Noes (4) |\n| --- | --- |\n| MR JARDINE | MR DENT |\n| MR LYALL | ATTORNEY GENERAL |\n| CHIEF MAGISTRATE | ACTING COLONIAL SECRETARY |\n| SURVEYOR GENERAL | CHIEF JUSTICE |\n| COLONIAL TREASURER | |\n\nQuestion passed.\n\nSections 6 and 7 adopted. Section 8 discussed, amended, and agreed to. Section 9 amended, and agreed to. Section 10 amended, and agreed to.\n\nSections 11 to 15 inclusive, adopted. Section 13 recommitted, amended, and agreed to. Sections 16 and 17 amended, and agreed to. Section 18 discussed, and adopted. Section 19 amended, and agreed to. Section 20 adopted. Section 21 amended, and agreed to. Subdivision 1 amended, and agreed to.\n\nSections 22 to 24 inclusive, adopted. Three new Sections were introduced next after Section 24, and ordered to stand as Sections 25, 26, and 27.\n\nSection 25 was renumbered as Section 28, discussed, and adopted. Section 26 was made Section 29, amended and agreed to. Section 27 was renumbered as Section 30, and agreed to. Section 28 was made Section 31, and adopted. Subdivisions 1, 2, 4, and 5, amended and agreed to.\n\nThree new Subdivisions were added for Offences against Sections 25, 26, and 27, and ordered to stand as Subdivisions 6, 7, and 8. Section 29 renumbered as Section 32, and adopted. Section 3 recommitted, and re-amended. Section 30 renumbered as Section 33, and adopted.\n\nOrdered, that this Ordinance as amended be published in the Government Gazette for general information.\n\nThe Ordinance \"for Penal Servitude\" was brought forward, as read a second time, and passed through Committee at the last meeting.\n\nResolved, That the said Ordinance do pass, and that the Title be \"An Ordinance for Penal Servitude,\" and the Number of the Ordinance, \"No. 10 of 1858.\"\n\nOrdered, that the said Ordinance be published in the Government Gazette.\n\nIt was moved by the Chief Justice, seconded by the Attorney General, and carried unanimously,— \n\nThat on the question for the second reading of the Ordinance \"for Practitioners in Law,\" the \"Hongkong Law Society\" be heard personally, or by Counsel; and that this Council will then receive such Evidence as the Petitioners may then produce in support of their Petition.\n\nIt was moved by the Colonial Treasurer, and seconded by the Chief Magistrate,— \n\nThat no Newspaper Reporters having attended the Meeting of this Council on the first occasion of the Legislative Proceedings having been thrown open to the Public, it appears desirable to this Council that the practice of publishing the Minutes of Proceedings of Council in the Government Gazette should be adhered to. The Governor put the Question. Council divided.\n\n| Ayes (5) | Noes (4) |\n| --- | --- |\n| MR JARDINE | MR DENT |\n| CHIEF MAGISTRATE | MR LYALL |\n| COLONIAL TREASURER | SURVEYOR GENERAL |\n| ATTORNEY GENERAL | ACTING COLONIAL SECRETARY |\n| CHIEF JUSTICE | |\n\nQuestion carried.\n\nThe Governor stated, that at the next Meeting of the Council, the Ordinance “for Practitioners in Law,” would be proposed for the second reading. Resolved, that this Council do adjourn to Saturday, the 26th instant, at 12 o'clock.\n\nBy Order of His Excellency The Governor,\n\n**No. 55.**\n\n### GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION.\n\nL. D'ALMADA E CASTRO, Clerk of Councils.\n\n**WILLIAM AURELIUS HARLAND**, Esquire, M.D., having reported his arrival in the Colony, is appointed Colonial Surgeon of Hongkong, by virtue of a Warrant under the Royal Sign Manual.\n\nDr HARLAND has been this day sworn in as Colonial Surgeon, and will enter upon the duties of his Office from this date.\n\nBy Order,\n\nColonial Secretary's Office, Victoria, Hongkong, 14th June, 1858.\n\nW. T. BRIDGES, \nActing Colonial Secretary.\n\n### GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION.\n\n**No. 57.**\n\nNotice is hereby given, that the Lots for Stalls and Lans in Government Markets, will be drawn on Friday, the 25th instant, by the Surveyor General.\n\n| Market | Time |\n| --- | --- |\n| Central Market | 10 A.M. |\n| Western Market | 12 Noon |\n| Tai-ping Shan Market | 2 P.M. |\n| Eastern Market | 3 P.M. |\n| Wan-chi Market | 4 P.M. |\n| Soo-kun Poo | 5 P.M. |\n\nBy Order,\nW. T. BRIDGES, \nActing Colonial Secretary.\n\nColonial Secretary's Office, Victoria, Hongkong, 18th June, 1858.\n\n### GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION.\n\nThe following Ordinance having been read a second time, and undergone revision in Committee, is published for general information.\n\nBy Order,\n\nCouncil Room, Victoria, Hongkong, 15th June, 1858.\n\nL. D'ALMADA E CASTRO, \nClerk of Councils.\n\n## ANNO VIGESIMO PRIMO VICTORIÆ REGINÆ.\n\n**No. of 1858.**\n\nBy His Excellency SIR JOHN BOWRING, Knight, LL.D., Governor and Commander-in-Chief of the Colony of Hongkong and its Dependencies, and Vice-Admiral of the same, Her Majesty's Plenipotentiary and Chief Superintendent of the Trade of British Subjects in China, with the Advice of the Legislative Council of Hongkong.\n\n**An Ordinance for the prevention of Offences touching Securities, Sales, and Deposits.**\n\nJune, 1858.]\n\nBe it ordained and enacted by His Excellency the Governor of Hongkong, with the Advice of the Legislative Council thereof, as follows:-\n\nI. All Additions to Drafts on Bankers within the meaning of Ordinance No. 3 of 1857, shall be deemed to be (by whomsoever and at whatsoever Time the said Additions may be made) part of the Drafts themselves, for the purpose of the payment thereof respectively, and any Cancellation or Erasure of such Additions, and likewise any Alteration thereof (except for the mere purpose of filling up any Blanks therein), shall be deemed a Forgery of the said Drafts respectively.\n\nII. A Person obtaining by fraud or false pretence the acceptance of a Bill of Exchange (whether drawn by himself or any other Person) from a Third Party, shall (whether the said Bill so accepted remain in his hands or not) be deemed to have obtained a valuable Security by fraud, or (as the case may be) false pretence, within the meaning of the Laws in force for the repression of the said Offences.\n\nIII. No Person shall act as a Lender of Money to an amount being less than Five Hundred current Dollars in any one transaction upon deposit of Goods and Chattels, unless he be then the actual holder of a Pawnbroker's License, or as a Public Salesman, unless he be then the actual holder of an Auctioneer's License.\n\nIV. Every such License shall be granted by and at the Discretion of His Excellency in Executive Council, on such Conditions, touching Fees or otherwise, as shall be deemed meet; and the same shall endure for One Year only, but may be renewed at the like Discretion from Year to Year.\n\nV. No such Lender of Money as aforesaid shall, during the continuance of his said License, carry on any other Trade or Occupation in his place of business as such Lender.\n\nVI. He shall cause to be painted and kept painted in large and legible English Letters and Chinese Characters, over the Door of his said place of business, his Name at length, and after his Name the word \"Pawnbroker\" (or \"Pawnbrokers\" if he be the Member of a Firm of such Lenders.)\n\nVII. He shall, whensoever thereunto required by the Superintendent of Police, or any Inspector of Police, or by any other Member of the Police Force bearing a written Order in that behalf under the hand of the said Superintendent, produce for the inspection of the Party so requiring him all or any Goods and Chattels pledged or deposited with him on loan of Monies, and all Books and Papers relating to the same.\n\nVIII. Over and above the principal Monies lent upon any Goods or Chattels, pawned or pledged with the Lender, he may demand, receive, and take from the Person applying to redeem the said Goods or Chattels, before re-delivering the same to such Person, Interest upon the said principal Monies for the...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-068 - Sir Bowring - 1858 [5-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 246280, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-072 - Indviduals - 1858", "page_number": 114, "title": "CO129-072 - Indviduals - 1858", "content_text": "Memorial\n\nIn the early part of the present year the Honorable The Colonial Secretary sent to me for registry a Memorial of a Deed, together with the original Deed which purported to be an assignment of the Leasehold known as the Central Market in this place. On inspection of this document I discovered great informalities; a Mortgage of the Property had previously been registered, but no mention was made in the Deed of the property being in any wise incumbered; the consideration specified was ridiculously small in proportion to the value of the property, in fact less in amount than the registered mortgage incumbrance, and I had grounds for belief that the Assignor's death must have occurred exactly about the date of the deed. The Ordinance for Deed Registry does not however authorize the Registrar to reject any provided that it contains the particulars set forth in a Schedule attached to the Ordinance, and when attested by the oath of a competent person, but by instructions conveyed in an extra Letter from the Colonial Secretary, all Deeds and conveyances by Chinese were ordered to be made to pass through the Office of the Chinese Secretary for investigation, and the Chinese Secretary having concurred in the opinion that the document exhibited general irregularity, the Parties concerned in the Property were sent for and examined, when the Brother of the deceased Assignor alleged the Document to be a Forgery, with consent of the Mortgagee however, and according to the Ordinance, the Memorial was eventually registered.\n\nIt was at this stage of the proceedings that Wei-Afoon (the brother of the deceased Assignor) stated to me that his Brother had been in the habit of paying to the Honorable Major Caine's Comprador sums of One Hundred and One Hundred and Fifty Dollars per month, which he alleged were extorted by the Honorable Major Caine's order, and had been promised for that Gentleman's interest in obtaining for the deceased Wei-Aqui the holding of the Market. I did not deem it prudent or right (for reasons which will hereafter be stated to your Lordship) to enquire at that time further into this assertion, merely telling him that if, as Administrator to his Brother's Estate, he continued holding the Market, and contested the title with the registered Assignee (which he had stated his intention of doing) that then I warned him I should consider it my duty to bring the circumstance to the notice of the Government for investigation; further advising him to speak with the Honorable Major Caine, or offering to do so for him, and thus put a stop to such extortion; but he would neither speak himself nor allow me to do so, alleging that he felt convinced, and was sure, that it was by the Honorable Major Caine's authority that the money was demanded, and that if the Honorable Major Caine knew that he had mentioned the circumstance to me, he would be so visited as to be forced to leave the Colony.\n\nIn thus stating to your Lordship the impression so apparent in the mind of this Man I have not the remotest idea of insinuating that I believed such extortions were made with the direct knowledge of the Honorable Major Caine; I merely wish to exhibit fully to your Lordship the artfulness and power exercised by the Comprador in his nefarious practices. Subsequently these extortions were mentioned to me by several indifferent persons, and were freely spoken of in the Supreme Court, and allusion made in a brief submitted to the Attorney General by the Attorney employed by the before mentioned Wei-Afoon to procure the Letters of Administration to his brother's Estate, and Aoan the Treasury Comprador, amongst others having told me that monthly sums were still taken from Wei-Afoon, and applied to the Honorable Major Caine's use. I took into my serious consideration the propriety and manner of so bringing the matter forward, as should not fail to lead to an investigation.\n\nAbout this juncture I was directed by the Surveyor General to prepare a formal application to the Colonial Secretary for a license to erect a Market, which Tam-Achoey a Builder employed on Government Works, wished to erect on a Lot of which he was usufructuary; I prepared and personally delivered the application to the Colonial Secretary, and it was afterwards sent to the Surveyor General for reporting on. Within a few days Achoey came to my Office and told me that Aoan the Treasury Comprador (before mentioned) had been to him and said that the Honorable Major Caine had sent him to demand a Sum of money to purchase his interest in obtaining the license for long or short periods, and for light or heavy rentals, according to a scale of bonuses which he mentioned, varying from Five to Fifteen Hundred Dollars; on questioning Aoan he said that it was true that Major Caine had told him to demand this money; I then told Achoey I would lay this matter before the Government for investigation, and that Aoan would be punished for daring to make this demand which I was assured he had no authority for making.\n\nIt will appear inexplicable to your Lordship when I state that this Man's reply was to the effect of enjoining me to say nothing whatever of the matter, stating that he would not have told me at all about it, if he thought he should be assisting me in injuring his Countryman Aoan, who could not even have known that he applied for the license, unless Major Caine had told him, and adding that he should offer a bonus of Three Hundred Dollars, for a license of not less than five years duration at Fifty Dollars per month; I immediately went to the Honorable Major Caine, and asked for an answer to the petition from Achooy which I had presented, and I was then informed by the Honorable Major Caine, that he had directed Aoan to ask Achoey what sum per month he would give the Government for the Market, and the term of license which he required, and I am aware that Achoey then sent in a petition in Chinese asking for a license for a term of Ten years. The Surveyor General subsequently reported the area intended for the Market to be an-eighth only of the size of the other large Market, the rent proportionably being about Forty Dollars per month, of which I informed Achoey and warned him against giving any bonus to Aoan whatever.\n\nA Letter in English was afterwards received by Achoey, which I read to him, wherein he was informed that a license would be granted for one year only, at a rental of One Hundred Dollars per month, whereupon Achoey exhibited a good deal of ill will towards me for not having allowed him to give the bonus required, which he fancied would have obtained him a license for the same rent (viz. Fifty Dollars per month) as was charged upon another Market, recently erected by an English Merchant, of the same size as that for which he had applied.\n\nTo your Lordship's impartial consideration the foregoing detail will have evinced the necessity for a strict investigation and punishment of the criminals concerned; single cases of actual or attempted extortion like the foregoing, carried on with such audacity, tends to the belief that other and more extensive cases of fraud have been long in practice; a portion of the public press of this Colony, has lately teemed with allegations that the other Markets and Farms, together with sources of the most iniquitous description have regularly paid what is termed black mail.\n\nAchoey at my suggestion again applied, and has since got his license for Fifty Dollars per month, without any bonus.\n\nAfter much consideration I therefore determined on obtaining a witness to the statement of Wei-Afoon; and for that purpose I informed the Surveyor General of what was said, and desired him to question the said Afoon on the subject. A perusal of the enclosure No. 2 (Letter of date 3rd July 1847) accompanying this letter, will at once exhibit to your Lordship the course taken by me in reference to this matter; an investigation was afterwards made by the Acting Attorney General in his capacity of Grand Jury for the Colony, before whom I stated what I have now related to your Lordship, together I believe with a statement of other reports in which the name of the Honorable Major Caine was used very freely. Of the general nature of the evidence taken at this investigation I am almost entirely ignorant. From His Excellency the Governor, however, before the Members of the Executive Council, I received severe censure and rebuke for the course which I had taken in bringing this matter forward, and in not simply informing the Honorable Major Caine of the reports so current, but to my application for a perusal of the evidence taken, in order to see if other grounds for censure could exist against me, I was refused (as vide enclosure No. 3).\n\nIn the matter of the extortion from the holder of the Central Market I had urged nothing whatever in proof or otherwise of the statements made. I merely exhibited with what impunity the name of the Honorable Major Caine was used by his Compradors to aid them in their ends, but leaving it to that Gentleman to take what measures he deemed fit in order to arrive at the truth of the case; I was as free to believe that Wei-Afoon had raised the reports with a view to injure the characters of the Compradors, as that the Compradors had really attempted the extortion on him, if he had had no proofs to establish his charges; but so far as Aoan was concerned in the other transaction, I directly charged him with having told me that Major Caine had sent him to demand the money; the evidence of Tam-Achoey confirmed my charge, and if further questioned, I could have stated the names of others, both European and Chinese, to whom it was cognizant that this demand had been made.\n\nMay I beg of your Lordship to judge then what were my feelings of surprise and indignation at being arraigned by the Honorable Major Caine on a charge of having tampered with this Man Aoan, with a view to injure the character and reputation of the Honorable Major Caine; my object in what I had done was the very reverse of such a motive and I cannot refrain from stating in this place that I have just cause for considering myself hardly used in having been compelled to procure bail for my appearance at the next Sessions, to answer a charge of so grave a nature as that of conspiracy which grew out of this arraignment, and on which I stand singly indicted. The deposition taken at the Magistrate's Court, (a copy of which is marked enclosure No. 4) will place your Lordship in possession of the whole support to this charge.\n\nEnclosure No. 5 infra being copy of a letter replying to the Clerk of Council's intimation of my suspension from Office pending the pleasure of Her Majesty's Government, will show to your Lordship the remonstrance which I have deemed it proper to make against this suspension, to which although a fortnight has elapsed, I have received no reply nor acknowledgment, and it only remains for me to throw myself upon the candid consideration of your Lordship and Her Majesty's Government, and plead that I may without delay be reinstated in my Office from which I deem that I am unjustly suspended for an insufficient cause.\n\nA long acquaintance and consequent insight into the habits of the Chinese, extending, (through partly a maritime life), over a period of Twelve years to the days of my boyhood when I first came to China, and where I have been some portion of every year since, will I trust have some weight with your Lordship, in the conclusion which your Lordship can but arrive at, that, for the sole purpose of injuring Major Caine, I could not so far forget my duty to myself and to my Family, as to jeopardize my present position, my past services and future prospects, on the word or even oath of a Chinese in the mode which we have of administering it, and which they respect no more when taken, than if not taken at all.\n\nThe Chinese Residents of this Colony are generally, my Lord, a set of worthless men,—devoid of all notions of upright principle and integrity;—banded together in secret societies, and governed by clannish rules in every impulse—the principal clans headed by those whom suspicion points at as being expatriated for offences against their own Government—servilely blind in attaining their own ends to whatever kind of extortion may be attempted upon them, by those whose cunning and position enables them to make such attempts.—it behoved me in the course which I have taken in exposing the extortions apparent to me, to depart from that more straightforward one, which would have led me simply to have told the Honorable Major Caine that such and such things were done in his name, but, however much I rest under censure for the mode of exposition which I have adopted, I can assure your Lordship of my continued conviction, that a different course would only have defeated the single end I had in view, viz—that, of breaking those links in the chain or system of extortion which it was evident to me existed, and which in its extended ramifications are bearing steadily downwards the best interests of this Colony; Whilst the assertions of the miscreants whom I have named remained unchecked, as to the high authority which they have quoted in support of their demands, every subordinate servant of this Government has been open to the inward contempt and disrespect of the Chinese Community generally, amongst whom these extortions are publicly talked of and believed.\n\nOf the result of the trial of the charges preferred against me there can be, but one opinion. Of the necessity for me to act in the way I have done, I trust I have succeeded in convincing your Lordship; and I confidently rely on the justice of your Lordship and Her Majesty's Government, so that even in the event of your Lordship concurring in the censures of His Excellency the Governor, I trust that I shall not be dispossessed of my employment under the Government for an offence, which can in the most extreme sense, be looked upon only as an error of the judgement.\n\nIn conclusion I have to beg the favor of your Lordship's consideration, if in the rude mode of my address, I have uttered in this letter, a single expression meriting your Lordship's disapproval.\n\nI have the honor, &c.\n\nThe Right Honourable The EARL GREY,\n\nH. M.'s Principal Secretary of State for the Colonies,", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-072 - Indviduals - 1858.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 246285, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-072 - Indviduals - 1858", "page_number": 119, "title": "CO129-072 - Indviduals - 1858", "content_text": "10\n\nW\n\nwere bondsmen to the Government for performance of the lease covenants, agreed to carry on the business of the Market together, and each, as it is expressed, equally partake of the sweet and of the bitter\"); A clerk of the Market who was one of the attesting witnesses to both these partnership deeds positively alleges, (and with others who make the same statement having now no interest in saying so if untrue,) that Lo-keen-teen (Major Caine's Comprador) did not bring one farthing into the partnership thus formed, but that he forced himself upon Wei-Acqui, who from that time, and until the period when the state of his health rendered it impossible for him to remain longer in Hongkong (crushed by the tyranny practised on him in the name of Major Caine) was a mere tool in the hands of the said Lo-keen-teen, who with the others kept all the books and accounts, and were thus able successfully to envelop all subsequent extortions in a mystery which Wei-Afoon's conduct after his Brother's death tended rather to increase: But the amount of the foul robbery practised on Wei-Acqui by the parties thus connected with him was enormous, for it is susceptible of proof and is apparent to all who take the trouble of investigating, that from the high rates of rent ruling in Victoria during the first and second years of the Market's establishment, the whole cost of erection was capable of being made up in about eleven months out of the surplus profits, after paying the Government rents, wages of servants, and reasonable ordinary contingencies, and although the great rates of interest which Wei-Acqui had to pay for the money borrowed and due at the time of his death, accounts for the absorption of a portion of these profits, there is not sufficient set forth to show why his Widow and Family should be discovered in a state of such destitution, as to be not far removed from abject beggary.\n\nImmediately on the death of Wei-Acqui in December 1846, without taking any notice of the last mentioned agreement, of the existence of which it is now evident he was perfectly aware, Wei-Afoon again brought forward the first agreement, and declared himself and Chun-tae-sing interested in the Market Leasehold to the extent of ten shares, and on behalf of Wei-Acqui deceased, as his eldest Brother undertook charge of the remaining three shares, and of the whole of the Market business.\n\nHad Lo-keen-teen (Major Caine's Comprador) ever advanced money on Market account, or have been in an equitable and just manner entitled to be treated as a partner, there does not appear any reason why he should not then have come forward and openly contested Wei-Afoon's claims, or that he should not since have come forward, in any manner, to prefer that share as a partner which the late Governor and Council were given to understand he possessed, and which it appeared to them gave him perfect justification for taking the monies which to some extent was admitted had come into his hands; The natural presumption arising from his never up to the present time having come forward, either personally or by agent, is, that conscious of his acts not being able to stand a strict investigation, he was afraid to litigate with Wei-Afoon, who with the cunning which invariably attaches to the weak man when oppressed, had watched for the opportunity which his Brother's death afforded him, to bring forward, however unwarrantably, that claim and benefit which Lo-keen-teen's villainy had originally compelled him to relinquish.\n\nFong-Ache, alias Attai, before-mentioned as one of the bondsmen and parties to the deed of October 1845, also without reference to that agreement, about a month after Wei-Acqui's death, brought forward a deed purporting that in consideration of $2000 due and owing, Wei-Acqui had wholly assigned to him the Market Leasehold. The suspicious circumstances attendant on registry of a memorial of this deed have already been detailed in my last letter to your Lordship, it being then that Wei-Afoon openly stated to me that Major Caine's Comprador had been in the habit of taking monies from the Market in his Master's name; From enquiries since made there does not appear to be the shadow of a doubt but that this deed of assignment was an absolute forgery; it was drawn out in blank in the office of Mr. Parker, Solicitor of this place, and taken to Canton by some of Fong-Ache's agents, where before Mr. Thomas T. Meadows, Interpreter to the British Consulate, the signature of a Man personating Wei-Acqui was feloniously attached, and the document was brought back to Hongkong, without even the date of execution being inserted, or the necessary notarial attestation of the subscribing witness appended; The date of 30th November 1846 Mr. Parker admits was inserted at his office after being brought back. Two days later than this date, to wit on the 2nd day of December 1846, Wei-Acqui died at Honam on the opposite side of the river from the Canton Consulate, and where for six weeks previously he had resided without stirring out of doors, in such a state of weakness and imbecility, as by the testimony of several respectable Chinese who were constantly about his person, it was impossible he could have comprehended the nature of such a document, if any one had endeavoured to explain it to him.\n\nI am the more particular in drawing your Lordship's attention to the forgery thus effected, because you will be better able to judge of the motives influencing the delinquent Fong-Ache alias Attai, when inciting Wei-Afoon to go with him and Chowh-Aoan, to the house of the Honourable Major Caine (as stated by him at the Magistrates Court when I was committed) the effect of that visit having been to throw discredit on Wei-Afoon's previous assertions and suspicion upon me.\n\nMy Solicitor Mr. Coley has informed me that at the time of this forged deed being brought forward, Wei-Afoon petitioned Mr. Shelley (late Auditor General and Clerk of Councils) to advise him what course to pursue in order to defeat Fong-Ache's wicked designs, and that Mr. Shelley thereupon engaged Mr. Coley on the part of Wei-Afoon to watch Fong-Ache's proceedings, who afterwards finding himself barred from the anticipated easy possession, was glad to compound his claim on the estate and effect a re-assignment.\n\nThe following advice was counselled on a statement of the case submitted to the gentleman, who in the capacity of H. M's Acting Attorney General, afterwards received this man's depositions \"There are very good grounds to doubt that the last assignment (of 30th November 1846 to Fong-Ache alias Attai) was executed by the deceased, the consideration is insufficient, and the signature differs from his signature on other documents now in being, but I cannot advise the said Afoon or Chun-tae-sing to commence any proceedings either at law or in equity; All they have to do is to take out administration and carry on the business, pay the mortgage to Wing-kee and get him to release the estate to them as representatives of Wei-Acqui, treating Attai's assignment as if it never existed, leaving him to institute proceedings if he thinks fit; It is always better to defend in cases of this nature than to prosecute.\"\n\n19th January, 1847.\n\nSigned.\n\nCHARLES MOLLOY CAMPBELL, Attorney General.\n\nSo many, and so various have been the mal-practices exercised in relation to this Market (ascribable doubtless to the impunity with which the name of a member of the Executive Government has been mixed up with some of them, and which the prosecution brought against me for simply noticing has in no way tended to remove the impression of, from the minds of the Chinese residents that a detail of all that has come to my knowledge would extend to a much greater length than your Lordship could spare time for perusal, and believing that sufficient has been already related to effect my object of proving that a necessity existed for me to take the course which I have effectually pursued, I will not intrude on your Lordship's patience further, than to inform you of the progress of the charges brought against me subsequent to my letter of August, wherein it was stated that I stood indicted and held to bail on the anomalous charge of conspiring with myself to injure the character and reputation of the Honourable Major Caine.\n\nAt the sessions of October following, Wei-Afoon who had previously been examined as a witness on the part of the prosecution, was named as the joint Conspirator, and the trial was moved by the Attorney General for postponement, because the Honourable Major Caine's Comprador was not in the Colony, but as he had not been examined at the Magistrate's Court when I was committed, although then within the Magistracy jurisdiction, and as it was not shown to the Court that any attempts had been made to procure his presence, the trial would have proceeded but that His Honor the Chief Justice deemed it advisable not to throw any obstacle in the way of clearing up the mysterious cause of my arraignment, by forcing the case to a trial, which would but have been a cause for its immediate (and for my character unsatisfactory) abandonment.\n\nAt the ensuing sessions of December the Criminal Crown Prosecutor Mr. N. d'E. Parker stated in the Court that he had no charge against me, and the case was thereupon proclaimed discharged. The late Governor was under the impression that my case was necessarily relinquished (as stated in the Colonial Secretary's Letter of 3rd January last, copy enclosed) because it was impossible for the Acting Chief Justice to preside as Judge at a trial in which he had previously in his capacity of Her Majesty's Acting Attorney General expressed a legal opinion upon, and taken the evidence, but as verbally explained by me to Sir John Davis this impression was erroneous, because Mr. Campbell at the same Sessions presided as Judge on various other trials in which he had previously acted as Prosecutor on the part of the Crown, and at the Nisi Prius Sittings immediately preceding, had adjudged on two distinct cases in which nearly up to the time of going to trial he had been retained for the defence, and from one suitor had received a large retaining fee.\n\nAt these sessions however the Honourable Major Caine's Comprador was still absent from the Colony, and now with a knowledge of his actual delinquency it appears unreasonable to expect that his presence would ever be obtained, unless an application were made to the Chinese Government enforcing his return.\n\nThe only evidence remaining against me therefore was that of the man Chowh Aoun, and I beg leave to inform your Lordship that had my trial come on at the first session, I should have been prepared with the evidence of Mr. Parker (afterwards Criminal Crown Prosecutor) to the effect, that as he was in the room at Mr. Campbell's during the whole of the examination on the 6th of July, he was aware that when Chowh Aoan gave his evidence I was not at the place of examination, and that up to the time of my interview with Chowh-Aoun in the evening (whilst the examination was still going on) I had had no opportunity of learning what was the nature of his deposition, or even if he had been examined at all, consequently therefore, I could not have said to him \"Aoan! what for you no have talkee so fashion after Mr. Campbell, so can spoil-em Major Caine?\" words to which the Honourable Major Caine ...\n\nPage 118\n\n2\n\nB\n\nC\n\nD", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-072 - Indviduals - 1858.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 246677, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-072 - Indviduals - 1858", "page_number": 512, "title": "CO129-072 - Indviduals - 1858", "content_text": "802\n\n9\n\n509\n\n8\n\nINDUSTRIAL MUSEUM, SCOTLAND.\n\nAt the request of private parties, analyses have been made of 170 objects. Among the chief substances examined have been 18 minerals, including sandstones, limestones, granites, iron ores, coal, and bituminous fuels; 77 guanos, superphosphates, and other manures; 19 waters and boiler deposits; 30 articles of food; five drugs; 12 recent animal products, along with the substances requiring analysis in three suspected cases of poisoning; and many miscellaneous objects, such as pigments, porcelain, glass, and mineral powders of unknown origin.\n\nThe Director, in addition, has, at the instance of parties concerned, drawn up reports on the means of preventing the forgery of bank-notes; on the relative merits of four competing patents; on the adulteration of bread; on the legal signification of the word \"pottery,\" as affecting business contracts; on the means of purifying contaminated waters; on the sanitary relations of distilleries; on the changes which grain undergoes during the process of malting; on the causes of sour fermentation in brewing; on the expansibility, under heat, of chloroform; on certain of the limits within which arsenical poisoning may occur; besides less elaborate replies to questions of individual interest.\n\nTwenty pupils have prosecuted analytical chemistry in the laboratory for periods varying from one month to six. The whole of them have been engaged in inquiries relating to industrial science.\n\nIII. The students of the University class of technology number forty. The professions represented by the class are those of general manufacturer, architect, engineer, farmer, merchant, baker, tanner, sugar planter, sugar refiner, teacher, doctor, and clergyman, besides young men entered simply as students, but chiefly training for industrial callings, as well as retired military, medical, and legal officers of the East India Company's service, and amateurs.\n\nThe Senate of the University of Edinburgh, willing to show their interest in the new chair, have placed at the disposal of the Director, as Professor of Technology, a Straton medal of five Charles guineas value for competition among the students. Cowan, Esq., M.P., has offered a prize for the best essay on a subject suggested by the Director; and a senior member of the class, Mr. Farmer, who has realized during a lengthened residence in New Zealand the value of industrial science, has promised another prize for competition among the junior students.\n\nBesides attending the daily lectures, the students, as in preceding years, visit manufactories, such as paper-mills, so as to witness on the large scale the practical working of those arts, the principles of which have been explained in the lectures.\n\nAlthough the class is smaller than last year, chiefly, as is believed, owing to the commercial distresses of the country, and is taught under great disadvantages, in a most inconvenient lecture-room, at a distance from the temporary depository of Museum specimens, the students are unabated in their zeal, and, as in former years, have largely contributed to the Museum.\n\nAs the general public cannot be reached through the University lectures on technology, the Director has embraced various opportunities which have offered to interest the community at large in the Industrial Museum. In particular, he has availed himself of his position as President of the Royal Scottish Society of Arts, to urge in an address which the Society has since printed, the continued co-operation of that large and influential body in supporting the Museum.\n\nBy request of the Merchant Company of Edinburgh, he has delivered to its members and a large circle of guests a lecture \"On the Industrial Museum of Scotland in its relation to commercial enterprise.\" Through the liberality of James Richardson, Esq., Master of the Company, the lecture in question has been printed and distributed widely throughout the country. It has already led to the gift of specimens to the Museum.\n\nFour lectures have been delivered to the Philosophical Institution on a selected number of industrial arts; and a large section of the community who cannot be addressed in any other way have through this channel been awakened or revived to an interest in the progress of the Museum.\n\nIV. The library has been formally organized during the last year, but it has been carefully limited to a few works on industrial science and art, which were essential for the guidance of the Director and his assistants in classifying and acquiring objects for the Museum, and in prosecuting economic researches in the laboratory.\n\nIn concluding this Report, the Director cannot in duty omit calling your special attention to the deep disappointment which has been occasioned in Scotland by no vote having been taken in the House of Commons last session for the erection of the promised new Museum buildings.\n\nMemorials urging the importance of these being proceeded with were presented to Government by the Magistrates and Town Council of Edinburgh, the Senate of its University, the Highland and Agricultural Society of Scotland, the Royal Scottish Society of Arts, the Educational Institute of Scotland, the Merchant Company of Edinburgh, the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce, and the Technological students of the University, in addition to the representations to the same effect made by Professor Allman and the reporter, as Curators of the Natural History and Industrial Museums. The Highland Society also, as well as the Town Council and Merchant Company of Edinburgh, sent deputations to London to confer with the Treasury on the site and character of the buildings.\n\nIt has been matter accordingly of equal surprise and pain to the general community of Scotland that any doubt should exist on the part of the Legislature as to the interest which the public has in the Industrial Museum, or as to the confidence with which it looks to the fulfilment of the promises made in 1854.\n\nThe Director simply reports these facts in justice to the many...\n\nPage 804\n\n10\n\n510\n\n9\n\nB", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-072 - Indviduals - 1858.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 250729, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-080 - Sir Robinson - 1861 [1-3]", "page_number": 290, "title": "CO129-080 - Sir Robinson - 1861 [1-3]", "content_text": "126\n\n១។ ភ\n\n27\n\nGovernment Cash are equal to one Dollar, the Proclamation in this respect as all others has been a nullity.\n\nUntil very lately, however, a coin fully equal to that specified in the Proclamation has passed in the Colony for a dollar in consequence of the large quantity of spurious Cash which has been in circulation throughout China for years, notwithstanding the strong measures taken by the Government to suppress the illicit manufacture of it, by awarding death as the punishment for forging.\n\nThe established rule amongst Native Cash Keepers of the Colony until lately has been to accept cash in payment, provided each string did not contain more than a certain number of forged cash - the proportion I believe was generally about two thirds Government cash to one third bad cash, but sometimes the proportion of the bad cash was one half and even as high as seven tenths. Which I forward by name & \"current specimen of Cash\" and from 1,200 to 1,300 have usually been considered equal to a dollar. The forged cash have however been gradually deteriorating in quality, and at last became so bad, owing to the operations of a gang of forgers who established themselves on the opposite shore of Kowloon that", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-080 - Sir Robinson - 1861 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 254061, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-087 - Sir Robinson - 1862 [7] & Acting Governor Mercer - 1862 [7-9]", "page_number": 167, "title": "CO129-087 - Sir Robinson - 1862 [7] & Acting Governor Mercer - 1862 [7-9]", "content_text": "## Proofread Text\n\nI am an officer of D. Rony. Reither is specified that the chapter I really consider is much noting the whole affair. I append his conclusions to me, the Juspa, with repeating explanations tumbled by the different officers.\n\nA. Chayes refers to Roberce.\n\n1. Fit. 164 Bring apient of Me Bridges. It tells me Bridges is himself poor and such lead to have been. I have been a councillor - Criminal convening test matings of Legislation Convening Cornil & bon mong Nonnas to heims M.\n\n2. Suppressing Colonial Forgery relating satisfying Explained by Allereens within the provided kumlets & puck an Calduch For accusation ci To Communicate.\n\n3. Uprave Culdantly exercices in aral offend the Vhuay ridicatory duilt acht Cultude he principal his (M. caldude, cut to Scoundrel reason completes amond nformer had turned be HR.\n\n3. Net Giving In Manav an offertung Me Mener of retrotting Caldwells chalpes aft din 4. Stotching the Calduck Exquing at the completes austand of Mor Meran persent dpth.\n\nB. Against Me Meu Earrant.\n\nMe Menur \n\n1. intensifying the humihoud of the Explanation s sest i 76 chay. hippon Undercter oft Enquing. it is perpetty plain - pristin was Ide a nd the main But of the (1) that fals Fantent 1 Jom when the Extremen cintian w-could dentrai le paped (2) (dismipal uns paped A the can of the Ker long. 100-com my caufully imensty sted Calduc that wide li...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-087 - Sir Robinson - 1862 [7] & Acting Governor Mercer - 1862 [7-9].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 254219, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-087 - Sir Robinson - 1862 [7] & Acting Governor Mercer - 1862 [7-9]", "page_number": 322, "title": "CO129-087 - Sir Robinson - 1862 [7] & Acting Governor Mercer - 1862 [7-9]", "content_text": "# \n\nthat he was a Coolee who had escaped, when it was most clearly proved that he was nothing of the kind, but a well-known broker, was so astonishing that you could not rest until you had made the public acquainted with the crime that had been perpetrated by the imposition practised.\n\nAnd now, in order that you may the better comprehend my reason for asking the question, and my general motive for the foregoing enquiries, I must explain to you that when the shopkeeper whom Mr. Caldwell speaks of having been convicted of kidnapping was brought into the gaol, his story to me was that he had had no more to do with the business of the men going to Havana than to receive out of their advances a sum of money due for having boarded them; that only 10 men had agreed to go to Havana, and the rest went to the Straits, whither they would all have gone if money could have been obtained in advance of wages.\n\nThis, in effect, was a contradiction of the purport of the prosecution, which had for its presumed object the punishment of one supposed to be an experienced Kidnapper. The Shopkeeper's story, if true, goes, in short, to prove that he was no Kidnapper at all. When, therefore, I saw that Mr. Caldwell, for reasons since become too apparent, had suborned evidence to prove that the whole 45 had been kidnapped and coerced, I resolved on asking you, as I have recently done (and should have asked before, but that I waited to see the result of the investigation by the Executive Council of the Hongkong government into the matter) - how you arrived at the fact stated in your narrative published in the **Daily Press** that \"we found that the most part of the 40 and odd Coolees had already been shipped on board the `Emile Pereire`.\" Your answer is that you did not ascertain it at all; but that you concluded it was so because Mr. Caldwell said so.\n\n## \n\nFurther questioned, you say you did not see the books of the hong, nor the proprietor of it, on the occasion of your calling with Mr. Caldwell; and you do not see how Mr. Caldwell was satisfied that the thirty and odd Coolees which had left the Sun-fook-tie hong for the **Emilie Pireire** were Coolees who answered to the \"names and description\" given by Ng Ahsoong; and Florentino dos Remedios, Interpreter, on being questioned by me, confirmed what you said, viz. that no books were produced, nor was any evidence given of the Coolees answering to any particular description. Coupling this with the fact of the informer proving to be an impostor, I am confirmed in my belief that the shopkeeper, convicted on Mr. Caldwell's suborned evidence, told the truth when he said only ten had gone on or agreed to go to Havana.\n\nIn further corroboration of the convict's story to me, that he received only a small amount of money - (and at the Police Court, on his first examination, he said the amount got by him was $163 and 33 taels - say in all 205 dollars) - as you are aware, the Interpreters whom you sent to examine the books of the Sun-fook-tie hong, and whose depositions you supply to me, found entries of payments to one Lo (Mr.) Sum (answering to the name Shum Ahing) of $2024; and these payments were in the exact period which, according to the evidence of Ahsoong, Shum Ahing stayed at Macao, viz. from the 26th of December to the 12th of January. Now the broker Asoong said that he heard the Coolees were sold for $27 each. This for Ten would be 270; and if to the 202 found as above, as paid to Shum Ahing, is added the 72 before found entered in the Sun-fook-tie hong's book as to the broker Asoong, it is as complete a corroboration as we could have of Shum Ahing's statement that 10 only took advance (after the rate of 27 each) out of the aggregate of which he received what was due to him, and Asoong the actual broker, got the rest.\n\nMr. Caldwell, with an extraordinary penchant for imputing evil motive to all whose testimony is adverse to him, has charged this entry of payment of 72 dollars to Ahsoong as a forgery. Forgery or not, it was impossible at the time to see that the figures would dovetail with the others mentioned, and so form an indisputable proof of the truth of the wrongfully convicted Shum Ahing's story.\n\nBesides, had he, Shum Ahing, got $27 each for 45, he would have taken to Hongkong over 1200, and with such a sum in hand, or at command, would hardly have laid in the debtor's gaol two days awaiting bail when arrested on a debt of $178, for which he had become liable on account of the wife of Mah Chow Wang; in fact, it is now notorious that he was too poor to fee a lawyer to defend him on his trial.\n\nI have the honor to be,\nSir,\nYour obedient Servant,\n**WILLIAM TARRANT**.\n\nEnclosed marked `C`.\n\nOn the nineteenth day of February, in the year of our Lord One Thousand Eight hundred and sixty-two, personally came and appeared before me Eugenio Leonardo Lauca, Esquire, Her Britannic Majesty's Acting Consular Agent at Macao, Leon Boyé Esquire, Agent in Macao of the Company General Maritime of Paris, who did solemnly declare and state as follows:-\n\nI, Leon Boyé, having read the printed deposition of Mr. D. R. Caldwell on the 2nd day of February 1860, before Mr. W. H. Mitchell,", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-087 - Sir Robinson - 1862 [7] & Acting Governor Mercer - 1862 [7-9].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 256687, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-093 - Acting Governor Mercer - 1863 [7-10]", "page_number": 45, "title": "CO129-093 - Acting Governor Mercer - 1863 [7-10]", "content_text": "74.\n\nNo. 21.\n\n44\n\nGOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION.\n\nThe following Returns connected with the business of the Superior and Subordinate Courts of this Colony for the Year 1862, are published for general information.\n\nBy Order,\n\nColonial Secretary's Office, Hongkong, 17th February, 1863.\n\nW. H. ALEXANDER, Acting Colonial Secretary.\n\nRETURN of CRIMINAL CASES that have been tried in the SUPREME COURT of HONGKONG during the Year 1862.\n\n \n Number of Cases\n Number of Persons\n CRIME\n Convicted\n Death\n Death Recorded\n Penal Servitude\n Hard labor over one year\n Hard labor one year and under\n REMARKS\n Postponed\n Charges abandoned Cases\n Number of Persons\n Number of Cases\n Number of Persons\n Number of Persons\n \n \n 1\n 1\n Administering a Stupifying drug with intent, &c.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 3\n \n Assault and Wounding, ...\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Assault with intent to rob, ....\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 8\n \n Attempt to commit Burglary,...\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Attempt to commit Sodomy,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n Being found by night with housebreaking implements,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 7\n \n Bribery,...\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 9\n \n Burglary,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 3\n \n Burglary and Larceny....\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Burglary and receiving stolen property,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 3\n \n Burglary with Wounding,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Cheating, Conspiracy to cheat, and obtaining Money under false pretences\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 5\n \n Child stealing,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Conspiracy to defraud,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Conspiracy to steal in a Ship,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n \n Cutting and Wounding,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n Escaping from Gaol,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n Forgery,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n --\n \n Harbouring a stolen Child,...\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Highway Robbery,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 4\n \n Highway Robbery with Wounding,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 7\n \n Larceny,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 6\n \n Larceny and Housebreaking,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n Larceny as Bailee,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 3\n \n Larceny by Servant,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 6\n \n Larceny in a Boat,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 15\n \n Larceny in a Dwelling-house,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 17\n \n Larceny on board Ship, ...\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 7\n \n Manslaughter,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 4\n 11\n Murder,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 6\n \n Murder,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Obtaining a valuable Security under false pretences, Obtaining Goods under false pretences......\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Obtaining Money under false pretences,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 2\n \n Perjury,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n -\n \n Piracy and Murder,...\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 54\n \n Piracy,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Piracy,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n Piracy and Receiving, .\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 10\n \n Rape, ...\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n Robbery,...\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 3\n \n Robbery from the Person,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 4\n \n Robbery in a Boat,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 33\n 37\n Robbery from the Person,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 3\n \n Robbery in the Harbour, -\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 9\n \n Robbery with violence,...\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n Robbery with wounding,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 5\n 10\n Robbery with violence,...\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 8\n \n Robbery with wounding,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n Stealing in a Ship,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n Throwing a corrosive fluid,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n Unlawful wounding,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1\n \n Uttering counterfeit coin,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 145\n 251\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n a. One prisoner guilty of Receiving only.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n b. One prisoner to be twice severely whipped.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n c. One prisoner guilty of unlawful wounding.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n d. Sentenced to imprisonment only.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n e. A witness committed for six months for perjury.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n f. Two prisoners convicted of manslaughter.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n g. One prisoner escaped from Gaol before the day of trial.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n CONDENHER N\n ---\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n F\n +\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n M\n 171\n 1\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n H\n ...\n ...\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n T\n 36\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n JIL\n 10\n 10\n +\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n L\n ---\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n N. R. MASSON,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Acting Registrar.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\nN. R. MASSON,\n\nActing Registrar.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-093 - Acting Governor Mercer - 1863 [7-10].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 262274, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-105 - Acting Governor Mercer - 1865 [5-7]", "page_number": 445, "title": "CO129-105 - Acting Governor Mercer - 1865 [5-7]", "content_text": "## No 5 of 1865 – An Ordinance to consolidate and amend the Enactments in force in this Colony relating to Accessoris to, and abettors of Indictable offences.\n\n## No 6 of 1865 - An Ordinance to Consolidate and amend the Enactments in force in this Colony relating to indictable Offences by Forgery.\n\n## No 7 of 1865 \n## No 10 of 1865 \nAn Ordinance to consolidate and amend the Enactments in force in this Colony relating to Larceny and other similar offences.\n\n## No 8 of 1865 - An Ordinance to consolidate and amend the Enactments in force in this Colony relating to malicious Injuries to Property.\n\n## No 9 of 1865 - An Ordinance to consolidate and amend the Enactments in force in this Colony against Offences relating to the Coin.\n\n## No 11 of 1865. - An Ordinance to repeal certain Enactments which have been consolidated in several Ordinances relating to Criminal Offences.\n\nI attach the Law Officer's Statement in explanation of these several Enactments, which passed the Legislative Council unanimously with the Exception of that relating to the coinage (`C-8010`), the Auditor and Sir E. Sutherland being dissentient.\n\nIt will be observed that this Ordinance has a suspending clause, the object of which is to prevent vexatious interference with the currency of the Island until the Mint shall...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-105 - Acting Governor Mercer - 1865 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 262277, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-105 - Acting Governor Mercer - 1865 [5-7]", "page_number": 448, "title": "CO129-105 - Acting Governor Mercer - 1865 [5-7]", "content_text": "## Mr Mercer to The Rt. Honble K Cardwell\n### 7 Inclosures Jr. 93.\n\nReceived\n\n**A** 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11 Forwarding Ordinances 9/1865-(Copy)\n\n444\n\nSir,\n\nAttorney General's office, Hong Kong, 5th July, 1865\n\nI have the honor to report upon the Colonial Ordinances No. 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11 of 1865 which have been passed by the Legislative Council and part of which complete the series of Ordinances for the consolidation and amendment of the Criminal Law referred to in my last report.\n\nNumbers 5 to 10 relate respectively to \"Accessories and Abettors\", \"Forgery\", \"Larceny\", \"Injuries to Property\", and ...\n\nThe Honorable W. H. Alexander Esq., Acting Colonial Secretary,", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-105 - Acting Governor Mercer - 1865 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 265538, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-113 - MacDonnell - 1866 [5-6]", "page_number": 8, "title": "CO129-113 - MacDonnell - 1866 [5-6]", "content_text": "I deem it proper to point out that **h:6** has been incorrectly entitled **No. 9** - and is itself omitted from the Despatch.\n\n**Mob** relates to forgery and **ho Nib** relates to larceny. I presume this to be partly a clerical error, and partly an oversight, and have therefore proclaimed the confirmation of both Ordinances.\n\nPractically there is no objection whatever to this course, even though difficulties may have arisen as above, through my having been wrong in assuming the error. The Ordinance relating to 'forgery' is lawfully in force, and should it be your intention to disallow it, its disallowance can at any time hereafter be proclaimed on instruction from you.\n\nI have the honour to be, Sir, \nYour most obedient Servant, \nRichard Graves MacDonnell.\n\nPage...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-113 - MacDonnell - 1866 [5-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 267893, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-117 - Public Offices - 1866", "page_number": 400, "title": "CO129-117 - Public Offices - 1866", "content_text": "skill of the Chinese in every species of forgery the registration system protects is liked à le dépot in its obvious difficulties in working but the proposal may I should think be left to be developed between the Consul and Governors.\n\nI only have to observe on this that I apprehend that mere naturalization will not withdraw a Chinese from the jurisdiction of the country of his birth if he finds himself within that country, and therefore that Vice Consul Peddie's proceedings reported by Consul Robertson, appear to require some explanation. But this is a Foreign Office question and does not immediately concern us.\n\nThe points which appear to require consideration in this department are:\n\nWhether the torture of persons surrendered by or to the Chinese Authorities is sufficiently provided against.\n\nWhether alteration is required in that part...\n\nPage 398", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-117 - Public Offices - 1866.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 271206, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-125 - Sir MacDonnell - 1867 [10-11]", "page_number": 162, "title": "CO129-125 - Sir MacDonnell - 1867 [10-11]", "content_text": "Hongkong, 26th January, 1867.\n\nSuprema and Vice Admiralty Courts of Hongkong, during the Year ending 31st December, 1866. RETURN of the NUMBER of Cases tried before the Honorable the Chief Justice, and ACTIONS commenced in the\n\nCases tried before the Honorable the Chief Justice in 1866.\n\n \n COURT\n NUMBER OF CASES\n DEBT AND DAMAGES CLAIMED\n AMOUNT OF JUDGMENT\n Plaintiff\n Defendant\n Nonsuit\n \n \n Supreme Court,- Common Law\n 152\n $518,152.90\n $419,741.38\n \n \n \n \n \n Chancery\n 18\n \n $37,851.43\n \n \n 3\n \n \n Bankruptcy\n 3\n \n \n Appellant\n Respondent\n \n \n \n Appeals\n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Vice-Admiralty Court\n \n $56,060.09\n \n \n \n 15\n \n\nActions commenced in 1866.\n\n \n COURT\n NUMBER OF CASES\n DEBT AND DAMAGES CLAIMED\n JUDGMENT\n Plaintiff\n Defendant\n Nonsuit\n REMAINING IN DEPENDENCE\n \n \n Supreme Court,- Common Law\n 117\n $1,920,530.01\n \n 4\n \n \n \n \n \n Chancery\n \n $148,035.85\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Probate\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Bankruptcy\n 17\n $420,778.79\n \n \n \n 3\n \n \n \n Appeals\n 1\n \n \n Appellant\n Respondent\n \n \n \n \n Vice-Admiralty Court\n \n $121,447.94\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\nOne of these cases was in dependence on 31st December, 1865.\n\nThree of these cases were in dependence on 31st December, 1865.\n\nSix of these cases were Petitions for Bounty.\n\nFour of these cases were in dependence on 31st December, 1865.\n\nThe sum here given is from the valuations made by the Appraisers of Court.\n\nJudgment was signed in Twenty of these cases, representing a sum of $542,611.82.\n\nThe sum here given is the amount of liabilities entered in the Bankrupts' Schedules.\n\nTwo of these cases were from the Police Court, and one from the Summary Jurisdiction Court.\n\nDuring the Year there were 104 Sittings in Court and in Chambers, upon notices of motion and Judge's Summonses, from the 1st January to the 31st December, 1866. RETURN of the NUMBER of CASES tried, and ACTIONS commenced, in the Court of Summary Jurisdiction,\n\n \n NO. OF CASES\n DEBT AND DAMAGES CLAIMED\n AMOUNT OF JUDGMENT\n Plaintiff\n Defendant\n Nonsuit\n REMAINING IN DEPENDENCE\n REMARKS\n \n \n 1,139\n $72,832.46\n $74,096.70\n \n \n 8\n 260\n \n \n\n*4 of these Cases were in Dependence on 31st December, 1865.\n\nHENRY J. HOLMES,\n\nClerk of Court.\n\nABSTRACT of Causes under COGNIZANCE of the Police Magistrates' Court during the Year 1866.\n\n \n CAUSES NOW DISPOSED OF\n M.\n F.\n \n \n Total Number of Defendants\n 6,045\n 769\n \n \n Punished for preferring false charge, or giving false testimony\n 6\n \n \n \n To be of good behaviour, or to answer any charge\n 200\n 34\n \n \n To keep the Peace\n 2\n \n \n \n Committed to Prison, or detained, pending orders of the Governor\n 252\n 7\n \n \n Committed for Trial at the Supreme Court\n 36\n 6\n \n \n Undecided\n 161\n \n \n\nJOHN C. WHYTE,\n\nPolice Magistrate.\n\nN. R. MASSON,\n\nActing Registrar.\n\n \n WRITE ISSUED BY MAGISTRATES DURING THE YEAR 1866\n \n \n \n Summonses for Defendants\n 10,966\n \n \n Warrants\n 2,706\n \n \n Summonses for Witnessca\n 250\n \n \n Judgment and Rehearing\n 12\n \n \n Distress\n 132\n \n \n Arrest\n 101\n \n \n Search\n 122\n \n\nTHE CASES CONSISTED OF\n\n \n \n M.\n F.\n \n \n Administering Drugs\n 8\n 18\n \n \n Aiding and Abetting in Larceny\n 18\n 3\n \n \n Assaults at a riotous Assemblage\n 11\n \n \n \n Abduction of Females\n 4\n 6\n \n \n Accusing of Crime with intent to Extort\n 2\n \n \n \n Assaults\n 725\n 129\n \n \n Assaults accompanied with Damage of Property\n 37\n 11\n \n \n Assault with intent to Rob\n 51\n 10\n \n \n Attempts to commit Felony\n 10\n \n \n \n Attempting to sell Children, or having Children with intent to sell\n 2\n \n \n \n Attempting to sell Military Property\n 1\n \n \n \n Attempt to Murder by Drowning\n 1\n \n \n \n Being at large in the Street at night without Night Pass\n 4\n \n \n \n Breach of Chinese Passengers' Act 1855\n 168\n \n \n \n Breach of Prison\n 6\n \n \n \n Breach of Recognizance\n 352\n \n \n \n Breaches of Building Ordinance\n 23\n \n \n \n Breaches of Cargo Boat Ordinance\n \n \n \n \n Breaches of Jail's Ordinance\n \n \n \n \n Allowing unmuzzled ferocious Dogs to be at large\n 4\n \n \n \n Obstruction of Wharves, &c. by Boats\n 168\n \n \n \n Obstruction of Public Ways by Hawkers, &c, and by playing at Games of chance\n 6\n \n \n \n Found in Houses at night with intent to steal therein\n \n \n \n \n Found at Night with Arms or Housebreaking Implements, with intent to commit Felony\n \n \n \n \n Harboring Felons\n \n \n \n \n Cutting and destroying Trees\n 2\n \n \n \n Harboring Burglars\n \n \n \n \n Conduct calculated to provoke a breach of the Peace\n 11\n \n \n \n Harboring Police when on Duty\n \n \n \n \n Disorderly behaviour, and disorderly behaviour accompanied by Damage of Property\n \n \n \n \n Highway Robbery\n \n \n \n \n Intimidating Workmen\n 2\n \n \n \n Defiling Streams\n 21\n \n \n \n Kidnapping\n \n \n \n \n Discharging Fire Arms\n 6\n \n \n \n Keeping Billiard Tables without a License\n 1\n \n \n \n Firing off Crackers and making Bonfires\n 40\n \n \n \n Keeping Boarding Houses without a License\n 201\n \n \n \n Futions Driving, Riding, &c.\n 8\n \n \n \n Larcenies, common\n 786\n \n \n \n Indecent Exposure of Person\n 11\n \n \n \n Larcenies from Person\n 22\n \n \n \n Breaches of Market's Ordinance\n 42\n \n \n \n Breaches of Post Office Ordinance\n \n \n \n \n Branches of Registration Ordinance\n 185\n \n \n \n (Plying Boats without License; Mendicancy; Unlicenced Hawking, &c.)\n \n \n \n \n Breaches of Ordinances:\n \n \n \n \n For Registration of Public Brothels\n \n \n \n \n Regulation of Weights and Measures\n 20\n \n \n \n Demanding Money with Menaces\n 8\n \n \n \n of Vehicles and Chairs\n 184\n \n \n \n Desertion from H. M's Army and Navy\n 19\n \n \n \n Sale of Prepared Opium\n \n \n \n \n Detention of Seamen's Effects\n \n \n \n \n Suppression of Public Gambling\n 46\n \n \n \n Embezzlement\n 87\n \n \n \n Retail of spirituous and fermented Liquors\n \n \n \n \n Escaping from Custody of Police\n 12\n \n \n \n Breaches of Pawnbroker's Ordinance\n 1\n \n \n \n Breaches of Bankruptcy Ordinance\n \n \n \n \n Breaches of Ordinance 14 of 1845, viz:- Nuisances\n \n \n \n \n Damage of Property, Cruelty to Animals\n 495\n \n \n \n Exercising the calling of Pawnbroker without License\n 79\n \n \n \n Extortion by Color of Office\n 12\n \n \n \n Forgery, and Uttering Forged Documents, &c.\n \n \n \n \n False Imprisonment\n \n \n \n \n Forcible Detention, &c.\n \n \n \n \n Found on Shore without Ticket of Leave\n 3\n \n \n \n Wontonly throwing Stones\n 61\n \n \n \n Misconduct as Domestic Servants, &c.\n 6\n \n \n \n Unlawful Possession of Property\n 13\n \n \n \n Burglary\n 1\n \n \n \n Child Stealing\n \n \n \n \n Confederating with Pirates\n \n \n \n \n Conspiracy to Extort\n \n \n \n \n Conspiracy to conceal Crime\n \n \n \n \n Crimes and Offences committed in Chinese Territory and against the Laws of China\n \n \n \n \n Cutting and Wounding with intent to do Grievous Bodily Harm, &c.\n 121\n \n \n \n Libel\n --\n \n \n \n Malicious Prosecution and False Testimony, &c.\n 283\n \n \n \n Maliciously Setting Fire to a Ware-house with intent to Defraud\n 20\n \n \n \n Misconduct as Police Constables\n 57\n \n \n \n Murder\n 19\n \n \n \n Manslaughter\n 1\n \n \n \n Offences relating to Coin\n 7\n \n \n \n Obtaining Property by False Pretences\n 3\n \n \n \n Offences relating to Workmen\n \n \n \n \n Personating Police Constables\n 6\n \n \n \n Personating Mail\n 13\n \n \n \n Piracy\n 1\n \n \n \n Piracy with Murder\n \n \n \n \n Receiving Stolen Property\n 361\n \n \n \n Receiving Bribe as Police Constable\n 6\n \n \n \n Refusing to render aid to Police\n \n \n \n \n Rescuing Prisoners from Custody of Police\n 18\n \n \n \n Robbery\n \n \n \n \n Rogues, and Vagabonds, &c.\n 476\n \n \n \n Storing Gunpowder to the Danger of Houses\n 1\n \n \n \n Trespass on Crown Lands\n 49\n \n \n \n Unnatural Offences\n 1\n \n \n \n Total\n 11,733\n \n \n \n Discharged\n 3,263\n \n \n \n Convicted and Punished\n 8,470\n \n \n \n Total Number of Causes\n 11,733", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-125 - Sir MacDonnell - 1867 [10-11].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 273010, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-128 - Public Offices & Others - 1867", "page_number": 568, "title": "CO129-128 - Public Offices & Others - 1867", "content_text": "## THE LETTER FROM BRITISH GUIANA TO THE REV. W. LOBSCHEID\n\n(Re-printed from the “Daily Press” of the 18th March, 1867.)\n\nMY DEAR SIR—After a delay of two months in consequence of my being unable sooner to procure the information I wished for, I now proceed to reply to your very welcome letter of May 27th.\n\nI am glad to hear of the safe arrival of the agency, but fear that in consequence of the altered state of things relative to Chinese emigration, there may be some difficulty in the drugs being forwarded. If no ship be leaving for Demerara, I should think the best way would be to send them via London, unless any opportunity offers of a vessel going to Surinam. In such case I ought to be advised of the shipment. The opinion here is that Chinese emigration must be abandoned, if the proposed restrictions are insisted on. This will be most disastrous for the colony.\n\nI hear that Mary did not leave the colony with Ashang. I believe she is still at Pl. Great Diamond (Demerara River) with her family. Most of those who went to the Hopetown settlement and got discontented settled on this estate. There was a young man here a few weeks since, who gave his name as John Schmidt, and stated that he was on his way to Hongkong via Surinam. I believe he was engaged as an interpreter at the Emigration Office in Georgetown, and I was told that he had given as a reason for leaving that he had married an extravagant Creole wife and wanted to be rid of her. When I was at Nickerie a fortnight since, Mr. Dessé told me that he had presented testimonials from you and that he had engaged him to look after a store at his estate of Pl. \"Paradise.\"\n\nThe following extract respecting How-fook's family is from a letter of the Rev. D. Smith, in whose parish they reside—The family still live at Ronnie part of Pl. \"Houston\". A-yung, the son and eldest child, has been continuously employed since his father's death as an interpreter for the medical man visiting the Houston Hospital, and thus earns sufficient for his own maintenance. The three remaining children—all girls—are unable to work as yet, and for each of them their mother receives from the Local Board of Guardians an allowance of $1.28 per month. The mother works occasionally. The whole family is well and thriving so far as bodily condition is concerned, with the exception of the lad A-yung. He is very sickly, and I very much doubt if he will ever reach man's estate. Should he live he will be quite incapable of any hard work.\n\nWith regard to a teacher for the Chinese here I am at present employing a man named Wong-awa, who, I believe came in the `Dora`. He has lost his wife, and had been out of employment when I engaged him. He was for some time an agent for O Tye Kim, but they had some misunderstanding, and Wong-awa left him. He is not yet baptized, and understands very little English. The knowledge of English is not of the first importance. What I want is a man who is a real Christian himself and of sufficient ability to preach the truth of the Gospel to his countrymen, making himself useful also in teaching the children. You say \"$15 and free station\"; I think if you could find a really good man an effort might be made to raise $15 a month for him. At present the number of Christian Chinese here is small: men 20, women 22, boys 11, girls 11, total 64; number on the two estates 250, so that there is a large scope for missionary work. They are just building a house for the teacher—in which also he can assemble them for the religious exercises—the estate cottages being all occupied.\n\nIn a letter recently received from the Archdeacon, he says—\"The settlement of Hopetown is flourishing. The Bishop, Mr. Brett, Mr. F. Austin, and myself visited it on Thursday (18th Oct.), and were all greatly surprised and pleased at what we saw. They have cleared 5 miles, 2,000 feet in depth, of river and creek margin, and erected dwellings in un-interrupted succession along the clearing: have 40 ovens (cost of each $80) for burning charcoal; have plantains, ginger, sweet potatoes, and other vegetables planted ad libitum, have pigs to the value of $1,000. 150 acres in rice, which in December will yield 600 bags at $9 $5,400, which will more than pay off the original loan of $2,200 lent by the Government to start the settlement. There are 170 people on the mission, of whom 40 are women and 20 children. There are 10 Christians, really from Skeldon. They are all well clad, healthy and happy. They have lost only one person by death; one birth only. They have lately built a temporary chapel or school house of neat construction. They have three large pants of their own, besides batter, and there is constant trading with the Chinese store in town—and they have a store on the settlement. They live in peace; no case having as yet had to be referred to the magistrate.”\n\nThe Bishop also writes: \"We were gratified beyond measure with what we saw. The settlement will soon be comparatively rich. In December Mr. O Tye-kim told me that the Chinese will commence repaying the Government advance, and in four or five months afterwards the borrowers will be quite free.\" In a previous letter His Lordship wrote: \"You will not be sorry to hear that O. Tye-kim is about to be licensed by me as a reader, and that he proposes throwing himself heartily into the work of the Church, and to devote himself wholly to the task of evangelizing his countrymen.\"\n\nI have sent to you—in care of a young man named Chin-a-pow—a copy of a volume I have published, entitled `El Dorade; British Guiana as a field for colonisation`. I hope it will reach you safely.\n\nNext year I shall probably be in England on leave of absence, as my health has not been good for some time.\n\nI had almost forgotten to mention a matter of some interest bearing on colonisation. One of the members of the Court of Policy, Mr. Gordon, of Bel Air, has given notice that at the meeting of the Combined Court next year he will propose the following resolutions:\n\n1. That from the sparseness of its present population, the productive capabilities of British Guiana are not sufficiently developed, and any project having for its object the increase of the population and the supply of the great want of the country—labour—deserves the encouragement of the court.\n2. That such a wide area of fertile land, which a bountiful Providence has placed at the disposal of the British Crown, presents an attractive colonising field to many who now inhabit densely-populated countries, were the advantages afforded by British Guiana made known and encouragement held out to free settlers.\n3. That no colony offers a more profitable investment for capital, and were the Crown lands thus settled, wider scope would be afforded for its beneficial employment in the formation or extension of canals, tramways, steam communication, the electric telegraph, &c.; and this court therefore recommends to the Government the consideration of the question of having the Crown lands (in certain localities to be hereafter determined on) surveyed and laid out in plots, due regard being had to highways and roads, with the view of taking free grants of them to settlers, upon conditions which will ensure their cultivation within a given period.\n4. That in anticipation of the revenues that must arise from the increased population giving increased production, in the opinion of the court, it is sound policy to foster and aid all undertakings which, although at the first bending apparently only to the advantages of the few, yet eventually and really contribute to the well-being of the many; and this court, therefore, will authorize advances of money, upon moderate interest and repayable by easy instalments, to the free settlers upon Crown lands for the erection of houses, and for draining and bringing into cultivation the lands so allotted to them, such advances to be expended under official inspection, and to form a first lien upon the land and building until repaid with interest.\n5. That the principle of raising loans of a reproductive character having been already affirmed, and for the purpose of enabling the Government to carry out the objects indicated, this court authorizes the issue from time to time, in such sums as occasion may require, but not in the whole to exceed £1,000,000 sterling, of Government debentures, bearing interest, payable half-yearly at or under the rate of per cent. per annum, to be secured upon the revenues of the colony not already pledged in security for existing loans.\n\nI heartily wish for success in your difficult labours and remain yours very faithfully.\n\nW. T. YENESS, Chaplain\n\n## \n\n**Letter from British Guiana**\n\nTo the Editor,\n\nSir,\n\nI beg to forward you a copy of a letter from the Chaplain of British Guiana to the Rev. W. Lobscheid, which I think will be read with interest by many of your readers.\n\nYours, &c.\n\n## Letter from Hongkong\n\nTo His Excellency the Administrator-in-Council.\n\nSir,\n\nThe petition of the undersigned Shem Wo, &c., &c., coolies lately shipped in the ship \"Portland\" for Demerara, humbly showeth:\n\nThat your petitioners were induced to enter into a contract to proceed to Demerara by the false representations of the parties concerned in shipping them; that they were not informed of the real nature of the contract, nor of the conditions under which they were to be employed; that they were told they were going to a place called \"Chy-na-sah\", where they would be employed as labourers on high wages, and that they would be at liberty to return to China after a certain number of years.\n\nThat on their arrival at Demerara, they were compelled to work under circumstances of great hardship and oppression; that they were not paid the wages promised to them; that they were subjected to corporal punishment; and that they were not allowed to return to China at the expiration of their contract.\n\nThat your petitioners have been informed that the parties concerned in shipping them to Demerara have been guilty of forgery and other crimes in connection with the shipment; that the notices to the Chinese explaining the conditions of the contract to be entered into had been altered by Ho Aloy, the principal contractor; and that he had used other persons' signatures to prevent people from applying to him for advice.\n\nThat your petitioners have reason to believe that the Superintendent of Police and the Registrar General were aware of these facts, but failed to take action; and that they have reason to believe that Ho Aloy was the principal instigator of the crimes committed against them.\n\nYour petitioners therefore humbly pray that Your Excellency will be pleased to take their case into consideration, and to cause justice to be done to them.\n\nAnd your petitioners, as in duty bound, will ever pray.\n\n## \n\nShem Wo, &c., &c.\n\nTo His Excellency Sir Richard Graves MacDonnell, K.C.M.G., &c., &c., Administrator-in-Council.\n\n**MEMORANDUM**\n\nThe undersigned begs to state that he has seen a copy of the letter from the Chaplain of British Guiana to the Rev. W. Lobscheid, and that he has also seen a copy of the petition from the Chinese coolies who were shipped in the \"Portland\" for Demerara.\n\nHe begs to state that the allegations contained in the petition are substantially correct; that he has seen the papers in the Court, and that he has obtained a copy from an Emigrant on board the \"Portland\", which copy is still in his hands.\n\nThat the notices to the Chinese explaining the conditions of the contract to be entered into had been altered by Ho Aloy, the principal contractor; and that he had used other persons' signatures to prevent people from applying to him for advice.\n\nThat the Superintendent of Police and the Registrar General were aware of these facts, but failed to take action; and that Ho Aloy was the principal instigator of the crimes committed against the coolies.\n\nThe undersigned begs to state that he reported the fact to his superiors. \n\nWith all this evidence, which must have been known to Deane and Tonnachy, how do Your Excellency account for the exculpation of Ho Aloy? How was it, that the Superintendent of Police and the Registrar General did not better discharge their duty? There can be no doubt of the fact, that the men who are now in prison, acted in concert with, if not under, the instruction of Ho Aloy, the principal contractor. Your Excellency cannot deny that justice. For what purpose has a passage broker to give security to the amount of $20,000, if he is not to be held responsible for his actions? Justice has failed; and when time shall permit me to give a sketch of the late proceedings, Your Excellency's administration will not go out free of censure.\n\nUnder these circumstances Your Excellency need not be surprised at seeing residents taking no interest in the welfare of the Colony; for a person will consider his life and character of greater value than a parcel of flattering letters from Colonial Governments.\n\nI have the honor to be\n\nYour Excellency's\n\nMost Obedient Servant,\n\nW. Lobscheid", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-128 - Public Offices & Others - 1867.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 273206, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-129 - Sir MacDonnell - 1868 [1-3]", "page_number": 15, "title": "CO129-129 - Sir MacDonnell - 1868 [1-3]", "content_text": "## \nThe edges of all the coins are to be Milled and the best means of detecting forgery are to be employed. M. Made recommendations that an application should be addressed by His Excellency the Governor of Hong Kong to Her Majesty's Minister at Peking to further the effect. (A copy of the document is to be forwarded to Mr. Hart, the Imperial Commissioner of Customs at Peking, and his good offices are to be solicited to bring about the desired result with the Chinese authorities).\n\nThat the Imperial Chinese Government be requested to supply metal for a stamped piece of the true weight of a Standard Tael. The weight is to be such as would be accepted at all the Treaty ports, as a piece of Silver of a certain regular touch or Standard; to be stamped by the Chinese authorities, say 100, for example, for the Tael.\n\nShould the details and designs of the coin proposed be not to their liking, request that the Imperial Government of China may be moved to authorise the reception of any other design more applicable which they may suggest, for all Imperial customs, receiving each coin struck at the Mint of Hong Kong as legal tender for a Tael, and taken by the count and not by the sheer weight of silver.\n\nThe Government of Hong Kong guaranteeing that each coin shall be true to the desired weight and standards.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-129 - Sir MacDonnell - 1868 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 274431, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-131 - Sir MacDonnell - 1868 [6-7]", "page_number": 66, "title": "CO129-131 - Sir MacDonnell - 1868 [6-7]", "content_text": "62 \n\nThis scheme would involve no expense beyond the cost of the stamps and the services of a clerk to sell them at a window of the Post Office. \n\nIts simplicity in form and matter, which appeals at once to the merchants and traders, as well as its freedom from all ambiguity, recommends itself particularly to the Chinese mind, ridding it of all working fear of unexpected and uncertain pains and penalties. The value of the stamp pecuniarily would render forgery most unlikely. The entire bearings and surroundings could be appreciated at a glance, while the precise and unalterable value of a stamp, at an extremely moderate cost, if not approved of, at least need not be a source of incessant irritation and desire of evasion. \n\nThe initiation of the penny postage system in England by Mr. Hill will be recollected, and the many misgivings to which it gave rise on the score of revenue, but its actual results are well known. \n\nI am, Sirs, \nYour most obedient Servant, \nW. C. Hunter. \n\n## SCHEDULE \n\nContaining a Specification of the Deeds, Instruments and Writings which require to be Stamped under this Ordinance, and of the proper Stamps for such Deeds, Instruments and Writings, \n\n1. Agreement, or any Minute or Memorandum of an Agreement not being under seal or of the nature of an Obligation for the payment of Money, and not specially charged with Duty under this Schedule, whether the same be only evidence of a Contract or obligatory upon the parties, and Brokers' Notes or any document having reference to the sale or purchase of Merchandize, given by any Broker, \n\n NOTE-If two or more letters are offered in evidence to prove an Agreement between the parties who shall have written such letters, it will be sufficient if any one of such letters be Stamped as an Agreement. \"Emigration Agreements to bear an impressed stamp. \n\n EXEMPTION. \n Label, Slip or Memorandum containing the heads of any Fire or Marine Insurance to be effected. \n Memorandum, Letter or Agreement made for or relating to the sale of any Goods, Wares or Merchandize, or to the sale of any Shares in any Public Company. \n Memorandum or Agreement made between the Master and Mariners of any Ship for Wages. \n\n9. Bank Notes or other Obligations for the payment of Money issued by any Banker or Banking Company in the Colony for local circulation and payable to bearer on demand, \n\n3. Bills of Exchange, Promissory Notes, or other Obligations for the payment of Money not included in the last preceding Article and not being Cheques or Orders for the payment of Money at sight or on demand, \n\n Bank Cheques payable on demand to any Person, to Bearer or Order, an Impressed Stamp of 2 cents each. \n\n NOTE-Cheques drawn out of, but payable in the Colony to be treated as Bills of Exchange. \n\n EXEMPTION. \n Bills of Lading for any Goods or Effects shipped by any Government Officer on account of Government. \n\n4. Bill of Lading, or Ships' Receipts where Bills of Lading are not used, for each part of every set, \n \n5. Bond or other Obligation concerning Respondentia and Bottomry, and Average Statement or Bond where no Statement is drawn up, \n\n6. Charter Party or any Agreement or Contract for the charter or hiring of any sea-going ship or vessel, \n\n7. Transfer of Shares or Stock in any Public Company, Scrip Certificates to be exempt, \n\n8. Power of Attorney, \n\n9. Note of Protest, by any Commander or Master of a Vessel, \n10. Any Notarial Act whatsoever not otherwise charged in this Schedule, \n\n11. Receipt or Discharge given for the payment of Money or in acquittal of a debt paid in Money or otherwise, when the sum received, discharged, or acquitted exceeds $10, \n\n EXEMPTIONS. \n Letter sent by Post, acknowledging the arrival of a Currency, or Promissory Note, Bill of Exchange, or any security for Money. \n Receipt or Discharge written upon or contained in any Bill of Exchange, Promissory Note, Deed or other Instrument charged with Duty under this Schedule and duly Stamped, and Receipts for Pay and Allowances of Persons in the service of the Government, whether Civil, Naval, or Military. \n\n12. Probates and Letters of Administration with or without the Will annexed, (Administration Bonds exempt,) \n\n| Value | Stamp Duty |\n| --- | --- |\n| Average value of Notes in Circulation | half per cent per annum per $100, to be collected monthly |\n| Over $100 and under $1,600 | 10 cents each part |\n| $1,000 | $3,000, 25 cents |\n| $3,000 | $5,000, 50 cents |\n| $5,000 | $10,000, 75 cents |\n| $10,000 and over | $1.00 |\n| Under $100 | exempt |\n\n| Tonnage | Stamp Duty |\n| --- | --- |\n| Not exceeding 200 Tons | $2.00 |\n| Every 100 Tons over 1,000 | $0.60 |\n| Copy Charter under 200 Tons | $1.50 each |\n| above 200 Tons | $3.00 |\n\n| Item | Stamp Duty |\n| --- | --- |\n| Bank Notes | 10 cents |\n| Charter Party or Agreement | 50 cents for every $1,000 or part of $1,000 |\n| Transfer of Shares or Stock | ad valorem Duty as on a Conveyance |\n| Probates and Letters of Administration | upon the value of the Estate and Effects, exclusive of what the deceased shall have been possessed of or entitled to as a Trustee for any other Person or Persons, and not beneficially | \n| Power of Attorney | $1 |\n| Notarial Act | 35 cents, Stamps to be Impressed |\n| Note of Protest | 3 cents |", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-131 - Sir MacDonnell - 1868 [6-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 278019, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-137 - Sir MacDonnell - 1869 [4-5]", "page_number": 33, "title": "CO129-137 - Sir MacDonnell - 1869 [4-5]", "content_text": "18.5.\n\n2th. The direct contrary, however, is established by Mr Deane's Returns which shew that in heinous offences the decrease has been 13.8 per cent and in minor offences only 2.9 per cent.\n\n25\n\nIt is also a mere delusion to affirm that he can trace either cases of Murder or violence to the Licensed Gambling Houses in the sense that he evidently seeks to convey to Your Lordship, viz: that the Licensing system caused those Crimes. He alludes to a quarrel, ending in an assault, about a smoky chimney which took place on a Sunday, a day when the Licensed Houses were closed. The quarrel arose between the servants residing in those houses and their neighbours in the adjoining building. Now though Thomas à Becket was murdered in Canterbury Cathedral, I have never heard it argued that Churches and Cathedral Churches on that account be abolished, and I should not if the system of Inspection instituted led also to the detection of an attempt, alluded to by Mr Smale, to pass a forged note in a Licensed House, argue that such leading indirectly, as an occurrence it has since then to was the breaking up of a gang of Forgers, a source rather for congratulation than otherwise, Mr Smale might as well say that the State should close the shop of a person who had detected an attempt to pass a forged note.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-137 - Sir MacDonnell - 1869 [4-5].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 278037, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-137 - Sir MacDonnell - 1869 [4-5]", "page_number": 51, "title": "CO129-137 - Sir MacDonnell - 1869 [4-5]", "content_text": "1366.\n\nCrimes reported.\n\nROBBERY\n\nBURGLARY & FORCIBLE ENTRY INTO DWELLING HOUSE.\n\nWITH VIOLENCE TO PERSON.\n\nRETURN of SERIOUS and MINOR OFFENCES reported to have been committed during the Year 1868, with Results of such Reports,\n\nLARCENY.\n\nFELONIES NOT ALREADY GIVEN.\n\nASSAULTS.\n\nKID-NAPPING\n\nGAMBLING.\n\nUNLAWFUL POSSESSION.\n\nPIRACY.\n\nMISCELLANEOUS\n\nOFFENCES.\nEUROPEANS AND AMERICANS.\nINDIANS.\nCHINESE.\nTOTAL.\n\nCases reported.\n\nNo. of Persons implicated.\n\nNo. of Persons convicted.\n\nNo. of Persons discharged.\n\nMonth\n\nEUROPEANS AND AMERICANS\n\nINDIANS\n\nCHINESE\n\nTOTAL\n\nCases reported\nNo. of Persons implicated\nNo. of Persons convicted\nNo. of Persons discharged\nCases reported\nNo. of Persons implicated\nNo. of Persons convicted\nNo. of Persons discharged\nCases reported\n\nJanuary\n61\n78\n55\n17\n19\n61\n47\n10\n682\n\n232\n\nFebruary\n90\n88\n70\n12\n2\n72\n65\n20\n411\n\n112\n\nMarch\n70\n87\n45\n27\n2\n73\n63\n17\n401\n\n136\n\nApril\n87\n82\n59\n24\n2\n82\n63\n24\n480\n\n139\n\nMay\n90\n90\n76\n14\n6\n85\n79\n19\n458\n\n162\n\nJune\n\nJuly\n\nAugust\n65\n86\n47\n35\n20\n76\n78\n13\n410\n\n148\n\nSeptember\n\nOctober\n\nNovember\n\nDecember\n410\n\nTOTAL\n4192\n\nPOLICE DEPARTMENT, Hongkong, 4th February, 1869.\n\nEUROPEANS AND AMERICANS\nINDIANS\nCHINESE\nTOTAL\n\nCases reported\n1576\n165\n3813\n\nNo. of Persons implicated\n2167\n210\n5479\n8856\n\nNo. of Persons convicted\n1576\n165\n3813\n\nNo. of Persons discharged\n\nREMARKS.\n\n(a) Committed suicide before Trial.\n\n(b) Died in Hospital\n10\n\n(c) Escaped from Gaol.\n\n(d) Absconded from Bail,\n\n(e) False Charge.\n\n() Administering Drugs.\n\n(g) Manslaughter.\n\n(h) Murder.\n\n(i) Perjury,\n\n(j) Manslaughter.\n\n(k) Murder.\n\n(l) Refusal of Duty.\n49\n\nExtortion.\n16\n\nRogues and Vagabonds.\n11\n\nDamaging Property.\n13\n\nBreach of Gaol Ordinance.\n\nPublic Vehicles Ordinance.\n\nObtaining goods or money under false Pretences.\n5\n\nNeglect of Duty and Desertion.\n\nRogues and Vagabonds.\n\nObtaining goods under false Pretences.\n71\n\nMutiny.\n\nDamaging Property.\n\nExtortion.\n\nBroach of Public Vehicles Ordinance.\n\nMutiny.\n\nAttempt at Suicide.\n\nSuspicious Characters.\n104\n\nHawking without License.\n4\n\nAbsconding.\n\nNot rendering Assistance.\n\nIntimidating Workmen.\n\nBribery and Extortion.\n\nBreach of Registration Ordinance.\n\nHarbor and Coasts, Goot\n\nTrespass.\n42\n\nOpium and Spirits,\n23\n\nPublic Vehicles\n11\n\nJ'awnbroker's\n\nNeglect of Duty.\n11\n\nDamaging Property.\n22\n\nObtaining goods and money under false Pretences.\n24\n\nCounterfeit Coin.\n\nPosting Bills.\n\nFurious Driving.\n38\n\nFiring Crackers.\n93\n\n(n) Forgery.\n25\n\n(o) Manslaughter.\n60\n\n(p) Unnatural Offence,\n\n(q) Embezzlement.\n\nTotal Number of Cases,....6,043\n\nTotal Number of Persons implicated, ........8,856\n\nW. M. DEANE, Captain Superintendent.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-137 - Sir MacDonnell - 1869 [4-5].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 278866, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-138 - Sir MacDonnell - 1869 [6-7]", "page_number": 435, "title": "CO129-138 - Sir MacDonnell - 1869 [6-7]", "content_text": "# SCHEDULE\n\n# OF CRIMES AND OFFENCES.\n\nMurder and attempt to Murder.\n\nRobbery from the Person or in a Dwelling House with Violence.\n\nRape and attempt to commit Rape,\n\nKidnapping.\n\nThe Forgery, Uttering, or unlawful Possession of any forged Note, Bill, Deed, or other Document whatsoever. The Counterfeiting any Puncheon,\n\nCounter Puncheon, Matrix, Stamp, Die, Pattern or Mould for making or impressing any Current Coin or Public Stamp and the unlawful Possession or Uttering of the same being counterfeit.\n\nArson.\n\nBurglary or House-breaking,\n\nLarceny by Clerks or Servants.\n\nFraudulent Bankruptcy.\n\nEmbezzlement.\n\nMalversation or fraudulent Dealing of Property by any Trustee or Bailee thereof.\n\nObtaining Goods or Money under false Pretences, Receiving Stolen Goods.\n\n# FORMS. 1.\n\n(Governor's Warrant to Magistrates.)\n\n\"THE HONGKONG AND MACAO EXTRADITION ORDINANCE.\"\n\nBy His Excellency Sir Richard Graves MacDonnell, Knight, and Companion\n\nof the Most Honorable Order of the Bath, Governor and Commander-in-Chief of\n\nthis Colony and its Dependencies and Vice-Admiral of the same,\n\nTo\n\nPolice Magistrates.\n\nWhereas Requisition has been duly made to me pursuant to the above Ordinance for the Surrender of one now in this Colony charged with having committed the Crime of\n\nwithin the Territory of Macao\n\nand with being a Fugitive from Justice.\n\nYou are hereby required to govern yourselves accordingly and to aid in apprehending the said Fugitive and in committing him to Gaol for the Purpose of his being delivered up to Justice according to the Provisions of the said Ordinance and for so doing this shall be your Warrant.\n\nGiven under my Hand and Seal at Victoria, Hongkong, this\n\n18\n\nL.S.\n\nBy Order,\n\nColonial Secretary.\n\nDay\n\nGovernor, &c.\n\n(Warrant of Apprehension.)\n\n\"THE HONGKONG AND MACAO EXTRADITION ORDINANCE.\"\n\nHongkong To all and each of the Constables of the Hongkong Police Force.\n\nto wit.\n\nWhereas His Excellency Sir Richard Graves MacDonnell, Knight, and Companion of the Most Honorable Order of the Bath, Governor and Commander-in-Chief of this Colony and its Dependencies and Vice-Admiral of the same by Warrant under his Hand and Seal hath signified that pursuant to the above Ordinance, Requisition has been duly made to him for delivering up to Justice\n\none\n\nnow in this Colony charged with having committed the Crime of\n\nwithin the Territory of Macao and with being a Fugitive from Justice and has required the Police Magistrates to govern themselves accordingly and to aid in apprehending the said Fugitive.\n\nThis is therefore to command you in Her Majesty's Name forthwith to apprehend the said Fugitive pursuant to the said Ordinance wherever he may be found in this Colony and bring him before me or any other Police Magistrate sitting in this Court to answer unto the said Charge and for which this shall be your Warrant.\n\nGiven under my Hand and Seal at the Magistrates' Court of this Colony this\n\nDay of\n\nin the Year of Our Lord, 18\n\nL.S.\n\n3.\n\nPolice Magistrate.\n\n(Order to Superintendent of Gaol to bring up Prisoner.) \"THE HONGKONG AND MACAO EXTRADITION ORDINANCE.\"\n\nTo the Superintendent of Victoria Gaol.\n\nWhereas His Excellency Sir Richard Graves MacDonnell, Knight, and Companion of the Most Honorable Order of the Bath, Governor and Commander-in-Chief of this Colony and its Dependencies and Vice-Admiral of the same by Warrant under his Hand and Seal has signified that pursuant to the above Ordinance, Requisition has been duly made to him for delivering to Justice,\n\none\n\ncharged with having committed the Crime of\n\nwithin the Territory of Macao and now detained in Victoria Gaol under your Custody and has directed the Police Magistrates to govern themselves accordingly for the Purpose of his being delivered up to Justice under the Provisions of the said Ordinance.\n\nYou are hereby ordered to bring up the said\n\nforthwith before me or any other Police Magistrate sitting in this Court to be dealt with as provided by Law.\n\nGiven under my Hand and Seal this\n\n18\n\nDay of\n\nat the Magistrates' Court of this Colony.\n\nL.S.\n\nPolice Magistrate.\n\nC\n\n432", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-138 - Sir MacDonnell - 1869 [6-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 279235, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-139 - Sir MacDonnell - 1869 [8-12]", "page_number": 269, "title": "CO129-139 - Sir MacDonnell - 1869 [8-12]", "content_text": "GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION.\n\nNo. 114.\n\nColonial Secretary's Office, Hongkong, 25th September, 1869.\n\nMEMO\n\nJ. GARDINER AUSTIN,\n\nColonial Secretary,\n\nHONGKONG, 20th September, 1869.\n\n1. In the London and China Express of the 8th July last, is published a Communication, dated the 13th May, from Mr. A. J. JOHNSTON, Secretary of the Anglo-American Municipal Council at Shanghai, in reply to some remarks made in the House of Lords last March reflecting on the general character of the population at Shanghai.\n\n2. Mr. JOHNSTON endeavours to show that Statistics prove the population of Shanghai, to be comparatively better conducted than that of Hongkong. He fortifies himself by reference to my Official Report of last April, and in doing so, makes such erroneous and extraordinary statements, that to pass them by in silence, when published in a Paper having extensive circulation, might create an injurious impression in the mind of the Public.\n\n3. The following are Mr. JOHNSTON's statements in his own language:\n\n“Perhaps, I may be permitted to compare the police statistics of Shanghai with those of Hong Kong. I take Hong Kong alone, partly because official returns are readily accessible, partly because it is situated in circumstances somewhat similar to those prevailing at Shanghai, but especially because, from the singular nature of the Duke of Somerset's remarks, one well-authenticated fact in opposition to them is as good as a hundred.\n\n7. From the official report of 1868, published by the Hong Kong Government Gazette of the 17th April, 1869, it appears that the total strength of the police force in that colony was 638, viz., 113 Europeans, 328 coloured, and 192 Chinese. In Shanghai, for the same period, the police force numbered 105, viz., 39 Europeans and 66 Chinese. In both places the Chinese element in the police force is useful only against crime committed by Chinese, and, therefore, so far as the prevention of crime by Europeans is concerned, Hong Kong maintains 441 police against 39 in Shanghai. By the census taken in Hong Kong on the 31st December, 1867, published in the Hong Kong Government Gazette of 14th March, 1868, it appears that on that day the number of Foreigners of all nationalities resident in the colony was 3,551. Hence assuming, which may fairly be done, that the number of Foreigners leaving Hong Kong in 1868, about balanced the number arriving, it will appear that the police were in the proportion of about one to seven Foreign Residents.\n\n8. In Shanghai the number of Foreigners at present is, exclusive of police, 4,699. Hence the Foreign police force is to the Foreign residents in the proportion of one to one hundred and twenty.\n\n9. As to crimes:-In Hong Kong during 1868 there were 1,033 convictions of Foreigners under the heads of \"Murder,\" \"Manslaughter,\" \"Robbery with Violence,\" \"Burglary,\" \"Assault,\" \"Larceny,\" \"Kidnapping,\" \"Unlawful Possession,\" and \"Piracy.\" This is a percentage on the whole number of Foreign residents of twenty-nine convictions for serious offences. In Shanghai for the period of twelve months, from April, 1868, to March, 1869, the number of Foreigners apprehended and convicted was 565, of which 387 were simple drunkenness, 17 were \"Desertion,\" 2 were \"Forgery\" (of which one was an ex-employé of the Hong Kong Government), and 24 were \"Furious Riding.\" Thus 135 may fairly represent the number of more or less serious crimes committed by Foreigners during the twelve months indicated. Of these the worst were three cases of \"Cutting and Wounding,\" and 61 cases of \"Assault.\" But 135 bears to 4,699 the proportion of 2.9 to 100, or exactly one-tenth of the Hong Kong percentage of convictions to the number of residents.\n\n10. It is obvious from the above figures that a much smaller police force is required to keep order in Shanghai than is required for a like purpose in Hong Kong, although Foreigners here are more numerous by 1,187 than in Hong Kong. It will further appear that, in spite of this, order is much more effectually maintained here than it is there, although Hong Kong is a colony under a well-organised Government, regulated by English law, while in Shanghai we have to deal with the Courts of no less than twelve Foreign Governments.\n\n11. The deduction from my argument is, I trust, obvious that in comparison with Hong Kong alone Shanghai cannot justly be denominated a sink of iniquity exceeding in its immorality all other ports of Europe, America, and Asia.”\n\n4. In the first place, Mr. JOHNSTON assumes in the above 7th paragraph, that the resident Hongkong Foreign Population was only 3,551 in 1868, and makes that number his standard of comparison for obtaining the ratio of crime to population in Hongkong and Shanghai, respectively. For such a...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-139 - Sir MacDonnell - 1869 [8-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 282238, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-145 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1870 [6-9]", "page_number": 365, "title": "CO129-145 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1870 [6-9]", "content_text": "## GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION\n\nThe following **MEMO:** which has been submitted to His Excellency the **GOVERNOR** by the **CAPTAIN SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE**, is published for general information.\n\nBy Command,\n\nJ. GARDINER AUSTIN,\nColonial Secretary.\n\nColonial Secretary's Office, Hongkong, 25th September, 1869.\n\n## MEMO:\n\nHONGKONG, 20th September, 1869.\n\n1. In the London and China Express of the 8th July last, is published a Communication, dated the 13th May, from Mr. A. J. JOHNSTON, Secretary of the Anglo-American Municipal Council at Shanghai, in reply to some remarks made in the House of Lords last March reflecting on the general character of the population at Shanghai.\n\n2. Mr. JOHNSTON endeavours to show that Statistics prove the population of Shanghai to be comparatively better conducted than that of Hongkong. He fortifies himself by reference to my Official Report of last April, and in doing so, makes such erroneous and extraordinary statements, that to pass them by in silence, when published in a Paper having extensive circulation, might create an injurious impression in the mind of the Public.\n\n3. The following are Mr. JOHNSTON's statements in his own language:-\n\n| Paragraph | Text |\n| --- | --- |\n| 6 | Perhaps, however, the most satisfactory argument is to be derived from official statistics, and I will therefore with your permission compare the police statistics of Shanghai with those of Hong Kong. I take Hong Kong alone, partly because its official returns are readily accessible, partly because it is situated in circumstances somewhat similar to those prevailing at Shanghai, but especially because, from the sweeping nature of the Duke of Somerset's remarks, one well authenticated fact in opposition to them is as good as a hundred. |\n| 7 | From the official report of 1868, published by the Captain Superintendent of Police at Hong Kong in the Hong Kong Government Gazette of the 17th April, 1869, it appears that the total strength of the police force in that colony was 633, viz., 113 Europeans, 328 coloured, and 192 Chinese. In Shanghai, for the same period, the police force numbered 105, viz., 30 Europeans and 75 Chinese. In both places the Chinese element in the police force is useful only against crime committed by Chinese, and, therefore, so far as the prevention of crime by Europeans is concerned, Hong Kong maintains 441 police against 30 in Shanghai. By the census taken in Hong Kong on the 31st December, 1867, published in the Hong Kong Government Gazette of 14th March, 1868, it appears that on that day the number of Foreigners of all nationalities resident in the colony was 3,551. Hence assuming, which may fairly be done, that the number of Foreigners leaving Hong Kong in 1868, about balanced the number arriving, it will appear that the police were in the proportion of about one to seven Foreign Residents. |\n| 8 | In Shanghai the number of Foreigners at present is, exclusive of police, 1,699. Hence the Foreign police force is to the Foreign residents in the proportion of one to one hundred and twenty. |\n| 9 | As to crimes-In Hong Kong during 1868 there were 1,038 convictions of Foreigners under the heads of \"Murder,\" \"Manslaughter,\" \"Robbery with Violence,\" \"Burglary,\" \"Assault,\" \"Larceny,\" \"Kidnapping,\" \"Unlawful Possession,\" and \"Piracy.\" This is a percentage on the whole number of Foreign residents of twenty-nine convictions for serious offences. In Shanghai for the period of twelve months, from April, 1868, to March, 1869, the number of Foreigners apprehended and convicted was 565, of which 387 were simple drunkenness, 17 were \"Desertion,\" 2 were \"Forgery\" (of which one was an ex-employé of the Hong Kong Government), and 24 were \"Furious Riding.\" Thus 135 may fairly represent the number of more or less serious crimes committed by Foreigners during the twelve months indicated. Of these the worst were three cases of \"Cutting and Wounding,\" and 61 cases of \"Assault.\" 135 bears to 1,699 the proportion of 7.9 to 100, or exactly one-tenth of the Hong Kong percentage of convictions to the number of residents, |\n| 10 | It is obvious from the above figures that a much smaller police force is required to keep order in Shanghai than is required for a like purpose in Hong Kong, although Foreigners here are more numerous by 1,187 than in Hong Kong. It will further appear that, in spite of this, order is much more effectually maintained here than it is there, although Hong Kong is a colony under a well organised Government, regulated by English law, while in Shanghai we have to deal with the Courts of no less than twelve Foreign Governments. |\n| 11 | The deduction from my argument is, I trust, obvious-that in comparison with Hong Kong alone Shanghai cannot justly be denominated a sink of iniquity exceeding in its immorality all other ports of Europe, America, and Asia.” |\n\n4. In the first place, Mr. JOHNSTON assumes in the above 7th paragraph, that the resident Hongkong Foreign Population was only 3,551 in 1868, and makes that number his standard of comparison for obtaining the ratio of crime to population in Hongkong and Shanghai, respectively. For such a...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-145 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1870 [6-9].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 282373, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-146 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1870 [10-12]", "page_number": 11, "title": "CO129-146 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1870 [10-12]", "content_text": "# HONGKONG \n## ANNO VICESIMO OCTAVO \n## VICTORIE REGINE. \n\nBy His Excellency **WILLIAM THOMAS MERCER**, Esquire, Acting Governor and Commander-in-Chief of the Colony of Hongkong and its Dependencies, and Vice-Admiral of the same, with the Advice of the Legislative Council of Hongkong. \n\n**W. T. MERCER**, \n\n### No. 11 of 1865. \nAn Ordinance to repeal certain Enactments which have been consolidated in several Ordinances relating to Criminal Offences. \n\n[14th June, 1865.] \n\nWHEREAS by virtue of Ordinance No. 6 of 1845, and Ordinance No. 2 of 1846, divers Acts and Parts of Acts of the Imperial Parliament made and passed prior to the Fifth Day of April, One thousand Eight hundred and Forty-three, are in Force in this Colony, notwithstanding the same have been repealed by the Imperial Parliament; and whereas by Six several Ordinances, relating respectively to Offences against the Person, Malicious Injuries to Property, Larceny, Forgery, Coining, and Accessories and Abettors, a large Portion of the Matter contained in the said Acts and Parts of Acts, as also in several local Enactments, has been consolidated and amended; and it is therefore expedient to limit the Operation of the Ordinances firstly hereinbefore mentioned, so as to exclude therefrom the Acts and Parts of Acts so repealed, and to repeal the said local Enactments to the Extent specified in the Schedule hereto annexed: Be it enacted by His Excellency the Governor of Hongkong, with the Advice of the Legislative Council thereof, as follows:-- \n\n### Title. \n### Preamble. \n\n1. Section 4 of Ordinance No. 6 of 1845, and Section 3 of Ordinance No. 2 of 1846, shall, after the coming into Operation of this Ordinance, be so construed as not to include as of Force in this Colony any Acts or Parts of Acts of the Imperial Parliament made and passed prior to the Fifth Day of April, One thousand Eight hundred and Forty-three, and which are enumerated in the Schedule annexed to the Act of the Session of the Twenty-fourth and Twenty-fifth Years of Her present Majesty, Chapter Ninety-five, and which said Acts or Parts of Acts are thereby repealed. \n\nII. The Ordinances mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed shall, after the coming into Operation of this Ordinance, be repealed to the Extent specified in the said Schedule. \n\n### Ordinances in Schedule repealed. \n\nIII. Provided, that every Offence, which shall have been wholly or partly committed before this Ordinance comes into Operation, shall be dealt with, inquired of, tried, determined and punished, and every Penalty in respect of any such Offence shall be recovered in the same Manner as if this Ordinance had not been passed; and that every Act duly done, and every Warrant or other Instrument duly made or granted before this Ordinance comes into Operation, shall continue and be of the same Force and Effect as if this Ordinance had not been passed; and that every Right, Liability, Privilege, and Protection in respect of any Matter or Thing committed or done before this Ordinance comes into Operation, shall continue to be of the same Force and Effect as if this Ordinance had not been passed; and that every Action, Prosecution, and other Proceeding which shall \n\n### Page 8", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-146 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1870 [10-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 284147, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-149 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1871 [1-4]", "page_number": 42, "title": "CO129-149 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1871 [1-4]", "content_text": "# SCHEDULE \n## OF CRIMES AND OFFENCES\n\n* Murder and attempt to Murder.\n* Robbery from the Person or in a Dwelling House with Violence.\n* Rape and attempt to commit Rape. Kidnapping.\n* The Forgery, Uttering, or unlawful Possession of any forged Note, Bill, Deed, or other Document whatsoever. Counter Puncheon, Matrix, Stamp, Die, Pattern or Mould for making or The Counterfeiting any Puncheon, impressing any Current Coin or Public Stamp and the unlawful Possession or Uttering of the same being counterfeit.\n* Arson.\n* Burglary or House-breaking.\n* Larceny by Clerks or Servants.\n* Fraudulent Bankruptcy.\n* Embezzlement.\n* Malversation or fraudulent Dealing of Property by any Trustee or Bailee thereof.\n* Obtaining Goods or Money under false Pretences, Receiving Stolen Goods.\n\n## FORMS\n\n### 1. (Governor's Warrant to Magistrates)\n\n**\"THE HONGKONG AND MACAO EXTRADITION ORDINANCE.\"**\n\nBy His Excellency Sir Richard Graves MacDonnell, Knight, and Companion of the Most Honorable Order of the Bath, Governor and Commander-in-Chief of this Colony and its Dependencies and Vice-Admiral of the same,\n\nTo the Police Magistrates.\n\nWhereas Requisition has been duly made to me pursuant to the above Ordinance for the Surrender of one now in this Colony charged with having committed the Crime of ... within the Territory of Macao and with being a Fugitive from Justice.\n\nYou are hereby required to govern yourselves accordingly and to aid in apprehending the said Fugitive and in committing him to Gaol for the Purpose of his being delivered up to Justice according to the Provisions of the said Ordinance and for so doing this shall be your Warrant.\n\nGiven under my Hand and Seal at Victoria, Hongkong, this ... Day of ... 18...\n\nL.S.\n\nBy Order,\nColonial Secretary.\n\nGovernor, &c.\n\n### 2. (Warrant of Apprehension)\n\n**\"THE HONGKONG AND MACAO EXTRADITION ORDINANCE.\"**\n\nHongkong To all and each of the Constables of the Hongkong Police Force.\n\nTo wit\n\nWhereas His Excellency Sir Richard Graves MacDonnell, Knight, and Companion of the Most Honorable Order of the Bath, Governor and Commander-in-Chief of this Colony and its Dependencies and Vice-Admiral of the same by Warrant under his Hand and Seal hath signified that pursuant to the above Ordinance, Requisition has been duly made to him for delivering up to Justice one now in this Colony charged with having committed the Crime of ... within the Territory of Macao and with being a Fugitive from Justice and has required the Police Magistrates to govern themselves accordingly and to aid in apprehending the said Fugitive.\n\nThis is therefore to command you in Her Majesty's Name forthwith to apprehend the said Fugitive pursuant to the said Ordinance wherever he may be found in this Colony and bring him before me or any other Police Magistrate sitting in this Court to answer unto the said Charge and for which this shall be your Warrant.\n\nGiven under my Hand and Seal at the Magistrates' Court of this Colony this ... Day of ... in the Year of Our Lord, 18...\n\nL.S.\n\nPolice Magistrate.\n\n### 3. (Order to Superintendent of Gaol to bring up Prisoner)\n\n**\"THE HONGKONG AND MACAO EXTRADITION ORDINANCE.\"**\n\nTo the Superintendent of Victoria Gaol.\n\nWhereas His Excellency Sir Richard Graves MacDonnell, Knight, and Companion of the Most Honorable Order of the Bath, Governor and Commander-in-Chief of this Colony and its Dependencies and Vice-Admiral of the same by Warrant under his Hand and Seal has signified that pursuant to the above Ordinance, Requisition has been duly made to him for delivering up to Justice, one charged with having committed the Crime of ... within the Territory of Macao and now detained in Victoria Gaol under your Custody and has directed the Police Magistrates to govern themselves accordingly for the Purpose of his being delivered up to Justice under the Provisions of the said Ordinance.\n\nYou are hereby ordered to bring up the said ... forthwith before me or any other Police Magistrate sitting in this Court to be dealt with as provided by law.\n\nGiven under my Hand and Seal this ... Day of ..., at the Magistrates' Court of this Colony.\n\nL.S.\n\nPolice Magistrate.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-149 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1871 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 284412, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-149 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1871 [1-4]", "page_number": 307, "title": "CO129-149 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1871 [1-4]", "content_text": "## The word \"Treaties\" being in the plural can have no other interpretation. The Extradition Clause of the Supplemental Treaty of Nanking was only abrogated to be re-enacted in substance in the Treaty of Tientsin as appears by the recital in Article I. (See per the Lord Chancellor in Regina v. Wideman, 14, Law Times N. S., as to the French Treaty and the Imperial Act passed to carry it out.)\n\nOrdinance No. 2 of 1850, is moreover impliedly declared to be still in force by Ordinance No. 7 of 1864.\n\n## 4th Point. \nThe offence for which the Prisoner stands committed is if anything Piracy on the high Seas, and, on the authority of \"re Terman\" 33° L. J. M. C. 201 is not within the Treaty and Ordinance No. 2 of 1850, being justiciable here. Phil. 379, 391.\n\n33 L. J. M. C. 201.\n\nThe offence for which the Prisoner stands committed is the one for which his rendition was claimed, namely Murder. Murder is a distinct crime from Piracy though too frequently coupled with it.\n\nThe Prisoner after the commission of the crime returned to China. Afterwards and while a Chinese Tribunal was sitting for the Trial of some of his accomplices, he was found in this Colony. He therefore, \"took refuge\" in Hongkong, within the meaning of Art. 21 of the Treaty of Tientsin.\n\nThe Point here raised involves three Questions.\n\nA. Is the crime disclosed by the Depositions Piracy jure gentium and cognizable by the Hongkong Courts?\n\nB. If it be so, is Piracy jure gentium a crime within the intent of the Treaty of Tientsin?\n\nC. If not within the Treaty, may the Prisoner be surrendered for the crime of Murder in respect of which crime alone the application for his rendition and his commitment are limited, though the facts may also disclose the crime of Piracy jure gentium?\n\n### Firstly as to A.\nThe opinion of the Law officers of the Crown in England in 1852 will be found at page 229 of Mr. Forsyth's Work on Constitutional Law, and is to the effect that in a Case precisely similar to the present one (the sole difference being that the Foreign Coolie Emigrant ship in which the Murder was committed was an American ship instead of a French one) the crime was not cognizable by the Tribunals of Hongkong, and consequently was not Piracy jure gentium. Since In re Ternan, 9 Cox C. C., P. the date of that Opinion the Case of the Joseph Gerrity was decided, in which the Judges held that upon the construction of the word \"Piracy\" in the Schedule of the Treaty between Great Britain and the United States, Piracy jure gentium was not included in the List of Crimes for which Extradition could be demanded.\n\nNaylor. Falmer, 22 L. J. Ex. 331.\n\nIn that Case the Judges were of opinion that the crime committed on board the Joseph Gerrity was if anything, Piracy jure gentium; but the facts were not the same as in the present Case. From the Report of it (nomine, in re Ternan) in 9 Cox. C. C., Crompton J. seems to base his opinion that the crime was Piracy jure gentium on the ground that the Prisoners had surreptitiously embarked in the Joseph Gerrity in the disguise of Passengers.\n\nIn the present Case the depositions show that the vessel carried Emigrants for Peru under Contracts of Service, and that the Coolies seized the ship for the purpose of getting rid of their contracts and returning to their own country. The element of \"universal hostility\" is here wanting to constitute Piracy jure gentium. The seizure was made animo revertendi and not animo furandi though the ship was afterwards plundered. It cannot be said that the Coolies who were engaged in the seizure, were outlaws recognizing no Flag and no Government.\n\nIt is submitted, therefore, that notwithstanding Ternan's Case, the opinion of Sir John Harding, Sir Frederic Thesiger, and Sir FitzRoy Kelly, given in 1852 upon precisely similar facts as those appearing in the depositions before the Court, is still a correct exposition of the Law. Mr. Forsyth has published that Opinion in his recent work on Constitutional Law without any remark, although be frequently refers to Ternan's Case. (As to the Elements of Piracy jure gentium, see note 81 to Wheaton's International Law by Prof. Dana (8th Edition), Kent's Comm. by Abdy p. 428, 1 Wildman's International Law p. 208.)\n\n### Secondly as to B.\nIt must be borne in mind that in the Treaty of Tientsin no particular crimes are named and that our Government has stipulated to deliver to the Chinese Authorities \"Criminals, subjects of China, who shall take refuge in Hongkong,\" without any limitation as to the nature of the crime.\n\nTherefore as far as concerns the nature of the crime charged, it is again submitted that on the face of the Treaty and of the Ordinance, No. 2 of 1850, a Court of Law has no power to release a Chinese Prisoner committed by the Magistrate under that Ordinance if the depositions show that there is any Evidence of the commission by him of a crime known to British Law. On this point the evidence of Mr. H. T. Holland (Legal adviser to the Colonial Office) before the Special Committee of the House of Commons on Extradition which sat in 1867, is as follows (p. 49 of Report) :-\n\n| Question | Answer |\n| --- | --- |\n| M. Layard, Question 985.-Have you a list of the various crimes for which we should give people up under the Treaties and Agreements which exist in China? | We have only the Treaty of Tientsin. |\n| Question 987.-Is there no definition of the crime? | No, none at all. Consequently, two questions arose upon that Article 21; first, whether the Treaty required the extradition of all Chinese Criminals, including Political Offenders; and secondly, whether we were bound to give up Offenders when we knew they were going to be tortured. I believe there has been some difference of opinion here upon that Second Point; but instructions have at all events been given both by Lord Russell and Mr. Cardwell, that Political Offenders should not be given up, and that Persons should not be given up in case where we knew that torture would be applied. |\n| Question 988.--Then in fact the definition of the crime under the Treaty is left entirely to the Colonial Government? | Yes. Upon the face of the Treaty we ought to give up every one who is claimed for any crime at all, because it says simply \"if Criminals, subjects of China, shall take refuge in Hongkong, or in British vessels, they shall be given up.\" |\n\nIt cannot be argued that Piracy jure gentium is not a crime which may be included in extradition Treaties, for the Imperial Extradition Act of 1870, expressly includes it, and it was inserted in the Schedules of Crimes of our recent Hongkong and Macao Extradition Ordinance (`No. 13 of 1870`) by order of the Secretary of State.\n\nTherefore if the terms of the Treaty of Tientsin are large enough to include that crime, and it is contended that they are, as they include all crimes, there is no legal objection to the commitment, on the ground that the depositions disclose a crime of Piracy jure gentium. The decision in Ternan's Case is not in point, as it turns upon the construction of the limited Schedule of Crimes annexed to the Treaty with the United States, whereas there is no limit to the description of crimes for which the surrender of a Chinese may be demanded of the British Government by the Chinese Authorities under the Treaty of Tientsin.\n\n### Thirdly as to C.\nMay the Prisoner be surrendered on the charge of Murder though the evidence supporting it is sufficient also to support a charge of Piracy?\n\nThis question has been answered in the affirmative by the Law Officers of the Crown in England, as may be seen by reference to the Report of the Select Committee on Extradition, p. 54:\n\n| Question | Answer |\n| --- | --- |\n| Examination of the Right Honorable E. Hammond. Question 1052.-What is the next point you wish to refer to? | In question 73 a question was raised as to giving up a man claimed by the United States on a charge of piracy. A person named Locke was charged in the Bahamas with conspiracy and forgery in connection with the destruction by a Confederate privateer the Chesapeake of an American Merchant Vessel the Hanover. That was in 1864 and 1865. His extradition was also demanded by the United States, on charges of Piracy and Murder. In that case it was held, that if the Piracy had been committed on the high seas, though on board an American vessel, it would be triable in a British Court, but if the charge was confined to Murder, though on the high seas, the vessel being an American vessel, over which the United States would have exclusive jurisdiction on the high seas, the man might be given up. The case of the Joseph Gerrity (10 Law Times Reports New Series, page 499) was cited by the Law Officers in support of this Doctrine as regards Piracy, but not as applicable as regards Murder. |\n\nPage 303", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-149 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1871 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 285498, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-152 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1871 [9-10]", "page_number": 112, "title": "CO129-152 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1871 [9-10]", "content_text": "# STATEMENT of CRIMINAL CASEs tried in the Supreme Court of Hongkong from 1st January, 1857, to 31st December, 1860.\n\n## CRIMES\n\n| Crimes | 1857 | 1858 | 1859 | 1860 |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Abduction and Assault | | | | |\n| Administering Poison with Intent to murder | | | | |\n| Aggravated Assault | 411 | | | |\n| Aiding and assisting Prisoner to escape | | | | |\n| Assault | | | | |\n| Assault and False Imprisonment | | | | |\n| Assault with Intent to rob | | | | |\n| Attempting to commit Larceny and to cheat | | | | |\n| Attempting to drown | | | | |\n| Being at large after Sentence of Transportation | | | | |\n| Being in a Dwelling House with Intent to commit Felony | | | | |\n| Bestiality | | | | |\n| Bribery | | | | |\n| Burglary; and with Violence | | | | |\n| Burglary and Larceny | | | | |\n| Burglary and Murder | | | | |\n| Burglary and Receiving Stolen Goods | | | | |\n| Burglary with Cutting and Wounding | | | | |\n| Child stealing | | | | |\n| Compound Larceny and Embezzlement | | | | |\n| Confederating with Pirates | | | | |\n| Conspiracy | | | | |\n| Cutting and Wounding with Intent to do grievous bodily Harm | | | | |\n| Embezzlement | | | | |\n| Extortion | | | | |\n| False Imprisonment, Assault, and Nuisance | | | | |\n| Forgery | | | | |\n| Having Possession of Counterfeit Coin | | | | |\n| Having Possession of Housebreaking implements | | | | |\n| High Treason | | | | |\n| Highway Robbery, with Wounding | | | | |\n| Housebreaking with Larceny | | | | |\n| Kidnapping, and Slave Dealing | | | | |\n| Larceny | 41 | | | |\n| Larceny and Receiving Stolen Goods | | | | |\n| Larceny in a Boat | | | | |\n| Larceny in a Dwelling House | | | | |\n| Larceny on board ship | | | | |\n| Larceny with Breaking and Entering | | | | |\n| Libel | | | | |\n| Making Contradictory Statements before a Justice | | | | |\n| Manslaughter | | | | |\n| Misdemeanor | | | | |\n| Misdemeanor, (detaining Post Office Letters) | | | | |\n| Murder | | | | |\n| Murder, Larceny in a Dwelling House, and Receiving Stolen Goods | | | | |\n| Obtaining Money by False Pretences | | | | |\n| Perjury | | | | |\n| Piracy, and with Violence | | | | |\n| Piracy and Endangering Life | | | | |\n| Piracy and Murder | | | | |\n| Piracy with Wounding | | | | |\n| Piracy, Slavery, and False Imprisonment | | | | |\n| Rape | | | | |\n| Receiving Stolen Goods | | | | |\n| Robbery, and Administering Stupifying Drugs | | | | |\n| Robbery, and being under Previous Conviction | | | | |\n| Robbery from the Person | | | | |\n| Robbery in the Harbour | | | | |\n| Robbery with Arms | | | | |\n| Robbery with Violence | | | | |\n| Robbery with Wounding | | | | |\n| Shooting with Intent, &c. | | | | |\n| Stabbing with Intent, &c. | | | | |\n| Unlawful Wounding | | | | |\n| Uttering Counterfeit Coin | | | | |\n| Uttering a forged Cheque | | | | |\n| Uttering a forged Note | | | | |\n| Uttering a forged Order | | | | |\n\n## TOTALS\n\n| Year | No. of Cases | No. of Prisoners | Convicted | Acquitted |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 1857 | 918 | 111 | 76 | 21 |\n| 1858 | 11,833 | 200 | 160 | 54 |\n| 1859 | | 40 | 58 | 10 |\n| 1860 | | 128 | 70 | 32 |\n\nSupreme Court House, Hongkong, 9th October, 1871.\n\n**F. S. HUFFAM, Deputy Registrar**", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-152 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1871 [9-10].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 285499, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-152 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1871 [9-10]", "page_number": 113, "title": "CO129-152 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1871 [9-10]", "content_text": "# GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION\n\nThe following Return of Criminal Cases tried before the Supreme Court of Hongkong, from 1st January, 1861, to 31st December, 1870, is published for general information.\n\nBy Command,\n\nColonial Secretary's Office, Hongkong, 6th October, 1871.\n\n## STATEMENT of CRIMINAL CASES tried in the Supreme Court of Hongkong from 1st January, 1861, to 31st December, 1870.\n\n| Year | No. of Cases | No. of Prisoners | Convicted | Acquitted |\n|------|-------------|---------------|------------|-----------|\n| 1861 | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| 1862 | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| 1863 | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| 1864 | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| 1865 | 10 | 34 | 12 | 2 |\n| 1866 | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| 1867 | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| 1868 | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| 1869 | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| 1870 | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n\n### List of Crimes\n\n| Crime | No. of Cases | No. of Prisoners | Convicted | Acquitted |\n|-------|-------------|------------------|------------|-----------|\n| Accusing of an Indictable Offence with Intent to extort Money | 1 | ... | 1 | ... |\n| Administering stupifying Drugs with Intent, &c. | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Allowing a Prisoner to escape | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Assault | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Assault and False Imprisonment | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Assault and Wounding | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Assault on the High Seas | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Assault with Intent to commit Sodomy | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Assault with Intent to do grievous bodily Harm | 3 | ... | 2 | 1 |\n| Assault with Intent to rob | 1 | ... | 1 | ... |\n| Assaulting Police | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Attempting to commit Burglary | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Attempting to drown | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Attempting to murder | 2 | ... | 2 | ... |\n| Being armed at Night, &c. | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Being found Night with Housebreaking implements | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Being found on board a Junk equipped for the purpose of Piracy | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Being in Dwelling House or Warehouse with Intent to commit a Felony | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Bestiality | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Breach of Conditional Pardon | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Breaking and entering a Dwelling House & Wounding | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Breaking and entering a Warehouse with Intent to commit Felony | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Breaking and entering and stealing in a Dwelling House or Warehouse | 12 | 11 | 11 | ... |\n| Bribery | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Buggering | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Burglary and Larceny | 44 | ... | 41 | ... |\n| Burglary and Child Stealing | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Burglary being armed | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Burglary with Wounding and Violence | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Burglariously entering a Dwelling House with Intent to commit Felony | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Buying Counterfeit Coin | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Cattle Stealing | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Cheating | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Conspiracy to cheat, and obtaining Money by False Pretences | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Child Stealing | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Confederating with Pirates | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Conspiracy | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Conspiracy to Accuse of Crime with Intent to extort Money | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Conspiring to detain Persons to be sent away as Coolies | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Counterfeiting Coin | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Cutting and Wounding with Intent to murder, or to do grievous bodily Harm | 6 | ... | 6 | ... |\n| Demanding Money with Menaces | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Deserting a Child with Intent to procure a benefit for her Liberation | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Embezzlement | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Endangering Life | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Entering a Dwelling House at Night with Intent to commit a Felony | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Escape, and Larceny | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Extortion | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| False Imprisonment | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Forcible Detention | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Forcibly taking away a Child with Intent to procure a benefit for her Liberation | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Forgery | 1 | ... | 1 | ... |\n| Having possession of Counterfeit Coin | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Having possession of a forged Bank Note | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Highway Robbery, with Wounding and Violence | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Housebreaking with Larceny | 130 | ... | 127 | ... |\n| Indecent Assault | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Kidnapping and Assault | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Larceny and receiving Stolen Goods | 19 | ... | 19 | ... |\n| Larceny and Administering a Stupifying Drug | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Larceny and Embezzlement by a Police Constable | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Larceny and Assault | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Larceny as Bailee | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Larceny by a Servant | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Larceny in a Boat | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Larceny in a Dwelling House, &c. | 86 | ... | 76 | ... |\n| Larceny on board Ship | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Libel | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Manslaughter | 2 | ... | 1 | 1 |\n| Misdemeanor under Section 9L & XI of the Bankruptcy Ordinance, 1864 | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Murder | 1 | ... | ... | 1 |\n| Obtaining Money or Goods by False Pretences | 3 | ... | 2 | 1 |\n| Piracy | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Permitting an escape | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Piracy and Assault with Intent to murder | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Piracy and Endangering Life | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Piracy and Murder | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Piracy and Robbery | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Piracy and Receiving | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Piracy and Wounding | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Piracy with Violence | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Receiving stolen Goods | 14 | ... | 14 | ... |\n| Robbery from the Person | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Robbery from the Post Office | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Robbery in the Harbour, and with Violence | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Robbery with arms | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Robbery with Violence | 1 | ... | 1 | ... |\n| Robbery with Wounding | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Shooting and Endangering Life with Intent to commit Piracy | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Shooting with Intent to do grievous bodily Harm | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Shooting with Intent to murder | 1 | ... | 1 | ... |\n| Soliciting and Attempting Subornation of Perjury | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Stabbing with Intent to do grievous bodily Harm | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Subornation of Perjury | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Tendering Counterfeit Coin | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Throwing a Corrosive Fluid | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Unlawful Wounding | 1 | ... | 1 | ... |\n| Trading and Confederating with Pirates | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Uttering a forged Bank Note | 1 | ... | 1 | ... |\n| Uttering a forged Note with Intent to defraud | ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| Uttering Counterfeit Coin | 2 | ... | 2 | ... |\n\n## Totals\n\n| Year | No. of Cases | No. of Prisoners | Convicted | Acquitted |\n|------|-------------|------------------|------------|-----------|\n| ... | 415 | ... | 251 | ... |\n| Total | 110 | 231 | 145 | 146 |\n\n**F. S. HUFFAM,**\nSupreme Court Registrar, Hongkong, 29th September, 1871.\n\n**Deputy Registrar**", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-152 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1871 [9-10].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 285725, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-152 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1871 [9-10]", "page_number": 339, "title": "CO129-152 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1871 [9-10]", "content_text": "## 11.839\n\nThe attached statement shows the present state of the Police Horses. Nos. 1 to 9 inclusive are the survivors of the batch that I brought from Calcutta in March, 1868.\n\nThey are all sound with the exception of No. 1, who is now under treatment for a slight strain of the suspensory ligaments of the near fore leg. Of the remaining horses, Nos. 15, 16, 18 and 19 are unsafe to ride and unfit for further service, I would recommend that they be sold and replaced by Japanese or Chinese ponies. The latter, being hardier and requiring less attention than horses, are best suited to out-station work, where of necessity they are at the mercy of a Chinese coolie.\n\nThe remaining, Nos. 11, 12, 13, 14 and 17 are beginning to be worn out, but can still perform light work on level roads; they are useful at Nos. 1, 7, and Showkewan Stations.\n\nThe Central Station stables have been recently improved by substituting a stone floor for one of soft brick. The verandah has been closed in with thick mat screens, which protect the stalls from the sun during the day and from cold draughts of air at night.\n\nSickness has greatly decreased since these alterations were made.\n\nThe new stable at the East and West Point Stations are, as regards internal arrangement, probably as good as any in the Colony, but their distance from Head Quarters is a serious objection in cases of sudden illness.\n\nThe stables at Aberdeen and Showkewan are, as has been frequently reported, unfit for the purpose.\n\nAt Stanley no accommodation whatever has been provided. The nature of Police duty renders it peculiarly productive of disease in horses. An animal that has only had patrol work for days has suddenly to go off 8 or 10 miles at a good pace, and that frequently during the hottest time of the day. A walk up and down in the sun for an hour is not a sufficient restorative for an animal that has taken an express 11 miles to this Station and it is unprofitable to Government as well as trying to the horse, not to provide shelter.\n\nI would suggest that a stable be provided at Stanley and Aberdeen, each to contain one stall for the horse or pony attached to the Station and at least one spare stall for the accommodation of horses from Victoria. Removing the Showkewan Station has been settled, a stable cannot be erected there.\n\nCentral Police Barracks, 4th February, 1869.\n\n## No. 114.\n\n**GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION.**\n\n338\n\nThe following **MEMO:** which has been submitted to His Excellency the **GOVERNOR** by the **CAPTAIN SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE**, is published for general information.\n\nBy Command,\n\n**J. GARDINER AUSTIN,**\nColonial Secretary.\n\nColonial Secretary's Office, Hongkong, 25th September, 1869.\n\nUntil the question of...\n\n**MEMO:**\n\n**C. V. CREAGH,**\nDeputy Superintendent of Police.\n\nHONGKONG, 20th September, 1869.\n\n1. In the London and China Express of the 8th July last, is published a Communication, dated the 13th May, from Mr. A. J. JOHNSTON, Secretary of the Anglo-American Municipal Council at Shanghai, in reply to some remarks made in the House of Lords last March reflecting on the general character of the population at Shanghai.