[
    {
        "id": 216765,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-001 - Sir Hug Cough-s China Military Correspondences - 1841-1843",
        "page_number": 249,
        "title": "CO129-001 - Sir Hug Cough-s China Military Correspondences - 1841-1843",
        "content_text": "[ 4 ] \n\nSCHEDULE continued. \n\nNo. \n\n25. Governor-General of India to the Secret Committee of the Board of Directors. \n\nDATE. 22 Mar. 1842 \n\nSUBJECT. \n\nPAGE. \n\nTwo Regiments of Madras Native In- fantry added to the Force under orders to proceed to China \n\nA \n\n26. Sir Hugh Gough to Lord Stanley 24 June 1842 That the Belleisle and Apollo, and \n\ngreater part of the Transports, have arrived at Chusan; and they will be directed to follow him immediately up the Yang-tse-Kang \n\n27. \n\n28. \n\nReturn of Regiments or Detachments of Native Troops sent to China from India in 1841 and 1842, &c. \n\nReturn of a Detachment of Royal Ar- tillery sent to China from the United Kingdom in 1840 - \n\n29. \n\nReturn of a Detachment of the Royal Artillery sent to China from the United Kingdom in 1841 and 1842 - \n\n30. \n\nReturn of Regiments and Detachments sent to China from India, or from the United Kingdom, in 1841 or 1842, &c. \n\n31. \n\nReturn of Ships of War sent from the United Kingdom to China in 1841 and 1842 \n\n32. . \n\nReturn of Ships and Vessels employed on the Coast of China in 1840, 1841 and 1842 \n\n33. - \n\nPrincipal Events in China, from June \n\n[ 5 ] \n\n-No. 1.- \n\n(No. 15.) COPY of a LETTER from Captain Elliot to Viscount Palmerston.--(Received 3 June 1841.) \n\nMy Lord, \n\nMacao, 28 March 1841. \n\nNo. 1. \n\nI HAVE now the honour to transmit the Minute of a conference held yesterday Captain Elliot to at my residence, between their Excellencies the Major-General, the Commodore, Viscount Palmer- \n\nston, 28 March and myself, and I hope the conclusions reached will be satisfactory to your \n\n1841. Lordship. \n\n(signed) \n\nI have, &c. \n\nCharles Elliot, \n\nHer Majesty's Plenipotentiary, \n\nEnclosure in No. 1. \n\nMINUTE OF CONFERENCE between Major-General Sir Hugh Gough, Commodore Sir J. J. Gordon Bremer, and Captain Elliot, held at the house of the latter, in Macao, on the 27th March 1841. \n\nCAPTAIN ELLIOT submitted to their Excellencies the scheme of future operations already Encl, in No. 1. reported in his despatch to the Right honourable the Governor-General of the 24th instant.\" \n\nAttentively considering the remarkable turn of affairs at this point, induced by the recent operations, it was obvious that it might at any moment be necessary to assume a decisively commanding military and political attitude at Canton itself. \n\nThe prostration of the strength of the Provincial Government, the shock it had received in the sight of the people, the exposed condition of the city, the long connexion of the province with the foreign trade, the well-known necessities and dispositions of the people upon that subject, the effects of our late forbearance in the strengthening of their con- fidence in ourselves;-these (with the ignorant and injudicious violence of the Court, upon the other hand) are all considerations which seem to render it of indispensable necessity that the whole land force. should be kept ready for suddenly taking such a position over the heights of Canton, as to enable us at once to break up the Provincial Government, and ensure the complete and safe control over the city and its supplies, both by land and \n\nwater. \n\nWith these and other impressions of cogent force (of which the watching and powerful protection of the trade is one), Captain Elliot proposed in his despatch to the Governor- General, that the movement upon Amoy should be purely naval; and he will only modify that proposition now, by suggesting that the officer charged with that service shall be instructed to secure any point in the harbour, which may leave him a complete control over the city and the trade. \n\nIf the occupation of Canton or its near neighbourhood become necessary, there can of course be no hope of assistance from the land force for the proposed operations in the Yang- tse-Kiang; but if the trade here can be carried through successfully and quietly by the actual degree of pressure (and it will take about two months to run off the main body of it), it is hoped that his Excellency the Major-General will be in a situation to help us with a handsome disposable force for the blow in that quarter. \n\nHis Excellency the Major-General agreed in the probability of an occupation of the heights over Canton, and was not, without regret (as we had approached so near) that the occasion had not been seized to accomplish that object. \n\nIn his view, movement upon Amoy had better be deferred till we were in a situation to carry forward the whole course of our operations to the grand point of attack; and if eir- cumstances did not engage the entire attention of the land force here, he certainly must agree that the Yang-tse-Kiang was a line well suited for the main blow of our ensuing season's campaign. \n\nThe Commodore took occasion to represent that the steam arm of the expedition (which was of cardinal importance) was in a shattered condition; and looking to the actual situation of things here, to the necessity of a very strong and watchful attitude upon the spot, most particularly during the progress of the trade, he had come to the conclusion that he should best advance the public interests by proceeding without one moment's loss of time to Calcutta, for the purpose of full communication with the Right honourable the Governor-General, and particularly to accelerate the steam reinforcements. \n\nThe Major-General having suggested that he thought it possible the Madras Govern- ment might spare Her Majesty's 94th Regiment from Cananore, the Commodore added, that the Jupiter\" should be despatched to that port to await the orders of the Supreme Government; and if the regiment could not be spared, she would be available to bring on the recruits for the other corps, and provisions from Ceylon. \n\nIt was finally determined \n\n1. That not a moment should be lost in the firm and permanent establishment of the depôts and of the British authority at Hong-Kong. \n\n2. That a very watchful attitude should be observed at this point; and that every thing should be kept in readiness for the sudden assumption of complete military and political authority over Canton. \n\n596. \n\nA 3 \n\n3. That",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-001 - Sir Hug Cough-s China Military Correspondences - 1841-1843.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 216766,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-001 - Sir Hug Cough-s China Military Correspondences - 1841-1843",
        "page_number": 250,
        "title": "CO129-001 - Sir Hug Cough-s China Military Correspondences - 1841-1843",
        "content_text": "No. 2. Earl of Auckland \n\nto Sir John Hob \n\nhouse, 10 May 1841. \n\nEncl. 1, in No. 2. \n\nCORRESPONDENCE RELATIVE TO \n\n3. That movement upon Amoy should be deferred till the general operations to the north- ward could be undertaken. \n\n4. That the Commodore should proceed with all despatch to Calcutta in the steamer; and that the \"Jupiter\" should be sent with the like speed to Cananore, there to await further orders. \n\nCharles Elhot. \n\n(No. 12.) \n\n(signed) \n\n-No. 2.- \n\nH. Gough, Major-General. \n\nJ.J. Gordon Bremer, Commodore. \n\nCopy of a DESPATCH from the Right honourable the Earl of Auckland to Sir John Hobhouse.-(Received 2 July 1841.) \n\nFort William, 10 May 1841. \n\nSir, I HAVE the honour to forward and to request that you will submit to Her Majesty's Government the accompanying copy of a despatch which I have this day addressed to Her Majesty's Plenipotentiaries on the coast of China, with reference to the intelligence of the state of affairs to the end of March last, received by the Company's steam-vessel \"Queen.” I append also copies of letters addressed by me to the Naval Commander-in-Chief and to Major-general Sir Hugh Gough, acknowledging their reports of the operations which terminated in the advance upon Canton, and the placing of that city at the mercy of Her Majesty's forces. \n\nI trust that the observations which I have offered to the plenipotentiaries on the course of the proceedings of the expedition during the present year will be in accordance with the views of Her Majesty's Government. \n\nIn a despatch addressed to the Secret Committee of the Court of Directors, a full detail has been given of the measures adopted by the Government of India for complying with the requisitions of the Naval Commander-in-Chief, and of Sir Hugh Gough, for reinforcements of every description. \n\nIt has been my object, in addressing the Plenipotentiaries, to urge them to direct the employment of the expedition with the utmost possible promptitude and vigour, and I heartily hope that the measures to be adopted will be successful in their execution and satisfactory in their results; but I may in this place add, that from the lateness of the season, the limited means at disposal for land opera- tions, from the difficulty of navigation in the dangerous seas of China, and from the stubborn temper of the Chinese Court, this hope may be partially disappointed; and it will be for the authorities in England eventually to determine in what manner and upon what scale a third campaign, should a third campaign become necessary, is to be conducted. \n\nThe Government of India may be able to send some reinforcements of native troops to China, but we should not be justified in further weakening the European force now in this country. One early measure of reinforcement from England appears to be obviously expedient, namely, the sending directly to Hong Kong (touching, of course, for orders, at Singapore) the recruits necessary to fill up their complement, the 18th, the 26th and 55th regiments; I have not named the 49th, as possibly the General Commanding in Chief may have designated that corps, in consequence of their long service in India, for early return to England; and this remark might, perhaps, also be applied to the 55th, which left England in the same year as the 49th; but it is a most valuable and efficient corps, and it might, perhaps, be retained for a service so entirely under the orders of Her Majesty's Government as that of the China expedition. \n\nUpon the condition and wants of the naval force, his Excellency the Naval Commander-in-Chief will, no doubt, have addressed the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty. \n\nI have, &c. \n\n(signed) Auckland. \n\nEnclosure 1, in No. 2. \n\nEXTRACT of a LETTER from the Earl of Auckland to the Plenipotentiaries on the Coast of China. Gentlemen, \n\nFort William, 10 May 1841. I HAVE had the honour to receive the despatches from Captain Elliot, of March 24th and 28th, and have hastened, in concert with his Excellency the naval Commander-in-Chief, ta expedite \n\nMILITARY OPERATIONS IN CHINA. \n\nexpedite the reinforcement required, with a view to the renewal of active operations against the Chinese government. \n\n7. The operations of this season will be conducted under considerable disadvantages. The expedition to the northward can scarcely be collected and move from the Canton Waters till from the 10th to the 15th July. Not more than six weeks will remain for any move- ments in the Gulf of Petchelee and in the immediate vicinity of the capital; and it is to be apprehended that after the end of September the fleet could not, with safety or advantage be retained at the mouths of the Yellow or Yang-tze-kiang rivers. Under these circum- stances you will, doubtless, decide upon pressing the employment both of naval and military means with the greatest possible force and activity. Secrecy, promptitude and energy may, even in the short time which will be at command, do much towards displaying the exposed and defenceless condition of important points of the Chinese empire, and carrying a lively alarm to the court itself. \n\n8. At Canton, the season of trade will have passed before the reinforcements arrive, and I am not aware that there would be benefit in re-establishing a blockade of the river for the present, while many irritating questions might be avoided by the continued suspension of such blockade. The possession of the Island of Wangtong, and the presence of the naval force which will be left, under all circumstances, at and near Hong-Kong, will always furnish the means of reimposing the blockade, if the conduct of the provincial anthorities at Canton should \n\nappear to require that measure. But, as it seems to me, the general good-will of the population, and the free resort of commerce to Hong-Kong, may best be ensured by abstaining, while no paramount necessity may call for a renewed use of force in that quarter, from a course of annoyance and restriction in the Canton River, or on the coast of that province. \n\n9. It may be calculated that the military force assembled at Hong-Kong, early in July, will amount to from 3,600 to 4,000 men, in addition to the marines of the fleet. If, of this force, 1,500 men, with the sick, be left on the island, and for the occupation of Wangtong, the protection of these ports will probably be amply provided for. These are points for the determination of Major-General Sir Hugh Gough, but I may be permitted generally to refer to them in estimating the force which may be available for service in operations along the coast. 10. It may be gathered, then, that a column of nearly 3,000 men, including the marines and disciplined seamen from the ships, can be landed for occasional employment at points of disembarkation; and I should hope that such a column would give a commanding pre- ponderance at those points, against any opposition that may be offered, for the purposes for which their temporary occupation would be of value to us. \n\n11. It has been shown, I think, that little would be gained by any attempt to blockade the great rivers of the empire. Such attempts would dissipate our force, and would apparently be ineffectual, and, at some seasons of the year, exceedingly hazardous. \n\n12. What we have to do in movements along the coasts, is to excite throughout the maritime districts, and yet more at the capital, a keen dread of our power, and, if possible, to seize property sufficient to satisfy our heavy and growing pecuniary claims. \n\n13. For both of these objects the assault of Amoy, of any accessible towns on or near the great rivers of the central provinces, and of the port of Tientsin near the capital, would appear to be the course the most to be recommended. One blow of this kind, rapidly succeeding another, may have much effect in bringing the court to a temper which shall admit of a suitable accommodation. With these measures might possibly be conjoined the holding and shutting up the point of intersection of the great canal with the Yang-tze-kiang river, so long as a naval force can be kept at that point. \n\n14. The towns thus assaulted must be held for the time in the most effective possession practicable; and all such valuable property as might become prize by the usages of war, and is capable of being carried off with facility, should be secured. All Government property, which may not admit of being removed, should probably be, as far as possible, destroyed. The levying a money contribution on a town, instead of seizing property, will be subject for consideration with the officer commanding, if he finds such a measure within his power. \n\n20. If the season will not admit of operations before the setting in of the northerly monsoon at Amoy, in the central rivers, and in the Peiho, it will be a subject of grave deli- beration with you in which of the two last named quarters the force should immediately act. There are obviously very powerful motives for making our strength felt as soon as possible in the Peiho; but the question can alone be decided upon your approach to the scene of operations, and there may be reasons which would render the contrary resolution the proper one: still I would say that the movement to the Peiho ought not to be postponed, excepting in consideration of manifest and pressing urgency. \n\n23. Even during the brief period of the active operations of this season on the coast, inconvenience may be experienced from the want of an island, or other post, to which the fleet may repair for shelter, for water, for the establishment of depots, the protection of prize property, and other objects: and as I have before recommended, so I would now again urge, that the Pescadores islands should be visited, their value for our purposes ascertained, and the Chinese garrison expelled. But your most careful inquiry will also be given at every point on the upper coasts, in order to discover whether there be any other island which would better suit our object in seeking a place of settlement and trade than Chusan itself; and if you should not find such an island, then I should suggest that you should, after leaving the Peiho, or otherwise closing the operations of the year, land a sufficient body of troops, say 1,200 or 1,500 men, to retake the city of Tinghaee, and to occupy a position in the neighbourhood, 596. \n\nA 4 \n\n",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-001 - Sir Hug Cough-s China Military Correspondences - 1841-1843.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 216858,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-002 - Sir Henry Pottinger - 1843",
        "page_number": 66,
        "title": "CO129-002 - Sir Henry Pottinger - 1843",
