[ { "id": 237152, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-052 - Sir Bowring - 1855 [9-12]", "page_number": 274, "title": "CO129-052 - Sir Bowring - 1855 [9-12]", "content_text": "Reenan, made à representation of the matter to Commodore Borry, then in Command of the U. S. Naval forces at this station, who sent a command aboard the \"Jodina Bates\" with orders to prevent the threatened removal of the men. The police did not carry out their intent.\n\nIn the case of the \"N. B. Balmer\" I heard men there imprisoned by the Crown for rioting, were removed to the \"Macedonian\". Upon their capture No. Mr Love, at that time the H. B. Commissioner to China, had an interview with Mr. Bridges, then, as now, Acting Attorney General and legal Adviser of the Crown, and it was understood that Mr. Bridges acceded to the point as contended for by us, and promised that these prisoners would thereafter be left to the local authorities without further attempt at interference.\n\nBut as it is impossible for your Excellency and myself to agree upon this point or permanently to settle the principle, it is idle to discuss it, and I agree with you in referring it to our respective Governments.\n\nThere are other minor points in this matter which require notice. Your Excellency, on the authority of Mr. May, Chief of Police, stated that no warrant was demanded by the officer in charge of the \"Vestal\"; that no member of the police had any interest or part in planning the escape of Madison from custody or service; and that Madison had not been taken into the employment of ...\n\nPage 2719\n\nThe original text is preserved as much as possible while correcting obvious errors and formatting it according to the given rules. The text is transformed into HTML using \n\n for paragraphs. Spelling corrections, spacing fixes, and rejoining broken sentences are done while preserving the original content and tone.\n\n was removed as per rule 12. Minor adjustments were made to adhere to the rules, such as correcting \"cormed brat\" to \"command aboard\", \"remorach\" to \"removal\", \"Hirent\" to \"intent\", \"Cownl\" to \"Crown\", \"brnon\" to \"Crown\", \"sottont\" to \"authorities\", \"Joer\" to \"Your\", \"fficer\" to \"officer\", \"Sherrye\" to \"charge\", \"ry\" to \"by\", \"Low-m\" to \"lawful\", and \"hiventive\" to \"custody or preventive\". The text is formatted to be readable while maintaining the original's integrity.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-052 - Sir Bowring - 1855 [9-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 237169, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-052 - Sir Bowring - 1855 [9-12]", "page_number": 291, "title": "CO129-052 - Sir Bowring - 1855 [9-12]", "content_text": "42.\n\n\"Conceded the facts as contended for by me, and promised that these 'Matters' should thereafter be left to the 'Covenant, in their further attempt at interference.\"\n\nYou are of course acquainted with the facts under discussion between the United State Authorities and the Government, and it is only necessary for me to explain that the vessels referred to by Commodore Elliot are those of the \"Florida Bates\" and the \"N. B. Palmer\".\n\nAs the Commodore's statement is at variance with that which I have received verbally from you, I directed by His Excellency, the Governor, to call upon you to give your recollection of the interview with Mr. Law, and its result.\n\n43.\n\nI have again to request the receipt of your reply with as little delay as possible!\n\nI have, &c.,\n\n(Signed) W. J. Mercer\n\nColonial Secretary.\n\nTrue Copy\n\nColonial Secretary.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-052 - Sir Bowring - 1855 [9-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 238783, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-056 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [6]", "page_number": 192, "title": "CO129-056 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [6]", "content_text": "Page 190\n\n92\n\n7129\n\nSHIPPING INTELLIGENCE.\n\nARRIVED,\n\n \n DATE\n NAME\n FLAG\n TONE\n RIG\n CAPTAIN\n FROM\n CARGO\n \n \n May 25\n Waverley\n Brit.\n b.\n 444\n Adles Beit.\n Whampoa\n \n \n \n 22\n Clipper\n \n sh.\n 355\n Conrad Heinrich Døn\n Cumaxing.\n \n \n \n 26\n \n Brit.\n sh.\n 531\n Melville Both\n \n 516; Wood\n \n \n 24\n Monarch\n \n \n \n \n \n 27&frica\n \n \n 28\n G10..ada\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 28\n Job Taylor\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 27\n Johanna Maria\n Dot.\n bl.\n 174\n Singh\n \n \n \n \n \n Dreyer\n Am.\n sh.\n 239\n Charlesson\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Brit.\n bg.\n 164\n loggett\n Am.\n l.\n \n \n \n Thompson\n Ám.\n bg.\n 299\n Code\n Ham.\n s.\n \n \n \n Gorritz\n \n \n 845\n \n \n \n \n \n 28\n Tuba: Caiu\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 21\n Jelena\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 28!\n Rolling Wave\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 25\n Argu\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 31/\n Cato\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 28\n Spirt of the Age\n Brit.\n ok.\n 731\n Billing\n \n \n \n \n \n 2John Buchanan\n \n Brit.\n bk.\n 290\n Ramray\n 29: Albauce\n \n \n \n \n \n Albauce\n Brit.\n bk.\n Mason\n Aw.\n 40\n B\n Am.\n \n \n \n Terry\n Brit.\n s.\n 760\n Clapioth\n Ham.\n s.\n 806\n \n \n \n Sinveking\n Am.\n Bh.\n 18\n Gioking\n Am.\n \n \n \n \n \n So Bellona\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Darne\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 20\n C, Lackmann\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 30\n Vancouver\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Excelsior\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 21\n Xace Hound\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 31\n tous\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Jute Vati Teong\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 14\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Alalua\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Ciem\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Fort Wilian\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 1:\n Munderio\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n B.\n \n \n 682\n Juzu\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Aru\n \n \n $ 580\n MD 0-187\n \n \n \n \n \n 3\n p.\n \n \n Uk.\n 358\n Zabala\n Dut.\n h.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 24\n d Cortal\n Havn.\n bk.\n 420\n \n \n \n Sejersterd\n Brit.\n bx.\n 254\n Young\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Brit.\n sh.\n 84\n @jlaton\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Am.\n sh.\n 1667\n Pike\n \n \n \n \n\nSAILED,\n\n \n FROM\n DATE\n NAME\n FLAG\n TONE\n RIG\n CAPTAIN\n CARGO\n \n \n Calcutta\n Mar. 22\n Sundries\n \n \n \n \n Macassar\n \n \n Mar. 21\n Bundries\n \n \n \n \n \n Swatom\n \n \n May 23\n Ballast\n Donbay\n Jeb.\n 12\n Cotton\n Sanghae\n ay 17:\n \n \n \n Ballast\n Cardi\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Mar. 2\n Ueneral\n Londen\n Pel.\n 15\n Gouerat\n East Coast\n May ngar\n \n \n \n Stat\n May 20\n ice\n New York\n 21\n Iron\n St, Sagapore\n \n \n April 29\n General\n Lowiún\n Job.\n 18\n General\n Singapore\n Mar. 30\n \n \n \n Rice\n Laban\n May 15\n Conte\n Rian\n April 13\n Rico\n \n \n \n Rive\n Calcutie\n April 6\n Rive\n Calcutta\n Epril 16\n tie\n \n \n \n Singapore\n as 10\n General\n Moliource\n Foril 12\n Ballast\n Me.ourne\n \n \n \n Ballast\n S Francar.\n 3\n Ballanc\n Macro\n \n \n \n \n Singapore\n April 24\n General\n singapore\n Tay\n Rice\n Singapore\n April 24\n \n \n \n Lice\n Singapore\n May 14\n 8ndries\n Melbourne\n #pil\n Baller\n \n \n \n Melbourne\n April 8\n allast\n Singapore\n ay 10\n General\n Boubey\n \n \n \n Siam:\n Moby\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\nThe Hongkong Register.\n\nCONTES\n\n \n Under\n \n \n \n Wa. Pastas and Co\n Wo. Pasisa and Co\n \n \n Revell and Co\n Hussell and Co\n \n \n Schaeffer and Co\n KFordonjce and Co\n \n \n Dent and Cu\n \n \n \n W. M. Robinet & Ce\n W.M.Robins & Co\n \n \n Williams. A. and Co\n W Pasta and Go\n \n \n Gibb, Land Co\n Order\n \n \n Linden and Co\n King and Co\n \n \n Dent and Co\n \n \n \n Fletclear and Co\n \n \n \n Won. Pastan and Co\n \n \n \n Russell and Co\n \n \n \n Angier and Cu\n \n \n \n S. E. Burrows\n \n \n \n L. J. Gutierrez\n \n \n \n Order\n \n \n \n Harkort and Co\n Order\n \n \n Lyall, Still and Co\n A. Heard and Co\n \n \n A. Heard and Co\n Order\n \n \n Sundries\n Order\n \n \n Conton Bankin, B. and C\n \n \n \n A:0.\n ab. 778jPerit\n \n \n 1 leve\n \n \n \n 1Cor.fucius\n \n \n \n 26 Pantaloon\n 25Hydrose\n \n \n Brit. sh.\n 40 Penney\n \n \n Brit g.\n 18 Bownywan\n \n \n Brit. eh\n 537 Sobicide\n \n \n Annnmooka\n \n \n \n Brat k\n \n \n\nSAILED,\n\n \n FROM\n DAN\n NAME\n FLAG\n TOTE\n RIG\n CAPTAI\n Fou\n CAROU\n \n \n Amoy\n \n Callno\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sundries\n Ccoliea\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Manda\n \n Maile\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Singapore\n \n Shaoghe\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sundries\n Manila\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sundries\n Japan\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Hongkong\n May 23\n Eaglet\n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 24 Color\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 97. de Castilia\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 93 Evening bar\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 28 Antelope\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 28 Resoluto\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 25 Genest Piowe\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 28. Erin\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 23; Neptuna\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Brim sorg\n 165:0abwell\n Paru.\n k.\n 98\n Viereck\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 12.4.2.201\n Aguirre\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Brit. sh.\n 811\n Dunn\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Am. etc.\n $19\n Mellus\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 10 ah.\n 600M\n Kenzie\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Brit. str.\n 850\n Jarnicos\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Am. seh.\n 136\n Badger\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n p. by.\n 281\n Naveran\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 'Catherine Apear\n Brit.\n sh.\n 109\n Bowler\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 29, Zuid Holland\n \n \n \n kiermann\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 30 Amerika\n \n \n \n Joke Tylor\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 28 Louisa Sophia\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 30 Wild Wave\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 97 Aouis\n Terry\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 27 Theres\n Terry\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 27/lda\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 27 Kamaran\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n YESAPL\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Goss\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n put. sh.\n 559\n Bour\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Prusz.bg\n 840\n Peps\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Brit.gel.\n 200\n Cheyen\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sundries\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n CoSTIONDEN\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Siemen and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Wm. Pustan and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n J. F. Edger\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Bamel and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n W. Pustau and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Rusell and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Slangbee Naila, e, P. & O. & N. Co\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Phillipines.