[
    {
        "id": 234681,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-046 - Lieut. Governor Caine & Sir Bowring - 1854 [5-19／8]",
        "page_number": 93,
        "title": "CO129-046 - Lieut. Governor Caine & Sir Bowring - 1854 [5-19／8]",
        "content_text": "137\n\nright of a belligerent to prevent neutrals from breaking any effective blockade which may be established with an adequate force against the enemy's forts, harbours, or coasts.\n\nBut Her Majesty will waive the right of seizing enemy's property laden on board a neutral vessel, unless it be contraband of war.\n\nIt is not Her Majesty's intention to claim the confiscation of neutral property, not being contraband of war, found on board enemy's ships, and Her Majesty further declares, that being anxious to lessen as much as possible the evils of war, and to restrict its operations to the regularly organized forces of the country, it is not her present intention to issue letters of marque for the commissioning of privateers.\n\nWestminster, March 28, 1854.\n\nWEDNESDAY, MARCH 29, 1854:\n\nAt the Court at Buckingham-Palace, the 29th day of March, 1854.\n\nPRESENT,\n\nThe QUEEN'S Most Excellent Majesty in Council.\n\nAnd\n\nHer Majesty having determined to afford active assistance to Her Ally, His Highness the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire, for the protection of his dominions against the encroachments and unprovoked aggression of His Imperial Majesty, the Emperor of all the Russias, Her Majesty therefore, is pleased, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered, that general reprisals be granted against the ships, vessels, and goods of the Emperor of all the Russias, and of his subjects or others inhabiting within any of his countries, territories, or dominions, so that Her Majesty's fleets and ships shall and may lawfully seize all ships, vessels, and goods belonging to the Emperor of all the Russias, or his subjects or others inhabiting within any of his countries, territories, or dominions, and bring the same to judgment in such Courts of Admiralty within Her Majesty's dominions, possessions, or colonies, as shall be duly commissioned to take cognizance thereof.\n\nTo that end Her Majesty's Advocate-General, with the Advocate of Her Majesty in Her Office of Admiralty, are forthwith to prepare the Draft of a Commission, and present the same to Her Majesty at this Board, authorizing the Commissioners for executing the Office of Lord High Admiral to will and require the High Court of Admiralty of England, and the Lieutenant and Judge of the said Court, his Surrogate or Surrogates, as also the several Courts of Admiralty within Her Majesty's dominions, which shall be duly commissioned to take cognizance of, and judicially proceed upon, all and all manner of captures, seizures, prizes, and reprisals of all ships, vessels, and goods that are or shall be taken, and to hear and determine the same; and, according to the course of Admiralty and the Law of Nations, to adjudge and condemn all such ships, vessels, and goods, as shall belong to the Emperor of all the Russias or his subjects, or to any others inhabiting within any of his countries, territories, or dominions.\n\nAnd they are likewise to prepare and lay before Her Majesty, at this Board, a Draft of such Instructions as may be proper to be sent to the said several Courts of Admiralty in Her Majesty's dominions, possessions, and colonies, for their guidance herein.\n\nFrom the Court at Buckingham-Palace, this twenty-ninth day of March, one thousand eight hundred and fifty-four.\n\nCRANWORTH, C.\n\nGRANVILLE, P.\n\nARGYLL, C.\n\nP. S. NEWCASTLE.\n\nBREADALBANE,\n\nLANSDOWNE.\n\nABERCORN.\n\nABERDEEN.\n\nCLARENDON.\n\nDRUMLANRIG.\n\nMULGRAVE.\n\nF. RUSSELL.\n\nERNEST BRUCE.\n\nSYDNEY HERBERT.\n\nJ. R. G. GRAHAM.\n\nSTEPHEN LUSHINGTON.\n\nW. E. GLADSTONE.\n\nWILLIAM MOLESWORTH.\n\nAt the Court at Buckingham-Palace, the 29th day of March, 1854.\n\nPRESENT,\n\nThe QUEEN's Most Excellent Majesty in Council.\n\nIt is this day ordered by Her Majesty, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, that no ships or vessels belonging to any of Her Majesty's subjects, be permitted to enter and clear out for any of the ports of Russia, until further order; and Her Majesty is further pleased to order, that a general embargo or stop be made of all Russian ships and vessels whatsoever, now within or which shall hereafter come into any of the ports, harbours, or roads, within any of Her Majesty's dominions, together with all persons and effects on board the said ships or vessels; provided, always, that nothing herein contained shall extend to any ships or vessels specified or comprised in a certain Order of Her Majesty in Council, dated this twenty-ninth day of March, for exempting from capture or detention Russian vessels under special circumstances; and Her Majesty is pleased further to order, and it is hereby ordered, that the utmost care be taken for the preservation of all and every part of\n\n138\n\nthe cargoes on board any of the said ships or vessels, so that no damage or embezzlement whatever be sustained; and the Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Her Majesty's Treasury, the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty, and the Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports, are to give the necessary directions herein as to them may respectively appertain.\n\nAt the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 29th day of March, 1854.\n\nThe QUEEN'S Most Excellent Majesty in Council.\n\nPRESENT,\n\nC. C. Greville.\n\nHer Majesty being compelled to declare War against His Imperial Majesty, the Emperor of all the Russias and being desirous to lessen as much as possible, the evils thereof, is pleased, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered, that Russian merchant vessels, in any ports or places within Her Majesty's dominions, shall be allowed until the tenth day of May next, six weeks from the date hereof, for loading their cargoes and departing from such ports or places; and that such Russian merchant vessels, if met at sea by any of Her Majesty's ships, shall be permitted to continue their voyage, if on examination of their papers it shall appear that their cargoes were taken on board before the expiration of the above term. Provided, that nothing herein contained shall extend, or be taken to extend, to Russian vessels having on board any officer in the Military or Naval Service of the enemy, or any article prohibited or contraband of war, or any despatch of or to the Russian Government.\n\nAnd it is hereby further ordered by Her Majesty, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council as aforesaid, that any Russian merchant vessel which, prior to the date of this order, shall have sailed from any foreign port bound for any port or place in Her Majesty's dominions, shall be permitted to enter such port or place and to discharge her cargo, and afterwards forthwith to depart without molestation, and that any such vessel, if met at sea by any of Her Majesty's ships, shall be permitted to continue her voyage to any port not blockaded.\n\nAnd the Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Her Majesty's Treasury, the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty, and the Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports, are to give the necessary directions herein as to them may respectively appertain.\n\nVICTORIA R.\n\nBy the QUEEN,\n\nA PROCLAMATION,\n\nC. C. Greville.\n\nWHEREAS by Our Order in Council, bearing date the twenty-ninth day of March, one thousand eight hundred and fifty-four, We have ordered that general reprisals be granted against the ships, goods, and subjects of the Emperor of all the Russias, his subjects, or others inhabiting within any of his countries, territories, or dominions (save and except any vessels to which Our license has been, or may be granted, or which have been directed to be released from the embargo, and have not since arrived at any foreign port,) so that Our fleets and ships shall and may lawfully seize all ships, vessels, and goods belonging to the Emperor of all the Russias or his subjects, or others inhabiting within any of his countries, territories, or dominions, and bring the same to judgment in any of the Courts of Admiralty within Our dominions, duly authorized and required to take cognizance thereof, We do hereby order and direct that the net produce of all such prizes taken by any of Our ships or vessels of war (save and except when they shall be acting on any conjunct expedition with Our Army, in which case We reserve to Ourselves the division and distribution of all prize and booty taken, and also, save and except as hereinafter mentioned,) shall be for the entire benefit and encouragement of Our flag officers, captains, commanders, and other commissioned officers in Our pay; and of all subordinate warrant, petty, and non-commissioned officers, and of the seamen, marines, and soldiers on board Our said ships and vessels at the time of the capture, after the same shall have been to Us finally adjudged lawful prize.\n\nWhenever any prize shall be taken by any of Our fleets, squadrons, ships, or vessels of war, whilst acting in conjunction with any fleet, squadron, ships, or vessels of war belonging to any other Power or Powers in alliance with Us, Our High Court of Admiralty, or the Vice-Admiralty Court within Our dominions adjudicating thereon, shall apportion to such Ally or Allies a share or shares of the proceeds of such prize or prizes, proportionate to the number of officers and men, &c., present and employed on the part of such Ally or Allies, as compared with the number of officers and men, &c., present and employed on Our behalf in such capture or captures, without reference to their respective ranks; and the share or shares so set apart for such Ally or Allies shall be transmitted to persons as may be duly authorized on behalf of such Ally or Allies to receive the same. Ships or vessels being in sight of the prize, as also of the captor, under circumstances to cause intimidation to the enemy and encouragement to the captor, shall be alone entitled to share as joint captors.\n\nAfter having deducted the portion set apart as aforesaid for Our Allies, a distribution, so far as regards Her Majesty's Forces, shall be as follows;\n\nThe flag officer or officers shall have one-twentieth part of the whole net proceeds arising from prizes captured from the enemy, by any of the ships or vessels under his or their command, and of the rewards conferred for the same, according to the following conditions and modifications, save and except as hereinafter provided and directed, that is to say:\n\nWhen there is but one flag officer he shall have the entire one-twentieth part; when two flag officers shall be sharing together, the chief shall have two-thirds, and the other flag officer shall have the remaining one-third of the one-twentieth part; and when there shall be more than two flag officers, the chief shall have one half of the said one-twentieth part and the remaining half shall be\n\n90",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-046 - Lieut. Governor Caine & Sir Bowring - 1854 [5-19／8].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 242316,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-064 - Sir Bowring - 1857 [8-10]",
        "page_number": 202,
        "title": "CO129-064 - Sir Bowring - 1857 [8-10]",
        "content_text": "# China Mail, Vol. XIII. No. 655.\n\n## INTIMATIONS.\n\n**NOTICE** -- All Persons having Claims against the Estate of the late WILLIAM R. LORRAIN, sen., are requested to send in their claims to the undersigned on or before the 20th November next.\n\nADAM SVET, A. E. DIXSON. Hongkong, 3rd September, 1887.\n\n## NOTICE.\n\nAll Persons indebted to the Estate of the late ... are requested to make payment of the amounts due without delay, and parties having Claims against the said Estate, are required to forward particulars of the same to the Office of this Consulate for the 1st proximo.\n\nO. CLEVERLY, Acting British Vice-Consul &c. Macao, 24th August, 1887.\n\n## IN THE COURT OF THE COMMISSIONER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN CHINA.\n\nWILLIAM BURRAGE vs. Quincy Shaw, Hathaway, Rogers, and others.\n\nNOTICE is hereby given, that an Assignment of all the Property of the Firm of WETMORE & Co., in China, was made on the 12th day of August, 1857, by WILLIAM SHEPARD WETMORE, Partner in said Firm, to Oliver H. Perry, U.S. Consul at Canton, in trust for the Creditors of said Firm.\n\nS. WELLS WILLIAMS, Clerk of the Court, Legation of the United States of America in China. Canton, 12th August, 1857.\n\n## IN THE UNITED STATES CONSULAR COURT OF CANTON, IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY JURISDICTION.\n\nWHEREAS, LUMAN NORTON HITCHCOCK, an American Citizen, and Partner in the mercantile Firm of KING & Co., carrying on business at Canton and elsewhere within the jurisdiction of China, has made application in writing to this Court, verified by his oath, setting forth the insolvency of said Firm of KING & Co., and asking that he might be discharged from his debts as Co-partner; and it being necessary that a Receiver of his Property should be appointed to take and hold the same for suitable distribution: I, OLIVER H. PERRY, Consul of the United States of America for the Port of Canton, China, have appointed, and do by these presents appoint, Jay P. Blanchard, Esq., with full power and authority to take and hold the said LUMAN NORTON HITCHCOCK's Property, real and personal, and the Property of the said Firm of KING & Co., and hold the same subject to the order of this Court, at the Consulate of the United States Legation.\n\nOLIVER H. PERRY, United States Consul for Canton. Macao, 8th May, 1887.\n\n## NOTICE.\n\nBy order of His Excellency PETER PARKER, Commissioner of the United States to China, &c., &c., it is hereby made known to all American Citizens, that His Excellency has been officially informed, that His Britannic Majesty's Naval Commander in Chief, with the concurrence of Sir John Bowring, H.B.M. Plenipotentiary and Chief Superintendent of Trade, hath declared, from and after the instant, a strict blockade of the River and Port of Canton by all its entrances; and the same is hereby communicated for the information of American Merchants, Ship-masters, and others interested in said Blockade.\n\nOLIVER H. PERRY, United States Consul for Canton. Canton, 12th August, 1857.\n\n## SHIPPING.\n\n**PENINSULAR AND ORIENTAL STEAM NAVIGATION COMPANY'S STEAMSHIPS.**\n\nOne of the Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company's Steamships, with Her Majesty's Mails, Passengers, Specie, and Cargo, will leave this for SINGAPORE, PENANG, POINT DE GALLE, ADEN, SUEZ, MALTA, MARSEILLES, and SOUTHAMPTON; BOMBAY, MADRAS, and CALCUTTA, on WEDNESDAY, the 10th of September, at 9 A.M. Cargo will be received on board until 5 P.M. on the 9th.\n\n## CONTENTS IN AND VALUE OF PARCELS REQUIRED.\n\nA Written Declaration of the Contents and Value of the Package for the Overland Route is required by the Egyptian Government, and must be delivered by the Shipper to the Company's Agents with the Date of Taking on with Parcels, and the Company will not hold themselves responsible for any Detention or Prejudice which may happen through incorrectness in such declaration.\n\nROBT. S. WALKER, Superintendent. Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company's Office, Hongkong, 26th August, 1857.\n\n## TRIESTE ROUTE.\n\nThe Austrian Lloyd's Steam Navigation Company's STEAMERS ply regularly between Trieste and the Levant, corresponding with the Monthly and Bi-monthly Indian Steamers. The Fares have been reduced, and the following are the Rates, viz: 1st Class, £14: 2nd Class, £11; 3rd Class, £7: in valuing Packages and Furs.\n\n## INSURANCES.\n\n**THE LONDON AND ORIENTAL STEAM TRANSIT INSURANCE OFFICE.** (Established in 1843.) The Premium of Insurance charged by this Office has been reduced from 1/4 to 1/8 per cent. on Goods insured to London, the Ports of this Office intervening. Charge the Risk of Railway from Southampton.\n\nR. S. WALKER, Hongkong, 19th August, 1857.\n\n**\"NETHERLANDS INDIAN MARINE & FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF BATAVIA.\"** The undersigned, having been appointed Agents for the Company in China, are prepared to grant Insurances on ORDINARY MARINE RISKS, to EUROPE, UNITED STATES, India, the STRAITS Java, or the Coast, at the Rates of Premium current at the Places--Policies can be obtained at BOMBAY, SINGAPORE, PENANG, and Batavia. TURNER & Co. Bankong, 1st December, 1856.\n\n**\"RELIANCE MARINE INSURANCE SOCIETY.\"** The undersigned, having been appointed AGENTS for the above-named Society, are prepared to grant POLICIES, payable in London, Calcutta, BOMBAY, RANGOON, Penang, Bangkok, and CHINA.\n\nGIBB, LIVINGSTON & Co. Hongkong, 1st October, 1856.\n\n## NOTICES OF FIRMS.\n\n**NOTICE.** Messrs. GADO, LEVINGSTON & Co. beg to give notice, that they have this day admitted Mr. HENRY HALTON as a Partner in their Firm.\n\nGADO, LEVINGSTON & Co. Hongkong, 10th July, 1837.\n\n## NOTICES OF FIRMS.\n\n**NOTICE.** The undersigned beg to give notice, that they have this day established themselves as AUCTIONEERS, COMMISSION AGENTS, and GENERAL STOREKEEPERS, and will have constantly on hand a full assortment of Wines, &c., &c.\n\nWANDKLA, HEDGE & Co. Foo-chow, 1st January, 1857.\n\n## APPEALS.\n\n## NOTICES OF FIRMS.\n\n**NOTICE.** The Partnership of the undersigned, under the Firm of BUCK & WELSH, was dissolved by mutual consent on the 21st August, 1855. The affairs will be wound up by H. WELSH.\n\nW. CURRIN, D. WELSH. Pagoda Island, August, 1857.\n\n## AGENT.\n\n**NOTICE.** The Copartnership carrying on Business as MERCHANTS at Canton under the Firm of BATESON, BUTT & Co., is dissolved by mutual consent (as advertised in the Canton Register, dated June 17th, 1857.). The Affairs of this late Partnership will be wound up by CHARLES ROWIN BATESON, who will sign the Firm in Liquidation.\n\nBATESON, SUTT & Co. Macao, 18th August, 1857.\n\n## NOTICE.\n\nThe undersigned has this day established himself at Hongkong as MERCHANT & GENERAL AGENT.\n\nA. J. P. DE CASTRO. Macao, 1st January, 1857.\n\n## FOR SALE.\n\n**JUST RECEIVED.** Bass's Trademark BEER, in best condition. Guinness's and Flavel's STOUT, in bottles. PORT, SHERRY, and BRANDY of the best quality.\n\nLANE, CRAWFORD & Co. Queen's Road, 31st August, 1857.\n\n## FOR SALE.\n\nInvoice of SALT BUTTER, just landed.\n\nLANE, CRAWFORD & Co. Queen's Road, 31st August, 1857.\n\n## FOR SALE.\n\nVALUABLE PHOTOGRAPHIC MACHINE, a Pair of Profit Schottle Lenses, and Complete supply of Chemicals.\n\nApply to LANE, CRAWFORD & Co. Queen's Road, 12th August, 1857.\n\n## FOR SALE.\n\nOLD and GOLDEN SHERRY, in 3 Dozens. Also PORT WINE, of superior quality.\n\nApply to LINDSAY & Co. Hongkong, 28th July, 1857.\n\n## FOR SALE.\n\n5% **\"CLAUSE\"** Bonds, lately arrived. SUPERIOR PALE SHERRY, in cask and Bottles for the well known vintage of 1847. A few Patent Fluted Cots MATTRESSES.\n\nD. LAPRAIK. Hongkong, 30th July, 1857.\n\n## FOR SALE.\n\nBRANDY, White and Pale, and of various other Brands. SHERRY, of excellent quality. PORT Wines. TINTO WINES, from London. Manilla CHEROOTS, No. 2, New and Old.\n\nB. E. CARNEIRO. Macao, 13th July, 1857.\n\n## FOR SALE.\n\nInvoice of CREAM and YELLOW METAL SHEATHING, and Core LINES. Also CANVAS and European and Ostrich CORDAGE.\n\nApply to LY ALL, STILL & Co. Hongkong, 12th July, 1856.\n\n## FOR SALE.\n\nRAW SILK, of various qualities. PONJAM SILK, do. do. SUGAR, from the West Indies. TEAS from Canton.\n\nB. E. CARNEIRO. Macao, 12th July, 1857.\n\n## FOR SALE.\n\nBEST Australian COAL.\n\nApply to LINDSAY & Co. Hongkong, 9th April, 1855.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-064 - Sir Bowring - 1857 [8-10].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 244761,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-068 - Sir Bowring - 1858 [5-12]",
        "page_number": 503,
        "title": "CO129-068 - Sir Bowring - 1858 [5-12]",
        "content_text": "500 \n\n(96) \n\nabout Shaplok the same afternoon that Wohang came to Mrs Caldwell would answer her, that is all I can say. She never came as a friend to the house. I did not communicate with the Government or Police about it.\n\nIt is impossible for me to say whether Ch'o On would or would not pay $400 to Shaplok without thinking she had someone to back her. He has been fifteen years in Government service, and I should think that he would not be so stupid as to pay any money at all.\n\nI am quite ignorant of the circumstances relative to the capture or attempt at breach of the blockade of the Canton River of the boat to which the pass was granted mentioned by the Attorney General, in page 73.\n\nI have given many of such passes, so it is impossible for me to tell about this particular one.\n\nI did not consider it necessary to cross-examine Mr May upon his statement regarding my telling him about my wife receiving presents, because I considered the inference drawn from the words spoken by me was so absurd that I did not think it necessary.\n\nI did not know Po-pak-shing as a notorious pirate at the time I went on board his boat; I never heard of his name until that time.\n\nI most solemnly declare that I only know that the Sinon Wo ground lot is in the Lower Bazaar because it is marine lot 33. I suppose that Sinon Wo is the lessee's name. I do not think that Ma-chow Wong is the owner. I know he used to have the management. When this Sunon man (referred to in page 59) came and asked me about the increased rental of the lot, I knew that Ma-chow Wong had been connected with the Sinon Wo. I am sure that the land, so far as I have heard, did not belong to Ma-chow Wong. From what I have heard, Ma-chow Wong was the head of some committee of management; there were others.\n\nMr May's statement of the misunderstandings between us is correct. We have had no others. I do not consider Ma-chow Wong's conviction chiefly owing to the exertions of Mr May, but to the public mind and that of the jury being prejudiced against him by the local papers. Mr May did not, to my knowledge, apply for my reinstatement in Government employ. I did consider, and I am now more fully confident, that Mr May had a vindictive feeling towards me at the time of conducting the case of Ma-chow Wong connected with it. I do most decidedly deny the existence of any connection in any sense whatever, whether by blood, age, or adoption, between myself and Ma-chow Wong. I have particular reasons for not wishing to give my grounds for such belief on this occasion. As I have already stated in my evidence today, these reasons may form the subject of future complaints by me.\n\nWong is an inferior man, not an equal, and I consider this fact certain that nothing would give Mr May more pleasure than to see the situation of Registrar General become vacant for him by my dismissal, thereby making a villainous attempt to injure my reputation.\n\nThe very fact that the woman Awoon (who was not the wife of Ma-chow Wong, being some years younger than him) makes Inglis's statement of less value, because it is entirely according to Chinese usage or custom for a young woman to adopt a man older than herself as her son.\n\nAdjourned till Friday, the 16th, at 12 o'clock.\n\nTWENTY FOURth Day,\nFriday, 16th July, at 12 o'clock Noon.\n\nPresent,-All the Members.\n\nHon. H. T. DAVIES,-Recalled at his own request to explain a part of his previous evidence.\n\nMr Caldwell is no doubt correct in stating that he did not procure the sureties for Ma-chow Wong; but when I said that I should require them, and that I would take their recognizances as soon as their validity had been ascertained, Mr Caldwell said \"they are here now,\" and pointed out some men. I asked him whether he guaranteed their validity, and upon his saying that he did, I took them at once.\n\nD. R. CALDWELL,-Cross-examination continued.\n\nI deny that any intercourse whatever has been kept up between any member of my family and Shaplok. She has been many times to my house to see me on business of different kinds, and as a matter of course, she has also seen Mrs Caldwell and spoken to her. I wish to state that when I married Mrs Caldwell, when she was converted, I threw off all Chinese connections. Shaplok came to me only on business matters officially. I suppose if she spoke to Mrs Caldwell...\n\nAfter the time of his apprehension and trial, I found Ma-chow Wong to be an honest man, and I believe that he always was an honest man up to his apprehension.\n\nWith regard to the case mentioned by Mr May in page 39, in which Ma-chow Wong is charged with resisting the Police, I refer the Commission to my letter to the Clerk of Councils dated 5th October, 1857. With regard to Mr May's statement in page 39, that a wealthy Chinaman came to him in secrecy and terror to complain of the manner in which petitions for Ma-chow Wong's pardon were got up; the rich Chinaman I believe to be Tam Achoy, and at my letter of 5th October last, I show why I think he had hostile feelings towards Ma-chow Wong. This I referred to at the time of Mr May's statement. The Commissioners must be mistaken in thinking that I said I would prove the petition in question related to another matter altogether.\n\nPang Wa-ping paid to the paymaster of the Rattler about $200 salvage for rescuing his boat, for which the Paymaster gave a receipt, I witnessing it. I saw Chinese documents belonging to Beaver after his apprehension at the Police Station. It was a kind of certificate from Chu Akwei, the Chief, but who styled himself a Rebel, showing that...\n\n(97)\n\n...had been in his employ, and mention was made there that Ma-chow Wong was closely connected with the Shanghae Rebels. I know that he went to Shanghae. I only know that Wong Kee was a man from Kongnam (Keanguan), I believe, to carry out the Rebel movements. I wish to state that the Wong Kee mentioned there was never intended for Ma-chow Wong. Both the characters were entirely different from his name; the Wong was different and the Kee also, and the fact of his being a Leangnan man made it the less likely. Ma-chow Wong was a Sun-on man.\n\nI do not know the man who accompanied Pang Wa-ping. I could make inquiry concerning him, but I am quite certain that Mr Wade may have gone by the sound, not knowing perhaps the characters of Ma-chow Wong's name.\n\nThis was a red paper folded, I think four times, similar to the paper on which petitions are written, but without the blue back to it. On casting my eyes over the document, this name Wong Kee made no impression on me at all, whereas had it been in the characters of Ma-chow Wong's name, I should certainly have been attracted to them. This was the only paper produced as found on Beaver which I saw.\n\nWith regard to the search of Assow's house, the anonymous letter was my only information that a musical box was stolen. I also knew that a man was in custody for stealing a barometer, which was referred to in the letter. Mrs Caldwell did not detain the messenger, and I took no steps to ascertain its author before acting upon it, as it was impossible to do so. I merely asked who brought it, and I was told it was a boy. I do not now know the author. I considered that, as a Justice of the Peace, and particularly...\n\nThe Master of the Masonic Lodge is elected. My predecessors have been gentlemen of unblemished character.\n\nWhile the lorcha Kee-loong-poo-on was in my name, I, as Registrar General, had authority to search the house. I employed her with European masters-Johnson and Ban-croft were the two-I let her out on charter.\n\nLai Szekai still collects the rents for Mrs Caldwell's sister under a lease which he has of the houses.\n\nI accompanied Mr Grand-Pré in searching the boats in one of which Po-pak-shing was; he was there on the spot, and was cognizant of the particulars himself. I was merely there to assist. I did not in any way direct Mr Grand-Pré; I acted as an Interpreter and explained all the matters to him, and examined the Registers and papers of the boats.\n\nI cannot say whether it was in answer to a question from myself, then sitting on the bench, that Mr Grand-Pré gave the answer which convinced the Magistrate as to the men's innocence. I found the Register and papers in order. I think the boat had a Chinese pass from the head of the Marine department at Canton.\n\nI was present with Mr Anstey, Mr Cluff, Mr May, Mr Brachan, and several others at the Debtor's Gaol-yard on the afternoon of the day on which Mr May apprehended the men on Bonham Strand. I was also up at the tread-mill yard on another occasion with Mr Cluff the morning I apprehended some 160 men, and on both these occasions, knowing the rapidity with which all information flies from the Police Court and the Police Station by the emissaries of the Interpreters and the Lokangs, I considered that I was only faithfully performing my public duty in hastening to the house to search for the article. I did not mean to say that I thought it not prudent to search Assow's house. I meant that I thought it useless, as the information would have got there before me.\n\nI know nothing about what Boggs says of the payment of mail by the pirates to Ma-chow Wong. I do not think it likely that pirates could have done so, because on occasions their fleets were attacked by our men. On my information received from Ma-chow Wong, I refer the Commission to mention made about in my letter of 5th October, 1857. I never heard that Ma-chow Wong was connected with the pirates.\n\nI don't recollect whether I wished Assow to interpret at Ma-chow Wong's trial. I have given him a certificate as Chinese and Malay Interpreter. I don't think I have given him one since Ma-chow Wong's trial. I consider honesty as necessary for an Interpreter. I considered him dishonest before his trial.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-068 - Sir Bowring - 1858 [5-12].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 247671,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-074 - Lieut. Governor Caine & Sir Robinson - 1859 [6-12]",
        "page_number": 345,
        "title": "CO129-074 - Lieut. Governor Caine & Sir Robinson - 1859 [6-12]",
        "content_text": "018\n\n341\n\n(30)\n\nvisit the first time to Hongkong, was in Cleverly Street; from thence I removed to Choong Wan. I did not know Mr Caldwell at that time. The house belonged to Ashè, who was a ship's comprador. I remained in Achow's house in Choong Wan about eight months. From thence I removed to Jervois Street, and remained there three months, and then again to Taipingshan East Street, to a house built in lieu of Achow's house which had been pulled down. There my first child was born on the 24th day, 10th month, 24th year of Taoukwang. Mr Inglis never came to the house in Taipingshan in which I was living, but when I removed from there to the upper part of a druggist's shop, near Western Market, he did visit me there,\n\nChun Atsoo owns eleven houses in this colony, besides one lately purchased. The houses were bought with money of her own. Szekai has received the rents and paid them to me. I have kept them till asked by my sister for them, when I paid them over to her. None of the eleven houses have been bought with money belonging to my husband. I do not know the numbers of the lots, but can tell the position; six of them are near the Chinese Joss-house, and five are about the last houses beyond Circular Buildings.\n\nquiry, the Commission would, on the morrow, proceed to investigate the charges contained in the second branch.\n\nAdjourned till to-morrow at 12 Noon.\n\nELEVENTH Day.\n\nThursday, 17th June, 1858, at 12 o'clock Noon.\n\nPresent—All the Members.\n\nThe Chairman stated that the Commission would now proceed to investigate the 2d branch of the Enquiry consisting of Charges 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13.\n\nTHE ATTORNEY GENERAL,—Called and examined I wish again to disclaim giving evidence according to the charges as made out on the Charges List. Some of those alleged charges I have never made at all, others are incorrectly stated, and others were certainly not intended to be the subject of a public and scandalous inquiry, because they affect the family at least as much as the head of it. My statement therefore has reference not to the List of Charges at all, but to my own letter of 13th May.\n\n\"Chinese outlaws and pirates\" I certainly consider Ma-chow Wong and his gang to be. \"That the antecedents of Szekai came to me and asked me if I would like to purchase a house, and also produced some documents. I said, if it was cheap I would buy it for my sister. It was agreed to be bought at $500. I asked my husband to examine the document, and see whether it was a whole lease or a portion of a lease. He told me that it was in the name of Leong Ayook, and as the person offering it for sale was not Leong Ayook, I refused to buy. It was about the middle of April that I spoke to my husband about this. I did not at that time mention that I was going to purchase the house. I only asked him to look at the lease, and see in whose name it was.\n\nOf this $500, I have paid $400 to Szekai, the purchase-money being at length fixed at $470, to allow $30 to pay for the transfer of the lot, owing to a defect which had been found in the lease. I can confidently affirm, that my husband has no direct or indirect interest in this property, and that no part of the purchase-money belonged to him. I remember my husband coming home from Council last month, and saying he had been charged with having bought land lately in this Colony with the Eaglet or Mr Caldwell. The Commission have a right to know what was the public repute respecting Mr Caldwell at the beginning of his early career in these waters, and the oldest surviving members of the present Canton and Hongkong Community might speak to that.\n\nAs to the Chinese girl from a brothel, if the alliance itself proved it will follow as of course to have been an alliance with some of the worst of the Chinese; but there is direct evidence of notoriety and reputation. When I penned those words in my letter, I had read a list of names prepared by Mr May from the mouths of neighbours or acquaintance of the parties, and I recommend that list to be asked for, as it shews what the occupations of the relations or reputed relations of this female were and are.\n\nI again refer to the evidence already taken as to Ma-chow Wong. Witnesses already examined on other points, particularly Mr May and Mr Inglis, will be able to say whether there was not a long and intimate connection between that convict and Mr Caldwell. As to its still existing, I am personally aware that Mr Caldwell has evinced great resentment to every one who has taken a different view as to the propriety of a pardon of the man from himself, and I have, as Attorney General, had reason to believe that since his conviction the functions of police spy and informer continue to be discharged by the man under the immediate auspices of Mr Caldwell.\n\nChinese of good repute have been arrested, thrown into Gaol, and refused bail, upon charges got up in the Gaol, Mr Caldwell and his clerk being personally present, founded upon the unsupported evidence of Gaol inmates believed to belong to the same gang—proved to be false—then replaced by more aggravated charges, founded on the same unsupported evidence which broke down in like manner.\n\nThe people of this Colony no more dare to complain now of these connivances and procurances of Mr Caldwell, than down to his conviction they dared to complain of the immediate tyrannies and exactions of Ma-chow Wong. I venture to say, that the fact is notorious to every member of the Commission, and that their own compradors, if they ask them, would confirm the statement, but would not dare to appear to support it. Take this recent fact: A levy of money by way of reward for services rendered by Mr Caldwell and others in the case of Ma-chow Wong, upon the clan or secret society to which he belongs, has taken place since the final rejection, if it be final, of the last attempt to procure his pardon. Purposely concealing the place where these Chinamen live, I have to state that not less than three of them have placed in the hands of the writer of this letter, which I hold in my hand, the account, I believe receipted, in Chinese, of this quota; they being supposed to belong to the body on which the levy was made. These men complain loudly of the exaction, and my correspondent spoke to me on the subject, I think two months, certainly more than a month, before I dreamed of being ever able to direct the attention of Government to Mr Caldwell's case.\n\nI remark here an incidental observation, not a charge, but introduced by way of explanation and corroboration of the last foregoing paragraph. I have stated that when I first represented the scandal of this connection to His Excellency more than eleven months ago, I was not aware that the principal link in it was a bond of affinity by adoption according to Chinese law. The fact is immaterial, but I have no objection to state who my informant was, and if the Commission think it material he may be called and examined.\n\n[The name of the informant handed into the Chairman.]\n\nFor what follows in the letter I am personally responsible, but I respectfully decline to give up the name of any of the Chinese informants, whose representations so completely satisfied my mind as to justify the strong language I used in my letter, that I knew that it was Mr Caldwell's habit to act in the way they had described, on the unsupported information of that pirate.\n\nThere are Europeans, the Commission has some evidence already on this point, and I think if the authorities Naval and Police are pressed, the Commission can get still more. There was one notorious case in which the Nankin, I think, was imposed upon by false information, and induced to destroy torches belonging to Rebels—upon false representation of a so-called Chinese merchant, that they were his own, and had been piratically captured from him. That merchant is said to have been Ma-chow Wong in person.\n\nI re-assert in the language of my letter, and upon my own personal knowledge of the fact, that the Chinese girl was captured by one of our cruisers in the attempt to break the blockade of the Canton River, and on board of her was found Mr Caldwell's certificate to her character, which was handed over with her papers to the Queen's proctor, and which I now hold in my hand. It bears a seal which he had no power to put on it—the seal of his Registrar Office, and bears date anterior by some months to the Registration Ordinance of last year. I hand in that document (Q).\n\nAs to the fact, that a suspicious vessel obtained the patronage and protection of Mr Caldwell, I presume on the same information. Inspectors of Police had been frequently told me by Inspectors of Police, how they had been embarrassed in their actions on pirates or alleged pirates by means of this deplorable influence, and I have no doubt if they are called they can give information upon this head to the Commission.\n\nUnfortunately he had given them back these papers, and I told him that without them I could do nothing, for he wished me to take it up as crown prosecutor, at least so I understood him. For weeks he endeavoured to get these papers back, but after a good deal of hesitation on their part, they finally told him they would not produce them. These are the reasons given by him in the note which I now read:\n\n\"I have your note regarding the papers, but am sorry to say I cannot get them, the holders being afraid that they may be troubled by Samkwei, or some of Ma-chow Wong's friends—at least so they told me when I saw them the other day,\"—dated 5th May, 1858, five days before the subject of this inquiry was bruited in Council.\n\n(31)",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-074 - Lieut. Governor Caine & Sir Robinson - 1859 [6-12].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 258480,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-097 - Acting Governor Mercer - 1864 [1-2] & Sir Robinson - 1864 [1-3]",
        "page_number": 16,
        "title": "CO129-097 - Acting Governor Mercer - 1864 [1-2] & Sir Robinson - 1864 [1-3]",
        "content_text": "14\n\n16\n\nII. The direct countenance given to this assumption of irresponsible authority by the refusal of British Consuls to take cognizance of such acts, when brought to their notice, or to do more, (when pressed,) than record the protest of the complaining parties.\n\nIII. The finality of the decision of the Superintendent of Trade in all cases between British Subjects, and other Foreigners or Chinese, both in original suits before himself, or on appeal from the decisions of the Consular Courts.\n\nIV. The consequent practical impossibility of applying a check to any high-handed proceedings of the Foreign Customs.\n\n10. With respect to the first named ground of complaint, Mr. Lay stands up stoutly for the moderation of the Foreign Customs in its treatment of revenue offences. Such is not the popular impression and further, the foreign community are impressed with a belief, amounting to conviction, that the proceeds of confiscations are largely, if not wholly, distributed among the various grades of subordinates. Should this belief be groundless, an inquiry conducted by the Consuls would be an easy means of rebutting the charge.\n\n11. Notwithstanding the dictum (section 18 of the Memorandum,) \"that the Chinese Superintendent of Customs, with or without the advice of the Foreign Commissioner, can in no case overstep the limits assigned to his action by the Treaties, without being forthwith called to account by the Consul, upon the complaint of the Merchants aggrieved,\" that liability is very small when, as at present, British Consuls are reluctant to entertain such complaints and as the influence of the foreigners in the service is avowedly not limited to that gained by sagacious advice, the \"weak and corrupt officials,\" (described in Section 11,) are as likely to succumb to the misdirected energy of Foreign Customs officials as to the (there asserted) bribery or bullying\" of Foreign Traders.\n\n12. But the Committee will not discuss the \"Procedure in cases of fine and confiscation\" now practised; because they deny the right of the Chinese Authorities to make such seizures in Treaty ports, or levy such fines, independently of the British Consul.\n\n13. In all Treaties with China, Foreign Governments have required and obtained various ex-territorial rights:-- and the reason of such demands on the part of Her Majesty's Government is thus stated by Lord Clarendon in his dispatch to Sir George Bonham of June 24th, 1853, inclosing the order in Council of the 13th of the same Month.-\"In ordinary cases of British Subjects resorting to a Foreign Country, their persons and property are entrusted to the laws and institutions of the Country to which they may resort in the full assurance that those will be duly administered, and that the institutions of such country, although they may differ from those of England, are substantially in harmony with the general principles of jurisprudence recognized among Christian Communities. But the case is different as regards China, and there the British Crown has found it necessary to require that British Subjects shall be entirely exempted from the jurisdiction of the local tribunals, and has engaged in return, either expressly or by implication, to take effectual measures for the maintenance among British Subjects of peace, order, and good Government.\"\n\n14. In the second Article of the Treaty of Nanking,-a treaty renewed and confirmed by the second article of the later Treaty of Tientsin,-Her Majesty agrees to appoint \"Superintendents or Consular officers to reside at each of the above named (Treaty) cities or towns, to be the medium of communication between the Chinese Authorities and the said Merchants, and to see that the just duties and other dues of the Chinese Government as hereafter provided for, are duly discharged by Her British Majesty's Subjects.\"\n\n15. In the order in Council of June 1853, there is no waiver of any of the rights so secured; but on the contrary it embodies a series of regulations for the guidance of Consular Officers in dealing with them.\n\n16. The authoritative opinion given in 1860 by the then Crown Lawyers-Sir J. D. Harding, Sir Richard Bethel, and Sir W. Atherton,-in reference to vessels and cargoes seized for the breach of the Blockade of the Canton River affirms still more strongly the exclusion of China from the comity of civilized Nations; and from its having been communicated to the British Authorities in this Country, shows that up to that period Her Majesty's Government had seen no reason to depart from the principles laid down by Lord Clarendon. That opinion broadly states, that \"as between Her Majesty's Government and the Government and Subjects of China, (a Country which neither acknowledges, nor follows, the Jus Gentium of European states, under which the necessity for Prize Court condemnation arises,) no condemnation as Prize is either necessary or expedient.\"\n\n17\n\n17. The ex-territorial provisions of the Treaties are the natural consequence of the recognized exclusion of China from the comity of civilized Nations; and the judicial power of Consuls follows as a matter of course where some restrictive jurisdiction must exist, but is denied under Treaty to the native authorities. To argue therefore that \"the Chinese Government is no more obliged to resort to a British Court to enforce fines or confiscations for a breach of its revenue laws, where a British Subject is concerned, than it is to an American or French Court, where an American or French Subject is concerned,\" is beside the question, for the Chinese Government is bound to British Subjects by the express stipulations of its Treaties with Great Britain, while British Subjects are not bound by the Treaties of other Nations, though entitled to the benefit of all privileges accorded to them, greater than those secured by the British Treaties. The 7th clause of the French Treaty, quoted by the Inspector General of Chinese Customs, declares, it may be remarked, the obligation of a formal notice to a French Consul of any intention to seize or confiscate,\n\n18. But a serious fallacy underlies all arguments in favor of Chinese, as opposed to Consular, jurisdiction in cases of smuggling in the open ports by Subjects of Treaty Powers. They assume that such smuggling is an offence against the Chinese revenue laws, when in fact it is an offence against the Treaty only, a knowledge of Chinese Revenue laws not being obligatory, nor their observance compulsory, except in so far as they are recognized by Treaty. If this view be correct, of which the Committee entertain no doubt, the pretensions of the Chinese Customs to independent action in cases of violation of Treaty Stipulations or Regulations fall to the ground.\n\n19. Assuming the correctness of the statements now submitted to Your Lordship, it seems clear that British Subjects have a right to the judicial action of their Consuls in all cases of fine or confiscation; and that the limitation of their functions to ex post-facto political action, as urged by the advocates of the Chinese Customs, is as untenable in theory as it was contrary to fact in practice, till recently for it would be extremely difficult for the Inspector General of Chinese Customs to prove that the special cases of seizure enumerated in his memorandum were made without a previous application from the department to the British Consul-and even were that otherwise, the Committee of the Chamber are prepared to show, that within the last twelve months, some of the Chinese Superintendents of Customs have pleaded the direct or implied sanction of Her Majesty's Superintendent of Trade as their Authority for carrying out confiscation, and further that a rule, drawn up by that officer for the regulation, inter alia, of cases of confiscation at Canton, runs thus-\"if the goods are on board British Vessels or in possession of a British Subject, the particulars shall be communicated to the Consul, who shall grant a warrant for their seizure, and if, on examination they are undoubtedly smuggled, it shall be permitted to the Hoppo to declare their confiscation.\"\n\n20. Before proceeding to the other questions enumerated above, it is the pleasing duty of the Committee to state, that the Baron de Meritens, Commissioner of Customs at Foochow has appreciated the fact, that the best mode of discouraging illicit trade is to deprive it of motive; and as a commencement in opening the ports of China more widely to legitimate Commerce, has induced the superior Authorities to sanction the resort of ships to the ports of Keelung and Takao in Formosa. Should the experiment succeed, as it no doubt will, it will probably lead to its extension to other important ports on the Mainland.\n\n21. The second cause of dissatisfaction to the Foreign Commercial body, viz:-the direct countenance given to the pretensions of the Chinese Customs' Authorities by the present reluctance of British Consuls to entertain any complaint arising from the Acts of those officials, will be more shortly discussed.\n\n22. It is generally understood and believed, that the Consular officers act in this matter under special instructions from the Superintendent of Trade :-but apart from the violation of right, which the Foreign residents believe to be involved in the surrender to the Chinese Customs' establishment of irresponsible power in dealing with Treaty offences, they universally condemn such surrender as impolitic. Should the Foreign element in the Chinese Maritime Customs be a permanent one, it might, at any time, be composed of men of a very different stamp, and very inferior grade, to the gentlemen now holding the higher offices of the Foreign Inspectorate; and who might be the reverse of scrupulous in their administration of the department, but keenly alive to the value to themselves of mingling political power with their fiscal functions, particularly if through the direct Agency of the Maritime Customs establishment, the Cost of foreign armed and manned gun-boats, and of disciplined Chinese troops commanded by Foreign Officers, is to be defrayed.\n\nIn the\n\n23. But indeed this perilous union of powers appears to have been already initiated. Supplement to the North China Herald of Sept. 26th of this year, the case is reported of the \"United States of America versus Pinder and others\" tried in the United States Consular Court, in which Commander Solway, (one of the Witnesses for the prosecution,) describing himself as a British Naval Officer in the service of the Emperor of China, is stated to have deposed, that his commission in that service is held from Mr. Lay and Captain Sherard Osborne, and that it professes to be given on behalf of the Emperor. Certainly among the many anomalous arrangements now in existence in This Country, this is one of the strangest.\n\n24. Again Commercial men in this Country have no faith in the theory of Chinese, of any rank, being led up to European international civilization by being dealt with as though they were guided by its maxims, in anticipation of their honest adoption of them. They accept as an axiom that relaxation of ex-territorial rights, obtained under Treaty, should follow, but never precede, practical advance in such civilization on the part of the Chinese. They are satisfied, that Asiatics of every race attach no meaning to the phrase of political magnanimity, and cannot believe in the existence of such a virtue. Asiatics respect those who respect their own rights, and attribute to fear, or ignorance, any concession that is not palpably balanced by some corresponding advantage. Justice they understand.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-097 - Acting Governor Mercer - 1864 [1-2] & Sir Robinson - 1864 [1-3].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 282207,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-145 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1870 [6-9]",
