DRYSDALE & CO., LTD.
CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS.
ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT CO., LTD. H.K. & Shanghai Bank Bldg. Tel. 27789
JOHN CLARKE'S
CASEBOOK
Troubled Waters
Burial Of Brian Farrell
'Page 10
Cadet Pilot Brian Bernard
Farrell, 18-year-old son
of
Mr R. E. Farrell, Manager
of the Hongkong Telephone
YOUND sense and thoughtCo., Ltd, and Mrs Farrell,
S
10
for our
ul
the Cemetery
Roman this
well-being lie, was buried with full military doubt, behini each honoura clause, paragraph and sub-Catholic paragraph of the laws, by-morning.
Earlier, a Requiem High Mass
laws, rules and regulation was celebrated at the Rosary Hill
drawn up by various
to
111-
Dominican Hore
of Studies,
thorities to govern our co-Stubbs Road, for Brian Farreli duct and help us
over-and Flight-Lieut. B. McConville, ying instructor of the Hongkong come our weaknesses.
There are certainly excellent Auxillary Air Force.
the rule which reasons behind slates thot those who bathe in the Serpentine must not awam beyond what are known by the near-poetical phrase of "the per- mitted waters."
On hot sunny days, such as older Londoners remember, there would be chaos if swimmers hudt the freedom of the lake. And ou the bleak evenings of the present summer, when the water is all but desented...? Well, # rule in a rule.
ON
FACT
N such an evening. recently, a policeman passing near to the Serpentine wis distressed to see a swimmer 50 yards outside the permitted waters.
Was
Both were in a H.K.A.A.F. Harvard training plane which crushed into the sea near Cheung Chau Island on Sunday morning. but rescued, Farrell muccumbed 10 his injuries. McConville's body has not yet been recovered.
Hill The Service
at Rosary was peformed by the Rev. Fr B. Miguelez, O. P. Acting Pro- curator of the Dominican Order in Hongkong. He was assisted by the Rev. Fr M. Sanchez O.P. Deacon), and the Rev. Fr G. Hernandez, O.P. (Sub-Deacon).
at the Cemetery The Service
the Rev.
Fr. was officiated by the
Fitzgerald. S.J Roman Catholic Chaplain to the Royal Air Force He was assisted by the Rev.
Gardner, Fr Joseph Senior Romun Catholic Chaplain. and Rev. Fr T. J. Sheridan, S.J.
Also present was the very Rev. Fr A. Riganti, Vicar- General
the of
Catholic Diocese.
"Hey there," called the police-A
man.
The
heard
and
swimmer headed for shore. The policeman look
notebook out his
and waited. At last the swimmer
out of the water-a climbed
beller finely-proportioned man. than elx toot toil
"You were swimming outside the permitted water." maid the policeman. "I'll trouble you for your name and address, please. then you'd better got dressed and come with me."
The bather could hardly believe his ears. "What?" he cald,
FICTION
CHIEF MOURNERS
The chief mourners were Mr Furrell, who is Honorary Vice- Consul for Spolu in Hongkong, Mrs Farrell, and two sons, Pat (an undergraduate at the Uni- versity of Hongkong) and Ken. neth, who is still at school. The eldest arm, Robert, is in Borneo, The deceased, the second eld
THE policeman repented his THE
statement and his question. The swimmer, whose name was Haroldi, gave him a ftctitious name and an unlikely-sounding address in Birmingham.
"Anything to prove that name and address is
the yours!!! officer asked, whon Harold had put on his clothes.
"but "No," said Harold, you think I'm going to give my proper name to a twopenny half- permy policeman that I fought for in the war, you're mistaken.
"Are you refusing to give me year, your name and address?""
"Yes,"
sald Harold, tucking Iris briefcase under his arm with
a sort of anality.
"In that case,
if
said the con- stable, "there will be a further charge against you of refusing." A BIG JOB?
"sup- pose this is a big job, eh? Usually go after the kids, don't you?"
"PAH," said Harold.