\n Sundries\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sing\n Sundries\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Ham. bk 250\n Heating\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Helbourne\n Sundriss\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Manila\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sundries\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Amoy\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sundries\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n East Cous\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sundries\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Mailt\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sundries\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n L'allo\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n .Cooles\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n East Coast\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Melbourn\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sundries (Teas\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Dan. bk.\n 400\n Gott\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Peru sh1200\n Ggueier\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pera. bg 180\n D250\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Ham. 397\n Reimer\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Bri shi 583\n 'M'Donald\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Loodon\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Surfries\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n O'Callaghan\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 6\n L. J. Gutierrez\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ·Gibb, L. and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sebaefer and\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sierasnya and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Dreyer and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Jardine, M. and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Dent and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Siemaxen and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n W. M. Robinet and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n W. M. Robinet and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Wm. Duetau and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Dent and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n CONDLANDER\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Fortescate\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 16\n Sir F. W. Nicolson\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\nSHIPS OF WAR.\n\n \n COMMANDER\n VESICL\n AT\n \n \n British\n Craize\n Barra....qula\n \n \n \n North\n Tique, ip\n \n \n \n Sybille ship\n 40 Commodore Ellio\n \n \n \n Arun\n Hoogkong\n \n \n \n Levant slop\n \n \n \n \n \n Fenn\n Japam\n \n \n \n Shylla frigate\n \n \n \n \n \n ¡Vicgirlgaze\n \n \n \n \n \n Pr Macan\n Arcaz, bereha\n \n \n \n ¡Dum Jo Leorv.j\n \n \n \n \n \n Brittak\n Hongkong\n \n \n \n Coromandel. str.\n \n \n \n \n \n Eneuuater, str.\n \n \n \n \n \n Harctica, hospital\n \n \n \n \n \n Tulen, bospicul\n \n \n \n \n \n Nankin, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Winchester, stip\n \n \n \n \n \n Whampra\n Bitter, brig\n \n \n \n Fuhchau\n Kalierse, sinop\n \n \n \n Shanghaernet, steer\n Past Coast\n \n \n \n Gemus, slop\n \n \n \n \n 3 Lira.\n Naits\n \n \n \n \n \n Ellis Master\n \n \n \n \n fR+ Newat?\n \n \n \n \n \n Seymour,\n \n \n \n \n \n Captain Wilson\n \n \n \n \n \n 24 Bumurd\n \n \n \n \n \n 14 R. Jenkins\n \n \n \n \n\nMERCHANT VESSELS.\n\n \n Date of Arrival\n Tone\n MASTERS\n \n \n 18 Bith\n 50 Captain Maisonneuve\n \n \n \n \n 50-A.Guerin, Capt. Plass\n \n \n \n 6 Lieut. Scarnieta\n \n \n \n \n 20 Lopez\n \n \n \n \n \n Sures\n \n \n \n British\n Chrysolite, ship\n John Taylor, alip\n \n \n \n Carnatic, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Agra, stip\n \n \n \n \n \n Bank of Baglard, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Banshee, barque\n \n \n \n \n \n Benjamin Heape, ship\n i Course, basqu\n \n \n \n Earl of landwicke, ba,\n \n \n \n \n \n Erin, steator\n \n \n \n \n \n Formosa, steamer\n \n \n \n \n \n Gulncre, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Hellespont, steamer\n \n \n \n \n \n Julia, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Lenrick, brig\n \n \n \n \n \n suveston, whip\n \n \n \n \n \n Lyrs, sohooner\n \n \n \n \n \n Max, brig\n \n \n \n\nMERCHANT VESSELS --Canterued.\n\n \n Date of Arrival\n Tons\n MASTERS\n DESTINATION\n \n \n Fuhehou\n May\n \n \n \n \n \n May\n 471M'Clelland\n Order\n \n \n \n (No. 23-JUNE 3, 1550\n \n \n \n \n Coxelos 26\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 789 barlessen\n Dent and Co\n \n \n \n \n 652 Smith\n Shangha\n May 714 Budge\n \n \n \n Ningpo tar.\n \n April 722) Mac\n \n \n \n jay\n 4465 Vincent\n \n \n \n \n 550 Jamieso\n \n \n \n \n \n Trautman and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n P. & C. S. N. Co\n \n \n \n \n \n Lyall, Still and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n Intended Despalvi\n \n \n \n \n \n Deat, Boale and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n Hongkong\n \n \n \n \n \n Smith, Kennedy and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n Cramptons, Labury and CosLovilu\n \n \n \n \n \n Early\n \n \n \n \n \n Jardine, Matheson and Co\n \n \n \n \n 5.\n \n \n \n \n \n April 16\n 261 Daiv\n ¿April\n \n \n \n \n Shaw, Bland and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n Melbourne\n \n \n \n \n \n Party\n \n \n \n \n \n 228 Day\n P. F. Cama and Co\n \n \n \n \n May 247,Dec.chor\n \n \n \n \n ¡May\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 7 750Tregcar\n P. & 0.8.\n N. Go.\n \n \n \n Hongkong\n \n \n \n \n \n Jane\n \n \n \n \n \n May\n 1002 Fraser\n \n \n \n \n May\n 836 Keys\n \n \n \n \n Dent, Beale and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n Hongkong\n \n \n \n \n \n April 21\n 5:0 Balfour\n \n \n \n \n Shaw, Bland and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n Freight or Char\n \n \n \n \n \n May\n 288 Cracke:\n \n \n \n \n Furdine, Matheson and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n May\n 641, Bett\n \n \n \n \n Augier and Co\n \n \n \n \n !Mauilu\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Lord of the Isles, slip\n į\n \n \n \n \n April\n \n \n \n \n \n Lindsay and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n May 7\n 280 Meckellar\n \n \n \n \n Ladeny and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n Ntugpo\n \n \n \n \n \n John Burd and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n Hingapore\n \n \n \n \n \n Early\n \n \n \n \n \n Dont, Scale and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n Hongkong\n \n \n \n \n \n sailed\n \n \n \n \n F\n \n \n \n \n \n April 5\n #38;Hant\n \n \n \n \n \n Freight or Char\n \n \n \n \n \n May\n 200 Cheyen\n \n \n \n \n Jarline, Matheson and Co\n \n \n \n \n \n 118Candes\n Order\n \n \n \n \n 375 Sena\n Qeder\n \n \n \n \n Pavid Sassoon, Suns and CoBombay\n \n \n \n \n \n Early\n \n \n \n \n \n Amoy\n \n \n \n \n \n Janet.\n \n \n \n \n \n Karly\n \n \n \n \n \n Orient, barque\n \n \n \n \n \n | Plato, steamer\n \n \n \n \n \n Unicom, steamer\n \n \n \n \n \n Water Witch, bacque\n \n \n \n \n \n Wellington\n \n \n \n \n \n Wild Dayroll, sch.\n \n \n \n \n \n Wild Wave, schooner\n Portugu\n \n \n \n \n Aurora, schooler\n \n \n \n \n \n Tramelga, barque\n \n \n \n \n \n French\n Bayadere, ship\n \n \n \n \n American\n Bayard, barque\n \n \n \n \n Cato, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Charmor, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Daring, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Edith Rose, whip\n \n \n \n \n \n Helena, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n John Stuart, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Levant, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Louisians, barque\n \n \n \n \n \n Lucknow, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Quickstep, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Samuel Russell, abips\n \n \n \n \n \n Samuel Willeta, shij\n \n \n \n \n \n Sancho Pau\n \n \n \n \n \n Sea Ngoph, barque\n \n \n \n \n \n Spire, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Underwriter, slaamer\n \n \n \n \n \n Vancouver, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Comet, whip\n \n \n \n \n \n Grazada, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Fluswar, stip\n \n \n \n \n \n James Marshall, brig\n \n \n \n \n \n Lorenza, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Miuna, schooner\n \n \n \n \n \n Penguin, okooner\n \n \n \n \n \n Recket, harque\n \n \n \n \n \n Kolding Wave\n \n \n \n \n \n bea Hanger, skip\n \n \n \n \n \n Selene, barque\n \n \n \n \n \n Curlow, brig\n \n \n \n \n \n John Wade, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Manry, barque\n \n \n \n \n \n Kingleader, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Wilmington, schooner\n \n \n \n \n \n Antelope, steamer\n \n \n \n \n \n Coumor, abip\n \n \n \n \n \n Waverley, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Dutch\n \n \n \n \n \n Admiral Zoutmann, al\n \n \n \n \n \n Johanu Maria, barque\n \n \n \n \n \n Baces, ekip\n \n \n \n \n \n Emilie, barque\n \n \n \n \n \n Protene, barque\n \n \n \n \n \n Neerlands Indie, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n St. Helena, sebooter\n \n \n \n \n \n Belions, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n Christana, barque\n \n \n \n \n \n Dasion\n \n \n \n \n \n Conrad livinzie, brig\n \n \n \n \n \n Hercules, brig\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Otto, barque\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Waldemar, large\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Dannebrog, baryor\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Hunbury\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n UONGEER\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n DESPIRATION\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n latended\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Drapaleis\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Loose, schooner\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Hongkong\n May 27\n 515\n Wood\n \n \n Russell and Co\n \n Singapore\n \n \n \n May 29\n 006\n Mason\n \n \n Lindsay and C\n \n \n \n \n \n has, Livingsth\n sud Co\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n British\n Africa, barque\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Alliance, barque\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Beverley, barge\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Challenger, abip\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Fixcelsior.\n ship\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Falcon, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Koehampton, barque\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Spirit of the Age, barq.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Trumphe, schooner\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Tubal Isl.\n brig\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Vindex.\n schocher\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pantaloons\n brig\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Bellona, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Angio Saxon, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Ann, loamor\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Annunooka, barque\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Caduceus, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Clipper, schooner\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Daphne, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Hazard, schooner\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Hiberiu, ship\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Hornet, achosiner", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-056 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [6].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 241828, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-063 - Sir Bowring - 1857 [4-7]", "page_number": 254, "title": "CO129-063 - Sir Bowring - 1857 [4-7]", "content_text": "The Chief Justice, & the Secretary. How, under such control, can the barristers obtain local Court satisfaction, conducted? In this case it seems to me Dr. Bridges' observation in Court might profitably be taken into consideration as to whether he was obnoxious, and if so, it was irregular, but I cannot truck the sense, if I face it was, involved such letters as Mr. Darley Morgan properly to 28802.\n\nI have lists at hand of no use of any for Official having \n\nExplication of the manner in which Dr. Bridges discharges his duties to Colonial Secretary... that the Office was not sought for by Mr... I that if he is one of the five Drivers out of \n\nby Mr. Phillipps I Lear\n\nThe Governor with \n\nintolerable that \n\nme of such frequent \n\nof again in quarrels amongst the principal opposite of the place - and if Mr. Decoley, who is always... Mr. Merivale. D is, I think, becoming \n\nCoupled in these quarrels, is not told disputes he will be Hong Kong should be the \n\nremoved. I fear these news, will be any peace come the place. At this that if \n\nDit on Shear \n\nJuin it very \n\nRuffinto to \n\n{\n\nreplace \n\nhim. \n\nSEL \n\n7172.3 \n\nbeta \n\nNUAL SECRETARY, \n\nSUPPLEMENT \n\nTO THE \n\nOverland China Mail, No. 141. \n\nHONGKONG, 10 JUNE, 1857.