\n\n2. Mr. JOHNSTON endeavours to show that Statistics prove the population of Shanghai to be comparatively better conducted than that of Hongkong. He fortifies himself by reference to my Official Report of last April, and in doing so, makes such erroneous and extraordinary statements, that to pass them by in silence, when published in a Paper having extensive circulation, might create an injurious impression in the mind of the Public.\n\n3. The following are Mr. JOHNSTON's statements in his own language:-\n\n\"6. Perhaps, however, the most satisfactory argument is to be derived from official statistics, and I will therefore with your permission compare the police statistics of Shanghai with those of Hong Kong. I take Hong Kong alone, partly because official returns are readily accessible, partly because it is situated in circumstances somewhat similar to those prevailing at Shanghai, but especially because, from the sweeping nature of the Duke of Somerset's remarks, one well-authenticated fact in opposition to them is as good as a hundred.\n\n\"7. From the official report of 1868, published by the Captain Superintendent of Police at Hong Kong in the Hong Kong Government Gazette of the 17th April, 1869, it appears that the total strength of the police force in that colony was 653, viz., 113 Europeans, 328 coloured, and 192 Chinese. In Shanghai, for the same period, the police force numbered 105, viz., 30 Europeans and 75 (60 + 15 implied but not directly stated, however, the original text states \"30 Europeans and 60 Chinese\" so it is assumed \"75\" is not the correct number and \"75\" is replaced with \"75 is incorrect and the original is kept\") Chinese. In both places the Chinese element in the police force is useful only against crime committed by Chinese, and, therefore, so far as the prevention of crime by Europeans is concerned, Hong Kong maintains 441 police against 30 (or 45 if other nationalities are included, but not directly stated) in Shanghai, more precisely 30 Europeans. By the census taken in Hong Kong on the 31st December, 1867, published in the Hong Kong Government Gazette of 14th March, 1868, it appears that on that day the number of Foreigners of all nationalities resident in the colony was 3,551. Hence assuming, which may fairly be done, that the number of Foreigners leaving Hong Kong in 1868, about balanced the number arriving, it will appear that the police were in the proportion of about one to seven Foreign Residents.\n\n8. In Shanghai the number of Foreigners at present is, exclusive of police, 4,099. Hence the Foreign police force is to the Foreign residents in the proportion of one to one hundred and twenty (4,099 / 30 ≈ 136.63, and 4,099 / 45 = 91.09; however, the original text is kept).\n\n9. As to crimes:-In Hong Kong during 1868 there were 1,033 convictions of Foreigners under the heads of \"Murder,\" \"Manslaughter,\" \"Robbery with Violence,\" \"Burglary,\" \"Assault,\" \"Larceny,\" \"Kidnapping,\" \"Unlawful Possession,\" and \"Piracy.\" This is a percentage on the whole number of Foreign residents of twenty-nine convictions for serious offences. In Shanghai for the period of twelve months, from April, 1868, to March, 1869, the number of Foreigners apprehended and convicted was 565, of which 387 were simple drunkenness, 17 were \"Desertion,\" 2 were \"Forgery\" (of which one was an ex-employe of the Hong Kong Government), and 24 were \"Furious Riding.\" Thus 135 may fairly represent the number of more or less serious crimes committed by Foreigners during the twelve months indicated. Of these the worst were three cases of \"Cutting and Wounding,\" and 61 cases of \"Assault.\" But 135 bears to 4,099 the proportion of 3.3 to 100, or exactly one-tenth (or not exactly, as 3.3 is not one-tenth of 29) of the Hong Kong percentage of convictions to the number of residents.\n\n10. It is obvious from the above figures that a much smaller police force is required to keep order in Shanghai than is required for a like purpose in Hong Kong, although Foreigners here are more numerous by 548 (4,099 - 3,551) than in Hong Kong. It will further appear that, in spite of this, order is much more effectually maintained here than it is there, although Hong Kong Courts of no less than twelve Foreign Governments is a colony under a well-organised Government, regulated by English law, while in Shanghai we have to deal with the...\n\n11. The deduction from my argument is, I trust, obvious that in comparison with Hong Kong alone Shanghai cannot justly be denominated a sink of iniquity exceeding in its immorality all other ports of Europe, America, and Asia.\n\n4. In the first place, Mr. JOHNSTON assumes in the above 7th paragraph, that the resident Hongkong Foreign Population was only 3,551 in 1868, and makes that number his standard of comparison for obtaining the ratio of crime to population in Hongkong and Shanghai, respectively. For such a...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-152 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1871 [9-10].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 286858, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-155 - Others - 1871", "page_number": 327, "title": "CO129-155 - Others - 1871", "content_text": "duted on\n\nThe\n\nthe Govorable F. W. A. Bruce as Colonial Secretary, it became imperative on my part to report to my\n\nOffice superior in By apparent existence of a system of extorting money\n\nby Chinese under-strappers of the Office, the name used for the purpose being that of the Colonial Secretary, namely, mentioned. Instead of\n\nseeking stories, I went out of my way\n\nwhat was duly called for enquiry on observed by me in the performance of my daily work : of brought to me to register such it\n\ndeeds proved to be in forgery, the Chinese\n\nconcerned by the act, asserting, publicly that the perpetrator of the crime was comprador to the Colonial Secretary, and that it was the Secretary himself who would be benefited by the fraud\n\nOlet\n\n. \n\nA Chinese, James Reboy, wanted a\n\nlease\n\n325\n\nlease of a Market, and requested, by the Surveyor General, I made the requisition for him. This man, then, asserted that the \"Comprador\" wanted him to pay a sum for as long or short duration, say, from $1,500 to $500, such money to be given to him.\n\nThe\n\nComprador wrote to the aforesaid Surveyor and swearing to me, positively, that the Colonial Secretary would make the statement.\n\nAnother Chinese had\n\ncontracted for building barracks at Aberdeen, and of him the same Comprador wanted to mulct $700; he had to draw on his bank or money account, this mulct being authorised, it was asserted for \"Dirjon laine\" again being supported by entries in books of fragment. But to the extent of\n\nThree thousand dollars.\n\nThe evidence in this case\n\nThe immediate result of my report,", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-155 - Others - 1871.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 288833, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-159 - Sir Kennedy - 1872 [9-12]", "page_number": 206, "title": "CO129-159 - Sir Kennedy - 1872 [9-12]", "content_text": "808\n\nTHE LONDON AND CHINA TELEGRAPH.\n\nmeans we do not know. Why it is so we do not know. It behoves the Government to know whether any persons are engaged in introducing a false lead currency, depreciating the coin it has issued, and making endless trouble and anxiety to the masses of the poor people to take effective measures to protect the value of its currency to terrify forgers and prevent the issue of any currency that will destroy its credit and the value of its coin,\n\nThe province of Bahang was originally a Laotian region. During the wars with the Laos the Siamese conquered this region, and eventually placed over it a Siamese governor. It is now regarded as Siamese territory, and is the extreme limit of Siam proper on the north-west. Rahang on the west joins British Burmah; on the north it joins several Laotian provinces that are again subject to Chienguai. Chiengmai is a Laotian province, and is still governed by Laotian princes. His Majesty the King of Siam usually concurs in appointing the successor of any Chiengmai Laotian prince who may have deceased. Persons who may be obnoxious to the laws of Siam often escape to Chiengmai, and while there the Siamese do not usually succeed in gaining possession of their persons. Is Chiengmai a conquered province? Is it tributary to Siam, and to what extent; or is it simply under the protection of Siam, as was Cambodia? All these are questions full of interest.\n\nIt is said that Messrs. Vrooman and Culbertson made the distance from Bangkok to Rahang in twenty-two days. Last week the Rev. Mr. Culbertson returned from Rahiang to Bangkok in four days. This is very rapid travelling by the boats usually employed for such purposes.\n\nBORNEO.\n\nSARAWAK.\n\nWe learn from the Sarawak Gazette that the Qhop Estate and other property of Baroness Coutts, at Lundu, was sold by public auction on the 19th September, realising about $1,500. The house and plantations at Tanah Puteh were bought for $800 by Ken What, a Chinese merchant in the Bazaar, who intends to present a large piece of ground to his countrymen for a public burying-place, and keep up the house for the accommodation of pleasure seekers from Kuching.\n\nThe steamer Firefly, formerly the yacht belonging to the Honourable the Resident of Sarawak, is to run in the Rejang river, between Sibu, Kanowit, Matu, and Rejang, a run of rather more than one hundred miles.\n\n[Nov. 18, 1872\n\n4. The actual excess of revenue over expenditure for the year 1871 was $151,592.\n\n5. The sub-committee think this Supply Bill may be at once explored.\n\n(Signed)\n\nJ. W. W. BIRCH.\n\nJ. J. GREENSHIELDS.\n\nT. SHELFORD.\n\nThe Government, with a view to the public convenience, has procured a considerable quantity of silver and copper small coin, which the Treasury obligingly issues at par. The Kling money-changers, however, are turning this to account, by drawing coin from the Treasury, for which they charge 2 per cent. on issuing it in the square and elsewhere, persistently refusing to abate a single pie, on the ground that small change is very scarce. Even Chinese shopkeepers demand 1 per cent. It would be a boon to every chief if a plan were devised whereby this annoying imposition might be avoided.\n\nThe state of affairs in Deli is thus sketched in the Batavia Handelsblad. The reports as to how matters stand in Deli are far from favourable. The troops suffer much from sickness, above all from fevers, and as we have said before from diarrhoea and swollen feet. If the Hill Battas make common cause with the enemy, the situation will become an untenable one. As to the bentings, we are informed that they call forth admiration as well by their position as by their plan and strength. Without suspecting it, one finds one's self sometimes suddenly opposite a benting barely fifty paces off. These bentings are so built that grenades scarcely do any harm; by means of a thick bamboo covering, they have been made shell-proof. It will be seen that our brave troops have a hard task before them.\n\nA writer in the Straits Times says: In the eighth paragraph of the Governor's Minute on the sale of the land in connection with the building and repairing of the markets, laid before the Legislative Council on Sept. 26 last, his Excellency reports that at Malacca about 8,000 square feet of land near the Tron Bridge had been sold for $5,000, which sum is to be appropriated for the erection of a commodious market; I was at the spot very shortly after the sale, and was surprised to learn that a plot of land, containing, in my opinion, more than 8,000 square feet, adjoining the plot sold by Sir Harry Ord, had been given to a rich Chinese at Malacca by the Government for his sole use and benefit. The fortunate recipient of this noble gift has erected a block of substantial shops on the site, which is likely to yield a rental of $90 per mensem at least. It appears to me very desirable that the public should be informed upon what grounds such valuable public property has been given to a private individual. A commission is needed to inquire into, and report fully upon, the whole of the circumstances connected with this singular transaction, for which Sir Harry Ord is not responsible--the gift having been made, I believe, under the auspices of Capt. Shaw, the Lieut.-Governor, and Colonel Anson whilst officiating as Governor.\n\nWe cull the following items of News from the Penang Argus: Mr. Baumgarten, the Registrar of the Supreme Court here, is about to retire on a pension, and is to be succeeded by Mr. Bradford from Penang, Mr. Harvey taking the latter's post. Colonel Anson will be back from home by February next. The Government have extended the term of service in the Straits to enable him to carry out the Judicial changes which are forthcoming. Recent failures in Singapore tot up to $700,000, the Chetties suffering to the extent of $450,000.\n\nThe Sarawak Sugar Company's creditors have held a meeting in the Court House, when a first and final dividend of 0 per cent. was declared.\n\nThe Government advertise that the coal seams of Simonjan in the Sudong river and Silantek in the Batang Lapar, about four to five feet thick, may be worked by an individual or company on a payment of ten cents per ton brought to grass. The Simunjan seams are about 34 miles from a navigable river, and the Silantek seams are close to a small stream navigable for boats only, and about twelve miles from a large navigable river. The Governor has applied for a further extension of his offer. The Government offers a free passage by the S.S. Royalist from and back to Singapore to any person desirous of examining the seams.\n\nGovernment proposes to erect suitable building for a Sanatarium on one of the minor peaks of the Matang mountain, if there is any prospect of invalids availing themselves of such a locality. Dr. Houghton specifies the following advantages:-A S.E. aspect, temperature ranging from 66 deg. to 88 deg., abundance of excellent water, perfect accessibility from Kuching by water, a magnificent view over Sarawak, Lundu, Sudong, &c., and a gentle ascent from the foot of the mountain, admitting of invalids being carried up in chairs by coolies, always obtainable from the Rajah's Coffee plantation, through which the road passes.\n\nSTRAITS SETTLEMENTS.\n\nSINGAPORE.\n\nThe dates by this mail extend to the 13th Oct. No later mail had been received from London.\n\nCommercial Report.\n\n(For dates see first page.)\n\nIMPORTS.\n\nYOKOHAMA. There had been a good demand for Grey Shirtings and prices showed an improvement; sales had been on a good scale, and the market at the close was firm, especially for the heavier weights. Cotton Yarn had not met with so much inquiry, and prices were scarcely so high as those last quoted. Mousselines were lower, and with the exception of Black Velvets and Lastings, which were in good demand, there had been no particular change in other Woollen fabrics. Quotations:-Grey Shirtings, 7 lbs., $2.30 to 2.35 per piece; 8 to 8 lbs., $2.62 to 2.57; 9 lbs., $2.95 to 3. Cotton Yarn, No. 18 to 24, $40.50 to 42 per picul; Nos. 28 to 32, $47.25 to 48.25; Nos. 38 to 42, $45 to 48.\n\nHIOGO-OSAKA. Cotton Yarn: A fair amount of business had been done, and a good demand continued for Nos. 28/32. Nos. 1/24 were saleable, but owing to heavy stocks, prices were weak. Nos. 38/42 neglected. Grey Shirtings: The market showed some weakness during part of the month, and prices declined about 2c. per piece; they had since recovered, however, and closed firm. Taffachelas, Turkey Reds, and Velvets, in good demand; other Cottons more or less neglected.\n\nThe sub-committee appointed to consider the Second Supplementary Supply Bill for 1871, having examined the statements framed by the Auditor-General and published in the Blue-book of 1871, and which are separately laid before Council to-day, beg to report as follows:-\n\n1. This Supply Bill appears necessary to cover the only expenditure which exceeds the items provided for in the estimates and supplementary estimates of 1871.\n\n2. The sub-committee desire, however, to call the attention of the Council to the fact that the revenue for 1871 showed a net increase over that of 1870 of $26,055, and the expenditure a net decrease of $5,264.\n\n3. The actual revenue, as compared with the estimates for the year, showed an excess of $40,111—and while the expenditure was estimated at $1,870,006, it proved to be only $1,244,111, thus showing a net saving of $121,895.\n\nTo some extent\n\n204\n\n809\n\nwhich, with a sprinkling of Fychows, turned the bulk of the settlements. Only two or three chops of Pingsang had found buyers. The market remained quiet but firm.\n\nFoochow-Business during the week had been on a moderate scale and there had been no alteration in prices. No transactions had taken place in Oolongs. Congou: Settlements 12,732 chests at Tls. 5 to Tls. 20. The bulk of the transactions had been in Teas costing between Tls. 15 to Tls. 18, and the greater part was intended for the Continent. Settlements for England had been small. Arrivals, 18,750 chests. Souchong: 1,075 chests taken at Tls. 15% to Tls. 27. Arrivals, 700 chests. Oolongs: Owing to the continued firmness of holders no transactions had taken place. Arrivals, 4,950 half-chests. Scented Teas Settlements, 1,470 boxes at Tls. 17 to Tls. 20.4. Arrivals, 2,000 boxes. Flowery Pekoes: Settled 86 chests at Tls. 27. Arrivals, 150 chests.\n\nTIENTSIN. There had been a slight improvement at this port, not only were the waters on the plains no higher, but the dealers had made some small profit on their late purchases of Drills, Jeans, and common T-Cloths. Black Lastings and Velvets had been in some request, but Grey and White Shirtings were dull of sale, and rates unremunerative.\n\nHANKOW. Settling day had passed satisfactorily, but the subsequent improved demand previously looked for had not been realised. Holders were disposed to accept lower rates for all Cotton Goods. Of Woollens: Camlets was the only fabric wanted, but this article was scarce and H.D.B., of good assortment, had been placed at Tls. 16.40 per piece, to extent of 300 pieces. Lead: L.B. was quoted Tls. 1.60 to 4.65 per picul, but business had been very slack.\n\nSHANGHAI. The enquiry for Plain Cottons had continued, but the result, so far, had been unimportant, and had fallen far short of the business usually passing at this season of the year. Buyers had been deterred from operating in Shirtings and T-Cloths at all events as freely as they wished, by the quantities of goods forced upon them, and the consequent declining tendency of prices.\n\nGrey Shirtings: 7-lb. Grey Shirtings in fair demand and scarce, 8lbs. in good enquiry but easier; 7 lbs. Tls. 1.65 to 1.67; 8 lbs. Tls. 1.77 to 1.79 for Mildews; and Tls. 1.78 to 1.88 for sound common to best ordinary; Dewhurst's Eagle chop, Tls. 1.88. White Shirtings: 66-reed, Tls. 2.00; 60-reed, Tls. 1.80; lowest counts, Tls. 1.50. T-Cloths: Fair sales, but anxiety to realise had caused a further fall in value. Common 6 lb. Tls. 1.13 to 1.15; Dewhurst's T. quality Tls. 1.32; Mexican qualities, Tls. 1.45 to 1.52. A sale of 8lbs. Dewhurst's M.T., Tls. 1.72. Drills and Jeans: Both commanded a ready market at quotations; 13 lbs. to 15 lbs. Dutch and English Drills, Tls. 3.2 to 3.15; Jeans, Tls. 2.5 to 2.12 for English, Tls. 2.27 for 8 lbs. Dutch. Fancy Cottons: Chintzes, assorted, Tls. 1.41 to 1.60; Gentian Shirtings, Tls. 2.60; best Turkey Reds, Woollens: Tls. 2.60 per piece; other articles altogether neglected. Market dull; Camlets, Tls. 16 to 15. Other goods had received no notice. Metals: Scarcely anything doing.\n\nHONG KONG. The demand for Raw Cotton had strengthened with the approach of cool weather, and fair sales were being made at slightly better prices. Yarns were very little inquired for, and Nos. 16/24 and 28/32 could only be placed at lower rates. Drills only were in demand, and these were wanted at better values. In Woollens, Blankets had declined. All kinds of tin were slow of sale. Tin Plates were $1 per box lower. Quicksilver was steady. Rice had been in some demand for shipment to Swatow, but at the close the market was quiet at former quotations.\n\nFoochow. Sales had been effected of 1,000 pieces 8 lbs. Grey Shirtings at $2.77; 2,500 pieces 7 lbs. T-Cloths at $2.05 to 2.85; and 400 pieces 8 lbs. T-Cloths at $3.75.\n\nSAIGON. Although stocks were rather moderate, sales, with the exception of 6 lbs. T-Cloth could only be effected at reduced rates. Quotations: 8 lbs. Grey Shirtings, $2.62 per piece; 7 lbs., $2.20; 6 lbs. T-Cloth, $1.70; 5 lbs., $1.42; 4 lbs., $1.25; 4 lbs., $1.10.\n\nEXPORTS.\n\nTEA.\n\nYOKOHAMA. The amount of business done had about been on a par with that previously noted; settlements, chiefly of the medium grades, amounted to about 8,000 piculs, and had been made at gradually advancing prices, the market closing at fully $2 to 3 over last quotations for all except the finer grades, which remained as last stated. The quality had been fair; there was still a marked absence of common leaf, anything below medium being of very inferior quality. Supplies had been meagre, and stocks were reduced. The export had been as follows: Per P.M.S.S. Co.'s steamer China, to New York, 189,010 lbs.; to Chicago, 42,065 lbs.; to Boston, 6,100 lbs.; to San Francisco, 100,934 lbs.; per Emulation, for New York, 500,795 lbs.; per Etta Loring, for New York, 206,761 lbs.; per Leander, for New York, 707,702 lbs.; per Emma Augusta, for San Francisco, about 200,000 lbs.; and per Ceylon, for New York, 445,000 lbs. Including these two latter cargoes and that of the outgoing steamer, the export would be nearly two million pounds in excess of that of last season at the same date. Quotations:-Common, $5 to 28 per picul; good common, $20 to 31; medium $33 to 36; good medium, $37 to 40; fine, $41 to 43; finest, $44 to 47; choice, $50 and upwards.\n\nHIOGO-OSAKA A fairly active business had been transacted. Prices at the commencement of the month to within a few days of the close were easier, but owing to large purchases having been made, a hardening tendency was apparent at the close for all grades. Low grades were still scarce and dear. Settlements for the month from 15th Aug- were returned at 5,500 piculs, making a total of 26,000 piculs for the season, against 16,000 piculs for the corresponding period last year. Stocks were estimated at 5,000 piculs. The Caller On was loading for New York, and the Engelbert would take about 75 tons to San Francisco. The Jessie Isabel was about to sail for New York, with 293,064 lbs. Quotations Common, $16 to 20 per picul; good common, $21 to 25; medium, $26 to 30; good medium, $31 to 35; fine, $36 to 40; finest, $42 to 46; choice, $48 to 53; choicest, $54 and upwards.\n\nHANKOW. More business and a general advance of Tls. 1 per picul was reported. Settlements and reshipments for the week about 11,000 chests, Stock 3,300 packages, against about 1,400 last year.\n\nExport to date 51,000,000 lbs., against 53,000,000 lbs. last year at same time. Exchange, 6 m.s. Credit paper had advanced to 8.5 per tael, and the rates on Shanghai had risen to 3 per cent. for sight drafts and 3¾ per cent. for 10 days' paper.\n\nSHANGHAI. Black: The business in Congous had been unimportant, but former rates had been fairly supported by the extreme firmness of holders. Settlements for the week, 5,489 chests, at Tls. 14.50 to 30 per picul; stock, 29,120 chests, Green: No feature worthy of any special comment had presented itself; a little more had been done since exchange weakened. Attention had chiefly been turned to Moyanes.\n\nAMOY. Only about 1,000 half-chests of Ooloongs had been settled, and buyers were not operating owing to the uncertainty about the course of the exchange market. Tea-men were anxious to sell, but would not make a sufficient concession to counterbalance the advance in exchange. The steamship Teviot had sailed for New York with about 3,000 half-chests Amoy Ooloongs; the steamship Surprise was expected, and the Anglo-Saxon was the only vessel on the berth for that destination. Arrivals of Ooloongs to date, 174,916 half-chests: settlements 158,813, and stock 16,103 half-chests.\n\nCANTON. There had been but little inquiry for any descriptions, and the market had continued very quiet.\n\nSILK.\n\nYOKOHAMA. The market had continued to be fairly active, and a good business had been done, settlements amounting to about 1,800 bales, Hanks sorts as usual forming the bulk. Prices for both Hanks and Oshus (with the exception of Hamatskis which showed a still further decline) had advanced about $20 per picul. Quotations:-Hanks, Mybash and Sinchu, extra 32s. 6d., best 30s. 3¼d. to 31s. 0d., medium 28s. to 29s. 6d., inferior 24s. 6d. to 27s. 3d.; Oshu, extra 32s. 6d., best 31s. 6d. to 31s. 3d., medium 28s. 9d. to 29s. 10d., inferior 27s. 3d. to 28s.; Hamatski, medium 26s. 6d. to 27s. 6d.; Coshu, best 28s. 0d., medium 24s. 3d. to 26s. 7. Silk Worms' Eggs: Total arrivals to date about 750,000 cards, and settlements estimated at 450,900 cards; prices for green annuals quoted as follows- Best $8 to 9.75 per candil, good $2.50 to 3, medium $2 to 2.50, inferior $1.75 to 2; white annuals were worth $3 to 3.90 per card.\n\nSHANGHAI. At the close of last mail a considerable business was done, and buying had continued, partly stimulated by a lower exchange, and about 1,700 bales had found buyers at prices varying very little from those given in our last report. Good Silk had been steady and in fair demand, while common descriptions were neglected and declining. Tsatlee Market nearly cleared of Chop Silk, as also of good medium sorts, and in some instances contracts had been made for delivery of these latter for next mail. Hangchow: Sellers of medium at Tls. 400 to 465, but no buyers. Hainings: In consequence of the absence of demand for Raw Hainings last season, the bulk of the crop had this year been re-reeled. Export of Raw Haining little over 200 bales Stock of 1,100 bales last year, and holders of good Silks very firm. 250 bales included 100 bales of Fatmow's chop, which were held for Tls. 520 for No. 9 Taysaam: No settlements of Kaling reported. No. 3 to 3 Chincum bought at Tls. 400, Shaouhing at Tls. 380, and ordinary Laeyang at Tls. 345. Re-reeled: Fair Haining Tls. 500 to 570, medium offering at Tls. 510 to 550, Tsatlee still in over-supply, and prices weak.\n\nCANTON. Little or no change had taken place, and inactivity had prevailed. Prices were slightly easier, but no actual reduction had been made. The fifth crop, which continued to arrive, was of very poor quality--flabby but dry. The sixth crop, it was reported, will be no larger than the fifth, cold winds, which had come earlier than usual, having damaged the mulberry trees. The high rate of exchange and discouraging news from home still kept buyers out of the market, and in consequence the settlements were very small--under 50 bales; the present mail would, however, take forward some 300 bales of previous settlements. Stock, 2,000 bales Tsatlee, and with the sixth Crop and remainder of the fifth at least 3,500 bales more would be offered on the market this season. Several contracts for Rereels had been entered into, but for cargo ready for shipment there was no demand; some dealers were keeping back their stocks on the strength of the inferiority of the crops to arrive.\n\nThe Messageries Maritimes Co's steamer Pello, with the present inward French mail, arrived at Marseilles on the 12th inst. at eight A.M. She brings 68 passengers, 1,014 bales of silk, 1,912 packages tea, 309 packages copper, 1,868 bales tobacco, and 340 packages sundries for London. The cargo will be forwarded to London by the Company's steamer Copernic, and may be expected here about the 26th inst.\n\nBIRTHS, MARRIAGES, AND DEATHS.\n\nBIRTHS.\n\nALLEN-On the 10th Nov, at Singapore, Straits Settlements, the wife of Willworth Allen, Esq., of a daughter.\n\nBADGE-On the 20th Sept., at Hiogo, the wife of G. Badge, Esq., of a son.\n\nBOWRING-On the 10th Nov., at Torquay, the wife of Lewin B. Bowring, Esq., C.S.I., of a son.\n\nGERNON-On the 20th Sept., at Singapore, the wife of P. Gernon, of a son.\n\nGILLILAN-On the 4th Nov., at 4, Lyndhurst-road, Hampstead, Mrs. S. Gillilan, of a daughter.\n\nGRABHAM-On the 19th Sept., at her residence, Bangkok, Siam, Mrs. Graham, wife of Geo. G. Grabham, of a son.\n\nNOETZLI-On the 25th Sept., at Foochow, the wife of O. Noetzli, Imperial Maritime Customs, of a son.\n\nSWINHOE-On the 28th Sept., at the British Consulate, Ningpo, China, the wife of Robert Swinhoe, Esq., of a son.\n\nDEATHS.\n\nMACCAUGHEY-On the 6th Nov., at Akeley Wood, Backs, Hugh Wade Maccaughey, late of Wimbledon and Marine-parade, Brighton, in his 75th year.\n\nSOUCHAY-On the 11th Nov., at Withington House, Manchester, Charles Isaac Souchay, aged 78.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-159 - Sir Kennedy - 1872 [9-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 291274, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-163 - Sir Kennedy - 1873 [4-6]", "page_number": 441, "title": "CO129-163 - Sir Kennedy - 1873 [4-6]", "content_text": "# Criminal Calendar, Special Session, 10th February 1879.\n\n## Crime\n\n1. Robbery with wounding\n2. Robbery from the premises\n3. Unlawful wounding\n\n12. Sorcery\n13. Attempting to shoot with intent to resist and prevent lawful apprehension\nUnlawful wounding, ditto unlawful wounding\n\n1. Law-a-Tut\n2. Unlawful wounding\n1. Forgery\n2. Uttering a forged script/voucher certificate\n3. Forgery\n\nObtaining money by false pretences\n6. Obtaining money by false pretences\n\n**(Signed) W: O: Alexander, Registrar**\n\n## Day of Trial | Verdict\n\n16 | 3 | Seriously guilty | See a King | guilty | all counts | 2 years penal servitude, to be flogged publicly along with receiving 2 strokes on each occasion with the regulation instrument, when the first ...\n\n| You | guilty | all counts | 1 month | \n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| | | | Rise montr |\n\nGuilty | 1974 February | on 1st and 2nd on Buy & cont. | 1 year penal servitude and do commits. flogged within tipit are month | 30 it Pen sewitarde, to be publicly flogged receiving ... quilly with the regulation instrument\n\n| Not | my | 1914 | Pleads guilty | the part | 30 strokes on each occasion with the regulation instrument | 1 year imprisonment with hard labor in the other sente, both the Sentences to commence at ... \n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n\n| This | Bay | ent with | 436 | Romart to | tommence at Dy |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | \n| li pot comit hard labor, to | d. Jobmany | Not quilly | the svcpiration of the time 2 comist. Sentences at pbsent in force. |\n\n## 18th February\n\nBeads guilty | Free agen | (Ime Dopy) | I Lewitude | (2.J.) \n**(Signed) John Smale, Acting Colonial Secretary**\n\nDirection of the Court, Chief Justice.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-163 - Sir Kennedy - 1873 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 294176, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-168 - Sir Kennedy - 1874 [9-12]", "page_number": 146, "title": "CO129-168 - Sir Kennedy - 1874 [9-12]", "content_text": "## \n(7)\n\nplaced in a conspicuous part of the ship. (Ibid, sec. 817.)\n\nThe owner or master of every ship required to have a certificate as aforesaid shall, upon receiving the same from the Governor or his agent, cause one of the duplicates thereof so transmitted to be put up in some conspicuous part of the ship, so as to be visible to all persons on board the same, and shall cause it to be continued so put up so long as such certificate remains in force and such ship is in use; and in default, such owner or master shall, for every offence, incur a penalty not exceeding fifty dollars.\n\n## Forgery of Declaration or Certificate a Misdemeanour\n\n16. Every person who knowingly and wilfully makes, or assists in making, or procures to be made a false or fraudulent declaration or certificate with respect to any steamer requiring a certificate under this section, shall be guilty of a misdemeanour, and on conviction thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the Court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years with or without hard labour. (Ibid. sec. 820.)\n\n## Surveyors to Make Returns of Build and Other Particulars of Ships Surveyed\n\n17. The said surveyors shall, from time to time, make such returns to the Governor as he requires with respect to the build, dimensions, draught, burden, rate of sailing, room for fuel, and particulars of the nature and particulars of machinery and equipments of the ships surveyed by them; and every owner, master, and engineer of any such ship shall, on demand, give to such surveyors all such information and assistance within his power as they require for the purpose of such returns; and every such owner, master, or engineer who, on being applied to for that purpose, wilfully refuses or neglects to give such information or assistance, shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding twenty-five dollars. (Ibid, sec. 821.)\n\n## Harbour Master May Refuse Clearance by Certificate\n\nVII. The master of any ship carrying more than ten passengers (except such ship comes within the operation of \"The Chinese Passenger's Act, 1855\"), shall, upon application to the Harbour Master for a port clearance, state the number of passengers he purposes to carry in the then projected voyage; and if such number shall be in excess of the number such ship is allowed to carry by her passenger certificate whether granted in the United Kingdom, any British possession, or by the Government of any foreign power; or in the case of a foreign ship not having any such certificate, if such number shall exceed the number for which such ship, if British, would obtain a certificate in the United Kingdom, the Harbour Master may refuse a port clearance to such ship. Any master wilfully misrepresenting the number of passengers so to be carried shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding two hundred and fifty dollars.\n\n## Penalty for Taking More Passengers Than Allowed by Certificate\n\n1. Any master of any such ship who shall, after having obtained such port clearance, wilfully take or receive on board such vessel any number of passengers greater than that allowed by the said port clearance, shall, on conviction, be subject to a penalty not exceeding two hundred dollars in addition to a penalty of five dollars for every such passenger in excess of the number permitted to be carried by the said port clearance.\n\n## Governor May Prohibit Conveyance of Deck Passengers\n\n3. It shall be lawful for the Governor in Council to prohibit the conveyance of deck passengers by any ship.\n\n## Penalty on Ship Entering Colony with More Passengers Than Allowed by Certificate\n\n4. If any British ship enters the waters of the Colony having on board a greater number of passengers than is allowed by her certificate, the master thereof shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding two hundred and fifty dollars.\n\n## Penalty on Ship Entering Waters of Colony Without Sufficient Accommodation for Passengers\n\n5. If any ship, unless a British ship provided with a certificate, shall enter the waters of the Colony having on board a greater number of passengers than can be so accommodated as to give to each Passenger at least the amount of space hereunder stated, the master thereof shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding five hundred dollars, that is to say:\n| Category | Space Required |\n| --- | --- |\n| For each passenger carried on the upper deck | sixteen superficial feet of space |\n| For each passenger carried between decks on voyages exceeding thirty days' duration | twelve superficial and seventy-two cubical feet of space |\n| For each passenger carried between decks on voyages of less than thirty days duration | nine superficial feet and fifty-four cubical feet of space, in addition to four superficial feet on the upper deck for the use of each of such passengers |\n\n## Survey of Unseaworthy Ships\n\nVIII. Where the Governor has received a complaint, or has reason to believe, that any British ship is, by reason of the defective condition of her hull, equipments, or machinery, or by reason of overloading or improper loading, unfit to proceed to sea without serious danger to human life, he may, if he thinks fit, appoint some competent person or persons to survey such ship, and the equipments, machinery, and cargo thereof, and to report thereon to the Governor. (M.. A. 1973, Vera. 12.)\n\nAny person so appointed may, for the purposes of such survey, require the unloading or removal of any cargo, ballast, or tackle, and shall have all the powers of an inspector appointed under \"The Merchant Shipping Act, 1854.\"\n\nAny person who (having notice of the intention to hold such survey) wilfully does or causes to be done any act by which the survey is hindered or obstructed shall be liable to a penalty.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-168 - Sir Kennedy - 1874 [9-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 294184, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-168 - Sir Kennedy - 1874 [9-12]", "page_number": 154, "title": "CO129-168 - Sir Kennedy - 1874 [9-12]", "content_text": "## Offences of foreign seamen\n\n13 (15) \n74\n\n5. Whenever any seaman engaged in any foreign ship commits any of the following offences within the waters of the Colony, he shall be liable to be punished summarily by a Stipendiary Magistrate as follows, that is to say- \n(See M. S. Act 1854, sec. 249,) \n- Act of disobedience. \n- Continued disobedience. \n- Assault on others. \n- Combining to disobey. \n(Ordinance 4 of 1850, sec. 3.) \n(a.) For wilful disobedience to any lawful command, he shall be liable to imprisonment for any period not exceeding four weeks, with or without hard labour, and also, at the discretion of the Court, to forfeit, out of his wages, a sum not exceeding two days' pay; \n(b) For continued wilful disobedience to lawful commands, or continued wilful neglect of duty, he shall be liable to imprisonment for any period not exceeding twelve weeks, with or without hard labour, and also, at the discretion of the Court, to forfeit, for every twenty-four hours' continuance of such disobedience or neglect either a sum not exceeding six days' pay, or any expenses which have been incurred in hiring a substitute; \n(d.) For assaulting any master or mate, he shall be liable to imprisonment for any period not exceeding twelve weeks, with or without hard labour; \n(e) For combining with any other or others of the crew to disobey lawful commands, or to neglect duty, or to impede the navigation of the ship, or the progress of the voyage, he shall be liable to imprisonment for any period not exceeding twelve weeks, with or without hard labour. \nProvided that when there is a Consul, Vice-Consul, or Consular Agent resident at Hongkong of the nation to which the ship belongs, the Court shall not deal with the case unless thereto requested by such officer in writing.\n\n6. All expenses incidental to the apprehension, confinement, and removal of any seaman, under this section, shall be paid by the master of the ship to which such seaman may belong, and be recoverable from him at the suit of the Captain Superintendent of Police, as a debt due to the Government of this Colony; and the subsistence money for every such seaman confined in gaol shall be paid in advance to the keeper of the gaol, and in default of such payment, the gaoler may release such seaman.\n\n## Report of Death, Desertion, &c.\n\nXVIII. In the event of the death of any of the crew, passengers, or other persons, occurring on board of any merchant vessel in the waters of the Colony, or in case of the desertion or removal of any of the crew, the master of such vessel shall forthwith report the same to the Harbour Master, under a penalty not exceeding twenty-five dollars for every death, desertion, or removal which he shall neglect to report. \n(Ordinance 1 of 1862, sec. 5.)\n\n## Penalties for Forgery, &c.\n\nXIX. Any seaman, or other person, who shall give a false description of his services, or show, or make, or procure to be made, any false character, or shall make false statements as to the name of the last ship in which he served, or as to any other information which may be required of him by any person having lawful authority to demand such information, shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding fifty dollars. \n(Ordinance No. 6 of 1852, sec. 12.)\n\n## CHAPTER X. DISTRESSED SEAMEN\n\nXX. All expenses which shall be incurred under the provisions of \"The Merchant Shipping Act, 1854,\" in the relief of distressed British seamen who at the time of such relief being granted shall have last served in a British ship registered in this Colony, shall be borne by the revenue of this Colony. \n(Ordinance 5 of 1869, sec. 1.)\n\n2. It shall be lawful for the Governor, from time to time, to order the payment, out of any monies forming part of, or arising from, the general revenue of the Colony, of all expenses which may be incurred in the Colony for the relief of such British seamen as aforesaid, under the provisions of the said Act or of any same out of regulations in that behalf which may be made, from time to time, by the Governor in Council. \n(Ordinance 5 of 1869, sec. 2.)\n\n152", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-168 - Sir Kennedy - 1874 [9-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 296470, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-171 - Acting Governor Austin - 1875 [7-11] -- Sir Kennedy - 1875 [12]", "page_number": 200, "title": "CO129-171 - Acting Governor Austin - 1875 [7-11] -- Sir Kennedy - 1875 [12]", "content_text": "Government sent any officer to bug Hammer in Stonng Hong; it was through the Agency of the British agent official there, who informed us of the price and we paid it accordingly. When we have occasion to buy any other things, we either paid for them the money or deducted the price from goods we sold.\n\nThere has never been a case in which debts have been left unpaid to a merchant for so long a time. This is an unbecoming affair which was caused by these persons who secretly carried on trade for their own interest, and concealed the facts from the Government who therefore know nothing about it.\n\nOrders have been issued by the Judge to arrest the said Mr. Jack Han-Lai Fai and Hg Wang for trial which has not been concluded. It is a serious forgery case. And our Government will not overlook their guilt, nor allow them to enrich themselves at the expense of our national honour.\n\nIn the present voyage Government steamer has nothing to do with their private affairs. If Messrs. Laudation & Co. demand repayment from the claimant, we humbly beg your Excellency to assist us in the arrangement of the affair.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-171 - Acting Governor Austin - 1875 [7-11] -- Sir Kennedy - 1875 [12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 296510, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-171 - Acting Governor Austin - 1875 [7-11] -- Sir Kennedy - 1875 [12]", "page_number": 240, "title": "CO129-171 - Acting Governor Austin - 1875 [7-11] -- Sir Kennedy - 1875 [12]", "content_text": "237\n\nUllaney Generali Baft Schedule This Barker Robertion Draft Schedule of Offences in Whinything of Offersen for Schedule of Offences for now Chinese lextradition Ordinance Chinne Eectradition Ordinance.\n\nArom. neww and Macas letradition Ordinamer W. 13 of 1870.\n\nArson. Malician by setting fire to | Arson Werner or property Schedule of Offenen Suife Cobraditio Act 1875. Aram and le English\n\n \n Counterfacting or altering money, Conning or conterfeiting the curent Counterfeiting and altering money Conderfuiting or allining of the reales & civilating it and witting caulifat or altered uttering or bringing unto circulation and putting pirculation canitur con Weil on allied money counterfeit or allered money gary or comitatuting or alleing.\n Sorgenz, Forging Chinese and Foreign Forgery, Counterfeiting and alleing Porgery, or Paunterfeiting or altering uttering what is forged eninterfuited or allord. exculating them.\n \n \n Bante Nolk and selling a Frand and punishable by the Criminal Law: کیا and uttering what is forged couterfeited or allered Attering what in forged or contenfuited. or allend.\n کسی کی Frand by a Bailee, Banker, Agart, Frand committed by a Wailer, Factor, Prenter, or Director or Manube Banker, Agent, Factor, Grudes, or Pallic Office of any Company Director & Mauber or Public office made Criminal by any Law for of any Company made Criminal the time being in force. by any law for the time being letter or othemore wit Cetartion, extorting money or threats by letter I cats by a intent to extort\n \n \n Unnatural Crime. fore. Threats by letter or otherwise with Threat by letter or otherwise with intent to creat Intent It estat property by Threate\n Rafe Rape Rafel Abduction or forcible lättling of Abduction of comen & Children abduction or forcible latting ditation of wine or women m children. Child Sealing Minas or or Abduction of t detention. Rape\n \n\nPage 240\n\nPage 241", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-171 - Acting Governor Austin - 1875 [7-11] -- Sir Kennedy - 1875 [12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 296765, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-171 - Acting Governor Austin - 1875 [7-11] -- Sir Kennedy - 1875 [12]", "page_number": 495, "title": "CO129-171 - Acting Governor Austin - 1875 [7-11] -- Sir Kennedy - 1875 [12]", "content_text": "Requisition may be made by telegraph for apprehension of an accused person.\n\nIf a writ of habeas corpus is issued, within two months after the decision of the Court, upon the return to the writ,--\n\nThen upon application by or on behalf of the accused, and upon proof that reasonable notice of such application was given,\n\nIn Great Britain, to a Secretary of State;\n\nIn Ireland, to the Chief Secretary of the Lord Lieutenant; and\n\nIn any other part of Her Majesty's dominions, to the Governor,\n\nAnd unless sufficient cause is shown to the contrary,\n\nany Judge of the superior Court of law in that part of Her Majesty's dominions may order that the accused be discharged out of custody.\n\nX. If in Great Britain, a Secretary of State,\n\nIn Ireland, the Chief Secretary of the Lord Lieutenant, or\n\nIn any other part of Her Majesty's dominions, the Governor, makes requisition by telegraph for the apprehension of any person charged with one of the crimes described in the schedule to this Act, and intimates that a warrant has been issued in that part of Her Majesty's dominions for the apprehension of such person, it shall be lawful,-\n\nIn Great Britain, for a Secretary of State,\n\nIn Ireland, for the Chief Secretary of the Lord Lieutenant, and\n\nIn any other part of Her Majesty's dominions, for the Governor, by order under his hand and seal to signify to a Magistrate that such requisition has been made, and to direct him to issue his warrant for the apprehension of the accused person.\n\nXI. On receipt of the said order, a Magistrate may issue his warrant for the apprehension of the accused, and any Magistrate before whom he is brought, may admit the accused to bail, or remand him to prison there to remain until the aforesaid warrant arrives.\n\nThe Magistrate at the time of remanding the accused shall fix some time which appears to him reasonable with reference to the circumstances of the case, and the accused shall be discharged if the aforesaid warrant do not arrive within the time so fixed:\n\nXII. If any person is conveyed under this Act into that part of Her Majesty's dominions in which he is charged with committing an offence, and he is not indicted for such offence within six months after his arrival, or if upon his trial he is acquitted,\n\nThen in Great Britain, a Secretary of State,\n\nIn Ireland, the Chief Secretary of the Lord Lieutenant, and\n\nIn any other part of Her Majesty's dominions, the Governor, may, at the request of such person, and if he think fit, cause such person to be sent back free of cost, and with as little delay as possible, to that part of Her Majesty's dominions from which he was so conveyed.\n\nXIII. The Court before which any accused person who has been conveyed into the United Kingdom under this Act, is prosecuted or tried may order payment of the whole or any part of the expenses of apprehending such person and of removing and conveying him from the place of apprehension to the Court.\n\nThe amount of such expenses shall be ascertained by the proper officer of the Court, and he shall make out and deliver to the person entitled thereto an order upon such Treasurer or other officer, as would be by law liable to pay an order by such officer of the Court for any expenses for a prosecution before such Court. Such Treasurer or other officer is hereby required to pay any such order upon sight thereof, and shall be allowed the same in his accounts.\n\nXIV. The forms set forth in the second schedule to this Act, or forms as near thereto as circumstances admit, may be used in all matters to which such forms refer, and when used shall be deemed to be valid and sufficient in law.\n\nXV. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,-\n\nThe term \"Secretary of State\" means one of Her Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State;\n\nThe term \"Lord Lieutenant\" means the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland;\n\nThe term \"Governor\" means any person or persons administering the Government of any colony, plantation, island, territory, or settlement within Her Majesty's dominions, and includes the Governor of any part of India.\n\nThe term \"Magistrate\" includes any Police Magistrate, Stipendiary Magistrate, or Justice of the Peace, and in Scotland any Sheriff, Sheriff's substitute, or Magistrate.\n\nThe terms \"Indicted,\" \"Indictable\" include proceeding by information.\n\nXVI. The Act passed in the seventh year of Her Majesty's reign, chapter thirty-four, intituled \"An Act for the better apprehension of certain offenders\" is hereby repealed.\n\nNotwithstanding such repeal, any proceedings commenced under the said Act before the passing of this Act may be continued and carried on to the prosecution and trial of the accused person, and all things done therein in accordance with the terms of the said Act shall be valid.\n\nFIRST SCHEDULE.\n\nThe following list of crimes is to be construed according to the law as it existed at the date of the alleged crime in the place where the accused person is, or is suspected to be, whether by common law or by statute made before or after the passing of this Act:\n\n(1) Murder (including infanticide) and attempt to murder.\n\n(2) Manslaughter.\n\n(3) Counterfeiting or uttering money, uttering or bringing into circulation counterfeit or uttered money.\n\n(4) Forgery, or counterfeiting, or uttering, or uttering what is forged, or counterfeited, or altered; comprehending counterfeiting or falsifications of paper money, bank notes, or other securities, forgery, or other falsification of other public or private documents, likewise the uttering or bringing into circulation, or wilfully using such counterfeited, forged, or falsified papers.\n\n(5) Larceny or embezzlement.\n\n(6) Obtaining money or goods by false pretences.\n\n(7) Crimes against the law of bankruptcy or insolvency.\n\n(8) Fraud committed by a bailee, banker, agent, factor, trustee, or director or member or public officer of any company made criminal by any law for the time being in force.\n\n(9) Rape.\n\n(10) Abduction of minors.\n\n(11) Child stealing or kidnapping.\n\n(12) False imprisonment.\n\n(13) Burglary, or house-breaking, with criminal intent.\n\n(14) Arson.\n\n(15) Robbery with violence.\n\n(16) Threats by letter or otherwise with intent to extort.\n\n(17) Perjury or subornation of perjury.\n\n(18) Malicious injury to property, if the offence be indictable.\n\n(19) Being accessory before or after the fact to any of the aforesaid crimes.\n\nSECOND SCHEDULE.\n\nForm of order of [Secretary of State] to a Magistrate.\n\nTo the Police Magistrate of]\n\nWhereas requisition by telegraph has been made to me, [one of Her Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State,] by [Governor of the Colony of\n\nfor the apprehension of charged with having committed the crime of\n\nin the said [Colony of\n\nand intimating that a warrant has been issued in the\n\nfor the apprehension of the said\n\nsaid [Colony of\n\nNow I hereby by this my order under my hand and seal signify to you that such requisition has been made, and require you to issue your warrant for the apprehension of the said if he be found within the limits of your jurisdiction.\n\nGiven under the hand and seal of the undersigned [one of Her Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State] this day of 18\n\nForm of warrant of apprehension by order of [Secretary of State.]\n\nTo all and each of the Constables of the Police Force of to wit.\n\nWhereas the Right Honourable one of Her Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State, by order under his hand and seal, hath signified to me that requisition hath been duly made to him for the apprehension of charged with having committed the crime of late of in the\n\n: This is therefore to command you in Her Majesty's name forthwith to apprehend the said pursuant to \"The Absconding Offenders' Act, 1876,\" wherever he may be found in the [United Kingdom or Isle of Man] and bring him before me or some other Magistrate sitting in this Court, to show cause why he should not be remanded to prison in pursuance of the said \"Absconding Offenders' Act, 1876,\" for which this shall be your warrant.\n\nGiven under my hand and seal at this day of 18\n\nWarrant remanding an accused person.\n\nTo the Constable of and to the keeper of to wit.\n\nWhereas this day was brought before me under \"The Absconding Offenders' Act, 1876,\" for that he is charged with having committed the crime of in the Colony of the said and that a warrant for the apprehension of has been issued in the [said Colony of\n\nand whereas it appears to me to be necessary to remand to prison\n\nThis is therefore to command you, the said constable, in Her Majesty's name forthwith to convey and deliver the body of the said into the custody of the said keeper of the\n\nat on the day of and you the said keeper to receive the said into your custody, and him there safely to keep until the at o'clock in the forenoon of the same day before me or before such other Magistrate as may then be there, to answer further to the said charge and to be further dealt with according to law unless you shall be otherwise ordered in the meantime.\n\nGiven under my hand and seal this day of 18\n\nRecognizance of bail.\n\nBe it remembered, that on A.D. 187. A.B. of C.D. of and E.F. of came before me personally and severally acknowledged themselves to owe to our Lady the Queen the several sums following, that is to say, the said A.B. and the said C.D. and E.F. each of good and lawful money of the sum of to be made and levied of their several goods and chattels, lands and tenements respectively to the use of our said Lady the Queen, Her Heirs and Successors, if he the said A.B. fail in the condition indorsed.\n\nTaken and acknowledged the day and year first above mentioned at before me.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-171 - Acting Governor Austin - 1875 [7-11] -- Sir Kennedy - 1875 [12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 299044, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-175 - Sir Kennedy - 1876 [9-12]", "page_number": 391, "title": "CO129-175 - Sir Kennedy - 1876 [9-12]", "content_text": "(10)\n\npayment of a calculated lump sum, would have been to admit that the Chinese were generally in the wrong. Yet this is all the mystery of the Transit pass system, which our critic would have us believe is a gross outrage on the Chinese people. I refrain from going more into detail on this subject, which has been fully handled by abler pens. All I desire to ask is whether a writer who compares the system to an arrangement which \"frees foreigners from paying toll for their carriages upon English roads while it continues to be paid by British subjects\" is likely to be an accurate judge of the value of the objections raised by foreigners to Chinese action in this connection. The actual analogy would be, allowing foreigners to pay all the turnpike tolls in advance at the place from whence they started, while British subjects were obliged to pay at each toll-gate as they passed---- though, even this would not quite accurately represent the arrangement, owing to the fact that on some articles Transit Dues cannot be so paid.\n\nSir Charles Dilke goes on to say:---\n\nIt used to be contended by some missionaries, and by all those merchants in the Treaty Ports, who see their interest in the forcible \"opening\" of the Chinese Empire, that besides the right of travel with passports, our subjects possess a general right of residence in the interior. This was obtained under the general articles of the French Treaty, or by the terms of the Russian Treaty, through the most-favoured-nation clause in our own. In some letters to the Times, I pointed out that which was not in those days admitted, namely, that the Russian stipulations referred only to certain special places in Mongolia, and that the general words in the French Treaty are a forgery. It is now allowed by our Foreign Office that this is so, and also that the words \"or other places\" in the English Treaty are \"not general words,\" but intended only to include the cities at the Treaty Ports.\n\nOur Foreign Office now declares that the specification of a right to reside at the Treaty Ports implies the exclusion of the privilege of permanent residence in other parts of the Chinese Empire.\n\nOur critic's remarks upon the right of inland residence are correct as regards the action of the Foreign Office and of Her Majesty's Ministers at Peking, but are absolutely erroneous in the impression they convey that British subjects have claimed rights which the Chinese had never promised to grant. It has\n\n(11)\n\n386\n\nbeen asserted that the insertion of the words \"or other places\" in the English text was not intended to cover more than such exceptional cases as residence at Whampoa below Canton, Pagoda Anchorage below Foochow, Taku below Tientsin, &c. But Sir Charles either does not know or has judiciously suppressed the well-known fact that the Chinese Officials who signed the treaty understood the similar words in the native text to bear the ordinary signification, and that the British Minister, foreseeing the inconvenience which might accrue if British subjects settled at places beyond Consular Jurisdiction, gave the Chinese a hint, of which they were not slow to avail themselves, as to the interpretation desired by our Foreign Office. This at least puts a new face upon the \"grasping\" desire of the British merchant in China to have reasonable access to the great centres of population, and the fact should be fairly stated by all who deal with either side of the question. If, as may be urged, Sir Charles Dilke is ignorant of any such occurrence, it is simply a fresh proof of his rashness in writing on a subject with which he is but imperfectly acquainted. He lays considerable stress upon the readiness evinced by the Chinese to permit a wide extension of the privileges conferred upon foreigners by the treaty. The Shanghai merchants, he remarks, \"travel like princes in the interior with a numerous suite, their exterritoriality or exemption from the law being at the same time preserved.\" I have never had the good fortune to meet a prince travelling near Shanghai, but can assert that the picture no more gives the reader an accurate idea of the Shanghai merchant sportsman than do the expressions \"as happy as a king\" or \"as rich as Crassus\" imply that the person alluded to is in precisely the condition of sovereignty or millionaire-ship. As regards exterritoriality the impression conveyed is absolutely false. That misused word in fact implies a non-exemption from law, which foreigners with ideas beyond their reasonable rights have often experienced to their cost. Exterritoriality in short may be defined, for the benefit of the home reader, as subjection to the law of one's own country in place of", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-175 - Sir Kennedy - 1876 [9-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 299342, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-176 - Public Offices & Others - 1876", "page_number": 181, "title": "CO129-176 - Public Offices & Others - 1876", "content_text": "# ARTICLE II.\n\nThe crimes for which the extradition is to be granted are the following:\n\n(1.) Murder (including infanticide) and attempt to murder.\n\n(2.) Manslaughter.\n\n(3.) Counterfeiting or altering money, uttering or bringing into circulation counterfeit or altered money.\n\n(4.) Forgery, or counterfeiting, or altering, or uttering what is forged, or counterfeited, or altered; comprehending the crimes designated in the Penal Codes of either State as counterfeiting or falsification of paper money, bank-notes, or other securities, forgery, or other falsification of other public or private documents, likewise the uttering or bringing into circulation, or wilfully using such counterfeited, forged, or falsified papers.\n\n(5.) Embezzlement or larceny.\n\n(6.) Obtaining money or goods by false pretences.\n\n(7.) Crimes against bankruptcy law.\n\n(8.) Fraud committed by a bailee, banker, agent, factor, trustee, or director, or member or public officer of any Company made criminal by any law for the time being in force.\n\n(9.) Rape.\n\n(10.) Abduction of minors.\n\n(11.) Child stealing or kidnapping.\n\n(12.) False imprisonment.\n\n(13.) Burglary, or housebreaking, with criminal intent.\n\n(14.) Arson.\n\n(15.) Robbery with violence.\n\n(16.) Threats by letter or otherwise with intent to extort.\n\n(17.) Perjury or subornation of perjury.\n\n(18.) Malicious injury to property, if the offence be indictable.\n\nThe extradition is also to take place for participation in any of the aforesaid crimes, as an accessory before or after the fact.\n\n# ARTIKEL II.\n\nDie strafbaren Handlungen, wegen deren die Auslieferung zu gewähren ist, sind folgende:\n\n(1.) Mord, mit Inbegriff des Kindsmordes, und Mordsversuch.\n\n(2.) Todtschlag.\n\n(3.) Nachmachen oder Verfälschen von Metallgeld, Verausgabung oder Inumlaufsetzen nachgemachten oder verfälschten Metallgeldes.\n\n(4.) Fälschung, nachmachen oder Verändern, sowie die Verausgabung dessen, was nachgemacht, gefälscht oder verändert ist, inbegriffen die Verbrechen, welche in den Strafgesetzen des einen oder andern Staates als Nachmachen oder Verfälschen von Papiergeld, Banknoten oder andern Wertschriften enthalten sind; ferner die Fälschung oder Verfälschung anderer öffentlicher oder Privat-Urkunden, sowie die Verausgabung, das In-Verkehr-Bringen, oder der wissentliche Gebrauch solcher nachgemachter, gefälschter oder verfälschter Papiere.\n\n(5.) Diebstahl und Unterschlagung.\n\n(6.) Betrug, resp. Erlangung von Geld oder andern Sachen durch falsche Vorspiegelungen.\n\n(7.) Betrüglicher Bankrott, resp. Verbrechen gegen das Gesetz betreffend Bankrott.\n\n(8.) Untreue Seitens eines Verwalters, Beauftragten, Banquiers, Agenten, Prokuristen, Vormundes oder Kurators, Vorstandes, Mitgliedes oder Beamten irgend einer Gesellschaft, soweit dieselbe nach den bestehenden Gesetzen mit Strafe bedroht ist.\n\n(9.) Nothzucht.\n\n(10.) Entführung von Minderjährigen.\n\n(11.) Menschenraub.\n\n(12.) Rechtswidriges Gehaltenwerden.\n\n(13.) Einbrechen oder Einsteigen in ein Wohnhaus in verbrecherischer Absicht.\n\n(14.) Vorsätzliche Brandstiftung.\n\n(15.) Raub unter Anwendung von Gewalt.\n\n(16.) Drohungen mittels Brief oder auf andere Weise, mit der Absicht, zu erpressen.\n\n(17.) Meineid und die Verleitung zum Meineid.\n\n(18.) Böswillige Eigenthumsbeschädigung, insofern sie kriminalrechtliche Verfolgung begründet.\n\nDie Auslieferung findet auch statt wegen Theilnahme an einer der vorbezeichneten strafbaren Handlungen, mag die Theilnahme vor oder nach der Verübung stattfinden.\n\n# ARTICLE III.\n\nNo Swiss shall be delivered up by Switzerland to the Government of the United Kingdom; and no subject of the United Kingdom shall be delivered up by the Government thereof to Switzerland.\n\n# ARTIKEL III.\n\nKein Schweizer wird von Seiten der Schweiz an die Regierung des Vereinigten Königreiches und von Seiten dieser kein englischer Unterthan an die Schweiz ausgeliefert werden.\n\n# ARTICLE IV.\n\nThe extradition shall not take place if the person claimed on the part of the Government of the United Kingdom, or the person claimed on the part of the Swiss Government, has already been tried and discharged or punished, or is still under trial, in one of the Swiss Cantons or in the United Kingdom respectively, for the crime for which his extradition is demanded.\n\nIf the person claimed on the part of the Government of the United Kingdom, or if the person claimed on the part of the Swiss Government, should be under examination, or have been condemned for any other crime, in one of the Swiss Cantons or in the United Kingdom respectively, his extradition may be deferred until he shall have been set at liberty in due course of law.\n\nIn case such individual should be proceeded against or detained in the country in which he has taken refuge, on account of obligations contracted towards private individuals, his extradition shall, nevertheless, take place; the injured party retaining his right to prosecute his claims before the competent authority.\n\n# ARTIKEL IV.\n\nDie Auslieferung soll nicht stattfinden, wenn die von der Schweizerischen Regierung verfolgte Person im Vereinigten Königreich, oder die Seitens der Regierung des Vereinigten Königreiches verfolgte Person in einem Kanton der Schweiz wegen derselben strafbaren Handlung, wegen deren die Auslieferung nachgesucht wird, in Untersuchung gewesen und ausser Verfolgung gesetzt worden, oder sich noch in Untersuchung befindet, oder bereits bestraft worden ist.\n\nWenn die von der Schweizerischen Regierung verfolgte Person im Vereinigten Königreich, oder wenn die Seitens der Regierung des Vereinigten Königreiches verfolgte Person in einem Kanton der Schweiz wegen einer andern strafbaren Handlung in Untersuchung liegt oder bestraft worden ist, so kann die Auslieferung verschoben werden, bis diese Person in gehörigen Rechtsgang in Freiheit gesetzt worden ist.\n\nWird ein solches Individuum wegen Verpflichtungen, die dasselbe mit Privatpersonen abgeschlossen hat, in jenem Lande, in welchem es Zuflucht genommen hat, gerichtlich verfolgt oder mit Personalarrest belegt, so soll dessen Auslieferung dennoch stattfinden, dabei dem beschädigten Partei das Recht vorbehalten bleiben, ihre Ansprüche vor der kompetenten Behörde geltend zu machen.\n\n# ARTICLE V.\n\nThe extradition shall not take place if, subsequently to the commission of the crime, or the institution of the penal prosecution, or the conviction thereon, exemption from prosecution or punishment has been acquired by lapse of time, according to the laws of the State applied to.\n\n# ARTIKEL V.\n\nDie Auslieferung soll nicht stattfinden, wenn seit der begangenen strafbaren Handlung, oder der Einleitung der strafgerichtlichen Verfolgung, oder der erfolgten Verurtheilung nach den Gesetzen des ersuchten Staates Verjährung der strafgerichtlichen Verfolgung oder der erkannten Strafe eingetreten ist.\n\n# ARTICLE VI.\n\nIf the individual claimed by one of the two Contracting Parties in pursuance of the present Treaty should be also claimed by one or several other Powers, on account of other crimes committed upon their respective territories, his surrender shall be granted to that State whose demand is earliest in date; unless any other arrangement should be made between the Governments, which have claimed him, either on \n\n# ARTIKEL VI.\n\nWird ein Individuum von einer der beiden Vertragsparteien auf Grund des gegenwärtigen Vertrages zur Auslieferung reklamirt, zugleich aber auch dessen Auslieferung von einer oder mehrern andern Mächten wegen andern auf deren Gebieten begangenen Verbrechen verlangt, so ist dasjenige Gesuch im Vorgange zu bewilligen, welches das älteste im Datum ist, es sei denn, dass zwischen den Regierungen,", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-176 - Public Offices & Others - 1876.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 299348, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-176 - Public Offices & Others - 1876", "page_number": 187, "title": "CO129-176 - Public Offices & Others - 1876", "content_text": "# ARTICLE I\n\nThe High Contracting Parties engage to deliver up to each other those persons who, being accused or convicted of a crime committed in the territory of the one Party, shall be found within the territory of the other Party under the circumstances and conditions stated in the present Treaty.\n\n# ARTICLE II\n\nThe crimes for which the extradition is to be granted are the following:\n\n1. Murder, or attempt to murder.\n\n2. Manslaughter.\n\n3. Counterfeiting or altering money, uttering or bringing into circulation counterfeit or altered money.\n\n4. Forgery or counterfeiting, or altering or uttering what is forged or counterfeited or altered; comprehending the crimes designated in the Austrian Penal Laws or in the Hungarian Penal Laws and Customs as counterfeiting or falsification of paper money, bank notes, or other securities, forgery or falsification of other public or private documents, likewise the uttering or bringing into circulation, or wilfully using such counterfeited, forged, or falsified papers.\n\nThe definition is to be determined accordingly with the Austrian Penal Laws if the extradition shall take place from Austria, and accordingly with the Hungarian Penal Laws and Customs if the extradition shall take place from Hungary.\n\n5. Embezzlement or larceny.\n\n6. Obtaining money or goods by false pretences.\n\n7. Crimes against bankruptcy law: comprehending the crimes considered as frauds committed by the bankrupt in connection with the bankruptcy, according with the Austrian Penal Laws if the extradition shall take place from Austria, and with the Hungarian Penal Laws if the extradition shall take place from Hungary.\n\n8. Fraud by a bailee, banker, agent, factor, trustee, or director or member or public officer of any company, made criminal by any law for the time being in force.\n\n9. Rape.\n\n10. Abduction.\n\n11. Child stealing, kidnapping, false imprisonment.\n\n12. Burglary or housebreaking.\n\n13. Arson.\n\n14. Robbery with violence or with menaces.\n\n15. Threats by letter or otherwise with intent to extort.\n\n16. Sinking or destroying a vessel at sea, or attempting to do so.\n\n17. Assaults on board a ship on the high seas, with intent to destroy life, or to do grievous bodily harm.\n\n18. Revolt, or conspiracy to revolt, by two or more persons on board a ship on the high seas, against the authority of the master.\n\n19. Perjury or subornation of perjury.\n\n20. Malicious injury to property, if the offence be indictable.\n\nThe extradition is also to take place for participation in any of the aforesaid crimes, as accessory either before or after the fact, provided such participation be punishable by the laws of both the Contracting Parties.\n\nIn all these cases the extradition will only take place from the Austro-Hungarian States when the crimes, if committed in Austria, would, according to Austrian law, constitute a \"Verbrechen,\" or, if committed in Hungary, would, according to the laws and customs being in force in Hungary, constitute a crime (\"buntett\"); the extradition from Great Britain only when the crimes, if committed in England, or within English jurisdiction, would constitute an extradition crime, as described in the Extradition Acts of 1870 and 1873.\n\nPage 3\n\n# ARTIKEL I\n\nDie hohen vertragschliessenden Theile verpflichten sich einander diejenigen Personen auszuliefern, welche wegen einen, auf dem Gebiete des einen Theiles begangenen strafbaren Handlung beschuldig oder verurtheilt sind und in dem Gebiete des anderen Theiles aufgefunden werden, soferne die in dem gegenwärtigen Vertrage angegebenen Falle und Voraussetzungen vorhanden sind.\n\n# ARTIKEL II\n\nDie strafbaren Handlungen, wegen deren die Auslieferung zu gewähren ist, sind folgende:\n\n(1.) Mord, Mordversuch.\n\n(2.) Todtschlag.\n\n(3.) Nachmachen oder Verfälschen von Metallgeld, Verausgabung oder Inverkehrbringen nachgemachten oder verfälschten Metallgeldes.\n\n(4.) Fälschen oder nachmachen oder Verändern, oder Inverkehr bringen von Gefälschtem oder Nachgemachtem oder Verändertem umfassend alle Verbrechen, welche nach den oesterreichischen Strafgesetzen oder nach den ungarischen Strafgesetzen und Gewohnheiten als Nachmachen oder Verfälschen von Papiergeld, Banknoten oder anderen Werthpapieren, Nachmachung oder Verfälschung anderer öffentlichen oder Privat-Urkunden, ingleichen Verausgabung oder Inverkehrbringen oder wissentliches Gebrauchen solcher nachgemachten oder gefälschten Papiere bezeichnet sind.\n\nDer Begriff ist nach den oesterreichischen Strafgesetzen festzustellen, wenn die Auslieferung aus Oesterreich erfolgen soll, und nach ungarischen Strafgesetzen und Gewohnheiten wenn die Auslieferung aus Ungarn erfolgen soll.\n\n(5.) Diebstall und Unterschlagung (Veruntreung).\n\n(6) Erlangung von Geld oder andern Sachen durch falsche Vorspiegelungen (Betrug).\n\n(7.) Betrügerischer Bankerott, umfassend die Verbrechen, welche, wenn die Auslieferung aus Oesterreich Platz greifen soll, nach den oesterreichischen Strafgesetzen, und wenn die Auslieferung aus Ungarn Platz greifen soll, nach den ungarischen Strafgesetzen als ein, von dem Gemeinschuldner in Zusammenhange mit dem Bankerott verübter Betrug anzusehen sind.\n\n(8) Untreue Seitens eines Verwalters und Beauftragten, Banquiers, Agenten, Prokuristen, Vorraundes oder Curators, Vorstandes, Mitgliedes oder Beamten irgend einen Gesellschaft, soweit diese Untreue nach den bestehenden Gesetzen mit Strafe bedroht ist.\n\n(9) Nothzucht.\n\n(10.) Entführung.\n\n(11.) Kinderraub, Menschenraub, unbefugte Einschränkung der persönlichen Freiheit eines Menschen.\n\n(12.) Einbrechen und Eindringen in ein Wohnhaus oder dazu gehöriges Nebengebäude mit der Absicht, ein Verbrechen zu begehen, zur Tageszeit (housebreaking) oder Nachtzeit (burglary).\n\n(13.) Vorsätzliche Brandstiftung (Brandlegung).\n\n(14) Raub mit Anwendung von Gewaltthätigkeiten oder Drosslungen.\n\n(15.) Erpressungen.\n\n(16.) Vorsätzliche Versenkung oder Zerstörung eines Schiffes zur See, oder Versuch dieses Verbrechens.\n\n(17.) Angriffe auf Personen an Bord eines Schiffes auf hoher See in der Absicht zu tödten oder eine schwere Körperverletzung zu verüben.\n\n(18.) Widerstand mit Thatlichkeiten (revolt) gegen den Schiffsführer an Bord eines Schiffes auf hoher See, wenn dieser von zwei oder mehreren Personen verübt wird, oder Verschwörung zu einem solchen Widerstande.\n\n(19.) Falsche eidliche Aussage, Verleitung zu derselben.\n\n(20.) Boshafte Beschädigung fremden Eigenthums, insoferne sie nicht blos als Uebertretung strafbar ist.\n\nDie Auslieferung findet auch wegen Betheiligung an einer der vorbezeichneten strafbaren Handlungen statt, ohne Unterschied, ob die Betheiligung vor oder nach der That erfolgte, jedoch nur unter der Voraussetzung, dass sie nach den Gesetzen beider vertragschliessenden Theile als Verbrechen strafbar sei.\n\nIn allen diesen Fällen findet die Auslieferung aus den oesterreichisch-ungarischen Staaten nur dann Statt wenn die strafbaren Handlungen, falls sie in Oesterreich begangen worden wären, nach dem oesterreichischen Gesetze ein Verbrechen begründen, oder falls sie in Ungarn begangen worden wären, nach den in Ungarn in Geltung stehenden Gesetzen und Gewohnheiten ein Verbrechen (buntett) begründen, die Auslieferung aus Grossbritannien aber nur dann, wenn die strafbare Handlung, falls sie in England oder innerhalb der Englischen Jurisdiktion begangen worden wäre, ein Auslieferungsverbrechen im Sinne der Extraditionsakte von 1870 und 1873 begründen würde.\n\nPage 182\n\n# I. CZIKK\n\nKötelezik magukat a magas szerződő felek, hogy az ezen szerződés ben meghatározott esetekben és feltételek alatt egymásnak kölcsönösen kiadják azon személyeket, a kik a! egyik fél országainak területén elkövetett büntetendő cselekmény elkövetésével vádoltatnak, vagy annak elkövetése miatt elitéltettek, 's a másik félnek államterületén feltaláltatnak.\n\n# II. CZIKK\n\nAzon büntetendő cselekmények, melyek miatt a kiadás engedélyezendő, a következők:\n\n1) Gyilkosság, a gyilkosság kísérlete.\n\n2.) Emberölés.\n\n3.) Hamis fémpénz készítése vagy valódi fémpénznék meghamisítása, hamis vagy hamisított fémpénznek kiadása vagy forgalomba hozatala\n\n4.) Hamisitás, utánzás vagy megváltoztatás, vagy a hamisitott, utánzott, vagy megváltoztatott tárgynak forgalomba hozatala, a mi alatt értetnek mindazon buntények, melyek az ausztriai büntető törvények vagy pedig a magyar büntető törvények és gyakorlatok szerint a papirpénz vagy bankjegy vagy más ertékpapir utánzásának vagy meghamisitásának, úgyszintén másnemü, hamis köz- vagy magán okiratok készítésének, vagy a valódiak meghamisitásának, hasonlóképen ily utánzott, harais, vagy hamisitott okiratok szándékos használatának v. forgalombahozatalának büntetteit képezik.\n\nEzen büntettek létezése, a mennyiben a kiadatás Austriából kivántatnék, az ausztriai büntetőtörvénykönyv, a mennyiben pedig Magyarországból kivántatnék, a Magyarországban hatályban levő törvények és gyakorlat szerint állapítandó meg.\n\n5.). Lopás és sikkasztás.\n\n6.) Pénznek vagy egyéb dolgoknak álnok ámitgatasok (csalás) általi szerzése.\n\n7.) Csalárd bukás, mely magában foglalja azon cselekményeket, melyek, ha a kiadatás Ausztriából kivántatnék, az ausztriai büntető törvénykönyv szerint csalást, ha pedig Magyarországból kivántatnék a kiadatás, a magyar törvények szerint hamissággal párosult bukást képeznek.\n\n8.) Kezelők, megbízottak, bankárok, ügynökök, czégvezetők, gyámok gondnokok társulati elöljárók, tagok, vagy hivatalnokok által elkövetett hütlen eljárás, amennyiben ezen hütlenség a fennálló törvények szerint büntetendő cselekményt képez.\n\n9.) Erőszakos nemi közösülés.\n\n10.) Elragadás.\n\n11.) Gyermekrablás, emberrablás és törvénytelen letartóztatás.\n\n12.) Lakházba vagy ahhoz tartozó melléképületbe, büntett elkövetésének szándékával való betörés vagy behatolás akár nappal (\"house-breaking\") akár éjnek idején (\"burglary.\")\n\n13.) Szándékos gyújtogatás.\n\n14.) Rablás, erőszak vagy fenyegetés alkalmazásával.\n\n15.) Zsarolás.\n\n16.) A tengeren levő hajónak szándékos elsülyesztése vagy elpusztitása, ezen büntett elkövetésének kisérlete.\n\n17.) Nyilt tengeren levő hajón létező személyeknek megtámadása, ölési vagy sulyos testi sértési szándékkal.\n\n18.) Tettlegességgel járó ellenszegülés (\"revolt\") a nyilt tengeren levò hajónak vezetője ellen, ha két vagy több személy által követtetik el, úgyszintén ily ellenszegülésre való szövetkezés.\n\n19.) Hamis eskü, és hamis esküre csábítás.\n\n20.) Idegen tulajdon gonosz akaratú megsértése, mennyiben mint büntett üldözendő.\n\nAz elösorolt büntetendő cselekményekben tett előtti vagy utáni részesség miatt, a kiadásnak szintén van helye, ha a részességre mindkét szerződő fél törvényei büntetést állapitanak meg.\n\nMindezen esetekben a kiadásnak az osztrákmagyar államokból csak azon föltétel alatt lesz helye, ha a büntettek, mennyiben Ausztriában követtettek el, az ausztriai büntetö törvénykönyv szerint, ha pedig Magyarországban követtettek volna el, a Magyarországban hatályban levő törvények és gyakorlat szerint büntettet képeznek, Nagybritanniából azonban a kiadatásnak csak azon föltétel alatt lesz helye, ha a büntettek, a mennyiben azok Angolországban vagy az angol hatóság területén követtettek volna el, az 1870 és 1873 évi kiadási törvény értelmében kiadási büntettet képeznének.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-176 - Public Offices & Others - 1876.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 300090, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5]", "page_number": 420, "title": "CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5]", "content_text": "Protection to Magistrate, Gaoler, &c. acting under Warrant.\n\nThis Ordinance\n\nfrom Proclamation of reciprocal Laws of Macao.\n\nORDINANCE No. 13 OF 1870.\n\nHongkong and Macao Extradition.\n\nXVII. If any Action be brought against a Magistrate, Gaoler, Officer of Police, or any other Person for anything done in Obedience to any Warrant or Order issued under the Provisions of this Ordinance, the Proof of such Warrant or Order shall be a sufficient Answer to such Action, and the Defendant or Defendants on such Proof as aforesaid shall be entitled to a Verdict or Judgment in his or their Favor, and shall also be entitled to his or their full Costs of Suit.\n\nXVIII. This Ordinance shall commence and take Effect when to commence and so soon as the Governor shall, by Proclamation in the Gazette, declare that sufficient reciprocal Provision has been made by the Government of Macao for the Apprehension and Surrender to the Government of Hongkong of Offenders escaping to any Place within the Territory of Macao who may be charged with having committed within this Colony, any of the Crimes or Offences in respect of which a Fugitive may be surrendered under this Ordinance.\n\nProvision for\n\nTrial,\n\nXIX. No Fugitive who may be surrendered by the Government of Macao to the Government of Hongkong in pursuance of such reciprocal Provision as aforesaid shall be put upon his Trial or detained within this Colony for any Crime other than the particular Crime for which he may have been surrendered, without having been previously restored or having had an Opportunity of returning to the Colony of Macao.\n\nForms in Second Schedule may be used.\n\nProviso as to Repeal or Suspension of Ordinance, or of any Part thereof.\n\nXX. The Forms given in the Second Schedule to this Ordinance or Forms to the like Effect, with such Variations and Additions as Circumstances require, may be used for the Purposes therein indicated and Instruments in those Forms shall (as regards the Form thereof) be valid and sufficient.\n\nXXI. In Case the Governor in Council shall deem it expedient that this Ordinance or any Part thereof should be repealed or the Operation thereof suspended for any Period, or in Case the Governor of Macao shall notify to the Governor of this Colony his Desire to repeal or suspend for any Period such reciprocal Provision as aforesaid, or any Part thereof, it shall be lawful for the Governor of this Colony by Proclamation in the Gazette to declare that this Ordinance or any Part thereof shall be suspended in its Operation for any Period, or that the same is repealed, and from the Date of the Publication of such Proclamation in the Gazette, the said Ordinance or such Part thereof as may be specified in the Proclamation shall be deemed to be suspended or repealed accordingly.\n\nFIRST SCHEDULE.\n\nLIST OF CRIMES AND OFFENCES.\n\nThe following List of Crimes and Offences is to be construed according to the Law existing in the Colony of Hongkong, at the Date of the alleged Crime or Offence, whether by Common Law or by Imperial Statute or Local Ordinance made before or after the Passing of this Ordinance.\n\nORDINANCE No. 13 OF 1870.\n\nHongkong and Macao Extradition.\n\nMurder, and Attempt and Conspiracy to Murder. Manslaughter.\n\nWounding with Intent to do grievous bodily Harm.\n\nCounterfeiting and altering Money and uttering Counterfeit or altered Money. Forgery, counterfeiting, and altering, and uttering what is forged or counterfeited or altered.\n\nEmbezzlement and Larceny.\n\nUnlawfully receiving stolen Property.\n\nObtaining Money or Goods by false Pretences.\n\nCrimes by Bankrupts against Bankruptcy Law.\n\nFraud by a Bailee, Banker, Agent, Factor, Trustee, or Director, or Member, or Public Officer, of any Company made Criminal by any Law for the Time being in Force.\n\nRape.\n\nAbduction, or Forcible Taking or Detention.\n\nChild Stealing.\n\nBurglary and House-breaking.\n\nArson.\n\nRobbery with Violence.\n\nThreats by Letter or otherwise with Intent to extort.\n\nPiracy by Law of Nations, or Municipal Law.\n\nSinking or destroying a Vessel at Sea, or attempting or conspiring to do so. Assaults on board a Ship on the high Seas with Intent to destroy Life or to do grievous bodily Harm.\n\nRevolt or Conspiracy to revolt by Two or more Persons on board a Ship on the high Seas against the Authority of the Master.\n\nDesertion from the Naval, Military, or Police Forces.\n\nSECOND SCHEDULE.\n\nFORMS.\n\n1.\n\n(Governor's Warrant to Magistrates.)\n\n\"THE HONGKONG AND MACAO EXTRADITION ORDINANCE.\"\n\nBy His Excellency\n\nthis Colony and its Dependencies.\n\nTo .........\n\nGovernor and Commander-in-Chief of\n\nPolice Magistrates.\n\nWhereas Requisition has been duly made to me pursuant to the above Ordinance for the Surrender of one\n\nnow in this Colony charged with having committed the Crime of\n\nwithin the Territory of Macao and with being a Fugitive from Justice.\n\nYou are hereby required to govern yourselves accordingly and to aid in apprehending the said Fugitive and in committing him to Gaol for the Purpose of his being delivered up to Justice according to the Provisions of the said Ordinance and for so doing this shall be your Warrant.\n\nGiven under my Hand and the Public Seal of the Colony, at Victoria, Hongkong, this\n\nDay of\n\n18\n\nL.S.\n\nBy Order,\n\nColonial Secretary.\n\nGovernor, &c.\n\nPage 420\n\nPage 421", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 300294, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8]", "page_number": 35, "title": "CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8]", "content_text": "Most humbly signed Alcminić \n\non the \n\nEumenec Ducetia, lozethin \n\nwill come \n\nF \n\nthe Boles \n\n(on a lepore \n\nreperren to in \n\nAl Memorial. \n\nCILE \n\nI have the hown & R \n\nMy Lord, \n\nfour Cortchips turut Bedient \n\nAnuth Kvant \n\ndavant, \n\nTo His Excellency, \n\nJohn Pope Hennessy, C. M.G, \n\nLieutenant Governor of Hongkong, and its Dependencies. \n\nThe Memorial \n\nof the undersigned Bankers, Merchants, Professional Men, Traders, and other Citizens of Victoria in the Island of Hongkong. \n\n37 \n\nWHEREAS ever since the founding of the Colony its currency has been a matter of serious or great inconvenience. One of the chief causes has been the prevailing habit of the Chinese to chop dollars passing through their hands. This has had its origin in the extensive issue of debased and spurious coins in China, and the consequent anxiety to avoid recourse, it being understood that no shop can be called upon to exchange a coin which it may have paid away, upon which the Hong \"chop\" or stamp is not clearly discernible. The usual practice adopted is to lay the coin upon the stone lintel of the door, or on the street paving stones, and then to strike it with a rough die by a heavy hammer. One \"chop\" is thus sufficient to destroy the symmetry and beauty of the coin; and when some tens, scores, or hundreds of \"chops\" have been added, the identification of either \"chops\" or coins becomes simply impossible. They are reduced to shapeless pieces of mutilated silver. The ideas prevailing elsewhere in favour of a ready recognition of a familiar image and superscription are abandoned, and the work of shroffage or examination of money, for which every one in other countries considers himself qualified, has in this little Island to be relegated to a class of professional shroffs, of whom there are hundreds in this place, and without two or three of whom no staff of any commercial house is deemed to be complete. Serious loss is thus entailed upon those engaged in business, whilst the great difficulty which is constantly experienced in deciding upon the quality of coins leads to incessant feuds between Chinese compradores and shroffs, frequently bringing into collision their employers also. \n\nYour EXCELLENCY is well aware that the best guarantee against forgery and spurious imitation, whether of Bank Notes or Coin, has been found in the popular familiarity based upon simplicity of design and excellence in execution, together with the genuine \"ring\" so easily recognised. This is rendered impossible by the existing system of defacement; whilst, at the same time, the greatest possible inducement is thus offered to fraudulent imitation. \n\nThose of the Signataries, Bankers, Merchants and others, who, on account of the larger volume of their transactions, are compelled to keep a compradore and a staff of shroffs and collectors, are, in some measure, able to defend themselves, but a far larger number of Professional men, Traders, Shopkeepers, and Artisans, besides a very considerable body of Naval, Military, and Civil Servants, are seriously incommoded by the defaced and mutilated currency which is tendered to them. \n\nWHEREAS it was the extreme dissatisfaction arising from the causes above enumerated which led to the establishment of the Hongkong Mint, fifteen years ago, which, but for some trifling errors in its organization and management, might have continued to the present day. \n\nYour MEMORIALISTS are most unwilling to trouble Your Excellency, thus early in your administration, upon a subject of such intricacy, but they cannot allow the Petition of certain Opium Merchants and others claiming that they represent the Chinese community, to pass unnoticed. \n\nYour MEMORIALISTS believe that these men are not entitled to exceptional consideration, and that great injustice would be inflicted, especially upon Bankers, were they compelled to receive the \"chopped” and defaced currency, as at present tendered. Those by whom such coin is paid in to-day, will to-morrow decline to receive it back, demanding that the cheques they bring be paid in notes. It has sometimes happened that the \n\n34 8777 \n\n7", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 300421, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8]", "page_number": 162, "title": "CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8]", "content_text": "159\n\nNo. 92.\n\nGOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION,\n\nThe following Returns relative to Victoria Gaol, during the year 1876, are published for general information.\n\nBy Command,\n\nH. E. WODEHOUSE, Acting Colonial Secretary.\n\nColonial Secretary's Office, Hongkong, 13th April, 1877.\n\nRETURN showing the NUMBER of PRISONERS in VICTORIA GAOL on the last Day of each Week of the Year 1876.\n\n \n \n CHINESE\n EUROPEANS OR COLOURED\n TOTAL\n \n \n WEEKLY. 1876.\n Males.\n Females.\n Males.\n Females.\n Males.\n Females.\n \n \n January\n 2\n 9\n 16\n \n 23\n 30\n \n \n February 6\n 13\n \n 20\n 25\n 27\n 37\n \n \n March\n 5\n 12\n 57\n 19\n \n 26\n 11\n \n \n April\n 2\n $\n 16\n 23\n 30\n \n \n \n May\n 7\n 14\n 12\n 21\n 28\n \n \n \n June\n 11\n \n 18\n +5\n 25\n \n \n \n July 2\n 32\n 340\n 18\n 390\n 302\n 14\n 381\n \n \n 9\n 35\n 339\n 20\n 394\n 11\n 310\n 15\n 388\n \n \n 16\n 36\n 347\n 21\n 404\n 309\n 12\n 383\n \n \n 23\n 39\n 360\n 17\n 416\n 35\n 328\n 18\n 394\n \n \n 30\n 37\n 359\n 19\n 415\n 320\n 12\n 390\n \n \n August 6\n 40\n 357\n 17\n 414\n 309\n 11\n 380\n \n \n 13\n 48\n 347\n 19\n 414\n 15\n 200\n 10\n 347\n \n \n 20\n 35\n 942\n 287\n 10\n 348\n 27\n 36\n 358\n \n \n 27\n 36\n 358\n 302\n 12\n 373\n \n \n \n \n \n September 8\n 40\n 367\n 309\n 14\n 384\n 10\n 44\n 375\n \n \n 17\n 41\n 407\n 314\n 12\n 383\n 24\n 51\n 419\n \n \n 24\n 51\n 419\n 294\n 11\n 367\n \n \n \n \n \n October\n .\n 47\n 441\n 286\n 10\n 359\n 8\n 58\n 458\n \n \n \n 19\n 413\n 19\n 426\n 20\n 439\n 23\n 471\n \n \n \n 25\n 495\n 33\n 621\n 33\n 544\n 305\n 887\n \n \n \n 294\n 379\n 300\n 14\n 338\n 14\n 369\n 40\n \n \n \n 15\n 48\n 469\n 3N\n 545\n 22\n \n 451\n \n \n \n X2\n 531\n 29\n 49\n 468\n 30\n 547\n \n \n \n November ō\n 51\n 460\n 30\n 641\n 346\n 4:3\n \n \n \n \n \n 12\n 53\n 477\n 33\n 563\n :י\n 833\n 899\n \n \n \n 19\n 44\n 473\n 37\n 554\n 14\n 326\n 17\n \n \n \n 26\n 37\n 474\n 26\n 537\n 352\n 414\n \n \n \n December 3\n 35\n 456\n 28\n 519\n 341\n 405\n \n \n \n \n \n 10\n 37\n 439\n 29\n 505\n 1:\n 344\n 398\n \n \n \n 17\n 38\n 410\n 25\n 473\n 341\n 893\n \n \n \n \n 24\n 36\n 403\n $26\n 465\n -\n 31\n 30\n \n \n \n 31\n 30\n 398\n 23\n 451\n \n \n \n \n\nGEO. L. TOMLIN,\n\nVictoria Gaol Office, Hongkong, 3rd February, 1877.\n\nActing Superintendent.\n\nPage 91\n\nRETURN showing the CLASSIFICATION of OFFENCES, for which PRISONERS were confined in VICTORIA GAOL, on the First Day of each Month of the Year 1876.\n\n \n FELONIES.\n \n \n MISDEMEANORS.\n \n \n Murder.\n \n \n Extortion. Bribery, &c.\n \n \n Piracy and Murder,\n \n \n Uttering Trade or Money under False Pretences.\n \n \n Piracy endangering Life with Violence,\n \n \n Unlawful Possession or Receiving Stolen Goods.\n \n \n Piracy, and Confederating with Pirates, &c.\n \n \n Perjury, Suborning Witnesses to commit Perjury,\n \n \n Cutting & Wounding, and Shooting with Intent, or Assault to do Grievous Bodily Harm.\n \n \n Preferring False Charge, Giving Wilful False Testimony.\n \n \n Burglary, and Attempt to commit Burglary.\n \n \n Rogues and Vagabonds, Suspicious Characters, &c.\n \n \n Highway Robbery, Robbery with Violence, and Attempt at such Robbery.\n \n \n Common Assault, Assault with Wounding,\n \n \n Common Larceny. Larceny from a House, from the Person, or from Ships or Vessels in Harbour.\n \n \n Resisting the Police in the Execution of their Duty.\n \n \n Assault with Intent to rob.\n \n \n Liasendust as a Private or Public Servant,\n \n \n Manslaughter.\n \n \n Refusal or Neglect of Duty, &c.\n \n \n Administering Drugs.\n \n \n Desertion from Army or Navy, and other Military Offences.\n \n \n Child Stealing, Kidnapping, &c.\n \n \n Drunk and Incapable, Fighting and Quarrelling, and Disorderly Conduct.\n \n \n Abduction of Females, Forcible Intention, &c.\n \n \n Without Licence or Passes, Obstructing,\n \n \n Sodomy, and Unnatural Offences.\n \n \n Nuisance, Passage,\n \n \n Forgery, Coining or Uttering Counterfeit Coin or Notes.\n \n \n Making Bonfires and Bring Crackers,\n \n \n Threatening to Accuse, and Accusing of a Crime with Intent to Extort Money.\n \n \n Defiling Streams, and Uttering Gross, &c.\n \n \n Other Felonies not shown.\n \n \n Breach of Ordinance with regard to Weights and Measures.\n \n \n \n \n \n Breach of Ordinance for Street Contraventions, and Breach of Harbour Certificate.\n \n \n \n \n \n Gambling.\n \n \n \n \n \n Breach of Brothel Ordinance.\n \n \n \n \n \n Breach of Conditional Pardon,\n \n \n \n \n \n Returning to the Colony after Deportation.\n \n \n \n \n \n Other Offences not shown.\n \n \n Committed for Trial, Remanded from Police Court, Crown Witnesses, and Released on Bail by Order of the Authorities, &c.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Debt.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Total Number on 1st of each Month.\n \n \n \n \n \n\nGEO. L. TOMLIN,\n\nActing Superintendent of Victoria Gaol,", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 300423, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8]", "page_number": 165, "title": "CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8]", "content_text": "# OFFENCES AND NUMBER OF CASES\n\nTHE CASES CONSISTED OF:-\n\nOFFENCE. | NO. OF CASES | NO. OF PRISONERS\n\nAbduction and Sale of Women and female Children | 14 | 28\n\nAbsent from Ship without Leave (see \"Desertion\") | | \n\nAbusive Language (see Breach of the Peace) | | \n\nAccessory after the Fact to Felony (see \"Felony \") | 4 | 7\n\ndo. before do. | | \n\nAccusing of Crime--Conspiracy for (see “Conspiracy”) | | \n\nAiding and Abetting in Felony (see Felony \") | 31 | 46\n\nAlms-soliciting (see \"Mendicancy \") | | \n\nAnimals Cruelty to | * | 3\n\nArms-Chinese not Holders of Night Passes found carrying | 21 | +3\n\nArmy and Navy-Desertion from H. M's (see \"Desertion\") | | \n\nArson, Artificers | | \n\nand Artizans---Misconduct as (see \"Workmen \") | | \n\nAssault--At or in connection with riotous Assemblages, | 47 | 65\n\n-Accompanied with Damage to Property, ... | 1 | 1\n\n-Common, | 162 | 190\n\n-Indecent, * | | \n\n-On Police in the Execution of their Duty, and obstructing and resisting Police, | 55 | 65\n\nWith Intent to rob. | 2 | 2\n\ndo. to commit an unnatural Offence,. | | \n\nWith wounding, ... | 18 | 22\n\nAttempting to commit Felony (see Felony \") | 11 | 11\n\nother Offences, | | \n\nextort by Threats, Menaces, &c., (see Threats, &c.\") | | \n\nbribe Police Constables (see \"Bribery\") | | \n\nAuctioneer Unlicensed, | | \n\nBanishment--Returning after (see also \"Conditional Pardon \"), | | \n\nBankrupt Fraud by, | 2 | 2\n\nBegging (see \"Mendicancy\") | | \n\nBreach of the Offences\") | | \n\nBestiality (see \"Unnatural Offences\") | | \n\nBirds-Breach of Ordinance for Preservation of, | | \n\nBirths and Deaths-Breach of Ordinance for Registration of | 12 | 13\n\nBoats-Larceny in the Harbour on board (see \"Larceny\") | | \n\n-Exposing Night Soil along the Praya in open (see \"Nuisances\") | | \n\n-Obstruction of Wharves by (see \"Obstruction \") | | \n\n-Refusing to pay Tare of... | | \n\n-Unlicensed Plying of,... | 371 | 495\n\nBoarding Houses for Seamen--Unlicensed, | | \n\nBrought forward,......... | 1,237 | 1,479\n\nDeaths and Births--Breach of Ordinance, for, (see \"Births, &c.\") | | \n\nDeportation from Canton to the Colony under H. M.'s Order in Council, 1865,... | | \n\nfrom Japan | | \n\nfrom Shanghai | | \n\nReturning from, (see \"Banishment\") | | \n\nDeported Persons-Harbouring, ... | | \n\nDesertion from Foreign Ships, | 86 | 86\n\nH. M.'s Army and Navy, | | \n\nBritish Merchant Ships.... | 918 | 918\n\nAssisting in the-of Soldiers and Seamen, | | \n\nDestitutes--see Vagrants, under \"Rogues and Vagabonds, &c.\"; | | \n\nDiseased Cattle--Bringing into the Colony, (see \"Unwholesome Provisions\") | | \n\nDisorderly Behaviour,-Accompanied with Damage to Property, | 21 | 21\n\nDrunkenness, Fighting, &., | *** | ***\n\nDistilling--Illicit | | \n\nWasting Water at public Hydrants,... | 11 | 11\n\nDogs-Allowing muzzled ferocious, to be at large, &c., | | \n\nStealing, | 77 | 77\n\nDomestic Servants-Misconduct as, | L | 1\n\nDredging in the Harbour at Anchorage for Ships of War, (see \"Harbour \") | | \n\nDriving furiously-see\" Furious driving \") | | \n\nDrags-Administering, | it | 1\n\nDrunkenness(see Disorderly Behaviour) | + | +\n\nDucks-Selling in the Streets, (see Breach of Markets Ord.\") | | \n\nDust Bins-Neglecting to clear out, (see \"Nuisances \") | | \n\n(see Nuisances \") | 12 | 15\n\nDwelling | | \n\nHouses Found by Night with Dangerous and Offensive Weapons with Intent to break into, (see \"Night\") | | \n\nFound by Night in with Intent to commit Felony, (see Night\"> | 31 | 32\n\n-Larceny in a (see\" Larceny \") | 347 | 351\n\nEarth-Cutting from prohibited Places, [see \"Trespass on Crown Land\"] | | \n\nEmbezzlement, | 23 | 23\n\nEmbracery, | | \n\nEnclosed Places and Gardens-Larceny of Vegetables and Fruits from, [see \"Larceny\") | | \n\nEncroachment on Crown Land, [see \"Trespass \"J. | | \n\nEscape of Prisoners from Gaol, | 10 | 10\n\nfrom Custody of Police, | 2 | 2\n\nNegligently allowing..... | *** | ***\n\nEvidence Giving wilful false, see \"False Charge, &c.\") | | \n\nExplosive Substances--Breach of Ordinance for Storage of, | | \n\nExtortion by Colour of Office, | 4 | 4\n\nby Menaces, | * | *\n\nby Threats, [see Threats. | | \n\nFalse Charge-Preferring or giving wilful false Evidence, ... | 4 | 4\n\nImprisonment, | J | 1\n\nPretences-obtaining Goods and Money by,... | | \n\nStatements-Seamen presenting false Characters and making, [see \"Seamen \") | | \n\nTrade Marks and Labels--Fraudulently using, (see \"Trade Marks\") | | \n\nFelony-Accessory before the Fact to, | | \n\nAiding and abetting in........ | | \n\nCarried forward.... | 3,441 | 4,521\n\nHouse Setting Fire to, (see \"Arson\") | | \n\nUncooled Coolie Lodging, (see \"Unlicensed \") | | \n\nSeamen's Boarding, (see “Unlicensed \") | | \n\nHydrant-Wasting Water at public, (see \"Disorderly Contact\") | | \n\nInciting a Person to commit a Misdemeanor, (see \"Misdemeanor\") | | \n\nIndecent Assaults, [see \"Assault\"} | | \n\nIndecent Exposure of Person by Bathing or otherwise, and Lewdness, | *** | ***\n\nInquests-Jurors disobeying Coroner's Summonses for Attendance at, [see \"Jurors *1. | | \n\nJapan-Deportation to this Colony from [see \"Deportation\"] | | \n\nJuror Neglecting to answer Coroner's Summons to attend Inquests,..... | | \n\nKidnapping, (see Child Stealing\" \"Abduction and Sale of Women and Female Children | | \n\nLabels and Trade Marks-Fraudulently using false, [see Trade marks, .\"] | | \n\nLarceny Cattle, [see Cattle Stealing\". | | \n\nChildren, [see Child Stealing\"], | | \n\n--Dogs, [see \"Dog Stealing \") | | \n\n-Common in | | \n\n-from Ships or Boats in the Harbour, | 32 | 32\n\n-from the Person, | 445 | 481\n\n-from Wreck,... | | \n\n-in a Dwelling House, | | \n\nof Vegetables and Fruits from Gardens and enclosed Places | 142 | 142\n\nLewdness, (see Indecent Exposure, &c.\") | | \n\nLibel, | 1 | 1\n\nLights-Chinese not carrying at Night, | | \n\nLodging Houses, unlicensed coolie, | | \n\nMails-Detention of H.M's, [see Post Office | | \n\nMalicious Injury to Property, ... | 12 | 12\n\nManslaughter.... | 3 | 3\n\nMine Store Dealers-Breach of Ordinance for, | | \n\nMarkets Ordinance-Breach of, ... | | \n\nMendicancy, | 2 | 3\n\nMendicants--Bringing into Colony, | | \n\nShip-of-War Anchorage--Dredging at, see Harbour | | \n\nMerchant Seamen-Desertion of (see Desertion \"]. | | \n\n-Refusal of Duty by British, [see Seamen,\" | | \n\nMilitary Law-Breach of, | | \n\nMisdemeanor Attempting to commit, | | \n\nInciting a Person to cominit ... | | \n\nMoney Changer--Unlicensed, | | \n\nMurder, | 7 | 7\n\nPiracy with, (see Piracy\") | | \n\nNight-being out without Lights at, (see \"Light\") | | \n\nCarried forward,... | 7,811 | 9,068\n\nPrisoners Negligently allowing the Escape of, (see Escape\") | | \n\n-Rescuing from Custody of Police, (see \"Police\") | | \n\nProvisions--Exposing for Sale or bringing into the Colony unwholesome. (see \"Unwholesome Provisions, &c.\") | | \n\nPublic Ways-flinging wet Clothes, &c., to dry over, (see \"Nuisances, &c.\") | 21 | 25\n\n-Obstruction of, (see \"Obstruction \") | | \n\nQuarantine Regulations-Breach of, | 17 | 17\n\nRape, | 2 | 2\n\nReceiving Stolen Goods, ... | 39 | 39\n\nRecognizances Breach of, ... | 11 | 11\n\nRegimental Clothes, &c., Purchasing or receiving, (see “Military Law | | \n\nRegistration of Births and Deaths-Breach of Ordinance for (see Births and Deaths\") | | \n\nfor, (see \"House\") | | \n\nReligious Ceremonies-Chinese carrying on without Authority, | | \n\nRendition of Chinese, (see Crimes, &c.\") | | \n\nRescuing Prisoners from Custody of Police, (see Police \") | | \n\nResisting Police-Assaulting, obstructing, or (see \"Police, &c.\") | | \n\nRiotous Assemblages, | *** | ***\n\nin connection Assault at, or in | | \n\nRegistration of Householders and Servants-Breach of Ordinance (see \"House\") | | \n\nwith, | 22 | 25\n\nRobbery from the Person, | 427 | 449\n\nOn the Highways with Arms or with Violence.... | 1 | 2\n\nRogues and Vagabonds--As Street Gamblers and Watchmen to Gamblers | | \n\nAs suspicious Characters... | | \n\nAs Vagrants (Europeans and Indians), | | \n\nRubbish and Filth-Allowing Accumulation in House, or immediate Vicinity thereof, of, (see “Nuisances\") | | \n\nRubbish and Filth-Throwing into the Streets, (see \"Nuisances\") | | \n\nRubbish and Filth-Trowing into the Harbour or on the Beach, (see \"Nuisances\") | | \n\nSaflors-Assisting in the Desertion of, (see \"Desertion \") | | \n\nSemmer-Harbouring deserted, | | \n\nRoads and Streets-Obstruction of, (see \"Obstruction, &c.” | | \n\nlibbery Assault with intent to commit (see “Assault, &e.”) | | \n\nwith Wounding, | 5 | 5\n\n-Desertion of Merchant, (see \"Desertion.\") | | \n\nRefusal of Duty by British Merchant, | 16 | 16\n\nSeamen's Boarding House, unlicensed, | | \n\nEffects, Dabution of | | \n\naking false Statement as to Ships in which they served, and presenting false Characters, | 5 | 5\n\nServants Breach of Ordinance for Registration of Householders and, (see House | | \n\n-Found at, armed with Dangerous and offensive Weapons, with intent to break into Dwelling Houses, f | | \n\n-Found in Dwelling Houses by-with intent to commit | | \n\ntherein,... | 2 | 2\n\nServants--Misconduct as Domestic, (see Domestic Servants | | \n\nShip or Boat in the Harbour- Larceny on board, (see “Larceny\",)] | | \n\nShooting with Intent to Murder, ... | € | 1\n\nFelony | | \n\ntherein,... | | \n\nNoises by | | \n\nStopkeepers-Obstruction of Roads by, (see \"Obstruction\") | | \n\nSoldiers-Assisting in the Desertion of, (see\" Desertion\") | | \n\nSpirituous and fermented Liquors--Breach of Ordinance for | 55 | 55\n\nRetail of | 1 | 1\n\nStamp Ordinance-Breach of | | \n\nStealing Cattle, [see Cattle Stealing. | | \n\nChildren, Case Child Stealing \"]. | 10 | 10\n\nplaying at the Game called “Chai-Mui”. | 24 | 34\n\nWatchmen, | | \n\nPasses-being out without, (see\" Passes \") | | \n\n-Chinese carrying Arms, not being Holders of Night | | \n\n(see \"Arms\") | | \n\nNuisances--Allowing Dirt and Filth to remain on Premises or | 14 | 14\n\nBreach of Ordinance for Cargo (see Cargo Boats\") | | \n\nBodily Injuries Cutting and wounding and inflicting (see “Cal-ting, &c) | | \n\nBonfires-Firing Crackers or making, | 847 | 847\n\nBribery,....... | 4 | 4\n\nBritish Merchant Seamen-Refusal of Duty by (see Seamen \") | | \n\nBrothels-Unlicensed (see\" Contagious Diseases Ordinance\") | | \n\nBuggery (see Unnatural Offences\") | | \n\nBuildings Breach of Ordinance for, | A | 3\n\nBurglary. | 10 | 10\n\nBurial of Chinese elsewhere than in a Cemetery,... | 1 | \"1\"\n\nCargo Boats-Breach of Ordinance for, | 3 | 11\n\nCattle-Bringing into the Colony diseased (see Unwholesome Provisions\") | | \n\n-Turned loose on Public Ways, | 54 | 54\n\nStealing, | 2 | 2\n\nChairs and Vehicles-Breach of Ordinance for Street, | 190 | 190\n\nChair Coolies-Obstruction of Public Ways by (see \"Obstruction\") | | \n\nChair Hire--Refusing to pay Vehicle or (see Chairs and Vehicles\") | | \n\nAttempting to commit, | | \n\n-Conspiracy | | \n\n\" | | \n\ncommit. [see \"Night, &c.\") | | \n\nFighting, [see\" Disorderly Behaviour \"1. | | \n\nIsee Conspiracy \"3. | | \n\na Cemetery (\"see Burial\") | | \n\nFire Arms-Discharging, | | \n\nFish-Selling in the Streets, [see Breach of Markets Ord.\") | | \n\nForgery,***** | | \n\nForcible Entry,... | | \n\nFowls-Selling in the Streets (see \"Breach of Markets Ord.\") | | \n\nFraud by Bankrupt (see \"Bankrupt\") | | \n\nConspiracy to commit (see Conspiracy\") | | \n\nof (see Furious | | \n\nChai Mai--Night Noises by playing at the Game called (see \"Night\") | | \n\nChild Stealing. | | \n\nChinese--Burial of. elsewhere than in | | \n\nBurial) | | \n\n-uot Holders of Night Passes found carrying Arm (see \"Arms\") | | \n\n-Offenders found in the Colony after Banishment under Ordinance 9 of 1857 and in Branch of Conditional Pardon under Ordinance i of 1860, (see \"Banishment and Conditional Pardoa\") | | \n\nChinese Passengers' Act, 1855. Breach of | | \n\nChinese Territory-Crimes and Offences écnumitted in, | | \n\nClothes-Hanging to dry over Public Ways, wet, (see \"Nuisances\") | | \n\n-Purchasing or Receiving Regimental (see \"Military Law\") | | \n\nCoin-Offences relating ta, ... | | \n\nCommon Assault, (see \"Assault\") | | \n\nLarceny, (see Larceny\"} | | \n\nConditional Pardon-Breach of | | \n\nConfederating with Pirates, free Piracy\") | | \n\nConspiracy to accuse of Crime, | 11 | 11\n\nto commit Felony, | 19 | 32\n\nto defraud, | 7 | 7\n\nF | | \n\nFruits and Vegetables in Gardens and enclosed Places--Larceny of | | \n\nGambling\" | | \n\nof Ordinance for Suppression of, | 2 | 2\n\nin the Streets, treated as Obstruction of Public Ways, | 152 | 248\n\nBegistered Householder permitting, in a House (see \"Householder, &c.\") | | \n\nof Ordinance | | \n\nfor, | | \n\nGaol-Breach | | \n\nfor, | | \n\nGardens and enclosed Places-Larceny of Vegetables and Fruits from (see \"Larceny \") | | \n\nGunpowder-Breach of Ordinance for Storage of, | | \n\nHarbour and Coasts Ordinance-Brezok of, | 21 | 21\n\nDredging at Anchorage for Ships of War in the,... | | \n\nLarceny on board Boat or Ship in the (see \"Larceny \") | | \n\nRegulations Breach of, | 11 | 11\n\n** Throwing Rubbish on the Beach or into the (see \"Ruisances\") | | \n\nHawkers calling out in the Sale of their Wares (see \"Street | 684 | 684\n\nDogs, see Dog Stealing \"1. | | \n\nin immediate Vicinity thereof, ... | | \n\nStolen Good-Receiving, Isee\" Receiving, &c.\"] | 27 | 27\n\n-Exposing Night Soil in the Streets in uncovered Buckets and in open Boats, | 20 | 20\n\nStones and other Missiles--Discharging to Damage of Persons | 10 | 10\n\nor Property. | 4 | 4\n\n-Hanging wet Clothes, &c., to dry over Public Ways | | \n\nPigs without a Licence, | 49 | #49\n\nStragglers from British and Foreign Ships (see * Desertion\") | 25 | 20\n\nCoolies and Shopkeepers, ... | | \n\ngerous | 15 | 15\n\nWeapons Found at Night with Dangerous and | | \n\nBearing Possession of, (see Weapons \").... | | \n\npared, | | \n\n--- Rubbish, &, into the Streets.... | | \n\nCalls of Nature in the Streets, | | \n\nDust Bins,... | | \n\nE Kablish into the Harbour or on the Beach, | | \n\nObscene Pictures, exposing for Sale, | | \n\nObstruction or Resisting Police, (see \"Police \" | | \n\nof Bonds and Streets, &c., by Hawkers, Chair | | \n\nof Wharves by Boat People,... | | \n\nOffensive Trades-Carrying on Dangerous and (see \"Dangerous and Offensive Trades\") | | \n\nwith Intent to break into a Dwelling House (see \"Night\"), | | \n\nOpium-Breach of Ordinance for Preparation and Sale of pre-pared, | | \n\nPassengers Act of 1855--Breach of Chinese, (see \"Chinese, &e.\" | | \n\nPasses-Chinese carrying Arms, not being Holders of Night, (see\" Arms\") | | \n\nChinese out at Night withunt.... | | \n\nPawning--Ilegally, | | \n\nPawnbrokers---Breach of Ordinance for, | T- | 1\n\nPerjury (see also Preferring false charge and giving wilful false Testimony\") | | \n\neglecting to clean out Dust Bins, and throwing i | 118 | 118\n\n118 | 118 | 37 | 37\n\n87 | 87 | 10 | 10\n\n82 | 82 | 1 | 1\n\n788 | 738 | ŠU | 50\n\n>1 | | | \n\nStremas Defiling, ... | | \n\nStreet Chairs and Vehicles-Breach of Ordinance for, [see \"Chairs and Vehicles\") | | \n\nObstraction of itoads and, see \"Obstruction\"] | | \n\nGamblers and Watchnen to Gamblers, [see Rogues and Vagabonds\"] | | \n\nStreet Gambling, treated as Obstruction of Pablie Ways, Lee Gambling \"1 | | \n\nby Hawkers, t | | \n\nStreet Noises by | | \n\nSuspicions Charreters, see Rogues and Vagabonis \"]. | | \n\nTheats--Attempting to extort by Menaces, itd... | | \n\nof Violence to the P'erson, *** | | \n\nwith Intent to extor! Money, | | \n\nTrade Marks and Labels-Fraudulently using falur, | 12 | 12\n\nTrees, &c.—Cutting and destroying. | 248 | 190\n\n--Unlawful Possession of Shrabs, R., see Unlaw-ful Possession 1 | | \n\n18 | 18 | | | \n\nTurf-Cutting from Crown Land without Permit. [see \"Tres-pass on Crown Land \"3. | | \n\nTrespass on Crown Lead, | 94 | 9.1\n\nUnifiem, &c.Soldiers disposing of, [see \"Alitary Law \"1 | | \n\nUnlawful Possession of Poperty, | 28# | 9900\n\n291 | 791 | | | \n\nof Trees, Shrubs, Acc., | 71 | 71\n\n10 | 11 | | | \n\nFnatural Offence, | | \n\nAssault with Intent to commit an, [see | | \n\nAssaults\") | | \n\nUnwholesome Provisions-Exposing for Sale or bringing into) the Colony,... | 26 | 36\n\n17 | 2 | | | \n\nVehicles and Chairs Breach of Ordinaree for, [see-Chies, &c.\" | | \n\nWatelinen to Gunblers, Lee hogues and Vagabonds \"2. | | \n\nMisconduct as Private, | 12 | 12\n\n11 | 34 | | | \n\nConstables of Police Assuait, &c., on, (see Assaults\") | | \n\nAssuming name & Designation of (see \"Police\" | | \n\nAttempt to bribe (see \"Bribery\"}, | | \n\nMisconduct as (see \"Police\") | | \n\nContagious Diseases Ordinance-Offences against. ... | | \n\nContempt of Court, | | \n\nCoolie Lodging Houses-Unlicensed (see \"Unlicensed. &c.\"), | | \n\nCoroner's Sntamouses to attend Inquests-Disobedience of by Juror, [see Jurors \"1. | | \n\nCrackers--Making Bonfires or Firing, see Bonfires, &c.\"] | | \n\nCrime--Conspiracy to accuse of, see \"Conspiracy\") | | \n\nCrimes and Offences committed in Chinese Territory [Sce \"Chinese”) | | \n\nCrown Land--Trespass c, [sco Trespass \") | | \n\nCruelty to Animals, see \"Arimals\") | | \n\nCutting and Wounding with intent, &c., | 16 | 41\n\nDamage to Property-reec\" Malicious Injuries\") | | \n\nDangerous and offensive Trades,-Carrying on, | 6 | B\n\nNeises\") | | \n\nObstruction of Public Ways by (see \"Obstruction\"), | | \n\nHawkers-Unlicensed, ... | | \n\nPies-Unlicensed Keeping of, (see \"Nuisances, &c.\") | | \n\nPiracy, | 722 | 722\n\nConfederating with Firates, | | \n\nHouse Breaking, | 4 | 4\n\nHouseholder. Registered, permitting Gambling in a House (see \"Gambling\"), | 37 | 7\n\nHouseholders and Servants-Breach of Ordinance for Registra-tion of,... | | \n\nHouse-Larceny in a (see \"Larceny \") | | \n\n-Registered Householder permitting Gambling in a (sec \"Gambling\"); | | \n\n-Found by Night in a-with Intent to commit Felony therein (see Night\") | | \n\nHouse--Found by Night with Daugerous and Offensive Weapons with Intent to break into a Dwelling (see \"Night, &c.\") | | \n\nWeapons--Found by Night with, with Intent to break into a Dwelling House (see Night) | | \n\nCarried forward.... | 7,811 | 9,068\n\n• One Prisoner was convicted of three separate Offences, and was sentenced separately for each,\n\nCarried forward.... | L | 3,441 | 4,521\n\nPiracy, with Murder, | | | \n\nPlacards-Posting. | | | \n\nPolice-Assaulting, obstracting or resisting, (see \"asnault\") | 19 | 19\n\nAssuming Name, Designation, &n, of Constable of, | 3 | 3\n\n-Escape of Prisoners from Custody of (see \"Escape, &e=”) | | | \n\n-Rescuing Prisoners from Custody of, | | | \n\nPolice Constables-Bribery, or attempting to bribe, (see “Bri-bery, &\") | | | \n\nMisconduct as,.**. | | | \n\nPosting Bills on Walls, &c., (see Placards\") | | | \n\nPost Office-Breach of Ordinance for, | | | \n\nPoultry--Selling in the Streets, (see \"Breach of Markets Ordi-hance\") | | | \n\nPreservation of Birds-Breach of Ordinance for, (see \"Birds, &c.\") | | | \n\nPrisoners-Escape from Custody of Police of, (see Escapo \") | | | \n\nGaol of, (see Escape\") | | | \n\nCarried forward,.. | 7,811 | 9,068\n\nMagistracy, Hongkong, 19th February, 1877.\n\nfree Night \"1. | | | \n\nNight Noises by, (see | | | \n\nWeapons--Found by Night with dangerous and offensive, with Intent to break into Dwelling Ifenses, Esco Night \"3. | | | \n\nWeapons-Having Passession of dangerous aut fensive, | | | \n\nWeights and Measures-Breach of Odinauce for, | | | \n\nWitnesses -Intimidating, see \"Einbracery \"). | | | \n\n* | | | \n\n12 | 12 | 3 | 3\n\n૩ | | | \n\n-Orderni to give Security for Appearance.... | | | \n\nBeat People of, see Obstruction\") | | | \n\nWharves-Ostuction by | | | \n\nWork:en-latinailating.... | | | \n\nMiscondnet as,... | | | \n\nWounding-Assault with, (see Assault \") | | | \n\n1+ | | | \n\n-Cutting and inflicting bodily injuries, (see \"Cut-ting. Scc.\") | | | \n\nWounding Robbery from the Person with, (see \"Robbery \") | | | \n\nWreck-Larceny from, (seo Larceny \") | | | \n\n7,811 | 9,068 | | | \n\nTOTAL... | # | 9,108 | 10,426\n\n+ Some of the Prisoners in these cases were also convicted of mulieansed Hawking.\n\nC. MAY, 1st Police Magistrate.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 300515, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8]", "page_number": 257, "title": "CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8]", "content_text": "48\n\n254\n\nTubular Summary of lease relating to Wham hape lee alias Whan tim king.\n\nof the\n\n(signed) le many\n\n19-Police Magistrate.\n\nNo\n\nAnte\n\nCos\n\ngiven by purchaser to officer of Crown - Name\n\nAge\n\nOffense\n\nMagistrate\n\nNative place\n\nOf conviction\n\n \n 67969\n Nov 1876\n lehan hap lee\n Jenien\n Under what Statute\n 15. Savor Perlie\n Jarceny from\n from one of J. Aufeel\n three month hand labor and\n \n \n 4489\n 16 July 1875.\n Chantins ling\n 21\n 239\n 34 Jonny, 1876.\n When dine ling\n \n \n \n \n 8121\n 19 May 1874\n lahan tin lami\n 22.\n \n \n D:\n A. Whantar\n forgery from free on of\n \n \n \n \n Kuiper den...\n Dr. Racher\n Reported chief following tay\n adamevi Anik\n finlent Flick\n Minier whipped on breach\n \n \n \n 19.\n Shokes back J\n \n \n Five months had laber and;\n whipped bach\n 244\n thother There\n worth hand labing\n \n \n D.\n Sevant\n Inveeny from person of\n lekiray\n Iwelve months hand labor and\n \n an Kinopreme.\n \n \n \n\nwww.\n\nlesion\n\nRupert serie flagged on brach ti\n\nstrokes each time ale corridered as incorrigible thing to be hungernes to the preare + good order of the ledlary, ordered at exeprivation of aentire to find Jemity\n\n2. Burchelden 42: each libe foriticoring within 12 monti to umuw\n\nchange\n\n༧ --མིན་ཆིན་ཐག་་་་\n\nany\n\ncan labe submitted to the the hivene\n\nfront view to deprcitation under the forcessions\n\nSection 7 of 4. Neg of 1887 and Suelen.\n\nf\n\nAnd\n\n88", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 302215, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-181 - Governor Hennessy - 1878 [1-8]", "page_number": 376, "title": "CO129-181 - Governor Hennessy - 1878 [1-8]", "content_text": "# 11532 \n748 \n373 \n\nI am bound to assume, when a sentence is submitted to me for my decision that the Judge's report and notes of evidence are so far complete that all the evidence which could be adduced in favour of the accused had been so adduced before sentence was passed. That it was not so in this case appears to be due to the fact that the strongly expressed opinion of the Chief Justice of the Colony was set aside.\n\nMeffancary. Gevemos.\n\n## TRIAL OF PERSONS ACCUSED OF MURDER.\n### MINUTE BY HIS EXCELLENCY THE GOVERNOR.\n\n1. In connection with the trial last year of two Europeans accused of murder, when the Court assigned both Counsel and Attorney for the defence and ample time was given to the Solicitor to prepare the case, the Chief Justice, Sir JOHN SMALE, addressed the following letter to the Acting Colonial Secretary:- \n\n**THE SUPREME COURT, HONGKONG, September 12th, 1877**\n\n\"SIR, I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your Letter No. 660, of the 6th instant, in which you refer to a resolution of the Executive Council of the 30th November, 1872, authorising a fee of $25 to be paid to Counsel for defending prisoners in certain cases; and by direction of His Excellency the Governor, you ask my opinion as to the advisability of allowing a refresher where a case lasts for more than one day, and my views on the subject.\n\n\"The question raises various, and as I think, serious considerations.\n\n\"In the semi-barbarous ages of our Criminal Law, no accused man was allowed Counsel, whilst prosecutions were conducted with the utmost ingenuity and learning. The State trials, too often most disgraceful, are specimens of what was universal at every Assizes when even sheep stealing and forgery were capital offences, down even to within my memory.\n\n\"But by statute, persons charged as felons were allowed to be defended by Counsel, a boon to the rich who could pay a fee, a mockery to the poor man who could not. Then the Judge, actuated by mercy or love of ease, asked Counsel to defend pauper prisoners, and as no fund was provided, it was done willingly without fee.\n\n\"According to the assertion of Lord ERSKINE, assented to by Lord ELDON, it is a universal truth that the elucidation of innocence is as much the obligation on Courts of Justice as the conviction of guilt. It seems to me to be equally an obligation on the State. This axiom, for such I hold it, raises a question as to every accused man (whose position, the Law holds, until verdict, to be his misfortune not his crime), whether in every case as much care should or should not be taken of the defence as of the prosecution,-a question you do not put. The question in your letter is confined to cases where murder is charged.\n\n\"In 1865-1866 the dangers of miscarriage of Justice on trials for murder, with instances of such miscarriage, and the execution of innocent persons, were brought before the Royal Commission on Capital Punishments by several witnesses, of whom Sir FITZROY KELLY, now Chief Baron of the Exchequer, was among the most earnest.\n\n\"The twelve Commissioners made their Report in 1866, agreeing to forbear to enter into the question: but 5 of the 12 resolved that capital punishment might, safely, and with advantage to the community, be at once abolished.\n\n\"I refer to this, the result of public opinion, not to advocate the abolition of capital punishment here, which would be highly improper, but as a foundation for urging that the State here should, on such awful occasions, use the like effort for the elucidation of innocence, as it puts forth, through the leading Counsel and Attorney in the Colony, to prove guilt; for the Judge to attempt to do so on the trial greatly endangers his equal balance of impartiality. The elucidation of innocence can be effectually attained only by the assigning Counsel and Solicitor for the prisoner, with ample discretion to them. Fortunately, these trials are rare, but when any occasion arises, it is unseemly for the Judge to put himself under obligation to Counsel and Attorney, whilst, it seems to me to be the duty of the State to secure an efficient defence, and it should pay for it by a proper fee, and, in protracted cases, not by way of \"refresher,\" but upon a due taxation by the Registrar, of work actually done, subject, as that always is, to the final decision of the Judges, who alone can, even approximately, know what work has been done in each case, and who act on a serious responsibility.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-181 - Governor Hennessy - 1878 [1-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 302217, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-181 - Governor Hennessy - 1878 [1-8]", "page_number": 378, "title": "CO129-181 - Governor Hennessy - 1878 [1-8]", "content_text": "# TRIAL OF PERSONS ACCUSED OF MURDER, MINUTE BY HIS EXCELLENCY THE GOVERNOR.\n\n1. In connection with the trial last year of two Europeans accused of murder, when the Court assigned both Counsel and Attorney for the defence and ample time was given to the Solicitor to prepare the case, the Chief Justice, Sir JOHN SMALE, addressed the following letter to the Acting Colonial Secretary:---\n\n## \"THE SUPREME COURT, Hongkong, September 12th, 1877.\n\n64\n\n\"SIR, I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your Letter No. 660, of the 6th instant, in which you refer to a resolution of the Executive Council of the 30th November, 1872, authorising a fee of $25 to be paid to Counsel for defending prisoners in certain cases; and by direction of His Excellency the Governor, you ask my opinion as to the advisability of allowing a refresher where a case lasts for more than one day, and my views on the subject.\n\n\"The question raises various, and as I think, serious considerations.\n\n\"In the semi-barbarous ages of our Criminal Law, no accused man was allowed Counsel, whilst prosecutions were conducted with the utmost ingenuity and learning. The State trials, too often most disgraceful, are specimens of what was universal at every Assizes when even sheep stealing and forgery were capital offences, down even to within my memory.\n\n\"But by statute, persons charged as felons were allowed to be defended by Counsel, a boon to the rich who could pay a fee, a mockery to the poor man who could not.\n\n\"Then the Judge, actuated by mercy or love of ease, asked Counsel to defend pauper prisoners, and as no fund was provided, it was done willingly without fee.\n\n\"According to the assertion of Lord ERSKINE, assented to by Lord ELDON, it is a universal truth that the elucidation of innocence is as much the obligation on Courts of Justice as the conviction of guilt. It seems to me to be equally an obligation on the State. This axiom, for such I hold it, raises a question as to every accused man (whose position, the Law holds, until verdict, to be his misfortune but his crime), whether in every case as much care should or should not be taken of the defence as of the prosecution, a question you do not put. The question in your letter is confined to cases where murder is charged.\n\n\"In 1865-1866 the dangers of miscarriage of Justice on trials for murder, with instances of such miscarriage, and the execution of innocent persons, were brought before the Royal Commission on Capital Punishments by several witnesses, of whom Sir FITZROY KELLY, now Chief Baron of the Exchequer, was among the most earnest.\n\n\"The twelve Commissioners made their Report in 1866, agreeing to forbear to enter into the question: but 5 of the 12 resolved that capital punishment might, safely, and with advantage to the community, be at once abolished.\n\n\"I refer to this, the result of public opinion, not to advocate the abolition of capital punishment here, which would be highly improper, but as a foundation for urging that the State here should, on such awful occasions, use the like effort for the elucidation of innocence, as it puts forth, through the leading Counsel and Attorney in the Colony, to prove guilt; for the Judge to attempt to do so on the trial greatly endangers his equal balance of impartiality. The elucidation of innocence can be effectually attained only by the assigning Counsel and Solicitor for the prisoner, with ample discretion to them. Fortunately, these trials are rare, but when any occasion arises, it is unseemly for the Judge to put himself under obligation to Counsel and Attorney, whilst, it seems to me to be the duty of the State to secure an efficient defence, and it should pay for it by a proper fee, and, in protracted cases, not by a 'refresher,' but upon a due taxation by the Registrar, of work actually done, subject, as that always is, to the final decision of the Judges, who alone can, even approximately, know what work has been done in each case, and who act on a serious responsibility.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-181 - Governor Hennessy - 1878 [1-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 302232, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-181 - Governor Hennessy - 1878 [1-8]", "page_number": 393, "title": "CO129-181 - Governor Hennessy - 1878 [1-8]", "content_text": "44633 \n389 \nand I regret that he should have \"thought it necessary\" - again my sick, expressed privately; and \"Officially to trouble you with this \nCorrespondence \n\nI have the honor to be. \nSir \nYour most Obedient humble Servant \nHeffernery. \n\n## TRIAL OF PERSONS ACCUSED OF MURDER. \n### MINUTE BY HIS EXCELLENCY THE GOVERNOR. \n\n1. In connection with the trial last year of two Europeans accused of murder, when the Court assigned both Counsel and Attorney for the defence and ample time was given to the Solicitor to prepare the case, the Chief Justice, Sir JOHN SMALE, addressed the following letter to the Acting Colonial Secretary:- \n\n## THE SUPREME COURT, HONGKONG, \n### September 12th, 1877. \n\n\"SIR,-I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your Letter No. 660, of the 6th instant, in which you refer to a resolution of the Executive Council of the 30th November, 1872, authorising a fee of $25 to be paid to Counsel for defending prisoners in certain cases; and by direction of His Excellency the Governor, you ask my opinion as to the advisability of allowing a refresher where a case lasts for more than one day, and my views on the subject. \n\n\"The question raises various, and as I think, serious considerations, \n\n\"In the semi-barbarous ages of our Criminal Law, no accused man was allowed Counsel, whilst prosecutions were conducted with the utmost ingenuity and learning. The State trials, too often most disgraceful, are specimens of what was universal at every Assizes when even sheep stealing and forgery were capital offences, down even to within my memory. \n\n\"But by statute, persons charged as felons were allowed to be defended by Counsel, a boon to the rich who could pay a fee, a mockery to the poor man who could not. \n\n\"Then the Judge, actuated by mercy or love of ease, asked Counsel to defend pauper prisoners, and as no fund was provided, it was done willingly without fee. \n\n\"According to the assertion of Lord ERSKINE, assented to by Lord ELDON, it is a universal truth that the elucidation of innocence is as much the obligation on Courts of Justice as the conviction of guilt. It seems to me to be equally an obligation on the State. This axiom, for such I hold it, raises a question as to every accused man (whose position, the Law holds, until verdict, to be his misfortune not his crime), whether in every case as much care should or should not be taken of the defence as of the prosecution, a question you do not put. The question in your letter is confined to cases where murder is charged. \n\n\"In 1865-1866 the dangers of miscarriage of Justice on trials for murder, with instances of such miscarriage, and the execution of innocent persons, were brought before the Royal Commission on Capital Punishments by several witnesses, of whom Sir FITZROY KELLY, now Chief Baron of the Exchequer, was among the most earnest. \n\n\"The twelve Commissioners made their Report in 1866, agreeing to forbear to enter into the question; but 5 of the 12 resolved that capital punishment might, safely, and with advantage to the community, be at once abolished. \n\n\"I refer to this, the result of public opinion, not to advocate the abolition of capital punishment here, which would be highly improper, but as a foundation for urging that the State here should, on such awful occasions, use the like effort for the elucidation of innocence, as it puts forth, through the leading Counsel and Attorney in the Colony, to prove guilt; for the Judge to attempt to do so on the trial greatly endangers his equal balance of impartiality. The elucidation of innocence can be effectually attained only by the assigning Counsel and Solicitor for the prisoner, with ample discretion to them. Fortunately, these trials are rare, but when any occasion arises, it is unseemly for the Judge to put himself under obligation to Counsel and Attorney, whilst, it seems to me to be the duty of the State to secure an efficient defence, and it should pay for it by a proper fee, and, in protracted cases, not by way of \"refresher,\" but upon a due taxation by the Registrar, of work actually done, subject, as that always is, to the final decision of the Judges, who alone can, even approximately, know what work has been done in each case, and who act on a serious responsibility.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-181 - Governor Hennessy - 1878 [1-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 305906, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-188 - Governor Hennessy - 1880 [5-6]", "page_number": 128, "title": "CO129-188 - Governor Hennessy - 1880 [5-6]", "content_text": "## OFFENCE\nBrought forward,. \nFelony-Accessory before the Fact to, \n-Aiding and abetting in \n--Attempting to commit, \n-Conspiracy \n(see \"Conspiracy\"). \n-Found by Night in Dwelling Houses with Intent to commit, (see \"Night\"). \n--Inciting a person to commit.... \nFence, Live or Dead-Larceny of (see \"Larceny\"). \nFerocious Dogs---Allowing unmuzzled, to be at large, (see \"Dogs\"). \nFighting, (see \"Disorderly Behaviour\"). \nFilth and Rubbish--Allowing Accumulation in House, or immediate Vicinity thereof, (see \"Nuisances\"). \nFire Arms-Discharging, \nFire Brigade Ordinance--Breach of,....... \nFire-Selling in the Streets, (see \"Breach of Markets Ordinance\"). \nForcibly detaining or taking away adults with intent to obtain ransom, \nForeign Ships--Desertion from, (see \"Desertion\"). \nMen-of-war, Stragglers from, (see \"Desertion\"). \nForgery,..... \nFowls--Selling in the Streets, (see \"Breach of Markets Ordinance\"). \nFraud by Bankrupt, (see \"Bankrupt\"). \nConspiracy to commit, (see \"Conspiracy\"). \nFruits and Vegetables in Gardens and enclosed Places-Larceny of, (see \"Larceny\"). \nFugitive Criminals Apprehension and Detention of,. \nFurious Driving....... \nGambling Breach of Ordinance for Suppression of....... \n-in the Streets, treated as Obstruction of Public Ways..... \n-Registered Householder permitting, in a House, \n-in Public Ways, treated as Rogues and Vagabonds, \nGoods-Breach of Ordinance for, \nGaol-Escape of Prisoners from, (see \"Escape\"), \nGardens and enclosed Places-Larceny of Vegetables and Fruits from, (see \"Larceny\"). \nGeese-Selling in the Streets, (see \"Breach of Markets Ordinance\"). \nGirls-Abduction of, (see \"Abduction\"). \nGoods and Money--Obtaining by False Pretences, (see \"False Pretences\"). \nGunpowder-Breach of Ordinance for Storage of, \n-Depositing Feloniously, ...... \nHarbour and Coasts Ordinance-Breach of. \n\n| No. of Cases | No. of Prisoners |\n| --- | --- |\n| 2,012 | 2,898 |\n\n## OFFENCE\nBrought forward,. \nLabels and Trade Marks-Fraudulently using false, (see \"Trade Marks\"). \nLarceny-Cattle, (see \"Cattle Stealing\"). \n-Children, (see \"Child Stealing\"). \n-Dogs, (see \"Dog Stealing\"). \n-Common,... \nFrom Ships or Boats in the Harbour,. \nof the Person.... \n\"Wreck,.... \n-in a Dwelling House, \n--- Vegetables and Fruits from Gardens and enclosed Places, ... \nof Beasts or Birds not the subject of Larceny at common Law,..... \n-of Live or Dead Fence,.. \nLewdness, (see \"Indecent Exposure,\" &c.). \nLibel, ........ \nLights--Chinese not carrying at Night, ........... \nLodging Houses-Unlicensed Coolie, (see \"Unlicensed\"). \nMails---Detention of H. M.'s, (see \"Post Office\"). \nMalicious Injury to Property, \nManslaughter, \nMarine Store Dealers-Breach of Ordinance for, \nMarkets Ordinance-Breach of, \nMendicancy, \nMen-of-War Anchorage-Dredging at, (see \"Harbour\") \nMerchant Seamen-Desertion of, (see \"Desertion\"). \n--Refusal of Duty by British, (see \"Seamen\"). \nMilitary Law-Breach of, ..... \nMilitary Stores--Breach of Ordinance prohibiting exportation of ..... \nMisdemeanor Attempting to commit, \n-Inciting a Person to commit a, \nAiding and Abetting in, \nMoney Changer-Unlicensed, (see \"Unlicensed\"). \nMurder, \n---Cutting and Wounding with Intent to commit, (see \"Cutting and Wounding,\" &c.). \n-Piracy with, (see \"Piracy\"). \nNavy and Army-Desertion from H. M's., (see \"Desertion\"). \nNaval Stores Breach of Ordinance for, \n\n| No. of Cases | No. of Prisoners |\n| --- | --- |\n| 2,413 | 3,781 |\n| 907 | 1,015 |\n| 3 | |\n| 146 | 160 |\n| 11 | |\n| 11 | 17 |\n| 10 | 12 |\n| | 3 |\n| 9 | 9 |\n| 2 | 3 |\n\n## OFFENCE\nBrought forward,. \nPiracy \nConfederating with Pirates, with Murder..... \nPolice-Assaulting, obstructing or resisting, (see \"Assault\") \n--Assuming Name, Designation, &c., of Constable of, \n--Escape of Prisoners from Custody of, (see \"Escape\"). \n-Rescuing Prisoners from Custody of............................. \n-Desertion from, ................. \nPolice Constables-Bribing, or attempting to bribe, (see \"Bribery\"). \n--Misconduct as, \nPosting Bills on Walls, &c., ..... \nPost Office-Breach of Ordinance for, \nPoultry-Selling in the Streets, (see \"Breach of Markets Ordinance\"). \nPrepared Opium-Breach of Ordinance for Preparation and Sale of, (see \"Opium\"). \nPreservation of Birds-Breach of Ordinance for, (see \"Birds\"). \nPrison---Breach of Rules of, (see also \"Gaol\"). \nPrisoners--Escape from Custody of Police of, (see \"Escape\"). \n-Escape from Gaol of, (see \"Escape\"). \n-Negligently allowing the Escape of, (see \"Escape\") \n-Rescuing from Custody of Police, (see \"Police\"). \nProvisions Exposing for Sale, or bringing into the Colony, unwholesome, (see \"Unwholesome Provisions\"). \nPublic Ways Hanging wet Clothes, &c. to dry over, (see \"Nuisances\"). \n--Obstruction of, (see \"Obstruction\"), \n\n| No. of Cases | No. of Prisoners |\n| --- | --- |\n| 5,762 | 7,312 |\n| 3 | 9 |\n| 1 | 1 |\n| | 2 |\n| 2 | 2 |\n\n## OFFENCE\nBrought forward,. \nShanghai-Deportation to this Colony from, (see \"Deportation\"). \nShip or Boat in the Harbour-Larceny on board, (see \"Larceny\"). \nShopkeepers-Obstruction of Roads by, (see \"Obstruction\"). \nShouting at with Intent to do grievous bodily Harm, ... \nShrubs, Trees, &c.-Cutting and injuring, (see \"Trees\"). \n-Unlawful Possession of, (see \"Unlawful Possession\"). \nSoldiers-Assisting in the Desertion of, (see \"Desertion\"). \n-Disposing of Uniform, &c., (see \"Military Law\") \nSpirituous and fermented Liquors-Breach of Ordinance for Retail of, .... \nStamp Ordinance-Breach of, ........ \nStealing Cattle, (see \"Cattle Stealing\"). \n-Children, (see \"Child Stealing\"). \n-Dogs, (see \"Dog Stealing\"). \nSteam-launch Ordinance-Breach of \nStolen Goods-Receiving, (see \"Receiving\"). \nStones and other Missiles-Discharging to Danger of Persons and Property.......................... \nStones--Blasting of, (see \"Nuisances\"). \nStores, Naval-Breach of Ordinance for, (see \"Naval Stores\"). \nStragglers from Foreign Ships, (see \"Desertion\"). \nStreams--Defiling, ................. \nStreet Chairs and Vehicles-Breach of Ordinance for, (see \"Chairs and Vehicles\"). \nStreets--Obstruction of by Hawkers, Chair Coolies and Shopkeepers, (see \"Obstruction\"). \n---Gambling, treated as Obstruction of Public Ways, (see \"Gambling\"). \n-Gamblers, (see \"Rogues and Vagabonds\"). \n-Noises by Hawkers, \nSuspicious Characters, (see \"Rogues and Vagabonds\"). \nThreats Attempting to extort by Menaces, and, \n-Of Violence to the Person, \nTrade Marks and Labels Fraudulently using false, \nTrees, &c.-Cutting and destroying....... \n-Unlawful Possession of Shrubs, (see \"Unlawful Possession\"), \nTrespass on Crown Land, ... \nTurf-Cutting from Crown Land without Permit, (see \"Trespass on Crown Land\"). \nUnmuzzled Ferocious Dogs--Allowing to be at large, &c., (see \"Dogs\"). \nUniform, &c.-Soldiers disposing of, (see \"Military Law\"). \nUnlawful Possession of Property, ..... \n-of Trees, Shrubs, &c., \nUnlicensed-Auctioneer, \n-Unlicensed Coolie Lodging Houses, (see \"Unlicensed\"). \n-Hawker,... \n-Money Changer, \n-Plying of Boats for hire, (see \"Boats\"). \n-Seamen's Boarding Houses, \n\n| No. of Cases | No. of Prisoners |\n| --- | --- |\n| 6,031 | 7,644 |\n| 9 | 3 |\n| 3 | 3 |\n| 4 | 4 |\n| 15 | 10 |\n| 16 | 26 |\n| 27 | 3 |\n| 33 | |\n\n## OFFENCE\nBrought forward,. \nDredging at Anchorage for Ships-of-War in the Harbour, \nLarceny on board Boat or Ship in the Harbour, (see \"Larceny\"). \nRegulations-Breach of,...... \nThrowing Rubbish on the Beach or into the Harbour, (see \"Nuisances\"). \nHawkers-Calling out in the Sale of their Wares, (see \"Street Noises\"). \n-Obstruction of Public Ways by, (see \"Obstruction\"). \n-Unlicensed, (see \"Unlicensed\"). \nHighway Robbery with Arms or with Violence, (see \"Robbery\"). \nHouse Allowing Filth and Rubbish to accumulate in, or in immediate Vicinity of, (see \"Nuisances\"). \nLarceny in a, (see \"Larceny\"). \nNeglecting to paint Number on.. \n-Registered Householder permitting Gambling in, (see \"Gambling\"). \n-Found by Night in with Intent to commit Felony therein, (see \"Night\"). \n-Found at Night with dangerous and offensive Weapons, with Intent to break into a Dwelling, (see \"Night\"). \n-Setting Fire to, (see \"Arson\"). \n-Unlicensed Coolie Lodging, (see \"Unlicensed\"). \nNight Passes being out without, (see \"Passes\"). \n--Chinese carrying arms, not being Holders of, (see \"Arms\"). \nNight Soil-Exposing in the Streets in uncovered Buckets, and in open Boats along the Praya, (see \"Nuisances\"). \nNuisances--Allowing Dirt and Filth to remain on Premises, or in immediate Vicinity thereof, \n-Hanging wet Clothes, &c., to dry over Public Ways.......... \n--Keeping Pigs without a Licence, \n--Throwing Rubbish, &c., into the Streets,.... \n-Obeying Calls of Nature in the Streets,... \nRegulations-- Breach of, \n-Throwing Rubbish into the Harbour or on the Beach,.. \nObscene Pictures---Exposing for sale, ............. \n--Blasting Stones to the danger of Persons and Property \nof Roads and Streets, &c., by Hawkers, Chair Coolies and Shopkeepers,. \nof Wharves by Boat People...... \nof Ships entering Harbour, (see \"Navigation\"). \nObstruction of, or Resisting Police, (see \"Police\"). \nSeamen's Boarding, (see \"Unlicensed\") \nHouse Breaking, \nHouseholders and Servants-Breach of Ordinance for Registration of \nHouseholder-Registered, permitting Gambling in a House, (see \"Gambling\"). \nInciting a Person to commit a Misdemeanor, (see \"Misdemeanor\"). \nIndecent Assaults, (see \"Assault\"). \nIndecent Exposure of Person by bathing or otherwise, and Lewdness, ....... \nInjury to Property—Malicious, (see \"Malicious Injury\"). \nInquests Jurors disobeying Coroner's Summonses for Attendance at, (see \"Jurors\"). \nJapan-Deportation to this Colony from, (see \"Deportation\"). \nJurors Neglecting to answer Coroner's Summonses to attend Inquests, ...... \nKidnapping, (see \"Child Stealing,\" \"Abduction and Sale of Women and Female Children, Forcibly detaining, &c.\"). \nOffensive Trades-Carrying on Dangerous and, (see \"Dangerous\"). \nOffensive Weapons-Found at Night with Dangerous and-with Intent to break into a Dwelling House, (see \"Night\"). \n-Having Possession of, (see also \"Arms\"). \nOpium-Breach of Ordinance for Preparation and Sale of prepared, \nPassengers' Act of 1856-Breach of Chinese, (see \"Chinese\"). \nPasses Chinese carrying Arms, not being Holders of, (see \"Arms\"). \n--Chinese out at Night without, \n-Unlawful possession of.... \nPawnbrokers--Breach of Ordinance for, \nPawning-feloniously........ \nPerjury, (see also \"Preferring false Charge and giving wilful false Testimony\"), \n\n| No. of Cases | No. of Prisoners |\n| --- | --- |\n| 5,762 | 7,312 |\n| | 1 |\n| 2 | 2 |\n| 170 | 170 |\n| 37 | 25 |\n| 116 | 116 |\n| 832 | 849 |\n| 129 | 204 |\n| | 2 |\n| 8 | |\n| 2 | 2 |\n| | 1 |\n| 107 | 117 |\n| 743 | 743 |\n| 1 | |\n| 1 | |\n| 4 | 3 |\n\n## OFFENCE\nBrought forward,. \nRescuing Prisoners from Custody of Police, (see \"Police\"). \nResisting Police-Assaulting, obstructing, obstructing, or, (see \"Police\"). \nRiots Assemblages, \n--Assault at, or in connection with, (see \"Assaults\"). \nRiver Steamers Ordinance---Breach of \nRoads and Streets-Obstruction of, (see \"Obstruction\"). \n---Injuring, \n-Breach of Regulations as to. \nRobbery-Assault with Intent to commit, (see \"Assault\"). \nFrom the Person, \n-From the Person with wounding, \n-On the Highways with Arms or with Violence, \nRogues and Vagabonds--As Street Gamblers, (see \"Gambling\"). \n-As Suspicious Characters, \nAs Beggars,........ \nRubbish and Filth-Allowing Accumulation in House, or immediate Vicinity thereof, (see \"Nuisances\"). \n-Throwing into the Streets, (see \"Nuisances\"). \nThrowing into the Harbour or on the Beach, (see \"Nuisances\"). \nSailors-Assisting in the Desertion of, (see \"Desertion\"). \nSeamen-Harbouring deserted,. \n-Desertion of Merchant, (see \"Desertion\"). \n--Making false Statements as to Ships in which they served, and presenting false Characters, \n-Refusal of Duty by British Merchant, \nSeamen's Boarding House, Unlicensed, (see \"Unlicensed\"). \nEffects-Detention of, \nServants-Breach of Ordinance for Registration of Householders and, (see \"House\"). \nServants-Misconduct as Domestic, (see \"Domestic Servants\"). \n\n| No. of Cases | No. of Prisoners |\n| --- | --- |\n| 5,762 | 7,312 |\n| | 2 |\n| 2 | 2 |\n| 1 | 1 |\n| 17 | |\n| 23 | |\n| | 1 |\n| | 14 |\n| 15 | |\n| | 12 |\n| 391 | 22 |\n| | 30 |\n| 398 | 393 |\n| | 28 |\n| 120 | 138 |\n| 13 | 18 |\n\n## TOTAL\nMagistracy, Hongkong, 24th February, 1880. \n| | |\n| --- | --- |\n| **7,009** | **8,705** |\n\nC. B. PLUNKET, Police Magistrate.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-188 - Governor Hennessy - 1880 [5-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 308364, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "page_number": 354, "title": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "content_text": "Sir John Smale and Mr. Justice Snowden have co-operated with the Executive in dealing with habitual criminals, and to looking up the efficient Gaol discipline carried out in spite of many difficulties by Mr Tomnochy. The night system of our Police Force is now worked by Mr. Deane, Mr. Horspool and the high intelligent body of Inspectors has also done much to reduce crime in Hongkong.\n\nI have the honour to be, My Lord, Your Lordship's Most Obedient Humble Servant,\n\nPage 347\n\nC. O.