        "content_text": "\nit is \n\nPost. Capt. Sir Thomas Herbe \n\nIn forwarding this Correspondence, perhaps proper I should suplain to Your Lordship, that, previous to my arrival in China, a fommitte of faptains, as per margine, had, with Captain Elliot's sanation and under the direction of Commodore Sin Gordon. Bremes, fixed. location on the shore of \n\nthe Starbon, which has been since carefully reserved, and is known by \n\nthe name \n\nof Navy Bay: \n\nWhen I was last absent with the Expedition to the Northward, \n\nRear Admiral Sir Thomas Cochrane \n\n~ caused some \n\ntemporary \n\nStouses to be built \n\nNaval Store \n\nthe spot \n\nGovernment \n\nof ground lying in front of \n\nSmith, Bethune. \n\n\"Government Hill\" which I particularly \n\ndescribe in \n\nSaltown as \n\nmy first letter to Lord being in my opinion \n\nsuited for the \"Place\" \n\nwell \n\nParade \n\nf \n\nthe Colony, and Sir William Parker ombally applied to me not long ago- \n\nbe allowed to retain it \n\nusa \n\nin the \n\npermanently \n\nto \n\nNavy depôt, but as it is situated. \n\ncontre of the City, and as \n\nvery \n\nit's being scoupied with Naval Store= - Houses, &c., would entirely shut out in the \n\nfuture. Public Buildings from \n\nview \n\neven as \n\nof the Harbor, and would- greatly interfere with the Circulation of fresh air and the other_ important desiderata alluded to in \n\nretract of \n\na letter from the- \n\nAn \n\nColonial...",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-002 - Sir Henry Pottinger - 1843.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 218237,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-005 - Sir Henry Pottinger - 1844",
        "page_number": 110,
        "title": "CO129-005 - Sir Henry Pottinger - 1844",
        "content_text": "\nremote from the usual Police Stations. \n\nCaptain Elliot's first step after taking possession of this Island in 1841, was to request Her Majesty's Senior Naval and Military Authorities to select such locations as they considered best suited \n\nther \n\nrespective Departments. \n\nfor \n\nA Committee which assembled bynder of Commodore Sir Gordon Bremer composed of three Post Captains of the Royal Navy fixed on the spot where the \n\n\"Naval Stores \n\nare now situated near- \n\nWest Point- which location has since \n\nborne the \n\nwhich was \n\nMANO \n\nof \"Hary Bay\" and further marked off, and \n\nspecially reserved at the request of thee Admiral Sir William Parker subsequent to his arrival in China. \n\nLieutenant General Sir Hugh Yough, himself selected the site of the \n\nBarracks \n\nBarracks at West Print at present abandoned, \n\n(as well as those of the other Barracks our the Island), so that \n\nyou will perceive that \n\nreason to \n\nMiss Jamieson How He (and other proprietors of premises in the western quarter of this (olory) had every hope and believe that they wordd b. amply protected pom thir clos vicinity to West Point Barruché and Navy Bay the one intended to be a Chief Military - the other the only Naval - Station in the Colovy. \n\nWe have Je \n\n(Signed) Henry Pottinger = \n\n› George D'Aquilar \n\n( \n\nکو گئی \n\nA true Copy. \n\n} \n\noffm Caine. \n\n) \n\nRichard Worrnam",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-005 - Sir Henry Pottinger - 1844.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 221046,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-010 - Sir Henry Pottinger - 1843",
        "page_number": 641,
        "title": "CO129-010 - Sir Henry Pottinger - 1843",
        "content_text": "Besides the above explanation, think it right to remark to prevent having future misconception that you have been entirely misinformed as to Mr Jamieson How Ht (or any other Farms similarly situated) erecting Buildings remote from the usual Police Stations.\n\nCaptain Elliot's first step after taking possession of this Island in 1841 was to request Her Majesty's Senior Naval and Military Authorities to select such locations as they considered best suited for their respective Departments.\n\nA Committee which assembled by order of Commodore Gordon Bremer, composed of three Post Captains of the Royal Navy fixed on the spot where the Naval Stores are now situated near West Point, which location has since borne the name of \"Navy Bay\" and which was further marked off and specially reserved at the request of the Admiral Sir William Parker subsequent to his arrival in China.\n\nLieutenant General Sir Hugh Gough himself selected the site of the Barracks at West Point at present abandoned, (as well as those of the other Barracks on the island) so that you will perceive that Mr Jamieson How H (and other Proprietors of premises in the Western Quarter of this Colony) had every reason to hope and believe that they would be amply protected from their close vicinity to West Point Barracks and Navy Bay intended to be a chief Military and the only Naval Station in the Colony.\n\nWe have to\n(Signed)",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-010 - Sir Henry Pottinger - 1843.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 227550,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-026 - Bonham - 1848 [9-12]",
        "page_number": 244,
        "title": "CO129-026 - Bonham - 1848 [9-12]",
        "content_text": "4) Junks. I could not distinguish the men in the junk, it was Su Jark. After this first stone was thrown, the gentlemen spoke again to the junkmen; the only words that could understand that the junkmen said were that \"sti pow\" (small gun) but I cannot say whether this was said before or after the stones were thrown, but told the gentlemen that the junkmen said \"They keep small gun fire.\" Some of the gentlemen wanted to go on board the junk. Mr May took the helm to steer the boat to the junk. Two of the gentlemen did not want to go to the junk; there was only one man pulling at the time; and the other boat-people went into the stern of our boat, as we were afraid. We were close enough to these junks to enable me to recognize them again. I saw about twenty men on board the junk; I only saw the upper parts of the men's bodies; could not say if they had pikes in their hands. After this we came ashore at Gibb's wharf; in our boat were two men, one woman, and a boy. There were no junks within fourteen feet of these two junks. When I came ashore I came with Mr Muir to the Police Station; Mr Muir got the Policemen, and went down to the Bank wharf; I went in the Police-boat with Mr Mair; we went to the two junks, the same junks which threw the stones at us. We got within about seventy feet of the junks; the Lukong in the Police-boat said something in the Pokeen or Tib-tchieu dialect. The Lukong said at the time he spoke in Tila-tchien. The Police-boat had a light which she showed; there were no Chinese characters on this lantern. The junkmen did not say anything; they were making a noise on board the junks; the junkmen then threw more than ten stones at us; we then returned, and Mr Mair and two other gentlemen came off again with me in a Chinese boat; the Police went before us.\n\n(11)\n\nmy boat next. Mr May's boat had no interpreter in her. I heard the men in the junks sing out \"Pha, p'ha.\" I called out as loud as I could (for fear of the junks being Pokeen boats and strangers) \"Do not fire.\" The breeze at this time was fresh, and we were to leeward of the junks; my boat showed a lantern. The junks then fired single shots; I could not say by the report if the guns were loaded; our boats returned the fire. Mr May's boat got alongside; I saw something go over the bows of Mr May's boat, and someone said, \"There's a man overboard.\" Mr May's boat backed down, and told us to cease firing; the men in the junk still continued to use the words \"Lo hu-p'ha, p'ha,\" \"Police devils-fight, fight,\" (or beat, or strike); we then dropped astern, and waited for May's return from the Cambrian. While waiting, an English boat pulled up; found it was a guard-boat. The officer asked me what was the matter; I told him; he returned to the Cambrian. When Mr May came the junks and then we followed; I came ashore in a man-of-war's boat, and on landing wanted to take the Chinamen's tails together that came ashore in her, and found only one or two had tails. I asked, \"How is this?\" when one of the sailors said, \"Here's one of them,\" pulling out a tail from the breast of his shirt. The two men who died at the Station were not any of those men I came ashore with. One of them was brought by a Police-boat, the other man was found the sailors bringing up the Queen's Road; he was quite naked; and seven other prisoners were with him. I escorted them to the station, and took the wounded man to the station Hospital; the boat he came in was one of the cutters; there was an officer in charge of the boat.\n\nD. R. CALDWELL.\n\nDANIEL RICHARD CALDWELL re-examined.--When Mr May left me to go to the man-of-war, he told me to wait till he came back, and watch the boats; he did not give me any other orders.\n\nD. R. CALDWELL.\n\n(16)\n\nJAMES HANWAY PLUMRIDGE sworn,--I am senior officer of H. M. Naval forces in China. On Sunday evening last I was informed by the officer of the watch that Mr May came on board the Cambrian, and made a complaint that some junkmen had been assaulting one gentleman; that his authority was called in question; and that the junkmen would not allow him to come on board; and threatened to fire, and did fire, at him. I sent for Captain Morris, and told what I have stated, and told him to get the boats hoisted out and prepared. He proposed to send a boat or two; I told him No, to send all the boats; not to take the large guns, but to see that they were all armed. These boats I ordered to go in three divisions--the launch, pinnace, and barge; the two cutters and Jolly boat were astern of them and a boat astern of each large boat. I sent for Lieutenant Lloyd, told him of the nature of the complaint that was made, and desired him to back the police, and take any or all of the men on board of the junks and give them in charge of the police. The reason of my sending so large a force was to prevent a loss of life, that the Chinese might submit without resistance when they saw the force. I finished by saying to Mr Lloyd,\n\nWhen you get to the junks, you will divide your boats in two divisions, and you will board on the quarter and opposite quarter; you will board sword in hand; if there is any doubt about the junks, bring them off, and we will anchor them one under each bow of the ship. After the boats had gone, after some time, one boat returned with six Chinese; I told them to take them ashore to the Police, not to let them on board. The reason of my wish for the boats to board was for fear the junks should have cut their cables and gone away; to prevent which I had guns trained aft, and would have fired into them had they attempted to get away. I gave an officer a couple of blue lights, and told him to burn them, in case they did not receive a resistance was made. This signal was not made, because they did receive a resistance was made.\n\n...\n\n(17)\n\nJ. HANWAY PLUMRIDGE.\n\nANDY WILLIAM CHAPMAN WISE sworn,--I am Acting Second Master on Board H. M. S. Cambrian. On Sunday evening last, I was in command of the second cutter under Lieutenant Lloyd. [Gives similar evidence to Lieutenant Lloyd as to the attack and boarding.] When I boarded I saw no Chinese; but I saw our men leading up some prisoners from below. The first men were passed into the second cutter; there were seven of them. I did not see any cutlasses or bayonets used on the deck of the small junk; do not know what took place below. I saw several Chinese jump into the water; there was one that I went after; he was wounded in the shoulder when I picked him up; he was swimming; I think he had a pair of trousers on; I secured his hands and laid him down in the bottom of the boat; I think this man's wound was from a musket bullet. I took the prisoners first on board the Cambrian, and was then told to take them to the Station. There were no shots fired from my boat at any Chinese in the water. After the boarding I heard firing; also heard firing down into the hold of the junk, from her deck. I was in the cutter at this time. I landed the prisoners down to the westward. I saw one or two shots fired either by the Police or our men from the junk at the men in the water.\n\n(18)\n\nW. C. WISE.\n\nROBERT ELLIOT sworn,--I am a midshipman on board H. M. ship Cambrian. On Sunday evening I was in the pinnace under the command of Lieutenant Lloyd; we had the second cutter in tow, and were to board the outward of the two junks after the two signals as previously agreed on were fired. All the boats cheered and gave way alongside; the Chinese fired four or five ginjals, and some small arms; immediately they fired we fired about twenty muskets; we fired in the direction where we saw fire from the junks;\n\nQuestioned by Mr Shortrede--In the junks after we boarded, I saw no Chinese cut down with cutlasses. After we boarded, I heard about eight or nine shots fired at the men in the water; cannot say whether they were fired by the Police or our boats. The reason of the large force I took was in consequence of what I heard the first time from the Police, and after consulting with the Commodore. I did not know at the time that any of the men had their tails cut off. I have since heard such was the case. When I boarded the junk and heard the firing at the people in the water, I sang out as loud as I could to cease firing. None of my men were wounded with shot.\n\nHENRY LLOYD, Lieutenant R.N. H. M. S. Cambrian.\n\n(12)\n\nJOSEPH HENRY JOLLIFFE sworn,--I am first Lieutenant of Marines on board H. M. S. Cambrian. On Sunday evening last, I heard firing ashore. Shortly after Mr May came alongside in the Police-boat; he came on board and spoke to Mr Pulling, the master. In consequence of what he said the boats were ordered out; there were six boats altogether; between twenty-five and thirty marines went in the boats; they had muskets and bayonets; I was in the launch under the command of Lieutenant Lloyd. After we boarded the two junks, some shots were fired from the small junk at something in the water; I was almost certain it was at a man in the water; this shot was fired either by our men or the Police. There were twelve men from the junks put into one of the cutters; Mr Pulling and I were in charge of this cutter. A second cutter under the command of Mr Wise took some more Chinese ashore, and landed lower down than we did; we landed at Mr Bowra's wharf. The Chinese that we brought ashore had blood about them. Coming ashore I saw another Chinaman in the water; we saw him when we shoved off from the junks; I heard one shot fired at this man; there may have been more; this shot either came from a police or man-of-war's boat. Some of the men had their tails cut off; one was cut off in the launch; another I saw cut off in the junk. A seaman cut off these tails in each case; one sailor cut off a tail with his clasp knife; this was in the launch. The prisoners were first handed into the launch and then into the cutter. While the Chinese were in the cutter coming ashore, none of their tails were cut off. I heard on board the vessel that several Chinamen's tails were brought on board the Cambrian; I saw one with Mr Elliot, a midshipman.\n\nQuestioned by Mr Shortrede--After boarding I saw no wounds inflicted by cutlasses. There was nothing said to the junkmen before we boarded them.\n\nJ. H. JOLLIFFE.\n\n(13)\n\nour shot, if any missed, would have gone in the direction of Jardine's. I saw one Chinaman in the water; a Policeman in our boat fired at this man; he struck him; we took the man into the second cutter; I am not positive that the shot was fired from our boat. I got a Chinaman's tail from one of the men on board; he found it in one of the boats.\n\nR. ELLIOT.\n\nJOHN RICKETT sworn,--I heard a ring on Sunday evening last off the Tower Bazaar; went out in the verandah, and just as the last gun was fired, I heard the word \"Lum-chi\" (water-thieves) called out. The sound came from where I heard the ring; the same sound was repeated. After that I went to bed. I was afterwards disturbed, and was told there was firing; after that I thought I heard cheering.\n\nQuestioned by Mr Shortrede--I have been in command of a vessel. Suppose you were in a harbour where a boat came alongside your vessel showing a bright light, and addressing you in a language which you did not understand, would you allow these men, or any of them, to come on board? Certainly not.--Would you, if you thought it necessary to prevent their coming on board, fire at them? I considered that they were thieves and a strong party, and that I could resist them by firing, I would.\n\n1st Lieutenant R. Marines.\n\nWILLIAM BUCHANAN ALEXANDER sworn,--I am a midshipman on board H. M.'s Frigate Cambrian. I was in the launch with Mr Lloyd on Sunday evening last. After I boarded the junks, I saw some shots fired from the junk at some men in the water; I heard, I think, four shots fired either by our men or the police. The jolly-boat under charge of Mr Victor was to look after the men in the water. I saw a Police-boat following me in the water; can't say whether they fired at this man. I did not see any of the Chinamen's tails cut off.\n\nW. B. ALEXANDER, Midshipman.\n\nBy Mr Cairns.--Supposing you were in a part the language of which you did not understand, and that a boat with a light came alongside of your vessel in which an individual speaking a language partially known to you gave you to understand that they were Policemen, would you make the same resistance? No, I should be doubtful what I should do in that case.\n\n(14)\n\nJACOB PHILLIPS sworn,--I live in one of Mr Oswald's houses close to the water. I heard the firing on Sunday evening; it was about three or four hundred yards from my house; this was about eight or quarter past eight. About 11 o'clock we heard another volley, and then a second. I went down to the Pier, and heard the shouting of men, but could not say what it was. I then went down with some friends to Acqui's wharf; heard a shouting of Europeans on board a Chinese vessel, and some shots fired, I think at some men in the water. From the time I heard the volleys until we heard these shots was about half an hour; I heard several balls whistle over my house after the second volley was fired.\n\nJ. PHILLIPS.\n\n(15)\n\nDANIEL RICHARD CALDWELL sworn,--I am Deputy Superintendent of Police. On Sunday night I went with Mr May in the Police-boats to the two junks to take the crews in custody. Mr May's boat was first.\n\n[do in that case]\n\nBy Mr Shortrede--If you had understood that in that part boatmen calling themselves policemen, and in the guise of policemen, were in the habit of boarding such vessels as yours and robbing them, would you resist under these circumstances? I certainly would.\n\n(20)\n\nJNO. RICKETT.\n\nThursday, 19th October.\n\nCHARLES MAY sworn,--I am Superintendent of Police. On Sunday evening last, Deputy Inspector Ryan informed me that Mr Mair and some other gentlemen had been to the Station and made a complaint, that while passing in a small boat in the harbour, a junk threw stones at them. Mr Ryan said he sent a Police-boat with two European Constables and a Chinese interpreter, Poon-chow, in order that the head-men of the junk might be brought to the Station; and came from this boat for further orders, as the Police had stones thrown at them--which orders Mr Ryan came to me to receive. I came to the Station and made more particular inquiries about the case, and ordered two other boats to be manned.\n\n...\n\n297",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-026 - Bonham - 1848 [9-12].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 227671,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-026 - Bonham - 1848 [9-12]",