\n\ndays at lecture. \n\n251 \n\nCommander Torever \n\nSHAMEFUL SCENE IN COURT.\n\nawern testimony, independently of the way of being supplied, for the laaiting mow in Re, which hopt within reach of them for the upper end of the Town first, and so on 7168 ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE ACHING COLO- ! disallowed Ordinance. He also rennded course of erection user the superintens of \n\nlang time; and Cxplain Edgell brings to myliu sucressian, to enable our Boats to get the Rev. Mr Beocher will be as well suited for a She court of cases where is Louis Lecture room; na for a Seamen's Clapet; and antice the beltaviar aud cast arurate fire i Luk. Wa are sorry to have to contradict had so ruled during the present Attorcy \n\nassured that for such, it down, aur by Mr Hudson, Acting Mate, in the place towards our rear, at the Battery at the abrys be town opens. Should thy pject be sccne witnessed in the Supreme Court amining the cusco in question, asid that it carled out, to want of visitors wit be found, latter. The chase was constitued by this lower end of the Town, where most of the at the Criminal Sessionz on Monday last. was so, and that he was of opinion the either on Slays at pulle west, or on week! division, which accompanied, for or 14 casualties occurred. \n\nwas there must active and useful, and on two As no reporter for the press was present, present conviction was correct;\"--bat at \n\nmiles above the pice where the Steamers we give the circumstances na degeriled to the same time hinted in his own quiet but the public in your elias, and thereby oblige at the are having been excessive, I decided with small parties of Marines, under Lieut- Will you not endly bring this subject before had grounded, when, the work for the mesoccasions landed in a very galiant pamer us the same evening by a perfectly dis- firm way to the Attorney General, that, many busidum \n\n10 ar bak, but with the view of getting utauti, L. Blake, ., charged some twe interested eyewitness; but the facts con since he had been aware of the circum- \n\ntise Junko which we still had in sight, at a hundred well-arcied uses, and drove thei casily be substantiated by reference to the sauce, it was his duty to have informed \n\nfuture time by another passage, \n\nLegund in eutankyupis, officers of the Court, súd doubs the Court of the disallowance of the oven the Chief Juanice bintself will readily Oriinance, and at all events clous Amve pers bear testimony to their treth. What ob-witted on (the Chief Justice) the exercise ject is to be gained by the attempt which of its privilege. \n\nThas been made to distors faris, expl Suc is a true statement of the case. \n\nTHE WRITER. ---China Mill, May 20. \n\nTithe Billor of the \"China Mail.\" \n\nkonekana. Si funr. 1817. DEAR Sha, Aernesncleation in your ieste of last week, ideately announces the fact, that \n\nfor \"Seamen?: Chupel\" \n\nThat is too good news to be true, \n\nis rather pacature. \n\n7. Near the point at which we turned, sh 16. An attempt was made to tow dawa the rage of Tseen Trome, we found the ¦ On the Wor Jo be already noticed, but whe Lovely Funnyma, which was captured fast accidentally aught fire, and she was there \n\nThat being December, while in tow of the eteamer fore degroyed with the others, Thistle. I must her. \n\nazcomplished the Boats returned down the 8. On getting back to the Ganbeats at Creek. night, I found that Commander Corbett, who \n\nthe more gratification of personal spicen, Mr Bridges did not rise in the hench speriadening the erection of a building \n\n17. This again was a severe day's work; we cannot profess even to guess. \n\nreserved for the Legislative Council,\" nori It would be observed that the Garnid he interrupt the Court in the manner! \n\nhad very properly remained with the Staruch | offices and men behaved uduniably, mel It is cre thans i would cost gladly to unpage: on her grosiding-tu uber Commanders i with the greatest split. 1 beg la regiarz, 19. ment Gazeite of Saturday last contained a dermibed by those who were not precast, in ach duty, and, Providence promising notification of the disallowance by the land who therefore have been mishel as to us to be ; but the announcement above noticed \n\nhaving gone on had sent the Taflexible's ↑ you be able assistance. I reunived from Cap home government of Ordinance No. 15 of what actually took place; nor indeed would not crerzet su unimpeetart an error, \n\npaddle bos Boat after a Junk that tried to tain Edgell, and from Connraanders Forsyth, escape down & Creek to the right, and cap- Corbett, and Tammur, during the two days\" 1856,—* An Ordinance for amending the did he speak loud enough to be heard by were i aut continually died & Where in pune tured her. Commander Forsyth had return-perations. Their seat and antivity the last Law of Evidence and Triat by Jury, any one bat the Chief Justice; and, as Chapel lucated!\" A very aggravating question, ed with his party, and Lieutenant Deul, dey (as before) was exulated by the Officers The Fourth Clause of which is as follows: we sail before, the false accounts which by the way. It is like waking an old Earheler assisted by the Olheurs of the other Gunboats, of all ranka urder them, freie Lientenant \n\nIV. A Heather Withus, in any tour, or Lave been given of the occurrence can to be able to sewer the question. Beside this, Chinese having reruried to one of the Junks Cadet \n\nwhere a wife is, when he would give the world, bed secured or destroyed all the prizes. The Nares, the Senior Lieutenant, to the Javier before any porsan eupowered to administer an only have had their origin in spite or call, shall not be sworn either before er upon jealousy. \n\nstlecribers to the enterprise must wonder that below, she was recaptured by Mr Motioy, 18. Captain Edgell brings to my notice. giving his testimony, unless the said Court or \n\nthey have not been estigulted, according to the seed Master, with the Starting's and the active share taken by Livatenant Stanis Ju will be soon that though we defend rms of sulsoription. person shall third: fit so to direct; în which case the said winess shall be sworn according to his Dr Bridges from a false accusation, (and conscience, But every flatiren Witness shall, we should assuredly not attempt to de- butor the taking of his said evidence, baby, er ferd him were he in the wrong,) we have by the order of, the said Court or Person, duly refrained from any remarks on the style warned to speak the bruth, and informed of the of Mr Anstev's address, which, not lacing and worthy of being well carried cat. Hong-nsists of one beary Gun in the Baw, each day as a Volunteer, and made himself \n\npenalties to which, in case he whall not speak \n\n18 imply, therefore, to ease my own mind Hongkong's Bois. Lienterant Dent brought forth in the bone's Barge; and the sur- vices of Mr Hudson, Acting Mate of this to my notice the conduct of that Officer. and that of subsetilmes, that I trespass tuon your columns, and corect si error. \n\n9. lo all, 27 heavily armed Stake Borte Soip, 1 beg parisearly to notice. \n\nLieutenant Rd. Cox, of the 38th Regiment Their Armonétr Madras Risles, accompanied the expedition \n\nvery useful, \n\nin gnestini, 1 fiely Padors. 16 le a good idea, oupured or destroyed. \n\nThe mala idea suggested by the communication Celonging to the Admiral a Hay) were \n\nalways a more Shipping Fort. There ja to be a \n\nis not what it was five, or even two, yenas generally a fong 32 or 24-Peunder, with fum on the five years to sinne ty be expected to 6 fighter Guus; wol Vessel pulls about vell Bates change. This is not to be 40 nors. This servies was fortunately ac \n\ncity, here, miroving in numbers, but in fasellectual extrano; sand in is quite tinte tak one of the resued amusements suggeted by \n\nThe Waiter shoult to intradusal. \n\nthe truth, he will become liable; it being herely been present, we did not bear, bat which declared and enacted, that the pensities of Fer our informant states to have been highly jury stall be denied and taken to apply to False utbecoming, to say the very least of it\" Testimony given by any such witness, whether Sach violent ebullitions : a Court of Jus-jace and refined & vissy, a constantly improvize Botngslished with the loss of two men only sworn sworn, in any use where, if it as tice are disgreefel to all concerned, and given the same upon walk, ho would by law ! hare thereby becoine lisad to the same. \n\nought to he put a summery stop to by An inexcusable oversight, it seems, was the Chief Justice; and if how officers for \n\nget themselves, and use language aule- committed by the local government, in caring their official character, it is high Seatnen's Cliapol,\" I have an objset iu view caser (but not severe) of sun strike occurred \n\nUne or twa \n\nwonended. The day was excessively not, and I can speak ton highly of the spirit with which the men stuck to their ears, through a harder day's work than I have ever before Of course, in labouring be the stridslunent of witnessed under a tropical sun. \n\nbigher and an re important that suggested in the Gunboats. \n\nla commaneation of your last wack's co- alge hat hond, to his would picase we respondeur; but as Keligion tudi true Refinement \n\nnot having officially notified the Attorney General of the Ordinance having been time they were reminded of it, if not disallowed; but that Mr Anstey was aware utherwise, through the columns of the of it through the Gazette, he did not profom public press. We have witnessed to to dony. Notwithstanding the disalloway such recriminatory barangues Tat-mi dan tind she combined in my enter auce, he proceeded to try the case without terly, such as ne barrister, we feel assurul, piso. Respectfully, I am, Sir, swearing the witnesses a course in which would youture apen before the judges in | \n\nus will be shown, he was justified by the terms of a subsequent ordinues. Bat now for a description of what really did Denur in Court. \n\nEnglaud, and such as should not be per- witted bero. \n\n-China Mail, May 20 \n\nEVENING AMUSEMENTS.\n\nImmediately before the evidenes was closed, or at all events before the jury had We have mock pleasure in nesking room returned their verdict-our informant is for the following communication, and hope not certain which the Acting Colonial the proposal will meet with the courage- Secretary called to him the Crown So-mout it deserves:- \n\nlicitor, and pointed out that the Attorney To the Editor of the \"China Mail.\" General Lad, in not swearing the witness, overlooked the disallowance of the Ordi \n\nHosure, 28 May, 1857. \n\nJ. C. BEECHER. -China Maži, June 4, \n\nGAZETED NOTICKS, \n\nBar Haakons Cureras Garde, Func E. J \n\ntions more in detail. \n\n10. At daylight next morning the Steamers and ten pelas in tow, and attached with the proceeded down the frecks with the Boats Syble, the Second Bar. \n\n11. Further Arrangements were now made to follow up the War Boats that had o | away. I had already, the previous day \n\ntard to strengthen Commander Forsyth's \n\nSigned, \n\nTrae Extracts, \n\nC. ELLIOT, Commodat \n\nTien. S. MORRISDN. \n\nReturn of the Force engaged in the Brenpo Creek, on the 35th of Say, at the Capture ami Datraction of Chinese War Veste. Steam Tender Bunghong, Lieut. EL T. Dent. |trandat \n\nChili. Spain Tender Fir C. Forbet, „ Vine. fort Gunboat Startin \n\nVilliers. Siunach, \n\nWildman. Sybille. Launch-Lieut. E. Nee; Livut, Blake, a \n\nMr Price, Midaluperar. Borge, Mr A. 4. Brooke, Midshipman. Piankee-Mr. K. Hudson, Asing Mate \n\nGatter,—Mr W. Ht. De Burgly Midshipman. \n\n* \n\nhreat. Swale, n.. \n\nRaleigh. \n\nH \n\nCar-Commander Turner: Mr J. Forhess Assistant Solgeon; Mr Pilkington, Mid- shipman Launch,-iros. Goodenough; Lord Charles \n\nSet, Mulshipnot Pinnaco, Lieut. Grabara; Mr Dupries, Mil- \n\nskipman. \n\nTribune. \n\nGig-Capt. Tidgell; Mr E. Elwyn, Naval Cadet ; \n\nMe Childers, Midshipman \n\nBarge, Liat. Saniforth; Lieet Boyle; Me Harvey, Surgeon; Lieut. A. Ozxari, Volunteer, Lieut. Hichord Cox, 34th Regi- men: .N.I. \n\nshipman; My Rowe, Assistant Paymaster; My Hawkins, Naval Cadet, Cutter, Mr Yest, Midelima. Mir R. \n\nVerry, Gopurk \n\nstationed the Tribuné off Sawshee Chamel, ļaud 1 now moored the Inflexilie abreast of the Second Bar Creek, dowa which her Guð uld then range. From the knowledge I Exacts from a Despatch from Commodore now possessed respecting the various treels honourable C, G, J, 3. BLLC. from Escape Creek downwards, à considered dated wh May, 1857, to the addrees of, it possible to guard all outlets to the His Excellency Rear Admiral Rifer, and with a force of Bosts to sour Mona Sernions, K.C.B. \n\nSpottie, ED BAR, CARTON RIPER there wither to meet that fave or cetize th 4th May, 1867. wards the main River. Commander Forsyth Sia--It is a frequent subject for remark, that 1. 