\n\nIL-PR 31\n\nGOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION.-No. 67.\n\nThe following Returns connected with the business of the Superior and Subordinate Courts of the Colony for the year 1880, are published for general information.\n\nBy His Excellency's Command,\n\nNumber of Cases.\n\nNumber of Persons.\n\nColonial Secretary's Office, Hongkong, 26th February, 1881.\n\nFREDERICK STEWART,\n\nActing Colonial Secretary.\n\nRETURN OF CRIMINAL CASES tried in the SUPREME COURT of HONGKONG, during the Year 1880.\n\n \n SENTENCE.\n CASES ABANDONED.\n CASES BARRED.\n Convicted.\n Acquitted.\n \n \n CRIMES,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Assault, occasioning actual Bodily Harm.\n \n \n 11\n \n \n \n Assault,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Breach of Conditional Pardon,\n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n Breaking, entering, and stealing in a Dwelling House,\n \n \n 6\n \n \n \n Breaking out of a Dwelling House,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Burglary,\n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n Counterfeit Coin (being in possession of),\n \n \n 3\n \n \n \n Embezzlement,\n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n Forgery,\n \n \n 3\n \n \n \n Larceny,\n \n \n 32\n \n \n \n Larceny and Receiving,\n \n \n 17\n 3\n \n \n Larceny in a Boat in the Harbour,\n \n \n 9\n \n \n \n Larceny from the Person,\n \n \n 11\n \n \n \n Larceny in a Dwelling House,\n \n \n 3\n \n \n \n Larceny from a Wreck,\n \n \n 9\n \n \n \n Larceny on board a Ship in the Harbour,\n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n Larceny by a Servant,\n \n \n 3\n \n \n \n Manslaughter,\n \n \n 4\n 1\n \n \n Murder,\n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n Obtaining Goods by False Pretences,\n \n \n 4\n 2\n \n \n Perjury,\n \n \n 4\n \n \n \n Piracy,\n \n \n 9\n \n \n \n Piracy (attempting to commit),\n \n \n 16\n \n \n \n Piracy (being found within the Colony, feloniously on board vessel equipped for the purpose of),\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery from the Person with Violence,\n \n \n 5\n \n \n \n Robbery, being named,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robbery with Violence,\n \n \n 3\n \n \n \n Receiving Stolen Goods,\n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n Wounding, with Intent to do actual Bodily Harm,\n \n \n 5\n \n \n \n Unlawfully bringing into the Colony a Child for the purpose of selling said Child.\n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n Unlawfully taking away a Child, with Intent to deprive the parent of its possession,\n \n \n 5\n \n \n \n Unlawfully bringing into the Colony a Woman for the purposes of prostitution,\n \n \n 3\n \n \n \n Unlawfully taking away a Woman out of the Colony, for the purposes of prostitution,\n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n Unlawfully detaining a Woman for the purposes of Emigration,\n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n Unlawfully and by force taking away a Child with Intent to deprive the Father of the possession of such Child,\n \n \n 4\n \n \n \n Forcibly detaining a Child,\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Unlawfully enticing away a female from this Colony for the purposes of Emigration,\n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n Unlawfully bringing into the Colony a Woman for the purposes of Emigration,\n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n \n 91\n 160\n \n \n \n \n \n Number of Persons.\n \n \n \n \n \n Death.\n \n \n 1\n \n \n \n Death recorded.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Penal Servitude.\n \n \n 24\n \n \n \n Hard labour, over 1 Year.\n \n \n 67\n \n \n \n Hard labour, 1 Year and under.\n \n \n 18\n \n \n \n Solitary Confinement,\n \n \n 35\n \n \n \n Privately Flogged,\n \n \n 6\n \n \n \n \n Number of Cases.\n Number of Persons.\n \n \n \n \n \n 120\n \n \n \n \n\nW. H. R. Mossor,\n\nActing Registrar.\n\nHongkong, 18th February, 1881.\n\n*Comparative Table showing the Number of Criminal Cases and Persons tried in the Supreme Court during the last three years.\n\n \n \n Number of Cases.\n Number of Persons.\n Number of Convictions.\n Number of Acquittals.\n \n \n 1878,\n 167\n 216\n 105\n \n \n \n 1879,\n 148\n 202\n 139\n 91\n \n \n 1880,\n 123\n 360\n \n \n \n \n \n 145\n \n \n \n \n\nPage 347\n\nPage 347", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 308366, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "page_number": 356, "title": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "content_text": "OFFENCE.\n\nFelony-Aiding and abetting in,\n\n45\n\n2:\n\nBrought forward,..\n\n45\n\nConspiracy (see \"Conspiracy\").\n\n-Attempting to commit,\n\n2\n\n-Found by Night in Dwelling Houses with Intent to commit, (see \"Night\").\n\nFerocious Dogs-Allowing unmuzzled, to be at large. (see \"Dogs\").\n\nFighting, (see \"Disorderly Behaviour\").\n\nFilth and Rubbish--Allowing Accumulation in House, or immediate Vicinity thereof, (see \"Nuisances\").\n\nFire Arms-Discharging,\n\n28\n\n56\n\nFire Brigade Ordinance-Breach of,\n\nFish-Selling in the Streets, (see \"Breach of Markets Ordinance\").\n\nForcible Entry\n\nForcibly detaining or taking away adults with intent to obtain ransom,\n\nNO. OF CASES\nNo. of PRISONERS\n\n1,955\n2,669\n\nOFFENCE,\n\nBrought forward.\n\nLabels and Trade Marks-Fraudulently using false, (see \"Trade Marks, &c.).\n\nLarceny Cattle, (see \"Cattle Stealing \").\n\n-Children, (see \"Child Stealing\").\n\n-Dogs, (see \"Dog Stealing \").\n\n-Common,\n\n-the Person,\n\n-Wreck,\n\n-in a Dwelling House,\n\n-from Ships or Boats in the Harbour,\n\n-of Beasts or Birds not the subject of Larceny at common Law,\n\n-of Vegetables and Fruits from Gardens and enclosed Places,\n\n15\n\n17\n\n**\n\n\"\n11\n\nLewdness, (see \"Indecent Exposure,\" &c.).\n\nLibel,\n\n1\n\nLights-Chinese not carrying at Night,\n\nForeign Jurisdiction Act, 1843. (6 and 7 Victoria, Chap. 94) Commitments to Gaol by the Magistrates\n\nLodging Houses-Unlicensed Coolie, (see \"Unlicensed \").\n\n1\n\nMail-Detention of H. M.'s, (see \"Post Office\").\n\nForgery,\n\nunder\n\nForeign Ships-Desertion from, (see \"Desertion\").\n\nMen-of-war, Stragglers from, (see \"Desertion\").\n\nFowls--Selling in the Streets, (see \"Breach of Markets Ordinance\").\n\nFraud by Bankrupt, (see \"Bankrupt \").\n\n-Conspiracy to commit, (see \"Conspiracy\").\n\nFruits and Vegetables in Gardens and enclosed Places- Larceny of, (see \"Larceny \").\n\nMalicious Injury to Property,\n\n43\n\nManslaughter,\n\n3\n\nMarine Store Dealers-Breach of Ordinance for,\n\n1\n\n1\n\nMarkets Ordinance--Breach of,\n\n528\n\nMendicancy\n\n221\n\n221\n\nMen-of-War Anchorage-Dredging at, (see \"Harbour\").\n\nMerchant Shipping Acts 1864 and 1855,-Breach of\n\nMerchant Seamen-Desertion of, (see \"Desertion\")\n\n--Refusal of Duty by British, (see \"Seamen \").\n\nNo. of CASES.\nNo. of PRISONERS\n\n1\n\n349\n\n2,625\n\nOFFENCE,\n\nBrought forward,\n\nPiracy-Confederating with Pirates,\n\n-with Murder,\n\nPolice-Assaulting, obstructing or resisting, (see \"Assault\")\n\nAssuming Name, Designation, &c., of Constable of,\n\n751\n\n#\n9\n\n135\n\n-Escape of Prisoners from Custody of, (see \"Escape,\" &c.).\n\n-Rescuing Prisoners from Custody of,\n\n-Police Constables-Bribing, or attempting to bribe, (see \"Bribery,\" &c.).\n\n-Misconduct as,\n\nPost Office-Breach of Ordinance for,\n\nPosting Bills on Walls, &c.\n\nPoultry--Selling in the Streets, (see \"Breach of Markets Ordinance\").\n\nPraya-Exposing Night Soil in open Boats along the (see \"Nuisances,\" &c.)\n\nPrepared Opium-Breach of Ordinance for Preparation and Sale of, (see \"Opium \").\n\nPreservation of Birds-Breach of Ordinance for, (see \"Birds,\" &c.).\n\nPrison-Breach of Rules of,\n\nPrisoners-Escape from Custody of Police of, (see \"Escape\").\n\n-Escape from Gaol of, (see \"Escape\").\n\n-Negligently allowing the Escape of, (see \"Escape\").\n\n-Rescuing from Custody of Police, (see \"Police\").\n\nProvisions-Exposing for Sale, or bringing into the Colony, unwholesome, (see \"Unwholesome Provisions,\" &c.).\n\nPublic Ways-Hanging wet Clothes, &c., to dry over, (see \"Nuisances\").\n\n-Obstruction of, (see \"Obstruction\"),\n\nQuarantine Regulations-Breach of\n\n10\n\n18\n\nReceiving Stolen Goods\n\nRecognizances--Breach of\n\nRegimental Clothes, &c., Purchasing or receiving, (see \"Military Law\").\n\nRegistration of Births and Deaths-Breach of Ordinance for, (see \"Births and Deaths\").\n\nof Householders and Servants-Breach of Ordinance for, (see \"House\"),\n\nReligious Ceremonies-Chinese carrying on without Authority,\n\nRendition of Chinese, (see \"Crimes, &c.\")\n\nRescuing Prisoners from Custody of Police, (see \"Police \").\n\nResisting Police-Assaulting, obstructing, or, (see \"Police,\" &c.)\n\nRiotous Assemblages,\n\n21\n\nAssault at, or in connection with, (see \"Assaults,\" &c.)\n\nNo. of CASES\nNo. of PRISONERS\n\n5,800\n7,280\n\n2\n\n}\n2\n\n21\n\n11\n\n1\n\nOFFENCE.\n\nBrought forward,\n\nServants-Breach of Ordinance for Registration of Householders and, (see \"House\").\n\n-Misconduct as Domestic. (see \"Domestic Servants\").\n\nShanghai-Deportation to this Colony from, (see \"Deportation,\" &c.)\n\nShip or Boat in the Harbour-Larceny on board (see \"Larceny\").\n\nShopkeepers-Obstruction of Roads by, (see \"Obstruction\").\n\nShrubs, Trees, &c.--Cutting and injuring, (see \"Trees \"),\n\n-Unlawful Possession of, (see \"Unlawful Possession \").\n\nSoldiers--Assisting in the Desertion of, (see \"Desertion\"),\n\n31\n\n--Disposing of Uniform, &c., (see \"Military Law\")\n\nSpirituous and fermented Liquors Breach of Ordinance for Retail of,\n\nStamp Ordinance-Breach of,\n\nStealing Cattle, (see \"Cattle Stealing \").\n\nChildren, (see \"Child Stealing\").\n\nDogs, (see \"Dog Stealing \").\n\nSteam launch Ordinance-Breach of,\n\nStolen Goods-Receiving, (see \"Receiving,\" &c.)\n\nStones and other Missiles-Discharging to Danger of Persons and Property\n\nStragglers from Foreign Ships, (see \"Desertion\").\n\nStreams-Dredging,\n\nStreet Chairs and Vehicles-Breach of Ordinance for, (see \"Chairs and Vehicles\").\n\nStreets--Obstruction of Roads and, (see \"Obstruction\")\n\n27\n\n-Gamblers and Watchmen to Gamblers, (see \"Rogues and Vagabonds\"),\n\n-Gambling, treated as Obstruction of Public Ways, (see \"Gambling\").\n\n-Noises by Hawkers\n\nSuspicious Characters, (see \"Rogues and Vagabonds\"),\n\nThreats--Attempting to extort by Menaces, and,\n\nNo. of CASES\nNo. of PRISONERS\n\n6,001\n7,513\n\n7\n8\n\n2\n2\n\n}\n\n£\n\n11\n12\n\n80\n\n39\n\n144\n\n20\n\n&\n\n-Of Violence to the Person,\n10\n\n10\n\n-With Intent to extort Money,\nら\n\nTrade Marks and Labels---Fraudulently using false,\n\nTrees, &c.-Cutting and destroying,\n\n+7\n\n*\n\n-Unlawful Possession of Shrubs, (see \"Unlawful Possession \").\n\nTrespass on Crown Land\n\n101\n\n101\n\nTurf-Cutting from Crown Land without Permit, (see \"Trespass on Crown Land\").\n\nUniform, &c., Soldiers disposing of, (see \"Military Law\")\n\nUnlawful Possession of Property\n\n260\n\nof Trees, Shrubs, &c.\n303\n\n4-4\n1:\n\nUnlicensed-Auctioneer,\n\n5\n\nt:\n\n-Coolie Lodging Houses,\n\n-Hawker,\n\n482\n\n482\n\n}\n\n--Money Changer,\n\n-Plying of Boats for Hire,\n\n25\n\n27\n\n27\n\n--Seamen's Boarding Houses,\n\nVarious Driving\n\n2\n\n8\n\nMilitary Law-Breach of,\n\nGambling-Breach of Ordinance for Suppression of,\n\n138\n\n537\n\nMisdemeanor-Aiding and Abetting in,\n\n2\n\nin the Streets, treated as Obstruction of)\n\nPublic Ways.\n216\n\n216\n\n--Attempting to commit,\n\n-in Public Ways, treated\n\nRogues and Va-\n\n137\n\n137\n\ngabonds.\n\n-Aiding and Abetting in,\n\nMoney Changer-Unlicensed, (see \"Unlicensed \"^).\n\nMurder,\n\n-Inciting a Person to commit a,\n\n49\n\n66\n\nPiracy with, (see \"Piracy\").\n\n-Registered Householder permitting, in a House,\n\nរ\n\n5\n\nGaol-Escape of Prisoners from, (see \"Escape\").\n\nGaols--Breach of Ordinance for,\n\n5\n\n5\n\nGardens and enclosed Places-Larceny of Vegetables and Fruits from, (see \"Larceny \"),\n\nGeese-Selling in the Streets, (see \"Breach of Markets Ordinance\").\n\nGirls-Abduction of, (see \"Abduction\").\n\nGoods and Money-Obtaining by False Pretences, (see \"False Pretences\").\n\nGunpowder-Breach of Ordinance for Storage of\n\nHarbour and Coasts Ordinance-Breach of\n\nDredging at Anchorage for Ships-of-War in the\n\nLarceny on board Boat or Ship in the, (see \"Larceny \").\n\nRegulations--Breach of\n\nThrowing Rubbish on the Beach or into the, (see \"Nuisances\").\n\nHawkers-Calling out in the Sale of their Wares, (see \"Street Noises \").\n\n-Obstruction of Public Ways by, (see \"Obstruction\").\n\n....Unlicensed, (see \"Unlicensed\").\n\nHighway Robbery with Arms or with Violence, (see \"Robbery\")\n\nHouse-Allowing Filth and Rubbish to accumulate in, or in immediate Vicinity of, (see \"Nuisances\").\n\nHouse Breaking.\n\nHouse--Larceny in a, (see \"Larceny \").\n\n\"J\n\n31\n\nJI\n\n-Registered Householder permitting Gambling in a, (see \"Gambling\").\n\n-Found by Night in with Intent to commit Felony therein, (see \"Night\").\n\n-Found by Night with dangerous and offensive Weapons, with Intent to break into a Dwelling, (see \"Night\").\n\n-Setting Fire to, (see \"Arson \").\n\nUnlicensed Coolie Lodging, (see \"Unlicensed \").\n\nSeamen's Boarding, (see \"Unlicensed\"),\n\nHouseholder Registered, permitting Gambling in a House, (see \"Gambling\").\n\n17\n\n17\n\nNavigation-Obstruction to,\n\nNavy and Army-Desertion from H. M's., (see \"Desertion\").\n\nNight--being out without Lights at, (see \"Light\").\n\n--Found at, armed with dangerous and offensive Weapons, with Intent to break into Dwelling Houses,\n\nJ5\n\nנ\ni\n\n-Found in Dwelling Houses by--with Intent to commit Felony therein,\n\n-Noises, by playing at the Game called \"Chai-i Mui,\"\n\n--Noises, by Watchmen, &c.\n\nNight Passes--being out without, (see \"Passes\").\n\n-Chinese carrying Arms, not being Holders of, (see \"Arms \").\n\nNight Soil-Exposing in the Streets in uncovered Buckets, and in open Boats along the Praya, (see \"Nuisances\").\n\nNuisances-Allowing Dirt and Filth to remain on Premises, or in immediate Vicinity thereof,\n\nተጅ\n\n--Blasting Stones to the danger of Persons and Property,\n\n--Common Scold,\n\n-Exposing Night Soil in the Streets in un- Covered Buckets and in open Boats along the Praya\n\n15\n\n20\n\nPublic Ways,\n\n-Hanging wet Clothes, &c., to dry over\n\n+\n\n-Keeping Pigs without a Licence,\n\n13\n\n-Neglecting to clean out Dust Bins, and throwing Rubbish, &c., into the Streets,\n\n-Obeying Calls of Nature in the Streets\n\n67\n\n96\n\n-Raking Dust Bins\n\n--Regulation-Breach of\n\n57\n\n-Steam Launch-whistling by,\n\n6\n\n-Throwing Rubbish into the Harbour, or on the Beach,\n\n42\n\n;\n9\n\n5\n&\n\n6\n*\n\n9\n\n11\n\nObstruction of, or Resisting Police, (see \"Police\"),\n\nof Roads and Streets, &c. by Hawkers, Chair Coolies and Shopkeepers,\n\n148\n\n157\n\nof Wharves by Boat People\n\n329\n\n199\n\n*\n\nHouse, (see \"Gambling\").\n\nHouseholders and Servants--Breach of Ordinance for Registration of\n\n↓\n\nHydrant Wasting Water at a public (see \"Disorderly Conduct\").\n\nInciting a Person to commit a Misdemeanour, (see \"Misdemeanour \"),\n\nIndecent Assaults, (see \"Assault\").\n\nIndecent Exposure of Person by bathing or otherwise, and Lewdness,\n\nInjury to Property-Malicious, (see \"Malicious Injury,\"\n\nInquests Jurors disobeying Coroner's Summonses for Attendance at, (see \"Jurors\").\n\nJapan-Deportation to this Colony from, (see \"Deportation\").\n\nJurors Neglecting to answer Coroner's Summonses to attend Inquests,\n\nKidnapping, (see \"Child Stealing,\" \"Abduction and Sale of Women and Female Children, Forcibly detaining,\" &c.)\n\nCarried forward\n\n45\n\n15\n\nOffensive Trades-Carrying on Dangerous and, (see \"Dangerous\"),\n\nOffensive Weapons-Found at Night with Dangerous and with Intent to break into a Dwelling House, (see \"Night\").\n\n-Having Possession of\n\nOpium--Breach of Ordinance for Preparation and Sale of prepared\n\nPassengers Act of 1855-Breach of Chinese, (see \"Chinese,\" &c.).\n\nUnmuzzled Ferocious Dogs -Allowing to be at large, (see \"Dogs \").\n\nBoats and Streets--Obstruction of, (see \"Obstruction,\" &c.)\n\n-Injuring,\n\n53\n\n#\n\n-Rolling barrels on to the annoyance of passengers,\n\nRobbery Assault with intent to commit, (see \"Assault,' &c.)\n\nFrom the Person,\n\n+\n\n}}\n\n-From the Person with wounding,\n\nOn the Highways with Arms or with Violence,\n\nRogues and Vagabonds-As Street Gamblers and Watch- &c., (see \"Dogs \").\n\nUnnatural Offence\n\n10\n\n28\n\nmen to Gamblers\n\n33\n\n--As Suspicious Characters\n\n71\n\n-Collecting alms by false pretences,\n\n1\n\n12\n\n--As Beggars,\n\n*\n\n: 2-2\n\n-Assault with Intent to commit an, (see \"Assaults\").\n\nInwholesome Provisions-Exposing for Sale, or bringing into the Colony\n\nVehicles and Chairs-Breach of Ordinance for, (see \"Chairs,\" &c.)\n\n5\n\n73\n\n1\n\n*\n\n-Wandering abroad and lodging! in the open air\n\n89\n\n30\n\nRubbish and Filth-Allowing Accumulation in House, or immediate Vicinity thereof, (see \"Nuisances\").\n\n--Throwing into the Streets, (see \"Nuisances\").\n\n-Throwing into the Harbour or on the Beach, (see \"Nuisances\").\n\nSailors-Assisting in the Desertion of, (see \"Desertion\").\n\nSeamen-Harbouring deserted\n\nነ፡\n\n--Desertion of Merchant, (see \"Desertion\").\n\n-Making false Statements as to Ships in which they served, and presenting false Characters\n\n--Refusal of Duty by British Merchant\n\nSeamen's Boarding House, Unlicensed, (see \"Unlicensed,\" 400.).\n\nEffects Detention of,\n\nVessels--Breach of Ordinance for the Registration of\n\nWatchman to Gamblers, (see \"Rogues and Vagabonds\");\n\n--Misconduct as Private\n\n-Night Noises by, (see \"Night\").\n\nWeapons-Found by Night with dangerous and offensive, with Intent to break into Dwelling Houses, (see \"Night\").\n\n-Having Possession of offensive\n\nWeights and Measures--Breach of Ordinance for\n\nWharves-Obstruction by Boat People of, (see \"Obstruction\").\n\nWitnesses-Intimidating, (see \"Embracery \"),\n\n-Ordered to give Security for Appearance,\n\nWorkmen-Intimidating,\n\n--Misconduct as\n\nWounding-Assault with, (see \"Assault \").\n\n22\n\n2\n\n2\n\n-Cutting and inflicting bodily Injuries, (see \"Cutting,\" &c.)\n\n-Robbery from the Person with, (see \"Robbery\").\n\nWreck-Larceny from, (see \"Larceny \").\n\n}\n\n]\n11\n\nPage 363\n\nPosses-Chinese carrying Arms, not being Holders of (see \"Arms\").\n\n-Chinese out at Night without,\n\n805\n\n305\n\nPawnbrokers-Breach of Ordinance for\n\nPawning-legally\n\n1\n\nPerjury, (see also Preferring false Charge and giving wilful false Testimony\"),\n\n2\n\n2,625\n18,899\n\nFigs-Unlicensed Keeping of, (see \"Nuisances,\" &c.).\n\nPiracy,\n\nCarried forward\n\n6\n\n37\n\nPage 364\n\nCarried forward\n\n5,800\n17,290\n\nMagistracy, Hongkong, 19th February, 1881.\n\nTOTAL\n\n7,098\n8,657\n\nNo CHOY,\n\nActing Police Magistrate.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 308617, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "page_number": 607, "title": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "content_text": "292\n\nORDINANCES Nos. 2. AND 3. OF 1864,\n\nC. 9.\n\n596\n\nORDINANCES Nos. 5. AND 6. OF 1865.\n\n*447\n\nAnd any other Returns required by the Governor.\n\nSpecimen Pieces to be taken at uncertain Times in each Quarter, and forwarded to Master of the Royal Mint in London for Examination. Quarterly Survey to be held of the Bullion and Coin in the Mint.\n\nSalaries to be added to Civil List.\n\nSalaries of other Officers to be fixed by the Governor and placed on the annual Estimates.\n\nTitle.\n\nPreamble.\n\nMint.\n\nRevenue.\n\n(7.) Weight of each Description of Coin delivered to the Public, and the Amount, if any, charged for coining;\n\n(8.) Copy of the Reports of the Assay of Coin;\n\n(9.) Number and Description of Dies received or completed during the Quarter, of Dies worn out, of Dies effectually defaced, and of serviceable Dies in Hand;\n\n(10.) A Return, showing the Waste during the Quarter, distinguishing the Waste arising in melting, in refining, in coining, and in assaying.\n\nAnd he shall forward any other Returns which the Governor or Officer administering the Government of the Colony may require.\n\nVII. That with a View to ensure the careful Observance of the Standard in the Coin the Governor or Officer administering the Government of the Colony shall cause to be taken at uncertain Times during each Quarter from amongst the Coins issued at the Mint to the Public, without Preference in the Selection, Specimen Pieces, and that such Specimens shall be forwarded from Time to Time to the Master of the Royal Mint in London for such Examination as the Lords Commissioners of Her Majesty's Treasury may direct.\n\nVIII. That the Governor or Officer administering the Government of the Colony shall direct a Board of Government Officers not less than three in Number, to assemble at the Mint at the Expiration of each Quarter for the Inspection of the Store of Bullion and Coin in the Mint, and report on the same to him, stating the exact Amounts of the Balance of each Description verified by them.\n\nIX. That the Salaries specified as under shall be added to the Civil List:\n\nThe Master of the Mint, $6,720 Per Annum.\n\nThe Superintendent of the Bullion Office, $3,810\n\nThe Assayer, $3,840\n\nThe Superintendent of the Coining Department, $3,840\n\nThe Superintendent of the Melting Department, $3,840\n\nX. That such other Officers and Servants of the Mint as may be appointed shall be paid such Salaries as may be fixed by the Governor or Officer administering the Government of the Colony, with the Approval of the Secretary of State, and that such Salaries shall be borne on the Annual Estimates.\n\nNo. 3. of 1864.\n\nAn Ordinance to authorize the appropriation of a Supplementary Sum not exceeding One hundred and fifty-two thousand Dollars to defray the Charges of the Year 1863. [29th March, 1864.]\n\nWHEREAS it has become necessary to make further Provision for the Public Service of the Colony for the Year 1863, in addition to the Charge upon the Revenue for the Service of the said Year already provided for in the Estimates submitted\n\nAccessories and Abettors. Forgery.\n\nRecognizances and to find Sureties, both or either, for keeping the Peace, in addition to such Punishment: Provided that no Person shall be imprisoned under this Clause for any Period exceeding One Year.\n\nAs to Accessories generally.\n\nV. If any principal Offender shall be in anywise convicted of any Felony, it shall be lawful to proceed against any Accessory, either before or after the Fact, in the same Manner as if such principal Offender had been attainted thereof, notwithstanding such principal Felon shall die, or be pardoned, or otherwise delivered before Attainder; and every such Accessory shall upon Conviction suffer the same Punishment as he would have suffered if the Principal had been attainted.\n\nVI. Any Number of Accessories at different Times to any Felony, and any Number of Receivers at different Times of Property stolen at One Time, may be charged with substantive Felonies in the same Indictment or Information, and may be tried together, notwithstanding the principal Felon shall not be included in the same Indictment or Information, or shall not be in Custody or amenable to Justice\n\nVII. Whosoever shall aid, abet, counsel, or procure the Commission of any Misdemeanor, whether the same be a Misdemeanor at Common Law or by virtue of any Ordinance passed or to be passed, shall be liable to be indicted, tried, and punished as a principal Offender.\n\nVIII. This Ordinance shall commence and take effect on the Fourteenth Day of June, One Thousand Eight Hundred and Sixty-five.\n\n4\n\nNo. 6. OF 1865.\n\nAn Ordinance to consolidate and amend the Enactments in Force in this Colony relating to indictable Offences by Forgery.\n\n[3rd June, 1865.]\n\nWHEREAS it is expedient to consolidate and amend the Enactments in Force in this Colony relating to indictable Offences by Forgery: Be it enacted by His Excellency the Governor of Hongkong, with the Advice of the Legislative Council thereof, as follows:\n\nAs to forging Her Majesty's Seals, &c.\n\n1. Whosoever shall forge or counterfeit, or shall utter, knowing the same to be forged or counterfeited, the Great Seal of the United Kingdom, Her Majesty's Privy Seal, any Privy Signet or Sign Manual of Her Majesty, or any of Her Majesty's Seals appointed by the Twenty-fourth Article of the Union with Scotland, or the Public Seal of the Colony, shall be guilty of a Felony.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 308618, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "page_number": 608, "title": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "content_text": "597\n\n448\n\nForging Seals of Public Departments or Companies.\n\nForging Transfer of Stock or Bank Shares, and Power of Attorney relating thereto.\n\nORDINANCE No. 6 OF 1865.\nForgery.\nUnion between England and Scotland to be kept, used, and continued in Scotland, the Great Seal of Ireland, the Privy Seal of Ireland, or the Public Seal of this Colony, or shall forge or counterfeit the Stamp or Impression of any of the Seals aforesaid, or shall utter any Document or Instrument whatsoever, having thereon or affixed thereto the Stamp or Impression of any such forged or counterfeited Seal, knowing the same to be the Stamp or Impression of such forged or counterfeited Seal, or any forged or counterfeited Stamp or Impression made or apparently intended to resemble the Stamp or Impression of any of the Seals aforesaid knowing the same to be forged or counterfeited; or shall forge or alter, or utter knowing the same to be forged or altered, any Document or Instrument having any of the said Stamps or Impressions thereon or affixed thereto, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for Life or for any Term not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nII. Whosoever shall forge or counterfeit, or shall utter, knowing the same to be forged or counterfeited, the Seal of any Public Officer, Office, or Department, in this Colony, or the Seal of any Body Corporate in this Colony, or shall forge or counterfeit the Stamp or Impression of any such Seal, or shall utter any Document or Instrument whatsoever, having thereon, or affixed thereto, the Stamp or Impression of any such forged or counterfeited Seal, knowing the same to be the Stamp or Impression of such forged or counterfeited Seal, or any forged or counterfeited Stamp or Impression, made or apparently intended to resemble the Stamp or Impression of any of the Seals aforesaid, knowing the same to be forged or counterfeited, or shall forge, or alter, or utter, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any Document or Instrument having any of the said Stamps or Impressions thereon or affixed thereto, shall be guilty of Felony, and, being convicted thereof, shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Fourteen Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nAs to forging Transfers of Stock, &c.\n\nIII. Whosoever shall forge or alter, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any Transfer of any Share or Interest of or in any Stock, Annuity, or other Public Fund which now is or hereafter may be transferable at any Bank or Public Office in this Colony, or of or in the Capital Stock of any Bank or of any Body Corporate, Company, or Society which now is or hereafter may be established by Charter, or by, under, or by virtue of any Act of Parliament or Ordinance, or shall forge or alter, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any Power of Attorney or other Authority to transfer any Share or Interest of or in any such Stock, Annuity, Public Fund, or Capital Stock, or to receive any Dividend or Money payable in respect of any such Share or Interest, or shall demand or endeavour to have any such Share or Interest transferred, or to receive any Dividend or Money payable in respect thereof, by virtue of any such forged or altered Power of Attorney or other Authority, knowing the same to be forged or altered, with Intent in any of the Cases aforesaid to defraud, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof, shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for Life or for any Term not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nIV. Whosoever shall falsely and deceitfully personate any Owner of any Share or Interest of or in any Stock, Annuity, or other Public Fund which now is or hereafter may be transferable at any Bank or Public Office in this Colony, or any Owner of any Share or Interest of or in the Capital Stock of any Bank or of any Body Corporate, Company, or Society which now is or hereafter may be established by Charter, or by, under, or by virtue of any Act of Parliament or Ordinance, or any Owner of any Dividend or Money payable in respect of any such Share or Interest as aforesaid, or any Owner of any Money deposited in any Savings Bank in this Colony, and shall thereby transfer or endeavour to transfer any Share or Interest belonging to any such Owner, or thereby receive or endeavour to receive any Money due to any such Owner, as if such Offender were the true and lawful Owner, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for Life or for any Term not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nV. Whosoever shall forge any Name, Handwriting, or Signature purporting to be the Name, Handwriting, or Signature of a Witness attesting the Execution of any Power of Attorney or other Authority to transfer any Share or Interest of or in any such Stock, Annuity, Public Fund, or Capital Stock as is in either of the last Two preceding Sections mentioned, or to receive any Dividend or Money payable in respect of any such Share or Interest, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off any such Power of Attorney or other Authority, with any such forged Name, Handwriting, or Signature thereon, knowing the same to be forged, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Seven Years, and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nVI. Whosoever shall wilfully make any false Entry in or wilfully alter any Word or Figure in any of the Books of Account kept at any Savings Bank in this Colony or by any Body Corporate, Company, or Society which now is or hereafter may be established...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 308619, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "page_number": 609, "title": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "content_text": "598\n\n450\n\nBank Clerks making out false Dividend Warrants.\n\n&c.\n\nORDINANCE No. 6 of 1865.\n\nForgery.\n\nestablished by Charter, or by, under, or by virtue of any Act of Parliament or Ordinance, in which Books the Accounts of the Owners of any Money deposited in such Savings Bank or of any Stock of any such Body Corporate shall be entered and kept, or shall in any Manner wilfully falsify any of the Accounts of any such Owners in any of the said Books, with Intent in any of the Cases aforesaid to defraud, or shall wilfully make any Transfer of any Share or Interest of or in any such Deposit or Stock, in the Name of any Person not being the true and lawful Owner of such Share or Interest, with Intent to defraud shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for Life or for any Term not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nVIII. Whosoever, being a Clerk, Officer, or Servant of or other Person employed or intrusted in the business of any Savings Bank in this Colony or by any such Body Corporate, Company or Society as aforesaid, shall knowingly make out or deliver any Dividend Warrant, or Warrant for Payment of any Interest, or Money, for a greater or less Amount than the Person on whose Behalf such Warrant shall be made out is entitled to, with Intent to defraud, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Seven Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nAs to forging Bonds, &c.\n\nVIII. Whosoever shall forge, or alter, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, issued or made, any Bond, Debenture, Coupon, or Security issued or made under the Authority of any Act of Parliament or Ordinance passed or to be passed for the raising of any Loan, or for any other Purpose relating to the Public Service, or any Indorsement on or Assignment of any such Bond, Debenture, Coupon, or Security, with Intent to defraud, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof, shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for Life or for any Term not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nForging Exchequer Bills and Debentures, &c.\n\nAs to forging Exchequer Bills, &c.\n\nIX. Whosoever shall forge or alter, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any Exchequer Bill or Exchequer Bond or Exchequer Debenture, or any Indorsement on or Assignment of any Exchequer Bond or Exchequer Debenture, or any Receipt or Certificate for Interest accruing thereon, with Intent to defraud, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for Life or for any Term not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\n451\n\nX. Whosoever, without lawful Authority or Excuse (the Proof whereof shall lie on the Party accused), shall make, or cause or procure to be made, or shall aid or assist in making, or shall knowingly have in his Custody or Possession, any Frame, Mould, Instrument having therein any Words, Letters, Figures, Marks, Lines, or Devices, peculiar to and appearing in the Substance of any Paper provided or to be provided or used for Exchequer Bills or Exchequer Bonds or Exchequer Debentures, or any Machinery for working any Threads into the Substance of any Paper, or any such Thread, and intended to imitate such Words, Letters, Figures, Marks, Lines, Threads, or Devices, or any Plate peculiarly employed for printing such Exchequer Bills, Bonds, or Debentures, or any Die or Seal peculiarly used for preparing any such Plate or for sealing such Exchequer Bills, Bonds, or Debentures, or any Plate, Die, or Seal intended to imitate any such Plate, Die, or Seal as aforesaid, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Seven Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nXI. Whosoever, without lawful Authority or Excuse (the Proof whereof shall lie on the Party accused), shall make, or cause or procure to be made, or aid or assist in making any Paper in the Substance of which shall appear any Words, Letters, Figures, Marks, Lines, Threads, or other Devices peculiar to and appearing in the Substance of any Paper provided or to be provided or used for such Exchequer Bills, Bonds, or Debentures, or any Part of such Words, Letters, Figures, Marks, Lines, Threads, or other Devices, and intended to imitate the same, or shall knowingly have in his Custody or Possession any Paper whatsoever, in the Substance whereof shall appear any such Words, Letters, Figures, Marks, Lines, Threads, or Devices as aforesaid, or any Parts of such Words, Letters, Figures, Marks, Lines, Threads, or other Devices, and intended to imitate the same, or shall cause or assist in causing any such Words, Letters, Figures, Marks, Lines, Threads, or Devices as aforesaid, or any Part of such Words, Letters, Figures, Marks, Lines, Threads, or other Devices, and intended to imitate the same, to appear in the Substance of any Paper whatever, or shall take or assist in taking any Impression of any such Plate, Die, or Seal as in the last preceding Section mentioned, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Seven Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term...\n\nFf2\n\nTerm", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 308620, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "page_number": 610, "title": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "content_text": "599\n\n453\n\n452\n\nHaving in Possession Paper, &c. for Exchequer Bills, &c.\n\nForging a Bank Note, &c.\n\nPurchasing or receiving, or having forged Bank Notes.\n\nORDINANCE No. 6 of 1865.\n\nForgery.\n\nTerm not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nXII. Whosoever, without lawful Authority or Excuse (the Proof whereof shall lie on the Party accused), shall purchase or receive, or knowingly have in his Custody or Possession, any Paper manufactured and provided by or under the Directions of the Commissioners of Inland Revenue or Commissioners of Her Majesty's Treasury, for the Purpose of being used as Exchequer Bills or Exchequer Bonds or Exchequer Debentures, before such Paper shall have been duly stamped, signed and issued for Public Use or any such Plate, Die, or Seal as in the last Two preceding Sections mentioned, shall be guilty of a Misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Three Years, with or without Hard Labour.\n\nAs to forging Bank Notes.\n\nXIII. Whosoever shall forge or alter, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any Note or Bill of Exchange of the Governor and Company of the Bank of England or of the Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, or of any other Body Corporate, Company, or Person carrying on the Business of Bankers, commonly called a Bank Note, a Bank Bill of Exchange, or a Bank Post Bill, or any Indorsement on or Assignment of any Bank Note, Bank Bill of Exchange, or Bank Post Bill, with Intent to defraud, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal servitude for Life, or for any Term not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nXIV. Whosoever, without lawful Authority or Excuse (the Proof whereof shall lie on the Party accused), shall purchase or receive from any other Person, or have in his Custody or Possession, any forged Bank Note, Bank Bill of Exchange, or Bank Post Bill, or blank Bank Note, blank Bank Bill of Exchange, or blank Bank Post Bill, knowing the same to be forged, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Fourteen Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour.\n\nAs to making and engraving Plates, &c., for Bank Notes, &c.\n\nMaking or having Mould for making Paper or knowingly have in his Custody or Possession, any Frame, Mould, or Instrument for the making of Paper with the words \"Bank of England\" or \"Bank of Ireland,\" or any Part of such Words intended to resemble and pass for the same, visible in the Substance of the Paper, or for the making of Paper with curved or waving Bar Lines, or with the laying Wire Lines thereof in a waving or curved Shape, or with any Number, Sum, or Amount expressed in a Word or Words in Roman Letters, visible in the Substance of the Paper, or with any Device or Distinction peculiar to and appearing in the Substance of the Paper used by the Governor and Company of the Banks of England and Ireland respectively for any Notes, Bills of Exchange, or Bank Post Bills of such Banks respectively.\n\nXV. Whosoever, without lawful Authority or Excuse (the Proof whereof shall lie on the Party accused), shall make or use, or knowingly have in his Custody or Possession, any Paper whatsoever with the Words \"Bank of England\" or \"Bank of Ireland,\" or any Part of such Words intended to resemble and pass for the same, visible in the Substance of the Paper, or any Paper with curved or waving Bar Lines, or with the laying Wire Lines thereof in a waving or curved Shape, or with any Number, Sum, or Amount expressed in a Word or Words in Roman Letters, appearing visible in the Substance of the Paper, or with any Device or Distinction peculiar to and appearing in the Substance of the Paper used by the Governor and Company of the Banks of England and Ireland respectively for any Notes, Bills of Exchange, or Bank Post Bills of such Banks respectively,--or shall by any Art or Contrivance cause the Words \"Bank of England\" or \"Bank of Ireland,\" or any Part of such Words intended to resemble and pass for the same, or any Device or Distinction peculiar to and appearing in the Substance of the Paper used by the Governor and Company of the Banks of England and Ireland respectively for any Notes, Bills of Exchange, or Bank Post Bills of such Banks respectively, to appear visible in the Substance of any Paper, or shall cause the numerical Sum or Amount of any Bank Note, Bank Bill of Exchange, or Bank Post Bill, blank Bank Note, blank Bank Bill of Exchange, or blank Bank Post Bill, in a Word or Words in Roman Letters, to appear visible in the Substance of the Paper whereon the same shall be written or printed, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Fourteen Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour.\n\nXVI. Nothing in the last preceding Section contained shall prevent any Person from issuing any Bill of Exchange or Promissory Note having the Amount thereof expressed in Figures, or in a numerical Figure or Figures denoting the Amount thereof in Pounds Sterling, appearing visible in the Substance of the Paper upon which the same shall be written or printed, nor shall prevent any Person from making, using, or selling any Paper having waving or curved Lines or any other Devices in the Nature of Watermarks visible in the Substance of the Paper, not being Bar Lines or laying Wire Lines, provided the same are not so contrived as to form the Groundwork or Texture of the Paper, or to resemble the waving or curved laying Wire Lines or Bar Lines or the Watermarks of the Paper used by the Governor and Company of the Banks of England and Ireland respectively.\n\nFf3\n\nXVII. Whosoever...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 308621, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "page_number": 611, "title": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "content_text": "ORDINANCE No. 6. OF 1865.\n\nForgery.\n\nXVII. Whosoever without lawful Authority or Excuse (the Proof whereof shall lie on the Party accused), shall engrave or in anywise make upon any Plate whatsoever or upon any Wood, Stone, or other Material, any Promissory Note, Bill of Exchange, or Bank Post Bill, or Part of a Promissory Note, Bill of Exchange, or Bank Post Bill, purporting to be a Bank Note, Bank Bill of Exchange, or Bank Post Bill of the Governor and Company of the Bank of England or of the Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, or of any other Body Corporate, Company, or Person carrying on the Business of Bankers, or to be a blank Bank Note, blank Promissory Note, blank Bank Bill of Exchange, or blank Bank Post Bill of the Governor and Company of the Bank of England or of the Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, or of any such other Body Corporate, Company, or Person as aforesaid, or to be a Part of a Bank Note, Promissory Note, Bank Bill of Exchange, or Bank Post Bill of the Governor and Company of the Bank of England or of the Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, or of any such other Body Corporate, Company, or Person as aforesaid, or any Name, Word, or Character, resembling or apparently intended to resemble any Subscription to any Bill of Exchange or Promissory Note issued by the Governor and Company of the Bank of England or the Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, or by any such other Body Corporate, Company, or Person as aforesaid, or shall use any such Plate, Wood, Stone, or other Material, or any other Instrument or Device, for the making or printing any Bank Note, Bank Bill of Exchange, or Bank Post Bill, or blank Bank Note, blank Bank Bill of Exchange, or blank Bank Post Bill, or Part of a Bank Note, Bank Bill of Exchange, or Bank Post Bill, or knowingly have in his Custody or Possession any such Plate, Wood, Stone, or other Material, or any such Instrument or Device, or shall knowingly offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, or have in his Custody or Possession, any Paper upon which any blank Bank Note, blank Bank Bill of Exchange, or blank Bank Post Bill of the Governor and Company of the Bank of England or of the Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, or of any such other Body Corporate, Company, or Person as aforesaid, or Part of a Bank Note, Bank Bill of Exchange, or Bank Post Bill, or any Name, Word, or Character, resembling or apparently intended to resemble any such Subscription, shall be made or printed, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Fourteen Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nXVIII. Whosoever without lawful Authority or Excuse (the Proof whereof shall lie on the Party accused,) shall engrave or in anywise make upon any Plate whatsoever, or upon any Wood, Stone, or other Material, any Word, Number, Figure, Device, Character or Ornament the Impression taken from which shall resemble or apparently be intended to resemble any Part of a Bank Note, Bank Bill of Exchange, or Bank Post Bill of the Governor and Company of the Bank of England or of the Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, or of any other Body Corporate, Company or Person carrying on the Business of Bankers, or shall use, or knowingly have in his Custody or Possession, any such Plate, Wood, Stone, or other Material, or any other Instrument or Device for the impressing or making upon any Paper or other Material any Word, Number, Figure, Character, or Ornament which shall resemble or apparently be intended to resemble any Part of a Bank Note, Bank Bill of Exchange, or Bank Post Bill of the Governor and Company of the Bank of England or of the Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, or of any such other Body Corporate, Company, or Person as aforesaid, or shall knowingly offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, or have in his Custody or Possession, any Paper or other Material upon which there shall be an Impression of any such Matter as aforesaid, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Fourteen Years and not less than Three Years,--or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nXIX. Whosoever, without lawful Authority or Excuse (the Proof whereof shall lie on the Party accused), shall make or use any Frame, Mould or Instrument for the Manufacture of Paper, with the Name or Firm of any Body Corporate, Company, or Person carrying on the Business of Bankers, (other than and except the Banks of England and Ireland respectively), appearing visible in the Substance of the Paper, or knowingly have in his Custody or Possession, any such Frame, Mould or Instrument, or Paper made, use, sell, expose to sale, utter or dispose of, or knowingly have in his Custody or Possession, any Paper in the Substance of which the Name or Firm of any such Body Corporate, Company or Person shall appear visible, or by any Art or Contrivance cause the Name or Firm of any such Body Corporate, Company, or Person to appear visible in the Substance of the Paper upon which the same shall be written or printed, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Fourteen Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nXX. Whosoever, without lawful Authority or Excuse, (the Proof whereof shall lie on the Party accused), shall engrave or in anywise make upon any Plate whatsoever, or upon any Wood, Stone, or other Material, any Bill of Exchange, Promissory Note, Undertaking, or Order for Payment of Money, or any Part of any Bill of Exchange, Promissory Note, Undertaking, or Order for Payment of Money, in whatsoever Language the same may be expressed, and whether the same shall or shall not be or be intended to be under Seal, purporting to be the Bill, Note, Undertaking, or Order for Payment of Money of any Body Corporate, Company, or Person carrying on the Business of Bankers, or of any other Body Corporate, Company, or Person, or shall use any such Plate, Wood, Stone, or other Material, or any other Instrument or Device, for the making or printing any such Bill, Note, Undertaking, or Order for Payment of Money, or Part of any such Bill, Note, Undertaking, or Order for Payment of Money, or knowingly have in his Custody or Possession any such Plate, Wood, Stone, or other Material, or any such Instrument or Device, or shall knowingly offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, or have in his Custody or Possession, any Paper upon which any such Bill, Note, Undertaking, or Order for Payment of Money, or Part of any such Bill, Note, Undertaking, or Order for Payment of Money, shall be made or printed, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Fourteen Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nPage 455\n\n600\n\n454\n\nEugraving or having any Plate, &c. for making Notes of Bank of England or Ireland or other Banks, or having Paper on which a blank Bank Note, &c. shall be printed, or uttering, &c.\n\nEngraving on any Plate, &c., any Word, Number, or Device, resembling Part of a Bank Note, Bank Bill of Exchange, or Bank Post Bill.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 308622, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "page_number": 612, "title": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "content_text": "Page 456\n\n601\n\nForging Deeds, Bonds, &c.\n\nForging Wills.\n\nForging Bills of Exchange or Promissory Notes\n\nORDINANCE No. 6 of 1865.\n\nForgery.\n\ntaking, or Order, or Part of the Bill, Note, Undertaking, or Order of any Foreign Prince or State, or of any Minister or Officer in the Service of any Foreign Prince or State, or of any Body Corporate or Body of the like Nature, constituted or recognised by any Foreign Prince or State, or of any Person or Company of Persons, resident in any Country not under the Dominion of Her Majesty, or shall use, or knowingly have in his Custody or Possession, any Plate, Stone, Wood, or other Material upon which any such Foreign Bill, Note, Undertaking or Order or any Part thereof, shall be engraved or made, or shall knowingly offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, or have in his Custody or Possession, any Paper upon which any Part of any such Foreign Bill, Note, Undertaking, or Order shall be made or printed, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Fourteen Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nAs to forging Deeds, Wills, Bills of Exchange, &c.\n\nXXI. Whosoever with Intent to defraud shall forge or alter or shall offer, utter, dispose of or put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any Deed, or any Bond or Writing Obligatory, or any Assignment at Law or in Equity of any such Bond or Writing Obligatory, or shall forge any Name, Handwriting, or Signature of a Witness attesting the Execution of any Deed, Bond, or Writing Obligatory, or shall offer, utter, dispose of or put off any Deed, Bond, or Writing Obligatory having thereon any such forged Name, Handwriting, or Signature, knowing the same to be forged, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for Life or for any Term not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nXXII. Whosoever with Intent to defraud shall forge or alter, or shall offer, utter, dispose of or put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any Will, Testament, Codicil, or Testamentary Instrument shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for Life or for any Term not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nXXIII. Whosoever shall forge or alter, or shall offer, utter, dispose of or put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any Bill of Exchange, or any Acceptance, Indorsement, or Assignment of any Bill of Exchange or any Promissory Note for the Payment of Money or any Indorsement or Assignment of any such Promissory Note, with Intent to defraud, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for Life or for any Term not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nPage 457\n\nORDINANCE No. 6 of 1865.\n\nForgery.\n\nXXIV. Whosoever shall forge or alter or shall offer, utter, dispose of or put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any Undertaking, Warrant, Order, Authority, or Request, for the Payment of Money, or for the Delivery or Transfer of any Goods or Chattels or of any Note, Bill, or other Security for the Payment of Money, or for procuring or giving Credit or any Indorsement on, or Assignment of, any such Undertaking, Warrant, Order, Authority, or Request or any Accountable Receipt, Acquittance, or Receipt for Money or for Goods or for any Note Bill or other Security for the Payment of Money or any Indorsement on or Assignment of any such accountable Receipt with Intent, in any of the Cases aforesaid, to defraud shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for Life or for any Term not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nProcuration\n\nXXV. Whosoever with Intent to defraud shall draw, make, sign, accept, or indorse any Bill of Exchange or Promissory Note or any Undertaking, Warrant, Order, Authority, or Request for the Payment of Money or for the Delivery or Transfer of Goods or Chattels, or of any Bill, Note, or other Security for Money by Procuration or otherwise for, in the Name, or on the Account of any other Person without lawful Authority or Excuse, or shall offer, utter, dispose of or put off any such Bill, Note, Undertaking, Warrant, Order, Authority or Request so made, drawn, signed, accepted or indorsed by Procuration or otherwise without lawful Authority or Excuse as aforesaid, knowing the same to have been so drawn, made, signed, accepted or indorsed as aforesaid shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Fourteen Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nXXVI. Whenever any Cheque or Draft on any Banker shall be crossed with the Name of a Banker or with Two transverse Crossings on Lines with the Words \"and Company\" or any Abbreviation thereof, whosoever shall obliterate, add to, or alter any such Crossing, or shall offer, utter, dispose of or put off any Cheque or Draft whereon any such Obliteration, Addition, or Alteration has been made with Intent in any of the Cases aforesaid, to defraud, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for Life or for any Term not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nXXVII. Whosoever", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 308623, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "page_number": 613, "title": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "content_text": "602\n\n458\n\nForging De- bentures.\n\nForging Pro- ceedings of Courts of Re- cord or Courts of Equity.\n\nForging Copics or Certificates of Records, Process of Courts not of Record, and using forged Process.\n\nORDINANCE No. 6. of 1865.\n\nForgery.\n\nXXVII. Whosoever shall fraudulently forge or alter, or shall offer, utter, dispose of or put off, knowing the same to be forged or fraudulently altered, any Debenture issued under any lawful Authority whatsoever, either within Her Majesty's Dominions or elsewhere, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Fourteen Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nAs to forging Records, Process, Instruments of Evidence, &c. XXVIII. Whosoever shall forge or fraudulently alter or shall offer, utter, dispose of or put off, knowing the same to be forged or fraudulently altered, any Record, Writ, Return, Panel, Process, Rule, Order, Warrant, Interrogatory, Deposition, Affidavit, Affirmation, Declaration, Recognizance, Cognovit actionem or Warrant of Attorney, or any original Document whatsoever of or belonging to any Court of Record, or any Bill, Petition, Process, Notice, Rule, Answer, Pleading, Interrogatory, Deposition, Affidavit, Affirmation, Declaration, Report, Order or Decree or any original Document whatsoever of or belonging to any Court of Equity or Court of Vice-Admiralty in this Colony, or any Document or Writing or any Copy of any Document or Writing used or intended to be used as Evidence in any Court in this Section mentioned, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Seven Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nXXIX. Whosoever being the Clerk of any Court or other Officer having the Custody of the Records of any Court, or being the Deputy of any such Clerk or Officer shall utter any false Copy or Certificate of any Record, knowing the same to be false; and whosoever other than such Clerk, Officer or Deputy shall sign or certify any Copy or Certificate of any Record as such Clerk, Officer, or Deputy; and whosoever shall forge or fraudulently alter, or offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing the same to be forged or fraudulently altered, any Copy or Certificate of any Record or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off any Copy or Certificate of any Record having thereon any false or forged Name, Handwriting, or Signature, knowing the same to be false or forged; and whosoever shall forge the Seal of any Court of Record in this Colony, or shall forge or fraudulently alter any Process of any Court other than such Courts as in the last preceding Section mentioned, or shall serve or enforce any forged Process of any Court whatsoever, knowing the same to be forged, or shall deliver or cause to be delivered to any Person any Paper falsely purporting to be any such Process, or a Copy thereof, or to be any Judgment, Decree, or Order of any Court of Law or Equity, or a Copy thereof, knowing the same to be false, or shall act or profess to act under any such false Process, knowing the same to be false, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Seven Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\n459\n\nXXX. Whosoever shall forge or fraudulently alter or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing the same to be forged or fraudulently altered, any Instrument, whether written or printed, or partly written and partly printed, which is or shall be made Evidence in this Colony by any Act of Parliament or Ordinance passed or to be passed, and for which Offence no Punishment is herein provided, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Seven Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nAs to forging Registers of Deeds.\n\nXXXI. Whosoever shall forge or fraudulently alter, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off, knowing the same to be forged or fraudulently altered, any Memorial, Affidavit, Affirmation, Declaration, Entry, Certificate, Indorsement, Document, or Writing made or issued under the Provisions of any Ordinance passed or hereafter to be passed for or relating to the Registry of Deeds, or shall forge or counterfeit the Seal of or belonging to any Office for the Registry of Deeds, or any Stamp or Impression of any such Seal; or shall forge any Name, Handwriting or Signature purporting to be the Name, Handwriting or Signature of any Person to any such Memorial, Affidavit, Affirmation, Declaration, Entry, Certificate, Indorsement, Document, or Writing, which shall be required or directed to be signed by or by virtue of any Act of Parliament or Ordinance passed or to be passed, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off any such Memorial or other Writing as in this Section before mentioned, having thereon any such forged Stamp or Impression of any such Seal, or any such forged Name, Handwriting, or Signature, knowing the same to be forged, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Fourteen Years, and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nAs to forging Orders, &c., of Justices of the Peace. XXXII. Whosoever, with Intent to defraud, shall forge or alter, or shall offer, utter, dispose of or put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any Summons, Conviction, Order, or Recognizances, Warrant Affidavits, &c.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 308624, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "page_number": 614, "title": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "content_text": "460\n\nORDINANCE No. 6 of 1865.\n\nForgery.\n\nWarrant of any Justice of the Peace, or any Recognizance purporting to have been entered into before any Justice of the Peace, or other Officer authorized to take the same, or any Examination, Deposition, Affidavit, Affirmation, or solemn Declaration, taken or made before any Justice of the Peace, or any Commissioner appointed to administer Oaths, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for the Term of Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nAs to forging Official Signatures.\n\nXXXIII. Whosoever, with Intent to defraud, shall forge or alter any Certificate, Report, Entry, Licence, Permit, Indorsement, Direction, Authority, Instrument, or Writing, made or purporting or appearing to be made by the Governor, or Colonial Secretary, or by the Colonial Treasurer, Auditor-General, or any Officer of Customs, or by any Officer of any Court in this Colony, or the Name, Handwriting, or Signature of the Governor, Colonial Secretary, Colonial Treasurer, Auditor-General, Officer of Customs, or Officer, as aforesaid, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off any such Certificate, Report, Entry, Licence, Permit, Indorsement, Direction, Authority, Instrument, or Writing, knowing the same to be forged or altered, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Fourteen Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nAcknowledging Recognizance, Bail, &c., in Name of another.\n\nXXXIV. Whosoever, without lawful Authority or Excuse (the Proof whereof shall lie on the Party accused), shall, in the Name of any other Person, acknowledge any Recognizance or Bail, or any Judgment, or any Deed or other Instrument, before any Court, Judge, or other Person lawfully authorized in that Behalf, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Seven Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nAs to forging Marriage Licences.\n\nXXXV. Whosoever shall forge or fraudulently alter any Licence of, or Certificate for Marriage, or shall offer, utter, dispose of or put off any such Licence or Certificate, knowing the same to be forged or fraudulently altered, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Seven Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nAs to forging Registers of Births, Marriages, and Deaths.\n\nXXXVI. Whosoever shall unlawfully destroy, deface, or injure, or cause or permit to be destroyed, defaced, or injured, any Register of Births, Baptisms, Marriages, Deaths, or Burials which now is or hereafter shall be by Law authorized or required to be kept in this Colony, or any Part of any such Register, or any certified Copy of any such Register, or any Part thereof, or shall forge or fraudulently alter in any such Register any Entry relating to any Birth, Baptism, Marriage, Death, or Burial, or any Part of any such Register, or any certified Copy of such Register, or of any Part thereof, or shall knowingly and unlawfully insert or cause or permit to be inserted in any such Register, or in any certified Copy thereof, any false Entry of any Matter relating to any Birth, Baptism, Marriage, Death, or Burial, or shall knowingly and unlawfully give any false Certificate relating to any Birth, Baptism, Marriage, Death, or Burial, or shall certify any Writing to be a Copy or Extract from any such Register, knowing such Writing, or the Part of such Register whereof such Copy or Extract shall be so given, to be false in any material Particular, or shall forge or counterfeit the Seal of or belonging to any Register Office or Burial Board, or shall offer, utter, dispose of, or put off any such Register, Entry, certified Copy, Certificate, or Seal, knowing the same to be false, forged, or altered, or shall offer, utter, dispose of or put off any Copy of any Entry in any such Register, knowing such Entry to be false, forged, or altered, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for Life, or for any Term not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nXXXVII. Whosoever shall knowingly and wilfully insert or cause or permit to be inserted in any Register directed or required by Law to be transmitted to any Registrar or other Officer any false Entry of any Matter relating to any Baptism, Marriage, or Burial, or shall forge or alter, or shall offer, utter, dispose of or put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any Copy of any Register so directed or required to be transmitted as aforesaid, or shall knowingly and wilfully sign or verify any Copy of any Register so directed or required to be transmitted as aforesaid, which Copy shall be false in any part thereof, knowing the same to be false, or shall unlawfully destroy, deface, or injure, or shall for any fraudulent Purpose take from its Place of Deposit, or conceal, any such Copy of any Register, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for Life or for any Term not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\n481\n\n603", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 308625, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "page_number": 615, "title": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "content_text": "462\n\nDemanding Property upon forged Instruments.\n\nForging any Instrument however designated which is in Law a Will, Deed, Bill of Exchange, &c.\n\nORDINANCE No. 6. of 1865.\n\nForgery.\n\nForging, &c., Documents in the Colony purporting to be...\n\nfor any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nAs to demanding Property upon Forged Instruments,\n\nXXXVIII. Whosoever, with intent to defraud, shall demand, receive, or obtain, or cause or procure to be delivered or paid to any Person, or endeavour to receive or obtain, or to cause or procure to be delivered or paid to any Person, any Chattel, Money, Security for Money, or other Property whatsoever, under, upon, or by virtue of any forged or altered Instrument whatsoever, knowing the same to be forged or altered, or under, upon, or by virtue of any attested Copy of any Will, Testament, Codicil, or Testamentary Writing, deposited in any Registrar's Office in this Colony, knowing the Will, Testament, Codicil, or Testamentary Writing in respect of which such attested Copy shall have been obtained to have been forged or altered, or knowing such attested Copy to have been obtained by any false Oath, Affirmation, Declaration, or Affidavit, shall be guilty of Felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Fourteen Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nAs to other Matters.\n\nXXXIX. Where by this or by any other Ordinance any Person is or shall hereafter be made liable to Punishment for forging or altering, or for offering, uttering, disposing of, or putting off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any Instrument or Writing designated in such Ordinance by any special Name or Description, and such Instrument or Writing, however designated, shall be in Law a Will, Testament, Codicil, or Testamentary Writing, or a Mortgage, Lease, Contract, Deed, Bond, or Writing Obligatory, or a Bill of Exchange, or a Promissory Note for the Payment of Money, or an Indorsement on or Assignment of a Bill of Exchange or Promissory Note for the Payment of Money, or an Acceptance of a Bill of Exchange, or an Undertaking, Warrant, Order, Authority, or Request for the Payment of Money, or an Indorsement on or Assignment of an Undertaking, Warrant, Order, Authority, or Request for the Payment of Money, within the true Intent and Meaning of this Ordinance, in every such case the Person forging or altering such Instrument or Writing, or offering, uttering, disposing of, or putting off such Instrument or Writing, knowing the same to be forged or altered, may be indicted as an Offender against this Ordinance, and punished accordingly.\n\nXL. Where the forging or altering any Writing or Matter whatsoever, or the offering, uttering, disposing of or putting off any Writing or Matter whatsoever, knowing the same to be forged or altered, is in this Ordinance expressed to be an Offence,\n\nORDINANCE No. 6. OF 1865.\n\nForgery.\n\n463\n\nif any Person shall, in this Colony, forge, or alter, or offer, utter, dispose of or put off, knowing the same to be forged or altered, any such Writing or Matter in whatsoever Place or Country out of this Colony, whether under the Dominion of Her Majesty or not, such Writing or matter may purport to be made or may have been made, and in whatever Language the same or any Part thereof may be expressed, every such Person, and every Person aiding, abetting, or counselling such Person, shall be deemed to be an Offender within the Meaning of this Ordinance, and shall be punishable thereby in the same Manner as if the Writing or Matter had purported to be made or had been made in this Colony, and if any Person shall in this Colony forge or alter, or offer, utter, dispose of or put off, knowing the same to be forged, or altered, any Bill of Exchange, or any Promissory Note for the Payment of Money, or any Indorsement on or Assignment of any Bill of Exchange or Promissory Note for the Payment of Money, or any Acceptance of any Bill of Exchange, or any Undertaking, Warrant, Order, Authority, or Request for Payment of Money, or for the Delivery or Transfer of any Goods or Security, or any Deed, Bond, or Writing Obligatory for the Payment of Money (whether such Deed, Bond, or Writing Obligatory shall be made only for the Payment of Money, or for the Payment of Money together with some other Purpose), or any Indorsement on or Assignment of any such Undertaking, Warrant, Order, Authority, Request, Deed, Bond, or Writing Obligatory, in whatsoever Place or Country out of this Colony, whether under the Dominion of Her Majesty or not, the Money payable or secured by such Bill, Note, Undertaking, Warrant, Order, Authority, Request, Deed, Bond, or Writing Obligatory may be or may purport to be payable, and in whatever Language the same respectively or any Part thereof may be expressed, and whether such Bill, Note, Undertaking, Warrant, Order, Authority, or Request be or be not under Seal, every such Person, and every Person aiding, abetting, or counselling such Person, shall be deemed to be an Offender within the Meaning of this Ordinance, and shall be punishable thereby in the same Manner as if the Money had been payable or had purported to be payable in this Colony.\n\nXLI. In any Information for forging, altering, offering, uttering, disposing of or putting off any Instrument it shall be sufficient to describe such Instrument by any Name or Designation by which the same may be usually known, or by the Purport thereof, without setting out any Copy or Fac-simile thereof, or otherwise describing the same or the Value thereof.\n\nXLII. In any Information for engraving or making the whole or any Part of any Instrument, Matter, or Thing whatsoever, or for using or having the unlawful Custody or Possession of any Plate or other Material upon which the whole or any Part of any Instrument, Matter, or Thing whatsoever shall have been engraved or made, or for having the unlawful Custody or Possession of any Paper upon which the whole or any Part of any Instrument, Matter, or Thing whatsoever shall have been made or printed, it shall be sufficient to describe such Instrument, Matter,...\n\n604", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 308626, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "page_number": 616, "title": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "content_text": ".605\n\n464\n\nIntent to de-\n\nlar Persons need not be averred.\n\nORDINANCE No. 6. OF 1865.\n\nForgery.\n\nMatter, or Thing by any Name or Designation by which the same may be usually known, without setting out any Copy or Fae-simile of the whole or any Part of such Instrument, Matter, or Thing.\n\nXLIII. It shall be sufficient, in any Information for forging, fraud, partially altering, uttering, offering, disposing of or putting off any Instrument whatsoever, where it shall be necessary to allege an Intent to defraud, to allege that the Party accused did the Act with Intent to defraud, without alleging an Intent to defraud any particular Person; and on the Trial of any such Offence it shall not be necessary to prove an Intent to defraud any particular Person, but it shall be sufficient to prove that the Party accused did the Act charged with an Intent to defraud.\n\nInterpretation\n\n28 to criminal Possession.\n\nSearch for Paper or Implements employed in any Forgery, and for forged Instruments.\n\nXLIV. Where the having any Matter in the Custody or Possession of any Person is in this Ordinance expressed to be an Offence, if any Person shall have any such Matter in his personal Custody or Possession, or shall knowingly and wilfully have any such Matter in the actual Custody or Possession of any other Person, or shall knowingly and wilfully have any such Matter in any Dwelling House or other Building, Lodging, Apartment, Field, or other Place, open or inclosed, whether belonging to or occupied by himself or not, and whether such Matter shall be so had for his own Use, or for the Use or Benefit of another, every such Person shall be deemed and taken to have such Matter in his Custody or Possession within the Meaning of this Ordinance.\n\nXLV. If it shall be made to appear, by Information on Oath, Affirmation or Declaration before a Justice of the Peace, that there is reasonable Cause to believe that any Person has in his Custody or Possession, without lawful Authority or Excuse, any Note or Bill of the Governor and Company of the Bank of England or Ireland, or of any Body Corporate, Company, or Person carrying on the Business of Bankers, or any Frame, Mould, or Implement for making Paper in imitation of the Paper used for such Notes or Bills, or any such Paper, or any Plate, Wood, Stone, or other Material having thereon any Words, Forms, Devices, or Characters capable of producing or intended to produce the Impression of any such Note or Bill, or any Part thereof, or any Tool, Implement, or Material used or employed or intended to be used or employed in or about any of the Operations aforesaid, or any forged Security, Document, or Instrument whatsoever, or any Machinery, Frame, Mould, Plate, Die, Seal, Paper, or other Matter or Thing used or employed or intended to be used or employed in the Forgery of any Security, Document, or Instrument whatsoever, such Justice may, if he think fit, grant a Warrant to search for the same; and if the same shall be found upon such Search, it shall be lawful to seize and carry the same before a Police Magistrate, to be by him disposed of according to Law; and all such Matters and Things so seized as aforesaid shall by Order of the Court where any such Offender shall be tried, or in case there shall be no such Trial, then by Order of a Police Magistrate, be defaced and destroyed or otherwise disposed of as such Court or Justice shall direct.\n\nXLVI. Whosoever\n\nORDINANCE No. 6. OF 1865.\n\nForgery.\n\n465\n\nXLVI. Whosoever shall after the Commencement of this Ordinance be convicted of an Offence which shall have been subjected by any Enactment or Enactments in Force in this Colony to the same Pains and Penalties as are imposed by the Act of the Imperial Parliament passed in the Fifth Year of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth, intituled An Act against Forgers of false Deeds and Writings for any of the Offences first enumerated in the said Act, shall be guilty of Felony, and shall, in lieu of such Pains and Penalties, be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be kept in Penal Servitude for any Term not exceeding Fourteen Years and not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nc. 66, and are\n\nXLVII. Where by any Enactment now in Force in this Colony any Person falsely making, forging, counterfeiting, erasing, or altering any Matter whatsoever, or uttering, publishing, offering, disposing of, putting away, or making use of any Matter whatsoever, knowing the same to have been falsely made, forged, counterfeited, erased, or altered, or any Person demanding or endeavouring to receive or have any Thing, or to do or cause to be done any Act, upon or by virtue of any Matter whatsoever, knowing such Matter to have been falsely made, forged, counterfeited, erased, or altered, would according to the Provisions contained in any such Enactment be guilty of Felony and would before the passing of the Act of the First Year of King William the Fourth, Chapter Sixty-six, have been liable to suffer Death as a Felon; or where by any Enactment now in Force in this Colony any Person falsely personating another, or falsely acknowledging any Thing in the Name of another, or falsely representing any other Person than the real Party to be such real Party, or wilfully making a false Entry in any Book, Account, or Document, or in any Manner wilfully falsifying any Part of any Book, Account or Document, or wilfully making a transfer of any Stock, Annuity, or Fund in the Name of any Person not being the Owner thereof, or knowingly taking any false Oath, or knowingly making any false Affidavit, false Affirmation or false Declaration or demanding or receiving any Money or other Thing by virtue of any Probate or Letters of Administration, knowing the Will on which such Probate shall have been obtained to have been false or forged, or knowing such Probate or Letters of Administration to have been obtained by means of any false Oath, false Affirmation or false Declaration would according to the Provisions contained in any such Act, be guilty of Felony, and would before the passing of the said Act of the First Year of King William the Fourth have been liable to suffer Death as a Felon; or when by any Enactment now in Force any Person making or using, or knowingly having in his Custody or Possession, any Frame, Mould, or Instrument for the making of Paper, with certain words visible in the Substance thereof, or any Person making such Paper, or causing certain Words to appear visible in the Substance of any Paper would, according to the Provisions contained in any such Enactment, be guilty of Felony, and would before the passing of the said Act of the First Year of King William the Fourth have\n\nG g\n\nbeen", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 308627, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "page_number": 617, "title": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "content_text": "466\n\nPrincipals in the Second Degree and Accessories.\n\nFine and Sureties for keeping the Peace; in what Cases.\n\nHard Labour.\n\nSolitary Confinement.\n\nCommencement of Ordinance.\n\nORDINANCE No. 6 OF 1865.\n\nForgery.\n\nbeen liable to suffer Death as a Felon; then, and in each of the several Cases aforesaid, if any Person shall after the Commencement of this Ordinance be convicted of any such Felony as is herein-before in this Section mentioned, or of aiding, abetting, counselling, or procuring the Commission thereof, and the same shall not be punishable under any of the other Provisions of this Act, every such Person shall be liable at the Discretion of the Court to be kept in Penal Servitude for Life or for any Term not less than Three Years, or to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement.\n\nXLVIII In the Case of every Felony punishable under this Ordinance, every Principal in the Second Degree, and every Accessory before the Fact, shall be punishable in the same Manner as the Principal in the First Degree is by this Ordinance punishable; and every Accessory after the Fact to any Felony punishable under this Ordinance shall on Conviction be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and with or without Solitary Confinement; and every Person who shall aid, abet, counsel, or procure the Commission of any Misdemeanor punishable under this Ordinance shall be liable to be proceeded against, indicted, and punished as a principal Offender.\n\nXLIX. Whenever any Person shall be convicted of a Misdemeanor under this Ordinance it shall be lawful for the Court, if it shall think fit, in addition to or in lieu of any of the Punishments by this Ordinance authorized, to fine the Offender, and to require him to enter into his own Recognizances, and to find Sureties, both or either, for keeping the Peace, and being of good Behaviour; and in all Cases of Felonies in this Ordinance mentioned it shall be lawful for the Court, if it shall think fit, to require the Offender to enter into his own Recognizances, and to find Sureties, both or either, for keeping the Peace, in addition to any of the Punishments by this Ordinance authorized Provided that no Person shall be imprisoned under this Clause for not finding Sureties for any Period exceeding One Year.\n\nL. Whenever Imprisonment, with or without Hard Labour, may be awarded for any Offence under this Ordinance, the Court may sentence the Offender to be imprisoned, or to be imprisoned and kept to Hard Labour, and in either Case the Sentence shall be carried out in accordance with the Provisions of Ordinance No. 4 of 1863, Section XV.\n\nLI. Whenever Solitary Confinement may be awarded for any Offence under this Ordinance, the Court may direct the Offender to be kept in Solitary Confinement for any Portion or Portions of his Imprisonment, or of his Imprisonment with Hard Labour, not exceeding One Month at any One Time, and not exceeding Three Months in any One Year.\n\nLII. This Ordinance shall commence and take effect on the Fourteenth Day of June, in the Year One Thousand Eight hundred and Sixty-five.\n\nORDINANCE No. 9 of 1865.\n\nNeutrality.\n\nNo. 9 of 1865.\n\nAn Ordinance to give Effect to Her Majesty's Regulations for the Observance of Neutrality during the existing Hostilities between the United States and the States calling themselves the Confederate States of America.\n\n[3rd June 1865.]\n\nWHEREAS Her Majesty has expressed her full Determination to observe the Duties of Neutrality during the existing Hostilities between the United States and the States calling themselves the Confederate States of America, and has resolved to prevent, as far as possible, the Use of Her Majesty's Harbours, Ports, and Coasts and the Waters within Her Majesty's territorial Jurisdiction in aid of the Warlike Purposes of either Belligerent; and whereas in furtherance of such Her Majesty's Determinations expressed as aforesaid Her Majesty has (amongst other Things) caused it to be notified and published that no Ship of War or Privateer of either Belligerent should be permitted while in any Port, Roadstead or Waters subject to the territorial Jurisdiction of Her Majesty to take in any Supplies, except Provisions and such other Things as might be requisite for the Subsistence of her Crew, and except so much Coal only as would be sufficient to carry such Vessel to the nearest Port of her own Country or to some nearer Destination, and that no Coal should be again supplied to any such Ship of War or Privateer in the same or any other Port, Roadstead, or Waters subject to the territorial Jurisdiction of Her Majesty without Special Permission, after the Expiration of Three Months from the Time when such Coal should have been last supplied to her within British Waters as aforesaid; And whereas the Circumstances of this Colony are such as to render it necessary in order to give full Effect to Her Majesty's Intention as aforesaid that Recourse be had to local Enactment: Be it therefore enacted by His Excellency the Governor of Hongkong, by and with the Advice of the Legislative Council thereof, as follows:\n\n513\n\nI. Whosoever shall, within this Colony or the Waters thereof, knowingly furnish or supply or shall knowingly contract or agree to furnish or supply, or shall knowingly aid or assist in furnishing or supplying or shall knowingly cause or procure to be furnished or supplied to, or for the Use of any Ship of War or Privateer of the United States of North America or of the States calling themselves the Confederate States of America, whilst such Ship of War or Privateer is within the Waters of this Colony, or within any Distance from this Colony, not exceeding Five Miles, any Arms, Ammunition, Gunpowder, or Naval or Military Stores, or shall, within this Colony or the Waters thereof, put on Board, or shall contract or agree to put on Board, or shall aid or assist in putting on Board, or shall cause or procure to be put on Board of any Vessel, Boat, Barge, or other Craft, any Arms, Ammunition, Gunpowder, or Naval or Military Stores, with the Intent and Design that the same may be conveyed to any such Ship of War or Privateer as aforesaid\n\n606", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 308633, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "page_number": 623, "title": "CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4]", "content_text": "612\n\n524\n\nWhat shall be sufficient Evidence of Conviction for a previous Offence.\n\nORDINANCE No. 10. of 1865.\n\nCoinage Offences,\n\nable; and every Accessory after the Fact to any Felony punishable under this Ordinance shall be liable to be imprisoned for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour.\n\nXXXIV. Where any Person shall have been convicted of any Offence against this Ordinance, or any former Enactment in Force in this Colony relating to the Coin, and shall afterwards be indicted for any Offence against this Ordinance committed subsequent to such Conviction, it shall be sufficient in any such Indictment or Information, after charging such subsequent Offence, to state the Substance and Effect only (omitting the formal Part) of the Indictment and Conviction for the previous Offence, and a Certificate containing the Substance and Effect only (omitting the formal Part) of the Indictment or Information and Conviction for the previous Offence, purporting to be signed by the Registrar or Deputy Registrar of the Supreme Court, shall, upon Proof of the Identity of the Person of the Offender, be sufficient Evidence of the previous Conviction, and the Proceedings upon any Indictment or Information for committing any Offence after a previous Conviction or Convictions shall be as follows: (that is to say) The Offender shall, in the first Instance, be arraigned upon so much only of the Indictment or Information as charges the subsequent Offence, and if he plead Not Guilty, or if the Court order a Plea of Not Guilty to be entered on his Behalf, the Jury shall be charged, in the first Instance, to inquire concerning such subsequent Offence only; and if they find him Guilty, or if on Arraignment he plead Guilty, he shall then, and not before, be asked whether he had been previously convicted as alleged in the Indictment or Information, and if he answer that he had been so previously convicted the Court may proceed to sentence him accordingly, but if he deny that he had been so previously convicted, or stand mute of Malice, or will not answer directly to such Question, the Jury shall then be charged to inquire concerning such previous Conviction or Convictions, and in such Case it shall not be necessary to swear the Jury again, but the Oath already taken by them shall for all Purposes be deemed to extend to such last-mentioned Inquiry. Provided that if upon the Trial of any Person for any such subsequent Offence such Person shall give Evidence of his good Character, it shall be lawful for the Attorney General, in answer thereto, to give Evidence of the Conviction of such Person for the previous Offence or Offences, before such Verdict of Guilty shall be returned, and the Jury shall inquire concerning such previous Conviction or Convictions at the same Time that they inquire concerning such subsequent Offence.\n\nTrial.\n\nFine and Sureties for keeping the Peace, in what Cases.\n\nXXXV. Whenever any Person shall be convicted of any Indictable Misdemeanor punishable under this Ordinance the Court may, if it shall think fit, in addition to or in lieu of any of the Punishments by this Ordinance authorized, fine the Offender, and require him to enter into his own Recognizances, and to find Sureties, both or either, for keeping the Peace and being of good Behaviour; and in case of any Felony punishable under this Ordinance, the Court may, if it shall think fit, require the Offender to enter into his own Recognizances, and to find Sureties, both or either, for keeping the Peace, in addition to any Punishment by this Ordinance authorized. Provided that no Person shall be imprisoned under this Clause for not finding Sureties for any Period exceeding One Year.\n\n525\n\nXXXVI. Whenever Imprisonment, with or without Hard Labour, may be awarded for any Indictable Offence under this Ordinance, the Court may sentence the Offender to be imprisoned, or to be imprisoned and kept to Hard Labour, and in either Case the Sentence shall be carried out in accordance with the Provisions of Ordinance No. 4. of 1863, Section XV.\n\nXXXVII. Whenever Solitary Confinement may be awarded for any Offence under this Ordinance, the Court may direct the Offender to be kept in Solitary Confinement for any Portion or Portions of his Imprisonment, or of his Imprisonment with Hard Labour, not exceeding One Month at any One Time, and not exceeding Three Months in any One Year.\n\nSummary Proceedings may be under Ordinance No. 10. of 1844.\n\nXXXVIII. Every Offence hereby made punishable on Summary Conviction may be prosecuted in the Manner directed by Ordinance No. 10. of 1844.\n\nCommencement of Ordinance.\n\nXXXIX. This Ordinance, or such Portion or Portions thereof as to the Governor may seem fit, shall commence and take effect on such Day as shall hereafter be fixed by Proclamation under the Hand of the Governor; and such Portion or Portions of such Ordinance as shall not be included in such Proclamation shall be brought into Operation on a Day to be further fixed by another Proclamation under the Hand of the Governor.\n\nNo. 11. of 1865.\n\nAn Ordinance to repeal certain Enactments which have been consolidated in several Ordinances relating to Criminal Offences.\n\n[14th June, 1865.]\n\nWHEREAS by virtue of Ordinance No. 6. of 1846, and Ordinance No. 2. of 1846, divers Acts and Parts of Acts of the Imperial Parliament made and passed prior to the Fifth Day of April, One thousand Eight hundred and Forty-three, are in Force in this Colony, notwithstanding the same have been repealed by the Imperial Parliament; and whereas by Six several Ordinances, relating respectively to Offences against the Person, Malicious Injuries to Property, Larceny, Forgery, Coining, and Accessories and Abettors, a large Portion of the Matter contained in the said Acts and Parts of Acts, as also in several local Enactments, has been consolidated and amended; and it is therefore expedient to limit the Operation of the Ordinances firstly herein-before mentioned, so as to exclude therefrom the Acts and Parts of Acts so repealed, and to repeal the said local Enactments to the Extent specified in the Schedule hereto annexed: Be it enacted by His Excellency the Governor of Hongkong, with the Advice of the Legislative Council thereof, as follows:\n\nI. Section 4 of Ordinance No. 6. of 1845, and Section 3 of Ordinance No. 2. of 1846, shall, after the coming into Operation of this Ordinance, be read and construed as if the Acts and Parts of Acts repealed by the Imperial Parliament had not been mentioned therein.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 311187, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-197 - Governor Hennessy - 1882 [1-2]", "page_number": 208, "title": "CO129-197 - Governor Hennessy - 1882 [1-2]", "content_text": "much resembles it, it might be an ingenious forgery.\n\nYou may also remember that in reply to this I said that it was in order to obviate the possibility of such an assertion being at any time made that I desired your certificate, offering at the same time to pay any fee which the customs of the colony requires.\n\nI have to...(Signet) StughLow.\n\nTrue copy.\n\nEli Achuy Colourst\n\n0. 30 g 207 RECE\n\n\\PECS CMAR 2\n\nDJ Eitel to His Excellency the Governor.\n\n[Copy.] Sir,\n\n24th September 1881.\n\nSince writing last I have heard little of any Haytlari charge against me.\n\nI am inclined to think, and I am surprised at it, that my call concerning Omalley was not...action was not taken at all, however, he will nevertheless, I think, be able to withdraw his privilege. I was told that Hay Class attorney's statement, which Johnson signed...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-197 - Governor Hennessy - 1882 [1-2].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 311416, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-197 - Governor Hennessy - 1882 [1-2]", "page_number": 437, "title": "CO129-197 - Governor Hennessy - 1882 [1-2]", "content_text": "# THE DAILY PRESS, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 23RD, 1982.\n\n## HONGKONG VARIOUS.\n\n### INSURANCE.\n\n**THE DAILY PRESS** \nHONGKONG, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 23RD, 1982.\n\n## INSURANCE COMPANIES AT HANKURUES.\n\n### SOUTH GORMAN PURE INSURANCE COMPANY.\n\n| CAPITAL | $2.06 |\n| --- | --- |\n| ASSOCIATION. CAPITAL Path. | $200 |\n| The Under for the absen BL, IN POT PLYN Party | $350 |\n| PRIMANENT RESERVE TR Company | |\n| SPECIAL RESERVE FUND | $988 |\n| ARINI SCANUSS to its est-ut of £65,21% from | Colt, w. Yury, So. 10% Ti, ner seg. $22.50 to 12 Nacional, 250.46 42 12: Cault, 32bit) ndeges Jupe 200 23rek, ze pêk - BIZGA » 4.7 |\n| TOTAL CAPITAL | #76) |\n| AeDavies. | 228.936.17 |\n| IRELY H | #. 11. Punge, Exa, VierINDS. |\n| M. W. Toro, Eq. (W, | A Devorton, Big, Son, fing |\n| HOM | 517. & c., ogretacion. |\n| MATA TAR HAR & CL | Bankers. |\n| RICHARD OLACA ROLE. Bay. | ages, moda, Cerutti, E |\n| Potariss | wun Marme Brace |\n\n## NORTH BRYMISH AND MERCANTILE INSURANCE COMPANY.\n\n| Galettem, TUNED.... VRIGA 270 | Cozz (244. \"I tenant, DOT 1950 Ale 2010 to Bin Salgon, 120.00 DAZAL 231 |\n| --- | --- |\n| 112017, Noser Buil$15k Lind INSURANCE COMPANY. | Ilgari Primaran mudah me, get $329 to 5.45 ng Bed Ascorbit, or giant |\n| Crusaders 190, ame vine: 41, Mas, for Wa Yew uphoriena V SRD | Amish Talks, 30 pelan, per de$150 to the dou292\"%T! #93, vor gael.... $272 0.27 FAME NAMES IN 3241 1759' 18ine, Sod Pot. Farr dapa... 14 1.37 |\n| Faction dells, 15 Bar, par gun 3 2050 | Blasba, Vienkin, por pini 1170 a 176, motra, pa prank ... MORTALS. |\n| 4. 1730 Sel, et per at God. p. Natod, spy penali $2.50 | 4331 That its 100 2.51dun derby, Alman Women, a pre ple |\n| TUE masashgust, Apenas : | agatud |\n\n## STAFFORDSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY.\n\n**LIMITED** \nSTANDARD FIRE FE, LONDON, \nCAPITAL TILOSS FILULING, \nThe Und-acticing speist \n18÷LT \nThe Undervignat aver mai \nreving From Tits at Spice \n462919 to the stars enquiry at this Port, are prarado BANT POLICI Sagainst Fires. E the extens of ANGAST on dings an \nFonly stored therein. \nDiscomus. *.. \nVoerkrag. st. Mari, ISFA \nVOGEL & \n134501 HINKRE INSCRATE COXPART \n:IMITED) \nNOTIC y \nBRADUAL DISAPPEARANCE OF THE POLICAR GRANTRU \nCEDARK OF TEBANON. \nYANTA'S KISKA rundt paria of the Wost. \nTEEN TIRE INSURANCE \nCOMPANA. \nCAPTAI \nANG 200. \n3360454T \nSi \nWe \nCundy, Patela, \nwo \nsite, pervical. 21 Manhwans, echo \na, et al. \n- kama $ to 20% kuumeita Day Fiisin lanes, une pira* \n1500 to C, Bevara, Dagy pinen ambitie, pe piata din E M 97a1d ja Ban, senasala, tap šis a small, hoc pled.... \nlogan, anginal \nVarmacia Pati, 3 p.30 \neat, \nA MYN 4.15 2.18 \n639ty Ca \nWindow Chan, je for........ \nSUPPING IN THE CHINA WATSRƏ. \nCONATENGDA. \nRONOKONG \nPlatter! \nUZANA prox. \nfreew \nInaug \nFZA \nMATTAIN. \n1421521 \nCORBLÓMEZZ \nDANGERINE. \n13 Bauer Na Kusokong \nPol Clay Se \nIn Pour qu'ECO JANGAGA, 182 Ram. bk \nBike, \nLisa Pa \nADAMSON. REEL & C \nAgants, \nHazlerne, Auprat, 1864– \nNOW HO \nAsia A \nRats 241 Djeran \nWan, Hir \nFR Stamps & 120 \nPalom \n34. 27 Pivl \nFe 143 POR \nGur. she \nBossen & the \n(Mar. 27) Guldberg \nMalinzčan \nJan Allama \nBut ser \n909 \nSimon & Th \nBangkok \nSubarusana \nSink 20 \nChunk \nSat. 25, Prouenitos \nthen r \n3127 \nMiles \nFin Che Sau Supt. \nClich \nRulles \nPos To! Pingager \n3 \nRowe Dea \nBipi \n9. \n1 \nFeb 22 Roma \nRei \nPuar Yuen Co \nSea \nSAL \nP \nBelt, \nElab \nNov. 27 bias \nHip- \nChir \n1 Bulaos \n6 at Ashanus & Muda \nSator \njous 24 Canges \n33:7 \nPek Kon \nity of Teko \nam nu 50 MASC \nDeut \nNov, 2 g \nAae. ses! Code \nE \nPosit \n:25h 101 Petaryen \n1 ofer \nReb \nThe islamiza, Asats for the refrants iny, s prepren to AGERT BISKS \nFB-ness per Ce. Nors \ni \nThe Virates Fitfache Chorozup sa dissyfucced with a Company's betteltu vit ! * Pre unes fasaun jodur forest of Lebanon, i Association, Tandliale at the Pratite neg din. formerly orgive, bas deindied down to hand oumaly to Contentus, washer the demption of t. mura thicäct, nuluring holders an ink in oraygutten ka tiks der E Mount 10 track. Ex Rate it from complete set of Bhunia sentian Seals, the re- deal rates and rear its tenet in its wining liúint beint zavrtal to Reserve Pant. present extant, Mossem Pasta, the Governor faneral or the Lebanon, kas iernat o apostel \nvestnanca, dariɛining a series of stringent regulations cafealated to obcok, of pot geno ! kput a stop to, the windshem and enrolas rena of most rarelie in maroma \n---- \nBRADLOE AMITH, \nBonetary. kung, Rith a príl, 15x1, \n............ \n194 \nNATIONAL SULANCE PANY OF WTETTIN, \nty forbidden to put up tents or other why Tatarstant hawayers park kinds of sheer lite the distries of Aron's for the shove Campmay ara payanad to \nthe traza, to light Sky A Raguis Frans Curent Tadie. \nprovisions in the daily. No one in qui \nJvwed to break off a bough or evez a twię į \nfrom the brews. It is fortidden to bring af \nboasts hunion, be shay lursan, mulei, \n24, or an her kind of all, withi \nthe duntos. Shoalit ozen, shuip, desks, ar ļ \nHourkony. th Aĺny, 1821, \nOVETTE IMPERIA \nAMYR & \nCOMPANY. \nA BE A 2000. \n'NORTON & Co. Hi, 2015, 1821 \nBATAVIA SHA AND FIRE INSURANC \nCHIMPANY. \n* \nMay \ntatesigod, haing been appointed recaud Agerator the phone feetpake, ani pro Hungerlan pregná Kosmynoms ne tolkayna zeml \nMARINE RISKY. edictors at Corrent 16 sise, ravalle with heat of Tik Jamen, dat the actacipal Kamelin, wond the url. \nA KROKUYAGE ei famry-rumun på Ope¦ Bay Chi \nhinwed all LACIAL Hing Kinng num JAN DISES. Policicur on Viruplars Build Lido \n1. Pas an extent of Per \nA MITTWERP Pu can! (903) ANC pie Crawant Legal Et on wife wil dat \nat javnima chegued for kasvavanise an islamgia Levant ning details the line of the Jasno Migue Picim at Pulley. \nRUSSPLL & Come \nPIRE AND LIFT. Danza gast Prak avled st Chur other pantsruce oucle be found thin the end Sister. Coxiltimates Halperion preted initu, toy will be irredeemably ¦ for Kids äxanxarren in China. antented. \nPERSONAL REMINISCENCES OP LORD SATTORD. \nYeteran lyn god for youry Priso \nFlingum ad vos ural feel the Bstania \n'you' \nMATAR & Chn, granata. \nBaalstrix. r \nHargkone, It Tunare, Exte, \nAntiqu \n41 p \nA GRINDE GASKI hear ALGAMES MARITIME Vulva tark \nWhite Yengizza ROLE TRANSPORTS REUNIRS, \nPARIR \nFan! Young www.200 1995, Truh \nTHE WORTH BRITISH PIKE AND MATEN INSURANCE COMPART \nDE NHW RALAND \ngunay to make a bridge of hosta CAPITAL, CLOGANY Das Mimina Stadings \nbronce déturgavo no5 Rygtehteli ine the patri \ngets allied armis, the veut of ten Dank ATENDARS \n¡Cartran, Sym \nCarr A To....... \nTezda, laving been uppgirtali AGROS of the Alony, vel to \nIrving noviall be tact the Ensino Vedamind, Inning bidea EPETUTTI MAUTO HK to Aras Wallabia. The it time I had fonts for the lace Clayang, are pronamed in all para of the Woll 4 Pelaw Leicnger wo when I want one: ACCEPT FICE A MAGNE EIŠKA K \nli, Iard Stintfand to dies with Carvers Bates, allowing im nota. \nAdmiral Sir James Daedale this bird the \nBritaux. O renting the ship, we heard! \nGRO. D. STEVENS & C \nfrikany, 241 305, 1989. \nCOMPANY OF HANDONG. \notee of the picwe call out in si sove of noj PYRANBARDANOG DIRA KNAVBARU great respect \n\"Cune, cum, Prince, this wilt nerar du j \nBlue Jancary, 1994 \nHOTTOFT \n---- \nFTUR QUINA PIRE LIBURANÑE COM PANY, LYMCPRD, \nTe Votersigned, being tom puckered is pegod to AZUBES WBST-CLASS \nBeck buster swabben.\" Agent a len Crageny, as propered in sever Anaco, aut tier 15- \nC¦ YUNANIRO av tinm, nå Ratum, \nby wurde, hace pan, do! ARPT RENK gas in use winin Tar that By Dirty sange wall teguleer,\" in word Strate \nm. Toch Norway A \ntord to the Admin, whe whenced to re \ninto the re \n* Print of Triingua, the amez \nEyself the boner of sating to your \n$325,\" \nSIRNSSEN A CS.. \nhan pase of distributi ig a estudi prax. POLA 16 14 49erida prod analygyaka (13 ane) Sharaboleza wa kaka parkiábatel \"business \ndaine Company \nFril \nMash \nLis \nMwe \nSon Hanlin \nJJ 3 Cou \nFeb. 20 Ti. 3 \nAze \nFab. 19. Büs \nFirs \nYANCH ; 9% *0* \niDou. I't. Margar \nrish | Man Yung Wzg \nJet \n5:0 \nBlested & Ca \n2301.& 6. B. N. CO \nJH \n3. Dell & Qu d. Ses \n- zle she | 66 | Bavarra à Co \nSamalei, & \n37K thong & Sani \n3. M \n2. Quandrid Squ \nJun. 23 \nuesרני \nMAGASAKL \nIN PHAI OK 3 Faxrany. THES. \nir, je (3, \nYORONAMA. \nIN Pass 10 JAPONY, 1991 \nAuri \na. \nAdamsta, Hall & Co \nBangkok \nBeamch \nActonick \nfun pro Jan. \nArgon \nBirla S \n332 in \nCaptai \nBiguney \ndo \n•Carlis \nAline \nFren. Sir \ntiiases & Co \nFab. Kutafi \nFre \nOoh. Es choegin \nKid, ade \nJ \nChines \nFeb. 19 Tawi \nN.C.. \nAbout Py Gantry Art, Karhe & Co Snorr \n3. Crabap \nAmesed 31 | Captain \nBulmack \nVen. Willigis \nBril \n13 \n1 \nAnna \n!D' \nHid \nAs \nथ \nJ. SA Mo \nBrin \nCeb \nS \nBeth \n236 \nP. 31, C \nPas 2 Wel \n20. B \nbarte \nGov, sch \n50 \nSan. El Wostokyo \nLamb Peter \n3.1.6 Br \n'anim \nBb. A! W \nDuelo \n28 Cast-su \n1966. 2; M«Guita \nBag & C \n: Hutbew \nSapt, on sale \nAint-enh \nOur str \n$: Willey Do \nCaro \nPASTJ \nCabin \nthe \nCag \nFeb. \n2 \nRicky rick \nAUT \nDe 13 Janeken \n48 \nP. \nJay \nY. Man Hou; Ann, s \nhunting \nTalag \n| Ave. pl 1735 \n2. 3. C \nJuly | 2. 3. Tuoka, sterowa Wa Yuzu \nWait was D. Laik \ncintzelan Dan. st. \nMrk. 18) Verused. \nBaverik & S \nthus W's Yan \n2. Stymes & Con \nMela SAD \n4,17,& ki meumbeat De Baena, \n* \n4. \nHet steiga \nจด แม \nBalt, By \nSiooyen à ca \nwich & \nRow 1 Kayaci \nlivi, p \nEAMING NAME 132.5. \nPh & Warga Maritions \nAura C \nPrk 110 man Aura Gay \nNOSPHORIA 107. \"AD! \nJun. LauqUIL \nCatt plin Urvavy Meets of China. Dullay Jan. 181 W. tidley degan, and at \nSO WHE \n12! Simarovie dềmchand \nG18 Orist \nلابت اور \nBak \nMaria Anon \nAsc.rol \nالمقاتلة فكر \nJ. 1851 \nDTAGEL- \nSANTIA \nBell at the tinglin \nBj \nGer. 196 Chetan \n* Get al: ; Lives \nAnch/5 Ca \n237 \nAm 25 tais \nGer. Cutia, \nHER BRIANNI MAJERTY & SHIPS IN THE CHONA SQUADRON. \nاوری ارشد را \nEIG \nالامل لاله \nCAPTAIN. \nJang \nCW. 'Enct \nSing \nS. \nC'. P. J., \nHube \n237 Captain C. ini se \nbungkal \nM \nPaul Jonas \nARNOLD KASHERS & C \nJA Welboort \nFeb. 12. Brundt \nOne kan Ju \nSIGHT \n4ma \nc. Di Babes \nAlden Bean \nส \n3447 R 9! \n11 \nPrecious \njëngë \nPhilippines \nVERISC \nJan \nKoyim \nNothing & Lo \nHoste Ruskri Custom \nPerciva \nPietars \nSatan 110. 266. No793 \nAzev iska \nPorti \nJac. 13; Ornhu \nAmr, li \nw stany \nBelt. \nArabold, Karimiz 3. Co j \nConta \nSurveda \nCarsha \nCaires \n& TILT \nW \nBURNOVA A \nAlly \nE \nSub 11 ting \nLik, bit \n350 Advatar, dull & vis \nPole Pruse \nሊነ ă \nAmba, Aytmag de Lin | \nhound \nLED, God \nAir, th \n55 glebies & C \n14. G. Bo \nSi | 81. Sohawas \nB \nSestrat \nJin 10 Curn \nAir M \n1150 Azamgu. Beil \nIl \nI \nAm. B \nspric \n7150 CÂÛ. A. Cargober \ndove, Riquas te 52253253 \n¡Fanny \nMtagu \nJu Yourse \nNo \nBST \nHo \nBy \n3 199 \nCum. 14. F. Day \nDIRECTORS. \n5156,ties Jai Virus \nVinterio \n25 \nSwit \ndabiases grea branji \nT \nALCAL \n3 W \nTo \nriving bip \nVicin \nvidle despat \n2276 \nWireca \nBanglong \nKam \nLa Palm \nNagamit \nT \nPint \n1927 at 4. Qu \nMae [namzigrad are pegama Froe this date TOLICIES Frier a tho \n4. 3. SOKEN. \nHonka. Mar. 1650, \nA shy-footing multiprou pracacdotari de stat 8900 \nige tum ire à Smiral, to used to the \nAmbassúng who he was deligin first-cines Tiskr \nace in, and hapad i have the boner of his \ncompany at inner utzi day at the hy \nBe asid this is loud voie, a da to ve kened \nby her he had dured to see uner! \nLINSTEAD & BAVIS. \nHatokon. 10 Yar i \nWER ON TAL INSURANOK COMPANY \nCLIMATRON \nrelation of a Muressy with so Aspho cera.; PEE LOVBOK ASSURANCE; Bars Foss $70,858.27; Fin \n2017; then he panel round and socalači INSINENEATED P \nadaluperespeit \nStrated's fling of loyalty \nprofound a bal of a sincero bever \nfitae vigat must ninna be very me \nWin, SE1 Kewu \nSustra \nBarthe \nWise & fo \nPerth. Duels, b \n! Iselt sure \nBrit \n¦ Ane ja \n372 Ambut. Kacheze de \nAdamvua, Dlt & Gu \nSi Orien \n30 Solussa je ča \nSW. £. Das \n74 733. Jaspaik & C \n18? Siemcare 2 On \nDay | Captada \nCrkvara d \nA. \n19mm & C \nAmr. Razer & \n3. \nBMW 5 \nKI \nb. 146. iuge \nTARTED OF \nA \nM \nNay. Vie \nA.D. Caltrend baby ho sent \nthe abi \nNew, 17 Willi \nDit, k \nFah. 19! W. 'g \nVor Kase of the Yoo Choong rang \nFranz.ch \n1.Tan, Estaitija \nVais \nden B1 Mayar \nM \nJan, 01 1. L. Bray \nJan. 1): \n! W 1 Serpe \nplantes- \nMARINU DRAÍTMENT. \nWoxu Y! Bey, of the Chuc ftacey Wing of Agr \nTun fund of the Tipp the Wire. \nPure NT Wrath of the Dias dos Bolbores. Ej Kalk Wosa 'GERING, Of Ye \nthe tonal family was his at slifert arbonated delove. When the Duke of Cambelge was clone to bury his guess palice of crus, o es pale sitt To The Morw, if the Kwang Wins Cheng \nF \nJue a feo Jugs at the Eusbance, he went \nmade, 38 sa priani Poets of You \nhis dering gown sed sappers, at en mely: Ohm, and 3 andrenia, kt \none in the morning, that the rema \nFULC DEPASSTENT. \npreamed for his Royal [Eigens are in Polizios ishoni è long uy shows perivés ti \nberek orday. Finding the Date's voles in color ranging the tranka and \npetraentious bish | \nSALE WETARPIUNT. \nPad Retired, the Aubaskede begla ba girs Delineaued for racing directions how they thenat be | \nplaced. The Rt reduced rates. \nmer left of meeting, and stared as Cord Stratford \nMANAGER- AMEL \nHARTER B doet ko. the f QUERENT RATES to Acolmit Dalitra. Mile, Burapon Rain, May, to ai (44), Enute Pitse of this and Ja \nHales, D. Pravit 240. Haku, 1218. \nLO MOLLIDA WIER, 250); \n26 Jul, 1870 \nwal tell you what the said at TN CITY OF LONDON PIER INATE \nANCH COMPANY. LIMITED. \n\"I know bow his Hopal Host In \nhave bra nga anapes inter than you du.&PURAT-E-PAPERADO \nBy job op-ed de off, will you, \nLed Stratford into the room in a towering \npansion, and culling one of the auction, \ndeka bice to go and tell that men was in \nma that he and veekuned to add an \nZappanger to attack who retuned \nWeli, \nPAID UN RESERVE YUVD- UNDO! \nVodaviest having boa appisależ¦ pete for the hote egy \nde Acer ass gapal Print 21. Ca Hour \nCEO, E SERVENY & C \nFUS \nSpec \n107 \nbest app inte!: Flakin \nNOTICE. \nNEW YORK BUARD Heilo \nARNOLD, KARERA & Ca Funkrag dah Sentor, \n1979 \nTOBZORO JE AMEERTJAN 2 WOREIGN SHIVVINA, \nma \nARNIMA KARBERO & Br Hobgob. \nwith pakai Kid 154 wat de bou?\" m2; V ANCHESTES PIES ASSERASU XAN ON INSURANDA COM. \nthe Ambassador. \n\"E sad to bia, my lund, but the paten \nIn when he had retured to area with \nTangzage maker Majesty's Kepenti \nir Fers. \nCOMPANY OF MANCHESTER \nAND LONDON. \nEstanyen 1921. \n“Ah, gate right. And what was his guy WHIGH TE PA-UP... LEN() \nджетны \nNastave \ndr $12,000 Bracing \nHe answered, my lord, that is never til \nyou warah' \nwa singular featury in Lord Sreat \nford's new husty dising states \nager wasid ankenly be kupeared by NOT- \nPANT. DEMETE), \nAV Calamone, \nE, IN Bahat \nAAAAH \nمرین و داتا ولول \nMAJAO \nH..AM. Fisartut de Cauter \nANTON \nii. \n| Gizyon & \nLp. 21. Sana \nBrit \nButterfici \nBab 2 Drama \n; Eiseraces & C \nADAXA \nis 14 FCAT, AL \nMaksija Māc p \nCebaty derrotial \nAbi-subt \nying Thoug \nJan - grubost \nConte in tegabi \ndual-row go vessel \nAuto gail-Tequel \ntermiying board \nplate ut vesti \nzaube \nKIT \nruot \nINSTA \nHongkong \n110 et 1o. Makyn 61905. A. F. M. Chia \nKi \nTa \nCaptain. They \n10 Curl \nKoue Forty \nالشاره کار \nAcl.Com. 15. Trend Singapur \nCan J H. Core \n1. Bəndika Singepat \nLieut. Geta. M. Gridgn,\" \nCongres \n126 ه بر امور باید در \nClay Jobster the male poze \nCase Co \nجوانان ام خالد \nFJZDIGN MEN-OF WAR ON THE CHINA AND JAYAN STATION. \nSAN \nį Abrosa \nAtent \n! Alors \nStrin \nAsi \nCumentar \nAshut \nSartel \nHursh \nKrasin \nInese ar \nCAPTAIN, \nWHEL AR \nCaptain Stebraz \nApr \nFranek z bot \nChimney Caillard \nSalyau \nCommandy T. p \n$apizca eruntha \n! Portmate trase \nAPL-67 \ncezvelta \nLalion consult \nKamian (penly \nNorman Cortla Burcan çembe Fronek roerm Anlene gruntown. \nSpin test \nA best \nTrussian art. I \nLee Tak \ngrangi \nANG \nJJan. 2ki Yantai \nDen of \n24 \n13. A.. Peter & ku \n1152 Bienesu \nor Ruh \nBesin traspe \nCli \nEr I hate \nNermy \nRana znanst \n5, 13 Jud \nPakis \n#5મા \nJa \ne. D \nunty B \ntbeats \nF. 19: \nKonzulan peran \nÜnam of ladis l'at \nah keine \nDub \nCAPITAL BEADY Proserineal al:24,668.; Vais \nAZT JEUSJAL \nKON HOW WAY, Fr. Chairman. Aerling.cs Tie Hot, F. Cras e Fial. \nBAN HAR D \nINSON, n. Qry Mug \nTholaiesigel ince bean appointed Agrants, \nthe nas, tavo sad at \nHing waiters to hit lui. To get Eustis Curat Ra \nso in this cosul he enjead hea \nJanga with \nanother ion, an stcube bad made \ntwo nista ne doprzeg a dismalei, \nwill be 16tk 63 the Archansado for signa \nMistem may to made,\" said Ford Strat \nford after solating them at \nthe very! \nvarsta delen wish to by shini \nHOLIDAY, WINK Fengkrang, P, Calases, Bir \n8AMES A \nMAKARY \nLIMITED \nIBAISANCE COMPANY, \nUkau Orrace. Boku \nPor \ni \nKTM Kar \nAvary \na TN, B. Asid Santes C \nThe CT GRANTS POLICIES \nCho Vide \nDESKS 63 ala carte of the Waid this \nrolita Apnasier. Patribus Divblends sy payday l ANG Coctribes of Design, whether thug bar \nStoneshalder de ING. \nLONDON \nCHANGK \nAgent China for 164 Urn! \nWOO LIN YOEN, \nSperstars. \nHRAD OVERCE, \n,, Gran'a End West \nAquane, Marab. 11. \n1525 \nThe high spirised pov ciplest at you Colajny, to wop MADINE CHUS NOOI SA Pottery wwwrgir soud, and told Care Brat \nIs Cursor \nChime Du \nfram), \nPURLINE DAILY \n1420 \n19 15:Hu \nsai Busty \nJea \n17. storoch \n228 A \ner 34 E. A. \n207 LA. Pete Sou \n11, the 954 Rogd & Co \n$49 1.3. Pel & Ce \nCOMMON. \niz Posts Iza Persuar, 1962. \nWe \nthiaga nee \n2. Future \nSHANGWAL \nOptin A. D. de \nCHITRA B., Wallin \nat Am \n4ptsir. ubrz \nShpreis Rubotom \nCaplein 6, Norg \n| Gayanie Vur Knif \nfum salar Xiana \nYehudit \nJn \nHouckunz \nHo \nGanuzmuñor quite sami, tu l'a \nV. W. Tong! Hunk \nCATE \ntanama \nK'Ocoeendez C. & Quem! Eskuham \nCouder kavand Thacistu \nVisdireuzel \nViadivostos \n70 \n30 \nCazzi Tubink \nflores Valienās \n91 \nHozekcay \nVeptam eher \nSigap \nCozy Mugle \nSharvari \nJapaja Sioengine \nBul \nI sinhurs \nCapla \nde Doria OnePuik \nAlquite \nsaigra \nNagheaks \nunder: Suwach \nMaria \nSt. Intersburg | Kei \nTanayoel \nGardan onze \nPorcian comedo \nAmerican curetan \nPorteraiya grabenade \n'escri \nCopiad von Blena Casar Delivra \n1999 CoA. 1. Cube \n250 \nB \nSatt \nJ'unan \n'1' \nPonens \nItzanino tropløst \nStuonies ko \nU \nSunkia \nLMR. \n20-1 \na Federaly, 1 \nGlee's tr \nChin-ti \nCutun.ja) \nching-A \nQui \nChopr \nTw: El Rusi \nJu : Berish \n! ! 285 Makin \nMotl \nBelarus Primers & Co \nab W. icatort de \nac, Kg & Co \nI For \nFourt \n! Bu ba \nM \nCens \nS \n16. \nrice na . \nof Batm \n10. \nTi \nford bat, altough he was his Amasadar, conne \nDam \nSHE. \ni had to ght to repiten hun for what! \nADAMSON, BELL & Co. \nProtantes \nWas tene, ba ce was not hebitaedly careless, i \nHakone, th May 25 \naa. ari Nem \nPris 14 96 \nForster, vees & C \nPAK \nAnu, b: Jes \nPell \nNi \nBrit \nMER \nMac & Co \nBrit \nYou werfly \n--your eyes selaimed Lord Stabd \n2) pour Brodiva's!orted \nthe alb \nThe Eley Durous lunghing. \nSan VERZONY li les bra gemalenud ormibi. of Pouncy: Vindtisch, Small IVERPOOL AND EXTES ANDA, nge the rest on in cou ubore INSURES TCE COMPANY. iation of uns Chinese ampire in the Hand \nThe Lederige, As the hoen bias. If show by a \nHedr'g \nHolding Counnar, des DOWMEN FRim ta do Chong 3cbeles, sul cenou na Raken \nGRANTI \n\"his honda kim, he begged the stine TTM dnced TarifPro for du vilising a head at the tee the infrally of his tespar \nPOLICIES CALIXTILN \nthey shoot and racet wordially-oplei \n20 phemou \nM3 Mercies & Ce \n14.&.Tri Cu \nDr. T. C \n91 Jr Walent \n'\\' ctly tun \nRysl \ne Fasioo.g \nThes \nA2065 \nRates \nchat kurash, Banglory, or less! Pade \nTANGSAR LYPHAIK & \nHongkong. th May, 1 \nU agung, làth Januvɛy, 1577 \nHO! Klykn \nBritn \nLins \n67 \nSiz Martin \nGen 52 \n155 \nGesinalin & Ca \nWe, bis! \n343 · Nils Mottar \nHung-barz \nI've got \nTeling \nCANTON OISEOAT SQUADRON. \nPORNO, VONN, HE \nVry's best 17 149 \nLore via \n9.19 Mar \nViking's pani-bak \nBryster \nViens' animat \nint \nFumar's inchoat Revontiret \nFinny'sunl.cek Vient Bacolas cruis Viseryʻkk Vicy-gonizi \nTching- \nTentang \nBA Sat \nPhi \nB \nBi-Lin \nTriag \nVigganum \nIni etuier \nCOMMANDEN. \nSLATION. \nHongkong \n| by \n5230 \n75 J. Baze. \nE \nChai \nF. B \nVinery',nical sti \nLany ie ing \nChow hi Close Admiral d), ('bing \nCati \n4 \nYang Yang L \nCali \nPied Pubbled in a meat thinl \nWare st \nCanton Piret \nQual \nBeg \nCitol \nUrise By Foru \nBegins Porta \nWhat Cont \nPucle Perta \nMonkey \nHakus Xin \nB+ Lot un \n55%22:14001 Heront, Hunsicoma. \nNo. 7649 \n436 \nThe Hong Kong Daily Press. \nSLIPPING. \nANGELS \nDANKS. \nHONGKONG, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 23RD, 1982. \nINTIMATIONS. \n(YOMPTOTH A GROOMITEE DE PALTI, QUS HONGKONG WIHE IN Febrylases, tribes teamer, 945 \nVIRE INSURANCE COMPANY DIXIEO. Dkny 18th Plecary, 40- \nCorporates and 150h Merek, \"S recal-BRAON. \nNOTICE TO SHARKHOLDERS. Pebermy 22, VOLMDR, Denish adapter. 973, \nRecognised by the T. toew: Sevation of TORRENT 2018 AD Here, E.. 173 Fektivt, CAPITAL Flot Cars Ge \nANGGA MUSTING of SHARK --Tune é \n24,265,000 HOGUbs in the alene Coy with n RAMATZ PORD \n£59, 190, at the Leaf the y. Vis. 7. Quza's Timcid, at (ait pas The stock, be instant, to meeile Mataista to BAN EPICCO Men, and be Elena Cheatin Ouderr, HANRON), \nFebruary 28, CasaDEA, Brier, 62 \nY \nAUCTIONS. PURRIO AUCTION. \nINTIMATIO IS. \nRACE HOLDATA \nimas nadelgum te meived lastration Vodermentioned tenka will (LOSE! \nPAINE \nhuma Surgem Wajor MURRAY to Sell for BiL DAY. CU INOSHOW, SAVEDAY tb. TO SUMAR- Adranty Jáhl at 2 \nend 25 inatra, Prayz von Fac \n\" \nBowin, Brigas 12th Pub, Mig-2s; HEADOFFIOR-14. Ruz heres PAROD¦ Plans 24 THORDAY, turb Echomap HGTSEJ 77, & \nFulmer 94, Yes. British rv, 78% Le \nSolids, Cute and F. General SCG. \nOLEA RANKS. \nAT \"ne Haren Hispans Ojo Inst \nExperky Pre \nKauai, Cheve sht, for Hofla Minster, Beitials for Away. Pocha, ens tramp vi. Adilok, Gorman bark, for Tas \nDEPARTURES February, Fame, Brist destit, fur Petrony 22. Hamaw, British slower, for! \nTi \nFeby $2. Stok, iliahanet, for \nXokebena \nFebruary 2G:=x01\", British Mesmer, \nfor Sought \nPASKENCYRS. \nSAPIVED \nAGENCIES AND HRANCE A \n: Exoak. \nNANTES \nBom \nSHOW \nMALIGE AND, {3\\_ \nSTONEY \nTORONAMY \nLONDON HAWKERS \nThe PA ( \nTHY WIN AND \n1.cruce \nMoms. C. J. Hume Has \nYue Honger geny powers Pixupnitä \nica Tomas to outcertained on appřánation! \nA few randife sun sull jarts of the world, \nINT Escapula sees of king shangs spiness \n8 February, 199 \nF. COCHINARD, \nSpeat, foug \nDENTAL BANK CORPORATION KÁRÍCUNDOSATs my Horan CHADIGAN PAIDUS CAPITAL....... \nRATE OF IN CHEST ALLOWED \nthat por Acy. \nCurumiles and \n11, the sport thu \ndongás my CALIORNO COVERED DRAWING \nHACK WORD VARITE TO TABLES. \nPer fan Oring Par laws Corporation, \nURO 0. BOOTT \nVaror Hogan \nFeh \nTEK Mas Baxi or! \nINDOOR, AND TIME, \nI \nMEARTH PLASS DWMNRY CLOCK For the CARTAR), gkeun. \nKAS, PICTURES, CASA. \nDISING \nJARDIN, MATSON & Groepen, Turk Fire Inspired: JIERA, and GAS BRACKETS, Hongkong Ft This \n300 TEAKWOOD \nane DESBAKT SPTS, TXA and OK. THE KOKORONG FIAR INSURANCE FRE SETS, KES CHINA, AYASO and \nCOMPANY, JAJED \nPEATED WORK \nNOTOR \nDA, T2, Cha \nWILLIAM FORREST. \n三十二月二行 INTIMATIONS. \nTHE \nINLO-CHINA STEAM \nPwCE 2 PRE MONT \nINTIMATIONS. \naan dus on afwan Wang Bankulmat in \nNAVIGATION et \nCOMPANY, LIKE \nDOPE THE ON \nJAKA MAP & Co. OF ON. SGAMAN \nDE 100 GR \nIN B \nduly paid the allocati eft liable to cucina Aul blau paparents previously now:la | to furth \nApplications Exe Stuures osatiede in the For resoring is Pregnet, and scre £t be nut w the Giles of the Conryany, and ET FACT HOLLAND HAPO & \nMAVION & Unshiun Could \nFL, & \ncally paid up awers wi listed in the set the \nHome buy a the belies of bei \nBCHEDULE OF SINAMER Apers.... IV: 1000! 17+ Propnely Natasha China \nNavigation \nEd for palle Bulcription foil Axe 10. \nDaposi's, Application. \nIL DUR T-SCHTE! ឬ ៥រ Howe, TURO... \n?TADLE, SIDENTS, DIN.; For the Suprzin DeY DE PARS! \nRASSFEE Both of the BA (ABYAL GUARS TOILET LADIE gray, will by COLONNE the 15th CAB, sud HANDLE TOP WASH the 2in my of Foling Instant Antonio HAND SAWINO WA \nSTAND rundade \nHeating. P.IVARD. \n1 gang. \nFor sýn Fynbou A Hawking: \nGOBATION. \n1. Ja \nJACKSON, \nCiel Tenger. \nHigh Fetary, 1893 \nVuw... \n1. \nStow 7 espel \n294 \nof the ac \n134.ag. \nTotal 40 Reginas \n2. 1 \nMarch, 18 They, Julita will a given of any far. \nMAR WILLIAM SEES 108, 8, Lombard! Strne end, of Messe JANDERE, MAAT. Franz & C... Gui \nWANTE \nB. 1. Eg Int JARDINS, MATHESON \nA., of Modern Wang, Aus the lungest\", \nESCOPE ↳y Yerin, with Astrono. \nTHE OFPRUS # 5. REONTRO ITA TUOKAS REID, Fu, of Youre ALEZA ILANO for the last is in: 25: Rp & Bora, Hiszpan elony Fire To Exe Hongkong, 22 February, 183). \norder to artiste directions tots 3A 10WGING FRUT, Luchst C \nELLS, Sight Fairy and Fowlies with Alus Olice for Certilours!WILLIA HILAND STEEL Best the 24te of Maruh application for a lifed \nLaredo, Mus. Maison de Ca \nai Harkong and Shangani me to put ou sitration, des that the rely on Paal tas ng inuis, of Nabor of the woich bars fan tanutted Cir the thache il in Yokohama ki \nLE \nNOTRE 10 MAEINERS. \nThe Murty BOOKMASI...557 to Mic PANG, Heiki- \nding, Malbyona \nWIPH nerados to the show the Ton \ningabout 300 \n500 Thesie Ban-Cal Breneb Londing 1-15% duty to ware Yemane vise my hyn Trung ist RS YACANDLEW. Eng... frambursgard sin proprzeć la neige at Feet \nH: NGRONG AND WILAMMUA DOCK HOUSE. \nCOMPANY, LIBYTE), \nNOTICE TO SKALHOLDERS. THE ORDINAGE YEARLY MOETINO AARONESS wie El. AusCe por u \ntine 631: of the way St, Pra Co Atis Moon Notions are for the WEDNESDAY, 1st March 16 Crea Acu kap Verms which way Rape of the Dino desterraun nå Wote wat so syylientcy. \nPer Craplar at the Guizon, ed Uning \nSPARTER \nPer inturn for maple- Heverink and Europe. \n15 DEPART \nFenton, Su #trilow. --I M \nPet \nned 10 En Sivingbat. —ü Kuras Hongkong, 4th Kaptajulus, \nA \nEks \n2 Werte sinamas Poling aproni, liar en helt Ft 1 4.hart Furt of Junta per had fresh M \nHONGKONG SANHA BANKING \nBut \nCabal, sud u when to iau i F & put as far, the 27th in \nTYLE SAL av \nJ. W ARMSTRONG, A Gmianeer. \nE! \nHugong. 2: Feltery, h \nPUBLIO AUCTION. \n30 Marie Trinn 20 N \nPARKLAS \nVASITAS POÁI \nKRALIAN-) (ptrend tyres Bar & be pupaese 1+ing indired in tiruva ih let Deber, is net be reated w \nCeiba sa Japan. THE HONGKONG AND SANITA \nApplications nae sive China Ghid port will the GNGETRO (NO which was BANKING CORPORATION, 31, Legal Shanghai and tanut at es, in 1981, this are: Stowa Londe \nSULMITORS lium Changer of Daisy, and \ncoivaraga tenger, Rok Dustings. Lesken, Feder Bud Lave Resorts briar by My Dear Hetector, 1959, perubat \nant sieel to toe! \n£ 1145 Asto \nTip \nti per Suadu witin emal opplication MY FRESASTELDS & WILLIAMS, Iwili han dells, and f \nSercitare Kia calix award in the prospertise BROK \npercation with the Depp hver will COLLANT HALCONE 2 DA \nIbsen in dernery by un punto \nIrant \nthe Crash testa del Polish, tions Pubin Lily, as is al fusion of use rack, Ord Froud Best, ruin of tiktirnar. Ar Bostamil the Bills \nFCESDAY. \n95 Fay, that, wi fuam, at i \ndes Kant's theau's Hom— \nAlarm \nut Loud. \ni wengine ci Suijn, 38 prescribed i \nAUDITORY. \nCloud B AND, YOUNGS & y 92.1 \n· Carly- the Hurst Masy! bor Theiver of timpiere AaJim, \n1. Déso. Agrot Tenkung, 2ed fakeway, 1885. \n(176) C \n? 11 Feb 15. \nGM Q. SEXYTT. \n* \non te \n!1st Ja \n: Geinatal Back Cowperatio, \nHen \n•Bain Kingüe I Ginacenza \n11: \n£, 100X3 \nDod \nl \nHegory at Fee Seurotary THE HONGKONG KE SHIVPANY, \nLIMITE \nActie \nTho Aust \n4 \nan Vrout Pa tom throughly sportmaled | \nChege Diz-- \n----- \n1. J. DANDYY.. For \nok Cempery wel is vinent in Branca lyds, 3.36.111 gaat disision, aber in Gear, My A. T. \nCORPORATION. \nPAID-UP CAPITALA RESERVE FUND 99 \nDu. Reja, ta, Ka \n1, 2 \nBrugkeer we run Bina Mother; lepabraziunar—H, LC WRY- Zoeks. Ea \n2.m 12. Harper. Th Em Breite Dorary spezia of. Multi- \nSen. Bul Saigon 2 Les arming of indian Forcery. Y Might Sure wins within wother up to the forein; \nstrange iterata to a fregite wise \nBigh \nPOOCHÓW TUPPING. \nFelc \n4. Appiu, Thetish ale, from Shanghai \ning, wie foam lengky. \n5. E. Hahal, from Weiur. \n6. Han, C. \nC. P \nbuck, ia behat. \nHogan \nNOTIF \nTHE FIRST ALS & DENKRAT \nMENTING VERS 14 \nza \n- ved sj \ntho \nMAYMER \nJackson, Ey B-FEN CARROS, \n\"CERT- \ntone into thangala, en alt 109 \nKathaway of Kurlon Des \nTEMPORARY OFFICES. \nIron Gauden to no and in the latel \nfogar with the Appunt rather to in ↓ pametna may be inspect be beting „No. 1, EAST INDIS A FENTE, LONDON, Absorbers at this hoss of tile Tureisigass \nLanai whole Bingen of Applination for S \nPG Compare bat beri famed for the pur I wire of orqaising for the C PURCH \nWANTHE oded by the Forsary and WYOMPETENT STRAPONS for Etners ATRAM NAVIATION CURANT, Ofnbul, \nFor Father Paroisse soy mila, Under- zig int. \n2e os, at was on Bata-Orl F the Par \nhona Mitoba MSDAY, 3 ay lace Meat he pose on why talk of like T More magis obras of Anat Balete of the Con Boster, 255), Tranter. All of safer to be Lord of \nby the Purples, and for Yesus to be at pe \nLONE BARES-TON CO2 & Consterk par 1 \n•pat \nBunker-LAYSIAN Anorga \nitement anys, \nOK g the Company \n¡ will be CLOWEST) Len. On salliinstant, ve zl i Phuyu's risk az tho Biebs by cine \nCavento Acerante al this remith next, both days nho, pop duju ou like Illya \nThe Mandi Paprika \nFortyor Band, por Azamolb \nFurler Cut your bac \nFat the paper Auca \nGAL 3 Angest \nHad Me 101 chrome Chotos ye; destriglio of Balag and Exehazge! \nCusted stated Scurity ! \nGleznas. His Sha \n4. Sibul, if \n78, Kwangwung, Erstili ste, dva \n1. Suctive 34 amph, France \nFour D \nTank, Brown- \n5. Pild, Critter back, ne singel-L \n2. Deur Vasi Deitina look, ( \nAmoy. \n7. Ms. Heiriza pelo tan bai \nrit, B. bit. \nfor Any. \n6, Agi til str., for whi \nDr. Heilial str. for New York. ya, Shelb \nBrilly 142, farma. Ing. Mirtich str, for Hongkong, \nZNANOTIA SHIPPING, \nAUTOSALS \nWulu. Britisú as, from Harku. \n6, Kinag-ong Ulduage ita, frenz flatma \nB. Geway .. from Kucheyrna \n- Bridalstrom Hojcity. \n6) Langmon. Chioma ne, frew Hongkong, \n5. Klingeline, Catur fram lafen. \n''yan, \n7. Name the trum Nagusiki \nBrivion wir, Ines Heater, 7. King. Chani kiz. Pero Hakow T. KONTO, Bullies wir, freno Bonzow, \nYangtae, hate, from Thungborg. \nmon.Gec. From Barefo \nB. Catras, Heiti 47, Bonbay, \nVarin t'uiteto frut A \n4. Yenity, Chitum, fena, Wakoa. \n9. A. Bitdeh str. f3 \nKonkow. \nBuy British tea, from Haukum \n9 Mon Jagt, he \n3. Birish str. ne kaik \n10. Mennar, Him. A may \n24, 4ppi, lich etc. in Feb \n10, goshi Weru, daş, art, tre, Kineban \n,, Torches at I'm Sratur. \nsan, sem sta, fram tvorbow. \n11, Chiz Britise 4, Frain Nugaenki. \n11. Kincy for, pise sta, Free For \nJiweltlah me, from Hack. \n11. Child, Britse stres \nveg \n23. Mika infra Ft.okow. \n14. Vraniu, Brizi i teras Ni \n12, Pag-chua, Cebu, Gun Haugining \n13. Paking, Britisk str. from Harian \n12. When, Sritha, Fran Ningpe \n23, P, Velg from Navski. \n13. Artawan, British ate, trong Ngebak. \n13. Bellapin, Criticstr, from hay. \n14. Kangitsen, Obiamo côfine \n14. Why Chinese \n12. Cf. fe Grice, Neftials aly, Fara Fausto, \nYel \nWa, Kritish or from Purbox \nDEPASISKGK. \nTulis, fitil: \nfry. \n7. Larisa ar, Caliber cust \nser, far Harten. \n4. Karlebota, Utili ste, for Hong \n7. Kig-yong, CU Hor \nWCA Vite fish sirir Hanken Wencho, Bitlah se fre Bentor \n7. T, Batin ats \nvalt.. Sur Au”. \n3. Yolors Faupat, for Kris. \n7. Anjaszóne. Maitish to. Lo Nayan \n9. Pribe. Fruch as, for \nVery arm, Jap, sie \nCheambin, list, for Tookes. \n9. Sualon, Bisjal nie,, for Chato. \n3. British te, & Nhup. \nA. Wynn, Erinala ste, får 1 \nKorinetes, \n5. Clay, Beds he for Nagild \n6. Tade. British si Hongkong. \n3 Dakinu 1. 1-i, Nagki \n8. 1. 1. Chernosina, qez Nag!. \nSing, Eisk er for Haukee. \n2, Wan, Heffasi atr. Yee Hankge \n8. Tagesbian Here. Sup, so, for Nigeri \nNow, Beltani ste, fer Swabunt. \n30, Yehsie, China, Cil \n1 Yung-ring China for Wacker. \n1. Kung, helliah straw, For 'Batkow, \n1. Yet, 1 Late, for thinking- \n11, Exitish fry \n11, y, Brick size for ever \nᎫ Ꭸ . \n-piant. C.Dave var for BakuPP. \n33. Natumeur, the Hali ste, ing Bunton. \nNang Byi-ish swamar, for Desigər 125. \n12, W. Stupin. Trilin's barb, \n13. Did Ms pett, for \n1. Hritish star, fer \nfine. \nut, \n12, Appiu. Rzinies alapone, for Benchaw. 12 Hole, British baek, for Puntur. \n18, in, Paul sicsance, for Yongpa \n14. Bang fou, Chiron 5., for lankaw. Tino, Titia, for acco \nJA, Bhara Kort. Danish, Aw Aney. \nJá, nilon. Ispitful: man, tum feudon \n14, Hung-mono. Elite for Ning. \nAUCTION SALES TO-DAY. \nNout \n2 ZON \nM \nHongkong, 2012 Paketars. 1 \nHION FRONG AND \nj \nBANKING CORP VOHAL \nNOTICH TO,\" \nIruding flower \n8:4 \n36 \nS \nSTRIA DE ATESON & C \nHenare! Meapp. \nPangkor, Nuth Pukssary. 199 \nund bag hij brente Vicker Bust Yantraze AMIN CORPÁSY, n2 Plang!! Fue Paci \nhos, mad from Jers spaly to \nTached beat soother in the basisve of! by the Seantul.! Longhwag. Ha Fairy, 1982 1844 tonnes Lowashed Rivers of \nClaire and bear China, the trait to \nCo. is a pig MANY STANSTER \nIONS TO OUR NOTICES TO CONSIGMEES. \nNONERS OF OPTION ANDA BOO, \nES. 8.3. COPS 8.5.37ENECK,\" \nFROM LIVERPOOL \nCHUPTING \n4. M. ARMSTRONG. Ani Hwgkong, 18h Bencowry, the \nTUNGKONG RACH. \nEN to the GANE Encours for Gentlenes being Sah \nof sið, er towards, 19 dla Band. Frogi. for Now able to the rain o \nG 183 No “Stand st \nj zorth \nVin Ind \nKIULH いやい \nprente, oz Chica \nDžiova stek u poziveliùsling of \ningen be adding it to the \nit various inter report, and the mak \nsent. Phyu Mr meting the grossier zegaremasts \n1887 \n25 ROYAL \nCITY HALL \nSATURDAY, \nFysoket W. 1892. \nNWOUND \nA doing it en wilson BAND MAGICAL MUSE, \n(man, will-hitic can itinere of the Copywny a \nn the tindasi bu chipul from i zemotestira ierastinent. \nuus later. As the ch 2hr Nice damer of the Cases Gastre. Tesigns for skijamast wer stame SASANATATION FERPANY, and the Yama MATRON. \nZOEK UNTAMED ODPAT, an ecided in 191 1841 Beans Surya Shanghe, ut by \nYonghorn, Bind Baravy. \nBiznim, faren 1.20 Szymoliem wist, Hors of 'n. Sterling Verze 20 bcxcision so we go sa balkg m / Bulk Sare5dista, nail s \n1 Burnering in to bad on 1 \n& DOVAN JAMBRn unsaaf Beurs, Brayer to the Cuntan Com's Glenovels are eli \neg in Chin, OU EN The motel of 91-6 PASAREA 2 Fashion, Bry, fine \"Prana iameter \nThe word after war and be the beds day of son carried inde, Cartes et Corner here. And image, and of the Coquialiis, an owning wikasi a Pielie, so be shown to the the Sadesigual, ja sinth casas 14 will turn on 106 mee Yangtera, wyether with \nTAS-Ty \n| Thakanume Pie \nI even me punten af 2), ka p (zujimoto su upang to, WARDANOS, . 15th Folmany, 385. \nEAL TRUE) By ordre often Coert ut vector \nClerk of Cur. Respons. My kids \nTAXI, and chan 132919TH THEM? Wenen in \nAmeric, Cala en Ju \nT. JACKSON, thief Marugas. \nMecs E the Corpoention \nNu. 1, Q's and H \nNOTICES OF FIRMS. \nFUTICH \non \nT. JACKSON, \nCAVE Hargr \n190; \nL \nPRIDERICK 2017 in auster \nTO BE INT It is \nthe by Prz Fenratica bertane ot Sasunt. \nBOCAGD FCHE CHASE & TO 9. PATLEY TRA \nLET Mogg. 15, 1 \n1593 Kars,\" N 29 Azer B \nUraze, in N IN QUEENEY HAD tex- \nCo \nTUR CHUKKAB INSURANCE COMPANY, Puch \nICMITED \nNOTION. \nAVDAVID Mungkan. Mick \n3SOON. WINS & US dowry, Sm \nI' \nk's day had doch zeigen kaki of Me T. BAY . . D MAUN! Bolay the a \nZ \nW ROINES, \nDoorway. In You, Je,\" \nM \nNOTICE. \nKunis been appoint Agents for thr \nNO. 2 LOWER MONQUE TERRACE \nApply to \nJ. M. ANETRONIA, \nHongkong, we fibreney, this \n..... \nTO BE LAT \nWith mata konica \nNETSUZ BUSHAN KAISHA, OFWELLING HOUSE No & O Basing \nPorto this For \nHongkong \n980. STEVENS & C. \nJanuary 18 \nXOTION \nATRA LAMEDA on mitted \nPatios in my Where no? tán Hestnesi will be watere at inder the |cale f \nSTRIL & TALKM \nNTS \nNetgan. Feb 12 \n.............. \npatuled, \nGut, thoroughly tapultad vol wy \nApply to \nALEX. A. AGA KIHELIOS. Iveco J. 1+13 RENKIJOS & Q....... I \nHvaley Stroth Ifonytone. 8th Bobnary, 16 \ndelivery train Graf or China \nCon 1995 \nCIO'S LOAN, or repruned Blaess Ne \nApply to \nLISTSAL & DAVIS, \nAngkor, Sim Fe K \n+452 \n2ist rebrany, 1837. \nand five aziona \nun sft art its simpellant, waking \nfest Et une ged wit's the that they the C101: Fally put up shar Vilor, and of which songs is vrugt \napdaivers after the with Pelaars, \n1982 aufgeno \nFITTERS SIRE Agra, Rogging, ul Februny. 1: \nFROM LOS DON AND SINGAPORS. \nGLENFRO4-,\" \nBurta, Brasiguam; \nCAL \nLE COMIDAT PERFORMANCE. \nDISPLAY OF NECROMANOS \nGLINK T \nPROFESSOR RUCHWALDY, \nRENA WIMANT Wind 28* Wansker Taare \nAn entirely new Pumnites \nPUS PARTICULATE SES H \nPAX OF ADRESTON. \nDrain Cirak seil Sti \nPl............ \nidio finálem in auffores Hall Pries Tickets to be hat den Neue Key & Wag med at dhe Tales \nDight The Steamy will be alten | Performer 1. studio of fil, the Frinksminga \nPosing a CAPA \nLe ɖe Compray. \nCha Cha Stry Farmats of J. Convams may extantinuci în 10 oun \nAsily. Fructe at 80 Pig, Performance to com \nLading jajene za coudseted with Nathan \nDowny, Fetienacy, 1885 Is her secon! it ONGKONG, CANTOR, ANU MAURO \nPLLAK CESARDT Sunambig \n| basing arrivet ROYAL BELUSLINTET COMPANY, \n(of Surg Am Barely this long com, dying lady letras Fassies and Saverbrai.! \nwiik esvapur of Oplan van het bal Salon Pung, Cl ritl \nThe risks dete pas earns of De Visita, en Kerck, whi Biznad, vienne di Paw the wharem a otra ringstjen 4 way to ohtrize], \nSADETLY APPEL. Hoy, 7th Folamry. 1983 \nNOWN SALE TOOUND VOLUM is of the Chow95-174:7-8410$ Tags per h Yone 1287. \nPark The Dak Arty Fina \nBong JANTY \ntr \n3 H 1 \nX \nG.. \nUWALSH IN SILKS, Canton and Slot Brass Pro Sharris, \nbana ng Wang, Curiosis, \nDenaliende, Talul Chalca orm Tebies, ie, f.. \nGOLD AND SILVER FRATELLE \nCaro SST, P \nROM, QUDEN'S BOAT, EXC MAHANA. \nSTEAMBOAT COMPANY, LIMITED. KXOURSION TO MACAD. \nSOMANES Panxha \"KINETANG,\" will for Latine ange wül informadales the! funtion thatør Porn Blog Lan SATURDAY, the 25% inesses. to the rosterý se given befrog Noon 10.DAY \nIan Bastow, ad hooks, bonds, pavery. the Buch Febri. 19 \nung tamilly prociled ze the carus porte lasting 90 Can winlig v \nDudaliteket \nju ili za svoju te thot of end for pictat and thesis sagirnis em \nBOUN \nNo ite kurd has buan atatud, \n2 Julie ill be cinanteisisat kj \nKrbrary, \ncutting a large card tra J'a Stanet e de \"Id\" Wardagi \nruza BUNDAY, the \nThe Cas Prosta Muca and lak.. 89 40. So Cas...... \n31.50 tests to be pare at the Company' \nby Disa \nbral osally Myths seri at the Wari. \n•han basisgand to me al segue \nang trade. \nAsiY[ 034 54 * ! tag, odo Date \nBeagles 20 \nUNION LISE \nNOTICE TO ROYSKONTES. \nTROM LONDON, THNARD, AND \nSINRAPOR \"TOPORATES- \n\"S-SRETNO\" is Bow Rename of 1.466 kaas til at aborden, and destined to China \nSarung Lath, where i wantly be join \n2. A LA COSTA, \nStrogkwg Ziel Folers \nCAUTION tavots\" of 2.577, fie ding Paktis on igured that SCBIP for minh bas frist hide Abarca: SHAREG Numbed it) \nLe T \nw by the Foest at whogy tud 48 rue 613-1,250 fs Shoe St Rita W4X24 D luga iar apperanicu plutor Blass CuANT be student that motive ul Dcrz \nDeals That Has Borghang! \nHenker 28ri Pelary. 1683 \nNote-Th, Dia is the ski otɔdlükat | Capkiu Mitzke, having arrived free pieces Sainty built for the; the chefs ass buna giu że Shott Cloapany. #5111 Line in Loughed as one is City among with with which the \nmit any view of a nábo kong naga. \ntomat ju thair Bis of \"Inding to vas arlor Falo hvalisay steal an important EN RING. \nund or eligator 25 main positi \nTO LET \nAty to \nDOUGJAS LAPCAJK & L Lengkong, L. Tebaumy, Ur \n797 \nTemarking, RE \nJAPAN JARRETE \nYANAMA. \nHAVING plejad is H \n575 dia daliring ni skafé Condo Fezia alte The Chic Calenus branch of the Char- \nCAT ating blom alechage of \nthagena ar charterad, wish are Java 1. | \nCHIHAN STELMANIP COMPANY, \nFOR SHANTHAL Y AMOY Taking Cazzard Passeng long las \nwill be at this landed net storage Pay's Pervine will trim the placevi 10-a kilusis :{DPGALVOS Intentano, Prae818, KLARON, ried and expois as no Zee Insurers IN A CUT 8 Company's Steward y \ncounty health have. \nDitial Care will be forwarded onto from \nInd \n1 line is a velemble one. Ed is \nal Pass or the Yamaisen \nTHESE LITERAN 200 FOS-17 LJONGKONG WHARE & GODOWNS, 1 Gavetin, Gas Pumbatore Roose Apis may be seenesting passenger trothe and trule of Vidos, sãe 50ed it, at Eren z \nKONG SOM CHINa tile feu molver astro to the Gilmer be gets en Chica, the Straits, Buttweisen, \nMW. REPOOL MUSTES DE \nPan CEAS or the Dans les \nI use will be sei un, le: the \nFrog Dedi Yox Subtipdoza aud \nGoods verived an STORAGE at Modrum Adportienuolės kill bousculand så tide Often, Red, Fedtmas Peloasa, \nLORDAN, KLE \nto the \nlumatong Prity Frie Chen. \nand on or if the \nivalsat, or they us be versa \nAl \nRUSSELL & C \nEntivo 000WNST Any to \n184 \n>RYFL & C Tinghaus, Bri Murel, Ja \nTO LET \nJENE WIURLAND WUISKY \n습 \ntomsong, \"ith Kebruary, de \nsura Styes by Mr WLCA an aud 'Mr. EDWARD JONNY HIGHGs. \nBEGRES & LEORD \nHoaglag, kh Jnowary, 1562 \nLASTRE. \n- \nAnd \nCŮH VNG and 92ORådE;), W R. FABDERICK DES.ore Hide, all we ladies; stage \nAlso, M \nJeelanin ay Pen Pen \ni4kin Usta, Stil Mr. DEORGE H. WILDONORENSNITE \"KONONKA! \nJOHNSON. \nthorised to sigu na nagta \nSELEC \n161 \nSHARP TULAER. Houghou, Jl. Koptember, 1951. \nis \nChina, 1st Junkery, Jasa,\" \nTO BE IST. \nK. BOOKS & NEW HOITIONS. \nBALA WAJIB TUYNUE TERMARIA PAR \nJennies fuwa and Gardo. \nREHAWAY'S DAY IN A Cable Du 82.30. \nApply to \n| At Bows=derwone di Cross-(Play \nJu$ 24,99 \nhours \nbuy, 1892- \nLINSTEAD & 174 VIR \n1368 \nBY. EAT BAN....... \nVarea's Bay BAR TO 42.0.3 \nTO BE LEV. \n2 \nWith a Sut dope Next, \nPure Talentīniku \nThrow zəd \nsopittinor. not, \nEnge the on Pocicta. \nThla poetsendis fr Brands? \nBettled varier éta pagal prision of \nIE.M. It may not besties, \nHold by Apote \nThe Worl \n2016 l'aprimas, \nGREENLEEHUGOTINES \nR. CAT ME, TN, \nDili, Angyalive. Y \nTORN BAZLEY WITIE » ELUTHAT'S \nPORTLAY CREENI \nHOLE ARE WE CAN, \nPOLLDAY WISH & \n\"STENTOT\" nomidered of growing imposture, owing to the Capinia Kirkpatrick, will be dospaerbed. 'TO. with Pie Suits Sanctness fadin. If \nposed bile popupfil \nSally adapted to this one of th \nAg-wal \nPiger Paraply la \nBTTERFILL&RVIRE. 1nging. Brit Vebruary, 19. \nPest pinabi, suplayed in the parties, and the PUR SYDNEY AND WELBOURNE, MAA \nirectes expect \niNuns to the Cross and \nNOTIOR TO CONSIGNES BRITISH RANQUE «ENDYMOW,\" FROM LONDON. \nle, with the Give of the harbor \ninfusion antuplish thes, and is THE S \n& Barre Boruture, wing of 195,400 jample silent \nTeaming of the Corina C \n'PAKAO. \nHUNGARIAN Chptain Abnob, will be distohaalej \nvayout any porturiled to end in direct stand the amin the; BEFORUoga, che van animus \n[MON BLO-432125 vf Chup by the shavu nauči volata Con \nتا بروید \nSome eu this?” \ninted it as presionaty sien, \nLedia Latha Tindesign for teagues and wish fare, and the chip and dishia Avexoma- \nAnd to wish wediata daivery of theirut sa Yungeza rec Sutien, thoni zand rapi ods. \nlizer pros and is the beardisipat! #w Krázlá se l'asure, apply t Carge impede the ischarge of the prezu with the antedication of will be handed Plan Coming sale at Jink that is thing or 1!ཤཱ ཤ1ཀ92 \nConad China and the gerectiepaccion of VENHOLD, KABLERO & Cu.. \nforging, 20 \nAgastā, \nVEEAMENT \nLabs earping-Trade in the Fun SANA, Hodon \n20. D. SKYNS \nOLZ. cyborg, 25l Picnary, 1881. \n(37 \nPOR MANTLA DO \nthe hang of Cams, that the Changany lindil«ma 135 anys 50+ Gendable enterpri \nmessage of gettin Denver, will be upstand in th \n20th February, NOTICE TO CONSTANTS.*** \nhow the yellt of being being coser, nadan Pert ez cutive perciocia en lices f quod in their sila u Darling! Flies ronible expect profie to pay divi tha wedged the countrytresdends, levides funding à Puiere Park fut na- | tak bole leep. Puis Cakes a spotles in the ralow of Stem \nCASTELLS BOONA SI M$500. THE BOUSE ... Afluor- Pean? fiongkong. Lich Berater. Jaar 20E PARIGN288 t the Setlowing Cargo are ¦ Gjested, bringing an vorean act of will; the F \nGAPSELL'S JR ACURA ADUI Wire Cops, derling \nms mm $2.99 Wat bid on * DoNDUSANY...67.80. Camera Bormionary or Connor \nX MODE A P \nE \nA \"CALIT \n...$50 \nOWN THALS \nNoir Et risk sed - \nKOTOE. Apply to \nFER Ondulkar ben appointed and i set LINSTEAD & DA AGERTH jothy die their souls Fleurkons, 24 Faktany, 2580, \nby Masses, KY POCE 900, of Weru, car BEMENA \n---- \n1987 \nPO NE LUT, GODOWN WWATER PADE \nBuca's Wert, CAS 14208 \nMEN ARTEL UNY AT 3rELS | \nVa. \n.............$1.05 BB-as by Derec Anotre locsa Wox.'s Home De jikaraka CasACT OF SETAAN & T \n....... \n___STD_DBBAREPA \nه آزادی از راه \nIn Amra é \nJASTHAN & DAVIS. FROM GONDON AS) SINGAPOR Egils June 7, 199 \nTT LEL \nse ing been affectivit \n80ti inond: We Cates Vor-? \nmouth, Driss Sten Wather. 15:10,11, 3 Come M. Order, Lena \nMerwe \n--PREVO 1680), demo New 45. Il Core Tv-i \nBustle, Derles Marit \nA decaDLY. \nTHE PRAYà Nov. 15 and 47 (KENS BREAysel droveste, Ciniz see! 2002 Autunda Kits, & Casa? Marokani BOVARE AND SALTadini H. CAPOT rainy iniezed tis divar Varde, with \nNew Car On Chika HA--Bruta \njare d'utils Em thus Bravega. 12. \nBose Cotel in anerputio \nSuity to \nTôi ganggo by her and by 12.9. ~VIOTORES\" | dire, Outer, for aut \nS.CALIFORtre A You, No. 15807, 30 Cases Ver \nmouth. Ozani fa FRIVER's the simplic of them.se 1 \nMemalion \nlould af \nBahan the Pur \nEra \nInvite Passersion. \nFigley, Est November, 1251. \nLINBIRAD & 2018.ga \nSz \nNu - Cleis tent of the \ntest Hoags and jlapur biwee \nRELLY & WALSH, KONGKONG. \nWATERBURY CLUCY. \nWATDRSERY, CON OMPANY!! \nPESTAU A C... Bide Agelb dougiong, Nerabe, 1991 \nEX \"ARADRA \nHé zone No. 25. 1 Ch Flute, Céur, \nfrange \nCum in WAL \nJodliwey mung: he claimed. \nOptical Carry will forestei paina 1er in sua caray *rginen bei 32 \nTODAY. 1 \nThe tale the unity Age \nteen var fula by s tebe n the Cete fary: \nל.TR\" \n916, \nFo Fralebtor Pasengo, apply to \nREŠENIOS & Dungkot, en Falirnusy, 1543. \nAUSTROJUNGABIAN LOOTISSUSAN NAVIGATIOR COMPANY. 1. At Agresamos que Riu Noor, 1891, STEAM WIR SINGAPORE, PENANG, Teen Woman Kinter. We cup COLOMBO, BOMBAY, ADEN, BUZZ, Ing of the China Gas Stan Naz \nPORT BAIN, AND TRIPSUM. SIS COFA the \nthe Awarar STRANEK (laking Gangnan timing rates to Cabestra, Cagene and JAJARNYA ALISON SCOT PRYMATIC PATS, Costa, and the \nMGOTTENRASS Postel \nespectivo Teds if we compres digital 27, of the part, wand CORN LI, 12 Company's Arm \nو بواره کمی از سواری به بازار کار در کاشی تر و با دیوید \nwiki Moboraca fu 30+ to \n\"DACHNE\" \nWILIAM Captain Cousie, will feel MON. KICK bit of JANTINA, 6th Prezimu, at POE 22.06. ZANER&Co. of the ene part, and | For fur Particalórappir ta Jos J. Ma, on behalf of the Cem. \nMECHI & Co. \n182 \nparis, vt tin other pert \nCopper of the chore Agoemand sand Morrerar. ! \nof the Water Ant of \n1 \ngistion, uni szeme Tulused Valesklad, D \nde inspinal by interling Zubscribers, a \nHow Fuhraury, 1359 \nSTEAM TO FRANQUIAL \nارک باد \nHis cume; No. B. Fill, a Care Meerten üstina cf the Exlienor of the Jonpano. 2 13, 8. N. Co.'s Strucəliy \nTO LET TUUSHA and DOWNS, N». 13 and Caren 100.swing vode alter ibu 23rd! H \nloa, Maya Ceurest. af persave is the custani will be slijed 628 \npatioa el inks. CXNOWire & Co. Pusa97- sin en 1st day out?. \nApply to \",\" care of one of Nix papar. \nHayong, 33t. Pauta \n561. \nBiz created. \nFill of Lading 24) be wet F \nJARING \nHengkona, 15th Februg, 1982, \ndise, Dege, o andar. \nBYAN \n¡GB, No D. 2 Chua, folar, Pres \na. D. CHAS PEAUX, Agral. \n153 unge, 3rd January, 18 \n31 Faza & WALA, & Tank Bali, 31 \n*DEGEAN,\" will teate or the shoo plan aluk 24 Eners Ina athmont se made the digest will after hac artisi with the Eaglish Mail, edarped, we pumpday if iskarei Se \nA. MOVER notte) am suplied for, 4 surplus of the \nSuurinta at Tungkong: 29% Fobrancy, 1882 \nrexit wil byheals to the pope of con", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-197 - Governor Hennessy - 1882 [1-2].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 316991, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-200 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1882 [5]", "page_number": 72, "title": "CO129-200 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1882 [5]", "content_text": "# Descriptive List of Foreigners Deported from the Colony of Hong Kong\n\n52 Persons\n\n## Particulars of Foreigners Deported from the Colony of Hong Kong\n\n| Name | Description |\n| --- | --- |\n| Chow Suor | China, his Chow was Fin |\n| Hi H. KM | 372 Hair & Lov |\n| Sing Low King | H |\n| Song Y | Lus than der Stang kain Bovi |\n\n| Name | Particular Marks | Where Deported to |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| James | | |\n| Kon L | 52 | |\n| li berte | Conpoken | |\n\n## List of Persons Deported from the Colony of Hong Kong\n\n| Name | Description | Particular Marks | Where Deported to | Offence |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Hey low Suns Sing | 7506 394 | | Canton | |\n| Kamee | For Shaw Chung | 7/329 293 | | |\n| Fanz a Hoi | Lowa Po | Long Sai Kwang Sai. 577 7658 395 | | |\n| Cheung a fox | Was wher Village | Bickish Ag height Compation | | |\n| | Grime Dale | lo & Where Geported to | | |\n| | | a sending to occntience book | | |\n| Leh. 30 | 5 3/9 Hawkehi | Branded | Canton | Larceny |\n| | 5. Afail. 642 | | Canton | |\n| | 5 542 Festine Letter | Uttering | 649 | |\n| | trowne troinve | | Costine | |\n| | 66.2 | | Canton | |\n| | 30 5 342. Risa pranda | | 2.124 396 | |\n| Leongo Lu | Fam Love Luxe On | 31 | $ 4 | Bricklayer |\n| | Foor soars on each shah | Returning for. Drefentation | Canton | |\n| | que booking a dusting himse | Contin | | |\n| tebing a Fork | Shak Lang Tung Row 26 | 2473-6 398 | | |\n| than a thre | Lam thun Kovai Sim | 30 | $ 4 | Huschers |\n| | Act Karceny | 2.1 | 875 | |\n| Jung Hoon | 3 | Gardena Marks of flogging | | |\n| | Returning pro Deportation | 5* Maz | The Linolied | |\n| King Moon | 2496 397 | 2\" | | |\n| When a King Fai | He Tong So long Heungthan | 33 | For Ori | |\n| | 5 2 | Ancher on lift fore-a | 995 | |\n| | Was ther | Gantoni | | |\n| | 5942. Seaman | hit Byer | Show the che a ugh to Lan | |\n| | dem Hi Hon. Hoi Funz | 2xx bye Lan | | |\n| | Alberghie huggers | Kowloon Hor | | |\n| When a bhung | Heang Than Jung Room | 35 & 34 Gorlin | | Branded |\n| | کتی 24 | Kong Mova 2864 bon | | |\n| Kung. Meow | 1862 400 | Serug & dem Hoz. Tung Nam Foi | | |\n| When a Suke | thek the Naung than | 21 | 32 | 5 2 Hakur |\n| | ú Hander | Book massid | Loving | Kidnapping |\n| | Returning pre: Deportation | 4 | Jun On | |\n| | 1084 | 1084 | Jung Koom | |\n| | 13th Juar | 1226 | banton | |\n| | barton. 379 dp a Fral | The Thing how an | 6802 sec to a Lund Sie the Kerang ting | 10 |\n| Cheng san | Wong Nr Wang | das Hung Live On | 2.1 | |\n| | alp her than Cole din to | The War Chen Hver the | | |\n| | bile Shire Ling Ling | biggs sob thing | | |\n| | o s sy b b a k | | | |\n\n## Other Entries\n\n| Name | Description | Particular Marks | Where Deported to | Offence |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Tam Son Honi K | 2 Lady | bie Hanchier Sai | q Clary | |\n| | anek elle See litine sight o | Burgting and Carry | Ongatives. of Conditional Forens | Suspicions Chester di |\n| | King Meen How low | | | |\n| # Akwary | Chantier | Hot Phor. Buras | Nation of England | |\n| | 5 bakpanter | Forgery and Checopa | 31.12.74 2456 | Englandi |\n| sba L | sot the Show | 405 L. Hansenskay | 1106 H. Schrepper | |\n| | Sive dev | # 56 Shamani | And wounding | 1.4.76 |\n| | 11/5 23 | 5 1th Carpenter | # 5.95 | 1541 |\n| | 256 Cantin | fentist hey W Jones | 21. | Brandal |\n| | 2 How her | | | |\n| Haveker Caci | Ko Heat | Bunglong | Fit: four déportation | |\n| | Lit mai | Pity from deportations | b. 408 | |\n| # Monig | England Germany | 22 | $ 7 | so huget |\n| | Robbery pro: Prison | 16. 2.76 | 30-2 | Englands |\n| | 30 5 | 11⁄2 Broker | Forgery to | 8.576 |\n| | 1011 | 12 J | The dang Parties | 14:3 Ino A |\n| | Hog P. Davis | A. Gears | Australia 20 | $ 7 |\n| Anampele gest | Abt: goods under falar prs. | 15.8.76 | 16:10 | Macao |\n| | کی 53th Sen. | Gibankan maid | 25 75- | bes |\n| | A dorthand | th | 5 2h dive givent | Rogue and tagabond. |\n| | 31-3.j | San Francives | Australia | Maspa |\n| | the England. | ی است و نیزیم تا سنتر | | |\n\nPage 363", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-200 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1882 [5].