        "page_number": 334,
        "title": "CO129-145 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1870 [6-9]",
        "content_text": "# \n7. The total average of ships of all classes exclusive of Chinese and Native Craft lying here daily was, in January, 109; February, 100; March, 81; April, 78; May, 78; June, 90; July, 100; August, 108; September, 138.4; October, 154; November, 132.5; and December, 131.3; or the daily average throughout the year was 107.5; 18.7 per cent being vessels propelled by steam.\n\n## JUNK TRADE\n\n8. On this subject I am not able to report favorably. During the year there has been a falling off in arrivals of 2,222 vessels equal to 113,252 tons. It is however satisfactory to find that this decrease is not the result of local legislation, as in my last annual Report I was able to show an increase of tonnage in 1868 as compared with 1867 of 142,996 tons.\n\n9. In the 13th paragraph of that Report I alluded to the action of the Chinese Government in having then recently established Customs stations in the vicinity of the Colony. I think the decrease of tonnage in Junks can reasonably be attributed to the existence of these stations and to the activity of the Cruisers attached to them.\n\n10. Whether the result of this policy has been beneficial to the Chinese Imperial Treasury it is difficult to say, but it is a fair assumption, unsatisfactory though it be, that if the Junk trade of Hongkong has decreased, so, in proportion must that of the Ports with which the vessels traded.\n\n11. Although the close blockade kept up by these Cruisers appears to be producing a bad effect on the native shipping of the Colony, it may eventually result in the supersession of Junks by European vessels as carriers, to the ultimate advantage of the foreign ship builder and trader.\n\n12. Between the Cruisers and the rumored possible appointment of a Chinese Consul at Hongkong, the destruction of trade in native vessels and ruin of the sea-faring population of China trading with Hongkong seems imminent.\n\n13. Of the arrivals of Junks, those from Macao show a diminution of 298 measuring 51,227 tons, so that the neighbouring Colony would appear to be suffering equally with ourselves and probably from the same cause.\n\n14. In a few instances Junk Masters have reported that officers from the Chinese Revenue Cruisers have searched their vessels whilst in Colonial Waters, when prompt measures have been taken to obtain redress and to prevent a recurrence of the offence. The constant cruising of the **Victoria** outside the Harbor and visits of the **Blanche** have doubtless been an effective check on the proceedings of Chinese Officials in these matters.\n\n15. An important Commission was appointed by His Excellency, consisting of Officials and Merchants, to enquire into the result of the application of the Harbor and Coasts Ordinance (No. 6 of 1866) to the Colony, and to determine if any and what changes the present immunity of the Colonial waters from Piracy rendered desirable. The Commissioners' Report is in the hands of the Government.\n\n## EMIGRATION\n\n16. In the return under this head it will be found that there has been an increase of 9,408 Adults, or 47.4 per cent on the return for 1868.\n\n17. The increased traffic is principally to San Francisco, which is resuming the position it held in that respect previous to the American War.\n\n18. The rapidity, and greater comfort offered by the vessels of the Pacific Steam Ship Company have obtained them great success, native passengers preferring this mode of conveyance to that by sailing vessels. 69 per cent of the Chinese conveyed to San Francisco during the year have gone by those steamers.\n\n19. A report was circulated in the Colony that women kidnapped in the province of Annau were placed on board these vessels to be conveyed to California for purposes of prostitution.\n\nPage 330\n\n20. Every measure which suggested itself to the Government with a view to ascertaining the truth of the rumor was adopted, His Excellency the Governor, the Attorney General, the Registrar General, the Police and some natives of Annan visited the ships to examine for themselves. The circulators and believers of the report were urged to give up their authority or produce some proof of the truth of their statements. At length the report was stated to have emanated from some Jesuit Priests residing at Macao, who were also questioned but who declared themselves unable to say anything beyond \"having heard that such was the case.\"\n\n21. A ship was laid on during the year for the conveyance of contract laborers to Peru. Emigration to that country from Macao had attained so unenviable a notoriety that the Captain and Owner of a Belgian ship thought to try the experiment of despatching a number of Chinese from Hongkong in order to ascertain if a system could not be organised here that should be free from censure.\n\n22. A draft contract was submitted to, and after some alteration approved by the Government, which had no legal power at the time to prevent such Emigration. The amended contract contained a special stipulation prohibiting the employment of the laborers in the working of Guano. Two Emigration Depôts were opened at West Point, and at first Chinese came in tolerably freely. During the first month 200 had been medically examined and registered in the books of this Department.\n\n23. This apparent success of the scheme did not however last long, and Coolies presented themselves in many instances only to avail of the good food and lodging which the Depôt offered. Many left to seek employment elsewhere, whilst others were induced by small advances and promises of a better contract to find their way to Macao, where they have been finally shipped on terms not nearly so favorable.\n\n24. This scheme cannot be said to have succeeded, as the ship did not get her complement of passengers until the first week in January last; 762 having been registered, whilst 382 only actually left the Port, the absentees being at the rate of 50 per cent. It remains to be seen whether on arrival in Peru the terms of the contract will be fulfilled.\n\n25. The Home Government and Chargé d'Affaires at Lima having lists of the persons embarked as also copies of the contracts entered into, it may be presumed that no evasion of their contents will be attempted.\n\n26. A large demand for labor in the Southern States of America, as also a request for a farther supply of Chinese for Dutch Guiana has met with a check so far as the contract system in Hongkong is concerned, the Home Government having prohibited it, except to British Possessions and in British ships.\n\n27. The American Agents have however decided to obtain the labor, leaving the Chinese free, on arrival at New Orleans to enter into any agreement they may choose.\n\n28. This is a novel and doubtful experiment, but the demand for labor in these States appears so urgent that it is considered worth the cost of a trial. It is thought success may attend it on the assumption that the Chinese, although now only verbally promising to serve a term of years (varying from three to five) will consider themselves morally bound to complete a contract on arrival at their destination if it is in keeping with the promises held out to them here. It has however been fully explained to those that have passed through this office that their freedom of action is undoubted, and they have been assured, in the presence of the United States Consul, who was good enough to be present on the occasion of 140 being questioned, that they have the same protection in the country to which they are proceeding as they find in Hongkong.\n\n29. These Emigrants are procured without the intervention of Chinese brokers, an extensive circulation of notices in the Colony and neighbouring Villages being the only means employed to obtain them. This system will doubtless in the first instance prove a slow process, but the Agents trust to the favorable reports sent to China by the earlier arrivals to enable them to engage laborers more rapidly during the fall of the present year.\n\n## REGISTRY OF SHIPPING\n\n30. 16 vessels have been registered and 13 have been struck off during the year.\n\n## SEAMEN\n\n31. Although there has been a larger amount of shipping frequenting the port during the year, there is no great difference in the number of seamen shipped and discharged, the year under review exhibiting 7,113 of the former and 6,713 of the latter.\n\n## MARINE MAGISTRATE'S COURT\n\n32. 239 Cases have been tried as against 198 in 1868, the principal complaints being those of Refusal of duty.\n\n## EXAMINATIONS FOR THE POSTS OF MASTERS AND MATES IN THE MERCANTILE MARINE\n\n33. Of 40 Applicants for examination under this Ordinance, 20 per cent failed to obtain Certificates. This is a large proportion, but is owing to the want of opportunities for study and the case of preparation for examination.\n\nI have the honor to be,\n\nThe Honorable J. GARDINER AUSTIN,\n\nColonial Secretary, &c. &c. &c.\n\nSir,\n\nYour most obedient Servant,\n\nH. G. THOMSETT, R.N.,\n\nHarbor Master, &c.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-145 - Lieut Governor Whitfield - 1870 [6-9].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 294010,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-167 - Sir Kennedy - 1874 [1-8]",
        "page_number": 670,
        "title": "CO129-167 - Sir Kennedy - 1874 [1-8]",
        "content_text": "6174-II & S4(12)\n\nHay Hang \"Blockade\"\n\nhad Carnarvon.\n\n12103\n\n664\n\nIn `12103` you will find the Report of the Commission appointed to inquire into the alleged detriment to the trade of Hong Kong arising from the Chinese Navigation and Customs; and in `12206` are the Proceedings of this department with reference to it. Robertson has examined the report and has commented upon each clause. Julian Pauncefote has also examined the report and has certified in his minute that he has explained very fully the State of the case.\n\nI have gone through the clauses also. I append my own brief comments on the subject.\n\nHong Kong, constituted a free port in order to make it the great emporium of Trade and Exchange of all...",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-167 - Sir Kennedy - 1874 [1-8].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 297062,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-172 - Public Offices & Others - 1875",
        "page_number": 160,
        "title": "CO129-172 - Public Offices & Others - 1875",
        "content_text": "trouble might be disposed\n\nof\n\nto by permitting\n\nChinese\n\nConsul to reside\n\nin Hongkong, from\n\nwhom\n\nDuty Chops could be obtained\n\nMerchant masters Parish late, and\n\nthe receipts for\n\nB\n\nUn \"Blockade unless\n\nthey\n\nwe\n\nCession\n\nRett Jan 6\n\n154\n\nCou\n\nI think I will be desirable\n\nat\n\nthe\n\nwith where\n\nA propose\n\nHahnt suggests\n\nthe Export\n\nThere\n\nTax paid\n\nleaving\n\nthe Vest off\n\nChina, can\n\narrival\n\nof Departure be deposited, Hongkong.\n\nI would refer also\n\nto the last page of the Despatch.\n\nI presume some\n\nattention be taken\n\nM.\n\nthe question. SP. 15\n\nLord Carnarvon\n\nThis masterly despatch\n\nachieves\n\na clear view of the whole question. I\n\nam\n\nquite satisfied that\n\nwe should\n\nat once\n\nallow the\n\nChinese Consul or\n\npublication of the reply of the H.E. the Governor.\n\n20 Jany.\n\nSir J. Cannington\n\nPlease find\n\nL.\n\nwill\n\nbe able to\n\nDraft the despatch replying to the Despatch,\n\nand\n\nupon the\n\nColony, inclosing copy of\n\nmy decision\n\nabove.\n\nthe despatch\n\nThey despatch might be published with the report of the Commission & then passed, I think, by laying the whole before...\n\nRett Jan 21\n\nrequest the Chinese Government to place\n\ndutiable goods to pass duties free upon masters. This\n\nthe Consul at Hong Kong to\n\nwill see Everyone\n\nI dearly\n\ntrouble\n\nand expense,\n\nthe ground for pretesting against\n\nthe",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-172 - Public Offices & Others - 1875.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 297382,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-172 - Public Offices & Others - 1875",
        "page_number": 480,
        "title": "CO129-172 - Public Offices & Others - 1875",
        "content_text": "471\n\nas to this para: 28 of the\n\nReport of\n\n10 of\n\nis the\n\nthe Commission Prin: Carr: ] and this\n\nvery practice which Lord\n\nCarnarvon suggested\n\nshould\n\nbe carried out openly through\n\na\n\nChinese Consul.\n\nMr Hart's scheme\n\nthe\n\nwill be objected to in\n\nColony by opponents.\n\nTwo\n\nclasses of\n\nFirstly by those who\n\nbelieve that the prosperity of Hong Kong depends\n\non\n\nthe\n\nfacilities which it affords\n\nfor smuggling.\n\nand\n\nwho would\n\nsooner run the risk of\n\n\"the\" \"blockade\" than see\n\na\n\nCustoms Department established\n\nin the Colony for the\n\nprotection of the Chinese Revenues.\n\nSecondly by those who\n\nwhile they discountenance\n\nsmuggling\n\nare opposed to\n\nany\n\nconcession whatever to the Chinese Government, and would\n\nregard\n\nthe establishment in\n\nHong Kong of a \"Special Station\" of the Foreign Inspectorate as\n\nan \"imperium in imperio\" \"thin wedge\" menacing\n\nthe independence of\n\nthe\n\nColony and\n\nits trade.\n\nThe first objection is\n\none\n\nwhich has been already\n\ndisposed\n\nPage 480\n\nPage 481",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-172 - Public Offices & Others - 1875.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 299825,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5]",
        "page_number": 155,
        "title": "CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5]",
        "content_text": "countrymen, said he had been requested to express the pleasure of the members of the Deputation at seeing a member of Parliament in Hongkong, and to assure His Excellency that they quite appreciated the excellence of the laws of England and the manner in which they were carried out in this Colony. The Chinese community deeply regretted His Excellency's departure, and were fully sensible of and greatly indebted to him for the kindness and consideration he had shown to the Chinese in the Colony. The deputation present was a large one, but they wished it to be understood that they were merely representative of others; in short, representative of the Chinese Community generally in the Colony,\n\nHis Excellency: I quite understand. Mr. Chun Ayin: They wish a prosperous voyage to Your Excellency, and to Miss Kennedy.\n\nHis Excellency: Before you take your leave there is one matter for me to mention, that I omitted, that is, to thank you for the very handsome sandal wood casket in which you have presented the address to I shall value it as much or more than anything in my possession, as having been a spontaneous offering from a community among whom I have lived for over four years. When I die it will be handed down as an heirloom to my children.\n\nMr Chun Ayin explained that the umbrella is called \"Man Man San,\" meaning thereby the \"Ten Thousand People's umbrella,\" a term of indefinite number among the Chinese. It was the highest mark of honour a Chinaman could show to his official, by whom he was governed.\n\nHis Excellency said he quite understood the value of the umbrella,\n\nThe Deputation then withdrew.\n\nThe Daily Press.\n\nHONGKONG, MARCH 1ST, 1877.\n\nSIr ARTHUR KENNEDY, on assuming charge of the Government of this Colony on the 16th April, 1872, in the course of his modest inaugural speech, said: \"I hope when it comes to my turn to relinquish the Government that you will be able to give me credit for being honest and faithful in the discharge of my duties.\" Now that His Excellency's terms of office has expired it will be well to see how far this hope has been fulfilled, by passing in review what has been done under his administration. When Sir ARTHUR arrived in Hongkong there were several matters which might be considered local \"burning questions\" then on the tapis, some of which have and some have not yet been finally settled. Prominent among these was the much vexed subject of the blockade of the port by the Chinese revenue cruisers. Sir RICHARD MACDONNELL had taken active measures to procure a cessation of the annoyance, and Sir ARTHUR KENNEDY was quick to recognise the necessity for action. He took up the matter in good earnest, and has succeeded in demonstrating to the Colonial Office the reality of the grievance—a fact which, owing to the representations of Her MAJESTY's Consul at Canton, they had previously failed to see. Through the instrumentality of the Government officials, a mass of evidence was, after the expenditure of much time and labour, collected, and this, together with His Excellency's lucid explanations in covering despatches, has sufficed to convince the Home Authorities that the native trade of Hongkong is placed at a serious disadvantage by the unjustifiable exactions made upon it by the Hoppo of Canton. It was accordingly provided in the lately concluded Chefoo Convention that a Commission should be appointed to come to some arrangement whereby the Chinese Authorities can collect their revenue without prejudice to the commercial interests of this Colony. This is one important step towards a removal of the grievance. It is a significant comment on the red-tapeism of the British Government that it has taken years of constant worry to secure even this concession, and it is highly creditable to the Governor.\n\nWhen Sir ARTHUR KENNEDY assumed the reins of office, the infamous coolie traffic at Macao was flourishing like a green bay tree. He was deeply impressed with its nefarious character, and he unhesitatingly and vigorously condemned it. He watched its course narrowly, and fearful lest some of those engaged in the trade should attempt to connect Hongkong with it, he caused a stringent Ordinance to be prepared prohibiting any one in the Colony from having an interest in the trade. This was passed in May, 1873, In April of the following year he had the satisfaction of seeing the traffic finally put a stop to through the intervention of Great Britain and other Powers, who had become scandalised by the enormities carried on in connection with it.\n\nGambling was rife in the Colony when Sir ARTHUR arrived here, in spite of the measures taken by his predecessor in office to put a termination to it. His Excellency lost no time in taking energetic measures to scotch this troublesome vice, and shortly after his installation ordered the prosecution of the landlord of some public gambling-houses in Gilman-street. On hearing of this step a large number of similar establishments were hastily closed, and the evil has since been very greatly reduced. In 1872 the public safety was far from well assured. Robberies were rife, and European residents could not walk on the less frequented roads after dusk with security. That has all been changed now. Not only do we enjoy immunity from \"knocking down,\" but serious crime of all sorts has been immensely decreased. This is owing, of course, to the great improvement of the Police Force, which has become what Hongkong has a right to expect, efficient and capable. Piracy, which at the commencement of Sir ARTHUR KENNEDY'S administration was rampant in these waters, has been reduced to comparatively small limits. In the gaols a more rigid discipline has also been introduced at the instance of His Excellency.\n\nIn the Public Works Department a great deal has either been carried through or inaugurated. Progress in this direction is, unfortunately, much impeded by the often vexatious delay experienced in procuring official sanction for a projected work from the Home Government, Notwithstanding this, however, much has been effected. The lighthouses on Green Island and Cape D'Aguilar—two highly important undertakings—have been completed. A decision has at length, after ten years' consideration, been arrived at with regard to the Civil Hospital, for which unreasonable delay Sir ARTHUR is not responsible. The new building was projected in 1867; the site was surveyed in 1870; the first plans, ill-adapted to the requirements of the Colony, arrived in 1875; and in 1876 it was found that, owing to the satisfactory working of the Contagious Diseases Act, the accommodation in the Lock Hospital had become largely in excess of what was needed. It was then proposed by the Colonial Surgeon and the Surveyor-General that the Lock Hospital should be adapted for the purposes of a Government Civil Hospital and a Lock Hospital built on the site intended for the Civil Hospital. His Excellency, finding that a large saving would be effected by this plan, gave it his sanction, and the plans were completed last month. All the improvements for the benefit and aid of sufferers will be introduced under the direction of the Colonial Surgeon. A small-pox hospital is still needed, but that is a matter which must be left to Sir ARTHUR's successor. No less than eight years ago new buildings were proposed for the Government Central Schools, but other matters have stood in the way of this much needed work. Sir ARTHUR, who has always taken a warm interest in this institution, has long wished to see it more suitably housed,",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 299934,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5]",
        "page_number": 264,
        "title": "CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5]",
        "content_text": "No.\n\n4,517\n\n(Subject.)\n\nDESPATCH.\n\nRECEIVED\n\n16 APR 1877\n\n45 The Houghong Blockade Question\n\nDate.\n\n26 mar 1874\n\nInwards copy of letter from Chamber of Commerce enclosing minutes of General Meeting containing a Protest against the appointment of Sir B. Robertson as a member of the Blockade Commission.\n\n3 Copies of General Report also included\n\n(Minutes.)\n\nThe Chamber of Commerce protests against Sir B. Robertson being a member of the Blockade Commission.\n\nPage 4570.\n\n...\n\nPage 4576.\n\n \n 70 \n\n 4540 \n\n 27/4/77 \n\n 3 \n\n 13033 \n\n Jo. \n\n GŁO \n\n In Branston \n\n gur spi \n\n 1117.4 \n\n Jimper \n\n 49 576444 \n\n 70",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 299937,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5]",
        "page_number": 267,
        "title": "CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5]",
        "content_text": "Hongkong\n\nW:45.\n\n7th March 1897\n\nAdministrator\n\nJ. Gardiner Austin, Esq.\n\nto\n\nThe Right Honorable\n\nThe Lord of the Admiralty,\n\nBlockade of Winhing.\n\nForwards protest by the Chamber of Commerce against appointment of Sir\n\nBrooke Robertson late\n\nof\n\na Member of the Commission\n\nin\n\n2 indemnities\n\n4\n\nCopy\n\nWar 45/77\n\n264\n\nHongkong General Chamber of Commerce.\n\nHongkong, 27th February, 1877.\n\nAt the Annual meeting of\n\nthis Chamber held on the 12th Instant\n\nthe following\n\nresolution was\n\nunanimously carried:-\n\n\"That this Chamber do protest\n\nagainst Sir Brooke Robertson being\n\nappointed\n\nas a member of the Blockade Commission, under the Chefoo Convention,\n\nand that a\n\ncopy of the minutes embodying\n\nthis protest, together with the memorial\n\nbe forwarded to the\n\nHont J.Gardiner Austin, C.M.G., Colonial Secretary,",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 299940,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5]",
        "page_number": 270,
        "title": "CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5]",
        "content_text": "Hongkong 29th November 1876\n\nREPORT\n\n4th Year 77\n\nOF THE\n\nCOMMITTEE\n\nOF THE\n\nHongkong General Chamber of Commerce\n\nFOR THE\n\nYear ending 31st December, 1876.\n\nPRESENTED TO THE MEMBERS\n\nBlockade of Hong Kong\n\nExtract from Sir Thomas Wade's letter dated 24th November 1876 to His Excellency The Governor of Hongkong relative to the appointment of Mr. B. Robertson as the Consular member of the Commission\n\n-\n\nAT THE\n\nAnnual Meeting held on 12th February, 1877.\n\nHONGKONG!\n\nPRINTED BY NORONHA & SONS, OSWALD'S TERRACE, WELLINGTON STREET.\n\n1877.\n\nEnclosure No.2 in Administrator J. Gardiner Austin's despatch \"No.4\" of 7th March 1877;\n\n267\n\nPage 270\n\nPage 271",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 299945,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5]",
        "page_number": 275,
        "title": "CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5]",
        "content_text": " \n\n(8)\n\n(9)\n\nmajority against us.\n\nof reason or right on his side, as take for instance a cargo of Indian Cotton arbitration where we knew at the outset there was a Straits produce, or Manchester goods. He cannot by any reasoning, however subtle, sustain his right to charge two import duties on these.\n\nIn fact, with all deference to Sir BROOKE ROBERTSON - in all probability he has done and written in reference to this subject has been in good faith, but it is in human nature to err, and by the balance of evidence it be\n\nmatter of this kind. It may be said in reference to a new comer that he would urge that an independent man should be appointed to investigate a would not be conversant with the matter. Well, many matters involving more points of detail are heard and decided in courts of justice; and any new man coming might be allowed time to study the question. I contend it would be better to have a new man to arbitrate than a man like Sir BROOKE ROBERTSON, who has shown that he is biassed. And further, we\n\ncommenced to suffer from this grievance is passing away. I do not suppose must not allow this opportunity to pass by us. The first generation who here are more than one or two now present who took part in the discussion when this was first spoken of. We have repeatedly petitioned two Governments on the subject, but all our labours and prayers have simply brought\n\nforth this Commission, and this only in consequence of the Convention at ments on the subject, but all our labours and prayers have simply brought\n\nwould have been shelved for years. Therefore we ought to make the best Chefoo. In all probability had it not been for that Convention the matter\n\nof it, and if our protest is not attended to, we might call a meeting of the citizens of the Colony to protest.\n\nit is finally decided by the high authorities that the Treaty of Tientsin applies to the trade in native craft from this Colony, then he could charge the foreign tariff, and no more, but if the foreign tariff is not applicable, he can only charge the native duties, so that whatever conclusion is arrived at he stands convicted of unwarrantable squeezing. Let us hope, gentlemen, that the Commission as agreed in Sir THOMAS WADE's Convention may so commence their labours, and that the end of these labours may be that the Colony will be freed from the many evils which the present system entail upon us.\n\nWith reference to the remarks in the report on the subject of H.M. Consul acting as a member of that Commission, let us hope that he will view these remarks in their proper spirit. For his high personal character, his genial, generous spirit in private life, we have all the greatest admiration, but I contend that no man can read his despatches without feeling convinced that there is a bias towards the Chinese view of the situation. Some of the ablest and best men, both in past and present times have been biassed on some point or other, and very often there is no way of accounting for a bias. Before concluding these remarks on the Blockade, I would call the attention of members to the very able manner in which His Excellency the Governor has been battling for the Colony in this matter. Our second Police Magistrate, also deserves the thanks of the community as he has been most untiring in his labours to bring to light the objectionable practices of the Hoppo's employés in and around this harbour. The Chief Justice, the Acting Attorney General, the Registrar General, and the gentleman who is now acting, Mr. TONNOCHY, have, on every occasion, done all in their power to protect the interests of the Colony, and to them much credit is due.\n\nI am sure\n\nMr. BALLIOS.-I think, Mr. Chairman, it would be advisable for us than could possibly take a position like that; he could not go into the jury Chamber to protest against Sir BROOKE ROBERTSON being appointed to try a man under such circumstances; he would feel himself bound to say to the judge, \"I feel myself disqualified to sit in this case.” Sir BROOKE would not accept such a position.\n\nMr. WELSH asked if the meeting was in order, as the adoption of the report had not yet been moved, and he believed the Chairman had not concluded his remarks upon it.\n\nThe CHAIRMAN said he was going to make a few remarks on the other portions of the report, and proceeded:-With regard to the Blockade, we have had\n\n272",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 299946,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5]",
        "page_number": 276,
        "title": "CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5]",
        "content_text": "(10)\n\nA very interesting and valuable report by our Secretary, Dr. DENNYS, on this place, and the only misfortune is that the port was opened so late in the last season, that there have not been many opportunities of proving its capabilities, but I think we can safely say with this report that we may look for some improvement in the trade there in the coming year. Then, as to the opening of Pakhoi, that certainly is a concession to the wishes of a number of people in this Colony, but I do not think we can say much about it until something more is known about the place. As to the telegraphic tariffs, I regret to say our efforts have not resulted in any actual reduction of charges. Then we come to the question of the establishment of a Chinese Government Mint. There was a very full report of the transactions of this Chamber at the meeting called to consider the subject, and I do not think there is much more to be said about it. As to postal rates, I think this Chamber ought to congratulate itself and the community generally on the satisfactory position to which this matter has been brought. We hope very soon to be receiving and despatching letters at very much reduced postage compared to what we have been in the habit of paying for years. As regards Reuter's telegrams, in this I hope we shall see improvement. I am sure the Chamber ought to feel indebted to the Sub-committee, who had a number of interviews with Reuter's Agent and put the matter on a footing which we think will prove satisfactory. I do not think I have anything else to remark on, except the state of the funds. This, I think, you will admit is very satisfactory. In spite of the fact that we have lost several of our members, after deducting the expenses of Dr. DENNYS in his visit to Hainan, and a sum paid for another matter, we are $164 better off than we were at this time last year, and, as I understand from Dr. DENNYS, the demand for the circular goes on increasing. I now move the adoption of the report and accounts as presented.\n\nMr. KAHN seconded.\n\nMr. WELSH wished to make an explanation with regard to a matter in the report under the head of \"Establishment of a Chinese Government Mint.” It said, \"After debate, a resolution was carried, with only two dissentients that the Chamber declined to make any recommendation in the matter of a Mint to be established under the authority of the Chinese Government.” From what Dr. DENNYS had told him he understood that the report might be technically correct, but as he was one of the dissentients referred to, he wished to say that he did not object to the resolution on its merits, but simply did not vote for it because he wished his own motion to be carried.\n\n(11)\n\nThe CHAIRMAN said he thought that could be made right.\n\nMr. WELSH. Then with regard to the Blockade, I think you said just now that one of the gentlemen called repeatedly for facts, and in the present report it states that official documents which have been received amply prove the correctness of the statements put forward. A great many of them do this, but the one point on which I specially called for facts was the annihilation of the trade of Hongkong. Not a single fact has been produced to show that the trade is being annihilated; on the contrary, it is increasing.\n\nThe CHAIRMAN.-I think you are confounding the public meeting with the meeting of this Chamber. It has never been said here that the trade is being annihilated.\n\nMr. WELSH.-I beg your pardon; I have misunderstood you.\n\nThe CHAIRMAN-I did not refer to you specially,\n\nMr. WELSH-Oh, I am glad to hear that; I thought it referred to me. There were annoyances and vexations, and I never objected to the statement of them.\n\nOn proposition of the Chairman, it was then put to the meeting that the report and statement of accounts be accepted. This was seconded by Mr. KAHN, and unanimously adopted.\n\nMr. BELILIOS then moved: \"That this Chamber do protest against Sir BROOKE ROBERTSON being appointed as a member of the Blockade Commission under the Chefoo Convention, and that a copy of the minutes embodying this protest, together with the annual report of the Chamber for 1876, be forwarded to His Excellency the Governor.\n\nMr. NELSON.-I will second that with pleasure. There is very little known yet as to what is going to be done in the matter, but I think there is no doubt, although we have no official information on the subject, that it is intended to appoint Sir BROOKE ROBERTSON on the Commission. Whether Sir BROOKE will accept the position or whether he will not, is a matter I\n\n273",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 299948,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5]",
        "page_number": 278,
        "title": "CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5]",
        "content_text": "Report of the Committee of the Hongkong General Chamber of Commerce for the Year ending 31st December, 1876, presented to the Members at the Yearly General Meeting held on Monday, February 12th, 1877.\n\nThe Committee beg to place before the Members of the Chamber, the following Report of their proceedings for the year ending 31st December, 1876.\n\nThe Blockade of the Port of Hongkong by Chinese Customs' Cruizers.\n\nThe hopes expressed in the last Annual Report that satisfactory results would be shortly attained respecting this long pending question, have made some progress towards realisation. Under the Convention concluded between Great Britain and China at Chefoo, on September 13th, 1876, it has been arranged that a Chinese Official, a British Consul, and an Official selected by the Hongkong Government shall meet to discuss, and, if possible, satisfactorily arrange, the points at issue.\n\nParliamentary Papers, just published, containing official correspondence and documents connected with the Blockade, amply prove the correctness of the statements put forward, from time to time, by this Chamber, even Her Britannic Majesty's Consul at Canton admitting (contrary to all his previous statements in defence of the Blockade), that extra and excessive duties were irregularly levied on the trade of the Colony. It is to be hoped that steps will now be taken to bring about an early and satisfactory settlement. The Committee, however, have grave doubts of a successful issue, as they learn with regret, that Her Majesty's Minister at Peking has appointed Sir BROOKE ROBERTSON a member of the Blockade commission; for all the discussions which have taken place on this vexed question clearly indicate that Her Majesty's Consul at Canton is at one with the Chinese on the subject, and that he has thus far been their advocate and apologist.\n\n[Correspondence on this subject will be found in Appendix 4.]\n\n(15)\n\nOpening of the Ports of Hoihow (K'iung-Chow) in Hainan, and of Haiphong in Tonquin.\n\nAn advantageous opportunity presenting itself for a visit to these ports early in the year, the Secretary was instructed to proceed thither, and report upon their trade capabilities. He accordingly left on the 22nd March, and returned after an absence of one month. His report has been already placed in the hands of Members, and nothing has since transpired to materially affect the conclusions therein stated. Both ports will probably, in the course of time, become centres of a moderate trade; but under present circumstances, improvement must necessarily be slow. Were the working of the mines known to exist permitted, it would no doubt tend to develop them more rapidly.\n\nOpening of Pakhoi.\n\nThe Committee note with satisfaction, that amongst the ports to be opened to Trade under the Chefoo Convention, is that of Pakhoi. Although but little is accurately known of its capabilities, its repute amongst the Chinese bears testimony to its trade activity. It is however right to add that recent reports from European visitors describe Pakhoi as but a small town containing not more than some 10,000 inhabitants. Its importance in Chinese eyes probably arises from its proximity to the important prefectural city of Leen-chow-foo and its convenience as a landing place for goods passing to the interior. The local business is described as having materially fallen off during the past three years, owing to additional exactions on the part of the native authorities. As a port, it is undoubtedly superior to any other known to Europeans on the South Coast.\n\nTelegraphic Tariffs.\n\nIn pursuance of the Resolution passed at the last Annual Meeting, the Committee have addressed letters to the Home Directors of the Eastern Extension Australasia and China Telegraph Company, and of the Great Northern Telegraph Company, copies of which will be found in the Appendix, together with the answers received, (Appendix B). Although no reduction of the tariff has followed, the recommendations put forth by the Committee, it is hoped, will not be without effect.\n\nIn August last, a despatch was received from the Honourable the Colonial Secretary, covering a letter from the Eastern Extension Australasia and China Telegraph Company.\n\n275",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 299964,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5]",
        "page_number": 294,
        "title": "CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5]",
        "content_text": "Hate that it is sure to disarrange\n\nthe fact that the feeling is genuine\n\nin this project is best of all;\n\nof some sort; it may be\n\nfraud in various\n\nJones in the present correspondence Grondinen\n\nGrondinen & this\n\nimpossible & such that, with\n\nor without definite harm,\n\nThe Community of persons\nfiring imbued with the belief\n\nthat, in the disputes arising out of the Blockade, the British\n\nside\n\nof the question is urged when Chinese authorities with an\n\nair of severity\n\nfinesse,\n\nwhich is wholly detrimental\n\n1\n\nMINUTE.\n\nMr. Bramston. Mr. Malcolm.\n\nMr. Meade.\n\nMr. Herbert. Mr. Lowther.\n\nEarl Carnarvon\n\n291\n\nto the interests of the colony in\n\nThe matter immediately in\n\nquestion, but encourage the\n\nCommanders of the cruisers\n\nthe character gathered\n\nto acts of further\n\nbecome more & more\n\nirritating\n\n3. Earl Carnarvon learnt\n\nwith\n\ngreat satisfaction\n\nThat\n\nThe conduct of the Customs\n\nOfficials have been made\n\nthe subject of diplomatic\n\nrepresentation both in Peking\n\nand in\n\nhopes that the meeting of the Commission\n\nwill lead to a\n\npermanent settlement of the",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 300865,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8]",
        "page_number": 607,
        "title": "CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8]",
        "content_text": "Jovernor. Nug писок\n\nDate.\n\nConfed\n\n187\n\nHonghong\n\nN° 13,033\n\n(Subject.)\n\nDESPATCH,\n\nRECEN\n\n30 OCT\n\n1877\n\nThe Blockade Question\n\n602\n\nauf 30\n\nInwalds\n\nCopy of a further communie : pone Fir\n\nfor settlach.\n\nBir\n\nLaft previous Paper.\n\n12745\n\n27.11-77\n\nFrili\n\n0.\n\nCob ods.\n\nnow they s\n\nho\n\nFB\n\n13537\n\nB. Robertion suggesting in\n\ndifficulty\n\n(Minutes.)\n\nDr. Bramston\n\nCemenoui\n\nFull Now 12.\n\nLu 12/45 from for. Hennessy\n\n115.11.77 18-1679\n\n& Lord\n\nSimple a very satisfactory from a Chinese point of view — The harbor is to be open only to ships which have Chinese Clearance — the point which Lord ... entertained in 12745.\n\nSend a copy to 2.0. & Join the theme of\n\ninstruction & the Mockard. Commission –\n\nnot humorous per\n\naus drafts ons\n\n08. 4 | 77—H & S 4132\n\n2545 4875\n\nwe discuss & Sir Bricke Ribalso\n\nthe\n\nbeing a to Commission: be in t And Coming\n\nhome on\n\non letter abord\n\nlove. I Wallis at home and whe\n\nUpon reviewing the original text and the output, I made the following corrections according to the given rules:\n\n1. Corrected \"Jovernor\" to a more plausible \"Governor\" but kept it as is due to rule 7.\n2. Corrected \"Nug писок\" which seems to be an OCR error, but kept as is.\n3. \"Confed\" is unclear; it might be \"Confidential\".\n4. \"Honghong\" is likely \"Hongkong\".\n5. \"N° 13,033\" is likely a reference number.\n6. \"DESPATCH\" is correctly spelled.\n7. \"RECEN\" is likely \"RECEIVED\".\n8. \"The Blockade Question\" seems to be a title or subject.\n9. Various corrections and formatting were considered but not applied due to the rules.\n\nHowever, to follow the instructions precisely and output in HTML using `` for paragraphs:\n\nThe output is already in the required HTML format using `\n\n` tags. Further corrections to the text itself were not made as per the instructions to not rephrase or rewrite unless it's an unambiguous correction like spelling or spacing. \n\nTo enhance the response according to the rules and compact knowledge:\n\n- The original text has many OCR errors and unclear parts.\n- The output is in HTML format as required.\n\nThus, the provided HTML output is the result of directly converting the given text into HTML format using `\n\n` tags for paragraphs.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 300866,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8]",
        "page_number": 608,
        "title": "CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8]",
        "content_text": "603 remain for some time longer, damn well 70 wants to postpone the Commission.\n\nGid.\n\nAs per GJ Pehlte the pending u: at all events batil & Wade reminds to the same to 7.0. & say remind them of my drafts?\n\n123/11 yes alone Kett hov 23 4570\n\n% Confidential My Lord 13038?? Government.\n\n20 OCT 1077 Victoria, Hong Kong. 30th August 1877.\n\nIn Sir Arthur Kennedy's despatch, No. 39 of the 28th of February 1877, he laid before Your Lordship Copies of two proposals for the settlement of the \"Hong Kong Blockade\" question; one being Sir Brooke Robertson's proposal, the other the proposal of the Hong Kong Government.\n\n2. Sir Brooke Robertson has now given me another proposal, which in some respects resembles Sir Arthur Kennedy's, but-\n\nThe Right Hon: The Earl of Carnarvon",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 300874,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-179 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [9-12]",
        "page_number": 2,
        "title": "CO129-179 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [9-12]",
        "content_text": "00129/179.\n\nHong Kong\n\n1844\n\nVolume M.\n\nContents.\n\n1\n\n  \n    Despatch\n    Date\n    Subject\n    By\n    Memorandum\n  \n  \n    107.\n    6 Sept\n    Blockade Question. Proposals of\n    His Q. Excellency\n    \n  \n  \n    108.\n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    109.\n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    110.\n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    #13.\n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    114\n    \n    Scheme of Open Competition for appointments in Civil Service.\n    \n    77\n  \n  \n    115.\n    \n    Defective State of Interpreters Dept.\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    \n    \n    Testimonials of certain Candidates at Civil Service Exam.\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    \n    \n    Cholera at Amoy.\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    \n    \n    Repatriation of Pauper Lunatics.\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    \n    \n    Amoy Postal Agency at\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    116.\n    \n    Drugs & Reports.\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    \n    \n    Freedom of Trade in Sulu.\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    119\n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    \n    \n    Short Sentences on old offenders.\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    \n    \n    Transportation & Convicts from Hong Kong to Labuan.\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    \n    \n    Constitution of Labuan Convict Settlement.\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    120.\n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    121\n    \n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    122.\n    \n    Dues levied on Chinese junks proceeding from Hong Kong to Macao.\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    123\n    \n    Despatch of Coolies to Labuan.\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    127.\n    \n    Criminal Returns & the Foot Binding.\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    126.\n    \n    Chinese business houses in Hong Kong.\n    \n    78\n  \n  \n    \n    \n    Short Sentences & old offenders.\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    129.\n    9 Oct\n    Famine Relief Fund\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    129.\n    \n    Application for certain Half pay.\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    \n    \n    Decrease of Crime\n    Q.\n    \n  \n  \n    \n    \n    Chinese Stamp Agency.\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    134\n    10\n    \n    \n    \n  \n  \n    \n    \n    Report of Coolie\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    136.\n    10\n    Appeal of Coolie\n    Colston on\n    \n  \n  \n    \n    \n    Commission on Hong Kong Post.\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    \n    \n    Overseer of\n    \n    \n  \n  \n    \n    \n    Works.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-179 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [9-12].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 301502,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-180 - Public Offices & Others - 1877",
        "page_number": 115,
        "title": "CO129-180 - Public Offices & Others - 1877",
        "content_text": "I am at present in this country on leave of absence, inclosing copy of a letter addressed by him to the Governor of Hong Kong upon the subject of the so-called Blockade.\n\nI am, Sir,\nyour most obedient humble servant\n\n109 Love, Hotel\n\nCopy\n\nMy Lord,\n\nAlbemarle Street\n17 Jan. 1877\n\nIn Art. VII of Section III of the Agreement signed by me on the 13th Sept. last at Chefoo, I stipulated that a Commission to consist of a British Consul, an officer of the Hongkong force, & a Chinese official of equal rank, should be appointed to consider some means of removing the causes of complaint against what is popularly known as the Hongkong Blockade.\n\nI have the honor to state that\n\nThe Earl of Derby",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-180 - Public Offices & Others - 1877.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 301557,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-180 - Public Offices & Others - 1877",
        "page_number": 170,
        "title": "CO129-180 - Public Offices & Others - 1877",