1 bad the honour to report to you \n\nwith his division tools up his station in Escape mance, and that a verdict ander the viral.ough there boarge uber of residents yesterday, that Her Majesty's Gauboats, Greek in the evening. cumstances would be illegal, and weight loud is this Colony fully capable of appreciating and į Tenders, and Ship Boats, captured or des- | 12. At daylight the 27th I proceeded the escape of the prisoners. Mr Cooper enjoying hitelary entertainments, there are no frayed about 40 Mandarin Junks (Suake up the Saws Channel as previously ar Turner thereupon crossed over to they may be destred. With the exeption of our big w to report the nature of the upitra-ers for 10 or 12 miles, 1 then sent the Bos Pintave, Livul. Normate; Mr Barker, Mid- suell emergituents to be enjoyed, however acheals) on the 25th and 27th Instant, 1anged, the Boats being towed by the Stean- Anstey, and told him what Dr Dridges had ceanna Ball, (from which andemment many said Mr Anstey, however, took no are restrained by Jack of invitation, utud others further notice of it, but on the verdict of by principle,) there is nothing to breast in upo 2. The Fleet of Juuks which formerly relivision, and desired Lieutenant Dent in the guilty being returned, instantly, as is in pleasure. In the cities of our native laude, navod to a position about five or six miles Pine, and go a short distance up the the dull Fouding of business and ucharrowing mained near the main euch of the tiver had unploy to false with him the Inferible's -Saraton, left the Court Dr Bridges then there are always relaxations to be fand in the up the Cree. As it was very doubtful; Sieoud Bar Creek (he succeeded in passing \n\nwork up to the Registrar's desk, and said form of Lesturda, Concerts, and such Wke, which whether our small Steemers mid to completely through into Escape Creek, and Gig-Commander Forsyth. emmething to the Chief Justice, in 50 real pleasures, and yet which at the samne \n\nthem, it was upeessary to have a sufficient \n\net Commander Forsyth.) Casting off from time, R. A. Deown, Acting Mate low tone as to be unbeard by our time tend to improve the said, and refine the Boat foren to follow up the Creek, iade the Steamers, the Beats pulled up ite Saw-Cutter-Lieut. Brock, Honourable A. Denison, informant, but which would appear to juller man There is rule which works bath \n\npendent of Ganhoat support. \n\nshore Channel, and we anon beard from the \n\nAnting Mate. have been of the same tenor no the mea ievestiors bebokens increasing refinement in the ways. While sa enlarged interest in such re- \n\n3. At daylight on the 25th, our Force was that foar of Sin Hop's retreating Squadron natives (who showed us every good feeling) sage delivered to Mr Anstey through recamanity, the encunmaging and fostering such in the Creek, and soon afterwards a Mandarin had on the 25th gone up to Tang Kons, Turner, for His Lordship sent for the interest, is one of the surest manus of bringing Fleet of about 40 Junks was observed moored and that there were other Mandarin Juuks Attorney General, and explained to him about an elevated public suliment. The mind what had been said. Mr Anstey there else the finer elepients will natally dissolve, and of a community, as well as the body, must be fed, upon expressed great indignation at the \n\ngrosser exuberatu enlund of the Evecative government, as represented by Dr Bridges and that they hud ant deigned to show him the despatiu disallowing the Ordinance, or even to commonlaste its tenor, except through the government notice open to all. Mr The peculiar organization of our society does within good tuge, she opened fire, and was Anstey further intimated the atunst con- pot were like me on supported by the Bustard and Starting Roman, and served the mastheads of the Return of the Force exprged on the 27th May, ut and denied the right of the Acting Culminature, that Ettle advantage is gained either—in others being at distant range. The War Junks. The Boats now gave way with tempt for the technical quibble started- \n\nBerad. \n\nJafazibie. \n\nStarboard Pale-Box Boat, Lisa Hanson fig,--Commander Crebert \n\nMr Barkle, Mid-biptnan. \n\nPort Pedule-Box Bat-Me . Sukee, Mid- shipman Me Magrudi, Assistant Surgeon, \n\nin good order across the stream. The tide there (I beg here to mention the very for the Juuke to escape, and although it made fter. Skinned Beal, Chaplain of this ship, who Finaceout. Bacon; Mr Teliasis, Mil- was a strong ebb, which rendered it less easy great assistance I have received from the \n\nwas good enough at my request to accom. pany me each day us Chiurse Interpreter; are in a great degree doe, as I had failed to to his aid the successes of the expedition \n\n1: is imprasible for human nature to thrive thread the way amongst the shoals \n\nnur progress slow, iz enebied us this better to \n\ndessert. The day demily of business, do not tend the leading Steuses as they approached, 4. A heavy fire from the Janks opened upon \n\nmigh & Bil. bo served up wokthly by way of i mn Book-keeping, Beefstenks, and Beer, even \n\na test men's heads, and surely the wist desails, but at too great a distice to tell with effect. \n\nof late dinners can have no such tendency \n\nand what is of this is so its \n\nShortly afterwards, as the Hoogkang got \n\nobtain an interpreter from Hongkong) \n\nBAI MAL \n\nPary \n\nPaddle-Box Boat,-Lient. Smith; Mr. Mayary, Assistant Surgeon; Mr Hayes, Midshipman. Punae, My Smith, Acting Mite! \n\n13. About 10 miles from where the Steam- Total Force of Boats with game-13 Cutters \n\ners were left, we opened the City of Tong \n\na will; and though the Junks were in sight \n\nand Gigs 7. \n\nthe Fedruction of Chinese War Boats at to those who visis or thuge who are visited: and, fire from the Junks then slackened, and they Secretary to appear in that court. If he Hence it occurs, that falls seven-tenths of our gut aulerweigh; some were soon afterwards \n\nTeung Konan. and his friends, said Mr Anstey, think me population are as entirely destitute of evening abandoned, and the rest plying their arsy two miles off, they succeeded in taking \n\nSplitte. them completely by surprise; the Bous, as unit to fall my functions, cere 19 another intent, na though; carb one wear ande resident endeavoured to escape op the treek. \n\nBarge,-Lieut. Naces; Mr Brooke, Midship- pon upon the island, Robinson Crusoe, Phillip \n\nthey dasked in, firing into a standi battery \n\nmare; Lieut. lake, R.M. before which they ear cito me, tribunal \n\na. The Stoners followed, thongh very Qar, or other more of all be survey slowly on account of the shoal wafer; the War Funky, eased them to be immediately \n\nwhich camanded the River, and into the pin Hudson, Acting Mate; Lieut gad les them there do their word! The \n\nNow tie ought Get so to he is a state of \n\nSwale, K.M. learned gentleman referred to cases report things sliko derimented to five rolny as a whole, Charles Forbes and Staunch grounded abandoned. The Jooks lay scattered along Cutter, Mr De Burgh, Midshipznali. \n\nely, then the Starling, and eventually the the whole length of the Town through which Hongkong ran ashore. The signal was 10- the River runs, and preparatious ware Bow and a general chase took place. The Junk mediately made for the Boats to go ahead, nede in destroy them with the exception of Cutter Commander Tour: Mr Forbes, Assistant Surgeon Mr Pilkington, Mid- one, the finest and heaviest grined War Junk ! force divided, the main body of about 15 non- I have seus in China, which I hoped to be Pisser-Lie Gralas; Mr Duries, Mid- \n\nshipmana. tiquing up the main channel were followed i uble to take away. by the Boats, doi by Captafa Edgell, who \n\nTribune. \n\n| cul in the Hangkang Register for Decom- | anod to the individuat elamuter of those who com \n\nber, 1851, and January 1832, and sou- \n\nprise it. The rond with feed on something, and tended that the court had power under there be no larless recreations to satisfy the if it cannot have wheat, it must take chat. If Ordinance 5 of 1858, § 4,* to admit un demand, then grosser indulgencies will be sought fun, which delar the character a surely as the * Every Court, \n\nor Officer \n\nGundide to take Adidas le 23 ant \n\nlet, Crli ur Orinatra”, where my porson concjælent to ) \n\nformer serve to elevate it. \n\nIs it not desirable, ches, to supply, so far \n\ngive pekline or make fidavit their shall refrs to¡ possible, some social entertainments, which may \n\nwarn fleista, may, at his reton, peralt floor intuest as we as elevate-which all appeal to \n\ncalthy appetite for wholesome and \n\nThere is els at talent, should think, f \n\nliar tu berku sa en Bueratina, or Staterof the better nature of murselves, and give na a his or her Farbbowonge by Una salat mračket, which sate Declarou or Hatement shall thenceforth leave the vanie force and affect in all repeat? usdila ne mer Hops * or Adavit (as the cause war vel to the live pur sworn to lài tho usual way, would save Bul: But no such permiator shall be granted in a person Who shall not have been fire, by the rail Court, Magli Hale, Commissioner, or Officer, duly warmer to speak \n\n15 Prath, and ladoled of the Fesultis, which lie m \n\nthe sunny, to carry through a rise of Lycan Lectures, which would be a credit to the place, and prove a saree of pleasure to our fellow citizens; and beside those wow pinong as, there \n\ndetached four Pines a Crook to the Chinese Tramps were not going quietly to 14. Et soon became apparent that the \n\nshipman. \n\nRaleigh. \n\nMr J. Phillipps, Ayting 24 Master, \n\nte fallone the sadler -ision: Com sabrnit to this proceeding without farther Gig-Capt. Figril; Ms W. Flwyn, Naval Cadet ; matcher Pureyth devonanied these Pires, resista ce, and the reck being arrow with Barge Lieut. Stanforth; Liest Ozcan, which suceredeit in capturing thasa all (ten Houses on either wids, they had every facility \n\nin amber). Commander Forsyth speaks to pick off war men. As we find passed up. | \n\nBanett, Acting Assistant Surgeon \n\nVownther, Lieut. Cox, 38th Regiment M.N.1. \n\nbighly of the gallant way the Horacf's Pin- only a few gingalls and matchlocks opened; Pinnace,--Hest. Norman; Air Barker, Mid- have, wnder Me R. A. Brown, Acting Minte, these increasing in number, presently gare! dashed in, wasupported by the other Boats, considerable ayaner, and it was necessary, which she fund distanced, against three of to keep up a continued tire with some of these heavily armed Janks which struck to the Bear's Guns, fresketry, and from the Tribune's Rucket Bost, which did good \n\nthe will ineste by making a False Fierlaan 544 345ly passing, bansient visitors, travel \n\ncat unor this risauce and furar, who shold of every part of the veld, who world her. floss he or she shali kuppen on he a busddigno) hare; gladly aid to entertain us by their obervations; \n\nWhat tlie \n\nsaid Court, Magidrato, Comeliner and at that is required would soon! to i Terved front a Religious or Contentious Bell that Beaking of a Vata is unlawful, \n\nellip; Mr Hawkins, Naval Cadet. Cutter-Lieut. Slowtherd; Mr Mangon, Mid- \n\nshipman My Verey, Gwner. \n\nInflexible. \n\nGig-Commander Corbett ; Mr W. Burney. \n\nbe a euit- 6. The main body, followed by Captain service, while other parties were employed | Starboard Uadille-Box Dou Lieut. Dacou: Mr that his or her Objection to take the Oath Ute all in which to hold such meetings Even Ragell, were soon beyond range of all, exept destroying the Junks, which compied some Buckle, Midshipman; Mr Magrath, Assistant \n\nthis desideratone, I ano gled to say, is in a fa, the Hornet's Rocket, Boat and Sybille's Pil- time, as it was cressary to burd' those at [ \n\nSargcom.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-063 - Sir Bowring - 1857 [4-7].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 355637, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-264 - Governor Sir Robinson & Public Offices - 1894 [9-12]", "page_number": 623, "title": "CO129-264 - Governor Sir Robinson & Public Offices - 1894 [9-12]", "content_text": "14468\n\nIn any further communication on this subject, please quote\n\nM 607%\n\nand address letter to\n\nThe Secretary,\n\nAdmiralty, Whitehall,\n\nLondon, S.W.\n\n \n\nC. O.\n\n14468\n\nRECEIVED\n\nREC 18 AUG 14\n\nAdmiralty,\n\n14th August\n\n1894.