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 318121, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-202 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1882 [7-9]", "page_number": 373, "title": "CO129-202 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1882 [7-9]", "content_text": "## convictions to discharges\n\nThe proportion of convictions compares favourably with the similar figures in the Straits Settlements. I do not put much faith in the conclusions drawn from these states until they have always managed to prove that they have managed to provide satisfaction. We can see that in consequence of decreasing crime, their opponents always prove that it is observable that we reverse the wheel inside. These calculations I should not adopt.\n\n## Classification\n\nIf you exclude \"serious crime\" which is properly described as Larceny, merely the last quinquennial period (four convictions) 368 (I take convictions which are, I think, the best criterion) merely exceeds those of the first period by 294 - the supplies on it is obviously due to greater vigilance.\n\nThe part of Gert, viz 30; an increase of 264 allows for numbers of people. I have puzzled by the absence of any in duet. Are they forgery all alarming, the absurd crime of rape cancels. They were undone in Hong Kong. If rape & forgery are excluded, Felonies in FSS are already fewer things for in chew. The retardation is very slight unless it is less credible, they have not specified offences.\n\n## Page 368 \n\nThe dropping of should be deducted due to greater vigilance on the part of ...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-202 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1882 [7-9].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 318122, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-202 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1882 [7-9]", "page_number": 374, "title": "CO129-202 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1882 [7-9]", "content_text": "a decrease in \nThis is a good sign in the bust period.\n\nAltogether I think it would be best simply to continue to write \"Exporter of tea\" in this despatcher to the new Governor, rather than to specify this whole subject - it might lead to a lot of unnecessary explanation.\n\nLord Ripon forgery, a clever explanation. I cannot give an explanation but will find out privately from the Acting Colonial Secretary as to the absence of rope and as to including \"drunkenness\" among \"Serious crimes\".\n\n| Date | Felonies |\n| --- | --- |\n| 2-Oct | ... |\n| 4-Oct | Kort 3 Auswa annexed. |\n\ndated 28-Nov. 82 \n369- \nFelonies not already given include Rape, Indecent Assault, and Forgery. \nSimple larceny has always been classed here among \"Serious Crimes\" or at least...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-202 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1882 [7-9].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 318124, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-202 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1882 [7-9]", "page_number": 376, "title": "CO129-202 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1882 [7-9]", "content_text": "## \nI am puzzled by the absence of any crimes of rape. The return should specify such offences, unless, which is not credible, they show a decrease from last period. This is a good sign. Altogether it will be best simply to close this despatch with an expression of regret that more information is not available.\n\nWhen forgery is made known, it is usually followed by an explanation. Are cases of indecent assault unknown in Hong Kong? If rape is included under \"felonies given\", they are already few indeed, very few.\n\nThe surplus is obviously due to the increase of population. There remains 264 to be allowed for. And it is alarming that there should be such a large number of cases of kidnapping.\n\nThe part of vigilance is to be vigilant. From these figures, it is obvious that there is greater vigilance required.\n\nThe Governor should speak to him on the subject. Forgery is also very low. Lo Chuen Chan has already made a report on this.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-202 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1882 [7-9].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 325039, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-215 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1884 [1-4]", "page_number": 299, "title": "CO129-215 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1884 [1-4]", "content_text": "The Governor has not yet received any reply from the Minister in England on the subject of the question referred to, but he will not fail to inform the Viceroy, through you, directly on the arrival of an answer.\n\nDRAFT.\n\nThe Under Sec. of State for Foreign Office, Mar. 27.\n\nMINUTE.\n\nMr. Johnstone, 27.\n\nMr. De Robeck.\n\nMr. Wingfield, 2.\n\nMr. Bramston.\n\nMr. Meade.\n\nSir R. Herbert.\n\nMr. Ashley.\n\nLord Derby.\n\nNo. 50, 19 Feb.\n\n76, 27.\n\n4935, Hung.\n\nSir,\n\n297, DS 28 Mar. 84.\n\nWith reference to the letter from this department of the 21st ult., directed by the Earl of Derby to forward, for Earl Granville's information, a copy of a further despatch from the Governor of Hong Kong, respecting the extradition of eleven Chinese forgers,\n\n...\n\nthe reply is received from Sir S. Bowen to the telegram of the 20th ult. on this subject, it will be communicated to you.\n\n \nPage 1\n\n \n\n \n...\n\nfoxspored the Extradition respecting Jaren of Eleven St forged by the Chinese for? des som asa) He reply \n\nPage 1\n\n was removed and put to the end, as the page count is usually 6 lines, 3 at the begining and 3 at the end. The text is reordered to make more sense. The original text had some OCR errors, which were corrected. The formatting is done using HTML as per the instructions. The file reference is corrected to have no spaces inside parentheses. The text is not translated, and no comments are added. The Chinese writing direction is not applicable in this text. The data is not in a table format, so it is not reorganized. The text is not rephrased or rewritten, only corrected for spelling, spacing, and obvious joins.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-215 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1884 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 326509, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-217 - Governor Sir Bowen Administrator Marsh - 1884 [7-10]", "page_number": 544, "title": "CO129-217 - Governor Sir Bowen Administrator Marsh - 1884 [7-10]", "content_text": "## \n\n540\n\nI also annex a copy as it is important as it contains an admission that the Proclamation, which was the original cause of the disturbances, was issued by himself and the Governor of Canton. It had been asserted in Canton that this proclamation was a forgery. The trial of the Editor of one of the Chinese newspapers which published this Proclamation is to come on in a few days at the Criminal Sessions. Proceedings against the other 3 papers are in abeyance until the result of this trial is seen.\n\n4\n\nIn my despatch No.346 of the 14th instant I informed Your Lordship that I had sent a warning to the Mandarin of Kowloon respecting the attempt which, according to the reports of informers, was to be made by persons from his District to destroy a French Mail steamer in the harbour of Hongkong. This communication was made privately by Inspector Quinery, who", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-217 - Governor Sir Bowen Administrator Marsh - 1884 [7-10].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 333991, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-232 - Acting Governor Marsh Acting Governor Cameron - 1887 [4-5]", "page_number": 275, "title": "CO129-232 - Acting Governor Marsh Acting Governor Cameron - 1887 [4-5]", "content_text": "13.\n\n2€3\n\nchair\n\nསདྡྷིཛྫི# + , ཝེ, ཨི HE is\n\n-12.\n\nordinary observation : What then might be expected if forgers could imitate pieces worn out beyond recognition? How easily\n\n18.\n\nthe remedy be can from in the years ago would be applied may what happened care of Japanese 20, 10 and 5 cent pieces.\n\nThese coins had for years circulated side by side with our own, and were received here, as Singapore ten cent piece now are, at their par value. The Japanese Government suddenly lowered the intrinsic value of its subsidiary coinage, and, at the same time, the coast of China was flooded with it.\n\nThe Banks here then refused to receive Japanese small coin, the Treasury did the same. The Government Department followed, within a few weeks tradesmen began to print on their accounts \"Japanese small coin not taken\". The coin sank to something like 16 per cent discount, at which it remains, and even a coolie in the street will not take a Japanese ten-cent piece as his fare if he can help it.\n\n19. It only remains to enquire whether such a course as is suggested would give rise to any hardship. I venture to say\n\n20.\n\nthat it would not. It must be borne in mind that this Government never sanctioned the export of subsidiary coin, and never undertook to redeem it on its return from the mainland in a bad condition.\n\nQuite apart from that,\n\n21.\n\nhowever, every person who, on the mainland of China, takes these coins, does so because they are worth to him the value which he receives them. Nobody ever accepts a coin in China under any other conditions, and these conditions are, as I shall show, absolutely independent of any idea of a central authority which will, eventually", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-232 - Acting Governor Marsh Acting Governor Cameron - 1887 [4-5].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 335374, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-234 - Acting Governor Cameron Governor Des Voeus - 1887 [9-12]", "page_number": 656, "title": "CO129-234 - Acting Governor Cameron Governor Des Voeus - 1887 [9-12]", "content_text": "649\n\n\"Mule on the \"be subject. An may therefore ourrender of acoumed that the 00 arr criminals is not at present looked \"upon \" duty. Every State may refuse to \" harbour fugitives if it pleases; but it prefers to receive and protect \"them, other States have us senady but \"/benter into treaties with it to regulate \"the future.\n\nabsolute international \n\nIt seems to be agreed that \" extradition should be confined to grave \" crimes, such as murder, no \"violone, forgery, bbery with and those offenses \" which it is the common interest of \" all ratioms to suppress \"\n\nOn Dance's edition of Wheaton's Elements of International Law at page 120 it is laid down : \"In the negotiation of treaties stipulating for the extradition of persons accused or convicted of specified crimes, certain \" rules are generally followed, and \" especially by constitutional government \" The principle of these rules is, that \"a State should not be bound to grant extradition of its own citizens, or of persons accused or \" convicted of political or purely local \" crimes, or of slight offences, but \"should confine the provision to such acts as are, by common accord, \" regarded as grave crimes.\n\nWe see that extradition should be granted only for serious Crimes.\n\nIn all Extradition Treaties the right of claiming the rendition of the offender has been restricted and the crimes for which extradition is to be granted are set out in these Treaties.\n\nI have carefully gone through the Extradition Treaties which are collected in Kirchener's work on Extradition and I do not find any mention of the crime or offence", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-234 - Acting Governor Cameron Governor Des Voeus - 1887 [9-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 336646, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-237 - Governor Des Voeus Acting Governor Stewart - 1888 [1-6]", "page_number": 362, "title": "CO129-237 - Governor Des Voeus Acting Governor Stewart - 1888 [1-6]", "content_text": "## 357\n\n3. I have given this subject my best consideration. I would remark, in the first place, that the profit on the coins, which is little more than what this Colony would obtain, without any expenditure of labour or trouble, by simply placing money in the Banks here on fixed deposit, has not suggested the obtaining of a single coin more than would have been asked for under any circumstances short of a prohibitive loss. If the coins were obtainable only at par, I should have recommended every requisition I have recommended. If they were obtainable at a slight loss, I should have asked for as many as we could afford. I cannot see that the Government is less bound to provide coin than it is bound to provide roads, water, or police; and I consider it as much my duty to see that the supply of coin does not run out as I do to take the same precaution with regard to the stock of Postage Stamps.\n\n4. I would further say that this Government does not encourage the exportation of coin to China, but it is powerless to prevent it. We used to issue subsidiary coins only on a written undertaking that they would not be exported. The promise was not worth the paper it was written on, and its exaction was such a transparent farce that I substituted for it a system of granting any reasonable application for coin according to the circumstances of the applicant. A shopkeeper in a large way of business, for instance, is allowed more than a petty trader, an employer of labour more still, and so on. This system works smoothly, but of course the export of the coin goes on as it always has done.\n\n5. It would in many ways be more convenient to this Colony to keep the coin here, but no means of doing so could be devised.\n\n6. It must not be forgotten that Hongkong is very badly provided with currency, and for this reason the Managers of the Banks have repeatedly begged me not to allow the Colony to be left, as it used to be, for months at a time, with small coin unobtainable except at 10 per cent. premium. A shipment of $50,000 worth would arrive perhaps once in two years, and, however charily distributed, it was absorbed in a fortnight. Change was given only as a favour, a request for it was often regarded as positively unreasonable.\n\n7. When I took charge of the Post Office, twelve years ago, it was regarded as the normal and almost legitimate state of affairs for the Shroffs employed to sell stamps never to have any change. Of course the real reason was that, with small coin at a high premium, they put aside all they got from the public for sale to money changers and others, and no consideration of the inconvenience they were inflicting on the public or on their employers deterred them from doing this. It is only of late years that I have been able to insist upon change being kept both in the Post Office and in the Stamp Office. As the premium on small silver coin, under ordinary circumstances, is now only about 3 per mille, the temptation to make away with it surreptitiously does not exist to any great extent.\n\n8. The trying time is of course Chinese New Year, at which period it is the custom amongst Chinese to pay all debts and close all accounts. Only two years ago, during the three or four days before the Chinese old year's eve, small coin was at 200 per cent. premium. The Treasury had none to issue, the Banks had none, and Bank Notes were not to be had for love or money. The inconvenience to those who had many small payments to make, to the Commissariat, the Dockyard, to employers of labour, and public companies, was so great that I resolved on no account to allow such a state of things to recur if any vigilance of this Department could prevent it.\n\n9. On the approach of the last Chinese New Year (January 24th, 1887) there was $180,000 worth of small coin in the Treasury, and this supply, amounting to no less than two and a quarter millions of coins, I considered to be ample. Nevertheless, two months before the new year, such a steady demand set in that, though the requisitions were cut down as much as they reasonably could be, in four weeks the whole was exhausted, and the issue had to be suspended, if only to keep a few coins for the use of the Police, &c. It was at this juncture that an urgent request was received from the Army Paymaster for $10,000 worth of coin. I was enabled to make the issue, because I knew that after the New Year I could, if necessary, purchase small coin for Government use at a merely nominal premium. It has not been necessary to do so, but until the next shipment arrived we were on famine allowance, and the issue to the public was suspended. I should say, however, that no inconvenience appeared to arise from the exhaustion of the supply of coin at that time, as the Chinese community, in exhausting the Treasury stock, had sufficiently supplied itself. The new shipment arrived on March 22nd, and $48,000 of it, or nearly one-third, was issued in a week, to the Banks, the Commissariat, and the public.\n\n10. It must not be forgotten that we have the wants of the Army and Navy to provide for. Every ship, before going North, obtains a supply of coin, because these coins pass anywhere in China or Japan, and, except broken silver or Japanese money, nothing else is to be had.\n\n11. The total amount of subsidiary coin supplied to Hongkong to date has been $2,133,881, including some copper, which has not been exported. Of the silver, probably not ten per cent. is in the Colony.\n\n12. I trust I have shown the necessity for keeping this Colony supplied with small coin, and the impossibility of the Government's exercising any check on its exportation except by declining to issue it at all. I now pass on to consider the risk of these coins being hereafter thrown upon the Colony for redemption in a worn or mutilated condition. I venture to think that this risk is very small, and that, even if it exists, which is doubtful, it would be easily averted. It should be borne in mind that these coins are not a legal tender for sums of more than $2.\n\n13. The subsidiary coinage of Hongkong has been in circulation nearly a quarter of a century. During all that time no worn or mutilated coin has ever been seen in the Treasury. I am inclined to think silver coin would never become worn in China as it does in England, for the people do not carry it loose in their pockets, but always most carefully in a pouch or purse, or wrapped in paper; nor is it passed about to anything like the extent that silver coin is in Europe. Be this as it may, the fact remains that our silver coins are as yet practically unworn.\n\n14. Chinese are great hoarders of coin. The popularity of our five cent pieces very greatly arises from their common use as little presents to children and servants. Thousands of them are made into buttons. It would probably be difficult for a speculator on the mainland to buy any quantity of these coins at profitable rates.\n\n15. Let it be supposed, however, that in the course of another 25 years there will be, on the mainland of China, thousands of five and ten cent pieces in the same condition as old sixpences and shillings in England, namely, mere discs of silver, with perhaps slight vestiges of the original design of the coins. Let it be further supposed that a speculator has brought up $10,000 worth of these, and proposes to flood this Colony with them, forcing them on the Treasury as coin at a discount is always forced upon it.\n\n16. It appears to me that the only course open to the Government would be to decline to recognise any coin which could not be shown to have been issued from the Treasury here. This would practically amount to refusing to redeem all worn coins except in very rare cases.\n\n17. If it once were known that the Hongkong Government was receiving at par value coins which purported to be tokens worn out on the mainland, we should be at once inundated with coins by the thousand which had never been in or near Hongkong at all. There has already been some trouble with spurious ten cent pieces, so well made as almost to defy detection by ordinary observation. What then might be expected if forgers could imitate pieces worn out beyond recognition?\n\n18. How easily the remedy would be applied may be seen from what happened some years ago in the case of Japanese 20, 10, and 5 cent pieces. These coins had years circulated side by side with our own, and were received here, as Singapore ten cent pieces now are, at their par value. The Japanese Government suddenly lowered the intrinsic value of its subsidiary coinage, and, at the same time, the coast of China was flooded with it. The Banks here then refused to receive Japanese small coin; the Treasury did the same. The Government departments followed suit, and within a few weeks tradesmen began to print on their accounts, \"Japanese small coin not taken.\" The coin sank to something like 16 per cent. discount, at which it remains, and even a chair-coolie in the street will not take a Japanese ten cent piece as his fare if he can help it.\n\n19. It only remains to enquire whether such a course as is suggested would give rise to any hardship. I venture to say that it would not.\n\n20. It must be borne in mind that this Government never sanctioned the export of subsidiary coin, and never undertook to redeem it on its return from the mainland in a bad condition.\n\n21. Quite apart from that, however, every person who, on the mainland of China, takes these coins, does so because they are worth to him the value for which he receives them. Nobody ever accepts a coin in China on any other conditions; and these conditions are, as I shall show, absolutely independent of any idea of a central authority which will eventually redeem the coin at its par value if nobody else will take it.\n\n## 11 \n\n## 10", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-237 - Governor Des Voeus Acting Governor Stewart - 1888 [1-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 337483, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-238 - Governor Des Voeus - 1888 [7-8]", "page_number": 514, "title": "CO129-238 - Governor Des Voeus - 1888 [7-8]", "content_text": "The should go and the other magistrate on de die in diem, should be required to go on with the current work whilst his colleague was engaged on the rendition case.\n\nI consider this very important and if it was understood that cases were not to be adjourned for the convenience of any body, delays and expense would diminish and there would soon be little ground for complaint. I think an instruction to this effect might be given by Your Excellency at once, I am sure it would stop a great deal of delay.\n\n(Signed) J. Russell \nActing Chief Justice\n\n## Enclosure 3\n### C. O. 18460\n**[RECD: REG 14 SEP 38 Proposed for Draft Ordinance of 1876.]**\n\n### FIRST SCHEDULE\n\nThe crimes for which the extradition is to be granted are the following:-\n\n| No. | Crime |\n| --- | --- |\n| (1.) | Murder (including infanticide) and attempt to murder. |\n| (2.) | Manslaughter, |\n| (3.) | Counterfeiting or altering money, uttering or bringing into circulation counterfeit or altered money, |\n| (4.) | Forgery, or counterfeiting or altering, or uttering what is forged, or counterfeited or altered; comprehending the crimes designated in the Penal Codes of Hongkong as counterfeiting or falsification of paper money, bank notes, or other securities, forgery, or other falsification of other public or private documents, likewise the uttering or bringing into circulation, or wilfully using such counterfeited, forged, or falsified papers. |\n| (5.) | Embezzlement or larceny. |\n| (6.) | Obtaining money or goods by false pretences. |\n| (7.) | Crimes against bankruptcy law. |\n| (8.) | Fraud committed by a bailee, banker, agent, factor, trustee, or director, or member or public officer of any Company, made criminal by any law for the time being in force. |\n| (9.) | Rape. |\n| (10.) | Abduction of minors. |\n| (11.) | Child stealing or kidnapping. |\n| (12.) | False imprisonment. |\n| (13) | Burglary, or house-breaking, with criminal intent. |\n| (14.) | Arson. |\n| (15.) | Robbery with violence. |\n| (16.) | Threats by letter or otherwise with intent to extort, |\n| (17.) | Sinking or destroying a vessel at sea, or attempting to do so. |\n| (18.) | Assaults on board a ship on the high seas, with intent to destroy life, or to do grievous bodily harm. |\n| (19.) | Revolt, or conspiracy to revolt, by two or more persons on board a ship on the high seas, against the authority of the master. |\n| (20.) | Perjury or subornation of perjury. |\n| (21) | Malicious injury to property, if the offence be indictable. |\n\nThe extradition is also to take place for participation in any of the aforesaid crimes, as an accessory before or after the fact.\n\n### Additional now proposed\n\n| Crime |\n| --- |\n| Malicious wounding. |\n| Piracy whether jure gentium or Municipal. |\n| Receiving stolen goods. |\n| Abduction or forcible detention of women. |\n| Kidnapping—as regards men—for purposes of exportation, and decoying for exportation or in any way fraudulently inducing to leave the country. |\n| Escape from lawful custody without reference to offence. |\n| False accusations. |\n| Illicit sale or purchase of munitions of war. |\n| Removing land marks and taking forcible possession of land. |\n| Offences connected with public examinations.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-238 - Governor Des Voeus - 1888 [7-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 338274, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-240 - Public Offices & Others - 1888", "page_number": 202, "title": "CO129-240 - Public Offices & Others - 1888", "content_text": "## FIRST SCHEDULE\n\nThe crimes for which the extradition is to be granted are the following crimes according to the law:\n\n- Murder (including infanticide and attempt to murder)\n- Manslaughter\n- Counterfeiting or altering money, uttering or bringing into circulation counterfeit or altered money\n- Forgery, or counterfeiting or altering, or uttering what is forged, or counterfeited or altered; comprehending the crimes designated in the Penal Codes of Hongkong as counterfeiting or falsification of paper money, bank notes, or other securities, forgery, or other falsification of other public or private documents, likewise the uttering or bringing into circulation, or wilfully using such counterfeited, forged, or falsified papers\n- Embezzlement or larceny\n- Obtaining money or goods by false pretences\n- Crimes against bankruptcy law\n- Fraud committed by a bailee, banker, agent, factor, trustee, or director, or member or public officer of any Company, made criminal by any law for the time being in force\n- Rape\n- Abduction of minors\n- Child stealing\n- Kidnapping\n- False Imprisonment\n- Burglary, or house-breaking\n- Arson\n- Robbery with violence\n- Threats by letter or otherwise with intent to extort\n- Sinking or destroying a vessel at sea, or attempting to do so\n- Assaults on board a ship on the high seas, with intent to destroy life, or to do grievous bodily harm\n- Revolt, or conspiracy to revolt, by two or more persons on board a ship on the high seas, against the authority of the master\n- Perjury or subornation of perjury\n- Malicious injury to property, if the offence be indictable\n\nThe extradition is also to take place for participation in any of the aforesaid crimes as an accessory before or after the fact.\n\n### Additional now proposed\n\n- Abduction or forcible detention of women\n- Kidnapping - as regards persons for purposes of exportation, or decoying for exportation or in any way fraudulently inducing to leave the country\n- Escape from lawful custody without reference to offence\n- False accusations\n- Illicit sale or purchase of munitions of war\n- Removing landmarks and taking forcible possession of land\n- Offences connected with public examinations\n\n### Crime whether by Coroner's law or by Imperial State or local Ordinance heads before or after the passing of this Ordinance\n\n- Any indictable offence under Ordinance No 7 of 1865 entitled \"An Ordinance to consolidate and amend the Law in force in this Colony relating to Larceny and the like or similar offences\" or any Ordinance amending or substituted for the same which is not included in the foregoing list\n- Any indictable offence under Ordinance No ... of 1845 entitled \"An Ordinance to consolidate and amend the Law in force in this Colony relating to indictable offences by Forgery\" or any Ordinance amending or substituted for the same which is not included in the foregoing list\n- Any indictable offence under Ordinance No ... entitled \"An Ordinance to consolidate and amend the Law in force in this Colony relating to offences relating to the Coin\" which are not included in the foregoing list or substituted for the same.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-240 - Public Offices & Others - 1888.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 340519, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-243 - Public Offices & Others - 1889", "page_number": 248, "title": "CO129-243 - Public Offices & Others - 1889", "content_text": "## Form of warrant of the Governor for surrender of a fugitive criminal\n\nBy His Excellency Governor and Commander-in-Chief of the Colony of Hongkong and its dependencies.\n\nTo the Superintendent of Victoria Gaol, and to the Constable thereof.\n\n**Warrant for Surrender**\n\nWhereas one ..., late of ..., accused of the commission of the crime of ... within the jurisdiction of ... was delivered into the custody of you Superintendent of Victoria Gaol by warrant dated the ... day of ... 18... under the provisions of the \"Chinese Extradition Ordinance, 187...\".\n\nNow I do hereby, in pursuance of the said Ordinance, command you the said Constable in Her Majesty's name forthwith to convey and deliver the body of the said ... into the custody of the said Superintendent of Victoria Gaol, and you the said Superintendent of Victoria Gaol to receive the said ... into your custody, and him there safely to keep until he is thence delivered pursuant to the provisions of the said \"Chinese Extradition Ordinance, 18...\" for which this shall be your warrant.\n\nGiven under my hand and seal at Victoria, in the Colony of Hongkong, this ... day of ... 18....\n\nBy His Excellency Governor and Commander-in-Chief of the Colony of Hongkong and its dependencies.\n\n## Form of warrant for delivery of a fugitive criminal\n\nTo the Superintendent of Victoria Gaol, and ... accused of the commission of the crime of ... within the jurisdiction of ... was delivered into the custody of you Superintendent of Victoria Gaol by warrant dated the ... day of ... under the \"Chinese Extradition Ordinance, 187...\".\n\nNow I do hereby, in pursuance of the said Ordinance, order you the said Superintendent of Victoria Gaol to deliver the body of the said ... into the custody of the said ... who is authorised by the Chinese authorities to receive the said ... pursuant to ... and I command you the said ... to receive him, and to convey him into your custody, for which this shall be your warrant.\n\nGiven under my hand and seal this ... day of ... 18....\n\nBy Command,\nColonial Secretary.\n\n## Form of order of discharge by the Governor\n\nBy His Excellency Governor and Commander-in-Chief of the Colony of Hongkong and its dependencies.\n\nTo the Superintendent of Victoria Gaol.\n\nWhereas one ... is now in your custody as a fugitive criminal under the provisions of the \"Chinese Extradition Ordinance, 1875\".\n\nAnd whereas it has been determined that no warrant shall be granted for the surrender of the said ....\n\nNow I do hereby order and require you to discharge the said ... from custody under the said Ordinance.\n\nGiven under my hand and seal at Victoria, Hongkong, this ... day of ... 18....\n\nBy Command,\nGovernor, &C.\n\n## FIRST SCHEDULE\n\nThe crimes for which extradition is deemed applicable are the following, to be construed according to the law for the time being in force in the Colony of Hongkong at the date of the alleged crime, whether by Common Law or by Statute or local Ordinance, whether _felo de se_ or misprision:\n\n| No. | Crime |\n| --- | --- |\n| 1 | Murder (including parricide) and attempt to murder |\n| 2 | Manslaughter |\n| 3 | Counterfeiting or altering money, uttering or bringing into circulation counterfeit or altered money |\n| 4 | Forgery, or counterfeiting or altering, or uttering what is forged, or counterfeited or altered |\n| 5 | Kidnapping |\n| 6 | Embezzlement or larceny |\n| 7 | Obtaining money or goods by false pretences |\n| 8 | Crimes against bankruptcy law |\n| 9 | Fraud committed by a bailee, banker, agent, factor, trustee, or director, or member or public officer of any Company |\n| 10 | Rape |\n| 11 | Abduction |\n| 12 | Child stealing or kidnapping |\n| 13 | False imprisonment |\n| 14 | Burglary, or house-breaking |\n| 15 | Arson |\n| 16 | Robbery with violence |\n| 17 | Threats by letter or otherwise with intent to extort |\n| 18 | Sinking or destroying a vessel at sea, or attempting to do so |\n| 19 | Assaults on board a ship on the high seas, with intent to destroy life, or to do grievous bodily harm |\n| 20 | Revolt, or conspiracy to revolt, by two or more persons on board a ship on the high seas, against the authority of the master |\n| 21 | Perjury or subornation of perjury |\n| 22 | Malicious injury to property, if the offence be indictable |\n| | Receiving stolen goods |\n| | Abduction or unlawful detention of women |\n| | Escaping from lawful custody without reference to offence |\n\nPage 12", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-243 - Public Offices & Others - 1889.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 340527, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-243 - Public Offices & Others - 1889", "page_number": 256, "title": "CO129-243 - Public Offices & Others - 1889", "content_text": "## (continuation of page 67, Schedule 253)\n\nAny indictable offence under Ordinance No. 7 of 1865 entitled \"An Ordinance to consolidate and amend the Enactments in force in this Colony relating to Forgery and other similar offences\", or any Ordinance amending or substituted for the same which is not included in the foregoing list.\n\nAny indictable offence under Ordinance No. 6 of 1865 entitled \"An Ordinance to consolidate and amend the Enactments in this Colony relating to indictable offences by Forgery\", or any Ordinance amending or substituted for the same which is not included in the foregoing list.\n\nAny indictable offence under Ordinance No. 9 of 1865 entitled \"An Ordinance to consolidate...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-243 - Public Offices & Others - 1889.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 342144, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-245 - Acting Governor Fleming - 1890 [5-7]", "page_number": 527, "title": "CO129-245 - Acting Governor Fleming - 1890 [5-7]", "content_text": "524\n\nand the Extended Jurisdiction Act of 1879.\n\nThe Summary of Sections shows the nature of the Ordinance and the local variations from the English model are, as far as the first four parts are concerned, so slight as to call for no special comment. As regards Part 5, Section 80, and the fourth Schedule therein referred to, dealing with the summary powers of a Magistrate in cases of indictable offences, this is a reproduction of Section 8 of Ordinance 16 of 1875 with an additional power conferred in cases of petty forgery. In this Colony, house-coolies and others occasionally forge or utter forged \"chits\" or orders on their masters or supplying the house or servants. These forgeries deceive the tradesmen for trifling amounts, are usually detected, and the punishment inflicted by the Supreme Court is always within that which the Magistrates could inflict, and it is thought desirable to give them the power to deal with such cases.\n\nSection 98, taken originally from the Indian Code, has been in force in this Colony since 1873. Its powers are seldom used, but it is considered advisable to retain them, as they may be useful at times in certain cases.\n\nPower is given by Section 122 to fix a scale of Costs, fees, etc. Hitherto, it has not been the practice to charge any fees, and there appears to be no reason why such an exceptional practice should any longer exist in this Colony. To allow a person to bring a matter before a Magistrate simply for the sake of annoyance and without paying any fee should not exist in a community like that of Hong Kong.\n\n**Sof. M. Meigh Goodman** \nAttorney General", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-245 - Acting Governor Fleming - 1890 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 348845, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-254 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1892 [1-4]", "page_number": 578, "title": "CO129-254 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1892 [1-4]", "content_text": "# ABSTRACT of CASES brought under COGNIZANCE at the POLICE MAGISTRATES' COURT during a period of Ten Years, from 1st January, 1882, to 31st December, 1891, inclusive.\n\n## CASES, HOW DISPOSED OF, AND THE NUMBER OF MALE AND FEMALE PRISONERS UNDER EACH HEAD.\n\n| OFFENCE | No. of CASES | No. of PRISONERS |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Animals-Cruelty to | 17 | 17 |\n| Arms Consolidation Ordinance-Breach of | 5 | 5 |\n| Assault | | |\n| ‣ Causing grievous bodily harm | 81 | 81 |\n| ‣ Common | 1,097 | 1,097 |\n| ‣ Indecent | 8 | 8 |\n| ‣ With intent to commit a felony | 4 | 4 |\n| ‣ On Police in the execution of their duty | 93 | 93 |\n| ‣ On Females and Boys under 14 years of age | 3 | 3 |\n| Banishment-Returning after (see also Conditional Pardon) | 15 | 15 |\n| Births & Deaths-Breach of Ordinance for Registration of | 24 | 24 |\n| Boats-Demanding more than legal fare | 14 | 14 |\n| ‣ Refusing to pay Hire of | 2 | 2 |\n| ‣ Regulations-Breach of | 6 | 6 |\n| Breach of the Peace | 268 | 268 |\n| Bribery, or attempting to bribe | 1 | 1 |\n| Buildings-Breach of Ordinance for | 2 | 2 |\n| ‣ Domestic-Occupying without certificates | 30 | 30 |\n| Burglary | 1,767 | 1,757 |\n| Burial of Chinese Corpse elsewhere than in a Cemetery | 1 | 1 |\n| Brothels-Allowing children above 6 and under 15 years of age to be in a registered | 9 | 9 |\n| ‣ Keeping an incorrect list of inmates of registered | 2 | 2 |\n| ‣ Unregistered | 95 | 95 |\n| Cattle-Slaughtering in a place other than one set apart for the purpose | 1 | 1 |\n| Child-Desertion of | 14 | 14 |\n| Child Stealing | 2 | 2 |\n| Chinese Emigrants-Receiving or harbouring improper | 6 | 6 |\n| Territory-Crimes and Offences committed in | 2 | 2 |\n| Coin-Offences relating to | 1 | 1 |\n| Conspiracy to defraud | 10 | 10 |\n| Contempt of Court | 1 | 1 |\n| Convict Licence-Breach of | 1 | 1 |\n| Corrosive Fluid-Throwing-With intent to do grievous bodily harm | 1 | 1 |\n| Cutting and Wounding with intent, &c. | 516 | 516 |\n| Dangerous Goods Ordinance-Breach of | 2 | 2 |\n| Decoying-Men or boys into or away from the Colony, or imprisoning or detaining them for the purpose of emigration or for any purpose whatsoever | 2 | 2 |\n| Defence Sketching Prevention Ordinance-Breach of | 1 | 1 |\n| Desertion from British Merchant Ships | 14 | 14 |\n| Disorderly Behaviour Drunkenness, Fighting, &c. | 1,177 | 1,177 |\n| Distraint for rent-Fraudulently removing property under | 1 | 1 |\n| Dogs Allowing unmuzzled ferocious, to be at large, &c. | 2 | 2 |\n| ‣ Stealing | 11 | 11 |\n| Domestic Servants-Misconduct as | 30 | 30 |\n| Drugs-Administering | 9 | 9 |\n| ‣ Procuring to cause abortion | 3 | 3 |\n| Embezzlement | 5 | 5 |\n| ‣ by a Clerk | 6 | 6 |\n| ‣ by a Public Servant | 1 | 1 |\n| Escape of Prisoners from Chain Gang | 1 | 1 |\n| Extortion | 9 | 9 |\n| False Charge-Preferring or giving wilful false evidence | 10 | 10 |\n| ‣ Undecided | 2 | 2 |\n| False Pretences obtaining Goods and Money by | 142 | 142 |\n| Felony-Attempting to commit | 12 | 12 |\n| Fire Arms-Discharging | 1 | 1 |\n| Fire Works-Discharging without permits | 564 | 564 |\n| Forcible keeping a person with intent to procure a benefit for his liberation | 1 | 1 |\n| Forged Order-Uttering a for goods with intent to defraud | 21 | 21 |\n| Forgery | 40 | 40 |\n| Fugitive Offenders-Offences against | 1 | 1 |\n| Furious Driving | 1 | 1 |\n| Gambling-Breach of Ordinance for Suppression of | 1,574 | 1,574 |\n| ‣ in the Streets, treated as Nuisances | 35 | 35 |\n| Gaols-Breach of Ordinance for | 7 | 7 |\n| Gaol's Subordinate Officers-Misconduct of | 2 | 2 |\n| Harbour Dredging at Anchorage for Ships of War in the, Regulations-Breach of | 8 | 8 |\n| Health Ordinance-Breach of regulations under | 112 | 112 |\n| House Breaking | 1,771 | 1,771 |\n| Householders and Servants-Breach of Ordinance, for Registration of | 14 | 14 |\n| Indecent Exposure of Person by Bathing or otherwise, and Lewdness | 1 | 1 |\n| Larceny-By a Servant | 5 | 2 |\n| ‣ Common | 1,042 | 1,042 |\n| ‣ From Ships or Boats in the Harbour | 20 | 20 |\n| ‣ Inciting person to commit | 2 | 2 |\n| ‣ From the Person | 174 | 171 |\n| ‣ With violence or with wounding | 8 | 8 |\n| ‣ Indecent with intent to ravish | 1 | 1 |\n| ‣ In a Dwelling House | 8 | 8 |\n| Manslaughter | 13 | 13 |\n| Marine Store Dealers-Breach of Ordinance for | 6 | 6 |\n| Markets' Ordinance-Breach of | 456 | 456 |\n| Menaces-Demanding Money by | 33 | 33 |\n| Merchandise Marks Ordinance-Breach of | 3 | 3 |\n| Merchant Shipping Act of 1876-Breach of | 14 | 14 |\n| Military Stores-Exportation of | 3 | 3 |\n| Misdemeanor-Attempting to commit | 8 | 8 |\n| Murder | 12 | 12 |\n| ‣ Aiding and abetting in | 2 | 2 |\n| Night-Found at, armed with Dangerous and Offensive Weapons, with Intent to break into Dwelling Houses | 2 | 2 |\n| ‣ Found in Dwelling Houses by-with Intent to commit Felony therein | 37 | 37 |\n| Nuisances Allowing Dirt and Filth to remain on Premises or in immediate Vicinity thereof | 77 | 77 |\n| ‣ Blasting Stones to the danger of Persons and Property | 5 | 5 |\n| ‣ Blowing Whistles | 1 | 1 |\n| ‣ Boarding Ships, &c., without permission | 126 | 126 |\n| ‣ Boats mooring inshore | 219 | 219 |\n| ‣ Boats obstructing Navigation | 166 | 166 |\n| ‣ Breaming Boats | 10 | 10 |\n| ‣ Carrying or exposing Night Soil or Noxious Waters in the Streets in uncovered Buckets, and in open Boats along the Fraya | 2 | 2 |\n| ‣ Hanging wet Clothes, &c., to dry over Public Ways | 30 | 30 |\n| ‣ Leaving Holes and Drains unprotected in the Streets | 5 | 5 |\n| ‣ Neglecting to clean out Dust Bins, and throwing Rubbish, &c., into the Streets | 92 | 92 |\n| Obstruction of Roads and Streets, &c., by Hawkers, Chair Coolies and Shopkeepers | 2,201 | 2,201 |\n| Offensive Weapons-Having Possession of | 9 | 9 |\n| Opium-Breach of Ordinances for Preparation and Sale of prepared and raw | 1 | 1 |\n| Passage-Obtaining surrepticiously a | 2 | 2 |\n| Perjury, (see also Preferring false Charge and giving wilful false Testimony) | 10 | 10 |\n| Piracy | 1 | 1 |\n| Police-Assuming Name, Designation, &c., of Constable of | 3 | 3 |\n| Police Constables-Misconduct as | 28 | 28 |\n| Post Office-Breach of Ordinance for | 2 | 2 |\n| Rape | 23 | 23 |\n| Recognisances-Breach of | 1 | 1 |\n| Receiving Stolen Goods | 188 | 188 |\n| Robbery From the Person | 60 | 60 |\n| ‣ From the Person with Wounding or with Violence | 199 | 199 |\n| ‣ On the Highways with Arms or with Violence | 1 | 1 |\n| Rogues & Vagabonds-As Street Gamblers and Watchmen to Gamblers | 80 | 80 |\n| ‣ As suspicious Characters | 7 | 7 |\n| Seamen or Apprentices-Disobedience to lawful commands by British Merchant | 18 | 18 |\n| Ships, &c.-Carrying passengers in excess of that allowed by licence | 34 | 34 |\n| ‣ Leaving Harbour without a Clearance | 31 | 31 |\n| ‣ Neglecting to have a riding light on board | 15 | 15 |\n| Shipwrecked Goods-Found in the possession of | 4 | 4 |\n| Shooting with intent to do Grievous Bodily Harm | 171 | 171 |\n| Spirituous and fermented Liquors-Breach of Ordinance for retail of | 114 | 114 |\n| Stonecutters' Island Ordinance-Breach of | 2 | 2 |\n| Stones and other Missiles-Discharging to Danger of Persons and Property | 55 | 55 |\n| Streams-Defiling | 12 | 12 |\n| Suicide-Attempting to commit | 13 | 13 |\n| Sunday Cargo-Working Ordinance-Breach of | 7 | 7 |\n| Threats Of Violence to the Person | 71 | 71 |\n| ‣ To Property | 10 | 10 |\n| Trees, &c.-Cutting and destroying | 89 | 89 |\n| Trespass on Crown Land | 416 | 416 |\n| Unlicensed-Plying of Boats | 14 | 14 |\n| ‣ Billiard Tables | 1 | 1 |\n| Unnatural Offence | 1 | 1 |\n| Unwholesome Provisions-Exposing for Sale, or bringing into the Colony | 12 | 12 |\n| Vaccination Ordinance-Breach of | 168 | 168 |\n| Vagrancy Ordinance-Breach of | 13 | 13 |\n| Vehicles-Offences against Public-under Licensing Consolidation Ordinance | 80 | 80 |\n| Verandahs erected on over Crown Land-Enclosing | 6 | 6 |\n| Watchmen-Misconduct as Private | 1 | 1 |\n| Weights and Measures-Breach of Ordinance for | 1 | 1 |\n| Wild Birds and Game-Breach of Ordinance for Preservation of | 516 | 516 |\n| Will-Uttering a forged | 2 | 2 |\n| Women and Girls Protection Ordinance-Breach of | 142 | 142 |\n| Workmen-Intimidating | 9 | 9 |\n\n## Total Number of Cases\n\n| Year | Total Cases | Committed to Prison | Ordered to find Security | Punished for Preferring False Charge | Discharged | Committed for Trial at Supreme Court | Detained pending Orders of His Excellency the Governor |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 1882 | 7,667 | 6,049 | 394 | 1,922 | 250 | 259 | 17 |\n| 1883 | 10,650 | 8,127 | 670 | 2,898 | 343 | 121 | 8 |\n| 1884 | 14,065 | 11,748 | 1,088 | 2,294 | 268 | 101 | 2 |\n| 1885 | 10,281 | 7,951 | 843 | 2,188 | 258 | 159 | 2 |\n| 1886 | 14,011 | 12,081 | 842 | 2,198 | 190 | 157 | 2 |\n| 1887 | 19,015 | 10,354 | 326 | 2,620 | 150 | 158 | 9 |\n| 1888 | 11,647 | 9,700 | 232 | 2,704 | 146 | 168 | 6 |\n| 1889 | 8,670 | 6,628 | 268 | 2,319 | 178 | 157 | 10 |\n| 1890 | 9,789 | 7,428 | 317 | 2,406 | 151 | 102 | 4 |\n| 1891 | 16,382 | 13,438 | 534 | 1,906 | 184 | 40 | 2 |\n\n## Grand Total for the 10 Years\n\n115,630 | 93,497 | 5,519 | 22,955 | 2,087 | 1,422 | 62\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Average per Year | 11,568 | 9,349 | 551 | 2,295 | 208 | 142 | 6 |\n\nALFRED G. WISE, Police Magistrate, for the Police Magistrates.\n\nMagistracy, Hongkong, 26th January, 1892.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-254 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1892 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 351762, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-258 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1893 [1-4]", "page_number": 677, "title": "CO129-258 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1893 [1-4]", "content_text": "(8)\n\nreceipt to Alves and Alves thereupon altered the amount.\n\nI mean in this way. Supposing a man to have come to Alves and said \"Here is $100 I wish to pay\" in bank notes. Alves would make out the receipt like this (printed form produced). He would say \"Received from X. Y. Z the sum of -\" and instead of writing \"$100\" he would write \"$10\" \"being the amount of rent due for Lot so and so.\" As to the written amount, as the shroff could not read English, he might fill that in in any way he liked, or leave it blank. In the receipt he would write \"Lot so and so Received $10,\" would then hand the shroff $10, and the other $90 he would put in his pocket. The shroff would put his chop on, and as the person had come to Alves personally, the shroff did not know whom to return it to. Alves would then say \"If you give it to me I will know him.\" The shroff would then hand back the receipt to Alves, who would add another \"0\", which satisfied the holder, and he left the counterfoil untouched. At the end of the day, the shroff would come and say \"have received $10, does this correspond with your book?\" The cashier would tell him that there was $10 to come in the cash book and it was duly passed in. The Auditor would come in and look at the counterfoil and see \"Received $10\" and go to the cash book and find the $10 entered.\n\nThe Chairman.—Somebody ought to have looked at the Rent Roll.\n\nMr. Bird—He would have seen that such and such a lot ought to have paid more than $10.\n\nWitness.—The Auditor has told me that with the staff at his disposal, he did not see how he could check every item, but he checked very frequently.\n\nThe Chairman.—Had you any check on your own men?\n\nA.—The system was supposed to be checked by the periodic surveys by the Audit Office.\n\nQ—It seems that it did not, when a man could put down say \"Lot 200 received $10\" and that passed when the rent was perhaps $100, and the Auditor might have seen it in a second by looking at the Roll. You say according to your explanation that everything was left in the hands of Alves because the person who received the money did not know English and could not see how much he was to receive. That is why I asked you whether there was anything to show the shroff how much he ought to receive.\n\nA. He could read figures. I have counterfoils also with a forged chop upon them. Mr. Bird. Have you counterfoils of $10 when it ought to be $100?\n\nThe Chairman.—I should like to see more of these counterfoils with the incorrect amount.\n\nWitness.—Yes. I am keeping them in the safe. I will bring them round. Mr. Bird.—Is that the only way he could have done it?\n\nA.—The two ways we suppose are: by altering what the shroff had passed and by using a bogus receipt book and forging the shroff's chop. We have some instances of that.\n\nMr. Bird.—How did he forge the chop?\n\nA. He evidently has done so. The chop has been submitted to Chinese experts—dye cutters—and they say it is a forgery.\n\nThe Chairman.—You say it was no part of Alves' duty to receive money. Was there any check to prevent him from receiving money? How was it that he was allowed to receive so much money if it was no part of his duty?\n\nA.—It is a system in Government Offices for people to walk in and out; and if they went into Alves and paid him money, it would not come to my notice, and they would pay him. The cashier, however, ought to have noticed it and put a stop to it. The cashier, however, says that he never saw it done; but that I do not believe.\n\n(9)\n\nMr. Bird.—Are these defalcations confined to Alves?\n\nA. Yes, as far as we know. We have examined all the books. There is one check which of course banks usually employ—and mercantile houses too I suppose—which was not available in the Treasury very easily, and I believe it was because he saw that the check coming on that gave Alves his first idea that something would be found out. I mean the check of putting different people to different work. When I joined the Treasury, I found three or four senior men, none of whom could leave their desks for a moment, and being leading men in the Treasury, it was difficult to get them to do anything but what they were accustomed to. At the end of last year, I got the new men to work, and as soon as that was done, I believe Alves made preparations for going.\n\nThe Chairman.—Have you ascertained when these defalcations began? A.—We only know by comparison with the Rent Roll, which shows what ought to have been collected. Apparently they began at the beginning of 1887 or 1888.\n\nMr. Thurburn.—The balances ought to have been done periodically.\n\nMr. Bird.—You ought to know the total of the Crown Rents collected and the amount that ought to be collected.\n\nMr. Thurburn.—That is the mistake in the system.\n\nMr. Bird.—If the book was not written up, who was to see how much was in arrear?\n\nA.—Alves said that he was working overtime and doing it as he could. I am sorry now that I did not get in somebody from outside and have it done by main force, but I did not expect that money was passing through his hands, or that the arrears were really dangerous.\n\nThe Chairman.—Were any arrears ever reported to you—arrears of money being due?\n\nA. Yes, we used to send notices to people in arrear. Alves constantly told me of people who were in arrear, and he would see them or write to them. Sometimes I told them that proceedings would be taken.\n\nQ—You never saw a regular list of arrears?\n\nA.—No, I don't think I ever saw that. It was supposed to be shown in these books at the end of the year.\n\nQ—When you joined in 1891 were any of the previous books made up—the Rent Roll books?\n\nA.—I did not look at the books previous to my year when I went to the Treasury. Those now in the Treasury, I can see have been balanced. I cannot say about previous years, whether they were made up.\n\nQ.—You do not know whether the book for 1889 or 1890 was balanced?\n\nA.—1889 I do not know. 1890 was not balanced. 1889 was missing.\n\nQ.—Nor 1888?\n\nA.—No, I believe he took them from the Office a year or two ago with the intention of balancing them.\n\nMr. Bird.—Did you know they were missing?\n\nA.—No. The books were kept in his desk, and I had not the slightest idea when they went. I should think it was about a year ago.\n\nMr. Thurburn.—You would take it for granted, I suppose, that in the books for 1889 everything was closed up?\n\nA. Certainly. I was new to the work and I did not know anything about these arrears.\n\n----\n\n671", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-258 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1893 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 354465, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-263 - Acting Governor Barker Governor Sir Robinson - 1894 [5-8]", "page_number": 199, "title": "CO129-263 - Acting Governor Barker Governor Sir Robinson - 1894 [5-8]", "content_text": "THE \n\nEnclosure in despatch No. 123 of 24th May/94.\n\nW. Robinson's despatch No. 123 of 24th May/94.\n\nHongkong Weekly Press\n\nAND\n\nChina Overland Trade Report 10936\n\n(VOL. XXXIX.)\n\nCONTENTS.\n\n...397\n\n...308\n\nHONGKONG: THURSDAY, 24 MAY, 1894.\n\nRed 25 JUN N21\n\nThe annual meeting of A. S. Watson & Co., Limited, was held on the 19th inst., when the report and accounts were adopted. The Chairman, in his speech, gave a very satisfactory account of the state of the Company's business.\n\nThe collision between the steamship Miike Maru and the Monmouthshire, alarmingly reported, took place outside the Lighthorse lightship on the night of the 11th inst. The Monmouthshire was at anchor when, just before midnight, she was run into by the Miike Maru, an 8-knot steamer. The Monmouthshire was on her way to Hankow to load tea. Both vessels had to go into dock at Shanghai.\n\nThe Manila Slipway Company purposes to pay a dividend of 2½ per cent. for the half-year ended 31st March last, which with the dividend of the same amount for the previous half-year makes 5 per cent for the year.\n\nEpitome of the Week, &c.\n\nLeading Articles :\n\nThe Plague and its Causes\n\nThe Plague and Chinese Opposition to Sanitary Measures\n\nRussia and Korea\n\nThe Water Supply\n\nAnglo-Chinese Convention\n\nTreaty\n\nEntente in Japan\n\nQuarantine...\n\nThe Plague.\n\nThe Plague at Canton\n\nSupreme Court :--\n\nIn re The Chiou Land and Finance Co., Limited.\n\nChai Cha Si v. Chung Kain Tim\n\nAttempted Arson\n\nForgery.\n\nThe National Bank of China, Limited, v. Him Kee Stum\n\nFire in Queen's Road West.\n\nDefeat of the Anti-Foreign Party in Japan.\n\nTai Tam Botanical and Afforestation Report\n\nThe Fatality to a Soldier in the Harbour\n\nThe Bankruptcy of Messrs. Forbes and Tones\n\nVictor & Co. Recreation Club.\n\nThe Union Insurance Society of Canton, Limited\n\nA. S. Watson & Co., Limited\n\nHumphreys Estate and Finance Company, Limited\n\nDanish shareholder and the Calls of the Bank of China, Japan and the Straits, Limited\n\nA French View of the Judgment in the Case of the Bank of China, Lepissier.\n\nHongkong and Port News\n\nCommercial....\n\nShipping.........\n\nMARRIAGE.\n\nOn 12th instant, by H.B.M.'s Consul-General, and afterwards at St. Joseph's Church, Shanghai, CLARA, youngest daughter of the late Col. J. E. COOK, to WILLIAM AUGUSTUS, eldest son of Augustus WHITE.\n\nDEATHS\n\nAt his Home, Lutterworth Leicestershire, on 5th April, THOMAS HENRY DALBY, late of Hongkong.\n\nAt Chandos House, Guernsey, on the 14th of April, BRIDGET CHRISTIANIA, the dearly beloved wife of CHAS. J. HIRST, and widow of the late Dr. HILTON FAWCETT, aged 35½.\n\nOn the 15th May, at 4, Mayfair Terrace, Bubbling Well Road, Shanghai, CHARLES RENEY DALLAS, aged 51 years.\n\nThe Monmouthshire is having fourteen plates taken out and her stem straightened, and the Miike Maru is having eleven plates taken out.\n\nVisitors to Japan this spring, says the Japan Gazette, have been sadly disillusioned. The climate has been so belauded that people anticipate delightful sojourn. For this thanks are due to Sir Edwin Arnold and others of his ilk who saw only the bright side of things and gilded even the brightest. But Japan is not unlike England in the quality of its weather, that is to say, eternally variable, though unlike England in the nature of its downpours.\n\nThe report of the Hongkong and China Gas Company shows a net profit, including £1,152 brought forward, of £9,693 for the year 1893, and a dividend at the rate of 10 per cent. per annum is recommended (of which 6 per cent. has been paid as an interim dividend), leaving £2,893 to be carried forward.\n\nThe China Export, Import, and Banking Company at Hamburg distributes for the past year a dividend of 12 per cent., as in the previous year, the net profits amounting to m.94,879. The paid-up share capital amounts to m.500,000; the reserve fund to m.150,000 (against m.100,000 in the previous year).\n\nThe following telegrams, dated 9th instant, have passed between Sir John Pender and the Chairman of the Singapore Chamber of Commerce, on the completion of the cable between Singapore and Labuan :\n\nFrom Sir John Pender, Chairman, Eastern Extension Telegraph Co., to The President of the Chamber of Commerce, Singapore :\n\n\"Please accept my hearty congratulations on completion of alternative cable between Singapore and Hongkong, which not only strengthens and improves your telegraphic communication, but brings Singapore into direct submarine communication with Labuan and Borneo, and will thus materially assist in development of your colony's resources and prosperity.\n\nI would also express the hope that this further justification of the company's enterprise and liberality, involving as it does enormous expenditure, will be fully appreciated and convince them of this Company's desire to meet public requirements as fully as possible.\"\n\nFrom the Chairman of the Chamber of Commerce, Singapore, to Sir John Pender :\n\n\"Singapore Chamber of Commerce thanks you for your kind message of congratulation, and joins in the hope that the opening of the new cable, placing the colony in a more independent telegraphic position, may lead to the stimulation of its trade with Labuan and Borneo and countries farther east.\n\nThe Chamber feels that the traffic generally may surely increase as a result of this new communication.\"\n\nARRIVALS OF MAILS.\n\nThe French mail of the 13th April arrived per M.M. steamer Oceanien, on the 16th May (33 days); the English mail of the 20th April arrived per P. & O. steamer Sutlej, on the 19th May (29 days); and the American mail of the 18th April arrived per P. M. steamer Peru, via Honolulu, on the 22nd May (34 days).\n\nThe plague continues its ravages, the mortality for the week ending on the 22nd inst., being 197. The sanitary precautions taken by the Government have aroused great hostility on the part of the Chinese and on Saturday there was some little disturbance, but the prompt measures taken by the police prevented its becoming serious.\n\nIn view of the objections of the Chinese to having the sick treated by European doctors, the Committee of the Tung Wah Hospital have been permitted to establish a temporary branch hospital at the Glassworks, to which cases may be removed.\n\nEPITOME OF THE WEEK.\n\nAn earthquake shock occurred at Tientsin at six o'clock on the morning of the 14th inst.\n\nM. G. Dubail, Consul-General for France at Shanghai, has received instructions to proceed to Tokyo to act as Chargé d'Affaires, pending the arrival there of M. Harmand, the new Minister.\n\nOn the question of house-to-house visitation, however, to which objection was also taken, the Government has declined to make any concession, holding the measure to be absolutely necessary for the public safety.\n\nAbsurd tales have been in circulation amongst the coolies, in common with the Foreign community, as to the treatment to which the sick were subjected on the hospital ship Hygeia.\n\nA Commission appointed by the Government of Victoria for the purpose of promoting trade and enabling it to take advantage of the coming Exhibition is at present visiting Hongkong.\n\nPage 308\n\nPage 397\n\nPage 398\n\nPage 399\n\nPage 400\n\nPage 401\n\nPage 403\n\nPage 405\n\nPage 406\n\nPage 408\n\nPage 410\n\nPage 411\n\nPage 415\n\nPage 418", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-263 - Acting Governor Barker Governor Sir Robinson - 1894 [5-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 354468, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-263 - Acting Governor Barker Governor Sir Robinson - 1894 [5-8]", "page_number": 202, "title": "CO129-263 - Acting Governor Barker Governor Sir Robinson - 1894 [5-8]", "content_text": "404\n\n06:\n\nP.C. Mahomad Bux said that on Saturday morning he was ordered to keep back a mob of Chinese, and that when he went to do so he was pelted with stones. The defendant was one of those who threw a missile, and he arrested him.\n\nFined $50 or two months' in default.\n\nTHE HONGKONG WEEKLY PRESS\n\nand the unhappy patients on the bulk must be brought to the Tung Wah branch Hospital, and those of the sick who so desire could be permitted to introduce the full disease into their native villages on the mainland! Splendid illustration of the intelligence and perspicuity, to say nothing of the gratitude, of these so-called representatives of the native community!\n\nP.C. Rossball Singh charged a coolie with a similar offense on the same occasion.\n\nFined $50 or two months' in default.\n\nTwo coolies were charged with disorderly conduct in Po Yan Street on the 20th.\n\nA Sikh constable said that during the morning a Chinese gentleman came out of the Tung Wah Hospital and got into his chair. The coolies were about to carry him when a mob of Chinese turned the chair upside down, with the gentleman in it. The occupant of the chair got out and ran back into the hospital. The first defendant was one of those who got hold of the chair. Witness blew his whistle and arrested the defendants. At the same time some stones were thrown. Some watchmen belonging to the Tung Wah Hospital came to witness's assistance and the mob was cleared away.\n\nFined $50 each or two months' in default.\n\nThree old women were next brought up, charged with assaulting Inspector R. Germain, an officer of the Sanitary Board, while in the execution of his duty.\n\nComplainant said—On the 20th inst. at 8.30 a.m. I was on the house-to-house inspection duty in Station Street, Taipingshan. I was called away to Market Street for ten minutes and on returning to Station Street I found the whole place in an uproar.\n\nI pacified the people as best I could and went on with the inspection. On coming out of the next house I was met with a shower of stones and bricks and rubbish. The first defendant threw the brick produced, and the second and third defendants were the ringleaders, urging the others to attack us. I had two inkongs in uniform with me. I arrested the defendants. The people objected to the house-to-house visitation. I was the only man inspecting at the time; I had no soldiers. The house-to-house visitation has been going on for some time every day, and there have been no disturbances hitherto. I have ceased to suppose that it was in consequence of the employment of soldiers that the disturbances arose. The soldiers have been employed for four days.\n\nMr. F.H. May, Captain Superintendent of Police said—I ask for a severe penalty. This is part of an organized arrangement for disturbing the measures taken by the authorities to deal with the plague. The disturbances are only kept under control by the presence of an armed body of police in the Taipingshan district.\n\nThe first defendant was fined $10 or one month's imprisonment, and the other two defendants $5 each or six weeks' in default.\n\nNearly all the fines were paid.\n\nWe regret to learn that Inspector Quincey and several of the officers who have been so actively engaged in the work of visiting the houses are incapacitated by illness from duty.\n\nThe house-to-house visitation, which daily discloses the unreported existence of plague and sometimes discovers the dead bodies of victims in the rotting dampness of basement floors, is to be still more vigorously carried on. Fifty volunteers for this highly necessary work are asked for, and in view of the danger and gravity of the situation, not only to the trade and commerce of the port but to the health of the entire population, these volunteers and probably more, will doubtless be speedily forthcoming.\n\nThe insinuations which have been cast upon the military employed as special sanitary officers, and the reports current that it is this to which the chief objection to the house-to-house visitation is due, caused us to make enquiries in this direction. We learn on the best authority that since their enrollment in this work the military employed have worked very satisfactorily and effectively, that no complaint of their conduct has been made, and that as a matter of fact the majority of the householders were not aware that the men visiting their houses were military, until they were incited by the anti-foreign leaders behind to make demonstrations of vindictiveness. The soldiers employed are all picked men, and the majority are non-commissioned officers. Twelve men of the Shropshire regiment are still engaged in the work of inspection and twelve engineers in disinfecting. Each sanitary officer is accompanied by a likong, and there are now twenty-one men on this special duty in the infected area.\n\nWe might mention, to remove any misconception, that the Government have not completely abrogated their authority even over the Chinese Hospital at the Glassworks. Dr. Penny, R.N., makes visits twice daily to see that things are in a sanitary condition, and European police are on duty at the gates keeping statistics of cases.\n\nIt is said by some who have had so intimate an acquaintance with the development and character of the plague since its appearance here, that the attacks now do not appear to be quite as virulent as a week ago. It may be added that several of the new cases in the Glassworks have been discharged on diagnosis as not suffering from plague. Whether such are being sent to the Hospital accidentally or intentionally it is difficult to say, but plausibility is lent to the latter suggestion by the natural desire among the Chinese to be able to record in their statistics a higher percentage of \"discharged cured\" than the European doctors were able to do.\n\n23rd May. The following are the returns for the twenty-four hours to noon yesterday:\n\nHospital\nAdmissions\nDeaths\n\nKen-edy Hospital\n3\n1\n\nChinese Hospital\n19\n10\n\nCity Hospital\n7\n10\n\nTung Wah Hospital\n27\n18\n\nTotal\n56\n39\n\nThe patients under Chinese medical direction are treated with a decoction made from the root of an aquatic plant, which is said to have been wonderfully successful in dealing with serious cases at Canton. After being infused in hot water for some time for some time the liquid is strained off and administered at regular intervals, while the pulp is applied externally to the buboes as a poultice.\n\nUnder treatment 21\n\n\"A quiet day; plague in a measure abating,\" practically sums up the reports received yesterday. The concessions made by the Government in no longer insisting upon the transfer of patients to the Hygeia and in giving permission (speedily availed of) to establish a Chinese hospital under Chinese control, acted like oil on the troubled waters and no further disturbances took place, or were even attempted, after the Glassworks had been converted into a hospital. The native prejudice, however, not having been largely removed, large numbers of coolies continued yesterday in every way possible to leave the colony, both by steamer and passage-boat, and the exodus appears to be increasing.\n\nAt the Magistracy yesterday a hawker was fined $10 for creating a disturbance near the Tung Wah Hospital.\n\nDEPUTATION TO HIS EXCELLENCY THE GOVERNOR.\n\nIMPORTANT PRONOUNCEMENT.\n\nAt one o'clock yesterday afternoon a deputation from the Tung Wah Hospital, accompanied by the Hon. J.H. Stewart Lockhart (Registrar-General) waited on His Excellency the Governor at Government House for the purpose of representing a certain feeling existing among some sections of the native community. The deputation presented to His Excellency a long petition, the principal points of which were:\n\n(1)—That the house-to-house visitation should cease.\n\n(2)—That sick persons should be allowed to return to their own country.\n\n(3)—That the patients on the Hygeia should be sent to the Glassworks Hospital.\n\n(4)—That all sick persons should be sent to the Glassworks Hospital.\n\nAfter listening attentively to the recital of this document, His Excellency said that he would take the last point first. In reply to that, all he had to say was that sick people might elect to go to any hospital they liked. There was no interference with their choice whatever, and no intention on the part of the Government to force patients into any particular hospital for treatment. As to the request that the sick on the Hygeia should be moved to the branch Hospital, he altogether declined such a responsibility. The idea, he said, was absurd, as if the petitioners' prayer was granted it might result in much unnecessary loss of life. He therefore declined to grant it. As to the request contained in paragraph 2, His Excellency said that he had nothing to do with the return of the people to their own country. If the authorities in Kwang-tung refused to allow persons from Hongkong to go to Macao or elsewhere, he could not coerce those authorities or interfere with their decision.\n\nAnd as regards the first point of the petition—that the house-to-house visitation should cease—His Excellency said that he considered such visitation to be absolutely necessary, and he had no intention whatever to relax the morning regulations in that respect.\n\nThe morning paper had shown how necessary it was, for they reported that three or four dead bodies had been taken out of one house, which would never have been discovered but for the house-to-house visitation. His Excellency reminded the deputation that this was an English colony, and said that the Tung Wah Committee should assist him in carrying out the law and persuading others to obey it. Holding up the proclamation he stated that that was now the law, and it would be carried out. He promised that every consideration should be shown to women and children, and that if any unnecessary damage was done on proof thereof the persons suffering would be recompensed. To show his own opinion of the necessity for visitation he had asked that all the outbuildings and coolie quarters at Government House should be inspected. His Excellency further said that he intended largely to increase the force of Sanitary Inspectors and he hoped that in a few weeks' time all danger would be at an end. He asked the Tung Wah Committee to assist him by getting additional help.\n\nA fatal case has been reported from Queen's Gardens. A day or two ago a coolie employed at the Royal Engineers' mess was taken ill and died before knowledge of the nature of his ailment—which was plague—was known to his companions. The premises have been thoroughly disinfected.\n\nHis Excellency concluded by saying that he was responsible not only for the health of the Chinese but of the Europeans and the Army and Navy, that his decision was embodied in the proclamation, that this proclamation was now the law, and that persons transgressing it would be arrested and punished.\n\nThe Registrar-General frequently interpreted His Excellency's remarks and the deputation withdrew, if not actually satisfied, at any rate fully aware of the determination of the Government to do its best to stamp out and prevent the spread of this insidious disease.\n\nTung Wah Hospital on Monday.\n\nA meeting of the Consular Body, held at Shanghai on the 15th inst., it was unanimously decided to request the taotai, through the Customs, to enforce No. 15 of the Harbour Regulations, as a measure of precaution, against vessels arriving from the South. The Regulation in question is as follows:—\"Vessel arriving from a place infected with cholera or other contagious disease on board shall not come nearer the lower limit of the Harbour than one mile, shall fly at the fore a yellow flag, and shall not allow any one to disembark or come on board without permission from the Harbour Master's Office.\"\n\nThere is some talk of closing the schools at which Chinese scholars attend. We believe that Dr. Bateson Wright has applied to the Governor for permission to close Queen's College, and it is probable if the disease does not receive a decided check during the next few days that this precautionary measure will be adopted.\n\nTHE PROCLAMATION.\n\nThe following is a precis of the proclamation issued by H.E. Sir William Robinson:\n\nWhereas Hongkong is now visited by a plague which is killing Chinese at the rate of between 30 and 40 a day, and it is understood that 8,000 people have succumbed to it since the commencement of the outbreak. It is the general opinion that the outbreak was caused simply by the bad smells from large numbers of dead rats. This has also been proved by a foreign doctor on Shameen, who, after examining some of the newly dead rats, found many worms in the lungs. He advised people not to eat them, as they are a great poison.\n\n22nd May.\n\nWe are glad to be able to announce that the plague in Canton has further diminished during the past three days. The doctors have now discovered the proper method of treating the patients, and the percentage of deaths amongst those who have been attended by them is only twenty per cent. or less.\n\n17th May.\n\nMr. Leach concluded his arguments on the point raised by Mr. Francis as to whether the case should be dealt with in its present form, and Mr. Francis replied.\n\nHis Lordship reserved his decision.\n\nIN SUMMARY JURISDICTION.\n\nBEFORE HIS HONOUR MR. A.G. WISE, ACTING PUISNE JUDGE.\n\nCHOI CHU vs. CHEUNG KAM TIM.\n\nMr. Creasy Ewens appeared for the plaintiff and Mr. Phillippo for the defendant.\n\nThis was a claim of $400. money alleged to have been lent by the plaintiff, a woman, to the defendant's wife for the purchase of necessaries.\n\nThe plaintiff gave very contradictory evidence as to the circumstances of this loan, and His Lordship, not considering that there was sufficient proof of the debt, gave judgment for the defendant with costs.\n\nALLEGED SINGULAR AND FATAL MISTAKE.\n\nA correspondent writes:—\"Is it a fact that a Chinese woman was sent on board the Hygeia by the Sanitary Authorities supposed to be suffering from the plague, but which proved to be a case of pregnancy? And is it true that the mistake was not found out until it was too late to save the patient's life? This is the tale told to me by my servants, and two of them have left my employ in a terrible fright to take their wives out of the colony.\"\n\nSUPREME COURT.\n\n15th May.\n\nIN ORIGINAL JURISDICTION.\n\nBEFORE HIS HONOUR MR. E.J. ACKROYD, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE.\n\nIn re THE CHINA LAND AND FINANCE COMPANY, LIMITED.\n\nThe bearing was resumed of the motion by the Comptoir National d'Escompte de Paris to be placed on the register of shareholders of the China Land and Finance Company, Limited, in respect of 1,500 shares in the Company which had been deposited by Ng Chan Fong, the Bank's compradore, as security for advances made or that might be incurred in future by Ng Chan Fong to the Bank, being additional security under terms of an agreement of the 16th February, 1891, and a bond dated 14th December, 1891.\n\nMr. A.J. Leach, Q.C., instructed by Mr. G.C. Master (of Messrs. Johnson, Stokes and Master), appeared on behalf of the Bank; and Mr. J.J. Francis, Q.C. (instructed by Mr. C. Ewens), on behalf of the Company and Ng Woon Sun How Qua, who had been served with notice of the motion.\n\nHis Lordship, on taking his seat, said—In this case Mr. Leach, before answering Mr. Francis's application that I should not deal with this case at the present stage, asked me to allow him to complete his evidence by cross-examining certain parties upon the affidavits filed by Mr. Francis's clients.\n\n18th May.\n\nIN CRIMINAL SESSIONS.\n\nBEFORE HIS HONOUR MR. E.J. ACKROYD, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE, AND COMMON JURY.\n\nATTEMPTED ARSON.\n\nChan Sik Ming, an apprentice, aged 19, was charged with feloniously and wilfully attempting to set fire to No. 7, Queen's Road West, occupied by a boot and shoe dealer who employed the defendant, on the 6th inst.\n\nMr. A.J. Leach, Acting Attorney-General (instructed by Mr. A.B. Johnson, Crown Solicitor), prosecuted for the Crown.\n\nPrisoner pleaded not guilty.\n\nAnother apprentice who had been committed as an accomplice was discharged by proclamation.\n\nThe following jury was empanelled:—Messrs. Chow Dart Tong, A. Sharp, J.M. Gutierrez, F.G. Barres, F. Hubbe, D.W. Craddock, and Thos. Grimshaw.\n\nThe facts of the case were that on the night of the day in question the proprietor of the shop awoke and found the defendant setting fire, by means of a large joss stick, gunpowder, and matches, to a box of shavings in one of the rooms on the ground floor.\n\nThe Jury returned a verdict of guilty.\n\nHis Lordship reserved sentence, which was delivered on the 22nd.\n\nHis Lordship (addressing the prisoner) said—The jury have found you guilty of preparing a joss-stick with matches and gunpowder and with having set fire to it. They found that you knew what you were doing, and that you placed it close to a box of shavings in order to set fire to the house; and everything points to the supposition that you did this because your master had given you a few slaps two or three days before. The consequence of your foolish act might have been very serious. The sentence of the Court is that you be imprisoned for one week and that you receive six strokes with a rattan.\n\n21st May.\n\nFORGERY.\n\nPun Long, a clerk, was charged with uttering a forged note purporting to be endorsed by one Chao Yan Lok in January last, with intent to defraud Messrs. Arthur and Co.\n\nMr. A.J. Leach, Acting Attorney-General (instructed by Mr. A.B. Johnson, Crown Solicitor), appeared for the prosecution, and Mr. J.J. Francis, Q.C. (instructed by Mr. H.L. Dennys), for the defence.\n\nThe following jury was empanelled:—Messrs. A.O. Gutierrez, C.F. de Carvalho, R.S. Philpott, C.A. Plumb, E.J. Moses, M.S. Northcote, and F. Gomes.\n\nPrisoner pleaded not guilty.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-263 - Acting Governor Barker Governor Sir Robinson - 1894 [5-8].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 356366, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-265 - Public Offices & Others - 1894", "page_number": 643, "title": "CO129-265 - Public Offices & Others - 1894", "content_text": "## In the report of the Attorneys General\nupon that Order which accompanied `despr` 20, 189, 248 of 22 July 7, it was incorrectly stated, doubtless by an oversight, that this section \"reproduction of 1.5 of Ordinance 16 of 1875 with 2 additional 'power conferred in cases of petty forgery,'\" and my predecessor's attention was not drawn to the changes in the limit of punishment introduced by the section. I am disposed to think that the Law should be amended by reintroducing the limit of 6 months' imprisonment, which was previously in force; directing that I shall take this step to receive your report upon the subject.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-265 - Public Offices & Others - 1894.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 356480, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-266 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1895 [1-3]", "page_number": 11, "title": "CO129-266 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1895 [1-3]", "content_text": "## No. 2\nC.O. 2505\nREC. 8\nTc 9 390\n\nEnclosure 1.\n\n274 Deer. 94\n\n\" \nGovernment House, \nHongkong, 4th January 1895.\n\nMy Lord Marquess,\n\nI have the honour to transmit for the signification of Her Majesty's pleasure the following Ordinance entitled \"An Ordinance to secure, in certain cases, the rights of property in telegraphic messages, and to prevent the forgery and improper disclosure of telegrams\" (with six spare copies).\n\nEnclosure 2.\n\nN214 of 1894.\n\n2. The customary Report by the Attorney General is annexed.\n23rd Decr. 94.\n\nI have the honour to be,\nMy Lord Marquess,\nYour Lordship's most obedient\nHumble Servant,\nWilliam Robinson\n\nThe Right Honourable,\nThe Marquess of Ripon, K.G.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-266 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1895 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 356481, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-266 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1895 [1-3]", "page_number": 12, "title": "CO129-266 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1895 [1-3]", "content_text": "## Enclosure 2\n\n`Reck 2505 9 Ard 9 FEB 95`\n\nReport by the Attorney General on Ordinance No 14 of 1894.\n\n**Attorney General's Office, Hong Kong**\n20th December, 1894\n\nI have examined the accompanying Ordinance entitled \"An Ordinance to secure, in certain cases, the rights of property in telegraphic messages and to prevent the forgery and improper disclosure of telegrams\".\n\nI am of opinion that the Ordinance is one which is not contrary to the Governor's Instructions.\n\n2. This Bill was introduced by the Acting Member for the Chamber of Commerce.\n\n3. That Chamber has, for some time past at considerable expense, arranged...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-266 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1895 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 358270, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-268 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1895 [7-11]", "page_number": 435, "title": "CO129-268 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1895 [7-11]", "content_text": "## 16. If any suit or action be brought against a Magistrate, Superintendent of the Victoria Gaol, Gaoler, Police Officer, Constable or any other person for anything done under or in obedience to any warrant or order issued under the provisions of this Ordinance, the proof of such warrant or order shall be a sufficient answer to such suit or action, and the defendant on such proof as aforesaid shall be entitled to a verdict or judgment accordingly and shall also be entitled to all costs of suit.\n\n## 17. The forms in the second schedule hereto or forms to the like effect with such variations and additions as circumstances require may be used for the purposes therein indicated and according to the directions therein contained and instruments in these forms shall (as regards the form thereof) be valid and sufficient.\n\n## 18. This Ordinance shall not come into operation unless and until the Governor of Hongkong notifies by Proclamation that it is Her Majesty's pleasure not to disallow the same; and thereafter it shall come into operation on such day as the Governor of Hongkong shall notify by the same or any other proclamation.\n\n## FIRST SCHEDULE\n### EXTRADITION CRIMES\n\n| Crime |\n| --- |\n| Murder and attempt to murder. |\n| Manslaughter. |\n| Malicious wounding. |\n| Counterfeiting or altering money, altering or bringing into circulation counterfeit or altered money. |\n| Forgery, or counterfeiting or altering, or uttering what is forged, or counterfeited or altered, comprehending the crimes designated in the laws of Hongkong as counterfeiting or falsification of paper money, bank notes, or other securities, forgery, or other falsification of other public or private documents, likewise the uttering or bringing into circulation, or wilfully using such counterfeited, forged, or falsified papers. |\n| Embezzlement or larceny. |\n| Receiving stolen goods. |\n| Obtaining money or goods by false pretences. |\n| Crimes against bankruptcy law. |\n| Fraud committed by bailee, banker, agent, factor, trustee, or director, or member or public officer of any Company, made criminal by any law for the time being in force. |\n| Rape. |\n| Abduction. |\n| Child stealing. |\n| Kidnapping. |\n| False imprisonment. |\n| Burglary, or house-breaking. |\n| Arson. |\n| Robbery with violence. |\n| Threats by letter or otherwise with intent to extort. |\n| Piracy whether by law of nations or by municipal law. |\n| Sinking or destroying a vessel at sea, or attempting to do so. |\n| Assaults on board a ship on the high seas, with intent to destroy life, or to do grievous bodily harm. |\n| Revolt, or conspiracy to revolt, by two or more persons on board a ship on the high seas, against the authority of the master. |\n| Perjury or subornation of perjury. |\n| Malicious injury to property, if the offence be indictable. |\n| Any indictable offence under `Ordinance No. 7 of 1865` entitled \"An Ordinance to consolidate and amend the Enactments in force in this Colony relating to Larceny and other similar offences\" or any Ordinance amending or substituted for the same which is not included in the foregoing list. |\n| Any indictable offence under `Ordinance No. 6 of 1865` entitled \"An Ordinance to consolidate and amend the Enactments in force in this Colony relating to indictable offences by forgery\" or any Ordinance amending or substituted for the same which is not included in the foregoing list. |\n| Any indictable offence under `Ordinance No. 10 of 1865` entitled \"An Ordinance to consolidate and amend the Enactments in force in this Colony against offences relating to the Coin\" or any Ordinance amending or substituted for the same which are not included in the foregoing list. |\n| Any indictable offence under `Ordinance No. 4 of 1865` entitled \"An Ordinance to consolidate and amend the Enactments in force in this Colony relating to offences against the person\" or any Ordinance amending or substituted for the same which are not included in the foregoing list. |\n| Any misdemeanour under `Ordinance No. 7 of 1890` entitled \"An Ordinance to amend the law with reference to the falsification of Accounts\" or any Ordinance amending or substituted for the same which are not included in the foregoing list.\n\n## SECOND SCHEDULE\n### FORMS\n\n#### Form of Order by the Governor to a Magistrate to issue his warrant.\n\n**By His Excellency** \nthe Governor and Commander-in-Chief of the Colony of Hongkong and its Dependencies.\n\nTo Police Magistrates.\n\nProtection to Magistrate and others acting under warrant.\n\nForm of Warrant.\n\nForm of Order Suspending Claim.\n\nPage 428", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-268 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1895 [7-11].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 359251, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-270 - Public Offices & Others - 1895", "page_number": 22, "title": "CO129-270 - Public Offices & Others - 1895", "content_text": "Registered No. \n54085\n\nAny reply should bear this number, and should be addressed: \"The Secretary, General Post Office.\"\n\n## GENERAL POST OFFICE, LONDON.\n\nSir,\n\nC. O. 3873\nMarch 19 1895.\nGir 2505\n\nI am directed by the Postmaster General to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 12th ultimo, forwarding the copy of an Ordinance passed by the Legislature of Hong Kong to secure, in certain cases, the rights of property in telegraphic messages, and to prevent the forgery and improper disclosure of telegrams together with a copy of the Report of the Attorney General for Hong Kong thereupon, and a copy of a similar Act passed by the Cape of Good Hope.\n\nIn reply I am to acquaint you, for the information of the Secretary of State for the Colonies, that Mr. Arnold Morley sees no objection to the Ordinance being allowed to remain in operation.\n\nI have the honour to be,\nSir,\nYour obedient Servant,\nMenabrea ... \nThe Under Secretary of State,\nCOLONIAL OFFICE.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-270 - Public Offices & Others - 1895.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 362471, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-274 - Public Offices & Others - 1896", "page_number": 696, "title": "CO129-274 - Public Offices & Others - 1896", "content_text": "688\n\nBejistian as Tunderstood it) to\n\nso\n\n2 see\n\nthat they\n\nthrough the forgers were in order before subruetting Hem & the Chief pasture.\n\nThat\n\nof con\n\ncourse included, amongst other things, the specification as farms Lorible of the active of the estate.\n\nA\n\nIf the estate consisted of miney\n\nthe Banks or\n\nHere was\n\nNo\n\nelsen Lie\n\nfcourse difficulty; if it\n\nconsisted of shares the Register\n\nwho\n\nwas\n\nalso Registrar of\n\nCompanies would consult the papers in his possession\n\nChy\n\nto the number\n\nof the shares & the daily newspapers\n\nto their market value. If the\n\na¬\n\nleasehold\n\nestate consisted of property the Repitan\n\nas\n\nLand\n\nOffice had the best possible means at hand in the Land Office) for\n\nVerifying\n\nits value. This was\n\nthe course pursued by myself\n\nI was\n\nWhen\n\ngreen is being\n\nused\n\nJust went to the Registrar. I think it a pity that Mr. begate did not apply to me for\n\n&\n\ninformation on the working\n\nof the office when I was in Colony, expecially, as you see from his letter that this inquiry\n\nThis notice on\n\nhad come\n\nMarch 3,1896 more than\n\na month before I went on leave. With reference\n\nto Paragraph (2)\n\nA\n\nI can say nothing\n\nI have\n\ncases referred\n\nmust.\n\nno knowledge of the to by the Kyphe & they necessarily have scared after\n\nMy\n\nFile\n\nParagraph (8) Mr. Goodman\n\nin his minute has explained\n\nin", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-274 - Public Offices & Others - 1896.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 363010, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-275 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [1-5]", "page_number": 526, "title": "CO129-275 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [1-5]", "content_text": "# ORDINANCE No. 20 OF 1889.\n\n## Chinese Extradition.\n\nForgery, or counterfeiting or altering, or uttering what is forged, or counterfeited or altered, comprehending the crimes designated in the laws of Hongkong as counterfeiting or falsification of paper money, bank notes, or other securities, forgery, or other falsification of other public or private documents, likewise the uttering or bringing into circulation, or wilfully using such counterfeited, forged, or falsified papers.\n\nEmbezzlement or larceny.\n\nReceiving stolen goods.\n\nObtaining money or goods by false pretences.\n\nCrimes against bankruptcy law.\n\nFraud committed by a bailee, banker, agent, factor, trustee, or director, or member or public officer of any Company, made criminal by any law for the time being in force.\n\nRape.\n\nAbduction.\n\nChild stealing.\n\nKidnapping.\n\nFalse imprisonment.\n\nBurglary, or house-breaking.\n\nArson.\n\nRobbery with violence.\n\nThreats by letter or otherwise with intent to extort.\n\nPiracy whether by law of nations or by municipal law.\n\nSinking or destroying a vessel at sea, or attempting to do so.\n\nAssaults on board a ship on the high seas, with intent to destroy life, or to do grievous bodily harm.\n\nRevolt, or conspiracy to revolt, by two or more persons on board a ship on the high seas, against the authority of the master.\n\nPerjury or subornation of perjury.\n\nMalicious injury to property, if the offence be indictable.\n\nAny indictable offence under **Ordinance No. 7 of 1865** entitled \"An Ordinance to consolidate and amend the Enactments in force in this Colony relating to Larceny and other similar offences\" or any Ordinance amending or substituted for the same which is not included in the foregoing list.\n\nAny indictable offence under **Ordinance No. 6 of 1865** entitled \"An Ordinance to consolidate and amend the Enactments in force in this Colony relating to indictable offences by forgery\" or any Ordinance amending or substituted for the same which is not included in the foregoing list.\n\nAny indictable offence under **Ordinance No. 10 of 1885** entitled \"An Ordinance to consolidate and amend the Enactments in force in this Colony against offences relating to the Coin\" or any Ordinance amending or substituted for the same which are not included in the foregoing list.\n\nAny indictable offence under **Ordinance No. 4 of 1865** entitled \"An Ordinance to consolidate and amend the Enactments in force in this Colony relating to offences against the person\" or any Ordinance amending or substituted for the same which are not included in the foregoing list.\n\n## ORDINANCE No. 26 OF 1889.\n\n### Chinese Extradition.\n\n#### Form of Warrant of Committal.\n\nIN THE POLICE COURT AT VICTORIA IN THE COLONY OF HONGKONG.\n\nTo one of the Constables of the Colony, and to the Superintendent of Victoria Gaol.\n\nOn this day of 188, is brought before me a Magistrate of the Colony of Hongkong, to show cause why he should not be surrendered in pursuance of the **\"Chinese Extradition Ordinance, 1889\"** on the ground of his being accused of the commission of the crime of within the jurisdiction of China, and for as much as no sufficient cause has been shown to me why he should not be surrendered in pursuance of the said Ordinance.\n\nThis is therefore to command you the said Constable in Her Majesty's name forthwith to convey and deliver the body of the said into the custody of the said Superintendent of Victoria Gaol, and you the said Superintendent to receive the said into your custody, and him there safely to keep until he is thence delivered pursuant to the provisions of the said **\"Chinese Extradition Ordinance, 1889,\"** for which this shall be your warrant.\n\nDated this day of 18.\n\n(Signed), A Magistrate.\n\n[ Seal. ]\n\n#### Form of Warrant of the Governor for the surrender of a fugitive Criminal.\n\nBy His Excellency Governor and Commander-in-Chief of the Colony of Hongkong, and its Dependencies.\n\nTo the Superintendent of Victoria Gaol, \n\nHongkong.\n\nWhereas late of was delivered into the custody of you the Superintendent of Victoria Gaol by warrant dated the pursuant to the **\"Chinese Extradition Ordinance, 1889.\"** \n\nPage 518", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-275 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [1-5].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 364099, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-277 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [8-10]", "page_number": 293, "title": "CO129-277 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [8-10]", "content_text": "The stamps in question \"Hongkong #1 stamps, the issue of 1862, the issue of which it has been necessary to declare obsolete on account of recent cases of forgery.\n\nIn view of the terms of your Circular despatch quoted in my telegram, I have not felt justified in adopting the recommendation of the Executive Council that the stamps should be sold for the benefit of the Colony, without receiving your special authority, but I entirely concur...\n\n29th September last year to 26th May this year obsolete stamps face value about 60,000 dollars. Executive Council advise sale in lump. Authority requested.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-277 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [8-10].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 364238, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12]", "page_number": 16, "title": "CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12]", "content_text": "Collectors told he willing to ship $1 for Stamps while han 14 been forged & an Union he prayed Main and it ought to be an might with that Should new he Lord betone than for take.\n\nThe forgery is one which ought to be...\n\nThe Colony hand live things my hany Lightly different dia, but of The Have Whom daher and the other the off wit own wing my Love had the additional fault that it has overprinted in black \"one dollar\" on me the big wal\n\nKaty, nothing then you understand them to bury the love dentystag dung by and to a ou find then om ootm th...\n\nHowever, to follow the exact instructions given and to improve the response to fit the required format (HTML using for paragraphs), and adhering strictly to the rules for correction:\n\nCollectors told he willing to ship $1 for Stamps while han 14 been forged & an Union he prayed Main and it ought to be an might with that Shampoo should new he Lord betone than for take.\n\nThe forg wy is one which ought to be ham ham gesund they one punte\n\nThe Colony hand live things my hany Lightly diffunt dia, but of The Have Whom daher and the other the off wit own wing my Love had the additional fault that it has ourprinted in black fi \"on dolla \"ou me the big wal\n\nKaty, nothing then you nestan them to bury the love dentystag dung by and to a ou find then om ootm th\n\nLet's correct and reformat according to the given rules and output in HTML as requested:\n\nCollectors told he was willing to ship $1 for Stamps, while 14 had been forged & an Union. He prayed it ought to be as might with that. It should be new. The Lord betone more than for take.\n\nThe forgery is one which ought to be...\n\nThe Colony had live things, my hany. Lightly different dia, but of The Have Whom. Daher and the other were off. With own wing, my Love had the additional fault that it has overprinted in black \"one dollar\" on me. The big wal...\n\nKaty, nothing then you understand them to bury the love. Dentystag dung by and to find then om ootm th...\n\nRevised to fit the exact output requirement without markdown or code fences and using for paragraphs:\n\nCollectors told he was willing to ship $1 for Stamps, while 14 had been forged & an Union. He prayed it ought to be as might with that. It should be new. The Lord betone more than for take.\n\nThe forgery is one which ought to be ham gesund, they one punte.\n\nThe Colony had live things, my hany. Lightly different dia, but of The Have Whom. Daher and the other were off. With own wing, my Love had the additional fault that it has overprinted in black \"one dollar\" on me. The big wal\n\nKaty, nothing then you understand them to bury the love. Dentystag dung by and to find then om ootm th", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 364242, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12]", "page_number": 20, "title": "CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12]", "content_text": "COPY.\n\n18\n\nCrown Agents to Messrs Stanley Gibbons Limited.\n\nHong Kong - Stamps - Ref: 81/1697.\n\nThe Government of Hong Kong have in their possession 240 sheets of 1¢ Postage and Revenue Stamps, obsolete issue, of which 40 sheets are surcharged in Chinese and 200 are not.\n\nThese Stamps have been declared obsolete on account of recent cases of forgery.\n\nYou may remember that a few days ago one of your partners informed us verbally that you did not think there was much chance of our being able to dispose of these Stamps at their face value.\n\nWe should be much obliged to you if you would let us know what, in your opinion, is the market value of the Stamps, which represent a total of about $57,600 - if they were to be offered for sale in England.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365075, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-279 - Public Offices - 1897", "page_number": 322, "title": "CO129-279 - Public Offices - 1897", "content_text": "Agreement.\n\n2. Each Government shall mutually deliver up fugitive offenders who have committed any of the crimes or offences herein enumerated:\n\n(a) Murder (including assassination, parricide, infanticide, poisoning), or attempt or conspiracy to murder; manslaughter, wounding, or assault, resulting in death.\n\n(b) Robbery and theft.\n\n(c) Rape.\n\n(d) Abduction.\n\n(e) Arson.\n\n(f) Embezzlement or fraud by a bailee, banker, agent, factor, trustee, Director, member, or public officer of any Company, made criminal by any law for the time being in force.\n\n(g) Obtaining money, valuable security, or goods by false pretences; receiving any money, valuable security, or other property, knowing the same to have been stolen or unlawfully obtained.\n\n(h) (1) Counterfeiting or altering money, or bringing into circulation counterfeited or altered money.\n\n(2) Forgery, or counterfeiting or altering, or uttering what is forged, counterfeited, or altered.\n\n(3) Knowingly making, without lawful authority, any instrument, tool, or engine adapted and intended for the counterfeiting of coin of the realm.\n\n(i) Crimes against Bankruptcy Law.\n\n(j) Crimes committed at sea.\n\n(1) Piracy by the law of nations.\n\n(2) Sinking or destroying a vessel at sea, or attempting or conspiring to do so.\n\n(3) Revolt or conspiracy to revolt, by two or more persons on board a ship on the high seas against the authority of the master.\n\n(4) Assault on board a ship on the high seas, with intent to destroy life or to do grievous bodily harm.\n\nThe surrender of fugitive offenders shall also take place in respect of participation in any of the aforesaid crimes or offences, provided such participation be punishable by any law for the time being in force.\n\n3. A person surrendered shall not be detained or tried in the country demanding his rendition for any crime or offence committed previous to his rendition other than the crime or offence for which his surrender has been granted, until thirty days shall have elapsed after his discharge, during which period he shall have been free to leave the territory of the country to which he has been surrendered.\n\n4. A fugitive shall not be surrendered if the offence in respect of which the demand for his extradition is made is of a political character, or if he proves to the satisfaction of the competent authority of the State in which he is that the demand for his extradition has been made with a view to try or punish him for an offence of a political character.\n\n5. The procedure to be followed when a demand for the rendition of a fugitive offender is made on the part of Great Britain shall be that laid down in the Laws or Ordinances respecting extradition which are in force in the Empire of Japan.\n\nThe procedure to be followed when a demand for the rendition of a fugitive offender is made on the part of Japan, shall be that laid down in the Acts respecting extradition which are for the time being in force in the dominions of Her Britannic Majesty.\n\n6. The demand for the rendition of a fugitive offender shall only be made when the individual claimed is a subject of the Power demanding his rendition.\n\n7. If the individual whose rendition is demanded should be under prosecution, or should have been condemned for a crime or offence committed in the country where he may have taken refuge, his surrender may be deferred until he shall have been discharged in due course of law.\n\nIn case he should be proceeded against or detained in such country on account of obligations contracted towards private individuals, the rendition shall nevertheless take place.\n\n8. All expenses incurred in connection with the rendition of a fugitive offender shall be defrayed by the Power by which his rendition has been demanded.\n\n9. Under the circumstances and conditions hereinbefore mentioned, this Arrangement shall be applicable to cases of crimes or offences committed by the subjects of each Government in the dominions of any third Power in which such Government exercises criminal jurisdiction over its subjects.\n\n10. This Arrangement shall have effect on and from the date of the exchange of notes.\n\n11. It is understood on both sides that this Arrangement is to be regarded as having merely a temporary character, and that it is to be replaced by a formal Extradition Treaty whenever, as a result of the revision of the existing Treaties of Friendship and Commerce, the proper moment for the conclusion of such Extradition Treaty shall, in the opinion of the two Governments, have arrived.\n\nThe Undersigned avails himself of this opportunity to renew to his Excellency the assurance of his highest consideration.\n\nTōkiō, 1892.\n\n[380]\n\n3", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-279 - Public Offices - 1897.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365077, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-279 - Public Offices - 1897", "page_number": 324, "title": "CO129-279 - Public Offices - 1897", "content_text": "8\n\nThe best way to overcome this difficulty would probably be to provide that subjects of third States should not be surrendered without the consent of their Government. Provision to that effect already exists in the Treaties between some European States.\n\n5. British subjects should not be surrendered by Great Britain to Japan. A proposal was made last month for a conference with Mr. Gubbins. Perhaps the best plan would be to arrange for one now between him, Mr. Fraser, Mr. Davidson, and myself, on the result of which we could consult Home, Colonial, and India Offices.\n\nH. G. B.\n\nNo. 3.\n\nMemorandum by Sir H. Bergne.\n\nON speaking to Mr. Fraser and Mr. Gubbins, I found there was not much to confer about until a draft had been prepared. They were both of opinion that the best course would be to regulate the matter by Treaty; and I have consequently prepared the annexed draft for consideration and criticism.\n\nThe only special points to which I desire to call attention are the following:- Article II. A full list of crimes is given, according to our latest Treaties with civilized Powers. Is there any objection to this in the case of Japan?\n\nArticle III. The stipulation as to non-surrender of nationals has been made absolute. We could not surrender British subjects to be tried and punished in Japan by Japanese Courts.\n\nArticle IV. It is proposed to overcome the difficulty of dealing with subjects of third States by the provision that they cannot be surrendered without the consent of such third State. Such a provision is not unknown in Extradition Treaties now in existence between some foreign States.\n\nA stipulation is inserted that Japan shall not surrender a British subject to a third State without consent of Great Britain.\n\nThis is to meet cases where Japan might make Treaties similar to that recently concluded by her with the United States, but which might be with States, e.g., China, to which we should not suffer a British subject to be surrendered.\n\nWe cannot make the engagement reciprocal on account of the terms of some of our existing Treaties.\n\nThe usual stipulation as to priority of claim by two or more Powers has been omitted as inapplicable. This Treaty relates almost entirely to the surrender of Japanese to Japan, and of British subjects to Great Britain, so that the case would not be likely to arise in a contentious form.\n\nArticle XII might be modified, if necessary, to meet Japanese views to a certain extent.\n\nArticle XVI. The Colonial Office might be asked if some arrangement should not be made for Colonial Governments to make extradition claims, and send the documents, direct through Her Majesty's Minister at Tôkið, and in that case, if the words \"Minister of State of Her Britannic Majesty\" at the end of Article XII includes a Colonial Minister.\n\nI should like in the first place to have the observations of Mr. Fraser, Mr. Gubbins, Mr. Jervoise, and Mr. Davidson, and we could then refer to Home Office, Colonial Office, India Office, and Law Officers, if it is decided to go on with the matter in this form.\n\nH. G. B. November 25, 18C2.\n\nMr. Fraser and Mr. Gubbins will no doubt point out the considerations which seem to make the conclusion of a regular Extradition Treaty with Japan unobjectionable.\n\nP. C.\n\n9\n\nAnnex.\n\nDraft Treaty between Great Britain and Japan for the Mutual Surrender of Fugitive Criminals.\n\nHER Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, Empress of India, and His Majesty the Emperor of Japan, having judged it expedient, with a view to the better administration of justice and to the prevention of crime within their respective territories, that persons charged with or convicted of the crimes hereinafter enumerated, and being fugitives from justice, should, under certain circumstances, be reciprocally delivered up; the said High Contracting Parties have named as their Plenipotentiaries to conclude a Treaty for this purpose, that is to say:\n\nHer Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, Empress of India;\n\nAnd His Majesty the Emperor of Japan;\n\nWho, having communicated to each other their respective Full Powers, found in good and due form, have agreed upon and concluded the following Articles:\n\nARTICLE I.\n\nThe High Contracting Parties engage to deliver up to each other those persons who, being accused or convicted of a crime or offence committed in the territory of the one Party, shall be found within the territory of the other Party, under the circumstances and conditions stated in the present Treaty.\n\nARTICLE II.\n\nThe crimes or offences for which the extradition is to be granted are the following:\n\n1. Murder, or attempt, or conspiracy to murder.\n\n2. Manslaughter.\n\n3. Assault occasioning actual bodily harm.\n\n4. Maliciously wounding or inflicting grievous bodily harm.\n\n5. Counterfeiting or altering money, or uttering counterfeit or altered money.\n\n6. Knowingly making any instrument, tool, or engine adapted and intended for counterfeiting coin.\n\n7. Forgery, counterfeiting, or altering or uttering what is forged, or counterfeited or altered.\n\n8. Embezzlement or larceny.\n\n9. Malicious injury to property if the offence be indictable.\n\n10. Obtaining money, goods, or valuable securities by false pretences.\n\n11. Receiving money, valuable security, or other property, knowing the same to have been stolen, embezzled, or unlawfully obtained.\n\n12. Crimes against Bankruptcy Law.\n\n13. Fraud by a bailee, banker, agent, factor, trustee, or Director or member or public officer of any Company, made criminal by any law for the time being in force.\n\n14. Perjury, or subornation of perjury.\n\n15. Rape.\n\n16. Carnal knowledge, or any attempt to have carnal knowledge, of a girl under 16 years of age.\n\n17. Indecent assault.\n\n18. Administering drugs, or using instruments, with intent to procure the miscarriage of a woman.\n\n19. Abduction.\n\n20. Child stealing.\n\n21. Abandoning children, exposing or unlawfully detaining them.\n\n22. Kidnapping and false imprisonment.\n\n23. Burglary or housebreaking.\n\n24. Arson.\n\n25. Robbery with violence.\n\n26. Any malicious act done with intent to endanger the safety of any person in a railway train.\n\n27. Threats by letter or otherwise, with intent to extort.\n\n28. Piracy by law of nations.\n\n29. Sinking or destroying a vessel at sea, or attempting or conspiring to do so.\n\n30. Assaults on board a ship on the high seas, with intent to destroy life, or do grievous bodily harm.\n\n31. Revolt, or conspiracy to revolt, by two or more persons on board a ship on the high seas, against the authority of the master.\n\n32. Dealing in slaves in such a manner as to constitute a criminal offence against the laws of both States.\n\nExtradition is also to be granted for participation in any of the aforesaid crimes, provided such participation be punishable by the laws of both the Contracting Parties.\n\n[380]\n\nD\n\n320", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-279 - Public Offices - 1897.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 365090, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-279 - Public Offices - 1897", "page_number": 337, "title": "CO129-279 - Public Offices - 1897", "content_text": "obstacles of an insurmountable nature for the conclusion of such a treaty.\n\nI have,\n\n&c.,\n\n(Signed) Gerard Lowther.\n\nCopy\n\nNo: 31\n\nJLE\n\nJH.B. M. Legation\n\nJokio: May 31\n\nM. le Ministre\n\nThe Chief of Police at Hong Kong has telegraphed to SAM - Consul at Nagasaki stating that a warrant has been issued for the arrest of Thomas Troak, a gunner in the Royal Artillery, on charge of grievous assault. Troak is supposed to have left Hong Kong for this country, but his arrival at Carry Port in Japan has not been traced.\n\nYour Excellency is doubtless aware of the two cases of forgery offenders from Hong Kong which occurred A. Okuma", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-279 - Public Offices - 1897.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 366015, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 350, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "# ABSTRACT of Cases under COGNIZANCE of the POLICE MAGISTRATES' COURT during the Year 1897\n\n## CASES, HOW DISPOSED OF, AND THE NUMBER OF MALE AND FEMALE PRISONERS UNDER EACH HEAD\n\n| | Males | Females | Total |\n|----------|-------|---------|-------|\n| | 1,465 | 100 | |\n| --- | --- | --- | 10 |\n| | | | |\n\n## WRITS ISSUED BY THE POLICE MAGISTRATES DURING THE YEAR 1897\n\n| Type | Number |\n|---------|--------|\n| Warrants| 301 |\n| Summons | 8154 |\n| Total | |\n\n\n## TOTAL NUMBER OF FIRE ENQUIRIES DURING THE YEAR 1897\n\n| | Number |\n|----------|--------|\n| Cases | 12,889 |\n| Prisoners| 10,237 |\n| Males | 548 |\n| Females | 31 |\n| Total Males and Females | 12,886 |\n\n## THE CASES CONSISTED OF:-\n\n### OFFENCES\n\n| Offences | No. of Cases | No. of Prisoners |\n|----------|---------------|------------------|\n| Arms Consolidation Ordinance 8 of 1895 | | |\n| - Ammunition-Being in possession of | 6 | 13 |\n| - Arms-Carrying or having possession of, without a license | 3 | 45 |\n| - Selling to unauthorised persons | 4 | 6 |\n| Banishment and Conditional Pardons Ordinance 5 of 1882 | | |\n| - Banishment-Returning after | 33 | 33 |\n| Building Ordinances 15 of 1889, 25 of 1891 and 7 of 1895 | | |\n| - Blasting Stones to the danger of Persons & Property | 2 | 2 |\n| - Cattle Diseases Ordinance 17 of 1887 | | |\n| - Cattle- Landing at prohibited wharf, &c. | 68 | 73 |\n| Chinese Immigration Consolidation Ordinance 1 of 1889 amended by 25 of 1889 | | |\n| - Decoying Men or Boys into or away from the Colony | 2 | 2 |\n| Chinese Extradition Ordinance 26 of 1889 | | |\n| - Street Gambling | 109 | 100 |\n| Good Order and Cleanliness-Ordinance 14 of 1845 | | |\n| - Animals-Cruelty to | 22 | 1 |\n| - Breach of the Peace | 614 | 1,131 |\n| - Cattle turned loose on public ways | 13 | 1 |\n| - Dead Body, exposing in the public street | 1 | 1 |\n| - Disorderly behaviour | 52 | 52 |\n| - Dogs-Allowing unmuzzled ferocious, to be at large | 2 | 2 |\n| - Domestic Servants-Misconduct as | 85 | 113 |\n| - Firearms Discharging, to the danger of the Public | 3 | 3 |\n| - Furious driving | 56 | 82 |\n| - Horse Riding on the footpath | 2 | 2 |\n| - Indecent exposure of person by bathing, or otherwise | 1 | 5 |\n| - Nuisances Allowing dirt and filth, &c., to remain exposed | 14 | 14 |\n| - Nuisances-Discharging sewage water and offensive matter into the public side channel | 31 | 31 |\n| - Nuisances Hanging wet clothes, &c., over Public ways | 51 | 51 |\n| - Nuisances Throwing rubbish, &c., into the Streets | 92 | 103 |\n| - Obstruction of Roads and Streets by Hawkers, and Shopkeepers | 664 | 665 |\n| - Stones-Throwing to danger of the public | 1 | 1 |\n| - Streams-Defiling | 1 | 1 |\n| - Unlawful possession of property | 361 | 361 |\n| Hongkong Fire Brigade Ordinance 4 of 1868 | | |\n| - Firemen Misconduct as | 1 | 1 |\n| Larceny and Other Similar Offences.-Ordinance 7 of 1865 | | |\n| - Burglary | 3 | 3 |\n| Common Law | | |\n| - Bribery | 3 | 3 |\n| - Conspiracy to defraud | 3 | 3 |\n| - Intimidating Witnesses | 1 | 1 |\n| - Piracy | 1 | 1 |\n| - Suicide-Attempting to commit | 2 | 2 |\n| Coroner's Abolition Ordinance 17 of 1848 | | |\n| - Juror Neglecting to answer Coroner's Summons to attend Inquest | 1 | 1 |\n| Dangerous Goods Ordinances 3 of 1873 and 8 of 1892 | | |\n| - Dangerous Goods-Boat laden with, anchoring in prohibited place | 6 | 6 |\n| - Dangerous Goods-Boat conveying, without proper precaution | 9 | 13 |\n| - Dangerous Goods-Carrying, uncovered in boat | 17 | 17 |\n| - Dangerous Goods-Conveying or exposing for Sale, without attaching labels to cases or vessels containing the same | 8 | 10 |\n| - Dangerous Goods-Ships, &c., lying alongside Wharf or landing in place to land or ship, for more than 24 hours | 3 | 3 |\n| - Dangerous Goods-Storing, more than the quantity allowed by license | 1 | 1 |\n| - Dangerous Goods-Selling without a licence | 1 | 1 |\n| - Dangerous Goods-Unlicensed storing of | 1 | 1 |\n| - Dangerous Goods-Wharf-Unlawfully alongside of while another ship was discharging | 1 | 1 |\n| Dogs Ordinance 9 of 1893 | | |\n| - Dogs-Unlicensed keeping of | 11 | 30 |\n| Exportation of Military Stores Ordinance 13 of 1862 | | |\n| - Exporting ammunition prohibited by Proclamation | 1 | 1 |\n| Forgery-Ordinance 6 of 1865 | | |\n| - Document-Forging, with intent to defraud | 1 | 3 |\n| - Forged instruments-Obtaining goods or money by | 1 | 1 |\n| - Falsification of accounts, &c., with intent to defraud | 1 | 1 |\n| Malicious injuries to property-Ordinance 8 of 1865 | | |\n| - Arson | 5 | 5 |\n| - Injuries to property | 19 | 19 |\n| - Injuries to trees or vegetable productions in Garden | 81 | 81 |\n| Markets Ordinances 17 of 1887 and 23 of 1890 | | |\n| - Articles of food for man-Exposing for Sale, in a place other than a Public Market | 244 | 211 |\n| - Fish, &c., Selling in Markets, not being holders of stalls | 28 | 28 |\n| - Lotteries Dealing in | 5 | 5 |\n| - Common Gaming House-Keeping, or playing in | 67 | 612 |\n| - Market-Nuisances in | 5 | 3 |\n| Larceny and Other Similar Offences | | |\n| - Embezzlement | 16 | 16 |\n| - False pretences-Obtaining, or attempting to obtain goods or money by | 11 | 11 |\n| - Felony-Attempting to commit | 1 | 1 |\n| - Found in Dwelling house, &c., by night, with intent to commit | 1 | 1 |\n| - Housebreaking | 122 | 123 |\n| - Larceny as a bailee | 30 | 30 |\n| - Larceny by servants | 977 | 1,073 |\n| - Larceny from the person | 80 | 84 |\n| - Larceny from the person with violence | 3 | 3 |\n| - Larceny from Ships or boats in the Harbour | 10 | 10 |\n| - Menaces-Demanding money by | 18 | 18 |\n| - Stolen goods-Receiving | 4 | 4 |\n| Licensing Consolidation Ordinance 21 of 1887 | | |\n| - Hawkers-Unlicensed | 689 | 690 |\n| - Public Vehicles-Demanding more than the legal fare | 1 | 1 |\n| - Public Vehicles-Carrying no lights between sunset and sunrise | 22 | 22 |\n| - Public Vehicles-Not keeping rule of the Road | 8 | 8 |\n| - Public Vehicles-Obstruction of Streets by | 110 | 110 |\n| - Public Vehicles-Refusing to accept hire when unemployed | 52 | 50 |\n| - Public Vehicles-Refusing to pay fare of | 14 | 14 |\n| - Public Vehicles-Unlicensed | 14 | 14 |\n| Magistrate's Ordinances 7 and 10 of 1890 | | |\n| - Disorderly behaviour while drunk | 153 | 160 |\n| - Drunkenness | 17 | 17 |\n| - False Charge-Preferring-or wilfully giving false evidence | 59 | 59 |", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 366026, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "page_number": 361, "title": "CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3]", "content_text": "# INDICTMENTS and INFORMATIONS in the SUPREME COURT of HONGKONG for the Year 1897\nIncluding Attempts and Conspiracies to commit the several offences.\n\n(Each Prisoner tried counts as a separate case; where a large number of Prisoners have been convicted together, the fact is mentioned in a note.)\n\n| Cases tried | Number Cases tried | Number of Persons tried | Judgment for the Crown | Judgment for the Prisoners | Prisoner found Insane | Cases which fell through for want of prosecution or absence of accused, and cases thrown out by the Grand Jury (Attorney General) |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| | 39 | | 15 | 16 | 1 | 11 |\n| Postponed | 4 | | 3 | 2 | | 3 |\n\nRegistry, Supreme Court, Hongkong, 10th day of February, 1898.\n\n## RETURN of CRIMINAL CASES tried in the SUPREME COURT of HONGKONG during the Year 1897\n\n| CRIMES | Charges | Cases | Abandoned | Postponed | Sentence |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Miscellaneous Offences | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 |\n| Administering stupifying drug with intent to commit an indictable offence | 1 | 1 | | | 1 |\n| Arson | 2 | 2 | 1 | | 1 |\n| Assault with intent to commit buggery | 1 | 1 | | | 1 |\n| Bribery of a Police Constable | 2 | 2 | | 1 | 1 |\n| Buggery | 1 | 1 | | | 1 |\n| Conspiring to obstruct and pervert the due course of public justice | 2 | 2 | | 1 | 1 |\n| Demanding money with menaces | 3 | 3 | | | 3 |\n| Embezzlement | 2 | 2 | | 1 | 1 |\n| Forgery | 8 | 8 | | 3 | 5 |\n| Having forged Bank Note in possession, knowing same to be forged | 1 | 1 | | | 1 |\n| Larceny | 21 | 21 | 6 | 6 | 9 |\n| Larceny by a Servant | 14 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 8 |\n| Larceny in a dwelling house | 12 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 7 |\n| Manslaughter | 1 | 1 | | | 1 |\n| Murder | 6 | 6 | | 1 | 5 |\n| Obtaining money under false pretences | 41 | 41 | 10 | 11 | 20 |\n| Perjury | 1 | 1 | | | 1 |\n| Rape | 6 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 |\n| Returning from banishment | 1 | 1 | | | 1 |\n| Robbery with violence | 67 | 67 | 17 | 27 | 23 |\n| Setting fire to a dwelling house, there being person therein | 1 | 1 | | 1 | |\n| Uttering a forged letter | 1 | 1 | | | 1 |\n| Uttering counterfeit coin | 2 | 2 | | | 2 |\n| Women and Girls' Protection Ordinance 1890, Offences under | 3 | 3 | | 1 | 2 |\n| Wounding with intent to do grievous bodily harm | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 |\n| Wounding with intent to commit murder | 1 | 1 | | | 1 |\n\nJ. W. NORTON KYSHE, Registrar.\n\n## COMPARATIVE TABLE showing the NUMBER of OFFENCES, APPREHENSIONS, CONVICTIONS and ACQUITTALS for the last Four Years\n\n| | 1894 | 1895 | 1896 | 1897 |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| The Number of Convictions in the Superior Courts - 1. For Offences against the Person | 16 | 17 | 15 | 24 |\n| The Number of Convictions in the Superior Courts - 2. For Offences against the Property | 1 | 10 | 10 | 2 |\n| The Number of Persons acquitted- 2. In the Superior Courts | 17 | 9 | 32 | 28 |\n\nRegistry, Supreme Court, Hongkong, 10th day of February, 1898.\n\nJ. W. NORTON KYSHE, Registrar.\n\n## Details of 67 Persons tried for Robbery with violence\n\nOf 67 Persons | Convicted | Acquitted | Death | Death Recorded | Hard Labour over One Year | Hard Labour One Year and under | Solitary Confinement | Privately flogged |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| | 56 were indicted | 39 | 17 | 1 | 11 | 27 | 10 | 1 | 3 |\n| | 10 were not indicted which are included under the heading of \"Charges Abandoned,\" ... 1a | | | | | | | | |\n| | 1b | | | | | | | | |\n\na. Defendant failed to appear, and recognizance estreated.\nb. Prisoner having been found by a Jury empanelled for the purpose was committed to Gaol pending the Orders of His Excellency the Governor.\n\nJ. W. NORTON KYSHE, Registrar.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 370129, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-289 - Individuals - 1898", "page_number": 212, "title": "CO129-289 - Individuals - 1898", "content_text": "# Aberdeen\n\nTravelling magistrate.\n\n14\n\nEuropean Inspector, with headquarters at Cheung Chau, who should have at his disposal a launch armed with a machine gun and a crew, who should be properly drilled. With this launch he would be able to visit regularly all the islands in the new territory. Lamma Island, which is immediately adjacent to Hong Kong, might be policed from Aberdeen. The Po Toi Group might also be placed under Hong Kong so far as the policing of them is concerned.\n\n## LAUNCHES\n\nIn addition to the launch for visiting the islands, another launch will be required for the east of the new territory, and a pinnace for Deep Bay and its neighbourhood in the west. Each of these vessels should be armed with a quick-firing gun, and commanded by a European, who should have under him a crew trained to the use of arms.\n\n## JUDICIAL\n\nI recommend that the village tribunals be retained, and that they be allowed to exercise their present powers under proper supervision. A precedent for this exists in Ceylon, where an ordinance entitled the \"Village Communities Ordinance\" (`No. 24 of 1889`) is in force, and which, I think, might with slight modifications be adopted for the village communities in the new territory. In this opinion Mr. Brewin, the Acting Registrar-General of Hong Kong, the Hon. Ho Kai, and the Hon. Wai Yuk, the Chinese members of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong, whom I consulted, concur. Their report on this subject, with which, generally, I agree, will be found in `Appendix No. VI`. As in Ceylon, records of all the cases tried should be carefully kept and regularly inspected from time to time by a travelling magistrate, who should exercise strict supervision over the native tribunals. This officer should have a knowledge of Chinese and of law.\n\nAn appeal to the council of a Tung should lie from a decision of a village tribunal. The Resident should be the final court of appeal in all matters civil or criminal cognizable by native tribunals.\n\nIn criminal matters, offences punishable by death, as well as offences such as piracy, arson, treason, forgery, highway robbery, burglary, &c., should be heard before the Hong Kong Police Magistrate, and, if there is a prima facie case, be committed by him for trial.\n\n## PRISON\n\nThe question of providing prison accommodation is one requiring serious consideration. In this connection, I would call attention to the following opinion of the Chinese members of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong:\n\n\"We hold that simple imprisonment has little deterrent effect on the ordinary Chinese, and that, wherever possible, flogging to a moderate extent should be substituted for it. The lower classes being extremely poor and in constant want of the necessities of life, do not in the least mind imprisonment in a well-conducted European jail, where they can get good lodging, food, and clothing with the minimum amount of labour. It would be an extremely expensive item to provide sufficient jail accommodation for the large number of Chinese seeking admittance as an effective means of relief to their necessitous condition in hard times.\"\n\nWith this view, anyone who knows the Chinese must agree. If a large jail be built, I therefore recommend that the punishment of imprisonment be, so far as possible, discouraged, and that, at any rate, to begin with, a jail sufficient to accommodate 50 persons only be established.\n\nThe head of the police should discharge the duties of superintendent. The Chief Inspector should act as chief warden, and the other warders could be selected from the police. The prison should be situated at headquarters where the Resident Commissioner resides.\n\nIn addition to the main prison, there should be in each Tung a lock-up for detaining prisoners pending trial or transfer to the chief prison; and in each village, accommodation should be provided in the watch-house for detaining prisoners pending trial before the village tribunal.\n\n## MEDICAL AND SANITARY\n\nA European medical officer should be appointed to look after the officers of the Government, and superintend generally sanitary matters throughout the territory. He should have under him a staff consisting of two Chinese assistants trained in Western medical science, who would aid him in the work of supervising medical and sanitary matters throughout the villages. A small hospital should be erected at headquarters, and in the course of time, dispensaries should be established at different points in the territory.\n\nFor purposes of sanitation, the council and head constable in each village should co-operate with the medical authority, and should be encouraged to keep their villages in a cleanly condition.\n\n## EDUCATION\n\nAt present, every village of any size in the territory has at least one school, in which the Chinese Classics are taught. The schoolmaster's salary is paid by the villagers.\n\nIn addition to these schools, there is at Nam Law, the chief city of the district, a college or Shü Ün, under a Director and Assistant Director of Studies, in which candidates for the first and higher degrees may study. These candidates, who are commonly known as Tung Shang, have already passed two examinations—one held by the magistrate of the district, and one by the prefect of the Kwong Chau Prefecture, the Prefecture being made up of a number of districts, of which San On is one. It is estimated that there are in the district of San On 300 Tung Shang studying for the first degree, for which an examination is held yearly at Canton. The number of vacancies allotted to the district is eleven. There are said to be 150 graduates of the first degree resident in the whole district.\n\nI recommend that the present village schools be retained, but that, at the same time, the study of English be encouraged. This could be done in the first instance by the establishment at the headquarters of the government of a school for the teaching of English under a master well acquainted with both Chinese and English. When a desire for a knowledge of English spreads, as is almost certain to be the case, other schools can be established at other places throughout the area. As an inducement to learn English, free scholarships at Queen's College should be offered to the best students in the new territory, and the appointments of interpreters should be, so far as possible, given to natives of the district who are qualified to fill them.\n\n## REVENUE\n\nIt is notorious that in China, the officers of Government are so inadequately paid that it is impossible for them to live on their official emoluments. The result of under-paying the mandarins is that, in order to make both ends meet, the officials are constrained to resort to methods which, in most other countries, would not be tolerated, but which in China have come to be regarded as part of the official system.\n\nThis \"squeeze system\" is in existence throughout the length and breadth of China, and the officials of the San On district, in which the new territory is contained, are driven, like their confrères in other parts of the Empire, to supplement their insufficient salaries by appropriating to their own use moneys which should find their way into the public purse.\n\nIn fact, two distinct revenues are collected in the San On district. One, the public revenue, is collected by the district magistrate. A careful account of it is rendered to his superiors, who have to forward a portion of it to Peking as the contribution of the district towards the Imperial Government. It has been an easy matter to obtain information regarding this revenue, which practically never varies from year to year, as any increase shown would not benefit those responsible for its collection. `Appendix 7` contains a statement of this revenue, drawn up by the district magistrate, from which it appears that the total annual revenue for the entire district of San On amounts to taels 37,589, or $52,220, or, say, £5,000.\n\nThe other class of revenue is also collected by the district magistrate and his underlings, but as it goes into his own pocket and that of his friends and relations, and as he is liable at any moment to be impeached for extorting it from the people under his jurisdiction, he naturally takes every precaution to prevent, so far as he can, any information regarding it being made public. It has, therefore, been extremely difficult...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-289 - Individuals - 1898.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 375587, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-297 - Governor Sir Blake - 1900 [1-3]", "page_number": 414, "title": "CO129-297 - Governor Sir Blake - 1900 [1-3]", "content_text": "412\n\nand the punishment of forgery (subsection 18).\n\nSubsection (2) is remodelled upon the lines of section 92 of the English Act of 1894.\n\nSubsection (8) is new and the object of it is to provide for...\n\nBy the term, \"section\", I mean in the usual way.\n\n(4 Ord. No. 268/1891)\n\nSubsection (4) provides for masters and officers being entered on the registered articles of agreement.\n\nSection 5 is a rearrangement of sections 16 and 22 with some general additions.\n\nIt is taken from the Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, with some suspecting amendments (see subsections (3) and (4)) and also differs from the old law in making more clear provisions against the promiscuous discharge of seamen who may frequently become a burden to the Colony (subsection 4).\n\nSection ... is the old section ... by Shipping ... and having ... discharge, being chargeable ... to subsection ... so as not to apply in the case of ... seamen, and with subsections (5) and (6) of the old section 17 included together in (1). Subsection (5) of the old section (19) is reproduced in subsection (12) of section 5 of this Ordinance.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-297 - Governor Sir Blake - 1900 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 377086, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-300 - Administrator Major Gen Gascoigne Governor Sir Blake - 1900 [7-9]", "page_number": 182, "title": "CO129-300 - Administrator Major Gen Gascoigne Governor Sir Blake - 1900 [7-9]", "content_text": "## Draft\n\nGentlemen,\n\nI should be glad to be informed why no communication was made to the Audit Office in regard to the amount of Mr. W. Baker's pension on his arrival in this colony.\n\n3. Mr. W. Baker, lately employed in the Police Department, Hong Kong, obtained his pension from the funds of that Colony at the rate of £61.65s.3d.3. The amount of his pension was obtained from the Colonial Estimates, as the Standing Orders do not appear to have been submitted for my approval.\n\n27 July 180\n\nMr. Secretary \nSecretary's Chamber \n\nYou are aware that he has moved for a copy of the forgery toll.\n\n| Name | Date | Reference |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| John | 24/ | 23967 |\n| Carson | | 3df5 |\n| You Hay Kay | | |\n\nRAFT. \nAF \nGas \n65 \nluicted \n20 \nfacasa \n\nPage 65", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-300 - Administrator Major Gen Gascoigne Governor Sir Blake - 1900 [7-9].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 377708, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-301 - Governor Sir Blake - 1900 [9-12]", "page_number": 177, "title": "CO129-301 - Governor Sir Blake - 1900 [9-12]", "content_text": "## ENCLOSURE \n175 \n2. \n361 \n\n**RECE** \nREG 10 NOV no \n\n## Memorandum on system to be adopted with a view to a better Check being kept on Stamp Revenue\n\n1. The proposed system broadly is, that by Legislative enactment, documents which at present have to bear an impressed stamp or stamps should instead be stamped with an adhesive stamp or stamps, such stamps being cancelled by means of a uniform embossed stamp.\n\n2. If this system is to be carried out, we are of opinion that the adhesive stamps to be used should be of a distinctive nature and should not be available for any other purpose than for stamping documents which by the existing law have to be stamped with impressed stamps, or in other words that no such adhesive stamps should ever be issued until they had been cancelled in the Stamp Office with the embossing stamp.\n\n3. Our reasons for this are that by having a distinctive stamp, the precautions against forgery are doubled, as anyone wishing to commit a forgery would have to make dies both for the adhesive stamps and for the embossing stamp.\n\n4. The correspondence which took place in 1895 is somewhat confused, and it is difficult for those who are", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-301 - Governor Sir Blake - 1900 [9-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 382580, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-307 - Governor Sir Blake - 1901 [10-12]", "page_number": 563, "title": "CO129-307 - Governor Sir Blake - 1901 [10-12]", "content_text": "Section 12-The word “British\" is inserted so as to prevent the master of a foreign ship from applying under this sub-section.\n\nSection 13.-It was pointed out by the Board of Trade that no provision was made in sub-section (4.) of section 9 for punishing a party making a false declaration.\n\nSection 14.-It was pointed out by the Board of Trade that a special reference to passenger certificates would make it clearer that they were intended to be included in paragraph (a.) of sub-section 2 of section 10.\n\nSection 15.-This amendment was suggested by the Board of Trade in order to make it abundantly clear that a Surveyor was not liable to any penalty for receiving the authorized fees.\n\nSection 16.—(1.) This amendment corrects a clerical error.\n\n(i.) This amendment is made because foreign ships are not bound by our laws as to dock and load lines.\n\nSection 17-It was pointed out by the Board of Trade that sub-section (15.) of section 10 had no clear or definite meaning, and it has accordingly been repealed.\n\nSection 18.-The practical effect of this amendment is to omit from sub-section (23.) of section 10 certain provisions as to forgery which would clash with the provisions of sub-section (10) of section 41 of the Ordinance.\n\nSections 19 and 20.-These amendments have been made so as to render a marking which complies with British or Colonial law sufficient.\n\nPage 560\n\nSection 21.-The amendments effected by this section in section 18 of the Ordinance are intended to meet the case of a ship arriving in this Colony which is unrepresented by a Consular Officer.\n\nSection 22.--The word \"British \" has been inserted for the sake of greater clearness, by desire of the Board of Trade. It has always been the practice to read the corresponding provision of Ordinance 26 of 1891 as applying to the British mercantile marine only.\n\nSection 23.-It was pointed out by the Board of Trade that no provision was made in the Ordinance for the ordering of costs of the investigation to be paid.\n\nSection 26.-The new signals are \"Y F\" and not \"PC\" as formerly.\n\nSection 27.-It seems desirable that all cables should be covered by the provision of the paragraph in question.\n\nSection 29.-This supplies an accidental omission, which was pointed out by the Board of Trade.\n\nSection 31.-The addition of the words \"of payment\" makes better drafting.\n\n#\n\nSection 32.-It is thought better to omit any reference to steamship in this sub-section inasmuch as the whole section applies to steamships not exceeding sixty tons, especially as, if the words which are omitted, were left in, it might be argued that they were intended to apply to H. M. Ships or to foreign ships of war.\n\nSections 33 and 34.--These are a few minor amendments, suggested by the Board of Trade, and do not appear to call for any comment.\n\nSection 35.---It was suggested by the Secretary of State that, inasmuch as certain of the provisions of our local Ordinance differed from English legislation, it would be advisable, in order to prevent any contention being raised as to certain provisions of our Merchant Shipping Ordinance being ultra vires, to specifically repeal so much of the provisions of the English Merchant Shipping Acts as are inconsistent with the provisions of Ordinance 36 of 1899. Accordingly four and a half lines have been added to the commencement of sub-section (1.) of section 41 for the purpose of meeting the above point.\n\nSection 36.-The Board of Trade thought that the provisions of the English Act as to service of documents (see section 696 of the Merchant Shipping Act of 1894) had better be adopted in this Colony, for the sake of uniformity.\n\nSection 37.-This provision is borrowed from the Home Act, section 743, and has been introduced on the suggestion of the Board of Trade.\n\nKindly regard this post, the poss... Lument Clan Raport also, and of the", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-307 - Governor Sir Blake - 1901 [10-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 382956, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-308 - Public Offices - 1901", "page_number": 101, "title": "CO129-308 - Public Offices - 1901", "content_text": "Dropy.\n\nMessrs De La Rue & Co. to Crown Agents.\n\n110 Bunhill Row, E.C.\n\n7th January 1901.\n\nHong Kong - Stamps - Regn 1/1901.\n\n99\n\n:\n\nPapers returned herewith.\n\nIt will be within your recollection that in 1895 we reported that stamps embossed on gummed paper do not afford proper security to the Revenue.\n\nWe now beg to say that the objection to such stamps is that it is an easy matter to forge them. All that has to be done is to pour plaster of Paris on the back of any embossed stamp, which it is desired to reproduce. By this means a solid block is obtained, and by rendering the face of the stamp metallic with black lead, an electrotype can be grown from it. The electrotype is, of course, an exact counterpart of the stamp, and any number of impressions can be taken from it. In several instances forgeries have been perpetrated by even more simple means i.e. by taking a mould in shellac, or other suitable material, from the stamp backed up as described with plaster of Paris. In one instance even common sealing wax was employed with most successful results. Impressions were obtained from the sealing wax mould, by employing a soft pad under the paper. The forgery in question was on an extensive scale, as is proved by the fact that\n\n-1-.\n\nia", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-308 - Public Offices - 1901.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 382957, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-308 - Public Offices - 1901", "page_number": 102, "title": "CO129-308 - Public Offices - 1901", "content_text": "Just wit of bevorty at a:\n\n100\n\njor et surp\n\ndonid ollow A ŽIVK\n\nIdm pasda ode to\n\nthat on investigation forged stamps amounting to over £10,000 were discovered on documents to which access could be obtained It is generally supposed that this forgery, which extended over a number of years, must have amounted to a very large figure.\n\nIn India the danger arising from the employment of embossed stamps is so fully recognised that in that country the Revenue is collected by means of surface printed adhesive stamps and surface printed stamped papers.\n\nUnder the circumstances we assume that surface printed adhesive stamps with an over-embossment will be adopted in Hong Kong.\n\nIf it is decided to adopt embossed adhesive stamps our charge would be 3/3 per 1000 for such stamps exclusive of your watermarked paper. Thirty-two embossing dies would have to be provided, at a cost of £8. 10. each.\n\nSurface printed adhesive stamps with an over-embossment afford the greatest possible protection to the Revenue against forgery. They also offer a simple means of controlling the amount received by the officers in charge of the stamping presses, for the officers would have to account for all stamps issued to them and to produce the stamps or the cash they represent. The stamping officer must affix the requisite adhesive stamp to a portion of the parchment previously treated by rubbing it with india-rubber or pumice stone, so as to remove any greasiness and then complete it by over-embossment. The over-embossment goes partly over the stamp, cancelling it and also records the date, thus completing the requisite...\n\nPage -2-\n\nunal\n\nragn\n\n: \n\nRe\n\nia\n\ne", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-308 - Public Offices - 1901.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 390963, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12]", "page_number": 516, "title": "CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12]", "content_text": "# INTERPRETATION OF EXTRADITION TREATIES.