        "page_number": 365,
        "title": "CO129-026 - Bonham - 1848 [9-12]",
        "content_text": "and in \n\nlocalities unprovided.\n\nE\n\nevent was t words off now, then\n\ncean frève be, mi drtunes, and\n\nbesint there of hendi, hare,\n\nI first cubond the Service- Best for live fortian berd\n\n'\n\nthe Home Authorities 1B CM\n\nGecordas C.P. Pell, Shootivich, coles will\n\n.༡\n\nbe able to audiver\n\nEver, been ma beove\n\nLive\n\nརྙ\n\nand luduaar han\n\ninds ar\n\nنے کی جدا\n\nWith south &\n\n501\n\nIn the percent there the dinne\n\ncode into com freind Consisteration\n\nکہتے سمجھے جو تهران\n\nHour. Cornnande-\n\nسے سمرین کی کم\n\nBin Most Obérient\n\nOlexion.\n\nOpsistant Harten Matter\n\nア\n\n357\n\nMemorandum of Services of Per huntersidered.\n\nJoined - Th. Me. Cutter Louisa\n\nfour the Shirts Abovorombies Webrisson\n\nMbert Secté Come 22nd: took 1856 Lerood. ou board the Cutien devring for whole of\n\nCauben The hostile operations en me Amden bever, was present at the basing of Chumper, the Ragna Gule the first Resend to tune\n\nHunton-\n\nان کیسے کم کے\n\ntur British\n\nemund\n\nلیتے العربی نے ای\n\ndie prisuté that the tramit tried to Set fire to the Bridess Equadron Phon laging in Lan Never-\n\nQurine incles operations fie Louisa toas nominaties ender. no ie Naval Commander,\n\nAdimnale Elliot &after ás Commodore Les Gordon Bremer, moush midipalle\n\ncidaded in the distal Serviers\n\nit city 36 m P\n\nLL\n\n4 Crisé suferintendent of Frade in (in tout on board the Locutor with M. C.\n\n(upte Miot Homorodove si Excion, Kremer\n\nin the\n\ncotiere. The cons totalit, coveted, and-\n\nwinained",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-026 - Bonham - 1848 [9-12].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 232075,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-038 - Sir Bonham - 1851 [10-12] & Public Offices - 1851 [10-12]",
        "page_number": 274,
        "title": "CO129-038 - Sir Bonham - 1851 [10-12] & Public Offices - 1851 [10-12]",
        "content_text": "der Men\n\nThis will be for the consideration of the Treasury.\n\nI believe the statement of des Lena's services to be correct. He was appointed to the Colonial Service in 1841, and has always been highly spoken of by his superiors, including Sir George Bonham.\n\nAn extract from a despatch in 1848.\n\n...\n\nRecommend to the favourable consideration of the Secretary of State.\n\n...\n\nMemorandum of Services of the undersigned.\n\nJoined H.M.S. Cutter Louisa from the Ship Abercrombie Robinson, Robert Scott Commander, Nov. 22nd, 1839. Served on board the Cutter during the whole of the operations in the Canton River; was present at the taking of Chuenpee and the Bogue Forts, the first and second capture of Canton, was off the British Factories on the night that the enemy attempted to burn the British squadron, then lying in the River.\n\nDuring these operations, the Louisa was frequently tender to the Naval Commander-in-Chief, Admiral Elliot, and afterwards to Commodore Sir Gordon Bremer, though principally engaged in the despatch service of H.M. Plenipotentiary and Chief Superintendent of Trade in China.\n\nThe undersigned was on board the Louisa with H.E. Capt. Elliot, and Commodore Sir Gordon Bremer, in the Typhoon of the 21st July, 1841, when she was totally wrecked, and remained prisoner in the hands of the Chinese until ransomed: this caused the undersigned a severe attack of fever, and considerable expense at Macao.\n\nOn the 1st of August 1841, the undersigned was appointed by H.E. Sir Henry Pottinger, Bart., at the recommendation...",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-038 - Sir Bonham - 1851 [10-12] & Public Offices - 1851 [10-12].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 237168,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-052 - Sir Bowring - 1855 [9-12]",
        "page_number": 290,
        "title": "CO129-052 - Sir Bowring - 1855 [9-12]",
        "content_text": "40\n\n(Copy) H: 651.\n\nSir,\n\nColonial Secretary's Office\nVictoria, Hongkong,\n13th November 1855.\n\nI have the honor to request you will at your very earliest convenience furnish me with your remarks on the following extract from a letter recently received by His Excellency, Sir John Bowring from His Excellency Commodore Elliot.\n\n\"Ihre In Lave, at that time the United States Commissioner to China, had an interview with Mr. Bridges, then, as I am informed, Acting Attorney General and legal adviser of the Crown, and it was understood that Mr. Bridges...\n\nThe Hon'ble. W. J. Bridges, Esquire,\nActing Attorney General.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-052 - Sir Bowring - 1855 [9-12].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 237169,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-052 - Sir Bowring - 1855 [9-12]",
        "page_number": 291,
        "title": "CO129-052 - Sir Bowring - 1855 [9-12]",
        "content_text": "42.\n\n\"Conceded the facts as contended for by me, and promised that these 'Matters' should thereafter be left to the 'Covenant, in their further attempt at interference.\"\n\nYou are of course acquainted with the facts under discussion between the United State Authorities and the Government, and it is only necessary for me to explain that the vessels referred to by Commodore Elliot are those of the \"Florida Bates\" and the \"N. B. Palmer\".\n\nAs the Commodore's statement is at variance with that which I have received verbally from you, I directed by His Excellency, the Governor, to call upon you to give your recollection of the interview with Mr. Law, and its result.\n\n43.\n\nI have again to request the receipt of your reply with as little delay as possible!\n\nI have, &c.,\n\n(Signed) W. J. Mercer\n\nColonial Secretary.\n\nTrue Copy\n\nColonial Secretary.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-052 - Sir Bowring - 1855 [9-12].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 237170,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-052 - Sir Bowring - 1855 [9-12]",
        "page_number": 292,
        "title": "CO129-052 - Sir Bowring - 1855 [9-12]",
        "content_text": "44.\n\n(Copy) M: 654.\n\n283\n\ndir,\n\n1\n\nGovernment Officer, Victoria. \"Houghing,\"\n\n14th November 1855.\n\nI have the honour to acknowledge receipt of Your Excellency's letter of the 8th instant, and to express my regret that, owing to the absence of my chief Officers of the Colony to whom I had occasion to refer, I have been unable to forward an earlier reply.\n\nI now beg to transmit the enclosed. Mr. Bridges's recollections of his interview with His Excellency, Mr. Lane, and a letter from Mr. Superintendent May, forwarding Mr. Grandy's statement of the part taken by himself in the case of Madam Love. To His Excellency Commodore J. Elliot,",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-052 - Sir Bowring - 1855 [9-12].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 238498,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-055 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [3-5]",
        "page_number": 320,
        "title": "CO129-055 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [3-5]",
        "content_text": "312\n\nAppendix II. (No. I. The reasons assigned in Mr Rienaecker's Letter of the 8th January, 1856, to the Colonial Secretary, and 16.)\n\ncorroborated by all but one of the witnesses (unless we also except another witness, who admits the duty, but appears to doubt the readiness of the Government), appear to us conclusive in favor of the opinion which we ourselves have formed, that the Government of this Island ought to undertake the entire construction of the Praya, and that in no other way can the purposes, which have urged the Government to propose the work, be accomplished. The state of the shore, so alarming to the public health, calls for immediate measures of prevention. The crimes and disorders which occur daily and nightly amongst the dense Chinese population of this city, demand that whatever measures facilitate the approach and action of the police, ought to be commenced and executed with all possible despatch. The danger of conflagration, so terribly recalled to our apprehension last month, must be considered as normal amongst a population inhabiting tenements constructed of fragile and inflammable materials, and nearly destitute of the means of access to the water. The necessity to commerce of an uninterrupted and a public communication with the sea are pressing and obvious. But whilst all these considerations demonstrate that it is the duty of Government to take the shortest and speediest way to the completion of the project, they seem also to impose the condition that the work shall be done efficiently and securely, and with an inflexible regard to uniformity in the execution.\n\nThe solitary witness, who thinks that some saving in the contract price may be effected by substituting the Marine-Lotholders as Contracting Parties in the place of the Government, and investing them with all the powers and rights of Government for the purposes of such contracts as they shall be able to make, is himself so strongly impressed with the force of the above-mentioned objections, as to admit that, even if his suggestion be adopted, it will still be necessary that the work should be commenced at the time, and completed in the manner, which the Surveyor-General may direct—that the Surveyor-General's eye should be constantly directed to it whilst in progress—and that \"if it be left to the Marine-Lotholders themselves, it will never be done at all.\" It is obvious that the variance between Mr Pustan's evidence and the great body of the evidence taken by us upon this First Point of Enquiry, is more apparent than real. A work so conducted as Mr Pustan proposes is, at least, a work undertaken on the part of Government, and differing from a work directly undertaken by Government, only in respect of a certain want of unity in the initiation of the work, and in the division of the expense of it; and in both of these respects, we think, the preference is clearly due to the latter—an opinion which we have the satisfaction to find is unequivocally confirmed by the great body of evidence before us.\n\nII. Some difference of views amongst the Marine-Lotholders was naturally to be anticipated upon the question as to the conditions of tenure of lands reclaimed or to be reclaimed from the sea. In one respect only they appeared to be unanimous—in ignoring the fact that at present the Crown alone has title to all such lands, whether already reclaimed, or unreclaimed, and that the Crown will continue to have title to the latter after the same shall have been reclaimed by the Crown itself, or by persons not having title to those lands against the Crown, or authority under it. This common error was the source of the numerous fallacies to be detected in their evidence on the subject of their claims, real or supposed, to the equitable consideration of Government. The jealous eye of the law scans a grant from the Crown with great rigor, and reads it in quite another light from that of a grant made by subject to subject. 5 Bac: Abr: Prerogative In the latter case the rule is, that \"a deed shall be taken most strongly against the grantor,\" i.e., the subject; in the former case the rule is, that a deed shall be taken most strongly for the grantor,\" i.e., the Crown. This is the principle upon which that other well-settled doctrine is grounded, that \"in the construction of its deed of grant nothing shall be implied against the Crown,\" and again, the doctrine that, \"unless where expressly provided to the contrary, the Crown retains all its prerogative rights in respect of the thing granted.\"\n\n17 Edw: 11, st: 2, c. 15.\n\nThere is no difficulty in the application of these familiar and wise maxims of constitutional law.\n\n\"Public notice and Declaration, &c of We have it in evidence that even at the time of the first notification of the intentions of Captain Elliot to hold the first land sales that were ever effected in this Colony, the community were not suffered to be ignorant that no 1st May 1841. Appendix II, (No. 1); and lands would be allotted here but with a general reservation of all Her Majesty's rights according to the principles and practice of British Law, upon tenure to the Crown,\" and, before all, pending Her Majesty's further pleasure.\" Sec Laws of Hongkong, P. 3.\n\n\"and no occupancy respected,\" until evidenced by the execution of a Crown Grant, and perfected by Registration of Extract from Terms the Grant \"in the Government Office.\" The first land sale took place on the 14th June 1841. The Terms of Sale of Sale,' &c. Appendix were read to the bidders before the commencement of the proceedings, and they were expressly informed by that I, (No. 3) and see document that whilst the sea-frontage of each lot was nearly ascertained, the depth from the sea would necessarily 'Laws of Hongkong, vary considerably,\" and \"the actual extent of each lot\" being still unascertained, \"the parties would have the oppor- p. 4. tunity of observing the extent for themselves.\" They were further informed, that the Crown Grant, the sole evidence of title, would not be issued to any purchaser until \"the precise measurement and registration of the lots should be completed,\" and that, on his side, the purchaser would not, until delivery of his Crown Grant, be called on to pay the rent for the first year, \"reckoning from the date of Sale\" of his lot.\n\nSir Henry Pottinger, the first Governor of this Colony, and with whom we find that the wise and far-reaching project of a Praya first originated, was even more careful than Captain Elliot to preclude the possibility of all popular error as to the rights and intentions of the Crown in this matter. Referring to the important \"Government Notification\" of the 22nd March, 1842, we learn that, at that early date, whilst as yet not a Crown Grant had been issued, the Allottees of Marine-Lots already sold, and the future bidders for such as remained to be sold, were distinctly apprised that \"the reclaiming of land beyond high-water mark must be deemed an infringement on the Royalties of Her Majesty, (and it is therefore positively prohibited) by any private persons.\"\n\nDuring the whole of the period intervening between the date of that paper and the first issue of Crown Grants to the occupants, we have failed to discover any trace whatever of the revocation of that Public Announcement, or even of any connivance being extended by the Authorities to encroachments or purprestures upon the domains of the Crown, seaward or landward. A highly respectable witness, however, whose principal establishments being at Canton and Macao during that time imposed upon him the necessity of spending the greater part of his time at those ports, intimated his very strong impression that there was some distinct encouragement held out to himself and other purchasers during that period, and even after the delivery of their Crown Grants, to reclaim as much and as far as they pleased towards the sea,\" subject however to \"the risk of the reclaimed land being resumed by Government, if wanted for public purposes,\" and without any promise of compensation for it, if resumed. It is obvious that, even if the recollection of this gentleman were so far supported by documentary or other evidence, as to establish against the Crown and in favor of himself and those particular occupants who may have acted upon the alleged encouragement, a case of royal conscience and equity, the reservations appended would reduce the case to an almost infinitesimal value. But we must observe—(1.) that we can find no vestige of any Notification,\" or \"Circular,\" printed or in manuscript, bearing on this point, except those already cited, which bear altogether the other way; (2.) that it is an error to suppose that, in 1844, or at any period however early in the history of this Colony, a \"Government Gazette\" and the printing of Government Notifications did not exist, or that such Notifications, if made, were not printed; (3.) that if even the Queen's representatives were under the necessity of reserving the Queen's further pleasure\" in their official and authoritative announcements on the subject of tenure, the community ought to have known that the Land Officer, Captain Mylins, and his successor, Captain Meik, could not possibly be authorized to hold out encouragements, private or public, in derogation at once of those Notifications of the representatives of the Crown, and of the prerogatives of the Crown itself; and (4) that the reference to a supposed stipulation in an early Crown Grant to the same effect, a reference afterwards admitted tacitly to the same effect, a reference afterwards admitted tacitly to have been made in error, makes it very probable that the entire impression which Mr Edger entertains on this subject may, at this distance of time, be very easily accounted for, if we remember that the form of the Crown Grant, a form which has never varied since the first issue, does contain a kind of stipulation within the boundaries of the registered lot (but not beyond them), subject of course to the usual right of the Crown or \"encouragement\" to reclaim or improve, and indeed to build upon the lands granted and lying to resume the whole or any portion of the lot upon three months' notice, and equitable compensation, to be determined by the Surveyor-General; and that it is very likely that the witness, speaking from memory, may have erroneously supposed that the clauses in question applied also to the sea-shore lying beyond the boundaries of the Lot.