\n\n0.7545 August 1894\n\n618\n\nI am commanded by My Lords Commissioners of the\n\nAdmiralty to request\n\nyou will inform\n\nThe Secretary of State that the Commander-in-Chief\n\nof\n\nthe China\n\nStation, in a letter dated 8th ultimo,\n\nNo 287, from Japan,\n\nhas reported that\n\nThe Plague at Hong Kong\n\nhas shown\n\nlittle reduction in virulence\n\nand that Commodore Bayes,\n\nwhile doing everything in his power to assist the Colony, is taking\n\nall requisite precautions to prevent the spread\n\nof the pest to the Service afloat, in which he has been hitherto successful.\n\nI am,\n\nYour obedient Servant,\n\nR. D. Brday.\n\nColonial Office.\n\nNo. 3.\n\n82915\n\n~16.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-264 - Governor Sir Robinson & Public Offices - 1894 [9-12].txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505070, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926", "page_number": 336, "title": "CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926", "content_text": "Nos.\n\ntook advantage of the recent presence in Hong Kong of Mr. O'Malley, Counsellor of His Majesty's Legation at Peking, \n\nto arrange for a visit of inspection to Bias Bay on the \n\n16th June in H.M.S. \"Despatch\". Our party, in addition \n\nto Mr. O'Malley and myself, consisted of Commodore Stirling, \n\nColonel Montague Bates (at present Officer Commanding the \n\ntroops in Hong Kong), Colonel Coates, Mr. W.T. Southorn \n\n(Colonial Secretary) and several military and naval officers. \n\nWe had also with us Captain H.F. Bloxham, acting Assistant \n\nSuperintendent of Police, and Lieutenant-Commander Ingham, \n\nRoyal Navy, who had both participated in the raid made upon \n\nthe Bias Bay pirates in co-operation with the Chinese \n\nauthorities in January 1925, and described in Captain \n\nBloxham's report which forms an enclosure in my predecessor's \n\ndespatch No.81 of the 3rd March, 1925.\n\n5.\n\nWe made a careful inspection of Bias Bay, noting \n\nespecially the anchorage to which the pirates take captured \n\nvessels, and viewing the village of Fan Lo Kong from the \n\nwaters of the inlet on which it is situated. Consequent \n\non this inspection, I have received the attached letters \n\ndated 24th and 25th inst., from Commodore Stirling and \n\nColonel Montague Bates respectively, indicating the nature \n\nof the operations which would be necessary, if a punitive \n\nexpedition were to be undertaken. It is clear from these \n\nletters that prior authority from the Admiralty and Foreign \n\nOffice will be needed, and I have the honour to suggest \n\nthat the consent of those departments and also of the Foreign \n\nOffice should be obtained to action on the following lines: \n\nWhen next a piracy in Bias Bay is reported, it is \n\nproposed that two companies of a British regiment should be \n\n...\n\n(111)", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505072, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926", "page_number": 338, "title": "CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926", "content_text": "by the Chinese people either in Canton or in Hong Kong,\n\nIt would certainly be welcomed by the Cantonese sea-faring\n\nfolk and it would serve to vindicate British prestige.\n\n7.\n\nI have shown this despatch in draft to Commodore\n\nStirling and to Colonel Montague-Bates, who concur in the\n\npracticability of the proposed punitive expedition.\n\nAccordingly I have the honour to request that, if these\n\nrecommendations meet with the approval of His Majesty's\n\nGovernment, the necessary instructions may be sent to Hong\n\nKong by telegram.\n\n8.\n\nI have sent a copy of this despatch to His\n\nMajesty's Minister at Peking, and His Majesty's Consul\n\nGeneral at Canton.\n\n9.\n\nX\n\nI enclose a chart showing Bias Bay and its\n\ncontiguity to Hong Kong waters: and I have indicated on\n\nthe chart the anchorage to which pirates have in the past\n\ntaken the vessels which they have seized.\n\nI have, &c.\n\n(Sgd.) C. CLEMENTI,\n\nGovernor, &c.\n\nNot circulated Colonial Office.\n\nin possession of\n\nPage 336\n\n \n(2)\n\n \n336", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505102, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926", "page_number": 368, "title": "CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926", "content_text": "7. This question was considered by the Oversea Defence Committee at their 272nd Meeting held on the 29th October, 1926. The Committee are unanimously of opinion that, from the point of view of Hong Kong, it is very desirable that some steps should be taken to deal with the Bias Bay pirates, who are inflicting much injury on the trade of the Colony.\n\nThey recognise, however, that it is for His Majesty's Government to decide whether British forces should be permitted to take action for this purpose on Chinese territory,\n\n8. The Committee are informed that the Foreign Office, while concurring in the desirability of checking piracy in Bias Bay, take the view that everything possible should be done to force the Chinese authorities to take action in the matter and to avoid action by British troops on Chinese soil, since the latter might result in propaganda throughout China to the detriment of British interests.\n\nFirst, the Foreign Office suggest, therefore, that action should be considered in three stages. The Canton Government should be informed that unless they take immediate action for the suppression of piracy in Bias Bay, His Majesty's Government may be forced to do so; secondly, in the event of no action being taken by Canton, naval action, not involving actual landing on Chinese soil, should be attempted; and, thirdly, if naval action is ineffective, a plan on the lines suggested by the Governor of Hong Kong, or as amended by the Acting Consul-General, Canton, should be considered.\n\nThe Foreign Office have submitted to the Committee the draft of a telegram (Appendix VI), which it has been suggested should be sent to the British Minister, Peking.\n\n9. The Admiralty take the view that the Foreign Office proposals for the Navy to patrol Bias Bay would involve a large operation owing to the extent of the Bay; that probably three craft would have to be permanently employed on the patrol, and that even then the plan was unlikely to be effective. While recognising that it might not be possible to capture the pirates themselves, they are of opinion that the destruction of their headquarters and organisation might produce the desired result, and for this reason, they consider that a plan on the lines suggested by the Governor of Hong Kong is the only solution to the problem.\n\n10. The War Office, while agreeing that the naval patrol of the coast (which the Foreign Office considered should not involve bombardment of the piratical villages), is unlikely to be effective, take the view that owing to the limited military resources of Hong Kong and the very large extent of the coastline of Bias Bay, the occupation suggested by the Acting Consul-General, Canton (Appendix IV), is not practicable. The area that could be occupied would be so small that it would probably have no effect whatever on the operations of the pirates. In this connection, the Committee note that in paragraph 5 of his despatch dated the 28th August, 1926 (Appendix II), the Governor of Hong Kong suggests that steps must be taken to make the pirate bases in Bias Bay and in the Canton River delta unsafe as centres for piratical operations. It would, therefore, appear that the Governor does not contemplate limiting his action to Bias Bay alone.\n\nThe War Office also doubt whether the combined naval and military expedition suggested by the Governor does not involve an alteration of the policy of His Majesty's Government with regard to China described in C.I.D. Paper No. 727-B, dated the 15th October, 1926, as follows:—\n\n\"The policy of His Majesty's Government is therefore to avoid being drawn into intervention in Chinese affairs on a large scale, and to pursue as far as possible a policy of patience and conciliation. This being so, they consider that armed action should be confined to the defence of British lives, property, and interests by whomsoever attacked, provided that such action is easily practicable and will not involve extensive and incalculable military commitments.\"\n\n11. The Air Ministry are strongly opposed to air action against the pirate villages, as suggested by the Commodore, Hong Kong, in Enclosure No. 3 to Appendix. They are of the opinion that it would be impossible to avoid inflicting damage on innocent persons, and suggest that this would result in charges of barbarous and inhuman conduct which might damage our prestige.\n\nThe Committee are fully in agreement with this view.\n\n12. In conclusion, the Committee submit that it is for His Majesty's Government to decide whether British forces may undertake punitive action against Chinese pirates on Chinese soil, and whether representations to the Canton Government regarding piracy in Bias Bay need be dependent on the preparation of a plan for such punitive action.\n\nThey further suggest that, if the decision of His Majesty's Government is favourable to action by British forces, the following suggestions should receive consideration by the Committee of Imperial Defence:\n\n(1) That before any action by British forces is undertaken, the Canton Government should be requested to take immediate and effective steps for the suppression of piracy in Bias Bay, and should be informed that if this is not done, His Majesty's Government may be forced to take action. They further suggest that the nature of the action contemplated should not be divulged, and that, in view of the fact that many ships, though not British-owned, have British masters and serve British interests, action should be permissible in any case where British interests are known to be involved.\n\n(2) That if the above course is agreed to, it is essential that a plan of British action should be framed by the local authorities in Hong Kong and approved by the Admiralty, War Office, and Air Ministry without delay. Further, it is suggested that the plan adopted must conform to the existing naval and military resources of Hong Kong, and should be such as to cause as little adverse comment as possible among responsible Chinese authorities.\n\n(3) That, occupation of Bias Bay being impracticable owing to the area involved, purely naval action being unlikely to be effective, and air action being undesirable owing to the risk of damage to innocent persons, the only plan that might produce the desired result is one generally on the lines suggested by the Governor of Hong Kong in his despatch of the 30th June, 1926.\n\n(4) That the presence of Chinese troops and authorities when the operation takes place is hardly feasible, as swift action would appear essential if success is to be achieved. In this connection, the Committee invite attention to the telegram from Peking (Appendix V), in which the British Minister suggests that co-operation by any Northern Chinese man-of-war would be more likely to antagonise Canton than isolated action taken by ourselves.\n\n(5) That the Foreign Office draft telegram (Appendix VI) should be considered in the light of the decisions reached on the points mentioned above.\n\n(6) That, as the Foreign Office consider that the most careful consideration should be given to questions of international law and general policy that might be affected by punitive action by British troops in China, any plan that may be considered feasible should not be finally approved without further reference to that Department.\n\n(Signed)\n\n2, Whitehall Gardens, S.W.1,\n\nNovember 8, 1926.\n\nG. N. MACREADY, Secretary,\n\nOversea Defence Committee.\n\n[15276]\n\nB 2\n\n366\n\nPage 363\n\nPage 363\n\nPage 363\n\n1", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505103, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926", "page_number": 369, "title": "CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926", "content_text": "# APPENDIX I.\n\nGovernor, Hong Kong, to Secretary of State for the Colonies.\n\n(O.C., No. C. 15383.) Sir,\n\nHong Kong, June 30, 1926.\n\nI HAVE the honour to invite your attention to my secret despatch of the 20th January last, concerning the capture of steamship \"Tung Chow\" by pirates, and particularly to the sixth paragraph, from which you will see that on the 9th January Mr. Fu Peng-sheung, then Commissioner of Foreign Affairs at Canton, wrote that this outrage \"should be dealt with by the Nationalist Government themselves, who would certainly be able to exterminate these pirates. Moreover, they had already begun to move in the matter, and there was no need for foreign assistance.