The policeman did not answer, but conducted Harold in dig-
nifed alience to the station, where he gave his real name to the duty sergeant.
at
for F. L. Me-
est, was a former student of King George V School, which he teft earlier this year. He join- ed the H.K.A.A.F. some time towards the end of last
year. The
chief mourner
the church service Convale was his wife, Mrs E. McConville. He is also survived by iwo young sons. The deceased
his
the post ook up H.K.A.A.F. in September ktus:
At the Cemetery, buglers from Band of Hongkong Regiment played the Last Post
und the Reveille. The firing party was drawn
from the Royal Air Force.
More
than 200 people came to pay their last respects.
the
L
Radio Hongkong
H.K.T.
with
with
the the
0 pm. Time Signal and Programme Summary: 6.63, Melody Stars; 0.30, Marching Guards: 7, "First Hearing" present by Paul Perry (Studio); Demi-fleure Francales (Studio); 7.59, World News Weather Report: 8, Time Bignal sad (London Relay); 830. New Talk (London Relay) от
Next morning, at Great Marl borough Street, Harold pleaded not guilty to refusing his name and address, guilty to the charge of swimming beyond the pre-Special Announcements; 8.15, Canada
scribed limits.
The policeman bogan hle story, his eyes upon his note- book.
"H
Calling. The Fourth in a series of Programmes by the International Service of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation on life in Catado, “How We live"!
0.30, Forces Favourites (London Reloy); 9. Time Signal, Orchestral Concert: 0.45, The Story of Curars. A Fonture Programme written by Harry Collier, Produced by Elleen Hots (BBCTS) 10.45. AL the Ballet. "Sylvia" (Delibes). Royal Opera House Orch. Covent Garden cond, by Hugo nignold: 10.10. Weather Report: 11, Time the Radio News Reel (London Relay): 11.15. Goodnight Murde; God Save The Queen; 1130, Cloie Down.
'I THOUGHT IT WAS A JOKE"
HOW beautifully you read," observed Mr Paul Bennett. VC, the magistrate, "But you're not supposed to read your evidence, you know." Hastily the policeman snapped
shut book, and spoke from memory,
Harold declined to go into the witness-box, but from the dock said: "I thought the whole thing was a Joke at. Arst. I couldn't was serious. think the officer
When I got to the zlation, £ realised it wasn't a joke, and I gave my name, then.”
оп the
"Well, you must pay 55. on the bathing offence, 208. other," sald the magistrate.
"Yes, sir,"
CHINA MAIL
· Established 1849
TUESDAY, JULY 20, 1954.
NEW
SHEAFFER'S
ADMIRAL
SNORKEL
PEN
SIDE GLANCES By Galbraith SLOSS APPEAL DISMISSED
6.B.
PAYING
"May I speak to your bookkeeper? I want to see just where he got off the boam!"
More Expatriates Arrive From Shanghai Today
Eleven British Commonwealth citizens were among the 24 passengers who arrived here this morning in the ss Poyang from Shanghai.
They were Mr M. H. Darwood, a storeman of the Ewo Brewery, his wife and five children; Mr F. W. Ridley, former Chief Officer of the British freighter Hippopotamus; Mr A. S. Ahmed, an accountant of Liddel Brothers, and his wife; and Sister Marina Lacombe, a Canadian nun of the Franciscan Order.
was and
J included Others
Mr R. Chaillan, who was chief of the department of the personnel French-owned Shanghai Tram-
Mr Chaillan, who ways. accompanied by his wife daughter, is returning to France. lie and his family liad been in China for more than 20 years.
Mr Y. Y. Toochinsky, 70, ac- companied by his daughter, was
He another
was passenger. with the American-owned firm of Toochin Brothers and Co.
in
4 Years For Chopper Attack
(Continued from Page 1)
aa
the
passage
driving in their relation to the charge.