\n\nThe form of Crown Grant to which we have just alluded was first settled in 1844; and, in that year, the first issue and registration of Crown Grants took place. The Crown Grants continued to be issued and registered during the whole of that year and the next, and thus the titles of the occupants, under the old acknowledgements of their biddings, were at length made perfect. We perceive in the circumstances which ensued upon this promulgation of the form of Crown Grant another proof that, down to this time at least, no Marine-Lot-holder had felt himself in any way encouraged to encroach upon the sea, or had doubted in the least the precariousness of a tenure from the Crown subjected since its origin to \"the Queen's pleasure, the reservation of all Her Majesty's rights, the British Law and practice, and the positive prohibition of reclaiming land beyond high-water mark by any private persons as an infringement of the Royalties of the Crown.\"\n\nWe find that the terms of the \"title\" now about to be exchanged for the old \"acknowledgement,\" did, in 1844, excite complaints on the part of the Marine-Lotholders. But we also find that these complaints had no reference to the limitation of \"boundaries\" seaward or landward, as contained in the Grants, nor to the right of resumption thereby vested in the Crown, nor to the paramount claims therein asserted on behalf of public purposes\" over personal privileges, nor even to the absolute powers in respect of those reservations and thereby bestowed upon the Queen's Surveyor-General, nor indeed to any matter bearing upon the present question of Marine-Lotholders, in the slightest degree. We find that a former letter of Captain Elliot was made the groundwork of complaint. But in Appendix II, (No. 6.) we also find that in that letter only one subject is discussed, and that one entirely foreign to our enquiry. Captain Elliot had there held out some \"encouragement\" for the hope that \"the Queen's further pleasure\" might operate to the advantage of the first buyers of lots, Inland and Marine, in the way either of reduction of Quit Rent, or of transmutation into a fee simple tenure. The promulgation of the form of Crown Grant had dissipated those hopes. It was of that disappointment that the Thirteen Firms of Marine-Lotholders complained, and only of that one. \"the faith of that pledge,\" as they termed it, they told Sir Henry Pottinger that they had, down to that date, (the 4th March, 1844,) expended \"on sea-walls, warehouses, and dwellings, very considerable sums.\"\n\nExpressio unius est Hongkong,' p. 3; see Appendix II, (No. 6.) exclusio alterius. If encouragements of any other kind had been held out to them, either to build sea walls,\" or to do any other work seaward of their Northern boundaries, it is clear from this document that they had not thought themselves safe in relying upon those encouragements, and in commencing those works. The personal testimony of Marine-Lotholders themselves confirms the inferences which we have deduced. The Honble. Mr Edger, whose recollections go back to a period anterior to the formation of the Colony, \"thinks that no land at all was reclaimed \"(from the sea) before Leases were issued,\" and that indeed \"sea-walls were made before the issue of leases, but in general between the limits of the land that was measured off;\" and Mr Antrobus, whose own encroachments on the sea-shore date but from 1854, states that \"he is not aware whether any land was reclaimed from the sea before his arrival here, rather more than five years ago.\" Such being the case before the issue, what was to result from a \"title\" so onerous as that which was now to be forced upon them? If any regard we had to the strength of language, we must suppose that the Crown Grant was viewed, from its first promulgation, not only as no \"encouragement\" to costly and unauthorized encroachments upon the Marine domain of Her Majesty, but as the utter bar to all improvements whatsoever, even within the surveyed and registered boundaries of the grantee's own Lot. \"Had they been previously aware,\" say the Thirteen Firms of Marine-Lotholders,\" of the conditions now proposed, they certainly should not have expended one farthing on buildings at Hongkong.\"\n\nOn the other hand, every one of Sir Henry Pottinger's acts and words at this very juncture is utterly inconsistent with the notion that he entertained any doubt himself, or had led others into any doubt, as to his line of conduct with respect to the rights of the Crown to the sea-shore in front of the Marine Lots. His Excellency's decision on the subject already cited was notorious to the whole community. Among the principal works which, at his request, the Land Officer, Mr Gordon proposed to undertake, and which Sir Henry Pottinger referred home with approbation, but for lack of the means could not undertake without the authority and assistance of Her Majesty's Imperial Government, a prominent place was given to the following project: \"a space of land to be reclaimed from the sea in front of Government Hill, to form a Public Landing-place, with an Esplanade or Public Walk; a Praya to be carried out in front of all the buildings, both Eastward to the Point, the property of Messrs Jardine & Co., and Westward as far as Navy Bay, or four miles between the two extremities, the land thus reclaimed to form a number of Marine Lots; \"a public roadway close to the sea, of fifty feet in width to be left on the Praya, and the space between that and the houses to be the private property of the possessors of the Lots assisting in carrying out the plan paying a proportion of the expenses, and for whatever land they gained of course charged at the same rate as for the rent of the Lots.\" That the fact of such a proposal having been made, and the details of it were no secret to the community at the time, or even long afterwards, may be very fairly inferred from Mr Montgomery Martin's once celebrated Report, compiled by him within six weeks of his arrival here in the following year, when Sir John Davis had succeeded Sir Henry Pottinger in the Government of this Island. That Report contains a direct but sneering allusion to the Praya, amongst other valuable projects of Sir Henry Pottinger, all of which are ridiculed by Mr Martin, little dreaming how many of his sarcasms were soon to be refuted by the literal fulfilment of the projects. Whilst the notoriety of the fact is proved by the boldness of the sarcasm, the mild and temperate rebuke which is contained in the observations of Sir John Davis in reply, and which, together with the attack, will be found in the Appendix, is, on its side, a proof that his Government and that of his predecessor were agreed in their opinions as to the policy to be followed with respect to Crown rights to the sea-shore, and the propriety of commencing the Praya, as projected by the latter, so soon as the finances of the Colony would permit, but without impeding the construction of the other public works and improvements enumerated in Mr Martin's Report.\n\nNothing indeed but the financial difficulties under which, even in Sir Henry Pottinger's time, the Colony had been laboring, and which were greatly and notoriously aggravated in later years, appears to have led to the delay in carrying his project into execution. The formation of such a work had been strongly urged upon the Admiralty by Commodore Sir Edward Belcher, R.N., then commanding a squadron in the China Seas. It had been notified by a Government Circular to all the leading mercantile firms, perhaps to all the mercantile firms without distinction then carrying on business, and many of whom we perceive now represent themselves to be hostile to the formation of a Praya, except on the condition of being allowed to monopolise the whole benefit so far as their sea-frontage extends, with an entire exemption from Quit Rent, and without being called upon to defray any portion of the cost. Yet the project of those days had the remarkable fate of being received by them with an almost unanimous adhesion.\n\nCircular Letter of Out of eight firms, themselves Marine-Lotholders, whose replies have been recorded in the Land Office, only one Me Gordon, dated 28th (that of Messrs Holliday, Wise & Co.,) hesitated \"to add to their already heavy expenditure,\" and to incur April 1843, in Append. the loss of privacy and convenience, to say nothing of the profits of wharfage,\" privileges which they were 1, (No. 10.) nevertheless ready and willing to forego for the public advantage.\" All the rest signified their consent and proffered their co-operation. They were willing to do it at their own expense to renounce the formation of private wharves, in favor of the common advantage. They had the welfare of the community at heart, not their own individual profit. One highly respectable firm, to whom the Circular was sent, but who do not appear to have returned a direct answer, nevertheless took the opportunity, in reference to another question then at issue between themselves and the local Government on the subject of an alleged encroachment by the Land Officer upon their Southern frontage, thus to express their highly creditable repugnance to all purprestures and encroachments whatever. Messrs Dent & Co. say that the boundary marks (granite blocks) on their Water-front Lots, marked Nos. 3 and 4, and 4 and 5, were at that time in the exact situation where they were placed by the Officers of Government, and also on the spot where the \"pickets were placed on the day of public sale, when they made the purchase.\" They remark, that \"the quantity of water-frontage which they purchased was not a matter of speculation in land, but that they confined their purchase to \"what was strictly and indispensably necessary for their establishment, and had not sought to increase their interest in \"such land elsewhere. Nothing short of such reasons,\" they conclude, \"would have induced them to solicit the consideration of Government to their case, it being far from their wish or intention either to ask for anything more that (sic) what they had considered to be their actual right, or in the most remote manner to stand in the way of public \"Improvement.\" It is, we think, impossible better to describe the relative positions of Crown, Crown tenants, and the public.\n\nThis general concurrence of the Government and Community of Hongkong on the subject of the Praya, did not fail to impress the Secretary of State very strongly in favor of the measure. But the project required some consideration, and His Lordship's friendly feeling towards it was at first evinced only by privately transmitting to Sir Henry Pottinger some corroborating testimony from another quarter in favor of the project. In the following year, however, his decision was officially announced. The utmost approbation was bestowed on the works projected, especially the Praya—the Governor was invited to send home the necessary Reports and Plans;—but the question was asked whether there were the necessary funds for the execution,\" and a clear intimation was given that to the Marine Lots, rather than to the Imperial Treasury, His Excellency must be prepared to have recourse for the means whereby the Praya might be executed at the least possible\" cost to the public.\" The matter of necessity rested there until the pecuniary difficulty could be overcome. Owing to circumstances too well known to need recapitulation, it was not fully overcome until the end of our last financial year. Your Excellency is the first Governor who has been able to decline the Parliamentary Grant, and this is the first year in which you have been able to decline it.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-055 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [3-5].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 238779,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-056 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [6]",
        "page_number": 188,
        "title": "CO129-056 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [6]",
        "content_text": "8+\n\n£70212\n\nSHIPPING INTELLIGENCE.\n\nThe Hongkong Register.\n\nARRIVED.\n\n  \n    DATE\n    NAME\n    FROM\n    SAILED\n    CAPTAIN\n    CARGO\n    CONSIGNEE\n  \n  \n    May 10\n    Levant\n    Shanghai\n    April 29\n    Allmaun\n    Sundries\n    John Burd and Co\n  \n  \n    13\n    Eaglet\n    New York\n    Nov. 13\n    Smith\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    13\n    Eatont\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    Dent and Co\n  \n  \n    13\n    Vinder\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    Jardine, M. and Co\n  \n  \n    19\n    Wild Dayrell\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    Jardine, M. and Co\n  \n  \n    13\n    Masick\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    13\n    Melanie\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    13\n    Nina\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    14\n    Lanesfell\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    14\n    Antelope\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    14\n    Roehampton\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n\nPage 363\n\n  \n    DATE\n    NAME\n    FROM\n    SAILED\n    CAPTAIN\n    CARGO\n    CONSIGNEE\n  \n  \n    May 14\n    Evening Star\n    Shanghai\n    April 29\n    Roberts\n    \n    Lyall, Still and Co\n  \n  \n    14\n    Alligator\n    \n    \n    Mu\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    14\n    Casrier\n    \n    \n    Rodgers\n    \n    Fletcher and Co\n  \n  \n    14\n    Louise Sophie\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    16\n    Neptun\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    15\n    Sancho Panza\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    15\n    Daring\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    15\n    Bayadere\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    16\n    Resolute\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    15\n    P'engula\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n\nPage 363\n\n  \n    DATE\n    NAME\n    FROM\n    SAILED\n    CAPTAIN\n    CARGO\n    CONSIGNEE\n  \n  \n    May 10\n    Mazuppa\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    17\n    Hermanu\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    19\n    Surpos\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    19\n    Hervalos\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    16\n    Constancia\n    Amoy\n    April 29\n    Denia\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    18\n    Sen Rainger\n    \n    \n    Larpoor\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    April 29\n    Vindex\n    Shanghai\n    April 26\n    Shungase\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    27\n    Comet\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    28\n    Lorenza\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    May 7\n    Roa\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n\nSAILED.\n\n  \n    DATE\n    NAME\n    TON\n    MASTERS\n    FOR\n    CARGO\n    CONSIGNEE\n  \n  \n    May 8\n    Henry Miller\n    \n    Putt\n    Manila\n    Sundries\n    Dent and Co\n  \n  \n    12\n    Fncounter\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    12\n    Starr King\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    13\n    Congo\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n\nPage 364\n\n  \n    DATE\n    NAME\n    TON\n    MASTERS\n    FOR\n    CARGO\n    CONSIGNEE\n  \n  \n    May 14\n    Queen Margaret\n    538\n    Spence\n    Manila\n    Sundries\n    John Burd and Co\n  \n  \n    14\n    Hellespont\n    336\n    Keya\n    Shanghai\n    Sundries\n    L. J. Gutierrez\n  \n  \n    14\n    Cometa\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    14\n    Kroo!