\"\n\n2. Not only has no attempt whatever been made from that day to this by the Canton Government to exterminate the Bias Bay pirates, but, since the seizure of steamship \"Tung Chow,\" three more piracies have been committed by the Bias Bay gang. I attach a report (Enclosure No. 1) by Mr. T. H. King, deputy superintendent of police, describing these piracies. Bias Bay is in a sort of \"No Man's Land,\" in which the writ of the Canton Government does not run, and which is dominated by pirates and brigands from the large village of Fan Lo Kong at the north-east corner of the bay.\n\n3. In view of the fact that a French vessel, the steamship \"Jade,\" was captured by Bias Bay pirates in February last, I was fortunate enough to secure the co-operation of the French naval commander-in-chief, Admiral Basire, with the British naval commander-in-chief, Admiral Sir E. Alexander-Sinclair, in a scheme whereby it is now arranged that, as a matter of routine, all British and French men-of-war on their way up and down the China coast between Hong Kong and Shanghai put into Bias Bay and steam round it, and, further, that they carry out their gunnery and torpedo exercises, as often as occasion permits, in this bay. The object of this scheme is that the pirates should so frequently see men-of-war in and about Bias Bay that they may be forced to consider it a hazardous place from which to organise piracies or to which to bring vessels which they have seized. I have endeavoured to interest the United States navy in this scheme through the United States Consul-general at Hong Kong and through the Counsellor of the United States Legation at Peking, who was recently on a visit to Hong Kong. But I have not yet had an opportunity of discussing the matter with Admiral Williams, the United States naval commander-in-chief in these waters, and I do not know what view he takes of the proposal.\n\n4. I regard it, however, as most important that these Bias Bay pirates should not be allowed to commit any further outrage with impunity. They have a long record of successful crime behind them, and I attach a précis (Enclosure No. 2) of piracies committed by them since 1921. The pirates, I may say, are led by daring men with a good knowledge and experience of ocean-going ships. I therefore took advantage of the recent presence in Hong Kong of Mr. O'Malley, Counsellor of His Majesty's Legation at Peking, to arrange for a visit of inspection to Bias Bay on the 16th June in H.M.S. \"Despatch.\" Our party, in addition to Mr. O'Malley and myself, consisted of Commodore Stirling, Colonel Montague-Bates (at present officer commanding the troops in Hong Kong), Colonel Coates, Mr. W. T. Southorn (Colonial Secretary) and several military and naval officers. We had also with us Captain H. F. Bloxham, acting assistant-superintendent of police, and Lieutenant-Commander Ingham, Royal navy, who had both participated in the raid made upon the Bias Bay pirates in co-operation with the Chinese authorities in January 1925, and described in Captain Bloxham's report, which forms an enclosure in my predecessor's despatch No. 81 of the 3rd March, 1925.*\n\n5. We made a careful inspection of Bias Bay, noting especially the anchorage to which the pirates take captured vessels, and viewing the village of Fan Lo Kong from the waters of the inlet on which it is situated. Consequent on this inspection, I have received the attached letters (Enclosures Nos. 3 and 4), dated the 24th and 25th instant, from Commodore Stirling and Colonel Montague-Bates respectively, indicating the nature of the operations which would be necessary, if a punitive expedition were to be undertaken. It is clear from these letters that prior authority from the Admiralty and War Office will be needed, and I have the honour to suggest that the consent of those Departments and also of the Foreign Office should be obtained to action on the following lines:—\n\nWhen next a piracy in Bias Bay is reported, it is proposed that two companies of a British regiment should be immediately despatched with such naval escort as may be available in accordance with a plan which is being prepared by the naval and military authorities. The expedition would proceed at once to the anchorage in Bias Bay, where pirated ships are moored, and would there land and endeavour to waylay the pirates while removing their loot. The troops would also search the pirate villages, and, if necessary, destroy them.\n\n6. Such a punitive expedition would, of course, be a warlike operation undertaken in Chinese waters and on Chinese soil. If, therefore, the co-operation of a Chinese cruiser, should one happen to be in or near Hong Kong at the time, could be obtained, this would be a great advantage. But it is not unlikely that no Chinese cruiser might be at hand, and the essence of a punitive expedition into Bias Bay is that it should follow immediately upon the report of a piracy. In such case, having regard to the fact that the Bias Bay area is outside the effective control of any administration in Canton, and having regard also to the numerous depredations committed by Bias Bay pirates in recent years, the de facto Canton Government when presented with the fait accompli might, of course, loudly protest against it as an act of war carried out by British armed forces in Kwangtung, but would, I believe, secretly rejoice at the extermination of this nest of pirates, and might even be encouraged thereafter to exert its own authority by stationing troops in this area and driving out the brigands who infest it. The result, as a whole, would I feel sure be salutary, and would not be misunderstood by the Chinese people either in Canton or in Hong Kong. It would certainly be welcomed by the Cantonese seafaring folk, and it would serve to vindicate British prestige.\n\n7. I have shown this despatch in draft to Commodore Stirling and to Colonel Montague-Bates, who concur in the practicability of the proposed punitive expedition. Accordingly I have the honour to request that, if these recommendations meet with the approval of His Majesty's Government, the necessary instructions may be sent to Hong Kong by telegram.\n\n8. I have sent a copy of this despatch to His Majesty's Minister at Peking and His Majesty's consul-general at Canton.\n\n9. I enclose a chart showing Bias Bay and its contiguity to Hong Kong waters, and I have indicated on the chart the anchorage to which pirates have in the past taken the vessels which they have seized.\n\nI have, &c.\n\nC. CLEMENTI, Governor.\n\nEnclosure No. 1\n\nPrécis of Piracies committed by Bias Bay Pirates, 1926\n\n1. Steamship \"Jade.\"-Shun Cheung Steamship Company, 6, Connaught Road, Central, 2nd floor, running between Haiphong, Kwong Chau Wan and Hong Kong. Was pirated on the 8th February, 1926, eight hours out from Kwong Chau Wan on her way to Hong Kong. She is a cargo ship, and was carrying 100 tons general cargo and bullion valued $82,900. There were ten third-class passengers. Seven of these were the pirates. They took the ship to Bias Bay and arrived off Fan Lo Kong at 10 A.M. on the 10th February. The ship was taken right up the creek, where it was in 3 fathoms of water and about 500 yards from the shore. The pirates called two sampans, which took off all the pirates and the bullion. The pirates boarded the ship at Kwong Chau Wan.\n\n2. Steamship \"Hsin Kong.\"-China Merchants' Steam Navigation Company. Was pirated on the journey from Shanghai to Canton, when she was near Swatow on the 25th March, 1926. The pirates took the ship to Bias Bay and transferred ashore cargo and loot from the passengers by means of a boat which was lying in readiness at an arranged spot. (\"South China Morning Post,\" of the 1st April, 1926.) (Hong Kong police have no report or details of this piracy.)\n\nPage 367", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505106, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926", "page_number": 372, "title": "CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926", "content_text": "10 \n\n5. This method would, it is considered, be the most effective for the work and act as the greatest deterrent against future piracies. \n\n6. As regards a combined Naval and Military operation, this could be arranged if authorised by his Excellency the Naval Commander-in-Chief, and as far as the Navy is concerned would entail— \n\n(a) Transport for troops. \n\n(b) Disembarking and re-embarking them on and from the beaches. \n\n(c) Covering their landing and supporting them with gunfire as may be required, \n\nThe details of this could be arranged after consultation between the Naval and Military staffs as to landing places and objectives after landing. \n\n7. The craft which would be available would depend on the season of the year, and during summer months it is improbable a cruiser would be available. \n\n8. I am discussing this question of a combined punitive expedition with his Excellency the General Officer Commanding, China Command, with a view to formulating a suitable plan, but it would not be possible to put such a plan into operation until the present Standing Instructions issued for the guidance of Commanders-in-Chief, and Senior Officers on the China station, issued by the Admiralty are materially altered. \n\n9. It is appreciated that the unstable conditions in China at the present time render the present instructions impractical to a certain extent, but in view of the radical principles underlying these instructions, it is not possible to make any departure from them unless authorised by their Lordships. \n\nI have, &c. (Signed) A. J. B. STIRLING, Commodore. \n\nSir, \n\nEnclosure No. 4. \n\nOfficer Commanding Troops, Hong Kong, to Colonial Secretary, Hong Kong. \n\nHong Kong, June 25, 1926. \n\nIn the event of another piracy taking place against a British ship at Bias Bay, or in the vicinity of Hong Kong, I understand it is the intention of his Excellency to deal summarily with the matter. I have the honour to state that from a military point of view the operation would appear to be simple, subject to a cruiser or a commandeered ship being available to take the troops without delay to the scene of the piracy. \n\nSo far as one can foresee, the number of men necessary for this operation would be roughly two companies of British troops, strength 220. Two days' rations would be carried, and it would be advisable to have the support of Naval fire in case the landing was opposed. \n\nBritish troops at Hong Kong (East Surreys) have already been trained for this type of operation and would be ready to embark fully equipped, &c., within two hours of the warning being issued either by day or night. \n\nThe authority of the War Office is necessary for this operation, and to avoid any hitch if at any future time a piracy takes place, it would appear advisable to obtain War Office authority without delay. \n\nI have, &c. \n\n(Signed) F. S. MONTAGUE-BATES, Lieutenant-Colonel. \n\n11 \n\nAPPENDIX II. \n\nGovernor, Hong Kong, to Secretary of State for the Colonies. (C.O. No. C. 187690.) Sir, \n\nHong Kong, August 28, 1926. WITH reference to my secret despatch of the 30th June on the subject of the Bias Bay pirates, I have the honour to inform you that two further outrages have recently been committed by these pirates. \n\n2. The Norwegian steamship \"Sandviken,\" chartered by the Soviet Trading Company, known locally as the \"Bolshy Company,\" which some time ago opened offices in Canton and Swatow, left Canton for Swatow at 9 A.M. on the 21st August with about 120 passengers and general cargo. At about 7:15 P.M. on the same day, when south of Hong Kong, some forty pirates, who came aboard the vessel at Canton disguised as passengers, and who were armed with revolvers and knives, took forcible possession of the ship, cut the wireless apparatus, obliged the captain to proceed to Bias Bay, and there looted the ship and the passengers. The pirates released the ship at 6 A.M. on the 22nd August, and she then proceeded to Swatow, where she arrived at 6 P.M. on the same day with crew and passengers all safe. The first news of the affair received in this Colony was a telegram despatched from Swatow by steamship \"Sandviken\" to Messrs. Wallem and Co. in Hong Kong at 6 P.M. on the 22nd August; but this news was not transmitted by Messrs. Wallem and Co. to this Government until the 24th August. The steamship \"Sandviken\" is registered in Bergen, Norway. \n\n3. The steamship \"Hoinam,\" a small Chinese-owned steamer, which plies between Canton and Swabue (Shanmei), left the latter port at noon on the 23rd August, and after the usual stop at Ma Kung, when off Bias Bay, she was seized by some thirty armed pirates, who had come aboard as passengers, taken into Bias Bay and looted. The pirates left the ship in small boats, which they met at a pre-arranged