        "content_text": "## DOMESTIC\n### Office or Individual\n\nNo 4089\n\n**(Subject.)**  \nRECEIVE  \n9 APR  \n1877  \n\nFor Offia Hong Kong Blockade Commission.\n\n| Date | Last previous Paper |\n| --- | --- |\n| 1877 | Finwawr Deep. 164 on the subject from his Chargé d'affaires at Peting. lens apit 25. 2345. 2945 |\n\n**(Minutes.)**  \nIn Bramston.  \n`(6 rma. 10 | 76--[I & § 2457)`  \nCan GWR april 11. be added in the Soft tote fepared in accordance with your menuts on 2945.  \nYesu ack. & concur in lach Garagraphe at ther `841.12/4`",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-180 - Public Offices & Others - 1877.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 301558,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-180 - Public Offices & Others - 1877",
        "page_number": 171,
        "title": "CO129-180 - Public Offices & Others - 1877",
        "content_text": "**RECEIVED** \n9 APR 1877 \n4039 \n165 \n\nForeign Office April 6. 157). \n27 \n\nI am directed by the Earl of Derby, Her Majesty's Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs to transmit to you to be laid before the Earl of Carnarvon, a copy of a despatch from Her Majesty's Chargé d'affaires at Peking, on the subject of the \"Hong Kong Blockade Commission.\"\n\nThe \nI am, \nYour most obedient Servant \nT. V. Lister \nUnder Secretary of State \nJulian Pauncefote \nColonial Office",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-180 - Public Offices & Others - 1877.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 301560,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-180 - Public Offices & Others - 1877",
        "page_number": 173,
        "title": "CO129-180 - Public Offices & Others - 1877",
        "content_text": "## 167\n\nCelebrations of the Commission to be instituted under the Chefoo Agreement, to consider the Question known as the \"Hongkong Blockade\".\n\nthat of the foot of Hongkong may be appointed by the Colonial Government.\n\nSir J. Wade had suggested to the Tsungli Yamen that Lin Kuen-yi replies that he has already been directed by the Tsungli Yamen to select a suitable officer to represent the Chinese foot in this Commission, & that he has consequently appointed a Taotai Kao to act with Sir B. Robertson & the officer who may be attached to the Chinese member.\n\nof the Foreign Customs establishment might be attached to the Chinese officer, if the latter desired it. The Governor further replies that he will do so if it be the wish of the Commission.\n\nI have seen (5.?) Hugh Fraser...",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-180 - Public Offices & Others - 1877.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 302024,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-181 - Governor Hennessy - 1878 [1-8]",
        "page_number": 185,
        "title": "CO129-181 - Governor Hennessy - 1878 [1-8]",
        "content_text": "## DESPATCH\n### Hong Kong \n#### No 2319 \n\n**(Subject.)** \n**CEIP** \n**C.0.** \n**28 FEB 1678** \n**183** \n\nParaphrase of Telegram from Governor of Hong Kong.\n\nSir B. Robertson wishes to appoint a Commission to settle the Blockade Question.\n\n**(Last previous Paper)** \n**53** \n**3 do 80** \n**Son 17** \n**130 3317)**\n\n**(Minutes.)**\n| Date | Minute |\n| --- | --- |\n| 26 Feb 78 | Copy F.O. Came Brampton down to Jou. I understand the Dolce kate per pas. Dolcekate went his forming November on 27 December last (`18010233/77`). |\n|  | Our letter 25 April (`70/70`) of What Love Daly of the Commission. Telegraph in `4533`/`2545`. We reminded anet arkad doing clout the appointment. |\n|  | Refly 6 the \"Certainly not. Matter still under consideration\". Then cons `16`, `p!!77-II`, both betegre Cell of AAMÅ hov. 27, `570` with refere Gul `7623`. |\n|  | It is supposed that F.O. wish to promote the Commission. |",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-181 - Governor Hennessy - 1878 [1-8].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 303169,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878",
        "page_number": 167,
        "title": "CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878",
        "content_text": "## DOMESTIC.\n\n### Hong Kong \nNo. 2356 \n\n**(Subject.)** \n161 RECEIVED 25 FEB 1673. Offer The so-called Chuise Blockade of \nDate. 1878 as previous Paper.\n\n| Date | Description |\n| --- | --- |\n| March 28 | Hong Kong Printed Copy of J. O. Confidential paper `883443`. ms, 10 \\| 77—(1&9 5450) Containing Copy of & Memor Int. Meade |\n\n### (Minutes.)\n\nOn April & May last year, we invited F.D. to consider Certain instructions for the proposed Commission which is to settle this Troublesome matter. Our letter of April 25 is printed here No. 2; our letter of May ... is not printed.\n\nMy Aunt will see (`4517`) that it objected to & Sin Parkes Robertson of the Commissioners.\n\nOn November 27th, we asked for an answer (see No. 3) and sent a further paper of suggestions by Sir Brook Robertson.\n\nNo. 4 is a memorandum by Sir J. Wade dated November ...; No. 6 is a Memorandum by Julian Pauncefote dated December 26th.\n\nNo official communication has been received from F.O.; but a few days since, Sir J. Pauncefote told Houghton verbally that on behalf of F.O., he would confer with himself and Sir Thomas Wade – If we approve de forme, Helton will or will send.\n\nMeanwhile, Sir H. Robertson has persuaded W. Hennessy to telegraph for remission of disappointment.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 303176,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878",
        "page_number": 174,
        "title": "CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878",
        "content_text": "## No. 2.\n\n**Mr. Pope Hennessy to the Earl of Carnarvon (Received September 24.)**\n\nSir,\n\nGovernment House, Hong Kong, August 3, 1877.\n\nI HAVE the honour to report that the Viceroy has issued a Proclamation embodying the substance of the Regulations agreed upon between Sir Brooke Robertson and the Taotai, as also the Tariff of dues and duties leviable on junks and cargoes.\n\n6. That the Tariff of dues and duties leviable on Chinese junks shall be published for general information, as also the penalties to be inflicted in case of any breach of Customs Regulations.\n\n7 \n\n3. The junk-masters, who have been in the habit of smuggling, are now, I understand, taking to a more legitimate trade, as they have become fully alive to the fact that the Hong Kong Government is prepared in every case to enforce the law of the Colony as it exists in Ordinance 6 of 1866.\n\n4. As I reported to your Lordship in my despatch of the 3rd August, all complaints about the so-called blockade of Hong Kong have ceased.\n\nJ. POPE HENNESSY.\n\nI have, &c.\n\n(Signed)\n\n**Inclosure 2 in No. 3.**\n**Inclosure 3 in No. 2.**\n\n**Proposed Basis of Settlement by the Hong Kong Government.**\n\n1. THAT the three Throat Gate stations shall be retained for collection of duties and war-tax, and delivery of receipts and clearances.\n2. That junks clearing from Hong Kong shall hand in manifests, pay duties, and receive clearances at one or other of such stations.\n3. That junks coming to Hong Kong shall stop at one or other of such stations for examination and payment of export dues from port of clearance, if such have not been already paid.\n4. That no dues whatsoever shall be demanded from junks coming to Hong Kong from ports in China, save such export duties as are payable at the respective ports of clearance.\n5. That a Tariff of dues and duties leviable on goods shipped by Chinese junks from Hong Kong shall be agreed upon and published, as also the penalties for breach of Customs Regulations.\n6. That on any seizure being made, it shall be forthwith reported to the Hong Kong Government, which may appoint an officer to inquire into the merits of the case jointly with an officer appointed by the Viceroy. If these two cannot agree, one of Her Majesty's Judges at Hong Kong shall be nominated by the Governor to investigate the matter and decide finally thereon.\n7. That all revenue cruizers shall be under the jurisdiction of the officer duly accredited to this Government for such special service.\n\n## No. 3.\n\n**Mr. Herbert to Lord Tenterden (Received November 28.)**\n\nSir,\n\nDowning Street, November 27, 1877.\n\nWITH reference to previous correspondence on the subject of the Hong Kong Blockade, I am directed by the Earl of Carnarvon to transmit to you, to be laid before the Earl of Derby, a copy of a Confidential despatch from the Governor of Hong Kong, containing a further proposal from Sir Brooke Robertson for the settlement of the question.\n\nI am also to refer you to the letters from this Department of the 25th April and the 3rd May (which have not yet been answered), and I am to state that Lord Carnarvon would be glad if he can be informed whether any steps are being taken in the matter of the appointment of Members to the proposed Commission.\n\n**(Confidential.)**\n\nMy Lord,\n\nI am, &c.\n\n(Signed) ROBERT G. W. HERBERT.\n\n**Inclosure 1 in No. 3.**\n\n**Governor Hennessy to the Earl of Carnarvon,**\n\nGovernment House, Victoria, Hong Kong, August 30, 1877.\n\nIN Sir Arthur Kennedy's despatch of the 28th of February, 1877, he laid before your Lordship copies of two proposals for the settlement of the Hong Kong Blockade question, one being Sir Brooke Robertson's proposal, the other the proposal of the Hong Kong Government.\n\n2. Sir Brooke Robertson has now given me another proposal, which in some respects resembles Sir Arthur Kennedy's, but with the advantage of being more simple. I have the honour to inclose a copy for your Lordship's information. I am disposed to prefer it to any other scheme on this subject I have seen.\n\nI am \n\n**Draft of suggested Regulations for Chinese Junks trading with the Colony of Hong Kong.**\n\n1. CHINESE junks bound for the harbour of Hong Kong will call at one or the other of the Chinese Customs Stations of ... and ... and, after examination by the officer in charge of the station at which a junk may call, the master will receive a clearance certificate in the form to be hereafter agreed upon.\n\n2. On anchoring in the harbour of Hong Kong the master will exhibit and surrender to the Harbour-Master this certificate, and if unable to produce it he will be ordered to leave the harbour with his junk, loaded or in ballast as may be, passengers alone being allowed to land.\n\n3. The master of a Chinese junk clearing from the harbour of Hong Kong, loaded or in ballast, will apply for and receive from the Harbour-Master a certificate in the form to be hereafter agreed upon, which he will exhibit and surrender to the officer in charge of the Customs Station at which he may call, and will receive in exchange a clearance certificate which will free his vessel from further search or detention until she arrives at her destination. Should a junk after leaving the harbour proceed to sea without calling at one or the other of the above-named stations she will render herself liable to capture and adjudication by the Chinese Customs authorities.\n\n4. If a complaint of the action taken by any officer of a Customs Station, or by any Chinese Revenue cruiser, is lodged with the Hong Kong Government by the master of a junk trading with the Colony, it will be forwarded to Her Majesty's Consul at Canton for investigation, and if deemed expedient by the Governor of Hong Kong, his Excellency will appoint an officer of the Colonial Government to sit with Her Majesty's Consul and the Superintendent of Customs, or their deputies, during the examination.\n\n5. A Tariff of the dues and duties payable at the above-named Customs Stations shall be published for general information, in order that complaints of excessive or unjust levies may be more satisfactorily traced.\n\nB. R.\n\n## No. 4.\n\n**Memorandum by Sir T. Wade,**\n\n(Signed)\n\nI HAVE read Mr. Herbert's letter of the 27th instant, inclosing, by the Earl of Carnarvon's desire, copy of a confidential despatch from Mr. Pope Hennessy, Governor of Hong Kong, with reference to the settlement of the so-called blockade question, as proposed by Sir Brooke Robertson, and inquiring, for the information of his Lordship, whether any steps have been taken in the matter of the appointment of members to the Commission, which, under the `Chefoo Agreement`, was to consider the question.\n\nIt would appear from Mr. Pope Hennessy's despatch of August 30 that an amended Code of Rules to regulate the supervision of the junk trade by the three native Custom-houses whose action has been objected to, is approved by Mr. Pope Hennessy himself. If this assumption be correct, it is then to be assumed that the work of the Commission is ended. There would in that case, of course, be no occasion for fresh consideration of its composition.\n\nOf the rules themselves I shall allow myself but one criticism, and that in no \n\nPage 168",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 303177,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878",
        "page_number": 175,
        "title": "CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878",
        "content_text": "## 8\n\nhostile sense.\n\nMr. Hennessy observes that they differ little from those earlier submitted to Sir Arthur Kennedy by Sir Brooke Robertson. There is, to my mind, one very significant difference, namely, in suppression of the original proposition to establish a branch of the Foreign Customs Inspectorate on the mainland opposite Hong Kong. I attached much importance to this proposition, because I believed that the point once carried, we should get rid altogether of the three Customs stations which enforce what is stigmatised as the blockade. These three stations the Chinese Government has, of course, a perfect right to maintain on the three points of Chinese territory on which they have been maintained, but it is to me certain that so long as they exist under exclusively native superintendence, so long will the junk trade be taxed in excess of the tariffs posted at these stations. The staff at such stations will always be of a low order; underpaid, if paid at all; beholden almost certainly to irregular fees for its subsistence, while there is the greatest difficulty in bringing home to it judicially the proof of such irregularity, the witness against it being the Chinese trader, who has to complain in effect of his own Government through a foreign authority. In the interest of the junk trade, I should have been glad to insure the disappearance of these stations, for which there could have been no longer any necessity, once a branch of the Foreign Customs had been invested with the surveillance of the trade.\n\nI have no doubt that Sir Brooke Robertson has good reasons to give for the abandonment of this part of the original scheme. He has had very possibly as great difficulty on the part of the colony as on the part of the Chinese. Our community is jealous of what it understands to be the freedom of the colonial port; and the Superintendent of Customs at Canton is as little likely as any of his brethren to desire expansion of the Foreign Customs Inspectorate, where its branch establishment must supersede the native branch offices officered by his own hangers-on.\n\nThe new rules at the same time do promise a check on the abuse of their authority by the three stations as regards, in particular, the invasion of the waters of the colony by Chinese cruisers when pursuing junks; the infraction of law of which the colony has undoubted right to complain. Taken as a whole, the new rules deprive these cruisers of their plea for irregular action of the kind; for they fully recognise the right of the Chinese Government to overhaul all Chinese vessels on their way into Hong Kong; and the obligation of the colony to refuse trading facilities to vessels that cannot, when they enter the port, produce proof that they have been so overhauled, and to certificate such vessels leaving the port, in such wise as to protect the Chinese Revenue against irregularity. Lastly, the appeal to Canton provided for in Rule 4, will, to a certain extent, and for a time, at all events, restrain the exactions of the three stations. I trust that Sir Brooke Robertson's new Rules may be allowed a trial.\n\nI have implied above that I have no faith in the adherence of the stations to a tariff. It is none the less desirable that a tariff should be published and hung up at the station Custom-houses. The Commission, I presume, will look to it that its import rates do not exceed the rates at which British imports are admitted into Macao.\n\nAs to Chinese produce brought in junks to Hong Kong, I confess that I do not see my way to any arrangement that will secure it against the levy of dues, which, according to our ideas and practice, must be esteemed arbitrary exactions. A quota of these more than probably passes into the private purse of the Canton Superintendent, himself always a member of the Imperial household, and not lightly taxed in the provision of jewels or other requirements of the Court as distinct from the State. Where produce comes from the coast of Kuang Tung, if, thanks to our intervention, dues cannot be charged at these three stations, they will not improbably be levied at those points of the coast, not open to foreign trade, from which the junks clear out; or the junks may be subjected to mart dues, or some other form of dues, by which our object in a Tariff may be equally defeated. I should recommend great liberality in the matter of Chinese produce to the framers of the Tariff. This may encourage the Superintendent at Canton (the Hoppo) to enjoin moderation upon his subordinates. A further check upon their exactions might be provided by the transmission to him periodically, through the Consul, of a return of the Chinese junks that had entered the harbours of Hong Kong or cleared thence. The Colony has now a system of registration that would facilitate the preparation of such a return.\n\nLord Carnarvon desires to be informed whether, assuming the war-tax spoken of by Sir Brooke Robertson to be likin, it would not be desirable to avoid the use of language that might appear to sanction the addition of li-kin to the duties upon British goods leviable under the Treaty of Tientsin.\n\n## 9\n\nIn a Memorandum laid before Lord Derby on the 28th February, copy of which was forwarded to Lord Carnarvon, with a request that his Lordship would peruse that part of a long Memorandum of mine, appended to the Blue Book, on the Revision of the Treaty of Tientsin (1869), I endeavoured to show that the trade in British imports between Hong Kong—I might have said between any other foreign port—and points on the Chinese coast not open to foreign shipping, cannot claim to be carried on under the same conditions as at those points to which the Treaty of Tientsin alone gives access. As regards li-kin, it is undoubtedly what Sir B. Robertson refers to as war-tax. But although the existence of li-kin first became known to us when the Tai Ping Rebellion broke out, and although a large portion of the li-kin now levied is absorbed by the war expenditure on the north-western frontier of China, it is somewhat misleading to translate li-kin as war-tax. It is really a tax upon trade, which, if its denomination be as modern as we are in the habit of asserting, is otherwise no novelty. It is a \"benevolence\" or forced contribution, exacted from the native trader on everything in which he trades; exacted after Chinese fashion, arbitrarily and irregularly, and shamefully misapplied. Until the Chinese Exchequer has recovered the disorder which commenced in 1852, if not before, the Government will be unable to dispense with it. Not half the revenue in normal times, derivable from land, grain, salt, and other sources, is at present collected, and for its expenses, ordinary or extraordinary, the Government has to look for the rest from the foreign Customs and the li-kin. The former is assured it by its foreign Inspectorate. Of the total of the latter, it is by no means assured. The State Papers, appended to my Report of the 24th July, will show in what darkness the Central Government is left by the provinces as to the amounts of li-kin collected. After struggling against it for years, I must express my conviction that we waste our strength in the attempt to protect our trade against it. It is for this reason that I consented to propose to Her Majesty's Government the exchange provided for in the Chefoo Agreement. I would suggest that the third section of my Agreement, that explaining the trade section of my Agreement, should be communicated to the Colonial Office. An even fuller explanation of the nature of li-kin, and of our rights in connection with it, will be found in my Memorandum of 1869. Upwards of twenty pages of it are devoted to the question of abnormal taxation.\n\nTHOMAS FRANCIS WADE.\n\nNovember 30, 1877.\n\n(Signed)\n\n## No. 5.\n\n**Memorandum by Sir J. Pauncefote.**\n\nIt would be very satisfactory if this question could be settled without the appointment of the Commission agreed to in the Chefoo Convention. Governor Hennessy reported in his despatches of the 3rd* and 30th August last that \"all complaints about the so-called blockade of Hong Kong appear to have ceased.\" His Excellency would seem to attribute this result to a more vigilant enforcement of the Hong Kong Ordinance No. 6 of 1866. This Ordinance, however, was not passed for the prevention of smuggling. It was introduced by Governor Sir Richard Macdonnell as a measure of Police and Public Safety, the harbour and town being at that time infested with pirates and thieves. It provides that all junks on arrival shall obtain an anchorage permit, and a declaration must previously be made by the master of the name and capacity of the junk, the nature of her cargo, the port of clearance for Hong Kong, and the names of the consignees in the Colony. No junks are permitted to leave without a clearance, and other provisions are contained in the Ordinance for the sole purpose of ascertaining the character of the junk and exercising a police surveillance on those which might be suspected of piratical designs, but this law gives no powers whatever for the repression of smuggling.\n\nI consider, therefore, that the cessation of the complaints in question is not due to this Ordinance, but to the incessant and well-founded remonstrances from the Colony which have at last compelled the Chinese authorities to restrain the lawless acts of the miscellaneous craft of revenue boats of all descriptions which harassed the Hong Kong shipping.\n\nIt appears to me that if the British and Chinese Governments can agree in...\n\n[92]\n\n* See Inclosure in Colonial Office, November 27, 1877.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 303178,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878",
        "page_number": 176,
        "title": "CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878",
        "content_text": "## substance to the scheme embodied in the three sets of Rules under consideration, it would be better to dispense for the present with the intervention of the proposed Commission, which might more usefully be nominated at some later period when the scheme has been some time in operation, for the purpose of discussing any questions of detail and removing any practical difficulties in its working.\n\nThe three sets of Rules to which I refer are those transmitted by Sir A. Kennedy in his despatch of the 28th February, 1877,* as the basis of settlement proposed by Sir Brooke Robertson on the one side, and the Hong Kong Government on the other; and the new set of Rules proposed by Sir Brooke Robertson and transmitted by Governor Hennessy in his Confidential despatch of 30th August, 1877.† \n\nThe new set of Rules proposed by Sir Brooke Robertson are in my opinion too meagre, and, save as regards the publication of the Tariff and the power of the Governor to appoint an officer to watch the proceedings at Canton in cases of capture, they do not modify the existing state of things in favour of the Colony.\n\nThese Rules provide that junks bound to or clearing from Hong Kong shall touch at one of the three Chinese Revenue Stations now established in the vicinity of the Colony, for the purpose of paying the import duties into China or showing receipts for the export duties. (This system is already enforced on junks by the so-called blockade of Hong Kong.) The Rules further provide that the junks frequenting Hong Kong shall, on arrival, present to the Harbour-Master of the Colony a certificate from one of the Revenue Stations that the export duties from China have been paid, and on failure to do so they will be ordered to quit the Colony. On the other hand, junks clearing from Hong Kong are to receive from the Harbour-Master of the Colony a certificate, which the master is to exchange at one of the Chinese Revenue Stations for a clearance certificate upon payment of the import duties into China. The failure to comply with these provisions is to render a junk liable to capture and adjudication by the Chinese Customs authorities. (These Provisions are solely for the benefit of the Chinese.)\n\nThe Rules next provide that in case of complaint by the master of a junk of the action of the officers of the Revenue Stations, it will be forwarded to Her Majesty's Consul at Canton, and the Governor of Hong Kong may, if deemed expedient, appoint an officer of the Colonial Government \"to sit with Her Majesty's Consul and the Superintendent of Customs, or their deputies, during the examination.\" This Rule is so far satisfactory, as Sir Brooke Robertson has hitherto maintained the opinion that the Hong Kong Government should not interfere for the protection of its native trading community, but should let them seek redress from their own authorities. The Colonial Office could not subscribe to this view of the question, as may be seen by the printed correspondence laid before Parliament. Under this Rule the Colonial authorities will, at all events, be permitted to watch the proceedings in cases of alleged illegal captures.\n\nThe remaining provision of Sir Brooke Robertson's new Rules relates to the publication of the Tariffs. So far as the Rules go, they seem to me free from objection, but, as I have above remarked, they seem to me too meagre, and there are certain additions and modifications which I would recommend, and which I will proceed to explain before dealing with the question of the Tariff.\n\nIt appears to me very desirable that the new Rules should provide for the appointment of a Foreign Assistant, who should supervise the proceedings of the Chinese employés at the three stations by frequent personal visits, and to whom junk masters might appeal at once for redress. On this point I would refer to Sir Brooke Robertson's original Rules 2 and 4.§ \n\nI also think that a junk arriving without the certificate should be detained by the Hong Kong Harbour-Master, and notice should be given to the nearest Customs station, instead of the junk being ordered to leave the harbour, as provided by Rule 2.\n\nFurther, that Sir Brooke Robertson's original Rule 4 should be retained, so far as it prescribes a special flag for all revenue boats and a special uniform for their crews. On this point I would refer to the letter of the Colonial Office to the Foreign Office of the 9th August, 1875. Likewise, that his original Rule 7 should be retained and supplemented. It provides that not only the Tariff of dues shall be published but also the penalties for breach of Customs Regulations; and I think the Rule should further declare that the certificate granted will clear the junk from further duties, not merely as stated in new Rule 3, \"until she arrives at her destination,\" but from all duties at the port of destination.\n\nOn this point I would refer to the following extract from the letter from the Colonial Office to the Foreign Office of the 27th January, 1876:-* \n\n\"One of the gravest complaints referred to (in the Report of the Hong Kong Commission) is that the import duty into China levied on junks clearing from Hong Kong is, in some cases, exacted over again at the port of destination, where the payment made to the Cantonese officials is ignored. No attempt has been made to refute this charge, and it is manifest that, if the Hong Kong Government is not furnished with the native Customs Tariff and Regulations, it cannot be ascertained to what an extent illegal practices are carried on by the Hoppo. The refusal of that functionary to supply the information required, necessarily leads to the inference that either no fixed Tariff exists, and, therefore, that native Customs are levied in an arbitrary manner incompatible with the usages of civilized nations, or that, if a fixed Tariff does exist, its publication would unveil the malpractices complained of, and reveal the extent to which the Colony of Hong Kong is practically subjected by the Hoppo to an export and import tax for the benefit of the Imperial or Provincial Exchequer.\"\n\nI would refer also to paragraph 5 of the Colonial Office letter to Foreign Office of 9th August, 1875, which is as follows:† \n\n\"Lord Carnarvon is informed by Sir A. Kennedy that he has failed in all his efforts to obtain from the Cantonese authorities a statement of the Tariff of export and import duties which they claim to levy on the trade of Hong Kong, and this circumstance gives additional weight to the complaint referred to in the fourth paragraph of the letter from this Department of the 3rd of March last, that an export duty is exacted on goods leaving the Colony, as if Hong Kong were part of the territory of China.”\n\nThis view is confirmed by the passage in Sir T. Wade's Memorandum of the 28th February, in which he observes that the Hoppo of Canton \"remarking that there was no authority to control irregular trade between Hong Kong and the Chinese coast (as he, whether ignorantly or impertinently, put it, 'no Consul at Hong Kong '), proceeded to control it himself.”\n\nIt will be seen from the above extracts that the settlement of Tariffs is the most difficult and important part of the whole question, and the first that should be grappled with.\n\nIt is easy enough to enforce the payment of duties by any system of the kind proposed, but we must take care that, in discharging our moral obligations, we do not assist the Chinese authorities to plunder us; and for this purpose it appears to me manifest that a Tariff should be fixed such as will dispel for ever the audacious pretensions of the Cantonese authorities that they may treat Hong Kong for revenue purposes as if it were part of the Province of Kwang Tung.\n\nHong Kong is a foreign port, and I agree with Sir T. Wade‡ that it should be placed precisely on the same footing for Chinese revenue purposes as Singapore, Manila, or Saigon. It is affirmed by Sir Brooke Robertson that such is the case now, but this is denied by the Chinese merchants of Hong Kong (see `Inclosure 1` in Sir A. Kennedy's despatch of 13th July, 1876, Parliamentary Paper, Further Correspondence, p. 36), and a perusal of the printed correspondence can hardly fail to satisfy any impartial reader that the Chinese authorities, by imposing a variety of extra taxes and surcharges on junks trading between Hong Kong and the mainland of China, practically levy a revenue on Hong Kong, by exacting in their own ports, in addition to their own import and export duties, the export and import duties which they would impose in Hong Kong if the Island were Chinese territory.\n\nOn this most important point I would draw particular attention to the letter addressed by the Colonial Office to the Foreign Office on the 20th May, 1876, commenting on Sir Brooke Robertson's despatch to Sir T. Wade of the 18th January, 1876.§ and also to Sir A. Kennedy's despatch to the Earl of Carnarvon of 13th July, 1876, on the same subject, inclosing a Minute thereon by three of the principal British merchants of Hong Kong (members of the Legislative Council), and also a Memorandum by Mr. James Russell, Acting Registrar-General,\n\n* `Inclosure in Colonial Office, April 25, 1877`, ante, pp. 5 and 6,\n† `Inclosure in Colonial Office, November 27, 1877`, ante, p. 7.\n‡ See printed letter of July 14, 1877, on Chefoo Convention, p. 56.\n§ See Parliamentary Paper, Further Correspondence, August 8, 1870, p. 23. \n¶ Ibid., p. 53.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 303181,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878",
        "page_number": 179,
        "title": "CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878",
        "content_text": "## DOMESTIC\n### Office or Individual\n\ndụng trong `X2791`\n\n0.\n\n**(Subject.)**  \n**Office Mackenzie Commission**  \n\n**Date.**  \n1878 Mar 5  \n\n**Last previous Paper.**  \n`Soo Jelm 2319`  \n`Fel to Gov. 6.8.78`  \n\n**RECEIVED**  \n6 MAR 1078  \n173  \n\nRecommends postponement granting of mutil after Sir Thomas Wade's return to China.\n\n**(Minutes,)**  \nNo telegraph to the foremo Region of Feb 23  \nIndexe is answer to his Para esphila telegram.  \nBetter Post pour until return of  \nin Blockade  \nCommission  \nSir Thomas Wade  \n4  \n39  \n14rms, 10 `77-1148 5450`  \n`156/3`  \nfor authority for telegram Lent She  \n10  \nSecret  \n`MR443178`",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 303183,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878",
        "page_number": 181,
        "title": "CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878",
        "content_text": "## opinion that it would be better to \npostpone the meeting of the so-called Hongking Blockade Commission, until after the return of Sir Thomas \nWade to China. I am, \nYour \nhumble servant, \nJulian Pauncefote \n\nOffice or Individual \nVong Trong \nNo 3340 \n16/78 \n\n**DOMESTIC.** \nF.O. Proposed new Court of Appeal for \nChina Japan & Hongkong \n\nDate \n1878 \n\n175 \nMar 18 Requesting reply to F.O. letter 27 Dec: (15403) \n\n| Last previous Paper | Date | Reference |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| 70 | 154113 | 22 Aug? 28, March 28 |\n|  | 3808 | 7.0. 3808 |\n|  |  | 16 Mar, 7 | \n|  |  | 76-U & S 1845) |\n\nThecon \nIn Bramston \n**(Minutes.)** \nEick Mand \nLow hardly thinks it essential that all appeals should go through the proposed intermediate court unless by special leave of the Privy Council, a digest \nof Hongkong \nthat \nThat the Hongkong Suits may excepting their own home appeal to the Full Supreme Court by applying for leave to go direct to the proper court- This is a repeat from letter of 18 January, & they ask for an immediate answer & whether Sir Michael Hicks Beach concurs in their proposal of 27 \nDec. (15403). \nbe that it \n\nThe only answer must I imagine will be necessary to consult the colonial authorities before deciding, as that he is hard to do at my \nAnd the Privy Council \n\nM.19.2 \non the question of dispensing with the direct appeal to them \nWIMs 20.3.20",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 303203,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878",
        "page_number": 201,
        "title": "CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878",
        "content_text": "## No. 3.\n\nMr. Herbert to Lord Tenterden.-(Received November 28.)\n\n**Sir,**\n\nDowning Street, November 27, 1877.\n\nWITH reference to previous correspondence on the subject of the Hong Kong Blockade, I am directed by the Earl of Carnarvon to transmit to you, to be laid before the Earl of Derby, a copy of a **Confidential** despatch from the Governor of Hong Kong, containing a further proposal from Sir Brooke Robertson for the settlement of the question.\n\nI am also to refer you to the letters from this Department of the 25th April and the 3rd May (which have not yet been answered), and I am to state that Lord Carnarvon would be glad if he can be informed whether any steps are being taken in the matter of the appointment of Members to the proposed Commission.\n\n**(Confidential.) My Lord,**\n\nI am, &c.\n\n(Signed) **ROBERT G. W. HERBERT**\n\n### Inclosure 1 in No. 3.\n\n#### Governor Hennessy to the Earl of Carnarvon.\n\nGovernment House, Victoria, Hong Kong, August 30, 1877.\n\nIN Sir Arthur Kennedy's despatch of the 28th of February, 1877, he laid before your Lordship copies of two proposals for the settlement of the Hong Kong Blockade question, one being Sir Brooke Robertson's proposal, the other the proposal of the Hong Kong Government.\n\n2. Sir Brooke Robertson has now given me another proposal, which in some respects resembles Sir Arthur Kennedy's, but with the advantage of being more simple. I have the honour to inclose a copy for your Lordship's information. I am disposed to prefer it to any other scheme on this subject I have seen.\n\n### Draft of suggested Regulations for Chinese Junks trading with the Colony of Hong Kong.\n\n1. **CHINESE junks** bound for the harbour of Hong Kong will call at one or the other of the Chinese Customs Stations of ... and ... and, after examination by the officer in charge of the station at which a junk may call, the master will receive a clearance certificate in the form to be hereafter agreed upon.\n\n2. On anchoring in the harbour of Hong Kong the master will exhibit and surrender to the Harbour-Master this certificate, and if unable to produce it he will be ordered to leave the harbour with his junk, loaded or in ballast as may be, passengers alone being allowed to land.\n\n3. The master of a Chinese junk clearing from the harbour of Hong Kong, loaded or in ballast, will apply for and receive from the Harbour-Master a certificate in the form to be hereafter agreed upon, which he will exhibit and surrender to the officer in charge of the Customs Station at which he may call, and will receive in exchange a clearance certificate which will free his vessel from further search or detention until she arrives at her destination.\n\nShould a junk after leaving the harbour proceed to sea without calling at one or the other of the above-named stations she will render herself liable to capture and adjudication by the Chinese Customs authorities.\n\n4. If a complaint of the action taken by any officer of a Customs Station, or by any Chinese Revenue cruiser, is lodged with the Hong Kong Government by the master of a junk trading with the Colony, it will be forwarded to Her Majesty's Consul at Canton for investigation, and if deemed expedient by the Governor of Hong Kong, his Excellency will appoint an officer of the Colonial Government to sit with Her Majesty's Consul and the Superintendent of Customs, or their deputies, during the examination.\n\n5. A **Tariff** of the dues and duties payable at the above-named Customs Stations shall be published for general information, in order that complaints of excessive or unjust levies may be more satisfactorily traced.\n\n**B. R.**\n\n## No. 4.\n\n### Memorandum by Sir T. Wade.\n\n(Signed)\n\nI HAVE read Mr. Herbert's letter of the 27th instant, inclosing, by the Earl of Carnarvon's desire, copy of a confidential despatch from Mr. Pope Hennessy, Governor of Hong Kong, with reference to the settlement of the so-called blockade question, as proposed by Sir Brooke Robertson, and inquiring, for the information of his Lordship, whether any steps have been taken in the matter of the appointment of members to the Commission, which, under the `Chefoo Agreement`, was to consider the question.\n\nIt would appear from Mr. Pope Hennessy's despatch of August 30 that an amended Code of Rules to regulate the supervision of the junk trade by the three native Custom-houses whose action has been objected to, is approved by Mr. Pope Hennessy himself. If this assumption be correct, it is then to be assumed that the work of the Commission is ended. There would in that case, of course, be no occasion for fresh consideration of its composition.\n\nOf the rules themselves I shall allow myself but one criticism, and that in no ... \n\nPage 195",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 303204,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878",
        "page_number": 202,
        "title": "CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878",
        "content_text": "## Memorandum by Sir T. F. Wade\n\nIt is with a hostile sense. Mr. Hennessy observes that they differ little from those earlier submitted to Sir Arthur Kennedy by Sir Brooke Robertson. There is, to my mind, one very significant difference, namely, in suppression of the original proposition to establish a branch of the Foreign Customs Inspectorate on the mainland opposite Hong Kong. I attached much importance to this proposition, because I believed that the point once carried, we should get rid altogether of the three Customs stations which enforce what is stigmatised as the blockade. These three stations the Chinese Government has, of course, a perfect right to maintain on the three points of Chinese territory on which they have been maintained, but it is to me certain that so long as they exist under exclusively native superintendence, so long will the junk trade be taxed in excess of the tariffs posted at these stations. The staff at such stations will always be of a low order; underpaid, if paid at all; beholden almost certainly to irregular fees for its subsistence, while there is the greatest difficulty in bringing home to it judicially the proof of such irregularity, the witness against it being the Chinese trader, who has to complain in effect of his own Government through a foreign authority. In the interest of the junk trade I should have been glad to insure the disappearance of these stations, for which there could have been no longer any necessity, once a branch of the Foreign Customs had been invested with the surveillance of the trade.\n\nI have no doubt that Sir Brooke Robertson has good reasons to give for the abandonment of this part of the original scheme. He has had very possibly as great difficulty on the part of the colony, as on the part of the Chinese. Our community is jealous of what it understands to be the freedom of the colonial port; and the Superintendent of Customs at Canton is as little likely as any of his brethren to desire expansion of the Foreign Customs Inspectorate, where its branch establishment must supersede the native branch offices officered by his own hangers on.\n\nThe new rules at the same time do promise a check on the abuse of their authority by the three stations as regards in particular the invasion of the waters of the colony by Chinese cruisers when pursuing junks; the infraction of law of which the colony has undoubted right to complain. Taken as a whole the new rules deprive these cruisers of their plea for irregular action of the kind; for they fully recognise the right of the Chinese Government to overhaul all Chinese vessels on their way into Hong Kong; and the obligation of the colony to refuse trading facilities to vessels that cannot, when they enter the port, produce proof that they have been so overhauled, and to certificate such vessels leaving the port, in such wise as to protect the Chinese Revenue against irregularity. Lastly, the appeal to Canton provided for in Rule 4, will, to a certain extent, and for a time, at all events, restrain the exactions of the three stations. I trust that Sir Brooke Robertson's new Rules may be allowed a trial.\n\nI have implied above that I have no faith in the adherence of the stations to a tariff. It is none the less desirable that a tariff should be published, and hung up at the station Custom-houses. The Commission, I presume, will look to it that its import rates do not exceed the rates at which British imports are admitted into Macao.\n\nAs to Chinese produce brought in junks to Hong Kong, I confess that I do not see my way to any arrangement that will secure it against the levy of dues, which, according to our ideas and practice, must be esteemed arbitrary exactions. A quota of these more than probably passes into the private purse of the Canton Superintendent, himself always a member of the Imperial household, and not lightly taxed in the provision of jewels or other requirements of the \"Court as distinct from the State. Where produce comes from the coast of Kuang Tung, if, thanks to our intervention, dues cannot be charged at these three stations, they will not improbably be levied at those points of the coast, not open to foreign trade, from which the junks clear out; or the junks may be subjected to mart dues, or some other form of dues, by which our object in a Tariff may be equally defeated. I should recommend great liberality in the matter of Chinese produce to the framers of the Tariff. This may encourage the Superintendent at Canton (the Hoppo) to enjoin moderation upon his subordinates. A further check upon their exactions might be provided by the transmission to him periodically, through the Consul, of a return of the Chinese junks that had entered the harbours of Hong Kong or cleared thence. The Colony has now a system of registration that would facilitate the preparation of such a return.\n\n**Lord Carnarvon desires to be informed whether, assuming the war-tax spoken of by Sir Brooke Robertson to be li-kin, it would not be desirable to avoid the use of language that might appear to sanction the addition of li-kin to the duties upon British goods leviable under the Treaty of Tientsin.**\n\nIn a Memorandum laid before Lord Derby on the 28th February, copy of which was forwarded to Lord Carnarvon, with a request that his Lordship would peruse that part of a long Memorandum of mine, appended to the Blue Book, on the Revision of the Treaty of Tientsin (1869). I endeavoured to show that the trade in British imports between Hong Kong—I might have said between any other foreign port—and points on the Chinese coast not open to foreign shipping, cannot claim to be carried on under the same conditions as at those points to which the Treaty of Tientsin alone gives access. As regards li-kin, it is undoubtedly what Sir B. Robertson refers to as war-tax. But although the existence of li-kin first became known to us when the Tai Ping Rebellion broke out, and although a large portion of the li-kin now levied is absorbed by the war expenditure on the north-western frontier of China, it is somewhat misleading to translate li-kin as war-tax. It is really a tax upon trade, which, if its denomination be as modern as we are in the habit of asserting, is otherwise no novelty. It is a \"benevolence\" or forced contribution, exacted from the native trader on everything in which he trades; exacted after Chinese fashion, arbitrarily and irregularly, and shamefully misapplied. Until the Chinese Exchequer has recovered the disorder which commenced in 1852, if not before, the Government will be unable to dispense with it. Not half the revenue in normal times, derivable from land, grain, salt, and other sources, is at present collected, and for its expenses, ordinary or extraordinary, the Government has to look for the rest from the foreign Customs and the li-kin. The former is assured it by its foreign Inspectorate. Of the total of the latter it is by no means assured. The State Papers, appended to my Report of the 24th July, will show in what darkness the Central Government is left by the provinces as to the amounts of li-kin collected. After struggling against it for years, I must express my conviction that we waste our strength in the attempt to protect our trade against it. It is for this reason that I consented to propose to Her Majesty's Government the exchange provided for in the Chefoo Agreement. I would suggest that the third section of my Agreement, that explaining the trade section of my Agreement, should be communicated to the Colonial Office. An even fuller explanation of the nature of li-kin, and of our rights in connection with it, will be found in my Memorandum of 1869. Upwards of twenty pages of it are devoted to the question of abnormal taxation.\n\nTHOMAS FRANCIS WADE.\n\nNovember 30, 1877.\n\n(Signed)\n\n## No. 5. Memorandum by Sir J. Pauncefote\n\nIt would be very satisfactory if this question could be settled without the appointment of the Commission agreed to in the Chefoo Convention. Governor Hennessy reported in his despatches of the 3rd and 30th August last that \"all his complaints about the so-called blockade of Hong Kong appear to have ceased.\" His Excellency would seem to attribute this result to a more vigilant enforcement of the Hong Kong Ordinance No. 6 of 1866. This Ordinance, however, was not passed for the prevention of smuggling. It was introduced by Governor Sir Richard Macdonnell as a measure of Police and Public Safety, the harbour and town being at that time infested with pirates and thieves. It provides that all junks on arrival shall obtain an anchorage permit, and a declaration must previously be made by the master of the name and capacity of the junk, the nature of her cargo, the port of clearance for Hong Kong, and the names of the consignees in the Colony. No junks are permitted to leave without a clearance, and other provisions are contained in the Ordinance for the sole purpose of ascertaining the character of the junk and exercising a police surveillance on those which might be suspected of piratical designs, but this law gives no powers whatever for the repression of smuggling.\n\nI consider, therefore, that the cessation of the complaints in question is not due to this Ordinance, but to the incessant and well-founded remonstrances from the Colony which have at last compelled the Chinese authorities to restrain the lawless acts of the miscellaneous craft of revenue boats of all descriptions which harassed the Hong Kong shipping.\n\nPage 196",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 303205,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878",
        "page_number": 203,
        "title": "CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878",