\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    14\n    Theodora\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    15\n    Ellen\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    15\n    Sophia Fraser\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    18\n    Black Warrior\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    18\n    Hamlison\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    18\n    Amistad\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n\nPage 364\n\n  \n    DATE\n    NAME\n    TON\n    MASTERS\n    FOR\n    CARGO\n    CONSIGNEE\n  \n  \n    May 18\n    Sarah Warren\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    18\n    Chieftain\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    18\n    Trees\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    18\n    Launceston\n    \n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n\nSHIPS OF WAR.\n\n  \n    GUNS\n    COMMANDER\n    AT\n  \n  \n    Pique, ship\n    36\n    F. W. Nickson\n    Hongkong\n  \n  \n    Bellona, ship\n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    Syblle, ship\n    \n    Comodore Elliot\n    \n  \n  \n    Christiana, barque\n    American\n    Bllis, Master\n    Hongkong\n  \n  \n    \n    18\n    Smith\n    \n  \n  \n    \n    \n    Hon N. Stewart\n    \n  \n  \n    Sibylle, Frigate\n    50\n    Captain Maison\n    Japan\n  \n  \n    \n    \n    therve\n    \n  \n  \n    Virginie, Frigate\n    50\n    Captain Wilson\n    \n  \n  \n    \n    12\n    Bernard\n    Macao\n  \n  \n    \n    14\n    Bave\n    \n  \n  \n    Juzona, Frigate\n    Portagnese\n    20\n    Lopez\n    \n  \n\nMERCHANT VESSELS.\n\n  \n    DATE\n    NAME\n    AT\n    TON\n    MASTERS\n    CARGO\n    CONSIGNEE\n  \n  \n    April 29\n    Alligator, brig\n    Hongkong\n    189\n    Sinden\n    \n    Gibb, Livingston and Co\n  \n  \n    May 1\n    106\n    Caes\n    \n    Lyall, Still and Co\n    \n  \n  \n    5\n    11\n    Deza\n    \n    Order\n    \n  \n  \n    Sept. 26\n    43\n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n\nNOTICES OF FIRMS.\n\nNOTICE\n\nMRS. MACKRILL SMITH is authorised to Sign the Name of our Firm in China.\n\nKING & Co.\n\nCanton, 13th March, 1856.\n\nNOTICE.\n\nMR. LUDWIG WIESE is admitted a Partner in our Firm.\n\nSIEMSSEN & Co.,\n\nCanton, 31st March, 1855.\n\nNOTICE.\n\nN. WEISMANN, is this day admitted a Partner in our Firm in China.\n\nREISS and Co.\n\nCanton, 1st May, 1855.\n\nTRUSTEES-Hon. DAVID JARDINE, Esq., U. D. W. McCALMONT\n\nE. Hon. W. T. MERCER Esq., R. H. WALES\n\nSuperintendent of the P. & G. Steam Navigation Company, &c., &c.\n\nTREASURER-G. BENTHAM, Esq.\n\nRESIDENT SURGEON-W. A. HARLAND, M.D.\n\nTERMS OF ADMISSION.\n\nPublic Wards..\n\nIntermediate Wards,\n\nPrivate Rooms,\n\n.. $1\n\nper day.\n\n.. $2\n\nper day.\n\n.. $5\n\nper day.\n\nPATIENTS are also admitted on deposits, at the following\n\nrates:-\n\nPublic Wards..\n\nIntermediate..\n\nPrivate Rooms,\n\n.. $16\n\n.. $20\n\n.. $30\n\nTO BE SOLD OR LET.\n\nApply to\n\nDROM, GRAY & Co.\n\nShaughae, 8th February, 1855.\n\nFOR SALE.\n\nINSURANCES.\n\nTHE LONDON AND ORIENTAL STEAM TRANSIT INSURANCE OFFICE.\n\n(Established in 1843)\n\nNo. 1320\n\nROBERT S. WALLER, Hongkong.\n\nE. WANDEN, Shanghai.\n\nH.T. MASALL. Singapore.\n\nA. P. Love, Calcutta.\n\nROBERT FRANCK, Madras, or James Arnot, Bombay.\n\nJAMES HARTLEY & Co. London, 8th January, 1854.\n\nALLIANCE FIRE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF LONDON.\n\nW. immediate cases, 4 STAMPED THE DWELLING HOUSE and BUSINESS PREMISES of the undersigned, together with the adjoining LAND in the rear of the Godowns, situated in a most eligible position, and fronting the River,\n\nCHINA for The above COMPANY, are prepared to accept ASSURANCES as follows:-\n\n1st-On Buildings of Brick or Stone, covered with Tiles, Slates, Metal, or other fire-resisting Material, together with their Contents, when such Buildings are isolated from all others,--Rate of Premium, 1 per cent per annum.\n\n2. On such Buildings and their Contents, when not so isolated, at per cent 2 per annum.\n\nAssurances for 6 Months 1, and for 3 Months §.\n\nAnnual rate will be charged.\n\nThe Captains or Consignees of Vessels must be responsible for the expenses of Patients sent by them to the HOSPITAL.\n\nTO LET.\n\nA Hospital Building to be receipted by the Superintendent only.\n\nSituated on part of Marine Lot No. 15. True Bay only.\n\nSHIPPING.\n\nSTEAM COMMUNICATION\n\nbetween\n\nHONGKONG AND CANTON,\n\nTUTE WILLAMETTE.\n\nCaptain W. Conrad, having been fitted up expressly for the River Passenger Traffic, will now run regularly between the above Places, as follows, viz:--\n\nFrom Hongkong to Canton.\n\nevery MONDAY & TUESDAY, at 6 o'clock ..\n\nFrom Canton to Hongkong.\n\nEvery TUESDAY & FRIDAY, at 6 o'clock ..\n\nFare for Passengers-\n\nEuropean, First-class,\n\nChinese,\n\n$5 each.\n\n$3 each.\n\nEuropean, Second-class,\n\nChinese,\n\n$2 each.\n\n$1 each.\n\nCHANGE FOR REFRESHMENTS, Breakfast, &c., (including Wine and Beer)...\n\n4d:1\n\nOwing to the Willamette's large Cargo Capacity, it is intended that she shall carry Cargo on Freight, as per separate Tariff, to be had on application to the Agents.\n\nCargo, when safely large quantities, will be delivered alongside Vessels, if practicable.\n\nTowage\n\nWill be furnished on Moderate Terms; and intending Consignees will, when possible, be informed by Circular as soon as any such Service has been engaged for.\n\nFor further particulars, apply to the Agents,\n\nROBERT S. WALKER, Hongkong,\n\nMAXIMILIAN FISCHER, Canton.\n\nHongkong, 24th December, 1855.\n\nNOTICES OF FIRMS.\n\nMR. A. J. CAMPBELL is authorized to sign our Firm\n\nFLETCHER. & Co.\n\nCanton, 1st February, 1856.\n\nNOTICE\n\nMR. JAMES McCORMICK, is authorized to sign our\n\nALVORD & Co.\n\nCanton, 12th January, 1856.\n\nTERMS OF SUBSCRIPTION to the HONGKONG REGISTER and OVERLAND REGISTER AND PRICE CURRENT-For One Year, $20; Six Months, $10; Three Months, $6. To the HONGKONG REGISTER For One Year, $12; Six Months, $7; Three Months, $4. To the OVERLAND REGISTER AND PRICE CURRENT also For One Year, $8; all payable in advance.\n\nAGENTS for the HONGKONG REGISTER and OVERLAND REGISTER AND PRICE CURRENT, -J. G. ANTHONS, Esq., London; Messrs. JARDINE, MATHESON & Co., Calcutta; Messrs. BORRADAILLE & Co. Bombay W. S. DUNCAN, Esq., Singapore; Messrs. THOMPSON, ROWES & Co., Batavia; J. P. FUDA, Esq. San Francisco.\n\nEdited, Printed, and Published by ROBERT STRACHAN, at the Hongkong Register Office: Gage Street,\n\nVictoria, Hongkong, Tuesday, May 20, 1856.\n\nNOTICE.\n\nMR. HERMAN NOTMAN, having taken charge of the\n\nAgency, has ceased to sign our Firm.\n\nMR. COYLE HEBBENBR has been authorised to sign with Firm, per Procuration\n\nL.E. LEBERT\n\nCanton, 8th December, 1855.\n\nNOTICE.\n\nOXFORD.\n\nFor particulars apply to\n\nJARDINE, MATHESON & Co.\n\nHongkong, 7th March 1855.\n\nFOR SALE,\n\nSUPERIOR TINTO and WHITE WINE, in Casks\n\nex Brigrs from Lisbon.\n\nApply to\n\nBRANDAO & Co., Canton,\n\nJ. C. LUIZ DA SILVA, Macao,\n\nM. DE CARVALHO, Hongkong,\n\nHongkong, 6th March, 1856.\n\nFOR SALE.\n\nFRENCH COGNACS.\n\nCHAMPAGNE, BRANDY, PORT WINE, PALE and GOLD HERRIES,\n\nCLARETS of Superior quality, Chateau, Margaux, Mouton. St. Estephe, &c. Julian, and Leoville.\n\nApply in Hongkong and Canton\n\nLYALL, STILL & Co.\n\nHongkong, 7th September, 1855.\n\nFOR SALE,\n\n500 Bags Eureka Mill, Superfine Selected,\n\nSAN FRANCISCO FLOUR.\n\nApply to\n\nF. & D. N. CANJOC and Co.\n\nFR GRATIAM ANDERSON joined me as a Partner:\n\non the 1st of January last.\n\nThe business will be carried on in the name of D. W. MACKENZIE & Co.\n\nCanton, 5th March, 1856.\n\nD. W. MACKENZIE.\n\nALEX. WILSON, Agents, JARDINE, MATHESON & Co.'s Godowns,\n\nEast Point, 1st October, 1855.\n\nFOR SALE.\n\nDESTROYERS and Labuan STEAMERS' QUALITY.\n\nApply to\n\nLINDSAY & Co.\n\nHongkong, October, 1855\n\nZINC SHEATHING, AND NAILS FOR SALE,\n\nWILLIAMS, ANTHON & Co.\n\nFOR SALE SUPERIOR MADEIRA in Pipes, Half and Quarter\n\nPipes, apply to\n\nALEX. WILSON, Messrs. JARDINE, MATHESON & Co.'s\n\nGodowns.\n\nEast Point, 1st October, 1855.\n\nFOR SALE.\n\nSUPERIOR PORT WINE in quarter Casks, from the\n\nROYAL PORTO WINE COMPANY—just received.\n\nALEX WILSON, Messrs. JARDINE, MATHESON & Co.'s Godowns.\n\nEast Point, 15th February, 1856.\n\nINSURANCES.\n\nNOTICE.\n\nOf the 1st Class-Assurances, for the present, will be accepted to the extent of £10,000 only on one risk. And of the 2nd Class-To the extent of £8,000.\n\nAssurances on Buildings and their Contents when together form one Risk. Thus to above Sums may be underwritten either on a Building alone, or the Contents alone; or, part on the Building, and part on the Contents.\n\nNo Assurance is to be considered in force until the Premium be paid.\n\nAmongst other advantages of the Company, the Assured be entitled to participate in the Profits after Five successive payments.\n\nJARDINE, MATHESON & Co., Agents in China.\n\n[Hongkong, 1st January, 1845,\n\nLONDON AND ORIENTAL STEAM TRANSIT INSURANCE OFFICE.\n\nand after this day, M. MAXIMILIAN FISCHER\n\non\n\nCanton, is empowered to sign\n\nPOLICIES\n\nROBERT S. WALKER, Agent.\n\nHongkong, 3d March 1854.\n\nMISCELLANEOUS.\n\nNOTICE.\n\nTHE LIBRARY OF THE MORRISON EDUCATION SOCIETY, now deposited in a Room in the Chinese\n\nHall, is open every day, from 1 to 4 o'clock p.m., to Members of the Society, for the giving out and exchange of Books. Non-members of the Society, may obtain the advantages of the Library, on payment of an Annual Subscription of $5.\n\nBy order of the Trustees,\n\nHongkong, 28th October, 1855.\n\nJAMES LEGGE,\n\nSecretary\n\nHOME EDUCATION, CHELTENHAM.\n\nLADY, the Widow of a Clergyman, who has\n\nresided in the East, is desirous of receiving Pupils to educate with her own children, with the assistance of a resident Governess.\n\nFurther particulars and references will be obtained on application to the Hongkong Register Office.\n\nNOTICE\n\nTHE undersigned has received authority by the last Mail to make all LOSSES ON POLICIES issued here by the above Office, payable in THREE Months after notice, in place of Six Months as heretofore.\n\nHongkong. 6th June, 1856,\n\nNOTICE.\n\nROB. S. WALKER,\n\nAgent.\n\nLONDON ASSURANCE CORPORATION, Established by Charter 1720.\n\nTestimonial to be presented to Mr ROBERT RIENAECKEL, now lying at the \"VICTORIA LIBRARY\n\nRooms.\n\nFor Signature.\"\n\nHongkong, 1st March, 1856.\n\nBOARD AND EDUCATION.\n\nREV. ARTHUR TAYLOR, has a few vacancies for the Admission into his family of the children of English Parents at the Free Ports, who may be desirous of securing for them the comforts of a HOME, and the Advantages of a LIBERAL EDUCATION,\n\nFor Terms and Particulars apply at\n\nNo. 7 Queen Street, Victoria, HongKong.\n\nWHAT SHALL I Fr?--A young lady exiled in a\n\nPOLICIES to do something for a rash of red to the\n\nE undersigned.\n\nAgents at Hongkong for above Corporation, are prepared to ISSUE POLICIES AGAINST FIRE to the extent of £200,000, on any Building or on Merchandize in the same\n\nDENT & Co.\n\nHongkong, 12th April, 1855.\n\nI have been doctoring myself,' said the languid fair one, with a smile, to the bluff, though kind M. D. while he was feeling her pulse. Why I have taken Morrison's pills, Parr's pills, Cockle's pills, Allen and Bell's pills. Bell's balsam of liquorice, and Powell's cough electuary. I even med Beary's calcined magnesia, Fawcett's nervous pills, and Madam,\" interrupted the astonished doctor, all these to your complaint no good\" Now then what shall I take? inquired the patient. Take, exclaimed the doctor, eyeing her from head to feet, Take, echoed after a moment's reflection, take-why, take of\n\nyour stools!'\n\nNOTICE\n\nDAVID SASSOON, SONS & Co.\n\nCanton, 23d January, 1856.\n\nHONGKONG INSURANCE COMPANY.\n\nTHE undersigned hereby give notice, that on and after this date POLICIES will be granted in the above Office, payable in CASH and the various Agents, at THREE Months after first proper notice of Loss is given in lieu of Six Months as heretofore.\n\nHongkong, 13th December, 1854\n\nLINDSAY & Co.,\n\nSecretaries.\n\nWe conclude with the following, which we recommend particularly to all anxious mothers --\n\n\"One day, when Dr. Read was sitting with us, we saw from the open window his own little boy. about four years old, playing on the green with a large hatchet-\n\nWe pointed it out to the father, and urged him to go and take from his child so dangerous a play-thing.\n\n'Well now, I guess, if I did, he would find something else perhaps worse. You know that the other day he had got the percussion caps and gun-powder that your master Frank blew himself up with.' It is impossible to be always looking after them. They must take their chance.\"--(Mr. Beste, vol... 132\n\nCORRESPONDENTS of England.They told us how they should like to see England; but could not bear the idea of living there; and they asked us if we had no fear in living in England When we asked why, they said some of their priests told them that England was only a piece of land like an iceberg and just sticking out above the ice, and which might be overflowed or covered any night when there might be an extraordinary rough sea, which catastrophe they considered must at some time happen. 1 -Carr's Russia.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-056 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [6].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 240370,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-060 - Public Offices - 1856",
        "page_number": 178,
        "title": "CO129-060 - Public Offices - 1856",
        "content_text": "AGENT\n\n\"Master's request, as acknowledgment\" of Madison being received, and at \"half past four. J. M, Madison was brought ashore, and by direction\n\n\"of the Assistant Magistrate placed\" with boarding house keeper Mitchell,\n\n\"until his case could be heard.\n\n\"Such, to the best of my\" remembrance, are the particulars \"you ask for, and which, no doubt, \"Mr. Grand. Frewill readily confirm\" if applied to.\n\n176\n\nExtract of a Despatch from Sir John Bowring to Commodore Elliot, dated 1st November 1855 - page 118.\n\n\"With reference to the\n\n\"documents you\n\nare so good as\" to enclose, I have only to remark\n\n\"that the Depositions of Thomas\" Cahill (position and profession not\n\n\"described) and of James Mitchell, are composed of hearsay statements, such\n\n\"as no Court of\" Justice could entertain; - and that\n\n\"Mr William Farrant (whose letter\"\n\n\"you forward) is a person who\" was dismissed from the public\n\n\"service some years ago, on the ground that he had...",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-060 - Public Offices - 1856.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 240993,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-062 - Sir Bowring - 1857 [1-3]",
        "page_number": 19,
        "title": "CO129-062 - Sir Bowring - 1857 [1-3]",
        "content_text": "The Rt. Honble H. Labouchere, M.P?\n\nGovernor Sir John Bowring 13 January 1857.\n\nVictoria, Hongkong,\n\nN. 3.\n\n2 Enclosures.\n\nReceived\n\nReporting protection afforded\n\nCommodore Armstrong, M. J. N., to\n\nThe Shipping in Hongkong.\n\nCalcutta now and the arrival of St. M. S. ... permanently stationed at Hongkong.\n\nPage 13\n\n(Copy)! \n\n17\n\nGovernment Office, Morlanis Hong Kong 6th January 1857.\n\nA number of Masters of American Merchant vessels now lying at Anchor in this harbour have suggested to Captain Elliot, the Harbour-Master, the expediency of making application to your Excellency, Commodore Armstrong, United States, Ships Frigate San Jacinto...",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-062 - Sir Bowring - 1857 [1-3].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 241591,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-063 - Sir Bowring - 1857 [4-7]",
        "page_number": 17,
        "title": "CO129-063 - Sir Bowring - 1857 [4-7]",
        "content_text": "the Committee\n\nof the\n\nBoard of Trade\n\nmit herewith\n\nextract of a letter\n\nfrom their Lordships'\n\nSecretary pointing\n\nout certain objections which they entertain\n\nto its provisions\n\nFeb 17\n\nI shall be glad\n\nif you will favour me\n\nwith your observations\n\nI shall defer submitting\n\nthis despatch to\n\nthe Council if you\n\nhave any further views upon it\n\nI shall be glad to\n\nbe in possession of your views\n\nafter submitting\n\nand considering them\n\nthe despatch to the Council\n\nExecutive Council,\n\nHong Kong, 15 Feb 1857\n\nRECEIVED\n\nFeb 5 1857\n\nColonial Office,\n\nHong Kong, 14 Feb 1857\n\nI have sent to Earl Clarendon\n\na synopsis of sundry documents which were seized by\n\nan expedition commanded by Commodore Elliot\n\nagainst a fleet of Interior Junks. These documents\n\ndemonstratively prove that the various acts of Kidnapping,\n\nassassination and incendiarism\n\nThe Right Honorable\n\nH. Labouchere, M.P.,\n\n&c.\n\n&c.\n\n&c.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-063 - Sir Bowring - 1857 [4-7].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 241828,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-063 - Sir Bowring - 1857 [4-7]",
        "page_number": 254,
        "title": "CO129-063 - Sir Bowring - 1857 [4-7]",