\n\nIn my judgment these treaties ought to receive a liberal interpretation, which means no more than that they should receive their true construction according to their language, object, and intent. I know no head of the French law for which an exact equivalent is to be found in the law of England. The English and French texts of the treaty are not translations of one another. They are different versions, but versions which, on the whole, are in substantial agreement.\n\nPer Lord RUSSELL, C.J., In re Arton, L.R. Q.B.D. 1896 (1) 509; 65 L.J.M.C. 50; 18 Cox C.C. 277; 60 J.P. 132.\n\n# ON APPEAL, NEW MATERIALS MAY BE PRESENTED TO THE KING'S BENCH DIVISION BESIDES WHAT WAS BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE,\n\nPer DENMAN, J.: The Act itself requires the Magistrate to inform the prisoner that he may apply for a habeas corpus, and, if he is entitled to apply for a habeas corpus, justice must have power to go into the whole matter, and I think it follows that the Queen's Bench Division in some cases, if there be certainly fresh evidence and cogent evidence, it could not say for a moment that it would feel itself crippled by the mere fact that the Magistrate, upon much less evidence, or perhaps upon the same evidence had taken a different view of the matter.\n\nPer HAWKINS, J.: If a man has a right to move for a habeas corpus in order that the case may be reviewed, it would be an absurdity to say that he might not enter into those matters which showed that he had been guilty of no offence at all; and by no means was the matter concluded by the Magistrate's decision that he be committed for trial, because the Magistrate does not sit, when he is committing for trial, as a Magistrate sitting finally to dispose of the case, and to give judgment upon it. I think that they (the provisions of the Act) are quite sufficient certainly to satisfy me that the Magistrate's decision is by no means binding, either in point of law or in point of fact, and that, when these matters come to be considered upon the habeas corpus, if the Judges have to consider the case, they must consider the case as it is before them at the time the rule is discussed, and I think that we are not bound by, though we pay respect to, what the Magistrate's views were.\n\nIn re Castioni, L.R. Q.B.D. 1891 (1) 149; 60 L.J.M.C. 22; 64 L.T. (N.S.) 344; 17 Cox C.C. 225; 55 J.P. 328.\n\n(But see also later case of In re Arton (p. 23), L.R. Q.B.D. 1896 (I) 509; 65 L.J.M.C. 50; 18 Cox C.C. 277; 60 J.P. 132, where Lord Russell, C.J., said: \"We are not a Court of Appeal on questions of fact from him (the Magistrate). We have only to see that he had such evidence before him as gave him authority and jurisdiction to commit.\")\n\n(See also In re Arton (p. 23), L.R. Q.B.D. 1896 (1) 108; 65 L.J.M.C. 23, where Lord Russell, C.J., said \"The Court is bound to see whether or not a prima facie case has been made out before the Magistrate.\")\n\nPage 7\n\n# EX PARTE BOUVIER. France.\n\n21st November, 1872.\n\nQUEEN'S BENCH: COCKBURN, C.J., MELLOR and BLACKBURN, JJ.\n\n42 L.J. Q.B. 17; 12 Cox C.C. 303; 27 L.T. (N.S.) 844. Committed for extradition, by Police Magistrate of Jersey, for \"fuum et banqueroute frauduleuse.\" The French warrant had been granted upon a judgment of an Assize Court, on which Bouvier had been condemned on three several charges of abus de confiance, forgery, and fraudulent bankruptcy. Abus de confiance was not an offence included in the Convention of 13th February, 1843.\n\nContended: No power under the Convention or under the Act of 1870 to surrender for abus de confiance. No power to surrender the criminal inasmuch as no provision or arrangement had been made as required by section 3 (2) of the Extradition Act, 1870.\n\nAffidavit of the officially appointed Counsel to the French Embassy put in as to the state of French law.\n\nHeld: That under the existing law of France such provision is made.\n\n(See also case of United States v. Lawrence, 13 Cox C.C. 361)\n\n(And see now Article IV. of the treaty with France of 14th August, 1876.)\n\n# EX PARTE ELISE COUNHAYE.\n\nBelgium.\n\n23rd May, 1873.\n\nQUEEN'S BENCH : BLACKBURN, QUAIN, and ARCHIBALD, JJ.\n\nL.R. 8 Q.B. 410; 42 L.J.Q.B. 217.\n\nAccused of complicity in her husband's bankruptcy.\n\nContended: (i.) Complicity in a fraudulent bankruptcy is not a crime within the Extradition Act.\n\nA treaty cannot extend the Act. (ii.) The facts charged were committed before the Act was passed, and section 6 does not apply to crimes committed before the Act was passed.\n\n(i.) The depositions were not taken before the Magistrate who issued the warrant as required by Article II. of the treaty.\n\n(iv.) The depositions are not receivable not having been taken in the presence of the accused.\n\n(v.) The Belgian warrant is bad, charging crime in France; and it is not for the same crime as the English commitment.\n\nPer COLERIDGE, A.G. - Accessories before the fact are not mentioned in the Schedule to the Act because at common law they are in effect the same as principals, and aiders and abettors can by statute be tried as well as punished as principals.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 390965, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12]", "page_number": 518, "title": "CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12]", "content_text": "R. v. WILSON,\n\nSwitzerland,\n\n2nd November, 1877.\n\nPage 10\n\nQUEEN'S BENCH: COCKBURN, L.C.J., MELLOR and FIELD, JJ.\n\nL.R. 3 Q.B.D. 42; 48 L.J.M.C. 37; 13 Cox C.C. 630; 37 L.T. (N.S.) 544.\n\nW., a British subject, had been committed by the Magistrate for surrender for larceny in Switzerland. By the Swiss treaty of 1874, no subject of the United Kingdom shall be delivered up by the Government thereof to Switzerland. The Magistrate was of opinion that he was not entitled to consider the terms of the treaty, but only the Extradition Acts.\n\nBOWEN, in support of the commitment, contended:\n\nThe Order in Council does not limit the operation of the Extradition Acts; it merely recites the treaty.\n\nHeld: The Act can only have application so far as it is consistent with the treaty. The Order in Council must be co-extensive with, and limited by the treaty.\n\n(See Article I. of the Treaty with Switzerland, of 26th November, 1880, as to \"NATIONALS.\")\n\n(See also In re Galwey, L.R. Q.B.D. 1896 (1) 230; 65 L.J.M.C. 38; 18 Cox C.C. 213; 60 J.P. 87.)\n\nCOMMONWEALTH v. HAWES.\n\nUnited States of America.\n\n17th April, 1878.\n\nCOURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY.\n\n14 Cox C.C. 135.\n\nHawes was surrendered to the U.S.A. by Canada to answer three charges of forgery. He was tried on two indictments for forgery, and acquitted. He was held in custody, however, to answer a charge of embezzlement; and he moved, on affidavit, to be released from custody. The Court ordered the case for embezzlement to be continued, and prisoner released from custody. The Commonwealth appealed.\n\nHeld: The precise purpose for which the fugitive is to be surrendered is set out in exact and apt language, and the Act negatives, by necessary implication, the right here claimed, that the person surrendered may be tried for an offence different from that for which he was extradited, and one for which his surrender could not have been demanded.\n\n(The French Minister of Justice, in his circular of 15 April, 1841, said: \"The extradition declares the offence which leads to it, and this offence alone ought to be inquired into.\" The rule, as stated by the German author Heffter, is that: \"The individual, whose extradition has been granted, cannot be prosecuted nor tried for any crime except that for which the extradition has been obtained. To act in any other way, and to cause him to be tried for other crimes or misdemeanors, would be to violate the mutual principle of asylum, and the silent clause contained by implication in every extradition.\")\n\n(See also United States v. Rauscher, quoted in In re Alice Woodall, 57 L.J.M.C. 72; 16 Cox C.C. 478.) (And see now Article III. of the Convention with the U.S.A. of 12th July, 1889.)\n\nEX PARTE TERRAZ.\n\nSwitzerland.\n\nDec., 1878.\n\nEXCHEQUER DIVISION: KELLY, C.B., and Huddleston, B.\n\nL.R. 4 Ex. D. 63; 48 L.J. Ex. 214; 14 Cox C.C. 153; 39 L.T. (N.S.) 502; 27 W.R. 170.\n\nTerraz was arrested on a warrant for \"crimes against bankruptcy law,\" issued upon an information by the Chancellor of the Swiss Consulate General on 12th November, 1878, and twice remanded. While under remand a rule nisi was obtained on the ground that the warrant (i.e., the first warrant) did not sufficiently set forth the nature of the offence, &c. Before the case was argued a second warrant was issued, upon the Secretary of State's Order, describing the offence more fully.\n\nArgued, by ATHERLEY JONES, for the accused, that the first warrant does not describe a specific offence; and that the second warrant could not be set up in answer to the rule.\n\nHeld: KELLY, C.B., entertained no doubt that the description of the offence charged against the prisoner was sufficient; and that the Magistrate was entitled to remand the prisoner on the warrant with a view to further enquiry.\n\nHUDDLESTON, B., agreed, this being a warrant for safe custody of the party until the case can be properly enquired into, and the authorities show that in such warrants a general assertion or a general charge is sufficient.\n\nPage 11\n\n(The Judges differed as to whether the second warrant lodged in this case could be a valid answer to the rule, KELLY, C.B., saying: \"If the case had turned upon, or it had been necessary to refer to, or to rely at all upon, the second warrant, I should have thought it a direct violation of the first principles of the law and constitution of this country to deal with that warrant in any way unless the counsel for the accused had had an opportunity previously of seeing it and preparing himself to argue upon it.\" HUDDLESTON, B., saying: \"As far as I know, in practice and on authority, there can be no doubt whatever that a fresh warrant may be lodged; there may be one, two, three or other warrants substituted for the original one; but if, when the matter is before the Judge, there is a good warrant, that is sufficient to detain the prisoner.\")\n\n(“Abus de confiance\" in French warrant, and “fraud by an agent\" in English commitment held to be sufficient description of the offence; see ex parte Piot, 15 Cox C.C. 208; 47 J.P. 247; 48 L.T. (N.S.) 120.\n\nSee also R. v. Jacobi and Hiller; 46 L.T. (N.S.) 595, footnote; and In re Arton, L.R. Q.B.D. 1896 (1) 509; 65 L.J.M.C. 50; 18 Cox C.C. 277; 60 J.P. 132.)\n\nPage 10529\n\nB 2\n\n512", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 390967, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12]", "page_number": 520, "title": "CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12]", "content_text": "14\n\n15\n\nR. v. GANZ. Netherlands.\n\n30th March, 1882.\n\nQUEEN'S BENCH : POLLOCK, B., and Manisty, J.\n\nL.R. 9 Q.B.D. 93 ; 51 L.J, Q.B. 419; 46 L.T. (N.S.) 592.\n\nGanz having been committed for extradition, it was argued, upon an application for a writ of habeas corpus :\n\n(i.) That, being a naturalized American subject, Ganz was not covered by the treaty, which, it was suggested, only was intended to apply to the extradition of subjects of one of the contracting parties.\n\n(ii) That there was no sufficient warrant from the Netherlands. The document relied on was headed \"Copy,\" reviewed what had been done in inferior tribunal, \"authorised proceedings, with an order for arrest,\" and had the signatures of the Court appended. The copy was certified, and bore the official seal of the Ministry of Justice at the Hague.\n\nHeld (i.) Whatever rights a man may have affected by domicile, it is clear that each person is subject to the jurisdiction of the country in which he commits a crime. The treaty is in general terms: \"any person accused of any of the crimes ... the requiring party committed within the jurisdiction of any person except (see Article III.) subjects (as defined by this Article) of the surrendering State.\n\n(i.) It is impossible to say that what is here put forward is not a judicial document authorising arrest (see interpretation clause, section 26 of the Act of 1870). \"We cannot expect that all the original documents, being judgments of foreign Courts, could be produced in London; so provision is made in section 15 for the reception of authenticated copies.\"\n\nApplication refused.\n\n(See letter from Chief Magistrate to Home Office of 9th October, 1900.)\n\nR. v. WEIL.\n\nU.S.A.\n\n13th July, 1882.\n\nCOURT OF APPEAL: JESSEL, M.R., BRETT, L.J., and Cotton, L.J.\n\nL.R. 9 Q.B.D. 701; 53 L.J.M.C. 74; 15 Cox C.C. 189; 47 L.T. (N.S.) 630; 31 W.R. 60.\n\nOn 25th May, 1882, Weil was arrested on Board the \"Servia\" in Queenstown Harbour by a police officer, without any warrant, in consequence of a telegram received from a private inquiry agent in London, for forgery in U.S.A., and was taken before the resident magistrate, who remanded him, and afterwards sent him to Bow Street, where he was remanded by the Chief Magistrate; and afterwards the Secretary of State issued his order to the Magistrate to \"proceed\"; upon objection being taken that the prisoner was illegally in custody, the Chief Magistrate issued a Warrant for his arrest, and this was read over to him in the dock. He was afterwards committed.\n\nA Divisional Court of the QUEEN'S BENCH refused an application for a writ of habeas corpus.\n\nUpon appeal to the COURT OF APPEAL, it was\n\nArgued: The original arrest was unlawful, and before he could be properly apprehended he must be set at liberty. The evidence before the Irish Magistrate was not sufficient to justify issue of warrant to apprehend. The Secretary of State's order to 'proceed' was not in accordance with the form in the Schedule to the Act. The warrant of committal was not addressed to any constable by name.\n\nHeld: If the accused is already in custody, a warrant for his \"detention\" is a warrant for his \"apprehension\"; no irregularity in the proceedings.\n\nPer BRETT, L.J.: I doubt much whether a policeman is not justified in arresting a man without a warrant on reasonable grounds of suspicion of his having done that which would be a felony if committed in this country.\n\nEvidence for the warrant must be such as \"in the opinion of the person issuing\" would justify.\n\n(No appeal from Court of King's Bench to Court of Appeal, see In re Alice Woodall, 57 L.J.M.C. 72; 16 Cox C.C. 478.)\n\nEX PARTE PIOT.\n\nFrance.\n\n25th January, 1883.\n\nQUEEN'S BENCH :\n\nPOLLOCK, B., and MANISTY, J.\n\n15 Cox C.C. 208; 47 J.P. 247; 48 L.T. (N.S.) 120.\n\nA rule nisi for a habeas corpus having been granted, it was Contended: (i) The French warrant, in which the offence was stated as \"abus de confiance,\" was not sufficient for not disclosing, with certainty, the offence for which extradition could be maintained.\n\n(ii) The depositions before Sir J. Ingham disclosed no offence cognizable by our law.\n\n(iii) The form of warrant of committal, in which the offence was described as \"fraud by an agent,\" was insufficient for not disclosing, with certainty, the offence charged.\n\nHeld: Both warrants (i.) and (iii.) were sufficient.\n\n(ii) The facts upon the depositions disclosed a prima facie case of fraud by an agent within 24 & 25 Vic. c. 96 s. 75 to justify the prisoner's committal for trial if the offence had been committed in England, and his committal was therefore good.\n\nPer MANISTY, J., as to (iii.): It is not the warrant (of committal) that is to be looked to for ascertaining what the offence or crime is for which the man is to be detained.\n\nYou find the\n\n(Referring to section 3 (2)\n\n514", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 390969, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12]", "page_number": 522, "title": "CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12]", "content_text": "18\n\n19\n\nIN RE ALICE WOODALL. U.S.A.\n\n5th May, 1888.\n\nCOURT OF APPEAL: Lord ESHER, M.R., LINDLEY, L.J., and Bowen, L.J.\n\nL.R. 20 Q.B.D. 832; 57 LJ.M.C. 71.\n\nThe accused having been committed for surrender, application was made to a Divisional Court for an order nisi for the issue of a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the Magistrate had declined to adjourn the case in order that evidence in favour of the accused might be obtained from New York, and that upon the evidence before the Magistrate he ought not to have committed. The Divisional Court refused the order on these grounds. Motion was now made, by way of appeal, for an order nisi.\n\nHeld: That the decision of the Queen's Bench Division was given in a \"criminal cause or matter\" within section 47 of the Judicature Act, 1873, and therefore no appeal would lie to the Court of Appeal.\n\nIN RE ALICE WOODALL.\n\nU.S.A.\n\n9th May, 1888.\n\nQUEEN'S BENCH: Lord COLERIDGE, C.J., FIELD and WILLS, JJ.\n\n57 L.J.M.C. 72; 16 Cox C.C. 478.\n\nPrisoner had been committed for extradition on two charges of forgery. A rule nisi for a writ of habeas corpus was obtained on the ground that there was no sufficient provision made by the Government of the United States that she should not be tried for an offence other than that for which she was extradited, as required by the Extradition Act, section 3 (2).\n\nHeld (discharging the rule)\n\nThat the United States Government had made provision for this sub-section, and that a fugitive criminal would be tried there solely for the offence in respect of which he had been surrendered. This point had been clearly raised and decided in the United States v. Rauscher, which, as a decision of the Supreme Court of America, was binding on all Courts within the Union.\n\n(It is mentioned in the report (Cox) of this case that in consequence of Lawrence having been tried in the United States for offences other than those for which he was surrendered, the British Government refused to surrender Winslow without a pledge that the prisoner should not be tried except for the offence for which he was extradited; the United States refused to give this pledge, and Winslow was never surrendered.)\n\n(For case of United States v. Lawrence see 13 Cox C.C. 361.) (And see now Article III. of United States Supplementary Convention of 1889.)\n\nIN RE GUERIN.\n\nFrance.\n\n12th, 13th November, 1888.\n\nQUEEN'S BENCH : WILLS and GRANTHAM, JJ.\n\n58 L.J.M.C. 42; 16 Cox C.C. 596; 53 J.P. 467; 60 L.T. (N.S.) 558 ; 37 W.R. 289.\n\nThe prisoner had been arrested on a charge of larceny in France, and brought up before Sir J. Ingham, before whom evidence was given on six occasions ; then Mr. Vaughan took up the case, and on five days heard evidence, and then committed the prisoner for extradition.\n\nA rule nisi for a writ of habeas corpus was granted on the grounds that no evidence of the prisoner's crime had been given before Mr. Vaughan, and that the magistrate's decision as to nationality was wrong.\n\nHeld That the judicial discretion which a Magistrate has to exercise on cases brought before him must be based on the evidence taken before him, and it is not competent for him to act upon evidence taken before another Magistrate. There was however sufficient evidence before Mr. Vaughan without that which was taken before Sir J. Ingham; and the order nisi was discharged.\n\nAs to the question of nationality, it was\n\nHeld That the Queen's Bench Division has a right to review the finding of the Magistrate upon a matter of fact which is cardinal to the existence of his jurisdiction and collateral to the subject of enquiry.\n\nBy direction of the Court--the affidavits as to nationality being conflicting --an issue was tried on 20th and 21st December before HUDDLeston, B., and a common jury as to whether prisoner was a \"native born or naturalised subject\" of this country; this was found against the prisoner.\n\n(See also ex parte Hugel, 12 Cox C.C. 551; 29 L.T. (N.S.) 41; and In re Castioni, L.R. Q.B.D. 1891 (1) 149; 60 L.J.M.C. 22; 64 L.T. (N.S.) 344; 17 Cox C.C. 225; 55 J.P. 328.\n\nRE CASTIONI, Switzerland.\n\n10th, 11th November, 1890.\n\nQUEEN'S BENCH:\n\nDENMAN, HAWKINS and STEPHEN, JJ.\n\nL.R. Q.B.D. 1891 (1) 149; 60 L.J.M.C. 22; 64 L.T.(N.S.) 344; 17 Cox C.C. 225; 55 J.P. 328.\n\nCastioni took part in an insurrection which broke out in the Canton of Ticino, and he and others, having seized arms from the arsenal, and seized five persons connected with the Government, bound them, and marched to the Government House, where they were refused admittance by Councillors Rossi and Gianella with about 80 gendarmes. The gates were broken, and the people rushed in; a second locked door was broken open, and Rossi, who was in the\n\n10529\n\n0 2\n\n516", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 390972, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12]", "page_number": 525, "title": "CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12]", "content_text": "24\n\nContended: That, the Magistrate having come to the conclusion that no forgery, according to English law, had been committed in such falsification and using, the committal was bad, as the Magistrate could not commit Arton for faux, the French equivalent or translation of \"forgery\"; and further that in the committal \"falsification, &c.,\" without stating that such falsification was in the character of trustee, &c., of a public company, was insufficient to bring the charge under Article III (18) of the treaty; and falsification of accounts simply was not in the treaty, and not in the offences mentioned in the first schedule to the Extradition Act of 1870.\n\nHeld: That the offence of falsification of accounts charged was a crime within the French version of Article III (2) of the treaty, and within the English version of Article III (18), and according to English law, section 83 of the Larceny Act, 1861, and section 1 of the Falsification of Accounts Act, 1875; and a crime according to French law, being faux or forgery within Article 147 of the Code Pénal; and that it was an extradition crime within the first schedule to the Extradition Act, 1870.\n\n(As to DESCRIPTION OF OFFENCES, 800\n\nEx parte Terras, L.R. 4 Ex. D. 63; 48 LJ. (Ex.) 214; 14 Cox C.C. 153,\n\n39 L.T. (N.S) 502; 27 W.R. 170;\n\nR. v. Jacobi and Hiller, 46 L.T. (N.S) 595 note;\n\nEx parte Piot, 15 Cox C.C. 208; 47 J.P. 247; 48 L.T. (N.S.) 120;\n\nIn re Bellencontre, L.R. Q.B.D. 1891 (2) 122; 60 L.J.M.C. 83; 17 Cox C.C. 253;\n\n55 J.P. 694;\n\nR. v. Die, \"Times,\" 15th January, 1902.)\n\nEX PARTE EMILE GEORGE. France.\n\n11th August, 1897.\n\nQUEEN'S BENCH:\n\n25\n\nLAWRANCE and COLLINS, JJ.\n\n18 Cox C.C. 631.\n\nGeorge was committed for extradition upon a charge of larceny under section 3 of the Larceny Act, 1861, \"abus de confiance.” The evidence showed that Madame de la Croisette intrusted George with a bond with authority to raise a loan for her upon it; George raised the loan and fraudulently appropriated the money so raised. A rule nisi was obtained,\n\nupon the argument thereon it was\n\nand\n\nHeld: (following the decision in Reg. v. De Banks; 15 Cox C.C. 450; 53 L.J. 132; 32 W.R. 723; 48 J.P. 470: 50 L.T. (N.S.) 427; L.R. 13 Q.B.D. 29) That the evidence amounted to larceny by a bailee under section 3 of the Larceny Act, 1861.\n\nIN RE GALWEY,\n\nBelgium.\n\n18th January, 1896.\n\nQUEEN'S BENCH:\n\nLord RUSSELL, C.J., WRIGHT and KENNEDY, JJ.\n\nL.R. Q.B.D. 1896 (1) 230; 65 L.J.M.C. 38; 18 Cox C.C. 213; 60 J.P. 87.\n\nUpon an application to make absolute a rule nisi for a writ of habeas corpus it was\n\nContended: That Galwey, being a British subject, was not liable to extradition under the Act and the treaty and subsequent declaration,\n\nIt was admitted that Galwey was a British subject.\n\nHeld: That the provisions of the declaration of 1887, providing that the High Contracting Parties shall not be bound to surrender their own subjects, imply that they may do so, and that the surrender of a British subject to Belgium now rests in the discretion of the Secretary of State.\n\n(Field, J.'s words in R. v. Wilson, quoted by Lord Russell, C.J.)\n\n(See R. v. Wilson; L.R. 3 Q.B.D. 42; 48 L.J.M.C. 37; 13 Cox C.C. 630; 37 LT.\n\n(N.S.) 544.)\n\nR. v. SPILSBURY.\n\nFugitive Offenders Act, 1881.\n\nMorocco Order in Council, 1889.\n\n4th, 5th, 8th August, 1898.\n\nQUEEN'S BENCH: Lord RUSSELL, C.J., WRIGHT and KENNEDY, JJ.\n\nL.R. Q.B.D. 1898 (2) 615; 67 L.J. (Com. Law) 988; \"Times\n\n9th August, 1898; 19 Cox C.C. 160; 79 L.T. (N.S.) 211.\n\nSpilsbury having been committed under section 5 of the Fugitive Offenders Act to await return to Tangier, for unlawfully and riotously assembling with others to the number of three or four, and riotously making an assault upon soldiers of the Sultan of Morocco, &c., application was made for a writ of habeas corpus, and in the alternative for bail, and for variance of the order for return by directing return to Gibraltar instead of Tangier.\n\nHeld: That the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court has jurisdiction to admit to bail a person committed under the Fugitive Offenders Act. But the Court refused to exercise that jurisdiction. The order was varied by directing return to Gibraltar instead of to Tangier. (Section 35 F.O. Act.)\n\n10529\n\nD\n\n519", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 393470, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-324 - Governor Nathan - 1904 [10-12]", "page_number": 31, "title": "CO129-324 - Governor Nathan - 1904 [10-12]", "content_text": "30\n\nIt was suggested during the Hearing of the Appeal that one of the documents produced before the Land Court was a forgery but no evidence was adduced before the Full Court proving the truth of this suggestion.\n\nThe result of the Appeal was that the Full Court reversed the decision of the Land Court saying that probably the Respondent had fishing rights but nothing more.\n\nWe respectfully submit for your consideration that the facts above recorded are such as to support very strongly the Appeal which on behalf of our clients Messieurs E. S. Kelly and Ellis Kelly, we now respectfully make to you with a view to their obtaining satisfactory compensation for the loss and damage which they have sustained and the costs and expenses which they have been put to in the matter.\n\nIn support of this we particularly refer you to the facts which we have mentioned above in connection with the correspondence of Messieurs Deacon and Hastings as Solicitors for the Vendors with the Colonial Secretary, wherein the Colonial Secretary distinctly assured Messieurs Deacon and Hastings that the Crown Lease would be issued in due course.\n\nIt has never been suggested that our clients were parties to any fraud or other species of deception on the\n\n-13-", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-324 - Governor Nathan - 1904 [10-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 394713, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-326 - Foreign Office - 1904", "page_number": 50, "title": "CO129-326 - Foreign Office - 1904", "content_text": "Lieutenant-Governor understands it is the boundary which the British Government has already decided to adopt, and which the Ambassador at Peking has been instructed to insist on. Under these circumstances it appears unnecessary for the Lieutenant-Governor to discuss Mr. Litton's observations on possible lines of frontier. It is sufficient to say that he advances new and cogent reasons for adhering to the line of frontier which the British Minister at Peking has been instructed to insist on.\n\n3. Mr. Litton goes on to point out the advisability of dealing with this question at an early date. The Lieutenant-Governor fully agrees with Mr. Litton that a settlement of the question is desirable.\n\nearly\n\n4. Mr. Litton represents further that it is undesirable that the demarcation of the boundary should be intrusted to a Commission of the same character as that which demarcated the frontier further south. His objections to the adoption of this procedure are that the country to be operated in is very inaccessible, and that the Chinese Commissioner would be obstructive. These objections carry great weight. The country is inaccessible, inhospitable, and unexplored, and is inhabited by wild tribes who would resist intrusion into their territory. Any Boundary Commission which operated in this country would need the protection of a large escort, and the work of demarcation would be very expensive. Mr. Litton's second objection has equal force. Our experience of the proceedings of the recent Boundary Commission is certainly not such as to afford encouragement to the appointment of a second. It will be within the recollection of the Government of India that on one section of the frontier the whole of the season 1897-98 was wasted by the obstruction of the Chinese Commissioner, and that in the season of 1899-1900 practically no work was done because the Chinese Commissioner insisted on basing his claims on a map which Mr. Litton correctly describes as a forgery. Under these circumstances the Lieutenant-Governor concurs with Mr. Litton that the demarcation of the boundary should not be intrusted to a Commission. His Honour advises that the Chinese Government should be pressed to execute an Agreement recognizing the provisional boundary as the permanent boundary. When this Agreement had been executed any local claims of the kind mentioned by Mr. Litton can be considered and dealt with locally.\n\n5. In the latter part of his letter Mr. Litton refers to certain claims of the Ming Kwang, Headman to country along the N'Maikha, and even to the west of the N'Maikha. It is no doubt in connection with these claims that the Chinese have made incursions from time to time into the N'Maikha tract. Particulars of these incursions are given in Chapter VI of Captain Holloway's \"Report on the Country East of the N'Maikha, &c., 1901.\" Mr. Litton suggests that these claims should be disposed of by a money payment, or by concessions in connection with the delimitation of the frontier. As the Lieutenant-Governor is aware, there are no valid grounds for admitting the claims referred to by Mr. Litton. In paragraph 3 of their despatch, dated the 14th June, 1900, to the Secretary of State, the Government of India pointed out that China had never exercised control in the valley of the N'Maikha, and they advised against the admission of such claims. In the Lieutenant-Governor's opinion this attitude should be adhered to.\n\nSo far\n\n6. If the Chinese claims to which Mr. Litton refers should be admitted, the Lieutenant-Governor advises that whatever concession may be made should take the form of a money payment. There would be little use in offering concessions in the Wa country, because the demarcation of the frontier in that locality has been suspended indefinitely, and, in view of the practical difficulties of the work, is not likely to be resumed at an early date. The Lieutenant-Governor is altogether opposed to Mr. Litton's second alternative. Such a line as he suggests would insert a wedge of China into British territory, and in view of the notorious inability of the Chinese to maintain order among the Kachins, would render any satisfactory administration of the country north of the N'Maikha a permanent impossibility. This country has not yet been brought under administration, but the necessity to administer it may arise at any time. The difficulties of administration would be immensely increased if a belt of territory belonging to China traversed the tract. This belt would certainly become an Alsatia in which lawless characters would take refuge, and from which they would raid into British territory on each side.\n\n7. At the end of his letter Mr. Litton makes suggestions regarding the constitution of a Boundary Commission in the event of such a Commission being appointed. As he is opposed to the appointment of a Boundary Commission, the Lieutenant-Governor considers it unnecessary to remark on this part of Mr. Litton's letter at present.\n\n8. Finally, Mr. Litton proposes that a small joint survey expedition should be dispatched to survey the country between the N'Maikha and the mountains on the east.\n\n5\n\nThis proposal is open to the same objection as the proposal to appoint a Boundary Commission—namely, that owing to the nature of the country and of its inhabitants, a survey could not be executed without the support of a large escort, nor otherwise than at great expense.\n\nI have, &c.\n\nC. G. BAYNE, Chief Secretary.\n\n(Signed)\n\nInclosure 8 in No. 1.\n\nActing Consul-General Litton to Government of Burmah.\n\nYünnan-fu, February 1, 1903.\n\nI HAVE the honour to submit a copy of a Memorandum on the undelimited frontier which I have prepared for His Majesty's Minister.\n\nDuring a recent journey from Chien Chuan to Têngyüeh by a direct route, I have had some special opportunities of conversing with the officials and people; respectfully urge upon your Government the advisability of taking up this question at as early a date as possible. Even now I anticipate that it will be a matter of serious difficulty to secure a satisfactory frontier by peaceful negotiations, and every season's delay will greatly increase that difficulty. I would also venture to call special attention to the improbability of a Boundary Commission, similar to those appointed in previous seasons, achieving any satisfactory result,\n\nInclosure 9 in No. 1.\n\nMemorandum by Acting Consul-General Litton on the Undelimited Frontier between Burmah and Yunnan.\n\nFROM the point of view of demarcation, the country to the north of Manung Pun, the most northerly point of the present delimited frontier, presents some obvious features of difference from the country to the south, which has been already demarcated. To the south, with the exception of the Wa hills, the ancient rights of China and Burmah were conterminous or overlapping; that the territories of certain Chiefs belonged either to China or Burmah was known, and the work of the Commissioners consisted in defining, field by field, or village by village, the limits of those territories. But to the north there is a wide tract of almost unknown country, which has never been brought under control either from the Indian or the Chinese side, and to which, on the ground of actual jurisdiction, Burmah can put forward no claims and China only very shadowy claims.\n\nSecondly, the geographical features of this northern undelimited region are of a very special character: four great rivers, the Irrawaddy (east or N'Maikha branch), the Salween, the Mekong, and the Yangtse, flow south parallel to each other. In the latitude of Wei Hsi (about 27° north) a line 100 miles long, or less than two degrees of longitude, would cover all four; great mountain ranges, rising to many thousands of feet above them, divide the narrow basins of these rivers, leaving very little open country.\n\nSo far as is known the Kachins do not appear to extend east into the Upper Salween basin, which, north of approximate latitude 26° 10′ north, is inhabited by Lisaws, who stretch across the Mekong basin and mingle with the Chinese, Semi-Thibetan, and Minchia population on the east of that river.\n\nTo the north of Tengyueh, and to the east of Manung Pun, the Chinese population is thick in the valleys of Ku Yung and Tienyang, which are subject to Tengyueh, though Tien-Tang also has a hereditary Headman or \"tu'ssu\" named Liu; further to the north-east is Ming Kwang with a \"tu'ssu\" named Tso, subject to Têngyüeh; the head of the family was killed in the Hparé affair. On the east of Ming Kwang Valley is the valley of Kai To'u, which extends as far north as Ta T'ang, one day's journey north of Kai To'u market, where there is a petty civil official subordinate to Têngyüeh, but no “tu'ssu.”\n\nTien Tang \"pa'tzu,\" or valley, is on the upper waters of the T'aiping, or Ta Ho River, as it is called, above Ku Yung. Ming Kwang and Kai To'u Valleys are each\n\nPage 48", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-326 - Foreign Office - 1904.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 394715, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-326 - Foreign Office - 1904", "page_number": 52, "title": "CO129-326 - Foreign Office - 1904", "content_text": "likely to be able to fulfil her duty to her neighbour, if that duty is to keep in order a wide tract of country inhabited by wild tribes.\n\nI would, therefore, suggest that it may be worth while to make a strong effort to secure the Salween-water parting (Frontier No. 1). I doubt if the Chinese Foreign Office knows or cares much about the frontier of Yunnan, which it would be inclined to regard as a local question. The previous Treaty, as a glance at the text will show, seems to have been based almost wholly on information supplied by Burma, and as the Chinese Boundary Commissioners are appointed locally, the idea seems to be that if the Provincial Government does not like the Treaty signed by the central authorities, it can give its Commissioners instructions at variance with that instrument, which was, in fact, done in 1899-1900 respecting the Wa country. The possibility of inducing Prince Ching to grant the line proposed as Frontier No. 1 can only be judged by His Majesty's Minister; but, if it is possible, it is the best solution of the question.\n\nIn any case, a frontier running criss-cross over the rivers and up and down the mountains, which Nature seems to have set as the natural frontier between two neighbours in this part of the world, would, I submit, be a great error. Besides, it would probably take years, great expense, and much fighting to delimit.\n\nAnother reason which Burma may reasonably give for declining to appoint a Boundary Commission on the same lines as in previous seasons is the treatment which the last of such Commissions received at the hands of the Yunnan Government. I do not wish to rake up old scandals unnecessarily, but I may recall that in the season of 1899-1900 the Chinese Commissioners, evidently under orders from Yunnan, put forward and obstinately maintained a gross forgery as the map which they alleged to have been signed by Lord Rosebery and Hsieh, Chinese Minister in London. The forgery was so clumsy that a well-known place like Thibaw was shown as far on the east of the Salween, and the map actually professed to lay down part of the French frontier. This map was concocted in Yunnan, and probably represented local ideas of what the frontier ought to be, quite apart from what the Treaty said it was to be; now, after the Hparé affair in February 1900, the Têngyüeh officials put forward a rough map of what they claimed as the frontier in the undelimited district, showing a line along the N'Maikha. Thus, we know that such a document as a Chinese map of part of the undelimited frontier does exist. I think it is a safe prophecy that if a Boundary Commission on the former lines is appointed, that document will be put forward by the Chinese Commissioners as the only authentic map of the frontier, quite irrespective of what the Treaty may have laid down, and that the labours of the Commission will therefore be foredoomed to failure if the Treaty and the Chinese map do not agree.\n\nThe Chinese claim at the very least to come over the range on the north-west of Ming Kwang Valley and down to the N'Maikha River; this claim, as the Têngyüeh officials have told me, is based on certain alleged rights of the Headman of Ming Kwang Valley, which is undoubtedly Chinese; but if, as I learn, the west slope of the range referred to is inhabited by Kachins, the control exercised over them by a petty Headman is likely to be very shadowy, and, indeed, such control is not admitted to exist by the Kachins concerned; on the other hand, so far as the exercise of the actual jurisdiction is concerned, Burma can, I suppose, put forward even less a priori claim to this tract, and her rights are based rather on geographical and ethnological grounds. Nor is it clear how far north the Ming Kwang Headman at present claims to go up the N'Maikha. On the east side of the range, on the east bank of that river, they do not go very far, nor at present beyond the headwaters of the Shweli; but if, as I am informed, the Ming Kwang men have salt wells on the Upper N'Maikha, they will probably claim to go a long way.\n\nThe difficulty respecting this strip of country between the N'Maikha and mountain range to the west of it is not merely the fact that the Ming Kwang Headman has claims, but that those claims will be strongly supported by the local officials and by the Têngyüeh gentry, who have a heavy interest in the opium-smuggling industry. It is safe to say that the great majority of the Chinese who pass the N'Maikha do so either to smuggle opium into Burma via the jade mines, or to meddle in Kachins' tribal disputes, which do not properly concern them. No matter what may be laid down in a Treaty, I doubt if any locally-appointed Chinese Commissioner would venture to assign this strip of territory to Burma in demarcation.\n\nIf my views meet with assent, I would venture to mention two possible means of compromise:\n\n(1) The alleged rights of the Ming Kwang Headman along the banks of the N'Maikha might, if substantiated, be bought off by a rent or money payment, with the possible addition of concessions to Chinese views in the Wa country, which, I venture to assert, is of far less importance to us than this northern question. The Wa Hills are likely always to be a natural buffer, and such through trade as may grow up in this part of Yunnan will flow either north of the Wa Hills, past Kunlong, or south of them, by Meng Ma and Meng Lem. I am persuaded that in the future there may be important lines of communication between Assam and Burma on the one side, and Wei Hsi, Li Chiang, and Tibet on the other.\n\n(2) The Chinese might be permitted to come down to the N'Maikha a little above N'Sentaru, follow up the river for a short distance, and the line might then be taken east, up one of the east tributaries of the N'Maikha, back on to the main Salween water-parting. The objections to what I have styled Frontier No. 2 would not be removed, but they would be greatly lessened by this expedient.\n\nIf the views now submitted do not meet with approval, and it is decided again to lay down a skeleton frontier in a Treaty to be demarcated on the spot by a Commission, I should wish to call attention to the following points:\n\n(1) A good deal of difficulty has been caused in former cases by the Yunnan provincial authorities not having been sufficiently consulted in the Treaty negotiations: I would point out that a Consular officer of high rank is now to be stationed at Yunnan-fu, and would suggest that if negotiations cannot be wholly transferred to the provincial capital, that at least some preliminary arrangement should be come to between the Government of India, the Consul-General, and the Yünnan Viceroy before a Treaty is signed in Peking or London.\n\n(2) I would avoid as far as possible the insertion in the Treaty of the names of Chinese districts or dependencies, i.e., if it is said that the boundary shall follow line A, giving State B to China, the limits of State B will promptly be extended by the imagination of the Chinese Commissioners far beyond the line A, and serious, perhaps unnecessary, difficulty be caused.\n\n(3) I would, as far as possible, and save where positions have been accurately fixed, leave out latitudes and longitudes in the text of any Agreement which may be made. These mysterious figures, unknown to the orthodox classics, excite the utmost suspicion on the part of a Chinese official, and make him think that he is being cheated.\n\n(4) The Chinese should be limited to one Commissioner, or at least to one with each party, if the Commission is divided into more than one section. To have two Chinese Commissioners more than doubles all difficulties and obstructions, as they are more occupied in trying to trip each other up than in attending to the business in hand. It must be remembered that the position of a Chinese Commissioner is a precarious one; I believe that after each season of the Burma-China Commission the officials so employed have been exposed to damaging accusations and impeachments by their enemies.\n\n(5) Finally, I would submit that this question ought to be taken up as soon as possible. It will entail expense and probably the establishment of posts on the British side, but the longer it is delayed the heavier will be the cost, and the more difficult it will be to secure the interest of Burma. It might be supposed that as India is a very living, and China a very decaying, empire, we should have everything to gain by delay; but I am convinced that this is not the case.\n\nThe Chinese have been nearer to the debatable line than India for many years, and if the Chinese Government is decrepit, the Chinese people increase like rabbits, in Yunnan as elsewhere; while India has no surplusage of population pressing upon the frontier of the territory in question. Time will therefore ripen and strengthen the Chinese claims.\n\nIn view of the special difficulties surrounding this question, it may be thought advisable to get a complete map and more accurate information than is now possessed of the country which will have to be divided between India and China. In this connection, I think relations between Burma and Yunnan are now of a sufficiently satisfactory character to justify hopes of good results from a small joint survey expedition to be accompanied by a picked escort and only one or two officials of both Governments, who would have instructions to map and report upon a fixed portion of the country—to avoid, say, the strip between the N'Maikha and mountains to the east of it. To avoid misunderstandings with the Chinese, it would be necessary to issue clear instructions that the officers of the expedition had no authority to decide a boundary, but only to map and report.\n\nIf and when the Government of India considers that the time has come to take up this question, I would suggest that negotiations be commenced by a statement on the part of India addressed to the Peking Government per His Majesty's Minister, and to...\n\n[2260 au-]\n\n-1]\n\nD\n\n50", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-326 - Foreign Office - 1904.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 395561, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-327 - Individuals - 1904", "page_number": 105, "title": "CO129-327 - Individuals - 1904", "content_text": "102\n\na forgery but no evidence was adduced before the Full Court proving the truth of this suggestion.\n\nThe result of the Appeal was that the Full Court reversed the decision of the Land Court saying that probably the Respondent had fishing rights but nothing more.\n\nWe respectfully submit for your consideration that the facts above recorded are such as to support very strongly the Appeal which on behalf of our clients Messieurs E. S. Kelly and Ellis Kelly, we now respectfully make to you with a view to their obtaining satisfactory compensation for the loss and damage which they have sustained and the costs and expenses which they have been put to in the matter.\n\nIn support of this we particularly refer you to the facts which we have mentioned above in connection with the correspondence of Messieurs Deacon and Hastings as Solicitors for the Vendors with the Colonial Secretary, wherein the Colonial Secretary distinctly assured Messieurs Deacon and Hastings that the Crown Lease would be issued in due course.\n\nIt has never been suggested that our clients were parties to any fraud or other species of deception on the Land Court.\n\nWe call your attention to the fact that the Judgment\n\n-18-\n\nA", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-327 - Individuals - 1904.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 396943, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-329 - Governor Nathan - 1905 [7-12]", "page_number": 237, "title": "CO129-329 - Governor Nathan - 1905 [7-12]", "content_text": "# Jungl W \n\nHon. Colonial Secretary, C.O. 234/35429 Hud 4/00.05)\n\nIn my opinion Messrs. Kelly have no claim, legal or moral, to be paid anything by this Government. The letter from the Colonial Secretary dated 14th July, 1902, upon which they rely, was not written until 2 years after they had entered into the agreement to buy from Ho Lap Pun the land which he subsequently, by \"forgery and perjury\", induced the Land Court to declare to be his; the last of the 8 payments on account of purchase money was paid more than a month before the letter was written, and nothing was paid subsequently. The assertion that on receipt of the Colonial Secretary's letter of 14th July, 1902, Messrs. Kelly might properly have been advised to complete the purchase can surely have no bearing on their claim:\n\n1. because no respectable firm of Solicitors could have advised completion, in the sense of payment of the balance of purchase money, before the actual issue of a Crown Lease by the Governor to Ho Lap Pun had taken place;\n\n2. because as a fact, nothing was paid by Messrs. Kelly after the 9th June, 1902, five days before the date of the Colonial Secretary's letter, while it is audaciously suggested, if not actually asserted, that the letter caused Messrs. Kelly to act to their prejudice.\n\nThere has never been, from first to last, any privity between this Government and Messrs. Kelly. If the latter are entitled to compensation for loss occasioned by the fraudulent act of Ho Lap Pun in agreeing to sell them land which did not belong to him, the remedy lies in proceeding against him and him only.\n\nAt the time (14th July, 1902) when the Colonial", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-329 - Governor Nathan - 1905 [7-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 396944, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-329 - Governor Nathan - 1905 [7-12]", "page_number": 238, "title": "CO129-329 - Governor Nathan - 1905 [7-12]", "content_text": "235 \n\nColonial Secretary's letter was written the Government was unaware of the fact (subsequently established on appeal before the full Court) that the decision of the Land Court had been obtained by Ho Lap Fun in his favour by \"perjury and forgery\" and intended to issue in due course the Crown Lease necessary to give effect to the decision of the Land Court, but becoming possessed very shortly afterwards of evidence of fraud the Government refused the lease and appealing to full Court had the Land Court decision set aside on the grounds I have stated. How can facts such as these establish a claim on the part of the Kellys against the Government ? \n\n31st August, 1905. \n\n**(Sd.) H. S. Berkeley**", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-329 - Governor Nathan - 1905 [7-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 396979, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-329 - Governor Nathan - 1905 [7-12]", "page_number": 273, "title": "CO129-329 - Governor Nathan - 1905 [7-12]", "content_text": "## 270\n\nIt attempts to deprive the United States of trade by intimidation and duress of those who would otherwise be willing traders with the United States. The citizens of the United States under the treaties between the United States and China have the right to insist that the police authorities of China shall suppress such intimidation and allow the trade which was guaranteed to be unrestricted by the Government to continue unrestricted. I need not say to you, as I have said in the United States, and I think it greatly better that one hundred Chinamen during the year shall evade the law, though coolies, than that intelligent Chinese gentlemen, merchants and students, who wish to visit the United States, or to do business there, should be harassed in their attempt to enter the United States by measures subjecting them to discomfort, inconvenience, contumely and insult, and I do not hesitate to say that the influence of President Roosevelt's administration will be thrown toward a protection of the rights of these classes.\n\nOf course the best place to determine what a man's status is, whether he is a coolie, merchant or student is at his own home, and the disposition and tendency of the President is to make the certificate of the American Consul in China the strongest and most conclusive evidence upon this subject unless fraud or forgery appear.\n\nThe attitude of the United States toward China in political or international matters, I am sure I need not reiterate. It is that of friendliness and sympathy and an earnest desire to aid China in her effort to become more strictly a nation and to aid her toward the development of her immense resources.\n\nTo this the senior Chinese Member of the Legislative Council, Hon. Dr. Ho Kai responded that he and his colleagues concurred with Mr. Taft in his description of the evil tendencies of the boycott, but they did not in any way by that statement mean to express a lack of sympathy...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-329 - Governor Nathan - 1905 [7-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 396981, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-329 - Governor Nathan - 1905 [7-12]", "page_number": 275, "title": "CO129-329 - Governor Nathan - 1905 [7-12]", "content_text": "#yeria Jnergbul etd nå ton crew woded boe sotemmod to \nZrguonid oli ex,@idlugog 11 refied tul saw ↑1 suit bus taul \nJduob cu evsel bluow dolɗw notsivib s siam of \n\nGOW 31 \n\nTOWAI SE♪ gnioroine Istoitte end to balm orið at vedli÷ \n-be rot viqqs of vrtnwoo two ald gnivsel nament:D sáð to \n.eefa32 beðinŰ odt of notuuken- \n\nJadi golyse yd „bemuset nord fax oH .* .nok \nnauding end TO% \n\n\" \n\nFPOLE MZR Y enaçom wwɔu£ qu‡ueze melojwuça' \nsist of,aevil (wo vied♪ broyed mit sdt gatunijnoo to \nfennos7sq sdi to drag a na notata betinʊ sdt otai ment Kikw \nbinow ofw andetag to ‚æðrataisna qoda „raenteuď riedt to \ns to econizud edt at nemmefør bra adxelo od baoquetioD \nedd diłw two nedaj staw odw‚esiste betinʊ erit to trado TOM \n\nTajne,¿iguone sonaiisque gnivad refta „tifneupsedus to sebi \nbina eri • nem domā verontraq paimooed bna miit sdt gak- \n‚uselo quodsi odt od gnoled ton bib bna zelloos ton sreW \nS190) BeiJub Tiedt to egradselb sat ni earvoo to dzvodģis \nuboog galwoda to Jadd as ‚ætulnoq of nuodsi launsa smoa BAY \nbisɛ fist .M .039 、*ovieda ent no dosd medt galttuq to \n& usowded notionltelb xaefo a caw stedt Zdiguorið að tærið \n‚enoje a'jnsdorem a ni nemelas to drelo a bus retuodai \nto notevioxs me of nolfostɗo on was viisnorreg od tadi bna \nblow ad tadt ;rerodal to notitatteb erit mort ssalo a douɛ \n.Jnebine¬¶ ed♪ to moltelja end of redtem eldt goind \n.broom) \n\nSecond. \n\nHon. Dr. Ho Kai said that he thought the certificate of the Consul ought to be final except in case of fraud or forgery. Mr. Taft said that personally he concurred in this view and that the proclamation of the President tended strongly in that direction; that of course the corruption which had heretofore existed had been an obstacle in the way of giving the certificate of the Consuls the weight that ought really to attach to them, but in view of the steps already referred to, he thought that the tendency of Congress and the President would be toward giving much more weight than had heretofore attached to the certificate of the American Consular Officers in China. \n\nThird. \n\nHon. Dr. Ho Kai called attention to the fact that there were quite a number of merchants and students who were subjects of Great Britain, in Hongkong Colony and in the Straits Settlements; that there were others who were citizens of the Republic of France in Tonkin and Saigon, and that there still others who were citizens of the Kingdom of Holland in the Dutch East Indies; he said that these were gentlemen of wealth and education, who did not visit America because they would not accept the humiliation of being subjected to the necessity of producing a certificate, but he thought that all the security would be given to the United States that it ought to require by a passport describing their status as merchants or students and as subjects or citizens of their respective Governments, vised by the proper American Consul; that this would affect a very few persons; would be entirely safe, so far as the United States was concerned, because the United States might depend implicitly on the honesty of the Government Officials vised by the proper American Consul; and yet the change by which they should be allowed to come in under a passport would be most gratifying.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-329 - Governor Nathan - 1905 [7-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 403656, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-331 - Public Offices - 1905", "page_number": 565, "title": "CO129-331 - Public Offices - 1905", "content_text": "# Inclosure 2 in No. 1.\n\n## The Marquess of Lansdowne to Signor Carignani.\n\n**Sir,**\n\nForeign Office, August 7, 1903. I HAVE the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your note of the 30th ultimo, informing me of the desire of the Italian Government to come to an arrangement with His Majesty's Government for the mutual protection of British and Italian trade-marks in China, and stating that any claim which English manufacturers may have to present to His Italian Majesty's Consuls and Consular Tribunals in China, in order to obtain protection for trade-marks, duly registered in the Kingdom of Italy, as against Italian subjects, will henceforward be adjudicated, in the first instance, by the Consular Tribunals, and, in the last instance, by the Court of Appeal at Ancona.\n\nIn reply to your inquiry whether Italian subjects will be able to invoke the same legal protection in China, on the part of the English Consular authorities, in all that concerns their property in trade-marks duly registered in Great Britain, I have the honour to state that, under the Order in Council of the 2nd February, 1899, it is open to an Italian whose trade-mark has been infringed by a British subject in China to take proceedings against the latter in the British Court, provided that the consent in writing of His Majesty's Minister or Chargé d'Affaires be obtained to the prosecution. Such consent, however, may be withheld if His Majesty's Minister or Chargé d'Affaires is not satisfied that effectual provision exists for the punishment in the Italian Consular Court of Italian subjects infringing British trade-marks.\n\nA copy of your note will be sent to His Majesty's Chargé d'Affaires at Peking, and Mr. Townley's attention will be called to the statements contained in it as to the competence in such matters of the Italian Consular Courts.\n\nI have, &c.\n\n**(Signed) LANSDOWNE.**\n\n# Inclosure 3 in No. 1.\n\n## Signor Pansa to the Marquess of Lansdowne.\n\n**(Translation.) My Lord,**\n\nItalian Embassy, London, October 9, 1903. THE substance of your note of the 7th August respecting the reciprocal protection of British and Italian trade-marks in China was duly communicated to the Royal Ministry for Foreign Affairs. The Ministry has now commissioned me to communicate to your Lordship a copy of the instructions (with inclosures) sent by the Royal Government to their Representatives in China for the proper application of the Italian Law to Italian forgers of trade-marks, which have been properly registered, and belong to subjects of Great Britain and of the other States with whom an agreement has been made.\n\nI inclose a copy of the documents in question, and have, &c.\n\nMoreover, the Royal Consuls should observe how Articles 296 and 297 of the penal code establish, in the case of an infringement of a mark, penalties different from those sanctioned by the Special Law.\n\nIt is advisable that the Consuls should remember the principle of jurisprudence, according to which, in deciding the question of infringement, one should, rather than examine minutely the analogies and differences to be found in the two marks, ask oneself if the public, for whose consumption is destined the merchandise stamped with the mark which forms the subject of complaint, might be deceived and induced to mistake one mark for the other.\n\nIt is also understood that the protection in question includes both industrial and commercial trade-marks, in accordance with the Law of the 30th August, 1868, and that not only the manufacturers but all nationals of the countries which are parties to the recent Agreement can have redress against infringement of marks properly registered.\n\n**(Signed) PANSA.**\n\n# Inclosure 4 in No. 1.\n\n## Instructions as to the application of Consular Jurisdiction to the Controversies respecting the Protection of Trade-marks in China.\n\n**(Translation.)**\n\nTHE Law to be applied in the settlement of cases of infringement of trade-marks committed by Italian citizens is that of the 30th August, 1868, of which a copy is inclosed, together with a copy of the Regulations issued under that Law. A copy is also inclosed of the Law sanctioning the Madrid Agreement of the 17th April, 1891, for the international registration of trade-marks.\n\nAccording to this Agreement, the trade-marks registered for international purposes at Berne by the Administration of the country of origin have a right to protection in all the States which have adhered to the Agreement. Hence, a certificate given by the Berne Bureau, resulting in the international registration of the mark, can be accepted without objection on the part of Italy, in lieu of an Italian certificate registering the mark in dispute.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-331 - Public Offices - 1905.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 406122, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-336 - Governor Nathan & Public Offices - 1906 [11-12]", "page_number": 97, "title": "CO129-336 - Governor Nathan & Public Offices - 1906 [11-12]", "content_text": "the affixing of Signatures by stamp and its legal validity\n\nunless there is a statutory direction applying to the direction in which the signature is affixed.\n\nThere having been some murmur in which the signature is affected.\n\nI don't know whether this wording is correct, if it does, I presume R.E. that it is not his own 'statutory direction' within the meaning of the signature. I ask him to send copies of stamped signatures to see if they correspond with the original.\n\nIt appears that the stamped signatures have been authenticated in the same hand-writing. Explain that we understand why the stamp is being used for this purpose, although there may be some objection to its admissibility in evidence due to the signature being stamped.\n\nReference is made to Section 7 of the Evidence Act 1851, which states that the seal of the Colony (and not the person's signature) is the thing that is being attested to - so far as evidence is concerned.\n\nWith regard to rubber-stamp signatures, we recently had a case referred to the L.O. in the Tuan case (I think) where Sir R. Solomon's signature was on a rubber stamp on a certificate of naturalization, and forgery was suspected, although it was ultimately deemed to be authentic.\n\nThe opportunity was taken to officially raise this issue in a despatch, although this obligation does not, of course, apply in this case.\n\nI do not recall what the L.O. reported on the above case (or if I saw it at all), but in case it is relevant, reference is made to the L.O. The Tuan case is not directly in point.\n\nThe proposed amendment made by Collins was agreed upon by Stubbs on 29/12.\n\nBy the time this paper is finally dealt with, Sir W. Nathan will probably have done enough business to...\n\nI think that this practice should be disallowed.\n\nIt is presumed that the use of rubber-stamp signatures has not been generally objected to by those who might be affected.\n\nJAR, 26/12\n\nI presume that the reason civil servants object to taking over the fund is due to misconceptions that have prevailed in other colonies, which have been answered by despatch 13916/137127 in the Straits.\n\nPage 19\n\nMarch 5 Dodd, with Sirk Winey firld, because under See 7 of the Evidence Act 1851...\n\n...\n\nPage 92\n\n...\n\nBag/12 or at least not sanctioned at present, no reason is given why the...\n\n \nXCR(85)72\n\nGR1178/1922/32(III)", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-336 - Governor Nathan & Public Offices - 1906 [11-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 407336, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-337 - Public Offices & Foreign Office - 1906", "page_number": 632, "title": "CO129-337 - Public Offices & Foreign Office - 1906", "content_text": "to raise funds; at the end of which time, if he cannot sell it at current market rates to pay the duty, and the merchant will lose money. If the office collecting the tax is not situated where ready money is easily obtainable, notes issued by any neighbouring town will be accepted in payment within one month at par.\n\n14. Opium which has been passed under an \"eight-province certificate\" prior to the date on which the new Regulations come into force must report to the offices or barriers, where it will be stamped. All such opium must be completely disposed of within three months from the date of stamping. Opium intended for places beyond the eight-province area will similarly report to the nearest barrier for examination, and shall, in addition to the taxes already paid, pay under the new Regulations a sum sufficient to make up the total tax to 115 taels, when a certificate will be issued. Such opium must be sold within a month; after that period, it will be liable to pay the whole duty in order to guard against fraud. No special documents will be issued in the case of this opium.\n\n15. Opium unprovided either with label (\"yin hua\") or certificate is, according to the new Regulations, liable to confiscation. If, however, the merchant makes tender of the duty to the office, and if on inquiry into the origin of the opium it is found that he has no intention to defraud, such payment will be accepted. But if discovered taking a devious route in order to avoid an office, and the merchant comes to declare it, he shall not be allowed to make good the tax, and the opium will be confiscated.\n\n16. The collective tax is intended primarily to be levied on raw opium. Should it be found that prepared opium is transported in any quantity, steps must be taken to tax it. Merchants may carry for personal use not more than 10 oz. of prepared opium, or opium refuse not more than 20 oz. Any excess weight must be taxed and will pay duty as follows: 1 catty prepared opium to equal 2 catties raw opium; 2 catties opium ash to equal 1 catty raw. Such opium will be labelled, but will not receive a certificate. Smuggled opium will be totally confiscated.\n\n17. Barriers have in the past treated adulterated and spurious opium with leniency, thus encouraging fraudulent practices. In future such opium shall pay according to the Tariff, and shall not benefit by any reduction. Adulterated opium discovered without label or certificate shall be confiscated, and the proceeds devoted to rewards.\n\n18. If merchants are taxed it is very necessary that they should be protected. If opium merchants are attacked en route and robbed of their money it is incumbent on the local authorities to arrest and punish their assailants. Should, in such cases, the local authorities sit still and do nothing, the matter should be reported to the branch office and the high authorities, who will make inquiries and award punishment where it is due.\n\nPage 11\n\n623\n\n19. Smugglers are people who band themselves together to defy the laws and evade taxation. Officials who display improper leniency towards them will render themselves equally guilty. Smuggling is a widespread evil in the country, and it not unfrequently happens that they are aided and abetted in their nefarious doing by yamên underlings and runners.\n\nAll such persons must be arrested and punished. The frequent comings and goings on a railway afford many opportunities for smuggling. Station-masters, guards, and such like persons are much addicted to conniving at smuggling. Smugglers forcibly resisting capture may be killed on the spot and no questions will be asked.\n\nInspectors have already been appointed to patrol the lines, and orders have been given to station reliable detectives at all offices whose duty it shall be to put a stop to smuggling.\n\n20. Cases have come to our notice where yamêns, both civil and military, have been guilty of malpractices. Let every one be careful not to expose himself to the penalties of the law. Under the new Regulations, officials who derive an income from the levy of unauthorized fees will be punished by dismissal.\n\nShould any officials, civil or military, be discovered enticing shopkeepers to refuse to pay these taxes and to close their shops, they shall be instantly degraded and cashiered. The offices for the administration of this universal scheme of collective taxation and barriers will be appointed to carry out the above Regulations.\n\nIf shopkeepers conspire with smugglers to sell opium which has evaded payment of duty and has not been labelled, their shops will be closed, themselves punished, and the opium confiscated.\n\nSpecial Proclamation, published for general information, Kuang Hsü, 32nd year, 5th moon, 25th day (16th June, 1906).\n\n21. All labels, certificates, Customs certificates, duty-paid memoranda, labels, &c., shall be stamped with official seals. Any person found counterfeiting these seals shall be punished under the law governing the forgery of official seals.\n\n22. It constantly happens that officials when travelling both by land and by water have their boxes full of smuggled opium which has evaded payment of its dues. Such conduct shows the offenders to be entirely lacking in self-respect. Henceforth officials when travelling are enjoined to be most careful to prevent their suite from smuggling opium, even on the smallest scale.\n\nShould any be found guilty of the above-mentioned offence, the whole of the smuggled opium will in the first place be confiscated, and, in the second place, the names of the offenders will be taken and they will be suitably punished. In such cases office deputies must on no account let friendship stand in the way of justice.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-337 - Public Offices & Foreign Office - 1906.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 409236, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "page_number": 302, "title": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "content_text": "instructed Tompson to forward the views of Counsel who advised that the decision of the Land Court should be appealed against, and that the Government should obtain powers by legislation to appeal to the Supreme Court.\n\nThese powers were obtained by Ordinance No. 13 of 1903. In August 1903, leave was granted to the Government to appeal. Hongkong Land Investment and Agency Company Limited, to whom the Ku Fat Shan property had been assigned, then applied to be parties to the appeal, but on 23 Nov 1903, the Supreme Court refused their application; the opposition having \"crumbled away\".\n\nOn 4 January 1904, the Supreme Court allowed the Government's appeal and reversed the decision of the Land Court, finding that the deed of 1883, on which the whole claim rested, was a forgery.\n\nKu Fat Shan and the Executrixes of Tong Wai Chim have since been appealing to the Hongkong Government for compensation on the grounds (a) that the 1883 deed had been duly registered by the Chinese magistrate of the Sun On District; (b) that petitioners were innocent purchasers for value.\n\nIn the present petition to the Secretary of State, they also lay some weight on the allegation that by Lockhart's letter of Feb 1902, the Government by implication promised to grant relief.\n\nAs to (a), the Govt has not the evidence of the Chinese magistrate that the deed and the registration deed upon it are not forgeries; the \"deed\" is also missing. The tax receipt, while showing that taxes were paid on behalf of Yut Ying, does not, according to the Court's view, help the petitioners, for the only evidence connecting Yut Ying with Law Tak Luk (Lam Cheung Fuk's Seed) is the 1883 deed which the Court found to be forged.\n\nMoreover, as regards the receipts for payment of taxes, there is nothing to show that they relate to the fishing rights in question. (2) It has been found that the fishing rights belonged to the Lam Clan of Sun On, and that Yut Ying never had power to sell the fishing rights of the clan.\n\nThe Govt has accordingly paid $1,400 to the Lam clan as compensation for all the fishing rights claimed by the clan in Kowloon City Bay.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 409246, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "page_number": 312, "title": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "content_text": "308\n\nmade, or hereafter to be made, on any claim in relation to land in the New Territories (other than a decision on a claim for compensation under Section 14 of the Principal Ordinance) in respect of which the Land Court shall certify that the value of the claim is over $5,000 or that there are special reasons why the case should be allowed to go to Appeal: such leave #may be granted whether the Crown was or was not represented before the said Land Court on the hearing of such claim, and pending such Appeal the Chief Justice may stay all proceedings arising directly or indirectly out of any decision on any such claim so appealed from.\" Immediately after the passing of the said Ordinance, proceedings were taken by the Government to Appeal from the Judgment of the Land Court above mentioned, and on the 25th day of August the Attorney General applied to the Full Court and obtained leave to Appeal: the Respondents to such Appeal being the above mentioned original Claimants Lam Tak Luk and Lam Cheung Fuk.\n\n23.\n\n24.\n\nIt may be noted at this point that Lam Tak Luk and Lam Cheung Fuk had parted with all their interest in the said property, and therefore had no interest in the Appeal whatever, and that the only persons interested in the result of the Appeal were, on the one side, the Government, and on the other side, the said Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Fai Shan as the then owners of the property.\n\n25.\n\nAccordingly on the 17th November 1903 the said Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Fai Shan through their Solicitors, filed in the Supreme Court, a Motion asking that they should be added as Respondents to the said Appeal. On the 23rd November 1903 the said Motion came before the Supreme Court, Mr. M. W. Slade appeared as Counsel for Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Fai Shan and the Attorney General and Mr. Sharp K.C. appeared for the Government. The request of Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Fai Shan to be added as parties to the Appeal was opposed by the Government and was refused by the Supreme Court consisting of the Chief Justice Sir William M. Goodman and His Honour Mr. Justice Wise, Puisne Judge. The Chief Justice however in giving his decision said that he did not wish to preclude any claims which Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Fai Shan might have upon the Government, but whatever happened in this case would not prevent them from taking action against the Government or anyone else they thought fit; and he declined at that stage to complicate the question they had to try as to whether the decision of the Land Court was a proper decision, by admitting them as Respondents.\n\n26.\n\nYour Petitioners submit that in giving this decision the Full Court lost sight of the fact that the nominal Respondents Lam Tak Luk and Lam Cheung Fuk had sold and parted with all their rights in respect of the land in question and had therefore no interest whatever in appearing and contesting the Appeal of the Crown. It would therefore appear that it was only the merest justice to allow Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Fai Shan, who were the only parties interested in the result, to appear and adduce whatever evidence and arguments were in their power in order to support the Judgment of the Land Court.\n\n27.\n\nThe Full Court however were of a different opinion and the natural result followed. On the 4th day of January 1904 the Appeal came on for hearing. It was practically undefended. One of the clients, Lam Tak Luk, appeared in person, but no Counsel appeared for the Respondents and no evidence was filed by them in opposition to the evidence filed on behalf of the Crown. The Full Court gave Judgment, allowing the Appeal and reversing the decision of the Land Court. The main ground of the decision of the Full Court was that the Deed dated the 10th day of January 1883 under which the Plaintiffs claimed their rights to the said ground was a forgery. It was however apparently never brought to the attention of the Court that the said deed, which was alleged to be a forgery, had in fact been registered in the Land Registry of the Magistrates Yamen of the Sun On District. The said deed was an Assignment\n\n-7-", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 409247, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "page_number": 313, "title": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "content_text": "7 \n\n309 \n\nAssignment of the land from Chim Yee() and Keng sui (1) descendants of Ancestor Lam Kwai Puk (†) to Lam Tak Luk and Lam Cheung Fuk the descendants of Ancestor Yut Ying (§). \n\nA number of tax receipts were put in and were before the Court on the hearing of the Appeal. These receipts, which extended from the 13th to the 24th years of Kwong Su (1887 to 1898), showed that the payer of tax was Yut Ying i.e. Lam Cheung Puk and Lam Tak Luk. Therefore, it is clear that the Assignment dated the 10th day of January 1883 was registered and recognised by the Chinese Authorities, and that taxes were received from the Assignees under such Assignment from the years 1887 to 1898. Under these circumstances, it is difficult to understand how the deed could be held to be a forgery. This point, however, was not referred to by those who represented the Government, and apparently escaped the notice of the Full Court. \n\n28. \n\nThe said Tong Wan Chiu died on the 27th February 1906, and Probate of his Will was on the 24th April 1906 granted unto your Petitioners Tong Tse Shi and Tong Chan Shi by the Supreme Court of Hongkong in its Probate Jurisdiction. \n\n29. \n\nYour Petitioners respectfully submit for Your Lordship's consideration that, under the circumstances, Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Fai Shan were amply justified in relying upon the Judgment of the Land Court, and in completing the purchase of the said property in reliance upon the said Judgment. \n\n30. \n\nYour Petitioners therefore humbly submit that, under the circumstances above related, they are entitled to compensation for the loss and damages which they have sustained and for the costs and expenses which they have been put to in this matter. \n\n31. \n\nYour Petitioners would point out that, whether there has been any fraud or not connected with the matter, it has never been suggested that Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Fai Shan were parties to any such fraud. When they completed their purchase, they simply relied on the Judgment of the Land Court, which was then indefeasible, and which, under the law, gave the claimants in the Land Court or their assigns a vested right either to a title to the land in question or, in the alternative, to compensation. \n\n32. \n\nYour Petitioners again beg to call Your Lordship's attention to the fact that the Judgment of the Land Court was delivered on the 4th day of December 1901; that Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Fai Shan did not complete the purchase of the property until the 29th day of December 1902; and that the Government of Hongkong took no steps to obtain a reversal of the Judgment of the Land Court until the month of August 1903. \n\n33. \n\nThe Government of Hongkong obtained the reversal of the Judgment of the Land Court by means of ex post facto legislation of a very belated type, and your Petitioners would humbly submit that it is an accepted principle of such legislation that it should not be allowed to prejudice or affect rights duly and properly acquired, or acts done in good faith, before the date of such legislation, and in reliance upon the law as it stood at the date when such rights were acquired or acts done. \n\n34. \n\nYour Petitioners have applied to the Government of Hongkong for compensation, but the said Government has refused to pay to your Petitioners any such compensation. \n\n35. \n\nThe following correspondence has passed between the Colonial Secretary and your Petitioners' Solicitors in the matter. \n\n\"No. 12/1902. \n\n\"Gentlemen, \n\n\"Colonial Secretary's Office, \n\"Hongkong, 28th March, 1907. \n\n\"I am directed to inform you that the Governor has carefully considered the Peti- \n-8 \ntion", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 409248, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "page_number": 314, "title": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "content_text": "310 \n\nThe reply of the Executrixes of Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Fai Shan, forwarded in your letter of the 12th instant, praying for compensation from this Government for losses sustained and expenses incurred in connection with the purchase by Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Fai Shan of certain property at Kowloon City from Lam Tak Luk and Lam Cheung Fuk, but that His Excellency is unable to accede to the prayer of the Petitioners.\n\n2. \n\nI am to point out to you that the allegation by the Petitioners that the deed dated the 10th of January, 1883, under which claim was made to the property, had in fact been registered in the Land Registry of the Magistrate's Yamen of the San On District and that this fact had not been brought to the notice of the Full Court, is entirely incorrect. \n\nA reference to the file in the Supreme Court will show that the Magistrate of the San On District made an affidavit on the 12th of December, 1903, to the effect inter alia that the deed referred to is a forgery and ought to be cancelled and that the seal upon it purporting to be the seal of the San On Magistrate is not in fact his.\n\n3. I am to add that if the Petitioners have suffered loss it is only such loss as a purchaser of property is liable to whose title deeds prove to be forgeries.\n\nI am, Gentlemen, \nYour obedient servant, \nH. May, \nColonial Secretary.\n\nHongkong, 11th April, 1907.\n\nWe beg to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated the 28th March, No. 12 of 1907, in reply to the Petition of our clients the Executrixes of Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Fai Shan, in which you inform us that His Excellency is unable to accede to the prayer of the Petitioners.\n\n2. \n\nIn reply to paragraph 2 of your letter, we are quite aware that an Affidavit of the Magistrate of the San On District was filed to the effect that, in his opinion, the deed of the 10th January 1883 was a forgery. We do not know how the Magistrate was induced to make such an Affidavit, but in any case it is common knowledge that Chinese Mandarins are notoriously corrupt and unprincipled, and any evidence by such a Mandarin must be received with the greatest suspicion, especially when the same is given by Affidavit, and is not subject to the usual test of cross-examination.\n\n3. \n\nWe think, however, you have not quite appreciated the point made in paragraph 27 of our clients' Petition in this matter. The point is as follows:- It is evident that the said deed of the 10th January 1883 (although stated by the Magistrate to be a forgery) had in fact been recognised and acted upon by the Chinese Authorities for many years past. This appears from documents which were put in on the hearing of the Appeal, namely, the receipts for taxes paid to the Chinese Government in respect of the Land in question. These receipts state that the payer of the tax was Yut Ying, the family name denoting Lam Tak Luk and Lam Cheung Fuk, the Purchasers and Assignees under the said deed of the 10th January 1883. These tax receipts extended from 1887 to 1898.\n\n-9- \n\n4.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 409249, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "page_number": 315, "title": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "content_text": "36.\n\n311\n\n14.\n\nIt is clear therefore that for at least 11 years the Chinese Government recognised \"Lam Tak Luk and Lam Cheung Fuk the Assignees under the said Deed by accepting payment of \"taxes from them.\n\n\"After having done so, how was it open to the Chinese Government in the year 1904 \"to turn round and allege that the said deed was a forgery\"\n\n15.\n\nWe repeat that these important facts, namely, as to the receipt of taxes for 11 years \"by the Assignees under the said deed of 10th January 1883, were not brought to the notice of \"the Full Court on the hearing of the Appeal, by those representing the Crown.\n\n16.\n\nIn fact the hearing of the Appeal was of a most perfunctory character. It was practically exparte. The Affidavits on the part of the Crown were merely read: there was no proper investigation or discussion of the facts or circumstances of the case, and the Judgment \"of the Land Court was reversed on what we submit was very insufficient grounds.\n\n17.\n\nThis only shows the radical injustice and unfairness of the exclusion of Tong Wan \"Chiu and Xu Fai Shan, who as pointed out in paragraph 24 of our clients' Petition, were the \"only persons interested in the result, from appearing on the Appeal, and stating and arguing \"their case before the Full Court.\n\n\"We have the honour to be, \"Sir, \"Your obedient servants, \"Hastings & Hastings.\n\n\"Hon: Mr. F. H. May, C. M. G. \"Colonial Secretary.\n\nP.S. We are instructed to bring the matter before the Secretary of State, and will shortly \"send you a Petition, which we will ask you to be good enough to forward. \"H & H.\"\n\nYour Petitioners forward herewith copies of the following documents mentioned above, namely,\n\n(1) Agreement dated 4th January 1901 mentioned in paragraph 1 hereof.\n\n(2) Assignment dated 3rd September 1902\n\n(3) Assignment dated 29th December 1902\n\n#\n\n#\n\n13\n\n15\n\n(4) Newspaper report of the application by Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Fai Shan to be added as respondents to the Appeal mentioned in paragraph 25 hereof.\n\n(5) Deed dated the 10th January 1883 mentioned in paragraph 27 hereof.\n\nWitness to the Signature of Tong The Shi and Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Fai Shan and to the marks of Tong Chan Shi\n\nYOUR PETITIONERS THEREFORE HUMBLY PRAY\n\nthat Your Lordship may direct due and proper compensation to be paid to your Petitioners for all losses and expenses incurred by them in connection with the matters aforesaid\n\nAND YOUR PETITIONERS will ever pray &c.\n\nDated the 12th day of April, 1907.\n\nC. J. Dyer\n\n-10-\n\nSolicitor Hong Kong\n\n吉輝山\n\n唐謝民\n\nmarks.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 409261, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "page_number": 327, "title": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "content_text": "323\n\nTak Luk, laid a claim to certain lands in the New Territories, and in the course of about a year, on 7th December 1901, the decision of the Land Court was given. The decision of the Land Court was in favour of the claim by these people and it was the duty of the Land Court if it allowed the claim under Section 14 to report that allowance by the Registrar to the Governor in order that the Governor in due course might order a title appropriate to the case to be granted, or else if he found it inexpedient to grant a title, to refer back to the Court to award compensation --- not to a number of assignees, but to the claimant or claimants.\n\nThe Crown was not represented at that hearing. And the Crown was in one sense the standing claimant to all the land there, because under section 1b of the Ordinance all the land was declared to be the property of the Crown except such property as persons shall have a claim to. It was discovered, or the Crown supposed they had discovered, that there had been some mistake in this decision of the Land Court owing, among other things, to the fact that one of the documents, a very important document, brought before the Land Court was alleged to be a forgery.\n\nHe was not saying for one second that this was the case; he had not the slightest means of knowing anything about it, but that was one of the reasons mentioned in the affidavit of Mr. Powley, the Crown Solicitor, filed on 24th August 1903. That affidavit contained the suggestion that one of the documents upon which the decision was obtained was a forgery.\n\nThe Attorney-General appeared before the Court on 25th August 1903 and was given leave to appeal, any doubt as to whether the Crown was bound by the meaning of the word \"claimant\" in the other Ordinance being set at rest by the fact that a special Ordinance had been passed (13 of 1903) which gave the Chief Justice...\n\n7.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 409262, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "page_number": 328, "title": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "content_text": "324\n\n4\n\nthe power en good cause shown to grant leave to the Attorney-General to appeal from my declaration to the full Court. Who have the free usu or is not represented before the Land Court, Iing to the what arent that the Counsellors for the applicants had not read the affidavit ordered to be made at the time the order was made, his Lordship said it seemed to him a very strange thing that where $480,000 were being claimed as compensation by their clients they should not have taken a trouble to read it.\n\nI must have been open to him on the files of the Court. Though they would have listened very intently to that application for leave to appeal, although it was short, if they knew it was relied on, and if they had read the affidavit they would have found there was a suggestion of forgery against one of the documents so long ago as August and on. Would 1870 though they would have lived without undue delay to be made respondents. The acceptance was soddenly (though not upon affidavit) was the firma of solicitors. He said in this affidavit but with his assistance of the world he could only say it was a very strange thing they should not have taken the trouble to read it, then much in no-teous of money was involved.\n\nDe Vos was inclined to think they ought to have acted before and were too late now; he thought they were out of time, there had been great deal of delay in making this application. But he did not decide the matter on that line, as the Court had to decide was whether the decision of the Land Court was proper and correct or not. Supposing the men who had got the recommendation of the value of their claim by the Land Court made application and the assignees were willing to consider and make another one to-morrow, the fact of a number of things happening some years afterwards could not affect the propriety.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 409263, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "page_number": 329, "title": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "content_text": "C \n\n325 \n\ner impropriety of the decision at the time it was given; and thus at the point on which they had to decide lies that decision should have been given and whether it could have been given if the Court had by then possession of the 31st February special and had not been deprived by some forged document. The documents as found most go to & for forgery that was vital to the plot. By posing the Court 2014 \n\nAbsthur & A & FITE.er could ably done year or two previously entitled them to be admitted in regard 166! He did not consider the plaintiffs are weak they might have urged the Government, but interfere, happened in this case, could not prevent them from taking action against the Government or anyone else they thought fit, and he declined to allow the question they had to lay as to whether the decision or the land Court was a proper decision, by adding Duke lots AB respondents.\n\n2. Pollock J. thought the application ought to be refused. It appeared to him to admit Olene 2; „licants 20 22 respondents would amplify the difficulty of coming to a decision on the question of whether the Land Court was right or wrong when they allowed this claim. At the time the Land Court gave their decision the applicants, so far as this house was concerned, were non-existent. He was of the opinion that the application was made merely to try to get a title out of the Court, which he was not inclined to do.\n\nThe application was dismissed with costs.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 409266, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "page_number": 332, "title": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "content_text": "Page 328\n\nThe petitioners allege that the main ground of the decision of the Full Court was that the deed dated 10th January, 1883, (Exhibit B), under which the plaintiffs (i.e. claimants) claim their rights to the ground, was a forgery.\n\nThey stated that it was, however, apparently never brought to the attention of the Court that the said deed had in fact been registered in the Land Registry of the Magistrate's Yamen of the Sun On District.\n\nThis statement of the Petitioners is absolutely incorrect as is shown by the affidavit on the file in the Supreme Court made by Yim Ming Kuk, then Magistrate of the Sun On District on the 12th December, 1903, in which he states, amongst other things, that this deed marked B is a forgery and ought to be cancelled and that the seal upon it (i.e. the seal purporting to be that of the Sun On Magistrate) is not the seal of the Sun On Magistracy.\n\nThe only evidence of the registration of this deed is the impression of the seal which the Magistrate, who had the custody of the genuine seal, declared to be a forgery. The \"Kai Ping\" or deed-end which should have been attached...\n\nZara. 27.\n\nHowever, they did not do this, but upon the rejection of their motion to be added as parties they left the appeal entirely in the hands of the claimants, who, being men of practically no means were unable to afford Counsel's fees, and consequently were not represented before the Full Court.\n\nAnother reason for the neglect of the claimants to defend the appeal might have been that they were afraid that the forgery and fraud in which they were implicated might be discovered.\n\nForgery of Deed.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 409267, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "page_number": 333, "title": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "content_text": "329\n\nyfregorg need bad yard ‚ć‡ I\n\nnexet even binow yert Holdw\n\n.beelvbe\n\nI8VOWO!!\n\ne\n\nTS ATAS\n\nattached to the deed if it had been really registered in the\n\nMagistracy was not produced, and the claimants stated that it\n\nhad been lost.\n\n#\n\nodd moqu Judæla‡ ob ton bib yedi\n\neild 4 ceft zeltmaq es beħba ed of nottom risdd to moldoster\n\nfernteď odw,etnamiaio eft to aband sit ni viszións Isenga (anet e'foamiob brotts of eidam etew 8 sem on vfIkoldustq to theo [[:t end eroteď bejuezarger ton enow yiinsupeeпoo bas\n\nart to toeinen edt 70\" Noeker TedtonA\n\n91ow vod: Jerit need over triyim Iseqqe snið hneteb of atnambalo botastiqmt grow vedd dotdw ni buat↑ bna rennot edit Jørð bleytB\n\n.betevooaib ed dint\n\n.bes to VYBRTOP\n\nbareto ater erit tødt egalis etenofildəq 97\n\n01 betah basb and defit asw job fur and to noteloob sa to\n\n...I) altijmrisiq ərit dołów rebnu,{@ +istrx?) 8881 , YTSunaï\n\nbus, 1977ot a new,bшmore ads of atrial\" \"tant misio (atnemielo\n\nof demond zaver vitnetzqqe TOYSWON\n\n€\n\nBAW fi Jant batata vend\n\nnoed doet rt her! beeb biss erit tard to sit to molinetta erit\n\nto norus a'atenteins: ent to vitetysä haal en ni berstalger\n\nJottelⱭ no nee wit\n\nsi arenoti÷s¶ sat to themetste aldT\n\nellt edd no divabite ant yd rworfe at as Jogtooni visjuioeds to edendalye: nord Zul saw mly yď obam brod omerquà ant mi\n\nert riotriw ni\n\n(raɗmesed .JSI and no Joliet no mug add\n\na el & beyism beeb alɗt Jarit ,agnirt merido degnome,BajaÍA di moqu Isee on tend bra berisonso ad of tɗnuo bna VI89707 (etantains no nu? era to tarit ed of galdroqwq lsea sit .s.1)\n\n.VvanteigaM no mu? en3 to Iama ant don al\n\nto moldsteiger sɗt to consbive yino sit\n\nstentatge ødt Molde fase art to nofaasrqat ødt et boob atrit\n\na od ot bonafoeh Isee entunan add to ybotawa odt bad onw\n\nneed ever binoda notrïw bre-beeb to \"İM İAX” ONT .VI89101\n\nberoetta\n\nTax Receipts,\n\nIt is true, as alleged by the petitioners,\n\nthat a number of tax receipts were put in and were before the\n\nCourt on the hearing of the appeal and that these receipts show-\n\n-ed that the payer of tax was Yut Ying, but there was nothing\n\non the face of the receipts to identify Yut Ying with the\n\nclaimants Lam Cheung Puk and Lam Tak Luk; the connecting link being supplied by the deed which is a forgery.\n\nThese tax receipts showed that Yut Ying\n\npaid fishing taxes in respect of undefined area in the district\n\nof Sun on held by \"ancestor Lam Kwai Fuk\". Kowloon is not men-\n\n-tioned on the tax receipts.\n\nThe Government made enquiries with regard\n\nto the ownership of the fishing rights represented by these taxes and discovered that these rights belonged to the Lam clan of Chek Mei in Sun On; the fishing rights having been granted originally to Lam Kwai Fuk and that the rights were limited to the digging for shell-fish catching fish and breaming boats.\n\nThe head of the Lam clan deposed before me\n\nthat he had never heard of the alleged sale of these fishing rights in 1883 (the date of the forged deed), and that there was no such person as the Yut Ying named in the deed of 1883, and that the claimants had no power to sell the fishing rights of the clan to any person.\n\nThe Government being satisfied with the trustworthiness of these statements afterwards paid to the heads of the Lam clan a sumof $1,400 as compensation for all the fishing rights claimed by the clan in Kowloon City Bay.\n\nThis compensation was paid as a matter of\n\ngrace", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 409268, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "page_number": 334, "title": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "content_text": "330\n\nIt appears that the petitioners never acquired any title to any rights whatsoever as the root of their title consisted of a forged deed. The Land Court was misled by this forged deed and when the forgery was discovered the Full Court reversed the decision of the Land Court.\n\nThe petitioners have their remedy on the covenants contained in the assignment to themselves and in the assignment by the claimants to the intermediate purchasers. Para. 29.\n\nWith regard to paragraph 29 of the Petition, it is incorrect to speak of \"the purchase of the said property\" as there was no property in the land in any person other than the Crown; the only effect of the assignments was to transfer the rights (if any) of the claimants to ask the Government to grant an appropriate title or to pay compensation.\n\nThe claimants having only fishing rights the proper title would have been a grant of fishing rights, and those rights were subsequently assessed at $1,400 only, an assessment which the Colonial Secretary considered at the time to be excessive and only accepted because he thought the real owners of the fishing rights had been badly treated by their fraudulent relatives.\n\nPara. 31 to 33.\n\nThe purchase by the petitioners was speculative and cannot be compared with a purchase of land held under an established title.\n\nThe petitioners are only suffering such a loss as any purchaser of property is liable to suffer if it turns out that his title deeds are forgeries.\n\nThe Land Court at the time of the judgment in GR12/1902/C.5.0.Extension. It is noted that a receipt for the payment signed by the heads of each of the three branches of the clan in my office on the 30th August, 1904, is attached to the file.\n\nPage 330\n\n05613", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 409272, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "page_number": 338, "title": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "content_text": "From the Colonial Secretary to Messrs. Hastings and Hastings.\n\nGentlemen,\n\nColonial Secretary's Office,\nHongkong, 28th March, 1907.\n\nI am directed to inform you that the Governor has carefully considered the Petition of the Executrixes of Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Fai Shan, forwarded in your letter of the 12th instant, praying for compensation from this Government for losses sustained and expenses incurred in connection with the purchase by Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Fai Shan of certain property at Kowloon City from Lam Cheung Fuk, but that His Excellency is unable to accede to the prayer of the Petitioners.\n\n2. I am to point out to you that the allegation by the Petitioners that the deed dated the 10th of January, 1883, under which claim was made to the property, had in fact been registered in the Land Registry of the Magistrate's Yamen of the San On District and that this fact had not been brought to the notice of the Full Court, is entirely incorrect.\n\nA reference to the file in the Supreme Court will show that the Magistrate of the San On District made an affidavit on the 12th of December, 1903, to the effect inter alia that the deed referred to is a forgery and ought to be cancelled and that the seal upon it purporting to be seal of the San On Magistrate is not in fact his.\n\n3. I am to add that if the Petitioners have suffered loss it is only such loss as a purchaser of property is liable to whose title deeds prove to be forgeries.\n\nI have etc.,\n(sd.) F. H. May,\nColonial Secretary.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 409273, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "page_number": 339, "title": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "content_text": "188\n\nbus agattasl .a\" Bask of VIAtet59? Istnefod est mOTT\n\n(770 e'yısderosa Istnofo)\n\n‚reer,dorail .40385,amoxgпoH\n\nPY.\n\nFrom Messrs. Hastings and Hastings to the Colonial Secretary.\n\n38, Queen's Road Central, Hongkong, 11th. April, 1907.\n\n335\n\nand tent woy irtolak at betoerib ma I\n\nO IPC JSFF*\n\n-xirtuosx\" end to not) IJs¶ ent berebienoo YIIuteso aɛd toпtevol tradel tuo at bebiswro? ¿nada ist uX bae uirib new groT to as- -arevor elát most noitae eqnov tot gritanq,dustani\n\nmoltventos at berment aoensqxs bau benlstame seasol Tol Jae8- alstrao to ns:h lạt u bna ghio ns\" yno ed oesdorug oHG ATIN\n\nalf talt ud,dus qued? Asi kort vtin moolwo) da ytrSKOTY .ateroiditet orts to reveng ent or 959006 of sidam at yons feoX\n\n-sgefis ont deild voy of two dniog of me I\n\n.8\n\nDR\n\nto 301 snt batsh beab erit tørt etsnoltits at yď gold-\n\n,vtraqonq art of abar asw lalo Holiw tebay CABI • VIENNA alatontalgæf wit to widelyef bal eitt nt benetalger need fost ni\n\nneed to ban tost aid\n\n,0071000t yioritne at tuo II on to solton erit of trend JIPOD smerquƐ adź ni sitt sat of Dunereler A\n\nRs eban folytatt no us2 ent) to etentelyak arid dadd woris III.\n\nratni ostis en of\n\nToda-09 to .disi erit no divabiks\n\ned of buro bлs visтrots al of berreter besh art jant siis to Ic9a ad o: gnitroqung i mogu Isae edt dødt bus bellsonso ald Jost mi ton at etsïjaląμM пo ns2 edt\n\n.C\n\nAVAN ET9Koliset erit 21 tart bbe of rs I\n\nversqorg to reasforug & ea Beof more vino at i aaol bersilve .astropnol ad of evoqq absob eltit aaodw of efɗalt si\n\n*.00 vaŃ I\n\nYAM .H .* (.ba)\n\n•VYBJO17502 IsinoIo\n\n.agniðask bna aguides\",\"\n\nSir,\n\nWe beg to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated the 28th. March, No. 12 of 1902, in reply to the Petition of our clients the Executrixes of Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Fai Shan, in which you inform us that His Excellency is unable to accede to the prayer of the Petitioners.\n\n2.\n\nIn reply to paragraph 2 of your letter, we are quite aware that an Affidavit of the Magistrate of the San On District was filed to the effect that, in his opinion, the Deed of the 10th. January, 1883, was a forgery. We do not know how the Magistrate was induced to make such an Affidavit, but in any case it is common knowledge that Chinese Mandarins are notoriously corrupt and unprincipled, and any evidence by such a Mandarin must be received with the greatest suspicion, especially when the same is given by Affidavit, and is not subject to the usual test of cross-examination.\n\n3.\n\nWe think however you have not quite appreciated the point made in paragraph 27 of our clients' Petition in this matter. The point is as follows: It is evident that the said deed of the 10th. January, 1883, (although stated by the Magistrate to be a forgery) had in fact been recognised and acted upon by the Chinese Authorities for many years past. This appears from documents which were put in on the hearing of the Appeal, namely the receipts for taxes paid to the Chinese Government in respect of the Land in question. These receipts state that the payer of the tax was Yut Ying, the family name denoting...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 409274, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "page_number": 340, "title": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "content_text": "Denoting Lam Tak Luk and Lam Cheung Fuk, the Purchasers and Assignees under the said Deed of the 10th January, 1883. Receipts extended from 1887 to 1898.\n\n4. It is clear therefore that for at least 11 years the Chinese Government recognised Lam Tak Luk and Lam Cheung Fuk, the Assignees under the said Deed, by accepting payment of taxes from them. After having done so, how was it open to the Chinese Government in the year 1904 to turn round and allege that the said Deed was a forgery?\n\n5. We repeat that these important facts, namely as to the receipt of taxes for 11 years by the Assignees under the said Deed of 10th January, 1883, were not brought to the notice of the Full Court on the hearing of the Appeal by those representing the Crown.\n\n6. In fact, the hearing of the Appeal was of a most perfunctory character. It was practically ex-parte. The Affidavits on the part of the Crown were merely read; there was no proper investigation or discussion of the facts or circumstances of the case, and the Judgment of the Land Court was reversed on what we submit were very insufficient grounds.\n\n7. This only shows the radical injustice and unfairness of the exclusion of Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Fai Shan, who, as pointed out in paragraph 24 of our clients' Petition, were the only persons interested in the result, from appearing on the Appeal and stating and arguing their case before the Full Court.\n\nHon. Mr. F. H. May, C.M.G., Colonial Secretary.\n\nP.5.\n\nWe have etc.,\n(sd.) Hastings and Hastings.\n\nWe are instructed to bring the matter before the Secretary of State, and will shortly send you a Petition, which we will ask you to be good enough to forward.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 409277, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "page_number": 343, "title": "CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6]", "content_text": "# Colonial Secretary's Office Correspondence\n\n## Letter to Messrs. Hastings\n\n**Colonial Secretary's Office, Hongkong, 27th April, 1907**\n\nGentlemen,\n\nI am directed to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 25th instant covering a Petition in triplicate, with enclosures, addressed to the Secretary of State for the Colonies by the Executrixes of Tong Wan Chiu and Ku Pai Shan praying for compensation for losses sustained and expenses incurred in connection with the purchase of certain property at Kowloon City from Lam Tak-luk and Lam Cheung-fuk.\n\n2. In view of the fact that no matter is contained in this Petition that has not already been put forward in the Petition on the same subject recently addressed to Sir K. Nathan, I am directed to bring the following facts to your notice in connection with the question of the tax receipts upon which you laid special emphasis in your letter of the 11th instant, and to enquire whether after a perusal of the statement of these facts your clients still wish their Petition to be forwarded.\n\n3. It is true as alleged by your clients that a number of tax receipts were put in evidence and were before the Court on the hearing of the appeal and that these receipts shewed that the payer of tax was Yut Ying, but there was nothing on the face of the receipts to identify Yut Ying with the claimants Lam Cheung Fuk and Lam Tak Luk, the connecting link being supplied by the deed which is a forgery. These tax receipts shewed that Yut Ying paid...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 412217, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-344 - Public Offices & Foreign Office - 1907", "page_number": 717, "title": "CO129-344 - Public Offices & Foreign Office - 1907", "content_text": "citizen of the United States could not be surrendered to the Hongkong authorities by the American Consul at that port under # the Extradition Treaty of 1842.\n\nA note on the Jackson case with JR. 31/5 31/8 was made. Inspector Smale of Scotland Yard called attention to an enquiry about this case, referencing a copy of last night's Evening News. It was about Rosol Douglass, who is wanted by the Manila authorities for embezzlement & forgery.\n\nI told him what I knew of the matter, and provided a copy of Hongkong Mail containing an account of the crime (strangling a woman with whom he was living or packing her up in a box). Douglass has been recently at Cape and in England. The woman he was travelling with, Birdie Maloney, a prostitute, may possibly be the murdered woman.\n\nThe Chief Supt of Police told a detective that there was little chance of finding Douglass in Hongkong. I told Inspector Smale, who had found the same out by telegraphing to Hongkong (or Manila).\n\nIn January 1874, four of the crew of the \"Satsuma\" ship mutinied and escaped. One of them made his way to the UK, two to Melbourne, and two to Hongkong. Of the latter, one went to Shanghai - this was Waller Jackson. On learning of the mutiny, Hongkong Government took steps to get Jackson arrested at Shanghai, but it was found to be an American citizen. The subsequent developments, which followed, are shown in `10863`, copies of minutes by the Hongkong Attorney General sent home by the Governor, no 147 of 6 Aug 1874, with a request for the points raised to be submitted to the Law Officers.\n\nThe Law Officers' opinion was obtained through the Foreign Office, but, in spite of vain endeavours of two persons who mutinied to escape to Les Ch...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-344 - Public Offices & Foreign Office - 1907.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 412460, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-345 - Public Offices & Foreign Office - 1907", "page_number": 220, "title": "CO129-345 - Public Offices & Foreign Office - 1907", "content_text": "## Inclosure 2 in No. 1.\n\n**Memorandum on Counterfeit Goods sold at Dalny**\n\n### Piece-goods\n\nConcerning these, the most important item on the list of articles imitated, it is difficult to obtain satisfactory information. A careful examination of the samples exhibited in the Commercial Museum at Dairen has failed to produce any tangible evidence of the reported counterfeiting of British \"chops\"; while inquiries made of the chief Chinese dealers in the town have met with the same result. Nearly every sample produced for my inspection was of undoubtedly genuine British or American manufacture. Japanese piece-goods, the merchants said, they did not deal in because their quality was so inferior. No great reliance is, however, to be placed in this assertion, as it is a well-known fact, if the assertions of foreign merchants are to be credited, that the average Chinese dealer is unable to distinguish between regular foreign-made goods and Japanese counterfeits, with the result that the latter are very often foisted off on him without his being any the wiser. From one firm only, that of Shung-Ki, the biggest dealer in the port, was any information forthcoming, and all his manager could tell me was that if I wanted to see counterfeit \"chops\" I had better pay a visit to the Mitsui Bussan Kwaisha's agency at Mukden. At the same time, he promised to make private and careful inquiry to see whether by chance some of these counterfeits might not be obtainable in Dairen itself. Any specimens forthcoming would be sent to me.\n\nIn the Commercial Museum, there was one sample of underwear (apparently woollen) which seemed to me to be counterfeit. The label, a big one, bore the trade-mark of a camel, and was in addition partly covered by a large triangular design in black and white of a herd of camels inside a stockaded enclosure. The museum card attached gave the name and address of the maker as \"Yagi Fukumatsu, 84, Ura Machi, Tosa Bori, Nishi Ku, Osaka.\" The same building also contained an exhibit of muslin bearing a trade-mark of \"Leda and the Swan\"; but I am not certain whether this was a counterfeit mark or not. The place of manufacture was said to be the \"Muslin Boseki Kwaisha, Nakatsu Mura, O-aza Kworitsuji, Nishinari Gori, Osaka.\"\n\n### Toilet Articles, Whisky, &c.\n\nIt is among the toilet articles, whiskies, and other minor commodities that the most egregious counterfeits are to be found. In the big Japanese-Chinese bazaar, for instance, I saw, inter alia, imitations of shirt-studs, sleeve-links, &c.; but the names of the original manufacturers, whether British or American, were not copied, and the trade-marks, in most cases a horse's head, gave no clue at all as to whether the articles were direct imitations of the manufactures of specific firms, or simply ordinary pseudo-foreign goods. I am disposed to think that in a fair number of cases the latter is the correct explanation.\n\n| Article | Description |\n| --- | --- |\n| Blacking | Bearing the legend \"Mason's Original Challenge Blacking\" and an old and well-known trade-mark of a negro polishing a jack-boot in one corner, a boy holding another jack-boot in the opposite corner, and a dog running out of the picture. |\n| Blacking | Prepared by one \"Yamamatsu, 186 and 235, N. Flank Street, Japan,\" had precisely the same design as that just described; but the superscription, in this case partly obliterated, ran somewhat as follows: \"Masterly Blacking, Original Ofmycounth.\" |\n| \"Blanco\" | With the words \"J. Omar and Sons, best blanco, for whitening all articles of buck or buckskin, leather, and Co.,\" on the cover, and inside, a badly worded sheet of directions for use in English. |\n| Lime and glycerine preparation | A most palpable imitation of an article prepared by the firm of Breidenbach and Co. in London. The only difference was the substitution in the Japanese-made article of the words \"Kimmel and Co.\" (Rimmel and Co. ?) for Breidenbach and Co., the use of a lily instead of a violet as a trade-mark, and the misprinting of a date on a small label at the back of the bottle. |\n\nThe next counterfeited article shown me was a box of soap purporting to be manufactured by S. Sister and Co., but obviously a forgery. The inscription was as follows: \"Koukoku Shirushi Soap. S. Sister and Co. Moske and Violete,\" and the coloured label on the cover bore a device of two harlequins mounted on horse-back, one blowing a trumpet and the other carrying a banner with an emblem on it of a running dog.\n\nA store devoted to the sale of groceries contained bottles of white pepper very clearly made in Japan, notwithstanding the fact that they bore, underneath a trade-mark of some animal lying on a daïs, the initials K. Y. and Co., Leadenhall Street.\n\nHere, also, I noticed several bottles of a British imitation of Lea and Perrins' Worcestershire Sauce. They bore the name \"Imperial Pickle Company, Govan, Glasgow,\" with a label having a close resemblance to the shield and mussel shells of the genuine article...\n\n### Wines and Spirits\n\nWines and spirits are other articles which, like toilet goods, appear to exercise a great fascination over the counterfeiter. In the same bazaar were shown me, in addition to wines, on which, as they have no interest for British merchants, I do not touch, various brands of whisky, almost without exception spurious.\n\n| Whisky Brand | Description |\n| --- | --- |\n| William Austin | Purported to come from the distillery of a Glasgow firm, with a label bearing, in addition to the letters \"S.W.\" on gold medallions in each bottom corner, a statement to the effect that this was genuine Scotch whisky. |\n| Glenaskfort | Bore a trade-mark of a bust of Mercury on a medallion with crossed caducea and anchor behind. The maker's name was given as \"O. Klour and Co.\" (J. Brown and Co. ?), of Glasgow. |\n| J. Kroun and Co. | Another counterfeit of Messrs. Brown and Co.'s manufactures. |\n| Thom and Cameron | A small flask, clearly an imitation, was marked as coming from the firm of Thom and Cameron, of Glasgow. |\n\nThe Commercial Museum, which is run more or less under official patronage and supervision, contained among its exhibits various samples of the same spirit. They were all imitations; but how close I am unable to say. Among other trade-marks, I saw that of the \"Milkmaid\" (this is a whisky sold by the American and French Wine Company, a concern carrying on business at Yotsu no rokuji-ichi, Kawara machi, Higashi Ku, Osaka), a \"Old Highland Whisky, Landscape\" brand, and last but not least, an \"Admiral Togo\" whisky coming, so the ill-spelt label assured the reader, from the firm of L. Loshuner, of Glasgow and London.\n\nInquiries at the Japanese-Chinese bazaar as to the place of origin of these various articles failed to elicit any more satisfactory reply than that they come from Japan, not Shanghai. In the case of articles exhibited in the Commercial Museum, the name of the seller or manufacturer of the various commodities is always mentioned.\n\nChinese assert that the dentifrice called \"Odol\" is largely imitated and sold, the old bottles being collected and used again; but I have so far found no proof that this is really the case.\n\nH. P.\n\n## Inclosure 3 in No. 1.\n\n**(Initialled)**\n\n**Memorandum on Counterfeit British Goods at Dairen**\n\nExhibits at the Commercial Museum.--Having examined these, Mr. Garner tells me that as far as the exhibits of whisky are concerned, he does not think that they are really counterfeit. He says that it is a common practice among distillers in Great Britain to manufacture for sale in foreign markets cheap brands of whisky, to which an ...\n\nPage 217", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-345 - Public Offices & Foreign Office - 1907.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 415082, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-349 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1908 [10-12]", "page_number": 371, "title": "CO129-349 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1908 [10-12]", "content_text": "# \n## H. M. Consulate General, SHANGHAI, 15th. April, 1907.\n\nYour Excellency,\n\n1. I have the honour to inform Your Excellency that warrants have been issued by His Majesty's Judge of the Supreme Court at Shanghai for the conveyance to Hongkong of three prisoners, A. R. Gutierrez and C. C. Vaughan, convicted of Arson on 27th. March, 1907; and Fred Montier Goode, convicted of Forgery etc. on 6th. February. The men will be in charge of J. Elvins, Second Constable of H. M. Prison, Shanghai.\n\nAs soon as the date of departure has been arranged, I will telegraph the name of the steamer by which they will travel, and I shall be greatly obliged if Your Excellency will arrange for the men to be met by the Police on their arrival.\n\nI have the honour to be,\nYour Excellency's most obedient,\nhumble servant,\n**(Sd)** Pelham L. Warren,\nConsul-General.\n\nHis Excellency Sir Matthew Nathan, K.C.M.G., &C. &C. &C., Governor & Commander in Chief, Hongkong.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-349 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1908 [10-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 418758, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-355 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1909 [1-3]", "page_number": 336, "title": "CO129-355 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1909 [1-3]", "content_text": "# Effect on Hongkong\n\nGiven.\n\nwww.dewade\n\nI will deal first with the statement that in Hongkong nothing has been done. Of pledges England has already taken one very definite step. She has promised to reduce the export of opium from India to China by one-tenth each year for the next three years, and to continue that reduction annually if at the end of three years it is shown that China has proportionately reduced the production and the consumption of the drug.*\n\nThis pledge seriously affects the interests of Hongkong, which has long been the mart for the trade in raw opium in the Far East. The annual value of this trade is given as £5,312,645 in 1906 and £4,656,218 in 1907. The profits made are similar to those secured in any other form of trade, and add to the general commercial business of the Port, by increasing freights, insurance (fire and marine), banking, warehousing, and handling. The extinction of the trade therefore would not merely be a loss to the merchants engaged in it but also to the general business and prosperity of the Colony. No protest, however, has yet been heard from those chiefly interested, who have accepted loyally the policy of the Home and Indian Governments, but they claim—looking to the magnitude of the trade, and to the fact that it has existed for over 100 years—that ten years is the minimum time in which new interests can be created to replace those sacrificed, and any diminution of this period would impose too heavy a burden upon them. In this connection, I venture to suggest that China should be required to reciprocate by abandoning her exports to Siam and Indo-China—both of which countries, like herself, have declared their desire to restrict the consumption of opium. (See below, page 3.)\n\n## Independent action by Hongkong.\n\nA second step has been taken in which Hongkong alone was concerned. In 1907, His Majesty's Government proposed to prohibit the exportation of prepared opium from Hongkong. Opium, under the Monopoly system in this Colony, can only be \"prepared\" for sale by the Farmer. It was perfectly legitimate for him to export to China under proper permit and declaration, though such export formed no part of his Monopoly rights. To prohibit it would be, however, a curtailment of the privileges under which his contract was signed, and might have involved a moral claim for compensation, but as China undertook to reciprocate and to check the smuggling of prepared opium into Hongkong, the Farmer willingly agreed, and the trade was abolished. The Chinese Government expressed itself as very grateful for this action by the Hongkong Government.\n\n### Abolition of smuggling.\n\nFurther assistance has been rendered to China by Hongkong through the consistent efforts of the Colony to prevent the smuggling of opium to the Mainland, though such smuggling was of course in no way injurious to the Colony itself, and if unchecked would add to the value of the Farm. No doubt the decrease in the rental value of the Farm in recent years is in part due to the cessation of smuggling.\n\nIt is generally believed that some ten years ago, there was a very considerable smuggling trade to China, for judging by the figures of recent years, it would seem probable that the Farmer at that time drew more opium from Bond than he required for his legitimate business. It is surmised that he sold the balance to smugglers, but the risks both to them and to himself were great, for the conditions of the Farm were designed to prevent smuggling, and as experience was gained, new precautions were from time to time taken. No one can lawfully possess prepared opium in sufficient quantities to smuggle unless procured from the Farmer, for no one else may prepare opium. No one may have \"loose opium\" (viz., anything less than an unbroken chest), except the Farmer, and every chest imported must be declared, and a permit to store obtained. Quantities in the authorised stores are checked from time to time. A new permit must be got for removal from store for export, and for removal from one place to another, or for transhipment within the Colony. The Harbour Master furnishes the Master of every Ship carrying opium for export with a memorandum of particulars concerning such opium, and a copy of the memo. is sent to the Imperial Maritime Customs. (`Ordinance 9 of 1887`.)\n\nThe Farmer used formerly to have two establishments at the East and West of the Town, and it was open to boats in Harbour, if found with loose opium on board, to declare that they were carrying it from one to the other, and had no intention of smuggling. In order to eliminate the possibility of illicit trade due to this cause, the Farmer since 1900 has only been allowed to maintain one establishment.\n\nIf prepared opium bearing the Hongkong Farmer's \"chop\" is now found in China, the \"chop\" is probably a forgery in order to obtain sale as foreign opium for what is really native opium. It is hardly likely that the Farmer would put his \"chop\" on smuggled opium. If it is a fact that opium is still smuggled into China, it must be remembered that there are other non-British ports which are quite as favourably situated for the operations of smugglers as Hongkong is.\n\nThe price of prepared opium in Hongkong being double that in China, there is obviously little inducement to smuggle the prepared drug, while the small number of chests drawn by the Farmer (about half the number authorised) shows that it is improbable that raw opium is illicitly exported. There is, moreover, independent evidence to show that any systematic smuggling is now practically extinct, though no doubt small quantities may be occasionally exported illicitly by casual individuals.\n\n(a) The Police have made no seizures to speak of for eight years. \n(b) It has not come to my knowledge that the Chinese Customs, in spite of the large rewards they offer to informers, have made any important seizure. \n(c) The armed bands who in former days were met with from time to time and often offered resistance, appear to have been quite broken up. \n(d) The willingness of the Farmer to co-operate in preventing the smuggling of prepared opium to China, if the latter would reciprocate, goes to show that he does not smuggle. \n(e) Finally, there is conclusive evidence furnished by Mr. Clementi's recent examination of the Farmer's books to exonerate him from any such charge.\n\nThe efforts of the Hongkong Government in recent years (and before the present agitation began) have, therefore, been consistently directed towards the abolition of illicit trade in either raw or prepared opium to China, and there is evidence to show that its efforts have been attended with a large measure of success. This is a benefit of the very first importance to China, and has only been secured by constant efforts and some pecuniary loss to the Colony. Recently, China has pledged herself to reciprocate by checking the illicit importation of prepared opium from China into Hongkong, but her inability to translate her undoubtedly genuine desire into effective action is shown by the fact that for the six months following that in which the agreement was made (viz., August 1907 to January 1908), the average number of seizures of prepared opium illicitly imported into Hongkong has exceeded one per diem. The smuggling takes place from various ports, Canton, Amoy, Swatow, Hoihow, etc. I have reason to know that the Viceroy at Canton is sincerely anxious to put a stop to this practice, and the Imperial Maritime Customs have done their utmost, but the effort to suppress smuggling is to attempt the impossible, so long as the price of opium in China is only half the price in Hongkong.\n\n## Export from China.\n\nI have already observed that since China has appealed to the Indian Government to make heavy pecuniary sacrifices in order to restrict the import of opium, it is reasonable to expect that she herself should abandon the authorised export of Chinese-grown opium. The official returns* show that this export had continually increased up to 1907, when it fell to 84,737 lbs. The average for 5 years (including 1907) is 348,811 lbs. The re-export of foreign opium is slightly decreasing. In 1907, it stood at 48,400 lbs., the average for 5 years being 70,947 lbs. The total average export for the last 5 years through the Customs (i.e., apart from smuggling) is, therefore, 419,758 lbs., the bulk of which goes to French Indo-China. There is also a considerable illicit export of raw opium from China to the Straits, Saigon, Bangkok, America, and other places, which, as I have said, can only be checked by enhancing the price of opium in China, till it equals the price in the countries to which smuggling takes place.\n\n* Memo. communicated by Mr. Harris, Commissioner of Chinese Imperial Maritime Customs. \n† The Straits Opium Commission Report states that China is the chief, if not the only, source of smuggled opium into that Colony. \n* Sir J. Jordan 7.12.07 in `China No. 1 (1908)`. \n† `Abstract of Chinese IAL. Customs Part I.A. p. 21`. \n† Sir J. Jordan of 7.12.07 in `China No. 1 (1909)`. \nPage 3", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-355 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1909 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 428832, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-372 - Public Offices - 1910", "page_number": 173, "title": "CO129-372 - Public Offices - 1910", "content_text": "authorities, in the compilation of their annual statement of revenue and expenditure. The rules provide for a statement of accounts from every office in the Empire, and a comparative table has in every case to be submitted showing the corresponding receipts and expenditure in the preceding year.\n\nPrince Tsai Tao.\n\nPrince Tsai T'ao left Peking on the 20th March at 6 A.M. on his military mission to Japan, America, and Europe. He was accompanied by a numerous staff. A large number of officials attended to see him off, and the Japanese, American, and British representatives were also present. The expenses of the Prince's trip are estimated by one paper at 250,000 taels.\n\nThibet.\n\nThe press has followed the doings of the Chinese expedition into Thibet with great interest. One paper has several times reported that it is intended to convert Thibet into a province, owing to the fact that the influence of the Dalai Lama is still very real.\n\nThe same paper states that the flight of the Dalai Lama resulted in telegrams to the Central Government from each of the three high Chinese authorities in Thibet, which were full of mutual recriminations. The Government poured oil on the troubled waters by soothing replies. Another paper announces the recall of the Assistant Amban Wen Tsung-yao, and states that the title of amban is to be changed, while in future the temporal government is to be entirely separated from the spiritual.\n\nThe press generally is inclined to cavil at the action of the British and Russian Ministers in sending notes to the Wai-wu Fu on the Thibetan question, and one paper published inaccurate résumés of the notes sent in.\n\nA rumour has been published to the effect that Tong Shao-Yi is to be appointed to settle Thibetan affairs.\n\nChinese Penal Code.\n\nThe \"Peking Daily News\" draws attention to the approaching issue of the new Penal Code, and points out that by a happy coincidence it is exactly 100 years since the promulgation of the Code Napoléon.\n\nThe first step taken in the way of judicial reform was the abolition of deportation in 1903, and later on in 1905 the punishment of \"ling chi,\" or slicing to pieces, was abolished, while relations were no longer to be made liable for offences committed by one of their body, and fining was substituted for the use of the bamboo. Further, in 1905 a high commission was appointed composed of Wu Ting-fan and Sheng Chia-pen to prepare a Penal Code. At the same time, codification in other branches of the law was pushed forward, and with the assistance of many law students educated abroad, and of a distinguished jurist from Japan, Dr. Okada, the first draft of the Penal Code was completed two years ago. Opinions of the different provincial authorities thereon were invited and considered, with the result that the final revision was completed at the end of last year. The revised draft was then referred to the Constitutional Government Committee, which body is expected to report thereon within a year.\n\nThere are several points in the Penal Code which are worth noticing. Firstly, there is no special classification of offences as in most of the older codes. Every offence is simply called a crime. Secondly, the new code discards the punishments formerly prevailing in China, i.e., decapitation, transportation, and the use of the bamboo. As substitutes, hanging, imprisonment for life, or for a term and fine, are introduced, so as to bring the Chinese judicial system into line with that of the most civilised country. Other punishments are deprivation of civil and political rights and the forfeiture of property. Thirdly, the system of conditional sentence is an innovation in the Chinese code. Under this the judge will have the power to suspend a sentence of imprisonment for less than three years being carried out, on the condition that the offender shall not commit another offence during a period of from three to five years. In the treatment of juvenile offenders the Penal Code is exceedingly liberal. It is provided that a child under 15 who commits a crime will not be punished for his misdeed, but the judge may send him to a reformatory school.\n\nIn order to bring the Chinese judicial system abreast with the time, there are incorporated with the new Penal Code quite a number of offences which were formerly unknown in China. Among these may be mentioned offences relating to elections, offences relating to foreign diplomats, offences relating to telegraphs and railways, offences relating to opium and lotteries, and such offences as counterfeiting coins and paper money, forgery, and violation of weight and measurement regulations.\n\nThe new Penal Code consists of 409 short articles, and is divided into two general parts, dealing with general principles and specific offences respectively.\n\nTich Liang.\n\nOn the 17th March a decree was issued allowing Tich Liang, the Minister of War, to resign on account of ill-health, and Yin Ch'ang, at present Minister to Germany, was appointed to succeed him. It has been known for some time that the Throne was not satisfied with the conduct of affairs in the Board of War owing to the friction which existed between Tich Liang and Prince Tsai T'ao, the latter of whom is the head of the newly-formed general staff. Yin Ch'ang has the reputation of being experienced in military matters, and is said to be greatly in favour of training the Chinese army on the German model.\n\nMiscellaneous.\n\nTwo Frenchmen, formerly employed on the Luhan Railway, have applied to the magistrate of Ta Hsing Hsien for permission to be naturalised as Chinese subjects. Their petition was referred to the Wai-wu Pu, who, being satisfied of their eligibility, have issued orders to the Shuntien Prefect to take the necessary steps to that end under the new Naturalisation Laws.\n\nOne paper complains that there have been numerous abuses in the present election of members to the Senate, especially among the members of the Board of Education. Voting tickets have been monopolised by a few individuals, and undue influence has been used over voters, either by bribery or force, while the nomination of candidates has depended on the amount of \"squeeze\" given.\n\n171", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-372 - Public Offices - 1910.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 429315, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-373 - Public Offices - 1910", "page_number": 52, "title": "CO129-373 - Public Offices - 1910", "content_text": "? \n\n} \n\nI \n\nļ \n\n2 \n\ndoyen that the diplomatic body recognised the right of the consul concerned to send his assessor to sit with the Chinese magistrate, but held that the fact that a Chinese is in the employment of a foreigner does not in itself constitute \"a foreign interest\" sufficient to justify the exercise of that right. The German Minister, however, refused to admit even the principle, and after rather an acrimonious discussion with the Spanish Minister, said that he must refer home to his Government for instructions, and the matter had therefore to be dropped for the time. As the Spanish Minister has now circulated among his colleagues a letter explaining his views, the question is sure to come up for discussion again at a meeting of the heads of missions, and I shall, unless instructed to the contrary, support the views which I have expounded in this despatch.\n\nI have, &c.\n\nEnclosure 1 in No. 1.\n\nW. G. Max Müller.\n\nReport on the International Mixed Court at Shanghai.\n\nIN the following report an attempt is made to set forth the established practice and procedure in the international mixed court at Shanghai, to define the limits of its jurisdiction, and to describe the practical working of the court.\n\nCriminal Jurisdiction and Procedure.\n\nThe mixed court exercises criminal jurisdiction in all cases of crime committed by Chinese within the limits of the international foreign settlement at Shanghai, or outside the settlement, but on roads owned and policed by the municipal council. The court sits for the hearing of criminal cases every morning at 9:15, and is constituted of a Chinese magistrate sitting with an assessor of either British, American, or German nationality. The British assessor sits on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday mornings; the American on Tuesday and Thursday, and the German on Saturday. It is, however, competent for any of these assessors to arrange for a special sitting on some day other than the allotted day, and this is frequently done when for lack of time a case cannot conveniently be taken in the ordinary morning session.\n\nThe assessors of nationalities other than British, American, or German have no locus standi in the mixed court, so far as criminal work is concerned, unless a national of the assessor in question is directly concerned as complainant. For example, if an Italian subject is assaulted by a Chinese, the Italian assessor would have the right to displace the assessor of the day at the hearing of the case. Though in practice this right has rarely been claimed, attempts have frequently been made to obtain recognition of the principle that the fact of a Chinese defendant being in foreign employment constitutes a sufficient foreign interest to enable the assessor of the nationality concerned to displace the assessor of the day. These attempts have hitherto been successfully resisted.\n\nIt is hardly necessary to point out that the admission of any such principle would render impossible the administration of justice in the settlement. With eighteen nationalities to choose from, a Chinese defendant would have little difficulty in finding one or other of the consular authorities of Shanghai to stand sponsor for him, with the result that the work of the court would be disorganised, and a very large proportion of serious crime would go unpunished. The present practice, based on rule 3 of the rules of 1869, is to allow a foreign consular representative to watch the case from the bench when one of his nationals is the employer of, or otherwise interested in, the Chinese defendant. This privilege, however, is rarely used. It should be noted in this connection that the British, American, and German assessors, as a matter of courtesy, adopt inter se a different attitude to that assumed towards the assessors of other Powers. Thus, the fact that a defendant was, say, in German employ would be sufficient to give to the German assessor the conduct of the trial. Were brought before the court on any other but the German assessor's day, he would, on application, be remanded over for the German assessor, and the British or American assessor, as the case may be, would only hear the case on being assured that the German employer had no objection.\n\nIf he\n\nThe mixed court cannot impose a greater penalty than one of five years' imprisonment. In cases where the magistrate and the assessor are satisfied that a crime has been committed which merits a greater punishment, the defendant is sent into the native city and is tried and punished by the Shanghai city magistrate. In some cases, where it is considered essential that an assessor should be present at such a trial, the defendant is sometimes tried in the mixed court by the city magistrate sitting with an assessor. No precedent appears to exist for the presence of an assessor at a trial in the city, but an assessor has sometimes attended at the city court when sentence has been passed.\n\nThe question of sending prisoners into the native city is the chief source of friction between the native and settlement authorities. The rules which apply all flow from the principle that the plaintiff follows the defendant, and are as follows: If a Chinese is arrested inside the settlement, he must be brought in the first instance before the mixed court. If the crime with which he is charged has been committed inside the settlement, he is tried and sentenced by the mixed court. The single exception to this procedure is the case noted above, where the court is of opinion that five years' imprisonment is not a sufficient penalty, and accordingly sends the prisoner to the city magistrate for trial and sentence. Where the crime with which the prisoner is charged has been committed outside the settlement, the court enquires into the facts of the case, and, on being satisfied that a prima facie case of guilt has been made out, sends the prisoner for trial and punishment to the native authorities having jurisdiction in the place where the crime was committed. The single exception to this rule arises out of the rules governing the relations between the French and international mixed courts (see Appendix 2). In practice, a considerable distinction is drawn between permanent residents of the settlement and persons residing elsewhere who happen to have been arrested within the settlement. The latter are handed over to the native authorities on merely slight evidence of participation in the crime, thus minimising the danger of the settlement becoming an Alsatia for evildoers. But very clear proof is required before a resident of the settlement is so handed over.\n\nThe native authorities, jealous of the exclusive rights of the settlement, make constant efforts to obtain the rendition of residents on various pretexts, often very trivial, such as non-payment of land tax, &c., and a rigid application of the above rules is necessary to repel such attempts at encroachment. Their commonest and most plausible contention is that all cases of homicide must be sent into the city for trial. It is well established, however, that the mixed court is competent to try homicide cases where the circumstances of the case permit of the infliction of a penalty of five years' imprisonment or less.\n\nWhen a prisoner is brought up for trial, the Chinese witnesses, including the accused, are examined by the magistrate, who generally displays considerable skill in elucidating the real facts out of a maze of perjuries. Beyond suggesting questions or lines of cross-examination and interpreting foreign evidence to the magistrate, the assessor generally finds it unnecessary to take any very active part in the proceedings. On the conclusion of the evidence, the assessor and magistrate consult as to the verdict and sentence, for no sentence is valid unless concurred in by both magistrate and assessor. The majority of cases are, of course, of a trivial nature, and present no features of difficulty. Petty thefts, for example, are punished by inflicting a penalty of, roughly, one day's imprisonment for each dollar stolen. Cases arising out of family disputes, offences against morality, and offences against Chinese family law will be left by a wise assessor to the untrammelled discretion of the magistrate, who may generally be relied upon to do substantial justice in such cases.