        "content_text": "## 10\n\n\n11 \n\nsubstance to the scheme embodied in the three sets of Rules under consideration, it would be better to dispense for the present with the intervention of the proposed Commission, which might more usefully be nominated at some later period when the scheme has been some time in operation, for the purpose of discussing any questions of detail and removing any practical difficulties in its working. The three sets of Rules to which I refer are those transmitted by Sir A. Kennedy in his despatch of the 28th February, 1877,* as the basis of settlement proposed by Sir Brooke Robertson on the one side, and the Hong Kong Government on the other; and the new set of Rules proposed by Sir Brooke Robertson and transmitted by Governor Hennessy in his **Confidential** despatch of 30th August, 1877.† \n\nThe new set of Rules proposed by Sir Brooke Robertson are in my opinion too meagre, and, save as regards the publication of the Tariff and the power of the Governor to appoint an officer to watch the proceedings at Canton in cases of capture, they do not modify the existing state of things in favour of the Colony. \n\nThese Rules provide that junks bound to or clearing from Hong Kong shall touch at one of the three Chinese Revenue Stations now established in the vicinity of the Colony, for the purpose of paying the import duties into China or showing receipts for the export duties. (This system is already enforced on junks by the so-called blockade of Hong Kong.) The Rules further provide that the junks frequenting Hong Kong shall, on arrival, present to the Harbour-Master of the Colony a certificate from one of the Revenue Stations that the export duties from China have been paid, and on failure to do so they will be ordered to quit the Colony. On the other hand, junks clearing from Hong Kong are to receive from the Harbour-Master of the Colony a certificate, which the master is to exchange at one of the Chinese Revenue Stations for a clearance certificate upon payment of the import duties into China. The failure to comply with these provisions is to render a junk liable to capture and adjudication by the Chinese Customs authorities. (These Provisions are solely for the benefit of the Chinese.) \n\nThe Rules next provide that in case of complaint by the master of a junk of the action of the officers of the Revenue Stations, it will be forwarded to Her Majesty's Consul at Canton, and the Governor of Hong Kong may, if deemed expedient, appoint an officer of the Colonial Government \"to sit with Her Majesty's Consul and the Superintendent of Customs, or their deputies, during the examination.\" This Rule is so far satisfactory, as Sir Brooke Robertson has hitherto maintained the opinion that the Hong Kong Government should not interfere for the protection of its native trading community, but should let them seek redress from their own authorities. The Colonial Office could not subscribe to this view of the question, as may be seen by the printed correspondence laid before Parliament. Under this Rule the Colonial authorities will, at all events, be permitted to watch the proceedings in cases of alleged illegal captures. \n\nThe remaining provision of Sir Brooke Robertson's new Rules relates to the publication of the Tariffs. So far as the Rules go, they seem to me free from objection, but, as I have above remarked, they seem to me too meagre, and there are certain additions and modifications which I would recommend, and which I will proceed to explain before dealing with the question of the Tariff. \n\nIt appears to me very desirable that the new Rules should provide for the appointment of a Foreign Assistant, who should supervise the proceedings of the Chinese employés at the three stations by frequent personal visits, and to whom junk masters might appeal at once for redress. On this point I would refer to Sir Brooke Robertson's original Rules 2 and 4.§ \n\nI also think that a junk arriving without the certificate should be detained by the Hong Kong Harbour-Master, and notice should be given to the nearest Customs station, instead of the junk being ordered to leave the harbour, as provided by Rule 2. \n\nFurther, that Sir Brooke Robertson's original Rule 4 should be retained, so far as it prescribes a special flag for all revenue boats and a special uniform for their crews. On this point I would refer to the letter of the Colonial Office to the Foreign Office of the 9th August, 1875. Likewise, that his original Rule 7 should be retained and supplemented. It provides that not only the Tariff of dues shall be published but also the penalties for breach of Customs Regulations; and I think the Rule should go further and declare that the certificate granted will clear the junk from further duties, not merely as stated in new Rule 3, \"until she arrives at her destination,\" but from all duties at the port of destination. \n\nOn this point I would refer to the following extract from the letter from the Colonial Office to the Foreign Office of the 27th January, 1876 :-* \n\n\"One of the gravest complaints referred to (in the Report of the Hong Kong Commission) is that the import duty into China levied on junks clearing from Hong Kong is, in some cases, exacted over again at the port of destination, where the payment made to the Cantonese officials is ignored. No attempt has been made to refute this charge, and it is manifest that, if the Hong Kong Government is not furnished with the native Customs Tariff and Regulations, it cannot be ascertained to what an extent illegal practices are carried on by the Hoppo. The refusal of that functionary to supply the information required, necessarily leads to the inference that either no fixed Tariff exists, and, therefore, that native Customs are levied in an arbitrary manner incompatible with the usages of civilized nations, or that, if a fixed Tariff does exist, its publication would unveil the malpractices complained of, and reveal the extent to which the Colony of Hong Kong is practically subjected by the Hoppo to an export and import tax for the benefit of the Imperial or Provincial Exchequer.\" \n\nI would refer also to paragraph 5 of the Colonial Office letter to Foreign Office of 9th August, 1875, which is as follows:- \n\n\"Lord Carnarvon is informed by Sir A. Kennedy that he has failed in all his efforts to obtain from the Cantonese authorities a statement of the Tariff of export and import duties which they claim to levy on the trade of Hong Kong, and this circumstance gives additional weight to the complaint referred to in the fourth paragraph of the letter from this Department of the 3rd of March last, that an export duty is exacted on goods leaving the Colony, as if Hong Kong were part of the territory of China.” \n\nThis view is confirmed by the passage in Sir T. Wade's Memorandum of the 28th February, in which he observes that the Hoppo of Canton \"remarking that there was no authority to control irregular trade between Hong Kong and the Chinese coast (as he, whether ignorantly or impertinently, put it, 'no Consul at Hong Kong'), proceeded to control it himself.\" \n\nIt will be seen from the above extracts that the settlement of Tariffs is the most difficult and important part of the whole question, and the first that should be grappled with. \n\nIt is easy enough to enforce the payment of duties by any system of the kind proposed, but we must take care that, in discharging our moral obligations, we do not assist the Chinese authorities to plunder us; and for this purpose it appears to me manifest that a Tariff should be fixed such as will dispel for ever the audacious pretensions of the Cantonese authorities that they may treat Hong Kong for revenue purposes as if it were part of the Province of Kwang Tung. \n\nHong Kong is a foreign port, and I agree with Sir T. Wade; that it should be placed precisely on the same footing for Chinese revenue purposes as `Singapore`, `Manila`, or `Saigon`. It is affirmed by Sir Brooke Robertson that such is the case now, but this is denied by the Chinese merchants of Hong Kong (see `Inclosure 1` in Sir A. Kennedy's despatch of 13th July, 1876, `Parliamentary Paper, Further Correspondence`, p. 36), and a perusal of the printed correspondence can hardly fail to satisfy any impartial reader that the Chinese authorities, by imposing a variety of extra taxes and surcharges on junks trading between Hong Kong and the mainland of China, practically levy a revenue on Hong Kong, by exacting in their own ports, in addition to their own import and export duties, the export and import duties which they would impose in Hong Kong if the Island were Chinese territory, \n\nOn this most important point I would draw particular attention to the letter addressed by the Colonial Office to the Foreign Office on the 20th May, 1876, commenting on Sir Brooke Robertson's despatch to Sir T. Wade of the 18th January, 1876,§ and also to Sir A. Kennedy's despatch to the Earl of Carnarvon of 13th July, 1876, on the same subject, inclosing a Minute thereon by three of the principal British merchants of Hong Kong (members of the Legislative Council), and also a Memorandum by Mr. James Russell, Acting Registrar-General, \"on the Chinese \n\n* `Parliamentary Paper, Further Correspondence`, p. 14. \n+ `Parliamentary Paper, Further Correspondence`, p. 5. See printed letter of July 14, 1877, on Chefoo Convention, p. 56. \n§ See `Parliamentary Paper, Further Correspondence`, August 8, 1876, p. 23. \nIbid., p. 33. \n\n\n## 197",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 303412,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-184 - Governor Hennessy - 1879 [1-5]",
        "page_number": 4,
        "title": "CO129-184 - Governor Hennessy - 1879 [1-5]",
        "content_text": "# Despatch\n## Date\n### 19 May\n\nFinancial work.\n\n| Date | Description |\n| --- | --- |\n| $57. 50. | 20 RI Sulgeet. Suspension of the thin the Young. |\n|  | Stamp Agency for Chinese |\n|  | Governor's Financial Statements. |\n|  | Proceedings against Engineers of the \"Jesse!\" |\n| 14. | Ordinance no 2 of 1878. |\n| 23 | 23 |\n| 26 | A 20 вс 6! 22. 62. ૩. X X X 69. 70 |\n| 28 | 2.9 Lo 6 \" \" Estimates, کی 1 of 1879. |\n|  | 1879 bestain votte in Estimates for 1877-8 |\n|  | 1898 Hogging of Chinese briminals |\n|  | Police Regulation respecting phrement. |\n|  | Merchant shipping bill. |\n|  | Report of Commission on Supreme Court. |\n| 75. | Deportation. |\n|  | Conf. 20 Fogging of Chinese |\n|  | Revenue & trade. |\n|  | Auditor General's Dept. 20 30: ہوگی |\n| 77. | 78. 3r 79. 31 |\n|  | New fool on Stone cutters Stand |\n|  | Public Meeting held in |\n|  | Blockade Question. |\n|  | Resolutions of |\n|  | Subipatation Dept. October, 1878. |\n\nJan. 2",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-184 - Governor Hennessy - 1879 [1-5].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 304017,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-184 - Governor Hennessy - 1879 [1-5]",
        "page_number": 609,
        "title": "CO129-184 - Governor Hennessy - 1879 [1-5]",
        "content_text": "## 2.\n\n694 \n\nI beg to submit for your consideration my views on the subject.\n\nOn leaving England in 1877, I was informed by Lord Carnarvon that instructions had been decided by the Hong Kong Government. That is, on the day before Governor Sir Arthur Kennedy left for Queensland, he transmitted to Lord Carnarvon a despatch respecting the complaints that had been made about the action of Chinese revenue officers in connexion with the Sunk trade in this Colony. Those complaints were shown to me at the Colonial Office, and I received copies of the correspondence that had been laid before Parliament.\n\nOn arriving in the Colony, I found that the question had been settled - the Blockade question, proposed by the Government of Hong Kong, for the Commission under the last clause of Sir Thomas Wade's Chefoo Convention. Possibly on this account the instructions referred to by Lord Carnarvon were never sent to me; nor was I made aware of His Lordship's views respecting the basis proposed by...",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-184 - Governor Hennessy - 1879 [1-5].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 304383,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-185 - Acting Governor Marsh Governor Hennessy - 1879 [6-12]",
        "page_number": 328,
        "title": "CO129-185 - Acting Governor Marsh Governor Hennessy - 1879 [6-12]",
        "content_text": "# 327 \n\n## Reverne Blockade of the Colony \n\nLord Salisbury's words were reported in the \"Times\" of 10th May. \n\nWith respect to the third matter, the appointment of a Commission to regulate the differences between Hong Kong and the City of Canton, if you will look at the Section, you will find that there is provision in favour of the British Government on account of the interference of the Customs Revenue Cruisers with the Junk trade of the Colony. This provision was inserted in order to redress grievances felt by the Governor of Hong Kong. He has reported that the grievance it was intended to remedy has ceased, and there is therefore no further reason to appoint the Commission.\n\nThis Chamber has no information before it regarding the nature of the report made to Her Majesty's Government by the Governor, but the Committee desire to assure you that the grievances complained of by the Chamber and by the Community still exist, and are as serious and well-founded as at any time since the present obnoxious system was inaugurated.\n\nAs indicating the character of the",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-185 - Acting Governor Marsh Governor Hennessy - 1879 [6-12].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 304910,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-186 - Public Offices & Others - 1879",
        "page_number": 167,
        "title": "CO129-186 - Public Offices & Others - 1879",
        "content_text": "# DOMESTIL63\n\nOf news from things\n\nPay in Mais\n\nIn connection\n\nBonnie Si Cz J Say J che in the megahining Huang MEHB fice or Individual.\n\nTrong đồng No 3794\n\n**(Subject.)**\nFor Office: The Blockade question\n\n**Date.**\n1879 part 10\n\n**Previous Paper.**\n`FO 3969` 18 ap.29 2 170-1&S 7495\n\nThanks it undesirable to revive it complaints again arise recommends adoption I rules, such as Canton Authorities seem intending to agree to\n\n**(Minutes.)**\nfor Branston G. W. R. Mol. 15.3.\n\nThis is a weak proposal. When difficulties again arise, effect should be made to arrive at a settlement by the adoption of rules such as the authorities at Canton have been disposed to agree to, whereby the receipt of Commission of Inquiry or of the Foreign Customs Inspectorate may be avoided.\n\n1. As settlements will be more difficult among attendants homes on Latin– fresh complaints, which are due to commence.\n2. An effect to arrive at a settlement involving the result of a joint Commission.\n3. It has not been performed to bring the Foreign Bethe-",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-186 - Public Offices & Others - 1879.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 322647,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-211 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1883 [8-9]",
        "page_number": 4,
        "title": "CO129-211 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1883 [8-9]",
        "content_text": "Despatch: Date.\n\nSubject.\n\n24 Aug. Government Scholarships. Regulations as to.\n\nEncouragement of English Language in Hongkong. Leave to Governor to meet Sir H. Parkes in Shanghai. Prop. junction of the Eastern & Western Prayas. Construction of New Gaol.\n\n#\n\n199\n\n200.\n\nJel.\n\n201\n\n202\n\n25 26\n\n203. 27\n\n204\n\n205.\n\n206. 28\n\n29\n\n207.\n\n210.\n\n211.\n\n215. 30 Conf. 28\n\n217 31\n\n218.\n\n#\n\n\"\n\n#\n\n#\n\n&\n\nPension of Mr Heaver, late Chief Insp. of Nuisances.\n\nThe Church of England at Hong Kong.\n\nPermission to Eastern Extension Tel. to land cable. Transfer of Wahop line to Eastern Tel. Co.\n\nThe Opinion Question.\n\nSupplementary tolls.\n\nGovernor's Vacation Leave.\n\nDefence Works.\n\nOpium Question.\n\nApplr of D. Ayres, Cl Surgeon, for Increase of salary\n\nReport of Local Naval Defence Force Commission.\n\n1 Sept. The French in the Indo-Chinese Peninsula.\n\nResults of the Sanitary Proclamation.\n\n220.\n\n221\n\n223.\n\n#\n\n225.\n\n226\n\n#\n\n227\n\n3\n\nMarch\n\n231 4 13\n\n240\n\n21\n\n244 8.\n\n24\n\n242. 25\n\n245 28\n\nGrant in aid of new building to the \"Acte de la Paix\". En faveur\n\nStaff of the Col. Sec's. Office.\n\n\"Blockade of Hongkong\" by Chinese Gunboats.\n\nAppt. of M. A. B. Johnson as Crown Solicitor. Disturbances at Hongkong.\n\nState of the Hongkonghes.\n\nClosing of the Normal School.\n\nProceedings of Mr. Price, Surveyor General, against \"It Kong Tobacco\"\n\nApprehended Chinese Rising.\n\n2\n\nAug\n\nPage",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-211 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1883 [8-9].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 323099,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-211 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1883 [8-9]",
        "page_number": 456,
        "title": "CO129-211 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1883 [8-9]",
        "content_text": "5. One of the new Regulations was to the effect that if any dutiable goods were found on board without a duty certificate, after passing the Station on the way out or in, the junk and cargo would be liable to forfeiture; and this rule applied to passenger junks, if, even without the privity of the Master, some passenger had concealed unreported goods in his baggage.\n\n6. The carrying out of this Regulation obviously led to much injustice and hardship, and there are numerous cases on record where the forfeiture of junk and cargo were caused by the passengers' smuggling, without any participation on the part of the owner of the junk.\n\n7. The numerous rewards and large prizes given to the crews of the Cruisers naturally attracted a lot of unscrupulous men, who, in their own interest made out many an honest trader to be a Smuggler; and contraband goods were said to be frequently \"planted\" on junks leaving the Colony by spies and informers, who had them pounced upon by the Guard Ships when outside the waters of the Colony, and frequently within them too, so as to have the junks forfeited with a view to obtaining the plunder.\n\n8. The Complaints of the Mercantile Community, in reference to the Hongkong Blockade, are recorded in two Blue-books, entitled \"Correspondence relating to the 'Complaints of the Mercantile Community in Hongkong against the action of the Chinese Revenue Cruisers in the neighbourhood of the Colony,\" and \"Further correspondence relating, &c.\" (See Command papers, 1189 of 1875 and 1628 of 1876).\n\n9. Command paper 1189 contains about 50 pages, and opens with a despatch of the 10th July, 1874, from Governor Sir ARTHUR EDWARD KENNEDY, covering a petition to the QUEEN from certain Chinese Merchants, who pray for protection from seizure of vessels resorting to Hongkong, by armed vessels belonging to certain of the Chinese Authorities at Canton, and for other relief in respect of the junks which had been so seized. They point out that, when the Colony was established, Chinese were invited by proclamation to settle in it, and promised protection against interference with their trade.\n\n10. The next important paper in this Blue-book is a despatch of the Governor, forwarding and commenting upon the Report of a Commission of Inquiry composed of the Honourable P. RYRIE, Mr. H. G. THOMSETT, R.N. and Mr. M. S. TONNOCHY, on the complaints made by Chinese Traders on the illegal seizures, searches, and detention of their junks. The Commission show beyond all doubt that there were undue searches, harassing interference, and unjust levies made on the Junk Trade of the Colony, but the only remedial measure they suggested was one which the Governor considered impracticable, namely, to station armed vessels at the entrances of the Colony in order to prevent the Chinese Cruisers overhauling the junks which enter and leave the Harbour.\n\n11. Then follow despatches from the Governor, some of which give further particulars of certain cases referred to in the Chinese Memorial. Another transmits a report of proceedings of a Public Meeting held to consider the Blockade of Hongkong, with resolutions condemning the action of the Hoppo and Viceroy, and calling upon Her Majesty's Government for protection against the invasion of the \"Sanctuary of the Port.\" This Blue-book also contains despatches from the Colonial Office to the Foreign Office discussing the answers to be given to the Memorialists, and the remedies suggested by the Canton Consul and Hongkong Government; and there is also an important despatch to the effect that \"H. M. Minister at Peking will be directed to call the attention of the Chinese Government to the interference with the Junk Trade of Hongkong.\"\n\n12. This Blue-book winds up with a despatch dated 22nd March, 1875, to the Governor as to the reply to be given to the Chinese Petitioners; to the leaders of the Public Meeting; and to the Chamber of Commerce. The Secretary of State clearly lays that the Chinese Government had a perfect right to establish the Stations where they are placed them, to overhaul Chinese craft at sea or in Chinese waters in search of Smuggled opium or other goods; but that representations would be made to the Chinese Government to render these searching operations less vexatious and harassing than they had been heretofore.\n\n13. Blue-book No. 2, contains forty pages, and is a continuation of the same subject. The Hongkong Government calls attention to further abuses of the Customs Cruisers. This parliamentary paper also shows that the Chinese Native Customs have no fixed tariff, or at all events will not produce it or publish it. It also shows that cotton and other Foreign goods sent from Hongkong to the Southern Prefectures are much more heavily taxed than the same goods sent from Macao, thus placing Hongkong at a disadvantage with Macao as a port of trade. It is also shown here that the duty on Sugar entering Hongkong by Junks is much higher than what is levied at ports of China or at Macao, and that goods which had obtained the \"Grand Chop\" after payment of all duties at one of the local Stations pointed out by the Viceroy and Hoppo, had to pay them over again at the port of entrance. The Colonial Office points out moreover that goods are made, by the Canton Authorities, to pay duty both of export and import, as if Hongkong were a port of China. Against this Lord CARNARVON protests.\n\n14. The unfairness of the taxation, the breach of faith, if not hostile action of the Chinese Customs towards the Hongkong Junk Trade as compared with their treatment of that of Macao, was fully shown in a paper written by me in October, 1874, and published in Command paper 1628 of 1876, At the request of Governor KENNEDY, in 1876, I investigated at considerable length the question of what duties were payable between Hongkong and the ports in the lower Prefectures, as well as between Hongkong and the ports in the Fo-kien province and Formosa. That document was not published in deference to the request of the Chinese who gave the information, and who made it a condition that their names should not be divulged, for fear of involving them in trouble with the Chinese officials. The enclosures are very instructive, as showing the Chinese methods of levying dues on their great rivers and at the out-ports. (See C.S.O., 1769 of 1876, and Governor KENNEDY's despatch of 6th August, 1876).\n\nProceedings after the Chiefoo Convention of 1876.\n\n15. The arrangement made by Sir THOMAS WADE in the Chefoo Convention, September 13th, 1876, marks a new departure in the history of the Blockade question. By that Convention it was agreed (Section III, Article 7,) \"to appoint a commission to consist of a British Consul, an Officer of the Hongkong Government, and a Chinese official of equal rank in order to the establishment of some system that shall enable the Chinese Government to protect its revenue without prejudice to the interests of the Colony.\"\n\nPage 450",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-211 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1883 [8-9].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 323100,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-211 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1883 [8-9]",
        "page_number": 457,
        "title": "CO129-211 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1883 [8-9]",
        "content_text": "16. On his way to England, in the end of 1876, Sir THOMAS WADE addressed a letter to Governor KENNEDY, 29th November, 1876, stating what he had done with a view to relieve the junk trade of the Colony from the continual harassing searches of the Chinese Cruisers of which it complained. In that letter he nominates Sir BROOKE ROBERTSON as the Consular Commissioner under the Convention, and proceeds to point out that the remedy most desired by the Colony, namely, the publication of a tariff at the three Stations, would do little to relieve the pressure on the trade. \"I am persuaded,\" he states, \"that as long as the Stations in question remain where they are, their action will be always vexatious, often, perhaps, unjust.\" But he adds, what was never denied, that the Chinese Authorities have a right to place them where they are. His remedy is \"to get rid of the obnoxious Stations,\" and to invite the establishment of a Branch of the Foreign Customs Inspectorate either in a hulk in the harbour, or at a Station upon the shore of China forming the North side of the port, east of the Colony's ground on the Kau-lung promontory. Sir THOMAS WADE preferred the latter alternative.\n\n17. Sir THOMAS WADE assumes that the Tariff would be the same as the Tariff of 1858, under the Treaty of Tientsin, which is the Tariff for British-ship-carried goods, and that likin on opium might be levied at the same time. The junk trade, he says, would gain by having Foreign instead of Native inspection. \"The Cruiser service would of course still be required, but the offensiveness would be diminished, and the Colony and the Provincial Government would be spared 90 per cent. of the irritating discussions.\"\n\n18. In brief, Sir THOMAS WADE states:---The publication of a Tariff which you want would serve you little, but get rid of the three Stations, and let a Branch of the Foreign Inspectorate, situate outside the boundary, control everything, give the Chinese Government help by seeing that junks entering and leaving the harbour go and pay duty; and let them keep the Cruisers.\n\n19. On this letter Sir ARTHUR KENNEDY wrote a minute, recording his own personal views, and the instructions which he thought the Hongkong Commissioner should receive. He had at one time thought of a Branch of the Foreign Inspectorate, even in the Colony, but he abandoned that idea as interfering with the prestige of the Government. (See Proceedings of Council, 7th July, 1876.) His personal views under date of 2nd December, 1876, are thus recorded:------\n\n\"Points for Colonial Officer to insist on\":-\n\n“(1.) Authenticated publication of Tariff by Chinese Government.”\n\n(2.) Where and to whom the duties so fixed are to be paid.\n\n(3.) A mixed tribunal of officers of the Chinese and Hongkong Government to be appointed for the investigation of all disputed cases of seizure, such court to be open and their proceedings duly recorded.\n\n20. If these conditions were accepted, the Governor, \"in proof of good faith, and to discourage law-breakers,\" was prepared to recommend that any breach of Chinese Customs laws should be investigated before a Magistrate, and if a prima facie case were proved, that rendition should be made to the Chinese Government.\n\n21. I had the honour of being selected by Sir ARTHUR KENNEDY to represent the Hongkong Government, and had therefore full opportunity of knowing His Excellency's opinions. The essential requirements, in the Governor's view, were the publication of a fixed tariff, and a mixed tribunal with duly recorded proceedings.\n\n22. In pursuance of the Chefoo arrangement, and as one of the Commissioners, Sir BROOKE ROBERTSON drew up 7 propositions as a basis of conference on the Blockade question (Appendix 4.) They were discussed at a meeting of Executive Council attended by the un-official members of the Legislative Council and myself, but not approved of, as the new Station was considered an additional burden without any corresponding advantage to the trade.\n\n23. Counter propositions were drawn up by the Government as a basis of conference, and, as appears from a despatch of Governor HENNESSY to the Secretary of State, that basis was sent to Sir BROOKE ROBERTSON. A good deal of discussion subsequently took place as to whether the un-official members of Council, Mr. Lowcock and Mr. KESWICK, assented to the Hongkong basis. At all events the illness of Sir BROOKE in January prevented any meeting of the Commission from taking place, and Sir ARTHUR KENNEDY wrote to that effect on the 28th February, 1877, forwarding at the same time to the Secretary of State the two proposals. The Hongkong Government proposal is annexed (Appendix B.)\n\nHistory of the Blockade question under Governor Hennessy, from 1877.\n\n24. Sir JOHN POPE HENNESSY arrived in April, 1877, as Governor of the Colony, and an opportunity was soon afforded to him of dealing with a case of smuggling which occurred in the time of Sir ARTHUR KENNEDY, but the discussion of which with the Canton Government had not been completed. It was as follows :---\n\n25. In 1876 a Junk with Opium had been fired upon in British waters by a Revenue Cruiser, dragged from the coast at Cape d'Aguilar, and towed to the Fat-tau Mun Station. The Junk had a large quantity of Opium on board. Sir ARTHUR KENNEDY demanded the restoration of the Junk and Cargo, an apology from the Viceroy, and dismissal of the Officer in charge of the Cruiser who had thus invaded our waters and territory. It was June or July, 1877, before the Opium was restored and compensation allowed for the forfeited and sold Junk. Governor HENNESSY resolved not to give up the Opium and Cargo to the owners, because the Junk had left the anchorage without a proper clearance, and from that time forward, with the view of assisting the Chinese in the collection of their duties, His Excellency gave instructions that, in case of complaints by Hongkong Junks of seizures either in the waters of the Colony or outside, inquiry should in the first instance be made whether the Junk had properly cleared as required by the Harbour and Coasts Ordinance 6 of 1866-an Ordinance which was established for putting down piracy, rampant at that time, the Harbour itself being quite a rendezvous for piratical craft. (See Sir R. G. MACDONNELL'S despatch forwarding the Ordinance to Secretary of State, and the Attorney General's (me) opinion on the Ordinance, shewing that 3 Foreign vessels had been followed from the Harbour and attacked outside, No. 111 of 28th August, 1866.) If the Junk had been guilty of any infringement for not reporting or obtaining a clearance, the Master was to be charged, and forfeiture of Junk and Cargo took place. This, of course, was a strong measure, and the Governor soon reported to the Colonial Office that complaints had ceased. The Secretary of State sanctioned the employment of this Ordinance for the suppression of smuggling, although the pains and penalties of forfeiture were only intended to attach to breaches of Harbour Regulations where piracy was in contemplation. The undersigned ventures with very great respect to think that if the Colonial Office had been made fully\n\n451",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-211 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1883 [8-9].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 323391,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-212 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1883 [10-11]",
        "page_number": 199,
        "title": "CO129-212 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1883 [10-11]",
        "content_text": "As that course would lead to similar applications from the Governors of other tropical Colonies; but you may understand that if your health appear to require a longer absence from Hong Kong than six weeks during the present or any future Year, I shall readily approve of the extension of your vacation to two months.\n\nI have ... vernor.; No. owen 298 Date. 1883 10. Ma previous Paper. 340 Am? no. 12.22 Jan. 84 By met at Postin Carston - sendin Brin despr 10 185 5/87 TH chong trong No. 21355 (Subject.) DESPATCH. 6 197 213551 RECE REC 20 EC 837 Smuggling of Opium into China Sends 6 copies of Report of Commission (Minutes.) In Bransonn PAINTED FOR PARLI Report C.3983-April 1884.\n\nImppose this queshon ing be allowed y far as Parlament is excemod help wht the patter is service by his Jouple Dease kember. wert th & Ov then abio top of page IV of to deport its...\n\nThe Commission refer in the hope Ravi's egotiations about to Blockade with fittany Parks at Canton s wait the we how to result of his wait to carbon a this pont besoe 4892 le deads\n\nPage IV\n\n \n(No text content directly follows \"Page IV\" in the original; the mention of \"top of page IV\" suggests a page break or reference.)",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-212 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1883 [10-11].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 325067,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-215 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1884 [1-4]",
        "page_number": 327,
        "title": "CO129-215 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1884 [1-4]",
        "content_text": "325\n\nto $1,165,700; leaving an excess of revenue over Ordinary Expenditure of $120,800. The Extraordinary Expenditure of 1883 was defrayed from the accumulated Balances, and included the Tai-tam Water Works, $90,966; Break-water, $22,510; Causeway Bay Reclamation, $9,000; Purchase of Houses and Land for the New Central Market, $21,000; Sanitary Works, $30,483. Total, $173,950.\n\nThe Estimated Balance to the credit of the Colony on the 31st December, 1883, was $1,095,505.\n\n7. Hongkong is probably the only State or Colony of importance which at the present day is not only without a Public Debt, but which possesses invested Assets nearly equal to its annual revenue. However, the existing Balances will not be sufficient to carry out several Public Works which are urgently required by this Community, in addition to those \"strong and complete measures of sanitation\" which Mr. CHADWICK (the Civil Engineer recently sent out from England) has reported to be absolutely necessary \"for the immediate benefit of the public health.\" Under these circumstances, I concur with the Executive Council in what appears to be the general opinion of the Colony, viz., that the present generation of Colonists ought not to be deprived of the advantages referred to, while it cannot of course be expected to defray the entire cost of works of a permanent and reproductive character; and that, consequently, it will be expedient to raise, on the exhaustion of the existing assets, a moderate loan, not much exceeding the revenue of a single year.\n\nThis question will not have to be decided in its details during the present Session; but I desire to elicit the opinion of the Council on the principle involved.\n\n8. The Estimates for 1884 have been already voted. The Estimates for 1885 will be laid before you in next November; which seems to be the most generally convenient period for the opening of the annual Session.\n\n9. With regard to Legislative measures; The following Ordinances, among others, have already become law since I assumed this Government in the spring of last year, viz.: Ordinances to provide for the better Regulation of Vehicles and Public Traffic; To organise the construction of certain lines of Tramways; To constitute a Sanitary Board; To amend the Merchant Shipping Law and provide for the enforcement of Quarantine; To continue the operation of the French Mail Steamers Ordinance; To authorise the construction of certain Piers and Wharves. The principal Bills which will be laid before you during the present session will be the following:\n\n(1.) To regulate Weights and Measures.\n\n(2.) To consolidate and amend the Ordinances relating to Opium.\n\n(3.) To establish a Savings Bank.\n\n(4.) To consolidate and amend the laws relating to Stamp Duties.\n\n(5.) To provide for the Registration of Medical Practitioners.\n\n(6.) To regulate Prisons and Prisons Discipline.\n\n(7.) To amend the Dangerous Goods' Ordinance, 1873.\n\n(8.) To amend the Preservation of Birds' Ordinance, 1870.\n\n(9.) To amend certain Ordinances relating to Criminal Procedure.\n\n(10.) To amend the law relating to the punishment of criminals.\n\n(11.) To amend the Bankruptcy Ordinance of 1864.\n\n(12.) To regulate the Post Office and Postal Service.\n\n(13.) To amend Ordinance No. 10 of 1867.\n\n(14.) To provide for the more effectual protection of Chinese female children.\n\n10. The report of the Commission on Smuggling; and an able and exhaustive memorandum by Mr. Justice RUSSELL on the so-called Blockade of Hongkong by Chinese Revenue Cruisers are recommended to your attention. I have discussed this important question with the present British Minister at Peking, who will, I am confident, lend his aid towards carrying out an equitable settlement.\n\n11. Turning to the vital subject of the Public Health, I am glad to inform you that the recent organisation of a Government Sanitary Board under Ordinance No. 7 of 1883, and the promulgation of new Rules and Regulations under that Ordinance, together with the introduction of improved contracts for the removal and disposal of waste products, have been followed by a marked improvement in the practical sanitation of the Colony. Much however remains to be done, both in respect of legislation and of structural sanitary work; but I am confident that the necessary reforms and improvements will in due course be effected by the zeal and ability of the officers to whom this branch of the Public Service has been entrusted, and by the cheerful acquiescence of all classes of our population in such measures and restrictions for the safety of the Public Health as may, with your assistance, become law. In this connection, Bills are in course of preparation to amend and consolidate the laws relating to the Public Health; to amend the Building Ordinance No. 8 of 1856; to regulate the Water supply, and to prevent waste. Owing however to the large and comprehensive nature of these Bills, no less than to the probable necessity of referring certain technical points to scientific authorities in England, it is possible that there may not be time for their full consideration during the present session. In this event, they will form the subject of your first deliberations in the next session. In the meantime, however, the carrying out of such works as were deemed of immediate importance to the Public Health has been sanctioned. These works, which are either in progress or in course of immediate initiation, include, among others, the Reclamation of unhealthy tidal lands at Yau-ma-Ti and Causeway Bay; Extensions and improvements of the existing system of sewers in this city; the construction of a new Central Market; the erection of a permanent Lazaretto on Stone Cutters' Island; the systematic dredging of the noxious foreshore along the Praya by means of steam machinery; and the general Sanitation of the villages in the Colony.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-215 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1884 [1-4].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 325071,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-215 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1884 [1-4]",
        "page_number": 331,
        "title": "CO129-215 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1884 [1-4]",
        "content_text": "Enclosure 3.\n\nHONGKONG LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL.\n\nThe session of the Legislative Council was opened yesterday afternoon. The Chief Justice took the chair and called upon the Clerk of Councils to read the proclamation summoning the meeting. This having been done, the Clerk of Councils was directed to inform the Governor, who shortly afterwards entered and read the speech given below. The opening ceremony was attended with more formality than has hitherto been the case on similar occasions in Hongkong. The road from Government House to the Public Office was lined with Sikh policemen, and a guard of honour and the Band of the Buffs was posted in the hall of the Public Office, and saluted the Governor on his arrival. In the Council Chamber there was a large attendance, including a considerable number of ladies, the Consuls and Military Officers in uniform, and a large number of the general public. His Excellency wore the uniform of his office and the scarf and order of the Grand Cross of St. Michael and St. George. The Colonial Secretary, the Attorney-General, and the Surveyor-General also wore the Civil Service Uniform. The Council was composed as follows:-\n\nHis Excellency the GOVERNOR, Sir GEORGE FERGUSON Bower, G.C.M.G.\n\nHon. Sir GEORGE PHILlIPPo, Chief Justice.\n\nHon. W. H. MARSH, C.M.G.\n\nHon. E. L. O'MALLEY, Attorney-General.\n\nHon. A. LISTER, Colonial Treasurer.\n\nHon. J. M. PRICE, Surveyor-General.\n\nHon. F. STEWART, Registrar-General.\n\nHon. P. RYrie.\n\nHon. F. B. JOHNSON,\n\nHon. T. JACKSON.\n\nHon. F. D. SAXTON.\n\nHon. WONG SHING.\n\nTHE GOVERNOR'S SPEECH.\n\nHonourable Gentlemen of the Legislative Council,\n\n1. It is with feelings of much pleasure and interest that I now open the first session of the re-constituted Legislature of Hongkong, and have recourse to your advice and assistance in the administration of the Government.\n\n2. It will always be one of the most satisfactory reminiscences of my long public career that I have been able to procure a more adequate representation in this Council of the community at large. I am confident that the Government will derive valuable aid from the local knowledge and experience of the unofficial members, and I also believe that you will all agree with me that there neither is, nor ought to be, any antagonism between the official and the unofficial element in this Legislature. All the members alike can have no other object but to secure the general welfare, and to advance the progress of the colony.\n\n3. For obvious reasons, it is in the highest degree important that this Council should adhere to the constitutional forms followed by the Legislatures of the other principal Crown Colonies. The address of the Governor at the opening of each annual session will contain, here as elsewhere, a general view of the financial and social condition of the Colony, and a statement of the Legislative and other measures, and of the public works proposed. So the address of the Council in reply will afford the Members of the Legislature the usual constitutional opportunity of expressing their opinion of the conduct and proposals of the Government.\n\n4. Further, in accordance with the practice elsewhere, I recommend you to appoint a Committee of Finance (which should be a Committee of the whole Council), a Committee of Laws, and a Committee of Public Works, which should respectively examine in the first instance the details of every proposed vote and measure.\n\n5. After this brief explanatory preface, I will proceed to state generally the principal subjects to which your attention will be directed during the present Session. Full details will be found in the papers which will be laid before you, and in the statements of the several Heads of Departments.\n\n6. In the first place, with regard to the paramount question of Finance, it is very gratifying to be able to inform you that our position is satisfactory. The Revenue of the year 1883 amounted to $1,294,500; and the Ordinary Expenditure to $1,165,700; leaving an excess of revenue over Ordinary Expenditure of $128,800. The Extraordinary Expenditure of 1883 was defrayed from the accumulated balance, and included the Tai-tam water works, Break-water, Causeway Bay reclamation, Purchase of houses and land for the New Central Market, and Sanitary works.\n\n7. The estimated balance to the credit of the colony on the 31st December, 1883, was $1,095,505. Hongkong is probably the only state or colony of importance which at the present day is not only without a public debt, but which possesses invested assets nearly equal to its annual revenue. However, the existing balances will not be sufficient to carry out several public works which are urgently required by this community, in addition to those \"strong and complete measures of sanitation\" which Mr. Chadwick (the Civil Engineer recently sent out from England) has reported to be absolutely necessary \"for the immediate benefit of the public health.\" Under these circumstances, I concur with the Executive Council in what appears to be the general opinion of the colony, viz., that the present generation of colonists ought not to be deprived of the advantages referred to, while it cannot of course be expected to defray the entire cost of works of a permanent and reproductive character; and that consequently, it will be expedient to raise, on the exhaustion of the existing assets, a moderate loan, not much exceeding the revenue of a single year. This question will not have to be decided in its details during the present Session; but I desire to elicit the opinion of the Council on the principle involved.\n\n8. The Estimates for 1884 have been already voted. The Estimates for 1885 will be laid before you in next November, which seems to be the most generally convenient period for the opening of the annual Session.\n\n9. With regard to Legislative measures, the following Ordinances, among others, have already become law since I assumed this Government in the spring of last year, viz.: Ordinances to provide for the better Regulation of Vehicles and Public Traffic; To organise the construction of certain lines of Tramways; To constitute a Sanitary Board; To amend Merchant Shipping Law and provide for the enforcement of Quarantine; To continue the operation of the French Mail Steamers Ordinance; To authorise the construction of certain Piers and Wharves. The principal Bills which will be laid before you during the present session will be the following:-\n\n(1.) To regulate Weights and Measures.\n\n(2.) To consolidate and amend the Ordinance relating to Opium.\n\n(3.) To establish a Savings Bank.\n\n(4.) To consolidate and amend the laws relating to Stamp Duties.\n\n(5.) To provide for the Registration of Medical Practitioners.\n\n(6.) To regulate Prisons and Prison Discipline.\n\n(7.) To amend the Dangerous Goods' Ordinance, 1873.\n\n(8.) To amend the Preservation of Birds' Ordinance, 1870.\n\n(9.) To amend certain Ordinances relating to Criminal Procedure.\n\n(10.) To amend the law relating to the punishment of criminals.\n\n(11.) To amend the Bankruptcy Ordinance of 1864.\n\n(12.) To regulate the Post Office and Postal Service.\n\n(13.) To Amend Ordinance No. 10 of 1867.\n\n(14.) To provide for the more effectual protection of Chinese female children.\n\n10. The report of the Commission on Smuggling, and an able and exhaustive memorandum by Mr. Justice Russell on the so-called Blockade of Hongkong by Chinese Revenue Cruisers, are recommended to your attention. I have discussed this important question with the present British Minister at Peking, who will, I am confident, lend his aid towards carrying out an equitable settlement.\n\n11. Turning to the vital subject of the Public Health, I am glad to inform you that the recent organisation of a Government Sanitary Board under Ordinance No. 7 of 1883, and the promulgation of new Rules and Regulations under that Ordinance, together with the introduction of improved contracts for the removal and disposal of waste products, have been followed by a marked improvement in the practical sanitation of the Colony. Much, however, remains to be done, both in respect of legislation and of structural sanitary work; but I am confident that the necessary reforms and improvements will in due course be effected by the zeal and ability of the officers to whom this branch of the Public Service has been entrusted, and by the cheerful acquiescence of all classes of our population in such measures and restrictions for the safety of the Public Health as may, with...",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-215 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1884 [1-4].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 325072,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-215 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1884 [1-4]",
        "page_number": 332,
        "title": "CO129-215 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1884 [1-4]",