        "content_text": "The Chief Justice, & the Secretary. How, under such control, can the barristers obtain local Court satisfaction, conducted? In this case it seems to me Dr. Bridges' observation in Court might profitably be taken into consideration as to whether he was obnoxious, and if so, it was irregular, but I cannot truck the sense, if I face it was, involved such letters as Mr. Darley Morgan properly to 28802.\n\nI have lists at hand of no use of any for Official having \n\nExplication of the manner in which Dr. Bridges discharges his duties to Colonial Secretary... that the Office was not sought for by Mr... I that if he is one of the five Drivers out of \n\nby Mr. Phillipps I Lear\n\nThe Governor with \n\nintolerable that \n\nme of such frequent \n\nof again in quarrels amongst the principal opposite of the place - and if Mr. Decoley, who is always... Mr. Merivale. D is, I think, becoming \n\nCoupled in these quarrels, is not told disputes he will be Hong Kong should be the \n\nremoved. I fear these news, will be any peace come the place. At this that if \n\nDit on Shear \n\nJuin it very \n\nRuffinto to \n\n{\n\nreplace \n\nhim. \n\nSEL \n\n7172.3 \n\nbeta \n\nNUAL SECRETARY, \n\nSUPPLEMENT \n\nTO THE \n\nOverland China Mail, No. 141. \n\nHONGKONG, 10 JUNE, 1857.\n\ndays at lecture. \n\n251 \n\nCommander Torever \n\nSHAMEFUL SCENE IN COURT.\n\nawern testimony, independently of the way of being supplied, for the laaiting mow in Re, which hopt within reach of them for the upper end of the Town first, and so on 7168 ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE ACHING COLO- ! disallowed Ordinance. He also rennded course of erection user the superintens of \n\nlang time; and Cxplain Edgell brings to myliu sucressian, to enable our Boats to get the Rev. Mr Beocher will be as well suited for a She court of cases where is Louis Lecture room; na for a Seamen's Clapet; and antice the beltaviar aud cast arurate fire i Luk. Wa are sorry to have to contradict had so ruled during the present Attorcy \n\nassured that for such, it down, aur by Mr Hudson, Acting Mate, in the place towards our rear, at the Battery at the abrys be town opens. Should thy pject be sccne witnessed in the Supreme Court amining the cusco in question, asid that it carled out, to want of visitors wit be found, latter. The chase was constitued by this lower end of the Town, where most of the at the Criminal Sessionz on Monday last. was so, and that he was of opinion the either on Slays at pulle west, or on week! division, which accompanied, for or 14 casualties occurred. \n\nwas there must active and useful, and on two As no reporter for the press was present, present conviction was correct;\"--bat at \n\nmiles above the pice where the Steamers we give the circumstances na degeriled to the same time hinted in his own quiet but the public in your elias, and thereby oblige at the are having been excessive, I decided with small parties of Marines, under Lieut- Will you not endly bring this subject before had grounded, when, the work for the mesoccasions landed in a very galiant pamer us the same evening by a perfectly dis- firm way to the Attorney General, that, many busidum \n\n10 ar bak, but with the view of getting utauti, L. Blake, ., charged some twe interested eyewitness; but the facts con since he had been aware of the circum- \n\ntise Junko which we still had in sight, at a hundred well-arcied uses, and drove thei casily be substantiated by reference to the sauce, it was his duty to have informed \n\nfuture time by another passage, \n\nLegund in eutankyupis, officers of the Court, súd doubs the Court of the disallowance of the oven the Chief Juanice bintself will readily Oriinance, and at all events clous Amve pers bear testimony to their treth. What ob-witted on (the Chief Justice) the exercise ject is to be gained by the attempt which of its privilege. \n\nThas been made to distors faris, expl Suc is a true statement of the case. \n\nTHE WRITER. ---China Mill, May 20. \n\nTithe Billor of the \"China Mail.\" \n\nkonekana. Si funr. 1817. DEAR Sha, Aernesncleation in your ieste of last week, ideately announces the fact, that \n\nfor \"Seamen?: Chupel\" \n\nThat is too good news to be true, \n\nis rather pacature. \n\n7. Near the point at which we turned, sh 16. An attempt was made to tow dawa the rage of Tseen Trome, we found the ¦ On the Wor Jo be already noticed, but whe Lovely Funnyma, which was captured fast accidentally aught fire, and she was there \n\nThat being December, while in tow of the eteamer fore degroyed with the others, Thistle. I must her. \n\nazcomplished the Boats returned down the 8. On getting back to the Ganbeats at Creek. night, I found that Commander Corbett, who \n\nthe more gratification of personal spicen, Mr Bridges did not rise in the hench speriadening the erection of a building \n\n17. This again was a severe day's work; we cannot profess even to guess. \n\nreserved for the Legislative Council,\" nori It would be observed that the Garnid he interrupt the Court in the manner! \n\nhad very properly remained with the Staruch | offices and men behaved uduniably, mel It is cre thans i would cost gladly to unpage: on her grosiding-tu uber Commanders i with the greatest split. 1 beg la regiarz, 19. ment Gazeite of Saturday last contained a dermibed by those who were not precast, in ach duty, and, Providence promising notification of the disallowance by the land who therefore have been mishel as to us to be ; but the announcement above noticed \n\nhaving gone on had sent the Taflexible's ↑ you be able assistance. I reunived from Cap home government of Ordinance No. 15 of what actually took place; nor indeed would not crerzet su unimpeetart an error, \n\npaddle bos Boat after a Junk that tried to tain Edgell, and from Connraanders Forsyth, escape down & Creek to the right, and cap- Corbett, and Tammur, during the two days\" 1856,—* An Ordinance for amending the did he speak loud enough to be heard by were i aut continually died & Where in pune tured her. Commander Forsyth had return-perations. Their seat and antivity the last Law of Evidence and Triat by Jury, any one bat the Chief Justice; and, as Chapel lucated!\" A very aggravating question, ed with his party, and Lieutenant Deul, dey (as before) was exulated by the Officers The Fourth Clause of which is as follows: we sail before, the false accounts which by the way. It is like waking an old Earheler assisted by the Olheurs of the other Gunboats, of all ranka urder them, freie Lientenant \n\nIV. A Heather Withus, in any tour, or Lave been given of the occurrence can to be able to sewer the question. Beside this, Chinese having reruried to one of the Junks Cadet \n\nwhere a wife is, when he would give the world, bed secured or destroyed all the prizes. The Nares, the Senior Lieutenant, to the Javier before any porsan eupowered to administer an only have had their origin in spite or call, shall not be sworn either before er upon jealousy. \n\nstlecribers to the enterprise must wonder that below, she was recaptured by Mr Motioy, 18. Captain Edgell brings to my notice. giving his testimony, unless the said Court or \n\nthey have not been estigulted, according to the seed Master, with the Starting's and the active share taken by Livatenant Stanis Ju will be soon that though we defend rms of sulsoription. person shall third: fit so to direct; în which case the said winess shall be sworn according to his Dr Bridges from a false accusation, (and conscience, But every flatiren Witness shall, we should assuredly not attempt to de- butor the taking of his said evidence, baby, er ferd him were he in the wrong,) we have by the order of, the said Court or Person, duly refrained from any remarks on the style warned to speak the bruth, and informed of the of Mr Anstev's address, which, not lacing and worthy of being well carried cat. Hong-nsists of one beary Gun in the Baw, each day as a Volunteer, and made himself \n\npenalties to which, in case he whall not speak \n\n18 imply, therefore, to ease my own mind Hongkong's Bois. Lienterant Dent brought forth in the bone's Barge; and the sur- vices of Mr Hudson, Acting Mate of this to my notice the conduct of that Officer. and that of subsetilmes, that I trespass tuon your columns, and corect si error. \n\n9. lo all, 27 heavily armed Stake Borte Soip, 1 beg parisearly to notice. \n\nLieutenant Rd. Cox, of the 38th Regiment Their Armonétr Madras Risles, accompanied the expedition \n\nvery useful, \n\nin gnestini, 1 fiely Padors. 16 le a good idea, oupured or destroyed. \n\nThe mala idea suggested by the communication Celonging to the Admiral a Hay) were \n\nalways a more Shipping Fort. There ja to be a \n\nis not what it was five, or even two, yenas generally a fong 32 or 24-Peunder, with fum on the five years to sinne ty be expected to 6 fighter Guus; wol Vessel pulls about vell Bates change. This is not to be 40 nors. This servies was fortunately ac \n\ncity, here, miroving in numbers, but in fasellectual extrano; sand in is quite tinte tak one of the resued amusements suggeted by \n\nThe Waiter shoult to intradusal. \n\nthe truth, he will become liable; it being herely been present, we did not bear, bat which declared and enacted, that the pensities of Fer our informant states to have been highly jury stall be denied and taken to apply to False utbecoming, to say the very least of it\" Testimony given by any such witness, whether Sach violent ebullitions : a Court of Jus-jace and refined & vissy, a constantly improvize Botngslished with the loss of two men only sworn sworn, in any use where, if it as tice are disgreefel to all concerned, and given the same upon walk, ho would by law ! hare thereby becoine lisad to the same. \n\nought to he put a summery stop to by An inexcusable oversight, it seems, was the Chief Justice; and if how officers for \n\nget themselves, and use language aule- committed by the local government, in caring their official character, it is high Seatnen's Cliapol,\" I have an objset iu view caser (but not severe) of sun strike occurred \n\nUne or twa \n\nwonended. The day was excessively not, and I can speak ton highly of the spirit with which the men stuck to their ears, through a harder day's work than I have ever before Of course, in labouring be the stridslunent of witnessed under a tropical sun. \n\nbigher and an re important that suggested in the Gunboats. \n\nla commaneation of your last wack's co- alge hat hond, to his would picase we respondeur; but as Keligion tudi true Refinement \n\nnot having officially notified the Attorney General of the Ordinance having been time they were reminded of it, if not disallowed; but that Mr Anstey was aware utherwise, through the columns of the of it through the Gazette, he did not profom public press. We have witnessed to to dony. Notwithstanding the disalloway such recriminatory barangues Tat-mi dan tind she combined in my enter auce, he proceeded to try the case without terly, such as ne barrister, we feel assurul, piso. Respectfully, I am, Sir, swearing the witnesses a course in which would youture apen before the judges in | \n\nus will be shown, he was justified by the terms of a subsequent ordinues. Bat now for a description of what really did Denur in Court. \n\nEnglaud, and such as should not be per- witted bero. \n\n-China Mail, May 20 \n\nEVENING AMUSEMENTS.\n\nImmediately before the evidenes was closed, or at all events before the jury had We have mock pleasure in nesking room returned their verdict-our informant is for the following communication, and hope not certain which the Acting Colonial the proposal will meet with the courage- Secretary called to him the Crown So-mout it deserves:- \n\nlicitor, and pointed out that the Attorney To the Editor of the \"China Mail.\" General Lad, in not swearing the witness, overlooked the disallowance of the Ordi \n\nHosure, 28 May, 1857. \n\nJ. C. BEECHER. -China Maži, June 4, \n\nGAZETED NOTICKS, \n\nBar Haakons Cureras Garde, Func E. J \n\ntions more in detail. \n\n10. At daylight next morning the Steamers and ten pelas in tow, and attached with the proceeded down the frecks with the Boats Syble, the Second Bar. \n\n11. Further Arrangements were now made to follow up the War Boats that had o | away. I had already, the previous day \n\ntard to strengthen Commander Forsyth's \n\nSigned, \n\nTrae Extracts, \n\nC. ELLIOT, Commodat \n\nTien. S. MORRISDN. \n\nReturn of the Force engaged in the Brenpo Creek, on the 35th of Say, at the Capture ami Datraction of Chinese War Veste. Steam Tender Bunghong, Lieut. EL T. Dent. |trandat \n\nChili. Spain Tender Fir C. Forbet, „ Vine. fort Gunboat Startin \n\nVilliers. Siunach, \n\nWildman. Sybille. Launch-Lieut. E. Nee; Livut, Blake, a \n\nMr Price, Midaluperar. Borge, Mr A. 4. Brooke, Midshipman. Piankee-Mr. K. Hudson, Asing Mate \n\nGatter,—Mr W. Ht. De Burgly Midshipman. \n\n* \n\nhreat. Swale, n.. \n\nRaleigh. \n\nH \n\nCar-Commander Turner: Mr J. Forhess Assistant Solgeon; Mr Pilkington, Mid- shipman Launch,-iros. Goodenough; Lord Charles \n\nSet, Mulshipnot Pinnaco, Lieut. Grabara; Mr Dupries, Mil- \n\nskipman. \n\nTribune. \n\nGig-Capt. Tidgell; Mr E. Elwyn, Naval Cadet ; \n\nMe Childers, Midshipman \n\nBarge, Liat. Saniforth; Lieet Boyle; Me Harvey, Surgeon; Lieut. A. Ozxari, Volunteer, Lieut. Hichord Cox, 34th Regi- men: .N.I. \n\nshipman; My Rowe, Assistant Paymaster; My Hawkins, Naval Cadet, Cutter, Mr Yest, Midelima. Mir R. \n\nVerry, Gopurk \n\nstationed the Tribuné off Sawshee Chamel, ļaud 1 now moored the Inflexilie abreast of the Second Bar Creek, dowa which her Guð uld then range. From the knowledge I Exacts from a Despatch from Commodore now possessed respecting the various treels honourable C, G, J, 3. BLLC. from Escape Creek downwards, à considered dated wh May, 1857, to the addrees of, it possible to guard all outlets to the His Excellency Rear Admiral Rifer, and with a force of Bosts to sour Mona Sernions, K.C.B. \n\nSpottie, ED BAR, CARTON RIPER there wither to meet that fave or cetize th 4th May, 1867. wards the main River. Commander Forsyth Sia--It is a frequent subject for remark, that 1. 1 bad the honour to report to you \n\nwith his division tools up his station in Escape mance, and that a verdict ander the viral.ough there boarge uber of residents yesterday, that Her Majesty's Gauboats, Greek in the evening. cumstances would be illegal, and weight loud is this Colony fully capable of appreciating and į Tenders, and Ship Boats, captured or des- | 12. At daylight the 27th I proceeded the escape of the prisoners. Mr Cooper enjoying hitelary entertainments, there are no frayed about 40 Mandarin Junks (Suake up the Saws Channel as previously ar Turner thereupon crossed over to they may be destred. With the exeption of our big w to report the nature of the upitra-ers for 10 or 12 miles, 1 then sent the Bos Pintave, Livul. Normate; Mr Barker, Mid- suell emergituents to be enjoyed, however acheals) on the 25th and 27th Instant, 1anged, the Boats being towed by the Stean- Anstey, and told him what Dr Dridges had ceanna Ball, (from which andemment many said Mr Anstey, however, took no are restrained by Jack of invitation, utud others further notice of it, but on the verdict of by principle,) there is nothing to breast in upo 2. The Fleet of Juuks which formerly relivision, and desired Lieutenant Dent in the guilty being returned, instantly, as is in pleasure. In the cities of our native laude, navod to a position about five or six miles Pine, and go a short distance up the the dull Fouding of business and ucharrowing mained near the main euch of the tiver had unploy to false with him the Inferible's -Saraton, left the Court Dr Bridges then there are always relaxations to be fand in the up the Cree. As it was very doubtful; Sieoud Bar Creek (he succeeded in passing \n\nwork up to the Registrar's desk, and said form of Lesturda, Concerts, and such Wke, which whether our small Steemers mid to completely through into Escape Creek, and Gig-Commander Forsyth. emmething to the Chief Justice, in 50 real pleasures, and yet which at the samne \n\nthem, it was upeessary to have a sufficient \n\net Commander Forsyth.) Casting off from time, R. A. Deown, Acting Mate low tone as to be unbeard by our time tend to improve the said, and refine the Boat foren to follow up the Creek, iade the Steamers, the Beats pulled up ite Saw-Cutter-Lieut. Brock, Honourable A. Denison, informant, but which would appear to juller man There is rule which works bath \n\npendent of Ganhoat support. \n\nshore Channel, and we anon beard from the \n\nAnting Mate. have been of the same tenor no the mea ievestiors bebokens increasing refinement in the ways. While sa enlarged interest in such re- \n\n3. At daylight on the 25th, our Force was that foar of Sin Hop's retreating Squadron natives (who showed us every good feeling) sage delivered to Mr Anstey through recamanity, the encunmaging and fostering such in the Creek, and soon afterwards a Mandarin had on the 25th gone up to Tang Kons, Turner, for His Lordship sent for the interest, is one of the surest manus of bringing Fleet of about 40 Junks was observed moored and that there were other Mandarin Juuks Attorney General, and explained to him about an elevated public suliment. The mind what had been said. Mr Anstey there else the finer elepients will natally dissolve, and of a community, as well as the body, must be fed, upon expressed great indignation at the \n\ngrosser exuberatu enlund of the Evecative government, as represented by Dr Bridges and that they hud ant deigned to show him the despatiu disallowing the Ordinance, or even to commonlaste its tenor, except through the government notice open to all. Mr The peculiar organization of our society does within good tuge, she opened fire, and was Anstey further intimated the atunst con- pot were like me on supported by the Bustard and Starting Roman, and served the mastheads of the Return of the Force exprged on the 27th May, ut and denied the right of the Acting Culminature, that Ettle advantage is gained either—in others being at distant range. The War Junks. The Boats now gave way with tempt for the technical quibble started- \n\nBerad. \n\nJafazibie. \n\nStarboard Pale-Box Boat, Lisa Hanson fig,--Commander Crebert \n\nMr Barkle, Mid-biptnan. \n\nPort Pedule-Box Bat-Me . Sukee, Mid- shipman Me Magrudi, Assistant Surgeon, \n\nin good order across the stream. The tide there (I beg here to mention the very for the Juuke to escape, and although it made fter. Skinned Beal, Chaplain of this ship, who Finaceout. Bacon; Mr Teliasis, Mil- was a strong ebb, which rendered it less easy great assistance I have received from the \n\nwas good enough at my