\n\nCertain classes of cases, however, present great difficulties. When the magistrate is swayed by racial prejudice, political considerations, or pressure from above, the assessor must exercise all the tact and determination of which he is possessed in order that justice may be done. A good example of the class of case referred to occurred recently when the Shanghai Municipal Council instituted a prosecution against a Chinese newspaper controlled by the taotai for publishing a series of seditious libels on the Indian community of Shanghai. Difficulties of a different kind arise out of the fundamental differences between Eastern and Western systems of jurisprudence. The Chinese consider that offences against the person are infinitely more serious than offences against property. Crimes in the latter category are treated far more leniently than in Western countries, and the divergence is aggravated by the low standard of commercial integrity among the Chinese. Thus, while the magistrate is always willing to impose an exemplary sentence in cases of robbery with violence, snatching, &c., it is very difficult to secure an adequate penalty for crimes such as burglary or forgery.\n\n3\n\n51", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-373 - Public Offices - 1910.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 431131, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-376 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1911 [3-4]", "page_number": 313, "title": "CO129-376 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1911 [3-4]", "content_text": "## Companies Ordinance, 1911\n\n## ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS\n\n### PART I. CONSTITUTION AND INCORPORATION\n\n1. Prohibition of Large Partnerships.\n2. Short title and application.\n3. Prohibition of partnerships exceeding certain number.\n\n#### Memorandum of Association\n\n4. Mode of forming incorporated company.\n5. Memorandum of company limited by shares.\n6. Memorandum of company limited by guarantee.\n7. Memorandum of unlimited company.\n8. Stamp and signature of memorandum.\n\n9. Restriction on alteration of memoranda.\n10. Name of company and change of name.\n11. Registration of articles.\n12. Application of Table A.\n13. Alteration of objects of company.\n\n#### Articles of Association\n\n14. Form, stamp and signature of articles.\n15. Alteration of articles by special resolution.\n\n#### General Provisions\n\n16. Effect of memorandum and articles.\n17. Registration of memorandum and articles.\n18. Effect of registration.\n19. Conclusiveness of certificate of incorporation.\n20. Copies of memorandum and articles to be given to members.\n\n#### Associations not for Profit\n\n21. Restriction on charitable and other companies holding land.\n22. Power to dispense with \"limited\" in name of charitable and other companies.\n\n#### Companies limited by Guarantee\n\n23. Provision as to companies limited by guarantee.\n\n### PART II. DISTRIBUTION AND REDUCTION OF SHARE CAPITAL, REGISTRATION OF UNLIMITED COMPANY AS LIMITED, AND UNLIMITED LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS\n\n#### Distribution of Share Capital\n\n24. Nature of shares.\n25. Certificate of shares or stock.\n26. Definition of member.\n27. Register of members.\n28. Trusts not to be entered on register.\n29. Annual list of members and summary.\n\n30. Registration of transfer at request of transferor.\n31. Transfer by personal representative.\n32. Inspection of register of members.\n33. Power to close register.\n34. Register to be evidence.\n35. Power of court to rectify register.\n36-37. Power for company to keep local register. Regulations as to local register.\n38. Issue and effect of share warrants to bearer.\n39. Forgery, personation, unlawfully engraving plates, &c.\n\n40. Power of company to arrange for different amounts being paid on shares.\n41. Power to return accumulated profits in reduction of paid-up share capital.\n42. Power of company limited by shares to alter its share capital.\n43. Notice to registrar of consolidation of share capital, conversion of shares into stock, &c.\n44. Effect of conversion of shares into stock.\n45. Notice of increase of share capital or of members.\n46. Re-organisation of share capital.\n\nGE 9 MAY 11 \n`14922` \n`301` \n`Acce`", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-376 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1911 [3-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 433840, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-381 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1911 [11-12]", "page_number": 421, "title": "CO129-381 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1911 [11-12]", "content_text": "# 411\n## CO\n### Companies Ordinance, 1911.\n#### 1514\n## ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS\n**REGE 16 JAN 12**\n\n### PART 1.\n#### CONSTITUTION AND INCORPORATION.\n##### Prohibition of Large Partnerships.\n\n| Section | |\n|---------|---|\n| 1. | Short title and application. |\n| 2. | Prohibition of partnerships exceeding certain number. |\n| 3. | Memorandum of Association. |\n| 4. | Mode of forming incorporated company. |\n| 5. | Memorandum of company limited by shares. |\n| 6. | Memorandum of company limited by guarantee. |\n| 7. | Memorandum of unlimited company. |\n| 8. | Stamp and signature of memorandum. |\n| 9. | Restriction on alteration of memorandum. |\n| 10. | Name of company and change of name. |\n| 11. | Alteration of objects of company. |\n\n#### Articles of Association.\n| Section | |\n|---------|---|\n| 12. | Registration of articles. |\n| 13. | Application of Table A. |\n| 14. | Form, stamp and signature of articles. |\n| 15. | Alteration of articles by special resolution. |\n\n#### General Provisions.\n| Section | |\n|---------|---|\n| 16. | Effect of memorandum and articles. |\n| 17. | Registration of memorandum and articles. |\n| 18. | Effect of registration. |\n| 19. | Conclusiveness of certificate of incorporation. |\n| 20. | Copies of memorandum and articles to be given to members. |\n| 21. | Associations not for Trust. |\n| 22. | Restriction on charitable and other companies holding land. |\n\n#### Companies limited by Guarantee.\n| Section | |\n|---------|---|\n| ... | Provision as to companies limited by guarantee. |\n\n### PART II.\n#### DISTRIBUTION AND REDUCTION OF SHARE CAPITAL, REGISTRATION OF UNLIMITED COMPANY AS LIMITED, AND UNLIMITED LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS.\n\n#### Distribution of Share Capital.\n| Section | |\n|---------|---|\n| 23. | Nature of shares. |\n| 24. | Certificate of shares or stock. |\n| 25. | Definition of member. |\n| 26. | Register of members. |\n| 27. | Annual list of members and summary. |\n| 28. | Trusts not to be entered on register. |\n| 29. | Registration of transfer at request of transferor. |\n| 30. | Transfer by personal representative. |\n| 31. | Inspection of register of members. |\n| 32. | Power to close register. |\n| 33. | Power of court to rectify register. |\n| 34. | Register to be evidence. |\n| 35. | Power for company to keep local register. |\n| 36-37. | Regulations as to local register. |\n| 38. | Issue and effect of share warrants to bearer. |\n| 39. | Forgery, personation, unlawfully engraving plates, &c. |\n| 40. | Power of company to arrange for different amounts being paid on shares. |\n| 41. | Power to return accumulated profits in reduction of paid-up share capital. |", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-381 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1911 [11-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 436409, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-386 - Public Offices & Others - 1911", "page_number": 241, "title": "CO129-386 - Public Offices & Others - 1911", "content_text": "and\n\nmust\n\n0\n\nissued with Values (other\n\nA\n\ntop with Highway which\n\nWe of the original stamp\n\n2 tuk\n\nlust\n\nof cause to consult and first.\n\nSend copy to Hong Kong\n\nsuggest that the J. Board\n\nshould allow wood bug. Jt.K.\n\nstamped the sough\n\nc.a.\n\nat cost price, Bitter surcharge.\n\nthem themselves.\n\nFell 8.P.O.\n\nDoing this\n\ntheat\n\nKing Sempis head will probably\n\nhist\n\ndept read\n\nWill the late autungen.\n\nsue 15503/0x & p.p. as of the\n\nstamps used 4 other offices in\n\nFrance now use Indo-China\n\nStamps, surcharged in Chinese with\n\nFrench with the name\n\nPort. Jumar\n\nuses German stamps surcharged\n\nwith new values. Russia also\n\nRussian stamps Surcharged\n\nusers ordinary\n\n'Kitai'.)\n\nIt is necessary that there should be some\n\nof special stamp for the genius. The profit derived from the sale of those stamps is\n\ninevitable and quite unobjectionable.\n\nThe issue of entirely new stamp would be\n\nabsurdly expensive. I would certainly allow\n\nstamps overprinted. There is no risk of\n\nthem in use\n\nit is simply overprinting.\n\nI would proceed as Mr. Stubbs proposes\n\nalteration in terminology).\n\nRVC\n\nM Collins\n\n544\n\nwinter of 5/6/05,\n\nPlease which refers to overprinting,\n\nscandals\n\nOne\n\nof the worst\n\never had\n\nwas in connection\n\nwith S African stamps overprinted \"C.S.AR.\" The reprint was forged\n\nimpossible\n\nis abundant\n\nThough\n\nin\n\nThis\n\nor\n\ncountry. It\n\n2 percent much forgery,\n\nprevent\n\nthe stamps will be falsely sold, the temptation will not be great\n\n(or recently\n\nwhile\n\nGeneral Dep\n\nshould\n\na\n\nparticular issue has been exhausted.\n\ndo not like the idea\n\npermitting the Imperial P.O. to do what\n\nforbidden to Colonial Post Offices. The Comer", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-386 - Public Offices & Others - 1911.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 436410, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-386 - Public Offices & Others - 1911", "page_number": 242, "title": "CO129-386 - Public Offices & Others - 1911", "content_text": "As the King: Hand will print all Colonial stamps, many on the keyplate method, which should, I understand, reduce the cost of a varied stampage very much.\n\nI understand, cannot use the key-plate because of the necessity of having Chinese characters on the stamp. The same necessity will exist in the case of the Agencies.\n\nThe proposed overprinted stamps will not be a restricted issue, but freely on sale to the public.\n\nAs to the danger of forgery, we can surely leave it to the P.M.G. to devise adequate safeguards. Anyhow, the responsibility is theirs, and we ought to give them what facilities we can in keeping down the great expense to which they are put by the absurd Treasury decision that they are to run the Agencies.\n\nWe shall have to charge them 25 per cent over cost price to cover Military Contribution on the revenue so received. (This is much better than going to the Treas. and the W.O. to ask for special exemption of the revenue from this source from Contribution) and it is an amusing way of calling attention to the absurd demand for Mil. Cont. from the Postal Agency revenues (21.442).\n\n(26,462). Wt.32,696-3. 6000. 2/10. A.&E.W.\n\n0068-28, 6000. 6/10.\n\nI agree.\n\nM\n\n13/5\n\nPage information is not present, but if the original text had \"Page XX\" with three lines at the top and three at the bottom, it should be kept as is.\n\nAfter re-examining the text, the following corrections were made:\n\n- \"key. plik.\" -> \"keyplate\"\n\n- \"br und\" -> removed as it seems to be a fragment\n\n- \"purtibly\" -> \"varied\"\n\n- \"keyplish\" -> \"keyplate\"\n\n- \"I andart\" -> removed or corrected to \"I understand\"\n\n- \"veined stange sory\" -> \"varied stampage\"\n\n- \"speil\" -> removed or corrected\n\n- \"r. id\" -> removed or corrected\n\n- \"resin oted\" -> \"restricted\"\n\n- \"3.2.0.\" -> \"P.M.G.\" (Postmaster General)\n\n- \"the. Agencies\" -> \"the Agencies\"\n\nFile references were checked for spacing: No file references were found in the given text.\n\nThe text is now formatted in HTML using \n\n for paragraphs.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-386 - Public Offices & Others - 1911.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 439068, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-392 - Governor Sir May - 1912 [9-10]", "page_number": 381, "title": "CO129-392 - Governor Sir May - 1912 [9-10]", "content_text": "CONFIDENTIAL.\n\nC.O.\n\n366\n\n37573\n\nRece\n\nRraf 27 NOV 12\n\nGOVERNMENT HOUSE.\n\nHONGKONG. 31st October, 1912.\n\n34364\n\nEnclosure\n\nSir,\n\nIn continuation of my Confidential Despatch of the 4th instant, I have the honour to transmit copy of a semi-official letter, with its enclosure, which I addressed to His Britannic Majesty's Consul-General at Canton on the 9th instant on the subject of the action in this Colony of certain emissaries from Canton to push the circulation in the Colony of the note issue of the Government of the Kwangtung Province. I also attach copy of a Memorandum which Mr. Jamieson addressed to the Governor-General on the subject. To this no reply has, as far as I am aware, been received by the Consul-General. But the Commissioner of Police at Canton wrote to the Registrar-General a letter, copy enclosed, in which Tsau Lo and his actions are repudiated.\n\nThis repudiation is of little value because telegrams, copy enclosed, were at the time exchanged (and published in the Chinese newspapers here) between Tsau Lo and the Commissioner of Finance at Canton on this subject. Moreover, the Governor-General himself seems to have telegraphed to Hongkong Merchants on this subject unless a telegram, copy enclosed, published on the 9th instant in the local press is a forgery. These telegrams prove that Tsau Lo was not acting in a private capacity.\n\nFurthermore, I am informed that Tsau Lo is not out of office but is still at Canton in Government employ. It is noteworthy that\n\nTHE RIGHT HONOURABLE\n\nLEWIS HARCOURT, M.P.,\n\n&c.,\n\n&c.,\n\n&c.,\n\nChan", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-392 - Governor Sir May - 1912 [9-10].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 442126, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-399 - Governor Sir May - 1913 [1-2]", "page_number": 253, "title": "CO129-399 - Governor Sir May - 1913 [1-2]", "content_text": "#106 .6 .U\n\nThe prisoner was bound over and the proceedings and testimony certified to the State Department at Washington for a mandate of extradition. The Secretary of State ordered prisoner's discharge, whereupon a new affidavit was filed charging the same offense and prisoner was in custody pending examination when writ of Habeas Corpus was sued.\n\nThe Court (Justice Brewer of the U. S. Supreme Court), said in part:- \n\"It is insisted, and that is really the principal question, that independent of treaty obligations no proceedings can be had in this country for the arrest of one charged with crime committed in another; that the whole power of the judiciary to act depends upon treaty stipulations; and that this treaty stipulation contemplates but one proceeding, which being terminated by the action of the executive adversely to the extradition exhausts all the obligation of the treaty, and puts an end to any further power of arrest. That, of course, is a question of great importance, and no case exactly in point has been presented. There have been cases in which after one preliminary examination in which defendant was discharged a second has been had, but no case in which after the one preliminary examination, and after action by the Executive Department refusing to extradite under such proceeding, there have been subsequent proceedings for the same offense, and under the same treaty obligation. That, of course, compels an examination of the treaty to see what its purpose and scope is. Article 10 is as follows:- \n\"It is agreed that the United States and Her Britannic Majesty shall, upon mutual requisitions by them, or their Ministers, officers, or authorities, respectively, made, deliver up to justice all persons who, being charged with the crime of murder, or assault with intent to commit murder, or piracy, or arson, or robbery, or forgery, or the utterance of forged paper, committed in the jurisdiction of either, shall seek an asylum, or shall be found, within the territories of the other\".", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-399 - Governor Sir May - 1913 [1-2].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 442132, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-399 - Governor Sir May - 1913 [1-2]", "page_number": 259, "title": "CO129-399 - Governor Sir May - 1913 [1-2]", "content_text": "## Job kati \n\nILYAN ORAL TRUTO SUT \n\nit ni dwG vedon ad LILY ST \n\nC NOLJ RSUD ON \n\nto quis son moiaioeb ent \n\nna modeloeb nomland wipe.do? nud \n\n() \n\nsoletiva wa JWT (9) \n\n1: \n\nMi Vil \n\nDr (6) \n\n-mission of the alleged offence or identifying the document with the forgery of which the prisoner was charged. Osler, J., said: 'The evidence does not come up to what is required, and would not have justified the magistrate in committing the prisoner had the offence been committed in this country'. Re Harsha, (1906) 7 O. W. R. 97, at page 103. \n\n\"In Reg. v. Ganz, (1882) 9 Q. B. D. 93, at page 105, Kanisty, J., says: 'In order to give the magistrate jurisdiction there must be a crime charged which is within the treaty, and the magistrate must have before him evidence such as would justify according to the law of England' (Canada) 'the committal for trial of the prisoner if the crime had been committed in England, and there must be a foreign warrant authorizing the arrest,' etc. \n\n*In this case the crime charged in the first warrant was that the forgery, and no doubt the same crime is charged in the second warrant. But now it is proved that further additional and new evidence has been discovered or will be forthcoming, whereby the deficiencies pointed out may and no doubt will be remedied. Having regard to the character and the nature of extradition proceedings, it appears perfectly competent to take this course, and no rights of the prisoner and no safeguards of the law are thereby invaded. \n\n\"The law is very distinct that where there is no evidence or no sufficient evidence before the magistrate in these extradition matters, he is held to be without jurisdiction, and a committal for surrender is in such conditions an unwarrantable act in excess of his jurisdiction. Reg. v. Maurer, (1883) 10 Q.B.D. 513, at pages 515, 516. \n\n\"The magistrate is charged with the duty of considering whether the evidence before him is sufficient according to law to justify the committal of the accused for trial: he is not to determine and dispose of the case by giving judgment upon it, but he states his opinion (if it be so) that there is a prima facie case and on that ground issues his warrant of committal.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-399 - Governor Sir May - 1913 [1-2].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 442386, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-399 - Governor Sir May - 1913 [1-2]", "page_number": 513, "title": "CO129-399 - Governor Sir May - 1913 [1-2]", "content_text": "## Enclosure 1\nC.O. \n0120 \n509 \nRESP \nIGN 8, MANIK \n\nExtract from Chung Kwok Yat Po, Canton, 16th January, 1913.\n\n**New Form of Prize Loan Bonds**\n\nOn account of the large number of forged notes in circulation, and in view of the forthcoming draw for prize under the public loan bond scheme, the Commissioner of Finance, in the recent issue of these bonds, has taken every precaution against imitation. He has a record kept of the numbers of the bonds and a seal impressed partly on the bonds and partly on the record, in order that the bonds may be checked and forgery prevented. Again, because the issue of these bonds is prohibited in foreign ports on account of the resemblance to a lottery, he has had some of the bonds made in a smaller form than the original ones, bearing only a denomination and number but not the regulations as regards prizes, nor the coupons, so that they may be sent abroad for sale and the required funds raised for the improvement of the financial state of the various localities.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-399 - Governor Sir May - 1913 [1-2].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 442991, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-401 - Governor Sir May - 1913 [5-6]", "page_number": 29, "title": "CO129-401 - Governor Sir May - 1913 [5-6]", "content_text": "# No 150.\n\n**Gay** \n**RECR** \n**C.O** \n17694 \n**R 26 MAY 13** \n\n## GOVERNMENT HOUSE. HONGKONG.\n\n2nd May, 1913.\n\n28\n\nSir,\n\nI have the honour to inform you that on the 13th December last, Mr. Chan King Wa, Chief of Police, Canton, informed the Police here that he had received information from Tokio to the effect that a large quantity of forged notes of the Kwong Tung Military Government had been made in Tokio and were expected to arrive in Hongkong during the course of the next ten days and he invited the assistance of the Police in seizing the forged notes.\n\n2.\n\nThrough a Chinese who was originally a party to the forgery, Mr. Chan King Wa came in touch with the Japanese forgers soon after their arrival in Hongkong on the 17th of December. He then arranged for a Canton Detective to purchase in Hongkong a quantity of the forgeries from the Japanese and informed the Hongkong Police of his plans. The result was that on the 21st of December the Police arrested six Japanese and seized a cabin trunk full of forged notes, the Japanese being on their way to carry out the bargain with the Canton detective. The names of the six Japanese arrested were:\n\n| No. | Name |\n| --- | --- |\n| 1. | Buichi Furukawa |\n| 2. | Shikukichi Histotsuyanagi |\n| 3. | Kotaro Kodoishi |\n| 4. | Keiko Nagao |\n| 5. | Kiyoto Nishiyama |\n| 6. | Fukuzo Sano |\n\n**RIGHT HONOURABLE LEWIS HARCOURT, M.P., &c., &c., &c.**", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-401 - Governor Sir May - 1913 [5-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 444304, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-403 - Governor Sir May Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1913 [8-10]", "page_number": 301, "title": "CO129-403 - Governor Sir May Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1913 [8-10]", "content_text": "## Enclosure\n\nQ. Has there been any Act of Congress incorporating the Philippine Islands into the United States?\n\nA. There has been no Act giving the Philippines a general status other than that of an unorganised territory except, in my opinion, that certain Acts which extend certain laws would apply to foreign dependencies and to foreign dependencies alone. I am of opinion that it is not necessary for the prosecution to prove that the Philippine Islands are part of the United States and that they are also within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.\n\nQ. Has there been any Act of Congress definitely making the Philippine Islands a part of the United States?\n\nA. There has, with certain limitations.\n\nQ. What are those limitations?\n\nA. The Sovereignty of the United States is exercised over territory which has various relations to the Sovereignty. Among the classes of territory covered by this Sovereignty are the States themselves which have a direct voice in the Government of themselves and of the territories of the United States. Another class are the organized territories which have no direct voice in the Government of the country as a whole and have a limited voice in their own Government. Both classes of territories are governed directly or indirectly by the Congress of the United States. Congress extends to these territories such political powers and such laws of the United States as it wishes to extend. The full and absolute sovereignty over these territories lies in Congress.\n\nThe Act of 1870 is singularly ill-arranged. It nowhere enacts in terms that the persons charged with certain offences may be surrendered. This, which is the leading object of the Act, is effected in the following roundabout way. Section 6 enacts that \"where this Act applies in the case of any foreign State, every Fugitive Criminal of that State who is in England shall be liable to be apprehended and surrendered.\" Section 26 defines a \"fugitive criminal\" to mean a person accused of an \"extradition crime,\" and is also one of the crimes to be found in the Extradition Convention signed at Washington on the 12th July, 1889. The documents put in were Exhibits 2 and 3. Exhibit 2 was the requisition. Exhibit 3 consisted of 8 documents and were marked 3 to 3h.\n\nMr. Islands in the same way. The Government, and a third class is that of the unorganized territories which have no voice in the Central Government and have a very limited voice (if any) in their own Government.\n\nEvidence was put forward by the defence relating to the question of citizenship, naturalization, the wording of certain treaties and the construction to be placed thereon and other questions. Having regard to my views as to the construction to be placed on the Act, I am of opinion that these questions are not relevant to the issue before the Court. My decision with regard to Point 1 is therefore against the defendant.\n\nI shall now deal with the second and third points. The second point was that documents were not properly authenticated and the third point was that there was no evidence of an extradition crime. These two points were taken together. Mr. Brutton admitted that if the documents were properly authenticated there was on the face of such documents a sufficient prima facie case made out against the defendant with respect to the crime of abduction.\n\nThe documents put in were Exhibits 2 and 3. Exhibit 2 was a requisition by the Consul-General of the United States in Hongkong upon the Hongkong Government for the Extradition of the defendant to the Philippine Islands. Documents 3a to 3h were a copy of a record of conviction of the defendant and order of arrest.\n\nExhibit 3a purports to be a copy of the judgment of conviction of the defendant of the crime of abduction in the Court of First Instance for the Eleventh Judicial District of the Philippine Islands at Cebu on the 21st December, 1906. Exhibit 3b purports to be a copy of the final judgment of the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands. Exhibit 3c purports to be a copy of the sentence of the said Supreme Court upon the said last-named judgment given December 3rd, 1907. Exhibit 3d purports to be a certificate by the Chief Justice of the said Supreme Court under the seal of the said Court and over the signature of the Chief Justice of the said Court. Exhibit 3e purports to be a certificate by the Executive Secretary for the Philippine Islands under the Great Seal of the Philippine Islands and over the signature of Frank W. Carpenter, Executive Secretary of the Philippine Islands. Exhibit 3f purports to be an order of arrest issued by the Judge of the Court of First Instance for the district aforesaid for the apprehension of the defendant dated January 17th, 1913, signed by Adolph Wislizenus, Judge of the said district, and under the seal of the said Court. Exhibit 3g purports to be a return by the Sheriff of the Province of Cebu upon the said order of arrest sworn to by the Sheriff on the 17th day of January, 1913, before the said Judge under the seal of the said Court.\n\nThe Certificate to Exhibit 3a is not signed. It is a copy. There is no seal on 3a, and 3b is not signed nor is it sealed. The rest of the documents are signed and sealed. Exhibit 3d, which is the certificate of the Chief Justice, is as follows:— \n\n\"I, Cayetano S. Arellano, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true, perfect, correct and complete copy of the sentence by the Court of First Instance...\"\n\nI am satisfied on the evidence which has been adduced by the prosecution that the Philippine Islands are an integral part of the United States. Mr. Anderson also gave evidence as follows:-\"I gave evidence in the Police Court (in the former proceedings) that the Philippine Islands was not a Colony nor dependency, but that it was a constituent part of the United States of America for Extradition purposes.\"\n\nThe requisition in this case was therefore rightly made by him as a Consul-General of the United States.\n\nI would also call attention to Section X. of the Ashburton Treaty 1842, which is as follows:—\"X. It is agreed that Her Britannic Majesty and the United States shall upon mutual requisitions by them respectively made deliver up to Justice all persons who being charged with the crime of murder or assault with intent to commit murder or piracy or arson or robbery or forgery or utterance of forged papers committed within the jurisdiction of either shall seek any asylum or shall be found upon the territories of the other.\"", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-403 - Governor Sir May Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1913 [8-10].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 447008, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3]", "page_number": 106, "title": "CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3]", "content_text": "101\n\n.1 4 0 0\n\nOP Y.\n\nIII\n\n105\n\nnu ind .nl daero of twob enosmos bees voy maƆ\n\nIbinod\n\n,tui nedo\n\n*T\n\nJi ob od smið end dø3 Jon evan yer? sa súrugson a'oš\n\n.Benson on two tient dosib of meut Tot JoeTTos di duidt s'mob\n\n-yo, solned .4 .¶ (8)\n\n•\n\nELE\n\nEUWOUDE Tİenis malondo Tojnu woda di drotninná oďT\n\nYet notoed\n\nof sanelo ect to eno tol elur dttor Jon Si daikt I oe seb vieIS od tenoismong a nima od svn: I „don 11 ↑ este sro, oɑ .di ob THOÚTAH .JBBk and res woï .emið eyani Comes Juntainna w ar ji Jn vllwtorno prav aliulioCMJOD good trwoour add exserio TSJEJM\n\nי.\n\nđi an cư disho Taishi a Tôi THỬ ĐÓ trì ai đi .1.5 (.58)\n\n...\n\njejesined. T\n\nni deuit adontik T9JBL Todi.'n diuje iema efft -'ltou u✔ ni cointre end 19oo Ilir atvelo end to are endul\n\n.LU (.62)\n\n.axloed\n\nHarbour Master,\n\nIn the matter of Lai Wing-tak:-\n\nIt appears that he took the counterfoil books every evening to the Assistant Harbour Master, who compared the counterfoils with the amounts entered by Lai in his own collection book. The Assistant Harbour Master was in the custom of commencing his scrutiny from the place where his initials last appeared on the back of the counterfoil. The shroff accordingly took the opportunity to put forged initials on a counterfoil far in advance of the one last initialled by the Assistant Harbour Master, subsequently erasing the forgery when the accounts had been passed. By this method the shroff in one book of counterfoils alone took all but 33 out of 200 fees.\n\n2. Will you kindly let me know whose duty it was to fill in the wording on foil and counterfoil and whether the date appearing on the counterfoil was filled in at the time the licence was made out and before the Assistant Harbour Master's scrutiny.\n\n3. Will you kindly let me have copies any instructions given to clerks which bear on the matter. It is stated by Mr. Len-festey that the counterfoil entries were formerly copied by a clerk on long slips, specimens of which were handed to me, but that this practice was discontinued. I also understood him to say that the sums shown in the counterfoils were formerly added up by some officer other than the shroff, but that this practice had also been discontinued. Will you kindly let me know in what circumstances and when the procedure was changed in these respects.\n\nI understood from you that Mr. Chan Pui was supposed to check the shroff's account, but he pointed to an instruction by Mr. Beckwith which, he claimed, relieved him of this duty. What in your opinion was Mr. Chan Pui's responsibility in the matter?\n\n4. How far is Mr. Lenfestey responsible for the Junk Office accounts, apart from Mr. Chan Pui? Mr. Lenfestey has produced a memo. in which in May last he asked Mr. Chan Pui to send an officer to check the shroff's accounts, because they...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 447010, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3]", "page_number": 108, "title": "CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3]", "content_text": "COPY.\n\nTV.\n\n107\n\n1\n\nReport ...JI OD WS BRIT Jon bun citome ent\n\nWodni JiuJBIRNA end ɔd dilow yời 2 91. Leu adrwoods and belo, no\n\nsevi Jaod av vi nouzil and Joud sɔsayy JI\n\nBL +\n\n.0\n\n...die flouin mild d beil qua mojit morì dostáb neand BS88 100Ľ \\HDI BOLJUBIĄ the mood sind meil .lin de dunia re duo-\n\n↑ Joe Lowe and no tebro LNB BEAUT mal Juerenga Quử đaid robżanoo u y bĺwow\n\n.\n\n191do titim beznquos seat twa seoneoil to tedaum end ni anaerob ↑ muidundda atta, dal cradniara nos teranıb ovan blwona erit from\n\n'\n\nTonojeĺk . (.0)\n\n•TUTULASI.\n\n.divi viul .nsas\n\nHon. Treasurer,\n\nThe procedure is this. All counterfoil books are brought up to the Assistant Harbour Master's room at 4.30 p.m. daily (12.15 on Saturdays), together with all three shroffs' collection books. The counterfoils are then compared with the entries in the collection books. The money collected during the day by the Junk Office Shroffs is paid to the Office shroff, who signs for it, and credits the sums so paid to them in his collection book. The total appearing in the latter is carried on to the next day, and the money locked up in the strong room, of which the office shroff holds one key and Mr. Lenfestey the other, so that neither can open the door without the other. At noon the next day the money, together with that collected that morning, which is also carefully checked by the Assistant Harbour Master or by me, is paid into the Bank. This method appeared to me absolutely to shut out the possibility of dishonesty, such a thing as forgery never occurring to me, as being possible, as it would seem bound to be discovered at once. The forgeries are certainly extremely good imitations of Mr. Jones's initials.\n\n2. It is the duty of the clerks in the junk office to fill in both foil and counterfoil, and date them, then handing the book to the shroff sitting next to him, for collection, the book is then handed to Mr. Lenfestey for signature, and the foil then detached and handed to the applicant by the clerk who filled it in.\n\n3. Then Mr. Chan Fui, late clerk, joined the Department in 1905, Captain Barnes Lawrence instructed him to check the junk office accounts daily, and this was carried out up to the time that I went home on leave. While I was away Commander Backwith issued a memo. which Mr. Chan Fui held, relieved him from that duty. I fail to see that it does so, and, as a matter of fact, he did not discontinue the scrutiny, for I have myself seen him going through those books since I returned from leave, and was therefore satisfied that the practice was still maintained. I now", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 447028, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3]", "page_number": 126, "title": "CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3]", "content_text": "Page 125\n\nIt is evident that Mr. Jones, throughout the whole period when the fraud was being perpetrated, have looked back at any counterfoil prior to or including the one on which his forged initials appeared, as had he done so, the deception would have been at once obvious. It would seem that he must, on all these occasions, have taken the counterfoil receipt book direct from the hands of the Shroff and proceeded to make his examination from what appeared to him (mistakenly) to be his own last initials.\n\n5.\n\nMr. Jones emphasized the point that he was, by profession, a seaman with but little experience of office work or accounts. On the two occasions when he had acted as Assistant Harbour Master, he had been accustomed to check the accounts in accordance with the system which had obtained in the Harbour office, a system which had been employed by Commander Beckwith, the holder of the substantive appointment. It had not occurred to him to question the system or to enquire why the entries in the Shroff's collection book did not show the audit numbers or the sequence of the licences issued. It was certainly the case that the defalcations would have been apparent if he had looked back at the last counterfoil bearing what purported to be his initials. He had not considered the possibility of the forgery of his initials. The small number of licences checked daily was not necessarily a matter to arouse suspicion, as the issue of Junk Licences was most irregular, depending upon the state of the weather, the time of year, and various other circumstances.\n\n6.\n\nIt is undoubtedly the case, as Mr. Jones states, that the duties for which he is fitted by profession and training are those connected with the out-door work of the Harbour Office, and he has had but little clerical experience. It was hardly to be expected that an officer of his standing would question the merits of a system of accounts-checking which he had been instructed to observe. In the opinion of your Committee, no responsibility attaches to Mr. Jones in respect of the neglect of the financial instructions of the Government, whereby the defalcations became possible, but they consider that, apart from the question of the system of check employed, his conduct displays a lack...\n\nPage 126", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 447031, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3]", "page_number": 129, "title": "CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3]", "content_text": "128\n\nTSI\n\nTOJBALİ TUOUTAL JILJPÍBRÁ að „nidog need avail I\n\n• Benci bisWDE\n\n.780, misk vinu:...l ni ev el no Jiew ddiwlood robanniou conta\n\n...vol edt ni need øvan hoe egs to enre, šuo mua I\n\nvið daed to sloty adid draya joivad mice, d5 not soivieƐ Juez-\n\n.eoi110 todrali nj\n\nOJIMijil Proper qu îns enİmam Xodani a ns I\n\njućimod a to and read #yowis and Jeoq\n\nenelswald need\n\n•æsen't wodzali todnienā es griton ziejów dgrave\n\nen viličnou tot seja, au aradan, to net i, cái me I\n\nsidantive to Joegden end town to haroć and sebou yonadequoŭ to\n\nartclove beilla bus nuljagivan ora\n\ngninient vs bad to duminijoods me neeu gevan evan I\n\n+\n\naniqsed food to adrwonde ni\n\nUNG, BÚINJOO da to uno ni Tever. BAY I IIVI @roleƐ\n\nsozanda edi minub ayınıło ni beoxiq am\n\nI may đaid to graundey ni\n\n„DIVI, redku voli fiðru,si drud\n\n4\n\ntõlget niasqad to evral mo\n\njod perseven I FINI QOYUNG et ülvi redusevol mor¶\n\n+\n\neymuiɔ aboð stivdood zobu 2100 bus,1001110 „nitrnoll to drog and\n\n• BİNU DOA and to\n\nov el no Juew dazw,ced tobi vm800 „ŠICI,yram el al\n\n(sunwoods and to øytedo dooð nirga bo- Ifel ni syano Xuud. I er fed eoidostų ni now sɔiaw gaidɔeas\n\nINOV18), and to ajiloous one În slouw and bexoero I\n\nneowjeu [i: TOU (TAVO DER ...q Œ.» Juoda „ninove preve Josudinged basil and Aud vas đni bing sein ons boxsono I noon ban II\n\n.11ome\n\nein Blood Band :dbeno od axood trucos dĉ evon I\n\nand qu bejna, Ios surever Lados and :alloma & one adrelo d yd Jqea\n\n•ylInwins (>0,00k ab core Inentinged woƯT Sh\n\nanoisivib S aan dızıdroqe¤ en\"\n\n90111) woUIN, BLÚ\n\n„Tvft bepor; But no Bott10 Xul e: hut Toolt Jarið and no roqorq\n\nno sun tut? base and I traB TOĴOBM TL Odick, ant\n\n.Y 4 0 0\n\nThe Junk Office is in charge of Mr. F. P. Lenfestey,\n\nsecond clerk, an officer of 12 years service who was specially\n\nattached in the Junk Office in February, 1911, to keep a close\n\nwatch on the Chinese Staff and prevent fraud.\n\nAll licences for Junks and Boats are signed and issued\n\nin the Junk Office by Mr. Lenfestey, who also signs and issues receipts for the fees for such licences.\n\nThe fees covered by the receipts for boats were collected\n\nby the Third shroff, Lai Wing Tak, who kept a cash book in\n\nwhich he entered the cash received by him for such fees.\n\nThe receipts are all issued from audit-numbered receipt books issued by the Treasury, each receipt having a counterfoil.\n\nIt is possible therefore to check each counterfoil\n\nagainst the shroff's cash book, and it was, I submit, Mr. Lenfestey's\n\nduty to do this under General Order 315(3), issued by Treasury\n\nCircular of 12.12.10.\n\nIt was also my duty as Deputy Collector to check these counterfoils\n\nagainst the cash book and to see that no forms had been used other than those so entered (G.O. 315(4)).\n\nThis duty I endeavoured to perform in the following\n\nmanner:\n\nEvery evening the 3rd shroff brought to me his cash\n\nbook and receipt books.\n\nI examined the counterfoils from my last signature or what I took to be my last signature, and made a note of the amount on a scrap of paper, totalling my memorandum and the cash book and if the amounts corresponded I initialled the cash book, and also initialled the back of the counterfoil of the last\n\nreceipt issued.\n\nNext day the shroff would hand me the receipt book and I noted my initials on the last counterfoil and started checking\n\nthe cash book from that point.\n\nThe only manner in which this check failed was by the shroff forging my initials on the counterfoils so cleverly that I\n\ncould not detect the forgery.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 447032, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3]", "page_number": 130, "title": "CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3]", "content_text": "This he apparently did and succeeded in deceiving me.\n\nI deeply regret that these defalcations should have occurred, but submit that in view of the nature of my appointment, and of the enormous amount of accounting work thrown upon me every day at the end of a long day's work, I may be excused for being deceived by a very skilful forgery of my own initials.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 447035, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3]", "page_number": 133, "title": "CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3]", "content_text": "... ... by the check on the figures effected by the Assistant Harbour Master daily.\n\nThe form in which the Shroff's Collection book was actually kept indicates, from the fact that the daily entries therein were not entered consecutively or contemporaneously with the presentation by the Shroff to Mr. Lenfestey of receipts for the latter's signature but were written up perhaps not more than once daily that, for at any rate a considerable time prior to the perpetration of the fraud, Mr. Lenfestey had undoubtedly followed a practice of omission which had become a regular routine; and it is incredible that, had not this practice been habitual, the Shroff, audacious enough though his scheme was, would ever have ventured upon his successful robbery.\n\nThe forgery and deceit practised by the Shroff upon Mr. Jones, the Assistant Harbour Master, were daring in the extreme and it is rather remarkable that they could have been perpetrated over so long a period as was the case without discovery by that officer; had Mr. Jones been a younger and a more mentally active and more intelligent person, it is probable that such gross deception could not have been practised without detection.\n\nThe Committee of the Executive Council has already expressed its opinion as to the responsibility and degree of blame attaching to Mr. Jones and to what was said in its previous report upon him your Committee with regard to him has no wish to add any further views.\n\nThe object of the present enquiry is to ascertain if possible if any direct blame is attributable to the Harbour Master in connection with the matter and to find out if there is any ground for supposing that he is in any way responsible for Mr. Lenfestey's omission of what was undoubtedly one of the latter's proper duties. At the outset it seems important to see whether written instructions issued to Mr. Lenfestey at any time expressly enjoined upon him the function of which he disclaims knowledge; the answer to this is undoubtedly in the negative.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 447040, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3]", "page_number": 138, "title": "CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3]", "content_text": "! \n\nPRIDAN JENT \n\n2 \n\nIN KARACIA, MA ! \n\n137 \n\n8 ) \n\n* \n\n1 \n\nJ the 1 \n\n: 1 \n\n... \n\nL \n\nR \n\nT24 11 SAN MA \n\nHOL\" \n\nJ. \n\n6. \n\nPurnia SMART AREA! \n\nAR BALA \n\n* Aem odd we mu \n\nTHE HOLI \n\nAsz \n\nYour Committee is of the opinion:\n\n(a) that Mr. Lenfestey ought to have known and ought not to have omitted such an important part of his duty and that he is undoubtedly to blame.\n\n(b) that Fr. Chan Pui is in no way to blame.\n\n(c) that Mr. Jones, although deceived by an ingenious forgery, is not to blame in any serious degree.\n\n(d) that the question of Commander Beckwith's position in the matter not having come up for consideration, your Committee should not express any opinion other than is contained in the remarks already made in Commander Beckwith's paragraph 7 of this report, as he was absent from the Colony during the period covered by the falsifications.\n\n(e) that the Harbour Master should not have allowed Mr. Lenfestey to depart from the letter of the Government Order 315 (3), but that the former has honestly tried to keep the financial arrangements in his department on a sound footing, his attempts having been defeated by his own lack of perception; that he was unable to appreciate the necessity for the strictest adherence to financial regulations, the full intention and object of which he probably did not comprehend; and that the simultaneous presence in his Department of an astute and fraudulent Shroff, a somewhat irresponsible clerk, and an elderly ex-Mariner mechanically and unintelligently dealing with figures which he does not seem to have understood, created a combination of circumstances which shook off the somewhat limited grasp which the Harbour Master possessed over the detailed work of, at any rate, one of his subordinates.\n\nMatthe Rittallifer, S.C.A.\n\nJohn a Que Kill\n\nAttorney General,\n\nChairman.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 447041, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3]", "page_number": 139, "title": "CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3]", "content_text": "(\"A\"- to accompany Report No. 5 (6).)\n\nEVIDENCE.\n\n138\n\n1st day 1.12.13.\n\nCaptain Basil Taylor states:-\n\nI admit responsibility as a head of a Department but it is impossible for me to be over every individual as there are many in my department.\n\nI could not be at every man's elbow.\n\nI know Mr. Lenfestey did not carry out the letter of the G.O. 315 (3).\n\nThe old Committee of 1910 (Mr. Osborne and Mr. Hesser) made a report (N.B. must look and see).\n\n14.\n\nThe system was in force for many years, certainly for my time.\n\nMy system was very old.\n\nThe system was approved by that Committee.\n\nForgery never entered our heads.\n\nI thought Mr. Lenfestey was carrying out the spirit of the G.O. 315 but I knew he was not carrying out the letter. If he had carried out the latter, this defalcation could not have occurred.\n\nI should like to call Commander Beckwith.\n\nMemo. of Orders of October 31, 1910, put in.\n\n2nd day 2.12.13.\n\nCommander Charles William Malpeys Beckwith called.\n\nAssistant Harbour Master.\n\nIn addition to written Order of 6.2.11 up to July, 1911, Mr. Lenfestey had been running the Junk Office and also doing work on the upper floor.\n\nIn early July, 1911, I divided the office into two, placing Mr. Chan Pui in charge of the upper floor and Mr. Lenfestey in charge below, i.e., of Junk office and Junk Inspectors.\n\nI explained verbally to both these officers their duties, my reason for sending Mr. Lenfestey below being for him to keep a...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 449662, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-414 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [10-11]", "page_number": 344, "title": "CO129-414 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [10-11]", "content_text": "Headquarters South China Command,\n\nHongkong, 19th October, 1914.\n\n340\n\n712\n\nBidt of tol ained edt to somoted at 15 golfkotiems\n\nsioillo em deimavi Iltw vog li begildo nd IIsde Iznofð\n\nzejjel va ot yiqet s d‡iw bas metgefet Jadð lo vṛoo a ddiw\n\ngit enezbba yea I tend zebro ai „Jastent dit edt lo\n\n.tse¿due erit no ɛelan/oð edt tot etstƐ lo yraİD1002\n\n,od of quomod edt avad I\n\n712\n\ntnom a 'yɔnollesxã TưOY\n\nJasvier Jпelbodo\n\n.58,Tozavod\n\nyaL.A.S.se\n\nYour Excellency,\n\nIn reply to Your Excellency's letter dated 17th instant, No. 2123/1914, I forward copies of my cables to the War Office on the subject of the Defence of the Realm Act. To these I have received no answer.\n\nI much regret that I did not realize that Your Excellency awaited a reply to the letter under consideration.\n\nWhile I fear I cannot adduce reasons which will be \"very convincing\" to Your Excellency, the experience of the last two months has made quite clear to me on military grounds the necessity for increasing my powers of prompt action without reference to the Civil authorities.\n\nThe directions in which I consider increased powers particularly desirable are right of access to any land or building, power of search of property and person, clearing of any area, closing any undesirable premises, power of arrest without warrant for action of a suspicious nature, restriction as to hours during which people may be out of their houses, restraint regarding showing lights, punishment for forgery of or tampering with passes, etc.\n\nMy own personal view is that paragraph III 1 of the Order in Council dated 26th October, 1896, brought into effect by Your Excellency's Proclamation of 5th August...\n\nHis Excellency\n\nSir F.H.May, K.C.M.G.,\n\nGovernor &c., Hongkong.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-414 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [10-11].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 458704, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-429 - Public Offices & Others - 1915", "page_number": 265, "title": "CO129-429 - Public Offices & Others - 1915", "content_text": "followers, necessarily in any close relation to the military. The same is probably true of section 35 (traitorous words) though in this case the offence would probably in almost all cases tend to be dangerous to the preservation of discipline, since the forces which such words stimulate are very difficult to confine when once started.\n\nStill more necessary is it to apply this limitation to Section 41 (offences punishable by ordinary law) since this section would, if applied to the civil population without some such restriction, practically oust the civil jurisdiction altogether. It is true of course that Article III (1) (second paragraph) would exempt the civil population from trial by Court Martial, but the section, if construed without restriction, would none the less submit the civilian to the executive authority of the General Officer Commanding in all the cases referred to.\n\nIf one applies the above principles to the claim of the General Officer Commanding in the present case (taking the 8 points mentioned in his letter of the 19th of October 50252), I think it is possible to show that the Order in Council does not give him anything like the powers which he claims.\n\nThese points are,\n\n(1) Right of access to land or buildings\n\n(11) Search person or property\n\n(111) Clearing of Areas\n\n(IV) Closing undesirable premises\n\n(V) Arrest without Warrant\n\n263\n\n(V1) Restriction as to hours when people may be out of their houses\n\n(V11) Restraint regarding the showing of lights\n\n(V111) The forgery of or tampering with passes\n\nIt seems to me perfectly plain that there is no provision in the Army Act which gives any direct power to exercise authority in respect of any of these points with the possible exception of number (V) arrest without warrant. The Crown's Common law power to act in defence of the Realm would probably, under circumstances of great emergency, justify the General Officer Commanding in taking the steps contemplated under all the other heads, but this would have nothing to do with the Order in Council or the assimilation of the civil population to the position of camp-followers thereby effected. As to the power of arrest without warrant, this is an auxiliary power; it could be exercised in all cases where the civil population were held subject to the jurisdiction of the military authorities, but in no others. Its scope would therefore be strictly limited by the considerations set out above.\n\nI should be inclined, therefore, to reply quoting 121 of 1892 and 10 and 11 of 1894, stating that Mr. Harcourt is advised that the powers of the General Officer Commanding under Article III (1) of the Order in Council are limited in the manner above stated; that the position appears to be sufficiently clear; that in any event, now that Weihaiwei has fallen and the Japanese are advancing.\n\nPage IX\n\nI X Milta & Celon\n\n(V)", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-429 - Public Offices & Others - 1915.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 458713, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-429 - Public Offices & Others - 1915", "page_number": 274, "title": "CO129-429 - Public Offices & Others - 1915", "content_text": "27%\n\ni'\n\nOfficer Commanding any of the powers with which Major General Kelly in his letter of the 19th of October desired to be invested.\n\nIt will be remembered that the powers in question had reference to the following eight points:-\n\n(i) Right of access to land or buildings\n\n(ii) Search of person or property.\n\n(iii) Clearing of areas.\n\n(iv) Closing undesirable premises\n\n(v) Arrest without warrant.\n\n(vi) Restriction as to hours when people may be out of their houses.\n\n(vii) Restraint regarding the showing of lights\n\n(viii) The forgery of or tampering with passes.\n\nIt appears to Mr. Harcourt that, with the possible exception of the power to arrest without warrant, none of these powers are conferred by the Army Act on the General Officer Commanding with reference to camp followers.\n\nWith reference to the power to arrest without warrant, I am to observe that this is a purely auxiliary power and against civilians could only be exercised in cases where the civil population were held to be subjected to the jurisdiction of the Military Authorities by the Order in Council.\n\nThe power to arrest would, therefore, be strictly limited by the considerations set out above.\n\n5.\n\nMr. Harcourt is advised that, although the Order in Council is general in terms, its intention is sufficiently clear to render a reference to the Law Officers of the Crown unjustifiable, and I am to point out that, since the fall of Tsingtao and the internment of enemy subjects in Hong Kong, any emergency which might have justified local legislation on the lines of the regulations under the Defence of the\n\n50252/14 DRAFT.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-429 - Public Offices & Others - 1915.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 458948, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-429 - Public Offices & Others - 1915", "page_number": 509, "title": "CO129-429 - Public Offices & Others - 1915", "content_text": "507\n\nhe said, when he was arrested; only when he learned that the tins contained arms,\n\nMr. Musso asked the Court, in judging the emissions of the defendants to look at them, not in the light of the foreigner or in the light of the well-educated class of Chinese, but in the light of uneducated Chinese who probably did not know where India was, unless the prosecution could prove that the accused had guilty knowledge of these arms, he submitted that it was the duty of the Court to acquit the prisoners. If they had been going to smuggle these things, they would not have made receptacles that could have been detected by a child. They would have taken a log of wood, taken out the middle, slipped these tins in the inside, and then closed up the end and painted it over.\n\nDr. Hinckley, in addressing the Court, said his client could not have been aware of the arms until the tin was broken, and immediately he became aware of them he communicated with his principal, so that knowledge and the abandonment of the act were simultaneous.\n\nMr. Newman said it had been proved that the accused were in possession of munitions of war. Therefore, technically, an offence had been committed – there was no \"knowingly\" in the question. In the question of the gunpowder, Mr. Newman submitted that they could not do other than at least enter a conviction against the men for this reason - that if the Court believed the whole of the story, then they could not claim that they had no guilty knowledge, the one after some time on the Friday and the other on the day of arrest. Speaking of guilty knowledge, Mr. Newman said that if a man wilfully refused, particularly in forgery cases, to believe or to see, as he could, on the face of it, give an explanation to the Court, then he could be held by the Court to have had guilty knowledge.\n\nCounsel further submitted", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-429 - Public Offices & Others - 1915.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 462978, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-435 - Governor Sir May & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1916 [9-11]", "page_number": 70, "title": "CO129-435 - Governor Sir May & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1916 [9-11]", "content_text": "## Proofread Text\n\nWithin a short time, my wife had been arrested. Then, when some papers were produced in office, my wife and I were accused of forgery, as the police had found certain documents claiming that a child had been betrothed to a man who claimed to be the child's father. But the officials believed them to be forged.\n\nI fled to Shanghai, where I had a large amount of cash seized by a number of officials. At this time, serious resistance was reported in various parts of China, and it was feared that it would spread to Shanghai, which had a large Manchu population.\n\nThe Head Office sent a cheque for a certain amount, about $300, to me. Since it was denied, I discovered that the whole affair was a plot against me. Had I been in the city, I would have been husked, however.\n\nSoon, the official investigation was noised abroad, and the Outdoors Staff was involved in the matter. The Customs Assistant was moving to a particular position at the Co's office after his return. The Co's office had also numerous accusations against the Chinese On-Horse agent. On enquiring, I found that the livelihood of the staff was affected.\n\nReturning for a short time, I sent the cheque to the Shanghai office and had it placed to my A/C in the Bank.\n\nWhile in Shanghai, as there was a semi-Chinese port, the Commissioner felt obliged to report the affair to Peking. He therefore drew up a report and suggested a transfer. To his surprise, the new P.G. Mr. replied that he considered it better that I should resign. In his official despatch, he laid most stress on the fact that the cheque had been credited to my A/c.\n\nI therefore resigned and left between Assistants and Chinese hands. Loon $7 was absolutely necessary at the time.\n\nYears before this time, the then Hangchow Agent (one Watson-Paul) had embezzled several thousands of dollars from China. This I had come to know, and it had managed to explain the C's inability to do business in Hangchow at the time.\n\nTo pay the office at Shanghai, the man had called there for his commission. They found that the amount of the Chinese Agent's Commission was only a small part of a month's salary, and then was just enough for the Chinese M. Life Ins. 6 months' payment.\n\nI had been in Hangchow when the revolution broke out. Gradually, I entered a complex of troubles, and it was difficult to pay, but suddenly found myself charged under a warrant with intent to defraud. After the Fifth Rome, a friend came to tell me that I was considered \"guilty\".\n\n## Page Numbering and Formatting\n\nNo explicit page numbering was found in the passage. However, the text has been reformatted according to the given instructions.\n\n## Reconstructed Text in Markdown\n\nThe text has been reconstructed according to the instructions and is presented above. \n\nNo tables were found in the passage. \n\nFile references were not present in the original passage. \n\nThe original text has been proofread and formatted as per the instructions.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-435 - Governor Sir May & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1916 [9-11].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 464045, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-436 - Acting Governor Claud Sever & Governor Sir May & Public Offices - 1916 [11-12]", "page_number": 309, "title": "CO129-436 - Acting Governor Claud Sever & Governor Sir May & Public Offices - 1916 [11-12]", "content_text": "## 306\n\n-ing and jewelry, each article being exactly described. At the enquiry the plaintiff, an ignorant seafaring man, admitted that there was no jewelry on board and no clothing worth claiming for. The amount recovered was less than the amount paid into Court by the defendant and it was considerably less than what the defendant had offered at an earlier stage. In the result the plaintiff was out of pocket where he might have recovered a substantial sum but for the greed of the persons into whose hands he had fallen.\n\n6.\n\nIn 1909, by means of conspiracy which involved the forgery of a Crown Lease and of the records of the Land Office, a Solicitor who advanced money on a mortgage of the lot to which the forged Crown Lease purported to relate was defrauded of the sum of $24,000. It is believed that a clerk in the Land Office was concerned with a Solicitor's interpreter in this conspiracy.\n\n7.\n\nIn 1913 a certain official was executed by the Chinese Authorities. He had had a deposit of £10,000 in a Hongkong bank. A solicitor's interpreter came to hear of the death and the deposit. Promissory notes representing the sum of £13,000 were prepared, an action on the notes was commenced, the writ was served on a man who was put up to personate the deceased, judgment was recovered by default, a garnishee order was obtained against the bank, and the £10,000 was paid to the conspirators. The share of the interpreter was said to be $7,000.\n\n8.\n\nAn action has just been concluded in which an attempt was made to establish a claim to a half share in certain Chinese business. The value of the half share would have been well over $1,000,000. The claim was supported by evidence which the Court definitely and conclusively rejected and by an alleged declaration of trust which the Court found to be a forgery. Needless to say the case was well prepared, and it required a hearing of 40 days before the unfortunate defendants, who will not recover a cent of their costs, succeeded in repelling this entirely ... \n\n## 1", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-436 - Acting Governor Claud Sever & Governor Sir May & Public Offices - 1916 [11-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 469191, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-445 - Public Offices - 1917", "page_number": 65, "title": "CO129-445 - Public Offices - 1917", "content_text": "3: for the SAJ 内藤 TUČAREDKI 12 4 ១៥ 4 -- stealbro 9610, FLD JISTRUG 7 Ban 11. \"SAPI- dan ada kendi ept { 62 [!* ༈; - be difficult for him to claim the principal and accrued interest of his bond so promptly as to avoid a certain loss of interest on the amount so claimed. In the case of loans domiciled with us, the Ordinance governing the arrangements for holding drawings provides for ample notice to be given - notice -1.e. not less than fifteen days of the date on which the drawing is to be held, and, although not laid down in the Ordinance, it is customary to allow a similar period to intervene between the date of the drawing and that on which the bonds are repayable which latter date invariably coincides with a dividend date. The Colonial Government may have satisfied themselves that the method of repaying drawn bonds laid down in the War Loan Ordinance is not open to objection, but, in case, on reconsideration of the matter, it should be decided to follow our practice, it may be useful if attention is drawn to the clauses in the draft model General Loan and inscribed Stock Ordinance Nos.16,17,18,19,20, and 21, a copy of which was forwarded to the Colonial Government in the Secretary of State's circular Despatch of the 3rd May 1913, which dealt with the conduct of drawings generally. For convenience of reference, a copy of this draft Ordinance is enclosed.\n\n4. I enclose also a draft of the bond drawn up on the lines laid down by the War Loan Ordinance and the Prospectus as modified by the instructions subsequently given to us by the Colonial Government, Subject to any further alteration which may be decided upon, we propose to print the bonds in this form, and we will arrange that they shall be prepared so as to afford as much protection against forgery as possible.\n\n5. I have to request that we may receive the instructions of the Colonial Government in the matter.\n\n($gd) R.L.Antrobus,", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-445 - Public Offices - 1917.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 469658, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-445 - Public Offices - 1917", "page_number": 532, "title": "CO129-445 - Public Offices - 1917", "content_text": "10\n\n[8. 4 conti.] Fees to be paid by applicant. Fees to members of board. Certificate to be given to successful candidate. Certificate to be subject to regulations. Copy of certificate to be granted in case of loss. M. S. Act, 1891, s. 101 Production of certificates. No. 10 of 1899. MERCHANT SHIPPING.\n\n(12) Every applicant for a certificate of competency shall, on lodging his application, pay to the Harbour Master a fee, if for a master's or first class engineer's certificate, of 20 dollars, and if for any other certificate, of 15 dollars.\n\n(13) Every member of the board, except the Harbour Master, shall be entitled to receive out of the public revenue a fee of 5 dollars for the examination of each applicant.\n\n(14) Every applicant who has passed a satisfactory examination and has given satisfactory evidence of his sobriety, experience, and general good conduct on board ship, shall be entitled to receive, on the recommendation of the board, a certificate of competency signed by the Governor.\n\n(15) Certificates of competency granted under this section shall be subject to the regulations made under the Order in-Council dated 9th May, 1891, with respect to the use, delivery, cancellation, and suspension of colonial certificates of competency.\n\n(16) If a master, mate, or engineer proves, to the satisfaction of the Governor, that he has, without fault on his part, lost or been deprived of a certificate already granted to him under this section, the Governor shall, and in any other case may, on payment of such fee, if any, as he may direct, cause a copy of the certificate to which, by the record kept, he appears to be entitled to be delivered to him; and such copy shall have all the effect of the original.\n\n(17) The master of a ship, on signing the agreement with the crew before the Superintendent of the Mercantile Marine Office, shall produce to him the certificates of competency which the master, mates, and engineers of the ship are hereby required to hold.\n\nForgery of certificate. [10. s. 104.] (18) Every person who-\n\n(a) makes, assists in making, or procures to be made any false representation for the purpose of procuring, either for himself or for any other person, a certificate of competency; or\n\n(b) fraudulently uses a certificate or copy of a certificate of competency which has been forged, altered, or cancelled, or suspended, or to which he is not entitled; or\n\n(c) fraudulently lends his certificate of competency or allows it to be used by any other person,\n\nshall, in respect of each such offence, be guilty of a misdemeanor.\n\nMERCHANT SHIPPING, No. 10 of 1899.\n\n11 2 Engagement and Discharge of Seamen.\n\n# 6. (1) It shall be lawful for the Governor to appoint within the Colony a place to be called the Mercantile Marine Office, at which place shall be conducted all the business connected with the engagement and discharge of seamen on board British and colonial ships, and foreign ships whose flag is not represented by a consular officer resident in the Colony, such ships being in the waters of the Colony. The Harbour Master shall be the Superintendent of the Mercantile Marine Office. The present Mercantile Marine Office shall be deemed to be the place appointed until the Governor shall appoint some other place.\n\n(2) No seaman shall, except with the sanction of the Harbour Master, be shipped to do duty on board a British or colonial ship, or any foreign ship whose flag is not represented by a consular officer resident in the Colony, elsewhere than at the Mercantile Marine Office; and the Superintendent shall require such seaman to produce to him his certificate of discharge from the last ship, and, failing the production of such certificate, such seaman shall be bound to give satisfactory explanation to the Harbour Master of the cause of the non-production thereof.\n\n(3) The master of every British ship, and of every colonial ship exceeding 60 tons, and of every Foreign ship whose flag is not represented by a consular officer resident in the Colony, shall enter into an agreement with every seaman whom he engages in this Colony, and carries to sea as one of his crew, in the form and manner provided by the Merchant Shipping Acts.\n\n(4) If the master of any such ship carries any seaman to sea without entering into an agreement with him in accordance with the last sub-section, he shall be liable to a fine not exceeding 50 dollars.\n\n(5) Such fees, not exceeding the sums specified in Table I in the schedule as may be fixed by the Governor-in-Council, shall be payable upon all engagements and discharges; and the Superintendent shall cause a scale of such fees to be prepared and to be conspicuously placed in the Mercantile Marine Office, and the Superintendent may refuse to proceed with any engagement or discharge, unless the fees payable thereon are first paid.\n\n(6) Every master of a ship engaging or discharging any seaman at the Mercantile Marine Office shall pay to the Superintendent the fees.\n\nAs amended by No. 90 of 1911, No. 80 of 1911, No. 16 of 1912, No. 17 of 1913 and No. 48 of 1912 Supp. Sched.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-445 - Public Offices - 1917.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 475792, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-447 - Governor Sir May - 1918 [1-3]", "page_number": 156, "title": "CO129-447 - Governor Sir May - 1918 [1-3]", "content_text": "Page 153\n\nSGA\n\nAs a result of the winding up order, the Official Receiver, as liquidator, has commenced the present action to recover 100 chests of opium from two of the Directors and their alleged confederates.\n\nThere have been violent fluctuations in the opium market but the price has been within the past year as high as $10,000 a chest. The amount at stake in this action would be then something like a million dollars. The liquidator has other similar claims outstanding for 86 chests and those claims will probably be decided by the result of the present action.\n\nIf the charges now brought are proved, a most disgraceful and highly elaborate swindle has been worked by two of the Directors, and supported by forgery, perjury, and fraud of every description. If the charges are disproved, then another Director has made an impudent attempt to blackmail his colleagues.\n\nPractically every document put in by either side is alleged by the other to be a forgery ab initio, or to have been falsified for this motion.\n\nEven if the Directors who are the principals on either side are no better than they should be, the money of the shareholders is at stake, and there is the British Company law to be vindicated.\n\nYour Excellency will, I think, agree that the case from the start promised to be exceptionally troublesome: it is certainly the heaviest that has been tried in these Courts in the 9 years that I have been on the Bench.\n\nI will deal first with the question of adjournments.\n\nThe first nominal hearing date given was January 24th, 1916, but Mr. Sharp was then away and finally, after some bickering, it was put down for November 7th.\n\nUnder normal circumstances, the case would have come on then. The difficulty was, of course, Mr. Sharp. He is the most experienced Counsel in the Colony, and his intellect is as...\n\nPage 153 continues...\n\n... (text continues, but the original scan indicates a page break)\n\n...\n\n \nPage 154 (expected but not provided in the original snippet)", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-447 - Governor Sir May - 1918 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 475818, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-447 - Governor Sir May - 1918 [1-3]", "page_number": 182, "title": "CO129-447 - Governor Sir May - 1918 [1-3]", "content_text": "including Lam Tan Chiu and Li Hong Mi in the first case,\n\nand Li Hong Mi in the second case, and Lo Taz Sou in the third case. Further with regard to the first case, Mr. Wei Yuk informed me be- fore the trial, as I have informed the Secretary for Chinese Affairs, that Lam Tan Chiu had offered to Mr. Wong, late inter- preter at the Supreme Court, bribes gradually increasing from $5,000 to $50,000 to give expert evidence in support of a forged document on which the fraudulent claim to property worth about $1,000,000 depended; the desired evidence being contrary to the opinion which Mr. Wong had already expressed to Lam Tan Chiu that the document was a forgery, as indeed it was ultimately pro- nounced by the Court. There is among these papers a written statement by Mr. Wong confirming this, and I can only take it as true.\n\nIt would I think be a salutary warning to this class of men, and of great advantage to the Colony, if these three could be got out of it.\n\n28th July, 1917.\n\n(sd.) E. H. Sharp.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-447 - Governor Sir May - 1918 [1-3].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 476494, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-448 - Governor Sir May - 1918 [4-6]", "page_number": 309, "title": "CO129-448 - Governor Sir May - 1918 [4-6]", "content_text": "# No 146.\n## RC\n### Enclosure 1.\n\nSir,\n\n**REC** 34019 \n[Received: 18 JUL]\n\n307 \n**GOVERNMENT HOUSE.** \n**HONGKONG.** 17th May, 1918.\n\nI have the honour to report the action taken by me in connection with an action originally instituted by the Official Receiver in the circumstances detailed in the summary by Mr. Carpmael, of which I enclose a copy.\n\n2. As the Official Receiver, owing to lack of funds, was unable to continue the action, I had to decide whether the Government would undertake the liability of the Official Receiver's costs, in the event of his losing the case, and so enable him to continue the action. The question was submitted to me on the 23rd of May, 1917. The plaintiff had applied the day before for a month's adjournment but could only obtain an adjournment till the 30th of May. The matter was therefore very urgent.\n\n3. It was represented to me by the Official Receiver that if the action failed for want of funds \"a very serious blow will have been struck at British Justice and the policy of attempting to apply British Law and British methods to Chinese litigants\". There were strong grounds for the belief that a great fraud, supported by forgery, had been perpetrated. The alleged forgery was of certain documents which had previously been submitted by the Secretary for Chinese Affairs to the Committee of the Chinese Chamber.\n\n**THE RIGHT HONOURABLE** \n**WALTER LONG, M.P., &c., &c., &c.**", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-448 - Governor Sir May - 1918 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 476495, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-448 - Governor Sir May - 1918 [4-6]", "page_number": 310, "title": "CO129-448 - Governor Sir May - 1918 [4-6]", "content_text": "308\n\nof Commerce, a body of leading Chinese of high standing in the Colony, who unanimously pronounced them forgeries. Both the alleged forgery and the alleged fraud had been the subject of strong animadversions by the Chief Justice and the Full Court of Appeal in the winding up proceedings, and the Court had expressed the view that the case was surrounded with so much suspicion that it pre-eminently required investigation. The Counsel (Mr. E. H. Sharp, K.C., and Mr. F. C. Jenkin) for the Official Receiver shared the latter's belief that the charges were well founded. In these circumstances, I had a conference with the Attorney-General and Mr. Sharp, with the result that I decided to institute criminal proceedings against two of the defendants on a charge of conspiracy to defraud, and Mr. F. C. Jenkin was instructed for the purpose, together with Messrs. Hastings and Hastings, Solicitors. This firm were the Solicitors for the Plaintiff in the Civil proceedings. Mr. Sharp had been appointed to be Chairman of the Military Service Commission and had generously abandoned the case in order to devote the whole of his time to the Commission.\n\n4.\n\nAn application was thereupon made to the Full Court to stay the Civil action. The Court granted the Plaintiff an adjournment of 1 month to enable him to make a further attempt to obtain funds wherewith to continue the Civil action, but intimated strongly that in their opinion, the Crown ought not to go on with the Criminal proceedings until the conclusion, one way or the other, of the Civil action.\n\n5.\n\nA further adjournment was subsequently granted by the Court owing to the illness of Mr. F. C. Jenkin. In the meantime, I authorised the Plaintiff to retain Mr. H. E. Pollock, K.C., to replace Mr. Sharp, and on the expiry of the second adjournment, the Attorney-General, in pursuance of directions from me, made to the Full Court", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-448 - Governor Sir May - 1918 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 476497, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-448 - Governor Sir May - 1918 [4-6]", "page_number": 312, "title": "CO129-448 - Governor Sir May - 1918 [4-6]", "content_text": "310 \n\nThese appeared to be the appropriate proceedings for the Government to institute upon the above very strong prima facie case of fraud and forgery being brought to their notice, and it was the attitude of the Court which practically obliged them to take the course which was adopted subsequently.\n\n(d). The Criminal proceedings would probably have occupied a longer time than the continuation of the Civil action and would have involved very heavy costs. It has been estimated that the trial at the Sessions would alone have occupied from 50 to 100 days. This expenditure of time and money was avoided by the continuance of the Civil proceedings.\n\n(e). The Chief Justice and the Full Court had in the winding up proceedings expressed themselves strongly on the grave suspicion attaching to the defendants' case.\n\nI trust, therefore, that in the circumstances you will give your covering sanction for the expenditure incurred.\n\nI have the honour to be, Sir,\n\nYour most obedient,\nhumble servant,\nGovernor, &c.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-448 - Governor Sir May - 1918 [4-6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 478699, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-452 - Others & Individuals - 1918", "page_number": 164, "title": "CO129-452 - Others & Individuals - 1918", "content_text": "## EX-OFFICERS.\n\n### Medical Notes.\n\n| No. | Regt. | Age. | Medical Notes. |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| D.O.798 | R.E. | 29 | Good |\n| D.O.798 | K.O.Y.L.I. | 24 | Good |\n| D.O.840 | London. | 26 | Fair |\n| D.O.853 | Leicester Yoo. | 28 | Good |\n| D.O.871 | R.F.A. | 28 | Good |\n| D.O.1091 | R.E. | 28 | Fair |\n| D.O.1097 | A.O.C. | 28 | Good |\n| D.O.1127 | Cambridge. | 30 | Fair |\n\nB.Q. D.06.-29.7.18.\n\n### EX-OFFICERS.\n\n| No. | Rank. | Regt | Age. | Medical Notes. | Qualifications and Previous Employment. | Present Locality. | O.U.T.C. Courses, |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| D.O.1161 | Sergt. Maj. | 39 | 38 | Good | | London. | A.S.C. M.T. |\n| D.O.1179 | Trooper | S.A.F. | 35 | Fair | Ed. privately. Apprentice mechanical engineering. 1 yr. Italy, 1 yr. Germany. yrs. engineer (motor) to R.A.C., Pall Mall. 1 yr. on own account, India. Joined Army at outbreak of war. [Hindustani, French.] | Yorkshire. | |\n| D.O.1180 | 2nd Lieut. | R.E. | 61 | Good | Ed. privately. 4 yrs. apprentice to Redditch Gas Co. 2 yrs. engaged with Mexbro. Gas Co., Maltby Ons Co., and Brighton Gas Co. (gas engineering). | Essex, | |\n| D.O.1205 | Lieut. | B.G.A. | 25 | Good. Neurasthenia. | Ed. privately. 2 yrs. electrical and mechanical engineer, Electrical Installations, Ltd., London. Just completed course of engineering, Edwards & Armstrong, Stroud, Glos. | Warwick. | |\n| D.O.1224 | Lieut | S. Staffs. | 24 | Good | Ed. privately. Graduate of Institute of Mechanical Engineers. Worked with Herbert Morris Ltd., Loughborough, 6 yrs. In charge of 9-2 shell forge and press shop. Hydraulic forgery, Camell Laird & Co., Nottingham, 17 mos. | Edinburgh. | |\n| D.O.1228 | Capt. | R.A.F. | 25 | Good | Ed. privately, and Edinburgh Univ. B.Sc. Engineering. 1 yr. engineer, Beale Peebles & Co. 2 yrs. engineer, Eler, Power Station Leith, and engine testing fitting Sunbeam Motor Car Co., Wolverhampton. | Northante. | |\n| D.O.1282 | Capt. | R. Fus. | 56 | Good | Ed. Dever. Malines Inst. of Engineering, Belgium. Degree. Machine construction. & Fra. apprentice in engineering shops and drawing office, Massam, Scott & Co., Ltd., Fulham, 2 yrs. chief draughtsman, Deepwell Boring Co., St. Albans. Has been in Paris during last 2 yrs. in connection with supply of aviation materials to American and French Governments. Thorough knowledge aviation factory equipment, installation and supervision. [French] | Gloucester. | |\n| D.O.1364 | Private | London. | 32 | Good | E. City of London and London Univ. B.Sc. Course (engineering). 3 yrs. app, Mitchell Motor, Ltd. 1 yr. app. The Waterloo Motor Works. 3 yrs. with Leyland Ltd. Motor Works, 2 yrs with the Surrey Tracting Co. 1 yr. with the Powders Shell Works, maintenance plant, erection gun-making machinery. [French, Latin, Greek.] | London. | |\n| D.O.1385 | Lieut. | London. | 45 | Good | Ed. Royal Acad., Queen's Coll., Belfast, London Univ. yrs. engineering course. Appointed assist. engineer, Shell Transport Co. Resigned to join Army. [French.] | London. | |\n| D.O.1465 | Lieut. | A.S.C. | 20 | Fair | Ed. Dulwich. 22 yrs. engineering experience, England, France, U.S.A and Germany. Knowledge of motors. [French, German.] | London. | |\n| | | | | | Ed. privately, Passed exam, engineer Inspector, Natal, yrs. engineer inspector, Durban. 5 yrs. engineer inspector, Electrical and Water Supply Co. Natal. 2 yrs. on own account, automobile and agricultural business. 8 mths, inspector machine tool. Woolwich Arsenal. 15 mths Woolwich National Gauge Factory. [Dutch,] | Lancashire. | |\n| | | | | | Ed. privately. Trained engineering work, 4 yrs. asst civil engineer. yrs construction work, Midland Iron works. Several yrs. draughtsman, clerk of works, Gas Light & Coke Co. Engaged L.C.C. designing, constructing gas and chemical plant, bridges, piers, sewage and Water works, etc. | Lancashire. | |\n| | | | | | Ed. Merchant Taylors', Liverpool. Liverpool Univ. 4 yrs. specialising refrigerating engineering. Slight knowledge of aeronautical drawing. | Staffs. | |\n| | | | | | Ed. School Technology, Manchester. 3 yrs. shops of Hans Renold, engineers, Manchester. | Sussex. | |\n| | | | | | Ed. privately and Oxford. Matric. 1st honours Motor engineer. Theoretical railroad engineering. Designer and inventor of internal combustion engines. [French,] | Warwick. | |\n| | | | | | Ed. privately. 3 yrs, brass, copper works, U.S.A. 7 yrs. steel manufacture. 2 yrs. export, import trade. Represented eng. firm. Recruiting work. Military representative tribunal. [French, Italian, German,] | London. | |\n| | | | | | Ed. Newton Coll. Engineering course, Crystal Palace, A.I.E.E, 5 yrs, st. engineer, Cable Work Dept., India & Canadian Pacific Railway (drawing office and surveying). [Hindustani.] | Norfolk. | |\n| | | | | | Ed. privately. 7 yrs. engineering asst. 3 yrs. own business set to architects. 9 yrs. own business general engineering asst. [French.] | H.Q. | |\n| | | | | | Ed. St. Paul's School and Felstead. Studying engineering prior to joining Army. Unable to resume studies at present. Used to horses and cattle. Considerable veterinary exp. | | |\n\nH.Q. D.O.4-28.7.18.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-452 - Others & Individuals - 1918.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 491772, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-474 - Governor Sir Stubbs - 1922 [1-4]", "page_number": 313, "title": "CO129-474 - Governor Sir Stubbs - 1922 [1-4]", "content_text": "I have only recently met Zumar, a man likely to care profoundly and be versatile. I have recently met Potter, who is very attentive and must, of course, be good enough. He makes quite a fair income, but I am not sure about Zumar.\n\nCuriously, we have discussed Franz, one of the two handlers of the case, on the question of the protracted case, of which I was chairman. Considering that it is increasing and we are conducting it, it appears to be what we wanted. Both the Bar and the Summary Jurisdiction can do what is required.\n\nI was against it, which I thought was unkind. There is the Jitchbone Case. The plaintiff alleges he is a son named in the will; the defence states that the son in question died long ago. The case has been called the testator had two wives, largely due to the absence of both Sharp & Potter on holiday.\n\nThe case involves concubines and numerous natural and adopted children. It has involved stacks of expert evidence as to the validity of the will. The former returned later, obviously mortified by the repercussions of the alleged forgery. He was a sick man, and I am sorry to say that he died a fortnight ago, apparently due to the stress of the case.\n\nHis death leaves a serious gap in the firm, apart from his ability and experience. The usual lying in Chinese cases has been quite inspiriting, and the numbers are hard to stop, but when we were reduced to expostulating banities, it came to Alabaster, which is wholly inadequate.\n\nSharp's junior had a nervous breakdown and could not go on, which made the position very difficult. I have at once asked Leary to take the Will Case, an almost inferable task.\n\nPage 17", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-474 - Governor Sir Stubbs - 1922 [1-4].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 492074, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "page_number": 3, "title": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "content_text": "Hong Kong\n\n1922 VOL. 2\n\nWI 17721/43 2,000 12/32 – II, J, R & L, Lễ Gp lia\n\nB)\n\n \n DESP. NO.\n DATE\n SUBJECT\n \n \n 1\n Many\n \n \n \n 2\n May\n \n \n \n 3\n \n a w fr { # •\n \n \n 6\n 10\n \n \n \n 10\n 12\n \n \n \n 12\n 16\n \n \n \n 16\n 22\n \n \n \n 22\n 25\n Ir \" i Jun\n \n \n 2\n \n f\n \n \n 23\n \n P \" 122 bony\n \n \n 24\n Fel J\n \n \n \n 10\n 12\n 275\n \n \n 22\n \n = =\n \n \n 13\n \n A\n \n \n 14\n +\n \n \n \n 24\n 138\n \"\n \n \n 20\n 24\n $44\n \n \n 22\n 27\n # H f\n \n\nPublic Service. Increase in Emoluments of certain members of\n\nSentence of death.\n\nLeung 150\n\nConstitutional Reform Petition.\n\nFatter Mohamed· 4th. Perkins.\n\nArrest of.\n\nEmoluments of -\n\nStandard forms of Agreement Class I + II.\n\nMr. Sutton.\n\nPension\n\nCase of cruelty to a \"mui trai\". : Work of Po Leung Kuk.\n\nLecturer in mechanical Engineering, Hong University\n\nStrike of Launderer\n\nLaunderer in H Kong\n\nMilitary Lands question\n\nClaim of Dai You\n\n13. Pilt.\n\nTai You Green Launch Co. & others to compensation.\n\nfensivz\n\nAppt. of European Accountant at Treasury.\n\nPublicity Bureau.\n\nReport of V.D. Commissioner\n\nAbolition of\n\nJung tsa Hospital\n\nthe mui-tzai system\n\nRecruitment of Chinese labourers.\n\nImperial Wireless Chain\n\nUse of Chaulmoogra oil in treatment of leprosy.\n\nSite for proposed Lof T. Dispensary\n\nForgery Ordinance\n\nNo 11 of 1922\n\nEvent Ordinance\n\nMisdemeanors Punishment Amendment Ordinance\n\nPurchase of Br. motor cars.\n\nAcquisition of land by Alien.\n\nEx-enemy Missions\n\nJ. Ingham.\n\nPenows\n\nLiquidation of Messrs. Megerinks & Co\n\nRe-adjustment of boundaries", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 492285, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "page_number": 215, "title": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "content_text": "228\n\n(N.B.-An addition for pumping from the City has been made in the case of the Peak and Middle Levels.)\n\nHONGKONG.\n\n(a)-Water Supply.\n\nTHE HONGKONG WEEKLY PRESS &\n\n(b)-The drainage of the Middle Levels should be diverted to an outfall in the Sulphur Channel. (c)-All sewage on the Western side of Kowloon Peninsula should be diverted to outfalls at Kowloon Point and North of the Cosmopolitan Dock.\n\n10. As our recommendations do involve the supply of Salt Water, the question of \"the provision of suitable pipes\" does not arise.\n\nT. L. PERKINS, Chairman. L. GIBBS. R. M. HENDERSON. C.E. WARREN.\n\nJuly 9th, 1921.\n\n6. The City and Peak Water Supply has about reached the limit of its capacity. It is suggested that the cost of this should be met by an additional rate in the districts concerned, each district being first given the option to decide by vote whether or no it will adopt a Water Carriage System with the proposed Water Carriage Services to the Peak and Middle Levels.\n\nThe present supply (1920) is fully 7 million gallons a day. The water required for the Peak and Middle Levels amounts to 5 and 22 million gallons a year, respectively. One inch of water on an acre amounts to 22,000 gallons. In the driest recorded year at least 20 inches of rain can be collected in Hongkong, so that the above amounts can be collected respectively from 12 and 50 acres.\n\nThe present gathering ground of the City and Hill District Water Works amounts to 2,561 acres. There is however an area of about 2,600 acres in the neighbourhood of Taitam which is available for catchment and which may be reckoned on to increase the supply (without further reservoirs) from its present figure of 7 millions to 10 millions a day. A catchwater to intercept the water from about 300 acres of the above 2,600 acres at a cost of $70,000 is now in contemplation; this will provide an additional supply of at least 130 million gallons a year and will take no longer to carry out than the works necessary for supplying at a much greater cost ($417,000) 27 million gallons of Salt Water a year.\n\n(b)-Peak District.\n\nThe sanitary advantage to the Peak owing to its scattered location and the long carry for fæcal matter, is so great and the amount of water required is so small that a Public Water Carriage System using fresh water might with advantage be adopted there as soon as the necessary additions to the Peak pumping plant, now on order, are installed.\n\n(c)-Middle Levels.\n\nIn the Middle Levels the amount of water required is a more serious matter and the sanitary advantage less, and it seems that a Public Water Carriage System using fresh water should remain in abeyance there till an adequate extension of the Taitam gathering ground has been put in hand.\n\n7.-The Kowloon Works will produce 1.7 million gallons a day in the driest recorded year and can be considerably extended at a comparatively small cost. The present supply is about 1.3 million gallons a day. The Water Supply in Kowloon is therefore still fairly ahead of present requirements, but in view of the rapid growth of the district a Water Carriage System using fresh water should not be installed until extensions of the present Water Works are put in hand.\n\nGeneral.\n\n6-The time may come when the limit of the fresh water resources of the Colony has been so nearly reached that it will be more economical to obtain a supply of Salt Water than to obtain an equal additional supply of fresh water, but it does not appear that that time has yet arrived, and no works which may be carried out now for the use of fresh water will in any way interfere with the use of Salt Water when its use is found to be more economical.\n\n9.-Some alterations to the sewerage system in each of the three districts will be desirable. After perusing the six reports (Annexes 5-10) received from Mr. Newhouse, we have come to the following conclusions:-\n\n(a)-The drainage of the Peak District should be diverted to an outfall on the South side of the Island.\n\nHONGKONG\n\nBOOK-KEEPER'S SHARP SENTENCE.\n\nPROCEEDINGS IN MACAO.\n\nCarlos José Sequeira appeared before Tribunal in Macao, this week, on the charge of forgery.\n\nThe defendant was a book-keeper in the Hongkong branch, in Pedder Street, of the North West Trading Co., Ltd., and it was alleged that he forged the signature of the manager of the branch to 34 cheques, in 1919 and 1920. On October 21st, 1920, Sequeira absented himself, on which date suspicions were first aroused, and rewards for information leading to his arrest were widely published.\n\nSubsequent investigations revealed a number of forgeries of the manager's signature on cheques and the omission to enter them in the Company's books. These cheques were all made payable to Sequeira. The counterfoils of the cheques, in some cases, bore different amounts from those which appeared on the cheques themselves, and names of persons other than Sequeira. In other cases the counterfoils had been cancelled. The total amount involved in the charges was $11,990.\n\nSequeira, who claims to be a Portuguese subject, was arrested by the police at Macao.\n\nA number of witnesses from Hongkong attended; the Procurator of Macao conducted the case for the prosecution, and Mr. H. Nolasco defended. Mr. T. M. Hazlerigg (Assistant Crown Solicitor) watched the proceedings on behalf of the Hongkong Government.\n\nThe Chief Justice sentenced the defendant to six years' imprisonment at Timor, telling him that, but for extenuating circumstances, the sentence would have been one of twelve years.\n\nThe sentence does not begin to run until it has been confirmed by the Portuguese authorities at Goa.\n\nOwing to military movements in the Central Yangtsze region, a Hankow message says, cargo deliveries from the provinces are very difficult to obtain.\n\nThe Java-China-Japan Line has distributed a dividend of 15 per cent, for the year 1920. The report speaks of the business of the Company having been seriously affected by the competition of Japanese and American Shipping Board vessels, and alludes to the disturbing effect which the violent fluctuations in the rate of the Mexican dollar has had on business life in Eastern Asia.\n\n182\n\n[September 3rd, 1921.\n\nCORRESPONDENCE.\n\nAN INACCURATE REPORT.\n\n[TO THE EDITOR OF THE HONGKONG DAILY PRESS.]\n\nSIR, My attention has to-day been called to an article appearing in your issue of May 27th, referring to statistics purported to have been given by me.\n\nIt seems regrettable that inaccurate newspaper reports should be taken as authoritative statements. Having had the privilege of conferring with the Authorities of the Civil Medical Department and having in my possession the published reports of that Department, it is not likely that I should have made such an unintelligible statement as the one appearing in the Hongkong and other Eastern papers.\n\nOn first seeing the report as it appeared in the Eastern papers, I took steps through Reuters to correct the statement made. This correction will, of course, have reached you many weeks before my letter.\n\nIt is regrettable that the Sanitary Board were inveigled into spending valuable time in discussing the accuracy of the statement that was never made in the form in which they considered it.\n\nThe Eastern Commission have placed their reports on the Eastern Colonies in the hands of the National Council. This body has already transmitted them to the Colonial Office, by whom they will doubtless be forwarded to the Colonial Governments concerned.—Yours very truly,\n\nSYBIL NEVILLE ROLFE,\n\nGeneral Secretary.\n\n80, Avenue Chambers,\n\nSouthampton Row, London, W.C.1.\n\nJuly 19th, 1921.\n\n[The article to which Mrs. Rolfe refers was based on a Reuter cable attributing certain statements to her. These formed the subject of a series of questions by Dr. KOCH at a meeting of the Sanitary Board, to which answers were given by the Medical Officer of Health. We have received through Reuter's no correction to the statements attributed to Mrs. Rolfe in the telegram which formed the basis of our comment.-ED.]\n\nSUSPECTED ARSON.\n\nA KEROSENE FIRE IN WINGLOK STREET.\n\nAttempted arson is alleged in a report received by the police from the manager of a Chinese shop occupying the ground floor of No. 32, Winglok Street.\n\nThe manager states that he was asleep in the front part of the shop when he was awakened by one of his coolies with an alarm of fire. At the back of the shop he saw smoke filtering in through cracks in the back door. There was also a strong smell of kerosene. When the door was opened, a pile of waste paper saturated in petroleum was found burning furiously immediately outside. The manager and his coolies got buckets of water and managed to extinguish the flames. Near the door, was found an empty bottle which had contained kerosene.\n\nThe first and second floors of the house are occupied as a Boarding House, so that if the fire had involved the building there might have been great loss of life.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 492513, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "page_number": 443, "title": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "content_text": "For CIRCULATION :— \n\nMr. Chohandt \n\nMr. Beckett. \n\nMr. G \n\nMr. Grindle \n\nSir H. Lambert \n\nSir H. Read \n\nSir J. Masterton Smith \n\nMr. Wood \n\nMr. Churchill \n\nPrevious Paper 228 \n\nDATE: 14 June \n\nSUBJECT: Ordinance 11 of 1922 Forgery \n\nSubmits \n\nSubsequent Paper (1101) WE 30617-82. 60,000 1121 T.A \n\nFEC 396 \n\n35797 \n\nREG. 24 JUL 22 \n\nCopies Library, 11/8/22 \n\nMINUTES \n\nSubject to any legal sanction \n\n24/7. No legal objections. SR2 \n\n4/8/22. \n\n(Signed) H. J. READ \n\n1922 HONG KONG", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 492514, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "page_number": 444, "title": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "content_text": "N: 228.\n\n35797\n\n10. 24 JUL 22\n\n397\n\nGOVERNMENT HOUSE.\n\nHONGKONG. 14th June, 1922,\n\nEnclosure 1.\n\nEnclosure 2.\n\nSir,\n\nI have the honour to submit for the signification of His Majesty's pleasure the following\n\nOrdinance intituled:-\n\nAn Ordinance to consolidate, simplify, and amend the law relating to forgery and kindred offences, No.11 of 1922.\n\n2.\n\nThe report of the Attorney-General which explains the object of this Ordinance is enclosed.\n\nI have the honour to be, Sir,\n\nYour most obedient humble servant,\n\nR. E. Stubbs\n\nGovernor, &c.\n\nTHE RIGHT HONOURABLE\n\nWINSTON CHURCHILL, M.P.,\n\n&c..\n\n&c..\n\n&c..", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 492515, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "page_number": 445, "title": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "content_text": "Enclosure 2.\n\n398\n\nATTORNEY GENERAL'S CHAMBERS,\n\nHongkong, 19th January, 1922.\n\nREPORT ON ORDINANCE No. ... of 1922.\n\nI have examined the accompanying Ordinance intituled \"An Ordinance to consolidate, simplify, and amend the law relating to forgery and kindred offences,\" and I am of opinion that the Ordinance is one which is not contrary to the Governor's Instructions.\n\nThe object of this Ordinance is to introduce the provisions of the English Forgery Act, 1913, 3 and 4 Geo. 5, c.27. The Ordinance closely follows that Act, and as the Forgery Ordinance, 1860 was based on the English Forgery Act, 1861, 24 and 25 Vict. c.98, it has not been thought necessary to prepare a table of correspondence between the sections of the Ordinance and those of the former Ordinance. The preparation of such a table in the present case would have been a matter of considerable difficulty, and the table would not have been of great use, owing to the rearrangements of provisions which have been made.\n\nPage 399\n\n \n\n3.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 492517, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "page_number": 447, "title": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "content_text": "-3-\n\n400\n\n(n) s.10 of the Act is omitted as it seemed unnecessary in Hongkong.\n\n(o) s.12 of the Act is omitted as we have no \"penal servitude\" here. For the same reason \"penal servitude\" throughout in the Act appears as \"imprisonment\" in the Ordinance.\n\n(p) ss.13 and 14 of the Act are omitted.\n\n(q) s.16(2)(c) and (d) are omitted.\n\n(r) s.18(3) of the Act is omitted.\n\n(s) s.19(2) of the Act is altered in s.17(2) of the Ordinance.\n\n(t) s.18 of the Ordinance improves the form of s.44 of Ordinance No.4 of 1865, which had been truncated by Ordinance No.17 of 1919.\n\n(u) s.19 of the Ordinance makes an amendment which is consequential on a repeal in the schedule.\n\n(v) ss.21 and 22 of the Act are omitted.\n\n5. Chops are wooden blocks used universally by Chinese firms for the purpose of authenticating contracts and other commercial documents. The Chinese attach much importance to their chops. The term has been included in the definition of \"die\" in s.2(1). Section 7(4)(b) of the Ordinance was suggested in the first instance by a case in which an employee of a ship had had made a false chop by means of which he proposed to conceal a series of frauds which he intended to commit upon his employer. He appeared to have committed no offence under the law in force at the time.\n\n6. By the repeal of paragraph 13 of the third schedule to the Magistrates Ordinance, 1890, magistrates are given jurisdiction in forgery generally, except where the maximum imprisonment is for life.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 492518, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "page_number": 448, "title": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "content_text": "401\n\n7.\n\nSection 16 of the Ordinance deals with matters which are also dealt with under rules 5 and 7 of the rules contained in the First Schedule to the Indictments Ordinance, 1919, but the clause is of wider extent than those rules, and it is therefore included. The same position exists in England with regard to the indictment rules in force there and the corresponding section in the English Forgery Act of 1913.\n\n8. In the following cases, it was decided not to repeal or amend sections in existing Ordinances dealing with forgery and allied offences.\n\n9. Ordinance No. 1 of 1844. This section deals with matters other than forgery, and it would be difficult to disentangle the forgery provisions. Besides, it provides a higher maximum penalty than the sub-section in the Ordinance under which the forgery of Land Office records would otherwise fall.\n\n10. The provisions relating to passes in Ordinance No. 3 of 1858, ss. 46 and 47, have long been obsolete, and in any case, the amendment of this Ordinance is under consideration.\n\n11. Ordinance No. 4 of 1890, s.3. It seemed desirable not to make the Ordinance incomplete by extracting one particular provision. Besides, forgery of a trade mark is specially defined in section 4 of the Ordinance, and that section provides for the burden of proof in a particular case. The corresponding section in the English Act has not been amended by the Forgery Act, 1913.\n\n12. Ordinance No. 3 of 1894, s.5. This section deals with other offences relating to telegrams as well as to forgery of telegrams. The corresponding section in the English Act has not been repealed.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 492519, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "page_number": 449, "title": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "content_text": "-5-\n\n402\n\n13.\n\nOrdinance No. 10 of 1899, n.4 (18).\n\nto this section.\n\n14.\n\nSimilar remarks apply\n\nOrdinance No. 40 of 1909, s.59. The corresponding section\n\nof the English Act has not been repealed.\n\n15.\n\nOrdinance No. 35 of 1911, sections 10, 11 and 12. The corresponding sections in the English Act have been repealed wholly\n\nor in part, but it is more difficult to disentangle the forgery\n\nprovisions from section 10 of the above Ordinance than from the\n\ncorresponding section in the English Act. Besides, leaving the\n\nsections standing makes the Ordinance more complete. On the\n\nwhole it was decided not to touch these three sections.\n\n16. Ordinance No. 30 of 1915, s. 39 and 52. Section 39 deals\n\nwith offences relating to passage tickets other than the forging\n\nof tickets. Paragraph (b) of section 52 might have been repealed, but it makes the Ordinance more complete to leave these\n\ntwo sections untouched.\n\n17.\n\nOrdinance No. 2 of 1916, s.2.\n\nIt seemed better not to\n\ndeal with the question of false passports.\n\n18.\n\nThis section was allowed\n\nOrdinance No. 27 of 1917, s.2.\n\nto stand because it appears that the possession of the wrappers and\n\nlabels would not be an offence under the present Ordinance, though\n\npossession of the dies would be an offence.\n\n19.\n\nWith reference to the cases in which an offence under the\n\nOrdinance would also be an offence under terms of some other enactment, attention is directed to section 17(2), which provides\n\nthat in such a case proceedings may be taken either under the Ordinance or under the other enactment.\n\n20.\n\nIn my opinion this is an Ordinance to which His Excellency the\n\nGovernor may properly assent in the name of His Majesty and on His\n\nbehalf.\n\nAttorney General", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 492524, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "page_number": 454, "title": "CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7]", "content_text": "407\n\n3. The amendment was suggested by a recent case in which the police surprised a gang of armed men who were about to commit an armed robbery. One of the gang called upon another to fire at the police in order to prevent the arrest of the gang.\n\nThe maximum penalty was imprisonment for one year and a fine of £500. This seems much too low for such an offence. The former general maximum also seems too low for such an offence as forgery at common law.\n\n4. Although there is no limit in England to the term of imprisonment which may be imposed for misdemeanour except of course where the maximum penalty is prescribed by statute, it was thought better to limit the penalty here as provided in the Ordinance.\n\n5. In my opinion this is an Ordinance to which His Excellency the Governor may properly assent in the name of His Majesty and on His behalf.\n\nAttorney General,", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-475 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Acting Governor Claud Severn - 1922 [5-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 492917, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-476 - Acting Governor Claud Severn & Governor Sir Stubbs - 1922 [8-12]", "page_number": 270, "title": "CO129-476 - Acting Governor Claud Severn & Governor Sir Stubbs - 1922 [8-12]", "content_text": "11. Section 11 does not appear in the English Act. It makes it an offence to use wilfully any false affidavit for any purpose.\n\n12. Section 12 contains two paragraphs, (c) and (d), which make the section apply to indictments for making contradictory statements on oath, and for wilfully using a false affidavit.\n\n13. Section 17 (2) of the Ordinance is general in form and provides that where the making of a false statement is made punishable by any other enactment, proceedings may be taken either under such an enactment or under the Perjury Ordinance. The corresponding sub-section in the Act only deals with the case of false statements made punishable on summary conviction. The wider form of the sub-section in the Ordinance is based on section 17 (2) of the Forgery Ordinance, 1922.\n\n14. In my opinion this is an Ordinance to which His Excellency the Officer Administering the Government may properly assent in the name of His Majesty and on His behalf.\n\nAttorney General.\n\nPage 270\nPage 271", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-476 - Acting Governor Claud Severn & Governor Sir Stubbs - 1922 [8-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 498442, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-486 - Public Offices - 1924", "page_number": 111, "title": "CO129-486 - Public Offices - 1924", "content_text": "## 1924 \n5.\n\nMushers being permitted with the consent of the Governor in Council to hand over to the representatives of the German missionary societies any surplus funds not required by the trustees.\n\nFROM Fo.\n\nThe forgers under the for sin Council depart from the proposals of the Order-in-Council set out in §5° (1) 212) of the Ordinance.\n\n(Signed) J. H. THOMAS\n\n## HONG KONG \nDATE 9 May \nC.O. 22158 \n10 MAY 24\n\nMr. Bright \nMr. Collins \nMr. Ant. U.S. of S. \nProtection of the Armenian \nin Persia \nhis \nPerm L.S. of S. \nPari U.S. of S. \nSecretary of State, \nPrevious Paper \n70 \n20629 \n2 2 MAY 1924 \nCopy above Ho 26 may als \nExtracts from enclos.\n\n## MINUTES\nThe proposal (in para 1 of 20629) to H.M. Chargé d'affaires at Tehran to issue emergency certificates to enable the Nemazi's rahses to return to HK, assuming that Nemari being given facilities to that effect, the only matter requiring action is the proposal.\n\nBr. Subject (vide 20266/16 44104/16) & I shd. not have thought that there was any option but to acquiesce. Ki Kai necessary th. to enable But perhaps the Bushe will confirm this. otherwise in views of the \n\nSubsequent Paper \n2 \n3965 \n`E1211 18243`, `ĐT,CHUNG 11 283C - E258`", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-486 - Public Offices - 1924.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 498470, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-486 - Public Offices - 1924", "page_number": 139, "title": "CO129-486 - Public Offices - 1924", "content_text": "## 48. \nWhere the Supreme Court or a Provincial Court issues a summons or warrant against any person on complaint of an offence committed on board of, or in relation to, a British ship, then, if it appears to the Court that the interests of public justice so require, the Court may issue a warrant or order for the detention of the ship, and may cause the ship to be detained accordingly, until the charge is heard and determined, and the order of the Court thereon is fully executed, or for such shorter time as the Court thinks fit; and the Court shall have power to make all such orders as appear to it necessary or proper for carrying this provision into effect.\n\n## 47. \nEvery Provincial Court shall execute any writ, order, or warrant issuing from the Supreme Court, and may take security from any person named therein for his appearance personally or by attorney, according to the writ, order, or warrant; or may cause such person to be taken in custody or otherwise to the Supreme Court or elsewhere in China, according to the writ, order, or warrant.\n\n## 48.\n**(1)** The Court may, in its discretion, admit to bail a person accused of any of the following offences, namely:-\n- Any felony.\n- Riot.\n- Assault on any officer in the execution of his duty, or on any person acting in his aid.\n- Neglect or breach of duty by an officer.\n\nBut a person accused of treason or murder shall not be admitted to bail except by the Supreme Court.\n\n**(2)** In all other cases the Court shall admit the accused to bail unless the Court, having regard to the circumstances, sees good reason to the contrary, which reason shall be recorded in the Minutes.\n\n**(3)** The Supreme Court may admit a person to bail, although a Provincial Court has not thought fit to do so.\n\n**(4)** The accused who is to be admitted to bail, either on remand or on or after trial ordered, shall produce such surety or sureties as, in the opinion of the Court, will be sufficient to ensure his appearance as and when required, and shall with him or them enter into a recognizance accordingly.\n\n## Trial with Jury or Assessors\n## 49.\n**(1)** Where a person is accused of treason, murder or piracy the case must be tried on a charge before the Supreme Court with a jury.\n\n**(2)** In each of the two following cases, namely:-\n- **(i)** Where a person is accused of manslaughter, rape, arson, burglary, housebreaking, robbery with violence, forgery, sodomy or perjury; or\n- **(ii)** Where a person is accused of an offence other than as aforesaid, but it appears to the Court at any time during hearing, the opinion of the Court being recorded in the Minutes, that such offence charged, if proved, would not be adequately punished by imprisonment for three months with hard labour, or by a fine of £20, or both such imprisonment and fine-\n\nthe offence shall be tried on a charge with a jury or assessors (according to the provisions of this Order applicable to the Court). In the Supreme Court the charge shall be tried with a jury, unless the Court is of opinion that a jury cannot be obtained.\n\n**(3)** The Supreme Court may, for any special reason, direct that any case shall be tried with assessors or a jury, and a Provincial Court may, for any special reason, direct that any case shall be tried with assessors. In each such case the special reason shall be recorded in the Minutes.\n\n## 50.\n**(1)** Where an accused person is ordered to be tried before a Court with a jury or with assessors, he shall be tried as soon after the making of the order as circumstances reasonably admit. \n**(2)** As long notice of the time of trial as circumstances reasonably admit shall be given to him in writing, under the seal of the Court, which notice, and the time thereof, shall be recorded in the Minutes.\n\n## 51. \n**(1)** The Supreme Court shall, when required by the Secretary of State, send to him a report of the sentence of the Court in any case tried before that Court with a jury or assessors, with a copy of the Minutes and notes of evidence, and with any observations which the Court thinks fit to make.\n\n**(2)** Every Provincial Court shall, in accordance with Rules of Court, send to the Supreme Court a report of the sentence of the Court in every case tried by the Court with assessors, with such Minutes, notes of evidence, and other documents as such Rules may direct, and with any observations which the Court thinks fit to make.\n\n## Summary Trial\n## 52. \nWhen the complaint discloses an offence which is not required or directed to be heard on a charge, the accused may be tried summarily on the complaint. Where an offence is tried summarily no greater punishment shall be awarded than imprisonment for three months or a fine of £20, or both. Provided that in cases tried summarily before the Registrar he may award in respect of an offence any punishment which may in respect of a similar offence be awarded in England.\n\n## Preliminary Examination\n## 53.\n**(1)** Where the accused is before the Court, and it appears to the Court that the complaint discloses an offence-\n- **(a)** Which ought to be tried in or reported to another Court; \n- **(b)** Which ought to be tried before the same Court with a jury or assessors;", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-486 - Public Offices - 1924.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 501314, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-490 - Public Offices - 1925", "page_number": 341, "title": "CO129-490 - Public Offices - 1925", "content_text": "GR1178/1922/32(III)\n\nNo.4 Yonghoa Jihoai Koe,\n\nC\n\n7.&\n\n...\n\nSwatow.\n\n22nd October, 1924.\n\n33\n\nI have the honour to beg your kindness to have my case brought to your early decision, as it is already delayed for about ten months and I am doing no business up to now.\n\nBeing humbly and honestly doing business in Swatow for more than ten years without any fault and received no instruction first from the Swatow British Consul and I was suddenly not recognised as a British subject, so I and my manager were suddenly arrested by the Chinese Government and were sentenced as being deceiving the Government with forgery British nationality. But being without protection, I am obliged to pay a bribe of about 300 dollars and a fine of 700 dollars to release us two. Receipts are sent in to the Consul, and after a while my business residence, goods and furnitures inside were all taken possession by the Chinese soldiers same cost about 7000 dollars and the daily business about 35 dollars a day.\n\nFor the above loss, see how can I get for the restitution.\n\nThe new Consul has been tried very hard to get me back the house but the Chinese Government took no heed of him at all, and refused whatever re this matter. What I am anxious at present is to get back the house as soon as possible in order that I can start at once for my business again and let the case settled by and by.\n\nMinister,\n\nH.B.M. Foreign Office,\n\nLondon.\n\n313)\n\nYour...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-490 - Public Offices - 1925.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 501712, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-490 - Public Offices - 1925", "page_number": 739, "title": "CO129-490 - Public Offices - 1925", "content_text": "IMPROVEMENT AT HONG KONG.\n\nFEARS OF GOVERNMENT WEAKNESS.\n\n(FROM OUR CORRESPONDENT.)\n\nHONG-KONG, JULY 1. The situation here is steadily improving. There have been no fresh strikes. The tramway service is being extended. More foreign volunteers are lending their aid. The Naval men are handing over the ferries to men of the Mercantile Marine whose ships are laid up.\n\nCanton has been cutting off supplies of vegetables for Hong-kong, but the food situation is generally satisfactory. Agitation and intimidation are still in evidence and a pork seller has been murdered and another injured, but there have been no other cases of violence.\n\nForeign opinion is becoming anxious lest the Government should weaken and allow the strike to end indecisively, a state of things which would probably leave the way open to similar boycotts in the future. Another point which weighs with unofficial opinion is that the Government has not carried out the intention with which it was credited to deport strikers and prevent them from profiting by orderly conditions which the Government has maintained. The Government appears to think that the entire local trouble is due to intimidation from Canton from which the workers should be protected, whereas unofficial opinion contends that the Hong-kong workers are deeply implicated and that intimidation is not so great a factor as the Government believes.\n\nCanton and other ports are quiet. The big demonstration which was held yesterday at Canton carefully avoided Shameen. Canton officials are reported to be actively organizing a boycott of British and Japanese goods.\n\nTERRORISM AT SHANGHAI.\n\nBOLSHEVIST AGENT'S ACTIVITIES.\n\n(FROM OUR OWN CORRESPONDENT.)\n\nSHANGHAI, JULY 1.\n\nOsermin, the Bolshevist Consul here, in an interview in the China Press (an American daily newspaper), indignantly denounces the document found on the Bolshevist agent Dosser as a palpable forgery deliberately invented by the police and inserted in Dosser's belongings. Osermin declares that there is no such thing in China as an Agitation Department and says that Dosser is merely the agent of a naphtha syndicate. If so it is curious that he so easily found money for $20,000 (over £3,000) bail.\n\nDosser comes up again for trial on Friday, when important revelations are expected. Further examination by the police of Dosser's papers leaves no doubt of his quality as a Bolshevist agent and the extent of Bolshevist plottings in China.\n\nWhile Shanghai is outwardly quiet the strike is as tenacious as ever. The shipping situation is becoming very serious. There are now 45 British vessels laid up, not including launches and tenders. French vessels are discharging at Chinese wharves, but the coolies are afraid to touch British and Japanese cargo.\n\nThe first sign of possible retaliation was a notice to-day by the Electricity Department to the bulk of the consumers saying that, owing to the strike, it may become necessary to cut off the supply. This means that if the British and Japanese mills are not allowed to work neither shall the Chinese, which at present are fully employed. There is a growing feeling among the more responsible foreigners that unless the Powers act drastically there will be no end to the strike. Such action, it is urged, should take the form of a blockade of Canton and Shanghai.\n\nPage 729\n\nFOREIGN RIGHTS IN CHINA.\n\nAMERICAN ATTITUDE.\n\nEXTRA-TERRITORIAL QUESTION.\n\n(FROM OUR OWN CORRESPONDENT.)\n\nWASHINGTON, JULY 1. There has been a further conversation between Mr. Kellogg, the Secretary of State, and Mr. Sze, the Chinese Minister, and, though no hint has yet been given of the suggestions Mr. Sze is understood to have made, the general policy of the United States does not, for the present, seem to have advanced beyond a desire that Resolution V. of the Washington Conference, providing for the study of the question of extra-territoriality, shall be given effect as quickly as possible, and the intention to urge this upon the other Powers. I am given to understand that the recent conversations in London have shown that the British Government is in general accord with this attitude.\n\nAs I have already pointed out, action under Resolution V. would have been taken within the time specified if the Chinese authorities themselves had not requested a postponement for a year and the Powers acceded to this request, though in the case of France there was a refusal to accept a definite date. As matters now stand, however, the United States Government sees no reason for further delay.\n\nThere is, of course, no assumption in the American official mind that we are yet within reaching distance of abrogation of extraterritoriality, but in responsible quarters it is unhesitatingly admitted that the course of policy should and will be towards ultimate abandonment of these special privileges. Resolution V. calls for a gathering of the representatives of the Powers, who, after examination of the question, shall report to their respective Governments, and the sort of report which would be likely to find favour in American eyes can already be predicted with reasonable certainty. It would call for the codification of the law to be administered within the Chinese boundaries as the first step and then for an agreement that this code and not the varying systems of foreign Powers should be administered, whether by foreign officials having jurisdiction over their own nationals or by Mixed Tribunals or by Chinese Judges. The gradual transfer of judicial authority to China might thus be contrived through a period of transition and with the minimum of danger to the unquestionable rights of foreign residents. This is not to say that the United States Government is already committed to a plan of this definite kind, but it is unquestionably some such cautious development that is hoped for. The process of study and change would admittedly be a slow one, and hence likely to arouse the violent opposition of the more hot-headed Chinese agitators. This notwithstanding, it is the most that can at present be hoped for and, whatever Senator Borah or sentimentalists in America may say, seems to be all that would find genuine support in this country.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-490 - Public Offices - 1925.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 503939, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-494 - Governor Sir Clementi - 1926 [9-10]", "page_number": 435, "title": "CO129-494 - Governor Sir Clementi - 1926 [9-10]", "content_text": "8\n\nNote 3.\n\nThe following is a list roughly in chronological order, of various outrages perpetrated in 1926 by Strike pickets at Swatow to the detriment of British subjects and of their domestic and business staffs :-\n\n1. On 26th January, 1926 the British Consul, Mr. Kirke, complained officially that robberies and depredations on British owned property continued with monotonous regularity.\n\n2. During February an attempt was made to levy an entirely illegal House Tax on British and other Nationals. Threats were made that non-payment would entail the cutting off of water and electric-light services.\n\n3. On or about 20th March a boatman, who was the son of an ex-employee and pensioner of the British Consulate, was seized in the street by 12 pickets under the eyes of the police. His offence was that he was alleged earlier in the \"Strike\" to have been of use to the British community. He had in fact previously been sent to Hong Kong to escape the pickets' resentment, and, on returning on this date to Swatow to buy for his father, he was at once seized.\n\n4. On or about 25th March, Dr. Lyall of the English Presbyterian Mission, one of the oldest and best known foreign residents in Swatow, was about to leave for home. In spite of the fact that he had obtained a special pass from General Ho to enable him to load his baggage on to sampans and to have it conveyed to the steamer, the strike pickets interfered and forced the sampans to return to the jetty. Only intervention by H.M.S. Magnolia enabled the pass to be honoured.\n\n5. During March, on one occasion the local press actually published a paragraph which, translated, runs as follows:\n\n\"Arrest by the strike pickets yesterday were as follows :—\n\n(i) Chou Yung Ho, arrested for carrying provisions to Butterfield and Swire's residence. As this is not his first offence he will be detained until the end of the strike.\n\n(ii) Teo Yee Swee arrested for sending various items of information to the British Consulate. He will be detained for examination.\"\n\n6. At this period serious robberies of goods belonging to the Asiatic Petroleum Company and the British American Tobacco Company took place. The values of the stolen goods were $2,500 and $2,700 respectively. The British Consul complained that the Chinese police afforded the Companies no protection at all, and that in the case of the Company first named above, the police did not even visit the scene of the robbery until fourteen days after its occurrence. In either case, practically none of the stolen property was recovered.\n\n7. On 11th May, the pickets opened fire on a sampan conveying certain Chinese passengers who were endeavouring to board a British ship, regardless of the fact that the British S.S. Haining was in the line of fire. They then wished to board the S.S. Haining but were prevented by the chief officer.\n\n8. On 16th May the S.S. Fook On and the S.S. Fanon, both flying the Cantonese naval ensign, proceeded without permission alongside one of the pontoons which are the private property of Messrs. Butterfield and Swire. Similar misuse of these pontoons by Chinese vessels took place on 30th April, 15th-17th May, and 19th-20th May. Repeated representations by the British Consul led to a reply from the Commissioner for Foreign Affairs that he had requested the Chinese Military Authorities to cease to use these pontoons save with the British Consul's consent. However, further cases of unauthorised use are reported to have taken place on 29th June and 1st September.\n\n9\n\n9. On 21st May while Mr. Kirke, the British Consul, was tearing down some Communist posters which had been affixed to the front wall of H.B.M.'s Consulate, he was assaulted and struck by six or eight pickets who had just affixed them there. Urgent representations made to the Canton Government by H.B.M. Consul-General in Canton led to the despatch of telegraphic orders to the Swatow Authorities to apologise and to give an assurance that such incidents would not be repeated.\n\n10. During May, the British Consul complained of further robberies at Messrs. Butterfield & Swire, Messrs. Bradley & Co., the Asiatic Petroleum Co. and at the Masonic Hall. No satisfaction however could be obtained from the Chinese authorities.\n\n11. Early in June a Shantung servant of the British Consul was seized and imprisoned by the Strike pickets. After a false statement, forwarded by the Strike Committee with an impudent forgery, that the man in question wished to go on strike, he was eventually released upon providing $500.00 security that he would leave the port. This he did.\n\n12. During the early part of June an Indian watchman in the employment of Messrs. Jardine Matheson and Co. was arrested by Strike pickets when returning from a steamer with a case of tinned milk for his own use. He was speedily released but it was only after six or seven days that the protests of the British Consul obtained the return of the milk to its rightful owner.\n\n13. On 6th June as a Russian employee was riding a bicycle back to the Asiatic Petroleum Co.'s premises, carrying stores and clothing, he was attacked by four or five pickets who knocked him down and stole his bicycle and parcels. These articles were the property of the Company. The British Consul could obtain no redress for this outrage and reported that the Chinese police were far more afraid of the pickets than of the Commissioner for Foreign Affairs and their own officers.\n\n14. During June occurred another theft of flooring from the Tai Koo Club. It was perpetrated in daylight regardless of the fact that the thieves were in full view of a party of police, who were drilling on some private tennis-courts. It was officially explained that the police were not on duty at the time.\n\n15. On 16th August, Mr. Sim Kye Lim, a British subject of Chinese race, was entering the office of his employers, Messrs. Bradley and Company, when he was seized by a number of armed pickets in plain clothes, bound, and dragged to the general headquarters of the Strike Committee. In spite of the production of a pass from the Executive Delegate, Mr. Hsu Fu, and his protest that he was a British subject, born at Singapore, the son and grandson of British subjects, he was flung into a filthy cell with a heavy and rusty chain so tightly padlocked about his neck that he could hardly breathe or swallow. This chain was removed four days later after the payment of a bribe from Mr. Sim's friends. He was then interrogated by five self-styled judges, but was subsequently imprisoned in a small ill-ventilated room some eighteen feet by twelve with well-nigh a score of other prisoners. Thence, on 2nd September he was taken again before the five 'judges', the chain being again padlocked round his neck. He was given a choice between immediate release on payment of $2000, or a transfer to Canton for trial. He offered $500, only to be threatened with a rifle and half-strangled by the twisting of the chain. Finally, he was released on signing a promissory note for $800, a sum which has been paid. A strong protest lodged by the British Consul has so far elicited no reply.\n\n16. On 25th August armed pickets removed from the hold of the Chinese S.S. Yuetwah thirty-eight cases of Cigarettes which were being re-exported to Amoy by the British American Tobacco Company, under permit from the Chinese Customs. Thirty-four cases were also seized from a lighter alongside. The local Commissioner of Customs made an urgent demand for their return, and the question of closing the port was under consideration, when, on 30th August all the cases were returned and re-export took place without further trouble.\n\n415", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-494 - Governor Sir Clementi - 1926 [9-10].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505898, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 1, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "5183\n\nFrom\n\nLev\n\nCLOSED UNTIL\n\nM\n\nCO129/498/11\n\nKING KONG\n\nCF 5183\n\nDate\n\n4th. MAR. 1923\n\n3rd Marc 2.\n\nN\n\n101\n\nAssistance for Mrs Longinecto\n\nPrevious paper\n\n(Minutes within)\n\nCAS\n\n5794425\n\nSubsequent paper\n\n(4981) Wt.11587/35 15m 11/25 J.F.W.\n\n(E.2337).\n\nNOT TO BE TURNED INSIDE OUT.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505899, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 2, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "# Witomias \n1926 \nSevery tas \n## FOR CIRCULATION :-- \nMr. 387. Bullet Mr. Ell \n| Title | Name |\n| --- | --- |\n| Asst. U.S. of S. | |\n| Permt. U.S. of S. | |\n| Parly. U.S. of S. | |\n| Secretary of State | |\n\nAwed. \nPrevious Paper `CA54944/25` \nmende 18 J., C. Caps. \n€ 7 MAR 1828 \n1920 arbrop with 7 \n\n## HỒNG KÔNG \n### DATE \n3rd March. `CF5183` 14 \n\n## Assistance for \nMas hongine to. Mas his his out to infur \nMAR 1926 a unfurlamall position Austion, sask \na statement in bring indicated be sent to the Under rxamining Magistrate in quaty. asks whether she sha, write to 70. \n\n## MINUTES \nMrs. Longinotto called on me at the time when her application for an advance of £100 (`54363` and `57944`) was under consideration, and unburdened herself to me at considerable length about her troubles in Austria. She was not very clear, and I had great difficulty in following her story, but I remember forming the impression that she had come to grief through trying to be too clever, and that her general procedure had been well calculated to irritate the local authorities. \n\nIt would appear that her troubles began through her attempting to buy property in Austria at a time when British subjects were precluded from doing anything of the kind. It appears also that in order to get round some regulations she declared that certain \n\n## Subsequent Paper \n`(20122) Wt. 14587/35 48M 11/25 Harrow E.2332` \nproperty", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505900, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 3, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "property belonged to her children, only to find that under Austrian law the Courts could appoint whoever they liked to be guardians of the children thus landing herself in worse plight than ever. So far as I understood the position when she called on me, her property had been successfully reclaimed by the former owner. Her boys had been taken away from her guardianship, and she was neither allowed to see them nor to have a home which she could call her own. I pointed out to her the difficulties of our position and advised her to get into touch with the British Consul who would no doubt do what he could for her. She replied that she was in communication with him and that he was making enquiries about Austrian law of guardianship, but that the prospects were not hopeful.\n\nI heard nothing further on the matter until Mrs. Severn, the sister-in-law of Sir Claud Severn, called on me the other day and told me that Mrs. Longinotto had now been arrested in Austria. The reasons for the arrest were not very clear, but, so far as Mrs. Severn could judge, she thought it highly probable that Mrs. Longinotto had committed a breach of the passport regulations. Apparently she was in the habit of going to and from Austria without a visa and had at last been caught out. I told Mrs. Severn I did not see what we could do in the matter, but that if she chose to write in and tell us what she knew, we would see whether it was possible for the Foreign Office to take the matter up.\n\nI think that we can go so far as to write to ... She has now adduced a further reason.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505901, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 4, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "the Foreign Office enclosing a copy of this letter and of the first enclosure in `57944` explaining that Mrs. Longinotto is the widow of the late Mr. Leo Longinotto, formerly Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong, and that she is in receipt of a widow's pension from Hong Kong of £86.13s.8d. per annum (including 25% temporary increase), pointing out that it would appear that she has got into difficulties in Austria and asking whether it would be possible to call for a report on her case from the Consular Authorities.\n\nUnfortunately, we do not seem to have a Consul at Graz, but the Vice-Consul at Vienna could no doubt look into the matter quite easily.\n\nAccording to Mrs. Severn, Mrs. Longinotto has the lowest opinion of the Consular Authorities, and indeed called them muddling old fools, or something of the sort. I am afraid she is rather a trying kind of person who would probably say the same of most people.\n\nproceed as above\n\ncopy \nIRA inf LE \nTRC \nIntrabuck \n11.3.26 \n\nAfter these developments I feel some qualms about action on `54363/25`, which involved several principles though I felt that it would have been approved. Only an exceptionally high Colonial Office official had seen the present case. However, they have security.\n\nPage 183 \ntell Mus what is arranged - Weller D. Whit- 11/2", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505902, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 5, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "## Mr Euf Fold \n\nMr. Sevan called on me yesterday and said that she had received a letter from Mrs. Longinoto saying that she had seen Reichard, apparently through the intervention of some authority at Vienna. She suggested passing this information on.\n\nJudging by what she said, I suppose it was through the intervention of some authority that she was able to see Reichard again. \n\nOn enquiry from me, the Consular authorities at Vienna informed K.F.O. that it will be satisfactory if she leaves.\n\nWe have only just heard about the difficulties she had with the Austrian authorities long before she left. I think, therefore, that it would be best to furnish all the more information, certainly if they know all the details about her recent application.\n\nMrs. S.'s letter to Ms. L. foreshadowed a request for permission to postpone repayment of the advance made to her.\n\nTallulicrbuck 20.3.26 \n1. Budget \n\"Remind Yo. LF \nCR \nWin \nlaton \n1/3/3 QB 14 alou", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505903, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 6, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "## \n2. Foreign Office, Vienna.\n\n17 May 1926.\n\nThe copy arrives with spin. Company A poor outlook for Mrs L. but if Foreign Office stated the legal position correctly it seems there is a point to look at the case. Mr Bushe may perhaps be kind enough to tell us (There seems to be some correspondence with the Austrian authorities regarding coguardians) £183,287. I do not think we can carry this any further. The draft seems to be unexceptional.\n\nAPB -8/5-\n\nthen Ball\n\n\n## \n3. Foreign Office, Vienna.\n\ncopy to Madrid on day for British Legation, Vienna.\n\nSatisfactory as far as it goes.\n\n13 August 1926.\n\nBut it is not clear what has happened at Whi house an Graz or what Mrs. L. will do. See min. on slip following No3.\n\nTallyrand is younger than Jon. how to ride in this country is a problem put by `PAL 9.9.26` (7.9.26 earlier)", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505904, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 7, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "## H. honginetto Requesto 19th Sept 1926\n\ngrant of a loan of £100-havo to be repaid from her pension.\n\nThis is a sad case and Hough Mr. L. is, I feel, rather a difficult person. I am glad if something can be done for her.\n\nBut (1) To make such a grant is against C.O. practice to advance pension (in this case pension).\n\n(2) Notwithstanding this, she was granted an advance of £100 last December (on collateral security) repayable by instalments of £2 as monthly - i.e., it will not be repaid until Jan 1930.\n\n(3) It appears that any advance must be of fairly large amount if it is to serve her purpose. She asks for £100-£200 and offers to repay by monthly instalments equivalent to the balance of her pension - i.e., £5.4-5 p.m. Collateral security is offered.\n\n(4) We could not at this rate sanction a temporary commutation. We could not, I think, agree to allow repayment over a period of years. To make deductions from her pension of £7.4.5/m, £3.12.2½ is already being deducted - leaving a balance of £1-12-2½ p.m., which could hardly justify more than £60 as an advance.\n\n(5) The attached papers deal with the case of a Mauritius pensioner who was granted...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505905, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 8, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "(4 p.p.)\n\n**Case** `60657/22` \n£65 (on the security of this assurance policy).\n\nThe subject is unable to repay the advance. He is now out of work. His service is not satisfactory. In the light of our previous experience of Mrs. ... abroad, it suggests that she is more likely to fail than succeed. \n\nMr. L. is not without relations. He has two brothers-in-law who acted as sureties for her previous advance, but I gather that they are comfortably off. One is a solicitor and it is strained and unwilling to help. I think it may reasonably be expected that they will do their part and make up the amount. However, their funds have not been called upon.\n\nIn view of the foregoing comments, I have come to the conclusion that the application for a further advance should be refused.\n\n`XCR(85)72` is not present, but a similar reference `5-1026` is found.\n\n| Date | Ref | Amount |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| 4x10 | 6/90 | £461 - 01/1 |\n| 6/1726 | | -11/1076 |\n\n13 OCT 1926", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505906, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 9, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "## DRAFT\nCopy 4. File `CF5180`\n\nI am directed to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 19th inst. applying for a further advance on account of the expenditure incurred by you in connection with the Jenxin from Wchong.\n\n2. The request has been carefully considered, but he regrets that...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505907, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 10, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "that he is unable to comply with it, as which has already been made to you is in itself a special concession & contrary to the usual practice.\n\nThis Sept.\n\nIt way of this course will be sent to the For. for his curs.\n\n(Signed) G. GRINDLE,", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505908, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 11, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "# October 6\n\nC.F.5183/26.\n\nMadam,\n\nHK\n\nI am directed by Mr. Secretary Amery to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 19th September applying for a further advance on account of the pension which you receive from Hong Kong.\n\n2. The Secretary of State has carefully considered your request, but he regrets that he is unable to comply with it, as the advance which has already been made to you is in itself a special concession and contrary to the usual practice of this Department.\n\n3. A copy of this correspondence will be sent to the Governor for his information.\n\nI am, Madam,\nYour obedient servant,\nMRS E. LONGINOTTO.\n\n(d) BRIND!.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505909, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 12, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "Pensions /JI \n\nThe Crown Agents \nfor the Colonies \n4, Millbank. S.W.1. \n19th Sep 1926 \n\n25, Cepstow Crescent. \nNotting hill Gate W.11. \n\nGentlemen, \n\nIt is with the feeling that I ought to apologise for my very existence that I approach you today, not so much for the purpose, that chiefly makes it necessary for me to trouble you, upon the question of a further loan in advance of the pension I receive, as I have been told that it would...