It is true that the learned Judge did not in so many words
Con
to his pre-
only
or
Incidental reasonable
the
offence
passage in paragraph a of the
which objection is taken occura la paragraph 10 and reads no aumming-up beginning "and Sloss has appealed against the assuming also that you are not
follows:-
If after you have consistored 'mem- conviction and sentence and no
satisfied that manslaughter is
all the evidence adduced, hers of the jury, you find, having fower than ten grounds of approved" is mere tautology, ro direct the jury as to the
observed the tlemeanour of the penl have been led.
рециол of the proceeding nection between the drunkenness
accused, that he has told you the the At the hearing of the appeal
you find that truth, or i and, however open to of the accused and his negligent
evidence adiliced on his behalf in Mr D'Almada for the appellant criticism the phraseology may driving, and it is this omission
sufficient to raise a reasonable stated that he was abandoning be, I do not take the view that that in complained of. But what
doubt in your minds as 30 $11# the 7th ground of appeal viz: It is a misrection that emild,
was the effect of the omission
Ruilt, then it is your duty to "The fear ed trial judge mist
acquit him of the charge of man- on the jury? In my opinion it in the circumstances, cause con- the
slaughter." directed
jury
10 the
fusion in the minds of the jury was rather to the advantage of
7 In paragraph
of The evidence of the killing of the
accused than decensed."
having regard to the direction the
cumming-up, the learned judgo The first ground of appeal that had previously been given Judice.
could
The learned judge had com- told the jury that it was for the In my view the Jury The verdict of the jury was un- be sup-
by charged against the accused, only understand from the pass-mented on the evidence of the prosecution to prove the offence reasonable or cannot
other having regard to the age that if they were not satis amount of alcohol imbibed ported
as given by Dr.any was the accused that manslaughter evidence", and
second fcd
he had directed the thereo, beyond all Eround of appeal-"The verdiet proved then it was upen to them Hung: of the Jury was against the to consider the question of con-Jury's attention to the evidence doubt, and that if they failed to taxi discharge that onus, then it was three offences of the collision with the weight of the evidence" were victing of
the duty of the jury to acqui not argued and may be deemed under Section 4 of the Vehicles outside the St. Francis Hotel.
The Jury had heard the ovi- No exception could be taken and Road Truffle Ordinance. For
addresses to have been abandoned,
by and, indeed, has been taken to The Orst ground of appeat indeed that is procisely what the denco and the
was that argued trial judge wrongly admitted
soy in evidence after objection to such above. evidence had been made, with- But after telling the jury that
It tells the jury that the out ruling as to the admissibility
accused must satisfy them either or otherwise of the evidenco independent upon there being an
that he has told the truth or unlawful and felonious killing
It is not contended by the de- that the evidence given on hia As this ground of appeal
were entitled to
must raise a reasonable framed it would appear that and that they
convict on any of these offences fence that there was no evidence behalf
driving. of negligent
Apar doubt in their minds on to his objection is taken, not so much
before If they were satisfed that man-
they can acquit to the admission of the
man- there was him of the
charge of evistence,
the judge's slaughter was not proved--which from the coillalon with the taxi gullt bui to
trial already mentioned, Correct-the
collision
the slaughter. the actual falling to rule on
ad-was quite ita
fudge concluded by saying musibility.
"out.
NOT CORRECT as regards the first, you rickshow which resulted in the In reality the objection goes
puller. The cir- should naturally only convict if death of the
dr. opinion that the the
fully the admissibility
you are of the
That is not a correct recklessness was not the cause of cumstances
scribed: the empty road, the ment of the law with respect to evidence led by the Crown that
death. the appellant collided with and
rickshaw being pulled along the struck a glancing blow to a taxi car which was drawn up front of the
question.
เด
uh:
the learned learned trial judge went on to Counsel; they had been, it is that direction.