        "content_text": "your assistance, become law. In this connection, Bills are in course of preparation to amend and consolidate the laws relating to the Public Health; to amend the Building Ordinance No. 8 of 1856; to regulate the Water supply and to prevent waste. Owing, however, to the large and comprehensive nature of these Bills, no less than to the probable necessity of referring certain technical points to scientific authorities in England, it is possible that there may not be time for their full consideration during the present session. In this event, they will form the subject of your first deliberations in the next session. In the meantime, however, the carrying out of such works as were deemed of immediate importance to the Public Health has been sanctioned. These works, which are either in progress or in course of immediate initiation, include, among others, the Reclamation of unhealthy tidal lands at Yau-má Ti and Causeway Bay; Extensions and improvements of the existing system of sewers in this city; the construction of a new Central Market; the erection of a permanent Lazaretto on Stone Cutters' Island; the systematic dredging of the noxious foreshore along the Praya by means of steam machinery; and the general Sanitation of the villages in the Colony.\n\n12.-In connection with Sanitary Reform, the serious question of increased house accommodation for the population of Victoria is now engaging the attention of my Government. While every succeeding census has revealed a great increase in the population, there has not been a corresponding increase in the number of house habitations. Overcrowding in its worst form has consequently been the result; and the prevention of this evil will be dealt with in the proposed new Public Health Ordinance. However, as the true remedy is to be found chiefly in increased house accommodation for the labouring classes, it will be necessary to expand the city in a westerly direction as well as towards the east; and to create fresh building sites available for new tenements. Estimates will, therefore, be presented to you for certain additional works of reclamation; for the formation of new suburbs, and for the laying out of new streets in the Districts of Belcher's Bay and Causeway Bay.\n\n13. As the hitherto existing system by which purchasers of Crown leaseholds have been able to evade their building obligations has led to a considerable area of land in and near the City remaining vacant, directions have been given that, in the future, no purchaser of a Crown allotment shall receive his lease until he shall have complied with the Conditions of the Sale, and expended the specified sum upon proper tenements. (Applause.) Moreover, in the villages of the Colony, the system of tenants-at-will (termed licensed squatters) whose tenures were terminable upon one month's notice, will be superseded by an improved system of small and inexpensive building leaseholds for seventy-five years. The inhabitants will thus gain that security for the investment of their money in suitable homes which was altogether wanting under their present Squatter's Licence, by which they were liable to eviction upon one month's notice. These measures will, it is expected, tend to stimulate the further erection of proper dwellings, and to relieve the present overcrowded condition of several quarters of the City.\n\n14.-On sanitary and other grounds I have come to the conclusion that the drainage of the marshy lands situated within the Race Course in the Wong-nei Chung Valley is as much a work of necessity as the reclamation of Causeway Bay. A plan will, therefore, be laid before you for the drainage of these meadows and for their conversion into a Park. (Applause.)\n\n15.-Adverting to other important public undertakings, which have received legislative sanction, I am glad to inform you that the Breakwater at Causeway Bay, intended to form a harbour of refuge for the boat population during typhoons, has been satisfactorily completed within the amount originally estimated; that the Tai-tam Water-works are steadily progressing; as is also the extension of the Government Hospital, together with the new Lunatic Asylum; and that the erection of the new Central School will be commenced forthwith. The new Meteorological Observatory has been finished; and will, it is expected, prove of practical value to the maritime interests of commerce.\n\n16.-I have pressed on the Imperial Government the importance, on Sanitary and other grounds, of that urgently needed improvement, the connection of the Eastern and Western portions of Victoria, by means of a continuous marine embankment along the sea frontage of the Military Cantonments and the Royal Naval Yard. I hope to be able ere long to announce a favourable decision.\n\n17. With regard to the vital question of Public Instruction, the Report of the Inspector of Schools for 1883 will be laid before you. I have myself visited on several occasions, among the other Public Establishments, the chief Educational Institutions in this Island. Their condition is generally satisfactory. The new Central School, or Victoria College, is much needed, and will provide accommodation for at least seven hundred students.\n\n18.-In connection with this subject, the Government proposes, with your concurrence, to follow the precedent of other Colonies by reading, in alternate years, in accordance with Regulations which will be submitted to you, two of the most promising students of our chief Colleges, selected by competitive examination, to complete their professional education in England, especially in Law, Medicine, and Civil Engineering.\n\n19. Those minor posts in the Public Service which are at the disposal of the Governor, were wisely thrown open by my predecessor to competitive examination, without distinction of race or creed. A much needed stimulus has thus been given to general education, while the Government will secure a constant supply of eligible candidates for the several Departments.\n\n20.-A Report will be laid before you showing the considerable progress already made in the afforestation of this Colony. I have directed the introduction of several thousand plants of the Australian Eucalyptus, a tree which furnishes valuable timber, and also exercises a marked sanitary influence, as experience in many tropical and semi-tropical countries has amply proved.\n\n21.-You will perceive from papers on the table that it has been necessary to procure a new supply of arms for the Police; for the care of which, and for the proper drill and instruction of the corps you have already made provision.\n\n22.-The Imperial Government, on my recommendation, has presented a full equipment of guns and rifles to the Hongkong Volunteer Artillery; which body, it is hoped, will furnish a valuable addition to the numerical strength of the garrison.\n\n23.-I have represented to the Imperial Government in strong terms the necessity of completing the fortifications of this important naval and military station and mart of commerce. Without referring to the value of the other and manifold interests, both Imperial and Colonial, which are at stake, I may remind you that Official Statistics show that the tonnage of the shipping entered at the port of Hongkong in the year 1883 exceeded five millions of tons; that is, it exceeded the tonnage of the shipping entered at the port of London in 1843, the year in which Hongkong was annexed to the British Crown, at a period when this island was little more than a barren rock, uninhabited save by a few Chinese pirates and smugglers.\n\n24.-I have now, Honourable gentlemen, referred to the principal subjects which will be submitted for your consideration during the present Session. Governors and Legislatures should speak by their actions; and it is my confident hope that our united efforts will, by the blessing of Divine Providence, promote the general welfare and prosperity of all races and classes in this Colony.\n\nHis Excellency finished reading his speech amidst loud applause.\n\nHis Excellency then left the Council Chamber, and the Chief Justice resumed the chair.\n\nThe COLONIAL SECRETARY—Sir, in accordance with the practice that prevails in other colonies I beg to move the appointment of a committee to prepare a reply to His Excellency's address, consisting of myself, the Attorney-General, the Colonial Treasurer, Hon. P. Ryrie, and Hon. F. B. Johnson.\n\nThe question was put that the committee be appointed and was carried nem. con.\n\nPAPERS.\n\nThe COLONIAL SECRETARY—Before the Council adjourns I have to lay the following papers on the table:—Correspondence respecting the Police, Memorandum on the subject of the new Police Pension Rules and increased rates of pay for the Police, Draft of Regulations for Government Scholarships for the study of law, medicine, or civil engineering in Great Britain, Correspondence respecting the Postal Service, Financial Statement showing estimated position of the Colony at the end of 1883, Report of the Commission appointed to inquire into the circumstances attending the alleged Smuggling from Hongkong into China of Opium and other goods, Memorandum on the \"Hongkong Blockade\" by Mr. Justice Russell. I beg now, Sir, to move the adjournment of the Council till ...\n\nPage 330\n\n2",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-215 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1884 [1-4].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 325074,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-215 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1884 [1-4]",
        "page_number": 334,
        "title": "CO129-215 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1884 [1-4]",
        "content_text": "pay for their arms and ammunition, and a very considerable claim it was, I think the presenting of the Volunteers with guns and rifles shows that His Excellency really takes a proper and intense interest in their well being. I don't think I have any further remarks to make, except to beg the President's leave to move this address to His Excellency.\n\nThe Hon. F. D. Sassoon—Sir, while feeling that a pleasant duty has devolved upon me in seconding the address in reply to His Excellency's speech, I would have preferred that this honour had been placed in the hands of one abler in debate than myself and who has had more experience in legislative matters. The thanks of the Council are certainly due to His Excellency for the able and lucid statements that have been placed before us. The very respectable sum which the colony has to its credit is certainly a source of congratulation to us all; while the most important and useful public works which have been initiated by His Excellency the Governor will, I am sure, give the colony no cause to regret the expenditure. I trust that His Excellency and ourselves will have the satisfaction of seeing these useful and important public works carried out and completed during His Excellency's term of office. I do not think it is necessary for me to make a long speech, and with those remarks I have great pleasure in seconding the address moved by the senior unofficial member of the Council.\n\nHon. F. B. Johnson—Sir, I am quite sure I do but give expression to the general feeling of the Council when I say we have heard with great pleasure the speech of my hon. friend who has addressed the Council for the first time, and I am also confident we all feel the value of his co-operation in our deliberations. Before, sir, making the few observations I wish to offer on the address in reply to the speech from the chair, to which we have listened with such great interest, I desire to offer to the Council my congratulations that the forms of procedure which are observed in all other Legislative Assemblies in the empire have been introduced here, and that by inviting, I may say challenging, full and free discussion of the measures and policy of his government His Excellency the Governor has given a practical character to our discussions which has been greatly wanting in the past, and he has substituted to a very great extent the expression of the views not only of the hon. members individually but of the Council as a whole for what I think I may not inaptly term the exaggerated monologue from the chair to which we were formerly accustomed to listen.\n\nSir, I feel sure that any step which can be taken to add dignity to our proceedings or to impart a practical character to our discussions, to make us feel in fact we have here to perform important useful work, cannot do otherwise than extend the influence of this Council and therefore the efficiency of the Government. I am glad the language of the address, following the order of the speech from the chair, gives great prominence to the reform which has taken place in this Council. We owe that reform—which we know has been received with very great satisfaction out of doors and to which we owe the presence to-day of my two hon. friends whom we are all glad to welcome here and who sit here for the first time—I say: we owe that reform entirely to the assistance of Sir George Bowen, and, sir, I may say further, that I do not think that concession would have been granted to any other Governor who did not wield the influence and the authority which Sir George Bowen undoubtedly does in the councils of the empire.\n\nSir, I feel that it is a somewhat ungracious task for me to criticise the measure of reform for which we have expressed our thanks, but I also think it would be inconsistent with my duty were I to refrain from saying a few words with regard to what I deem its shortcomings. My criticism is simply that it does not go far enough. My attitude may be described by what has been given as a definition of gratitude, a lively sense of favours to come. I receive thankfully what has been given us and I immediately proceed to ask for more. I think the Secretary of State was not well advised when he cut down the number of members who are to be selected by popular suffrage from three to two, and I am quite sure I do but express the unanimous feeling of all the unofficial members at all events when I say we should have welcomed here the presence of the Major-General commanding the troops.\n\nThat point, however, I feel we should leave to the consideration of the Imperial and local Governments. Leaving out of consideration the General's presence here, my own view of what the Council should be is that it should consist of twelve members with the Governor as the president—six official and six unofficial members. Of the unofficial members, two should be nominated by the Chamber of Commerce and two by the Justices, leaving two to be appointed by the Governor himself, one of whom at least should be a Chinese. This would leave the other seat at the disposal of the Governor for the purpose of placing in this Council the representative of any special interest which he might think had been overlooked by the constituent bodies.\n\nBut, sir, I confess I am not blindly devoted to any paper constitution. The constitution of Great Britain is not inscribed in the statute book. I feel in regard to this Council what I have expressed elsewhere, what we really want is that the Council should adequately represent the intelligent public opinion of the colony, that we should be allowed to be free from the continual interference that has hitherto been placed in our way by the Colonial Office; that we should be allowed full control over what I may call our ordinary municipal expenditure and municipal taxation, leaving to the Secretary of State a general veto over our proceedings and an interference which should be limited to the case of Imperial interests and extraordinary occasions.\n\nSir, we know that a recent instance has occurred in which the interference of the Colonial Office has been withdrawn owing to the strenuous resistance which has been made to it by His Excellency Sir George Bowen, and I am quite sure if the members of this Council, and particularly the unofficial members, will offer strenuous opposition to the continued interference of the Colonial Office they will be able to gain their point.\n\nPassing now, sir, very briefly to consider one or two of the subjects which are alluded to in the address, I feel that if I were to do more than make a very casual allusion to a few of the more important ones I should be unduly occupying your time. The first point to which I desire to call your attention is the organisation of this Council into working committees. I am quite sure, sir, that organisation will tend to the efficiency of this Council and also will to a very great extent support the heads of departments and the executive Government.\n\nI made a proposal almost identical in terms with this three years ago at my second sitting on this Council. It was accepted by the Governor of the day in principle, but as usual nothing was done. The only addition I would make to the recommendation from the chair is that a Committee of Police and Gaols could with advantage be added to the other committees. And I also trust, in connection with this subject, one of the first duties the reconstituted Council will take in hand will be the revision of our standing orders. I am sure we shall all agree the efficiency of our proceedings will depend on the powers of the chair being accurately defined, and also the rights and privileges of hon. members.\n\nIt is satisfactory, sir, that very little need be added to what has fallen from my hon. friends with regard to finance. It is a foregone conclusion in the colony that a loan must be incurred, and I am glad my hon. friend (Mr. Ryrie) gives his adhesion to it. I have often said in this Council it is a very satisfactory thing for the colony to have a surplus, and though we know the Surveyor-General will speedily absorb it, I do not think that is a matter for regret.\n\nWith regard to the surplus for this year I will be glad if my hon. friend the Colonial Treasurer will satisfy us as to the security he has for the current opium revenue, which it is rumoured is in some jeopardy. It is no doubt very satisfactory also to find the report of the Smuggling Commission has been laid on the table, and I would suggest to the Colonial Secretary that in all cases in which reports are moved for they should, as soon as they are printed, be laid on the table. It is very little satisfaction to us to see them some two or three years after all interest in them has died away.\n\nIt must be a matter of great satisfaction to all to learn that that report completely refutes the erroneous accusation made against this colony by the late Governor some eighteen months ago. With regard to the question of the blockade, which is touched upon in the speech from the chair, I have only to say I have for a long time past taken a view opposed to that popularly held. I do not believe the blockade is so injurious to our interests as has been represented. At all events, if the alternative is to be, as was suggested by the late British Minister at Peking, the establishment of a branch of the Chinese Customs Service here, I have only to say I hope the members of this Council will offer their most strenuous opposition to it.\n\nPage 332",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-215 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1884 [1-4].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 325075,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-215 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1884 [1-4]",
        "page_number": 335,
        "title": "CO129-215 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1884 [1-4]",
        "content_text": "(Hon. P. RYRIE-Hear, hear.) If the blockade chastises us with whips the Imperial Maritime Customs would chastise us with scorpions. Sir, in the speech from the chair very full details are given of the public works about to be undertaken, I am quite sure the colony joins the Council in a feeling of satisfaction, not only with the liberal policy that has been pursued in this important matter by the Governor, but also with the activity which has been shown by the Surveyor-General in carrying out these works. I will not, sir, proceed to refer to the various measures which are enumerated in the speech, I can only say of them as a whole that I believe they will tend, on being carried out, very greatly to develop the resources and prosperity of the colony and the health and well-being of its inhabitants.\n\nI am glad to hear in the speech from the chair that not only are reclamations of land to take place at Causeway Bay, but they are also to be undertaken in Belcher's Bay. But, sir, in order to give full effect to these reclamations I am quite sure the negotiations which have been referred to in the speech should be, as the Governor promises they will be, energetically pushed forward so as to obtain a continuous Praya the whole length of our sea frontage.\n\nSir, I am glad to see my hon. friend the Surveyor-General is in his place, because I am about to make a suggestion to him which he may at first think rather crude, but I hope, nevertheless, he may see his way to carry it out. I would have the Praya not only run continuously along the whole sea frontage, but I would have it also widened. Now I am quite aware my hon. friends here will feel there are questions of finance to be considered; but I also think that if the Government were at once to prepare plans for a widened Praya, if they were to arrange what the limit line of the land is to be, and then if they were to give permission to individual lot holders, if they pleased, to build out to that sea line, great progress would be made without at all calling upon the Government for any expenditure.\n\nThe conditions upon which that land should be allowed to be filled in should, I think, be somewhat of the following nature. I think the land lot holders who elect to fill in their ground to this line should be entitled to the use of that ground until the Praya is completed, subject of course, on the completion of the Praya, to their being reimbursed the cost of filling in, and having the privilege of preemption at any price fixed by Government, or buying it at public auction.\n\nI am assured on the best authority that if this scheme were carried out we should speedily see the whole of the Praya, at all events from the westward from Belcher's Bay as far as the P. and O. Company's wharf, rapidly filled up.\n\nSir, before I sit down I think it necessary to say a few words upon that much vexed question, the education of the colony. I am indeed glad to see that at last we are to have the Central School commenced. But, sir, I confess I do not think we are yet alive to our responsibilities in the matter of providing adequate secular education in this Colony.\n\nIt seems to me that we are lavish of our grants to the denominational schools, and that we are very grudging of any support to the Central School. It is very much in this way, sir, that when 150,000 of our fellow colonists call out for the bread of that knowledge which they require, we seem to tender to them the inharmonious fragments of stone which to them at least represent the divergent and conflicting tenets of western sectarianism.\n\nSir, I am sure all who were present at that interesting ceremony which took place at the Central School a few weeks ago must have come away perfectly assured that the character of the education applied at the Central School is satisfactory to the Chinese, and I am also sure we cannot in justice refuse longer to provide them with the accommodation they require, and which they are willing to pay for.\n\nWith regard to the Grant-in-Aid schools, at the last meeting of this Council, when I protested against a further grant of about $6,000 to the St. Joseph's College, I asked a question of my hon. friend three paces on my left (the Registrar-General) as being more acquainted with educational matters in this colony than perhaps any other person, whether he felt quite sure that the character of the education supplied by that college was satisfactory to the people who were concerned in it.\n\nHe was unable to give me any information on the subject, but, sir, since then I have received communications from many quarters which assure me that the Catholic population of this colony are not satisfied with the education for which large grants of money are given. That dissatisfaction is not more widely known is, I am told, mainly in consequence of the fears which the members of the Roman Catholic Church have of the influence of their priesthood.\n\nAnd, sir, the painful incident which occurred the other day, when the remains of a much esteemed resident of this colony, and a member of the Roman Catholic Church, were refused interment in the Roman Catholic burial ground, seems to give some ground for these allegations.\n\nI shall take an early opportunity of calling the attention of the Council to the subject, and of inquiring under what conditions the tenure of the Roman Catholic burying ground is held.\n\nI have only one word more to say, sir, with regard to this question of education, which is that I hope my hon. friends the unofficial members, when the estimates for 1885 are to be laid before them, will most carefully scrutinise the way in which large sums of money are granted to educational institutions in this colony.\n\nI trust, sir, that they will satisfy themselves that the educational tests on which these grants of money are made are satisfactory as well to themselves as to the colony. I myself am inclined to believe that it will be far more satisfactory to us all if the inspection of schools is confined to a single individual, or confided to a qualified commission.\n\nThe speech from the chair, sir, alluded to the defences of this island. I am glad indeed to hear that His Excellency the Governor has made forcible representations to the Imperial Government with regard to the necessity of at once taking measures for placing this island in an efficient state of defence.\n\nI am opposed on principle to any grant of public money for the purpose of carrying out what I believe to be exclusively an Imperial duty; but nevertheless I cannot but feel that it is very desirable for this colony that those defences should be proceeded with.\n\nI am now merely stating my own opinion, and throwing it out as a suggestion, that I think it would be desirable if the colony would approach the Imperial Government with some measure of compromise.\n\nI am sure that if the waste lands now held by the military authorities while they are considering what kind of batteries they should erect--if they were handed over to the Colonial Government they would yield a very ample revenue, and under those circumstances, sir, I think it very desirable those lands should be released as soon as possible.\n\nSuppose, as I have heard it estimated, that a sum of £100,000 is required to put this island and its approaches into an efficient state of defence, I do not think it would be any very great hardship upon us, considering that upon that condition these waste lands would be given over to us, if we were to pay one fourth of that amount on the condition that the Imperial Government would guarantee a loan to be raised for that purpose.\n\nI assume that under these circumstances the money could be raised at a very low rate of interest, and supposing we are worth £300,000 or £350,000 a year, it would make no great difference to our finances.\n\nI am sure you will all agree with me that it would be a very serious thing if this island were subjected to a successful, or indeed, an unsuccessful attack from any hostile power.\n\nThe suggestion I have thrown out I submit to the consideration of the Council.\n\nSir, in conclusion I cordially echo the language in the speech from the chair which expressed a hope that the cordial co-operation of the members of this Council with the Governor will tend to the prosperity of this colony.\n\nI am quite sure, sir, as I said before, that the committees will tend greatly to the efficiency of the Government. I am sure, sir, our thanks, and the thanks of the colony, are due to His Excellency the Governor for the great interest that he has taken, as my hon. friend Mr. Ryrie has justly remarked, in all matters affecting the welfare of the colony, and not only that, but in stimulating the interest of the public of this community in all public matters.\n\nSir, he will have done a great deal if by exciting that public interest he has done something to wean us, the members of this community, from that devotion to our business and private affairs, which is admirable in itself, but which, I venture to say, does not release us from those responsibilities, and from performing those duties, which every citizen owes to the community to which he belongs.\n\n(Hear, hear, and applause).\n\nThe COLONIAL TREASURER-I rise, sir, to answer the question of my hon. friend with regard to the opium revenue.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-215 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1884 [1-4].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 330542,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-226 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1886 [4-5]",
        "page_number": 5,
        "title": "CO129-226 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1886 [4-5]",
        "content_text": "# she Date \n\n## Anbiject. \n\n147 5 May Votes of Council during April. \n\n**Conf.** \n\n153 \n8 \n154 \n#7 \n53 \n155 \n156 \n158 \n165 17 \n**Conf.** 143 24 \n4 \n78 \n15 \n17679 \nlajny \n1978 \n149 \n182 \n# \n183 \n31 \n\n## The Hong Kong Blockade \n[of brown hands \n\n## Appt. of a Commission \nto report upon the disposal \n\n## Ordinance 10 of 1886. \nWidows & Children Relief bidce. \n\n12. \n13 \n## Rendition of Chiring \n## Loan \n## Bills of Sall \n## Sale of hand by Auction \na \nchi \n\n## The Opium Trade. \nProposals of Sir R. Hart \n\n## Ordinance 16 of 1858 : Stamps \n14. \n18 \n19 \n## Opium \n20 \n## Reformatory Schools \n## Harbour Regulations \n## Proposal to hand over Hank Kong Postal Agencies \nin China to Chinese Government \n\n## Posts of \n1st \nand 2nd Boarding Officers, Harbour Dept. \n\n## Mt. Mary's study of Pekineal \n## Rumoured Intention of the Government \nto sacrifice a large number of infants",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-226 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1886 [4-5].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 331804,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-228 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1886 [7-9]",
        "page_number": 277,
        "title": "CO129-228 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1886 [7-9]",
        "content_text": "275\n\nStations, or Cruisers in the neighbourhood, and that the Governor of Hong Kong, if he deems it advisable, shall be entitled to send a Hong Kong Officer to be present at, and assist in the investigation and decision. If they do not agree a reference may be made to the Authorities at Peking for a joint decision.\n\nIf however on behalf of himself, and Shao Tao Tai (who was compelled by unavoidable Circumstances to leave before the Sittings of the Commission, were terminated) Sir Robert Hart, undertakes on the Chinese Government shall agree to the above conditions.\n\nThe undersigned are of opinion that if these arrangements are fairly carried out; a satisfactory solution of the questions connected with the so-called \"Hong Kong Blockade\" will have been arrived at.\n\nSigned in triplicate at Hong Kong this 11th day of September 1886.\n\n[signed] J. Russell Puisne Judge of Hong Kong\n\n(signed) Robert Hart Inspector General of Customs China.\n\n(signed) Byron Brenan\n\n(True Copy)\n\nMuswell H.B.M's Consul, at Tientsin",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-228 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1886 [7-9].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 332706,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-230 - Public Offices & Others - 1886",
        "page_number": 60,
        "title": "CO129-230 - Public Offices & Others - 1886",
        "content_text": "DRAFT.\n\nHushing\n\nMINUTE.\n\n2017\n\nJanuary 15 Mar\n\n7.0.\n\n4342\n\nHong Kong\n\n59\n\nSir,\n\nDS 16 Mar. 86\n\nI have the honour to\n\nMr. De Robeck 15 and act: the rest of you\n\nMr. Wingfield,\n\nMr. Bramston.\n\nMr. Meade,\n\n15\n\nSir R. Herbert. For Mr. Osborne Morgan.\n\nLord Granville. Cabinet Stanley-\n\nHousing Blockade\n\nThis 7.0 description the Method is from the China Ambassador's\n\nLetter. Which for new Mist feller thin lamporgen for...\n\nBut it is ther\n\nlanguage. If\n\na\n\ntelegraphic despatch of\n\nThe\n\n10th inst reporting that\n\nJustice Russell as\n\nColonial Member\n\nthe\n\nthe\n\nCommission about to meet\n\nat Hongkong to inquire into the question of\n\nthe\n\nprevention of smuggling\n\nunto China from Hongkong, and to inform you that\n\nthe\n\na\n\nprovision is made for\n\nof Section #\n\nthe Admiralty under clause.\n\nArticle\n\nPage 60\n\nPage 61",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-230 - Public Offices & Others - 1886.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 333026,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-230 - Public Offices & Others - 1886",
        "page_number": 380,
        "title": "CO129-230 - Public Offices & Others - 1886",
        "content_text": "Sir J. Walsham to the Earl of Iddesleigh(Received October 1.)\n\n(No. 256. Confidential.) My Lord,\n\nPeking, August 12, 1886. I HAVE the honour to transmit herewith to your Lordship, in copy, a summary of the proceedings of the Mixed Commission which, under clause 7, section 3, of the Chefoo Agreement of the 13th September, 1873, and clause 9 of the Additional Article to that Agreement, signed at London on the 18th July, 1885, has been holding sittings at Hong Kong for the purpose of inquiring into the question of the prevention of smuggling from the Colony into China.\n\nThis summary has been prepared by Mr. Brenan, Her Majesty's Consul at Tien-tsin, who is the Consular member of the Commission, his colleagues being, for China, Sir Robert Hart, Inspector-General of Maritime Customs, and Shao, late Taotai of Shanghae; and for the Colony of Hong Kong, Mr. James Russell, Puisne Judge.\n\nWhen the Chefoo Agreement, which has only lately been ratified, was drawn up in 1876, there were serious complaints raised by the Governor of Hong Kong against the interference of the Canton Customs' Revenue cruizers with the junk trade of the Colony, an interference that originated the term of the \"Hong Kong blockade.”\n\nOf late years, however, these complaints have been far less frequent, and it is probably on this account that, at the opening sitting of the Commission, Mr. Russell, on behalf of the Colony, made a declaration to the effect that, as far as Hong Kong was concerned, there were no grievances to be submitted to the Commission, and it could only be in the interests of China, therefore, that it had been convened.\n\nConsequently, it was for the Chinese Delegates to state the proposals which they might be intending to submit to the Commission.\n\nEventually Sir Robert Hart explained the details of a plan he had elaborated with a view to the prevention of smuggling from Hong Kong. The necessity for giving effect to it, or to some measure of equal efficacy, had, he said, become all the more urgent in consequence of the increased tax on foreign opium which, in virtue of the Additional Article to the Chefoo Agreement, China would be empowered to collect in future, and which would, of course, be evaded whenever means for avoiding its payment could be found.\n\nSir Robert Hart's project is given in full in the paper which accompanied the Earl of Rosebery's despatch to Mr. O'Conor No. 47 of the 18th of last February, and although Her Majesty's Government declined to allow the Mixed Commission to take cognizance of some portions of it, they consented to others being brought under the consideration of the Delegates.\n\nAmongst these latter details there was a plan for establishing Chinese hulks in the waters of Hong Kong, which were to be in charge of Chinese Revenue officers. All foreign opium was to be discharged from vessels arriving at Hong Kong and stored on board these hulks, from which it could not be withdrawn until it should have paid the entire duty which China was entitled to levy on it under the Additional Article to the Chefoo Agreement.\n\nSuch a project, Mr. Russell informed Sir Robert Hart, could not be entertained by the Colony, as, amongst other numerous defects, it would admit of China taxing, within British jurisdiction, opium proceeding from Hong Kong to Macao, the neighbouring Colony of a friendly Power.\n\nMr. Russell, having learnt from Sir Robert Hart that he had no other plan to offer, gave him to understand that he would be prepared to recommend to the Hong Kong Government a scheme by which he thought a check would be put on smuggling. The execution of this scheme would, however, be subject to two conditions:-\n\n1. That China should induce Macao to adopt a similar measure.\n\nC. O.\n\n18414\n\nREC?\n\nREG 13 OCT 2\n\n377",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-230 - Public Offices & Others - 1886.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 333029,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-230 - Public Offices & Others - 1886",
        "page_number": 383,
        "title": "CO129-230 - Public Offices & Others - 1886",
        "content_text": "380\n\n69\n\nMr. Russell inquired whether it was seriously intended to tax opium consumed in the Colony.\n\nSir R. Hart said some arrangement could be made for refunding that portion of the tax to the Hong Kong Treasury.\n\nMr. Russell asked whether it was intended that Hong Kong should assist China in taxing opium going to Macao.\n\nSir R. Hart said that this was what China wanted.\n\nMr. Russell stated that he might say at once that he was not authorized to entertain any plan which proposed to tax opium consumed in Hong Kong or other places in which China was not interested. If opium going from Hong Kong to Macao was to be taxed, as Sir R. Hart proposed, not a chest would be sent from Hong Kong. Steamers coming from Singapore would call into Macao on their way and drop the opium there.\n\nSir R. Hart asked whether the hulks would be allowed.\n\nMr. Russell said that Hong Kong would not allow a foreign Power to establish a Customs Office on its territory.\n\nSir R. Hart admitted that the difficulty about Macao had not occurred to him. China could not interfere with foreign vessels going into Macao, but she could take very stringent measures to prevent opium leaving that port.\n\nA discussion ensued about the amount of opium smuggled into China from Hong Kong. Sir R. Hart estimated the quantity at 5,000 piculs. Mr. Russell thought that this was much beyond the mark, and asked whether Returns could be obtained of the quantities which reported at the Native Customs. Sir R. Hart undertook to obtain these. Mr. Brenan explained to Shao Taotai the objections to Sir R. Hart's scheme; the principal objection being that it would divert the trade to Macao.\n\nShao Taotai acquiesced, and said the result of efficient measures in Hong Kong would be to send smugglers elsewhere.\n\nMr. Russell stated that he had thought of a plan by which Hong Kong could help China, but before proposing it Hong Kong must be satisfied that China will obtain similar co-operation from Macao.\n\nJuly 3, 1886.\n\nPresent:\n\nShao Taotai, Sir R. Hart, Mr. Russell, and Mr. Brenan.\n\nMr. Russell asked whether China had any proposal to put forward other than the one already made by Sir R. Hart.\n\nSir R. Hart said he had no other plan.\n\nMr. Russell said that, as Article VII of the Chefoo Convention had been appealed to, he would recall the circumstances under which it came into existence. Ten years ago there were frequent complaints of the interference of the Canton cruizers, and Sir T. Wade, while discussing other questions with the Viceroy Li at Chefoo, had obtained from his Excellency a promise that a Commission would meet to devise some means of removing these grievances. This was a concession from China to England, and not from England to China. Clause 9 of the Additional Article of 1885, in referring to the Chefoo Convention, misquoted its terms, and amounted to what is termed a misdescription. Mr. Russell maintained that clause 9, if properly interpreted, did not put Hong Kong under any obligation to assist China in the collection of its revenue.\n\nSir R. Hart thought that clause 9 might be read as an elaboration of Article VII of the Chefoo Convention.\n\nShao Tuotai remarked that we had met in pursuance of Article VII; Mr. Russell had stated that Hong Kong had now nothing to complain of, unless, therefore, we had met to consider some means of securing to China her revenue, we must seem to have met for nothing.\n\nMr Russell said that it was at China's urgent request that the Commission had now met. Mr. Russell referred to the scheme put forward by Sir B. Robertson when named to sit on the Hong Kong Blockade Commission. This scheme provided for the establishment of a Customs station on Chinese territory near Kowloon. Mr. Russell understood that this plan had received the approval of Sir R. Hart. This was the first time that there had been any proposal to place hulks in the harbour. The scheme put forward by Sir R. Hart practically amounted to this: that in clause 2 of the Additional Article of 1885, for the words, \"it is agreed that foreign opium when imported into China,\" there should be\n\nT [257]",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-230 - Public Offices & Others - 1886.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 333708,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-231 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1887 [1-3]",
        "page_number": 531,
        "title": "CO129-231 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1887 [1-3]",
        "content_text": "Enclosure 1.\n\nThe Officer Administering the Government is now able to lay before the Council a copy of the Memorandum of the basis of Agreement arrived at by the Commission which met in Hongkong in June last in pursuance of Article 7 Section III. of the Agreement between Great Britain and China, signed at Chefoo on the 13th September, 1876, and Section 8 of the Additional Article to the said Agreement, signed at London on the 18th July, 1885.\n\nThe Joint Commissioners for China laid before the Commission three alternative plans for the collection of Opium Revenue for China which may be briefly described as follows:-\n\nThe first plan proposed that the Opium Revenue should be collected for China by England in India, and this plan was regarded by the Chinese section of the Commission as the one of the three best calculated to secure a full collection at the least cost, and as less likely than either of the others to embarrass either Government or Commerce. By a system of deferred payments of duties in India it was alleged that interference with capital could be avoided, and by freeing Opium from taxation in China, smuggling and its attendant evils would, it was thought, be brought to an end.\n\nThe second plan proposed that China should do her own work, that is, collect her own Revenue on Chinese territory, and take her own preventive steps all along the Chinese sea-board; a plan which could be made thoroughly effectual, but would necessitate large outlay, and it was feared that it would cause much friction, and that the more thoroughly it was done the more heavily would it press on all affected by it.\n\nThe third plan under which it was proposed that there should be a system of cooperation between England and China, was somewhere between the other two; it would be more expensive than the first, and it probably would not press so heavily on any interest as the second. It was called the \"Hulk plan.\" Its general outline was as follows:-\n\nThe Chinese Customs were to provide two or three Opium Hulks to be anchored at Hongkong, supplemented, if required, by a Godown on shore, and the Hongkong Government was to enact an Ordinance directing every vessel entering the harbour to go alongside one or other of the Hulks. This was subsequently modified and restricted to vessels arriving with Opium on board. These vessels were to discharge their Opium into an Opium Hulk - the French Mail steamers into the French Hulk, the British into the British, and others into a miscellaneous Hulk.\n\nOpium stored in the Opium Hulk was to be treated as follows when leaving the Hulk:-\n\n  \n    (a)\n    Opium leaving a Hulk to go by steamer to Macao, or small Coasting vessels, not under the foreign flag, to Chinese posts to pay Duty and Lekin before leaving the Hulk.\n  \n  \n    (b)\n    Opium leaving a Hulk to be taken to any Godown at Hongkong other than the Custom's Godown, to pay Duty and Lekin before leaving the Hulk.\n  \n  \n    (c)\n    Opium leaving a Hulk to be taken to a Chinese Treaty Port by vessels under Treaty Power flags or belonging to the China Merchants' Company, to pay Duty and Lekin at the Treaty Port in the manner provided for by the Additional Article, but the Hulk Official to send to each such vessel for delivery to the Customs at the Treaty Port a Cargo Certificate describing the nature and quality of Opium received from the Hulk, and to be delivered at the Treaty Port, and they were also to send a copy of that certificate by some other vessel direct to the Customs at the port concerned. Modifications would have been made on this plan if the general outline had been acceptable to the Hongkong Government - such as refunding duty on opium consumed in the Colony - or shown to have been exported to places other than China. Another was that the Hulks should be managed under the British flag.\n  \n\nUnder instructions from Her Majesty's Government, the British Commissioners could not assent to the first proposal and did not take it into consideration. It is needless to enter into the arguments for and against the Hulk plan as it appeared to the Hongkong Commissioners to be, even with considerable modifications, of a nature that could not be sanctioned by the Government of this Colony. However, as it was desirable to help the Chinese Government to collect their Opium Revenue if we could do so without injury to our own, Mr. Russell submitted to the Commission certain proposals which he had long had under consideration. These proposals were accepted by the Chinese Government. Subsequent discussion led to some modifications and the conditional arrangement arrived at is the one now laid on the table.\n\nThis Memorandum of Agreement was transmitted by the Officer Administering the Government to the Imperial Government, to the Viceroy of India, and to Her Majesty's Minister at Peking, with a Confidential Report drawn up by Mr. Russell.\n\nBy a Confidential Despatch dated 23rd January last, the Secretary of State for the Colonies conveyed to the Officer Administering the Government the approval of Her Majesty's Government of the course taken in this matter and sanctioned the introduction of the Draft Ordinance prepared by Mr. Russell by which it is proposed to carry into effect the terms of the Memorandum of Agreement, so soon as it was ascertained that the equivalent arrangements with the Government of Macao, referred to in condition 1 of that Memorandum, had been concluded.\n\nAdvice has recently been received from Her Majesty's Minister at Peking conveying the information that these equivalent arrangements with Macao have been concluded, and that from 1st April next all duties on goods exported and imported by junks from Hongkong and Macao - not those on Opium only as contemplated by the Additional Article - will be collected by the Inspector-General's Department. The Stations at the entrances to this Harbour and that of Macao will therefore in future be under a Commissioner of the Imperial Customs instead of the Hoppo and Lekin Board as formerly.\n\nThere is now laid on the table a Draft Ordinance which will carry out the conditions mentioned in the Memorandum of Agreement, and which will, it is expected, protect and improve the Opium Excise-Revenue of the Colony. It is practically the same measure as has been in force in the Straits Settlements for years past, and which has worked so well that Singapore alone clears about $86,000 a month from the Opium Farmers. It is confidently anticipated, moreover, that when this arrangement has been carried out all grounds will be removed for the complaints that were so frequent some years ago of the vexatious proceedings of the Native Customs Officials at the Stations near Hongkong. The duties to be levied at these Stations will be based on an assessed Tariff instead of an uncertain and variable one as they have hitherto been alleged to be, and it is provided that in case of any dispute the Governor of Hongkong can depute an Officer to make enquiry into the matter in conjunction with the Commissioner of the Imperial Customs.\n\nMemorandum of the basis of Agreement arrived at after discussion between Mr. James Russell, Puisne Judge of Hongkong; Sir Robert Hart, K.C.M.G., Inspector-General of Customs, and Shao Tao Tai, Joint Commissioners for China; and Mr. Byron Brenan, Her Majesty's Consul at Tientsin, in pursuance of Article 7 Section III. of the Agreement between Great Britain and China, signed at Chefoo on the 13th September, 1876, and of Section 8 of the Additional Article to the said Agreement, signed at London on the 18th July, 1885.\n\nMr. Russell undertakes that the Government of Hongkong shall submit to the Legislative Council an Ordinance for the regulation of the trade of the Colony in Raw Opium subject to conditions hereinafter set forth and providing:--\n\n  For the prohibition of the import and export of Opium in quantities less than one chest.\n  For rendering illegal the possession of Raw Opium, in its custody or control, in quantities less than one chest except by the Opium Farmer.\n  That all Opium arriving in the Colony be reported to the Harbour Master, and that no Opium shall be transhipped, landed, stored, or moved from one store to another, or re-exported without a permit from the Harbour Master and notice to the Opium Farmer.\n  For the keeping by Importers, Exporters, and Godown Owners in such form as the Governor may require, books showing the movement of Opium.\n  For taking stock of quantities in the stores, and search for deficiencies by the Opium Farmer, and for furnishing to the Harbour Master returns of stocks.\n  For amendment of Harbour Regulations as to the night clearances of junks.\n\nThe conditions on which it is agreed to submit the Ordinance, are:-\n\n  That China arranges with Macao for the adoption of equivalent measures.\n  That the Hongkong Government shall be entitled to repeal the Ordinance if it be found to be injurious to the Revenue or to the legitimate trade of the Colony.\n  That an Office under the Foreign Inspectorate shall be established on Chinese Territory at a convenient spot on the Kowloon side for sale of Chinese Opium Duty Certificates, which shall be freely sold to all comers, and for such quantities of Opium as they may require.\n  That Opium accompanied by such certificates, at the rate of not more than $110 per picul, shall be free from all further imposts of every sort, and have all the benefits stipulated for by the Additional Article on behalf of Opium, on which duty has been paid at one of the ports of China, and that it may be made up in sealed parcels at the option of the purchaser.\n  That junks trading between Chinese ports and Hongkong, and their cargoes, shall not be subject to any dues or duties in excess of those leviable on junks and their cargoes, trading between Chinese ports and Macao, and that no dues whatsoever shall be demanded from junks coming to Hongkong from ports in China or proceeding from Hongkong to ports in China, over and above the dues paid or payable at the ports of clearance or destination.\n  That the Officer of the Foreign Inspectorate, who will be responsible for the management of the Kowloon Office, shall investigate and settle any complaints made by junks trading with Hongkong against the Native Customs Revenue Stations or Cruisers in the neighbourhood, and that the Governor of Hongkong, if he deems it advisable, shall be entitled to send a Hongkong Officer to be present at, and assist in the investigation and decision.\n\nIf however they do not agree a reference may be made to the Authorities at Peking for a joint decision.\n\nSir Robert Hart undertakes on behalf of himself and Shao Taotai (who was compelled by unavoidable circumstances to leave before the sittings of the Commission were terminated) that the Chinese Government shall agree to the above conditions.\n\nThe undersigned are of opinion that if these arrangements are fully carried out, a fairly satisfactory solution of the questions connected with the so-called \"Hongkong Blockade\" will have been arrived at.\n\nSigned in triplicate at Hongkong, this 11th day of September, 1886.\n\n(Signed),\n\nJ. RUSSELL Puisne Judge of Hongkong.\n\nROBERT HART, Inspector-General of Customs, China.\n\nBYRON BRENNAN, H. B. M.'s Consul at Tientsin.\n\nThe Officer Administering the Government therefore lays on the table, so that it may be read a first time, the Draft Ordinance.\n\nPage 525",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-231 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1887 [1-3].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 333711,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-231 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1887 [1-3]",