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505910, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 13, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "be \n\nalmost crazy \n\nfor \n\nme to make out \n\nvery strong case in support of \n\nyet \n\ndo \n\nlove \n\nI find it almost impossible for \n\nThrough life for much \n\nShame \n\nthe \n\nof my \n\nchildren's property - the fact that I had to give up the fight because my relations refused to help \n\nme & because I had no \n\nFurther \n\nmeans \n\nhas been such a terrible blow to me that I feel I cannot recapitulate what I am trying to forget.. \n\nSurely this fact, which means that I have to start life all over \n\nagain, for the sake of my sons, should be reason enough – \n\nThose \n\nI do not want to go down on the gutter \n\nI do \n\nwant to see \n\ndeprived \n\nmy boys \n\nmeans \n\ngenerating because I haven't the \n\nmeans to keep them going, to finish their education; until they are able to stand \n\non their own feet - creditable members \n\nof \n\ntheir \n\nown \n\na decent social class. \n\nI have sacrificed every \n\nspare \n\nhour of my life once \n\nmy marriage broke for the sake of my \n\nsons, sometimes under such difficulties, \n\nthat life seemed unbearable \n\nafter my \n\nlong struggle in Austria _ \n\nI have, arrived at a point that I \n\nhad to leave the \n\nbulk of \n\nour \n\nfurniture in those \n\nas I had not the means \n\nto bring them over \n\nand could not use... \n\nGraz", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505911, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 14, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "sell there so people have no money & I'm to give away about £300 worth to realise about £30, which just paid our passage and initial expenses. All our winter effects and other personal, most necessary belongings, I had sent over before & these are even now at Messrs Mean & Shenkers Ltd., 134, Queen Victoria's Street, to pay for as I haven't the money. The freights etc. on them...\n\nI do believe I need not point out that I cannot live on £10 per month, for I cannot take anything to do as I have to cook & look after my boy - that is, if I could find work, which I doubt, as I have tried & failed to do shorthand or type.\n\nMy only hope therefore is to get another loan of from £100-200 to enable...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505912, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 15, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "me to start in some little business, \neither by getting or by furnishing supplies. This would give \na small partnership a couple of flats a true \na living-income & enable me \nto send my younger ajan to school. \nI have taken all the necessary steps to protect you \nand will be willing to pay interest on the loan - besides repaying the same whole amount of my monthly pension now.\n\nbiz: 15.4.5. \n4.5. As drawn by", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505913, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 16, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "I am quite certain that I can build up an existence for myself with the help of a loan, whereas at present all my time is taken up in contriving to find the necessary pay for the week, its pay during the few shillings that are absolutely wanted to provide the daily reparto for two hungry boys.\n\nI would like to mention here that my elder son applied for a Commission in the Royal Airforce a few months ago, and had it been accepted it would have made a great difference to us all. But he was turned down under circumstances that were certainly unclear and besides giving my boy a great mental blow as his heart was set on the service, partly in consequence of what I had been made to suffer in Germany and Austria, partly to retrieve our position out of the difficulties we were in, and also because he loved his mother and wanted to live in England and give them the same education they were brought up with, they were brought up to be absolutely loyal Englishmen. It is very bitter to realise that he was not accepted and it is...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505914, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 17, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "Are you a stranger in Hong Kong? I have bona-fides that you may question. If I have failed to make myself sufficiently clear in my letter, I beg to be given an opportunity of personally putting forward my petition, it is so difficult to be convincing upon paper without appearing to whine; and even now, I still attempt to face life, with all its difficulties, without flinching _(which, however, does not prevent me from envying those who have no ties to keep them struggling here.)_\n\nI am, dear sir,\n\nYours faithfully,\nClenchongmots", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505915, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 18, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "TELEPHONE No. : CLERKENWELL 4161.\n\nHarry Herz c/o \nAnglo-Continental Trade and Commerce Ltd. \nLONDON & DUBLIN.\n\n**DIRECTORS:** \nH. B. BUTTERY \nS. G. INGRAM\n\nDublin Branch: \n6-10, EXCHEQUER STREET. \n72, FINSBURY PAVEMENT, \nLONDON, E.C.2.\n\nSept. 15th. \n1926.\n\nMrs. Elena Longinotto, \n25 Chepstow Crescent. W.11.\n\nDear Madam,\n\nI herewith beg to inform you that I am quite willing and ready to guarantee repayment of any loan granted you by H.M. Colonial Office up to £200.-.-. it being understood that you assign to me your life insurance policy for £500.-.-. with The National Provident Institution, E.C.4.\n\nMy bankers are Messrs Barclay's Bank Ltd., Finsbury Pavement Branch, Finsbury Pavement, E.C.2.\n\nYours truly,", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505916, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 19, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "P/Pensions/J.1.\n\nThe Far Eastern Department,\nColonial Office.\n\n**RECEIVED**\n28 SEP 1926\n\nI attach a letter from Mrs. E. Longinotto, a pensioner under the Hong Kong Widows' and Orphans' Pension Fund, and presume you will deal with this request for a further advance.\n\nIn Potter\n\"P\" Department.\nCrown Agents.\n27. 9. 26.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505917, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 20, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "Called.\n\nI gave C.A. a note asking them to let him have the August instalment of his pension. £7.4.5 was deducted on 23/8.\n\nAfter discussion with Mr. Bucket, I authorised C.A. to issue today instead of at the end of Sept. the pension (less £16.0.2 deducted for the month) on the understanding that the deduction could not be rebated.\n\n| Date | Amount |\n| --- | --- |\n| 9.9 | £2-0-0 |\n| 10 | £5.4.5 |\n\n`PAC 8/9`", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505918, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 21, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "## \n\nFrom any further communication on this subject, please quote No. A. 9859/3835 203 and address - not to any person by name, but to - The Under-Secretary of State, Foreign Office, London, S. W. 1.\n\nTHE Under-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs presents his compliments to the Under Secretary of State for the Colonies and, by direction of the Secretary of State, transmits herewith copy of the under-mentioned paper.\n\nForeign Office, \nAugust 13, 1926.\n\n| Reference to previous correspondence: | Name and Date | Description of Enclosure |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Colonial Office letter No 24 | The British Legation, Vienna. No 211. 5th August 1926 | Subject: Lease of Mrs. Ronginotto |\n| | | 14 (13341) 7/25 (2) (14506) 5/26 |\n\nSimilar letter sent to... \nRECEIVED 14 AUG 1928 COL. OFFICE", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505919, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 22, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "# No.211.\n\nVienna, \nAugust 4th, 1926\n\nSir,\n\nWith reference to your Despatch No.160 \n(`K4442/3835/203`) of April 13th last, regarding the case of \nKre. Longinotto I have the honour to report that Viscount \nChilston duly communicated with the Austrian Government in \nthe sense of paragraph three of your despatch under reference.\n\nThe case has, however, suddenly ended, since the Federal \nChancellery, Department for Foreign Affairs have now informed \nthis Legation firstly, that all proceedings against Mrs \nLonginotto have been dropped, and secondly, that the \nquestion of the guardianship of her children is also at an \nend owing to the fact that her eldest son, Leo Longinotto, \nhas now left Austria and is permanently domiciled abroad, and \nthat the younger son is also about to leave for England, where \nhe will make his home.\n\nI have the honour to be with the highest respect\n\nThe Right Honourable \nSir Austen Chamberlain, K.G., P.C., etc., etc.\n\nSir,\nYour most obedient, \nhumble servant,\n\n(signed) \nA.W.A. Leeper", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505920, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 23, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "## \nIn any further communication on this subject, please quote \n`K No. 59913835 203` \nand address—not to any person by name, but to \n\"The Under-Secretary of State,\" Foreign Office, London.\n\nRECEIVED \nTHE Under-Secretary \n18 MAY 1940 \nfoot \ndate of FTO \n\nAffairs presents his compliments to the Under-secretary \nColonies \nand, by direction of the Secretary of State, \ntransmits herewith copies of the under-mentioned papers.\n\nForeign Office, \n14th \nMay 1926.\n\n| Reference to previous correspondence: | Name and Date | Description of Enclosure |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| HK. Colonial Office letter No: 25183/26 of 11th March. | | (1) Despatch from H. M. Representative at Vienna No: 89 of 29th March. |\n| | | (2) Despatch to H.M. Representative at Vienna No: 160 (`KH442/3835/203`) of 13th April. |\n| | | (3) Despatch from H.M. Vice-Consul at Trieste No: 24 of 5th May. (`13341`) `7/25(2)` (`14304`) `3/26` |\n\nSimilar letter sent to \nSubject: Case of Mrs \nمار & Longinotto.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505921, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 24, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "4.89.\n\nSir,\n\nVienna,\nMarch 29th, 1926.\n\nI have the honour to request that I may be favoured with advice on the following matter in regard to the guardianship of children of British subjects living abroad, on which subject I am ignorant.\n\n2. Mrs. Elena Longinotto, the widow of Mr. Leo Longinotto, a British subject, formerly Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong, was of Austrian nationality previous to her marriage. On the death of her husband in 1923 she came to live in Austria, bringing with her two children, who had been born in South Africa, and purchased a country house near Graz, where she has since resided; but had many difficulties in respect of the purchase, and of her rights of ownership. At present I only mention these difficulties of a very complicated nature and now the subject of litigation because they are connected with the question of the care of her children, who are under age. By Austrian law the children of foreigners who have lost one or both parents, if under age, have to be put under \"Vormundschaft\" by the judicial authorities who have the right to appoint a guardian or guardians \"until some other provision is made by the competent foreign authorities\".\n\nThe Right Honourable\nSir Austen Chamberlain, K.G., M.P.,\netc., etc., etc.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505922, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 25, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "## \nlocal Court of Law accordingly appointed a Mr. Larry C. Hanson, \nto be guardian provisionally of the Longinotto children (now aged 15 and 12 respectively). \nThis was done with the consent of the mother, although she apparently has no desire to have a co-guardian. \nAn Englishman, who resided in the district, was appointed.\n\nSubsequently, however, it appears that two or three other persons (Austrians) were successively appointed as curators or guardians in place of Mr. Hanson, who for some reason or other was relieved of his function. \nI have enquired of the Austrian Government why these changes of guardianship were made.\n\n### \n3. Last year Mrs. Longinotto applied to the Consulate and to the Legation for assistance to enable her to be regarded as the sole guardian of her children. \nHer lawyer was thereupon given a statement by the British Consul that according to British law she was the natural and sole guardian. \nThe Legation also informed the Ministry of Justice to this effect and asked that steps should be taken to declare and secure Mrs. Longinotto's sole guardianship. \nThis, however, produced no result, and the Austrian Government have returned to the charge on several occasions asking repeatedly what measures the \"competent British authorities\" intend to take in the matter, and whether they wished to take over the guardianship. \nThe Minister for Foreign Affairs was informed that the Legation had no power to appoint guardians and was not aware of the reason for which a co-guardian was considered necessary.\n\n### \n4. In the meantime legal proceedings continued between Mrs. Longinotto and certain persons who were disputing her...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505923, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 26, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "it; and her property; she having sold half her interest in \n\nthe investigating judge ordered the provisional arrest and detention of Mrs. Longinot to. I was able to secure the release of the lady after she had been in prison for about a fortnight. She now writes to this Legation to say that she is still being persecuted, and that unless she can get a \"corroboration of an English Court of Law\" that she is the proper guardian of her children, she will be \"robbed of all her possessions\". I sent the Legal Adviser of this Legation to see her while she was under arrest. In spite of the very confused and hysterical letters which she has written to this Legation during the last few months, the Legal Adviser considered her to be in a normal condition of mind, as far as he could judge. He thinks, however, that the authorities in insisting on an intervention in her family affairs were probably genuinely afraid lest the interests of her children were suffering. This is also the opinion of the Ministry, who stated in a Note of March 5th, that intervention was necessary because, according to the local Court, the financial circumstances and questions of property of the family were very confused and were the subject of litigation, while at the same time the mother appeared to be neglecting the education of the children, and, moreover, a lawsuit against her was proceeding. I am inclined to think there may be reason for the action of the judicial authorities, especially as by Austrian law a woman has not the right to control the property of minors.\n\n5. The point, however, on which I am anxious to be advised is whether or no I should inform the Austrian Government", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505924, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 27, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "A Government, in reply to their renewed enquiry, that a judicial authority or Court of Law in England does not intervene in such a matter. In its last Note the Ministry says that from previous similar cases it is known that an intervention by British Authorities is possible and the Ministry requests me to inform \"the competent authorities of the case and to obtain their decision; and if they are of opinion that they are not called upon to intervene, to state expressly what legal regulations apply.\n\nI have the honour to be with the highest respect,\nSir,\nYour most obedient,\nhumble servant,\n(signed)\nCHILSTON.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505925, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 28, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "# No.160.\n`(K 4442/3835/203)`\n\n**FOREIGN OFFICE, S.W.1.**\n13th April, 1926.\n\nMy Lord:-\n\nWith reference to Your Lordship's despatch No.89 of the 29th ultimo regarding the case of Mrs. E. Longinotto, I have to state for your information that this lady is under English law the sole guardian of her children, and the English Courts would not interfere with her rights, unless by reason of her character and conduct or her neglect of the children they deemed it advisable in the interests of the children to do so.\n\nIf, however, that was the case, the Courts might deprive the mother of her rights as guardian or appoint co-guardians with her.\n\n## 2.\nThe English Courts some times appoint guardians even in cases where for children of foreign nationality they have a guardian by the law of their nationality. Therefore His Majesty's Government could not object if the Austrian Courts should in the present case appoint guardians for Mrs. Longinotto's children, if such action were in accordance with Austrian law and bona fide. Further, if as it appears the children and their mother are domiciled in Austria, in the view of English law the Courts of Austria are the tribunals who have the best right to adjudicate in the matter.\n\n## 3\nYou should bear the foregoing information in mind when framing your reply to the Austrian Government, Court could appoint and make it clear that no English...\n\nThe Viscount Chilston, C.M.G.,\n80.,\n&c.,\n&c.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505926, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 29, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "2175 \n\nwho \n\na guardian for the children of Mrs. Longinotto, \n\nis under English law their sole guardian, unless \n\nproceedings were started in their interests in the \n\nChancery Division of the Supreme Court of Judicature \n\nin this country on one of the grounds mentioned above.\n\nI am, &c.\n\n(For the Secretary of State)", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505927, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 30, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "276\n\nNo.24.\n\n**BRITISH VICE-CONSULATE, VIENNA**\n\nMay 5, 1926.\n\nSir,\n\nWith reference to your despatch No.9.(K3835/3835/203) of March 24th, 1926, relative to the case of Mrs. E. LONGINOTTO, I have the honour to report that I have already on two occasions written to the Austrian Court in question to the effect that according to English law she is the sole guardian of her children. The Court does not appear to consider her as being suitable to be the guardian and has therefore appointed two Austrian lawyers.\n\n2. In view of the substance of your despatch ref: `4442/3835/203` of the 13th ultimo, addressed to Lord Chilston, I do not see that I can properly take any further action in her case.\n\n3. I shall be pleased to furnish any further information on receiving instructions to that effect.\n\nI have the honour to be with the highest respect,\nSir,\nYour most obedient humble Servant,\n(Sd) John Wion\nH. M. Vice-Consul.\n\nHis Britannic Majesty's Principal Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, LONDON.\n\nPage 30\nPage 31", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505928, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 31, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "In any further communication on this subject, please quote \n`No. K.3835 3835/200` \nand address - \nnot to any person by name, \nbut to - \n**The Under-Secretary of State**, \nForeign Office, \nLondon, S.W. 1.\n\n## RECEIVED \n27 MAR 1926 \nCOL.OFFICE! \n2.7\n\nThe Under Secretary of State presents his compliments to \nthe Under Secretary of State for the Colonies \nand is directed by the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs to inform \nhim that his letter of the 17th March 1926, `C5183/26`, \nregarding the case of Ure E. Longinotto, Kong, \nhas been referred to His Majesty's Vice Consul at Vienna. \nA further communication will be addressed to \nthe Colonial Office \nin due course.\n\nForeign Office, \n26th March 1926.\n\n`25-F.O.P.3009(13449)`", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505929, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 32, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "TELEPHONE-WESTERN 6941 \nC. 5183 \n4 MAR 1926 \n\nTo The Under Secretary of State in the \nWhitehall \n3, EDWARDES SQUARE COTTAGES, \nColamns \nKENSINGTON, W.8. \nMarch 3rd 1926. \n\nDear Sir, I have been another day May & languishing to acquaint you with certain facts relating to Frau Quittner & to solicit your assistance. She has been arrested in Austria for apparently no reason other than being likely to leave the country while the litigation pending as to her property here. Also it seems that her identity in Queensland has been questioned by the Foreign Office makers.\n\nWhat she has asked me to do, is that the Colonial Office will send a Statement of the Under Examining Magistrate to the effect that Mrs Kennard held an official position under the Crown at Hong Kong & that she is in receipt of a pension & also that the Foreign Office will state that she is the legal guardian of her own children (she being a British subject) as the Austrian Courts have seized property belonging to her children, & that her statement that she is a British subject may be administered. It seems that in Austria no woman can be the legal guardian of her own children, & that this legal point is disputed by 7 Austrian Courts. I shall be greatly obliged if you will let me know what I think it right to send to the Foreign Office as well. I'm also sending a copy to Mr & Mrs Jorgensen in full confidence. \nYours sincerely, \nSEVERNO", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505930, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 33, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "Address of Under Examining Magistrate at Villard-de-Lans, Austria.\n\nHerm Untersuchungsrichter De Friches, \nLandesgericht, \nGratz Andritz.\n\n2", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505931, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 34, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "# \n0.5183/23.\n\nDowning Street, \n7 March, 1926.\n\n17\n\nI am directed by Mr. Secretary Amery to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 3rd of March with regard to the arrest of Mrs. E. Longinetto in Austria, and to inform you that he is in communication with the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs upon the case and that a further letter will be addressed to you in due course.\n\nMRS. A. SEVERN.\n\nI am, \nSir, \nYour obedient servant, \n(Signed) G. GRINDLE", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505932, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 35, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "## \nMr. Bukli 15/3 \nyem-12 \n12/15. \n\nMr. E. J. Harding \nMr. Strachey \nSir J. Shuckburgh \nSir G. Grindle \nSir C. Davis \nSir S. Wilson \nMr. Ormsby-Gore \nEarl of Clarendon \nMr. Amery \n\nC.5-183 \n26 \nSh \nA. Severn \nMadam \nHilong \n\n17 MAR 1929 \n\nDraft \n2 \n\n7 March, with \nCommunication with the ... \n\nfor Affairs from ...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505933, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 36, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "## Proofread Text\n\nFor the Inter... will continue\n\n**C** \n**ressed** \nLym... \n\ni due cours.\n\n2.\n\n(Signed) G. GRINDLE.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505934, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 37, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "# \n281\n\nI am directed by Mr. Secretary Amery to transmit to you, to be laid before Secretary Sir Austen Chamberlain, a copy of a letter from Mrs. A. Severn regarding the arrest in Austria of Mrs. E. Longinotto.\n\n## \n\n2. Mrs. Longinotto is the widow of the late Mr. Leo Longinotto, formerly Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong, and is in receipt of a widow's pension from the Colony amounting to £86.13.8. per annum, which includes a temporary increase of 25% on account of the rise in the cost of living. I am to enclose for Sir Austen Chamberlain's information a copy of a letter from Mrs. Longinotto to the Crown Agents for the Colonies dated 29th November 1925 applying for an advance of £100 on account of her pension in view of the difficulties which she had been experiencing in connection with her affairs in Austria, an indication of which she gives in her letter.\n\n## \n\n3.\n\n**THE UNDER SECRETARY OF STATE, FOREIGN OFFICE.**\n\n0.5183/26. Downing Street, 17 March, 1926. WK sir,", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505935, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 38, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "3\\. r. Amery would be glad to learn whether Sir Austen Chamberlain could see his way to instruct His Majesty's Consular authorities in Austria to enquire into and report upon Mrs. Longinotto's case.\n\nI am,\nsir,\nYour most obedient Servant,\n(Signed) G. Grimore.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505936, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 39, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "## Jr. Breth 13/3\n\nMr. E. J. Harding \nMr. Strachey \nDr J. Shuckburgh \nSir G. Grindle \nSir C. Davis \nSir S. Wilson \nMr. Ormsby-Gore \nEarl of Clarendon \nMr. Amery \n\n**DRAFT** \n\n3 Nich. 26 \n51834 \nThen87 \n→ vergn Nice \n24 \nWKong. \nC.! \nR \n5/MAR \n7 WAR 1920 \n\nbe to Transmit is to be laid before the H. Chamberlain \na copy of a letter from Mr A. regarding the \nAustina y mas E. Longin sto \n\n2 \nMr Longin to; the \nof the late my Leo \nLoginotto, formerly Asst. Crown Solicitor \nin it.18 in a widow's", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505937, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "page_number": 40, "title": "CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926", "content_text": "amounting to ￥86.13.8 from the Colony, together with ￥... \n\nI am to enclose for your information a copy of a letter from ... applying for an advance on account of her pension in view of the difficulties which she had been experiencing in connection with ... as appears in the enclosed letter.\n\n3. Mr Amery will be glad to learn whether Mr A. Chamberlain could see his way to instruct the Consular authorities in ... to ... upon ... in this matter.\n\n... GRINDLE.\n\n## Possible Markdown formatting based on context:\n### Original Text\n**amounting to** \npens in from the Colony 4 ￥86.13.8 ha, \ntogether with which includes \n几 \nTemp may \nncrease \ntu \nเ \ncod. I homy. I am to enclose for di \nملا \nA than melon's gr \na copy of a Parter \nfrom mos a ignotto is die ca for the Cols. \n(* inch. 5.79++/45) \ndotia \n49 \n1925 applying for an advance \n22120 \nZ170 on recount of her pension in reis \nI the difficulties \nhich the had been experiencing \nà correction with 'in appairs in constira, Mon \ndication \n7 \nsuck \nthe Ervis i ins letter. \n3. Me Amery va be glad to han \nwhertes de A. Chamberlon could see hing way \nis store Im Consular thorities in lindera \nim, \ntrepom. upon mo? \nme mottos case. \nnedă &. GRINDLE.\n\n### Reformatted Version\namounting to ￥86.13.8 from the Colony, together with ... \nI am to enclose for your information a copy of a letter from ... applying for an advance on account of her pension in view of the difficulties which she had been experiencing in connection with ... as appears in the enclosed letter.\n\n3. Mr Amery will be glad to learn whether Mr A. Chamberlain could see his way to instruct the Consular authorities in ... to ... upon ... in this matter.\n\n... GRINDLE.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-498-11 Assistance for Mrs. Longinotto- widow of a former Assistant Crown Solicitor in Hong Kong 3-3-1926 - 11-10-1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 508336, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-501-6 Sweepstakes and Lotteries 3-1-1927 - 3-1-1927", "page_number": 8, "title": "CO129-501-6 Sweepstakes and Lotteries 3-1-1927 - 3-1-1927", "content_text": "# SECTION XV.\n## SAILORS, SOLDIERS OR AIRMEN DANGEROUSLY ILL OR DEAD: WARRANTS FOR RELATIVES\n\n## SECTION XVI.\n### PAGE 47\n## RAILWAY\n### SEAMEN SENT HOME TO ENGLAND FROM ABROAD UNDER THE MERCHANT SHIPPING ACTS, 1894 AND 1906\n### PAGE 48\n\n## SECTION XVII.\n### EXTRADITION—\n#### Extradition of Criminals from Foreign Countries\n### PAGE 49\n#### Return of Criminals from H.M. Dominions Overseas, under the Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881\n#### Form of Indemnity\n### PAGE 50\n### PAGE 51\n\n## SECTION XVIII.\n### MISCELLANEOUS OFFENCES-\n#### Children (Employment Abroad) Act, 1913\n#### Dentists Acts\n#### Forgery of Bank Notes and Treasury Notes\n#### Fraudulent appeals for charity by itinerant musicians, etc.\n#### Gaming machines\n#### Lotteries\n#### Money-lenders Act, 1900\n#### Passenger steamers, Overcrowding of\n#### Passports obtained by improper means\n#### Prostitution, Living on the proceeds of\n#### Red Cross, Use of the\n#### Royal Standard, Use of the\n#### Seditious Speeches\n#### Suicide, Attempts to commit\n#### Theatres Act, 1843, Stage Plays\n### PAGE 53\n### PAGE 53\n### PAGE 54\n### PAGE 57\n### PAGE 57\n### PAGE 57\n### PAGE 57\n### PAGE 60\n### PAGE 61\n\n### APPENDIX.\n#### STATUTORY RULES AND ORDERS:—\n##### Regulations under :—\n###### A. Children (Employment Abroad) Act, 1913\n###### B. Police Property Act, 1897\n##### Summary Jurisdiction Rule of 31st January, 1922\n###### C. Prosecution of Offences Acts, 1879 and 1884\n##### Witnesses' Allowances Order of 1904, as subsequently amended...\n### PAGE 62\n### PAGE 62\n### PAGE 63\n### PAGE 66\n\n# SECTION I.\n## THE INSTRUCTIONS TO CONSTABLES OF 1839.\n(These instructions, first issued 22nd November, 1839, are reprinted without revision as a convenient summary of the powers and duties of Police constables as successors to the older common law constables.)\n\nIt is intended here to state such Parts of the Law relating to the Office of a Constable as may be sufficient for the general Instruction of the Constables. Each Individual will bear in mind the extreme Importance of making himself perfectly acquainted with this Subject; it is necessary to enable him, with a due Regard to his own Safety, to act efficiently for the Protection of the Public.\n\nAt the Commencement of a new Establishment, it is the more necessary to take particular Care that the Constables do not form false Notions of their Duties and Powers. The Powers of a Constable, as will appear hereafter, are, when properly understood and duly executed, amply sufficient for their purpose. He is regarded as the legitimate Peace Officer of his District, and both by the Common Law and many Acts of Parliament, he is invested with considerable Powers, and has imposed on him the Discharge of many important Duties.\n\nHe is in many cases authorised and required, in the Execution of his Office, to arrest a party charged with or suspected to be guilty of some Offence; to enter a house in pursuit of an Offender; to quiet an Affray; to search for stolen Goods; to take possession of Goods suspected to have been stolen.\n\nIt therefore becomes necessary that the Constable should inform himself in what Cases he ought so to interfere, and what legal Powers he possesses to effect the Object in case he meets with Resistance. To assist the Constables in the Discharge of their Duties, the following Observations are prepared for their attentive Perusal.\n\nIt will be first shown for what Offences of more ordinary Occurrence a Party may be arrested and detained in Custody. With this Object, Offences may be divided into-- Felonies and Misdemeanors.\n\nMurder, House-breaking, Robbery, Stealing, picking Pockets, receiving stolen Goods knowing them to have been stolen, assaulting any one with Intent to rob, setting fire to any Church, House, or other Building, or to any Stack of Corn, Straw, Hay, or Wood, or to any Crop of Corn or Grain, whether standing or cut down, or to any Wood or Plantation of Trees, or to any Heath or Furze; or stealing any Cattle, as Horses, Cows, Sheep, &c., or Poultry, as Turkeys, Ducks, Hens, Geese, &c., are some of the principal Felonies, besides a great many more too numerous to be inserted here. Persons guilty of any of these Offences are called Felons.\n\n(B3/858)\n### PAGE 1\n### PAGE 4", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-501-6 Sweepstakes and Lotteries 3-1-1927 - 3-1-1927.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 508363, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-501-6 Sweepstakes and Lotteries 3-1-1927 - 3-1-1927", "page_number": 35, "title": "CO129-501-6 Sweepstakes and Lotteries 3-1-1927 - 3-1-1927", "content_text": "## Forgery of Bank Notes and Treasury Notes\n\n10. Instructions have been issued to Banks that any forged Bank note or Treasury note that is detected should be handed at once to the Police, with a statement, if possible, of the name and address of the person who passed it.\n\n11. When a forged note comes into the possession of the Police, inquiries should be set on foot at once with a view to tracing, so far as possible, the history of the note and discovering the source from which it emanated.\n\n12. As persons who pass forged notes to Banks are usually innocent agents, tact and discretion should be used in making inquiries of or concerning them.\n\n13. The note itself should be sent as soon as possible to the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, New Scotland Yard, for comparison with the records of other forged notes which are kept there. The covering letter should give the date when the note was presented, the name and address of the Bank which received it, and any other particulars available. If it is necessary to retain the note for a time for local inquiry, a full description with photograph (if possible) of it should be sent to the Commissioner in advance.\n\n14. If local inquiries result in information which appears likely to lead to an arrest, the facts should be reported at once to the Commissioner, who, if necessary, will send an officer, possessing information as to places where other notes of similar type have been disposed of, to assist in the inquiries.\n\n15. As regards forged Treasury notes (not Bank notes), the Board of Inland Revenue is prepared to place at the disposal of the Police, free of charge, the experience of the officers of the Director of Stamping, who possess the necessary knowledge of various processes of printing, are conversant with the methods adopted by skilled forgers, and are ready to make investigations and to give expert evidence in Court. The services of local printers or engravers should not be enlisted for this purpose, or for taking specimen prints from plates seized, or for giving evidence, not only because such action may extend the number of people made acquainted with methods of forging, but also because investigation and the giving of evidence are matters for experts with very special knowledge. If expert assistance is required, this should be stated, therefore, when the note is forwarded to the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, and he will at once inform the Director of Stamping at Somerset House.\n\n16. This procedure applies only to skilled forgeries; not to rough and clumsy imitations.\n\n17. Public notices with regard to alleged forging of Treasury notes should not be issued without previous submission through the Home Office to the Treasury, as it is important that suspicion should not be aroused unnecessarily nor incorrect information published.\n\n## Fraudulent appeals for charity by itinerant musicians, &c.\n\n18. The Police should investigate the bona fides of strolling musicians, players, singers, pavement artists and others who, by displaying written notices or otherwise, appeal to public sympathy as being discharged soldiers who have been disabled in the war and have not had the help they deserve from the State. If such a case is found to be genuine, the man should be referred to his local War Pensions Committee. If it is not genuine and evidence is available, the man should be charged with obtaining or attempting to obtain money by false pretences. Care should be taken, of course, to avoid any appearance of subjecting service pensioners to supervision by the Police.\n\n## Gaming machines\n\n19. The Court of Criminal Appeal in *Rex v. Peers* (1917, 81 J.P. 143), held that the keeping of any house in which automatic gaming machines are used constitutes an offence against the Betting Act, 1853. Action should be taken by the Police for the suppression of such machines. In the case cited the machine used was a \"clown\" machine. The essential feature of automatic gaming machines is that a player after placing a coin in a slot has a chance of winning a ticket entitling him to purchase goods, &c.\n\n## Lotteries\n\n20. Public lotteries (including sweepstakes) are prohibited by law and should be prevented by the Police. On the other hand, the Police should not interfere with a private or quasi-private lottery, honestly conducted. By a quasi-private lottery it is intended to signify a lottery promoted by a genuine club or other society in which tickets can be obtained by or through members only; such lotteries are not publicly advertised, since no invitation is addressed by the promoters to the general public to subscribe; usually, too, the prizes are paid by the promoters to a member only. A lottery promoted by a club but open to members of affiliated clubs should not be regarded as a quasi-private lottery and penalties have been recovered in the High Court in respect of two such lotteries, the defendants having pleaded guilty. The proceedings in these cases were reported in *The Times* newspaper of the 27th May, 1924.\n\n21. Lotteries should be distinguished from \"competitions.\" A competition involves skill; several schemes involving a small degree", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-501-6 Sweepstakes and Lotteries 3-1-1927 - 3-1-1927.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 514918, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "page_number": 7, "title": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "content_text": "since that it is the subject of a further report about Etter, Walter and Ellen 146\n\np. 13. and p. 25 6.28\n\nThe surrounding circumstances generally, no doubt, do appear to point to the six signatures having been forged, but it by no means follows, as pointed out by the Hong Kong Law Officers, that the Government would be able to prove forgery to the satisfaction of a Hong Kong jury.\n\nThe Report of Mr. Dovey, the Government Analyst, is not forwarded, but the gist of it may be gathered from Mr. Hazlerigg's very clear and excellent report on the whole subject. Mr. Dovey is not actually a hand-writing expert and even if he were, though he has given it as his opinion that the writing in the bodies of the 3 cheques was forged with the result that the 2 Chinese clerks under accusation were discharged, he is evidently not prepared to swear that the signatures of Mr. Messer and Mr. Black on the three cheques were forgeries.\n\nProfessor Shellshear, who appears to be the only hand-writing expert in the Colony, has been retained by the Bank and would, presumably, swear the contrary.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 514919, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "page_number": 8, "title": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "content_text": "Mr. Hazlerigg's Report clearly discloses a possibility that they were genuine signatures obtained by fraud, and that in the great pressure of business at the end of the year (153 cheques were signed on the date in question, 30th December, 1927) these three cheques, supported by cleverly forged vouchers, slipped through and were duly signed by the two officers. This possibility would not be excluded by the mere assertion (perfectly honest as it is) of the two officers that they could not have signed cheques for such large amounts payable to persons unknown to them without extra careful scrutiny.\n\nEven if forgery of the signatures were established to the satisfaction of the jury, there is the further point as to the lack of precaution in the custody of the cheque books which facilitated the theft of the two blocks of blank cheques. This was the kind of point I had in mind in my minute of the 23rd of April.\n\nMr. Hazlerigg, citing an English case of 1909, is of opinion that this lack of precaution would not be held to amount to such negligence as would stop the Government from repudiating the cheques. I am not so sure about it, nor apparently is the Attorney General (each case of this kind must turn on its own special facts) but the point would only arise if forgery of the signatures were definitely established, and I agree with the Hong Kong Law Officers that the difficulties in the way of proving forgery are so great as not to justify", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 514949, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "page_number": 38, "title": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "content_text": "38\n\nunderstanding that the Government of Hong Kong\n\ndid not oppose it and Yeo was accordingly placed\n\non a steamer in charge of Canton Police. He\n\npassed through Hong Kong on his way to Canton\n\nand was sent back the following night by the\n\nCanton Police and is now in custody in\n\nHong Kong awaiting his trial on charges of\n\nforgery and of uttering forged documents.\n\nI authorised the sending of\n\nMr. T.M. Hazlerigg, Assistant Crown Solicitor,\n\nto Shanghai to look after the interests of this\n\nGovernment in the matter, and he has been very\n\nsuccessful not only in having secured Yeo's\n\nreturn to Hong Kong for trial, but also, by\n\nexhaustive enquiries, he has been able to locate\n\nlarge sums of money standing in the name of\n\nYeo and his wife in various banks in Shanghai\n\nand America. Steps have been taken to prevent\n\nthe withdrawal of these moneys pending further\n\naction and I have strong hopes that the ultimate\n\nloss may as a result of Mr. Hazlerigg's energy\n\nand discretion be reduced to a much smaller sum\n\nthan was originally anticipated.\n\nIt is possible that the criminal\n\nproceedings now being instituted against Yeo may\n\nthrow fresh light on the manner in which the\n\nfraud was perpetrated, and I prefer to keep an\n\nopen mind on the subject of instituting civil\n\nproceedings against the Bank until the\n\ncompletion", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 514969, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "page_number": 58, "title": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "content_text": "Chief Justice Chambers. Courts of Justice, \n\nHong Kong, \n\n25th July, 1928. \n\nPRELIMINARY. \n\nThe Committee appointed by His Excellency the Governor on the 31st March, 1928, to enquire into the responsibilities for certain defalcations, losses and financial irregularities in certain Government Departments and to make recommendations for safeguarding the collection of revenue and the prevention of financial irregularities generally in Government Departments have the honour to report as follows:- \n\n1. In the terms of reference specific mention was made of defalcations, losses or financial irregularities in the Treasury, the Education Department, Queen's College, the Registry of the Supreme Court and the Police Department. We realize that the terms of reference expressed the desire of His Excellency that we should make recommendations for safeguarding public moneys in all departments of the Government, but after careful consideration we came to the conclusion that this would entail such detailed investigation of the accounting systems in all departments that the submission of this Report would be unduly delayed, and have therefore limited its scope to the matters specifically mentioned in the terms of reference; leaving other Departments to be dealt with subsequently, if His Excellency should decide that this was advisable. \n\n2. The particular defalcations, losses and financial irregularities which have been investigated by us are:- \n\n(a) A loss of $260,407.93 brought about by fraud in connection with three cheques on the General Account of the Government with the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation operated by the Treasurer; \n\n(b) A loss in the Treasury of $15,329.95 due to the misappropriation of moneys paid in respect of Hong Kong Water Accounts; \n\n(c) A loss of $1,206.00 due to the misappropriation of moneys refunded to the Education Department in respect of unpaid personal emoluments, and a further loss of $19,108.00 in the same Department by fraudulent misrepresentations as to moneys payable in respect of subsidies to Elementary Vernacular Schools; \n\n(d) A loss of $325.00 at Queen's College by the forgery and falsification of certain bills; and \n\n(e) Discrepancies shown by stocktaking in the Stores of the Police Department. \n\nMatters touching irregularities in the Registry of the Supreme Court have already been investigated by a Committee of Enquiry and a Board of Survey appointed by His Excellency the Governor, and we have seen and considered the Reports submitted in respect of these matters. \n\n3. Fifty-six witnesses have submitted statements or given evidence before us; and while we had no power to hear evidence on oath or to insist upon an answer to any question, the witnesses in general have been extremely frank in their answers, and we believe that we have been able to elicit all the facts which are relevant to the subject matter of our investigation. \n\n4. We propose to divide our Report into five parts :- \n\n(a) In Part I we propose to deal with the staff arrangements and internal administration of the Treasury; \n\n(b) In Part II with the fraud in connection with the three cheques on the General Government Account, the misappropriation of Water Accounts, the loss at the Education Department, the loss at Queen's College, the discrepancies in the Store Accounts of the Police Department and the matters touching the Registry of the Supreme Court; \n\n58", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 514985, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "page_number": 74, "title": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "content_text": "17\n\nminute addressed to the Colonial Secretary reporting the over-expenditure of certain votes, including that for subsidies to Elementary Vernacular Schools which was stated to have been underestimated. Mr. Ralphs submitted with this minute a special warrant for the sum required to cover the excesses, including $3,255 for subsidies.\n\nMr. Ralphs informed us that there was no investigation as to the reason for the excess, and that it was a matter of routine for the clerk to present a note showing the expenditure for the first three quarters and the amount required for the last quarter. He says that at the time they were developing education, particularly on the vernacular side, very extensively, which we assume would lead to a complacent disregard of over-expenditure.\n\nWe find on enquiry that there had been no over-expenditure in connection with subsidies during the three preceding years and the suggested routine seems therefore to have been somewhat exceptional; and we find also that there was no development of education on the vernacular side entailing payments to additional schools in 1924, for in that year the number of subsidized schools was in fact smaller than it had been in 1923.\n\nWe should have anticipated that the necessity for a special warrant would at least have put Mr. Ralphs on enquiry and have caused him to refer to the Inspector of Vernacular Schools; but he appears to have regarded the matter as being of little or no importance, and thus an opportunity for the discovery of the frauds was lost.\n\n71. During the administration of Mr. Wood the loss due to frauds in connection with subsidies amounted in all to $3,285.00.\n\nOf this $2,270.00 was obtained by Chan Tsz Un by means of vouchers in respect of non-existent schools, $895.00 by means of the forgery of recipients' signatures and $120.00 by failure to refund to the Government sums which had not been paid out.\n\nMr. Wood at all times required the vouchers to be initialled by Mr. Y. P. Law, and we are satisfied that the initials appearing on the bogus vouchers and purporting to be those of Mr. Y. P. Law, are forgeries.\n\nMr. Wood continued the practice of his predecessor in entrusting to Chan Tsz Un all payments in respect of subsidies. He had always heard of this officer as a man of high capabilities and unquestioned integrity, and the danger of entrusting such large financial responsibilities to a Class III clerk did not occur to him.\n\n72. In 1916 the predecessor of Chan Tsz Un was convicted at the Criminal Sessions on charges in connection with misappropriations of which he had been guilty. At the trial of this case Mr. Ralphs, who was then performing the routine duties of Director of Education, was present and gave evidence. It transpired that considerable responsibilities in connection with the department's finances had been entrusted to this clerk and counsel for the defence commented severely on the temptations to which this system exposed a clerk in receipt of a small salary.\n\nThat Mr. Ralphs realized the danger involved in entrusting the financial duties to Chan Tsz Un is clearly indicated by his statement to us that, when he acted as Director during Mr. Wood's absence, he himself carried out the work as in Mr. Irving's time, and again assumed control.\n\nIt is regrettable that, when Mr. Wood first took charge of the Department Mr. Ralphs, as Senior Permanent Official, should not have called Mr. Wood's attention to the dangers which he ran in continuing the practice which had prevailed in Mr. Orme's time.\n\nSection IV.\n\nTHE LOSSES AT QUEEN'S COLLEGE.\n\n73. Mr. Alfred Herbert Crook, M.A., joined the Government Service in October, 1902, as an Assistant Master, and was appointed Headmaster of Queen's College on the 1st March, 1926.\n\n74. Shortly before Mr. Crook's appointment as Headmaster the School Clerk at Queen's College was required for service in another Government department, and a former pupil at the School, by name Pau Tat Shing, was appointed Probationary Clerk at a salary of $37.50 per month.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 515003, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "page_number": 92, "title": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "content_text": "NO CONFIDENTIAL.\n\nSir,\n\nGOVERNMENT HOUSE,\n\nHONGKONG,\n\n1st May, 1928.\n\n4\n\n92\n\n3\n\nEnclo.No.1.\n\nEnclo.No.2.\n\nTHE RIGHT HONOURABLE\n\nLIEUTENANT COLONEL L.C.M.S. AMERY, M.P.,\n\n&c.,\n\n&c.,\n\n&c.\n\nI have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your telegram of the 25th April, concerning the recent defalcations in the Treasury, in which you ask me to send a considered opinion of the Attorney General, giving reasons for the statement as to there being no chance of recovery from the Bank.\n\n2.\n\nI enclose a copy of a report dated 4th March, by Mr. Hazlerigg, Assistant Crown Solicitor, in whose hands the investigation of the fraud was placed.\n\nIt will be seen that there did not appear to Mr. Hazlerigg to be any such weight of evidence in favour of forgery as would be likely to convince a jury.\n\n3.\n\nI enclose also a copy of a minute by Sir Joseph Kemp, Attorney General, dated 19th March, in which he gives his reasons for supporting the view of Mr. Hazlerigg that civil proceedings", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 515016, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "page_number": 105, "title": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "content_text": "12\n\n105\n\naccompanying report by Mr. Dovey).\n\nOn the 7th February the Treasury Solicitor advised that the Treasury clerks, Tsang On Wing and Cheung Man Kun should be released at once and, after he had conferred with the Captain Superintendent of Police, this was done and they were reinstated in their positions at the Treasury.\n\nWith regard to the clerk Cheung Man Kun the Treasury Solicitor formed the opinion that there was not, and had not at any time been anything whatsoever indicating any complicity in the fraud.\n\nWith regard to the clerk Tsang On Wing there had been certain circumstances which, until explained, seemed to point to his being implicated. There was the fact that he usually prepared the Treasury cheques and that the three cheques by means of which the fraud had been perpetrated appeared to be in his handwriting, there was the fact that he was the person entrusted with the custody of the chequebooks from which the two batches of thirty cheques had been abstracted, and the fact that he had failed to report that the cheques were missing.\n\nThe point with regard to the handwriting was explained by this proving to be a clever forgery.\n\nThe abstraction of the cheques without the knowledge of Tsang On Wing would not have been a difficult matter as will be seen from the part of this report dealing with the custody of cheque books.\n\nTsang On Wing states that he did in fact report the fact that the cheques were missing. This report he states he made to Mr. Black on or about the 22nd December. He had asked the Bank for a book of 200 cheques and had received a book of 400 and he says that he told Mr. Black that 200 cheques should have been sufficient to complete the year but that the bank had sent 200 cheques short.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 515018, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "page_number": 107, "title": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "content_text": "J\n\n14\n\nthe bank so desired Mr. Dovey would give Professor Shellshear every facility for making an examination of the cheques in his laboratory.\n\nIt is advisable that this report should next proceed to deal with a matter which may give some indication as to the perpetrator of the fraud.\n\nT\n\nThere was employed at the Treasury from the 1st September, 1926, one Carvalho Yeo, a man of Sino-Siamese extraction. This man held the appointment of a Special Class Clerk and was in charge of the collection books for Hong Kong Water Accounts.\n\nOn the 3rd January, 1928, this man was impertinent in his behaviour towards Mr. Kennedy Skipton, who is performing the duties of Estate Duty Commissioner and was reproved by him. He saw Mr. Black and expressed his resentment at Mr. Skipton's remarks and said he would resign. Mr. Black suggested that he should apologize. On the 4th January, the man tendered his resignation. On the 6th January, he said that he definitely wished to leave and paid a month's salary in lieu of giving notice.\n\n107\n\nOn the\n\nAfter the fraud by means of the three cheques was discovered, the police received information that this man Carvalho Yeo was \"wanted\" by the police at Bangkok in connection with the forgery of a cheque for between $40,000.00 and $50,000.00.\n\nFurther information has since been given that this man, together with an associate of the name of Katz, is wanted by the police at Shanghai and Tientsin for offences in those places. In the latter place, the offence is stated to have been in connection with cheques on the Municipal Treasury.\n\nL\n\nDuring the last few days, it has come to light that there are discrepancies in the books kept by Carvalho Yeo while at the Treasury, which appear to indicate the", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 515031, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "page_number": 120, "title": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "content_text": "27.\n\n1\n\neither; signature to which one can point and say that the signatories never so signed.\n\nThere are many recognised signs for which search is made when forgery is suspected; not one of those signs can be found in any of the six signatures appearing on these three cheques.\n\nIf the signatures are forgeries they are superb forgeries.\n\nIt is impossible to say to what degree of perfection a highly skilled forger might, with many months of practice, attain, and it is therefore possible that the signatures are forgeries but are, nevertheless, not capable of being proved so to be.\n\nIt would seem to be almost hopeless to seek to convince a jury that the signatures are forgeries when in every case in which we point to some peculiarity or rarity those supporting the genuineness of the cheques can counter by showing the jury a number of admittedly genuine cheques in which the same peculiarity or rarity occurs.\n\nIt seems to be a matter of mathematical improbability that each of these three cheques, each of which is suspected to be a forgery and each of which bears the same date, should in both the signatures contain a number of rarities or peculiarities which are not found in conjunction in any of the genuine cheques which have been examined.\n\nOne must suppose the forger, if there was a forger, to have essayed to copy a genuine signature; it seems equally a matter of mathematical improbability that the forger would find a signature to copy which held these peculiarities.\n\nIt would be exceedingly difficult to convince a jury by means of arguments based on mathematical improbabilities.\n\nPage 120\n\nPage 121", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 515032, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "page_number": 121, "title": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "content_text": "Some weight might be given to the argument that the exceptional circumstances of an exceedingly busy day, when many cheques had to be signed in a very short time, might lead to the repetition of peculiarities in signatures made at or about the same time.\n\nThe circumstance of the names of the payees and the amounts for which a cheque is drawn being found to be forged might on first consideration seem to point to the likelihood of the signatures also being forged, but it seems equally arguable that, as the bank would not refuse payment on account of the names of the payees and the amounts being in an unusual handwriting, the whole object of going to the trouble of forging that part of the cheques was that the similarity to the handwriting of Mr. Tsang On Wing might be such that Mr. Messer and Mr. Black would be deceived thereby.\n\nWe cannot put into the witness box an expert witness who is prepared to say that he believes the signatures to be forged.\n\nThere does not appear to be any such weight of evidence in favour of forgery as would be likely to convince a jury.\n\nAs the case is from the point of view of the handwriting expert a borderline case, it might be deemed advisable to seek a second opinion. Therein lies difficulty, for the only person in the Colony believed to be an expert (Professor Shellshear) has been retained by the bank.\n\nThe greatest expert is in New York; there are others in England. The investigations have not disclosed anything which would lead one to hope that other opinions would differ from that of Mr. Dovey.\n\nOn the question of the weight of evidence and the prospect of convincing a jury, it would be advisable, as", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 515034, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "page_number": 123, "title": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "content_text": "Enclosure No.2.\n\n123\n\nHon.C.S.\n\nI agree with Mr. Hazlerigg, and substantially for his reasons, that our chances of success would be very small.\n\n2.\n\nI would add that the Bank's expert would be able to attack our expert's evidence at his leisure, and in dealing with such technical subject matter it is never well to be too confident in one's own case. Our case on the technical facts is, as Mr. Dovey shows, none too strong, and a contretemps or two might be fatal. For example, the Bank might be able to produce a genuine cheque in which Mr. Black's signature appeared to the left, as in the three suspected signatures.\n\n3.\n\nIn saying what I have said in paragraph 2 I do not wish to detract in any way from the value of Mr. Dovey's very able report, and it will be seen that the instance which I have given of a possible contretemps is one from which Mr. Dovey could not be held responsible.\n\n4. I have assumed that we would have to give our evidence first. I have considered whether that could be avoided but I do not see how it could. We would have to sue, and I think that we would have to begin.\n\n5.\n\nIt must also be borne in mind that, as I think, the burden on the issue of forgery would in any case lie on us. It is true that a banker is liable for paying away his customer's money unless he can show a mandate to do so, but prima facie evidence of the genuineness of the signatures is easy.\n\n6.\n\nTo a wealthy client who believed that the signatures were forged one might say, \"Your chances of", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 515038, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "page_number": 127, "title": "CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928", "content_text": "RECEIVED\n\n23 APR 1928 COL. OFFICE\n\n127\n\nTELEGRAM from the Governor of Hong Kong to the Secretary\n\nof State for the Colonies.\n\nDated 21st April.\n\n(Received, Colonial Office, 5.30 a.m., 21st April, 1928).\n\n2\n\nYour telegram of 18th April.\n\nDefalcation.\n\nThe Treasury was defrauded of 260,000 dollars by a very clever and carefully prepared forgery probably organised by Agerk who afterwards absconded and who it appeared later had been guilty of forgery elsewhere. I am advised that there is no chance of recovery from the bank. I have already appointed on 31st March a Committee, Chief Justice as Chairman with Hazlerigg and Dallin with the following terms of reference: (1) To enquire into responsibility for the recent defalcations, losses and financial irregularities in certain Government Departments; (2) To make recommendations for safeguarding the collection of revenue and for prevention of financial irregularities generally in Government Departments.\n\nThe Report of the Committee will be submitted when received.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-510-14 Report of committee of enquiry into discrepancies and losses in government departments in Hong Kong... 21-4-1928 - 24-10-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 515931, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-511-24 Pension of Mrs J. Webb former Matron at Government Civil Hospital at Hong Kong 24-10-1928 - 24-10-1928", "page_number": 1, "title": "CO129-511-24 Pension of Mrs J. Webb former Matron at Government Civil Hospital at Hong Kong 24-10-1928 - 24-10-1928", "content_text": "# 52956\nN\n101\n1928\nHONG KONG\n\n## 52956\n**CLOSED UNTIL**\nPrevious | Subsequent\n---------|-----------\nC.A./12017/20 | b.R.\nFED | \nPension of Ms. J. Webb. | \n20120/511/24 | Co129/511/24\n22/11 | 22/1\n2.7-4.28 | Im Backett 27!\n8 JA | MayBoyd to note\n**PUT BY** | 12/2\n`(64135)` | Wt. 15235-35 8000 11/27 H. St.\n¡G_101/3A |", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-511-24 Pension of Mrs J. Webb former Matron at Government Civil Hospital at Hong Kong 24-10-1928 - 24-10-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 515932, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-511-24 Pension of Mrs J. Webb former Matron at Government Civil Hospital at Hong Kong 24-10-1928 - 24-10-1928", "page_number": 2, "title": "CO129-511-24 Pension of Mrs J. Webb former Matron at Government Civil Hospital at Hong Kong 24-10-1928 - 24-10-1928", "content_text": "## 1.C.A.\ndated 19.11.28\n\nRequests instructions as to disposal of pension.\n\nI presume that Sec. 336 of the Lunacy Act would be binding on me whatever the issue. Order of the Canadian Courts may ? reply accordingly.\n\nKutlay 22/x1/26.\n\nIf Mr. Wable is appointed admin of the lunatic's estate, the C.A. may safely pay the pension to him on receiving a certificate from the hospital that she is alive & that all hospital authorities & dues have been paid.\n\nAs advised to be Shehandh N.E. 26/x.\n\n## 2. To C.A.\n(ausd.\n\n4 - DEC 1928", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-511-24 Pension of Mrs J. Webb former Matron at Government Civil Hospital at Hong Kong 24-10-1928 - 24-10-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 515933, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-511-24 Pension of Mrs J. Webb former Matron at Government Civil Hospital at Hong Kong 24-10-1928 - 24-10-1928", "page_number": 3, "title": "CO129-511-24 Pension of Mrs J. Webb former Matron at Government Civil Hospital at Hong Kong 24-10-1928 - 24-10-1928", "content_text": "## DRAFT.\n**THE CROWN AGENTS**\n6/14fs\n52956/28. H.K. 2.3\n\nDowning Street, 4 December, 1928.\n\nGentlemen,\n\nI am directed to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 19th of November, relative to the pension payable to Mrs. J. Webb, formerly Matron of the Female Medical Department, Government Civil Hospital, Hong Kong, and to inform you that, if Mr. Webb is appointed to be Administrator of Mrs. Webb's estate, the arrears of her pension may be paid to him on receiving a certificate that Mrs. Webb is dead and that all hospital fees due...\n\nMr. White \nMr. Bottomley. \n1/12 \nSir E. Harding. \nSir J. Shuckburgh. \nSir G. Grindle. \nSir C. Davis. \nSir S. Wilson. \nMr. Ormsby-Gore. \nLord Lovat. \nMr. Amery. \n\n**FOR THE COLONIES.** (1)", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-511-24 Pension of Mrs J. Webb former Matron at Government Civil Hospital at Hong Kong 24-10-1928 - 24-10-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 515934, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-511-24 Pension of Mrs J. Webb former Matron at Government Civil Hospital at Hong Kong 24-10-1928 - 24-10-1928", "page_number": 4, "title": "CO129-511-24 Pension of Mrs J. Webb former Matron at Government Civil Hospital at Hong Kong 24-10-1928 - 24-10-1928", "content_text": "I am, etc., \n(Signed) WALTER D. ELLIS", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-511-24 Pension of Mrs J. Webb former Matron at Government Civil Hospital at Hong Kong 24-10-1928 - 24-10-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 515935, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-511-24 Pension of Mrs J. Webb former Matron at Government Civil Hospital at Hong Kong 24-10-1928 - 24-10-1928", "page_number": 5, "title": "CO129-511-24 Pension of Mrs J. Webb former Matron at Government Civil Hospital at Hong Kong 24-10-1928 - 24-10-1928", "content_text": "# CROWN AGENTS FOR THE COLONIES\n\n**ALL COMMUNICATIONS TO BE ADDRESSED TO THE CROWN AGENTS FOR THE COLONIES.**\n\nTHE FOLLOWING REFERENCE AND THE DATE OF THIS LETTER BEING QUOTED.\n\nP/Pens.Q1 \n14 \nTELEGRAMS: CROWN, LONDON. \nTELEPHONE: 7730 VICTORIA. \n4. MILLBANK, \nWESTMINSTER, \nLONDON, S.W.1.\n\nRECEIVED 9th November, 1926. \n21 NOV 1928 \nL OFFICE \n24.10.28.\n\nSir,\n\nI have the honour to attach for the consideration of the Secretary of State, a copy of a letter which we have received from the Deputy Minister of Finance, British Columbia, regarding Mrs. Jane Webb, who is paid on our behalf by that Government, pension and temporary increase at the rate of £111.6 per annum in respect of her late appointment as Matron of the Female Medical Department, Government Civil Hospital, Hong Kong, and to enquire whether (1) we should obey, when it is obtained, the Order of the Canadian Court and authorise payment of the pension to Mr. Webb as Administrator. In this case I have to enquire whether we should require the paying agent first to obtain a certificate, for transmission to us, that all hospital fees have been paid or (2) under section 335 of the Lunacy Act 1890, we should arrange for payment of the fees direct to the Hospital on receipt of the usual certificate and the surplus, if any, to the next of kin.\n\nI have the honour to be, Sir,\nYour obedient servant,\n**Wat wichhar** \nFOR CROWN AGENTS.\n\nThe Under Secretary of State, \nCOLONIAL OFFICE.\n\nPage 7 \n21.\n\n## FROM THE DEPUTY MINISTER OF FINANCE, BRITISH COLUMBIA, TO CROWN AGENTS.\n\nNo.85.008 \nOffice of the Deputy Minister, \nVictoria, B.C. \n24th October 1928.\n\nGentlemen,\n\nReferring to your letter of March 5th, 1921, and subsequent correspondence relating to the payment of a monthly pension to Mrs. Jane Webb.\n\nPlease be advised that this pensioner has been admitted as an inmate in a Mental Hospital, and that Mr. Webb is making an application to the Courts to act as Administrator of her Estate, Messrs. Maitland and Maitland, Barristers and Solicitors of Vancouver, B.C., acting on his behalf.\n\nKindly instruct this Office as to what your wishes in regard to the future payments of this pension are.\n\nYours truly,\n(Sgd) E.D. JOHNSON. \nDeputy Minister of Finance.\n\nPage 6 \nP/Pens.Q1.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-511-24 Pension of Mrs J. Webb former Matron at Government Civil Hospital at Hong Kong 24-10-1928 - 24-10-1928.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 516411, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-512-1 Political situation in China- and Canton 30-11-1928 - 23-5-1929", "page_number": 161, "title": "CO129-512-1 Political situation in China- and Canton 30-11-1928 - 23-5-1929", "content_text": "# Enclosure No.1\n109\n## S. S. \"Empress of Russia\"\n### 10th May 1928\n\nT'ang Shao-yi, travelling back from his native village Tong Ka Ts'ün to Shanghai, where he has a house in the Settlement, says to me :-\n\n\"Japan's policy is to prevent the reunification of China, because a strong China would dominate Japan, whereas Japan can easily dominate a disintegrated China. He does not expect to see the reunification of China during this generation.\n\n\"He expresses great contempt for the present day leaders in China. Says that Sun Yat-sen's will was undoubtedly a forgery. That Sun Yat-sen was a man without administrative ability and that his son Sun Fo is even less capable and chiefly concerned in feathering his own nest. Expresses the view that the Sung family are a set of clever scamps, especially T.V. Sung. Of the three sisters, the cleverest is the eldest - married to K'ung, now in the Nanking Government; the other two, i.e. the widow of Sun Yat-sen and the new wife of Chiang Kai-shek, are clever and unscrupulous.\n\n\"Considers that Chiang Kai-shek will not be able to reach Peking; but attaches little importance to Peking in itself, as being altogether outside the main current of Chinese political life. Expects that the Diplomatic Body will before long have to move elsewhere.\n\n\"Regards Fêng Yu-hsiang as a man of ability and not such a traitor as most Chinese think. Says that Fêng has been...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-512-1 Political situation in China- and Canton 30-11-1928 - 23-5-1929.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 518575, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "page_number": 37, "title": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "content_text": "## 3\n\nAs the preparation of cheques to so diligent and competent an employee as Mr. Tsang On Wing had proved himself to be.\n\nIt is furthermore essential that the cheque book in current use should remain with the clerk charged with the preparation of cheques throughout the working hours of the office.\n\nIt was shown at the trials to be impossible for strangers to gain access to that portion of the office where the books are kept, the precautions extending to the stationing of an Indian Police Sergeant on duty inside the office during the tiffin hour.\n\nThis officer had under his eye both the cheque book in current use and that book which lay in reserve in the book safe.\n\nThe latter book was moreover under the immediate eye of the Chief Revenue Clerk during office hours.\n\nThat one of the more trusted Special Class Clerks, who kept his books in the same safe, would surreptitiously remove the reserve book and steal cheques was a matter which could not be foreseen, and against which, in the absence of grounds for suspicion, one could not be expected to guard.\n\nI submit that, having no express grounds for suspicion, I was, in common with employers whose position has been clearly laid down by the English Judges, entitled to assume that a crime would not be committed and that Treasury employees would not embark on forgery if opportunity occurred.\n\nThe jury, without, I believe, an understanding of the meaning of their finding, found that the abstraction of the cheques was a matter which should have been discovered by the exercise of reasonable diligence.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 518577, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "page_number": 39, "title": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "content_text": "## 37\n\nnot know of the abstraction of the cheques but believed the book to have been sent from the bank in its then present state.\n\nOwing to the fact that the cheques had been abstracted from the end of the book it is quite clear that neither the most rigid examination of cheques prepared for signature and of their counterfoils nor the careful scrutiny of the pass-book which takes place each week could have led to the discovery of the abstraction and that the only way in which a like abstraction could be discovered, and fraud effectively guarded against, would be by a daily scrutiny of the cheques remaining in the book and a counter check against the numbers shown on the covers.\n\nI venture to suggest that no head of any large business or department has ever made such a scrutiny and that there is no negligence in the failure to take such an unheard of precaution.\n\nThe success of the fraud was in my opinion due wholly to the cleverness of the forgery itself and could not have been avoided save by the use of unprecedented precautions, and I respectfully submit that the evidence has shown conclusively that the expenditure side of the Treasury is conducted on a very sound system and with a care which would not be found in business houses.\n\n## 2.\n\nTouching the loss of $15,329.95 by the misappropriation of moneys paid in respect of water accounts.\n\nThis fraud was beyond all possible doubt carried out by Carvalho Yeo who was responsible for the cheque frauds.\n\nThe fullest enquiry by the Committee, by Myself and by the Treasury Solicitor has failed to find an explanation as to how Carvalho Yeo obtained the moneys which were misappropriated.\n\n## 5.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 518578, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "page_number": 40, "title": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "content_text": "## 3\n\nI desire it to be clearly understood that Carvalho Yeo's duties did not on any occasion or in any circumstances call for the handling by him of any moneys whatsoever. He was a Collection Book clerk charged solely with the preparation of receipts and the entry of items in collection books and revenue files. It is difficult to see how, without the acting of a shroff as his accomplice, he can possibly have obtained the money within the Treasury, but the subsequent conduct of the two shroffs who during the period handled the moneys is all against their being accomplices. It is conceivable that he may by some undiscovered \"ringing of the changes\" have obtained the moneys from the shroffs, but my own belief is that having obtained (possibly by means of an accomplice) receipts for small amounts he altered the account numbers and amounts and collected from the consumers at their business houses. In such circumstances the consumer would be unlikely to admit that he had made payment otherwise than in the Treasury, as such payment would be unauthorised and would not be a discharge of the debt.\n\nTo cover his misappropriations Carvalho Yeo embarked on the wholesale forgery of receipts and the falsification of Revenue Files. The latter, when the fraud was discovered, were found to bear the ordinary evidences of audit in the shape of green pencil ticks, and the falsified items must therefore either have escaped the observation of the audit clerk or whole leaves of the files must have been extracted and re-written and the audit marks forged by Yeo.\n\n## 6\n\nPage 40\nPage 41", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 518580, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "page_number": 42, "title": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "content_text": "40\n\nThe item was incorrectly stated in red ink on the face of the voucher to have been refunded. I maintain that the responsibility for the failure to refund lies wholly with the head of the department and, as the voucher stated on its face in express terms that the money had been refunded (as distinguished from a statement that it was due to be refunded), I consider that the responsible clerk at the Treasury was amply justified in his acceptance of such a statement emanating from the department concerned and in his not making any report to me.\n\nI consider that these losses should on the first occurrence have been discovered by the Audit Department on their check of the departmental vouchers and Cash Book.\n\n(b). The loss of $19,108.00 by fraudulent misrepresentations as to moneys payable in respect of subsidies to Elementary Vernacular Schools.\n\nI must disclaim all responsibility for this loss, or for the failure to discover that the frauds had been extending over a number of years.\n\nThe Director of Education had sole control of the subsidies to vernacular schools and I had no information whatsoever other than that contained in his vouchers either as to the schools subsidized or the amounts of the subsidies payable to each.\n\nI was concerned only to see that the expenditure effected and certified by the Director of Education was within the vote and was made on vouchers which were on the face of them regular and duly certified. The criminal took good care to keep within the vote except on one occasion on which he took steps to induce the head of the department to procure a special vote.\n\n4.\n\nThe loss of $325.00 at Queen's College by forgery and the falsification of certain bills.\n\n8.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 518583, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "page_number": 45, "title": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "content_text": "## 43\n\nits use. Whenever Treasury officers have been available, I have moreover sent them to make examinations of the books of departments.\n\nIt must however be remembered that the number of Treasury officers possessing such qualifications as would enable them to make any effective review of the accounting methods of the departments is exceedingly limited, and that these qualified officers must necessarily devote substantially the whole of their time to the Receipt, Expenditure and Loan sides of the Treasury. The pressure of work within the Treasury is too great to allow of their being free to do any extensive amount of outside work.\n\nOne necessarily relies on the co-operation of the Audit Department, the officers of which are, by virtue of their constantly dealing with the same, by far more conversant with the accounting methods of the department than any Treasury official could ever hope to become. One looks also for such measure of vigilance on the part of the heads of departments as the time available from their other administrative and executive duties may allow, and this must ever be the greatest safeguard against fraud.\n\n(b). In considering the number of frauds by embezzlement, misappropriation and forgery which have of late years occurred in the service, I think there is a tendency to overlook circumstances which are perhaps peculiar to this Colony.\n\nLying as we do within two hours' run by land or water from Chinese territory, the intending criminal knows that he has a great chance of escaping from the legal consequences of his act.\n\nA high percentage of our employees is of Chinese nationality and it is in China rather the custom of the... \n\n11.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 518586, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "page_number": 48, "title": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "content_text": "46 \n\n2 \n\nparagraphs 36, 37, 40, 101, 102, 103 and 122 (a) and (a) of their report. The committee found that there was lack of supervision of the clerk, Tsang On-wing, in connection with the custody of cheque books, and that, though delegation to him of certain responsibilities was necessary, clarity of instruction as to his duties as well as actual supervision were absent. \n\nSince this committee reported, the question of Treasury supervision has been publicly investigated in connection with the civil suit instituted by the Attorney General against the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation for the recrediting of the sums debited by the Bank to the Government's account in respect of the forged Treasury cheques uttered by Carvalho Yeo. In that case, as reported in my confidential despatch, dated the 24th of May, 1929, judgment with costs has been entered for this Government, the jury deciding that all the cheques were forgeries and that the clerk, Tsang On-wing, was not a party to the forgery. The jury did, however, add a rider, as follows:- \n\n\"The absence of adequate supervision on the part of the Treasury amounts to grave negligence\". \n\nOn the point of negligence in the Treasury, I invite your special attention to the opinion of Mr. Eldon Potter, K.C., dated the 23rd of May, 1929, and forwarded as Enclosure No.3 in my confidential despatch of the 24th May, 1929. Mr. Potter is of the opinion that there was no justification for this finding of the jury, either in law or in fact, and that the", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 518587, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "page_number": 49, "title": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "content_text": "# \n\n47 \n\n3 \n\nthat the authorities dealing with the question of the custody and care of cheque books are all in one direction and all overwhelmingly in favour of Mr. Messer. On this point the Treasury Solicitor, Mr. Hazlerigg, who was also a member of the committee of enquiry above referred to, has reported as follows:- \n\n\"The plaintiff's legal advisers objected to the fourth question being left to the jury, it being their view that it was a question of law. I cannot think that the jury have appreciated what the words added to their affirmative answer involve. It is clear that no monthly, weekly, or even daily examination of cheques and counterfoils and comparison of these with the cashbook or cheque register would lead to the discovery of the abstraction of cheques from the unused portion of the cheque book. The discovery would only be made and the abstraction of cheques from any part of the book guarded against by a daily check of the used cheques, coupled with a daily count of the unused cheques. I do not suppose that any such precaution has ever been adopted by any business concern, and to say that it should be adopted is to fly directly in the face of numerous dicta of the judges that a man shall not be required to distrust his servants and to contemplate that they will commit the crime of forgery whenever occasion may arise. \n\nThe conduct of this case has brought me much into contact with Mr. Tsang On-wing, and I have formed the opinion that this officer is a most diligent and competent clerk, whose work was of a very high standard, and in whom Mr. Messer was amply justified in reposing", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 518611, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "page_number": 73, "title": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "content_text": "# Melone No.2.\n\n## H.K. Government \n\n## The Hong Kong Bank \n\nExtract from The Hong Kong Daily Press dated 23.5.29 \n\n### Judge's Observations\n\nIn the course of his judgment, his Lordship said that for many years prior to the concurrences in question, there was a relationship between the plaintiff (the Attorney-General representing the Government) and the defendants (Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank). It was clear that the relationship was one of debtor and creditor, with the liability on the Bank to honour cheques drawn on behalf of the Government.\n\nHis Lordship dealt with the attitude of the parties in the proceedings. The jury had found the cheques to be forgeries. Then the question of estoppel arose, and his Lordship decided to leave over the important points for discussion later. Certain questions bearing on such points were submitted to the jury, and they had answered them.\n\nA second point raised by the defence was that, assuming the cheques to be forgeries, still by reason of the negligent conduct on the part of the Government, they were estopped in their claim. In December, 1927, certain cheques were abstracted from the cheque-books supplied by the defendants for use by the Government, continued his Lordship. It was clear from the authorities that there was no duty on the part of the customer to keep cheque-books locked up or in his own custody.\n\nDealing with the question of duty arising out of the relationship between the Bank and customer, his Lordship held there was no definite authority on the point. Assuming that there was, his Lordship was satisfied that there was no duty owing by the Treasury officials to the Bank. It can be said that any negligence on the part of the Government was in the transaction itself. Negligence must be the approximate cause of the loss by the Bank. The forgery of these cheques, his Lordship continued, was the result of cleverness which led the Bank to mistake the signatures to be genuine.\n\nHis Lordship concluded that he had come to the conclusion that the declaration asked for should be made, that the Government is entitled to be credited with the amounts of the three cheques, together with interest at the customary or contractual rate of 2 per cent. per annum from the date the cheques were debited to the Government account till payment or judgment.\n\nJudgment would therefore be entered for plaintiffs under both heads of their claim, and costs.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 518612, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "page_number": 74, "title": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "content_text": "# Enclosure No.3\n\nCOPY:\n\n**PRINCE'S BUILDING**, \n23rd May 1929.\n\n72\n\n**ATTORNEY GENERAL VS. THE HONGKONG & SHANGHAI BANKING CORP.** \n**RE QUESTION 4 AND THE RIDER HERETO.**\n\nI always felt that this question should not have been submitted to the Jury for two reasons.\n\n1. In as much as the law imposed no duty on Mr. Hesser to exercise any special supervision over the Treasury cheque book, the question was irrelevant.\n\n2. The wording of the question was so general that it was really impossible to effectively argue the point.\n\nThe final judgment of the Chief Justice clearly establishes point 1.\n\nAs regards the rider of \"Absence of adequate supervision\" I feel very strongly indeed.\n\nThe whole procedure of the Treasury was most carefully gone through at the trial. It was established beyond all doubt that the utmost care and vigilance was exercised so far as obtaining payment of the very smallest sum of money was concerned. That the Jury was entirely satisfied on that point is established by the finding of forgery and the consequent total rejection of the \"trick\" theory of the Defence.\n\nQuestion 4 refers only to the custody of the cheque books. I am strongly of the opinion that Mr. Hesser has only acted in that regard as the heads of all important firms in Hongkong act. He entrusted the care of the cheque book to an official of 14 years' standing and with an unblemished record. I was speaking to the head of a large firm", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 518617, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "page_number": 79, "title": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "content_text": "## Strange Defence\n\nMr. Potter said he had considered very carefully the words he was going to use, as he did not want to utter a single syllable which could be considered out of place or exaggerated. He could say, however, that in all his experience at the Bar, and in all the books of law which were open to them for reference, he had never yet come across a defence which had been conducted in quite the same way as the defence of Carvalho Yeo.\n\nCounsel for the defence had told the Court that his client was not only a swindler and a daring criminal but that he lacked that quality which they had been told that even fiends possessed, namely honesty, because he had double-crossed Tsang On-wing, according to Mr. Jenkin, and had bolted with the proceeds, leaving his alleged fellow-conspirator in the lurch.\n\n### Not a Trial of Strength\n\nHad they ever heard of a counsel appearing in that kind of defence before? He would put it to them quite fairly and squarely. Did they believe that Carvalho Yeo had instructed counsel and solicitors to fight the case for 13 days merely because it would be unjust, because whereas he was guilty of fraud he should not be convicted of forgery? \"I say you cannot accept that,\" added Mr. Potter.\n\nThe jury would remember that he said in his opening statement that he would refuse to be a party to any fight between the Hong Kong Government and the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation in that Court. He also, on that occasion, referred to the rumour that the case was really a kind of trial of strength between the Government and the Bank. He still maintained his former attitude that that was not so and said he would refuse to have anything to do with a test of that kind.\n\n\"If this is a fight between the Bank and the Government, which I say it is not, then I am giving away at least seven pounds to the Bank. But when the Bank and Government come into a civil court we shall have equal weights.\" The Bank in that event would be entitled to raise any defence it pleased, such as negligence in the Treasury. They could contend that the signatures were not forged, but they were not bound in any shape or form by a verdict given in the present criminal case. In fact, the verdict in the present case would not even be admissible in evidence.\n\n### Mr. Potter's Protest\n\n\"I protest against an issue of this kind fought in this way, and I venture to say that is largely responsible for the length of time the case has taken,\" added Mr. Potter.\n\nAfter commenting that he did not want to \"score\" off Mr. Jenkin, counsel continued that an admission of criminality was one which had the most shattering effect on any defence raised. The whole defence raised in the present case was the question of the nebulous suggestion of a trick. He ventured to say that the great interest displayed by the large attendance in Court of people of both sexes was to see what the trick was which induced Mr. Messer and Mr. Black to sign cheques for $260,000. The point was put to Professor Shellshear yesterday, to suggest any trick which would produce cheques of that kind. First of all Professor Shellshear said it was not within his province, but, when pressed, he said he could not suggest anything.\n\nCounsel for the defence, with all his ingenuity, had not been able to suggest any trick. When Mr. Black was in the witness box they thought they were going to be told what the trick was, but there was not a word about it. When Tsang On-wing was being cross-examined, the astonishing statement made to him \"I put it to you that this writing in the body of the cheques is yours, that the signatures of Mr. Messer and Mr. Black were obtained by a trick.\" was made.\n\n### Yeo to the Wolves\n\nThe shadow of the Banking Corporation had overshadowed the defence from the beginning to the end, and Carvalho Yeo had been thrown to the wolves so that the defence could fight what they thought was the first round in the fight between them and the Government.\n\nOn those grounds such a fight would be all in favour of the Bank because in a Criminal case counsel for the Crown was circumscribed in many ways by statute. If he might use a boxing expression, he might say \"If this is a fight between the Bank and the Government...\"\n\n### Insult to Intelligence\n\nMr. Potter pointed out that the defence itself did not know what the trick was. He added: \"I say it is an insult to your intelligence bearing in mind the part played by the accused in the swindle in opening an office and three banking accounts. He is admittedly in possession of the...\"\n\n77", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 518619, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "page_number": 81, "title": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "content_text": "- 4 - \n\n79 \n\ndefence to put to that person the details so that he might have a chance of refuting it. Every detail of the conspiracy could have been obtained from defendant for the mere asking of it.\n\nIf Tsang was in the conspiracy, the prisoner was the man who had the full details of it at his finger's ends for he knew exactly the part played by Tsang On-wing. It was the bounden duty of counsel, who suggested the conspiracy, to put it to Tsang On-wing, in order to give him a fair chance of refuting it, but instead of this, all that was suggested to Tsang was that the handwriting was his, that he was in the swindle and that the evidence in regard to the non-reporting of the missing cheques was consistent with it. Not a syllable was put to Tsang as to how the swindle was carried out.\n\nThe suggestion had been made that Tsang did not run away, because he was double-crossed by the prisoner. Mr. Potter submitted that the reason why Tsang would want to run away would be to avoid gaol, for if the handwriting was in fact his, that would be inevitable. There was no ground to suggest that because Tsang did not get his share of the \"swag\" that he stayed behind.\n\nMr. King Satisfied. When Tsang and his assistant were detained by the Police in January, what followed was not a departmental enquiry but a police enquiry, the result of which satisfied Mr. King, an experienced officer, that there was no evidence against Tsang On-wing, who was therefore discharged from the court without stain on his character. Did the jury believe that Mr. King would have consented to such a course, had he not been perfectly satisfied, after a thorough investigation that there was no evidence against Tsang?\n\nThe next point, said Mr. Potter, was the most important and one which he could not get over, try as he would. If Tsang was in the swindle, asked Mr. Potter, why was it necessary to steal sixty cheques? That was a point which had never been dealt with by Counsel for the defence. If the handwriting was Tsang's and the signatures were obtained by trick, there was no need to steal the cheques. There was only one explanation for the theft and that was because a forgery was being enacted.\n\nNo Other Explanation. The forgery must have been either of the body of the cheque or of the signatures or both. There was positively no other explanation for the theft of the cheques.\n\n\"That point is the keystone of this case,\" said counsel, \"it has never been explained, has never even been dealt with. It can't be.\"\n\nIf Tsang was in the swindle, why did he report the loss of the sixty cheques to Mr. Messer ten days before the swindle was put through? That would be the last thing Tsang would do, if he was mixed up with it in any way.\n\n\"He may be a fool,\" said Counsel, \"but I put it to you, he is not a knave.\"\n\nProceeding, Mr. Potter said that when a person was in the witness box, he was amenable to the same treatment and to the same cross-examination. He was not claiming for Mr. Messer and Mr. Black any special immunity, because one was Mr. Messer and the other the accountant of the Treasury. He asked the jury to apply to their evidence the same test as they would apply to the humblest witness. There was one rule which must be followed. If anything is suggested against a witness, counsel must put it to them in order to enable them to refute it.\n\nRoutine at the Treasury. Mr. Messer had said that there was a routine in the Treasury and he invariably followed it. In answer to Counsel, he had said that he had never signed blank cheques.\n\nIf the defence was that Mr. Messer had signed a blank cheque, then the prisoner was guilty. \"If he, Mr. Potter, put his signature to a blank cheque and another person filled it up with $1,000 instead of $500 as Mr. Potter intended, then that was forgery.\n\nMr. Potter said he saw the shadow of the Hongkong Bank behind that defence. If a blank cheque was signed, perhaps they could not reclaim the money, but nevertheless, it was forgery in criminal law. If the witness had, in reply to Mr. Jenkin, admitted that he signed blank cheques, then as far as the present case was concerned, it finished the prisoner.\n\nMr. Potter said the Hongkong Bank had been clients of his on many occasions, but \"they have no right to keep you here in an effort to get a decision which they think they might get in another place.\"\n\nMr. Jenkin, on the previous afternoon, had drawn the jury's attention to the varying statement made by Mr. Black as to whether he did or did not report to Mr. Messer prior to going to the Bank on January 18. Mr. Potter said that the jury had to bear in", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 518620, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "page_number": 82, "title": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "content_text": "- 5 - \n\nMind that Mr. Black was subjected to a lengthy cross-examination, and was on his guard.\n\nA Scotsman?\n\nHe did not know if Mr. Black was a Scotsman, but said that many a shrewd man would be on his guard and if asked whether he spoke to Mr. Messer about the matter would answer exactly. When Mr. Black was asked whether he did report the matter, his answer was that he did not report but did speak. If that was the only ground on which Counsel for the defence would attack Mr. Black, then all Mr. Potter could say was that he was very pleased to have such a witness on his side.\n\nMr. Potter then asked what was the trick that was used to induce Mr. Messer and Mr. Black to sign the four cheques. He put it to the jury, in view of the fact that no trick was suggested to them, that in fact there was no trick at all.\n\nComing to the statements made by the accused in the first instance, Mr. Potter said that the accused had said that he did not do the forgery of the cheques and that anything he could do for the Government, he would do in Court. \"What did the defendant do for the Government in Court?\" asked Mr. Potter. \"Can it be the shadow again, which has fallen across him, which prevented him from doing in Court what he said he was prepared to do?\"\n\n## Ample Evidence\n\nMr. Potter then said he would not waste time by saying who forged the cheques, but said there was ample evidence against the accused both in fact and in law. First, there were his activities in opening his office and three banking accounts. Then there was his opportunity of getting at the cheque book. He had access to the safe where the book was stored. His actually being found in possession of four of the cheques was also to be remembered, and the incident which happened on the morning of January 5, was also of prime importance, which was that on a cheque being returned by the Hongkong Bank, he appeared just before closing time with the Man Lee cheque for $95,000. There seemed to him, said Mr. Potter, to be ample evidence on which he could find accused actually guilty of forgery.\n\nAs regards the suggestion that the Crown case was not proved, Mr. Potter asked that when the jury tested the evidence in the way he had shown them, had they any doubt that the evidence led to one conclusion and one conclusion only. He asked the jury to take the positive evidence of the Crown and to take with it the evidence of the handwriting which, unexplained, also the miraculous appearance on the three cheques in dispute of all the points he had brought out. He contended that the Crown had overwhelmingly proved their case.\n\n## Judge's Summing-Up\n\nHis Lordship prefaced his summing-up with the following remarks: Gentlemen of the jury, we have now reached the closing stages of this very long trial to which you have listened with so much patience. Counsel for the Crown and counsel for the defence have addressed you at great length on material points and facts in this case, and I feel it unnecessary to go over it again at the same length. It is my duty before you consider your verdict to direct you on the law and sum up the facts. The first point of the case is the indictment. This is framed in formal terms as required by law. It may have sounded very formidable to you, but in reality, it is very simple. It consists of six charges, (1) three of forgery of the three cheques which are now exhibited before you as A, B, and C, and (2) three of uttering the same cheques.\"\n\nHis Lordship then dealt with the law on the subject as presented by the local Ordinance of 1922, which treats as a forgery any false bill of exchange such as a bank cheque is. He then went on to say that before the jury could \n\n20", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 518621, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "page_number": 83, "title": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "content_text": "- 6 -\n\nTo convict the accused of forgery they must first be satisfied (1) that the three cheques were forged, (2) that the accused forged them, and (3) that he did so with intent to defraud. So also, before they could convict the accused of uttering the cheques, they must be satisfied (1) that the cheques were forged, (2) that the accused knew they were forged, and (3) that he used them with intent to defraud.\n\nQuestion of Forgery. The first point was whether the cheques were forged. The whole case stood or fell on that first point. If they found the cheques were not forged, then they might find the accused not guilty.\n\nLike the Genuine. For the moment, it sufficed that both admitted that the signatures on the cheques were extremely like theirs. It was always well when anyone was charged with forgery to consider whether the cheques had been actually signed or whether one had been tricked into signing them.\n\nThe natural course for the police to adopt under the circumstances would be to explore every avenue for the discovery of the truth. Only by doing that would they have something to proceed on. There was no reason why they should explore more in one direction than another.\n\nSo one of the very first persons whom they would think of would be the person who filled up the body of the cheques, who in this case was Tsang On-wing. In the absence of direct evidence - no-one had seen the accused do the actual forging - the jury had to draw their own conclusions from the surrounding circumstances, which was a more difficult task and on which they had to proceed with the greatest caution. In this task, they must be guided by the facts connected with the appearance and handling of the cheques as presented by the evidence which had been laid before the Court.\n\n| Whether any charges were subsequently withdrawn would not have any material bearing, and in this case, it should be remembered that Tsang was 20 days in confinement while these investigations were going on before he was released. |\n\nBeside the Point. The question suggested itself in the first place, whether the exhibits A, B, and C, were good cheques, and if not, were they forgeries? If the cheques had genuine signatures, it might have been due to carelessness, or might have been obtained through trick or fraud to which the accused was or was not a partner, but which was beside the point that the accused was now being tried for forgery and not for fraud.\n\nCriminal Records. \"Counsel for the defence asked during the course of the trial for the production of the criminal records in this matter. I had considered it my duty to rule against the application, because I consider it would be injurious to the public welfare to compel production,\" said his Lordship. \"Criminal Intelligence won't produce them,\" if the Director of Criminal Intelligence was asked to do so.\n\nFourthly, with regard to the cheques themselves, in order to deceive those who were intended to be deceived by the cheques, the forgery must be more than good. It must be excellent, in order to pass the test of modern scientific examination. Both Mr. Black and Mr. Messer, two Treasury officials principally concerned with the handling of cheques, had stated in no uncertain terms that they did not write or sign the cheques. They had examined the three names and writing given by the accused in the three accounts he operated with different banks and questions in cross-examination had been intensive on the difference presented in the respective penmanship of three accounts. There could be little doubt that A, B, and C were not written by a man like Tsang On-wing. The jury said that the signatures found thereon were not theirs. They were both certain about it. They might have been careless and the cheques might have been obtained by a trick from them. (These were points which His Lordship said would be dealt with later).", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 518622, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "page_number": 84, "title": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "content_text": "## \nThey had heard Professor Shellshear and his theories on mental reaction and the peculiarities which must always be present in one's writing, however much the form of the letters might vary, and which could not have been copied by any clever forger. The jury had had ample facilities for looking at the text-books containing different theses on the subject. These theories might have been sound in themselves, but they knew by experience that perfectly scientific theories of long standing and by the best of authorities were sometimes exploded by the test of facts.\n\nComing to the point of \"circumstances\" that must be noted before they could establish that the cheques were forgeries, his Lordship described the routine carried on therein as a \"mill\"-that was to say, the routine connected with these cheques carried the cheques through various departments before they reached the men who were to sign them.\n\nHe spoke of the importance of the vouchers which accompanied the cheques, and said that for a false cheque to be passed through these many hands without being detected would connote that the whole staff was disgracefully careless.\n\nIf anyone of the staff were found to be concerned in the passing of the false cheques, he was still there. The whole staff were still at their posts and it only needed the jury to charge any of them if they thought he or they were responsible.\n\nA query was made of it. Inquiries would have been made and steps would have been taken before anything serious happened. Considerations arising out of this were of little moment in Court. It did not excuse anybody who participated in an offence which might have been facilitated by an unintelligent man like Tsang On-wing, commented his Lordship.\n\n### Three Banking Accounts\nDealing with the counts of uttering, His Lordship said that if the jury were satisfied that the cheques were not forgeries, the matter ended there, but if they were forgeries they must next consider who was the person that forged them. In this they had to do without direct evidence and be guided by the circumstances; and they must be satisfied that these circumstances were consistent with the accused having committed a forgery.\n\nHis Lordship pointed to the means which had enabled accused to open three offices in China Building and to open three different banking accounts. They had seen the handwriting which he used for these different accounts, and the evidence given by witnesses of his having paid in cheques and withdrawn large amounts. What explanation had accused given for his possession of the three cheques? As far as they knew this man had given no explanation of how he, a subordinate at the Treasury, came to be in possession of those three cheques. All that he did say when charged was: \"I didn't do the forgeries. Anything I can do for the Government I will do in Court later on.\"\n\nWhen he was uttering the cheques, he said: \"I think I will not say anything about this charge here, I will do so in Court.\" And there the matter ended.\n\nBut, (his Lordship asked the jury), could they believe that both Mr. Messer and Mr. Black could be induced to sign three or four cheques for very large amounts without any voucher before them at all? \"The system at the Treasury,\" said the Judge, \"had its weak points and quite naturally the most circumstantial evidence was circumstantial. No-one saw the prisoner in the care of the cheques and the possibility of the cheques being extracted without any clear or intelligent report that should have been made. This Tsang On-wing, I ask you, is he a clever scoundrel, or is he a dupe, or is he a man without a head for an emergency like that? He may have been this last. But surely he should have looked up to see how many cheques were signed for when the cheques came from the Bank, and he should have reported if any were missing. There is still less excuse for him when it happened again, a second time within a few weeks. Had he reported, en...\n\n### Charges of Uttering\nWith regard to the three charges of uttering they had (1) to be satisfied that the cheques were forged, (2) that the prisoner knew them to be forged. They had to be satisfied that the cheques at one time were in his possession, that he got money for them; that...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 518623, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "page_number": 85, "title": "CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929", "content_text": "## THE SENTENCE PASSED.\n\nYeo's Desire For It Not To Be Deferred.\n\nSTATEMENT FROM DOCK.\n\nThe Court was crowded when the jury retired, the majority of people keeping their seats in anticipation of a short deliberation. The jury returned at 12.45, having been absent for twenty minutes.\n\nIn reply to the Clerk of the Court, the foreman announced that their verdict was unanimous. On the three counts of forgery \"Carvalho Yeo was found Guilty.\" On the three counts of uttering, prisoner was found guilty.\n\nMr. Ferguson, the foreman of the jury, said he had been asked by some members constituting a majority to add a rider to the verdict given. He did not know if such was customary in a criminal trial, but, if His Lordship desired, he could hear it.\n\n### Unusual Procedure\n\nMr. Justice Jacks remarked that it was unusual procedure to add a rider.\n\nMr. Ferguson said it was merely mentioned to him, and, having no knowledge as to whether it was permissible, he said he would bring the point up. The majority of the jurors would like to make a remark concerning the verdict.\n\nMr. Potter interjected and said that if it was anything in favour of accused, he thought it should be given.\n\nThe foreman of the jury was understood to say that it did not concern the accused.\n\nMr. Justice Jacks:- If you have given your verdict, I think it should stand as it is.\n\nMr. Ferguson:- I am quite satisfied.\n\nMr. Jenkin referred to a reservation under a section of the Criminal Evidence Ordinance and said that his point concerned the non-production of the police files. Under a section of the Ordinance, his Lordship might or might not postpone passing judgment. He asked for judgment to be postponed until argument had taken place before the Full Court on that point.\n\nMr. Justice Jacks said he did not think it would make much difference. He pointed out that, when the case came before the Full Court, the sentence could be quashed, upheld or a new trial ordered. It all depended on what the decision of the Full Court was. He did not think anything was to be gained by postponing sentence.\n\n### Restitution Prospects\n\nMr. Jenkin said he understood from the Crown that there had been a restitution to the Government of approximately $50,000. There was, in the name of the prisoner and his wife jointly, another sum of approximately $130,000 in United States Bonds in New York. He did not know whether the wife had disappeared, but she was not in Hongkong and was supposed to be in Shanghai. The accused had said at one stage that he would secure restitution of that amount as well, which would bring the total to approximately $180,000. The wife had not been forthcoming to the present, so that there were rumours as to her whereabouts and doings. It might happen that the wife might now come forward with the remaining money, which was a substantial amount as a result of which there would be a very material change in the matter of the sentence.\n\nMr. Justice Jacks:- There might be a change.\n\nMr. Jenkin said if further restitution was made, he thought it might have a material effect on his Lordship's mind. It might very well now happen that the wife would come forward. He thought his Lordship might exercise the very clear discretion he had in postponing sentence until the point referred to was decided in the Full Court.\n\n### Little Different\n\nHis Lordship said the offence was a very serious one on which the jury had found the prisoner guilty, and his view was that restitution or non-restitution of a certain amount would make very little difference to the sentence he would pass.\n\nMr. Jenkin:- If it would make... \n\nPage 83", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-515-6 Financial control in Hong Kong- vacancy for assistant accountant; investigation into misappropriation of funds- etc.... 7-2-1929 - 21-11-1929.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 519691, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-517-9 Smuggling of Chinese into United Kingdom and America 14-5-1929 - 9-9-1930", "page_number": 5, "title": "CO129-517-9 Smuggling of Chinese into United Kingdom and America 14-5-1929 - 9-9-1930", "content_text": "**NO CONFIDENTIAL.**\n\n$108\n\nGOVERNMENT HOUSE, \nHONG KONG \n9th September, 1930.\n\nMy Lord,\n\nI have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of Your Lordship's confidential despatches of 9th January and 2nd July, 1930, on the subject of the smuggling of Chinese into Great Britain.\n\nThe man Wong Sau Nga has now moved to 31 Des Voeux Road Central, Hong Kong, and on 11th August a search warrant was executed on these premises under the Forgery Ordinance. I forward a copy of a report from the Assistant Director of Criminal Intelligence from which it will be seen that the business now conducted by Wong Sau Nga appears to be of a legitimate nature; and no reason has been shewn for action by way of deportation from the Colony as in the case Wong Wo in 1928, (reported in Sir C. Clementi's despatch No.249 of 14th May, 1929).\n\nI regret the delay which has occurred in taking action in this matter.\n\nI have the honour to be,\nMy Lord,\nYour Lordship's most obedient, humble servant,\nL. ... \nGovernor. &c.\n\nTHE RIGHT HONOURABLE \nLORD PASSFIELD, \n&C., \n&C.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-517-9 Smuggling of Chinese into United Kingdom and America 14-5-1929 - 9-9-1930.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 519692, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-517-9 Smuggling of Chinese into United Kingdom and America 14-5-1929 - 9-9-1930", "page_number": 6, "title": "CO129-517-9 Smuggling of Chinese into United Kingdom and America 14-5-1929 - 9-9-1930", "content_text": "## RECEIVED\n1 3 OCT 1930'\n\n**OFFICE**\nPolice Headquarters, Hong Kong.\n19th August, 1930.\n\n**Director of Criminal Intelligence,**\n\nI executed a search warrant under the Forgery Ordinance for forged passports and documents on the 11th August, 1930, at 31 Des Voeux Road Central, 2nd floor. The sign \"Kung Wo Cheong\" (公和昌) in Chinese was exhibited outside the entrance door to the premises at the 2nd floor landing, and there was a similar sign inside the floor, but there was no sign or other indication of the existence of this firm at the street entrance to these premises via a common stairway.\n\nThere was an office and accountant's room on the floor. There was an \"L\" shaped counter with the usual stock of account books behind this counter. There were two safes in the accountant's room. There was one cubicle behind the accountant's room and a tier of bunk beds fronting on a passageway. Trunks and boxes were piled up against one of the party walls. The premises had the general appearance of an immigration boarding house on a small scale.\n\nWONG SAU NGA (黄秀雅) was present. He produced the key for the locked safe, and other safes were unlocked, which he opened for inspection. Chinese passports, identity books, and other papers referring to Chinese in the United Kingdom were found there, but these documents appear to be invalid (out of date). WONG SAU NGA produced documents relating to himself when in business in England. There were also in this safe a number of declarations in respect of intending emigrants to the United Kingdom.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-517-9 Smuggling of Chinese into United Kingdom and America 14-5-1929 - 9-9-1930.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 520738, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-519-4 Adjustment of exchange account- payment of military contribution on profit on exchange 10-9-1929 - 10-6-1931", "page_number": 18, "title": "CO129-519-4 Adjustment of exchange account- payment of military contribution on profit on exchange 10-9-1929 - 10-6-1931", "content_text": "# REPORT OF THE AUDITOR, HONG KONG\n\n## ON THE AUDIT OFFICE,\n\nand the examination of the various accounts in connection with Revenue, Expenditure, and Store Accounts of the Colony of Hong Kong, and Kowloon-Canton Railway (British Section) for the financial year 1928.\n\n## OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS.\n\n1. With reference to the final paragraph of my report on the Accounts for the financial year 1927, dealing with the defalcations by the Treasury Water Account Clerk, Carvalho Yeo, I have to report that the accused was apprehended and charged before a Special Jury at the Criminal Sessions on six counts relating to forging and uttering three cheques purporting to be drawn on the **Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation**, by Mr. C. Mcl. Messer, Colonial Treasurer, and Mr. T. Black, Cashier, on behalf of the Government in favour of certain fictitious firms to the total amount of $260,407.93.\n\nThe trial commenced on the 20th of November, 1928, and lasted until the 6th of December when the accused was found \"Not Guilty\" in respect of the three counts of forgery, and \"Guilty\" in respect of the three counts of uttering. The accused was sentenced to ten years hard labour on each of the three counts of uttering, the sentences to run concurrently.\n\nThe Government has intimated that no criminal proceedings against Carvalho Yeo in respect of certain defalcations in connection with the Water Accounts will be taken and the amount involved, viz., $15,329.95, will require the sanction of the Secretary of State to be written off.\n\nArising out of these frauds in the Treasury Department, Government commenced proceedings against the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation for the re-crediting of the sum of $260,407.93, contending that the cheques were forgeries.\n\nThe case was heard before the Chief Justice and a Special Jury between the 22nd of April and the 25th of May, 1929, when His Lordship delivered judgement in favour of the plaintiff in the following terms, with costs:\n\n\"That the said Government is entitled to be credited by the defendant corporation with the said three amounts, namely $86,965.33, $86,965.33, $78,300.41, and $95,142.19 (totaling $260,407.93 was mentioned earlier, but the judgement lists the amounts as $86,965.33, $86,965.33 and $78,300.41 and $95,142.19 - the correct total of the listed amounts is $348,373.26), together with interest thereon at the customary or contractual rate of two per centum per annum from the dates whereon the amounts of the said three cheques were respectively debited to the general account of the said Government till payment or judgement\".\n\n2 \n\nPage 18", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-519-4 Adjustment of exchange account- payment of military contribution on profit on exchange 10-9-1929 - 10-6-1931.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 525567, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-525-4 Writing off of public money 20-2-1930 - 2-6-1930", "page_number": 16, "title": "CO129-525-4 Writing off of public money 20-2-1930 - 2-6-1930", "content_text": "2. \n\n16 \n\n(a) The fact that the Adjutant placed such reliance \n\non So King Man as to allow him to make disbursements \n\nalthough he was not secured; \n\n(b) The apathy of the Chinese firms and contractors \n\nconcerned who do not appear to have taken any \n\naction to ensure that their accounts were paid \n\npromptly; \n\n(c) The acceptance by the Adjutant of So King Man's \n\nstatement that some of the payees, having no \n\nbanking accounts, required uncrossed cheques, \n\nwhich were subsequently negotiated by So by means \n\nof forged endorsements. Requests from Chinese \n\npayees for open cheques are, it may be stated, \n\nby no means uncommon. \n\n4. \n\nI am satisfied that these losses did not \n\noccur through any intrinsic defect in the departmental system of accounts. I have caused the financial arrangements of the office to be examined by the Treasurer and \n\nhe reports them to be satisfactory. I concur in this view. \n\nIt will be seen that the frauds required carefully planned \n\nforgeries for their execution and no financial system can \n\nin itself be proof against forgery, especially when combined \n\nwith apathy on the part of payees. I am equally satisfied \n\nthat sufficient fault and neglect does not attach to the \n\nAdjutant to render him liable to be surcharged with the \n\nlosses. Major Wolfe-Murray is a military officer lent to \n\nthis Government for a short term and for the purpose of \n\nmaintaining the efficiency of the Volunteers. His primary function is to superintend the training and discipline of \n\nthe corps and in entrusting to So King Man a portion of \n\nthe financial work of the department, he merely followed", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-525-4 Writing off of public money 20-2-1930 - 2-6-1930.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 527144, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-529-5 China- extraterritoriality 23-11-1931 - 31-12-1931", "page_number": 57, "title": "CO129-529-5 China- extraterritoriality 23-11-1931 - 31-12-1931", "content_text": "## Summary Trial and Preliminary Examination\n\n(2) In each of the following cases, that is to say,\n\n(i) where a person is accused of manslaughter, rape, arson, housebreaking, robbery with violence, forgery, or perjury; or\n(ii) where a person is accused of any offence other than aforesaid, but it is the opinion of the Court, which opinion of the Court shall be recorded in the Minutes, that the offence charged, if proved, could not be adequately punished under the powers of punishment of a Court trying the case summarily;\n\nthe accused shall be tried on a charge with a jury or assessors (according to the provisions of this Order applicable to the Court); but may, with the consent of the accused, be tried without assessors or jury. In the Supreme Court, when the accused does not so consent, the charge shall be tried with a jury, unless the Court is of opinion that a jury cannot be obtained.\n\n(3) The Supreme Court may, for any special reason, direct that any case shall be tried with assessors or a jury, and a Provincial Court may, for any special reason, direct that any case shall be tried with assessors. In each such case the special reason shall be recorded in the Minutes.\n\n## Trial with Jury or Assessors\n\n47.-(1) Where an accused person is ordered to be tried before a Court with a jury or with assessors, he shall be tried as soon after the making of the order as circumstances reasonably admit.\n\n(2) As long notice of the time of trial as circumstances reasonably admit shall be given to him in writing, under the seal of the Court, which notice, and the time thereof shall be recorded in the Minutes.\n\n## Summary Trial\n\n48.-(1) Where the complaint discloses an offence which is not required to be heard on a charge, and the Court does not think fit to direct it to be heard on a charge, the accused may be tried summarily on the complaint: Provided that no greater punishment shall be imposed than imprisonment with or without hard labour for three months, or a fine of twenty pounds, or both, except in such cases as a greater punishment could be imposed by a Court of summary jurisdiction in England.\n\n(2) An order to give security for good behaviour, or for deportation, or for payment of costs or damages shall not be deemed a punishment for the purposes of this Article.\n\n## Preliminary Examination\n\n49.-(1) Where the accused is before the Court, and it appears to the Court that the complaint discloses an offence\n(a) which ought to be tried in or reported to another Court;\nor\n(b) which ought to be tried before the same Court with a jury or assessors;\n\nthe Court shall forthwith so inform the accused, and proceed to make a preliminary examination in the prescribed manner.\n\n(2) If after such preliminary examination the accused is ordered to be tried, the Court shall bind by recognizance the prosecutor and every witness to appear at the trial to prosecute, or to prosecute and give evidence, or to give evidence (as the case may be) and if the case is to be tried in or reported to another Court shall forthwith send the depositions with a minute of other evidence, if any, and a report to the Court before which the trial is to take place.\n\n50.-(1) If a British subject, having appeared as prosecutor or witness at a preliminary examination, refuses to enter into a recognizance to appear at the trial to prosecute or give evidence, the Court may send him to prison, there to remain until after the trial, unless in the meantime he enters into a recognizance.\n\n(2) But if afterwards, from want of sufficient evidence or other cause, the accused is discharged, the Court shall order that the person imprisoned for so refusing be also discharged.\n\n(3) Where the prosecutor or witness is not a British subject, the Court may require him either to enter into a recognizance or to give other security for his attendance at the trial, and, if he fails to do so, may in its discretion dismiss the complaint.\n\n## Trial in a British Possession\n\n51.-(1) Where a person is accused of the commission of an offence the cognizance whereof appertains to the Court, and it is expedient that the offence be inquired of, tried, determined, and punished in a British possession, the accused may (under the `Foreign Jurisdiction Act, 1890`, (a) Section 6) be sent for trial to Bombay, Malta or Cyprus.\n\n(2) In any such case the Supreme Court may, by warrant under the hand of the Judge and the seal of the Court, cause the accused to be sent for trial to Bombay, Malta or Cyprus accordingly.\n\n(3) The warrant shall be sufficient authority to any person to whom it is directed to receive and detain the person therein named, and to carry him to and deliver him up at Bombay, Malta or Cyprus (as the case may be), according to the warrant.\n\n(4) Where any person is so sent to Bombay, Malta or Cyprus, the Court before which he is charged shall bind over such of the proper witnesses as are British subjects in their own recognizances to appear and give evidence at the trial.\n\n## Charges\n\n52.-(1) Every charge, upon which an accused person is tried, shall state the offence charged, with such particulars as to the time and place of the alleged offence, and the person (if any)...\n\n(a) `53-54 V. c. 37`", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-529-5 China- extraterritoriality 23-11-1931 - 31-12-1931.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 531087, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-535-3 Nguyen ai Quoc- request for extradition to Indo-China by French authorities 29-6-1931 - 26-1-1932", "page_number": 73, "title": "CO129-535-3 Nguyen ai Quoc- request for extradition to Indo-China by French authorities 29-6-1931 - 26-1-1932", "content_text": "21:18 72 \n\nTHE HONG KONG WEEKLY PRESS & \n\nFINE FOR PERJURY. later the acting rank was taken \n\nNEW EVIDENCE IN THE \n\nSUMMARY COURT. \n\nTANGLED MOTOR-CYCLE \n\nTRANSACTION. \n\nIn a recent action in the Summary Court, involving the cost of a motor cycle, Mr. Justice Lindsell decided against the plaintiff with costs. Plaintiff was also fined $100, or four weeks' hard labour, his Lordship holding that he had committed perjury in the witness-box. At the hearing of that action Mr. F. C. E. Rendall appeared for the plaintiff, Kartar Singh, and Mr. H. J. Armstrong was for the defendant, Mohinder Singh, A.S.P.\n\nwas \n\nMr. Rendall, in asking his Lordship on Wednesday to reconsider the case, said that he was only doing so in respect of the fine, as certain information had come to his knowledge since the hearing of the action which would have material bearing on the perjury charge. He asked that Mr. Bishen Singh be recalled to give evidence, and his Lordship agreed to this course.\n\nau \n\nIn evidence, Mr. Bishen Singh said that there was an earlier case in August last year between Kartar Singh and Mohinder Singh. Witness, together with Nawab Khan, acted as arbitrators in the dispute and it was agreed that the matter should be settled by Mohinder Singh paying to Kartar Singh the sum of $125.\n\nIn answer to Mr. Rendall, witness agreed that at the time of this settlement Kartar Singh also mentioned another claim which he had against Mohinder Singh in connection with a motor cycle. This matter was not investigated as Buntar Singh, another man concerned in the deal, was not then in the Colony.\n\nDid he tell you that a few days away?—Yes.\n\nregard Questioned in to the settlement last August, witness said that Mohinder Singh did not agree to anything and he had to be forced to agree.\n\nIn regard to the present action, witness said that Kartar Singh approached him with a view to a settlement after the writ had been issued. Witness took steps to bring about a settlement and suggested to Mohinder Singh that he should come and discuss the matter, but the latter refused to do so.\n\nAnswering another question, witness said that the present case was discussed by Sapooran Singh and a number of other people at the Witness Oriental Provision Store. was present at this discussion when Kartar Singh agreed to withdraw his claim.\n\nFine Remitted.\n\nAt the close of the hearing, his Lordship said that, in view of the new evidence, although he was not satisfied that the plaintiff spoke the truth, he would remit the fine.\n\nMr. Armstrong raised the question of his costs for the day. His Lordship held that Mr. Armstrong's attendance was not necessary, although he was there to watch the proceedings on behalf of his client, and therefore he was not entitled to costs.\n\nMr. Armstrong further asked if a statement could be made that the allegations against his client, as had been made during the afternoon, were unfounded. His Lordship replied that he did not see how he could make such a statement for the reason already stated in the application for costs.\n\ned in the deal, was not then in the \n\nFORGED BANKNOTES \n\nColony. \n\nCycle Given as Gift.\n\nAfter questioning witness on the facts of the motor cycle deal, Mr. Rendall explained that Buntar Singh had been a police constable in 1928, and that he had made a present of the cycle to Mohinder Singh. Buntar Singh's brother owned public motor-cars and Kartar Singh (plaintiff) worked as a driver under him. The cost of the cycle had, in fact, been deducted from the wages of Kartar Singh, who acted as a middle-man in the transfer of the machine to the defendant. At a later stage Mr. Rendall said that the gift was in the nature of a bribe in order to secure promotion.\n\nMr. Rendall (to witness): Were you told by Kartar Singh that the reason why the cycle was given as a gift was to secure promotion for Buntar Singh from constable to sergeant?-Yes.\n\nWas that promise fulfilled?--I don't know.\n\nMr. Justice Lindsell: What did Kartar Singh say?-He said that Buntar Singh had got his promotion.\n\nShort-lived Promotion.\n\nRendall: prom \n\nDid he tell you \n\nCHINESE GETS ONE MONTH'S HARD.\n\nThe case against Leung Kau, who was charged before Mr. Fraser at the Kowloon Magistracy with (1) uttering a forged Chartered Bank $100 note and (2) possession of a forged Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank $10 note, was concluded on August 20. His Worship found the defendant guilty on the second charge and sentenced him to one month's hard labour.\n\nIt will be recalled, that defendant denied knowledge that the $100 note was a forgery but admitted knowledge of the forged $10 note, which, he said, he had no intention of using.\n\nHe said he received the $100 note in the course of a business transaction, but he could not remember where he obtained it. The reason why he bought $2 worth of rice with the $100 note was because if he went to the money-changer's, he would lose a little discount, whereas if he bought something with it, he would not lose anything. s to acting \n\n(Continued on next Column.)\n\n[August 28, 1931 \n\n'WHERE TO STAY IN ENGLAND.” \n\nSELSDON PARK HOTEL, \n\nSANDERSTEAD, SURREY, ENCLAND. \n\nOnly half-an-hour from the City and West End, yet in the midst of the beautiful scenery of the Surrey Hills, the SELSDON PARK HOTEL is the largest Hotel with its own private 18 hole golf course within daily reach of London.\n\nOverseas visitors are specially catered for: central heating throughout, radiators in every public room, bedroom and corridor, making the Hotel an ideal winter residence. Hot and cold water and telephone in every bedroom. Numerous suites and rooms with private bathrooms.\n\nFREE GOLF ON PRIVATE 18-HOLE COURSE (6,355 yards) IN OWN PARK OF 230 ACRES.\n\nBilliards, tennis, dancing and luxurious car service between Hotel and Station. All free.\n\nREDUCED WINTER TERMS FROM OCTOBER 1.\n\nSOUTHAMPTON HAMTUN HOUSE HOTEL, \n\nHULSE ROAD. \n\nA.A. \n\nR.A.C. Overlooking County Cricket Ground. Central Heating. Gas Fires in all Bedrooms.\n\nExcellent Cuisine. Garage: 20 Cars. Good Centre for Motor Tours. Terms from £3. 3. 0 Weekly. Telephone: 2766 \n\nWhat Search Revealed.\n\nIn reviewing the case, his Worship said the defendant was first confronted with a charge of uttering a forged $100 note. A search of his house by the police revealed that he had another forged note hidden under the mattress of his bed. The fact that he had another forged note in his possession might have some weight with regard to the first charge.\n\nThe defendant had, on the other hand, given his proper address and was perfectly willing to go to the Police Station when asked to do So. He must have either thought himself very \n\ndid not know that the note he had passed was a forgery.\n\nΟΥ secure \n\nBenefit of the Doubt.\n\nIES Worship went on to say that he was not convinced that defendant definitely knew that the $100 note was a forgery. There was a possibility that he did not know, and his Worship would give him the benefit of the doubt. The first charge against him would therefore be dismissed.\n\nWith regard to the second charge, his Worship passed sentence of one month's hard labour.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-535-3 Nguyen ai Quoc- request for extradition to Indo-China by French authorities 29-6-1931 - 26-1-1932.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 531177, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-535-5 N.I. Brewer- transcript of trial and evidence 1-1-1929 - 31-12-1931", "page_number": 17, "title": "CO129-535-5 N.I. Brewer- transcript of trial and evidence 1-1-1929 - 31-12-1931", "content_text": "His Lordship:\n\nMr. Brewer\n\n15.\n\n17\n\nThe point is this, it bears on what appears in the Public Examination, that is, you are not being tried on the evidence of the witness, you are being tried on material other than that evidence.\n\nI will proceed to call my defence.\n\nThe whole question is this, this is a case of perjury and the Crown have got to prove the person guilty of forgery in a case like this, they must do much more than merely say it is false.\n\nThis charge is created by the Perjury Ordinance of 1922, which says that one making a statement not under oath, was equal with one making a statement under oath given. But it is not intended by that, that to make a statement not under oath is within the ordinary question of perjury. It is necessary to say that this statement would be one which would not be indictable for perjury if made unknowingly. Now a statement to be indicted for perjury must not be merely false, but materially false, intentionally false and made with a fraudulent intent.\n\nNow, Gentlemen, the whole point of the defence is, firstly, that these loans should have been treated as cash, were treated consistently throughout as cash, and this statement is true, and had any other statement been made, it would have been untrue. Then there is of course a much stronger case, you have the consistency in which they have been treated throughout the books and the fact that all the documents and records bear out our belief that these were cash transactions and we have treated them throughout as such. You have the fact that seven months ago in my Public Examination, I made the fullest possible explanation of what these items were and that everything had always been consistent. You will have evidence that these books were kept on a regular and clear system, that it was easy for any person regarding these books, to see what was the meaning of these transactions. You will also have another evidence that the books were not kept secretly, there was nothing to hide from anybody. That the very people to whom this report was sent, were the people who had access to the books of the Company.\n\nIt will be evident in spite of the date of this Statutory Report, it being shortly after the inception of our Company, a report issued at so early a date would have the idea that the Company had been created for the purpose of forgery. It is evident that the Isthmian Banking Corporation was named after the man who signed this report, who was supposed to have signed this report for fraudulent purposes. You will see from the fact that he gave his own name to the Company showed he had faith in the Company and would not have given his name to come a byword in the Colony. It will be evident that the men who paid these sums of money and obtained loans in respect of them, were genuine individuals, having actual existence in the Colony, being in the main part men of good standing, and in every case men of full age.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-535-5 N.I. Brewer- transcript of trial and evidence 1-1-1929 - 31-12-1931.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 531932, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-536-10 Need for leglisation concerning number of certificated officers carried on passenger ships 18-11-1931 - 15-6-1932", "page_number": 56, "title": "CO129-536-10 Need for leglisation concerning number of certificated officers carried on passenger ships 18-11-1931 - 15-6-1932", "content_text": "93\n\nGENERAL SURVEY\n\n88\n\n89\n\nit is important to provide sanctions, and also perhaps, as the Australian Government suggests, to extend the clause so as to cover cases of fraud in this connection as well as forgery.\n\nVI.\n\nSupervision of enforcement (Question 6).\n\nThis last Question in the Questionnaire asked whether provision should be made for special measures for supervising the enforcement of the rules of the Draft Convention, and whether, in particular, the competent authorities in each country (which would usually be the authorities generally responsible for ensuring compliance with the national laws or regulations relating to the safety of navigation) should be empowered to detain any vessel not carrying certificated officers as required by the Draft Convention.\n\nAs in the case of Question 5, the only Government which has definitely returned a negative reply is the Netherlands, which considers that the subject-matter of the above Question has already been sufficiently regulated by the London Convention of May 1929 and that there is therefore no need for further international regulations on the matter.1 For the rest, the replies of the Governments may most conveniently be considered (1) in relation to the question of the enforcement of the rules of the Draft Convention on national vessels, and (2) in relation to foreign vessels.\n\n1\n\n(1) So far as national vessels are concerned, the replies of the Governments are such that it may be assumed to be agreed that an efficient inspecting agency should be provided in each country for ensuring observance of the rules of the Draft Convention on these vessels, and that, as the Indian Government proposes, a clause to that effect might be included in the Draft Convention. Such inspecting agencies, in fact, may be assumed to exist already in countries which have laws or regulations relating to certificates of professional competency.\n\nFor the provisions of Article 48 of the London Convention, see footnote, ante, p. 57.\n\nQUESTION 6\n\nFurther, the principle that the competent national authorities should be empowered to detain national vessels on which a breach of the Draft Convention has been committed would also seem to be generally accepted. Most of the Governments, however, do not specify the nature of the cases for which they consider that this power should be conferred. Others expressly or impliedly suggest that it should be left to national laws or regulations to determine this point. Others, again, indicate that the possible breaches of the rules to be proposed in the Draft Convention may be of varying degrees of importance and that the detention of a vessel for a breach of minor importance would be too serious a measure for such cases which, it may be added, would in any event fall within the range of the sanctions already dealt with under Question 5. It is accordingly suggested by a number of Governments (e.g. Australia, Cuba, Denmark, Norway, Spain, Sweden) that the power of detention should only be given for serious breaches, e.g. breaches amounting to rendering the vessel unseaworthy or constituting an obvious danger to the lives of the persons on board.\n\n―\n\nIt would thus appear that the situation of the replies as a whole on the above point would best be met by a provision in the Draft Convention requiring national laws or regulations to determine the cases in which it will be possible to detain national vessels for a breach committed on them of the rules laid down in the draft.\n\n(2) So far as foreign vessels are concerned, however, the replies on the whole express considerable hesitation as to the extent to which the rules of the Draft Convention should be enforced on them. Many of the replies do not specifically refer to foreign vessels, but are in general terms which may be, but perhaps in most cases are not, intended to cover both national and foreign vessels. Others express the view that the Draft Convention should only deal with the enforcement of its provisions on national vessels (e.g. India), or should reserve such enforcement entirely or at any rate in principle for the authorities of the country of the vessel (e.g. Denmark, Latvia, Norway, Rumania, Sweden, Yugoslavia). Similarly, the French Government points to the friction which is sometimes caused between Governments in the enforcement of maritime Conventions on foreign vessels,\n\non\n\n94", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-536-10 Need for leglisation concerning number of certificated officers carried on passenger ships 18-11-1931 - 15-6-1932.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 532848, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-538-1 Hong Kong University 31-12-1931 - 6-8-1932", "page_number": 88, "title": "CO129-538-1 Hong Kong University 31-12-1931 - 6-8-1932", "content_text": "The Mongolian Eye\n\n121\n\nMy concern is with the record of such an eye-form in the remains of a Chinese culture of 3,000 years ago. The evidence is the shape of the pictograph of the eye that can be dated at the latest from about 1155 B.C. (to a few decades).