On But the
of
13
In
statement quoted In the passage complained of admitted, properly directed
the law relating to the degree immediately above la in my of negilgence required to es opinion tablish the charge against the aceited.
offences three
to
were not
of
ACTUAL COLLISION
were
with
that
open to the criticism
state-
his
A MISDIRECTION
the carlier to left side of the road, the swerve the burden of proof and
Inconsistent with Objection has been taken St. Francis Hotel this passage and it seems to me of the car to the left for no ap-rection that the prosecution
although the learned parent reason and the collision that in Yeo Woo Street. And, as 1
And swerve again to the right, must prove the case against the quilo mi trial judge
correctly
the accused beyond all reasonable the failure to stop after the understand the argument,
collision.
the doubt, the pursuit by objection is that this evidence told the jury that it was open the
It is clear that it is not for the policemen in the car
and the convict WOS inedmissible because ite to them
accused to prove offences under Section 4 of the pallo
and cutting in which the
ho raise only effect would be to pre-
and
must Traffic Road Judico
the appellant to stop innocence nor
his evi without Vehicles appellant
doubt by being corroborative or tending Ordinance he proceeded to give and finally the condition of the reasonable
the
car All these dence. jury a direction that "the driver of the the offence charged, to prove
In this case we are not con- recklessness was the cause
facts had been commented on PROPERLY ADMITTED
an intentional act the death it was not open In my judgment the evidence them
reckless by Counsel in their addresses to cerned with
The convict of
nor with provocation. complained of properly driving under Section 4 of the the jury.
In my opinion, the mere omie-principle is clearly stated that not for the prisoner to admitted and this ground of op- Vohleles and Road Traffic Or-
Pion complained of in the cir- it is
WELS telling the peal must fail,
dinance. The next ground of appeal į
to rumstances was not prejudicial show that he With the utmost respect
truth in his evidence or by his la raise a reasonable evidence That the learned) the learned argued was
Judge that seems to the defence of the accused.
The summing-up must be taken doubt before he is entitled to be trial judge misdirected the jury to me to be clearly a
passage doubt Der whole, and the As a BS to the manner of driving direction and to be not in accomplained of must be read in acquitted.
the law as lald Andrewn v. Director down in which would support the charge cordance with
WDS
to
of to
Atkin
with the rest of the
and
I have already in this judg- that it is in- ment remarked of manslaughter.
Mr D'Almach stated that he of Public Prosecutions 28 C.A.R.-up and the defence.
I am satisfied that the jury contestable that a summing-up
as must be rend as a whole had no quarrel with the sum-34 at p. 48 where Lord
had been sufficiently directed as
unkenness be taken for criticism divorced ming up in so for ps concerned stated paras. 1-5. But objection was "Section 12 of the Read Trame fully to appreciate the relation that isolated passages should not
the drunkenness Act. 1930
More Density for ship between taken to the passage in line 3
driving without due care or atten- of the accused and the negligent from the rest of the summing- tion. This would apparently cover driving required to establish the 3
the as a whole, But taken of paragraph 6 which reads:--
summing-up cannot be said to ba non-atisfactory
and I have
then
WIDE
all degreas of negligence, Section
A
where
com-
This is not ju my 11 Impuses a penalty for driving charge. recklessly by at a speed or in a opinion case manner whlet is dangerous to the direction can amount to mis- mented particularly oni two puhile. There can be no doubt
น The next ground of appeal is passages complained of, which, negligence on that if death were that the learned trial judge fail-in my opinion, amounted
misdirection and proper grounds caused the offender would haved to put the case for the ap-upon which to allow the appeal
If I under-
that this section covers driving direction. with Buch high degree of
committed manslaughter. But theed to converse is not true, and it is per-pellant adequately. fecily bosible that a man may stand the argument of defence and quash the conviction, unless drive at a speed or in a manner counsel correctly,
the learned the proviso to Section 82 of the Ordinance dangerous to the public and cause irai ludge did put the case for Criminal Procedure death and yet not be guilty et
be applied. manslaughter."