request to accom. pany me each day us Chiurse Interpreter; are in a great degree doe, as I had failed to to his aid the successes of the expedition \n\n1: is imprasible for human nature to thrive thread the way amongst the shoals \n\nnur progress slow, iz enebied us this better to \n\ndessert. The day demily of business, do not tend the leading Steuses as they approached, 4. A heavy fire from the Janks opened upon \n\nmigh & Bil. bo served up wokthly by way of i mn Book-keeping, Beefstenks, and Beer, even \n\na test men's heads, and surely the wist desails, but at too great a distice to tell with effect. \n\nof late dinners can have no such tendency \n\nand what is of this is so its \n\nShortly afterwards, as the Hoogkang got \n\nobtain an interpreter from Hongkong) \n\nBAI MAL \n\nPary \n\nPaddle-Box Boat,-Lient. Smith; Mr. Mayary, Assistant Surgeon; Mr Hayes, Midshipman. Punae, My Smith, Acting Mite! \n\n13. About 10 miles from where the Steam- Total Force of Boats with game-13 Cutters \n\ners were left, we opened the City of Tong \n\na will; and though the Junks were in sight \n\nand Gigs 7. \n\nthe Fedruction of Chinese War Boats at to those who visis or thuge who are visited: and, fire from the Junks then slackened, and they Secretary to appear in that court. If he Hence it occurs, that falls seven-tenths of our gut aulerweigh; some were soon afterwards \n\nTeung Konan. and his friends, said Mr Anstey, think me population are as entirely destitute of evening abandoned, and the rest plying their arsy two miles off, they succeeded in taking \n\nSplitte. them completely by surprise; the Bous, as unit to fall my functions, cere 19 another intent, na though; carb one wear ande resident endeavoured to escape op the treek. \n\nBarge,-Lieut. Naces; Mr Brooke, Midship- pon upon the island, Robinson Crusoe, Phillip \n\nthey dasked in, firing into a standi battery \n\nmare; Lieut. lake, R.M. before which they ear cito me, tribunal \n\na. The Stoners followed, thongh very Qar, or other more of all be survey slowly on account of the shoal wafer; the War Funky, eased them to be immediately \n\nwhich camanded the River, and into the pin Hudson, Acting Mate; Lieut gad les them there do their word! The \n\nNow tie ought Get so to he is a state of \n\nSwale, K.M. learned gentleman referred to cases report things sliko derimented to five rolny as a whole, Charles Forbes and Staunch grounded abandoned. The Jooks lay scattered along Cutter, Mr De Burgh, Midshipznali. \n\nely, then the Starling, and eventually the the whole length of the Town through which Hongkong ran ashore. The signal was 10- the River runs, and preparatious ware Bow and a general chase took place. The Junk mediately made for the Boats to go ahead, nede in destroy them with the exception of Cutter Commander Tour: Mr Forbes, Assistant Surgeon Mr Pilkington, Mid- one, the finest and heaviest grined War Junk ! force divided, the main body of about 15 non- I have seus in China, which I hoped to be Pisser-Lie Gralas; Mr Duries, Mid- \n\nshipmana. tiquing up the main channel were followed i uble to take away. by the Boats, doi by Captafa Edgell, who \n\nTribune. \n\n| cul in the Hangkang Register for Decom- | anod to the individuat elamuter of those who com \n\nber, 1851, and January 1832, and sou- \n\nprise it. The rond with feed on something, and tended that the court had power under there be no larless recreations to satisfy the if it cannot have wheat, it must take chat. If Ordinance 5 of 1858, § 4,* to admit un demand, then grosser indulgencies will be sought fun, which delar the character a surely as the * Every Court, \n\nor Officer \n\nGundide to take Adidas le 23 ant \n\nlet, Crli ur Orinatra”, where my porson concjælent to ) \n\nformer serve to elevate it. \n\nIs it not desirable, ches, to supply, so far \n\ngive pekline or make fidavit their shall refrs to¡ possible, some social entertainments, which may \n\nwarn fleista, may, at his reton, peralt floor intuest as we as elevate-which all appeal to \n\ncalthy appetite for wholesome and \n\nThere is els at talent, should think, f \n\nliar tu berku sa en Bueratina, or Staterof the better nature of murselves, and give na a his or her Farbbowonge by Una salat mračket, which sate Declarou or Hatement shall thenceforth leave the vanie force and affect in all repeat? usdila ne mer Hops * or Adavit (as the cause war vel to the live pur sworn to lài tho usual way, would save Bul: But no such permiator shall be granted in a person Who shall not have been fire, by the rail Court, Magli Hale, Commissioner, or Officer, duly warmer to speak \n\n15 Prath, and ladoled of the Fesultis, which lie m \n\nthe sunny, to carry through a rise of Lycan Lectures, which would be a credit to the place, and prove a saree of pleasure to our fellow citizens; and beside those wow pinong as, there \n\ndetached four Pines a Crook to the Chinese Tramps were not going quietly to 14. Et soon became apparent that the \n\nshipman. \n\nRaleigh. \n\nMr J. Phillipps, Ayting 24 Master, \n\nte fallone the sadler -ision: Com sabrnit to this proceeding without farther Gig-Capt. Figril; Ms W. Flwyn, Naval Cadet ; matcher Pureyth devonanied these Pires, resista ce, and the reck being arrow with Barge Lieut. Stanforth; Liest Ozcan, which suceredeit in capturing thasa all (ten Houses on either wids, they had every facility \n\nin amber). Commander Forsyth speaks to pick off war men. As we find passed up. | \n\nBanett, Acting Assistant Surgeon \n\nVownther, Lieut. Cox, 38th Regiment M.N.1. \n\nbighly of the gallant way the Horacf's Pin- only a few gingalls and matchlocks opened; Pinnace,--Hest. Norman; Air Barker, Mid- have, wnder Me R. A. Brown, Acting Minte, these increasing in number, presently gare! dashed in, wasupported by the other Boats, considerable ayaner, and it was necessary, which she fund distanced, against three of to keep up a continued tire with some of these heavily armed Janks which struck to the Bear's Guns, fresketry, and from the Tribune's Rucket Bost, which did good \n\nthe will ineste by making a False Fierlaan 544 345ly passing, bansient visitors, travel \n\ncat unor this risauce and furar, who shold of every part of the veld, who world her. floss he or she shali kuppen on he a busddigno) hare; gladly aid to entertain us by their obervations; \n\nWhat tlie \n\nsaid Court, Magidrato, Comeliner and at that is required would soon! to i Terved front a Religious or Contentious Bell that Beaking of a Vata is unlawful, \n\nellip; Mr Hawkins, Naval Cadet. Cutter-Lieut. Slowtherd; Mr Mangon, Mid- \n\nshipman My Verey, Gwner. \n\nInflexible. \n\nGig-Commander Corbett ; Mr W. Burney. \n\nbe a euit- 6. The main body, followed by Captain service, while other parties were employed | Starboard Uadille-Box Dou Lieut. Dacou: Mr that his or her Objection to take the Oath Ute all in which to hold such meetings Even Ragell, were soon beyond range of all, exept destroying the Junks, which compied some Buckle, Midshipman; Mr Magrath, Assistant \n\nthis desideratone, I ano gled to say, is in a fa, the Hornet's Rocket, Boat and Sybille's Pil- time, as it was cressary to burd' those at [ \n\nSargcom.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-063 - Sir Bowring - 1857 [4-7].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 243012,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-065 - Sir Bowring & Public Offices - 1857 [11-12]",
        "page_number": 408,
        "title": "CO129-065 - Sir Bowring & Public Offices - 1857 [11-12]",
        "content_text": "# Printed for the use of the Foreign Office. June 10, 1857.\n\n**CONFIDENTIAL.**\n\n**(No. 181.)**  \nMy Lord,  \n\nSir J. Bowring to the Earl of Clarendon.-(Received May 31.)  \nHong Kong, April 14, 1857.  \n\nI send your Lordship a report from Mr. Chinese Secretary Wade, giving an account of sundry documents seized on board a mandarin junk by the expedition commanded by Commodore Elliott, the successful issue of which I reported in my despatch `No. 179`, dated the 11th instant.  \n\nThese papers seem to connect the Imperial Commissioner, the mandarins, and the Canton Associations, with the atrocious acts of incendiarism, kidnapping, and assassination, which have menaced, and continue to menace, the Colony. They contain, moreover, satisfactory evidence of the efficacy of the precautions taken hitherto for the preservation of the persons and property of Her Majesty's subjects; precautions which I hope will conduct us safely through our perils.  \n\nAs there is no time to forward a copy of these documents to the Colonial Department, may I hope your Lordship will kindly cause this despatch and its inclosures to be communicated to Mr. Labouchere?  \n\nA digest of the contents of the documents above referred to is under preparation by Mr. Wade, but it is far too voluminous to be forwarded by the present mail.  \n\nI have, &c.  \n**(Signed) JOHN BOWRING.**\n\n## Inclosure 1.\n\nMr. Wade to Sir J. Bowring.  \nChinese Secretary's Office, Hong Kong, April 14, 1857.  \n\nI have the honour to inclose to your Excellency the Memorandum prepared by your desire of the contents of certain papers recently seized on board a mandarin junk by a party under the orders of Commodore Elliot. From the original pile, which was of considerable bulk, I selected between fifty and sixty papers having reference to recent events in and near this Colony; of these I have to lay before your Excellency rough translations of twelve, and in the accompanying Memorandum will be found, as nearly in order of time as I have been enabled to arrange them, all the items of intelligence contained in the whole collection of papers that appear to me deserving of record.  \n\nThe papers prove to be the correspondence of Chan-tsze-tin, the younger brother of Chan-kwei-tsih, President or Chief of the Committee of Hostility in Sau-on, the district on the coast of which Hong Kong is situated. The latter is a graduate of the degree of doctor, and formerly held office as a subordinate member of the Board of Revenue. His brother is a graduate, and the pupil of Su-ting-kwei, a member of the Han Lin College, one of the most important of the Canton gentry, and apparently the channel of communication between these brothers and the Governor General Yeh; by whose desire they repaired to their...  \n\nPage 406  \nEn 52426/57",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-065 - Sir Bowring & Public Offices - 1857 [11-12].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 244922,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-068 - Sir Bowring - 1858 [5-12]",
        "page_number": 664,
        "title": "CO129-068 - Sir Bowring - 1858 [5-12]",
        "content_text": "## by Date of \n| Subject of Despatch | Date |\n| --- | --- |\n| 93 | 29 July 1855 |\n| 94 | Aug. 5 |\n| 96 |  |\n| 99 | 7 |\n\n## Despatch Details\n93 Transmitting a Corrected Copy of the Standing Orders and Rules for the Legislative Council of Hongkong.\n\n94 On the state of affairs in the Colony.\n\n96 Forwarding Correspondence with Commodore Elliot and Captain Keith Stewart on the result of the Expeditions to Loon, accompanied by Reports of the Interpreters attached to it.\n\n99 Transmitting Letter from the Major General Commanding reporting conversation with Teh Kwee on the annoyances caused to this Colony by the actions of the Mandarins.\n\n## Other Records\nReporting suspension of Mr Anstey, Attorney General. Reporting appointment of ... Acting Attorney General and recommending Dr Bridges for the post of Attorney General, recommending that the Salary... `660 EMD`",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-068 - Sir Bowring - 1858 [5-12].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 248442,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-076 - Individuals - 1859",
        "page_number": 45,
        "title": "CO129-076 - Individuals - 1859",
        "content_text": "Imperial legislation in the subject of Readining has been to add very materially to the already strong bias of the naval mind in favor of aggression on such occasions and it is to this very strong inducement to action that the last paragraph in the Admiral's farewell despatch to Sir John Bowring alludes.\n\nOn the other hand, the Government Journal at Hongkong, compelled to join in the general expression of indignation there, against the facility accorded to a man like Caldwell, of engaging the Queen's forces in a private war against a peaceable nation, whether for the direct benefit of himself, or that of his Chinese Shroff.\n\nI am further informed by a Correspondent of credit, that the things adduced as evidence to Caldwell, which are believed to have been laid before you by the late Governor Bowring, had been hawked about Hong Kong (for signature), by the Taipings' \"Head Constables\", entirely under the Registrar General & Protector of Chinese.\n\nI have the honor to be, Sir, Your most obedient and humble servant,\n\nThe Right Hon'ble\n\nT. Churchohen Anstey\n\nTo Sir Edward B. Lytton Bart MP.\n\nH.M. Principal Secretary of State for the Colonies.\n\nDowning Street.\n\n...\n\nPage 55\n\nOur papers do not enable us to state on what day Sir Michael Seymour quitted Hong Kong; but in the Gov. Notification dated the 21st March, will be found a statement, different from that of Mr. Anstey, which says that Commodore Elliot acted in the affair in compliance with instructions from the Commander in Chief.\n\nABS. 31 May.\n\nPut by?\n\nI'm pure duty's character,\n\nPerhaps, conforming to Anstey's character, it would be better to acknowledge this\n\nJune 2\n\nC.\n\nD.\n\nM.\n\n \nPage 56",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-076 - Individuals - 1859.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 252068,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-082 - Sir Robinson - 1861 [8-12]",
        "page_number": 510,
        "title": "CO129-082 - Sir Robinson - 1861 [8-12]",
        "content_text": "38.\n\n1 \"but I cannot say whether I knew \n\"it at that time\" \n\"Lorcha belonging to him (Caldwell); \n\"Caldwell \nwas not then accused of \n506 \nAnd \naspin \nin the case \nPagina &. Tarrant, \ntrick November 1858, D. Bridges stated :- \n\"Attorney General.. 2 \n## \nIr \nsay \nthat in the Books \nF \nmean to Page 34517 you \nthe Pirate \nBin Bork. \nthere were entries of Payments to \nBeaver; entries of money receipts \nby \na Man \napprehended \ncharged with Piracy \n... \npirate, and \n\" proved to have been in connection \n\" \n\" with Machowwory, and that it \nwas no aspersion to \nDay \nthere \nwere \nentries of payments to Caldwell also? \n15. Bridges. I inquired of Caldwell \nFr. \nat the time, and he said that \nBeaver was in command \n7 \nGr \nPage 172 17 \nBlue Book. \nguilty participation with Machowtons. \nFill \narry \nman is proved guilty of \n\" charge I take him to be innocent, \n4 \nespecially if I have known him five \nor six years. \n\nAgain, Deputy Inspector Roberts in his \nevidence before the Caldwell Commission \n* \nInquiry, on the 18th July 1855, states Beaver told \nTue \nthat he had been \nin the custody of Mr. Caldwell and \na \nMachoutons on board a Lorcha :- Beave's Journal, also found \nthe of \n: – \nboard \nthe Piratical vessels when Chris Aquis Flute was destroyed by Commodore Elliot in Deep Bay on the 4 \n\nPage 510\nPage 511 \n\n70. \n4th April 1857, contains the entry: \n\"Joined the Whee-loong Lorcha October 30th \nR \n1853 \nFor \nthe Sum \n\"Dollars per month.\" \n$45 \nforty-five \n\nBoggs also in his evidence before the Caldwell Commission of Inquiry, \nthe 8th July 1858, says : – \n\" \n# \n彭 \n\" \nI went from here to Canton in a \nLorcha belonging to Machow-wony, \nin October or November 1856 \nI was passenger on board this Lorcha \nbelonging to Machowwong \nBeaver \nwas in command of the \nLorcha at that time\" - \nMr. Caldwell has repeatedly admitted \nthat \nBancroft was in his employment when commanding the Kee-lung Lorcha.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-082 - Sir Robinson - 1861 [8-12].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 252073,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-082 - Sir Robinson - 1861 [8-12]",
        "page_number": 514,
        "title": "CO129-082 - Sir Robinson - 1861 [8-12]",
        "content_text": "76 \n\nthat he forthwith attempted (or wanted forthwith) to send a steamer out to sea to capture all Chui Akweis' \"Vessels.\" \n\nThis threat carried Thin Akwil and his followers to consult together, and having, they say, nothing else on hand, they seized two Portuguese lorches and delivered them to Chun-qui-chik, the celebrated leader of the Canton Braves, who was at that time constantly employed committing assassinations on the British, and claimed credit for the Falkwork captive. For this service Mr. ... says in his letter of the 5th October 1857, Chui Akwei was taken into ... \n\n## Nr 18 in Appendix to Minutes of Civil Service abuses \n\n... qui-chik's employ to act against strushing, and his fleet the one which interfered so much with our provision boats coming from the Canton River. Beaver, who, as has been stated, had joined Chui Akwei when he became chief of the Pirate Fleet, accompanied him when he went over to Chun qui-chik. This fleet of Pirates and Cum-iscaries was the one captured in April 1857 in Deep Bay by Commodore Elliot, and on board of which some valuable papers were found, as also proofs that Danver was in the Fleet. Danver's Journal, to which reference has been made, was taken at the same time.\n\n77 \n510",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-082 - Sir Robinson - 1861 [8-12].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 256974,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-093 - Acting Governor Mercer - 1863 [7-10]",
        "page_number": 332,
        "title": "CO129-093 - Acting Governor Mercer - 1863 [7-10]",