spot, and released her. The steamship \"Hoinam\" then continued her voyage, passing southward of Hong Kong, direct to Canton, whence the first news of the affair reached Hong Kong on the 27th August. \n\n4. Another recent piracy, which took place quite close to Hong Kong, was that of the steamship \"Kwong Lee,\" owned by the China Merchants' Steam Navigation Company. She was en route from Shanghai to Canton, and passed south of Hong Kong in the morning of the 13th July. When she was entering the Canton River a number of pirates, disguised as passengers, seized her and took her to Ngai Mun, in the delta, where they looted and disabled her. The ship, after the pirates left her, managed to get under way again at 6 P.M. on the 15th July and proceeded direct to Canton, where the first report of the occurrence was made. \n\n5. In none of these cases has the Canton Government taken any steps to trace the pirates or to act against the pirate bases, which are well known; and it is clear that, if piracies of ever-increasing number and daring are not to be committed in and around the waters of this Colony, we must ourselves take steps to make the pirate bases in Bias Bay and in the Canton River delta unsafe as centres from which these operations can be planned and executed. I trust, therefore, that the recommendations made in my secret despatch of the 30th June, if not yet acted upon when this despatch reaches you, may be approved as early as possible and that telegraphic instructions on the subject may be sent to me. \n\nI have, &c. \n\n(Signed) C. CLEMENTI. \n\nGovernor, &c. \n\nAppendix I. \n\n[15276] \n\nD \n\n370 \n\n1", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505110, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926", "page_number": 376, "title": "CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926", "content_text": "This question was considered by the Oversea Defence Committee at their 272nd Meeting held on the 29th October, 1926. The Committee are unanimously of the opinion that steps should be taken to deal with the Bias Bay pirates, who were inflicting much injury on the trade of Hong Kong. They recognise, however, that questions of high policy are involved, and that any suggestions they might be able to put forward must be subject to the policy of His Majesty's Government.\n\n8. The Committee are informed that, while the Foreign Office concur in the desirability of checking piracy in Bias Bay, they are of opinion that everything possible should be done to force the Chinese authorities to take action in the matter and to avoid action by British troops on Chinese soil, as the latter might result in propaganda throughout China to our detriment. They suggested, therefore, that action should be taken in three stages. Firstly, the Canton Government should be informed that unless they take immediate action for the suppression of piracy in Bias Bay His Majesty's Government will be forced to do so; secondly, in the event of no action being taken by Canton, naval action, not involving actual landing on Chinese soil, should be attempted; and, thirdly, if naval action is ineffective, a plan on the lines suggested by the Governor of Hong Kong, or as amended by the Acting Consul General, Canton, should be considered.\n\nThe Foreign Office submitted to the Committee the draft telegram (Appendix VI), which it was suggested should be sent to the British Minister, Peking.\n\n9. The Admiralty view is that the Foreign Office proposals for naval patrolling of Bias Bay would involve a large operation owing to the extent of the Bay; that probably three craft would have to be permanently employed on the patrol, and that even then the plan was unlikely to be effective. While recognising that it might not be possible to capture the pirates themselves, they are of opinion that the destruction of their property might produce the desired result, and for this reason, they consider that a plan on the lines suggested by the Governor of Hong Kong is the only solution to the problem.\n\n10. The War Office, while agreeing that the naval patrolling of the coast, which the Foreign Office considered should not involve bombardment of the piratical villages, was unlikely to be effective, point out that owing to the limited military resources of Hong Kong and the very large extent of the coastline of Bias Bay, the occupation suggested by the Acting Consul-General Canton (Appendix IV), is not practicable. The area that could be occupied would be so small that it would probably have no effect whatever on the operations of the pirates. In this connection, the Committee note that in paragraph 5 of his despatch dated the 28th August, 1926, the Governor of Hong Kong suggests that steps must be taken to make the pirate bases in Bias Bay and in the Canton River delta unsafe as centres for piratical operations. It would, therefore, appear that the Governor does not contemplate limiting his action to Bias Bay alone.\n\nThe War Office also doubt whether the combined naval and military expedition suggested by the Governor does not involve an alteration of the policy of His Majesty's Government with regard to China, which is described in C.I.D. Paper No. 727-B, dated the 15th October, 1926, as follows:-\n\n\"The policy of His Majesty's Government is therefore to avoid being drawn into intervention in Chinese affairs on a large scale, and to pursue as far as possible a policy of patience and conciliation. This being so, they consider that armed action should be confined to the defence of British lives, property, and interests by whomsoever attacked, provided that such action is easily practicable and will not involve extensive and incalculable military commitments.\"\n\n11. The Air Ministry are strongly opposed to air action against the pirate villages, as suggested by the Commodore, Hong Kong, in Enclosure No. 3 to Appendix I. They are of the opinion that it would be impossible to avoid inflicting damage on innocent persons, and suggest that this would result in charges of barbarous and inhuman conduct which might damage our prestige.\n\nThe Committee generally are fully in agreement with this view.\n\n12. While recognising that it is not within their competence to make definite recommendations on this subject at the present stage, the Committee would submit that if punitive action by British forces against Chinese pirates on Chinese soil is not deemed to be at variance with the general policy of His Majesty's Government with regard to China, the following suggestions should receive consideration by the Committee of Imperial Defence:-\n\n(1.) That before any action by the Services is undertaken, the Canton Government should be requested to take immediate and effective steps for the suppression of piracy in Bias Bay, and should be informed that if this is not done, His Majesty's Government will be forced to take action. They further suggest that the precise details of the action contemplated should not be divulged, and that in view of the fact that many ships, though not British-owned, have British masters and serve British interests, action should not be strictly confined to cases where British-owned ships are involved.\n\n(2) That if the above course of action is approved, it is essential that a plan of British action, framed by the local authorities in Hong Kong, should be approved by the Admiralty, War Office, and Air Ministry before the Canton Government is approached. Further, that the plan adopted must conform to the present naval and military resources of Hong Kong, and must be such as to cause as little adverse comment as possible among responsible Chinese authorities.\n\n(3) That occupation of Bias Bay being impracticable owing to the area involved, purely naval action being unlikely to be effective, and air action being undesirable owing to the risk of damage to innocent persons, the only plan likely to produce the desired result is one generally on the lines suggested by the Governor of Hong Kong in his despatch of the 30th June, 1926.\n\n(4.) That the presence of Chinese troops and authorities at the scene of action when the operation takes place is hardly feasible, as swift action would appear essential if success is to be achieved. In this connection, the Committee invite attention to the telegram from Peking (Appendix V), in which the British Minister suggests that co-operation by any Northern Chinese man-of-war would be more likely to antagonise Canton than isolated action taken by ourselves.\n\n(5.) That the Foreign Office draft telegram, shown in Appendix VI, should be considered in the light of the decisions reached on the points mentioned above.\n\n(Signed)\n\n2, Whitehall Gardens, S.W.1,\n\nNovember 1, 1926.\n\nC. N. MACREADY, Secretary,\n\nOversea Defence Committee.\n\n[15276]\n\nB 2\n\n374\n\nF", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505111, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926", "page_number": 377, "title": "CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926", "content_text": "APPENDIX I.\n\nGovernor, Hong Kong, to Secretary of State for the Colonies.\n\n(C.O., No. C. 15383.) Sir,\n\nHong Kong, June 30, 1926.\n\nI HAVE the honour to invite your attention to my secret despatch of the 20th January last, concerning the capture of steamship \"Tung Chow\" by Bias Bay pirates, and particularly to the sixth paragraph, from which you will see that on the 9th January Mr Fu Peng-sheung, then Commissioner of Foreign Affairs at Canton, wrote that this outrage \"should be dealt with by the Nationalist Government themselves, who would certainly be able to exterminate these pirates. Moreover, they had already begun to move in the matter, and there was no need for foreign assistance.\"\n\n2. Not only has no attempt whatever been made from that day to this by the Canton Government to exterminate the Bias Bay pirates, but, since the seizure of steamship \"Tung Chow,\" three more piracies have been committed by the Bias Bay gang. I attach a report (Enclosure No. 1) by Mr. T. H. King, deputy-superintendent of police, describing these piracies. Bias Bay is a sort of \"No Man's Land,\" in which the writ of the Canton Government does not run, and which is dominated by pirates and brigands from the large village of Fan Lo Kong at the north-east corner of the bay.\n\n3. In view of the fact that a French vessel, the steamship \"Jale,\" was captured by Bias Bay pirates in February last, I was fortunate enough to secure the co-operation of the French naval commander-in-chief, Admiral Basire, with the British naval commander-in-chief, Admiral Sir E. Alexander-Sinclair, in a scheme whereby it is now arranged that, as a matter of routine, all British and French men-of-war on their way up and down the China coast between Hong Kong and Shanghai put into Bias Bay and steam round it, and, further, that they carry out their gunnery and torpedo exercises, as often as occasion permits, in this bay. The object of this scheme is that the pirates should so frequently see men-of-war in and about Bias Bay that they may be forced to consider it a hazardous place from which to organise piracies or to which to bring vessels which they have seized. I have endeavoured to interest the United States navy in this scheme through the United States consul-general at Hong Kong and through the counsellor of the United States Legation at Peking, who was recently on a visit to Hong Kong. But I have not yet had an opportunity of discussing the matter with Admiral Williams, the United States naval commander-in-chief in these waters, and I do not know what view he takes of the proposal.\n\n4. I regard it, however, as most important that these Bias Bay pirates should not be allowed to commit any further outrage with impunity. They have a long record of successful crime behind them, and I attach a précis (Enclosure No. 2) of piracies committed by them since 1921. The pirates, I may say, are led by daring men with a good knowledge and experience of ocean-going ships. I therefore took advantage of the recent presence in Hong Kong of Mr. O'Malley, Counsellor of His Majesty's Legation at Peking, to arrange for a visit of inspection to Bias Bay on the 16th June in H.M.S. \"Despatch.\" Our party, in addition to Mr. O'Malley and myself, consisted of Commodore Stirling, Colonel Montague-Bates (at present officer commanding the troops in Hong Kong), Colonel Coates, Mr. W. T. Southorn (Colonial Secretary) and several military and naval officers. We had also with us Captain H. F. Bloxham, acting assistant-superintendent of police, and Lieutenant-Commander Ingham, Royal Navy, who had both participated in the raid made upon the Bias Bay pirates in co-operation with the Chinese authorities in January 1925, and described in Captain Bloxham's report, which forms an enclosure in my predecessor's despatch No. 81 of the 3rd March, 1925.