the appellant adequately when
After such a consideration the The whole paragraph of the he said in paragraph 18 of the Court
decide whether "Its contended that his con- there has been a substantial mis carriage of justice in that the sumption of alcohol was not auf. Belent when spread over the period appellant has lost an opportun- from 7.30 or 7.45 to 2 em to ity to be acquitted because of viablish recklessness on ble part; to is one of the offences specifically its mentioned.
sander
Sentence of four years was passed on 23-year-old Chung Lam, alias Sa Chau. Miss Toochinsky sold that she former factory worker, by
had been and her father
Mr Justice J, R. Gregg at Shanghal for 25 years, adding
this that I took them 15 months to the Criminal Sessions obtain their exit permits.
morning after a Jury of five women and six men convicted him of a lesser have
"So that if you bear in mind the phrase 'a reckless disregard for the lives and mięty of others', you will have i think a fair idea of the kind of negligence alleged in the present came. This high de- gree of negligence, however, is not nocerity the same as that re- quired to constitute the offence of dangerous driving; and, antag that you are satisfied that the accused
negligent. but not that he was guilty” such a reck- less disregard on 'I have described, anxi samarsing also that you are not satisfied that manslaughter in proved, you may convlet of any one of three other offences pet out under Section 4 of our Vehicles judgment relates to offences un-summing-up: and Road Traffic Ordinance which der Section 11 of the Road
becnew applicable Section 13 of the same ordinance." Traffle Act and must include It is contended that this driving recklessly, because that Bussage must have tended confuse the
jury because
Death raight have ensued from to tell the jury "I effect was you find the accused not guilty the reckless driving but there of reckless disregard and if you might well be a lack of connec And
not tion between the rockless driving: manslaughter proved then you may convict of and the death and in such a one of the offences under Section case there could be no 4 of the Vehicles and Rood viction for manslaughter, but Traffle Ordinance.”
one for reckless driving under DIFFERENTLY WORDED Section 11 of the Road Trame I think that the passage could Act or under Section 4 of the
been differently
dinance. alternative charge of wound- and to that extent it may
it seems to me to be a Thus open to criticism.
jury ing with intent to do griev-view when regard is had to the the manner employed by the
misdirection to direct the portion of the Eumming-up learned trial judge. ous bodily harm.
out in paragraph 5
RUSSIANS IN SIBERIA
Miss Touchinsky revealed that 1.500 White Russions in Shang- return to hal had agreed to Russia and that they are now in Siberia. She said that she and her father will go to Israel first and then proceed to the United States where she has four sisters. She Бая another alster Canada.
In
also
worded bo
But, in my
and the
con-
must
NO INTERFERENCE
I have carefully read the re- cord of appeal and the facts and
and that there is no suggestion the misdirection and omissions even by the taxi-driver of bad on the part of the learned judge. driving by the scouted. It is sub- mitted that there no reliabla evidence of excessive speed on his part: and, that being so, it is con tended that there is no reliable evidence of that high degree of pegligence necery to establish the evidence given at the trial
have been brought to our atten the crime of manslaughter.“
But it is submitted that the ton by Counsel in their submis
alons and in my opinion the introductory sentences in para-
overwhelming. graphs 10 & 18 put part of the evidence for the prosecution in thing secondary. The
Counsel for the complained of read thus
conceded that the learned judge The accused does not deter the did at the beginning and end of kiing of the deceased. Na Chow:
Vehicles and Road Trafile Or. case for the appellant as some-the case was overmellart has
passages
but states, in effect, at you have his summing up direct the jury heard that he has no reliction adequately, although he falled of anything After he left the Sky-
room Bar. His defence la, briefly, to do so in the,tolddie and it
whak
these lapses that was against that he knows nothing of happened and that he had only a
complaints were made. Veie recollection of some of the events whica took place at the Queen Mary Hospited,"
am satisfled that on the evidence.no reasonable jury it. directed throughout. The case for the accused properly "briefly that, on leaving the Sky room Bar and Later the time of would or could have come to any the collision, he must have been in other conclusion and, that there
min of #omething ice has boom no: substantial 4 state "automatism and the that hape carriage of justice in this case. recollection of anything
this. In my opinio Denedimet material "Umes it
per ease for application of
JUDGE'S DUTY
a prom
FAILED TO DIRECT The Crown case, conducted By opening portion of paragraph `01
The next grounds of com- Mr W. A. Blair-Kerr, Crown it seems obvious that the learn Counsel, assisted by Det. Sub- ed trial judge was telling the plaint are contained in grounds Insp. A. J. McNiven, was that fury that if manslaughter was 6 and 8 of the grounds of ap
proved then Chung used a meat chopper on not
they could peal viz--that (8) "The learned Yip Tal-iam, an employee of the convict of the offences under trial judge failed to direct the Mr Francisco Luciano,
Sum Sun Textile Company
Section 4 of the Vehicle and Jury as to the effect of drunken- who Filipino musician,
let Kowloon City, as he slipt in the Road Traffic Ordinance.