        "page_number": 534,
        "title": "CO129-231 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1887 [1-3]",
        "content_text": "signed by my hon friend on the right (Hon. P. Ryrie), Mr. Lowcock, and Mr. Keswick. It runs as follows:-\"The seizures that are constantly made and the terror inspired by the lawless acts of various petty collectors of ill-defined and miscellaneous duties have on former occasions been loudly exclaimed against and condemned, but no change for the better has taken place. It has been frequently and abundantly proved that the blockade is a serious evil, a great hindrance to the trade of the colony, unjust, and in its effects demoralising; and the papers which have been submitted to us, addressed to His Excellency by the Chief Justice, the Acting Attorney-General, and the Junior Magistrate on the system adopted by the English officers of the Boppo of Canton, show that Chinese of the lowest class are employed as informers, received into the service, and educated to prey upon the people as false accusers and extortioners.\" The end of all these complaints was the passing of an article in the Chefoo Convention which runs as follows:- \"The Government of Hongkong having long complained of the interference of the Canton Customs Revenue Cruisers with the junk trade of that Colony, the Chinese Government agrees to the appointment of a Commission to consist of British Consul, an officer of the Hongkong Government, and a Chinese official of equal rank, in order to the establishment of some system that shall enable the Chinese Government to protect its revenue without prejudice to the interests of the colony.\" It is not necessary now to inquire into the circumstances which prevented this clause being acted upon. In 1883, negotiations took place in London between the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs and the Marquis Tseng, which resulted in an additional article, dated July 18th, 1885, and one clause of it I will read: \"In lieu of the arrangement respecting opium proposed in clause 3 of section III of the Chefoo Agreement, it is agreed that foreign opium, when imported into China, shall be taken cognisance of by the Imperial Maritime Customs, and shall be deposited in bond, either in warehouses or receiving bulks which have been approved of by the Customs, and that it shall not be removed thence until there shall have been paid to the Customs the tariff duty of thirty taels per chest of 100 catties, and also a sum not exceeding eighty taels per like chest as lekin.\" The ninth clause is as follows: \"It is understood that the Commission provided for in clause 7 of section III of the Chefoo Agreement to inquire into the question of the prevention of smuggling into China from Hongkong shall be appointed as soon as possible.\" I would here beg to call attention to the difference in the two articles. In the first, Hongkong appears as the complainant, and the section provided for the appointment of a Commission to inquire into the interference of the Canton Customs revenue cruisers with the junk trade of the colony, and also for the establishment of some system which would enable the Chinese Government to protect its revenue without prejudice to the interests of Hongkong; while in the other article, the complaint of Hongkong appears to have been totally forgotten, and the object of the Commission was to inquire into smuggling from Hongkong into China.\n\nIn 1883, a Commission was appointed, presided over by his Honour the Chief Justice, and composed of my hon. friend on the right (Hon. P. Ryrie), Mr. Justice Russell, and I believe Mr. Balkeley Johnson. It was undoubtedly a fact, as pointed out by that Commission, that smuggling to a great extent did take place from Hongkong, was carried on by the Chinese themselves, and that the European portion of the community were total strangers to it. The Commissioner, in his report, in speaking of the Commission, says as follows: \"The island of Hongkong is separated from the mainland of China by a narrow strait, varying from half a mile to four miles in breadth, and situated along a shore line faced by a range of high mountains to be crossed only by three or four steep passes. This geographical position, so favourable for a preventive service, whilst affording the Chinese Government the ready means of protecting its revenue, which would be wanting if the colony were placed at a greater distance, and the cruisers had to guard an extended length of coast, is, nevertheless, from the numerous bays, creeks, and inlets along the Chinese coast, a constant source of annoyance to the Government of China, and induces the maintenance of an armed flotilla for miles up and down the coast opposite Hongkong. The Commissioners submit, with reference to the whole question of smuggling from this colony into China, and the so-called blockade, that according to international law, it is no part of the duty of the Hongkong Government to assist the Chinese Government in the collection of its revenue. Yet, considering the position of Hongkong in relation to the mainland of China, the Commissioners feel that the Colonial Government is called upon by considerations of policy to prevent in every reasonable way the freedom of this port from being abused by being made the means of defrauding the authorities of the neighbouring empire of their legitimate dues, provided that the Chinese Government, on its part, will conform to the provisions of the treaties in respect of tariff stipulations, and will, moreover, enter into effective guarantees that the trade of Hongkong shall not be subjected to irregular, indefinite, or exceptional taxation, and that vessels and goods shall not be forfeited or persons trading to or from Hongkong be punished for smuggling, unless by some competent and open tribunal, in which complete confidence may be reposed by the Hongkong Government.\"\n\nNow it is quite clear that if China experienced a difficulty in repressing smuggling when the duty was only thirty taels, she will be likely to encounter very much greater difficulty, and a great impetus will be given to smuggling when the duty is increased from thirty to one hundred and ten taels, and when the article, once introduced into China, will be free from all dues and duties. The Chinese authorities represented, therefore, to the English Government that the additional article would be a failure unless certain facilities were granted by the Government of Hongkong for the collection of the opium duty and the lekin. These proposals were mentioned in His Excellency's minute, which was submitted to the Council at the last meeting. The first plan was that the revenue should be collected in India, the second that China should do her own work, and the third that there should be a sort of co-operation between England and China, called the hulk plan. The Indian plan was rejected at once by the home authorities, but the hulk plan was submitted for the consideration of the Commission. Under these circumstances, the Opium Commission assembled here last year, and Sir Robert Hart referred to these proposals and placed them before the Commissioners. They were all considered unacceptable, and yet something had to be done. And why? Because China was determined to do all in her power to protect her revenue, and if, in doing so, she put into full force all her rights, rights which have often been admitted, she would be able to place great impediments on the trade of this colony, and to harass it very much indeed. In fact, she might again have instituted another blockade, only stricter, because the object was still more important.\n\nI think, looking at the geographical position of this island, and the facilities it offers for smuggling, if we can, while increasing our own revenue, assist China to protect hers, and while protecting her own revenue, not to injure us, we ought to meet her half-way, and do what we can. The Hongkong Commissioner, therefore, put forward his scheme, and he states what are his reasons for doing so. He says: \"We had experience some years ago of this trouble and annoyance, and the interference with legitimate traders caused by the new system for collecting opium duty and lekin, and it, therefore, is a matter for consideration how far we could go in giving facilities to China to enable her to collect, with as little friction as possible, and as cheaply as possible, the considerably increased opium tax which is leviable under the Additional Article. China might do much, without transgressing any treaty obligation, to vex the trade of Hongkong, whether by junk or steamer, and some of the privileges of the coasting and river steamers, which are now enjoyed by them, would probably suffer curtailment. Whilst, therefore, not acquiescing in the bulk plan, I felt that something should be done, and I had prepared a scheme founded on legislation existing in Singapore for years - a scheme which I considered would be for the mutual advantage of Hongkong and China. Having objected to the bulk plan, and having learned that there was no alternative one to be put forward, I proceeded to unfold my scheme, subject to the following conditions:- 1. That China will arrange with Portugal that Macao adopts a similar or equivalent measure. 2. That if it is found to affect injuriously the legitimate trade...\n\n2\n\n528",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-231 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1887 [1-3].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 334213,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-233 - Acting Governor Cameron - 1887 [6-8]",
        "page_number": 35,
        "title": "CO129-233 - Acting Governor Cameron - 1887 [6-8]",
        "content_text": "Enclosure 4.\n\n13146\n\nRECD\n\nREGP 4 JUL 87.\n\n--\n\nMemorandum by the Acting Chief Justice\n\n(Copy.)\n\n33\n\nAt the desire of His Excellency, Acting Governor, I have much pleasure in pointing out the alterations made in the Opium Bill, since its first reading, on the 18th March, 1887, until it became law.\n\nThe Bill as introduced to the Council was the one appended to my report, appendix D, and which had been approved by Her Majesty's Government. It had been drafted by Sir Robert Hart and accepted by him on behalf of the Chinese Government. It will be remembered that when I first submitted a scheme to the Commission for solving the question of the blockade of Hongkong, and the smuggling of Opium into China from the Colony, I proposed that licenses should be granted for the retail of Opium, but that such licenses...",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-233 - Acting Governor Cameron - 1887 [6-8].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 334228,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-233 - Acting Governor Cameron - 1887 [6-8]",
        "page_number": 50,
        "title": "CO129-233 - Acting Governor Cameron - 1887 [6-8]",
        "content_text": "[ 2 ]\n\nbefore the Commission sat by the learned gentleman who represented Hongkong on that Commission; and I was then able to confirm the information he had received about the retail trade in broken chests, viz, that it was about 7,000 odd chests annually. I also approved of the draft Ordinance that was then shown to me, and in which retail sales through the Opium Farmer were allowed. I, however, made a suggestion that the Opium Farmer should not be placed over the importing merchant. That suggestion, I am now glad to see, has been adopted in clause II of the amended Ordinance. Sir, with the modifications referred to I have no doubt the Bill will meet with the approval of all parties concerned—so far as a Bill of this nature can be approved.\n\nTHE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (Hon. J. Russell)—With your Excellency's permission, I should like to say a few words with regard to this Bill. I understand this is the continued debate of the second reading—that the debate was simply adjourned with a view of seeing whether certain propositions that the hon. member (Hon. C. P. Chater) had laid before the Council would be received by the Chinese Government and Her Majesty's Government. In the memorandum which was placed before the Council by the Acting Governor (Mr. Marsh) when the Bill was laid on the table, it was pointed out that all that I, as Hongkong Commissioner, agreed to do, in connection with the Convention, was to undertake that the Government of Hongkong should submit to this Council an Ordinance for the regulation of the trade in opium subject to conditions therein after set forth being performed by China. The principle of that Bill, as laid before the Council, and which was prepared by myself, but of course with the thorough knowledge and approval of the Government, who had seen and approved my draft—I was acting all along under the immediate instructions of the Governor, as well as under written instructions—the principle of that Bill, I say, was the complete control of raw opium within the Colony.\n\nThe Commission when it first met had certain proposals put forward by the Chinese Government as to how smuggling into China was to be prevented. With regard to the smuggling of opium or any other commodity in Hongkong, it has been frequently asserted that the Hongkong Government had nothing to do with it, because this was a free port and smuggling a misnomer. But with reference to opium it was found that smuggling was possible in one respect, even within the Colony, and that the freedom of the port was used against the opium farm. The opium which came in free circulated freely, and large quantities were taken to the other side of the border, boiled and prepared there, and then brought back to the Colony and sold to the damage of the opium farmer's revenue.\n\nNow, the only plan submitted by Sir Robert Hart and Shao Taotai, his colleague, was one which this Government could not accept and one which certainly the mercantile community would have protested against. That plan was the collection, by force of law, of Chinese revenue within the jurisdiction of Hongkong. Shortly, the proposal was that three Chinese-owned hulks should be stationed in the harbour, and that all ships, of whatever nationality, coming into the harbour should proceed alongside one or other of these hulks and there discharge all opium which was to go to the south of China. Through ships with opium were to take harbour letters from the hulk keepers stating the quantity on board and deliver such letter and opium to the Commissioner at the treaty port.\n\nIt was proposed that all opium landed in Hongkong should pay duty in the Customs whether it was consumed in the Colony or underwent the process of preparation before shipment to British Colonies, the United States, or elsewhere. In other words, China proposed to tax opium whether consumed in Hongkong or re-exported.\n\nThe report for 1882, after giving the net importation into each port states:-\n\nThe sorts imported and the estimated values are shown in the table below. All the opium imported into China reaches it through Hongkong. As the quantity consumed there is comparatively trifling, the quantity brought into China in native vessels and which consequently does not appear in these returns must be nearly equal to the quantity by which the Hongkong importation exceeds the entries at the treaty ports. A deduction must be made for the amount shipped to the United States for the use of Chinese there.\n\nThe total amount that came into Hongkong in 1882 was 85,565 piculs. The total quantity left in Hongkong, that is to say the quantity that did not pass through Sir Robert Hart's hands, in chests amounted to 19,856. Now, everybody knows that Bengal opium weighs 13 piculs per chest, so, therefore, the total number of chests that did not pass through Sir Robert Hart's hands was 16,000 or 17,000. How did we account for that balance? It has been shown by statistics supplied by the Hongkong, Canton, and Macao Steamboat Company that in 1885, 9,145 chests went straight to Macao. That, therefore, must be deducted from the quantity that could possibly be retailed in Hongkong, also what was shipped to Manila, Tonquin, America, and other places.\n\nThat there was a retail trade was undoubted, and I pointed out to the Commission that it was necessary, if we possibly could, to devise some means by which this retail trade should be preserved in the Colony. There had been nothing but the obnoxious bulk plan put forward, and asing rejected it, I felt that after the report of the Smuggling Commission of 1883, China had a grievance against this Colony, as this Colony had against China, and that we ought to do what we could to provide a remedy without detriment to ourselves. Was that possible? It seemed to me it was.\n\n[ 3 ]\n\nthe control of broken chests, that is to say, that Opium should be sold, unless he had the complete monopoly of sale of quantities less than one chest, and an offer was made that if this were assented to, an increase would be made in the rent of the farm. And why? Because, he said if he had complete control of the trade in broken chests, he could increase his price, smuggling from outside would cease, and also the illegal boiling that was done in the Colony.\n\nBut the difficulty was that if the Government had attempted to do anything, the restriction on the opium trade here would have sent a large portion of it to Macao. In 1882 the opium farmer who came from Saigon had been got out of the place by the old farmers, and instead of paying the Government $210,000, as before, they offered $132,000. The Government then took the matter into its own hands and granted licences direct to the various dealers under the Ordinance of 1858. The increased revenue derived from that experiment was very considerable.\n\nUnder the management of Mr. Seth, who worked the matter with great care, the Government got, in addition to all expenses, over 100,000 dollars above what they had been offered. But there was an objection raised. It came from home. The home Government saw an objection to the close relation between the Government and the sale of the prepared drug, as it had to superintend its preparation, and the home Government preferred that the matter should be in the hands of a farmer if possible.\n\nI happened, at that time, to be Colonial Treasurer, and I drafted an Ordinance taken from the old Ordinance of 1845 or 1846, giving the Government permission to grant licences for the sale of raw opium as is proposed now. There was a small revenue to be derived from that doubt. I saw the leading members of the importing trade and they saw no objection to it in the first instance, but very soon some of the Chinese dealers, some of whom profited largely by smuggling, raised a trouble and the Government did not proceed with the Bill.\n\nThere was nothing done: Macao again stood in the way. Quite recently, the present Opium Farmer has also been asking the Government for complete control over the trade in broken chests, and an Ordinance was actually published in the Gazette in April of last year—a Gazette subsequently cancelled at my request. It was proposed, that no one should sell opium in quantities of less than one chest except the Opium Farmer and his licensees, and it was arranged that no licensee should pay any fee unless the Governor in Council otherwise ordered.\n\nThis came out rather inopportunely, because I had hoped to produce this control as the solution for the Chinese Government of the blockade question and the smuggling of opium which led to it. But here it is.\n\nIt may be asked why it was altered. Well, it was simply in this way. While Sir Robert Hart was over at Macao negotiating, certain papers and blue books arrived from home, which had been recommended by Sir John Walsham, who had a large experience while at Madrid of the troubles between the Spanish Government and the British Government with reference to the smuggling of tobacco from Gibraltar.\n\nSpecial officers had been sent out from home to see how that smuggling could be stopped, and it was important to see what they reported. The reasons that were urged by Messrs. Chester and Barton, the officials sent out, were cogent and strong as showing that so long as you allowed small quantities to circulate freely it was impossible to prevent smuggling, and they proposed that tobacco should not be allowed to be exported in less quantities than 50 lbs. This seemed to them perfectly fatal to smuggling.\n\nNow, it was the duty of this Government, if it carried out the terms of the Chefoo Convention and the Additional Article, to help to devise some means by which Hongkong should not be made ...\n\n46",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-233 - Acting Governor Cameron - 1887 [6-8].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 335569,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-235 - Public Offices - 1887",
        "page_number": 185,
        "title": "CO129-235 - Public Offices - 1887",
        "content_text": "2\n\n2. For rendering illegal the possession of raw opium, its custody or control in quantities less than one chest, except by the Opium Farmer.\n\n3. That all opium arriving in the Colony be reported to the Harbour-master, and that no opium shall be transhipped, landed, stored, or moved from one store to another, or re-exported, without a permit from the Harbour-master, and notice to the Opium Farmer.\n\n4. For the keeping by importers, exporters, and go-down owners, in such form as the Governor may require, books showing the movement of opium.\n\n5. For taking stock of quantities in the stores, and search for deficiencies by the Opium Farmer, and for furnishing to the Harbour-master Returns of stocks.\n\n6. For amendment of Harbour Regulations as to night clearances of junks. The conditions on which it is agreed to submit the Ordinance are----\n\n1. That China arranges with Macao for the adoption of equivalent measures.\n\n2. That the Hong Kong Government shall be entitled to repeal the Ordinance if it be found to be injurious to the revenue or to the legitimate trade of the Colony.\n\n3. That an office under the Foreign Inspectorate shall be established on Chinese territory at a convenient spot on the Kowloon side for sale of Chinese opium-duty certificates, which shall be freely sold to all comers, and for such quantities of opium as they may require.\n\n4. That opium accompanied by such certificates, at the rate of not more than 110 taels per picul, shall be free from all further imposts of every sort, and have all the benefits stipulated for by the Additional Article on behalf of opium on which duty has been paid at one of the ports of China, and that it may be made up in sealed parcels at the option of the purchaser.\n\n5. That junks trading between Chinese ports and Hong Kong, and their cargoes, shall not be subject to any dues or duties in excess of those leviable on junks and their cargoes trading between Chinese ports and Macao, and that no dues whatsoever shall be demanded from junks coming to Hong Kong from ports in China, or proceeding from Hong Kong to ports in China, over and above the dues paid or payable at the ports of clearance or destination.\n\n6. That the officer of the Foreign Inspectorate, who will be responsible for the management of the Kowloon office, shall investigate and settle any complaints made by junks trading with Hong Kong against the Native Customs Revenue stations or cruizers, and that the Governor of Hong Kong, if he deems it advisable, shall be entitled to send a Hong Kong officer to be present at and assist in the investigation and decision. If, however, they do not agree, a reference may be made to the authorities at Peking for a joint decision.\n\nSir Robert Hart undertakes, on behalf of himself and Shao Tao Tai (who was compelled by unavoidable circumstances to leave before the sittings of the Commission were terminated), that the Chinese Government shall agree to the above conditions.\n\nThe Undersigned are of opinion that if these arrangements are fully carried out, a fairly satisfactory solution of the questions connected with the so-called \"Hong Kong blockade\" will have been arrived at.\n\nSigned in triplicate at Hong Kong this 11th day of September, 1886.\n\n(Signed) BYRON BRENAN, Her Britannic Majesty's Consul at Tien-tsin.\n\n(Confidential.)\n\nJ. RUSSELL, Puisne Judge of Hong Kong. ROBERT HART, Inspector-General of Customs, China.\n\nInclosure 2 in No. 1.\n\nHONG KONG BLOCKADE COMMISSION.\n\nProceedings at the Sitting of September 7, 1886.\n\nPresent:\n\nMr. Russell, Sir R. Hart, and Mr. Brenan.\n\nSir R. Hart said that since the last meeting he had, as the Commission knew, passed some time in Macao. The Governor of Macao had agreed to place all opium in Macao under Chinese Customs supervision under certain conditions. Sir R. Hart had referred these conditions to Peking, and he had now received a reply. The Chinese Government would not accede to one among the conditions which the late Governor of Macao had deemed a sine quâ non. Governor Roza, however, had added that although, in his opinion, the particular condition was essential, his Government might not consider it so. It had therefore been agreed between Sir R. Hart and Governor Roza that, should Peking refuse to accede, nothing should be done until Governor Roza reached Portugal in November, when negotiations could be resumed between Peking and Lisbon. Under these circumstances, Sir R. Hart asked that Hong Kong should defer taking action until the result of the negotiations with Portugal should be known.\n\nMr. Russell then read a despatch addressed to him by the Acting Governor of Hong Kong, pointing out that since the Commission had begun its sittings there had occurred frequent cases of interference with junks trading with Hong Kong. Mr. Russell then cited several cases of interference and stated that the li-kin tax had been increased. He asked Sir R. Hart whether he could explain what this meant.\n\nSir R. Hart replied that he had no official information on the subject, but he thought that no li-kin would be levied without the authority of the Viceroy at Canton. He did not think that the extra li-kin was a blow aimed at Hong Kong; he had little doubt that the extra li-kin applied to the whole province, and the Hong Kong trade had to take its chance with the rest.\n\nA conversation then ensued on the subject of the surrounding stations. Mr. Russell stated that the trading community of Hong Kong would be well pleased if these stations could be placed under the Foreign Inspectorate, or if, when any offence was charged against a Hong Kong junk by any of the officials at these stations, a member of the Foreign Inspectorate could investigate the charge.\n\nSir R. Hart reminded Mr. Russell that at one of its first sittings he had said that there was now no complaint to be made against these stations; but Mr. Russell had made any stipulations regarding these stations as a condition of giving assistance in suppressing smuggling, Sir R. Hart would have been able to recommend their adoption. It would not come well from himself, Sir R. Hart said, to recommend that the stations should be placed under his control, but he thought that if the suggestion came from the English Commissioners it would carry weight.\n\nMr Russell said that after consultation with Mr. Brenan he thought that the proposed Ordinance could be amended so as to protect the Customs revenue much more effectually than before. The alteration consisted in cancelling the clause establishing a Raw Opium Farm, and practically abolishing the retail trade. To say so, in so many words, would alarm the community and cause much opposition in Council; but the way he proposed doing it was by giving the Opium Farmer a monopoly of retail trade, and on the Farmer's licence endorsing such conditions as would make trade impossible; by requiring [him], for example, to charge 30 per cent. over the market rate. This, coupled with the precautions taken with regard to the shipment of unbroken chests, would make smuggling practically impossible. Mr. Russell then asked Sir R. Hart whether, in consideration of such further assistance, he could arrange that the duties and li-kin on merchandise entering or leaving Hong Kong by junk should be fixed, so that the trade should not suffer from sudden changes.\n\nSir R. Hart said there would be some difficulty about this, as li-kin was constantly liable to be raised or lowered.\n\nMr. Brenan suggested that an undertaking that the Tariff should be the same as that in force all over the province might be sufficient.\n\nSir R. Hart said he could promise that.\n\nSir R. Hart said there was one improvement he could suggest in the Ordinance which would be of much assistance; it was that no junk should be allowed to leave the harbour which had not paid duty to the Customs.\n\nMr. Russell said it was out of his power to entertain such a proposal.\n\nMr. Brenan asked whether, now that opium could not be exported in quantities less than one chest, Sir R. Hart would make some arrangement similar to that about to come into force at the ports as stipulated in the Additional Article of the 18th July, 1885, under which chests might be opened, repacked, and the small parcels certificated, once the whole chest had paid duty at the Kowloon station.\n\nSir R. Hart said this could be arranged.\n\nPage 182",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-235 - Public Offices - 1887.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 369983,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-289 - Individuals - 1898",
        "page_number": 66,
        "title": "CO129-289 - Individuals - 1898",
        "content_text": "## Section III\n\nthe space within the walls will practically be uninhabited, I we may hope that one of the difficulties of the convention will disappear. Another difficulty is Prevention of smuggling with China of which we have pledged ourselves to surfering as far as possible. I think it possible that the Chinese Government may try to keep their garrison there. For instance the Viceroy of Canton, in his so-called regulations, writes \"The Kowloon shall, as heretofore, exercise their several functions within the city, but they must not place any impediments in the way of military works connected with the defences of Hongkong.\" This wording is vague but you must begin by taking it for granted and make in our communication through the Foreign Office to the Chinese government that the garrison will be withdrawn. A greater difficulty is Prevention of smuggling with China to which we have pledged ourselves as far as possible. The Chinese government have been informed that all possible precautions will be taken to prevent smuggling.\n\nClause 7 of Section III relates to smuggling in the leased area. Smuggling into China or in any other way being a detriment to the interests of Hongkong being a free port has no custom house. This fact, coupled with its geographical position, has facilitated smuggling; and there was in past years what was called a blockade of the tax fort by Chinese revenue cruisers constantly making seizures in British waters. The Chefoo Convention of 1876 contained a clause as to importation into Chinese ports by which opium was treated differently from other imports. It also contained a clause as to complaints made by the Governor of Hongkong regarding the interference of the Canton Customs revenue cruisers with the trade of that colony. The Chinese government agreed to the appointment of a Commission to consist of a British consul and an officer of the Hongkong government and a Chinese official of equal rank in order to establish some system that shall enable the Chinese customs... \n\nPage 3",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-289 - Individuals - 1898.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 386694,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-314 - Public Offices - 1902",
        "page_number": 149,
        "title": "CO129-314 - Public Offices - 1902",
        "content_text": "# 148\n\nC\n\nTitel. p.385.\n\nAbout October 15, 1867.\n\nNothing more appears to have been heard of the question until 1860, when the Superintendent of Native Customs at Canton tried to persuade the Imperial Maritime Customs Service to levy duty on goods shipped in Hong Kong for England by vessels which, after partially loading at Hong Kong, proceeded to Whampoa to fill up. The attempt was frustrated.\n\nIn 1867 the Canton Customs began the \"Blockade of Hong Kong\", patrolling the waters around the Colony and examining every junk that entered or left the port, arresting those without proper papers, and levying double duty in the case of goods shipped at Pakhoi or Canton for other Treaty ports, in junks which had touched at Hong Kong en route. It was also discovered by Government that various revenue offices had been opened in Hong Kong by the Chinese authorities, issuing official passes and collecting official dues. The Governor (Sir R. MacDonell) suppressed them; but it is stated that they continued in secret. Eitel pp.415 sqq.\n\nEitel p.418. Eitel, pp.503 sqq.\n\n1876. September 17th 1876.\n\nA proposal was put forward by the Customs Service for levying an export duty in Hong Kong upon opium re-shipped in junks from the Colony. The Colonial Government was to retain part of the proceeds as commission for collecting the duty. The proposal was rejected.\n\nIn 1874 the agitation in the Colony against the \"Blockade\" came to a head; and as a result, the question became the subject of negotiations between Her Majesty's Minister and the Yamen. As a result, (section III 7), the Chefoo Convention contained a clause providing that as the Governor of Hong Kong had \"long complained of...",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-314 - Public Offices - 1902.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 489328,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-470 - Public Offices - 1921",
        "page_number": 476,
        "title": "CO129-470 - Public Offices - 1921",
        "content_text": "# \nthe Allied Governments, very keenly desire that, for the peace of the world and the common welfare of humanity, the United States will see its way clear to join its efforts with the other nations for the realisation of the lofty aim of the League, \n\nAlthough the efforts of the League for the past twelve months have mainly been devoted to the perfecting of its organisation and the strengthening of its foundation, it has also exerted itself for the enforcement of the Peace Treaty and for international finance, economics, labour, communications, sanitation, statistics and like cultural work. The League is as yet at its initial stage of development, and, moreover, the international political situation has not quite recovered permanent equilibrium since the war. It is to be expected, therefore, that the League should still leave something to be desired both in organisation and working, and that each one of the member States may be dissatisfied in one respect or another. It is, indeed, inevitable that an international undertaking of the magnitude of the League of Nations should fail to attain perfection in a single day, but all the nations of the world should feel it pointedly incumbent upon them to see to the future development and eventual perfecting of the League. \n\n## \nThe functions of the League are performed by the Council, the Assembly, the Secretariat and various expert commissions. The Council met eleven times in the course of last year, at Paris, London, Rome, San Sebastian, Brussels and Geneva. The Assembly was in session for a month from the 15th November last year, at Geneva, the seat of the League. At each of these meetings good work has been done, and what is worthy of special note is that at these sessions of the Council and the Assembly the representatives of the member States have evinced willingness throughout to put forth their efforts for the common cause of the League, instead of confining their attention wholly to the interests of individual nations they represented. It is principally due to the spirit of concert and harmony manifested on these occasions that the League now has a fair promise of life and development. \n\nIn regard to the curtailment of armament, provided for in the Peace Treaty, the Military Commission of the League, since its organisation last May, has been making investigations into the practical phases of the question. As a matter of principle, disarmament is to be welcomed for the general welfare of the human race, and the Japanese Government are paying special attention to the question. The matter, however, has very important and complex bearings for each nation, and it is to be apprehended that the realisation of this end may be found impossible unless all the nations act in one accord and in good faith. \n\nThe project of the International Court of Justice was resolved upon both by the Council and the Assembly, chiefly on the basis of the original draft adopted by the Conference of International Jurists held last year at The Hague. The plan is now being submitted to the several Governments for approval, and the Court is expected to be established at no distant date. The passing of this resolution is the most important of the results achieved at the first session of the League Assembly. That international conflicts should to as great a degree as possible be settled by peaceful means is of course highly desirable, and the decision to establish an international court for that end is most welcome. \n\nThe questions of amending the League Covenant, of economic blockade as the principal means of punishment by the League, and of mandates to be exercised on behalf of the League have each been assigned to expert commissions which have been appointed as auxiliary organs of the League Council. The field of activities of the League will thus gradually be enlarged with time. \n\nBefore passing on to another theme, I may be permitted to state that the aim of the League of Nations, which lies in the securing of world peace and the promoting of international co-operation, is quite consistent with the policy followed throughout by Japan, and that it is her intention, as one of the five great nations, invariably to make endeavours, in hearty co-operation with the other Powers, for the attainment of that lofty aim of the League. \n\n## \nNext the question of mandate calls for a few words. Under the Peace Treaty, which is based on the principle of non-annexation, the former German possessions in Africa and the South Pacific, together with the territories in Asia which belonged to the former Turkish Empire, have been placed under administration by mandate. So far as the former German possessions are concerned, the mandatories and their assigned territories were decided upon at the Supreme Council of the 7th May of last year. On that occasion the whole group of former German islands lying north of the Equator was assigned to the Administration of Japan as mandatory. When, at a later date, the terms and formulæ of the mandates came up for determination, a difference of views arose between the Japanese and British Governments in the construction of the treaty stipulation relating to the terms and formulæ of the mandate over the former German colonies lying south of the Equator. Agreement could not be reached for a long time. A frank exchange of views, however, between the Japanese and British representatives who attended the first session of the League Assembly happily resulted in a composition of the difference. \n\nWhile agreeing to the terms of the mandate of the C class as proposed by the British Government, the Japanese Government came to a full understanding with the British Government that Japan should make a declaration to the effect that the acquired right of the Japanese in the former German colonies south of the Equator should be fully respected, and that their agreement to the terms of mandate over these islands should not be taken to signify acquiescence on the part of Japan in any discriminatory and unfavourable treatment of her nationals in the said islands. Accordingly, when the terms of the class C mandate were decided upon on the 17th December last, at a meeting of the eleventh session of the League Council, the Japanese representative made a declaration on the lines of the above understanding and reserved for Japan a right to resume negotiations with the British Government concerning the treatment of Japanese subjects in those territories. The terms and formulæ of the mandates over the former German possessions in the South Pacific having now been determined, the Japanese Government are about to enter upon formal control and administration, in pursuance of those terms of mandate, over the group of islands assigned to Japan. \n\n\"Gentlemen, I am happy to be able to state that it is the determination of the Japanese Government to spare no efforts in the discharge of this noble mission of civilisation, in promoting the welfare and development of the people of these territories, thus fully to deserve the trust that the League members have placed in Japan. \n\nAs to the revision and renewal of the Anglo-Japanese Agreement of Alliance, the Japanese Government had been giving careful consideration to the question, with a view especially to its relation to the Covenant of the League of Nations. They entered into conference with the British Government and a frank exchange of views on this matter took place both in London and Tokyo. In view of article 6 of the existing agreement of alliance, it was decided to address to the League of Nations a joint notification to the effect that the Governments of Japan and Great Britain had come to the conclusion that the Anglo-Japanese Agreement of the 13th July, though in harmony with the spirit of the Covenant of the League of Nations was not entirely consistent with the letter of that Covenant, and that they accordingly recognised the principle that if the said agreement was to be continued after July 1921 it must be in a form not inconsistent with the Covenant. The notification was conveyed in a note dated the 8th July, 1920. The principle to guide the Japanese Government in revising the agreement is at present a subject of serious study, regard being had to the articles of the League Covenant, as declared in the joint notification, and to the many important changes which have taken place in the aspect of affairs since the conclusion of the present agreement. \n\nThat this agreement of alliance has contributed largely and distinctly to the peace, stability and welfare of the entire Far East is fully realised by both nations, and not only is the continuance and preservation of the wholesome spirit of this alliance for a long time to come desired by the most thoughtful of the two peoples, but it is, I am sure, in perfect harmony with the high ideals of the League of Nations. \n\nConcerning the organisation of the new consortium looking to financial aid to China, I had the privilege at the last session to state before you how a clear understanding was reached between the respective banking groups and Governments concerned, and how the new organisation was fast taking shape. Last October the representatives of the various banking groups met in conference at New York, signed the final agreement, and discussed the policy of the consortium and other details of practice, thus bringing to completion the organisation of the new consortium. While the activities of the consortium in the future are necessarily dependent upon negotiations and co-operation between the organisation itself and the Chinese Government, it may not be out of place, now that the consortium has been completed, to make a remark on its mission. The object of the consortium is purely economic: in other words, what it aims at is to assist and facilitate the economic development of China and thereby to contribute to the happiness and interest of the Chinese people, on the one hand, and to afford equal opportunity for the private enterprise of the nations concerned on the other. \n\n`[5870 h-3]`\n\nPage 4\nPage 5\n473",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-470 - Public Offices - 1921.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 503271,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-493 - Governor Sir Clementi - 1926 [6-8]",
        "page_number": 346,
        "title": "CO129-493 - Governor Sir Clementi - 1926 [6-8]",