*\n\n5. We made a careful inspection of Bias Bay, noting especially the anchorage to which the pirates take captured vessels, and viewing the village of Fan Lo Kong from the waters of the inlet on which it is situated. Consequent on this inspection, I have received the attached letters (Enclosures Nos. 3 and 4), dated the 24th and 25th instant, from Commodore Stirling and Colonel Montague-Bates respectively, indicating the nature of the operations which would be necessary, if a punitive expedition were to be undertaken. It is clear from these letters that prior authority from the Admiralty and War Office will be needed, and I have the honour to suggest that the consent of those Departments and also of the Foreign Office should be obtained to action on the following lines:--\n\nWhen next a piracy in Bias Bay is reported, it is proposed that two companies of British regiment should be immediately despatched with such naval escort as may be available in accordance with a plan which is being prepared by the naval and military authorities. The expedition would proceed at once to the anchorage in Bias Bay, where pirated ships are moored, and would there land and endeavour to waylay the pirates while removing their loot. The troops would also search the pirate villages, and, if necessary, destroy them.\n\n6. Such a punitive expedition would, of course, be a warlike operation undertaken in Chinese waters and on Chinese soil. If, therefore, the co-operation of a Chinese cruiser, should one happen to be in or near Hong Kong at the time, could be obtained, this would be a great advantage. But it is not unlikely that no Chinese cruiser might be at hand, and the essence of a punitive expedition into Bias Bay is that it should follow immediately upon the report of a piracy. In such case, having regard to the fact that the Bias Bay area is outside the effective control of any administration in Canton, and having regard also to the numerous depredations committed by Bias Bay pirates in recent years, the de facto Canton Government when presented with the fait accompli might, of course, loudly protest against it as an act of war carried out by British armed forces in Kwangtung, but would, I believe, secretly rejoice at the extermination of this nest of pirates, and might even be encouraged thereafter to exert its own authority by stationing troops in this area and driving out the brigands who infest it. The result, as a whole, would, I feel sure, be salutary, and would not be misunderstood by the Chinese people either in Canton or in Hong Kong. It would certainly be welcomed by the Cantonese seafaring folk, and it would serve to vindicate British prestige.\n\n7. I have shown this despatch in draft to Commodore Stirling and to Colonel Montague-Bates, who concur in the practicability of the proposed punitive expedition. Accordingly, I have the honour to request that, if these recommendations meet with the approval of His Majesty's Government, the necessary instructions may be sent to Hong Kong by telegram.\n\n8. I have sent a copy of this despatch to His Majesty's Minister at Peking and His Majesty's consul-general at Canton.\n\nI enclose a chart showing Bias Bay and its contiguity to Hong Kong waters,* and I have indicated on the chart the anchorage to which pirates have in the past taken the vessels which they have seized.\n\nI have, &c.\n\nC. CLEMENTI,\n\nGovernor.\n\nEnclosure No. 1\n\nPrécis of Piracies committed by Bias Bay Pirates, 1920\n\n1. Steamship \"Jade.\"—Shun Cheung Steamship Company, 6, Connaught Road, Central, 2nd floor, running between Haiphong, Kwong Chau Wan and Hong Kong. Was pirated on the 8th February, 1926, eight hours out from Kwong Chau Wan on her way to Hong Kong. She is a cargo ship, and was carrying 100 tons general cargo and bullion valued $82,900. There were ten third-class passengers. Seven of these were the pirates. They took the ship to Bias Bay and arrived off Fan Lo Kong at 10 a.m. on the 10th February. The ship was taken right up the creek, where it was in 3 fathoms of water and about 500 yards from the shore. The pirates called the pirates boarded the two sampans, which took off all the pirates and the bullion.\n\n2. Steamship \"Hsin Kong.\"—China Merchants' Steam Navigation Company. Was pirated on the journey from Shanghai to Canton, when she was near Swatow on the 25th March, 1926. The pirates took the ship to Bias Bay and transferred ashore cargo and loot from the passengers by means of a boat which was lying in readiness at an arranged spot. (\"South China Morning Post,\" of the 1st April, 1926.) (Hong Kong police have no report or details of this piracy.)\n\nPage 375", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 505114, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926", "page_number": 380, "title": "CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926", "content_text": "5. This method would, it is considered, be the most effective for the work and act as the greatest deterrent against future piracies.\n\n6. As regards a combined Naval and Military operation, this could be arranged if authorised by His Excellency the Naval Commander-in-Chief, and as far as the Navy is concerned would entail—\n\n(a) Transport for troops.\n\n(b) Disembarking and re-embarking them on and from the beaches.\n\n(c) Covering their landing and supporting them with gunfire as may be required.\n\nThe details of this could be arranged after consultation between the Naval and Military staffs as to landing-places and objectives after landing.\n\n7. The craft which would be available would depend on the season of the year, and during summer months it is improbable a cruiser would be available.\n\n8. I am discussing this question of a combined punitive expedition with His Excellency the General Officer Commanding, China Command, with a view to formulating a suitable plan, but it would not be possible to put such a plan into operation until the present Standing Instructions issued for the guidance of Commanders-in-Chief, and Senior Officers on the China station, issued by the Admiralty are materially altered.\n\n9. It is appreciated that the unstable conditions in China at the present time render the present instructions impractical to a certain extent, but in view of the principles underlying these instructions, it is not possible to make any radical departure from them unless authorised by Their Lordships.\n\nI have, &c.\n\nSir,\n\n(Signed) A. J. B. STIRLING, Commodore.\n\nEnclosure No. 4.\n\nOfficer Commanding Troops, Hong Kong, to Colonial Secretary, Hong Kong.\n\nHong Kong, June 25, 1926.\n\nIn the event of another piracy taking place against a British ship at Bias Bay, or in the vicinity of Hong Kong, I understand it is the intention of His Excellency to deal summarily with the matter. I have the honour to state that from a military point of view the operation would appear to be simple, subject to a cruiser or a commandeered ship being available to take the troops without delay to the scene of the piracy.\n\nSo far as one can foresee, the number of men necessary for this operation would be roughly two companies of British troops, strength 220. Two days' rations would be carried, and it would be advisable to have the support of Naval fire in case the landing was opposed.\n\nBritish troops at Hong Kong (East Surreys) have already been trained for this type of operation and would be ready to embark fully equipped, &c., within two hours of the warning being issued either by day or night.\n\nThe authority of the War Office is necessary for this operation, and to avoid any hitch if at any future time a piracy takes place, it would appear advisable to obtain War Office authority without delay.\n\nI have, &c.\n\n(Signed) F. S. MONTAGUE-BATES, Lieutenant-Colonel.\n\nPage 11\n\nAPPENDIX II.\n\nGovernor, Hong Kong, to Secretary of State for the Colonies.\n\n(C.O. No. C.187690.)\n\nSir,\n\nHong Kong, August 28, 1926. With reference to my secret despatch of the 30th June on the subject of the Bias Bay pirates, I have the honour to inform you that two further outrages have recently been committed by these pirates.\n\n2. The Norwegian steamship, \"Sandviken,\" chartered by the Soviet Trading Company, known locally as the \"Bolshy Company,\" which some time ago opened offices in Canton and Swatow, left Canton for Swatow at 9 A.M. on the 21st August with about 120 passengers and general cargo.\n\nAt about 7:15 P.M., on the same day, when south of Hong Kong, some forty pirates, who came aboard the vessel at Canton disguised as passengers, and who were armed with revolvers and knives, took forcible possession of the ship, cut the wireless apparatus, obliged the captain to proceed to Bias Bay, and there looted the ship and the passengers. The pirates released the ship at 6 A.M. on the 22nd August, and she then proceeded to Swatow, where she arrived at 6 P.M. on the same day with crew and passengers all safe. The first news of the affair received in this Colony was a telegram despatched from Swatow by steamship \"Sandviken\" to Messrs. Wallem and Co. in Hong Kong at 6 P.M. on the 22nd August; but this news was not transmitted by Messrs. Wallem and Co. to this Government until the 24th August. The steamship \"Sandviken\" is registered in Bergen, Norway.\n\n3. The steamship \"Hoinam,\" a small Chinese-owned steamer, which plies between Canton and Swabue (Shanmei), left the latter port at noon on the 23rd August, and after the usual stop at Ma Kung, when off Bias Bay, she was seized by some thirty armed pirates, who had come aboard as passengers, taken into Bias Bay and looted. The pirates left the ship in small boats, which they met at a pre-arranged spot, and released her. The steamship \"Hoinam\" then continued her voyage, passing southward of Hong Kong, direct to Canton, whence the first news of the affair reached Hong Kong on the 27th August.\n\n4. Another recent piracy, which took place quite close to Hong Kong, was that of the steamship \"Kwong Lee,\" owned by the China Merchants' Steam Navigation Company. She was en route from Shanghai to Canton, and passed south of Hong Kong in the morning of the 13th July. When she was entering the Canton River a number of pirates, disguised as passengers, seized her and took her to Ngai Mun, in the delta, where they looted and disabled her. The ship, after the pirates left her, managed to get under way again at 6 P.M. on the 15th July and proceeded direct to Canton, where the first report of the occurrence was made.\n\n5. In none of these cases has the Canton Government taken any steps to trace the pirates or to act against the pirate bases, which are well known; and it is clear that, if piracies of ever-increasing number and daring are not to be committed in and around the waters of this Colony, we must ourselves take steps to make the pirate bases in Bias Bay and in the Canton River delta unsafe as centres from which these operations can be planned and executed. I trust, therefore, that the recommendations made in my secret despatch of the 30th June, if not yet acted upon when this despatch reaches you, may be approved as early as possible and that telegraphic instructions on the subject may be sent to me.\n\nI have, &c.\n\n(Signed) C. CLEMENTI, Governor, &c.\n\nAppendix I\n\n[15276]\n\nD\n\n378", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-496 - Public Offices - 1926.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 }, { "id": 570479, "series_id": 27, "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine", "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案", "series_use_hku_proxy": false, "document_key": "CO129-585-1 Sino-Japanese conflict- attacks on shipping 25-1-1940 - 2-10-1940", "page_number": 296, "title": "CO129-585-1 Sino-Japanese conflict- attacks on shipping 25-1-1940 - 2-10-1940", "content_text": "376\n\n- 2\n\n-\n\n-\n\noff Kit Shek in Chinese waters, about one hundred miles from Hong Kong, is described in four further Police reports and supporting statements enclosed herewith.\n\n4.\n\nSix of the nine junks mentioned in the reports dealt with in the preceding paragraph were manned by natives of Hong Kong and all nine operated from Hong Kong fishing bases, Shaukiwan and Aberdeen, and were engaged in catching fish for the Hong Kong markets near the Colony's coasts.\n\n5.\n\nCopies of this despatch are being sent to His Majesty's Ambassadors at Tokyo and Shanghai, and the Commodore, Hong Kong.\n\nI have the honour to be,\n\nSir,\n\nYour most obedient, humble servant,\n\nN. G. Smith\n\nColonial Secretary\n\nfor Governor.", "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-585-1 Sino-Japanese conflict- attacks on shipping 25-1-1940 - 2-10-1940.txt", "external_url": "", "rank": 0 } ]