neas in a manslaughter charge;" Shanghai under the auspices of early hours of March 10 ond In paragraph 6 and the part (6) "The learned trial
Judge the International Red Cross, In@eted three wounds is of paragarph just mentioned failed to direct the Jury as to also, arrived. Mr Luciano, who head.
the learned trial judge, as Mr the incorrectness of the low put D'Almada conceded, gave FORGERY CHARGE had spent 27 years in Shanghal
the forward by Crown Council In
It is the unquestioned duty of the Proviso, and, although there where he played in dance hall
The Jury unanimously ge- Jury a proper and accurate his final address to the Jury." returning to the bands, is
quitted him of the main charge direction as to the degree of It is complained that the the judge to put the defence has been midirection in the the jury. It is summing-up, I decline to inter of wounding with intent to mur-negligence required to establish learned Judge failed to direct adequately to was Mrder and the triel Judge con manslaughter. He told them the jury as to the importance of conceded that the learned trial fere with the verdict
"ONE EXCEPTION curred with the findings.
told accused when he the
Jury Dan mich e char sr this. Members dangerous driving and reckless de put the case for the of the Jury, the degree of nesti driving in manslaughter.
“It is submitted that there is Mr Justice Reynolds said: I The Juni
redce which the drown is required Criminal Sessions
to criables, 3 vary bigh indeed: At paragraph 4 of the sum envied with Chung's case which
and, socording to the len Daming-up the learned judge after no reliable evidence of excessivo agree with the judgment just {was the only one for trial, ^\
Juces the last which Chehould defining manslaughter continued pood on his part etc. etc." "1 delivered except with regard
The prosent charge is concerned contended
that degrea with toms of what is on a reliable evidence of there no to one particular, matter which, to outcome of the appeal which I negligence necessary involuntary manslaughter; that is of
man- also agree should be dismissed. where man, by a culpable establish the crime of nextact of a duly impoflaughter." But this
cannot, however, agree that was In him, is the cause of andiber; and, in this case, it is really criticism of the case that part of the learned trial One of the alleged negligent driving for the prosecution rather than judge's direction, where he said:
"But of a motor-CHE." __
The appellant was, of course, reckles
at
Mak Po, 40, of 37 Cheung-Philippines. shawan Road, accond floor, appeared before Mr Hin-shing Another passenger
Central this morning, R. von.dar Čron, a Swiss mer-
forgery of charged wiih
chant. A sold Harold, and valuable security,
He was rê-
POLISH NUN gingerly, like a bather proving manded three days in Polico water he expects to be icy cold, he stepped down from the dock custody for further enquirlos.
is alleged to and went off to pay the price of inattention to the letter of the have forged a receipt in respect of a $10,100 loan from Yu Sau law.
to Wong Wal-ching on or about March 7 this year. ·
SABOTEURS
MUST REGISTER!
Washington, July 19. The Senate Judiciary Com- mitted today approved legislation to
make peace-time #pying
'The defendant
Alleged Larceny
By Trick
Another Catholic hun was of Wegzanovska, Sister V. Poland: She hack China for 25 going to Macao.
in been
years
and
19
Sister Lacombe had spent 24 years in Shanghai and was assigned to the General Bos- pital there.