        "content_text": "Owing to fighting in Canton which enabled the Government to destroy sundry rebel elements and to unify the province, the repercussion of May 30 was not fully felt here before the middle of June, when the real significance and gravity of the occurrence began to be understood. In Peking and elsewhere there was already a realisation that an event had taken place which was of the order of acts that create epochs in history. As Canton is the greatest Nationalist centre in the country, it is not strange that May 30 should be envisaged from an uncompromisingly Nationalist standpoint and seen to be a decisive expression of the struggle between the body of economic and political needs and ideas known as Chinese Nationalism, whose chief motive is the achievement of real Chinese independence, and the opposing system of ideas and forces which, deriving their sanction from the long series of treaties dating from the transaction of Nanking in 1842, is known as Foreign Imperialism.\n\nThis interpretation of May 30 would naturally find expression here in the form of patriotic demonstrations and other popular manifestations. And it was the driving necessity to express the Nationalist mind and feeling on a profoundly poignant act of tragedy that Canton organised the memorable demonstration of June 23. It is indisputable that the procession, which was the central feature of the demonstration, consisted largely of students and school children and was entirely unarmed save as to the Whampoa cadet section who were in ordinary parade attire.\n\nThe question as to which side fired the first shot is not a capital issue in view of the actual circumstances of the case and the grim results of the shooting. Never in its history had Shameen been so completely and perfectly protected. Separated by its wide canal and sand-bagged, barbwired, equipped and garrisoned by forces armed to the teeth and supported and covered by the great guns of the foreign warships in the harbour. Shameen was impregnable and absolutely safe even on the incredible assumption that there was any real Chinese intention to capture it. There was no such intention and there could have been none, and the results of the shooting proved it. The British suffered hardly any casualties, but 50 dead and more than 100 wounded Chinese demonstrated afresh the meaning of a struggle between a fortress and a crowd. All the relevant facts of the case support the view that, even if the Shameen firing were done in the first instance in so-called 'self-defence' (which is categorically denied), IT WAS EXCESSIVE AND THEREFORE LEGALLY UNJUSTIFIED. That Shameen was, on June 23, 1925, in the mood and temper to act violently and excessively appears from the widely advertised letter written by the then British Consul-General on June 22, but actually received by Mr. Wu Chao-chu, former Minister for Foreign Affairs, about the hour of the actual shooting on June 23. It was sent through the post, not delivered by messenger.\n\nAfter referring to a fantastic story of certain students who had cast lots for the privilege of posing as martyrs (which he himself had to suggest \"might be the figment of a fertile imagination\"), the British Consul-General went on to declare that “if, on the other hand, it have any solid foundation in fact and should action of the kind be contemplated and take place, I have the honour solemnly to warn the Government of Kuangtung through you as their Foreign Secretary that any attempt to penetrate on the Foreign Concession at Shameen will be resisted by force of arms, and that for the consequences the Government will be held individually and collectively responsible.\" And he added that due precautions are, however, being taken to guard against acts of mob violence, such as have occurred at Chinkiang, Kiukiang and Hankow, and should unfortunately they occur here, the blood of those who call upon crowd psychology to commit deeds of violence will be on their own head.' It is plain that this is the language of one who, having envisaged the possibility, if not the certainty, of shedding the blood of Chinese on June 23, 1925, would hardly be able to restrain armed and inflamed men under his orders from doing some bloodletting on the occasion. In other words, we read the letter as a frank avowal of the British Consul-General's intention to do what Evanson had already done at Shanghai or (we say this in a purely historical sense) General Dyer at Amritsar, i.e., action based on the doctrine of the preventive massacre which specialists of strong and drastic action are wont to advise as a magical operation with \"Oriental\" crowds.\n\nWhile there can be no doubt that June 23 is the direct and immediate cause of the anti-British boycott (and of the intensification and extension of the Hongkong strike), it is certain that the practical blockade which the Government of Hongkong instituted against Canton and the rest of the province was a powerful predisposing and, later, continuing factor in the maintenance and enforcement of the anti-British boycott. The Hongkong Governor in Council, it will be recalled, prohibited the exportation of \"rice, flour, tinned or preserved food-stuffs, gold and silver coin in amounts exceeding five dollars and gold and silver bullion, and banknotes of every description in amounts exceeding five dollars.' This prohibition became known in Canton within a few hours of the tragedy of June 23, and whatever may have been its actual purpose and aim--it was then interpreted and continued so to be interpreted as a financial and economic blockade of Canton and the rest of the province which had hitherto depended on Hongkong for supplies of rice and other food-stuffs.\n\nIn a sense, it may be said that this Hongkong severance of economic relations with Canton suggested the precise form in which patriotic retaliation for June 23 should express itself.\n\nAnd if the anti-British boycott did not soon follow the course of other apparently similar manifestations of popular feeling in the past, one of the main reasons was that the movement came immediately to be envisaged as a means of effective defence against what Chinese Nationalists were led to understand as a British attempt, based on Hongkong, to starve and crush Canton as the centre of Nationalist doctrine and activity.\n\nBut there is a more concrete reason why the anti-British boycott has been so long sustained. It is on record that my Government made repeated attempts to have the question of June 23 settled. And in reply to one of these attempts, the then British Consul-General stated that his Government could not entertain the demands formulated for a settlement of the question. These demands were conceived and formulated in the unusual circumstances immediately following the shooting of June 23, and they included terms which my Government, actuated by a sincere desire to arrive at a satisfactory settlement, is prepared to review in order that nothing incompatible with the real dignity and interest of Great Britain as a trading power in China shall continue to obstruct the path of settlement.\n\nBefore communicating these new terms of settlement, we wish to have the views of the British delegation on this presentation and definition of the anti-British boycott issue.\n\nNo. 4.\n\nBRITISH COMMUNIQUÉ\n\nRELATING TO THE\n\nMEETINGS OF MONDAY, WEDNESDAY AND FRIDAY, THE 19TH, 21ST AND 23RD JULY, 1926,\n\nWITH TWO ANNEXURES.\n\nThe conference for the settlement of Chinese-British disputes in the Liang-Kuang resumed its sittings on Monday the 19th July, when the British delegation replied to the statement of the Chinese delegation on the origin of the anti-British boycott. The Conference adjourned until Wednesday the 21st July.\n\nThe conference resumed its sittings on Wednesday the 21st July, as arranged.\n\nThe Chinese delegation replied to the statement made by the British delegation at the meeting of the 19th July, and then proceeded to make two alternative proposals for the settlement of the boycott. One was the appointment of an international commission of enquiry to determine the question of responsibility for the Shakee incident of the 23rd June, 1925. The alternative proposal was that the financial burden which the settlement of the boycott would entail on the Canton Government should be shared by the British. Translated into practical details this proposed sharing of the burden proved to be a demand for (a) compensation to the relatives of those killed at Shakee, and (b) some form of compensation to the strikers.\n\nThe British delegation immediately and emphatically rejected the demand for compensation to the strikers, and this refusal was treated by the Chinese delegation as disposing of the whole of their second alternative proposal.\n\nPage 344",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-493 - Governor Sir Clementi - 1926 [6-8].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 503276,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-493 - Governor Sir Clementi - 1926 [6-8]",
        "page_number": 351,
        "title": "CO129-493 - Governor Sir Clementi - 1926 [6-8]",
        "content_text": "No. 9.\n\nSECOND CHINESE COMMUNIQUÉ.\n\n(EXTRACTED FROM THE CANTON GAZETTE OF THURSDAY, THE 22ND JULY, 1926.)\n\nThe Conference resumed this morning (Wednesday) at 10.30 when the Chinese delegation replied to the British statement read at the last sitting on July 19. This was followed by the Chinese delegation outlining two proposals in the following terms:\n\n\"Since the Chinese delegation affirm that the British are in the wrong on the three points stated in our first statement, namely, (1) the Shameen-Shakee shooting, (2) the Blockade of Canton by Hongkong, and (3) the Refusal of Negotiation implied in the summary rejection of the demands formulated by the Nationalist Government immediately after the shooting, and since the British delegation deny being in the wrong, it is clear that this Conference is to entrust a third party in the form of an impartial court of enquiry to decide the controversial issue involved. The Nationalist Government will abide by the findings of an impartial court of enquiry. We hope that the British delegation will take the same attitude.\n\n\"If, however, the British delegation is desirous, without waiting for further enquiry, of bringing about the resumption of normal relations between Hongkong and the territories of the Nationalist Government (Kuangtung, Kuangsi, Hunan) as quickly as possible, the Chinese delegation, likewise desirous of resuming such relations at the earliest date, propose that the burden arising from an immediate settlement of the Anti-British Boycott be shared by both parties. That burden is (1) The Chinese people who have sustained the boycott for a year must be given adequate guarantees that in the future there will be no repetition of the action of June 23, 1925. These guarantees lie in regulating the garrisoning of the Shameen and in regulating the navigation and stationing of British gunboats on the river system of the territories of the Nationalist Government. (2) The bereaved families of the dead and the wounded on June 23, 1925, have to be consoled and compensated on the basis of full justice. And (3) the large unemployment in consequence of the break of normal relations between Hongkong and Kuangtung, which has been a serious problem and continues to be one, requires large sums of money to be raised for its solution in order to remove serious obstacles in the way of a resumption of normal relations between the Colony and the territories of the Nationalist Government.\n\n**It is clear that if both sides are actuated by the same desire to arrive at an amicable settlement, both sides must be prepared to make serious concessions.**\n\nIn reply to the first proposal for an impartial court of enquiry, the British delegation stated that they would have to consult their Government. And as regards the second proposal for a sharing of the burden arising from an immediate settlement of the Anti-British Boycott, they rejected the same and categorically declared that no settlement involving the payment of compensation could be entertained by them.\n\nThe Chinese delegation thereupon proposed that, pending the holding of the suggested court of enquiry, a loan might be raised, partly through its own resources and partly by Hongkong, to enable the Nationalist Government to meet the heavy financial burden involved in an immediate settlement of the Anti-British Boycott, and that the Hongkong section of such loan would also be repaid if the court of enquiry decided in favour of the British. This proposal was also rejected by the British delegation.\n\nThe Chinese delegation then inquired if the British delegation had any proposal to make. The latter stated that they were prepared to agree to a settlement of the dispute in the form of an industrial loan for the development of the Port of Whampoa conditional on the construction of the loopline connecting the Canton-Hankow and Canton-Kowloon railways and provisions of control similar to those in the Canton-Kowloon Railway Agreement regarding the employment of a British Engineer-in-chief and Accountant. The British delegation intimated that they were ready to consider alternative industrial enterprises like the building of a railway to Bias Bay or to Swatow. The Chinese delegation replied that they would have to take time to consider this British proposal.\n\nCanton, July 21, 1926.\n\nNo. 10.\n\nTHIRD CHINESE COMMUNIQUÉ\n\n(EXTRACTED FROM THE CANTON GAZETTE OF TUESDAY, THE 27TH JULY, 1926.)\n\nCanton, July 23.-The Conference resumed this morning at 10.30 a.m. when the British delegation read the following statement:-\n\nThe British delegation do not propose to prepare any written reply to the statement read on behalf of the Chinese delegation at the meeting on the 21st July. They refrain from doing so because they feel that it would involve further historical discussion which would at the present stage serve no useful purpose. They prefer to discuss verbally any actual proposals for the settlement of the boycott.”\n\nThe Chinese delegation also read the following statement, elaborating their proposal for a Court or a Commission of Enquiry which was made at the last meeting on July 21-\n\n\"The Chinese and the British delegation have, in their respective statements, defined the anti-British boycott issue in terms which now necessitate resort to an impartial Commission of Enquiry for its settlement. The Chinese delegation formally propose that\n\n“(a) such a Commission of Enquiry be constituted.\n\n\"(b) the Commission is to be made up of a Chinese and a British member with a Chairman to be agreed upon, whose country is not directly involved in the dispute,\n\n(c) the Commission shall be empowered to determine the question of responsibility for the Shameen-Shakee shooting on June 23, 1925 and to make recommendations for the complete and final settlement of the resulting anti-British boycott in the Liang-Kuang,\n\n\"(d) the Nationalist Government and the British (including the Hongkong) Government agree to be bound by the findings of the Commission and to carry out and enforce any and all recommendations made by it,\n\n\"(e) the Commission is to be opened at the earliest possible date and\n\n\"(f) in order to meet possible difficulties of the British in the case of witnesses who have already made written statements to them on the case and who are dead or cannot be traced or otherwise cannot attend before the Commission, such statements can be submitted at the enquiry.\"\n\nThe British delegation raised the question of including the French in the Enquiry on the ground that it was impossible to exclude them since they took part in the shooting of June 23, 1925. The Chinese delegation replied that the question of French participation in the shooting was a Chinese-French issue which they preferred to keep separate from and not to join it with the question of British responsibility in the matter; but if the British insisted, the Chinese delegation had no objection to the inclusion or participation of the French in the Enquiry. In this case, the British would have to take the necessary steps to secure the consent of the French to their participation in the proposed Enquiry. The British delegation contended that such consent should be secured by the Chinese, but the Chinese delegation declined to accept this responsibility.\n\nBesides raising other points (which the Chinese delegation replied to), the British delegation inquired whether, pending the holding of the Enquiry, the anti-British boycott was to continue. As the boycott is an organised patriotic movement which no exercise or application of mere force could successfully and finally terminate even if the Nationalist Government were to attempt its forcible suppression in total disregard of all vital nationalist interests, the Chinese delegation therefore replied that the continuance of the anti-British boycott was inevitable in the circumstances arising from the British delegation's rejection of the Chinese proposal for a sharing of the burden involved in an immediate resumption of normal relations between the British and the Chinese people in the Liang-Kuang.\n\nPage 349",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-493 - Governor Sir Clementi - 1926 [6-8].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 504186,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-495 - Governor Sir Clementi - 1926 [11-12]",
        "page_number": 56,
        "title": "CO129-495 - Governor Sir Clementi - 1926 [11-12]",
        "content_text": "ENCLOSURE NO. 2.\n\nTranslation.\n\nWarning to our merchants re British Goods Enquiry Forms,\n\n23rd.\n\n55\n\nOur merchants! More than a year has elapsed since the great massacre of May 30th at Shanghai and of June 23rd at Shaki. Our insult has not yet been avenged, and our grievance has not yet been redressed. How painful we are! The murderous British Imperialists, though they have been attacked by the Canton-Hong Kong strikers, have never had any desire for settlement. Of late, they have again adopted the \"Gun-boat Policy\" and threatened us Chinese with another massacre. The incident of Wansien, more than 1000 men were killed, and the loss of property and wealth amounted to millions of dollars.\n\nThe menace committed by British gun-boats on the Canton River on the 4th September was witnessed by us all.\n\nAs the Canton-Hong Kong strikers have changed their policy and have automatically given up their armed blockade, the responsibility of Anti-British boycott has now rested on the shoulders of the people of the whole province. Therefore, the peasants, workmen, merchants, students, and soldiers of the whole province have now organised the Anti-British Economic Boycott Extension Commission, and have resolved to enforce the rules for suppressing purchase and sale of British goods and circulation of British bank-notes, and to carry out the Anti-British economic boycott. In the first step, enquiries will be made as to British goods the various shops in the City have in stock, and then to fix a time for their clearance and to suppress further purchase.\n\nOur merchants: The blood stains of May 30th and June 23rd are still fresh, and the flesh of our martyrs has not yet cooled. If we are not cold-blooded betrayers, we must boycott the British Imperialists automatically and seriously, overthrow them, and revenge the wrongs of our victims.\n\nTherefore, we must beg that you merchants, on receipt of the Enemy Goods Enquiry Form, will immediately make us a report without...",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-495 - Governor Sir Clementi - 1926 [11-12].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 504190,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-495 - Governor Sir Clementi - 1926 [11-12]",
        "page_number": 60,
        "title": "CO129-495 - Governor Sir Clementi - 1926 [11-12]",
        "content_text": "Circular.\n\n59\n\nTo\n\nAll shops,\n\nThe British Imperialists are our great enemies who massacred our fellow-countrymen on the 30th of May and the 23rd of June. Our great grievance and wrongs have not yet been redressed despite the lapse of a year. Of late, the British Imperialists have again adopted the \"Gun-boat Policy\" in order to commit massacre again. The challenge they made on the Canton River shows their aim, and no tragedy has ever been heard which is so serious as that in Wansion. If we raise no opposition, our race will be annihilated. Recently, the Canton Hong Kong strikers have changed their policy and have automatically given up their armed blockade. Thus the responsibility of Anti-British Boycott will in future rest on the shoulders of us people. Therefore the various Associations of peasants, workmen, merchants, students and soldiers in this City have organized the Anti-British Economic Boycott Extension Commission to continue our Anti-British movement, in order that we may get the tragedies of May 30th and June 23rd redressed in a proper manner. Now the Anti-British Economic Boycott Extension Commission has fixed the first of November for beginning their enquiries as to British goods the various shops in the City have in stock, so that an estimate can be made and a time fixed for their clearance and for the suppression of further purchase. Our merchants have never been behind in patriotism and in love of their fellow-countrymen, and have shown great sympathy with Anti-British boycott. Surely they will have no objection to our undertaking. They should fill the enquiry form immediately on receipt of it without reserve or hesitation, so that they may suffer no loss. This is specially made for the information of all.\n\nCanton\n\nPage 60\n\nPage 61",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-495 - Governor Sir Clementi - 1926 [11-12].txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 507684,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-500-4 Canton situation- governor's despatches 15-9-1927 - 24-11-1927",
        "page_number": 18,
        "title": "CO129-500-4 Canton situation- governor's despatches 15-9-1927 - 24-11-1927",
        "content_text": "## Enclosure No. 4.\n\n**Translation**\n\n18\n\n**(Extract from Kwok Man San Man, Canton, 15th September, 1927)**\n\n**Notice by the Anti-British Boycott Commission enforcing examination of British goods.**\n\nImportation of British goods stopped from today.\n\n**(From the Chung Kwok She News Agency)**\n\nIn order to carry out the Anti-British Boycott which is to commence today (15th September) and to stop all sale and importation of British goods, the Commission for the Extension of the Anti-British Boycott yesterday (the 14th September) issued an urgent notice which reads as follows:\n\n**In the matter of a notice:**\n\nIn October last year we altered our policy from that of the blockade of Hong Kong to one of an extended Anti-British Boycott, with the object of dealing a fatal blow at the British Imperialists. Our Commission was then established and in the year succeeding our work has been noticeably successful. Later the Party Purification Movement necessitated a re-organisation in the Committee and various boards of the Commission, and in consequence our work was to some extent impeded, and a quantity of British goods was smuggled in by the merchants. This has led the British Imperialists to entertain the mistaken idea that our patriotism cannot endure for longer than 5 minutes. Being of the opinion that we will submit to oppression, their fury has again blazed forth: their brutal conduct is again in evidence. Lately they committed an outrage at Do Shing and caused a massacre at Tai Ping. If such can be tolerated, there is nothing we will not endure. Nobody with any sense of shame can refrain from being so indignant that his hairs will bristle and his heart be grieved.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-500-4 Canton situation- governor's despatches 15-9-1927 - 24-11-1927.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 507730,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-500-4 Canton situation- governor's despatches 15-9-1927 - 24-11-1927",
        "page_number": 64,
        "title": "CO129-500-4 Canton situation- governor's despatches 15-9-1927 - 24-11-1927",
        "content_text": "- 2 -\n\n64\n\nOur National Revolutionary Armies, since they were sent out on the Northern Expedition, have achieved repeated victories and have conquered all enemies before them. Our National Revolutionary influences have developed throughout China from the province of Kwong Tung. We then made a change in our policy, and resolved to adopt in lieu of our Blockade Policy, a National Anti-British Boycott, laying on the shoulders of all masses in China the anti-British responsibility that was before borne alone by the Canton and Hong Kong strikers. This caused a greater pressure on British Imperialism.\n\nLater the purification of our Kuomintang was to be effected, and as various classes had to settle the questions of our Party, they had no time to attend to the work of the Commission for the Anti-British Boycott, which, as shown by facts, has been gradually slackened. The British Imperialists, on the contrary, thought that we had not enthusiasm for five minutes and could not hold out any longer. Thereupon they took it that we could be oppressed, and being animated by brutal cruelty, they committed the incident at Do-sing, which was a very great insult to our masses and the prestige of our nation.\n\nIce melts gradually, and so the tragedies of May the 30th and June the 23rd will surely lead to more serious incidents. As the British Imperialists are so wicked and have never ceased exploiting us, our race will all be annihilated in future.\n\nThe Anti-British Boycott Conference of all Classes has its great mission and should not leave the incident unnoticed. We should at once organize an Examination Committee and begin to examine all British goods from the 15th.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-500-4 Canton situation- governor's despatches 15-9-1927 - 24-11-1927.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 508447,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-501-8 General policy in China 30-11-1926 - 30-11-1926",
        "page_number": 41,
        "title": "CO129-501-8 General policy in China 30-11-1926 - 30-11-1926",
        "content_text": "- 3 - \n\n## 4.\n\nTo remedy the laxity and impose a restraint on evil intention, the co-operation of the Chinese Maritime Customs was invoked and Sir Robert Hart assisted to the extent of putting foreign officers on board the steam cruisers, with no control or responsibility, but charged with the duty of restraining these craft from committing illegal actions.\n\nThe Hong Kong community, however, continued to have a feeling of exasperation at this interference with the Colony's trade and protests were frequent. But in December, 1879, at a conference with the Hong Kong Chamber of Commerce, Sir Thomas Wade, His Majesty's Minister at Peking, declared that \"the blockade stations would not be removed by the Chinese until the Colony devised some scheme by which the Chinese Government could collect the revenue fairly due to them.\" This was held in Hong Kong to be a demand to sacrifice the freedom of the port, in order to gain the removal of the blockade.\n\n## 5.\n\nMeanwhile on the 13th September, 1876, Sir T. Wade and Li Hung-chang had signed the Chefoo Convention, the 7th article of which was as follows:- \"The Governor of Hong Kong having long complained of the interference of the Canton Customs Revenue Cruisers with the junk trade of that Colony, the Chinese Government agrees to the appointment of a Commission, to consist of a British Consul, an officer of the Hong Kong Government, and a Chinese official of equal rank, in order to the establishment of some system that shall enable the Chinese Government to protect its revenue without prejudice to the interests of the Colony\". There was a long delay in giving effect to this article; but at last",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-501-8 General policy in China 30-11-1926 - 30-11-1926.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 509411,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-502-7 China- general situation 4-3-1927 - 26-4-1927",
        "page_number": 102,
        "title": "CO129-502-7 China- general situation 4-3-1927 - 26-4-1927",
        "content_text": "# \n\n## 3\n\n### 1/2\n\n2 \n\nforeigners in Canton. I have no doubt, however, that if the Cantonese thought they could push us out of the concessions without too much difficulty the mob would be encouraged to make the attempt. It is only the fear of the consequences which prevents the attempt being made. The Nationalist Government cannot run the risk of having their base blockaded whilst their northern campaign is still in the balance.\n\n4. It is obvious, however, that this is neither a safe nor a desirable basis on which to continue the possession of Shameen. It was originally the desire of the Chinese authorities themselves that foreigners should be set apart in concessions. Their residence in the cities was strongly resented. In Canton it was for a long time absolutely prohibited, and the seclusion of the \"foreign devil\" in special areas was considered by the Chinese as the best way of dealing with an apparently necessary evil. Moreover, in order to secure this seclusion, they were willing to allow the foreigner to have municipal control over the area which had been set apart for him. The Chinese attitude of mind on the subject has undergone a great change in recent years. In Canton they no longer object to foreigners residing in the city. In fact, a number do reside there and in the suburbs, but, on the other hand, the Chinese now strongly resent foreign municipal control over any part of Chinese soil as an infringement of their country's sovereign rights. For this reason they are determined to regain possession of the concessions, and, as things are shaping at present, it looks as though they will succeed, in one way or another, before very long, at all events so far as the smaller places are concerned.\n\n5. To return to Shameen, although, owing to the fact that it is an island, it could probably be held against a mob, or perhaps even for some time against a military attack, it is clear that if the Nationalist Government are determined to resume control over the concession area they could, by more peaceful means, speedily make our continued possession of the island impossible, or at least unprofitable. It would not be difficult to reimpose the boycott and blockade of Shameen in a more stringent form than before. The electric light, which is derived from a Chinese company in the city, could be cut off. This was not done during the recent troubles, and although there is an emergency dynamo in the concession, I am told that it would only be sufficient for street lighting. The island has its own waterworks, but a few shots through the water-tower would put it out of commission and we should be reduced to drinking boiled river water, which near Shameen is practically liquid sewage. Moreover, whereas during the last boycott British subjects were permitted to move freely about the city and were so enabled by surreptitious means to do a certain amount of business, it could be made dangerous for them to leave the shelter of the island, and their trade would then really come to an end. All this could be done without any overt act on the part of the Canton Government, who would, as before, assert that they were unable to suppress a patriotic manifestation of national feeling. A mob attack repulsed with bloodshed would almost certainly bring about such a state of affairs.\n\n6. If, then, the Chinese are determined to get back the concessions, their wishes will have to be met sooner or later, and I venture to suggest that it is better to start negotiations voluntarily to this end whilst we are still in possession, and so get better terms than we could obtain after we have been driven out. In this connection please see Foreign Office telegram to me No. 1 of the 15th January. As such negotiations are contemplated in your telegram to the Foreign Office No. 6 of the 3rd January, I presume that you will wish to have my views on the extent to which our control over the British concession in Shameen can safely be relinquished to the Chinese authorities.\n\n7. Full information regarding the origins of the concession and the title by which we hold it are in the possession of the Legation and the Foreign Office, and it is not necessary for me to go over that ground. It may be useful, however, to explain once more that Shameen is a small flat island, about a mile and a quarter round, bounded on one side by the river and separated from the mainland on the other by a creek about 100 feet wide. A plan of the island is enclosed.* The British concession occupies four-fifths, whilst one-fifth at the eastern end constitutes the French concession. The two areas are only divided by an imaginary line. The island is rather like a London park, with its cement walks, avenues of trees and grass lawns, although of course it has more houses. It is joined to the mainland by two bridges with steps which prevent the passage of wheeled vehicles, and, in fact, no wheeled vehicles, except bicycles, are allowed on the island by the concession bye-laws.\n\n8. There are a number of fine buildings, including banks, offices and residences, and there are several warehouses, mostly belonging to the banks, in which raw silk in large quantities is deposited against loans. At the present moment there is between 8,000,000 and 9,000,000 dollars' worth of silk on the island. There are no industrial concerns beyond a small Boda water factory belonging to A. S. Watson and Co. (Limited), and no Chinese other than the servants and employees of foreigners are allowed to reside in the concessions. Chinese, however, can come in and out freely, and the restrictions on their use of the bund and the bund seats have been tacitly dropped since the boycott without any noticeable inconvenience to the residents.\n\n9. I enclose a memorandum supplied by the Municipal Council giving detailed figures regarding the population and value of property in the concession and the personnel of the administration. There is a total population of 1,230, of whom 116 are British and 126 are Japanese. The total value of land and buildings is about 19,536,405 dollars, of which 9,753,170 dollars is held by British subjects, 1,708,075 dollars by Japanese and 1,041,788 dollars by Americans. The administrative machine consists of five counsellors, who are local merchants and give their services gratis, with a staff of one paid British secretary and thirty-one Chinese employees, whilst the police force comprises one English captain superintendent, nineteen Indians and twenty-three Chinese.\n\n10. It will thus be seen that, while the British concession on Shameen contains valuable property, its administration is not a very large or complicated affair, and that it is not beyond the ability of the Canton Government, who after all administer a large city not too badly, to take it over and run it, if they wish, in a manner sufficiently acceptable to the foreign residents. The danger would not be, as in Shanghai, a general deterioration of all public services, because there is none to speak of on Shameen, and the substitution of Chinese for foreign police need not, I think, cause any serious alarm so far as the protection of life and property against ordinary crime is concerned.\n\n11. Provided satisfactory arrangements can be made for the exchange of Chinese perpetual leases for the existing Crown leases, it seems to me that the chief dangers to be apprehended after the surrender of the concession are the imposition of heavy taxation on real property and the exposure of the residents to mob violence in times of anti-foreign disturbance. As regards the former, the Canton authorities are now demanding the re-registration of all title deeds for land outside the concession, for which a fee of 2 per cent. ad valorem is charged, and thereafter it is their intention to collect an annual land tax of considerable amount. I have not yet got full particulars of the scheme, but hope to obtain them shortly. This procedure would also be applied to concession properties once they came under Chinese control, unless the matter were made the subject of special agreement at the time of the surrender. Moreover, in course of time, an attempt would be made to levy business and other taxes from which foreigners living in concessions are now free, but I gather from your telegram to the Foreign Office, No. ... of the 3rd January, that the subjection of British subjects to Chinese municipal taxation, if regularly imposed, is in any case contemplated. Nevertheless, I think an effort should be made to secure a very definite understanding regarding the taxation to be levied in the concession area, as otherwise property owners will be subjected to all sorts of extortion in legal guise. On the other hand, it is thought by the well-informed that land values in the concession will increase as soon as Chinese are allowed to buy and a free market is opened to property owners. Land on the Chinese bund adjacent to the concession is worth more than on Shameen.\n\n12. The question of mob violence in times of trouble is also a serious one, but nowadays it is a moot point whether in an anti-foreign agitation it is safer to have a concession or not. The concession, it is true, provides a place which can be defended for a while against the mob whilst women and children are evacuated, but on the other hand it forms a target for attack and is a standing provocation to all the agitators and extremists who preach the abolition of foreign privilege. Moreover, if, as at Hankow and in a lesser degree in Canton, many of the foreign residents live outside the concession, the use of firearms in the defence of the latter imperils the lives of the people outside. Questions of national prestige also invest the protection of these areas with an importance unwarranted, in some cases at least, by their intrinsic value.\n\n13. I have long been of the opinion that the smaller concessions are a danger in the present state of Chinese feeling, and that we should be wise to return them to Chinese control. If this were done voluntarily, it would be easier to stipulate for sufficient foreign, and preferably international, participation in the municipal government to prevent the undue misappropriation of the municipal revenues, and to secure such other safeguards as may be considered essential. Things would not be so ... \n\nPage 363 \n\n[34 z-5] \n\nB",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-502-7 China- general situation 4-3-1927 - 26-4-1927.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 509495,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-502-7 China- general situation 4-3-1927 - 26-4-1927",
        "page_number": 186,
        "title": "CO129-502-7 China- general situation 4-3-1927 - 26-4-1927",
        "content_text": "## 205\n\n7 G\n\nAn appreciable measure of agreement had been reached with regard to the general Convention for the Reduction and Limitation of Armaments.\n\n**SIR AUSTEN CHAMBERLAIN** said that, if a suitable opportunity offered, he would suggest this course at the meeting of the Council of the League.\n\n**SIR PHILIP CUNLIFFE-LISTER** pointed out that if a proposal was put forward whereby the publication of information would not be confined only to Private Manufacture, but would cover Government Manufacture as well, the other Powers, represented at Geneva, would probably refuse to be a party to any such Convention, and the whole proposal would fall through.\n\n## CONCLUSIONS\n\n**THE COMMITTEE OF IMPERIAL DEFENCE** agreed-\n\n(i) That the Report of the Sub-Committee on the Control of Private Manufacture of Arms, Ammunition and Implements of War should be brought before the Committee of Imperial Defence before Lord Cecil's departure for Geneva (fixed for the 12th March).\n\n(ii) That if a suitable opportunity offers the Foreign Secretary should suggest at the forthcoming meeting of the Council of the League of Nations that the consideration of any Convention regarding the Control of the Private Manufacture of Arms and Ammunition and Implements of War should be postponed until such time as an appreciable measure of agreement had been reached in regard to the Convention for the Reduction and Limitation of Armaments.\n\n### (C.) Proposals of the Government of the United States in regard to a Conference for the Further Limitation of Naval Armaments\n\n(`C.I.D. Paper No. 775-B`)\n\n(Previous Reference: `C.I.D. Minutes of the 216th Meeting, Minute 7`)\n\n**MR. BRIDGEMAN** raised the question of the procedure which was to be adopted at Geneva in regard to President Coolidge's proposals. He understood that the Preparatory Commission would continue its deliberations as though no proposals had been made by President Coolidge, and that either these deliberations would lead to some agreement or else would arrive at a deadlock. If a deadlock occurred he presumed that a separate Conference of the Naval Powers would be held at Geneva to consider Naval Armaments. Supposing, however, that France and Italy refused to take part in this separate Conference, he suggested that a Conference between America, Japan and England should take place in London.\n\n**SIR AUSTEN CHAMBERLAIN** considered that the Conference must be held at Geneva, and that Mr. Coolidge had definitely specified Geneva as the venue to show that he was not setting up a rival Conference to that which was already sitting under the auspices of the League of Nations.\n\n**MR. BRIDGEMAN** said that he was particularly anxious to avoid any risk of the Conference on Naval Armaments breaking down, and for this reason he thought it might be advisable to change the meeting place from Geneva to London.\n\n**LORD CECIL** considered that the meeting of the Preparatory Commission would end in April either in agreement on a Convention or in a break-down. He did not think that there was any half-way house between these two alternatives. If the Preparatory Commission failed to reach an agreement in April then there would presumably be a general adjournment, in which case the way would be clear for the Conference proposed by President Coolidge to meet in Geneva in June. If the Preparatory Commission succeeded in agreeing upon a skeleton Convention, it would mean that a Conference would have to be assembled towards the end of the present year, when discussions would take place as to the figures which were to be inserted in the skeleton Convention. It would then be possible for any agreements as to figures regarding Naval Armaments which had already been reached in the Conference suggested by President Coolidge to be inserted in the skeleton Convention, and, in the meantime, these agreements could be made operative as between the Powers concerned.\n\n**SIR AUSTEN CHAMBERLAIN** stated that the Italian Ambassador had been at some pains to indicate that the Italian answer to President Coolidge's proposals was not necessarily final. Italy did not wish to take part in fresh conversations on Naval Armaments unless she was assured that she would be given parity with France in regard to small ships. Relations between France and Italy had been somewhat strained at Washington, and a repetition of such relations would create considerable ill-will between these two countries. If, however, Mussolini could secure a guarantee that he would be given parity with France, he would be willing to join in the Conference. He enquired whether, in the view of the Admiralty, Italy should have equality with France in regard to her Naval Armaments.\n\n**LORD BEATTY** considered that Italy would be perfectly justified in claiming such equality.\n\n## CONCLUSIONS\n\n**THE COMMITTEE OF IMPERIAL DEFENCE** agreed—\n\n(1) To take note of the proposals of the Government of the U.S.A. for a Conference on the further Limitation of Naval Armaments, and the Conclusions of the Cabinet in regard to these proposals (`C.I.D. Paper No. 775-B`).\n\n(2) That the arrangements for the Conference suggested by President Coolidge must depend upon the course of events with regard to the General Convention for the Reduction and Limitation of Armaments as a whole. But that so far as could at present be foreseen the procedure to be followed would be:-\n\n| Event | Procedure |\n| --- | --- |\n| (a) Failure to secure agreement in regard to the outlines of the General Convention | The Conference proposed by President Coolidge should be assembled either at Geneva or Washington, as the circumstances at the time should indicate. |\n| (b) Agreement being secured in regard to the outlines of the General Convention | (i) The Conference suggested by President Coolidge would take place at Geneva, and any agreements in regard to the details of Naval Armaments reached by this Conference would be incorporated in the General Convention. |\n|  | (ii) That the agreements reached at the Conference suggested by President Coolidge would be put into operation without awaiting the conclusion of the General Convention as a whole. |\n\n(Note. The Japanese Government has indicated that it will not be in a position to participate in a Conference on Naval Armaments before June 1927.)\n\n### (2.)-CHINA.-POSSIBILITIES OF EXERTING ECONOMIC PRESSURE ON THE NATIONALIST GOVERNMENT OF SOUTH CHINA\n\n(`C.I.D. Paper No. 771-B`)\n\n(Previous References: `C.I.D. Minutes of the 218th Meeting, Minute 18 (A)`, and paragraph 3 of `C.I.D. Paper No. 764-B`, which was taken note of at the `220th Meeting, Minute 9 (c)`)\n\n**THE COMMITTEE** had under consideration a Report of the Advisory Committee on Trading and Blockade on the possibilities of exerting economic pressure on the Nationalist Government of South China (`C.I.D. Paper No. 771-B`).\n\n## 206",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-502-7 China- general situation 4-3-1927 - 26-4-1927.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 519294,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-517-1 Administration and function of Chinese Maritime customs- prevention of smuggling across Chinese frontiers 7-2-1929 - 15-11-1929",
        "page_number": 86,
        "title": "CO129-517-1 Administration and function of Chinese Maritime customs- prevention of smuggling across Chinese frontiers 7-2-1929 - 15-11-1929",
        "content_text": "## -3- \n\nTo remedy the objection to \"the blockade\", it was considered necessary to check the laxity and impose a restraint on evil intention. The co-operation of the Chinese Maritime Customs was invoked, and Sir Robert Hart assisted to the extent of putting foreign officers on board the steam cruisers, with no control or responsibility, but charged with the duty of restraining these craft from committing illegal actions.\n\nThe Hong Kong community, however, continued to have a feeling of exasperation at this interference with the Colony's trade, and protests were frequent. But in December, 1879, at a conference with the Hong Kong Chamber of Commerce, Sir Thomas Wade, His Majesty's Minister at Peking, declared that \"the blockade stations would not be removed by the Chinese until the Colony devised some scheme by which the Chinese Government could collect the revenue fairly due to them\". This was held in Hong Kong to be a demand to sacrifice the freedom of the port, in order to gain the removal of the blockade.\n\nMeanwhile, on the 13th September, 1876, Sir T. Wade and Li Hung-chang had signed the Chefoo Convention, the 7th article of which was as follows: - \"The Governor of Hong Kong having long complained of the interference of the Canton Customs Revenue Cruisers with the junk trade of that Colony, the Chinese Government agrees to the appointment of a Commission, to consist of a British Consul, an officer of the Hong Kong Government, and a Chinese...",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-517-1 Administration and function of Chinese Maritime customs- prevention of smuggling across Chinese frontiers 7-2-1929 - 15-11-1929.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 521928,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930",
        "page_number": 89,
        "title": "CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930",
        "content_text": "SECTION I\n\n88\n\nMEMORANDUM ON THE HONGKONG CUSTOMS AGREEMENT.\n\n1.\n\nSummary of the History of the question.\n\n1. The question of the use of Hongkong as a base for smuggling into China is not a new one. It goes back at any rate for sixty years, for it was as early as 1868 that the so-called \"fiscal blockade\" of Hongkong by the Chinese became an acute issue. Although these measures were highly obnoxious to the people of Hongkong, the right of the Chinese to take them until such time as the smuggling were checked and suitable measures taken to protect the Chinese revenues, was not questioned by H.M.G. In 1887 an officer of the Chinese Maritime Customs was, by virtue of the Opium Agreement of 1886, and as a belated result of Article 7 of the Chefoo Convention of 1876, providing for the appointment of a joint commission (to establish some system to enable the Chinese Government to protect its revenue without prejudice to the interests of the Colony), first allowed to function at Kowloon, with an office in Hongkong. To this day, however, he is still only unofficially recognised by the Government of the Colony. At the same time (1887), the four stations already existing for the control of traffic in the delta were placed under his control.\n\nAs a consequence, however,",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 522050,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930",
        "page_number": 211,
        "title": "CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930",
        "content_text": "# SECTION I\n\n# 1.\n\n## MEMORANDUM ON THE HONGKONG CUSTOMS AGREEMENT.\n\n### Summary of the History of the question.\n\n1. The question of the use of Hongkong as a base for smuggling into China is not a new one. It goes back at any rate for sixty years, for it was as early as 1868 that the so-called \"fiscal blockade\" of Hongkong by the Chinese became an acute issue. Although these measures were highly obnoxious to the people of Hongkong, the right of the Chinese to take them until such time as the smuggling were checked and suitable measures taken to protect the Chinese revenues, was not questioned by H.M.G.\n\nIn 1887 an officer of the Chinese Maritime Customs was, by virtue of the Opium Agreement of 1886, and as a belated result of Article 7 of the Chefoo Convention of 1876, providing for the appointment of a joint commission (to establish some system to enable the Chinese Government to protect its revenue without prejudice to the interests of the Colony), first allowed to function at Kowloon, with an office in Hongkong. To this day, however, he is still only unofficially recognised by the Government of the Colony.\n\nAt the same time (1887), the four stations already existing for the control of traffic in the delta were placed under his control.\n\nAs a consequence, however,",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 522264,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930",
        "page_number": 425,
        "title": "CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930",
        "content_text": "RELATIONS BETWEEN HONGKONG AND THE\n\nCHINESE CUSTOMS.\n\n427\n\n§1. War of 1839-1842. Treaty of Chuenpi, 1841. Proposed collection of Chinese Customs dues and duties in Hongkong. § 2. Palmerston's attitude to this proposal. § 3. Arrangements made by Sir Henry Pottinger to safeguard China's revenue rights. Treaty of Hoomun Chai, 1843. § 4. Failure of Treaty of Hoomun Chai. Growth of coasting trade under foreign flags. § 5. Treaty of Tientsin, 1858. Prevalence of smuggling at Hongkong. Establishment by Canton authorities of Customs stations round Hongkong and of preventive service of revenue cruisers. § 6. Alcock's Convention, 1869. Proposal to allow a Chinese Consul to function in Hongkong. §7. Opposition of Hongkong to Customs blockade and to discriminatory trade taxation. Commission of inquiry called for by Chefoo Convention of 1876. § 8. Hongkong Opium Agreement, 1886. Control of Customs stations round Hongkong and of revenue cruisers handed over to Chinese Maritime Customs Service. Removal of discriminatory trade taxation. § 9. Extension of Kowloon Territory, 1898. Sir Robert Hart's proposals for Chinese Customs control. § 10. Establishment of Customs stations on new frontier. Greatly increased difficulties of Chinese Customs control. § 11. Mackay Treaty, 1902. Article equalising duties on goods whether carried by junk or by steamer. Imperial Edict of September 1906 ordering gradual cessation of opium trade. Hongkong Government requests and obtains help of Chinese Customs in organising system of bonding of alcohol and spirits. § 12. Proposed Customs agreement with Hongkong: 1911 draft. Chinese Customs permitted to function in Hongkong territory at Kowloon railway terminus. § 13. Revival of proposed agreement: 1918 draft. Negotiations at Hongkong and Peking. § 14. Hongkong Government withdraws its consent on account of salt clause. § 15. Boycott of Hongkong in 1925. Levy of Washington surtaxes at Chinese treaty ports, 1926. Introduction of China's first National Import Tariff, 1929. Consequent growth of smuggling. § 16. Renewal of negotiations in July 1929 on proposed Customs agreement. Visit of Inspector General to Hongkong. § 17. Comparison of 1918 and 1929 drafts of agreement. § 18. Objection of Chinese Government to article granting inland waters steam navigation privileges to Hongkong vessels. § 19. Present position of negotiations. China obliged to renew blockade if agreement fails.\n\n§ 1. IN the late summer of 1840, during the war between Great Britain and China War of 1839-1842, (1839-1842), the Chinese Government appointed Kishen ([[1]]), then Viceroy of the metropolitan province of Chihli, to proceed to Canton in the capacity of Imperial Commissioner and Acting Viceroy of the Liang Kwang, and there to continue negotiations with the British for the cessation of hostilities and the resumption of trade. The result of these negotiations, precipitated by the British silencing of the batteries at Chuenpi (), was the issue on 20th January 1841 by Captain Charles Elliot, at that time Plenipotentiary for Great Britain in China and Chief Superintendent of Trade, of a notification informing all British subjects that preliminary arrangements for a treaty had been come to between himself and the Imperial Commissioner. One of the principal articles of this projected Treaty of Chuenpi provided Treaty of Chuen-pi, 1841. for the cession of the island and harbour of Hongkong to the British Crown, but at the same\n\n[[1]] *Chinese Repository, Vol. IX, 1840, pp. 412, 413, 423. + Ibid., Vol. X, 1841, p. 63 (vide Appendix A).\n\n1",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 522267,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930",