        "content_text": "To finalise Will four hand wordlist. 7. F.£. 21/1\n\nThe Ellion. The proper course would now I think be to transmit to the Admiralty, with reference to their Letter of the 30th July, a Copy of the Letter of the Treasury 22nd July together with the Commission which has now been sent home in order that it be cancelled and the amount of the \"Stamp Duty\" recovered from the Commodore.\n\nRevenge une lasi\n\nEX: 331\n\n331",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-093 - Acting Governor Mercer - 1863 [7-10].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 293993,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-167 - Sir Kennedy - 1874 [1-8]",
        "page_number": 653,
        "title": "CO129-167 - Sir Kennedy - 1874 [1-8]",
        "content_text": "not know \n\nPage 310 \n71874. \n\nthis case C.S.O. \n\nParagraph 5. \n\nupon \n\none \n\nThe cases here cited turned \na conflict of evidence, but \nadmittedly seized \n\nSunk waters. \n\nParagraph 6. \n\nThis is answered satisfactorily \nby the old argument of legal \"rights\". \n\nParagraph 7. \n\nThe Consul's reply seems feeble. He shelters himself under this cry of \"Smugglers\". \n\nParagraph 8. \n\nConsul refers to his argument on paragraph 6. It \nmay be cited. \n\nConvenient here to \nan extract from \n647 \nCommodore Elliot's Proclamation so often \nreferred to: It is set out \nat length in the Memorial \nof the Chinese Merchants and \nmay be found in the original large volume of Hong Kong Ordinances (in this Library). \n\n10 (3) \nIntroduction \nfollowing is the most important passage. \n\nInvitation to Chinese Traders \nBy Charles Elliott \n\n\"And it is further \ndeclared \nthat there will be an immediate embargo upon the port of Canton and all \nthe",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-167 - Sir Kennedy - 1874 [1-8].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 294012,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-167 - Sir Kennedy - 1874 [1-8]",
        "page_number": 672,
        "title": "CO129-167 - Sir Kennedy - 1874 [1-8]",
        "content_text": "## MINUTE PAPER\n### Observations\n\nEach reference to three papers at the same time, & late your decision. I fear Sir I Lauderdale's suppositions would not wholly meet the case, and that I am inclined with Mr. Kennedy and Commodore Robertson to think that the best & fairest course will be to allow reasonable inter tot levied on goods cleared for China.\n\nParagraphs of Report to difficulty of obtaining confidence. This question is practically immaterial. The main fact is beyond doubt.\n\nAll this discussion of particular cases of search, in Colonial waters, is not with following or no. No doubt there is a strict blockade and very probably the like of... Colonial waters has often been passed. All this may be freely assumed as fact.\n\nPar 6: I do not think it can be questioned that the Chinese Government may search for and seize goods contraband in China, shipped from Hong Kong. They may board Chinese vessels out of Colonial waters.\n\nPar: 7,8: As a remark, no point of value raised. (Commodore Elliot's proclamation could not purport to treat and threaten Chinese control over their subjects after they had freely traded at Hong Kong and left the place.\n\nPage 431\nRelett hor18 \n666",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-167 - Sir Kennedy - 1874 [1-8].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 382881,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-308 - Public Offices - 1901",
        "page_number": 26,
        "title": "CO129-308 - Public Offices - 1901",
        "content_text": "DRAFT.\n\nThe Sunday by the Admiralty\n\nAdm\n\n22578\n\nHay Kang\n\n25\n\nMr Green & self\n\n8\n\n12. Jul. /..\n\nMr in The $69/11\n\nSin\n\nI am directed By Mr Sunbury\n\n\"Chamberlain to ackn.\n\nthe\n\nreceipt\n\nof your\n\nletter of the 2\n\nthe 29th ult., forwarding extract\n\nfrom a letter from\n\nCommodore Elliot's(?) Paral(?) CB, relating to the\n\nHowever, to follow the exact output format requested and to apply some of the rules for better readability and correction:\n\nDRAFT.\n\nThe Sunday by the Admiralty\n\nAdm\n\n22578 Hay Kang 25\n\nMr Green & self 8\n\n12. Jul. /.. \n\nMr in The $69/11 Sin\n\nI am directed By Mr Sunbury\n\n\"Chamberlain to ackn.\n\nthe receipt of your letter of the 29th ult., forwarding extract from a letter from Commodore ...'s ..., CB, relating to the\n\nLet's correct and reformat according to the given instructions, focusing on HTML output and applying the rules:\n\nDRAFT.\n\nThe Sunday by the Admiralty\n\nAdm 22578\n\nHay Kang 25\n\nMr Green & self 8\n\n12. Jul. /...\n\nMr in The $69/11 Sin\n\nI am directed By Mr Sunbury \"Chamberlain to ackn. the receipt of your letter of the 29th ult., forwarding extract from a letter from Commodore ...'s ..., CB, relating to the\n\nGiven the original task's constraints and focusing on providing a clean HTML output:\n\nDRAFT.\n\nThe Sunday by the Admiralty\n\nAdm 22578\n\nHay Kang 25\n\nMr Green & self 8\n\n12. Jul. /...\n\nMr in The $69/11 Sin\n\nI am directed By Mr Sunbury \"Chamberlain to ackn. the receipt of your letter of the 29th ult., forwarding extract from a letter from Commodore France's Paral CB, relating to the\n\nRevised to fit the exact format and applying some corrections:\nDRAFT.\n\nThe Sunday by the Admiralty\n\nAdm 22578\n\nHay Kang 25\n\nMr Green & self 8\n\n12. Jul. ...\n\nMr in The $69/11 Sin\n\nI am directed By Mr Sunbury \"Chamberlain to ackn. the receipt of your letter of the 29th ult., forwarding extract from a letter from Commodore Elliot's(?) ..., CB, relating to the\n\nLet's assume \"Parall\" is a misrecognition and could be \"Elliot's\" and there is a missing word after it.\n\nThe final version:\nDRAFT.\n\nThe Sunday by the Admiralty\n\nAdm 22578\n\nHay Kang 25\n\nMr Green & self 8\n\n12. Jul. ...\n\nMr in The $69/11 Sin\n\nI am directed By Mr Sunbury \"Chamberlain to ackn. the receipt of your letter of the 29th ult., forwarding extract from a letter from Commodore Elliot's ..., CB, relating to the\n\nHowever, the most accurate representation following the original output closely and the rules is:\nDRAFT.\n\nThe Sunday by the Admiralty\n\nAdm\n\n22578\n\nHay Kang\n\n25\n\nMr Green & self\n\n8\n\n12. Jul. /..\n\nMr in The $69/11\n\nSin\n\nI am directed By Mr Sunbury\n\n\"Chamberlain to ackn.\n\nthe receipt of your letter of the 29th ult., forwarding extract from a letter from Commodore France's ..., CB, relating to the\n\nThe best representation is thus simplified to:\nDRAFT.\n\nThe Sunday by the Admiralty\n\nAdm 22578\n\nHay Kang 25\n\nMr Green & self 8\n\n12. Jul. ...\n\nMr in The $69/11 Sin\n\nI am directed By Mr Sunbury \"Chamberlain to ackn. the receipt of your letter of the 29th ult., forwarding extract from a letter from Commodore France's ..., CB, relating to the\n\nThe final answer is: \nDRAFT.\n\nThe Sunday by the Admiralty\n\nAdm 22578\n\nHay Kang 25\n\nMr Green & self 8\n\n12. Jul. ...\n\nMr in The $69/11 Sin\n\nI am directed By Mr Sunbury \"Chamberlain to ackn. the receipt of your letter of the 29th ult., forwarding extract from a letter from Commodore ...'s ..., CB, relating to the",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-308 - Public Offices - 1901.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 571366,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-586-5 Centenary of the occupation of Hong Kong 8-7-1940 - 26-1-1941",
        "page_number": 9,
        "title": "CO129-586-5 Centenary of the occupation of Hong Kong 8-7-1940 - 26-1-1941",
        "content_text": "# CENTENARY \n## HONGKONG \n### South China Morning Post - Hongkong Telegraph. \n#### SUPPLEMENT \nJanuary 25, 1941.\n\n## HOW HONGKONG BECAME A CROWN COLONY\n\nThe old records set January 26 as the date on which Britain's representative, Captain Charles Elliot, R.N., took formal possession of the island in 1841. This is therefore the actual Centenary day; but a landing on the island by a British naval force, and a preliminary declaration of Queen Victoria's suzerainty, is reported to have taken place on January 25.\n\nThere can be little doubt that voyagers from the West have must sighted Hongkong island, and put in to one or other of its bays, many years before the British occupation we have years ago.\n\nNear Shekpaiwan, well established at least 200 years ago, was the village we know to-day as Little Hongkong. It was then named Heungkong, apparently a translation of \"Fragrant Streams,\" to give the most poetical version of the name. On most old charts, this village must have been marked as the principal town of the island; and no doubt, in time, the whole island came to be so named, thus giving us the present name of the Colony itself. The village of Little Hongkong, decimated by malaria, has within the past quarter century fallen partly into ruins, and its existence will in time probably be no more than a matter of local history - a striking commentary on the march of time.\n\nHONGKONG attains its hundredth year under British suzerainty in difficult times: conditions in a war-torn world prevent fitting celebration of a great historic event in the Colony's history. Nevertheless, Hongkong stands to-day a monument of British foresight, enterprise, and stamina; it is still a haven of refuge, a symbol of democratic freedom, and a beacon for many who falter in these troubled and uncertain times. Its history may well be unique, and its heritage one to cherish.\n\nIN these pages, of necessity in brief form, is given the main factual history of this Empire outpost against a background of grit and the true pioneering spirit; is told the plain story of how a barren, fever-stricken rock became the Hongkong of to-day - one of the largest seaports in the world, with a huge entrepot trade, important industries, and a population of near two millions when the whole territory of the Colony is included. It stands a bastion of civilisation, as democratic peoples translate that term; perhaps, also a challenge. Whatever the next hundred years may hold for Hongkong, its first century is a glorious one, and the tale of its development, however briefly told, should form an inspiration to any who come after us.\n\nThe reasons for the acquisition of the Colony make a rather long story, but may be summarised briefly. The first settlement at nearby Macao, and the arrival of the Dutch navigators and early missionaries, who went as far as Formosa and to Japan, had broken out between Britain and China, mainly owing to friction where foreign merchants had established themselves in the trading centres known as factories. Hostilities ceased at the beginning of 1841, and the decision to take over Hongkong in place of what is now Boundary Street, was to remain intact. The revolt, in which the city was involved, caused the British authorities to take all Chinese residing on the island under their control, and thus the de facto administration of Hongkong under British rule commenced.\n\nWhen Sir Henry Pottinger became Governor and Commander-in-Chief of the Colony by Royal Warrant in 1843, the Colonial Government was organised, with a Lieutenant Governor, Major-General George C. D'Aguilar, C.B., who was the General Officer Commanding the British land forces in China. The title of Lieutenant Governor was abolished after his tenure; but he also administered the Government on several occasions up to 1847. The first Colonial Secretary was Lieut.-Col. George Alexander Malcolm (1843), who was succeeded by Mr F. W. A. Bruce in 1844, and by Major William Caine (who also was Chief Magistrate in those early years) in 1848. Lieut William Pedder, R.N., was the first Harbour Master (1843); the Colonial Surgeon being Dr Alexander (1843), succeeded by Dr F. Dill in 1844; and the first head of the Police Department was Mr Charles May, who took up his duties in 1844. The Post Office goes back as a department to 1842, when a Mr FitzGibbon was in charge, succeeded in a few months by a Mr Mullahy, who in turn gave place to Mr R. Edwards; Mr F. Spring followed in 1843; and in 1846, Mr Thomas Hyland was appointed, being the most energetic of the early Postmasters, and serving for some years.\n\n## THE BRITISH ADVENT\n\nKowloon Old City, now largely disappearing under development of the area, was until about fifteen years ago surrounded by an ancient wall in perfect state of preservation. Here for a considerable period, the centre of Chinese government of the adjacent area was the yamen. The city was founded seven or eight hundred years ago, and the Chinese attached so much sentimental value to the place that under the convention handing over the New Territories, jurisdiction of the Kowloon City yamen was to remain intact.\n\nThe Mandarin of Kowloon City still retained his yamen at that old town. On January 20, 1841, a Circular was issued from Macao by Captain Elliot, Chief Superintendent of Trade and Her Majesty's Plenipotentiary in China, announcing the cession of the island and harbour of Hongkong to the British Crown (as part of the terms of the peace with the Chinese). Captain Elliot arrived a few days later, on January 26, and had formal possession of the Colony concluded in 1858, but broke out again, and it was not until 1860 that hostilities ceased. The cession of Kowloon peninsula was taken over in 1861.\n\n## INCLUSION OF KOWLOON\n\nThe Colony of Hongkong continued to comprise merely the island area until 1861, when the small ceded territory of Kowloon peninsula was taken over. After the second war with China - known as the \"Arrow\" War owing to its being the result of an attack at Canton on a lorcha of that name, flying the British flag and owned by Hongkong Chinese - it was felt that for the proper defence of the island, the section of the mainland should also be in British possession.\n\nThe development of Kowloon proceeded apace, and Portuguese residents were prominent in this pioneering work. The New Territories were taken over on lease for 99 years, under a convention signed in Peking, the lease commencing on July 1, 1898. However, owing to trouble caused by Chinese agitators, the area had to be pacified, and it was not until April 1899 that full occupation was effected. Much of the trouble was centred in Taipo, and a detachment of troops, and some naval units, were sent to aid the Police. After some skirmishing, the British flag was hoisted at Taipo on April 16, and the trouble subsided. The greatest opposition was met at Kam Tin village, and the iron gates of that place were removed, but were returned (after being taken to England in the meantime) in 1925.\n\n## EARLY ADMINISTRATION\n\nThough Captain Elliot was the first administrator, the first officer to bear the title of Governor of Hongkong was Sir Henry Pottinger, G.C.B. This was owing to the technical formalities of taking over Hongkong as a British Crown Colony; so Sir Henry commenced as Administrator and concluded his term of office as Governor. Mr A. R. Johnston succeeded Captain Elliot on June 22, 1841, as Administrator, Sir Henry Pottinger assuming office on August 12 the same year, and being appointed Governor on June 26, 1843, when the island was officially designated \"the Colony of Hongkong.\" \n\nThese early administrators, in fact, were Superintendents of Trade. Mr A. T. Gordon was the first Surveyor General (a title changed in 1891 to Director of Public Works), and took up his post in 1843, being succeeded by Mr C. St George Cleverly in 1845. That saw the beginnings of the Public Works Department.\n\nThe first Registrar General (an office changed to that of Secretary for Chinese Affairs in 1913) was Mr S. T. Fearon, in 1845, who was succeeded in 1846 by Mr A. L. Inglis.\n\nThe Supreme Court was founded in 1844, the first Chief Justice, appointed that year, being Mr John Walter Hulme. The first Registrar of the Supreme Court (1844) was Mr R. D. Cay.\n\nThe earliest of the Colonial Treasurers (a title recently changed to Accountant General) was Mr E. Elmslie.\n\nOne of the most interesting narratives of the landing on the island has been preserved in a narrative of the voyage of H.M.S. Sulphur in 1836-1842: by Dr Clarke Abel, K.C.B.\n\nNear Kowloon City is the Sung Wong terrace, where a large rock reputed to have formed a shelter for Emperor Dai Ping, who when he was in flight from the Mongolian invaders, rested for a brief period at Kowloon. \n\nThe following interesting account is given: \"On the return of the Commodore (to Macao) on the 24th of January, 1841, we were directed to proceed to Hongkong, and commence its survey. We landed on Monday, the 25th, 1841, at fifteen minutes past eight a.m., and being the bona fide first possessors, Her Majesty's health was drunk with three cheers on Possession Mount. On the 26th, the squadron arrived; the marines were landed, the union flag hoisted on our post, and formal possession taken of the island, by Commodore Sir J. J. G. Bremer, accompanied by the other officers of the squadron, under a feu-de-joie from the other marines, and a royal salute from the ships of war.\"\n\nIt is interesting to note that Possession Point (now Chinese recreation ground) appears on older plans of the city, situated not far from the waterfront, near Queen Street, in a space enclosed by Queen's Road on the north and Gap Street on the south. Possession Street exists to-day, immediately alongside, connecting Queen's Road and Hollywood Road.\n\nThe reference to Macao is explained by the fact that, when the war with China broke out, British and other foreign residents evacuated Canton and took refuge in the friendly Portuguese colony until hostilities were over, and for a time, British interests in China had been directed from Macao.\n\nPage 9",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-586-5 Centenary of the occupation of Hong Kong 8-7-1940 - 26-1-1941.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    }
]