Swedish Diplomat
Passes Through
Mr Hans Skola, Becretary of
the Swedish Embassy in.Pek-
Mr Ridley, who signed offing, accompanied by his wife, the Hippopotamus, sald ho is arrived here at noon today fr
here. taking a vacation
the as Hunan from Tientsin, en
The
out the subject, in explaining to
A
that
gree however, does not affect
apply to delamine whether the
•pieliciler DRAU Degrenne ki a ammounted or did not amount to w crime ludges luve use, me yo have already beard, mary epitheta much we "gulpable", "criminal”,
wicked" "close""com prete, and so forth; but wher epithet be used, and, whether a Gutbet be used or not, in order to establishi: drimizni liability, She option of the jury, the norteance explain the degree of negligences of the case for the Crown, are
In the very next paragraph defence strictly speaking.
Each sunt be much then, - des the the learned, judgo' went on to entitled to rely on, anji, wook- {naturaal” pinion that
of me sienner went beyond required to be
"outablished in
of the
1220
mas meter of compension be such a cafe as this, ie, mane but it is dificult to appreciate reckless was not the case tween subjects and showed such a derepend for the like and walely of laughter arising out of negil-how it can be said that his de- of death will misdirection
Lai Lam, 21-year-old coolie Hippopoliamus is on the China rute to Wellington,,where ka thobers, ne so amount to a orkne gent driving. And it in as well [fando af automatism and failure Part any oblection can be raised
punishable by death. It would require
all poopte trained in was charged before Mr Hin esplanage or sabotage by foreign shing Lo ut Central today, with powers to register with the being an accessory before the fact to larceny by trick of $8,000. Attorney-General.
The offence is alleged to have had Sponsors of the legislation said that they did not expect taken plworld Hotel, Wanchal mabodegree: to register. but the Good World
· provision - would help prosecuRoad, on July 10, He was 20«
manded until, July". #
and on
coast trade. She, carried mostly lumber and com
demeying "of
In
will take up another post in the
Coming or punim conues to recall here that defence. Coun- not to been think, that Swedish Legation there." KATA COM
most abel har stated that he has no not to have been adequately put think, that I was Bishop Leopold Brellinger, of
Mr and Mrs Skold were mar-
mengde that can now be applied to fault to find with this portion of Buch dermce, a b was pros able to the accused in leaving
perly put to the jury and fee open to the Jury in Linz, Austria, Bishop of Ching-
Cunha bath dete of the tumming-up...
by is theorie smáfected
ground of bring in """ Verdleb of ground.or halen, Hopel, and Father Joseph ried by the Bwedish Ambassa
paragraph 10 the learned no substance, in thả n House of Lorde, in anottier, CAM come from Chinghaleo, who had Wistrand, in the Chinese caplin OZASIDIRECTION recicles and dangerous drivm Finally it is complained that opfiton she mis
of Vigrain, who also dor to China, Mr T. H. W.
Tomraky, The epithet “recibens.?)
Judge Revers illustrations of complai
FINAL COMPLAINT driving where reckless drivin
the owner of the death, best expelled by the Chinese Inst November Mrs Skold,
With thist ofrection immediate which did not commend them-
thác authorities
arrived here today number of the start of the Ame
the learned trial judges) rilga tordalence Counsel.me by the Hunan from Tientsin, brsawan the former Miles Ann is before third te le dimoult to selves encounted realrected; the furyangtok the unus and
"had" brendis own home its ectedly the jury could BaThese They had been In China for Edman. Both published by WILLIAM. ALICH CHOLÁS „for
be concised by this: PADRES CORY: Derences to the sepect of negli- or proof andyan per more, than 90 years, the last Cisina, for the last year, and a
Its my opinion tha of Mouth China Morning Post : Limited at 1-3
letpris, in the Colony, of Hongkong, 4 seven in Tientein,
A
could
}
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.