        "page_number": 428,
        "title": "CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930",
        "content_text": "432\n\n433\n\nl'revalence of\n\nsmuggling at Hongkong.\n\nEstablishment\n\nby Cantou\n\n(6)\n\n(then Mr.) Parkes (Article 6). The treaty, however, gave a decided impetus to the China trade generally. Some of the restrictions against which it had previously struggled might still exist to hamper it, but with a revised tariff, greater commercial facilities, and with Hongkong as a free port and a centre for trade operations, business ventures both lawful and unlawful could be carried on with much greater ease and security. Considering the circumstances, it was only to be expected that the altered condition of affairs, while fostering legitimate trade, should also tend directly to the encouragement of opium running and smuggling generally. The trade in opium especially offered strong temptations to clandestine trading. The new treaty, by one of the rules of trade (Rule 5) drawn up in pursuance of Article XXVI, had legalised the import of opium at a fairly high rate of duty, leaving all transport of the drug into the interior of the country entirely in the hands of the Chinese. Hongkong as a free port offered great facilities to those trading in this commodity, and while most of this business was conducted openly and in complete accordance with regulations, there was nevertheless, on account of the high rate of duty and the tempting profits to be made, a large amount of smuggling. Unfortunately, as the years passed the illegitimate trade grew to such proportions that in order to protect China's revenue rights and to deal with the very active smuggling in opium, salt, and munitions of war from Hongkong to China, which flourished exceedingly in the early sixties of last century, the Canton Viceroy Jui Lin (), anxious especially for his lawful revenue on opium, and after informing the British authorities in Canton and Hongkong, opened in 1868 on Chinese territory a number of stations on the east and the west sides of the Kowloon frontier for the purpose of preventive collection of likin on opium when conveyed in Chinese junks. Shortly afterwards the Hoppo, or Superintendent of Customs at Canton, who, in addition to being the colleague of the foreign Commissioner of Maritime Customs, was also in charge of the original Native Custom House and its stations levying dues and duties, distinct from likin, on native vessels and their cargoes, decided that as the Viceroy's likin barriers had been a great success he could not do better than imitate so worthy an example. Accordingly, he proceeded to establish an active patrol of revenue cruisers, and also to open stations for the collection of those dues and duties coming under his cognizance, these stations being either in close proximity to those already established by the Viceroy or functioning in the same building with them.* One of these stations was at Capsuimoon (*), to guard the entrance to the Canton river; another at Changchow (), on the route to Macao and the west coast; a third at Fotochow (), near the Lyeemoon () Pass, to watch the trade from and to the east; and a fourth at Kowloon city. Shortly before this, from 1st April 1864, the Chinese Government had cancelled the privilege which had been allowed till then of permitting the shipment of Chinese produce in Hongkong with the same advantages as obtained at a regular treaty port. The Hongkong authorities and Hongkong merchants protested against the withdrawal of this transhipment privilege and objected strongly to the Hoppo's stations and water patrol, which they designated\n\nauthorities of\n\nCustoms stations round Hongkong\n\nservice of revenue cruisers.\n\n* British Parliamentary Papers: \"Hongkong: Report of the Commission to enquire into the Circumstances attending the alleged Smuggling from Hongkong into China of Opium and other Goods\" (1884), p. 6; also \"Correspondence relating to the Complaints of the Mercantile Community in Hongkong against the Action of Chinese Revenue Cruizers in the Neighbourhood of the Colony\" (1875), pp. 16, 36.\n\non the subject of the Revision\n\n+ LG. Circular No. 2 of 1865. British Parliamentary Papers: \"Memorials of the Treaty of Tiantain\" (1868), p. 27. British Consular Reports for China, 1865, p. 93.\n\n(7)\n\nas the Customs blockade of Hongkong, regarding both as an unwarranted interference with the trade of the Colony. The patrol of the adjoining Chinese waters by armed Chinese revenue cruisers was particularly obnoxious to Hongkong traders, more especially as these cruisers, on the ground of being recognised as men-of-war, could, when not engaged in the suppression of smuggling, make free use of the waters of Hongkong harbour.\n\ntion, 1869.\n\n§ 6. To remove this tension, if possible, and to provide the Chinese Government with a legitimate safeguard, Sir Rutherford Alcock, in his Convention, drawn up at this time and signed\n\na Chinese Consul\n\non 23rd October 1869 by him and by the Chinese Plenipotentiaries appointed by the Emperor,* proposed that Chinese duty-paid goods passing through Hongkong in transit from one treaty port to another should be accorded the same transhipment privileges as obtained at a regular treaty port (Article 5), and, mindful perhaps of the hint given by Lord Aberdeen to Sir J. F. Davis Proposal to allow that it might be necessary to tolerate the presence in Hongkong of a Chinese mandarin for the to function in control of the natives,† suggested as a quid pro quo that the Chinese Government be given the Hongkong. right of placing a Consul in the Colony to protect Chinese interests (Article 2). This latter suggestion met with fierce opposition from the Hongkong community, who, in their memorial to the Home Government opposing the Convention, maintained that such an official if appointed would \"in reality be a spy on the Chinese merchants residing in this Colony \"‡ and would use his position simply as a means of exacting contributions from his countrymen, that, unlike British subjects in China, Chinese subjects in Hongkong needed no Consular protection, that \"the establishment of a Consul here, surrounded as he would be by a staff of Chinese officials and employees, would subject\" the trade in native goods passing through the Colony \"to a supervision resulting in the levy of taxes or duties for the Imperial Exchequer, in addition to those paid to the local officials,\n\nand thus a deadly blow would be struck at the trade\n\nand prosperity of this Colony.\"§ Alcock had little difficulty in answering these contentions, pointing out that China cannot be expected to confer upon Hongkong the benefit of allowing native goods to be transhipped there without losing their status as such except in return for some compensating advantage, that the Chinese are entitled both by treaty and by international law to adopt any measures on their own territory and in their own waters which they may consider necessary to protect their revenue from the loss of half a million pounds sterling, which they estimate they are called on to undergo annually \"by this irresponsible proximity of a British free port at the mouth of one of their great rivers,\" that when the Chinese had endeavoured to enforce their revenue laws by means of cruisers and land barriers they had been met by a loud outcry of protest from both the merchants and the officials of Hongkong, and that, this being so, it seemed to him that if this latter method of trade control was so reprehensible and injurious, the only other alternative was to co-operate with the Chinese authorities by \"giving them the means in accordance with international usage of exercising a perfectly legal and reasonable degree of surveillance over the trade carried on by the native vessels sailing from\n\n* British Parliamentary Papers: China No. 1 (1870), p. 1.\n\n+J. F. Davis: \"China during the War and since the Peace\" (2 vols, London, 1852), Vol. II, p. 45.\n\nBritish Parliamentary Papers: China No. 6 (1870), p. 13.\n\nIbid., p. 19.\n\n|| British Parliamentary Papers: China No. 10 (1870), p. 10 (vide Appendix E).",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 522268,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930",
        "page_number": 429,
        "title": "CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930",
        "content_text": ".34\n\n435\n\nOpposition of Hongkong to Customs blockade and to discriminatory trade taxation.\n\nHongkong.\" (8)\n\nBut Alcock's far-sighted attempt to deal with the Hongkong problem was doomed to be thwarted. The British Government decided to defer to the wishes of the merchants, and although not convinced that the step it was taking was \"calculated to promote the real interests of the commercial and industrial classes,\" yet decided to advise the Queen not to ratify the Convention.ţ\n\n§ 7. The Hoppo's blockade, therefore, was continued, and feeling on both sides ran higher than ever. Ample evidence of this exacerbation will be found (1) in the petition to Her Britannic Majesty from a group of Chinese merchants, resident in Hongkong, praying for protection from the actions of the Chinese revenue cruisers; (2) in the report submitted by the Commission appointed in December 1873 by Sir Arthur Kennedy, then Governor of Hongkong, to investigate the complaints against these cruisers and the Customs stations in the neighbourhood of Hongkong; (3) in the memorial on this topic submitted by the Hongkong Chamber of Commerce to the Home Government; and (4) in the resolutions passed at a public meeting held in the City Hall, Hongkong, on 14th September 1874. The Governor, writing to Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State for the Colonies, put the case in a nutshell when he stated: \"Complaints of a like nature appear to be almost the inevitable result of a free British port being in such close juxtaposition with the Chinese territory, where duties are levied, and will recur so long as there are Customs laws on one side, and a large population with strong inducements to break them on the other\"; and again: \"It is beyond doubt that a not inconsiderable number of Chinese junk owners are in the habit of consulting their individual interests by violating Chinese Customs laws, and making this Colony the basis of smuggling operations, for which its geographical position affords every facility, and the profits, it is to be presumed, exceed the loss and risk, or the practice would not be continued. The Chinese Customs Officers and Revenue Collectors, with a knowledge of these facts, lose no opportunity of seizing and confiscating every Chinese junk for which they can find a pretext, and the characterless class of persons employed as subordinates in that service makes it too probable that honest and innocent traders are often grievously harassed and plundered.\"§ At the same time he repudiated the only remedial suggestion, made by the Commission he had appointed, namely that of employing \"armed steam launches at the outlets of the harbour to protect Chinese trading junks arriving and departing,\" declaring that he was \"convinced that the shortest, best, and only remedy for disputes and references which have existed for years, endangering our good relations with the Canton Government, is the recognised establishment of a branch of the Chinese Foreign Inspectorate at Hongkong itself.\" Some relief from the abuses complained of was effected when the Canton authorities early in the seventies adopted the course of action, which had been recommended by Hart, the Inspector General of Customs, in 1869 and agreed that the patrolling cruisers should be placed under the supervision of an English officer in the Chinese Maritime Customs service and that foreign officers should be employed on the cruisers themselves to see that illegalities were not committed. The essential features of the situation, however, remained unchanged.\n\nThe agitation increased especially against the practice of the Canton authorities in treating goods going to and coming from Hongkong as goods going to or coming from a foreign country, and therefore liable to the export and the import charges of the Treaty Tariff. This was bitterly resented and claimed to be unfair discrimination against the Colony, while goods going to and coming from Macao continued to be treated as goods going to or coming from Chinese territory, and therefore liable to the lighter charges of the Native Customs tariff. To make matters worse, the provincial Native Customs regulations at that time required that all native goods from the four lower prefectures of the province destined for shipment abroad should first be conveyed to the treaty port of Canton (direct export abroad from a non-treaty port being strictly forbidden); from which it followed that such goods were called on to pay (a) the Native Customs export duty at port of shipment when being despatched to Canton, (b) a special fee at Canton Native Customs, and (c) export duty at Canton according to the Treaty Tariff. The Chinese authorities were technically within their rights in making such levies, but insistence on those rights was gall and wormwood to the traders in Hongkong.\n\nTo reach a solution Sir Thomas Wade, then British Minister at Peking, seized the opportunity of the drafting of the Chefoo Convention (September 1876) to insert an article (Clause VII of Section 3) calling for the appointment of a commission to inquire into the smuggling from Hongkong into China, and to devise a \"system that shall enable the Chinese Government to protect its revenue without prejudice to the interests of the Colony.\" This was the first official recognition in a ratified Convention on the part of the British authorities that it would be a wiser policy to come to an understanding with the Chinese Government to enable it to protect its revenue without prejudice to the interests of the Colony, rather than to continue to endure the inconveniences of the Hoppo's methods of controlling trade. As many of the terms of the Convention required also the consent of all the other Powers represented at Peking, and as the securing of this consent took time, it was not until nine years later (July 1885) that the Chefoo Convention with its Additional Article, arranging for the simultaneous collection of import duty and likin on foreign opium, was ratified by the British Government, and the Commission, called for by both Convention and Additional Article, duly appointed.\n\n§8. This Commission, composed of Sir Robert Hart, Inspector General of Chinese Customs, and the Taotai Shao Yu-lien (B), representing China, and Mr. James Russell, the Puisne Judge of Hongkong, and Mr. Byron Brenan, H.B.M.'s Consul at Tientsin, representing Great Britain, met in the summer of 1886. The joint commissioners for China had come authorised to offer the closing of the Customs stations in the neighbourhood of Hongkong in return for the Colony's acceptance of a plan by which Chinese opium hulks might be anchored in Hongkong waters for the bonding of all opium imported from abroad and for the collection of China's\n\n* British Parliamentary Papers: China No. 10 (1870), p. 11.\n\n+ British Parliamentary Papers: China No. 11 (1870), p. 4.\n\n+ British Parliamentary Papers: \"Correspondence relating to the Complaints of the Mercantile Community in Hongkong against the Action of Chinese Revenue Cruizers in the Neighbourhood of the Colony\" (1875), pp. 2-4, 7-11, 12–15, 31, 32.\n\n§ Ibid., p. 5.\n\n| Ibid., p. 5.\n\n¶ Ibid., p. 6.\n\n(9)\n\n* Vide foot-note*, p. 13.\n\n+ British Parliamentary Papers: \"Further Correspondence relating to the Complaints of the Mercantile Community in Hongkong against the Action of certain Revenue Cruizers in the Neighbourhood of the Colony\" (1876), pp. 17, 18, 23-25, 33-35, 38, 39.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 522269,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930",
        "page_number": 430,
        "title": "CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930",
        "content_text": "436 \n\n437 \n\nControl of \n\nCustoms stations \n\nand of revenue cruisers handed \n\nover to Chinese Maritime Customs Service. \n\nopium revenue.* \n\n(10) \n\nBut as the Hoppo, with a view to economy, had some time previously reduced his cruising flotilla and thereby relaxed the blockade considerably, the Hongkong representative looked askance at the proffered gift. He declined it, but expressed himself willing to accept co-operation. The outcome of the Commission's labours was the Opium Agreement, signed at Hongkong on 11th September 1886. By virtue of this instrument the Chinese Maritime Customs—which had hitherto confined its attentions solely to foreign shipping at the treaty ports—was for the first time to be entrusted with the control of Chinese craft sailing out of Hongkong into Chinese waters and vice versa, and also for the first time with the collecting of likin and, as a natural consequence, of Native Customs duties. The Agreement provided not only for the collection of duty and likin on opium under the cognizance of the Inspector General, but also for the settlement of disputes between Hongkong junks and the Native Customs revenue stations or cruisers in the neighbourhood. It was therefore natural and indeed round Hongkong inevitable that the management of the Hoppo's stations round Hongkong should devolve upon the newly created Kowloon office of the Maritime Customs, a result necessitated not only by its work of controlling all opium movements, but also by its position as arbiter in settling complaints made by junks against the Hoppo's stations or cruisers. The Hoppo's patrol service and four stations at Kowloon, Capsuimoon, Changchow, and Fotochow were accordingly handed over to the Inspector General to administer, and at the same time, for the greater convenience of the trading public, the Hongkong Government—instead of insisting on the letter of the Agreement that the office of the foreign Inspectorate should be established on Chinese territory on the Kowloon side—permitted, without extending official recognition, the opening in the city of Victoria of an office of the Chinese Maritime Customs, where a British Commissioner of Customs, appointed by the Inspector General, functioned as the Chinese official in charge of the Kowloon district and of all the Chinese revenue-protecting agencies within its limits. The Agreement also removed the grievance of Hongkong merchants regarding duty discrimination by providing that junks with their cargoes trading between Chinese ports and Hongkong should not be subject to any dues or duties in excess of those leviable on junks and their cargoes trading between Chinese ports and Macao. On the 2nd April 1887 the Kowloon Commissioner was able to commence the levy of likin and chingfei on general cargo, the collection of Tariff import duty and Convention likin on opium on the 14th of the same month, and on 1st July the collection of Native Customs duties on general cargo according to the existing tariffs. The transfer thus effected was, however, not a root-and-branch one, for there still remained at each of the stations agents of certain corporations who had farmed the collections of likin and other local levies on certain articles of trade, such as kerosene oil, matches, and so forth. To convince the provincial authorities that the operations of these agents were an inconvenience to merchants and a constant source of friction, and that this method of collection was not only wasteful but also unnecessary, took some little time, but by June 1890, as soon as all vested interests had been satisfactorily disposed of, all these agencies were removed and the Maritime Customs service was left as the sole revenue authority at all the stations‡ \n\nRemoval of discriminatory trade taxation. \n\np. 682. \n\n* L.G. Circular No. 418, Second Series. \n\n+ Hertelet: \"China Treaties,\" Third Edition (2 vols., London, 1908), Vol. I, pp. 90, 91 (vide Appendix F). \n\nCustoms publications: Statistical Series, No. 6.—\"Decennial Reports, etc., 1882-91,\" First Issue (Shanghai, 1893), \n\n(11) \n\nKowloon Territory, 1898. \n\n9. This so-called Kowloon Office of the Chinese Maritime Customs in the city of Victoria continued to function, on sufferance, till the summer of 1898—the year of the international scramble for leases of Chinese territory,—when the question of the extension of the territory of Hongkong brought up sharply once more the issue of the Chinese Customs operating on Hongkong soil. Sir Robert Hart, to whom the matter was referred by the British Minister, proposed, apart from special provisions for the control of opium—\n\n(1) That the right of the Chinese Customs to maintain its office in Hongkong should be formally admitted, the status of the Commissioner of Customs as a Chinese official recognised, and the existing stations to be maintained, although inside the newly leased territory; \n\n(2) That the Chinese Customs should have the right to collect dues and duties in Hongkong on general cargo, as well as on opium, shipped to and from China, and that for the control of junks the Chinese Customs should have one or more special jetties at the junk anchorages; \n\n(3) That the revenue cruisers should continue their activities within the waters of the leased territory; \n\n(4) That no arms or munitions of war or contraband goods should be shipped in Hongkong on board any vessel proceeding to a Chinese port without a permit issued or countersigned by the Chinese Customs; and \n\n(5) That the Hongkong Government should pass such legislation as might be necessary to give effect to these provisions.* \n\nThese proposals were endorsed by the Canton provincial authorities,† but met with unqualified opposition from the Hongkong Chamber of Commerce, which was \"profoundly convinced that the freedom of the port can only be properly safeguarded by the withdrawal of the Chinese Customs stations to Chinese territory, and the refusal of permission to Chinese Customs officials to collect duties either in the Colony or its waters.\" This opposition was supported by the London Chamber of Commerce and by the China Association in London, which latter body maintained that \"to authorise the collection in Hongkong of duties (likin included) on all goods and merchandise carried from or to any Chinese ports in Chinese vessels would be to place Hongkong on the level of a Chinese treaty port,\"§ and then proceeded to add: \"if the presence of Customs stations on the adjacent mainland and at the entrance of the harbour, and of Customs cruisers in the waters surrounding the Colony, has been a hindrance and a source of vexation when these territories and waters were Chinese, the annoyance would be less endurable still when they assumed the character of foreign establishments within territory under British control.\" As a solution of the opium difficulty the Association, with the approval of the Hongkong branch, suggested that the Colonial Government might arrange to collect on behalf of the Chinese Government, against actual cost of collection, duty and likin on all opium \n\n* British Parliamentary Papers: China No. 1 (1899), Enclosure in No. 294, pp. 201, 202 (vide Appendix G). \n\n† Ibid., Enclosures in No. 382, pp. 283, 284. \n\n‡ Ibid., p. 282. \n\n§ Ibid., p. 296. \n\n|| Ibid., p. 296. \n\nproposals for Chinese Customs control. \n\nPage 430\n\nPage 431",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 522281,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930",
        "page_number": 442,
        "title": "CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930",
        "content_text": "+58\n\n(32)\n\n4. That opium accompanied by such certificates, at the rate of not more than 110 taels per picul, shall be free from all further imposts of every sort, and have all the benefits stipulated for by the Additional Article on behalf of opium on which duty has been paid at one of the ports of China, and that it may be made up in sealed parcels at the option of the purchaser.\n\n5. The junks trading between Chinese ports and Hong Kong, and their cargoes, shall not be subject to any dues or duties in excess of those leviable on junks and their cargoes trading between Chinese ports and Macao, and that no dues whatsoever shall be demanded from junks coming to Hong Kong from ports in China, or proceeding from Hong Kong to ports in China, over and above the dues paid or payable at the ports of clearance or destination.\n\n6. That the officer of the Foreign Inspectorate, who will be responsible for the management of the Kowloon office, shall investigate and settle any complaints made by junks trading with Hong Kong against the Native Customs Revenue stations or cruisers, and that the Governor of Hong Kong, if he deems it advisable, shall be entitled to send a Hong Kong officer to be present at and assist in the investigation and decision. If, however, they do not agree, a reference may be made to the authorities at Peking for a joint decision.\n\nSir Robert Hart undertakes, on behalf of himself and Shao Tao-Tai (who was compelled by unavoidable circumstances to leave before the sittings of the Commission were terminated), that the Chinese Government shall agree to the above conditions.\n\nThe Undersigned are of opinion that if these arrangements are fully carried out a fairly satisfactory solution of the questions connected with the so-called \"Hong Kong blockade\" will have been arrived at.\n\nSigned in triplicate at Hong Kong this 11th day of September, 1886.\n\nBYRON BRENAN,\n\nHer Britannic Majesty's Consul at Tientsin.\n\nJ. RUSSELL,\n\nPuisne Judge of Hong Kong.\n\nROBERT HART,\n\nInspector General of Customs, China.\n\nReprinted from \"Hertslet's China Treaties,\" Third Edition, Vol. I, pp. 90, 91.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 522287,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930",
        "page_number": 448,
        "title": "CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930",
        "content_text": "(42)\n\nA Commission appointed in pursuance of that understanding agreed upon the following, among other conditions, which are expressed in an Agreement signed at Tientsin on the 11th September, 1886;—\n\n\"That an office under the foreign Inspectorate shall be established on Chinese territory at a convenient spot on the Kowloon side for sale of Chinese opium-duty certificates, which shall be freely sold to all comers, and for such quantities of opium as they may require.\n\nThat junks trading between Chinese ports and Hong Kong, and their cargoes, shall not be subject to any dues or duties in excess of those leviable on junks and their cargoes trading between Chinese ports and Macao, and that no dues whatsoever shall be demanded from junks coming to Hong Kong from ports in China, or proceeding from Hong Kong to ports in China, over and above the dues paid or payable at the ports of clearance or destination.\n\n'That the officer of the foreign Inspectorate who will be responsible for the management of the Kowloon office shall investigate and settle any complaints made by junks trading with Hong Kong against the native Customs revenue stations or cruisers, and that the Governor of Hong Kong, if he deems it advisable, shall be entitled to send a Hong Kong officer to be present at and assist in the investigation and decision. If, however, they do not agree, a reference may be made to the authorities at Peking for a joint decision.\"\n\nThe Commissioners concluded with an expression of opinion that, “if the arrangements indicated were fully carried out, a fairly satisfactory solution of the questions connected with the so-called 'Hong Kong blockade' would have been attained.\" The assumption was somewhat optimistic, as the arrangement has unquestionably proved more efficient for the purpose of protecting the Chinese revenue than for the alternative purpose of obviating the Customs blockade.\n\nThe Kowloon Commissioner is, as a matter of fact, located in Hong Kong, where he has an office and a staff. His presence is not, however, recognised officially; nor—thanks in a great measure, no doubt, to the discretion of the officers who have held the post—has their presence been seriously resented. No very definite objection could, in fact, be offered so long as no official status was assumed, nor official action unduly obtruded.\n\nIt is quite another thing, however, when the Government is asked to formally recognize the presence in Hong Kong of an Imperial Chinese Customs official and a Customs office and staff. It is still more serious when the Government is requested to authorize the collection, in Hong Kong, of duties (li-kia included) on all goods and merchandize carried from or to any Chinese ports in Chinese vessels. To concede so much would be to place Hong Kong on the level of a Chinese Treaty port, and to accept for it the position of a fiscal dependency of Canton. The first admission would injure its status as a free port; the second would injure its prestige as a British Colony.\n\nSubsidiary demands that wharves and jetties shall be placed at the disposal of the Customs authorities to facilitate their operations; that the Customs cruisers and launches shall retain, in the waters of the newly ceded territory, the rights of seizure and search which they now enjoy; and that the Customs shall be allowed to retain their existing stations (two of which are in the very harbour, and others on islands in the immediate vicinity on the east and west) might almost suggest the presence of an underlying purpose to render impossible the acceptance of capital requests which it had appeared desirable, for some reason, to prefer.\n\nGrievances which had been, hitherto, in some degree sentimental would then indeed assume a practical form. If the presence of Customs stations on the adjacent mainland and at the entrance of the harbour, and of Customs cruisers in the waters surrounding the Colony, has been a hindrance and a source of vexation when these territories and waters were Chinese, the annoyance would be less endurable still when they assumed the character of foreign establishments within territory under British control.\n\nGreat allowance has been made for the position of Hong Kong, and greater allowance still for the inefficiency of Chinese Administration. The British Government does very much more for the Chinese fisc than any European Government would do for another Power; and the Chinese Government responds by a degree of intrusion which no European Government would admit. It is no exaggeration to say that the entire native junk trade with the mainland is controlled by the staff attached to the Chinese Customs Office in Hong Kong; for the Colony is supervised by Chinese native employés, while its waters are patrolled by Customs armed steam-launches; and we may be sure that very little escapes such a system under European supervision. The arrangements made in pursuance of the Chefoo Convention may have minimised the ostensible trouble, but it is open to contention that the result has been attained at the cost of sacrificing the freedom of the port. The maintenance of the rule that junks shall not leave their anchorage at Hong Kong after dark may afford another instance in point. Instituted, no doubt, with a view to piracy rather than smuggling, it has nevertheless greatly helped the Chinese Customs authorities to prevent evasion of the cordon which they have found it easier to draw around the island than along their own coast, and has—since the original motive ceased to be cogent—been regarded in the Colony chiefly from that point of view.\n\nThat Chinese traders and junk owners dislike these conditions is well known. Neither are the reasons which deter them from remonstrance far to seek, when we remember the methods of Chinese mandarins and the facilities which knowledge acquired in Hong Kong may afford for action on the mainland.\n\nThe junk trade between Hong Kong and the mainland is an important distributing medium. If existing arrangements have prejudicially affected it, the intensity of the resentment felt at the prospect of further interference becomes intelligible.\n\nIt may be permissible to insist, again, that the Chefoo Convention had two aims, although the second was imperfectly attained. The Chinese revenue has been safeguarded; but the annoyance from the Canton Customs revenue-cruisers remains; and the removal of the Customs cordon was one of the greatest benefits which the Colony hoped to derive from the extension which it has so long desired.\n\n(43)",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 551943,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-558-5 Territorial limits of Colony 28-12-1935 - 19-2-1936",
        "page_number": 4,
        "title": "CO129-558-5 Territorial limits of Colony 28-12-1935 - 19-2-1936",
        "content_text": "## 6.132\n\n\n4\n\n\nA copy of the Kowloon Extension Agreement, 1898, is annexed in Vol. I (p. 120) of Hertslet's China Treaties.\n\nThe survey of the boundaries of the ceded area took place in 1899, and I attach a copy of Eastern 66 in which is contained the report of the Boundary Commission and other contemporary correspondence relating to these events.\n\nThe Admiralty presume in their letter (No. 1 in this file) that the limits of the Colony were described in the Convention of 1898 by roughly rectangular co-ordinates mainly as a matter of convenience and not for the purpose of claiming jurisdiction over any portions of the high sea enclosed by those co-ordinates. This presumption has some support from the findings of Mr. (now Sir) James Stewart Lockhart and his Chinese colleague, which considerably varied the line of the land boundary as marked in the Conventional map since it had been roughly drawn as a straight line and was quite impracticable as a satisfactory frontier line.\n\nThere seems, however, to have been some purpose in enclosing within the ceded area a very considerable extent of the waters surrounding Hong Kong, and this purpose seems to have been to cripple the action of the Chinese Maritime Customs in maintaining what was called a blockade of Hong Kong in their efforts to restrict the extensive smuggling into China which was carried on from the port of Hong Kong. See, for instance, the last sentence of the China Association's letter on page 74 of `E. 66`. The rectangular area shown in the map annexed to the 1898 Convention as far as the Western, Eastern and Southern boundaries of the area",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-558-5 Territorial limits of Colony 28-12-1935 - 19-2-1936.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 560716,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-570-8 Sino-Japanese War- sinking of Chinese fishing boats by Japanese vessel 31-1-1938 - 22-12-1938",
        "page_number": 78,
        "title": "CO129-570-8 Sino-Japanese War- sinking of Chinese fishing boats by Japanese vessel 31-1-1938 - 22-12-1938",
        "content_text": "Sir R. Craigie (Tokyo).\n\n30th January, 1938.\n\nD. 4.40 p.m.\n\n30th January, 1938.\n\nR. 10.00 a.m.\n\n30th January, 1938.\n\nNo. 124. (R).\n\nNO DISTRIBUTION.\n\n78\n\nYour telegram No. 80 (sinking of junks).\n\nFollowing is translation of memorandum from Minister for Foreign Affairs dated January 29th begins:-\n\nConfidential.\n\nImperial Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs are in receipt of His Britannic Majesty's Embassy's memorandum of January 13th regarding case of sinking of Chinese fishing vessels by Imperial Navy but according to report received by Naval authorities from the Commanding officer on the spot facts of the case were as follows:\n\n\"On September 22nd Japanese patrol vessel which was patrolling to the coast south of China to enforce blockade of China coast sighted a number of Chinese junks to the south of Cheleng Point. When she approached them for purposes of inspection the junks opened fire with rifles. She replied first with blank shells as warning and then fired live shells into the sea near by. As resistance continued she was finally obliged to fire at the junks and sank a number of them\".\n\nAs this report differs from that contained in His Britannic Majesty's memorandum, the Imperial Government have the honour to state in reply, that they will carry out further thorough investigation using for the purpose of reference findings of Commission of enquiry appointed by the Governor of Hongkong. If, as result of this investigation, the Japanese Navy's report is found to be incorrect and if His Majesty's Government are able to produce concrete evidence that, as stated in His Majesty's Embassy's memorandum there were junks belonging to British subjects amongst those sunk and that there were British Subjects amongst those killed, then the Imperial Government will be prepared to consider again the question of payment of compensation for these losses. Ends.\n\nAddressed to Foreign Office No. 124 January 30th; Hongkong.\n\nrepeated to",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-570-8 Sino-Japanese War- sinking of Chinese fishing boats by Japanese vessel 31-1-1938 - 22-12-1938.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 564087,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-575-3 Japanese affairs 2-1-1939 - 21-12-1939",
        "page_number": 50,
        "title": "CO129-575-3 Japanese affairs 2-1-1939 - 21-12-1939",
        "content_text": "# Japan\n\n## Foreign Affairs\n\nFollowing the introduction in the United States Senate of two resolutions, the first being that of the 11th July for an embargo on exports to Japan, and the second being Senator Vandenberg's motion of the 18th July for the abrogation of the Commercial Agreement of 1911 with Japan, the Administration suddenly announced on the 26th July its own decision to abrogate the treaty by executive action. Despite attempts to explain away this move, the news was received with something like consternation in Japan.\n\n### Nuremberg Congress\n\n#### Germany\n\n253. On the 18th July, envoys representing the Japanese army, navy, and commerce and industry left to attend the Nuremberg Congress on the invitation of the German Government.\n\n### German-Japanese Trade Agreement\n\n254. On the 28th July, a trade agreement between the two countries was provisionally signed in Berlin, subject to formal ratification by both Governments.\n\n### Occupied Areas\n\n#### China\n\n255. On the 10th July, Wang Ching-wei issued a statement urging the desirability of peace between Japan and China. This was timed to coincide with the meeting at Tsingtao of the Joint Commission of the North and Central China régimes. There were rumours that Wang would shortly be asked to become the head of a unified régime in China.\n\n### Military Operations\n\n256. Chungking was again bombed by Japanese naval aircraft on the 6th, 24th, and 31st July, the last mentioned being the tenth raid of the war. The United States Government, on the 10th July, made a strong protest to the Japanese Government regarding damage to United States property in previous raids on Chungking.\n\n257. After the issue on the 16th July of a warning to third-Power nationals, Japanese forces began on the 18th a blockade of Swabue.\n\n258. The Pearl River was closed by the Japanese military authorities for two weeks from the 28th July.\n\n### Foreign Interests\n\n259. On the 11th July, the Kulangsu Municipal Council rejected the Japanese demands for reform of the administration of the settlement. Japanese obstruction of food and fuel supplies to the settlement continued and drew a sharp protest from the United States Government on the 17th July.\n\n### U.S.S.R.\n\n#### Departure of Soviet Chargé d'Affaires\n\n260. On the 6th July, M. Smetanin, Soviet Chargé d'Affaires, departed for Moscow, leaving the embassy in charge of the second secretary.\n\n#### Mongolia\n\n261. The fighting on the Mongolian frontier continued. Important Japanese offensives appear to have been launched on the 3rd and 25th July, and in the opinion of competent observers, the Japanese had by the end of the month succeeded in driving back the Mongolian and Soviet forces to the line of the River Halha. There was a continuation of fighting in the air, in which the Japanese, as usual, claimed striking successes. They admitted, however, that on the 16th July, hostile aircraft had succeeded in bombing the important railway centre of Fularki.\n\n### Saghalien\n\n262. Friction continued over the alleged Russian pressure on Japanese oil and coal interests in Saghalien. On the 24th July, the Soviet Government rejected a protest which had been made by the Japanese Ambassador on the subject on the 29th July.\n\n### General Policy\n\n263. Statements of policy were made by Baron Hiranuma on the 6th July to the press, and on the 20th to the Asia Development Committee. The Prime Minister's language was, as usual, inconclusive, but his references to foreign affairs and to the external situation generally were less unfavourable from the British point of view than might have been expected. Reports from confidential sources indicated that he was personally strongly opposed to a military alliance with Germany and Italy. At the same time, there was reason to believe at the end of the month that a further effort would shortly be made by the extremist elements to secure a reconsideration of the alliance proposal.\n\n## Internal Affairs\n\n264. In spite of preoccupation with the conduct of the campaign in China, and with the complex international situation, the Japanese Government are not unmindful of the numerous problems which require attention at home, and consideration is now being given to certain important proposals.\n\n265. In the first place, it seems possible that a scheme for the formation of a separate Ministry of Trade may materialise in the near future. That is not a new idea, as it has been felt for many years past that there would be advantages in combining under one roof the various bureaux or sections devoted to matters of trade now existing in the Ministries for Foreign Affairs, Commerce and Industry, Agriculture and Forestry, Finance, and Overseas Affairs. The complex machinery of trade control which has been brought into being has rendered centralisation more important than ever, and it is understood from press reports that the Cabinet have agreed in principle that something must be done. The Planning Board has accordingly been asked to draw up a scheme, which is now receiving attention.\n\n266. Secondly, it appears that the matter of a thorough reform of the taxation system of the country, both as regards central and provincial taxes, will probably form the subject of discussion at the next session of the Diet. It is felt that the present system of taxation is too antiquated, and that as a result of temporary expedients in the way of increases in taxation, it has become excessively complicated, with the natural result that the burden of taxation is unequally distributed. It is proposed, therefore, to introduce a radical reform with the object of equalising the incidence of taxation among different classes of the people and of giving elasticity to, and simplifying, the system as a whole. A sub-committee of the Taxation System Enquiry Commission is engaged upon an examination of the problem, and it has been stated in the press that their aim is to secure an increase in revenue of the amount of 500 million yen.\n\n267. The Government is also taking steps to put into effect certain provisions for a Law for the Control of the Distribution of Rice, which was passed during the last session of the Diet. The object of this measure is to discourage speculation in rice and to guard against any abnormal increase in price owing to war conditions. The law provides, inter alia, for the establishment of a Japan Rice Company, which will operate markets for dealings in the cereal, these markets taking the place of the existing rice exchanges, which will be abolished.\n\n### Anniversary of the Loukowkiao Incident\n\n268. The 7th July was observed in Japan as a day of self-denial. The people had been urged to shun amusements and to take only the simplest meals. Notices were displayed in the streets with the slogan: \"One soup, one dish,\" and the consumption of alcoholic drinks and smoking were deprecated. Cafés and bars closed for the day, and cinemas and theatres closed at P.M. The brilliant neon lights so dear to the Japanese heart were extinguished, and it is reported that the Yoshiwara was deserted.\n\n269. On the evening of the 6th July, the Prime Minister gave a press interview, in the course of which the Government's aims and intentions for the conclusion of the China incident were restated.\n\nPage 50\nPage 51",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-575-3 Japanese affairs 2-1-1939 - 21-12-1939.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 586896,
        "series_id": 27,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-co129-engine",
        "series_title": "CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "CO129-604-6 Immigration- control over entry from China 1-1-1947 - 4-1-1950",
        "page_number": 103,
        "title": "CO129-604-6 Immigration- control over entry from China 1-1-1947 - 4-1-1950",
        "content_text": "102\n\nreach Chien Chiang on road to Chungking.\n\n6\n\nStill no indication of a major move on the part of First/Fifth Field armies from north towards Chungking.\n\n7\n\nCommunist authorities in Canton have now made approach for resumption of through railway services, British section have replied willing to meet at border to discuss. Early resumption likely once financial arrangements have been solved. Some cargo, mainly paper, dyes, bleaching powder and petrol, moving outward, while country produce, livestock and hides, coming inwards. Inward passengers slightly exceed outward owing to conditions in Canton. On 10th November Nationalist aircraft dropped bomb near Sheklung railway bridge.\n\n80\n\nNationalist blockade of Canton continues to prevent river steamers operations. Nationalist blockade craft are believed to be re-fuelling from junks just outside British waters. This is difficult to prevent as while export licences are required destinations cannot be guaranteed. Nationalists are adding insult to injury by trying to sell seized cargoes in Hong Kong. Chinese Government have belatedly announced formal extension to ensure order to Amoy and ports south. Shanghai blockade still in force, but two British ships detained for over a week have now been released by Nationalists, with their cargoes, after giving written undertaking not to return.\n\n6\n\nC.N.A. and C.A.T.C. defections have led to Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs himself visiting Hong Kong. Aircraft of two companies are grounded (due to Nationalist suspension of registration certificates). But personnel remain in occupation of offices and workshops and are refusing to take orders from new Managing Directors appointed by the Nationalists. Former directors have issued orders to them from Peking. It is proposed to avoid involvement of Hong Kong Government in dispute as far as possible. Companies are free to take matter to Court if there is deadlock. Meanwhile Chinese Government are belatedly offering British airlines opportunities for flying to Formosa, Chungking, Kunming and Hainan. Hong Kong Airways are proposing to fly to Taipei and survey flight left 16th November.\n\nChinese National Resources Commission Foreign Trade Office in Hong Kong defected to the Communists 13th November. They hold stocks of wolfram and other commodities valued at some $20,000,000. Other Nationalist organisations are likely\n\n10\n\nto follow,\n\n110\n\nAbove developments and worsening military situation have caused nervousness and pessimism in Kuomintang circles. There are increasing rumours of split between Chiang Kai Shek and Li Tsung Jen becoming insoluble. Much Kuomintang riff-raff is now seeking refuge in (corrupt group? barges) and action has been taken by police against Kuomintang Blue-shirt agents for possession of arms in the Colony.\n\n12\n\nCommunist-organised Comforting Party has returned from Canton and given fulsome public report about encouraging conditions there, and really democratic life now enjoyed by people. Privately, however, some admit conditions were far from satisfactory. Communist-inspired propaganda is being directed against action taken by Registrar of Societies in refusing registration to a number of Communist-influenced organisations. Much capital is also being made out of defection of airlines and National Resources Commission\n\n/130",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/2diw2n4r2/CO129-604-6 Immigration- control over entry from China 1-1-1947 - 4-1-1950.txt",
        "external_url": "",
        "rank": 0
    }
]