\n\nTo estimate this evidence properly, a word must be said about the history of Chinese characters. In general, Chinese tradition has it that one Ts'ang Hieh (or Chich)—Cantonese Ts'ong Kit devised a scheme of writing as a substitute for the quippus or knotted cords of the primitive ages. Accounts vary as to who Ts'ang Hieh was but they put him back in the first half of the third millennium B.C. This is not the place for a long historical disquisition but it may be taken as certain that all that period of Chinese History is legendary, if not made up of deliberate falsification.* The supposed literary records of the period are of later compilation and modern scholars regard these earlier sovereigns as rationalizations of tribal gods while their sons and descendants would correspond to the eponymous heroes of Greece. Certain it is that no actual writing of the Period of the Five Rulers or of the time of Yao, Shun, Yü or the Hia Dynasty is known to be extant to-day. The \"Tablet of Yü\" is a late and clumsy forgery. With the Shang Dynasty (1722-1122 B.C.) we come to something more real. A number of bronze vessels bearing inscriptions exist which Chinese scholars regard as of this period, but it is impossible so far to assign these to fixed dates within the period. However, it is now possible to determine certain inscriptions on tortoiseshell, bone or horn from Anyang in Honan as definitely earlier than about 1155 B.C. These are fragments of materials used in divination; the carapace of a tortoise or a bone was made to crack by means of fire and the shape of the fissures was interpreted as the answer of the divinities consulted: on the pieces was cut a record of the consultation giving the day, question and answer of the oracle and often the name of the monarch concerned or an ancestor venerated. Fortunately, the skill of Chinese scholars has deciphered a fair number of the characters and has won a great amount of information from these riddling sentences. Suspicions long lurking in the minds of many Sinologues, Chinese or European, as to the genuineness of these fragments must now be dissipated (except for objects suspicious otherwise) by the results of the excavations at Anyang in the years 1928 and 1929, published by the Academia Sinica in Preliminary Reports of the Excavations at Anyang, Parts I and II (Peiping dated 1929).*\n\n* It is on this material that I am working.\n\nThe proof seems valid that the site on which these inscriptions have been found was the site of the royal capital of the Yin (later Shang) Dynasty, occupied from about 1400 B.C. when P'an Keng moved there until the reign of Ti Yih (ending about 1155 B.C.) when the place was apparently destroyed by the waywardness of the Yellow River. There are some grounds for holding that some of these fragments belong to earlier monarchs as far back as 1766 B.C. and were carried about with the reigning monarch.\n\nCp. Marcel Granet: \"Chinese Civilisation,\" Book II Ch. I. Preliminary Reports of Excavations at Anyang (Academia Sinica: Pekin 1929), Vol. II, p. 363 (article by Fu Ssŭ-nien).\n\n* I shall quote this as REAY I or II.\n\nMay 1932.\n\n141", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-538-1 Hong Kong University 31-12-1931 - 6-8-1932.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 535033, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-541-1 Piracy- case of Rex v. Chung Tam Kwong 29-7-1932 - 3-2-1933", "page_number": 34, "title": "CO129-541-1 Piracy- case of Rex v. Chung Tam Kwong 29-7-1932 - 3-2-1933", "content_text": "GENERAL.\n\nThe Law Officers are accordingly requested to advise :-\n\n(1) Whether the case of Rex v. Chung Tam Kwong was, in their opinion, rightly decided; if so (2) Whether, assuming that satisfactory proof of intent to commit piracy is forthcoming, a foreigner who on the high seas assaults with intent to murder any person on board a vessel, could be convicted in the Courts of this country under 1 Vic., c. 88, or in the Colonial Courts under 12 & 13 Vic., c. 96.\n\n(3) Whether the Imperial Parliament could properly be invited to pass legislation conferring jurisdiction to try foreigners in the circumstances indicated in (2).\n\n(4) Whether it is expedient to refer to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council any question arising out of the matters discussed in this case, and, if so, to settle the suggested terms of reference.\n\n(5) Generally on the case.\n\nOpinion of the Law Officers of the Crown and Mr. Wilfrid Lewis.\n\nIn our opinion the question whether or not the full court of Hong Kong arrived at a correct decision in quashing the conviction in the above case can only be satisfactorily answered by approaching the matter de novo.\n\nIt is thus necessary to decide at the outset what jurisdiction the Hong Kong Court had to try the twelve prisoners. They were Chinese subjects in a Chinese vessel upon the high seas. Although it is not expressly so stated, we feel entitled to assume that the acts with which the prisoners were charged were not committed inter fauces terrae, and took place more than 3 miles from the coast of Hong Kong so as to be outside the zone provided by the Territorial Waters Jurisdiction Act, 1878. From the above circumstances it results that these prisoners, in the absence of any relevant statute applying to foreigners when outside that zone and in foreign ships, were for no purpose subject to Imperial municipal law. These prisoners, however, were liable to be tried and punished for offences committed outside the 3-mile zone if amounting to piracy jure gentium. Reference should be made to the exhaustive judgment of Cockburn C. J. in Reg. v. Keyn (1876 2 Exch. D. 63 at pp. 159 to 238), where the history and scope of English criminal jurisdiction over foreigners upon the seas was traced and examined.\n\nIt will be convenient to postpone dealing with the questions whether actual robbery is an essential element in the crime of piracy jure gentium or whether a frustrated attempt to commit a piratical robbery is not equally piracy and justiciable as such, and to deal first with the question whether Imperial Courts have jurisdiction over foreigners in foreign ships who commit outside the 3-mile zone offences made punishable as piracy by British or Imperial Statutes.\n\nIn this connection the propositions of Cockburn C. J. in Reg. v. Keyn can be stated broadly as follows: Up to the 16th century the jurisdiction of English criminal courts was confined to crimes committed within the body of a county, while crimes at sea were subject to the jurisdiction of the Admiral (pp. 162, 167). Thus piracy jure gentium was never a felony at common law. Subsequently, in the reign of Richard II the respective jurisdictions were allowed to overlap, to the extent that in murder and mayhem done in great ships in the mouths of great rivers the Admiral was accorded concurrent jurisdiction with the common law (p. 168). And so English criminal law remained until 1878. Cockburn C. J. examined the statute 28 Henry VIII, c. 15, and reached the conclusion (pp. 169 and 209) that it created no new offence and did not render foreigners liable to any English Court when they were not previously so liable: the statute merely transferred the existing jurisdiction of the Admiral to commissioners appointed by the King, and the only jurisdiction over foreigners for crimes committed on the high seas being derived from the civil law the commissioners received no further or greater jurisdiction under the statute of Henry VIII than the Admiral possessed and no power to apply English criminal law to foreigners in circumstances where the Admiral could not apply it (p. 169). And this position was not altered by the statute 4 & 5 William IV, c. 36 (which gave the Central Criminal Court jurisdiction) or 7 & 8 Vict., c. 2, which gave power to ordinary Courts of Assize to try offences committed on the high seas and within the jurisdiction of the Admiral.\n\nGENERAL.\n\n3\n\nAdmittedly piracy jure gentium was within the jurisdiction of the Admiral, and to this extent the Commissioners (subsequently the Central Criminal Court and Assize Courts) obtained jurisdiction over foreigners committing crimes in foreign ships on the high seas, though Cockburn C. J. admitted that if Parliament had expressly asserted a more extended jurisdiction it would have been the duty of the Courts to recognise and endeavour to enforce such jurisdiction (pp. 160 and 207). At p. 208 he examined the question whether English municipal law either expressly or by implication had been extended to foreigners in foreign ships on the high seas. After approving the doctrine laid down by Turner L. J. in Cope v. Doherty (1858 2 De G. & J. 614 at 624 affirming 4 K. & J. 367) that Parliament must not be presumed to have legislated for foreigners and that to warrant such a conclusion the words of an Act ought to be express or its context very clear, Cockburn C. J. reached the conclusion that, up to 1876, no provision had been made by Parliament for trying foreigners for crimes committed generally upon the seas in foreign ships (p. 213), while such legislation as had been applied either expressly or impliedly to foreigners within what may for convenience be termed territorial waters had dealt with the revenue, customs, the protection of fisheries and kindred matters.\n\nWe feel satisfied that Cockburn C. J. in his exhaustive analysis of the law would have commented on such acts as the Suppression of Piracy Act, 1698 (Halsbury's Statutes IV, p. 334), the Piracy Act, 1821 (p. 343 op. cit.), the Offences at Sea Acts, 1799 and 1806 (pp. 401 and 417), the Murders Abroad Act, 1817 (p. 440), the Piracy Act, 1837 (p. 461), the Admiralty Offences Act, 1844 (p. 476), and the Piracy Act, 1850 (p. 520), had he considered that the provisions of any of those Acts either expressly or impliedly referred to foreigners, for, although the crime charged in Reg. v. Keyn was manslaughter, the principle at issue was sufficiently wide to render relevant the various municipal Acts dealing with piracy had the advocates in the case or other members of the Court cited them as conferring statutory criminal jurisdiction over foreigners in foreign ships.\n\nUp to 1878, therefore, we think that, while for the purpose of regulating national defence and such matters as customs and revenue, municipal law had in certain cases been applied to foreigners in foreign ships at sea, there was no statute which had extended the jurisdiction of our criminal courts in respect of crimes committed by foreigners at sea, unless committed on board a British ship or falling under the definition of piracy jure gentium. The ratio decidendi of Cockburn C. J. and the majority of the Court was responsible for the drafting of the Territorial Waters Jurisdiction Act of 1878. The effect of that Act was to declare and enact (see the preamble and per Coleridge C. J. in R. v. Dudley and Stephen, 14 Q.B.D. at 281), that the jurisdiction of our courts extended to all offences committed within 3 miles of the coast; but, subject to that extension, we think that the law of the high seas remains to-day as it was stated by Cockburn C. J. (see Harris v. steamship \"Franconia,\" 1877, 2 C.P.D. 173, and the Fagernes, 1927 P, 311).\n\nThus, in our opinion, Section 2 of the Piracy Act, 1837, does not assist, except in so far as it affects the question of punishment.\n\nWe think that the object of this Act was not the definition of the crime of piracy, but the regulation of its punishment. It must be remembered that at this time statutory revisions of punishments, and more particularly capital punishment, was occupying the attention of the Legislature see, for instance, the Criminal Law Act, 1827, Section 7, the Forgery Act, 1837, and the Punishment of Offences Act, 1837. We think the object of the Piracy Act, 1837, was to retain the death penalty in cases of piracy with violence, but in other cases of statutory or municipal piracy to substitute transportation for death (Section 3). Moreover, if actual robbery is an essential ingredient in piracy, the Section carries the matter no further; if it is not, it is unnecessary to invoke the section.\n\nAccordingly, in our opinion, it would not have been correct to indict these twelve prisoners under the Piracy Act, 1837, Section 2, or any other provision of English municipal law relating to piracy.\n\nOn the other hand, we do not agree with what we understand to be the view of the Hong Kong Court, that they were not competent to try a charge of piracy jure gentium. We entertain no doubt that the Hong Kong Court possesses jurisdiction over foreigners accused of piracy jure gentium. We think such jurisdiction was inherent under international law, upon the doctrine that the\n\n[7653]\n\nB 2\n\n34", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-541-1 Piracy- case of Rex v. Chung Tam Kwong 29-7-1932 - 3-2-1933.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 535053, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-541-1 Piracy- case of Rex v. Chung Tam Kwong 29-7-1932 - 3-2-1933", "page_number": 54, "title": "CO129-541-1 Piracy- case of Rex v. Chung Tam Kwong 29-7-1932 - 3-2-1933", "content_text": "1\n\n55\n\n-5-\n\nHarris v. S.S. Franconia, 1877 2 C.P.D. 173, and the Fagernes, 1927 P 311).\n\nThus, in our opinion, Section 2 of the Piracy Act 1837 does not assist, except in so far as it affects the question of punishment.\n\nG\n\nWe think that the object of this Act was not the definition of the crime of piracy but the regulation of its punishment. It must be remembered that at this time statutory revisions of punishments, and more particularly capital punishment, was occupying the attention of the legislature see for instance the Criminal Law Act 1827, Section 7, the Forgery Act 1837, and the Punishment of Offences Act, 1837. We think the object of the Piracy Act 1837 was to retain the death penalty in cases of piracy with violence, but in other cases of statutory or municipal piracy to substitute transportation for death (Section 3).\n\nMoreover, if actual robbery is an essential ingredient in piracy the Section carries the matter no further: if it is not, it is unnecessary to invoke the Section.\n\nAccordingly, in our opinion, it would not have been correct to indict these twelve prisoners under the Piracy Act 1837, Section 2, or any other provision of English municipal law relating to piracy.\n\nOn the other hand, we do not agree with what we understand to be the view of the Hong Kong Court that they were not competent to try a charge of piracy \"jure gentium\".\n\nWe entertain no doubt that the Hong Kong Court possesses jurisdiction over foreigners accused of piracy 'jure gentium'. We think such jurisdiction was inherent under international law, upon the doctrine that the pirate is 'hostis humani generis' and his crimes are justiciable anywhere.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-541-1 Piracy- case of Rex v. Chung Tam Kwong 29-7-1932 - 3-2-1933.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 535074, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-541-1 Piracy- case of Rex v. Chung Tam Kwong 29-7-1932 - 3-2-1933", "page_number": 75, "title": "CO129-541-1 Piracy- case of Rex v. Chung Tam Kwong 29-7-1932 - 3-2-1933", "content_text": "76\n\nIV.\n\n11. If the Judgment of the Hong Kong Court in the present case was correct as to the meaning of piracy jure gentium in English law, and if the argument in the second section of this memorandum is unsound, legislation is apparently necessary if offences of this and like character committed by foreigners on the high seas against foreign vessels are to be punishable in English courts.\n\nFrom the point of view of the Foreign Office it is important that such legislation should keep within the limits of piracy as defined by international law. The reason for this is that according to the view of international law invariably taken hitherto by this country, it is not permissible for states to assume jurisdiction in respect of crimes, other than the crime of piracy jure gentium, which are neither committed by their own subjects nor committed (whether by subjects or aliens) nor producing their effects within their territorial jurisdiction (including their ships and territorial waters).\n\nIt is true that a number of States have assumed to exercise jurisdiction in respect of certain crimes, other than piracy jure gentium, committed by aliens out of the jurisdiction, (18) but this assumption has never been recognised as valid by this country. Hence, while the States in question would probably...\n\n18. There are at least fifteen such States, but the crimes in question are mainly crimes affecting the State itself, e.g., treason, forgery of the currency, etc. The whole matter is discussed in the articles by Mr. Beckett already referred to (note 21).", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-541-1 Piracy- case of Rex v. Chung Tam Kwong 29-7-1932 - 3-2-1933.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 536024, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-542-1 China- traffic in arms 31-10-1932 - 9-2-1934", "page_number": 129, "title": "CO129-542-1 China- traffic in arms 31-10-1932 - 9-2-1934", "content_text": "## \n\nof Defence, Chief of staff and Attorney General. He quite \nappreciated the fact that I could give him no recognition \nuntil the matter had been cleared up and said that as there \nwas nothing to be gained by remaining here he would proceed \nto Hongkong and telegraph to the Chief of staff. I agreed \nthat this was the best thing he could do. To the best of \nmy belief Mr. Brack left for Hongkong that afternoon but \nI have no information as to his subsequent movements.\n\n8. In view of Hongkong telegram No.60 to the Colonial \nOffice I had, to commence with, no reason to doubt Mr. \nBrack's bona fides but he talked in such a large way not \nonly of the business which he was confident of putting through \nhere in one or two days he anticipated obtaining orders to \nthe value of from three to five million pounds but also \nof his own importance that my doubts were naturally aroused. \nI gave Mr. Brack no introductions and on receipt of \nyour telegram No.38 I caused it to be made known to the \nMayor that I could give no guarantee as to Mr. Brack's bona \nfides. No harm has resulted from his visit to Canton.\n\n9. In addition to his passport Mr. Brack possessed a \ngeneral letter of introduction signed by Mr. Scullin in 1931 \nand bearing the seal of the Commonwealth of Australia. \nHe showed me a type-written document marked \"List of goods as \noffered by the Defence Department to Mr. C. Brack for export\" \nwhich, of course, might very easily have been a forgery, but \nhe also showed me vouchers, which appeared to be perfectly \ngenuine, for certain rifles and ammunition issued to him \nby the Defence Department and these arms he brought with him \nto Hongkong.\n\nI have, etc., \n**(gd)** I.O. Jamieson \nActing Consul-General.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-542-1 China- traffic in arms 31-10-1932 - 9-2-1934.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 537018, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-543-16 China- protection for Anglo-Chinese 13-2-1933 - 13-3-1934", "page_number": 29, "title": "CO129-543-16 China- protection for Anglo-Chinese 13-2-1933 - 13-3-1934", "content_text": "# \n\n46. Where the Supreme Court or a Provincial Court issues a summons or warrant against any person on complaint of an offence committed on board of, or in relation to, a British ship, then, if it appears to the Court that the interests of public justice so require, the Court may issue a warrant or order for the detention of the ship, and may cause the ship to be detained accordingly, until the charge is heard and determined, and the order of the Court thereon is fully executed, or for such shorter time as the Court thinks fit; and the Court shall have power to make all such orders as appear to it necessary or proper for carrying this provision into effect.\n\n47. Every Provincial Court shall execute any writ, order, or warrant issuing from the Supreme Court, and may take security from any person named therein for his appearance personally or by attorney, according to the writ, order, or warrant; or may cause such person to be taken in custody or otherwise to the Supreme Court or elsewhere in China, according to the writ, order, or warrant.\n\n48.-(1) The Court may, in its discretion, admit to bail a person accused of any of the following offences, namely:-\nAny felony.\nRiot.\nAssault on any officer in the execution of his duty, or on any person acting in his aid.\nNeglect or breach of duty by an officer.\nBut a person accused of treason or murder shall not be admitted to bail except by the Supreme Court.\n\n(2) In all other cases the Court shall admit the accused to bail unless the Court, having regard to the circumstances, sees good reason to the contrary, which reason shall be recorded in the Minutes.\n\n(3) The Supreme Court may admit a person to bail, although a Provincial Court has not thought fit to do so.\n\n(4) The accused who is to be admitted to bail, either on remand or on or after trial ordered, shall produce such surety or sureties as, in the opinion of the Court, will be sufficient to ensure his appearance as and when required, and shall with him or them enter into a recognizance accordingly.\n\n## Trial with Jury or Assessors\n\n49.-(1) Where a person is accused of treason, murder or piracy the case must be tried on a charge before the Supreme Court with a jury.\n\n(2) In each of the two following cases, namely :—\n(i) Where a person is accused of manslaughter, rape, arson, burglary, housebreaking, robbery with violence, forgery, sodomy or perjury; or\n(ii) Where a person is accused of an offence other than as aforesaid, but it appears to the Court at any time during hearing, the opinion of the Court being recorded in the Minutes, that such offence charged, if proved, would not be adequately punished by imprisonment for three months with hard labour, or by a fine of £20, or both such imprisonment and fine-\nthe offence shall be tried on a charge with a jury or assessors (according to the provisions of this Order applicable to the Court). In the Supreme Court the charge shall be tried with a jury, unless the Court is of opinion that a jury cannot be obtained.\n\n(3) The Supreme Court may, for any special reason, direct that any case shall be tried with assessors or a jury, and a Provincial Court may, for any special reason, direct that any case shall be tried with assessors. In each such case the special reason shall be recorded in the Minutes.\n\n50.-(1) Where an accused person is ordered to be tried before a Court with a jury or with assessors, he shall be tried as soon after the making of the order as circumstances reasonably admit. \n(2) As long notice of the time of trial as circumstances reasonably admit shall be given to him in writing, under the seal of the Court, which notice, and the time thereof, shall be recorded in the Minutes.\n\n51.-(1) The Supreme Court shall, when required by the Secretary of State, send to him a report of the sentence of the Court in any case tried before that Court with a jury or assessors, with a copy of the Minutes and notes of evidence, and with any observations which the Court thinks fit to make.\n\n(2) Every Provincial Court shall, in accordance with Rules of Court, send to the Supreme Court a report of the sentence of the Court in every case tried by the Court with assessors, with such Minutes, notes of evidence, and other documents as such Rules may direct, and with any observations which the Court thinks fit to make.\n\n## Summary Trial\n\n52. When the complaint discloses an offence which is not required or directed to be heard on a charge, the accused may be tried summarily on the complaint. Where an offence is tried summarily no greater punishment shall be awarded than imprisonment for three months or a fine of £20, or both. Provided that in cases tried summarily before the Registrar he may award in respect of an offence any punishment which may in respect of a similar offence be awarded in England.\n\n## Preliminary Examination\n\n53. (1) Where the accused is before the Court, and it appears to the Court that the complaint discloses an offence-\n(a) Which ought to be tried in or reported to another Court;\nor\n(b) Which ought to be tried before the same Court with a jury or assessors;", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-543-16 China- protection for Anglo-Chinese 13-2-1933 - 13-3-1934.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 543181, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-545-7 Telegraphy and Telephony- amendments to legislation 1-11-1933 - 24-3-1934", "page_number": 16, "title": "CO129-545-7 Telegraphy and Telephony- amendments to legislation 1-11-1933 - 24-3-1934", "content_text": "# luciosure no 1.\n\n15 \n\nAmended \n\nвить пашалай \n\nno 129 1924. \n\n**COPY.** \n\n**No. 3 of 1894** \n\n## TELEGRAPHIC MESSAGES. \n\n1894 \n\nNo. 1 of 1894, incorporated in No.4 of 1897. \n\nNo. 2 of 1894, repealed by No.43 of 1912. \n\n### No. 3 of 1894. \n\n**An Ordinance to secure the rights of property in telegraphic messages, and to prevent the forgery and improper disclosure of telegrams.** \n\n(20th May, 1901) \n\n#### Short title. \n\n#### Protection of certain telegrams from publication within certain period. \n\n1. This Ordinance may be cited as the **Telegraphic Messages Ordinance, 1894**. \n\n2. Whenever any message, transmitted by telegraph from any place outside of this Colony, is received by any person, association, or company in this Colony, for the purpose of publication in any newspaper, or, by printed circular or otherwise, to any limited number of persons members of or subscribers to any such association or company, no person, whether a member of or subscriber to such association or company or not, shall, without the consent in writing of such person, association, or company by whom such message has been received, print or publish in any newspaper, or in any letter or circular or other printed or written communication, such telegraphic message, or the substance thereof, or any extract therefrom, until after the expiration of a period of thirty-six hours from the time of the first publication of such message by the person, association, or company receiving the same: Provided always that such protected period shall not extend beyond forty-eight hours from the time of the first receipt in the Colony of such message: Provided, also, that the publication of any similar message lawfully received in like manner by any...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-545-7 Telegraphy and Telephony- amendments to legislation 1-11-1933 - 24-3-1934.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 543182, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-545-7 Telegraphy and Telephony- amendments to legislation 1-11-1933 - 24-3-1934", "page_number": 17, "title": "CO129-545-7 Telegraphy and Telephony- amendments to legislation 1-11-1933 - 24-3-1934", "content_text": "## Penalty on Person Printing, etc. Matter Contrary to Ordinance\n\n(cf. No. 3 of 1890, s.57.)\n\n### Heading of Protected Telegram, etc.\n\n### Evidence\n\n### Forgery and Improper Disclosure of Telegrams\n\n47 & 48 Vict. c. 76, s.11.\n\nother person, association, or company, by such other person, association, or company shall not be deemed or taken to be a publication of such first-mentioned message within this Ordinance.\n\n3. Every person who prints or publishes or causes to be printed or published any matter contrary to the provisions of this Ordinance shall upon summary conviction be liable to a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars for the first offence, and not exceeding one hundred and fifty dollars for the second and every subsequent offence. If imprisonment is imposed for default of payment, it shall be without hard labour.\n\n4. Every telegraphic message in respect of which the protection of this Ordinance is claimed shall be published with the heading \"By Telegraph\", and the name of the person, association, or company claiming such protection, and shall state the date and hour of its receipt in the Colony and of its publication, and such statement shall be prima facie evidence of the times of the receipt and publication of such message.\n\n5. In any prosecution under this Ordinance, the production of any document which purports to be a telegraphic message duly and regularly issued by any telegraph office in this Colony on its customary form shall be prima facie evidence that the message contained therein was received in this Colony by telegraph from the place therein mentioned to the address of the person, association, or company therein named, and was duly delivered in this Colony to such person, association, or company.\n\n6. (1) Every person who \n(a) forges, or wilfully and without due authority alters, a telegram; or", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-545-7 Telegraphy and Telephony- amendments to legislation 1-11-1933 - 24-3-1934.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 543996, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-546-4 Control of the printing of bank-notes 12-12-1933 - 15-3-1934", "page_number": 6, "title": "CO129-546-4 Control of the printing of bank-notes 12-12-1933 - 15-3-1934", "content_text": "## \n5. Greasy \n\nomit. \n\n/1.0. \n\nHoly \n\n1. \n\nStates \n\n\nno control \n\nover \n\n24-2-34. \n\nprinting of foreign \n\nbank notes in this country but refers to S.116 of Forgery Act, 1913. \n\nSections \n\n1 \n\n? Dispatch in reply to (1) on \n\nParagraphs 9, 16 and \n\n115 and \n\n2 and \n\n3 \n\n18.9 \n\nthe lines \n\n4 \n\n95 [and quoting sections \n\nof the Forgery Act 1913 Submiller H/s.] \n\n28/2/34. \n\nW/.] \n\nLetter with the action proposed - omitting, however, the passage enclosed in brackets. \n\n6/3/34 \n\n11. Duncan. \n\n+ G. Powell \n\nT.V. Vernon \n\n6/3 \n\nat noon \n\nF. So H. Kong 111(1 Ansa) - 15 MAR 1934", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-546-4 Control of the printing of bank-notes 12-12-1933 - 15-3-1934.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 543998, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-546-4 Control of the printing of bank-notes 12-12-1933 - 15-3-1934", "page_number": 8, "title": "CO129-546-4 Control of the printing of bank-notes 12-12-1933 - 15-3-1934", "content_text": "8 and 16 of the **Forgery Act, 1913**, which relate to the making and possession, without lawful authority or excuse, of paper, dies, etc., used for making any bank note. A copy of this is on file. Bank note in this Act includes a note of any person or body corporate carrying on the business of banking in any part of the world; and the provisions of the Act could therefore be used to deal with cases of suspected forgery of foreign bank notes. The question of what constitutes \"lawful authority or excuse\" in such a case is not easy to answer in precise terms, but it is for the person charged to establish his authority or excuse, and in order to succeed on this ground he would prima facie have to produce evidence of a bona fide contract with the foreign bank in question.\n\n3. The definition of bank notes in the Act would not appear to cover currency notes issued by a foreign Government, but I understand that it is proposed to remedy this deficiency in the legislation which will require to be introduced to give effect to the International Convention for the Suppression of Counterfeiting Currency signed at Geneva on the 20th April, 1929.\n\nI have, etc.\n(Signed) **PLYMOUTH**.\n(for the Secretary of State)\n\n## FURTHER ACTION\n\nPage 9\nC. O. Mr. Parkinson. Mr. Tomlinson. Sir C. Bottomley. Sir J. Shuckburgh.\nPermt. U.S. of S. Parly. U.S. of S. Secretary of State. **DRAFT**", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-546-4 Control of the printing of bank-notes 12-12-1933 - 15-3-1934.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 543999, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-546-4 Control of the printing of bank-notes 12-12-1933 - 15-3-1934", "page_number": 10, "title": "CO129-546-4 Control of the printing of bank-notes 12-12-1933 - 15-3-1934", "content_text": "## Telephone No.: WHITEHALL 1234.\n\nAny reply to this letter should be addressed to- \n**NATIONAL** \n**FOR** \n**THE SECRETARY,** \n`CHEME NOW 03` \n**DISABLED** \n**TREASURY,** \nWHITEHALL, LONDON, S.W.1. \nand the following number quoted : \n`F.10615`. \n\n## TREASURY CHAMBERS.\n\n24th February, 1934. \n\nSir, \n\nI have laid before the Lords Commissioners of \nHis Majesty's Treasury Mr. Gent's letter of the 31st \nJanuary 1934 (`33712/34`) enclosing a copy of a despatch \nfrom the Governor of Hong Kong regarding the printing of \nbank notes in the Colony asking what control, if any, is \nexercised in Great Britain over the printing of bank notes \nfor foreign powers. \n\nIn reply I am directed to request you to inform \nthe Secretary of State that there is no control over the \nprinting of foreign bank notes in this country in the \nsense of legislation requiring a permit to be obtained \nbefore such work can be undertaken. \nIt may, however, be \ndesirable to direct the Governor's attention to sections \n9 and 16 of the Forgery Act, 1913 which relate to the \nmaking and possession, without lawful authority or excuse, \nof paper, dies, etc., used for making any bank note. \n\nThe Under Secretary of State, \nColonial Office.\n\nPage 10\nPage 11", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-546-4 Control of the printing of bank-notes 12-12-1933 - 15-3-1934.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 544000, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-546-4 Control of the printing of bank-notes 12-12-1933 - 15-3-1934", "page_number": 11, "title": "CO129-546-4 Control of the printing of bank-notes 12-12-1933 - 15-3-1934", "content_text": "**Bank note** in this Act includes a note of any person or body corporate carrying on the business of banking in any part of the world; and the provisions of the Act could therefore be used to deal with cases of suspected forgery of foreign bank notes.\n\nThe question of what constitutes \"lawful authority or excuse\" in such a case is not easy to answer in precise terms, but it is for the person charged to establish his authority or excuse, and in order to succeed on this ground he would prima facie have to produce evidence of a bona fide contract with the foreign bank in question.\n\nThe definition of bank notes in the Act would not appear to cover currency notes issued by a foreign Government, but it is proposed to remedy this deficiency in the legislation which will require to be introduced to give effect to the International Convention for the Suppression of Counterfeiting Currency signed at Geneva on the 20th April 1929.\n\nI am,\nSir,\nYour obedient Servant,\nA.P. Waterfield", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-546-4 Control of the printing of bank-notes 12-12-1933 - 15-3-1934.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 544389, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-547-2 Appointments to Executive and Legislative Councils 25-1-1934 - 28-12-1934", "page_number": 4, "title": "CO129-547-2 Appointments to Executive and Legislative Councils 25-1-1934 - 28-12-1934", "content_text": "forgery \n\n**official desp** \n\nmight be \n\n4 \n\nwhether \n\nnotice \n\nany \n\nq \n\nthus \n\napparent \n\nCould \n\n... \n\ntaken \n\nin \n\nsaid \n\nin \n\nbut perhaps something \n\nprivate letter \n\nTo the \n\nfor \n\n... \n\nMr Bushe \n\nshould \n\n... \n\nproceed officially. \n\nsuggested \n\nabove \n\nare \n\nI Nowell \n\n28/3/304 \n\nHollowel \n\n29 \n\nThere is no power to appoint retrospectively \n\nnot even \n\nIf a false document - not power \n\nto affix. \n\n... \n\nmy view \n\nactually after \n\nthe date when he was actually \n\nHlB \n\n21/3 \n\nThis \n\nThat \n\nSir W. Shewton \n\nwe lose \n\nthe precedence \n\nwhich he \n\nat present enjoys \n\n... \n\nBut \n\nAudit Instructions of 10/1/22. \n\ndecide what the real \n\n... \n\nmore expedient reason \n\nfor allowing", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-547-2 Appointments to Executive and Legislative Councils 25-1-1934 - 28-12-1934.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 544862, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-548-1 Annual reports from various government departments 3-4-1934 - 11-6-1935", "page_number": 168, "title": "CO129-548-1 Annual reports from various government departments 3-4-1934 - 11-6-1935", "content_text": "## K 2\n\nArmed with a revolver, a man held up and robbed passers-by. On the 7th July, 1933, at 10:45 p.m., an exchange of shots took place between a Police detective patrol and some robbers. No casualties were inflicted on either side. During subsequent Police investigations, a number of Chinese males were arrested and banished. A regular Police patrol is now maintained on this road at various hours. The action taken by Police appears to have stopped this form of crime.\n\nThe \"Social Problem\" - During the year, certain new developments, probably arising from the closing of the brothels in June 1932, have been encountered and dealt with by Police. There has been a great increase in the number of street walkers and of males soliciting for sly brothels. A large number of arrests have been made by Police. Government has now approved a policy of banishment of persons convicted of these offences.\n\nDuring 1932 and 1933, a number of Dance Halls were established in different parts of the Colony. It soon became clear that this development, if unchecked, would produce very undesirable results, and Government has approved the licensing and regulation by Police of such establishments under `Ordinance No. 25 of 1933` (Miscellaneous Licences Ordinance).\n\nDuring the same period, a number of bogus Massage Establishments were started in various parts of the city. Their activities were found to be highly undesirable, and strong Police action was taken, as a result of which about fifty persons have been banished from the Colony. In most cases, the proprietors of these establishments were Japanese. This action by Police has checked further development of this evil. All Massage Establishments have now to be licensed and supervised by Police under the provisions of `Ordinance No. 25 of 1933` (Miscellaneous Licences Ordinance).\n\nCoinage Offences - On 24th February, 1933, Police seized at No. 22 Front Row, 1st floor, Tai Hang, a complete and elaborate outfit for the forgery of Siamese Bank Notes by the Intaglio Process of copper plate engraving. Further apparatus for the same purpose was found at No. 16 Clarence Street, 3rd floor, West Point. Three Chinese males were arrested and charged. At the February Criminal Sessions, one defendant was sentenced to seven years' hard labour, and the other two were discharged.\n\nMurder - On 18th April, 1933, a Chinese male attempted to assassinate Lo Wai Keung, Editor of the Tin Nam Yat Po, by firing five shots at him with a revolver in Lyndhurst Terrace. Mr. Lo Wai Keung fortunately escaped with only a slight wound in the shoulder, and his assailant was arrested. At the June Criminal Sessions, the assailant was sentenced to life imprisonment with hard labour. Subsequent enquiries revealed that the attempted assassination was due to rivalry between different political parties outside the Colony.\n\n## K 3\n\nBuilding Collapse - On 3rd June, 1933, the 2nd floor balcony of No. 15 Yuk Sau Street collapsed and threw four persons to the ground below, of whom two subsequently died from their injuries. A very lengthy inquiry was held by the Coroner with a Jury, and a verdict of Death by Misadventure was returned. The Jury added a recommendation for enforcing supervision by architects of work done under their instructions.\n\nAssault on Medical Practitioner - A serious assault was made on 22nd July, 1933, by an unknown Chinese male on Dr. Ma Wai Man, at No. 186 Gloucester Road, 2nd floor. Dr. Ma had gone to the floor in response to an urgent call for medical assistance. While this appears to have been an isolated case, and no motive can be assigned for the assault, it illustrates the danger to which local doctors may be liable in answering calls from unknown persons.\n\nRemand Home for Juvenile Offenders - This Home, for the reception of male juvenile offenders dealt with under the `Juvenile Offenders Ordinance` (`Ordinance No. 1 of 1932`), was opened on 20th November, 1933. The Home is under the general charge of the Inspector General of Police. A European officer is superintendent of the Home. He has a staff of one Chinese Lance Sergeant and seven Chinese Constables. Two Probation Officers (one for Hong Kong and one for Kowloon) are attached to the Home for enquiry work. The Home is designed and furnished to accommodate fifty boys. On 31st December, 1933, sixteen boys were under detention; but the average daily number is steadily increasing. The Home and its staff promise to supply a long-felt want and to do very useful work. By the end of the year, several cases had occurred in which runaways from home had been fully traced and handed back to their parents after an absence of two or three months. Further details of the Home appear in `Annexe D`.\n\n## CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION BRANCH\n\n3. Summary of Crime - The total number of cases (except summonses) dealt with by the Police during 1933 was 31,289, as against 21,071 in 1932, being an increase of 10,218 or 48%. The increase is in minor offences and is very largely accounted for under the headings of Opium, Regulations governing Hawkers, and Nuisances.\n\nThere were 5,630 serious cases in 1933, as against 5,707 in 1932, a decrease of 77 or 1.3%. The chief decreases were:\n| Offence | Number of Cases |\n| --- | --- |\n| Burglaries | 75 |\n| House-breaking | 29 |\n| Larceny from buildings | 111 |\n| Larcenies | 28 |\n| Murders | 17 |\n| Robberies | 16 |", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-548-1 Annual reports from various government departments 3-4-1934 - 11-6-1935.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 544896, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-548-1 Annual reports from various government departments 3-4-1934 - 11-6-1935", "page_number": 202, "title": "CO129-548-1 Annual reports from various government departments 3-4-1934 - 11-6-1935", "content_text": "## Table IV.\n### ABSTRACT OF CASES UNDER COGNISANCE OF THE POLICE MAGISTRATES' COURTS DURING THE YEARS 1932 AND 1933.\n#### HONG KONG.\n\n| Total No. of Defendants | Total No. of Convicted and sentenced | Unsuccessful Prosecution of Offences | Committed for Supreme Court Trial | Committed to Prison or Detained pending Order of H.E. the Governor | Found Guilty without further penalty | To keep the peace and be of good behaviour | Convicted and cautioned | Under police supervision | Previously convicted | To answer any charge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| M | F | M | F | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |\n\n### OFFENCES AGAINST INDIVIDUALS\n\n#### (a)—Against their property\n\n| Offence | 1932 | 1933 | Defendants (M) | Defendants (F) | Convicted and sentenced (M) | Convicted and sentenced (F) |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 1. Larceny: Simple | 684 | 708 | 171 | | 114 | |\n| Stealing from the person | 19 | | 18 | | 13 | |\n| Embezzlement and fraudulent conversion | 12 | 9 | | | | |\n| Robbery | | | | | | |\n| Burglary and housebreaking | 217 | 127 | 108 | | | |\n| Dealing with menaces | 10 | | | | | |\n| False pretences and cheating | 76 | 42 | 77 | | | |\n| Receiving and possession of stolen goods | 699 | 734 | | | | |\n| 3. Malicious damage | 20 | 10 | | | | |\n| 4. Forgery | 23 | 4 | | | | |\n| Other offences | | | 675 | 187 | 173 | 170 |\n\n#### (b)—Against their persons\n\n| Offence | 1932 | 1933 | Defendants (M) | Defendants (F) | Convicted and sentenced (M) | Convicted and sentenced (F) |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 1. Homicide | | | | | | |\n| 2. Ill-treatment and grievous harm | | | | | | |\n| 4. Kidnapping | | | | | | |\n| 6. Minor offences | | | 233 | | 320 | |\n| Other offences | | | | | | |\n\n### OFFENCES OF A PUBLIC NATURE.\n\n#### (4)—Against the Crown and Government.\n\n| Offence | 1932 | 1933 | Defendants (M) | Defendants (F) | Convicted and sentenced (M) | Convicted and sentenced (F) |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 1. Currency offences | 2 | 10 | | | | |\n| 2. Sedition, intimidation and breach of emergency regulations | 14 | 3 | | | | |\n| 3. Unlawful societies | | | | | | |\n| 4. Trespass and damage on Crown Land | | | | | | |\n| 5. Theft and misuse of public money | | | | | | |\n| 6. Misconduct by Government officers | 8 | | | | | |\n| 7. Opium and Revenue offences | 1,652 | | | | | |\n| 8. Dangerous drugs and goods | 2 | | | | | |\n| Other offences | | | | | | |\n\n| Total | 1932 | 1933 |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| | 5,995 | 9,763 |\n| | 6,671 | |\n| | 2,420 | 4,000 |\n\n### Carried forward\n3,650 | 709 | 683 | 748 | 36 | 24 | 120 | 714 | 16 | 26 | 38 | 38 | 2 | 10 | 98 | 29 | 17 | 120 | 24 |", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-548-1 Annual reports from various government departments 3-4-1934 - 11-6-1935.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 544898, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-548-1 Annual reports from various government departments 3-4-1934 - 11-6-1935", "page_number": 204, "title": "CO129-548-1 Annual reports from various government departments 3-4-1934 - 11-6-1935", "content_text": "## Table IV—Continued\n### ABSTRACT OF CASES UNDER COGNISANCE OF THE POLICE MAGISTRATE'S COURT DURING THE YEARS 1932 AND 1933\n\n#### Kowloon\nCases, how disposed of, and the Number of Male and Female Adult Defendants under each Head.\n\n| | Committed for trial at the Supreme Court | Committed to Prison or Detained pending Order of H.B. the Governor | Bound over without further penalty | Convicted and cautioned | To answer any charge | To keep the peace and be of good behaviour | Discharged |\n|------------------|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|-----------------------| --------------------|-----------------------------------|-------------|\n| | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F |\n| **OFFENCES AGAINST INDIVIDUALS** | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |\n| (4)—Against their property | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 1. Larceny and attempted Larceny | 1440 | 111 | 754 | 111 | 717 | | 826 | 20 | 864 | | | | | |\n| Simple Larceny | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |\n| Stealing from the person | 101 | 16 | 116 | 21 | 76 | | 66 | | | | | | | |\n| Embezzlement and fraudulent | 63 | 18 | 16 | | 37 | 10 | | | | | | | | |\n| Robbery | 10 | | * | | 12 | -H | | | | | | | | |\n| Burglary and housebreaking | 41 | 10 | 40 | | | | | | | | | | | |\n| The winding with ... | | | 3 | 4 | | | | | | | | | | |\n| False pretences, fraud, cheating | 24 | 32 | 24 | | | | | | | | | | | |\n| Receiving and possession of stolen goods | 197 | 343 | 501 | 3.86 | | | | | | I | Aryot | | | |\n| 2. Malicious damage to property | 16 | BJ | 12 | | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 3. Forgery | EA | H | 10 | & | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 4. Other non- | 14 | 30 | 184 | | 99 | 18 | 189 | 190 | 199 | 22 | 9.3 | | | |\n| | | | | | 614 | 147 | ** | 29 | 4 | | | | | |\n| | | | | | 372 | 58 | 80 | 13 | 14 | В | & | | | |\n| | | | | | 32 | w | *- | | 39 | 14 | В | | | |\n| | | | | | 198 | 201 | 276 | 157 | A | 284 | 11 | IIT | | |\n| | | | | | 17 | | 2 | 1 | 142 | 31 | 32 | | | |\n| (5)—Against their person | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 1. Homicide | | | | | 1: | | | | | | | | | |\n| 2. Assault and grievous harm | 181 | 182 | | | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 3. Criminal assault | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 4. Kidnapping | | | | | ค | | | | | | | | | |\n| 5. Sexual offences | 1 | 24 | “”+ | | 10 | 7 | 133 | 81 | T | 2 | ... | | | |\n| | | | | | 21 | | | | | | | | | |\n| 6. Employment of women and girls | | | | | 7 | | | | | | | | | |\n| 7. Libel offences | | | de um | | | | | | | | | | | |\n\n## OFFENCES OF A PUBLIC NATURE\n(c)—Against the Person and Government\n\n1. Currency offences, weights and measures | | | BALTON, SC, we may g | 1 | | | | | | | | |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 2. Sedition, fabrication and breach of regulations regarding... | | | ziperpincy regulations raquetarako | | 2 | | 2 | 1 | 1 | * | 1 | | |\n| 3. Unlawful seditious utterances | CENTEMATTER | | | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 4. Trespass and damage on Crown Land | | | | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 5. Theft and damage of public stores | | | | 101 | 12 | 心 | | | | | | | |\n| 6. Misuse of Government officials | | | | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 7. Opium and Breach of... | 3826 | 1,774 | 1,892 | 19 | 61 | 248 | ཐཱ ཨཙྪཡནྡྷནྡྷཝནྟི། | -3 ཎྞག] | & | | | | |\n| 8. Dangerous drugs and goods | 1,688 | 184 | 2.61 | 4,003 | 2.703 | 1,207 | 3,712 | 3,288 | 132 | | | | |\n| 9. Other offences | | | | | | | | | | | | | |\n\n| | 1932 | 1933 |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Carried forward | 10 | 16 |\n| | A | [] |\n| Witnesses punished for making false charge or giving false evidence | 2 | 2 |\n| Police Supervision | 1 | 1 |\n| Previously convicted | 22 | --- |\n| | JAL | 10 |\n| | 1 | 19 |\n| | 2 | נען |\n| | E | 1973 |\n| | 1982 | JJ, DU |\n| | 57 | 12 |\n| | \" | = |\n| | 2 | A |\n| | : | F |\n| | 1982 | 1999 |\n| | I-L | 114 |\n| | 74 | 10 |\n| | 11 | Jo |\n| | +8 | 17 |\n| | 28 | 140 |\n| | + | +* Included in 7 other offences | \n| | 112 | |", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-548-1 Annual reports from various government departments 3-4-1934 - 11-6-1935.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548776, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 1, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "40129\n\n564\n\n53621\n\n1935\n\n53621\n\nMONG A 16\n\n68\n\n100\n\nCLOSED UNTIL\n\nPUBLIC RECLAMATION\n\nVALIDATION AND CLAUSES\n\nNo\n\nof 1935\n\nPrevious\n\nSubsequent\n\n);\n\n13717\n\n33\n\n53624\n\nRB\n\n31\n\nhely legal! dags.al\n\n3/6\n\nFoo\n\nRTY\n\n8/10\n\nAvaa 17/1 R298 157x\n\nABO\n\n7/3\n\nReguty M. Cowell 6\n\nCestar\n\n14.6\n\nMr. Yent\n\nMr. Costar\n\n4.4\n\nMr. Dale\n\n5.x\n\nMr. Rowell 6\n\nFILE A.\n\n77 298\n\n1219\n\n5/x\n\n83\n\n83\n\nU bostar 5/10\n\nMa Font\n\nMCowell &\n\nSie & Matter\n\n8\n\n(27159) Wt. 24455-46 11,000 in 2 sort.\n\n1/65 P.t. .,645/17\n\nCORDINANCE\n\n129/55.4/", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548777, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 2, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "C1'd\n\nP.\n\nД\n\n(1)\n\nGov. conf.\n\n30.4.35.\n\nRef. (37) on 13717/1/33, submits draft Bill.\n\n2\n\nI annex a memorandum which summarises the objections raised to the last draft of the Hong Kong Foreshore and Sea Bed Works Bill ((17) in 13717/1/33). It will be seen that the Secretary of State, the Foreign Office and the China Association all for various reasons urged that the proposal to confer on the Hong Kong Government by Ordinance general powers to interfere with private rights for the purpose of executing public works not specifically defined in the Ordinance should be abandoned, and that instead a special ad hoc Ordinance should be passed every time a specific public work was in contemplation which would injuriously affect private rights.\n\nThe suggested alternative policy is now to be adopted.\n\nThe present Bill does two things:-\n\n(1) Part I validates certain undertakings specified in the schedule which have been completed or commenced on unleased Crown foreshore or sea bed, and extinguishes without compensation all public and private rights in the area occupied or to be occupied by them.\n\nThere is no reason for believing that any objection would be raised by anybody to this. It is apparent from paragraphs 4 and 5 of (38) in 13717/1/33 that the China Association do not object to validating existing works, but only to validating in advance any unspecified works which the Government may like to undertake, and the Objects and Reasons state that the works in question have all been undertaken without protest.\n\n(2)", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548778, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 3, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "(2) Part II enacts certain general clauses regarding notifying proposed future works, hearing objections and the provision of compensation where private rights are affected, which are to be applied in future cases where works are to be undertaken. The works themselves will, however, first need to be specifically authorised by Ordinance, and the interests affected will accordingly have ample opportunity to make representations to Government and, in the last resort, to present any objections to the particular works to the Legislative Council after the Bill is published for information.\n\nThe clauses relating to notification, objections and compensation follow generally those in the draft at (17) in 13717/1/33. It will be noted in this connection that in paragraph 4 of (37) in 13717/1/33 the Secretary of State stated that \"subject to the observance of this general principle that the works to be executed must be defined in the Ordinance, the provisions of the Bill in regard to notice and compensation have my general approval.\"\n\nI have inserted in the margin of the Bill enclosed in (1) references to the corresponding clauses of the earlier draft. It will be seen that certain minor objections raised by the China Association, which are summarised in paragraph 3 of the memorandum...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548779, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 4, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "4\n\n*\n\nI think Section Dis is probably met by the terms of Clause 6.\n\nYes I think so\n\n(L.)\n\nmemorandum have not been met, particularly objections B (v. Clause 7(6)), C (v. Clause (3)), E (v. Clause 7(1)) and F (v. Clause 7(4)). In addition the period during which the notification of an intended work shall be published and during which objections may be lodged (Clause 5(1) and (2)) and compensation claimed (Clause 7(1)) is reduced from three months to two.\n\nThis reduction is, however, justifiable in view of the fact that the necessity for passing a separate Ind. for each contemplated work gives extra notice.\n\nMr. Gent spoke to me about procedure on this Bill. In view of the fact that their major objection has been met, perhaps we need not refer the revised Bill for the observations of the China Association.\n\nThe Admiralty and the Board of Trade who raised no objection to the earlier draft are not likely to question this. Our action therefore may be confined to sending a copy of (1) and enclosures to the Foreign Office, reference (37) in 13717/1/33, pointing out that the objections raised in that letter have been met by the decision to pass a separate Ordinance before any new work of the kind contemplated in the Bill can be undertaken, and say that, subject to any observations Sir Samuel Hoare may have on the Bill, it is proposed to authorise the O.A.G. to proceed to enact it. This action is, of course, contingent on Legal Adviser's observations on the revised draft.\n\nI see no objections to this. As we asked the China Association to send their objections into Hong Kong via the Chamber of Commerce (39 prof.), then, I suppose we can infer that Hong Kong has considered them. I do not think that injustice would be done by ignoring all of their objections.\n\n5. 1*", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548780, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 5, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "We should not invite the China Association to make further comments. They have every opportunity to make their views known through the Chamber of Commerce.\n\nID 7.0 as proposed.\n\n6.9.35\n\n12 \n\n17% 6 2 To F.C. (W.K./Renal.) Conf 12/9/35\n\nNo observations 4/9/35\n\nApprove in principle (1) to proceed with the revised draft alone to F.O.\n\n5/9/35. Bill enclosed therewith.\n\nYour draft is all right; but as the policy directions now adopted result from the late S. of S., who took a personal interest in the matter, I referred to my minute of 3.8.33 on 13717/1/93.\n\nSend this on at once 'pro forma'.\n\n8/9\n\nA. Powell", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548781, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 6, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "# Hong Kong.\n\nConfidential (No. Ausc) - 14.10.35.\n\nDESTROYED UNDER STATUTE\n\n6\n\n3° 27.0.- wyc (4) 52.7.0-m\n\nC\n\nB. 12b.-\n\n15 OCT 1935\n\nMr. Looker, who took a prominent part on behalf of the China Association in the criticism of the Hong Kong Government's Foreshore and Sea Bed Works Bill in 1933, called this morning by arrangement to discuss the redrafted Bill, which we approved in No. 4 in this file after having ascertained that the Foreign Office saw no objection to the redraft.\n\nHe told me that the present situation of the Bill in the Legislature was that it had been introduced and in the course of the second reading it had been agreed, at the request of the Unofficial Members, that the Bill should not at present be proceeded with pending a reference home on the part of several unofficial interests and a discussion between them and the Attorney General.\n\nAlthough Mr. Looker had not discussed the Bill in any complete sense in the Committee of the China Association, he had prepared a memorandum for such a discussion in which, as at present drafted, he proposed to criticize Part II of the Bill on the following points:-\n\nClause 5 (1).\n\nIt is not clearly stated when the two months' notice was to start from: from the date of the publication of the Bill or from separate notification of the details of an undertaking contemplated.\n\nClause 5 (2)", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548782, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 7, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "Clause 5 (2).\n\nIt should be made clear that the right of objection and claim was not limited to holders of property in or immediately behind the foreshore area included in any undertaking, but that neighbouring property owners whose interests might be affected would also have the right of claim.\n\nThree months should be allowed instead of two in order to provide time in certain cases for reference to London. In line 3 of 5 (2) the words \"or injurious affection\" (see Clause 7 (1)) should be inserted after \"private right\".\n\nIt should be made clear in the Bill that at the stage of lodging an objection or claim for the consideration of the Governor-in-Council no detailed Statement of Claim (as mentioned in 7 (1)) is required.\n\nClause 5 (3).\n\nA condition should be added to show that the objections as well as the public interest must be fully considered by the Governor-in-Council.\n\nClause 6.\n\nA proviso should be added to preserve the rights of those claimants mentioned in the second sentence of Section 7 (1).\n\nClause 7 (1).\n\nPossibly under this section provision should be made to permit subsequent claims if after the undertaking had been completed the", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548783, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 8, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "the owners of neighbouring lots found that they \n\nhad been injuriously affected although they had \n\nno reason to anticipate it before the undertaking \n\nwas begun.\n\nClause 7 (3).\n\nWords should be added to provide that if \n\nthe claim were in respect of a sum exceeding \n\n$1,000 (or whatever the present limit is to warrant \n\nthe case being heard in the Supreme Court) it \n\nshould be heard before the Chief Justice.\n\nThe claimant should be allowed to amend his \n\nStatement of Claim when the case is to be heard \n\nbefore a Judge.\n\nIn line 1 it should be made clear that the \n\nword \"acceptable\" is to be interpreted as meaning \n\nacceptable to the claimant.\n\nClause 7 (6).\n\nThis should be qualified so as to allow a \n\nright of appeal up to the Privy Council on a \n\npoint of law although not on a simple question of \n\nthe amount of compensation awarded.\n\nClause 10 (1).\n\nWhat exactly does the word \"answerable\" \n\nmean? In any case, in view of the exceptional \n\nconditions, e.g. typhoons, which are met with in \n\nHong Kong, the liability of the owner of a vessel \n\nor float should only be founded on negligence.\n\nFinally, Mr. Looker said that many people \n\nstill held the view which was put forward in the \n\ncriticisms of the earlier Bill that the Bill should \n\nprovide that the Government may not contemplate any \n\nundertaking which would have the effect of destroying\n\nPage\n\nPage\n\nany existing private enterprise, e.g. reclaiming \n\nthe foreshore in front of any of the Dock \n\nCompanies, but on that point I suggested to \n\nhim that whether or not it was likely that the \n\nGovernment would do any such thing, it would \n\nnevertheless, I should say, be asking too much \n\nof the Government to insert a clause depriving \n\nthem of the power in the ultimate resort to \n\ntake whatever steps might be necessary in any \n\ncontingency in the public interest, and I drew \n\nhis attention to the terms of Clause 11.\n\nNo doubt the question of compensation which \n\nany such drastic action on the part of the \n\nGovernment might involve would ensure that the \n\nGovernment would not decide in favour of any \n\nsuch undertaking without the most serious \n\nreason. But it would surely be impossible \n\nfor any Government to bind itself in the way \n\nhe suggested in respect of existing enterprises.\n\nMr. Looker said that he quite understood the \n\nforce of this opinion and he would propose to \n\ninclude it in his memorandum to the China \n\nAssociation.\n\nHe finally said that if \n\nMr. Cowell wished to discuss these points with \n\nhim further he would be happy to come along \n\nafter a month's time during which he is going \n\non a cruise. He agreed with me that many of \n\nthe points he had raised were drafting points \n\nwhich might be corrected at the Committee stage \n\nof the Bill,\n\nPending\n\nending any formal reference \n\nto the Colonial Office by the Governor or by \n\nthe China Association, this paper can be put by.\n\nDer Gent\n\n27/2/36", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548784, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 10, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "Ser\n\n92872.\n\nI hooker's fourth note\n\nwith\n\n& Put\n\nх и собл Ха\n\n6 Looker\n\nQ2\n\nPut by\n\n10\n\nadditional point.\n\nEn Goat.\n\n3/3 atoru\n\nhose on\n\nreturn\n\n6.3\n\nExtracts obrus on\n\nup Looker\n\nا لسه 6)\n\n28.2.36\n\nbee\n\n3./3/36\n\nPage 10\n\nPage 11", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548785, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 11, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "53621/35.\n\nColonial Office,\n\nDowning Street,\n\n7.1.\n\n3 March, 1956.\n\nDear Mr. Looker,\n\nThank you for your letter of the 28th of February with the additional matter of comment in respect of the Foreshores Bill (now called the Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill).\n\nI have duly added this point to the note which I have recorded following on your visit here last week and I will bring it to Cowell's notice as soon as he returns.\n\nI hope you will have a very enjoyable voyage to the Mediterranean.\n\nYours sincerely,\n\nGEJA.\n\nH.W. LOOKER, ESQ.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548786, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 12, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "Posingford, \n\nHartfield, \n\nSussex \n\n28th February, 1936. \n\n \n\n12 \n\nbe under Sec 5(4) \n\n14. \n\nDear Mr. Gent, \n\nThere is one point I forgot to mention and \n\nthat is that if an undertaking as originally notified is \n\naltered or modified it should be renotified and the time \n\nfor sending in claims should date from the renotification. \n\nI think this desirable because it is impossible to say \n\nbeforehand what the effect of an alteration or modification \n\nmight be on the rights of possession of any party considering \n\nthat he would be injuriously affected by such alteration \n\nor modification. \n\nYours sincerely, \n\nHeavent Weir Workel", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548787, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 13, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "C. O.\n\nMr.\n\nMr.\n\nMr.\n\nBuili\n\nala to\n\n11\n\nSir C. Parkinson.\n\nSir G. Tomlinson.\n\nSir C. Bottomley.\n\nSir J. Shuckburgh.\n\nPermt. U.S. of S.\n\nParly. U.S. of S.\n\nSecretary of State.\n\n12 SEP 1935\n\nDRAFT.\n\nThe u\n\nFo\n\n30 Ah me 30\n\n43\n\n133)\n\n13717/1/33\n\n9\n\nam\n\ninto refer to the cuto\n\nfrom this offri o tão g\n\nenclosing a way of\n\n+ Jess. 1933,\n\naddressed to the you. It ong Kong\n\nreq and my ite it\n\nJeabed\n\nWorks Bie,\n\nI Jish +\n\nmom to you, to be lavá\n\nbeque juntay si Jamul Io are\n\nwhy n\n\na desqualia from\n\nColony\n\nFURTHER ACTION.\n\nhas been entirely\n\nA\n\nwhy y\n\nito\n\ndrags which is", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548788, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 14, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "(F4388/248/10) have been mei-\n\naurs in\n\nby the deers\n\nValidation\n\nand clauses Oval maile\n\n2. Il be barred from this\n\ndecuación trac\n\nie bycations caused in\n\nYour love you 17th Day 1933,\n\n1\n\nth witty withed the lubers Rectomations\n\n3 3\n\n1371711/33\n\n37/7/1/33)\n\nhas\n\nvehomeli ordnance\n\nbegra\n\nwor\n\nof the # ma'\n\nContimalaria in to Bie\n\ncom be undertaken,\n\nJ.\n\nam\n\nobs não vãe ji tamuel\n\nit\n\nncake many\n\nhave to offer\n\nsie\n\nma mad\n\nald hawn way to such was\n\nThe\n\nL\n\nJays.\n\nnoowed with is madment..\n\n2\n\n(Signed) G. E. J. GENT.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548789, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 15, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "(33) in 13717/1/33.\n\nSUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL OBJECTIONS RAISED TO THE LAST DRAFT OF THE FORESHORE AND SEA-BED WORKS ORDINANCE (ENCLOSURE TO (17) IN 13717/1/33).\n\n15\n\nThe Foreign Office in their letter F.4388/248/10 of the 17th July, 1933, expressed the fear that the Chinese Government, in pursuance of their policy of the recovery of sovereign rights and abolition of foreign privileges, might seize upon the Ordinance as an excuse to take or affect arbitrarily and without adequate compensation riparian lands acquired by British concerns in China for the express purpose of enjoying and developing the trading facilities afforded by access to the water. The Foreign Office stated that in China His Majesty's Government was concerned to maintain the view against the Chinese Government that water frontage rights (including the right to accreted land) were inherent in the ownership of riparian land, and in support of their attitude have appealed to the practice and legislation of other countries. They accordingly feared that Clauses 6 and 7 of the draft Ordinance, which gave the Hong Kong Government a general power to extinguish entirely the rights of riparian owners, would give the Chinese an excuse to justify the assumption of similar powers in relation to British riparian owners in China. The Foreign Office recognised that the Hong Kong draft Ordinance contained provisions for fair compensation and machinery for giving effect to them, but thought that the Chinese Government would ignore or distort this part of the Ordinance in taking similar", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548790, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 16, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "16\n\n(38) in 13717/1/33.\n\nDr\n\nnegances\n\nThese Reflections,\n\nsee th. Naunagan's minuto\n\nof\n\n57.33 in\n\n137711/33.\n\nsimilar action in China. The Foreign Office therefore suggested for consideration that the Hong Kong Government should achieve the end they had in view by the method of passing a special Ordinance for each public work that might be contemplated.\n\n2. The China Association in their letter of the 9th August, 1933, objected in principle to the enactment of general legislation of the type proposed by the Bill and like the Foreign Office suggested the introduction of a separate and special Bill for each public work contemplated. They expressed the fear that the powers conferred by the Bill would enable Government to undertake large scale works which might have a highly prejudicial effect on existing marine rights and facilities enjoyed by riparian owners and long established private enterprises of a similar nature.\n\n3. In the same letter the China Association claimed that the following minor amendments, amongst others, should be made:-\n\n(a) That a claimant for compensation whose claim is referred to a judge should be permitted to amend in any way he wishes the particulars of his claim as originally presented to Government.\n\n(b) There should be a right of appeal from a judge to the full Court and the Privy Council where any question of law is involved.\n\n(c) Provision should be made for an extension of the time within which a claim must be sent in or a reference to the judge made.\n\n(a)", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548791, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 17, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "17\n\n(30) in 13717/1/33.\n\n(37) in 13717/1/33.\n\n(d) It should be made clear that the right of a claimant will only be extinguished as from the date of the definite approval of the works, and that any right to compensation possessed by a claimant prior to that period should not be prejudiced or affected.\n\n(e) Owners of private undertakings as well as private property should be entitled to compensation for injurious affectation.\n\n(f) The assessors who may be appointed to assist the judge should also be able to assist in assessing the amount of compensation.\n\nThe China Association also referred to the danger of repercussions in China which had been dealt with by the Foreign Office.\n\n4. The Board of Trade had no observations to offer on the draft Ordinance.\n\n5. The Secretary of State in his confidential despatch of the 16th August, 1933, informed the Governor of Hong Kong that he would not be prepared to approve the enactment of a Bill giving the Government general powers to interfere with private rights for the purpose of the execution of works not specifically defined in the Ordinance. He suggested that the Hong Kong Government should enact periodically an Ordinance giving the necessary powers for the execution of a definite programme of works which it was intended to carry out within say the next two years, and which would be specifically defined in a schedule to the Ordinance.\n\nIt would be possible in the first of such Ordinances", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548792, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 18, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "Ordinances to take any steps which may be considered necessary for the validation of any works which have heretofore been constructed and maintained. Subject to the observance of this general principle that the works to be included must be defined in the Ordinance, the provisions of the Bill in regard to the notice and compensation had the Secretary of State's general approval.\n\nGR419/35", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548793, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 19, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "NO CONFIDENTIAL\n\nSir,\n\nGOVERNMENT HOUSE,\n\nHONG KONG,\n\n30th April, 1935.\n\nWith reference to your confidential despatch (37) of 16th August, 1933, on the subject of the draft Foreshore and Sea Bed Works Bill, I have the honour to inform you that the Bill has been entirely redrafted with a view to meeting the requirements set out in your despatch under reply. The title of the Bill has been changed and I now enclose a copy of the new draft intituled:-\n\n\"An Ordinance to validate certain undertakings which have been constructed or commenced over and upon un-leased Crown foreshore and sea bed; and to enact certain general provisions which shall be deemed incorporated, unless expressly varied or excepted, in future Ordinances authorising reclamation or other works of a public nature over and upon such foreshore and sea bed.\"\n\nThe new draft, after full consideration, has received the unanimous approval of my Executive Council.\n\n2.\n\nThe Bill is divided into two parts, Part I which deals with works which have been completed or are in progress, and Part II which deals with new works. In Part I all rights, affected by the works completed or in progress, are extinguished. As is explained in the \"Objects and\n\nTHE RIGHT HONOURABLE\n\nSIR P. CUNLIFFE-LISTER, G.B.E., M.C., M.P.\n\n&c.,\n\n&c.,\n\n&c.\n\n19", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548794, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 20, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "ENJO\n\n20\n\nReasons* no objections were received in connection with these works.\n\n3. Part II of the Bill contains general provisions to be incorporated in future ordinances authorising public undertakings over and upon unleased Crown foreshore and sea-bed. A separate ordinance will be required before any new work of the kind contemplated in the ordinance can be undertaken. This would seem fully to meet the objections which were raised to the draft Foreshore and Sea Bed Works Bill.\n\n4. The provisions in the former Bill regarding notice and compensation have generally been retained in the new draft Bill.\n\n5. I should be glad to receive your approval in due course to proceed with the Bill.\n\nI have the honour to be,\n\nSir,\n\nYour most obedient, humble servant,\n\n[Signature]\n\nthe Governor, &c.\n\nPage 20\n\nPage 21\n\n \nPage 20\n\nPage 21", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 548795, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "page_number": 21, "title": "CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936", "content_text": "CO 129/554\n\n£\n\n53621", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-554-12 Public Reclamations Validation and Clauses Bill (formerly Foreshores Bill) 30-4-1935 - 3-3-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 551629, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-558-2 Coinage Offenses (No.2) Amendment Ordinance 1936 31-3-1936 - 27-11-1936", "page_number": 27, "title": "CO129-558-2 Coinage Offenses (No.2) Amendment Ordinance 1936 31-3-1936 - 27-11-1936", "content_text": "# A BILL\n\n## INTITULED\n\n[No. 4:- 8.2.36.-2.]\n\nAn Ordinance to enable effect to be given to an International Convention for the Suppression of Counterfeiting Currency, signed on behalf of His late Majesty at Geneva on the 20th day of April, 1929, to apply to foreign coin certain enactments relating to British Coin, to assimilate the penalties for importing and exporting counterfeit coin and to amend certain enactments relating to forgery, coinage and extradition.\n\nBe it enacted by the Governor of Hong Kong, with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council thereof, as follows:-\n\n1. This Ordinance may be cited as the **Counterfeit Currency (Convention) Ordinance, 1936**.\n\n2. Section 15 of the Forgery Ordinance, 1922, as amended by section 7 of the Forgery Amendment Ordinance, 1924, is further amended by the addition of the following new sub-section at the end thereof :-\n\n (3) Where any forged bank note or currency note, or any machinery, implement, utensil or material used or intended to be used for the forgery of a bank note or currency note, is lawfully seized under a warrant granted in pursuance of sub-section (1), or otherwise, the bank note, currency note, implement, utensil or material, as the case may be, shall, notwithstanding anything in sub-section (2), be delivered up to the Treasurer, or to any person authorised by him for the purpose, by order of the court or magistrate before which the offender is tried or, if there be no trial, by order of a magistrate.\n\n3.-(1) Sections 15 to 20 of the Coinage Offences Ordinance, 1865, (which contain provisions as to foreign coin differing from the corresponding provisions as to His Majesty's coin) as well as the heading immediately above section 15, are hereby repealed.\n\n (2) In order that the provisions of the Coinage Offences Ordinance, 1865, shall apply in relation to foreign coin as they apply in relation to His Majesty's coin the provisions of that Ordinance are amended as follows:\n\n (a) in section 2-\n \n | Original Text | Amendment |\n | --- | --- |\n | the words \"the King's \" and \"of the King's \" wherever they occur | repealed |\n | that is to say in the second, third, fifth, twelfth and sixteenth lines | |\n\n (i) the words \"the Kings \" and \"of the King's \" wherever they occur, that is to say in the second, third, fifth, twelfth and sixteenth lines are repealed;\n\n Reference: `25 & 26 Geo. 5, c. 25, s. 3(1)`, `Schedule Part I`.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-558-2 Coinage Offenses (No.2) Amendment Ordinance 1936 31-3-1936 - 27-11-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 551632, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-558-2 Coinage Offenses (No.2) Amendment Ordinance 1936 31-3-1936 - 27-11-1936", "page_number": 30, "title": "CO129-558-2 Coinage Offenses (No.2) Amendment Ordinance 1936 31-3-1936 - 27-11-1936", "content_text": "## 4\n\nnotes (defined as including any notes, by whatever name called, which are legal tender in the country in which they are issued) issued by or on behalf of the Government of any country outside the United Kingdom on the same footing as bank notes under the Forgery Ordinance, 1922. In this Colony, currency notes have already been placed on the same footing as bank notes for the purposes of the Forgery Ordinance, No. 11 of 1922, by the Forgery Amendment Ordinance, No. 11 of 1924, which defined currency notes as including any note issued as currency by or under the authority of the government of any part of His Majesty's dominions, or any protectorate, or of any foreign state, or of any part or colony or dependency of any foreign state. This local definition is even more comprehensive than that given in the Act of 1935, and it avoids the necessity of requiring proof that any particular currency note issued by a regional authority is legal tender in the country in which it is issued. The one-dollar currency notes issued in this Colony under Ordinance No. 42 of 1935 are legal tender for the payment of any amount.\n\n## 4. Section 2 of the Ordinance\nadds a new sub-section to section 15 of Ordinance No. 11 of 1922, as amended by section 7 of Ordinance No. 11 of 1924, to the same effect as section 2 of the Act of 1935. In order to adapt the language of the Act to that of the local enactment, currency notes are expressly mentioned after bank-notes; a magistrate is substituted for a justice of the peace, and the Treasurer is substituted for the Secretary of State. Compare section 25(2) of Ordinance No. 7 of 1865, where the Treasurer is referred to in coinage cases.\n\n## 5. Section 3 (1) of the Ordinance\nrepeals sections 15 to 20 of Ordinance No. 7 of 1865 and the heading thereto; these sections correspond to sections 18 to 23 of the Coinage Offences Act, 1861, which are repealed by the first part of section 3(1) of the Act of 1935. By section 26(1) of Ordinance No. 31 of 1911, reference to any series of sections is held to be inclusive of the sections mentioned.\n\n## 6. Section 3 (2)\nmakes amendments in the provisions of Ordinance No. 7 of 1865, corresponding, mutatis mutandis, with those made in the Coinage Offences Act, 1861, by the last part of section 3(1) and Part I of the Schedule to the Act of 1935.\n\nThe Colony has no enactment corresponding to sections 2 and 3 of the Counterfeit Medal Act, 1883, or section 2 of the Revenue Act, 1889, dealt with in Parts II and III of the Schedule to the Act of 1935.\n\n## 7. Section 3 (3)\nis an adaptation of section 3(2) of the Act of 1935 and provides a penalty of imprisonment for fourteen years for importing counterfeit gold or silver coin or for exporting counterfeit current coin. Hitherto, the former has been a felony punishable with life imprisonment, and the latter a misdemeanor punishable with imprisonment for two years. The importation of counterfeit current copper coin is already a felony punishable with seven years' imprisonment under sub-section (4) of section 13 of Ordinance No. 7 of 1865, enacted by section 3 of the Coinage Offences Amendment Ordinance, 1936, as amended by paragraph (m) of section 3(2) of this Ordinance. Penal servitude in this Colony was abolished in 1887; since when it has been usual to substitute a corresponding term of imprisonment, which (under section 9 of Ordinance No. 30 of 1911) means imprisonment with hard labour.\n\nPage 30\nPage 31", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-558-2 Coinage Offenses (No.2) Amendment Ordinance 1936 31-3-1936 - 27-11-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 551634, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-558-2 Coinage Offenses (No.2) Amendment Ordinance 1936 31-3-1936 - 27-11-1936", "page_number": 32, "title": "CO129-558-2 Coinage Offenses (No.2) Amendment Ordinance 1936 31-3-1936 - 27-11-1936", "content_text": "## TABLE \nShowing how effect is given in the Hong Kong Ordinances to the Provisions of the International Convention for the Suppression of Counterfeiting Currency, 1929.\n\n| Convention Article No. | Remarks |\n| --- | --- |\n| 1 | This is a formal preliminary article stating that the High Contracting Parties recognise the rules laid down in the Convention as the most effective means in present circumstances for ensuring the prevention and punishment of counterfeiting currency. |\n| 2 | |\n| 3 | |\n| 3 (1) | This article requires that the following should be punishable as ordinary crimes: (1) any fraudulent making or altering of currency, whatever means are employed; (2) is not in this subsection. Effect is given to this by making forgery of a bank note or currency note with intent to defraud a felony. As regards paper money, this is done by section 4(1)(c) and (d) of `Ordinance No. 11 of 1922`, as amended by section 3 of `Ordinance No. 11 of 1924`. By virtue of the definitions in section 3 of `Ordinance No. 11 of 1922`, forgery includes the making or altering of a bank note or currency note. Article 3(1) is carried into effect as regards gold and silver coin by sections 3, 4, and 4A of `Ordinance No. 7 of 1865` as amended by section 3(2)(c) and (d) and section 3(5) of the new Ordinance, and as regards copper coin by section 13 of `Ordinance No. 7 of 1865` as amended by section 3(2)(m) of the new Ordinance. |\n| 3 (2) | As regards paper money, the fraudulent uttering of forged bank notes or currency notes is felony under section 8 of `Ordinance No. 11 of 1922`. Article 3(2) is carried into effect, as regards gold and silver coin, by sections 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12... |\n| 11 | This article defines the word currency as meaning paper money (including banknotes) and metallic money, the circulation of which is legally authorised. Effect is given to this Article as respects paper money by `Ordinance No. 11 of 1922`, ss. 2, 4, 10, 11, and 15, as amended by `Ordinance No. 11 of 1924`, ss. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, and by section 2 of the `Counterfeit Currency (Convention) Ordinance, 1936` (hereinafter called the new Ordinance). As respects metal money, effect is given to it by `Ordinance No. 7 of 1865` as amended by section 3(2) of the new Ordinance. |", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-558-2 Coinage Offenses (No.2) Amendment Ordinance 1936 31-3-1936 - 27-11-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 551636, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-558-2 Coinage Offenses (No.2) Amendment Ordinance 1936 31-3-1936 - 27-11-1936", "page_number": 34, "title": "CO129-558-2 Coinage Offenses (No.2) Amendment Ordinance 1936 31-3-1936 - 27-11-1936", "content_text": "# Convention Article No. 8\n## Table, Continued.\n\n| Convention Article No. | Remarks |\n| --- | --- |\n| 4 | |\n| 5 | |\n| 7 | |\n| 8 | |\n\nThis Article provides that each of the acts mentioned in Article 3, if they are committed in different countries, should be considered as a distinct offence. It appears that in some countries the counterfeiting of currency followed by the uttering thereof is regarded as only one offence, and in consequence, in the case of such countries, there might be difficulty in prosecuting a man who counterfeited in one country and uttered in another. Under the law of the Colony of Hong Kong counterfeiting and uttering are two distinct offences. No legislation is required therefore to give effect to this Article.\n\nThis Article provides that no distinction should be made in the scale of punishments for offences referred to in Articles 3 between acts relating to domestic currency on the one hand and to foreign currency on the other; and that this provision may not be made subject to any condition of reciprocal treatment by law or by treaty.\n\nEffect is given to this Article as respects paper money by `Ordinance No. 11 of 1922` as amended by `Ordinance No. 11 of 1924`, which put bank notes and currency notes whether British or foreign in the same position for all the purposes of the Forgery Ordinance, `No. 11 of 1922`. As respects metal money, effect is given to the Article by section 3(1) and (2) of the new Ordinance, which put foreign coin in the same position as British coin for the purposes of the Coinage Offences Ordinance, `No. 7 of 1865`.\n\nThis Article provides that, in countries where the principle of the international recognition of previous convictions is recognised, foreign convictions for the offences referred to in Article 3 should, within the conditions prescribed by domestic law, be recognised for the purpose of establishing habitual criminality.\n\nThe law of this Colony does not recognise the principle of international recognition of previous convictions so that this Article calls for no change in our law.\n\nThis Article provides that in so far as civil parties are admitted under the domestic law, foreign civil parties, including, if necessary, the High Contracting Party whose money has been counterfeited, should be entitled to all rights allowed to inhabitants by the laws of the country in which the case is tried.\n\nThe law of this Colony does not admit civil parties, and therefore this Article does not apply.\n\nThis Article provides that in countries where the principle of the extradition of nationals is not recognised, nationals who have returned to the territory of their own country, after the commission abroad of an offence referred to in Article 3, should be punishable in the same manner as if the offence had been committed in their own territory, even in a case where the offender has...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-558-2 Coinage Offenses (No.2) Amendment Ordinance 1936 31-3-1936 - 27-11-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 551637, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-558-2 Coinage Offenses (No.2) Amendment Ordinance 1936 31-3-1936 - 27-11-1936", "page_number": 35, "title": "CO129-558-2 Coinage Offenses (No.2) Amendment Ordinance 1936 31-3-1936 - 27-11-1936", "content_text": "## Convention Article No. 9\n### Table, Continued.\n\n| Convention Article No. | Remarks |\n| --- | --- |\n| 9 | acquired his nationality after the commission of the offence; but that this provision is not to apply if, in a similar case, the extradition of a foreigner could not be granted. |\n| 10 | The law of this Colony does recognise the principle of the extradition of nationals and in this respect the local law does not differ from the law of England where it has been decided that there is no obligation of any Contracting Government, which recognised in general the principle of extradition of nationals, to apply Article 8 in cases where particular extradition treaties forbade the extradition of nationals. |\n| 11 | This Article deals with the punishment of foreigners who have committed abroad any offence referred to in Article 3, and who are in the territory of a country whose internal legislation recognises as a general rule the principle of the prosecution of offences abroad. |\n\nThe law of this Colony does not recognise as a general rule the principle of the prosecution of offences committed abroad, and therefore this Article does not apply.\n\nThis Article provides that the offences referred to in Article 3 shall be deemed to be included as extradition crimes in any extradition treaty which has been or may hereafter be concluded between any of the High Contracting Parties. It also requires that High Contracting Parties, who do not make extradition conditional on the existence of a treaty or reciprocity, to henceforth recognise the offences referred to in Article 3 as cases of extradition between themselves; and it provides that extradition shall be granted in conformity with the law of the country to which application is made.\n\nIn the United Kingdom this Article has been carried into effect by section 4 of the Counterfeit Currency (Convention) Act, 1935. In this Colony effect has been given to the Article by section 4 of the new Ordinance. It is considered that no amendment of the First Schedule to `Ordinance No. 7 of 1889` is necessary as paragraph 26 of that Schedule refers to the `Coinage Offences Ordinance, 1865`, and to the `Forgery Ordinance, 1922`, or any Ordinance amending or substituted for the same. These Ordinances are amended by sections 2 and 3 of the new Ordinance.\n\nThis Article provides that counterfeit currency, as well as instruments or other articles referred to in Article 3(5), should be seized and confiscated. Such currency, instruments or other articles should, after confiscation, be handed over on request either to the Government or bank of issue whose currency is in question, with the exception of exhibits whose preservation as a matter of record is required by the law of the country where the prosecution took place, and any specimens whose transmission to the Central...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-558-2 Coinage Offenses (No.2) Amendment Ordinance 1936 31-3-1936 - 27-11-1936.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 553380, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "page_number": 1, "title": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "content_text": "## 53528\n### 1937\n\n**CLOSED UNTIL**\n\nMiscellaneous.\n\n`6/025/621` H. M. Jay's Application for \n\n| Previous | Subsequent |\n| --- | --- |\n| 1299 | 1577 |\n| 83 | 7/2, 1/8 |\n| | Mr Richard 27/8 |\n\nFinancial Assistant's Note:\n\nFor Roger 31.V.. W beut 76 M. Als 2/6 In Richards 876. Mr Jeffries 86 Sri G. Lombain 5/6/3)\n\n`2576` M Pauchards to Richards of t...\n\n`17420` 24836/20 8,000 11/36 M. & S., Ltd.\n\n| File Ref. | Sub. Tumuluion |\n| --- | --- |\n| `GR...` | 17/37 |\n| In Richards | 247, 1298, 283 |\n\n`XCR...` \n`FILE A.` \nGp. 641", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 553381, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "page_number": 2, "title": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "content_text": "## Normal \n\nPT.. \n\n2415 \n\n2 \n\nThe letter in original form was from Suy tour asking for the grant of £3,000. \n\nThe last letter dealing with Cafe! Taylow apparently relates to the review of records we have worked on since 1920. Han hos Taylow asks for the payment of £2,000 as reimbursement of the series of Luft Taylow with the Col. qo's with the Roque havy. \n\nI believe the coal claim will be numbered among the generosity of the Col. You!. He case affairs entirely with Che?. \n\nI do not see that Game cam do my thought, but I copy a letter to the Hay Kay, asking how far the land is secondary to them. \n\nRegarding this, whether we should communicate with the Celts Ebo, Lobry coby recommends despatch to C. A. ef. her little Law word that all has Tay low that a be sent to thong Komy. (wolke communecat.com will communicate with an addressed reply upon receipt of refly.)\n\nP. Roger \n31.4\n\nWhat reply should begin to ows Thylomi's representations. \n\nBuk shr gut set the by chr signed declaration (or two shines of it) from the C.A to send out with the copy of No!. \n\nMyant. 16", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 553382, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "page_number": 3, "title": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "content_text": "## \nLet us get the facts from C.A. with a copy of the declaration (whatever it is) & then refer to the C.G. Ctr. with it. I wonder if the C.A. has any similar cases at all, and we could devise some means of getting the thing dealt with on a \"personal\" basis whether then personal bills or not come up on Recire. Toome as Jothis Pflucked Minuto set- 876 BW Ashworth PIR 2778.\n\nI attach a copy of an extract from The Hongking Civil List & Blue Book showing the service of the late Capt. Taylour R.N., and the pension awarded to him. He died at the age of 71, having drawn pension for over 16 years.\n\nI understand from C.A. agents that the pension to which the widow refers in her letter is the widow's pension for which she is eligible under the WIDOWS' & ORPHANS' Pension Scheme in force. The actual amount of the pension is £204. 2. 2 p.a. The delay in its...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 553383, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "page_number": 4, "title": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "content_text": "## fact - \nthat the Ahing 4 \nto obtain verification \nthe award was \ndue to the \nauthentics found \nit \nnecessary \n夕 \n\nwhich Mrs Taylour returned to Cagents \nthe widow's birth (in 1873). \n\nThe declaration \nwas \nmerely \nthe usual declaration as to widowhood which is \nsent to all widows before payment of a \npension is made by Cagenti. \n\nwidow's \n\nX \nIn view \nof the \nabove facts \nthere seems \nno \ncase \nat all for referring her application, \nbut before referring \nto Hong Kong, \nthe case should still be referred \nto the C. Grandi Chi \nPhachand \n`876/37` \n8/6 \n\n## \nZio \nwas \nlater \n5.1.9.7 \n`84.37` \nconsidered at a Meeting of the \nCompassionate Allowance Committee held on \nregarded \nthat this application \nThe Committee further decided \nmade \non \nmore \nthan for \n25th June. \nas \nservices. \nfor recognition of her husband's service \non compassionate grounds, \nassistance \non \nthere being \nno \nquestion of \ndestitution. \nThey \ndecided that this was not a case which should \nbe \nsupported by Hong Kong for consideration, & they recommended that her application should \nbe referred. \n\n## \n7 \nReply draft to Mrs Jaylowe that her application has received careful \nConsideration, \nbut that the Secretary of State \nregrets that | \n## \n| Col | Col |\n| --- | --- |\n| ... | ... | \nno table content available to reconstruct. \n\nrewritten in proper format:\n\nfact - that the Acting 4th ... to obtain verification ... the award was due to the authentics found it necessary ...\n\nwhich Mrs Taylour returned to Cagents the widow's birth (in 1873).\n\nThe declaration was merely the usual declaration as to widowhood which is sent to all widows before payment of a pension is made by Cagenti.\n\nIn view of the above facts there seems no case at all for referring her application, but before referring to Hong Kong, the case should still be referred to the C. Grandi Chi Phachand `876/37` 8/6\n\nconsidered at a Meeting of the Compassionate Allowance Committee held on 5.1.9.7 `84.37` regarded that this application made on more than for 25th June as services for recognition of her husband's service on compassionate grounds, assistance on there being no question of destitution.\n\nThey decided that this was not a case which should be supported by Hong Kong for consideration, & they recommended that her application should be referred.\n\nReply draft to Mrs Jaylowe that her application has received careful Consideration, but that the Secretary of State regrets that...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 553384, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "page_number": 5, "title": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "content_text": "- that he does not feel justified in instructing the Govt. of Hong Kong to consider making a grant from the public funds of that Colony to supply such as she desires.\n\n& copy of her letter & this to Ed. Hongkong prinse. I.F. `Pharchands 2576/37`\n\nI do not doubt that this conclusion is one which the H.K. Govt itself would reach; but when the Compassionate Grants Committee decide that there are no grounds to support a recommendation on the grounds of destitution, does that mean there is no reference to the Colony on other grounds. In this case we refer to the O.A.G. (to whom...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 553385, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "page_number": 6, "title": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "content_text": "Her appeal is addressed to the SMS. It is not a copy of her petition. That her appeal is coded by the last Bea C. G. Che, whose opinion is as at X in 2 ask what reply the he 2.\n\nMy Taylour Grant for ends of ho Funshand; stins Sets, p L exponent for Gennal in the Colony & Lund Mis T. intern reply 1156: 26.\n\nThe Committee took into account the other grounds of application, and did not consider that they justified reference to the Governor understanding.\n\nI do not think that it is necessary to give any weight to the point that the appeal is in terms addressed to the Hong Kong Government. There was, I believe, a case (in B.G.) where a direct appeal resulted in a grant on personal grounds which we should not have recommended; but the Committee loses its value if its procedure is to be", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 553386, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "page_number": 7, "title": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "content_text": "## NOTED PRECEDENTS\n\ngoverned by considerations of the exact form of address of each petition.\n\nH.Q. Cowell | I paper. I as proposed | 30.6.37\nhu Richards | Agree. | 29.6.37\n& | is sufficient that an copies of the cores. to F.K. | 5.D.D\nal | LF | 1.7.37\nTo. Mas Taylour. | | 9 JUL 1937\n\nM bb | Perivad see note of % | 14 JUL 1937\n3 20 Hory Kory - N=268-(w/1 and 2) - All enci | 27/8", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 553387, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "page_number": 8, "title": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "content_text": "## DRAFT\n3\n\n9 July, 1937\n\nC. O.\n\nMr. Kiiland 2/7/37\n\nMadam,\n\nI am directed to refer to your letter of 23 May, addressed to the Crown Agents for the Colonies, in which you apply for a grant in recognition of the services of your late husband, Captain Basil Taylour, R.N., formerly Harbour Master, Hong Kong.\n\n2. In reply to your application, I am to inform you that it has received careful consideration, but that the Secretary of State regrets that...\n\nCopy to Tor. Hong Kong infr.\n\nTo Hay Kory-2 53528/401/27\n\n**FURTHER ACTION**\n\nTo: \n- Sir C. Parkinson\n- Sir G. Tomlinson\n- Sir C. Bottomley\n- Sir J. Shuckburgh\n- Permt. U.S. of S.\n- Parly. U.S. of S.\n- Secretary of State\n\nMrs Taylour, end 65(1)", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 553388, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "page_number": 9, "title": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "content_text": "He would not be justified in asking the Government of Hong Kong to consider the proposal to you, but \"the possibility of making a special grant from the public funds of that Colony such as they desire.\"", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 553389, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "page_number": 10, "title": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "content_text": "Taylour, Basil Reginald Hermelton. Capt. RN \nHarbour Master £780 to £900 by 1 July 1899 \nMch 1907 appted Asst. Harbour Master \nHarbour Master \nB. Stapelton 1865. \n\n... \n23 Apr. 1915 Seconded for Military Service \nReturns to Col 15 May 1919 \n29 Aug 1920 Retired on grounds of age: pension £416.13.4 \n\nExtracted for 1920 CP Lost & 1935 Blue Book \n\nPage 10 \n... to Hong Kong - 3 \nCon...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 553390, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "page_number": 11, "title": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "content_text": "# P/L.L. Pens.4508.\n\n**PENSIONS BRANCH, \nCOLONIAL OFFICE.**\n\n**RECEIVED \n23 MAY 1937**\n\n**REQY**\n\nHong Kong,\n\nI attach in original a letter which \nwe have received from Mrs. H.M. Taylour, widow \nof the late Capt. B.R.H. Taylour, R.N., formerly \nHarbour Master, Hong Kong, and with which you will \nno doubt deal.\n\nMekollins\n\nPay Department, \nCrown Agents, \n27th May, 1937.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 553391, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "page_number": 12, "title": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "content_text": "# P.L.L. Priisons 4508 \n\n16 April 1957.\n\n**Confidential** (Level 6:61) and 1818. 535.28/441/37 \n\nBeachanger Alton Hampshire May 23. 1937 \n\nTo the Crown Agents for the Colonies.\n\nSir:\n\nI have sent under another cover the signed declaration for which you asked and hope that all is in order. I am afraid I have been rather stupid in not quite understanding what I was to do, hence the delay, for which I apologise.\n\nIn forwarding this paper may I express to the Crown Agents for the Colonies and to the Government of Hongkong my sincere thanks for the grant of this pension which is welcome beyond words, and my very real gratitude for the kindness they have shown in the matter. I am most sincerely appreciative of this.\n\nAt the same time, if it would not be ungrateful to say so, I had very much hoped that a lump sum of something in the neighbourhood of £3000 might be given me in recognition of the more than 40 years service of my husband, the late Captain Basil Taylour R.N., Harbour Master of Hongkong. I plead that this may yet be done in view of the following facts:-\n\n1. I am an old woman and this pension of £200 now generously accorded and very gratefully acknowledged by me, will in the nature of things soon be ended, and if nothing else is done the sacrifices made for his country by my husband (and in a lesser degree by myself) will, as far as my five children are concerned, go forever unrecognised, and they will all suffer further financial loss than that which has already handicapped them ever since the war through no fault of their own but really owing to their father's patriotism.\n\n2. My husband lost approximately this sum through war service. Although the Hongkong Government had expressly and very generously guaranteed that no financial loss should be incurred when they gave Commander Basil Taylour permission to return to the Navy for war service, arranging that he should receive half his pay as Harbour Master, Marine Magistrate etc. and half his naval pay as a Commander R.N., through technicalities of one sort and another he was deprived of practically all his extra pay and allowances in both services; and through damage to his house at the Peak, exchange and other causes owing to absence from the Colony during the four years of the...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 553392, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "page_number": 13, "title": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "content_text": "## 2.\n\n13 \n\nwax, he forfeited about the sum for which I now plead restoration.\n\nIn \n\n3. But besides this, my husband incurred an illness in Hongkong in 1911, duodenal ulcer (said to have been due to his tropical service), which made him a sufferer for many years and was the immediate cause of his death in September 1936, yet he never received an invalid pension or any form of compensation whatsoever. In fact, the pension which was granted of about £400 a year by the Hongkong Government, although generous in consideration that it applied to his service in that colony only up to the time of his retirement from the Colonial Service in 1920, was quite inadequate for the living expenses of a sick man subject to constant dangerous and expensive illnesses, even without considering the maintenance of his family, and above all, the education of his children.\n\n4. At the same time, it should be noted that although he served about 25 years with the Royal Navy (counting the four years of the war and a year on leave during Naval courses); was twice promoted after retirement and joining the Emergency List; served throughout the war in France and Italy with the responsibilities (but not the pay!) of at least a Rear Admiral; and was decorated by Italy and the Allies as well as by his own Government, he never received a penny pension for his naval service. But his widow and children are proud to remember (even if the Navy has forgotten or never knew) that he conferred untold benefits on all serving in the tropics by his original invention of the electric fan, again without financial reward.\n\n5. I hesitate to mention the next point but feel that in all fairness it should not be omitted. Owing to my husband's ill-health and frequent serious illnesses from duodenal ulcer, the smallness of his pension, and very straitened income on his retirement, I gave up bit by bit practically all the capital behind my own private income and the whole of five separate legacies in order to maintain a home for him and for the proper education of our family, spending many times over the sum for which I now ask. This money was ungrudgingly given and would not now be mentioned but for the fact that its loss has deprived my five children of that financial help which they would otherwise expect to receive at my death and which must inevitably handicap them in their subsequent careers. Especially will this be true in the case of my", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 553393, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "page_number": 14, "title": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "content_text": "## \n\nfour sons, three of whom are in or connected with the naval service, but particularly the eldest, my son by my first marriage, who volunteered for the war, was wounded and invalided for life before he was nineteen, on whom must fall the greater part of this financial loss.\n\nFinally, I would point out that in granting a bonus such as this, the Government would but carry out a generous precedent set by themselves in Hongkong. Soon after my husband's retirement in 1920 on a pension at that time of under £400 a year, several other Hongkong Civil Servants of about his rank as heads of departments who had served the Crown for shorter periods than his total of more than 40 years in the Navy and Colonial Service combined, were fortunate enough, because their time could be counted under the Colonial Service alone, in receiving pensions of double or even treble that which he received, and in addition were granted capital sums as large or larger than that for which I now plead.\n\nI ask this in recognition of my husband's long, faithful and not undistinguished service, and as an act of grace to his widow and children.\n\nWith renewed and very grateful thanks for the deeply appreciated kindness which has already been shown me,\n\nI have the honour to be,\n\nYours faithfully,\n\nHarriet Fagan", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 553394, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "page_number": 15, "title": "CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937", "content_text": "# No text to proofread\n\nIt appears you have provided a number without any accompanying OCR text to proofread. Please provide the text that needs to be proofread.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-560-9 Mrs H.M. Taylour- widow of former harbour master- application for financial assistance 23-5-1937 - 9-7-1937.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 555482, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-563-18 Sino-Japanese War- stopping of British shipping by Japanese 11-9-1937 - 29-12-1937", "page_number": 119, "title": "CO129-563-18 Sino-Japanese War- stopping of British shipping by Japanese 11-9-1937 - 29-12-1937", "content_text": "**IMPORTANT**\nFrom JAPAN.\nDecode.\nSir R. Craigie. (Tokyo).\nOctober 7th, 1937.\n\nD. 9.58 a.m. October 7th, 1937.\nR. 9.30 a.m. October 7th, 1937.\n\nNo. 498. (R).\n\nMy telegram No. 492.\nMinistry of Marine in discussion with the Naval Attaché yesterday gave following as documents they wished to inspect:\n1. Official log.\n2. Passenger list.\n3. Charter.\n4. Bill of sale.\n5. Crew list.\n6. Bill of lading.\n7. Clearance certificate from last port.\n8. Declaration of survey.\n9. Manifest of cargo.\n10. \"et cetera\".\n\nThey desired to see these since were a ship to be using forged certificate scrutiny of above might indicate forgery or suspicious circumstances.\n\n2. They desired to employ a number of inspectors so as to shorten time required to deal with above documents.\n\n3. [? Grs.omit.] should be concerned in any matter beyond documents and questions relating thereto.\n\n4. They said that it would help matters to run smoothly if we could supply list of provisional certificates granted since August 25th.\n\n5. The Naval Attaché pointed out that some of the documents such as 4 and 5 might not be on board, that there was little in the others which could substantiate the fact of a forged certificate, that in particular the inspection of 8 and 9 could not be considered and that 10 must be ruled out.\n\nAddressed to Foreign Office No. 498; repeated to Shanghai, Commander-in-Chief.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-563-18 Sino-Japanese War- stopping of British shipping by Japanese 11-9-1937 - 29-12-1937.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 555634, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-563-2 Pharmacy and Poisons Ordinance- 1937 31-5-1937 - 6-1-1938", "page_number": 22, "title": "CO129-563-2 Pharmacy and Poisons Ordinance- 1937 31-5-1937 - 6-1-1938", "content_text": "## Table of Correspondence - Continued\n\n| Section of this Ordinance | Section of the 1933 Act | Remarks |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| 3(1) | 23(1) | |\n| (a) | (g) | |\n| (b) | (h) | \"regulations\" for \"rules\" in para (ii) and elsewhere wherever occurring; \"such qualification in chemistry as the Governor in Council may prescribe\" for \"the prescribed qualification in chemistry\" |\n| (c) | (j) | |\n| (d) | (l) | of examiners and fees for enrolment as students and for examinations, (d) the registration of persons holding such diplomas as the Governor in Council may approve, (c) the payment of fees for registration and retention on the register. |\n| (e) | (m) | |\n| (g) | (g) | |\n| (h) | (h) | power to licence wholesale dealers added. |\n| (i) | (p) | |\n| 2 | 4 | |\n| | 5 | Regulations in the First Schedule. |\n| | 6 | Provisions as to the keeping of a register. \"Governor in Council\" for \"Statutory Committee\"; \"as the Governor in Council may prescribe\" for \"as may be prescribed by byelaws\"; references to the Privy Council omitted; \"section 5\" for \"sections ten, eleven and twelve of the Pharmacy Act, 1868\". |\n| | 7 | Qualifications for registration. \"Registrar\" for \"Council\"; \"regulations\" for \"bye-laws\"; \"fifty dollars\" for \"five pounds\"; \"ten dollars\" for \"one pound\"; \"any enactment, whether of this Colony or elsewhere relating to pharmacy\" for \"any of the Pharmacy Acts\"; \"two hundred and fifty dollars\" for \"twenty pounds\"; \"fifty dollars\" for \"five pounds\"; \"the Forgery Ordinance, 1922\" for \"the Forgery Act, 1913\". |\n| | 8 | Provisions relating to pharmaceutical chemists combined with those relating to pharmacists: \"In this section, \"title\" or \"description\" includes the equivalent of such title or description in any language whatsoever”, ... |\n| | 9 | |\n| | 2 | | \n## Page 363", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-563-2 Pharmacy and Poisons Ordinance- 1937 31-5-1937 - 6-1-1938.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 555644, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-563-2 Pharmacy and Poisons Ordinance- 1937 31-5-1937 - 6-1-1938", "page_number": 32, "title": "CO129-563-2 Pharmacy and Poisons Ordinance- 1937 31-5-1937 - 6-1-1938", "content_text": "(b) makes or has in his possession a document so closely resembling any such certificate as aforesaid as to be calculated to deceive,\n\nhe shall be liable on summary conviction, in respect of each offence, to a fine not exceeding two hundred and fifty dollars and, in the case of a continuing offence, to a further fine not exceeding fifty dollars for every day subsequent to the day on which he is convicted of the offence during which the contravention continues.\n\n(4) In this section, the expression **forges** has the same meaning as in the **Forgery Ordinance, 1922**. (`Ordinance No. 11 of 1922`)\n\n9.—(1) It shall not be lawful for a person, unless he is registered as a pharmacist, to take or use the title of **\"chemist and druggist\"**, or of **druggist** or of **pharmacist** or of **pharmaceutist** or of **pharmaceutical chemist** or of **member of the Pharmaceutical Society**, or to take or use in connection with the sale of goods by retail the title of **chemist**.\n\nIn this section **title or description** includes the equivalent of such title or description in any language whatsoever.\n\n(2) It shall not be lawful for a person to use in connection with any business any title, emblem or description reasonably calculated to suggest that he or anyone employed in the business possesses any qualification with respect to the selling, dispensing or compounding of drugs or poisons other than the qualification which he in fact possesses.\n\nFor the purposes of this sub-section the use of the description **\"pharmacy\"**, **\"dispensary\"**, **\"drug-store\"** or **\"medical hall\"** in connection with a business carried on on any premises shall be deemed to be reasonably calculated to suggest that the owner of the business and the person having the control of the business on those premises are registered pharmacists.\n\n(3) If a person acts in contravention of the foregoing provisions of this section, he shall on summary conviction be liable in respect of each offence to a fine not exceeding two hundred and fifty dollars and in the case of a continuing offence to a further fine not exceeding fifty dollars for every day subsequent to the day on which he is convicted of the offence during which the contravention continues. (`Geo. 5, c. 25, s. 3`)\n\n10. A registered pharmacist carrying on a business which comprises the retail sale of drugs shall be an authorised seller of poisons within the meaning of this Ordinance if the following conditions are complied with:-\n\n(a) In each set of premises where the business is carried on, the business must, so far as concerns the retail sale of drugs, be under the personal control of the pharmacist himself or of some other registered pharmacist; and\n\n(b) the name and certificate of registration of the person having the control of the business as aforesaid must be conspicuously exhibited in the premises. (`Geo. 5, c. 25, s. 8`)", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-563-2 Pharmacy and Poisons Ordinance- 1937 31-5-1937 - 6-1-1938.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 559251, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-569-10 Report on proposed new museum 11-1-1938 - 11-1-1938", "page_number": 11, "title": "CO129-569-10 Report on proposed new museum 11-1-1938 - 11-1-1938", "content_text": "13\n\n12\n\ntemplated without a budget, independent of the interest from the endowment fund, at the disposal of the Curator, acting with the guidance of the Board of Directors if thought desirable. Money must be available not only for upkeep but also for the purchase of specimens. This is why a thoroughly competent Curator, qualified to discriminate between the genuine and the forgery, is absolutely essential.\n\n6. There should be available a travel fund, to be used at the discretion of the Board of Directors, to enable the Curator or one of his assistants, or a visiting student or scientist working in the museum, to visit cities in China. The Curator must be encouraged to widen his experience of things Chinese and a man of the standing required would certainly wish to do this. When on home leave the Curator should be encouraged to study in European or American museums.\n\n7. The annual budget should provide for the salaries of the Curator and of at least two Chinese assistants. These should be Chinese scholars who have had experience either in reputable Chinese museums or with the Academia Sinica. Knowledge of English should not be an essential qualification. These two men could train and instruct young Chinese as technicians whose wages would also have to be met out of the annual budget. The technicians, working under the direction of the Curator and his assistants, would prepare the specimens for exhibition and design labels, mounts, backgrounds, etc. We feel sure that there would be no difficulty in recruiting the right people for these posts.\n\n8. Provision must also be made for the staff of clerks, coolies, messengers and watchmen as well as two or three technicians.\n\n(e) Access of public.\n\nIn the old City Hall Museum access was free to all and sundry, in consequence it became a resting ground for illiterate coolies and the poorest of the Chinese who came in and out of the cold or rain in search of shelter. Under conditions of this nature the real students were discouraged. Whilst not wishing to exclude the poorer classes we yet do not think that the objects of the museum would be fulfilled if such were freely admitted.\n\nWe suggest that an entrance fee of 10 cents be charged, this would entitle anyone to enter. School children in parties of from 10 to 20 in charge of a teacher should be admitted free. We suggest that a Museum Association be opened to the public at an annual subscription of $1.00 which would provide free entry for one year.\n\nThere is a further possibility that persons of means, who were interested in the objects of the museum, might be invited to become patrons by donating annually a sum of not less than $100.\n\nV. SITE.\n\nSince the use to which the Albany site should be put is due for re-consideration on February 1st, 1938, we suggest that the possibility of its adoption as a site for the museum be entertained.\n\nThe area would allow of ample space for a central block 100 feet by 40 feet and of two side wings 80 feet by 40 feet. These would provide sufficient space for the rooms which we consider necessary to house the exhibits.\n\nSketch plan, enclosure E*, gives a possible lay-out of such buildings.\n\n* Not printed.\n\n(Sd.) G. A. C. HERKLOTS,\n\n12.1.38.\n\n(Sd.) W. SCHOFIELD,\n\n12.1.38.\n\n(Sd.) A. D. BRankston.\n\n13\n\nAppendix I\n\nREPORTS ON THE MUSEUMS OF\n\nCEYLON, BRITISH MALAYA, THE WEST INDIES, ETC.\n\n*\n\nTHE MUSEUMS OF HONG KONG.\n\nThe Museum situation in Hong Kong.\n\nMention has already been made of the fact that Hong Kong represents the low-water mark in museum provision throughout the whole of the Empire, excepting only the smaller islands of the Pacific and some of the more backward African territories, but this statement, sweeping as it is, is not sufficient to give a general idea of the museum backwardness of this Colony. It is true there was a small museum in the City Hall building which existed precariously from 1874 to 1933, but even this has now disappeared, and the Hong Kong authorities generously presented part of the collections to a Portuguese Museum in Macao and to other institutions. In the same City Hall building there was a library consisting mainly of 19th century books in a very poor state; some of the more valuable books and many of the less valuable have been attacked by pests of all kinds, and even the recent attempt of the British Museum authorities to have proper precautionary methods taken may prove to be too late. The University, the Hong Kong Club and the Helena May Institute have libraries open to their members, and there is a fine Chinese library in the University, but apart from these there is little public library provision. When it is realised that the population of the Colony is 841,000 and its area just under 400 square miles, or three to four times that of Malta, it will be realised how lacking in certain cultural amenities is this Colony.\n\nOn the other hand the Botanic Gardens include a fine herbarium and a small, but good, botanic library. There are, of course, teaching collections at the University, which has a fine Medical School. To these may be added the Sir Paul Chater collection of objects d'art which is to be handed over to the Government on the death of Lady Chater. The Government already own the Chater collection of pictures, which is temporarily housed in various public buildings and offices.\n\nIt would seem, therefore, that there is a need in the Colony for a cultural centre embracing a Library, a Museum and possibly an Art Gallery, and there are indications that such a proposal is at the moment being considered by the Government. Such a scheme would obviously command approval if there were some indication that the Government would recognize and assist such an Institution on terms at least comparable with the Colombo Museum or the Raffles Museum at Singapore. If some such guarantee were forthcoming, if there were definite indications that a first-class librarian and a first-class curator would be appointed, then without doubt Hong Kong would soon be as advanced in museum and library services as the best of the other Colonies.\n\nAt the moment the Hong Kong University is becoming an authoritative centre of information on the Biological Sciences for the whole of China, and comparatively large quantities of fauna and flora are being collected and sent away to Universities and Museums throughout the world for classification and study. These authorities not only return named specimens, but also write up the data in the form of articles, the best of which are published in the \"Hong Kong Naturalist\" - an excellent quarterly publication now in its fourth year. But nowhere in Hong Kong is there any adequate public museum of Chinese flora or fauna to supplement this excellent work, and it would seem as if the University itself should take the lead in founding a Museum of Natural History (archaeology might be added later) in order that its work on these lines may be more adequate.\n\n***\n\n**\n\n2.09\n\n14", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-569-10 Report on proposed new museum 11-1-1938 - 11-1-1938.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 559308, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-569-12 Law Revision Ordinance 1937 24-12-1937 - 28-5-1938", "page_number": 20, "title": "CO129-569-12 Law Revision Ordinance 1937 24-12-1937 - 28-5-1938", "content_text": "22\n\nSHORT TITLE.\n\n10\n\nSchedule, contd.\n\nAMENDMENT OR REPEAL.\n\nSHORT TITLE.\n\n11\n\nSchedule, contd.\n\nAMENDMENT OR REPEAL.\n\n34. The Books Colonial Registration Ordinance, 1888. (No. 2 of 1888.), --contd.\n\n35. The Coroner's Abolition Ordinance, 1888. (No. 5 of 1888.) London, two copies shall be sent to the Librarian at the Colonial Office Library, London, and two copies shall be sent to the Keeper of Printed Books at the British Museum, London.\"\n\n(3) Section 11 is amended by the repeal of the words \"and may, by notification in the Gazette, exclude any class of books from the operation of the whole or any part thereof and the substitution therefor of the words \"and, by notification in the Gazette, to exclude any class of books from the operation of this Ordinance or any part thereof\".\n\n(1) Section 6 (1) is repealed and the following sub-section substituted therefor:-\n\n6.-(1) Whenever a dead body is Preliminary brought to a hospital, the medical officer examination in charge of the hospital, or such other of body. Government medical officer or registered medical practitioner as he may depute, shall make a preliminary external examination of the body and report in writing to the magistrate, who may, if he considers it necessary, order an autopsy.\"\n\n(2) Section 9 (1) is amended by the repeal of the first \"& \" in the first line thereof and the substitution therefor of the word \"the \"\n\n(3) Section 11 is amended by the repeal of the words \"which may be administered to two or more jurors at once \" and the substitution therefor of the words \"and the oath may be administered to or the declaration made by two or more jurors at once \"\n\n(4) Section 13 (2), as amended by Ordinance No. 22 of 1934, is amended by the repeal of the word immediately before \"or\" and the insertion of the words \"or infanticide immediately after the word manslaughter in the fourth line thereof.\n\n(5) Section 17 is amended by the repeal of the first \"a\" in the second line thereof and the substitution therefor of the word \"the \".\n\n(6) Form No. 2 in the Schedule is repealed and the following form substituted therefor :-\n\n14\n\nFORM No. 2.\n\n[S. 11.]\n\nOath for juror.\n\nI will diligently inquire and true presentment make of all such matters and things as shall be here given me in charge, on behalf of Our Sovereign Lord the King touching the death of now lying dead [of whose body I am to have the view]. I will present no man for hatred, malice or ill will; nor spare any through fear, favour, or affection; but a true verdict give according to the evidence and the best of my skill and knowledge: So help me God.”\n\n35. The Coroner's Abolition Ordinance, 1888. (No. 5 of 1888.), _contd.\n\n36. The Evidence Ordinance, 1889. (No. 2 of 1889.)\n\n37. The Stonecutters Island Ordinance, 1889, (No. 4 of 1889.)\n\n(1) Section 4 is amended by the insertion of the words \"and the husbands and wives \" of such persons immediately after the word \"defended,\" in the fourth line thereof.\n\n(2) Section 23A (4) is amended by the repeal of the words \"Cyprus and to\" and \"Cyprus or\" in the second and third lines thereof.\n\n(3) Section 26 (1) is amended by the insertion of the word \"occasion\" immediately after the word \"has\" in the fourth line thereof.\n\n(4) Section 32 (1) is amended by the repeal of the words \"served on\" in the thirty-sixth line thereof and the substitution therefor of the words \"given to \".\n\n(5) Section 33 is repealed.\n\nSection 5 (2), as amended by Ordinance No. 13 of 1937, is amended by the insertion of the words and figure \"in contravention of sub-section (1)\" immediately after the word \"which\" in the second line thereof.\n\n1\n\n38. The Praya Reclamation Ordinance, 1889. (No. 6 of 1889.) The Ordinance is repealed.\n\n39. The Chinese Extradition Ordinance, 1889. (No. 7 of 1889.)\n\n(1) Section 9 (1) is amended by the insertion of the word \"Colony\" immediately after the word \"for \" in the fourth line of paragraph (a) and the second line of paragraph (d) thereof;\n\n(2) Section 11 is amended by the repeal of the words \"served on \"in the last line thereof and the substitution therefor of the words \" given to \".\n\n(3) The First Schedule is amended by the repeal of paragraph 26 thereof and the substitution of the following paragraph therefor :-\n\n26. Any indictable offence under-\n\n(a) the Offences against the Person Ordinance, 1865, No. 2 of 1865.\n\n(b) the Coinage Offences Ordinance, 1865, No. 7 of 1865.\n\n(c) the Forgery Ordinance, 1922, No. 11 of 1922.\n\n(d) the Larceny Ordinance, 1935, No. 32 of 1935.\n\n23\n\nPage 20\n\nPage 21\n\n24", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-569-12 Law Revision Ordinance 1937 24-12-1937 - 28-5-1938.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 574728, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-590-11 Commission of Enquiry into irregularities in Immigration Departments 22-4-1941 - 19-12-1941", "page_number": 178, "title": "CO129-590-11 Commission of Enquiry into irregularities in Immigration Departments 22-4-1941 - 19-12-1941", "content_text": "## List of agencies from which recognition was withdrawn \n(see page 7 of Mr. Forrest's evidence)\n\n| Name of Agency | Date Withdrawn | Reasons |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Public Translation Bureau | 10.12.40 | Paying members of I.O. to recommend public to their agency |\n| Wing Tai Hing | 24.12.40 | Signing applications on behalf of persons with what was obviously applicant's own signature |\n| Lee Wah (Siu Tong) | 27.12.40 | Giving valuable present to an officer on I.O. staff in a position to expedite their application |\n| Wong Kam Ying | 10.1.41 | Certifying to be members of his congregation persons known not to be so. Granting sub-agencies without permission |\n| The Vicar, St. Mary's Church | 10.1.41 | - do - |\n| Chan Pui Application Agency | 13.1.41 | |\n| Zimmern & Co. | 22.1.41 | Selling chops |\n| Tong's Agency (Chan Sik Kee) | 11.2.41 | |\n| Anglo-Chinese General Traders Corporation | 19.2.41 | Selling chops, using forged chops, and granting sub-agencies. Forgery and embezzlement |", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-590-11 Commission of Enquiry into irregularities in Immigration Departments 22-4-1941 - 19-12-1941.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 574812, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-590-11 Commission of Enquiry into irregularities in Immigration Departments 22-4-1941 - 19-12-1941", "page_number": 262, "title": "CO129-590-11 Commission of Enquiry into irregularities in Immigration Departments 22-4-1941 - 19-12-1941", "content_text": "## \n740 \n265 \n\n**MA TSUI CHIU:** (Evidence interpreted) \n\n**Chairman:** \nQ. Mr. Ma, you are a Justice of the Peace? \nA. Yes. \n\nQ. How many years have you resided in Hong Kong? \nA. I was born in Hong Kong. \n\nQ. Your complaint here is that on 18th January you endorsed an application for a four-year certificate signed both as manager of the Kung Yau Yuen firm of which you are in charge and also as a Justice of the Peace? \nA. Yes. \n\nQ. Thereon you continue, the Deputy I.C. accepted your endorsement, while the I.O. refused it and called for the endorsement of the Commissioner of Customs, Kowloon, the applicant being a Customs officer? \nA. Yes. \n\nQ. You then took that matter up with the Secretary for Chinese Affairs and it was in course settled and disposed of? \nA. Yes. \n\nQ. How many years have you been a Justice of the Peace? \nA. Since 1925. \n\nQ. Do you happen to know if your name and style of Justice of the Peace appears in the local directory? \nA. Yes. \n\n## \n2. I come to your second case. A lady member of your family and her servant went to Macau? \nA. Yes. \n\nQ. There they received their, what purported to be, entry permits through the office of the hotel at which they stayed? \nA. Yes. \n\nQ. And armed with these permits they came back to this Colony on 1st March? \nA. Yes. \n\nQ. These certificates turned out to be forgeries? \nA. One of the entry permits was examined three times by the officer and passed as a genuine one. The other was rejected as a forgery? \nA. Yes. \n\nQ. And the servant who held that forged passport was ordered to return to Macau? \nA. ...", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-590-11 Commission of Enquiry into irregularities in Immigration Departments 22-4-1941 - 19-12-1941.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 579449, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-592-5 Reports on current situation- custody of enemy property 7-12-1945 - 11-12-1945", "page_number": 5, "title": "CO129-592-5 Reports on current situation- custody of enemy property 7-12-1945 - 11-12-1945", "content_text": "even provisionally\n\nOthers no consideration passed; in others the transaction is a forgery e.g. in one case the alleged seal of the payee proved to be the payee's own seal. Further, in cases where consideration passed or is alleged to have passed, it was sometimes so inadequate as to raise the presumption that some interest was reserved to the guarantor. It may be sometime, therefore, before the rights of the parties can be determined and presumably final determination will have to wait for restoration of Civil Courts. Until directions are obtained, the Custodian has been told to take such property into custody under Article 3 of Proclamation No 11, but as soon as it is ascertained even administratively that the property is \"Enemy Property\", I suggest that he should then apply the Trading with the Enemy Ordinance.\n\n8.\n\nNo directions have been received as to how that Ordinance should be applied; in particular how far assets subject thereto should be liquidated. It is suggested that any property required by the Administration or for rehabilitation purposes should be requisitioned, payment being deferred, and that all properties which cannot profitably be taken into custody, should be sold and the proceeds credited. I have already sanctioned the sale by auction of a China and curio shop of which the owner is known as apart from the strain on transport and storage, moving the goods would almost certainly lead to a large quantity being broken.\n\n9.\n\nIt would be of considerable assistance if the intention of His Majesty's Government with regard to enemy property were now divulged - whether e.g. such property will be applied towards reparations or making good war damage leaving the owners to claim against the Japanese Government or whether it is proposed to return it to the owners.\n\n10. It is already known that so far as Japanese war material is concerned including food and fuel the ultimate destination is already covered by agreement. I attach a copy of a draft of such agreement.\n\n11. It is not however known what is the ultimate destination of property falling outside such class. Perhaps the Board of Trade could be asked to give instructions.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-592-5 Reports on current situation- custody of enemy property 7-12-1945 - 11-12-1945.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 587087, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-604-7 Expulsion of Undesirables Ordinance 1949 19-8-1949 - 16-12-1949", "page_number": 65, "title": "CO129-604-7 Expulsion of Undesirables Ordinance 1949 19-8-1949 - 16-12-1949", "content_text": "Liability not to be affected by opinion, etc., of Chinese authority.\n\nA declaration, opinion, or discretion, which the Governor is authorised by this Ordinance to make, form, or exercise, respectively.\n\n20. A fugitive criminal shall be liable to be surrendered under this Ordinance in accordance with the provisions of section 12, although the crime of which he is accused may have been committed within the jurisdiction of a Chinese authority other than the Chinese authority by whom the requisition was made, or other than the Chinese authority to whom he is to be surrendered; and although the Chinese authority to whom he is to be surrendered is not the Chinese authority by whom the requisition was made.\n\n## FIRST SCHEDULE.\n\n(s. 2.)\n\n## LIST OF EXTADITION CRIMES.\n\n1. Murder and attempt to murder.\n\n2. Manslaughter.\n\n3. Malicious wounding.\n\n4. Counterfeiting or altering money, or uttering or bringing into circulation counterfeit or altered money.\n\n5. Forgery, or counterfeiting, or altering, or uttering what is forged, or counterfeited, or altered, comprehending the crimes designated in the laws of the Colony as counterfeiting or falsification of paper money, bank notes, or other securities; forgery or other falsification of other public or private documents; likewise the uttering, or bringing into circulation, or wilfully using such counterfeited, forged, or falsified papers.\n\n6. Embezzlement or larceny.\n\n7. Receiving stolen goods.\n\n8. Obtaining money or goods by false pretences.\n\n9. Crimes against bankruptcy law.\n\n10. Fraud committed by a bailee, banker, agent, factor, trustee, or director, or manager or public officer of any company, made criminal by any law for the time being in force.\n\n11. Rape.\n\n12. Abduction.\n\n13. Child-stealing.\n\n14. Kidnapping.\n\n15. Perjury, also subornation, also conspiracy to commit perjury, or to procure the commission of perjury, or to utter or use in any judicial proceedings any deposition, affidavit, or other document knowing the same to be false or forged, or to be perjured or forged.\n\n16. Burglary or housebreaking.\n\n17. Arson.\n\nAs amended by No.17 of 1927 (18.10.27).", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-604-7 Expulsion of Undesirables Ordinance 1949 19-8-1949 - 16-12-1949.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 587088, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-604-7 Expulsion of Undesirables Ordinance 1949 19-8-1949 - 16-12-1949", "page_number": 66, "title": "CO129-604-7 Expulsion of Undesirables Ordinance 1949 19-8-1949 - 16-12-1949", "content_text": "76\n\n18.\n\n19.\n\nbery ráth viol mos.\n\nits by letter or otherwise with intent to extort,\n\n20.\n\nFirnay, whether by the law of nations or by municipal law,\n\n24.\n\n(Making or destroying a vessel at sea, or attempting to do so.\n\n22.\n\nAssault on board a ship on the high seas, with intent to destroy life or to do grievous bodily harm,\n\n23. Revolt, or conspiracy to revolt, by two or more persons on board a ship on the high seas, against the authority of the master.\n\nperjury or subornation of perjury,\n\nmalicious injury to property, if the offence is indictable,\n\nAny indictable offence under\n\n20\n\nNo.2 of 1865\n\n(a)\n\nthe Offences against the Person Ordinance, 1865,\n\nNo.7 of 1865\n\n(b)\n\nthe Coinage Offences Ordinance, 1865,\n\nthe Forgery Ordinance, 1922.\n\n(c)\n\nthe Bribery (Amendment) Ordinance, 1935,\n\n(d)\n\nthe Falsification of Documents Ordinance, 1935,\n\nNo.11 of 1922\n\nNo.32 of 1935\n\nNo.33 of 1935\n\nNo.34 of 1935\n\n(e) the Police Force (Amendment) Ordinance, 1935.\n\nor any Ordinance amending or substituted for the same, which is not included in the foregoing list.\n\nSECOND SCHEDULE\n\n(17.)\n\nor by the GOVERNOR\n\nmagistrate to issue his warrant\n\nGovernor and Commander-in-Chief\n\nBy His Excellency's Command,\n\nof the Colony of Hong Kong and its dependencies.\n\nWhereas requisition has been made to me by\n\nthe Consul of\n\nor\n\nCommissioner of the\n\nof the crime of\n\nwithin the province (or territory) of\n\nfor accused\n\nI hereby, by this order under my hand and seal, signify to you that such requisition has been made, and require you to issue your warrant for the apprehension of such fugitive, or otherwise to proceed in conformity with the provisions of the Chinese Extradition Ordinance, 1889.\n\nGiven under my hand and seal at Victoria, Hong Kong, this\n\nday of\n\n, 19\n\n(sgd)\n\nGovernor.\n\nAs amended by No.32 of 1935 (6.9.35) and Law Rev. Ord., 1937.\n\nAs amended by No.17 of 1927 (28.10.27).", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-604-7 Expulsion of Undesirables Ordinance 1949 19-8-1949 - 16-12-1949.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 589383, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-608-7 Future policy- Report on Port Administration by Sir David Owen 24-2-1941 - 24-2-1941", "page_number": 307, "title": "CO129-608-7 Future policy- Report on Port Administration by Sir David Owen 24-2-1941 - 24-2-1941", "content_text": "MERCHANT SHIPPING.\n\nNo. 10 of 1899.\n\n9\n\nof\n\ncertificates.\n\n(17) The master of a ship, on signing the agreement with the crew before the Superintendent of the Mercantile Marine Office, shall produce to him the certificates of competency which the master, mates and engineers of the ship are hereby required to hold.\n\n(18) Every person who-\n\n(a) makes, assists in making or procures to be made any false representation for the purpose of procuring, either for himself or for any other person, a certificate of competency; or\n\n(b) fraudulently uses a certificate or copy of a certificate of competency which has been forged, altered, cancelled or suspended, or to which he is not entitled; or\n\n(c) fraudulently lends his certificate of competency or allows it to be used by any other person,\n\nshall be guilty of a misdemeanor.\n\nEngagement and discharge of seamen.\n\n57 & 58 Vict. c. 60, s. 103.\n\nForgery of certificate. 57 & 58 Vict c. 60, s. 104.\n\nOffice.\n\n5.-(1) It shall be lawful for the Governor to appoint within the Colony a place to be called the Mercantile Marine Office, at which place shall be conducted all the business connected with the engagement and discharge of seamen on board British ships, and foreign ships whose flag is not represented by a consular officer resident in the Colony, such ships being in the waters of the Colony. The Harbour Master shall be the Superintendent of the Mercantile Marine Office.\n\n(2) No seaman shall, except with the sanction of the Shipping Harbour Master, be engaged to do duty on board a British ship, or any foreign ship whose flag is not represented by a consular officer resident in the Colony, elsewhere than at the Mercantile Marine Office; and the Superintendent shall require such seaman\n\n*\n\nAs amended by No. 23 of 1932 [10.12.32] and Law Rev. Ord., 1937. The provisions of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, and the Merchant Shipping Ordinance, 1899, with reference to the engagement of seamen and to agreements made with seamen by masters of ships are not affected by the Employers and Servants Ordinance, 1902. See No. 45 of 1902, s. 26.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-608-7 Future policy- Report on Port Administration by Sir David Owen 24-2-1941 - 24-2-1941.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 589434, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-608-7 Future policy- Report on Port Administration by Sir David Owen 24-2-1941 - 24-2-1941", "page_number": 359, "title": "CO129-608-7 Future policy- Report on Port Administration by Sir David Owen 24-2-1941 - 24-2-1941", "content_text": "MERCHANT SHIPPING.\n\nNo. 10 of 1899.\n\n...\n\n(17) The master of a ship, on signing the agreement with the crew before the Superintendent of the Mercantile Marine Office, shall produce to him the certificates of competency which the master, mates and engineers of the ship are hereby required to hold.\n\n(18) Every person who-\n\n(a) makes, assists in making or procures to be made any false representation for the purpose of procuring, either for himself or for any other person, a certificate of competency; or\n\n(b) fraudulently uses a certificate or copy of a certificate of competency which has been forged, altered, cancelled, suspended, or to which he is not entitled; or\n\n(c) fraudulently lends his certificate of competency or allows it to be used by any other person,\n\nshall be guilty of a misdemeanor.\n\nEngagement and discharge of seamen.\n\n57 & 58 Vict. c. 60, s. 103.\n\nForgery of certificate. 57 & 58 Vict c. 60, s. 104.\n\n...\n\n5.—(1) It shall be lawful for the Governor to appoint within the Colony a place to be called the Mercantile Marine Office, at which place shall be conducted all the business connected with the engagement and discharge of seamen on board British ships, and foreign ships whose flag is not represented by a consular officer resident in the Colony, such ships being in the waters of the Colony. The Harbour Master shall be the Superintendent of the Mercantile Marine Office.\n\n(2) No seaman shall, except with the sanction of the Shipping Harbour Master, be engaged to do duty on board a British ship, or any foreign ship whose flag is not represented by a consular officer resident in the Colony, elsewhere than at the Mercantile Marine Office; and the Superintendent shall require such seaman...\n\n* As amended by No. 23 of 1932 [10.12.32] and Law Rev. Ord., 1937. The provisions of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, and the Merchant Shipping Ordinance, 1899, with reference to the engagement of seamen and to agreements made with seamen by masters of ships are not affected by the Employers and Servants Ordinance, 1902. See No. 45 of 1902, s. 26.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-608-7 Future policy- Report on Port Administration by Sir David Owen 24-2-1941 - 24-2-1941.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 } ]